Abstract
Background
The close relationship between earlobe creases (ELC) and the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been reported. In addition, this study aimed to determine associations between ELC and the presence, extent, and severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by coronary angiography in non-elderly and elderly patients.
Methods
We assessed 1,086 consecutive patients with suspected CAD by coronary angiography. We defined severe CAD as Gensini scores > 20. Multiple logistic regression analysis was adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, lipid profiles, and body mass index (BMI) to assess the presence or absence of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD in elderly (age ≥ 60 years) and non-elderly (age < 60 years) patients.
Results
ELC was a significantly positive determinant of CAD (odds ratio (OR) = 3.074, p < 0.001), multivessel disease (OR = 3.101, p < 0.001), and severe CAD (OR = 2.823, p < 0.001) in all patients. ELC was also a predictor of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD not only in patients aged ≥ 60 years (OR = 3.095, p < 0.001; OR = 3.071, p < 0.001; OR = 2.761, p < 0.001, respectively) but also in those aged < 60 years (OR = 2.749, p = 0.035; OR = 2.634, p = 0.038; OR = 2.766, p = 0.006, respectively).
Conclusions
ELC was independently associated with the presence of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD in both elderly and non-elderly patients who were assessed by coronary angiography.
Keywords: earlobe crease, non-elderly patient, elderly patient, gensini score, coronary artery disease
Introduction
Frank (1973) [1] initially described the relationship between earlobe creases (ELC) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Some subsequent studies found a significant positive relationship between ELC and CAD [2,3], whereas others did not [4,5]; thus, conclusions have remained controversial. Moreover, a relationship between the angiographic severity of CAD and ELC has been implied [6,7] but not confirmed, and the increasing prevalence of ELC with aging and their clinical significance according to age is unclear.
The present study aimed to clarify the association between ELC and the presence, extent, and severity of CAD in non-elderly and elderly patients who were assessed by coronary angiography.
Materials and methods
Participants
This study included a series of 1,086 consecutive patients (mean age: 66.1 ± 11.4 years; males: 826) who were assessed by coronary angiography at Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, located in Kawagoe City, Saitama Prefecture, Japan, between February 2009 and September 2012. The exclusion criteria comprised a history of coronary artery bypass grafts and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our institutional review board at Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University (approval number: 1116) approved the study, and all patients provided written informed consent to participate.
The patients were divided into groups according to the presence or absence of ELC. The severity of coronary atherosclerosis was assessed using Gensini scores [8], and coronary risk factors such as age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking were identified from a review of the medical records of the patients. The effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) and statins, as well as body mass index (BMI) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, were also assessed.
Definitions
Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Coronary artery disease was defined as >50% luminal narrowing of any main coronary artery on coronary angiograms. Multivessel disease was defined as >50% luminal narrowing in at least two of the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. Severe CAD was defined as Gensini scores ≥ 20 [9]. Dyslipidemia was defined as values of >220, >140, <40, and >150 mg/dL for total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides, respectively, or taking lipid-lowering medication. Smoking was defined as currently smoking or having stopped smoking <1 month before enrollment. Hypertension was defined as systolic or diastolic blood pressure > 140 and/or > 90 mmHg, respectively, or under medication with antihypertensive drugs. Diabetes was defined as a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or under antidiabetic medication with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents at enrollment.
Coronary angiography
We evaluated the severity of CAD using Gensini scores [8]. Severe CAD was defined as Gensini scores ≥ 20, which was equivalent to 90% stenosis at a proximal site in the left anterior descending coronary artery [9]. The patients were divided according to Gensini scores of ≥20 (severe CAD) and <20 (mild CAD).
ELC classification
Earlobe creases were generally assessed in patients while seated or supine if they were in an unstable clinical condition such as shock. Two trained observers who were blinded to the coronary angiographic findings graded ELC as absent (grade 0), superficial or not completely extending across the earlobe (grade 1), or clear-cut creases extending across the earlobe (grade 2) [10]. Figure 1 illustrates a schema that outlines the grading of earlobe creases.
Figure 1. Earlobe crease.
a, b, and c show representative schema demonstrating grades 0, 1, and 2, respectively.
Statistics
All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables are expressed as numbers (n) with frequency (%). Continuous and categorical variables were compared using unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests, respectively. Associations between ELC and coronary atherosclerosis such as CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD were assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for coronary atherosclerosis were calculated from the outcomes of multiple logistic regression models after adjustment for the potential confounders of age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, LDL-C, HDL-C, and BMI.
Results
Clinical characteristics and angiographic findings of patients with and without ELC
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients. We found that 841 (77.4%) of them had ELC and 245 (22.5%) did not. The frequencies of gender, dyslipidemia, smoking, and plasma HDL-C values did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, patients with ELC were older (68.6 ± 9.3 versus 58.1 ± 13.2, p < 0.001) and had lower plasma LDL-C values (111.6 ± 34.7 versus 118.4 ± 33.2, p = 0.008) than those without ELC.
Table 1. Characteristics of the patients.
Data are shown as mean ± SD or number (%).
SD, standard deviation; ELC, earlobe crease; ACE-I, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index
| All (n = 1086) | With ELC (n = 841) | Without ELC (n = 245) | p value | |
| Age (years) | 66.1 ± 11.4 | 68.6 ± 9.3 | 58.1 ± 13.2 | <0.001 |
| Male | 826 (76.1%) | 650 (77.3%) | 176 (71.7%) | 0.078 |
| Hypertension | 771 (70.9%) | 626 (74.4%) | 145 (59.2%) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 387 (35.6%) | 313 (37.2%) | 74 (30.2%) | 0.048 |
| Dyslipidemia | 681 (62.7%) | 536 (63.7%) | 145 (59.2%) | 0.194 |
| Smoking | 419 (38.6%) | 316 (37.6%) | 103 (41.9%) | 0.206 |
| ACE-I/ARB | 362 (33.3%) | 296 (35.2%) | 66 (26.9%) | 0.015 |
| Statins | 264 (24.3%) | 218 (25.9%) | 46 (18.7%) | 0.021 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 113.2 ± 34.4 | 111.6 ± 34.7 | 118.4 ± 33.2 | 0.008 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 45.8 ± 12.8 | 45.6 ± 12.5 | 46.5 ± 13.5 | 0.367 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.9 ± 3.5 | 23.6 ± 3.1 | 24.6 ± 4.1 | <0.001 |
The frequencies of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and medication with ACE-I/ARB and statins were significantly higher in patients with ELC than those without (74.4% versus 59.2%, p < 0.001; 37.2% versus 30.2%, p = 0.048; 35.2% versus 26.9%, p = 0.015; 25.9% versus 18.7%, p = 0.021, respectively).
The frequencies of CAD and multivessel disease were higher (88.3% versus 68.9%, p < 0.001; 34.5% versus 21.2%, p < 0.001, respectively) and the sum of Gensini scores was significantly higher in patients with ELC than those without (46.7 ± 37.6 versus 31.9 ± 37.2, p < 0.001) (Table 2). No significant differences were evident between unilateral and bilateral ELC, or between ELC grades 1 and 2.
Table 2. Angiographic findings.
ELC, earlobe crease; CAD, coronary artery disease; VD, vessel disease
| All (n = 1086) | With ELC (n = 841) | Without ELC (n = 245) | p value | |
| CAD (%) | 912 (83.9%) | 743 (88.3%) | 169 (68.9%) | <0.001 |
| 0VD (%) | 201 (18.5%) | 115 (13.7%) | 86 (35.2%) | <0.001 |
| 1VD (%) | 543 (50%) | 436 (51.8%) | 107 (43.8%) | 0.024 |
| 2VD (%) | 227 (20.9%) | 193 (23%) | 34 (13.7%) | 0.002 |
| 3VD (%) | 115 (10.6%) | 97 (11.5%) | 18 (7.3%) | 0.061 |
| Multivessel disease (%) | 342 (31.5%) | 290 (34.5%) | 52 (21.2%) | <0.001 |
| Gensini score | 41.5 ± 38.0 | 46.7 ± 37.6 | 31.9 ± 37.2 | <0.001 |
Associations between ELC and CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD in all patients
Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ELC and the classical coronary risk factors male sex, hypertension, smoking, high LDL-C, and low HDL-C were independent risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. The presence of ELC was a predictor of the presence of CAD (OR = 3.074, p < 0.001), multivessel disease (OR = 3.101, p < 0.001), and severe CAD (OR = 2.823, p < 0.001) in all patients (Tables 3-5). The OR of ELC was the highest among all risk factors for CAD.
Table 3. Multiple logistic regression analysis of the presence of CAD in all patients.
CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; ELC, earlobe crease
| OR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Age | 1.021 | 0.999-1.044 | 0.052 |
| Male | 2.103 | 1.279-3.455 | 0.003 |
| Hypertension | 2.543 | 1.615-4.002 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.362 | 0.824-2.252 | 0.227 |
| Smoking | 1.963 | 1.188-3.244 | 0.008 |
| LDL-C | 1.010 | 1.003-1.017 | 0.002 |
| HDL-C | 0.970 | 0.955-0.986 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.989 | 0.929-1.053 | 0.748 |
| ELC | 3.074 | 1.889-5.002 | <0.001 |
Table 5. Multiple logistic regression analysis of CAD severity in all patients.
CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; ELC, earlobe crease
| OR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Age | 1.001 | 0.984-1.018 | 0.884 |
| Male | 1.787 | 1.195-2.670 | 0.004 |
| Hypertension | 1.991 | 1.383-2.868 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.097 | 0.764-1.575 | 0.613 |
| Smoking | 1.256 | 0.870-1.814 | 0.222 |
| LDL-C | 1.005 | 1.000-1.010 | 0.041 |
| HDL-C | 0.966 | 0.954-0.979 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.967 | 0.919-1.017 | 0.202 |
| ELC | 2.823 | 1.905-4.184 | <0.001 |
Table 4. Multiple logistic regression analysis of multivessel disease in all patients.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; ELC, earlobe crease
| OR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Age | 1.018 | 0.997-1.040 | 0.084 |
| Male | 2.131 | 1.318-3.447 | 0.002 |
| Hypertension | 2.395 | 1.540-3.722 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.242 | 0.773-1.995 | 0.369 |
| Smoking | 2.085 | 1.287-3.376 | 0.002 |
| LDL-C | 1.011 | 1.005-1.018 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C | 0.971 | 0.956-0.986 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.965 | 0.909-1.025 | 0.259 |
| ELC | 3.101 | 1.938-4.962 | <0.001 |
Associations between the presence of ELC and the presence of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD in patients aged ≥60 and <60 years
The presence of ELC was a predictor of the presence of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD in patients aged ≥60 years (OR = 3.095, p < 0.001; OR = 3.071, p < 0.001; OR = 2.761, p < 0.001, respectively) and in those aged <60 years (OR = 2.749, p = 0.035; OR = 2.634, p = 0.038; OR = 2.766, p = 0.006, respectively) (Tables 6, 7).
Table 6. Associations between ELC and the presence of CAD in patients aged ≥60 years.
Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and body mass index
ELC, earlobe crease; CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
| OR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Presence of CAD | 3.095 | 1.731-5.533 | <0.001 |
| Multivessel disease | 3.071 | 1.751-5.384 | <0.001 |
| Severity of CAD | 2.761 | 1.703-4.477 | <0.001 |
Table 7. Associations between ELC and the presence of CAD in patients aged <60 years.
Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and body mass index
ELC, earlobe crease; CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
| OR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Presence of CAD | 2.749 | 1.072-7.049 | 0.035 |
| Multivessel disease | 2.634 | 1.053-6.588 | 0.038 |
| Severity of CAD | 2.766 | 1.331-5.751 | 0.006 |
Discussion
We identified two important clinical issues. The presence of ELC was independently associated with the presence of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD assessed by coronary angiography. The presence of ELC was a more powerful indicator of CAD than conventional coronary risk factors in both elderly patients and non-elderly patients who were assessed by coronary angiography.
Earlobe creases and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis
An association between ELC and coronary atherosclerosis has been identified in clinical [1-3,11-13] and necropsy [14-16] studies. A previous meta-analysis [12] has revealed a potential association between ELC and the presence of coronary artery disease, with an odds ratio of 3.3. Earlobe creases are also significantly related to atherosclerotic changes in the carotid artery [17] and the aorta [14]. Elliott et al. [6] followed up on patients admitted to a coronary care unit or who underwent cardiac catheterization and found an association between the number of creased ears and 10-year cardiac events.
The association between ELC and atherosclerosis was evaluated using various methods, including carotid ultrasonography [17], CT angiography [18], coronary angiography [9], and autopsy or necropsy [14-16]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has identified an association between ELC and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis using CT angiography [18], and the present study is the first to demonstrate a relationship between ELC and the severity of CAD based on a semiquantitative scoring system for coronary angiography.
Clinical implications for elderly and non-elderly populations
The present findings identified ELC as the most powerful indicator of coronary atherosclerosis among elderly and non-elderly patients and that age, diabetes mellitus, and BMI (or obesity) were not significantly associated with coronary atherosclerosis in this population. Aging is one of the most important risk factors for many diseases, and it is generally considered to be significantly associated with atherosclerosis. Indeed, previous studies [3,19,20] have shown a relationship between age and CAD. However, one autopsy study [14] found no association between age and the extent of coronary aortic atherosclerosis, whereas ELC was significantly associated with both coronary and aortic atherosclerosis. Age was no longer considered a predictor of CAD in that population, whereas ELC remained a significant indicator of CAD.
The present study of a high-risk population with suspected CAD did not find any association between age and CAD but identified ELC as the most significant determinant of coronary atherosclerosis in both elderly and non-elderly populations. This finding is consistent with the outcomes of a previous meta-analysis [12]. Therefore, ELC could be a useful marker for the risk stratification of patients before coronary angiography regardless of age.
Mechanism and future
One explanation for an association between the myocardium and earlobe has been that both are supplied by the same end arteries, of which the origin is genetically determined. Shoenfeld et al. [21] found significant tears in the elastic fibers of biopsy specimens of earlobes from patients with ELC, and Higuchi et al. [10] found that patients with ELC had shorter telomeres. However, the precise mechanism of the association between ELC and CAD has not been clearly elucidated. Further investigation is needed to clarify the mechanism of this relationship.
Limitations
As a limitation of this study, it is important to note that it is a single-center, cross-sectional, and observational investigation, which differs significantly from a randomized controlled trial. The study included high-risk patients who underwent coronary angiography. In fact, 83.9% of the patients had significant CAD defined as >50% stenosis on coronary angiograms. Therefore, the present findings cannot be expanded to healthy or asymptomatic individuals. Race, family history of coronary artery disease, and other possible confounding factors were important variables but were not included in our study.
Conclusions
Earlobe creases were independently associated with the presence of CAD, multivessel disease, and severe CAD in elderly and non-elderly patients who were assessed by coronary angiography. Earlobe creases could serve as a useful marker for the risk stratification of patients before undergoing coronary angiography regardless of age.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University issued approval 1116
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Aural sign of coronary-artery disease. Frank ST. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:327–328. doi: 10.1056/nejm197308092890622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ear-lobe crease and coronary atherosclerosis. Kaukola S, Manninen V, Valle M, Halonen PI. Lancet. 1979;2:1377. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92868-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ear lobe crease and coronary artery disease. 1,000 patients and review of the literature. Elliott WJ. Am J Med. 1983;75:1024–1032. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90883-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Letter: Diagonal ear-lobe crease as a coronary risk factor. Mehta J, Hamby RI. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:260. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197408012910519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.A new wrinkle to the earlobe crease. Brady PM, Zive MA, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Dalen JE. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/607639. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:65–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diagonal earlobe creases and prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Elliott WJ, Powell LH. Am J Med. 1996;100:205–211. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89460-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diagonal earlobe crease as a marker of the presence and extent of coronary atherosclerosis. Tranchesi Júnior B, Barbosa V, de Albuquerque CP, et al. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1417–1420. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90292-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Gensini GG. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:606. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80105-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Validation of a novel clinical prediction score for severe coronary artery diseases before elective coronary angiography. Chen ZW, Chen YH, Qian JY, Ma JY, Ge JB. PLoS One. 2014;9:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Diagonal earlobe crease are associated with shorter telomere in male Japanese patients with metabolic syndrome. Higuchi Y, Maeda T, Guan JZ, Oyama J, Sugano M, Makino N. Circ J. 2009;73:274–279. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-08-0267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Diagonal ear lobe crease: a premonitory diagnostic sign of impeding ischemic heart disease. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH, Bawaskar PH. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7:1361–1367. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_181_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ear lobe crease as a marker of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Lucenteforte E, Romoli M, Zagli G, Gensini GF, Mugelli A, Vannacci A. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175:171–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Presence of ear lobe crease may predict intermediate and high-risk patients with acute non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Kahyaoglu M, Gecmen C, Candan O, et al. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2020;12:172–178. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Earlobe crease and atherosclerosis. An autopsy study. Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S, Ishikawa Y, Shimada K, Takemoto S. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:871–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb05702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.The earlobe crease, coronary artery disease, and sudden cardiac death: an autopsy study of 520 individuals. Edston E. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006;27:129–133. doi: 10.1097/01.paf.0000221067.73173.d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Diagonal earlobe creases and fatal cardiovascular disease: a necropsy study. Kirkham N, Murrells T, Melcher DH, Morrison EA. Br Heart J. 1989;61:361–364. doi: 10.1136/hrt.61.4.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Diagonal ear-lobe crease is correlated with atherosclerotic changes in carotid arteries. Shrestha I, Ohtsuki T, Takahashi T, Nomura E, Kohriyama T, Matsumoto M. Circ J. 2009;73:1945–1949. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Relation of diagonal ear lobe crease to the presence, extent, and severity of coronary artery disease determined by coronary computed tomography angiography. Shmilovich H, Cheng VY, Rajani R, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1283–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Earlobe crease and coronary heart disease in Japanese. Toyosaki N, Tsuchiya M, Hashimoto T, et al. Heart Vessels. 1986;2:161–165. doi: 10.1007/BF02128142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Diagonal ear-lobe crease: prevalence and implications as a coronary risk factor. Lichstein E, Chadda KD, Naik D, Gupta PK. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:615–616. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197403142901109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Diagonal ear lobe crease and coronary risk factors. Shoenfeld Y, Mor R, Weinberger A, Avidor I, Pinkhas J. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980;28:184–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1980.tb00514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

