Abstract
Background and Objectives:
The objective of this study was to determine molecular characterization and genetic diversity of colistin-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates in Intensive Care Unit hospitalized patients.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 127 A. baumannii clinical isolates were evaluated for antimicrobial susceptibility. PCR reaction and sequencing were performed for the detection of mutations in pmrAB and lpx ACD genes.
Results:
Based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 40.94% and 33.85% of the isolates were MDR and XDR respectively whereas 3.93% of them were found to be PDR. Results of agar dilution MIC and E-test indicated that 76% of the isolates were sensitive to colistin. All of the isolates were positive for blaOXA-51 and 50% of them were positive for both blaOXA-23 -like and blaOXA-143 -like genes while only 25% of the isolates were positive for blaOXA-72 . None of them were positive for the blaOXA-58 -like gene. There is no mutation in pmrA. The V162A substitution for pmrB gene was repeated in two isolates, and E394D and Y292H substitutions in lpxA were observed in two isolates; also, C120R and F165L substitutions in lpxC gene was repeated in two isolates. Analysis of phylogenetic tree based on alterations in lpxACD and pmrB genes indicated the appearance of new isolates compared to the reference strain ATCC17978 A. baumannii isolates.
Conclusion:
The present study indicated the prevalence of MDR and XDR A. baumannii isolates and the emergence of PDR isolates in the northwest portion of Iran. The appearance of colistin-resistant isolates with new mutations in pmrB, lpxACD genes indicates new resistance mechanisms.
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii, Beta-lactamase OXA-23, Beta-lactamase OXA-143, OXA-72 carbapenemase, Beta-lactamase OXA-58, Colistin
INTRODUCTION
Acinetobacter baumannii is the leading cause of a wide range of infections, including meningitis, pneumonia, wound, bloodstream, and urinary tract infections, especially in intensive care units (1, 2).
The escalating prevalence of antibiotic resistance due to inappropriate antibiotic use and the appearance of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and even pan drug-resistant (PDR) strain is now a serious threat in clinical settings (3, 4). Based on reports, there is a direct association between the prevalence of MDR and XDR and the high risk of mortality and morbidity in A. baumannii infected patients (5, 6).
MDR A. baumannii isolates are identified based on resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines antibiotic classes (7). In this regard, carbapenems are known as the best therapeutic agent for MDR A. baumannii (8). For a while, colistin is used as a last resort antibiotic against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains; however, based on recent reports, colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains have increased in clinical settings (9, 10).
Colistin is a cationic peptide that acts through disruption of the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance to colistin is resulting from post-translational modification or loss of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules forming the outer leaflet of the OM (11). It occurs via alterations in the pmrAB two-component regulatory systems, lpxACD, or efflux pump mechanisms (7, 12, 13). According to studies, mutations within pmrA are not often related to resistance to colistin (14) while several mutations including non-synonymous SNPs, frameshifts, and deletions have been detected in pmrB gene (15). The LpxACD genes are involved in the first three stages of lipid A synthesis. Based on reports inactivation of lpxA or lpxC genes through mutation leads to colistin resistance (16).
This study was conducted to survey the molecular characterization of colistin-resistant A.baumannii clinical isolates in Tabriz, North-west Iran.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples collection and bacterial identification.
From January 2016 to October 2020, a total of 127 non-duplicate A. baumannii isolates were recovered from patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) wards of Imam Reza and Sina hospitals in Tabriz, Iran. Several clinical samples were collected from hospitalized patients including trachea, urine, blood, wound swab, fluid (pleural, cerebrospinal), bronchial secretions, catheter, and throat. A. baumannii isolates were identified by standard microbiological (colony morphology, Gram-staining) and biochemical tests (catalase test, glucose oxidation, oxidase test, citrate utilization, and Oxidation-Fermentation of various sugars test (4, 17). Hospitalized patients in intensive care settings (ICU) were included in this study. Outpatient and hospitalized patients in non-intensive care settings and patients which were transferred from other hospitals were also excluded from the study.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing.
The antibiotic susceptibility test of the isolates was carried out by the disk diffusion method based on the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (18). The following antimicrobial disks (MAST, UK) were utilized for antibiotic susceptibility testing; imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), amoxicillin-sulbactam (10 μg), cefepime (10 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (10 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg). A bacterial suspension was prepared with the 0.5 McFarland turbidity from A. baumannii isolates and inoculated on the Muller-Hinton agar plats. The antibiotic disks were incubated with the inoculated plates at 37°C overnight. A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as positive control and ultrapure water as a negative control (19). MDR isolates were defined based on resistance to at least one agent from three classes of drug including cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycoside. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates were detected from MDR isolates resistant to carbapenems. Pan-drug resistant (PDR) isolates were found from XDR isolates resistant to polymyxins (20, 21).
Colistin susceptibility testing.
Colistin susceptibility test was carried out by agar dilution MIC and E- test methods. E- test was performed based on the manufacturer’s guidelines (bioMérieux, Madrid, Spain). For this, Mueller Hinton agar plates were inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland suspension from each isolate, and E-test strips were placed on the pre-inoculated agar plate surface. Plates were incubated for 16–24 hours at 35°C. The MIC results were read where the inhibition zone intersects the E-test strip and interpreted according to the Clinical and CLSI guidelines. The possible range of MIC for the E-test (colistin) was 0.016 to 256 mg/liter.
The agar dilution method was performed according to the procedure detailed in the previous reports (22). Colistin powder (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used in this method. A serial dilution for colistin was provided, ranging from 0.03 to 64 μg/mL in Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Plates were inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland suspension from each isolate and incubated at 37°C overnight. The MIC values were read based on the lowest antibiotic concentration that can inhibit visible bacterial growth.
DNA extraction and PCR amplification.
The DNA extraction was performed by the boiling procedure. The suspension of individual colonies in 300 μL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) was boiled at 95ºC for 10 minutes and then centrifuged (3). The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA were evaluated by spectroscopy at 260 nm and 260/280, respectively. The PCR reaction was conducted to amplify blaOXA-like, lpxA, lpxC, lpxD, pmrA, and pmrB genes using specific primers (Table 1). PCR reaction began with an initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 minutes, 40 cycles of (94°C for 1 minute, 49°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute). The final extension was carried out at 72°C for 5 minutes (21). PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and sequenced on both DNA strands and compared with the reference strain ATCC17978 (GenBank Accession Number CP000521).
Table 1.
Sequences of primers used to determine the presence of pmrAB and lpxACD genes
| Genes | Sequence (5′-3′) | Size (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| bla OXA-51 | Forward | TAA TGC TTT GAT CGG CCT TG | 353 |
| Reverse | TGG ATT GCA CTT CAT CTT GG | ||
| OXA-58 | Forward | G TAT TGG GGC TTG TGC TG | 599 |
| Reverse | CCC CTC TGC GCT CTA CAT | ||
| OXA-72 | Forward | GGT TAG TTG GCC CCC TTA A | 249 |
| Reverse | AGT TGA GCG AAA AGG GGA T | ||
| OXA-23 | Forward | TGT TGA ATG CCC TGA TCG | 504 |
| Reverse | ATT TCT GAC CGC ATT TCC AT | ||
| OXA-143 | Forward | TGGCACTTTCAGCAGTTC | 152 |
| Reverse | GTG TAA TCT TGA GGG GGC | ||
| Pmr A | Forward | GGTGGAATGGGTCAATAAC | 595 |
| Reverse | TTATGATTGCCCCAAACG | ||
| Pmr B | Forward | GAAAGAACAGCTGAGCAC | 1296 |
| Reverse | AACTTATGGACAGGCTGG | ||
| Lpx A | Forward | CCATTCTACCGCCATTATTGA | 746 |
| Reverse | CACAATTCCACGCTCTGA | ||
| LpxC | Forward | CGTACTCTCAATCGTGTG | 870 |
| Reverse | CGTATGGAATTGGACAGTC | ||
| LpxD | Forward | AAGGTGAGCTAATTGGTGAAG | 959 |
| Reverse | AGTGATTTGGGTCAATGGC |
Phylogenetic analysis.
We used MEGA7 (version 7.0.2) for point mutations analysis in five colistin-resistant isolates compared to the drug-sensitive strain ATCC 17978 and constructed the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree by the bootstrap algorithm.
RESULTS
Antimicrobial susceptibility.
According to disk diffusion results, all of the isolates were resistant to meropenem (Fig. 1). Based on the classification method of MDR, XDR, and PDR isolates (20), 41.73% (53/127) of cases were MDR, while the frequency of XDR and PDR strains was 33.85% (43/127) and 3.93% (4/127) respectively. XDR isolates were detected based on resistance to only one or two antibiotic classes, while PDRs were resistant to all antibiotic categories (23). The highest rate of MDR and XDR was related to tracheal samples (p<0.05) (Fig. 2). PDRs were mainly isolated from wound samples (p<0.05) (Fig. 2). The highest MDR and XDR rate was related to inpatients up to 50 years (p<0.05) (Table 2). The prevalence of PDR was dependent on gender, and all PDR isolates were isolated from males (Table 2). All of the colistin-resistant isolates were also resistant to chloramphenicol, imipenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime. Most of the isolates were resistant to ceftazidime and cefepime (Table 3).
Fig. 1.
Results of antibiotic susceptibility testing of A. baumannii clinical isolates obtained from Imam Reza and Sina hospitals in Tabriz, Iran.
Fig. 2.
Frequency of MDR, XDR, and PDR A. baumannii isolates in ICU ward of Imam Reza and Sina hospitals of Tabriz, Iran.
Table 2.
Demographic data and frequency of MDR, XDR, and PDR in A. baumannii clinical isolates obtained from inpatients in Imam Reza and Sina hospitals of Tabriz, Iran.
| Gender | A. baumannii N=127(%) | MDR (n=53) | P. value | XDR (n=43) | P. value (p=0.86) | PDR (n=4) | P. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 81 (63.78%) | 39 (73.58%) | (p=0.05) | 27 (62.80%) | (p=0.86) | 4 (100%) | - |
| Female | 46 (36.22%) | 20 (37.74%) | (p= 0.05) | 16 (37.20%) | (p=0) | 0 | - |
| Age | |||||||
| <17 | 4 (3.14%) | 2 (3.77%) | (p=0.73) | 0 | (p=0.95) | 0 | - |
| 18–30 | 18 (14.17%) | 2 (3.77%) | (p=0 .004) P<.05 |
6 (13.95%) | (p=0.18) | 1 (20%) | P=0 .52 |
| 31–40 | 12 (9.44%) | 4 (7.54%) | (p=0.53) | 2 (4.65%) | (p=0.15) | 0 | - |
| 41–50 | 20 (15.74%) | 5 (9.43%) | (p=0.09) | 4 (9.30%) | (p=0.017) | 0 | - |
| >51 | 73 (57.48%) | 40 (75.47%) | (p= .0005) p<.05 |
31 (72.09%) | P<.05 | 3 (80%) | P=0.47 |
Table 3.
The profile of antibiotic susceptibility of colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates
| Colistin resistant isolates | CAZ | C | MEM | AN | GM | TE | SXT | IPM | SAM | CIP | FEP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A158 | S | R | R | S | S | R | S | R | S | R | S |
| A307 | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| A384 | R | R | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | R |
| A529 | R | R | R | R | R | S | S | R | S | R | R |
| A115 | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Caz: ceftazidim; C: coloramfenicol; Mem: meropenem; Ipm: imipenem; AN: Amikacin; GM: Gentamicin; TE: Tetracyclin; SXT: Trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol; SAM: Ampicilin – sulbactam; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; FEP: cefepim
MIC test.
Five A. baumannii carbapenem-resistant isolates were identified based on the E- test and agar dilution results. MICs of colistin-resistant isolates were ranging from 16 to 64 mg/L. Based on results 76% of the isolates were sensitive to colistin while 19% of them indicated an intermediate resistance to colistin.
Frequency of carbapenemase encoding genes.
Based on PCR results, a high proportion of MDR (41/77.36%) and XDR (36/85.71%) isolates were positive for the blaOXA-23 gene while only 2 (50%) of PDR strains was carried the blaOXA-23 gene. Also, 29 (54.72%) of MDR isolates were positive for the blaOXA-143 gene whereas 13(30.95%) of XDR and 2 (50%) of PDR isolates were carried the blaOXA-143 gene.
The frequency of the blaOXA-72 gene was almost identical between MDR (13/24.53%) and XDR (9/21.42%) isolates and only 1(25%) of PDR strains was positive for the blaOXA-72 gene.
Resistance mechanisms to colistin.
The colistin-resistant isolates were screened for the incidence of mutations in lpxACD and pmrAB genes. For this, after successful amplification of lpxACD and pmrAB genes, the potential mutations were revealed by sequencing (Table 4). The results were compared to the reference strain ATCC17978 (GenBank Accession Number CP000521) to detect the presence of alterations related to resistance to colistin. Based on Clustal W results, V299 G substitution was also detected in all colistin-resistant and colistin susceptible isolates, compared to the sequences of the A. baumannii ATCC 17978.
Table 4.
Details of point mutations in pmrAB and Lpx ACD genes involved in resistance to colistin.
| Colistin resistant isolates | pmrA | pmrB | lpxA | lpxC | lpxD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A115 | no | 227 frameshift mutation | 299V—G | 94E—G | 7L—V |
| 292Y—H | 115M—L | 29I—V | |||
| 394E—D | 151G—A | ||||
| 120C—R | |||||
| A158 | no | 162V—A | 342P—R | 120C—R | 99I—N |
| 292Y—H | 136E—R | 174R—P | |||
| 137A—L | |||||
| 166A—P | |||||
| A307 | no | 371A—V | 394E—D | 109T—P | 109I—L |
| 125T—P | 112S—A | ||||
| 140Q—P | |||||
| 152G—E | |||||
| A384 | no | 133V—D | 405P—R | 100V—G | 62 I—V |
| 162V—A | 165F—L | 90L—P | |||
| 110H—R | |||||
| 131N—I | |||||
| 186F—L | |||||
| A529 | no | No | 107K—Q | 131I—N | 127 frameshift mutation |
| 283I—N | 165F—L | 180V—G | |||
| 298, Frameshif mutation | 182T—P | ||||
| 222V—G |
The V162A substitution in pmrB gene was repeated in two isolates, also E394D, and Y292H substitutions in lpxA, were found in two isolates and C120R substitution related to lpxC gene was also detected in two isolates. A phylogenetic tree was designed based on alterations in lpxACD and pmrB genes and results indicated the appearance of new isolates compared to the reference strain ATCC17978 A. baumannii. The examination of point mutations in the lpxA gene for five colistin-resistant isolates was indicating four phylogenetic groups that two isolates (A307 and A384) were in a group (Fig. 3). According to point mutations for lpxD gene, A307 and A529 isolates were classified in a group, and based on the analysis of variations for lpxC gene, A384, and A158 isolates were found in a single group.
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic analysis of five colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates based on point mutations in pmrB and lpxACD genes.
DISCUSSION
The escalating prevalence of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates has led to the overuse of colistin as a last-line antibiotic. Currently, the appearance of colistin-resistant strains has limited the therapeutic options against MDR A. baumannii in clinical settings.
This study was conducted to characterize colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates. In this study, all of the clinical isolates were resistant to carbapenem based on resistance to meropenem or imipenem. Also, 76% of the carbapenem-resistant isolates were sensitive to colistin consistent with results reported from Saudi Arabia (76% cases sensitive to colistin) (24). Colistin resistant rate, in our study, was almost similar to results obtained from Shiraz, Southwest of Iran, in which 6% of isolates were resistant to colistin (25).
The frequency of MDR and XDR isolates was 41.73% and 33.85%, respectively which was not consistent with the frequency of MDR and XDR reported from a burn center hospital in the northwest of Iran (74.75% MDR and 73.13% XDR) (26). This inconsistency can be associated with the hospitals under study. Also, MDR and XDR rates in our study were fewer than studies done in the west (84% MDR and 48% XDR) (26) and the North of Iran (91.4%MDR and 58.3% XDR) (27). The incidence of PDR in this study was equal to 3.93% which was less than the PDR rate reported from Shahid Motahari Burns Hospital, Tehran, Iran (14.5%) (28).
The highest proportion of MDR was isolated from tracheal samples not consistent with the recent reports regarding the high rate of MDR in wound and blood samples (26, 29). It is indicating a lack of association between the sample type and MDR rate. The prevalence of MDR was dependent on age which was more detected in patients older than 51 years old similar to the previous study (30).
The most percentage of MDR and XDR were related to patients up to 50 years (p<0.05). In our study, there were no mutations in pmrA consistent with the previous studies (31–33) indicating a lack of correlation between colistin resistance and incidence of mutation in pmrA gene. Remarkably, all colistin-resistant isolates were harbored at least one point mutation in the pmrB gene. In this study, three types of alterations in the pmrB gene (V162A, A371V, V133D) were detected that V162A substitution was repeated in two isolates and this mutation seems to be key in the occurrence of resistance to colistin. A mutation related to the change of alanine to valine reported in this study was previously detected in recent studies indicating a crucial role of this mutation in resistance to colistin (32, 34). Until now, a variety of mutations have been reported.
In a recent study performed on colistin-resistant isolates, five types of mutations (P233S, A142V, A227V, and T235I) were observed in the pmrB gene (34).
Also, in a study done by Park et al. six kinds of point mutations were identified in the pmrB (I121F, T192I, Q228P, A184V, P190S, and A183T) (31), and Beceiro et al. reported eight alterations in the pmrB gene (L87F, M145K, S14L, P233S, A227V, S403F, F387Y, and N353Y) (32).
In our study, several mutations were found in the lpxA gene (V299G, P342R, E394D, Y292H, P405R, K107Q, I283N, and frameshift mutations) that E394D and Y292H substitutions were repeated in two isolates. Also, V299G substitution was detected in all colistin-resistant and colistin susceptible isolates, compared to the sequences of the A. baumannii ATCC 17978. It was indicating a lack of correlation between V299G substitution and resistance to colistin.
In lpxC, fourteen alterations were found in the five colistin-resistant isolates that C120R and F165L substitutions were repeated in two isolates. In lpxD, fifteen mutations were observed in the five colistin-resistant isolates. In a recent study, Nurtop et al. reported three mutations (V63I, Q4K, and E117K) within the lpxD gene (35).
Until now, a variety of mutations have been identified in colistin-resistant isolates that may be related to resistance to colistin however it is obvious that repetition of some mutations in our study can be directly associated with resistance to colistin.
Analysis of the phylogenetic tree made based on alterations in lpxACD and pmrB genes indicated the appearance of new isolates in comparison with the reference strain ATCC17978 A. baumannii. Based on point mutations in the lpxA gene in five colistin-resistant isolates, four phylogenetic groups were classified which two isolates (A307 and A384) were in a group. Based on the diversity of point mutations in lpxD gene, A307 and A529 isolates were in a group and the analysis of variations in lpxC gene was indicating the classification of A384, and A158 isolates in a single group. Also, the A384 isolate was in a single group based on point mutations that occurred in pmrB, lpxA, lpxC genes.
In conclusion, the present study indicated the prevalence of MDR and XDR A. baumannii isolates and the emergence of PDR isolates in the northwest portion of Iran. The appearance of colistin-resistant isolates with new mutations in pmrB, lpxACD genes highlights the incidence of new resistance mechanisms in A. baumannii clinical isolates.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to acknowledge the infectious and tropical diseases research center, Tabriz University of medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran. The study was conducted after ethical approval of the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (reference number: IR. TBZMED. REC.1396.811).
REFERENCES
- 1.Zarrilli R, Crispino M, Bagattini M, Barretta E, Di Popolo A, Triassi M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of sequential outbreaks of Acinetobacter baumannii in an intensive care unit shows the emergence of carbapenem resistance. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 946–953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pogue JM, Mann T, Barber KE, Kaye KS. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, surveillance and management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013; 11: 383–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ghavghani FR, Rahbarnia L, Naghili B, Dehnad A, Bazmani A, Varshochi M, et al. Nasal and extra nasal MRSA colonization in hemodialysis patients of northwest of Iran. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12: 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rahbarnia L, Farajnia S, Khaneshi H, Farajnia H, Naghili B, Tanomand A. Detection of blaOXA-23 and blaNDM-1 carbapenemase among clinical isolates of A. baumannii in Tabriz, north-west of Iran. Gene Rep 2020; 18: 100555. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shi J, Sun T, Cui Y, Wang C, Wang F, Zhou Y, et al. Multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii hospital infection associated with high mortality: a retrospective study in the pediatric intensive care unit. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20: 597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Freire MP, de Oliveira Garcia D, Garcia CP, Campagnari Bueno MF, Camargo CH, Kono Magri ASG, et al. Bloodstreaminfection caused byextensivelydrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in cancer patients: high mortality associated with delayed treatment rather than with the degree of neutropenia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22: 352–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ahmed SS, Alp E, Hopman J, Voss A. Global epidemiology on colistin resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Infect Dis Ther 2016; 4: 10.4172/2332-0877.1000287. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bassetti M, Righi E, Esposito S, Petrosillo N, Nicolini L. Drug treatment for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Future Microbiol 2008; 3: 649–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Biswas S, Brunel JM, Dubus JC, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Rolain JM. Colistin: an update on the antibiotic of the 21st century. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2012; 10: 917–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vila J, Pachón J. Therapeutic options for Acinetobacter baumannii infections: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012; 13: 2319–2336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Da Silva GJ, Domingues S. Interplay between colistin resistance, virulence and fitness in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics (Basel) 2017; 6: 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dahdouh E, Gómez-Gil R, Sanz S, González-Zorn B, Daoud Z, Mingorance J, et al. A novel mutation in pmrB mediates colistin resistance during therapy of Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017; 49: 727–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park YK, Ko KS. Effect of carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) on killing Acinetobacter baumannii by colistin. J Microbiol 2015; 53: 53–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thi Khanh Nhu N, Riordan DW, Do Hoang Nhu T, Thanh DP, Thwaites G, Huong Lan NP, et al. The induction and identification of novel Colistin resistance mutations in Acinetobacter baumannii and their implications. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 28291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moffatt J, Harper M, Harrison P, Hale JD, Vinogradov E, Seemann T, et al. Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 4971–4977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moffatt JH, Harper M, Adler B, Nation RL, Li J, Boyce JD. Insertion sequence IS Aba11 is involved in colistin resistance and loss of lipopolysaccharide in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3022–3024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peymani A, Higgins PG, Nahaei MR, Farajnia S, Seifert H. Characterisation and clonal dissemination of OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in Tabriz, northwest Iran. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012; 39: 526–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sahu C, Jain V, Mishra P, Prasad KN. Clinical and laboratory standards institute versus European committee for antimicrobial susceptibility testing guidelines for interpretation of carbapenem antimicrobial susceptibility results for Escherichia coli in urinary tract infection (UTI). J Lab Physicians 2018; 10: 289–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ranjbar R, Farahani A. Study of genetic diversity, biofilm formation, and detection of Carbapenemase, MBL, ESBL, and tetracycline resistance genes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn wound infections in Iran. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8: 172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008; 21: 538–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mirshekar M, Shahcheraghi F, Azizi O, Solgi H, Badmasti F. Diversity of class 1 integrons, and disruption of carO and dacD by insertion sequences among Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist 2018; 24: 359–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tenover FC, Emery SL, Spiegel CA, Bradford PA, Eells S, Endimiani A, et al. Identification of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and proteus species can potentially improve reporting of cephalosporin susceptibility testing results. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 294–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 268–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ghanem S, El Shafey HM, Manzoor N. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Acinetobacter spp. isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital at Madinah, Saudi Arabia. African J Microbiol Res 2018; 12: 723–729. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sepahvand V, Davarpanah MA, Hejazi SH. Epidemiology of colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Shiraz, Iran. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 2015; 5: 45–48. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mirzaei B, Bazgir ZN, Goli HR, Iranpour F, Mohammadi F, Babaei R. Prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in clinical samples from northeast of Iran. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13: 380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deylam Salehi M, Ferdosi-Shahandashti E, Yahyapour Y, Khafri S, Pournajaf A, Rajabnia R. Integron-mediated antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from intensive care unit patients, Babol, north of Iran. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 7157923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sobouti B, Mirshekar M, Fallah S, Tabaei A, Mehrabadi JF, Darbandi A. Pan drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii causing nosocomial infections among burnt children. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2020; 34: 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tavares LCB, Vasconcellos FMd, Sousa WVd, Rocchetti TT, Mondelli AL, Ferreira AM, et al. Emergence and persistence of high-risk clones among MDR and XDR Acinetobacter baumannii at a Brazilian teaching hospital. Front Microbiol 2019; 9: 2898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang H, Zhang Y, Li S, Wang J, Chen J, Pan Z, et al. Rifampicin resistance and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis detection using Xpert MTB/RIF in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study. Microb Drug Resist 2018; 24: 675–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Park YK, Choi JY, Shin D, Ko KS. Correlation between overexpression and amino acid substitution of the Pmr-AB locus and colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011; 37: 525–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beceiro A, Llobet E, Aranda J, Bengoechea JA, Doumith M, Hornsey M, et al. Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3370–3379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Adams MD, Nickel GC, Bajaksouzian S, Lavender H, Murthy AR, Jacobs MR, et al. Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 3628–3634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Haeili M, Kafshdouz M, Feizabadi MM. Molecular mechanisms of colistin resistance among pandrug-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with high case-fatality rate in intensive care unit patients. Microb Drug Resist 2018; 24: 1271–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nurtop E, Bilman FB, Menekse S, Azap OK, Gönen M, Ergonul O, et al. Promoters of colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Microb Drug Resist 2019; 25: 997–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



