Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Apr 25;18(4):e0284764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284764

Identification of reference genes for the normalization of retinal mRNA expression by RT-qPCR in oxygen induced retinopathy, anemia, and erythropoietin administration

Mandkhai Molomjamts 1,*, Ellen C Ingolfsland 1,*
Editor: Jing Chen2
PMCID: PMC10128940  PMID: 37098032

Abstract

Background

Anemia and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are common comorbidities experienced by preterm infants, yet the role of anemia on the pathogenesis of ROP remains unclear. Reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a sensitive technique for estimating the gene expression changes at the transcript level but requires identification of stably expressed reference genes for accurate data interpretation. This is particularly important for oxygen induced retinopathy studies given that some commonly used reference genes are sensitive to oxygen. This study aimed to identify stably expressed reference genes among eight commonly used reference genes in the neonatal rat pups’ retina upon exposure to cyclic hyperoxia-hypoxia, anemia, and erythropoietin administration at two age groups (P14.5 and P20) using Bestkeeper, geNorm, and Normfinder, three publicly available, free algorithms, and comparing their results to the in-silico prediction program, RefFinder.

Results

The most stable reference gene across both developmental stages was Rpp30, as predicted by Genorm, Bestkeeper, and Normfinder. RefFinder predicted Tbp to be the most stable across both developmental stages. At P14.5, stability varied by prediction program; at P20, RPP30 and MAPK1 were the most stable reference genes. Gapdh, 18S, Rplp0, and HPRT were predicted as the least stable reference genes by at least one of the prediction algorithms.

Conclusion

Expression of Rpp30 is the least affected by experimental conditions of oxygen induced retinopathy, phlebotomy induced anemia and erythropoietin administration at both timepoints of P14.5 and P20.

1. Introduction

Iron deficiency is the most common micronutrient deficiency in the world, and it is experienced by 25%-85% of preterm infants [14]. Iron deficiency puts preterm infants at risk for disrupted neurodevelopment, neuronal differentiation and myelination and leads to iron deficiency anemia [5]. This preexisting anemia of prematurity is often exacerbated by phlebotomy induced anemia (PIA) which is caused by the frequent need for blood analysis while in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Anemia may also increase the risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a common blinding disease that accounts up to 40% childhood blindness worldwide [6,7]. Supplemental use of oxygen in the NICU disrupts retinal neurovascular growth and leads to ROP. The retina is the most metabolically active tissue in the body and consists of diverse neuronal types and consumes oxygen at rates higher than neurons in the brain [8].

Thus, the impact of iron deficiency and depletion of oxygen supply caused by anemia on the pathogenesis of ROP must be defined for enhanced treatment. It has been difficult to isolate the impact of anemia in the clinical setting given the effect of blood transfusions and other underlying factors.

Quantitative analysis of retinal mRNA by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a powerful tool for investigating the impact of experimental conditions on the developing retina. Oxygen-induced retinopathy preclinical models (OIR) are commonly used to study altered retinal angiogenesis and neovascularization and are pertinent to the study of ischemic retinopathies such as retinopathy of prematurity and diabetic retinopathy [9]. The rat retina vascularizes postnatally in a pattern that mimics human retinal development, vascularizing centrally (from the optic nerve) to peripherally (to the outer edge of the retina). In this model, the rat OIR model alters retinal vascularization during phases of rapid retinal growth and development, and study during both the avascular and neovascular phases of retinopathy provide distinct insights. Addition of other experimental conditions during this time period are likewise highly time sensitive. Furthermore, the retina is a complex tissue, comprised of more than 60 cell types that have morphologic and functional differences during development [10]. Quantitative determinations of retinal development therefore require care to differentiate time point and cell type being studied.

RT-qPCR allows investigation into the complex mechanisms underlying retinal development with high sensitivity and specificity. RT-qPCR accuracy, however, depends heavily on the selected reference gene stability. Parallel quantification of reference genes as endogenous controls is the optimal way to correct inevitable experimental variations in addition to the calculation of true relative quantification (fold change) of genes. No single gene is found to be expressed uniformly across tissues or within cells under different conditions. For instance, commonly used GAPDH is shown to be sensitive in hypoxic conditions and transcriptionally modulated [11]. This highlights the importance of reference gene validation according to the experimental conditions.

Currently, there is no consensus regarding reference gene selection for RT-qPCR analysis of neonatal rat retina tissue across the experimental conditions of OIR, anemia, its treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) and room air control (RA).

Therefore, the objective of this study was to measure the stability of 8 commonly used reference genes in RT-qPCR of whole retinal lysates at two developmentally relevant time points across these 4 experimental conditions. Use of a single reference gene may not be sufficient in RT-qPCR data normalization, but this study offers a set of reference genes from the stability ranking. The stability of reference genes was evaluated by Bestkeeper, geNorm, and Normfinder algorithms individually in addition to the in silico prediction program, RefFinder, which integrates previously mentioned algorithms and comparative delta Ct algorithm. We subsequently demonstrated the significance of validating reference gene selection by quantifying target gene expression levels normalized by several candidate genes.

2. Results

2.1 Analysis of reference gene stability

Efficiency of RT-qPCR for all tested probes ranged within the acceptable range of 90–110% (Table 1) [12].

Table 1. Reference gene candidates evaluated by this study and their qPCR amplification efficiency.

Gene symbol Gene name GenBank Accession number Supplier Assay ID
(Taqman probe)
Function qPCR Efficiency (%)
Alox-15 Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase NM_031010.2 Rn00696151_m1 Lipoxygenase enzyme 102.1
GAPDH Glycealdehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase NM_017008.4 Rn01775763_g1 Oxidoreductase in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis 94.4
HPRT Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase NM_012583.2 Rn01527840_m1 Metabolic salvage of purines 91
MAPK1 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1 NM_053842.2 Rn00671828_m1 Signal transduction 98.4
PPIA Peptidylprolyl Isomerase A NM_017101.1 Rn00690933_m1 Chaperone protein 98.0
RPP30 Ribonuclease P/MRP Subunit P30 NP_001178012 Rn01479850_m1 RNA polymerase III transcription factor 96.7
Rplp0 Ribosomal protein, large, P0 NM_022402.2 Rn03302271_gH Structural component of ribosomal subunit 96.7
18S Ribosomal protein 18S NM_213557.1 Rn01428913_gH Ribosome subunit 95.28
TBP TATA box binding protein NM_001004198.1 Rn01455646_m1 RNA polymerase II transcription factor 98.0

2.2 Bestkeeper analysis

All reference genes were evaluated by Bestkeeper algorithm, and the S.I. was expressed in terms of r-value, coefficient of correlation. High stability of a candidate gene is correlated to a higher r-value [13]. Fig 1A displays the stability ranking at P14.5, Fig 1B displays the stability ranking at P20, and Fig 1C displays the comprehensive reference gene stability across both time points.

Fig 1. Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by Bestkeeper.

Fig 1

Higher stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

Across all groups and time points, RPP30 was the most stable reference gene (S.I. 0.912) followed by HPRT (S.I. 0.83) and PPIA (S.I. 0.829) (Fig 1C). At P14.5, GAPDH (S.I. 1.000) and RPP30 (S.I. 0.825) were the most stable reference genes (Fig 1A). At P20, RPP30 (S.I. 0.950) and PPIA (S.I. 0.930) were the most stable genes (Fig 1B).

The least stable genes at P20 and across the comprehensive ranking of all groups and time points were Rplp0 (S.I. 0.607) and TBP (S.I. 0.686), respectively. At P14.5, Rplp0 (S.I. 0.04) and TBP (S.I.0.533) were the least stable reference genes.

2.3 Normfinder analysis

The Normfinder algorithm was used to rank the stability of candidate reference genes. The stability index of Normfinder is calculated as a stable value for each gene, and a lower value indicates more stability [14]. Normfinder also identifies the best combination of two genes. RPP30 (S.I. 0.156) was the most stable reference gene, followed by MAPK1 (S.I. 0.176) for the comprehensive ranking of both timepoints (Fig 2C). The best combination of two genes across both timepoints was 18S and Tbp (S.I. 0.130). At P14.5, Rplp0 (S.I. 0.09) and TBP (S.I. 0.1) were the most stable reference genes, and the best combination of two genes was 18S and Tbp (S.I. 0.061). At P20, RPP30 (S.I. 0.122) and MAPK1 (S.I. 0.182) were the most stable reference genes (Fig 2A and 2B), and the best combination of two genes was Mapk1 and Rpp30 (S.I. 0.135). HPRT (S.I. 0.232), Rplp0 (S.I. 0.417), and 18S (S.I. 0.344) were the least stable genes at P14.5, P20, and at the comprehensive rankings, respectively.

Fig 2. Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by Normfinder.

Fig 2

Lower stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

2.4 GeNorm analysis

All reference genes were analyzed by geNorm algorithm, which calculated by the M-value for each gene as the arithmetic mean of all pairwise variation [15]. A lower M-value indicates higher stability of candidate reference genes. PPIA (S.I. 0.290) was the most stable reference gene at P14.5, while MAPK1 (S.I. 0.266) was the most stable reference gene at P20 (Fig 3A and 3B). MAPK1 (S.I. 0.266) and RPP30 (S.I. 0.267) were the most stable reference genes in the comprehensive ranking list (Fig 3C). GAPDH (S.I. 0.629 and 0.559) was the least stable reference gene at both P14.5 and P20. 18S (S.I. 0.559) was the least stable reference gene in the comprehensive ranking.

Fig 3. Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by geNorm.

Fig 3

Lower stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

Vn/Vn+1 calculations of sequential numbers of reference genes were performed for each individual time point and comprehensively across both time points to determine the appropriate number of reference genes necessary for normalization. In each of these analyses, V2/V3 was < 0.15, indicating that using two reference genes is adequate and there is limited value added with additional reference genes.

2.5 Reffinder analysis

To compare individual algorithms against the popular RefFinder algorithm, which creates a summary stability ranking from four individual algorithms, we analyzed the 8 candidate reference genes with this in silico prediction tool. Reference gene stability was ranked by the RefFinder program and the S.I. is expressed as a geometric mean. Higher stability of the candidate gene is correlated to lower geometric mean. Fig 4A displays the stability ranking at P14.5; Fig 4B displays the stability ranking at P20 and Fig 4C displays the comprehensive reference gene stability across both time points.

Fig 4. Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by RefFinder.

Fig 4

Lower stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

Across all groups and time points, TBP was predicted to be the most stable reference gene (Geometric mean (G.M.) 1.189) followed by MAPK1 (G.M. 1.861) and RPP30 (G.M. 3.224) (Fig 4C). At P14.5, PPIA (G.M. 1.000) and RPP30 (G.M. 2.590) were the most stable reference genes (Fig 4A). At P20, 18S (G.M. 1.861) and Rplp0 (G.M. 2.213) were the most stable genes (Fig 4B).

The least stable genes at P20 and across the comprehensive ranking of all groups and time points were GAPDH (G.M. 8) and PPIA (G.M. 7). At P14.5, GAPDH (G.M. 8) and HPRT (G.M.7) were the least stable reference genes.

Ranking of all genes and timepoints are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Summary of reference gene rankings by 3 primary algorithms and RefFinder, a summary tool, at each timepoint, P14.5, P20, and a comprehensive ranking of both timepoints.

Timepoints Normfinder Bestkeeper geNorm Reffinder
1 (Most stable) Comprehensive RPP30 RPP30 RPP30 TBP
2 MAPK1 HPRT MAPK1 MAPK1
3 PPIA PPIA TBP RPP30
4 TBP MAPK1 PPIA 18S
5 GAPDH 18S Rplp0 HPRT
6 Rplp0 GAPDH 18S Rplp0
7 HPRT TBP HPRT PPIA
8 (Least stable) 18S Rplp0 GAPDH GAPDH
1 (Most stable) P14.5 Rplp0 GAPDH PPIA PPIA
2 TBP RPP30 RPP30 Rpp30
3 18S HPRT TBP TBP
4 PPIA 18S MAPK1 MAPK1
5 MAPK1 MAPK1 Rplp0 Rplp0
6 GAPDH PPIA 18S 18S
7 RPP30 TBP HPRT HPRT
8 (Least stable) HPRT Rplp0 GAPDH GAPDH
1 (Most stable) P20 RPP30 RPP30 MAPK1 18S
2 MAPK1 PPIA RPP30 Rplp0
3 TBP MAPK1 GAPDH TBP
4 PPIA HPRT TBP MAPK1
5 GAPDH GAPDH PPIA RPP30
6 18S Rplp0 Rplp0 HPRT
7 HPRT TBP HPRT PPIA
8 (Least stable) Rplp0 18S 18S GAPDH

2.6 Quantification of target gene compensated by reference genes

Alox-15 mRNA expression was normalized to each reference gene at each individual time point, and the percentage difference was calculated by comparing to Alox15 mRNA expression level normalized to TBP. (Fig 5). At P14.5, fold change of Alox-15 normalized by two of the most highly stable genes across both time points, TBP (black) and MAPK1 (blue) resulted in similar values, 100% vs 82.68% respectively in RA+PIA group. Fold change normalized with GAPDH (purple), an unstable gene across both time points, led to a significantly lower value for all groups. There was about 70% difference in Alox-15 expression level between the a more stable reference gene, PPIA (orange), and a less stable gene, GAPDH in the RA+PIA group (Fig 5C and 5D).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

The percentage difference of expression level of Alox-15 in neonatal rat retinas normalized by different reference genes compared to TBP normalization at P14.5 by percentage (A), by fold change (C) and at P20 by percentage (B), and by fold change (D). Fold change was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method. All results are expressed as relative amounts to the RA group of the respective time point.

In contrast, selection of reference genes did not cause significant disparity in all groups at P20. RA, RA plus PIA, and OIR groups had similar expression of Alox-15 regardless of the reference gene. The OIR plus PIA plus EPO group had higher Alox-15 expression when normalized to 18S, a more stable gene at this time point, although the variation was not significant compared to Alox-15 expression normalized by a less stable gene, GAPDH (P = 0.107) (Fig 5B).

3. Discussion

We have shown the stability of 8 commonly used reference genes across two time points that are pertinent to the developing retinal vasculature. TBP, MAPK1, and RPP30 are the most stable genes that are uninterrupted by anemia, OIR and EPO administration. We have demonstrated that normalization of RT-qPCR data with an unstable reference gene may lead to erroneous data conclusions. In this interest, identification of a stable reference gene that is not coregulated with the target gene is an absolute prerequisite.

Comprehensive stability ranking of the 8 candidate reference genes was determined through 3 validated algorithms (NormFinder, Bestkeeper, and geNorm) and compared to the comprehensive stability ranking predicted by RefFinder, an in silico, high throughput, popular, web-based, free program. This program has not been peer reviewed to our knowledge. It combines 4 programs (BestKeeper, GeNorm, NormFinder and comparative delta Ct) that use different methods to determine gene stability and gives a summary ranking as a geometric mean. It does not account for qPCR efficiency, so the user must only reliably use this tool when their own qPCR efficiency approximates 100%. Results from individual programs varied. Only in the comprehensive ranking, Normfinder, Bestkeeper, geNorm, all predicted RPP30 as the most stable reference gene, but at P14.5 and P20, no more than two algorithms resulted the same most stable reference genes.

Retinal development progresses rapidly during the neonatal phase, making it important to identify reference genes that are stable across multiple time points. Retinal development is highly impacted by OIR, necessitating testing of reference genes in both the avascular phase (P14.5 in this study) and the neovascular phase (P20). Furthermore, anemia and its treatment with EPO both alter iron homeostasis and impact cellular processes that may alter expression of genes typically thought to be stable in the retina [16]. In this study, TBP, MAPK1, and RPP30 were identified as stable genes across both time points between groups of all experimental conditions. GAPDH was most frequently identified as unstable and thus a poor candidate reference gene, and Rplp0 and 18S also received the least stable ranking in at least one algorithm so should not be used as single reference genes under these conditions.

The variability between algorithm results underscore the important point that in many experimental conditions, multiple reference genes should be used. In our study, GeNorm Vn/Vn+1 calculations determined that the use of 2 reference genes at each time point and comprehensively across time points is adequate. NormFinder suggested combinations of two reference genes in each analysis with the most stable S.I.: 18S and Tbp for use across both time points and at P14.5 and Mapk1 and Rpp30 at P20. In two of these three comparisons performed by NormFinder, the stability index of the combination of two genes was lower, indicating more stability, than the identified most stable single reference gene.

Due to differences in pathophysiology and cellular processes occurring at the two time points that may alter gene expression, analysis at each individual time point was also included. Table 2 shows the most and least stable genes at each time point, pertinent for experiments that only investigate one time point. The instability of reference genes between the two time points, being highly stable at P14.5 and highly unstable at P20, suggests that degree of transcription is affected in some of the most commonly used reference genes by the developmental stage of the retina.

We categorized the 8 tested genes based on their functional groups as metabolic enzymes (GAPDH, PPIA, MAPK1 and HPRT), ribosomal proteins (18S and RPLP0), and transcription factors (TBP and RPP30). Transcription factors appear to be more stable in a developing retina, although large-scale testing at different time points with more genes must be completed for confirmation. Specifically, RPP30 is ranked as the most stable reference gene 6 out of 9 times by Normfinder, Bestkeeper, and geNorm algorithms, Both TBP and RPP30 are ranked in the top most stable genes by Reffinder.

It is important to note that these experiments used whole retinal lysates, making the data generalizable only to other studies involving whole retina. The retina is a complex tissue composed of neural, vascular, and inflammation-regulating cell types. To determine candidate reference genes in a particular retinal cell type, further studies specific to cell type are required.

4. Conclusion

We demonstrated the importance of determining the stability of reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization according to various developmental stages and experimental conditions. Depending on the developmental stage, a different reference gene or combination of two genes may be required. This study validates TBP, MAPK1 and RPP30 as the three most suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of rat retinal tissue with PIA, EPO, OIR and RA conditions at P14.5 and P20.

5. Methods

5.1 Animal procedures and retinal dissection

All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Minnesota and comply with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals (NIH Publications No. 8023, revised 1978). Sprague Dawley timed pregnant rat dams, gestational day 15–16, were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and housed for one week prior to delivering the pups. Upon birth, the newborn rat pups were cross-fostered into litters of 18 pups to induce growth restriction according to the standard OIR model and assigned into groups with the following experimental conditions: room air (RA) control, phlebotomy-induced anemia (PIA), OIR and EPO (Fig 6). All animals were housed in a temperature and humidity controlled facility with time-cycled light (12 hours light, 12 hours dark). Pregnant and lactating dams had ad libitum access to standard rat chow and water.

Fig 6. OIR and PIA animal models and experimental groups.

Fig 6

In OIR groups, every 24 hours, the oxygen concentration was switched between 50% and 10% FiO2 until P14 when they were removed to room air (21% FiO2). Phlebotomy to induce PIA occurred from P3- P20 on hyperoxia days only, to prevent variation in oxygen concentrations during the highly sensitive hypoxia periods. Hematocrit levels of controls and PIA pups are shown. Bottom panel shows the experimental groups and timing of EPO administration.

RA animals were housed with a lactating dam in room air until euthanasia. OIR was induced using the Penn et al. 50/10 model [17]. Within 5 hours of birth, pups and dams were placed in a BioSpherix large animal chamber (BioSpherix, Redfield, New York), initially at 50% fraction inspired oxygen (FiO2). Every 24 hours, the oxygen concentration was cycled between 50% and 10% for 14 days. Oxygen concentrations were verified twice a day with external sensors. Small air ports in the chamber remained open throughout the experiments to allow for ventilation. Animals were then removed from the chamber to recover in room air until time of euthanasia.

The PIA model in these experiments was modified from the PIA model in mice, which successfully mimics the 50% reduction in hematocrit often occurring in preterm infants due to frequent phlebotomy [18]. PIA animals were phlebotomized 6ul/g from the facial vein once a day or twice daily to a target hematocrit of 15–20%. When animals were in the OIR chamber, phlebotomy occurred during the hyperoxia phase only to prevent FiO2 fluctuations during the sensitive hypoxia phase. As seen in Fig 6, pups reached their target hematocrit level at postnatal day (P) 14-P15. They were then phlebotomized once daily to maintain that degree of anemia. EPO was administered to half of the pups at 5000 units/kg through intraperitoneal injections from P10 to P20, alternating once or twice daily while in the chamber, during the hyperoxia phase from P10-P14, and twice daily thereafter until euthanasia. Dams and pups were monitored two times daily for the entirety of the experiments for signs of pain or distress. If a pup did not gain weight for two consecutive days, phlebotomy was not performed until weight gain was documented to alleviate suffering. Phlebotomy qualifies as Pain Class A according to the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, so analgesia was not used for phlebotomy. This is consistent with practices for preterm infant phlebotomy. All pups remained in room air from P14 until euthanasia at P14.5 or P20. P14.5 represents the end of the hyperoxic-hypoxic injury and is a time of high retinal avascularity in the OIR model, mimicking the avascular Phase I of ROP. P20 is a time of peak neovascularization in the OIR model, mimicking the neovascular Phase II of ROP [17]. Rat pups were euthanized by carbon dioxide followed by confirmatory decapitation due to neonatal age. Immediately upon death, retinas were dissected and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen followed by -80C storage until further application.

5.2 Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from individual whole retina using the RNaqueous RNA isolation kit (Ambion, TX) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and concentration were measured by Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, MA). Extracted total RNA samples were frozen and stored in -80C until cDNA synthesis. cDNA was synthesized using 1000ng of RNA in a High-Capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit with RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems, CA). cDNA was diluted to 1:10 with nuclease free water after synthesis and stored in -4C for short term or -80C for long term storage.

5.3 Quantitative PCR

The following four representative groups from each relevant time point were selected for RT-qPCR experiments to determine reference gene stability based on the inclusion of all 4 experimental conditions: RA control, RA plus PIA, OIR, and OIR plus PIA plus EPO. The RT-qPCR experiments were performed on 4–6 animals per group with equal representation of both female and male. Total reaction volume was 10ul: 4.5ul diluted cDNA, 0.5ul 20x commercial Taqman primer/probe (ThermoFisher,MA), and 5.5 ul Luna fast master mix (Cat. #M3004E, New England Biomed, MA). 8 commonly used housekeeping genes for conditions of OIR and anemia were selected from the literature- RPP30, TBP, PPIA, MAPK1, Rplp0, HPRT, 18S and GAPDH and were tested at both experimental endpoints (Table 1) [1922]. Each sample was run in duplicate in a QuantStudio 3 qPCR machine (Applied Biosystems, MA). The RT-qPCR temperature profile included 95C for 1 min as an initial denaturation followed by 40 cycles of 95C for 15s and 60C for 30s.

Primer amplification efficiency of Alox-15 and each reference gene in each group was tested using slope analysis with a linear regression model. Relative standard curves were generated with 4 serial dilutions of cDNA (1:1, 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000). Each primer efficiency was calculated according to the equation: E  =  (10(−1/slope) -1) x 100%.

5.4 In silico prediction of reference gene stability

We used Normfinder, geNorm, and Bestkeeper, three free, publically available algorithms validated to determine reference gene stability. We used these algorithms to predict stability rankings across all samples from both time points and then repeated the algorithms with data separated by P14.5 and P20 timepoints. The Normfinder algorithm was used as an excel add-in; available at https://moma.dk/normfinder-software. Inter and intragroup variations are calculated in Normfinder using a variance analysis-based approach [23]. GeNorm algorithm was accessed through qbase+ software, available at https://genorm.cmgg.be/. The gene expression stability measure, M, is calculated in geNorm as the average pairwise variation, V, for the gene with all other tested reference genes [15]. GeNorm also calculates Vn/Vn+1 for two sequential numbers of reference genes to determine whether the use of additional reference genes is required, with Vn/Vn+1 > 0.15 indicating an additional reference gene is required. Bestkeeper algorithm was also used as an excel add-in, available at https://www.gene-quantification.de/bestkeeper.html. Bestkeeper algorithm used standard deviation and variation deviation for stability ranking [13]. Average Ct values were used as the raw input data.

RefFinder (http://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder/ and http://blooge.cn/RefFinder/), a free, online in silico prediction program was used to compare to the predicted stability of each tested gene in the above algorithms [24]. The program code is publicly available on the following website, https://github.com/fulxie/RefFinder. RefFinder integrates four programs, BestKeeper, NormFinder, geNorm, and comparative delta-Ct which all use different algorithms to rank stability of reference genes [1315,25]. Based on the ranking of each program, appropriate weight was assigned to each gene and the final overall ranking was calculated by RefFinder as the geometric mean of each gene weight. RefFinder was run on all Ct values across both time points to generate a comprehensive ranking. It was again run on Ct values from the P14.5 endpoint groups only and P20 groups only to generate rankings specific to each time point.

5.5 Quantification of target gene expression

The expression level of the retinal enzyme, Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase (Alox-15) was quantified in all four groups [26]. Alox-15 was selected from our RNA sequencing data due to its consistent alteration by the experimental conditions of OIR and PIA. Fold change of Alox-15 was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method by each reference gene both for the comprehensive ranking across both time points and again at each individual time point [27]. All groups were normalized to the RA control group of their respective time point.

5.6 Statistical analysis

All groups were normally distributed with equal variance. Ct value outliers of the 8 candidate genes were identified by GraphPad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA) using the ROUT test (Q = 1%) before each ranking of stability was determined by RefFinder, geNorm, Bestkeeper, and Normfinder. Outliers of the target gene, Alox-15 were identified by the same methods after fold change was calculated. All outliers were excluded. The statistical significance of Alox-15 fold change compensated by each reference gene was determined by a two-tailed t-test using GraphPad Prism 8 or Microsoft Excel.

Supporting information

S1 Raw data. Ct values by group with and without outliers removed.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Minnesota Neonatology labs and Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences lab.

