Skip to main content
Frontiers in Nutrition logoLink to Frontiers in Nutrition
. 2023 Apr 12;9:1078528. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1078528

Corrigendum: Current concepts and unresolved questions in dietary protein requirements and supplements in adults

Stuart M Phillips 1,*
PMCID: PMC10131182  PMID: 37124482

In the published article, there was a typographical error in Table 1 as published. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

Table 1.

PDCAAS and DIAAS scores for selected isolated proteins and foods.

Food PDCAAS DIAAS Limiting AA
MPC1 1.00 1.18 Met + Cys
WPI1 1.00 1.09 Val
SPI1 0.98 0.90 Met + Cys
PPC1 0.89 0.82 Met + Cys
RPC1 0.42 0.37 Lys
Whole milk2 1.00 1.43 Met + Cys
Cooked peas1 0.58 0.82 Met + Cys
Cooked rice1 0.62 0.59 Lys
Almonds5 0.35 0.40 Lys
Chickpeas6 0.52 0.67 Trp
Tofu3, 4 0.70 0.97 Met + Cys
Corn-based cereal1 0.08 0.01 Lys
Hydrolyzed collagen7 0.0 0.0 Trp

PDCAAS, protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score; DIAAS, digestible indispensable amino acid score for adolescents and adults; MPC, milk protein concentrate; WPI, whey protein isolate; SPI, soy protein isolate; PPC, pea protein concentrate; RPC, rice protein concentrate.

1

Values from Rutherfurd et al. (1).

2

Values from FAO (2) and Herreman et al. (3).

3

Values for PDCAAS from Anwar and El-Chaghaby (4).

4

Values for DIAAS from Reynaud et al. (5).

5

Values from Ahrens et al. (6).

6

Values from Nosworthy et al. (7).

7

Hydrolyzed collagen has a PDCAAS and DIAAS score of 0 since it contains no tryptophan (Trp) and is very low in methionine (8).

The author apologizes for this error and states that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Rutherfurd SM, Fanning AC, Miller BJ, Moughan PJ. Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. J Nutr. (2015) 145:372–9. 10.3945/jn.114.195438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.FAO . Dietary Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition. Rome: FAO; (2013). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Herreman L, Nommensen P, Pennings B, Laus MC. Comprehensive overview of the quality of plant- and animal-sourced proteins based on the digestible indispensable amino acid score. Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 8:5379–91. 10.1002/fsn3.1809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anwar D, El-Chaghaby G. Nutritional quality, amino acid profiles, protein digestibility corrected amino acid scores and anitoxidant properties of fried tofu and seitan. J Fac Food Eng Suceava. (2019) XVIII:176−90. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reynaud Y, Buffière C, Cohade B, Vauris M, Liebermann K, Hafnaoui N, et al. True ileal amino acid digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAASs) of plant-based protein foods. Food Chem. (2021) 338:128020. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahrens S, Venkatachalam M, Mistry AM, Lapsley K, Sathe SK. Almond (Prunus dulcis L.) protein quality. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. (2005) 60:123–8. 10.1007/s11130-005-6840-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nosworthy MG, Neufeld J, Frohlich P, Young G, Malcolmson L, House JD. Determination of the protein quality of cooked Canadian pulses. Food Sci Nutr. (2017) 5:896–903. 10.1002/fsn3.473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stuart PS, Bell SJ, Molnar J. Use of tryptophan-fortified hydrolyzed collagen for nutritional support. J Diet Suppl. (2008) 5:383–400. 10.1080/19390210802519689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES