Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Neurosci. 2023 Jan 26;6:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100067

Sex differences in addiction-relevant behavioral outcomes in rodents following early life stress

Millie Rincón-Cortés 1
PMCID: PMC10124992  NIHMSID: NIHMS1880649  PMID: 37101684

Abstract

In humans, exposure to early life stress (ELS) is an established risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs) during later life. Similarly, rodents exposed to ELS involving disrupted mother-infant interactions, such as maternal separation (MS) or adverse caregiving due to scarcity-adversity induced by limited bedding and nesting (LBN) conditions, also exhibit long-term alterations in alcohol and drug consumption. In both humans and rodents, there is a range of addiction-related behaviors that are associated with drug use and even predictive of subsequent SUDs. In rodents, these include increased anxiety-like behavior, impulsivity, and novelty-seeking, altered alcohol and drug intake patterns, as well as disrupted reward-related processes involving consummatory and social behaviors. Importantly, the expression of these behaviors often varies throughout the lifespan. Moreover, preclinical studies suggest that sex differences play a role in how exposure to ELS impacts reward and addiction-related phenotypes as well as underlying brain reward circuitry. Here, addiction-relevant behavioral outcomes and mesolimbic dopamine (DA) dysfunction resulting from ELS in the form of MS and LBN are discussed with a focus on age- and sex-dependent effects. Overall, these findings suggest that ELS may increase susceptibility for later life drug use and SUDs by interfering with the normal maturation of reward-related brain and behavioral function.

Keywords: Early life stress, Maternal separation, Limited bedding, Reward, Addiction, Sex differences

1. Introduction

In humans, exposure to early life stress (ELS) is linked to greater susceptibility for developing a variety of psychiatric disorders, which often emerge during adolescence and persist into adulthood [15]. For example, ELS is a potent predictor of later life alcohol and/or drug dependence and addiction in humans [6,7]. In adults exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), ACE scores are strongly related to initiation of drug use from early adolescence into adulthood and problems with drug use [812]. Compared to individuals without a history of ELS, people with 5 or more ACEs were up to 10 times more likely to initiate illicit drug use and become addicted to drugs [8]. Similar effects have also been found for alcohol use: ACEs increased the likelihood of initiating alcohol use during early life (age 14) and adult alcohol dependence [13,14]. The neurobiological basis for these effects is unknown but is thought to involve aberrant function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which mediates the stress response, and the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system, which mediates reward-related processes including neurobehavioral responses to drugs of abuse [6,7,1517].

In humans, longitudinal studies have indicated that the first postnatal years of life constitute a sensitive period for the enduring effects of ELS experienced within the context of the caregiver such as parental absence, maltreatment, neglect, and physical abuse, among others [18,19]. Many of these stressors can be modeled in developing rodents to provide mechanistic insights into disrupted behavioral and brain processes by which ELS may contribute to later life substance use disorders (SUDs). For example, maternal separation (MS) and limited bedding and nesting (LBN) are two widely used rodent models of ELS based on parental absence and disruption of maternal behavior through environmental modulation of resources (i.e., resource scarcity), respectively. Consistent with effects reported in humans, ELS alters alcohol and drug intake in developing and adult rodents [2022]. One of the ways ELS may increase risk for SUDs is by inducing behavioral changes that promote drug use and addiction [21,23]. Indeed, there are behaviors that are linked to higher levels of drug use and augmented risk for addiction in both humans and rodents [2435], and some of these are increased following ELS, which will be reviewed here. Moreover, many of the addiction-relevant behavioral outcomes resulting from ELS (e.g., impulsivity, drug intake, disrupted motivational processes) are also mediated by alterations within the brain’s primary reward pathway- the mesolimbic DA system. Thus, MS and LBN-induced changes in addiction-relevant behaviors and mesolimbic DA dysfunction in rodents are discussed, with a particular focus on age and sex differences given that the neurobehavioral consequences of ELS are modulated by sex (or gender in humans) and may differ based on developmental stage [36,37].

2. Modeling ELS in rodents

In humans, the first year of life represents a sensitive period for HPA-axis regulation and function, as cortisol activity is particularly sensitive to the quality of caregiving so that ELS involving the caregiver (e.g., neglect, abuse, maltreatment) is likely to have a large impact on subsequent brain and behavioral development [18,38]. In rodents, this period of time is thought to be analogous to the first two weeks of life, or postnatal days (PND) 1–14 [39]. The first two postnatal weeks in rodents correspond to the stress-hyporesponsive period (SHRP), during which neonates display low basal plasma concentrations of the stress hormone corticosterone (CORT) and reduced stress reactivity, as they exhibit attenuated stress-induced CORT and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) responses compared to older animals [4043]. However, infant rats can mount elevated stress responses, as indexed by HPA-axis activation and glucocorticoid secretion, in a stressor-specific manner during this period [44,45]. MS and rearing with an LBN dam are two ELS paradigms involving the caregiver that are known to override the SHRP and compromise development across multiple levels including brain, behavioral and endocrine systems via dysregulation of the HPA-axis and other mechanisms [4650]. This review focuses on ELS in the form of MS and/or LBN occurring during the first two weeks of postnatal life in rodents, as it constitutes a critical period for programming neurobehavioral development [46,47,49], including addiction-relevant behavioral outcomes and reward-related circuitry [21,5153]. Below is a brief overview of the MS and LBN models (for reviews, see [47,50,54,55]).

2.1. Maternal separation (MS)

In this manuscript, the term MS will refer to lengthy repeated separations of neonatal rodents from their mother during the first 2–3 weeks of life. This distinction is made given that MS can occur during an acute form consisting of a single 24-h separation within the first 2 postnatal weeks, in repeated brief (3–15 min) episodes, which have been referred to as handling, or longer (6–8hr) periods per day. Importantly, the effects of MS often differ based on the length of separation but also on the pup’s developmental timing (i.e., age range) during separation [5659]. Brief periods of MS increase the amount of pup-directed maternal behaviors (i.e., licking and grooming) when the pup is placed back in the nest [60,61], and often produce opposite hormonal and behavioral effects than those observed following extended (3–6 h) periods [57,62,63]. The burst in pup-directed maternal behavior following brief separation (i.e., handling) is thought to confer resilience to pups, as suggested by decreased stress-induced hormonal and behavioral responses as well as enhanced negative feedback of the stress response compared with non-separated pups or pups separated for longer bouts of time [56,6369]. However, when pups are maternally deprived for extended periods of time, this results in increased HPA responsiveness and prolonged HPA-axis activity (due to the lack of a mature negative feedback system) and can result in long-term impairments in behavioral and endocrine responses to stress [56,70,71]. Here, I focus on long-term (3–4 hr) repeated MS within the first 2–3 postnatal weeks given that this manipulation often produces robust and long-lasting effects on behaviors of interest.

2.2. Limited bedding and nesting (LBN)

This model was originally developed by the Baram laboratory, is based on creating an impoverished cage environment via resource depletion and has been adapted by multiple laboratories worldwide [54,72]. Since bedding type and volume are critical components of the rat dam’s nesting environment, drastically reducing the amount of available bedding represents a form of chronic stress for the dam and her pups [72,73,74]. This procedure was developed to experimentally produce fragmented, adverse maternal care to mimic the quality of care that often characterizes severely stressed mothers [54]. Notably, this is a model of continuous stress exposure in pups in which the caregiver is present (unlike in the MS model) but exhibits aberrant, unpredictable maternal behaviors, including increased negative pup-directed behaviors (e.g., stepping, dragging, improper transport, shoving), thereby resulting in upregulation of the HPA-axis in pups [7277]. This atypical infant response (e.g., increased CORT levels) is thought to contribute to immediate and later life effects of LBN on neurobehavioral function since blocking the infant increase in CORT during LBN prevents LBN-induced deficits in pup social behavior [78], although long-term effects of this manipulation (i.e., CORT blockade) remain to be determined.

The findings obtained using these two models of ELS involving disrupted caregiving are consistent with the notion that maternal presence and caregiver sensitivity are critical for regulating HPA-axis activity and maintaining low CORT levels in infant rodents, but also for determining offspring physiological and behavioral responses to stressors throughout the lifetime [79,80]. Moreover, these models recapitulate two factors thought to contribute to long-term effects of ELS on brain and behavior: 1) the deprivation of stimuli critical for behavioral and neurobiological development and 2) the effects of chronic stress exposure during a sensitive period [16,46,62], both of which may contribute to increased risk for numerous detrimental health outcomes, including SUDs and addiction. Finally, both MS and LBN are known to induce enduring changes in HPA-axis function, including later life responses to stress and drugs of abuse [4749,71,81]. This is significant given that effects of ELS on addiction-relevant and reward-related behaviors as well as dopaminergic circuits in humans are thought to be partially mediated by alterations in HPA-axis function [7,15,16]. Thus, the neurobiological sequelae of ELS in MS and LBN rodents appears to parallel what is observed in humans and may provide opportunities to gain unique behavioral and neurobiological mechanistic insights, which may potentially aid in developing interventions to reduce risk for SUDs.

3. Effects of ELS on addiction-relevant behavioral outcomes in rodents

In humans and rodents, there are behavioral traits that are strongly associated with, and even predictive of, increased susceptibility to drug use and addiction [2435]. In rodents, behavioral phenotypes associated with addiction-like behavior include increased anxiety-like behavior, impulsivity, novelty-seeking and risk-taking, sensitivity to locomotor activating properties of psychostimulant drugs, changes in alcohol and drug intake patterns as well as alterations in responses towards natural rewards (i.e. anhedonia) [24,25,52,8288]. Importantly, the expression of behavioral traits associated with addiction-like behaviors often varies between the sexes and across development, which may provide additional insights into the links between ELS and increased susceptibility to SUDs. For these reasons, addiction-relevant behavioral outcomes resulting from ELS in the rodent models described above (i.e., MS, LBN) are reviewed, reported age and sex differences are emphasized and opportunities for future research are highlighted.

3.1. Effects of ELS on anxiety-related behaviors

Increased anxiety is a risk factor for developing SUDs in humans and addiction-related behaviors in rodents [25,83,85,89,90]. In humans, clinical and epidemiological research demonstrate a strong association between anxiety disorders and susceptibility for SUDs during adolescence and adulthood [9193]. For example, anxiety disorders often precede SUDs and are also comorbid (co-occur) with SUDs [89,92,9496]. Furthermore, ELS is a potent risk factor for the onset and persistence of both anxiety-related disorders and SUDs during later life [9,97100]. In rodents, ELS frequently results in long-term changes in anxiety-related behaviors that can be measured using a variety of behavioral assays. These are described and summarized below.

Many rodent studies assessing ELS effects on anxiety-like behavior have employed the elevated plus maze (EPM). In this test, reductions of time spent in the open arm and in the number of open arm entries are considered indices of anxiety-like behavior [101,102]. MS decreases open arm time and open arm entries in periadolescent and adolescent male and female rats [103106], although results showing no difference in MS groups [104], or even increased open arm time in MS females [107], have also been reported. In adulthood, both male and female MS rats were less likely to explore open arms, as they made fewer entries into the open arm and spent less time on the open arm [108114]. Studies assessing sex differences in adult MS rats have found either decreased open arm time and entries only in MS males or decreased open arm entries and time in both males and females compared their non-MS counterparts, but also greater decreases in MS males compared to MS females [115,16]. A study focused on adult female rats found comparable open arm time and open arm entries in MS females and non-separated females [117]. In mice, studies have shown no change in MS males or females during adolescence [118], but decreased percentages of open arm time in adult MS male and female mice [119], as well as sex-specific effects during adulthood in which females show reduced open arm duration and number of entries [120]. Taken together, these data suggest that MS consistently increases anxiety-like behavior in the EPM, with male rats showing more robust effects compared with females; and that this effect may be reversed in mice, with females being more susceptible to MS effects.

Other tests used to measure anxiety-like behaviors in rodents include the light-dark box and the open field. These tests are based on rodent aversion to brightly illuminated and exposed places, which constitute a risk for predation [121123]. In the light dark box, longer latencies to enter the light chamber and less time spent in the brightly light box are considered reflective of anxiety-like behavior. In the open field, increased time in the periphery (corners) and reduced time in the center are interpreted as increased anxiety-like behavior. In the light-dark box, prepubertal (PND 30–31) MS rats (group including both sexes) exhibited shorter latencies to enter the dark chamber and increased time spent in the dark chamber, but no changes in time spent in the center of an open field [124]. During adolescence (PND 42), only MS male rats exhibited reductions in the number of entries and time spent in the light box as well as fewer entries into the center zone of an open field [125], suggesting enhanced anxiety-like behavior only in males at this developmental stage. Decreased time spent in the light chamber has also been reported in adult MS male rats and mice compared to nonseparated or briefly separated control males [113,126128]. However, MS does not appear to have an impact on the time spent in the light compartment or the latency to enter the light in ovariectomized adult female mice [129]. This may suggest a sex-specific effect of MS in the light dark box in male rodents across development. In the open field, many studies have reported decreased center activity (e.g., ambulation, number of visits to center, center time, latency to center, center crossings) in adult MS male rats and mice exhibited compared with non-MS males [119,127,128,130135]. Yet, a study conducted in adult female rats found no effect of MS for time spent in the center [136], which may suggest that adult males are more sensitive to MS effects in the open field test. In mice, adult MS females exhibited reduced time spent in center [129] and number of entries into the center zone, but also greater reductions compared to MS males [119], which may suggest species-dependent effects of MS on the open field. Moreover, MS effects on adult female mice in the open field appear to be modulated by estrous cycle: MS females actually exhibited more time in the center during diestrus, but no changes compared to nonseparated females during behavioral estrus [132].

Anxiety-related behavior in rodents can also be measured using tests based on novelty-induced changes in food or water consumption in which the inhibition of food/water intake by exposure to novelty is interpreted as an index of anxiety-like behavior [137140]. For example, MS increased novelty-induced suppression of feeding in juvenile (PND 26–29) MS rats of both sexes [141], as indexed by rats taking longer to begin feeding, and enhanced novelty-induced suppression of drinking in adult rats of both sexes [142]. MS also increased latency to feed in adult male mice [135]. Collectively, findings from MS studies in rodents suggest sex-specific effects of MS on anxiety-like behavior that differ based on the behavioral assay used: i) MS increases anxiety-like behavior in the EPM and light dark box test primarily in male rodents, although effects in rats of both sexes can be seen during adolescence; ii) MS increases anxiety-like behaviors in the open field in male rats across development (i.e., adolescence, adulthood), but in adult mice these changes are more pronounced in females and vary according to estrous cycle; and, iii) MS enhances novelty-induced suppression of feeding and drinking in rats of both sexes throughout development and in adult male mice, although effects on females remain unknown. Notably, few studies have incorporated sex as a biological variable (SABV) into their experimental design and compared the effects of MS across development and/or in both sexes within same study, underscoring the need for this type of approach.

Long-term changes in anxiety-like behaviors have also been found following LBN (i.e., scarcity-adversity), although effects are usually task and sex-specific. In the EPM, published studies have found mixed effects: no effect of LBN in adolescent male rats [143], no effect on adult male and female rats [144] or reduced percentage of open arm time or entries only in adult LBN males [145147]. Studies conducted in adult male mice or in mice of both sexes have found no impact of LBN on the EPM [148150]. In the light-dark box, adolescent LBN female mice exhibited reduced time spent in the light chamber, and this effect persisted into adulthood, whereas no changes were observed in adolescent or adult LBN males [126]. However, a study that used only adult male mice found reduced time spent in the brightly lit compartment of the light-dark box [149]. In the open field, there have been mixed results: no alterations in either sex during prepuberty and adulthood or a sex-specific effect in adult LBN male rats, which exhibited more time spent in the periphery and reduced time spent in the center [144,145,151]. These effects may depend on developmental timing and rodent species, as LBN exposure did not impact duration of time spent in the center in adolescent or adult male mice [143,149,150]. In mice, a study that pooled both sexes found no effect of LBN on time in center in the open field or the light dark box [152]. For novelty-induced suppression of feeding, a study that used only adult female rats found that LBN increased latencies to begin food consumption [153], whereas a study that used both sexes found no effect [151]. In mice, LBN increased latency to consume food in a novel environment only in females [150]. Taken together, these data suggest that LBN: i) increases anxiety-like behavior in the EPM and open field primarily in adult male rats, but not in mice; ii) increases anxiety-like behaviors in the light dark box that may be sex-specific and age-dependent in mice (i.e., adolescent females, adult males), although effects are relatively unexplored in rats; and iii) enhances novelty-induced suppression of feeding in adult female rodents.

In sum, ELS in the form of MS or LBN exerts long-lasting changes in anxiety-like behaviors that are typically more robust in male rodents, which exhibit increased anxiety-like behavior. It is worth mentioning that a possible contributing factor to this sex difference is that most studies have used the EPM and open field, and in female rats these tests are more reflective of activity rather than anxiety-like behavior since they are more active [154156]. For instance, females display greater distance moved and velocity in the open field test and greater baseline velocity of movement and a higher number of open arm entries in the EPM [155,157]. Thus, caution should be exercised when interpreting results from female rats in these tests (i.e., EPM, open field). MS and LBN converged in enhancing novelty-induced suppression of feeding/drinking in both sexes (MS) or specifically in female rodents (LBN). Most studies have focused in adolescent and adult male animals or used groups pooling both sexes. Given the known sex differences in anxiety-like behavior across development and in multiple behavioral tasks, which often result in distinct and/or opposite effects, these data highlight a need for additional studies integrating SABV as a factor as well as earlier (and multiple) timepoints. Furthermore, studies assessing the relationship between ELS, anxiety-like behavior and drug intake are scarce, and may represent an opportunity to evaluate the relationships between these variables.

3.2. Effects of ELS on impulsivity

Impulsivity is typically characterized by rapid decision-making, premature actions, behaving without forethought, and preference for immediate over delayed gratification [158,159]. Impulsivity is commonly observed in drug users and SUDs [160165], and has been linked to earlier emergence of and higher rates of substance abuse as well as greater substance-related adverse consequences [159,166169]. Importantly, developmental changes in impulsive behavior are thought to contribute to SUDs; and impulsivity is particularly salient during adolescence in both humans and rodents [170174]. Increased impulsivity is strongly associated with illicit substance use in young adults [175178] and is a common outcome of ELS in humans that may increase susceptibility to SUDs [179183]. Indeed, children who have experienced severe stressors such as physical abuse, neglect, and institutionalization show impaired impulse control as well as long-lasting changes in impulsivity-related behaviors [182188]. For example, a recent study found significant associations between ELS and impulsive choice by using monetary delay discounting, in which ELS individuals exhibited a preference for smaller rewards sooner (i.e., greater impulsive choice) [185]. Collectively, these data suggest that ELS may confer risk for substance use and SUDs in humans due to effects on impulsivity.

Links between impulsivity, drug self-administration and drug-seeking behaviors have also been found in animal models useful for the study of addiction [189192] and in rodent models of ELS [193]. Commonly used behavioral measures of impulsivity in rodents often measure impulsive action, which refers to the diminished ability to withhold a motor response, and impulsive choice, which is reflected in a preference for smaller faster rewards over larger delayed rewards [24]. Impulsive action is measured by using inhibitory control tasks such as go-no-go and stop-signal reaction time [24,189]. In these tasks, subjects are required to inhibit motor responses when a cue or stop signal is presented; and subjects who have difficulty inhibiting their response are said to display greater impulsive action [24, 89]. Impulsive choice is frequently measured by using delay-discounting tasks in which subjects must choose between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards [190]. In rats, ELS in the form of total maternal deprivation and isolation (with minimal simulated licking) results in the inability to withhold premature responses during a differential reinforcement of low rates of responding (DRL) task in adult rats of both sexes [194]. On a DRL schedule, rats are rewarded for making operant responses after a specific (minimum) length of time has elapsed. Premature responses reset waiting times and do not produce reward. The premature responses observed in adult male and female rats exposed to ELS included lower efficiency ratios for earning rewards (i.e., food pellets), shorter interresponse times, and greater number of responses during the waiting period. All of these are thought to reflect impulsive action as rats failed to inhibit their behavioral responses. However, ELS effects on impulsive choice were found to be sex- and task-dependent as only male rats who underwent maternal deprivation and minimal stimulated licking exhibited changes in delay discounting, which reflects impulsive choice [194]. Specifically, male rats who underwent maternal deprivation and minimal simulated licking exhibited higher preference for the larger reward, suggesting reduced impulsive choice [194]. Thus, this modified MS paradigm enhanced impulsive action in both sexes but reduced impulsive choice only in males. Reductions in impulsive choice, as indexed by preference for the larger delayed reward, have also been found in adult LBN male but not LBN female rats [193] or in adult LBN female rats [195]. The discrepancy observed in female rats may be due differences in prenatal stress exposure (dams bred in house vs shipped while pregnant) or the type of LBN paradigm used (continuous with the same dam vs 1-hour daily with a different dam). Unlike the modified MS paradigm, LBN had no effect on impulsive action, as measured by premature responding in the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT), in adult male or female rats [195].

In sum, MS appears to increase impulsive action in both sexes but reduces impulsive choice only in male rodents whereas LBN does not appear to affect impulsive action but may reduce impulsive choice in both sexes. More studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the ontogeny of impulsivity-related behaviors under normative conditions and following ELS to evaluate if effects are similar throughout the lifespan in rodents. For example, whether impulsivity measures are potentiated in adolescent animals following ELS is unknown. Interestingly, increased impulsivity is predictive of compulsive drug taking in rodents, although effects depend on impulsivity type (impulsive action vs choice), drug class and even sex [190]. Thus, impulsivity may be a mediating factor between ELS and drug use vulnerability in animal models relevant to addiction, but more studies are needed. Examining this possibility requires additional studies aimed at dissecting the relationships between these variables (e.g., impulsivity type, sex, drug) in ELS animals across development.

3.3. Effects of ELS on novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors

Novelty-seeking (also called sensation-seeking) is a behavioral construct related to impulsivity that refers to exploratory behavior in search of varied, novel and rewarding sensations, experiences and/or stimuli [196,197]. In humans, sensation-seeking increases vulnerability to SUDs and novelty-seeking scores are elevated in individuals with SUDs [198200]. Moreover, men exhibit higher sensation-seeking behaviors than women during both adolescence and adulthood, suggesting sex differences in novelty-seeking behaviors that persist throughout the lifespan [201,202]. In rats, high novelty reactivity and preference is linked to individual vulnerability for developing compulsive psychostimulant administration [84,203205]. Importantly, humans and rodents also exhibit developmental changes in novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors, and these behaviors are particularly salient during adolescence [201,206213]. Increased exploratory drive and heightened novelty-seeking may contribute to increased risk-taking behavior, including drug use, and augmented addiction vulnerability during this period [214,215]. For instance, illicit drug use in humans is more common in high novelty-seeking adolescents, and adolescents exhibit increased reckless/risky behaviors compared to adults [207,216,217].

In rodents, novelty-seeking usually refers to the intrinsic drive to explore complex or novel stimuli and areas [218220]. Novelty-seeking and preference in rodents has been compared to sensation-seeking in humans and is strongly correlated with drug self-administration and other addiction-relevant behaviors such as impulsivity and drug intake. For example, individual differences in rat behavioral responses to novelty (i.e., locomotion, preference) can predict subsequent behavioral and dopaminergic responses to cocaine as well as amphetamine self-administration in both male and female rats [88,221224]. These studies have established a link between high novelty preference and greater psychostimulant-induced behavioral reactivity and self-administration. Yet, little is known regarding how ELS may affect the link between novelty-seeking and drug addiction in humans or rodents.

Novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors can be evaluated in rodents by assessing preference for novel vs familiar environments using activity chambers that differ in visual cues and/or by measuring locomotor activity in response to a novel environment [25,204]. The Concentric Square Field (CSF) consists of several arenas that stimulate exploration and risk-taking behaviors in a novel apparatus. In this test, the animal is placed in an open arena that includes sheltered and open areas, ground and elevated areas, enriched areas as well as differently illuminated zones; and, its choice for different environments is measured within the same session [225]. Elevated and/or exposed areas (e.g., bridge, center circle) are considered risky compared to dark corners since rodents tend to avoid open, elevated areas such as in the EPM [121,122]. Thus, measures associated with these areas such as number and duration of visits are a considered as an index of risk-taking behaviors [225]. During the CSF, MS increased exploratory and risk-taking behaviors in adult male rats, as indexed by shorter latencies for initial zone visits, including risky zones, and longer duration of risky zone visits compared to non-separated or briefly separated rats [226]. This is consistent with a study showing increased exploratory behaviors (i.e., nose poking, locomotion) in adult male MS rats in response to a novel environment [227]. Adult female rats exposed to long or short MS exhibited comparable behavior in the CSF, suggesting MS exerts sex-dependent effects on the CSF in which males show enhanced novelty and risk-taking behaviors [228]. However, adult female rats exhibited heightened exploratory activity specifically during high estrogen phases (i.e., proestrus, estrus) compared to diestrus [228], suggesting that fluctuations in ovarian hormones modulate the expression of exploratory and risk-taking behaviors in the CSF. With regards to sex differences in exploratory drive in response to a novel environment, adult MS females showed increased spontaneous ambulation (i.e., horizontal activity) compared to nonseparated females, whereas no effect was found in adult MS males compared with nonseparated males, as well as elevated rearing (i.e., vertical activity) compared to MS males [229]. Little is known regarding the impact of MS on the CSF at earlier developmental stages.

Other behavioral measures of novelty-seeking include the playground maze (PGM) and novel object retrieval tasks under risky conditions. The PGM is a variation of the novel object recognition test. In the PGM, exploratory responses to a single novel object are measured within the context of responses to 7 familiar objects in a familiar environment (open arena). In the initial trials, the rat is placed in the maze containing 8 novel objects (typically plastic toys) that the rat can explore/interact with. On test day, one of the familiar objects is replaced with a novel object and the time spent around the novel object area is expressed as a percentage to determine novelty-seeking responses [88,230]. A baseline sex difference has been observed in control males compared to control females during adolescence, which is characterized by a higher percentage of time spent interacting with the novel object [105]. However, only adolescent female MS rats exhibited enhanced novelty-seeking responses, as indexed by higher percentages of novel object exploration/interaction time and greater number of approach responses to the novel object, compared to control adolescent females [105]. In a novel object retrieval task in which rats had to cross an unsafe, risky zone (filled with water) to be able to access, interact with and retrieve hidden novel objects, adolescent MS rats (pooled group including both sexes) exhibited reduced latencies to cross the risky zone and reach the platform containing novel objects, took less time to retrieve novel objects, and retrieved more objects than controls [124]. A prior study conducted in adult LBN rats of both sexes revealed that LBN males spent more time exploring a novel object compared to control males, but no differences were observed in LBN females compared with control females [195]. Furthermore, although rats typically show a preference for novel environments over familiar ones [231], LBN decreased preference for a novel environment in adult rats of both sexes [195]. These findings suggest that LBN increases novelty-seeking behavior in response to novel objects in adult male rodents but reduces preference for novel environments in both sexes, although more studies are needed to confirm these findings.

With regards to the relationship between ELS and novelty-seeking in rodents, results obtained using the MS model suggest that ELS produces sex-specific increases that are task- and developmentally dependent. Adult males exhibited increased novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors during the CSF. However, MS effects on exploratory behaviors in response to a novel environment were augmented in female MS rodents compared to male MS rodents and varied according to estrogen levels. In the PGM, adolescent MS females showed an enhancement in novelty-seeking behaviors. In novel object retrieval tasks, adolescent MS animals exhibited enhanced novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors, but sex differences remain unexplored. LBN decreased preference for novel environments in both sexes, but a sex-dependent effect was found in response to novel objects in which male LBN rodents exhibited increased exploration.

3.4. Effects of ELS on alcohol intake

Early life environments are known to modulate later life patterns of alcohol consumption in both humans and rodents. Humans with a history of ELS, including parental absence, maltreatment, and neglect, are more likely to start drinking early in life and use drinking as a coping mechanism [13,14,232234]. This is significant given that earlier initiation of alcohol consumption is correlated with increased susceptibility to alcohol dependence and abuse in both males and females [235237]. A study examining sex differences found that ACEs were associated with excessive alcohol use, but sex did not moderate this relationship, suggesting that ACEs impact alcohol use similarly in both sexes [238]. Thus, ELS is a potent risk factor for lifetime alcohol dependence in both men and women [13,239].

ELS also potentiates voluntary alcohol intake in rodents, and many studies have reported sex differences. MS does not appear to impact long-term voluntary alcohol intake in adult female rats [228,240]. However, adult MS male rats and mice consume more of an ethanol solution during adulthood and exhibit increased preference for alcohol over water [111,241245]. Increased voluntary alcohol intake is also observed in adolescent MS male rats and mice compared with nonseparated controls [246,247]. Studies pooling both sexes have found that MS increases alcohol intake during an operant task in adult rats [248250]. Interestingly, a study that identified increased anxiety-like behavior, HPA-axis hyperresponsiveness and greater alcohol consumption in adult male MS mice found that all of these measures were reduced following antidepressant administration, suggesting a link between HPA-axis dysregulation, negative affect states and greater alcohol intake following ELS [111]. Similar sex-dependent effects of ELS on alcohol consumption have been observed in adult LBN mice. Although adult male LBN and control mice consumed similar baseline amounts of alcohol, male LBN mice exhibited accelerated alcohol intake escalation compared with controls, but this effect was not observed in adult LBN females [251]. These data suggest that LBN exposure accelerates the transition from moderate to excessive alcohol drinking in adult males but not females [251]. In sum, MS in rodents increases adult alcohol consumption whereas LBN accelerates the transition to excessive alcohol consumption. These effects are often more potent in males and typically not observed in females, suggesting that female rodents may be more resilient to the effects of ELS on later life alcohol intake.

3.5. Effects of ELS on behavioral responses to drugs of abuse and drug intake

In humans, exposure to ELS increases susceptibility for early initiation of drug use as well as later life addiction [6,7]. Childhood stressors, as well as the number/frequency of childhood stressors, are strongly related to early adolescent drug use and later life drug-related problems [812,252]. This is significant given that adolescence is a critical period in development during which drug exposure increases risk for SUDs [171,253], and ELS is thought to increase risk for SUDs through its influence on adolescence substance use [17,254]. Thus, adolescent drug use may represent an intermediate step in the path from ELS to SUDs.

ELS in rodents alters behavioral responses to a wide variety of drugs, often in an age- and sex-dependent manner. These behavioral responses include conditioned place preference (CPP), which refers to animals preferring a context previously paired with drug reward, drug-induced locomotion, behavioral sensitization, which refers to the augmented motor-stimulant response that occurs with repeated, intermittent administration of an addictive substance as well as drug-self administration [22,255257]. Furthermore, the influence of ELS on drug-induced responses appear to differ based on drug class, as reviewed below.

3.5.1. Psychostimulants

MS influences behavioral responses to psychostimulants during later life, although effects vary depending on multiple factors including age and sex of the animals as well as the drug and dose tested. Adolescent male MS rats exhibited levels of methamphetamine-induced place preference that were similar [258] or reduced compared to those in nonseparated controls [259]. However, adolescent MS rats exhibited augmented locomotor responses (i.e., behavioral activation) to methamphetamine, but this effect occurred at different doses for male (3.0 mg/kg) and female (1.0 mg/kg) rats [260]. Adolescent MS rats also exhibited increased cocaine-induced (10 mg/kg) place preference and locomotion, but these effects were only observed in males [105,261]. It is worth noting that adolescent control (i.e., nonhandled) female animals exhibited higher levels of cocaine-induced locomotion compared to males, suggesting a sex difference at baseline (no stress) conditions [105]. Collectively, these data suggest that MS increases psychostimulant-induced locomotion particularly in males. These effects may be explained by a sex-specific developmental increase in psychostimulant-induced locomotion in females, which may contribute to a ceiling effect in these animals.

MS does not appear to impact cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in periadolescent (PND 36–37) male rats [262]. However, adult MS rats of both sexes exhibited behavioral sensitization to amphetamine, as animals responded to the amphetamine challenge injection with increased locomotor activity, as well enhanced cocaine-induced locomotor activity (5–10 mg/kg i.p.; 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) [263,264,265]. A study conducted in adult female rats found no changes in cocaine-induced locomotion but attenuated cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in MS females compared to nonseparated females [266]. With regards to drug self-administration, adult male MS rats exhibited increases in methamphetamine self-administration (e.g., more active lever presses, higher number of infusions) compared to adult males that experienced shorter (15-min) separations [267,268]. Effects on adult females remain to be determined. Adult MS rats of both sexes acquired cocaine-self administration at lower doses (0.0625–0.125 mg/kg) than nonseparated controls [264], suggesting that MS facilitates the acquisition of cocaine self-administration during adulthood. However, the total voluntary cocaine intake (number of infusions per session) did not differ between MS and nonseparated animals at these doses [264]. When tested at higher doses (0.125–0.5 mg/kg), adult MS rats actually exhibited reduced voluntary cocaine intake, as indexed by fewer numbers of cocaine infusions as well as blunted drug-induced reinstatement of the cocaine response, as demonstrated by MS rats making fewer presses on the formerly active lever compared to non-separated animals [269]. These data suggest that MS facilitates the acquisition of psychostimulant administration, but not total intake, during adulthood and that these effects may be limited to lower doses.

LBN also exerts long-term effects on behavioral responses to psychostimulants, but developmental and sex differences remain to be explored. Adult male LBN rats did not exhibit changes in cue or drug-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking, nor cocaine-induced locomotion (10 mg/kg) but acquired cocaine self-administration faster and preferred to self-administer lower doses of cocaine compared to controls under low effort conditions [270]. This is consistent with findings obtained in adult MS rats [264]. Adult male LBN mice exhibited increased locomotor activity in response to acute cocaine administration compared with controls, but comparable behavioral sensitization [271].

3.5.2. Opioids

MS exposure produces robust behavioral effects in response to opioid administration. Adult male MS rats exhibited morphine-induced CPP- even to lower doses, greater morphine-induced locomotion as well as increased intake and preference of a morphine solution compared to nonseparated control rats [272278]. With regards to morphine-induced locomotion, MS produced behavioral sensitization in males, whereas females exhibited tolerance to morphine-induced locomotor activity [276]. Adult MS female rats exhibited enhanced CPP to morphine, although this was reduced when compared to MS males suggesting a sex difference, as well as increased morphine intake compared to nonseparated control females [275277]. Thus, MS increases opioid self-administration in males and increases behavioral responses to opioids in both sexes, but MS females appear less affected in subset of these effects (i.e., behavioral sensitization, place preference) compared to MS males.

Sex-dependent changes in opioid administration have also been reported in adult LBN rats. Although total heroin self-administration (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) during acquisition was comparable in adult female control and LBN rats, LBN exposure increased resistance to extinction as indexed by LBN female rats taking longer to reach extinction criteria [279]. Moreover, adult LBN females exhibited enhanced cue-induced and heroin-primed reinstatement of heroin-seeking behavior (i.e., more drug lever presses) [279]. In adult male rats, LBN led to reduced heroin consumption during the training phase as well as overall consumption, as indexed by lower numbers of infusions [280]. Despite reduced intake, LBN did not alter extinction or reinstatement to heroin seeking in adult males [280]. Thus, LBN potentiates heroin-seeking behaviors in female but not male rats. A study that pooled both sexes found no differences between adult LBN and control animals for acquisition and maintenance of heroin-self administration (0.06 mg/kg/infusion), but increased breakpoints for heroin self-administration under a progressive ratio reinforcement schedule, impaired extinction of heroin-seeking behavior and increased reinstatement of heroin-seeking by heroin-associated cues in LBN rats [281]. Given prior findings in adult LBN females and males [279,280], it seems likely that the effects reported in the latter study, which pooled both sexes, were driven by female-specific changes. With regards to morphine, adult LBN rats exhibit sex-specific effects in which males are resistant to opioid-seeking behavior. LBN males earned fewer infusions of low-dose morphine (0.25 mg/kg) compared to control males under both fixed and progressive reinforcement schedules, whereas LBN and control females earned similar number of infusions [193]. These behavioral effects were specific to a lower dose of morphine, as LBN did not impact the number of infusions obtained by animals of both sexes at higher doses (0.75 mg/kg) [282]. Taken together, these findings indicate that LBN increases heroin-seeking behaviors in females but reduces morphine self-administration in males, and that effects are specific to lower doses of opioids.

3.6. Effects of ELS on responses to natural rewards

In rodents, sweet foods/solutions and social interactions constitute natural rewards, and as such, they have potent motivational properties and activate brain’s primary reward pathway- the mesolimbic DA system [283291]. A growing body of evidence indicates that ELS in the form of MS and LBN disrupts later life responses to rewards, including natural rewards, as measured on a variety of behavioral tasks [52,292].For instance, both male and female rats reared under ELS conditions exhibit alterations across a spectrum of reward-related processes throughout development, including intake of palatable solutions and/or foods as well as motivated social behaviors known to be rewarding to rats, including play and sexual behaviors [52]. This is in accordance with human studies showing disrupted reward-related responses following ELS [293,294,295].

3.6.1. Sucrose/palatable food intake

Since developing and adult rats typically exhibit an unlearned preference for sucrose solutions over water [296,297], a way to measure changes in motivational and reward-related behaviors involves administration of sugar-containing liquids and foods. MS typically decreases intake and/or preference of sucrose solutions (1–2%) compared to control (non-separated) rats in adolescent male and adult rats [111,133,134,272,298304], but has no effect in adolescent females or adult females [298,303306]. However, effects depend on the concentration of the sucrose solution used, as adult MS male rats exhibited increased intake of a 3% or 10% sucrose solution compared with non-separated controls [307,308]. This suggests that ELS may reduce sucrose consumption to lower concentrations of sucrose but increases sucrose consumption at higher doses in male rodents during free choice paradigms. Adult male MS rats also exhibited reduced sucrose self-administration, as indexed by reduced lever presses, suggesting attenuated motivational drive for sucrose reward in these animals [309]. With regards to palatable food intake, studies have found reduced cookie intake in periadolescent (PND 28–40) male rats [310], but sex-specific effects during late adolescence/early adulthood: no differences between MS and nonseparated males, but MS females consumed more of a graham wafer compared to nonseparated females [107]. In adulthood, male and female MS rats exhibited increased palatable food consumption [116,311]. These findings suggest that MS induces distinct effects on sucrose vs palatable food consumption: a sex-specific decrease in sucrose consumption and preference in adolescent and adult male MS rodents, whereas it increases palatable food consumption in both sexes during adulthood.

LBN exposure within the first two postnatal weeks reduced adolescent and adult sucrose consumption and/or preference in male rats [143,312314]. However, LBN did not alter sucrose consumption in adult female rats, as they were comparable to controls [279]. No effect of LBN was observed for sucrose preference in either sex in prepubertal (PND 30) rats [151], which may suggest that LBN-induced alterations in sucrose intake emerge later in development (~PND 45) specifically in males. The effects of LBN on sucrose intake and preference patterns are similar to those observed following MS, in which reductions are seen specifically in adolescent and adult males. In mice, LBN reduced sucrose consumption in adult females [150,315], but not males [315,316], which may suggest that LBN effects on sucrose consumption is species-dependent and that sex-dependent effects on mice are opposite from those observed in the rat. LBN also induced sex-specific effects with regards to consumption of palatable food. LBN reduced palatable food intake at baseline (no effort condition) in adult male rats [270], but not in female rats [279]. Adult LBN female rats consumed more palatable food, exhibited increased preference for palatable food, and were willing to expend more effort for palatable food pellets compared to control females [153,279]. With regards to palatable foods, LBN results in bidirectional effects in the sexes: decrease in males, increase in females.

In sum, both MS and LBN reduce sucrose preference in adolescent and adult male rats, with no effect on females at these timepoints. MS increases palatable food consumption in both sexes during later life, whereas LBN exerts sex-specific bidirectional effects: it decreases palatable food consumption in males but increases palatable food intake in females. Collectively, these findings demonstrate long-term effects of ELS on behavioral responses to natural rewards such as sucrose and palatable food.

3.6.2. Social behaviors

Social interactions constitute a form of natural reward for rodents and increase activity within the same brain pathway activated by drugs of abuse- the mesolimbic DA system [317,318]. Although rodent social behaviors are diverse (see Table 1 for descriptive summary of these behaviors), here I focus on social play, social approach, social interaction and sexual behaviors given the rewarding value of these interactions and their mediation by mesolimbic dopaminergic neurotransmission [289,291]. MS exerts sex-dependent effects on play behaviors in rats, and results differ depending on the control group used. Periadolescent (PND 30–40) MS male rats have been reported to make both more and fewer nape attacks (i.e., pouncing), which are considered as play solicitations, compared to non-separated sex-matched controls [319,320]. These mixed results may be due to differences in methodology including duration of MS (2 vs 3-week), number of behavioral tests done on the same animal, testing location (home cage vs play box arena) and familiarity of the play partner (cage mate vs novel rat). Nape attacks were not affected in MS females, but MS females did exhibit reductions in pinning behavior compared to control females [319]. A study that compared MS, handled and nonhandled control rats found no effect of MS on nape attacks in juvenile (PND 24–26) male and female rats [321]. However, adolescent MS animals exhibited increased pinning behavior compared to briefly separated (15-min) male rats, whereas MS and briefly separated females made comparable numbers of pins [322]. These results suggest more robust effects on MS on pinning behavior compared to other indices of social play as well as a reduction in pinning in MS female rats compared to controls but an increase in pinning in MS males. With regards to social interaction, MS exerts sex-dependent effects in juvenile (PND 25) rats: no effect in MS males compared to nonseparated males, but MS females exhibited reduced nose-to-nose duration and increased the latency for nose-to-nose contact [323,324]. In adolescent (PND 42–45) rats, increased latency for nose-to-nose contact was observed only in MS males [323]. However, periadolescent male MS rats exhibited increased frequency of anogenital sniffing [325], suggesting MS may exert differential effects on nose-to-nose vs anogenital sniffing. In adolescent male mice, no effect of MS on affiliative behaviors has been reported [326]. Finally, although MS accelerated sexual maturation in males, the frequencies of sexual behaviors did not differ in adult MS males or females compared to nonseparated controls [327].

Table 1.

Social Behaviors Modulated by ELS.

  • Social Play: This test consists of observing a pair of rats under baseline conditions or following a social isolation period, which is known to increase play behaviors [336]. Play behaviors can be measured in the home cage or in a neutral arena and recorded. These include following and chasing, pouncing or nape contacts (when one animal contacts the back of the neck of the other animal with its paws or snout), bouts of boxing/wrestling (also called rough and tumble play or play fighting), as well as duration and frequency of pinning (when one rat exerts a dominant posture over the other rat by holding it down with its back against the floor). Nape contacts and pins are considered the main indices of social play behaviors [337]. Nape contacts are considered index of play solicitations whereas pins are usually regarded as the culmination and possibly extension of a play bout. This test serves as an index of social reward and is useful for measuring future dominance hierarchies [318,338]. Reductions in social play are often interpreted as indicative of blunted social reward-related behavioral and brain function.

  • Social Approach: This test occurs in a 3-chambered apparatus in which the test animal is placed in a center chamber that is in between two other chambers [339,340]. Both side chambers contain an enclosure that enables the test animal to see and smell its content but prevents direct contact. During testing, one enclosure contains a conspecific animal while the other one is empty or contains an inanimate object. In this test, the amount of time an animal spends exploring each enclosure (sniff time) and/or each chamber containing an enclosure (social chamber vs control chamber) is recorded. Decreases in time spent sniffing the enclosure containing the conspecific animal (or the chamber containing this enclosure) are interpreted as attenuated social motivation and/or social avoidance [341,342].

  • Social Interaction: In contrast to the social approach test, which limits the degree of social interactions possible, this test allows for the measurement of direct social interactions as the animals can freely explore each other [342,343]. Several behaviors such as sniffing, following, crawling over and under, contact time and grooming are measured and recorded. Reductions in social interaction are commonly interpreted as social withdrawal and/or avoidance [341].

  • Sexual Behavior: Sexual behaviors are typically measured in male rats by presenting them with a sexually receptive female rat- a naïve, virgin, estrus female rodent. In males, sexual behaviors include mounting (the male straddles the female from behind and thrusts his hips), intromission (mounting with vaginal insertion) and ejaculation, including the number of and or latency to reach these behaviors [344]. In females, sexually receptive measures are centered around lordosis (a receptive posture that facilitates intromission)[345]. These behaviors are usually recorded/videotaped and scored.

LBN rats exhibit alterations in social behaviors such as social play, approach (i.e., motivation), interaction and sexual motivation. For example, early life rearing with an LBN dam decreases reward-related play behaviors in adolescent and adult male rats [143,312] but not in prepubertal rats of either sex [328]. LBN rats also exhibit blunted social motivation, as indexed by reduced time spent in a chamber containing a social stimulus animal, prior to weaning as well as during adolescence and adulthood [313,329332]. In the 3 chambered social approach test, these effects have been observed across development in LBN rats (i.e., group pooling both sexes) [331]. Adult male mice exposed to LBN also exhibit reductions in social approach behavior and time spent with a social stimulus [316]. In adulthood, sex differences have been reported for social interaction in an open arena, in which social contact time is reduced only in LBN males [144]. With regards to sexual motivation, adult LBN male and female rats spent more time with a sexually receptive female or sexually vigorous male, respectively, compared to controls during the no-contact phase of a partner preference test in which they had to choose between a same sex vs opposite sex partner [333]. Moreover, adult LBN male rats exhibited altered copulatory behaviors including reduced latencies to mount, intromit, and ejaculate at earlier timepoints than controls over a 3-week period [334], although the frequency of these behaviors did not differ between adult LBN and control males [333]. In adult female mice, LBN delayed sexual maturation [335].

To summarize, MS and LBN appear to influence different types of social behaviors. MS reduced play behaviors in females but increased them in males, whereas LBN reduced play behaviors in male rats. MS impaired social interaction at earlier timepoints in females (i.e., juvenile) than males (i.e., adolescence), but no effect was seen in mice. LBN reduced social approach and interaction across multiple time points in males and groups pooling both sexes, although effects may be driven by males considering that only LBN males exhibited reduced social interaction during adulthood. Finally, MS and LBN both accelerated sexual maturation specifically in males, and LBN enhanced adult sexual motivation in both sexes.

4. Effects of early life stress on later life mesolimbic DA system

The mesolimbic DA system consists of dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc), amygdala and prefrontal cortex (PFC), among others, and is fundamental to reward-related processes including the drug-induced sensation of pleasure that acts as a positive reinforcement signal [346,347]. Activation of the mesolimbic DA system, which stimulates VTA DA release and dopaminergic neurotransmission, is necessary for the rewarding properties of both natural and drug rewards [346,348,349]. Addiction is characterized by severe dysregulation of motivational circuits, which can include exaggerated incentive salience, reward deficits, and impulsivity-all of which involve mesolimbic DA system dysfunction [350,351]. As reviewed above (Section 3), ELS in the form of MS or LBN disrupts addiction-related behaviors in rodents (e.g., impulsivity, drug intake, behavioral responses to natural rewards) that are known to be mediated by the mesolimbic DA system. These findings suggest that ELS may influence later life addiction-relevant behavioral phenotypes via disruption of mesolimbic DA function.

ELS produces enduring effects in reward-related processes and mesolimbic DA function in humans [293,294,295]. In accordance, multiple studies have demonstrated a long-term impact of ELS, as induced by disrupted mother-infant interactions due to MS or LBN, on the mesolimbic DA system in rodents (for reviews, see [51,53]). For example, MS results in robust and long-lasting changes in DA transporter (DAT) levels in the NAc, which were reduced in MS rats compared to controls, as well as in the responsiveness of mesolimbic DA neurons to stress, in which MS rats responded to a mild stressor (tail pinch) with significantly greater increases of NAc DA levels [263,352]. It is worth noting that DA responses to stress are dependent on the developmental stage, duration and type of stressor used, as NAc and VTA DA responses to 1-hour restraint stress were suppressed in adolescent MS rats [353]. MS rodents also exhibit changes in DA concentrations and DA receptor expression during later life, although effects often differ by sex, age, receptor subtype and brain region [106,243,244,311,354358]. Stereological analysis of VTA neurons in adult MS rats (group containing both sexes) have identified a reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive DA neurons [250], whereas a study that used both sexes found increased number of DA neurons, as indexed by TH-immunoreactivity, in adult MS females but not males [265]. Moreover, MS also results in long-lasting alterations in the electrical activity of VTA DA neurons in both sexes. Using in vivo extracellular recordings, Masrouri and colleagues found that adult MS males displayed a decrease in firing rates and burst firing compared to control males, suggesting VTA DA hypoactivity [359]. Using whole-cell patch clamp recordings in brain slices from adolescent female rats, Spyrka and colleagues found an MS-induced increase in VTA DA neuron excitability and enhancement of excitatory synaptic transmission [360]. These findings may suggest opposite effects of MS on VTA DA neurons in males and females (i.e., lower numbers and hypoactivity in males, higher numbers and hyperactivity in females). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that MS alters the mesolimbic DA system across different levels in rodents (e.g., release, receptors, neurons) and that sex differences are present in these effects.

Available evidence suggests a long-term impact of LBN on later life mesolimbic DA system structure and function. For example, adolescent and adult LBN rats (group containing rats of both sexes) exhibited blunted c-Fos immunoreactivity, an indirect marker of neural activity, during a social approach test within cortical (PFC), striatal (NAc), and limbic (basolateral amygdala-BLA) structures receiving dopaminergic innervation from the VTA [331], which may suggest blunted mesolimbic DA system activation in response to social stimuli. With regards to drug-induced neural activity within reward-related structures, a recent study conducted in adult LBN males showed differential heroin-induced c-Fos expression, as indexed by blunted heroin-induced neuronal activation in the NAc core, but not the NAc shell, in LBN males compared to controls [280]. This finding is in accordance a prior study showing reduced excitatory activity in the NAc core of adult LBN males but not adult LBN females [193]. Adult LBN males also exhibit alterations in NAc DA receptor density, as measured by immunoreactivity [361]. Neuroimaging studies conducted in LBN rats have identified structural, morphological, functional connectivity changes within nodes of the mesolimbic DA system [144,312,313,362]. For instance, preweaning (PND20) LBN male rats, but not female rats, exhibit morphological changes in the BLA characterized by increased spine density, dendritic length and arborization compared to CON males as well as BLA hyperexcitability in vitro [144]. Male LBN rats also exhibit reduced resting state functional connectivity between cortical (mPFC) and limbic (BLA) structures, between the BLA and VTA, as well as between cortical (mPFC) and striatal reward-related areas (caudate putamen) compared with CON rats [313,362]. These data suggest that functional connectivity within multiple components of the mesolimbic DA system is altered by early life LBN exposure, which may contribute to impaired reward processing underlying reward-related deficits in LBN rats such as reduced sucrose consumption and blunted social play [313]. Finally, LBN also results in enduring changes in the activity of VTA DA neurons: adult LBN female rats exhibited a reduction in the number of spontaneously active VTA DA neurons (i.e., population activity) compared with control females, suggesting a hypodopaminergic state [77]. Whether these findings (i.e., DA downregulation) extend to adult LBN male rats remains to be determined. Within this context, a decrease in VTA DA neuron activity would be expected to diminish stimulus-driven DA neuron responses, leading to attenuated mesolimbic DA system activation and blunted reward-related responses [363]. Notably, hypodopaminergic states are also observed in adult male and female rats exposed to chronic stress [364,365], in which VTA DA attenuation is driven by BLA hyperexcitability, and specifically, increases within a BLA-ventral pallidum inhibitory circuit that decrease VTA DA neuron activity [364,366]. Thus, an interesting possibility is that this circuit also contributes to LBN-induced changes in VTA DA neuron function, but this remains to be tested.

In sum, results obtained using MS and LBN in rodents indicate that the maturation of the mesolimbic DA system is sensitive to ELS, as suggested by broad and long-lasting changes in structure and function within nodes of this system, including its source (i.e., VTA DA neurons). Thus, ELS interferes with mesolimbic DA system development and disrupts later life function. The mechanisms by which ELS disrupts mesolimbic DA system development and function remain unclear, although ELS-induced changes in gonadal and stress hormone signaling systems known to regulate mesolimbic DA activity have been implicated [367369]. Other mechanisms including ELS-induced changes in transcriptomic patterns across the reward circuitry [370], glutamatergic signaling [193,371], and microglial pruning of stress-related brain regions [372,373] have also been suggested.

5. Conclusions

In rodents, ELS in the form of MS and LBN results in HPA-axis dysregulation and long-lasting changes in addiction-related behavioral phenotypes including anxiety-like behavior, impulsivity, novelty-seeking, as well as altered behavioral responses to alcohol, drugs and natural rewards. These findings are briefly summarized here and in Table 2. MS typically increases anxiety-like behavior in male and female rodents in a variety of tasks (e.g., EPM, open field, light-dark box, novelty-induced suppression of feeding), although males display anxiety-like behavior in more tests than females. LBN tends to increase anxiety-like behavior in both sexes, but this effect is task-dependent (EPM and open field in males, light-dark box and novelty-induced suppression of feeding in females). In terms of impulsivity, MS increases impulsive action in both sexes but reduces impulsive choice only in males; LBN spares impulsive action but reduces impulsive choice primarily in males as mixed findings have been reported for females. Within the context of novelty-seeking and risk-taking in rodents, adult MS males exhibit increased novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors in the CSF, although adolescent MS animals of both sexes exhibit enhanced novelty-seeking and risk-taking behaviors in novel object retrieval tasks and adolescent MS females exhibit enhanced novelty-seeking in the PGM. LBN decreased preference for novel environments in both sexes. ELS increases alcohol intake (MS) or accelerates the transition into excessive alcohol consumption (LBN) in males but not females. The impact of ELS on later life responsivity to drugs and drug intake depends on the stressor paradigm used and the animal’s sex. MS increases addiction-related behavioral responses to (i.e., CPP, drug-induced locomotion) and self-administration of psychostimulants and opioids in both sexes, although these effects are typically more robust in males. Following LBN, males exhibit reduced intake of psychostimulants and opioids as well as reduced cue and drug-induced opioid reinstatement whereas females do not exhibit changes in opioid intake but display enhanced cue and drug-induced reinstatement of opioid-seeking behaviors. ELS reduces sucrose preference in adolescent and adult male rats, with no effect on females. MS increases palatable food consumption in both sexes during later life, whereas LBN exerts sex-specific bidirectional effects: it decreases palatable food consumption in males but increases palatable food intake in females. Finally, ELS tends to decrease social play behaviors and dampen social motivation for a conspecific in both sexes. As discussed here, the effects of ELS on addiction related-behavioral outcomes are often sex-dependent and can vary across the animal’s lifespan (see Table 2 for summary of behavioral outcomes following MS and LBN in male and female rodents). For example, adult males exposed to ELS often exhibit heightened anxiety-like behavior, increased novelty-seeking and risk-taking, greater alcohol intake, and dampened responses to natural rewards, but the effects on drug responding/intake (potentiation vs reduction) depend on the ELS paradigm used and drug type. Importantly, the findings reviewed here demonstrate long-term effects of ELS in responses to natural rewards such as sucrose, palatable food and social encounters, which is in accordance with a recent meta-analysis indicating dampened reward responsiveness and social deficits following ELS in rodents [292] and clinical studies showing disrupted reward processing in adults previously exposed to adverse early life experiences [53,293,294].

Table 2.

Summary of Behavioral Findings after ELS in rodents.

Behavioral Outcome/Sex Males Females
Anxiety-like behavior MS
  • EPM: ↑

  • Open Field: ↑

  • Light-dark box: ↑

  • Novelty-induced suppression of feeding/drinking: ↑

MS
  • EPM: ↑

  • Open Field: - rats, ↑ mice

  • Light-dark box: -

  • Novelty-induced suppression of feeding/drinking: ↑

LBN
  • EPM: ↑ adult rats, - mice,

  • Open Field: - prepubertal rats, mice; ↑ adult rats

  • Light-dark box: - rat, ↑ mice

  • Novelty-induced suppression of feeding and drinking: -

LBN
  • EPM: -

  • Open Field: -

  • Light-dark box: ↑ mice

  • Novelty-induced suppression of feeding and drinking: ↑

Impulsivity MS
  • Impulsive choice: ↓

  • Impulsive action: ↑

MS
  • Impulsive choice: -

  • Impulsive action: ↑

LBN
  • Impulsive choice: ↓

  • Impulsive action: -

LBN
  • Impulsive choice: -

  • Impulsive action: -

Novelty-Seeking/Risk-Taking MS
  • CSF: ↑

  • Risky novel object retrieval: ↑

MS
  • CSF: -

  • Risky novel object retrieval: ↑

LBN
  • Novel object exploration: ↑

  • Preference for novel environment: ↓

LBN
  • Novel object exploration: -

  • Preference for novel environment: ↓

Alcohol Intake MS
  • Consumption: ↑

  • Preference: ↑

MS
  • Consumption: -

  • Preference: -

LBN
  • Intake escalation: ↑

LBN
  • Intake escalation: -

Drug Intake and Response MS
  • Psychostimulant-induced CPP: ↓ methamphetamine, ↑ cocaine

  • Psychostimulant-induced locomotion: ↑ methamphetamine, cocaine

  • Psychostimulant self-administration: ↑ intake methamphetamine, - intake low dose cocaine, ↓ intake high dose cocaine

  • Opioid-induced CPP: ↑

  • Opioid-induced locomotion: ↑

  • Opioid intake: ↑

MS
  • Psychostimulant-induced CPP: - cocaine

  • Psychostimulant-induced locomotion: ↑ methamphetamine, - cocaine

  • Psychostimulant self-administration: -

  • Opioid-induced CPP: ↑

  • Opioid-induced locomotion: -

  • Opioid intake: ↑

LBN
  • Psychostimulant-induced locomotion: - rats, ↑ mice

  • Psychostimulant self-administration: ↓ intake

  • Cue and drug-induced reinstatement: -

  • Opioid intake: ↓

LBN
  • Psychostimulant-induced locomotion: ?

  • Psychostimulant self-administration: ?

  • Cue and drug-induced reinstatement: ↑

  • Opioid intake: -

Response to Natural Rewards MS
  • Sucrose: ↓

  • Palatable Food: ↓ prepubertal, - adolescents, ↑ adults

  • Social: - juvenile play, ↓ prepubertal play, ↑ prepubertal/adolescent play; - interaction (juvenile rats, mice), ↓ adolescent interaction, - frequency of sexual behaviors

MS
  • Sucrose: -

  • Palatable Food: ↑

  • Social: - juvenile play, ↓ prepubertal play; ↓ juvenile interaction, - adolescent interaction, - frequency of sexual behaviors

LBN
  • Sucrose intake: ↓ rats, - mice

  • Palatable Food: ↓

  • Social: ↓ play, ↓ approach, ↓ interaction, - frequency of sexual behaviors

LBN
  • Sucrose intake: - rats, ↓ mice

  • Palatable Food: ↑

  • Social: ↓ play, ↓ approach, ↓ interaction, - frequency of sexual behaviors

MS- maternal separation, LBN- limited bedding and nesting. ↓ most studies indicate a reduction, ↑ most studies indicate an increase, - indicates no change compared to control animals, ? indicates an unknown.

In addition, ELS influences the development of the mesolimbic DA system, which undergoes protracted development and is thought to play a pivotal role in numerous addiction-related outcomes resulting from ELS. As such, it is likely that ELS increases susceptibility for later life drug use and addiction by interfering with the normal maturation of reward-related brain and behavioral function. This would suggest that mesolimbic DA function may be a target for modulating the effects of ELS on later life addiction-related behaviors including alcohol/drug intake. Yet, little is known regarding the mechanisms by which ELS disrupts mesolimbic DA system development and DA signaling. Indeed, most behavioral and neurobiological studies have focused on assessing neurobehavioral outcomes in only one sex (i.e., males) at one developmental timepoint (i.e., adulthood), so the relationship between ELS, addiction-related behaviors, drug use and DA function remains poorly understood. A comprehensive understanding of how ELS influences behavioral and DA system development in both sexes is critical for understanding the mechanisms by which ELS potentiates risk for later life SUDs.

Funding sources

This material is based upon work supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grant No. K01MH128800.

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  • [1].Cohen P, Brown J, Smaile E, Child abuse and neglect and the development of mental disorders in the general population, Dev. Psychopathol 13 (2001) 981–999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Edwards VJ, Holden GW, Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Relationship between multiple forms of childhood maltreatment and adult mental health in community respondents: results from the adverse childhood experiences study, Am. J. Psychiatry 160 (2003) 1453–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].McLaughlin KA, Greif Green J, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC, Childhood adversities and first onset of psychiatric disorders in a national sample of US adolescents, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69 (2012) 1151–1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Syed SA, Nemeroff CB, Early life stress, mood, and anxiety disorders, Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 1 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Carr CP, Martins CM, Stingel AM, Lemgruber VB, Juruena MF, The role of early life stress in adult psychiatric disorders: a systematic review according to childhood trauma subtypes, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis 201 (2013) 1007–1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Enoch MA, The role of early life stress as a predictor for alcohol and drug dependence, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 214 (2011) 17–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Kirsch DE, Nemeroff CM, Lippard ETC, Early life stress and substance use disorders: underlying neurobiology and pathways to adverse outcomes, Adversity Resilience Sci. 1 (2020) 29–47. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Chapman DP, Giles WH, Anda RF, Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study, Pediatrics 111 (2003) 564–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Choi NG, DiNitto DM, Marti CN, Choi BY, Association of adverse childhood experiences with lifetime mental and substance use disorders among men and women aged 50 + years, Int. Psychogeriatr 29 (2017) 359–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Merrick MT, Ports KA, Ford DC, Afifi TO, Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A, Unpacking the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adult mental health, Child Abuse Negl. 69 (2017) 10–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, Dube SR, Giles WH, The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology, Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci 256 (2006) 174–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Villanueva L, Gomis-Pomares A, The cumulative and differential relation of adverse childhood experiences and substance use during emerging adulthood, Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev 52 (2021) 420–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Pilowsky DJ, Keyes KM, Hasin DS, Adverse childhood events and lifetime alcohol dependence, Am. J. Public Health 99 (2009) 258–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Dube SR, Miller JW, Brown DW, Giles WH, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Anda RF, Adverse childhood experiences and the association with ever using alcohol and initiating alcohol use during adolescence, J. Adolesc. Health 38 (2006) 444.e1–444.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Sinha R, Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 1141 (2008) 105–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Smith KE, Pollak SD, Early life stress and development: potential mechanisms for adverse outcomes, J. Neurodev. Disord 12 (2020) 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Andersen SL, Teicher MH, Desperately driven and no brakes: developmental stress exposure and subsequent risk for substance abuse, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 33 (2009) 516–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Gunnar MR, Donzella B, Social regulation of the cortisol levels in early human development, Psychoneuroendocrinology 27 (2002) 199–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Gee DG, Casey BJ, The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery, Neurobiol. Stress 1 (2015) 184–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Moffett MC, Vicentic A, Kozel M, Plotsky P, Francis DD, Kuhar MJ, Maternal separation alters drug intake patterns in adulthood in rats, Biochem. Pharmacol 73 (2007) 321–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Levis SC, Baram TZ, Mahler SV, Neurodevelopmental origins of substance use disorders: evidence from animal models of early-life adversity and addiction, Eur. J. Neurosci (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Walters H, Kosten TA, Early life stress and the propensity to develop addictive behaviors, Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 78 (2019) 156–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Kendall-Tackett K, The health effects of childhood abuse: four pathways by which abuse can influence health, Child Abuse Negl. 26 (2002) 715–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Mitchell MR, Potenza MN, Addictions and personality traits: impulsivity and related constructs, Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep 1 (2014) 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Belin D, Belin-Rauscent A, Everitt BJ, Dalley JW, In search of predictive endophenotypes in addiction: insights from preclinical research, Genes Brain Behav. 15 (2016) 74–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Wingo T, Nesil T, Choi JS, Li MD, Novelty seeking and drug addiction in humans and animals: from behavior to molecules, J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol 11 (2016) 456–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Jupp B, Dalley JW, Behavioral endophenotypes of drug addiction: etiological insights from neuroimaging studies, Neuropharmacology 76 (Pt B) (2014) 487–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Ersche KD, Turton AJ, Pradhan S, Bullmore ET, Robbins TW, Drug addiction endophenotypes: impulsive versus sensation-seeking personality traits, Biol. Psychiatry 68 (2010) 770–773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Sarramon C, Verdoux H, Schmitt L, Bourgeois M, Addiction and personality traits: sensation seeking, anhedonia, impulsivity, Encephale 25 (1999) 569–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Sher KJ, Bartholow BD, Wood MD, Personality and substance use disorders: a prospective study, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 68 (2000) 818–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Dawe S, Gullo MJ, Loxton NJ, Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse, Addict. Behav 29 (2004) 1389–1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Ersche KD, Turton AJ, Chamberlain SR, Muller U, Bullmore ET, Robbins TW, Cognitive dysfunction and anxious-impulsive personality traits are endophenotypes for drug dependence, Am. J. Psychiatry 169 (2012) 926–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].de Wit H, Richards JB, Dual determinants of drug use in humans: reward and impulsivity, Nebr. Symp. Motiv 50 (2004) 19–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Zuckerman M, Sensation seeking and the endogenous deficit theory of drug abuse, NIDA Res. Monogr 74 (1986) 59–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Hatzigiakoumis DS, Martinotti G, Giannantonio MD, Janiri L, Anhedonia and substance dependence: clinical correlates and treatment options, Front. Psychiatry 2 (2011) 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Bath KG, Synthesizing views to understand sex differences in response to early life adversity, Trends Neurosci. 43 (2020) 300–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Zahn-Waxler C, Shirtcliff EA, Marceau K, Disorders of childhood and adolescence: gender and psychopathology, Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol 4 (2008) 275–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Graham YP, Heim C, Goodman SH, Miller AH, Nemeroff CB, The effects of neonatal stress on brain development: implications for psychopathology, Dev. Psychopathol 11 (1999) 545–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Sengupta P, The laboratory rat: relating its age with human’s, Int. J. Prev. Med 4 (2013) 624–630. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Sapolsky RM, Meaney MJ, Maturation of the adrenocortical stress response: neuroendocrine control mechanisms and the stress hyporesponsive period, Brain Res. 396 (1986) 64–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Guillet R, Michaelson SM, Corticotropin responsiveness in the neonatal rat, Neuroendocrinology 27 (1978) 119–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Guillet R, Saffran M, Michaelson SM, Pituitary-adrenal response in neonatal rats, Endocrinology 106 (1980) 991–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Henning SJ, Plasma concentrations of total and free corticosterone during development in the rat, Am. J. Physiol 235 (1978) E451–E456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Walker CD, Scribner KA, Cascio CS, Dallman MF, The pituitary-adrenocortical system of neonatal rats is responsive to stress throughout development in a time-dependent and stressor-specific fashion, Endocrinology 128 (1991) 1385–1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Schoenfeld NM, Leathem JH, Rabii J, Maturation of adrenal stress responsiveness in the rat, Neuroendocrinology 31 (1980) 101–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Rincon-Cortes M, Sullivan RM, Early life trauma and attachment: immediate and enduring effects on neurobehavioral and stress axis development, Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 5 (2014) 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Nishi M, Effects of early-life stress on the brain and behaviors: implications of early maternal separation in rodents, Int. J. Mol. Sci 21 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Babicola L, Ventura R, D’Addario SL, Ielpo D, Andolina D, Di Segni M, Long term effects of early life stress on HPA circuit in rodent models, Mol. Cell Endocrinol 521 (2021) 111125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Bolton JL, Short AK, Simeone KA, Daglian J, Baram TZ, Programming of stress-sensitive neurons and circuits by early-life experiences, Front. Behav. Neurosci 13 (2019) 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Gutman DA, Nemeroff CB, Neurobiology of early life stress: rodent studies, Semin. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 7 (2002) 89–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Birnie MT, Kooiker CL, Short AK, Bolton JL, Chen Y, Baram TZ, Plasticity of the reward circuitry after early-life adversity: mechanisms and significance, Biol. Psychiatry 87 (2020) 875–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Birnie MT, Levis SC, Mahler SV, Baram TZ, Developmental trajectories of anhedonia in preclinical models, Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Hanson JL, Williams AV, Bangasser DA, Pena CJ, Impact of early life stress on reward circuit function and regulation, Front. Psychiatry 12 (2021) 744690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Walker CD, Bath KG, Joels M, Korosi A, Larauche M, Lucassen PJ, Morris MJ, Raineki C, Roth TL, Sullivan RM, Tache Y, Baram TZ, Chronic early life stress induced by limited bedding and nesting (LBN) material in rodents: critical considerations of methodology, outcomes and translational potential, Stress 20 (2017) 421–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Molet J, Maras PM, Avishai-Eliner S, Baram TZ, Naturalistic rodent models of chronic early-life stress, Dev. Psychobiol 56 (2014) 1675–1688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ, Early, postnatal experience alters hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) mRNA, median eminence CRF content and stress-induced release in adult rats, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res 18 (1993) 195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Lehmann J, Feldon J, Long-term biobehavioral effects of maternal separation in the rat: consistent or confusing? Rev. Neurosci 11 (2000) 383–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].van Oers HJ, de Kloet ER, Levine S, Early vs. late maternal deprivation differentially alters the endocrine and hypothalamic responses to stress, Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 111 (1998) 245–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Levine S, Huchton DM, Wiener SG, Rosenfeld P, Time course of the effect of maternal deprivation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the infant rat, Dev. Psychobiol 24 (1991) 547–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A, Sharma S, Pearson D, Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ, Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress, Science 277 (1997) 1659–1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Fenoglio KA, Chen Y, Baram TZ, Neuroplasticity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis early in life requires recurrent recruitment of stress-regulating brain regions, J. Neurosci 26 (2006) 2434–2442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Hall FS, Social deprivation of neonatal, adolescent, and adult rats has distinct neurochemical and behavioral consequences, Crit. Rev. Neurobiol 12 (1998) 129–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Francis DD, Meaney MJ, Maternal care and the development of stress responses, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 9 (1999) 128–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Levine S, Haltmeyer GC, Karas GG, Denenberg VH, Physiological and behavioral effects of infantile stimulation, Physiol. Behav 2 (1967) 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Meaney MJ, Aitken DH, Viau V, Sharma S, Sarrieau A, Neonatal handling alters adrenocortical negative feedback sensitivity and hippocampal type II glucocorticoid receptor binding in the rat, Neuroendocrinology 50 (1989) 597–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Hess JL, Denenberg VH, Zarrow MX, Pfeifer WD, Modification of the corticosterone response curve as a function of handling in infancy, Physiol. Behav 4 (1969) 109–111. [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Meaney MJ, Bhatnagar S, Diorio J, Larocque S, Francis D, O’Donnell D, Shanks N, Sharma S, Smythe J, Viau V, Molecular basis for the development of individual differences in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress response, Cell Mol. Neurobiol 13 (1993) 321–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Korosi A, Shanabrough M, McClelland S, Liu ZW, Borok E, Gao XB, Horvath TL, Baram TZ, Early-life experience reduces excitation to stress-responsive hypothalamic neurons and reprograms the expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone, J. Neurosci 30 (2010) 703–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Levine S, Infantile experience and resistance to physiological stress, Science 126 (1957) 405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Ladd CO, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB, Persistent changes in corticotropin-releasing factor neuronal systems induced by maternal deprivation, Endocrinology 137 (1996) 1212–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Plotsky PM, Thrivikraman KV, Nemeroff CB, Caldji C, Sharma S, Meaney MJ, Long-term consequences of neonatal rearing on central corticotropin-releasing factor systems in adult male rat offspring, Neuropsychopharmacology 30 (2005) 2192–2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Gilles EE, Schultz L, Baram TZ, Abnormal corticosterone regulation in an immature rat model of continuous chronic stress, Pediatr. Neurol 15 (1996) 114–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Ivy AS, Brunson KL, Sandman C, Baram TZ, Dysfunctional nurturing behavior in rat dams with limited access to nesting material: a clinically relevant model for early-life stress, Neuroscience 154 (2008) 1132–1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Brunson KL, Kramar E, Lin B, Chen Y, Colgin LL, Yanagihara TK, Lynch G, Baram TZ, Mechanisms of late-onset cognitive decline after early-life stress, J. Neurosci 25 (2005) 9328–9338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Raineki C, Opendak M, Sarro E, Showler A, Bui K, McEwen BS, Wilson DA, Sullivan RM, During infant maltreatment, stress targets hippocampus, but stress with mother present targets amygdala and social behavior, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 116 (2019) 22821–22832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Raineki C, Moriceau S, Sullivan RM, Developing a neurobehavioral animal model of infant attachment to an abusive caregiver, Biol. Psychiatry 67 (2010) 1137–1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Rincon-Cortes M, Grace AA, Postpartum scarcity-adversity disrupts maternal behavior and induces a hypodopaminergic state in the rat dam and adult female offspring, Neuropsychopharmacology 47 (2022) 488–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Perry RE, Braren SH, Opendak M, Brandes-Aitken A, Chopra D, Woo J, Sullivan R, Blair C, Family Life Project Key Investigators, Elevated infant cortisol is necessary but not sufficient for transmission of environmental risk to infant social development: cross-species evidence of mother-infant physiological social transmission, Dev. Psychopathol 32 (2020) 1696–1714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Levine S, Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the neonatal rat: the role of maternal behavior, Neurotox. Res 4 (2002) 557–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Levine S, The ontogeny of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The influence of maternal factors, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 746 (1994) 275–288 discussion 289–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].van Bodegom M, Homberg JR, Henckens M, Modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by early life stress exposure, Front. Cell Neurosci 11 (2017) 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Mormede P, Le Moal M, Simon H, Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration, Behav. Pharmacol 1 (1990) 339–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Dilleen R, Pelloux Y, Mar AC, Molander A, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ, Dalley JW, Belin D, High anxiety is a predisposing endophenotype for loss of control over cocaine, but not heroin, self-administration in rats, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 222 (2012) 89–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Belin D, Berson N, Balado E, Piazza PV, Deroche-Gamonet V, High-novelty-preference rats are predisposed to compulsive cocaine self-administration, Neuropsychopharmacology 36 (2011) 569–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Pelloux Y, Costentin J, Duterte-Boucher D, Anxiety increases the place conditioning induced by cocaine in rats, Behav. Brain Res 197 (2009) 311–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Belin D, Mar AC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ, High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking, Science 320 (2008) 1352–1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Poulos CX, Le AD, Parker JL, Impulsivity predicts individual susceptibility to high levels of alcohol self-administration, Behav. Pharmacol 6 (1995) 810–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Klebaur JE, Bardo MT, Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 63 (1999) 131–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Merikangas KR, Mehta RL, Molnar BE, Walters EE, Swendsen JD, Aguilar-Gaziola S, Bijl R, Borges G, Caraveo-Anduaga JJ, DeWit DJ, Kolody B, Vega WA, Wittchen HU, Kessler RC, Comorbidity of substance use disorders with mood and anxiety disorders: results of the International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology, Addict. Behav 23 (1998) 893–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Spanagel R, Montkowski A, Allingham K, Stohr T, Shoaib M, Holsboer F, Landgraf R, Anxiety: a potential predictor of vulnerability to the initiation of ethanol self-administration in rats, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 122 (1995) 369–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Kushner MG, Abrams K, Borchardt C, The relationship between anxiety disorders and alcohol use disorders: a review of major perspectives and findings, Clin. Psychol. Rev 20 (2000) 149–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Lopez B, Turner RJ, Saavedra LM, Anxiety and risk for substance dependence among late adolescents/young adults, J. Anxiety Disord 19 (2005) 275–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Marmorstein NR, Anxiety disorders and substance use disorders: different associations by anxiety disorder, J. Anxiety Disord 26 (2012) 88–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Conway KP, Compton W, Stinson FS, Grant BF, Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions, J Clin Psychiatry 67 (2006) 247–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Skinstad AH, Swain A, Comorbidity in a clinical sample of substance abusers, Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 27 (2001) 45–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Ipser JC, Wilson D, Akindipe TO, Sager C, Stein DJ, Pharmacotherapy for anxiety and comorbid alcohol use disorders, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev 1 (2015) CD007505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Kessler RC, Davis CG, Kendler KS, Childhood adversity and adult psychiatric disorder in the US national comorbidity survey, Psychol. Med 27 (1997) 1101–1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC, Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication II: associations with persistence of DSM-IV disorders, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67 (2010) 124–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Green JG, McLaughlin KA, Berglund PA, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC, Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication I: associations with first onset of DSM-IV disorders, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67 (2010) 113–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Douglas KR, Chan G, Gelernter J, Arias AJ, Anton RF, Weiss RD, Brady K, Poling J, Farrer L, Kranzler HR, Adverse childhood events as risk factors for substance dependence: partial mediation by mood and anxiety disorders, Addict. Behav 35 (2010) 7–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M, Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat, J. Neurosci. Methods 14 (1985) 149–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Pellow S, File SE, Anxiolytic and anxiogenic drug effects on exploratory activity in an elevated plus-maze: a novel test of anxiety in the rat, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 24 (1986) 525–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Pascual R, Zamora-Leon SP, Effects of neonatal maternal deprivation and post-weaning environmental complexity on dendritic morphology of prefrontal pyramidal neurons in the rat, Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars) 67 (2007) 471–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Honeycutt JA, Demaestri C, Peterzell S, Silveri MM, Cai X, Kulkarni P, Cunningham MG, Ferris CF, Brenhouse HC, Altered corticolimbic connectivity reveals sex-specific adolescent outcomes in a rat model of early life adversity, Elife 9 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Tschetter KE, Callahan LB, Flynn SA, Rahman S, Beresford TP, Ronan PJ, Early life stress and susceptibility to addiction in adolescence, Int. Rev. Neurobiol 161 (2022) 277–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Li M, Xue X, Shao S, Shao F, Wang W, Cognitive, emotional and neurochemical effects of repeated maternal separation in adolescent rats, Brain Res. 1518 (2013) 82–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].McIntosh J, Anisman H, Merali Z, Short- and long-periods of neonatal maternal separation differentially affect anxiety and feeding in adult rats: gender-dependent effects, Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 113 (1999) 97–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Daniels WM, Pietersen CY, Carstens ME, Stein DJ, Maternal separation in rats leads to anxiety-like behavior and a blunted ACTH response and altered neurotransmitter levels in response to a subsequent stressor, Metab. Brain Dis 19 (2004) 3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Salzberg M, Kumar G, Supit L, Jones NC, Morris MJ, Rees S, O’Brien TJ, Early postnatal stress confers enduring vulnerability to limbic epileptogenesis, Epilepsia 48 (2007) 2079–2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Kalinichev M, Easterling KW, Plotsky PM, Holtzman SG, Long-lasting changes in stress-induced corticosterone response and anxiety-like behaviors as a consequence of neonatal maternal separation in Long-Evans rats, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 73 (2002) 131–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Huot RL, Thrivikraman KV, Meaney MJ, Plotsky PM, Development of adult ethanol preference and anxiety as a consequence of neonatal maternal separation in Long Evans rats and reversal with antidepressant treatment, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158 (2001) 366–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Lee JH, Kim JY, Jahng JW, Highly Palatable food during adolescence improves anxiety-like behaviors and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in rats that experienced neonatal maternal separation, Endocrinol. Metab. (Seoul) 29 (2014) 169–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Maniam J, Morris MJ, Voluntary exercise and palatable high-fat diet both improve behavioural profile and stress responses in male rats exposed to early life stress: role of hippocampus, Psychoneuroendocrinology 35 (2010) 1553–1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Koe AS, Ashokan A, Mitra R, Short environmental enrichment in adulthood reverses anxiety and basolateral amygdala hypertrophy induced by maternal separation, Transl. Psychiatry 6 (2016) e729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Wigger A, Neumann ID, Periodic maternal deprivation induces gender-dependent alterations in behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to emotional stress in adult rats, Physiol. Behav 66 (1999) 293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].de Lima RMS, Dos Santos Bento LV, di Marcello Valladao Lugon M, Barauna VG, Bittencourt AS, Dalmaz C, de Vasconcellos Bittencourt APS, Early life stress and the programming of eating behavior and anxiety: sex-specific relationships with serotonergic activity and hypothalamic neuropeptides, Behav. Brain Res 379 (2020) 112399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Aisa B, Tordera R, Lasheras B, Del Rio J, Ramirez MJ, Effects of maternal separation on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses, cognition and vulnerability to stress in adult female rats, Neuroscience 154 (2008) 1218–1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].He T, Guo C, Wang C, Hu C, Chen H, Effect of early life stress on anxiety and depressive behaviors in adolescent mice, Brain Behav. 10 (2020) e01526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Veenema AH, Bredewold R, Neumann ID, Opposite effects of maternal separation on intermale and maternal aggression in C57BL/6 mice: link to hypothalamic vasopressin and oxytocin immunoreactivity, Psychoneuroendocrinology 32 (2007) 437–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Bondar NP, Lepeshko AA, Reshetnikov VV, Effects of early-life stress on social and anxiety-like behaviors in adult mice: sex-specific effects, Behav. Neurol 2018 (2018) 1538931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Lister RG, Ethologically-based animal models of anxiety disorders, Pharmacol. Ther 46 (1990) 321–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Crawley JN, Exploratory behavior models of anxiety in mice, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 9 (1985) 37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Archer J, Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review, Anim. Behav 21 (1973) 205–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Sharma SS, Srinivas Bharath MM, Doreswamy Y, Laxmi TR, Effects of early life stress during stress hyporesponsive period (SHRP) on anxiety and curiosity in adolescent rats, Exp. Brain Res (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Jin S, Zhao Y, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Li C, Zhang D, Lian B, Du Z, Sun H, Sun L, Anxiety-like behaviour assessments of adolescent rats after repeated maternal separation during early life, Neuroreport 29 (2018) 643–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Demaestri C, Pan T, Critz M, Ofray D, Gallo M, Bath KG, Type of early life adversity confers differential, sex-dependent effects on early maturational milestones in mice, Horm. Behav 124 (2020) 104763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Malcon LMC, Wearick-Silva LE, Zaparte A, Orso R, Luft C, Tractenberg SG, Donadio MVF, de Oliveira JR, Grassi-Oliveira R, Maternal separation induces long-term oxidative stress alterations and increases anxiety-like behavior of male Balb/cJ mice, Exp. Brain Res 238 (2020) 2097–2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Kestering-Ferreira E, Tractenberg SG, Lumertz FS, Orso R, Creutzberg KC, Wearick-Silva LE, Viola TW, Grassi-Oliveira R, Long-term effects of maternal separation on anxiety-like behavior and neuroendocrine parameters in adult Balb/c mice, Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 5 (2021) 24705470211067181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Tsuda MC, Ogawa S, Long-lasting consequences of neonatal maternal separation on social behaviors in ovariectomized female mice, PLoS ONE 7 (2012) e33028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Lambas-Senas L, Mnie-Filali O, Certin V, Faure C, Lemoine L, Zimmer L, Haddjeri N, Functional correlates for 5-HT(1A) receptors in maternally deprived rats displaying anxiety and depression-like behaviors, Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 33 (2009) 262–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Ogawa T, Mikuni M, Kuroda Y, Muneoka K, Mori KJ, Takahashi K, Periodic maternal deprivation alters stress response in adult offspring: potentiates the negative feedback regulation of restraint stress-induced adrenocortical response and reduces the frequencies of open field-induced behaviors, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 49 (1994) 961–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Romeo RD, Mueller A, Sisti HM, Ogawa S, McEwen BS, Brake WG, Anxiety and fear behaviors in adult male and female C57BL/6 mice are modulated by maternal separation, Horm. Behav 43 (2003) 561–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Guan J, Ding Y, Rong Y, Geng Y, Lai L, Qi D, Tang Y, Yang L, Li J, Zhou T, Wu E, Wu R, Early life stress increases brain glutamate and induces neurobehavioral manifestations in rats, ACS Chem. Neurosci 11 (2020) 4169–4178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Zolfaghari FS, Pirri F, Gauvin E, Peeri M, Amiri S, Exercise and fluoxetine treatment during adolescence protect against early life stress-induced behavioral abnormalities in adult rats, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 205 (2021) 173190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Qin X, Liu XX, Wang Y, Wang D, Song Y, Zou JX, Pan HQ, Zhai XZ, Zhang YM, Zhang YB, Hu P, Zhang WH, Early life stress induces anxiety-like behavior during adulthood through dysregulation of neuronal plasticity in the basolateral amygdala, Life Sci. 285 (2021) 119959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Dimatelis JJ, Vermeulen IM, Bugarith K, Stein DJ, Russell VA, Female rats are resistant to developing the depressive phenotype induced by maternal separation stress, Metab. Brain Dis 31 (2016) 109–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Shephard RA, Broadhurst PL, Effects of diazepam and picrotoxin on hyponeophagia in rats, Neuropharmacology 21 (1982) 771–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Britton DR, Britton KT, A sensitive open field measure of anxiolytic drug activity, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 15 (1981) 577–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Delini-Stula A, Hunn C, Differential effects of anxiolytics and beta-receptor blocking drugs on novelty-oriented (“neophobic’) behavior in the rat, Pharmacopsychiatry 21 (1988) 186–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Stout JC, Weiss JM, An animal model for measuring behavioral responses to anxiogenic and anxiolytic manipulations, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 47 (1994) 459–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Grissom EM, Hawley WR, Bromley-Dulfano SS, Marino SE, Stathopoulos NG, Dohanich GP, Learning strategy is influenced by trait anxiety and early rearing conditions in prepubertal male, but not prepubertal female rats, Neurobiol. Learn. Mem 98 (2012) 174–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Macri S, Mason GJ, Wurbel H, Dissociation in the effects of neonatal maternal separations on maternal care and the offspring’s HPA and fear responses in rats, Eur. J. Neurosci 20 (2004) 1017–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Molet J, Heins K, Zhuo X, Mei YT, Regev L, Baram TZ, Stern H, Fragmentation and high entropy of neonatal experience predict adolescent emotional outcome, Transl. Psychiatry 6 (2016) e702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Guadagno A, Wong TP, Walker CD, Morphological and functional changes in the preweaning basolateral amygdala induced by early chronic stress associate with anxiety and fear behavior in adult male, but not female rats, Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 81 (2018) 25–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Prusator DK, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B, Gender specific effects of neonatal limited nesting on viscerosomatic sensitivity and anxiety-like behavior in adult rats, Neurogastroenterol. Motil 27 (2015) 72–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Maniam J, Antoniadis CP, Le V, Morris MJ, A diet high in fat and sugar reverses anxiety-like behaviour induced by limited nesting in male rats: impacts on hippocampal markers, Psychoneuroendocrinology 68 (2016) 202–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Dalle Molle R, Portella AK, Goldani MZ, Kapczinski FP, Leistner-Segal S, Salum GA, Manfro GG, Silveira PP, Associations between parenting behavior and anxiety in a rodent model and a clinical sample: relationship to peripheral BDNF levels, Transl. Psychiatry 2 (2012) e195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Naninck EF, Hoeijmakers L, Kakava-Georgiadou N, Meesters A, Lazic SE, Lucassen PJ, Korosi A, Chronic early life stress alters developmental and adult neurogenesis and impairs cognitive function in mice, Hippocampus 25 (2015) 309–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Wang XD, Labermaier C, Holsboer F, Wurst W, Deussing JM, Muller MB, Schmidt MV, Early-life stress-induced anxiety-related behavior in adult mice partially requires forebrain corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1, Eur. J. Neurosci 36 (2012) 2360–2367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Goodwill HL, Manzano-Nieves G, Gallo M, Lee HI, Oyerinde E, Serre T, Bath KG, Early life stress leads to sex differences in development of depressive-like outcomes in a mouse model, Neuropsychopharmacology 44 (2019) 711–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Doherty TS, Blaze J, Keller SM, Roth TL, Phenotypic outcomes in adolescence and adulthood in the scarcity-adversity model of low nesting resources outside the home cage, Dev. Psychobiol 59 (2017) 703–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Gallo M, Shleifer DG, Godoy LD, Ofray D, Olaniyan A, Campbell T, Bath KG, Limited bedding and nesting induces maternal behavior resembling both hypervigilance and abuse, Front. Behav. Neurosci 13 (2019) 167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Machado TD, Dalle Molle R, Laureano DP, Portella AK, Werlang IC, Benetti Cda S, Noschang C, Silveira PP, Early life stress is associated with anxiety, increased stress responsivity and preference for “comfort foods” in adult female rats, Stress 16 (2013) 549–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Fernandes C, Gonzalez MI, Wilson CA, File SE, Factor analysis shows that female rat behaviour is characterized primarily by activity, male rats are driven by sex and anxiety, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 64 (1999) 731–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Simpson J, Ryan C, Curley A, Mulcaire J, Kelly JP, Sex differences in baseline and drug-induced behavioural responses in classical behavioural tests, Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 37 (2012) 227–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Lynn DA, Brown GR, The ontogeny of exploratory behavior in male and female adolescent rats (Rattus norvegicus), Dev. Psychobiol 51 (2009) 513–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].Johnston AL, File SE, Sex differences in animal tests of anxiety, Physiol. Behav 49 (1991) 245–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [158].Dalley JW, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW, Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control, Neuron 69 (2011) 680–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Perry JL, Carroll ME, The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 200 (2008) 1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [160].Wit H.d., Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes, Addict. Biol 14 (2009) 22–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].Dawe S, Loxton NJ, The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 28 (2004) 343–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Hanson KL, Luciana M, Sullwold K, Reward-related decision-making deficits and elevated impulsivity among MDMA and other drug users, Drug Alcohol Depend 96 (2008) 99–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Barratt ES, Oderinde V, Mathias CW, Harper RA, Swann AC, Increased impulsivity in cocaine dependent subjects independent of antisocial personality disorder and aggression, Drug Alcohol Depend 68 (2002) 105–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Petry NM, Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 154 (2001) 243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Dolan SL, Bechara A, Nathan PE, Executive dysfunction as a risk marker for substance abuse: the role of impulsive personality traits, Behav. Sci. Law 26 (2008) 799–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Impulsivity and substance abuse: what is the connection? Addict. Disord. Treat 1 (2002) 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Lejuez CW, Magidson JF, Mitchell SH, Sinha R, Stevens MC, de Wit H, Behavioral and biological indicators of impulsivity in the development of alcohol use, problems, and disorders, Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 34 (2010) 1334–1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].Iacono WG, Malone SM, McGue M, Behavioral disinhibition and the development of early-onset addiction: common and specific influences, Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol 4 (2008) 325–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Allen TJ, Moeller FG, Rhoades HM, Cherek DR, Impulsivity and history of drug dependence, Drug Alcohol Depend 50 (1998) 137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Argyriou E, Um M, Carron C, Cyders MA, Age and impulsive behavior in drug addiction: a review of past research and future directions, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 164 (2018) 106–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Jordan CJ, Andersen SL, Sensitive periods of substance abuse: early risk for the transition to dependence, Dev. Cogn. Neurosci 25 (2017) 29–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].Chambers RA, Taylor JR, Potenza MN, Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability, Am. J. Psychiatry 160 (2003) 1041–1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].Collado A, Felton JW, MacPherson L, Lejuez CW, Longitudinal trajectories of sensation seeking, risk taking propensity, and impulsivity across early to middle adolescence, Addict. Behav 39 (2014) 1580–1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Doremus-Fitzwater TL, Barreto M, Spear LP, Age-related differences in impulsivity among adolescent and adult Sprague-Dawley rats, Behav. Neurosci 126 (2012) 735–741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].Shin SH, Chung Y, Jeon SM, Impulsivity and substance use in young adulthood, Am. J. Addict 22 (2013) 39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Quinn PD, Harden KP, Differential changes in impulsivity and sensation seeking and the escalation of substance use from adolescence to early adulthood, Dev. Psychopathol 25 (2013) 223–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Elkins IJ, King SM, McGue M, Iacono WG, Personality traits and the development of nicotine, alcohol, and illicit drug disorders: prospective links from adolescence to young adulthood, J. Abnorm. Psychol 115 (2006) 26–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Kong G, Smith AE, McMahon TJ, Cavallo DA, Schepis TS, Desai RA, Potenza MN, Krishnan-Sarin S, Pubertal status, sensation-seeking, impulsivity, and substance use in high school-aged boys and girls, J. Addict. Med 7 (2013) 116–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Kim ST, Hwang SS, Kim HW, Hwang EH, Cho J, Kang JI, Kim SJ, Multi-dimensional impulsivity as a mediator of early life stress and alcohol dependence, Sci. Rep 8 (2018) 4104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Duckworth AL, Kim B, Tsukayama E, Life stress impairs self-control in early adolescence, Front. Psychol 3 (2012) 608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Hostinar CE, Stellern SA, Schaefer C, Carlson SM, Gunnar MR, Associations between early life adversity and executive function in children adopted internationally from orphanages, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 109 (Suppl 2) (2012) 17208–17212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Lovallo WR, Early life adversity reduces stress reactivity and enhances impulsive behavior: implications for health behaviors, Int. J. Psychophysiol 90 (2013) 8–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Oshri A, Kogan SM, Kwon JA, Wickrama KAS, Vanderbroek L, Palmer AA, MacKillop J, Impulsivity as a mechanism linking child abuse and neglect with substance use in adolescence and adulthood, Dev. Psychopathol 30 (2018) 417–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Hentges RF, Shaw DS, Wang MT, Early childhood parenting and child impulsivity as precursors to aggression, substance use, and risky sexual behavior in adolescence and early adulthood, Dev. Psychopathol 30 (2018) 1305–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Levitt EE, Amlung MT, Gonzalez A, Oshri A, MacKillop J, Consistent evidence of indirect effects of impulsive delay discounting and negative urgency between childhood adversity and adult substance use in two samples, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 238 (2021) 2011–2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Chugani HT, Behen ME, Muzik O, Juhasz C, Nagy F, Chugani DC, Local brain functional activity following early deprivation: a study of postinstitutionalized Romanian orphans, Neuroimage 14 (2001) 1290–1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Green AH, Self-destructive behavior in battered children, Am. J. Psychiatry 135 (1978) 579–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Acheson A, Behavioral processes and risk for problem substance use in adolescents, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 198 (2020) 173021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Winstanley CA, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Jentsch JD, Insight into the relationship between impulsivity and substance abuse from studies using animal models, Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 34 (2010) 1306–1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Jupp B, Caprioli D, Dalley JW, Highly impulsive rats: modelling an endophenotype to determine the neurobiological, genetic and environmental mechanisms of addiction, Dis. Model. Mech 6 (2013) 302–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Anker JJ, Perry JL, Gliddon LA, Carroll ME, Impulsivity predicts the escalation of cocaine self-administration in rats, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 93 (2009) 343–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Perry JL, Nelson SE, Carroll ME, Impulsive choice as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in male and female rats, Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol 16 (2008) 165–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Ordones Sanchez E, Bavley CC, Deutschmann AU, Carpenter R, Peterson DR, Karbalaei R, Flowers J 2nd, Rogers CM, Langrehr MG, Ardekani CS, Famularo ST, Bongiovanni AR, Knouse MC, Floresco SB, Briand LA, Wimmer ME, Bangasser DA, Early life adversity promotes resilience to opioid addiction-related phenotypes in male rats and sex-specific transcriptional changes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Lovic V, Keen D, Fletcher PJ, Fleming AS, Early-life maternal separation and social isolation produce an increase in impulsive action but not impulsive choice, Behav. Neurosci 125 (2011) 481–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Fuentes S, Daviu N, Gagliano H, Garrido P, Zelena D, Monasterio N, Armario A, Nadal R, Sex-dependent effects of an early life treatment in rats that increases maternal care: vulnerability or resilience? Front. Behav. Neurosci 8 (2014) 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR, A psychobiological model of temperament and character, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 50 (1993) 975–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Zuckerman M, The sensation seeking motive, Prog. Exp. Pers. Res 7 (1974) 79–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Zuckerman M, Neeb M, Sensation seeking and psychopathology, Psychiatry Res. 1 (1979) 255–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Franques P, Auriacombe M, Tignol J, Addiction and personality, Encephale 26 (2000) 68–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].Hittner JB, Swickert R, Sensation seeking and alcohol use: a meta-analytic review, Addict. Behav 31 (2006) 1383–1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Arnett J, Sensation seeking: a new conceptualization and a new scale, Pers. Individ. Dif 16 (1994) 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  • [202].Cross CP, Cyrenne DL, Brown GR, Sex differences in sensation-seeking: a meta–analysis, Sci. Rep 3 (2013) 2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [203].Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H, Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration, Science 245 (1989) 1511–1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [204].Dellu F, Piazza PV, Mayo W, Le Moal M, Simon H, Novelty-seeking in rats–biobehavioral characteristics and possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man, Neuropsychobiology 34 (1996) 136–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [205].Belin D, Deroche-Gamonet V, Responses to novelty and vulnerability to cocaine addiction: contribution of a multi-symptomatic animal model, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med 2 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [206].Laviola G, Macri S, Morley-Fletcher S, Adriani W, Risk-taking behavior in adolescent mice: psychobiological determinants and early epigenetic influence, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 27 (2003) 19–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [207].Arnett J, Reckless behavior in adolescence: a developmental perspective, Dev. Rev 12 (1992) 339–373. [Google Scholar]
  • [208].Kelley AE, Schochet T, Landry CF, Risk taking and novelty seeking in adolescence: introduction to part I, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 1021 (2004) 27–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [209].Stansfield KH, Philpot RM, Kirstein CL, An animal model of sensation seeking: the adolescent rat, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 1021 (2004) 453–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [210].Spear LP, The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 24 (2000) 417–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [211].Steinberg L, A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking, Dev. Psychobiol 52 (2010) 216–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [212].Braams BR, van Duijvenvoorde AC, Peper JS, Crone EA, Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior, J. Neurosci 35 (2015) 7226–7238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [213].Steinberg L, Albert D, Cauffman E, Banich M, Graham S, Woolard J, Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model, Dev. Psychol 44 (2008) 1764–1778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [214].Doremus-Fitzwater TL, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP, Motivational systems in adolescence: possible implications for age differences in substance abuse and other risk-taking behaviors, Brain Cogn. 72 (2010) 114–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [215].MacPherson L, Magidson JF, Reynolds EK, Kahler CW, Lejuez CW, Changes in sensation seeking and risk-taking propensity predict increases in alcohol use among early adolescents, Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 34 (2010) 1400–1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [216].Wills TA, Vaccaro D, McNamara G, Novelty seeking, risk taking, and related constructs as predictors of adolescent substance use: an application of Cloninger’s theory, J. Subst. Abuse 6 (1994) 1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [217].Gerra G, Angioni L, Zaimovic A, Moi G, Bussandri M, Bertacca S, Santoro G, Gardini S, Caccavari R, Nicoli MA, Substance use among high-school students: relationships with temperament, personality traits, and parental care perception, Subst. Use Misuse 39 (2004) 345–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [218].Berlyne DE, Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behavior, Br. J. Psychol 41 (1950) 68–80. [Google Scholar]
  • [219].Berlyne DE, The arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol 48 (1955) 238–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [220].Berlyne DE, Slater J, Perceptual curiosity exploratory behavior, and maze learning, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol 50 (1957) 228–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [221].Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr, Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine, Synapse 9 (1991) 121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [222].Pelloux Y, Costentin J, Duterte-Boucher D, Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 171 (2004) 277–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [223].Sell SL, Dillon AM, Cunningham KA, Thomas ML, Estrous cycle influence on individual differences in the response to novelty and cocaine in female rats, Behav. Brain Res 161 (2005) 69–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [224].Davis BA, Clinton SM, Akil H, Becker JB, The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred high-responder and low-responder rats, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 90 (2008) 331–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [225].Meyerson BJ, Augustsson H, Berg M, Roman E, The concentric square field: a multivariate test arena for analysis of explorative strategies, Behav. Brain Res 168 (2006) 100–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [226].Roman E, Gustafsson L, Berg M, Nylander I, Behavioral profiles and stress-induced corticosteroid secretion in male Wistar rats subjected to short and prolonged periods of maternal separation, Horm. Behav 50 (2006) 736–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [227].Marmendal M, Eriksson CJ, Fahlke C, Early deprivation increases exploration and locomotion in adult male Wistar offspring, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 85 (2006) 535–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [228].Lundberg S, Abelson KSP, Nylander I, Roman E, Few long-term consequences after prolonged maternal separation in female Wistar rats, PLoS ONE 12 (2017) e0190042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [229].Slotten HA, Kalinichev M, Hagan JJ, Marsden CA, Fone KC, Long-lasting changes in behavioural and neuroendocrine indices in the rat following neonatal maternal separation: gender-dependent effects, Brain Res. 1097 (2006) 123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [230].Nicholls B, Springham A, Mellanby J, The playground maze: a new method for measuring directed exploration in the rat, J. Neurosci. Methods 43 (1992) 171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [231].Hall FS, Humby T, Wilkinson LS, Robbins TW, The effects of isolation-rearing on preference by rats for a novel environment, Physiol. Behav 62 (1997) 299–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [232].Rothman EF, Edwards EM, Heeren T, Hingson RW, Adverse childhood experiences predict earlier age of drinking onset: results from a representative US sample of current or former drinkers, Pediatrics 122 (2008) e298–e304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [233].Lacey RE, Zilanawala A, Webb E, Abell J, Bell S, Parental absence in early childhood and onset of smoking and alcohol consumption before adolescence, Arch. Dis. Child 103 (2018) 691–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [234].Shin SH, Edwards EM, Heeren T, Child abuse and neglect: relations to adolescent binge drinking in the national longitudinal study of adolescent health (AddHealth) study, Addict. Behav 34 (2009) 277–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [235].Hingson RW, Zha W, Age of drinking onset, alcohol use disorders, frequent heavy drinking, and unintentionally injuring oneself and others after drinking, Pediatrics 123 (2009) 1477–1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [236].Hingson RW, Edwards EM, Heeren T, Rosenbloom D, Age of drinking onset and injuries, motor vehicle crashes, and physical fights after drinking and when not drinking, Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 33 (2009) 783–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [237].Jenkins MB, Agrawal A, Lynskey MT, Nelson EC, Madden PA, Bucholz KK, Heath AC, Correlates of alcohol abuse/dependence in early-onset alcohol-using women, Am. J. Addict 20 (2011) 429–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [238].Lee RD, Chen J, Adverse childhood experiences, mental health, and excessive alcohol use: examination of race/ethnicity and sex differences, Child Abuse Negl. 69 (2017) 40–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [239].Fenton MC, Geier T, Keyes K, Skodol AE, Grant BF, Hasin DS, Combined role of childhood maltreatment, family history, and gender in the risk for alcohol dependence, Psychol. Med 43 (2013) 1045–1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [240].Roman E, Ploj K, Nylander I, Maternal separation has no effect on voluntary ethanol intake in female Wistar rats, Alcohol 33 (2004) 31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [241].Cruz FC, Quadros IM, da S Planeta C, Miczek KA, Maternal separation stress in male mice: long-term increases in alcohol intake, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 201 (2008) 459–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [242].Roman E, Gustafsson L, Hyytia P, Nylander I, Short and prolonged periods of maternal separation and voluntary ethanol intake in male and female ethanol-preferring AA and ethanol-avoiding ANA rats, Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 29 (2005) 591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [243].Ploj K, Roman E, Nylander I, Long-term effects of maternal separation on ethanol intake and brain opioid and dopamine receptors in male Wistar rats, Neuroscience 121 (2003) 787–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [244].Amancio-Belmont O, Becerril Melendez AL, Ruiz-Contreras AE, Mendez–Diaz M, Prospero-Garcia O, Maternal separation plus social isolation during adolescence reprogram brain dopamine and endocannabinoid systems and facilitate alcohol intake in rats, Brain Res. Bull 164 (2020) 21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [245].Romano-Lopez A, Mendez-Diaz M, Ruiz-Contreras AE, Carrisoza R, Prosper-o-Garcia O, Maternal separation and proclivity for ethanol intake: a potential role of the endocannabinoid system in rats, Neuroscience 223 (2012) 296–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [246].Thompson SM, Simmons AN, McMurray MS, The effects of multiple early life stressors on adolescent alcohol consumption, Behav. Brain Res 380 (2020) 112449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [247].de Almeida Magalhaes T, Correia D, de Carvalho LM, Damasceno S, Brunialti Godard AL, Maternal separation affects expression of stress response genes and increases vulnerability to ethanol consumption, Brain Behav. 8 (2018) e00841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [248].Bassey RB, Gondre-Lewis MC, Combined early life stressors: prenatal nicotine and maternal deprivation interact to influence affective and drug seeking behavioral phenotypes in rats, Behav. Brain Res 359 (2019) 814–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [249].Gondre-Lewis MC, Warnock KT, Wang H, June HL Jr, Bell KA, Rabe H, Tiruveedhula VV, Cook J, Luddens H, Aurelian L, June HL Sr, Early life stress is a risk factor for excessive alcohol drinking and impulsivity in adults and is mediated via a CRF/GABA(A) mechanism, Stress 19 (2016) 235–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [250].Gondre-Lewis MC, Darius PJ, Wang H, Allard JS, Stereological analyses of reward system nuclei in maternally deprived/separated alcohol drinking rats, J. Chem. Neuroanat 76 (2016) 122–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [251].Okhuarobo A, Bolton JL, Igbe I, Zorrilla EP, Baram TZ, Contet C, A novel mouse model for vulnerability to alcohol dependence induced by early-life adversity, Neurobiol. Stress 13 (2020) 100269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [252].Huang S, Trapido E, Fleming L, Arheart K, Crandall L, French M, Malcolm S, Prado G, The long-term effects of childhood maltreatment experiences on subsequent illicit drug use and drug-related problems in young adulthood, Addict. Behav 36 (2011) 95–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [253].King KM, Chassin L, A prospective study of the effects of age of initiation of alcohol and drug use on young adult substance dependence, J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 68 (2007) 256–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [254].Kirsch DE, Lippard ETC, Early life stress and substance use disorders: the critical role of adolescent substance use, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 215 (2022) 173360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [255].Sanchis-Segura C, Spanagel R, Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: an overview, Addict. Biol 11 (2006) 2–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [256].Steketee JD, Kalivas PW, Drug wanting: behavioral sensitization and relapse to drug-seeking behavior, Pharmacol. Rev 63 (2011) 348–365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [257].Bardo MT, Bevins RA, Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153 (2000) 31–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [258].Faure J, Stein DJ, Daniels W, Maternal separation fails to render animals more susceptible to methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference, Metab. Brain Dis 24 (2009) 541–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [259].Dimatelis JJ, Russell VA, Stein DJ, Daniels WM, The effects of lobeline and naltrexone on methamphetamine-induced place preference and striatal dopamine and serotonin levels in adolescent rats with a history of maternal separation, Metab. Brain Dis 27 (2012) 351–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [260].Pritchard LM, Hensleigh E, Lynch S, Altered locomotor and stereotyped responses to acute methamphetamine in adolescent, maternally separated rats, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 223 (2012) 27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [261].Ganguly P, Honeycutt JA, Rowe JR, Demaestri C, Brenhouse HC, Effects of early life stress on cocaine conditioning and AMPA receptor composition are sex-specific and driven by TNF, Brain Behav. Immun 78 (2019) 41–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [262].Planeta CS, Marin MT, Effect of cocaine on periadolescent rats with or without early maternal separation, Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res 35 (2002) 1367–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [263].Brake WG, Zhang TY, Diorio J, Meaney MJ, Gratton A, Influence of early postnatal rearing conditions on mesocorticolimbic dopamine and behavioural responses to psychostimulants and stressors in adult rats, Eur. J. Neurosci 19 (2004) 1863–1874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [264].Moffett MC, Harley J, Francis D, Sanghani SP, Davis WI, Kuhar MJ, Maternal separation and handling affects cocaine self-administration in both the treated pups as adults and the dams, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 317 (2006) 1210–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [265].Chocyk A, Przyborowska A, Dudys D, Majcher I, Mackowiak M, Wedzony K, The impact of maternal separation on the number of tyrosine hydroxylase-expressing midbrain neurons during different stages of ontogenesis, Neuroscience 182 (2011) 43–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [266].Li Y, Robinson TE, Bhatnagar S, Effects of maternal separation on behavioural sensitization produced by repeated cocaine administration in adulthood, Brain Res. 960 (2003) 42–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [267].Lewis CR, Staudinger K, Scheck L, Olive MF, The effects of maternal separation on adult methamphetamine self-administration, extinction, reinstatement, and MeCP2 immunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens, Front. Psychiatry 4 (2013) 55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [268].Lewis CR, Bastle RM, Manning TB, Himes SM, Fennig P, Conrad PR, Colwell J, Pagni BA, Hess LA, Matekel CG, Newbern JM, Olive MF, Interactions between early life stress, nucleus accumbens MeCP2 expression, and methamphetamine self-administration in male rats, Neuropsychopharmacology 41 (2016) 2851–2861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [269].O’Connor RM, Moloney RD, Glennon J, Vlachou S, Cryan JF, Enhancing glutamatergic transmission during adolescence reverses early-life stress-induced deficits in the rewarding effects of cocaine in rats, Neuropharmacology 99 (2015) 168–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [270].Bolton JL, Ruiz CM, Rismanchi N, Sanchez GA, Castillo E, Huang J, Cross C, Baram TZ, Mahler SV, Early-life adversity facilitates acquisition of cocaine self-administration and induces persistent anhedonia, Neurobiol. Stress 8 (2018) 57–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [271].Mitchell SJ, Maguire EP, Cunningham L, Gunn BG, Linke M, Zechner U, Dixon CI, King SL, Stephens DN, Swinny JD, Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Early-life adversity selectively impairs alpha2-GABAA receptor expression in the mouse nucleus accumbens and influences the behavioral effects of cocaine, Neuropharmacology 141 (2018) 98–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [272].Vazquez V, Penit-Soria J, Durand C, Besson MJ, Giros B, Dauge V, Maternal deprivation increases vulnerability to morphine dependence and disturbs the enkephalinergic system in adulthood, J. Neurosci 25 (2005) 4453–4462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [273].Vazquez V, Giros B, Dauge V, Maternal deprivation specifically enhances vulnerability to opiate dependence, Behav. Pharmacol 17 (2006) 715–724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [274].Kalinichev M, Easterling KW, Holtzman SG, Early neonatal experience of Long-Evans rats results in long-lasting changes in reactivity to a novel environment and morphine-induced sensitization and tolerance, Neuropsychopharmacology 27 (2002) 518–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [275].Michaels CC, Holtzman SG, Early postnatal stress alters place conditioning to both mu-and kappa-opioid agonists, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 325 (2008) 313–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [276].Abad AT, Miladi-Gorji H, Bigdeli I, Effects of swimming exercise on morphine-induced reward and behavioral sensitization in maternally-separated rat pups in the conditioned place preference procedure, Neurosci. Lett 631 (2016) 79–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [277].Mohammadian J, Najafi M, Miladi-Gorji H, Effect of enriched environment during adolescence on spatial learning and memory, and voluntary consumption of morphine in maternally separated rats in adulthood, Dev. Psychobiol 61 (2019) 615–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [278].Tesone-Coelho C, Morel LJ, Bhatt J, Estevez L, Naudon L, Giros B, Zwiller J, Dauge V, Vulnerability to opiate intake in maternally deprived rats: implication of MeCP2 and of histone acetylation, Addict. Biol 20 (2015) 120–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [279].Levis SC, Bentzley BS, Molet J, Bolton JL, Perrone CR, Baram TZ, Mahler SV, On the early life origins of vulnerability to opioid addiction, Mol. Psychiatry 26 (2021) 4409–4416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [280].Levis SC, Birnie MT, Bolton JL, Perrone CR, Montesinos JS, Baram TZ, Mahler SV, Enduring disruption of reward and stress circuit activities by early-life adversity in male rats, Transl. Psychiatry 12 (2022) 251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [281].Leyrer-Jackson JM, Overby PF, Nagy EK, Olive MF, Early life stress promotes heroin seeking but does not alter the excitability of insular pyramidal cells targeting the nucleus accumbens, Front. Behav. Neurosci 15 (2021) 777826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [282].Sanchez EO, Bangasser DA, The effects of early life stress on impulsivity, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 137 (2022) 104638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [283].Hajnal A, Smith GP, Norgren R, Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 286 (2004) R31–R37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [284].Hajnal A, Norgren R, Accumbens dopamine mechanisms in sucrose intake, Brain Res. 904 (2001) 76–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [285].Martel P, Fantino M, Mesolimbic dopaminergic system activity as a function of food reward: a microdialysis study, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 53 (1996) 221–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [286].Damsma G, Pfaus JG, Wenkstern D, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC, Sexual behavior increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of male rats: comparison with novelty and locomotion, Behav. Neurosci 106 (1992) 181–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [287].Pfaus JG, Damsma G, Wenkstern D, Fibiger HC, Sexual activity increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of female rats, Brain Res. 693 (1995) 21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [288].Gambarana C, Masi F, Leggio B, Grappi S, Nanni G, Scheggi S, De Montis MG, Tagliamonte A, Acquisition of a palatable-food-sustained appetitive behavior in satiated rats is dependent on the dopaminergic response to this food in limbic areas, Neuroscience 121 (2003) 179–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [289].Manduca A, Servadio M, Damsteegt R, Campolongo P, Vanderschuren LJ, Trezza V, Dopaminergic neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens modulates social play behavior in rats, Neuropsychopharmacology 41 (2016) 2215–2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [290].Vanderschuren LJ, Niesink RJ, Van Ree JM, The neurobiology of social play behavior in rats, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 21 (1997) 309–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [291].Gunaydin LA, Grosenick L, Finkelstein JC, Kauvar IV, Fenno LE, Adhikari A, Lammel S, Mirzabekov JJ, Airan RD, Zalocusky KA, Tye KM, Anikeeva P, Malenka RC, Deisseroth K, Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior, Cell 157 (2014) 1535–1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [292].Duque-Quintero M, Hooijmans CR, Hurowitz A, Ahmed A, Barris B, Homberg JR, Hen R, Harris AZ, Balsam P, Atsak P, Enduring effects of early-life adversity on reward processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 142 (2022) 104849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [293].Novick AM, Levandowski ML, Laumann LE, Philip NS, Price LH, Tyrka AR, The effects of early life stress on reward processing, J. Psychiatr Res 101 (2018) 80–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [294].Herzberg MP, Gunnar MR, Early life stress and brain function: activity and connectivity associated with processing emotion and reward, Neuroimage 209 (2020) 116493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [295].Hanson JL, Albert D, Iselin AM, Carre JM, Dodge KA, Hariri AR, Cumulative stress in childhood is associated with blunted reward-related brain activity in adulthood, Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci 11 (2016) 405–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [296].Hall WG, Bryan TE, The ontogeny of feeding in rats: IV. Taste development as measured by intake and behavioral responses to oral infusions of sucrose and quinine, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol 95 (1981) 240–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [297].Vigorito M, Sclafani A, Ontogeny of polycose and sucrose appetite in neonatal rats, Dev. Psychobiol 21 (1988) 457–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [298].Maniam J, Morris MJ, Palatable cafeteria diet ameliorates anxiety and depression-like symptoms following an adverse early environment, Psychoneuroendocrinology 35 (2010) 717–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [299].Hui JJ, Zhang ZJ, Liu SS, Xi GJ, Zhang XR, Teng GJ, Chan KC, Wu EX, Nie BB, Shan BC, Li LJ, Reynolds GP, Hippocampal neurochemistry is involved in the behavioural effects of neonatal maternal separation and their reversal by post-weaning environmental enrichment: a magnetic resonance study, Behav. Brain Res 217 (2011) 122–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [300].Oines E, Murison R, Mrdalj J, Gronli J, Milde AM, Neonatal maternal separation in male rats increases intestinal permeability and affects behavior after chronic social stress, Physiol. Behav 105 (2012) 1058–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [301].Amini-Khoei H, Mohammadi-Asl A, Amiri S, Hosseini MJ, Momeny M, Hassanipour M, Rastegar M, Haj-Mirzaian A, Mirzaian AH, Sanjarimoghaddam H, Mehr SE, Dehpour AR, Oxytocin mitigated the depressive-like behaviors of maternal separation stress through modulating mitochondrial function and neuroinflammation, Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 76 (2017) 169–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [302].Masrour FF, Peeri M, Azarbayjani MA, Hosseini MJ, Voluntary exercise during adolescence mitigated negative the effects of maternal separation stress on the depressive-like behaviors of adult male rats: role of NMDA receptors, Neurochem. Res 43 (2018) 1067–1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [303].Chocyk A, Majcher-Maslanka I, Przyborowska A, Mackowiak M, Wedzony K, Early-life stress increases the survival of midbrain neurons during postnatal development and enhances reward-related and anxiolytic-like behaviors in a sex-dependent fashion, Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 44 (2015) 33–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [304].Sadeghi M, Peeri M, Hosseini MJ, Adolescent voluntary exercise attenuated hippocampal innate immunity responses and depressive-like behaviors following maternal separation stress in male rats, Physiol. Behav 163 (2016) 177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [305].Huang J, Shen C, Ye R, Shi Y, Li W, The effect of early maternal separation combined with adolescent chronic unpredictable mild stress on behavior and synaptic plasticity in adult female rats, Front. Psychiatry 12 (2021) 539299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [306].Ye Y, Yao S, Wang R, Fang Z, Zhong K, Nie L, Zhang Q, PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB signaling pathway regulates behaviors in adolescent female rats following with neonatal maternal deprivation and chronic mild stress, Behav. Brain Res 362 (2019) 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [307].Michaels CC, Holtzman SG, Neonatal stress and litter composition alter sucrose intake in both rat dam and offspring, Physiol. Behav 89 (2006) 735–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [308].Shalev U, Kafkafi N, Repeated maternal separation does not alter sucrose-reinforced and open-field behaviors, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 73 (2002) 115–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [309].Campbell EJ, Mitchell CS, Adams CD, Yeoh JW, Hodgson DM, Graham BA, Dayas CV, Chemogenetic activation of the lateral hypothalamus reverses early life stress-induced deficits in motivational drive, Eur. J. Neurosci 46 (2017) 2285–2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [310].Noh VRSJ, Yoo SB, Lee JH, Min BM, Jahng JW, Suppressed intake of highly palatable food and dysfunction of the HPA axis activity responding to restraint stress in adolescent rats that experienced neonatal maternal separation, Appetite 51 (2008) 388. [Google Scholar]
  • [311].de Souza JA, da Silva MC, de Matos RJB, do Amaral Almeida LC, Beltrao LC, de Souza FL, de Castro RM, de Souza SL, Pre-weaning maternal separation increases eating later in life in male and female offspring, but increases brainstem dopamine receptor 1a and 2a only in males, Appetite 123 (2018) 114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [312].Bolton JL, Molet J, Regev L, Chen Y, Rismanchi N, Haddad E, Yang DZ, Obenaus A, Baram TZ, Anhedonia following early-life adversity involves aberrant interaction of reward and anxiety circuits and is reversed by partial silencing of amygdala corticotropin-releasing hormone gene, Biol. Psychiatry 83 (2018) 137–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [313].Yan CG, Rincon-Cortes M, Raineki C, Sarro E, Colcombe S, Guilfoyle DN, Yang Z, Gerum S, Biswal BB, Milham MP, Sullivan RM, Castellanos FX, Aberrant development of intrinsic brain activity in a rat model of caregiver maltreatment of offspring, Transl. Psychiatry 7 (2017) e1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [314].Kangas BD, Short AK, Luc OT, Stern HS, Baram TZ, Pizzagalli DA, A cross-species assay demonstrates that reward responsiveness is enduringly impacted by adverse, unpredictable early-life experiences, Neuropsychopharmacology 47 (2022) 767–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [315].Liu X, Sun YX, Zhang CC, Zhang XQ, Zhang Y, Wang T, Ma YN, Wang H, Su YA, Li JT, Si TM, Vortioxetine attenuates the effects of early-life stress on depression-like behaviors and monoamine transporters in female mice, Neuropharmacology 186 (2021) 108468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [316].Wendel KM, Short AK, Noarbe BP, Haddad E, Palma AM, Yassa MA, Baram TZ, Obenaus A, Early life adversity in male mice sculpts reward circuits, Neurobiol. Stress 15 (2021) 100409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [317].Trezza V, Campolongo P, Vanderschuren LJ, Evaluating the rewarding nature of social interactions in laboratory animals, Dev. Cogn. Neurosci 1 (2011) 444–458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [318].Manduca A, Carbone E, Schiavi S, Cacchione C, Buzzelli V, Campolongo P, Trezza V, The neurochemistry of social reward during development: what have we learned from rodent models? J. Neurochem 157 (2021) 1408–1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [319].Muhammad A, Kolb B, Maternal separation altered behavior and neuronal spine density without influencing amphetamine sensitization, Behav. Brain Res 223 (2011) 7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [320].Veenema AH, Neumann ID, Maternal separation enhances offensive play-fighting, basal corticosterone and hypothalamic vasopressin mRNA expression in juvenile male rats, Psychoneuroendocrinology 34 (2009) 463–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [321].Arnold JL, Siviy SM, Effects of neonatal handling and maternal separation on rough-and-tumble play in the rat, Dev. Psychobiol 41 (2002) 205–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [322].Lundberg S, Martinsson M, Nylander I, Roman E, Altered corticosterone levels and social play behavior after prolonged maternal separation in adolescent male but not female Wistar rats, Horm. Behav 87 (2017) 137–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [323].Holland FH, Ganguly P, Potter DN, Chartoff EH, Brenhouse HC, Early life stress disrupts social behavior and prefrontal cortex parvalbumin interneurons at an earlier time-point in females than in males, Neurosci. Lett 566 (2014) 131–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [324].Farrell MR, Holland FH, Shansky RM, Brenhouse HC, Sex-specific effects of early life stress on social interaction and prefrontal cortex dendritic morphology in young rats, Behav. Brain Res 310 (2016) 119–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [325].Giachino C, Canalia N, Capone F, Fasolo A, Alleva E, Riva MA, Cirulli F, Peretto P, Maternal deprivation and early handling affect density of calcium binding protein-containing neurons in selected brain regions and emotional behavior in periadolescent rats, Neuroscience 145 (2007) 568–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [326].Venerosi A, Cirulli F, Capone F, Alleva E, Prolonged perinatal AZT administration and early maternal separation: effects on social and emotional behaviour of periadolescent mice, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 74 (2003) 671–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [327].Yano K, Matsuzaki T, Iwasa T, Mayila Y, Yanagihara R, Tungalagsuvd A, Munkhzaya M, Tokui T, Kamada S, Hayashi A, Masaki R, Aoki H, Tamura K, Irahara M, The influence of psychological stress in early life on sexual maturation and sexual behavior in male and female rats, Reprod. Med. Biol 19 (2020) 135–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [328].Granata LE, Valentine A, Hirsch JL, Brenhouse HC, Infant ultrasonic vocalizations predict adolescent social behavior in rats: effects of early life adversity, Dev. Psychobiol 64 (2022) e22260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [329].Raineki C, Cortes MR, Belnoue L, Sullivan RM, Effects of early-life abuse differ across development: infant social behavior deficits are followed by adolescent depressive-like behaviors mediated by the amygdala, J. Neurosci 32 (2012) 7758–7765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [330].Raineki C, Sarro E, Rincon-Cortes M, Perry R, Boggs J, Holman CJ, Wilson DA, Sullivan RM, Paradoxical neurobehavioral rescue by memories of early-life abuse: the safety signal value of odors learned during abusive attachment, Neuropsychopharmacology 40 (2015) 906–914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [331].Rincon-Cortes M, Sullivan RM, Emergence of social behavior deficit, blunted corticolimbic activity and adult depression-like behavior in a rodent model of maternal maltreatment, Transl. Psychiatry 6 (2016) e930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [332].Perry RE, Rincon-Cortes M, Braren SH, Brandes-Aitken AN, Opendak M, Pollonini G, Chopra D, Raver CC, Alberini CM, Blair C, Sullivan RM, Corticosterone administration targeting a hypo-reactive HPA axis rescues a socially-avoidant phenotype in scarcity-adversity reared rats, Dev. Cogn. Neurosci 40 (2019) 100716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [333].Davis LK, Bolton JL, Hanson H, Guarraci FA, Modified limited bedding and nesting is a model of early-life stress that affects reproductive physiology and behavior in female and male Long-Evans rats, Physiol. Behav 224 (2020) 113037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [334].Eck SR, Palmer JL, Bavley CC, Karbalaei R, Ordones Sanchez E, Flowers J 2nd, Holley A, Wimmer ME, Bangasser DA, Effects of early life adversity on male reproductive behavior and the medial preoptic area transcriptome, Neuropsychopharmacology (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [335].Manzano Nieves G, Schilit Nitenson A, Lee HI, Gallo M, Aguilar Z, Johnsen A, Bravo M, Bath KG, Early life stress delays sexual maturation in female mice, Front. Mol. Neurosci 12 (2019) 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [336].Panksepp J, Beatty WW, Social deprivation and play in rats, Behav. Neural Biol 30 (1980) 197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [337].Vanderschuren LJ, Achterberg EJ, Trezza V, The neurobiology of social play and its rewarding value in rats, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 70 (2016) 86–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [338].Trezza V, Baarendse PJ, Vanderschuren LJ, The pleasures of play: pharmaco-logical insights into social reward mechanisms, Trends Pharmacol. Sci 31 (2010) 463–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [339].Yang M, Silverman JL, Crawley JN, Automated three-chambered social approach task for mice, Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. Chapter 8 (2011) 26 Unit 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [340].Moy SS, Nadler JJ, Perez A, Barbaro RP, Johns JM, Magnuson TR, Piven J, Crawley JN, Sociability and preference for social novelty in five inbred strains: an approach to assess autistic-like behavior in mice, Genes Brain Behav. 3 (2004) 287–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [341].Toth I, Neumann ID, Animal models of social avoidance and social fear, Cell Tissue Res. 354 (2013) 107–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [342].Sandi C, Haller J, Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms, Nat. Rev. Neurosci 16 (2015) 290–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [343].File SE, Hyde JR, Can social interaction be used to measure anxiety? Br. J. Pharmacol 62 (1978) 19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [344].Heijkoop R, Huijgens PT, Snoeren EMS, Assessment of sexual behavior in rats: the potentials and pitfalls, Behav. Brain Res 352 (2018) 70–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [345].Guarraci FA, Frohardt RJ, “What a girl wants”: what can we learn from animal models of female sexual motivation? Front. Behav. Neurosci 13 (2019) 216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [346].Adinoff B, Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction, Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 12 (2004) 305–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [347].Baik JH, Dopamine signaling in reward-related behaviors, Front. Neural Circuits 7 (2013) 152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [348].Kelley AE, Berridge KC, The neuroscience of natural rewards: relevance to addictive drugs, J. Neurosci 22 (2002) 3306–3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [349].Di Chiara G, Imperato A, Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 85 (1988) 5274–5278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [350].Koob GF, Volkow ND, Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis, Lancet Psychiatry 3 (2016) 760–773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [351].Kalivas PW, Volkow ND, The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice, Am. J. Psychiatry 162 (2005) 1403–1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [352].Meaney MJ, Brake W, Gratton A, Environmental regulation of the development of mesolimbic dopamine systems: a neurobiological mechanism for vulnerability to drug abuse? Psychoneuroendocrinology 27 (2002) 127–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [353].Jahng JW, Ryu V, Yoo SB, Noh SJ, Kim JY, Lee JH, Mesolimbic dopaminergic activity responding to acute stress is blunted in adolescent rats that experienced neonatal maternal separation, Neuroscience 171 (2010) 144–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [354].Majcher-Maslanka I, Solarz A, Wedzony K, Chocyk A, The effects of early-life stress on dopamine system function in adolescent female rats, Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 57 (2017) 24–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [355].Matthews K, Dalley JW, Matthews C, Tsai TH, Robbins TW, Periodic maternal separation of neonatal rats produces region- and gender-specific effects on biogenic amine content in postmortem adult brain, Synapse 40 (2001) 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [356].Brenhouse HC, Lukkes JL, Andersen SL, Early life adversity alters the developmental profiles of addiction-related prefrontal cortex circuitry, Brain Sci. 3 (2013) 143–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [357].Gracia-Rubio I, Martinez-Laorden E, Moscoso-Castro M, Milanes MV, Laorden ML, Valverde O, Maternal separation impairs cocaine-induced behavioural sensitization in adolescent mice, PLoS ONE 11 (2016) e0167483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [358].Tractenberg SG, Orso R, Creutzberg KC, Malcon LMC, Lumertz FS, Wearick-Silva LE, Viola TW, Riva MA, Grassi-Oliveira R, Vulnerable and resilient cognitive performance related to early life stress: the potential mediating role of dopaminergic receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex of adult mice, Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 80 (2020) 13–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [359].Masrouri H, Azadi M, Semnanian S, Azizi H, Maternal deprivation induces persistent adaptations in putative dopamine neurons in rat ventral tegmental area: in vivo electrophysiological study, Exp. Brain Res 238 (2020) 2221–2228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [360].Spyrka J, Gugula A, Rak A, Tylko G, Hess G, Blasiak A, Early life stress-induced alterations in the activity and morphology of ventral tegmental area neurons in female rats, Neurobiol. Stress 13 (2020) 100250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [361].Laguna A, Lajud N, Juarez J, Sanz-Martin A, Chronic early-life stress increases cognitive impulsivity and D2 immunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens of adult rats, Dev. Psychobiol 64 (2022) e22259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [362].Guadagno A, Kang MS, Devenyi GA, Mathieu AP, Rosa-Neto P, Chakravarty M, Walker CD, Reduced resting-state functional connectivity of the basolateral amygdala to the medial prefrontal cortex in preweaning rats exposed to chronic early-life stress, Brain Struct. Funct 223 (2018) 3711–3729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [363].Grace AA, Dysregulation of the dopamine system in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and depression, Nat. Rev. Neurosci 17 (2016) 524–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [364].Chang CH, Grace AA, Amygdala-ventral pallidum pathway decreases dopamine activity after chronic mild stress in rats, Biol. Psychiatry 76 (2014) 223–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [365].Rincon-Cortes M, Grace AA, Sex-dependent effects of stress on immobility behavior and VTA dopamine neuron activity: modulation by Ketamine, Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol 20 (2017) 823–832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [366].Belujon P, Grace AA, Regulation of dopamine system responsivity and its adaptive and pathological response to stress, Proc. Biol. Sci 282 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [367].Eck SR, Bangasser DA, The effects of early life stress on motivated behaviors: a role for gonadal hormones, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 119 (2020) 86–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [368].Rodrigues AJ, Leao P, Carvalho M, Almeida OF, Sousa N, Potential programming of dopaminergic circuits by early life stress, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 214 (2011) 107–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [369].Gatzke-Kopp LM, The canary in the coalmine: the sensitivity of mesolimbic dopamine to environmental adversity during development, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 35 (2011) 794–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [370].Pena CJ, Smith M, Ramakrishnan A, Cates HM, Bagot RC, Kronman HG, Patel B, Chang AB, Purushothaman I, Dudley J, Morishita H, Shen L, Nestler EJ, Early life stress alters transcriptomic patterning across reward circuitry in male and female mice, Nat. Commun 10 (2019) 5098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [371].Castro-Zavala A, Martin-Sanchez A, Lujan MA, Valverde O, Maternal separation increases cocaine intake through a mechanism involving plasticity in glutamate signalling, Addict. Biol 26 (2021) e12911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [372].Garvin MM, Bolton JL, Sex-specific behavioral outcomes of early-life adversity and emerging microglia-dependent mechanisms, Front. Behav. Neurosci 16 (2022) 1013865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [373].Bolton JL, Short AK, Othy S, Kooiker CL, Shao M, Gunn BG, Beck J, Bai X, Law SM, Savage JC, Lambert JJ, Belelli D, Tremblay ME, Cahalan MD, Baram TZ, Early stress-induced impaired microglial pruning of excitatory synapses on immature CRH-expressing neurons provokes aberrant adult stress responses, Cell Rep. 38 (2022) 110600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

RESOURCES