Abbreviations

18S

Ribosomal protein 18S

Alox-15

Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase

cDNA

Complimentary DNA

EPO

Erythropoietin

FiO2

Fraction of inspired oxygen

GAPDH

Glycealdehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GM

Geometric mean

HPRT

Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase

MAPK1

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1

mRNA

Messenger RNA

NICU

Neonatal intensive care unit

OIR

Oxygen induced retinopathy

P

Postnatal day

PIA

Phlebotomy induced anemia

PPIA

Peptidylprolyl Isomerase A

ROP

Retinopathy of Prematurity

Rplp0

Ribosomal protein, large, P0

RPP30

Ribonuclease P/MRP Subunit P30

RT-qPCR

Reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction

SI

Stability Index

TBP

TATA box binding protein

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Yes- EI received a Career Starter Grant (no grant number) from the Knights Templar Eye Foundation (https://www.ktef.org/). The funding source did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Georgieff MK. The role of iron in neurodevelopment: fetal iron deficiency and the developing hippocampus. Biochem Soc Trans 2008;36:1267–71. doi: 10.1042/BST0361267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Borigato EVM, Martinez FE. Iron Nutritional Status Is Improved in Brazilian Preterm Infants Fed Food Cooked in Iron Pots. J Nutr 1998;128:855–9. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.5.855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Halliday HL, Lappin TRJ, McClure G. Iron Status of the Preterm Infant during the First Year of Life. Neonatology 1984;45:228–35. doi: 10.1159/000242009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iwai Y, Takanashi T, Nakao Y, Mikawa H. Iron status in low birth weight infants on breast and formula feeding. Eur J Pediatr 1986;145:63–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00441856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Georgieff MK. Long-term brain and behavioral consequences of early iron deficiency. Nutr Rev 2011;69:S43–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00432.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quinn GE, Barr C, Bremer D, Fellows R, Gong A, Hoffman R, et al. Changes In Course Of Retinopathy of Prematurity From 1986 To 2013: Comparison Of Three Studies in the United States. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1595–600. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lundgren P, Athikarisamy SE, Patole S, Lam GC, Smith LE, Simmer K. Duration of anaemia during the first week of life is an independent risk factor for retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992 2018;107:759–66. doi: 10.1111/apa.14187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berman ER. Biochemistry of the Eye. Springer Science & Business Media; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scott A, Fruttiger M. Oxygen-induced retinopathy: a model for vascular pathology in the retina. Eye 2010 243 2009;24:416–21. 10.1038/eye.2009.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Masland RH. Cell Populations of the Retina: The Proctor Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4581–91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klenke S, Renckhoff K, Engler A, Peters J, Frey UH. Easy-to-use strategy for reference gene selection in quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2016;389:1353–66. doi: 10.1007/s00210-016-1305-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor S, Wakem M, Dijkman G, Alsarraj M, Nguyen M. A practical approach to RT-qPCR—Publishing data that conform to the MIQE guidelines. Methods 2010;50:S1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper-Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. vol. 26. 2004. doi: 10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Data: A Model-Based Variance Estimation Approach to Identify Genes Suited for Normalization, Applied to Bladder and Colon Cancer Data Sets. Cancer Res 2004;64:5245–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002;3:research0034.1. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Španinger K, Sytkowski AJ, Debeljak N. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR evaluation of chronic erythropoietin treatment effect on the SH-SY5Y and PC12 cells. Cent Eur J Chem 2013;11:348–57. 10.2478/s11532-012-0164-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Penn JS, Henry MM, Tolman BL. Exposure to Alternating Hypoxia and Hyperoxia Causes Severe Proliferative Retinopathy in the Newborn Rat. Pediatr Res 1994 366 1994;36:724–31. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199412000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wallin DJ, Tkac I, Stucker S, Ennis KM, Sola-Visner M, Rao R, et al. Phlebotomy-induced anemia alters hippocampal neurochemistry in neonatal mice. Pediatr Res 2015;77:765–71. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adachi H, Tominaga H, Maruyama Y, Yoneda K, Maruyama K, Yoshii K, et al. Stage-specific reference genes significant for quantitative PCR during mouse retinal development. Genes Cells 2015;20:625–35. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Madamanchi A, Capozzi M, Geng L, Li Z, Friedman RD, Dickeson SK, et al. Mitigation of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy in α2β1 Integrin-Deficient Mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:4338–47. 10.1167/IOVS.14-14061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rocha-Martins M, Njaine B, Silveira MS. Avoiding Pitfalls of Internal Controls: Validation of Reference Genes for Analysis by qRT-PCR and Western Blot throughout Rat Retinal Development. PLOS ONE 2012;7:e43028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wijngaarden P van Brereton HM, Coster DJ Williams KA. Genetic Influences on Susceptibility to Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1761–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dheda K, Huggett JF, Bustin SA, Johnson MA, Rook G, Zumla A. Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. BioTechniques 2004;37:112–9. doi: 10.2144/04371RR03 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B. miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol Biol 2012 801 2012;80:75–84. doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9885-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Silver N, Best S, Jiang J, Thein SL. Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol 2006;7:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-7-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chapman JR, Waldenström J. With Reference to Reference Genes: A Systematic Review of Endogenous Controls in Gene Expression Studies. PLoS ONE 2015;10. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0141853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001;25:402–8. 10.1006/METH.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Raw data. Ct values by group with and without outliers removed.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES