Abstract
Background: We aimed to explore the relationship between the serum Soluble Scavenger with 5 Domains (SSC5D) levels and heart failure (HF).
Methods and Results: We retrospectively enrolled 276 patients diagnosed with HF or normal during hospitalization in Shanghai General Hospital between September 2020 and December 2021. Previously published RNA sequencing data were re-analyzed to confirm the expression profile of SSC5D in failing and non-failing human and mouse heart tissues. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was used to quantify Ssc5d mRNA levels in murine heart tissue after myocardial infarction and transverse aortic constriction surgery. To understand the HF-induced secreted proteins profile, 1,755 secreted proteins were investigated using human dilated cardiomyopathy RNA-seq data, and the results indicated that SSC5D levels were significantly elevated in failing hearts compared to the non-failing. Using single-cell RNA sequencing data, we demonstrated that Ssc5d is predominantly expressed in cardiac fibroblasts. In a murine model of myocardial infarction or transverse aortic constriction, Ssc5d mRNA levels were markedly increased compared with those in the sham group. Similarly, serum SSC5D levels were considerably elevated in the HF group compared with the control group [15,789.35 (10,745.32–23,110.65) pg/mL, 95% CI (16,263.01–19,655.43) vs. 8,938.72 (6,154.97–12,778.81) pg/mL, 95% CI (9,337.50–11,142.93); p < 0.0001]. Moreover, serum SSC5D levels were positively correlated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (R = 0.4, p = 7.9e-12) and inversely correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (R = −0.46, p = 9.8e-16).
Conclusion: We concluded that SSC5D was a specific response to HF. Serum SSC5D may function as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for patients with HF.
Keywords: heart failure, SSc5D, biomarker, LVEF, NT-ProBNP
1 Introduction
Heart failure (HF) is a systolic or diastolic dysfunction of the heart, which is the terminal stage of various cardiovascular diseases. Despite improvements in medication and management, the morbidity and mortality of HF remain high worldwide (Tedeschi et al., 2020). Currently, the clinical diagnosis of HF is mainly based on the patient’s symptoms, signs and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (Heidenreich et al., 2022).
Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been recommended as the gold standards for HF diagnosis in HF guidelines (Yancy et al., 2017). However, other non-cardiac diseases, such as renal failure (Tsutamoto et al., 2006), obesity (Das et al., 2005), etc., can also change plasma BNP and serum NT-proBNP levels. Therefore, it is particularly important to find more biomarkers with higher specificity and sensitivity to improve the value of prediction and diagnosis of HF. In addition to classical HF biomarkers, studies on serum biomarkers of HF have increased. MicroRNAs are endogenous small non-coding RNAs that play a crucial role in cardiovascular diseases (Huang et al., 2018) and have been proven to be biomarkers for HF diagnosis and prognosis (Yang et al., 2021). Moreover, serum LL-37/cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) (Zhou et al., 2020) and soluble ST2 receptor (Weinberg et al., 2003) have been shown to promote the diagnostic and prognostic value of HF. Given the deadly conditions of HF, the investigation of HF-specific responders and regulators will contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of clinical patients. In this study, we explored the secreted proteins of patients with HF and demonstrated that serum Soluble Scavenger with 5 Domains (SSC5D) was overly elevated in failing hearts compared to control group.
SSC5D is a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich superfamily (SRCR-SF) (Gonçalves et al., 2009). Studies have demonstrated that numerous SRCR-SF members play essential roles in inflammation and immunity (Lee et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021). Additionally, SRCR-SF has been reported to be associated with various cardiovascular diseases, such as collagen deposition, angiogenesis (Umana-Diaz et al., 2020), and atherosclerosis (Silva et al., 2016). However, the function of SSC5D in cardiovascular disease remains unknown. Therefore, this study investigates the diagnostic value of serum SSC5D for patients with HF.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Patient’s characteristics
A total of 276 patients who were diagnosed with HF or control during hospitalization in Shanghai General Hospital between September 2020 and December 2021 were enrolled in this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital (2018KY250). The study was performed under the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
HF is classified into the following categories based on LVEF: HFrEF (HF with reduced EF), LVEF≤40%; HFimpEF (HF with improved EF), previous LVEF≤40% and a follow-up measurement of LVEF>40%; HFmrEF (HF with mildly reduced EF), LVEF 41%–49%; HFpEF (HF with preserved EF), LVEF≥50% (Heidenreich et al., 2022). In this study, patients were grouped based on their symptoms and LVEF values: the HF group, LVEF<50% with typical symptoms of HF (Ponikowski et al., 2016), and the control group, LVEF≥50% without typical symptoms of HF. Patients who were diagnosed with acute infections, cancers, age<18 years, acute coronary syndrome, pregnancy, autoimmune diseases, or surgery within 1 month were prospectively excluded. Table 1 presents patient’s characteristics.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics | Controls (N = 148) | HF (N = 128) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 61 (50–66) | 61 (52–68) | 0.4398 |
Male, n (%) | 89 (60.1) | 94 (73.4) | 0.0197 |
Smoker, n (%) | 24 (16.2) | 23 (18.0) | 0.6993 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 24.8 (22.8–27.1) | 25.0 (22.9–27.3) | 0.9217 |
SBP, mmHg | 134 (120–146) | 125 (113–137) | 0.0004 |
DBP, mmHg | 78 (70–84) | 75 (68–83) | 0.3011 |
Heart rate, bpm | 78 (73–88) | 82 (72–92) | 0.2364 |
Medical history, n (%) | |||
Hypertension | 67 (45.3) | 64 (50.0) | 0.4326 |
Diabetes mellitus | 26 (17.6) | 46 (35.9) | 0.0005 |
Hypercholesterolemia | 48 (32.4) | 14 (10.9) | <0.0001 |
Atrial fibrillation | 11 (7.4) | 33 (25.8) | <0.0001 |
COPD | 2 (1.4) | 3 (2.3) | 0.5376 |
Myocardial infarction | 4 (2.7) | 62 (48.4) | <0.0001 |
Anemia | 0 | 5 (3.9) | 0.0152 |
Treatment, n (%) | |||
ACE-I/ARB | 59 (39.9) | 118 (92.2) | <0.0001 |
Beta-blocker | 49 (33.1) | 109 (85.2) | <0.0001 |
Digoxin | 1 (0.7) | 17 (13.3) | <0.0001 |
Statin | 94 (63.5) | 100 (78.1) | 0.0081 |
Antiplatelet/anticoagulant | 71 (48.0) | 76 (59.4) | 0.0583 |
CCB | 30 (20.3) | 13 (10.2) | 0.0209 |
Loop diuretic | 1 (0.7) | 71 (55.5) | <0.0001 |
Laboratory measurements | |||
NT-proBNP, pg/mL | 48.6 (21.0–107.3) | 1,147.0 (495.0–2,249.3) | <0.0001 |
HDL-c, mmol/L | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | 0.0089 |
LDL-c, mmol/L | 2.6 (2.1–3.2) | 2.5 (1.9–3.2) | 0.5810 |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 92.2 (79.6–99.3) | 79.5 (67.3–94.5) | <0.0001 |
hs-CRP, mg/L | 0.9 (0.3–1.9) | 1.6 (0.8–5.0) | <0.0001 |
Sodium, mmol/L | 142 (141–143) | 141 (139–143) | 0.0010 |
Creatinine, μmol/L | 74 (65–84) | 86 (71–100) | <0.0001 |
BUN, mmol/L | 5.4 (4.5–6.5) | 6.7 (5.1–8.1) | <0.0001 |
Cystatin C, mg/L | 0.97 (0.85–1.08) | 1.15 (1.03–1.33) | <0.0001 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 138 (127–151.8) | 140 (130–152) | 0.6807 |
Total bilirubin, μmol/L | 12.6 (9.9–16.8) | 14.7 (10.7–20.4) | 0.0063 |
Echocardiographic parameters | |||
LVEDd (mm) | 48 (46–50) | 63 (59–68) | <0.0001 |
LVESd (mm) | 30 (28–31) | 51 (46–57) | <0.0001 |
LAd (mm) | 37 (35–40) | 46 (43–51) | <0.0001 |
LVEF, % | 68 (65–70) | 37 (30–43.8) | <0.0001 |
Categorical variables are presented as n (percentage, %), and continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range). p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACE-I, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, Angiotensin II, receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hs-CRP, hypersensitive C-reactive protein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; LVEDd, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESd, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LAd, left atrial diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
2.2 RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis
RNA-seq data of humans (Accession number: GSE165303, GSE46224, and GSE116250) and mice (Accession number: GSE95755) were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Raw data were transformed into fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM), reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM), and counts per million (CPM) using the R statistical software for further analysis. The expression pattern of Ssc5d was derived from previously published scRNA-seq data (Zhuang et al., 2020). The human cardiac single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) transcriptomics data from the Kuppe et al. study was downloaded from: https://cellxgene.cziscience.com/collections/8191c283-0816-424b-9b61-c3e1d6258a77) (Kuppe et al., 2022). To re-analyze the scRNA-seq data, we performed a quality control of single cell by choosing individual live cell among each dataset. In brief, both the count of features and mitochondria were defined as the cut-offs. Then the data from all individual cell was screened based on the original article criteria prior to further analysis. When the quality control was completed, we normalized each cell characteristic by dividing or multiplying all unique molecular identifiers by 10,000 to get the value in per million transcripts, and then performed logarithmic transformation using RStudio.
2.3 Secreted proteins data analysis
The secreted proteins data were downloaded from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology website (https://www.guidetopharmacology.org/).
2.4 Myocardial infarction (MI) and transverse aortic constriction (TAC) model
Male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Sipper-BK Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital (2021AW035) and conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. TAC and MI surgery were performed based on the previous literature to construct failing heart model (n = 5–7) (Du et al., 2020; Zhuang et al., 2022).
2.5 RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assays
Heart tissues were collected from mice after MI (14 and 28 days) or TAC (1 and 4 weeks) surgery and the sham group. Total RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Japan) and cDNA was amplified using the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix kit (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative PCR analysis was performed using the TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ kit (Takara, Japan) and the QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Co., United States). The specific qPCR primer sequences were as follows (5′-3′):
Mouse Ssc5d Forward primer: GCGTCGTCTGTGTAGGTCAG; Mouse Ssc5d Reverse primer: AGCGTGAGTTATAGGGGGCT; Mouse Gapdh Forward primer: CCGCATCTTCTTGTGCAGT; Mouse Gapdh Reverse primer: CATCACCTGGCCTACAGGAT; Gapdh was used as an endogenous control and the 2^−ΔΔCT method was used to analyze the data.
2.6 Blood samples collection and ELISA assays
Blood samples were collected from patients with HF and the control group, centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 20 min to obtain serum, and stored at −80°C for further ELISA assays. Serum SSC5D concentrations were measured using the Human SSC5D/Soluble scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain-containing protein SSC5D ELISA Kit (catalog no: #EK21098, SAB, United States), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Human serum samples were diluted 1:100 in sample diluent. All serum samples were measured by a researcher who was oblivious to the patient’s clinical data.
2.7 Statistical analysis
IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26, 2019) and R statistical software (version 4.0.4, 2021) were used to analyze data. The experimental data were represented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was performed to compare the difference between 2 groups. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test was used to evaluate the difference between ≥3 groups. Categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentages, %) and were compared using the chi-square test. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the continuous variables. If the continuous variables did not conform to the normality distribution, they were presented as median (interquartile range) and compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. The SSC5D concentration values were transformed into a normal distribution using a logarithm of 10 and divided into quartiles for further analysis. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relationships between serum SSC5D levels and NT-proBNP, LVEF, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), cystatin c, and creatinine. A logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the association between HF and risk factors of HF. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hemoglobin, creatinine, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), BUN, Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and eGFR were adjusted. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic value and determine the optimal cut-off value with or without SSC5D. The two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 SSC5D transcript is elevated in failing heart
To investigate the role of secreted proteins in cardiovascular diseases, we first collected a list of secreted proteins data. Subsequently, we re-analyzed their expression patterns in failing and non-failing (NF) heart tissue RNA-seq (GSE165303) data (Feng et al., 2022). We identified 1,459 genes in common (Figure 1A). Furthermore, by setting p < 0.05 and |log2FoldChange|>1, we identified 190 secreted proteins that were differentially expressed in the hearts of patients with HF, and SSC5D was one of the most differentially upregulated genes (Figure 1B). Furthermore, through Pearson correlation analysis in R, we discovered a significant positive correlation between SSC5D and the cardiac hypertrophy marker genes A-type natriuretic peptide (NPPA) (R = 0.6, p = 3.1e-11) and B-type natriuretic peptide (NPPB) (R = 0.46, p = 1.3e-6) (Figures 1C, D). To verify the results of increased SSC5D expression, a series of human failing heart tissues (GSE165303, GSE46224, and GSE116250) RNA-seq data were re-analyzed to compare the expression of SSC5D. From RNA-seq data analysis, we found that SSC5D expression was significantly upregulated in the failing group (dilated cardiomyopathy, DCM; ischemic cardiomyopathy, ICM) compared to the NF group (Figures 1E–G).
To further verify the human failing heart RNA-seq data, we constructed mouse TAC and MI models and collected cardiac tissue at different times after surgery. We found that the Ssc5d mRNA expression was significantly elevated at 4 weeks (approximately 2-fold, p < 0.0001) after TAC surgery compared to that in the sham group (Figure 2A). Similarly, compared with the sham group, Ssc5d mRNA levels were significantly elevated at 14 and 28 days after MI surgery, and the highest fold increase (approximately 11-fold, p < 0.0001) was observed at day 28 (Figure 2B). To further determine the origin of Ssc5d, we re-analyzed mouse heart RNA-seq data (GSE95755) (Quaife-Ryan et al., 2017), which sorted cardiac cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and vascular endothelial cells for RNA-seq analysis. We discovered that Ssc5d levels were significantly higher in fibroblasts than in other cell populations in both neonatal (P1) and adult (P56) mouse hearts (Figure 2C). Additionally, Zhuang et al. have integrated three representative mouse heart scRNA-seq datasets, including 27,349 non-cardiomyocytes (macrophages, fibroblasts, endothelia, and lymphocytes) isolated from myocardial infarction or sham heart tissue (Zhuang et al., 2020). We contacted the authors and re-analyzed their data to explore the expression profile of Ssc5d in non-cardiomyocytes and revealed that Ssc5d was markedly co-expressed with Col1a1-positive fibroblasts. Moreover, we re-analyzed the previous published human cardiac single-nucleus RNA sequencing data (snRNA-seq) (Kuppe et al., 2022). By analyzing this snRNA-seq data, we showed that SSC5D was expressed predominantly in fibroblasts, to the less extent in endothelial cells or myeloid cells (Supplementary Figures S1A, B). This is consistent with our previous findings that SSC5D is mainly expressed in fibroblasts. Although it is possible that circulating Ssc5d is synthesized by other cells, our results demonstrated that it is mainly present in fibroblasts in the heart. Taken together, these results suggest that cardiac Ssc5d was mainly derived from fibroblasts and was markedly upregulated after MI and TAC surgery.
3.2 Patient’s baseline characteristics
To further clarify the relationship between serum SSC5D and HF, we collected 276 blood samples and measured serum SSC5D concentrations in all patients using an ELISA Kit. The 276 enrolled patients were grouped into two based on their symptoms and LVEF values. Table 1 presents the baseline data of the patients. There were no significant differences in age, smoking status, BMI, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate between the control and HF groups. More men were included in the HF group than in the control group and more HF patients have a medical history of diabetes mellitus, anemia, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction. The number of patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARB), beta-blockers, digoxin, statins, calcium channel blockers (CCB), and loop diuretic drugs was significantly higher in the HF group than in the control group. However, no significant difference was observed in patients receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug treatment. Compared with the control group, blood creatinine, total bilirubin, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and BUN levels were higher in the HF group, whereas eGFR, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), and sodium levels were slightly lower in the HF group. Furthermore, the echocardiographic results indicated a significant decrease in LVEF but an increased left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESd), and left atrial diameter (LAd) in the HF group compared with the control group.
3.3 Association of serum SSC5D with risk factors of HF
We discovered that the SSC5D levels were significantly elevated in the HF group compared with the control group [15,789.35 (10,745.32–23110.65) pg/mL, 95% CI (16,263.01–19655.43) vs. 8,938.72 (6,154.97–12778.81) pg/mL, 95% CI (9,337.50–11142.93); p < 0.0001] (Figure 3A). Furthermore, patients with HF were grouped into two, HFmrEF (n = 37) and HFrEF (n = 86) groups, and we discovered that the serum SSC5D levels in the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups were significantly higher than those in the control group (Figure 3B). However, no statistical difference was observed between the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups (Figure 3B).
We then analyzed the relationship between serum SSC5D levels and clinical HF risk factors. We discovered that serum SSC5D levels were higher in patients aged ≥65 years than those aged <65 years (Figure 3D). Patients with a history of hypertension and diabetes had higher serum SSC5D levels (Table 2). Moreover, elevated NT-proBNP and decreased LVEF were highly correlated with higher serum SSC5D levels (R = 0.4, p = 7.9e-12, and R = −0.46, p = 9.8e-16, respectively) (Figures 3E, F). Serum SSC5D levels were significantly correlated with indicators of renal dysfunction, such as eGFR, BUN, cystatin c, and creatinine (Figures 3G–J). However, no statistical difference in serum SSC5D levels was observed between the sexes and smoking status (Figure 3C; Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Variables | SSC5D (pg/mL) | p-Value |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male (n = 183) | 10,816.41 (7,292.48–16,740.40) | 0.0956 |
Female (n = 93) | 12,256.01 (8,949.68–20,167.58) | |
Age | ||
<65 (n = 173) | 10,102.50 (6,889.57–15,352.32) | <0.0001 |
≥65 (n = 103) | 14,575.00 (9,912.62–21,872.13) | |
Smoking | ||
Yes (n = 47) | 10,696.58 (6,799.49–14,196.77) | 0.2587 |
No (n = 229) | 11,543.20 (7,876.62–18,328.31) | |
Hypertension | ||
Yes (n = 131) | 14,120.30 (10,053.31–21,035.89) | <0.0001 |
No (n = 145) | 9,561.05 (6,459.68–14,248.90) | |
Hypercholesterolemia | ||
Yes (n = 62) | 9,764.05 (7,331.49–13389.56) | 0.0017 |
No (n = 214) | 12,113.56 (7,892.27–19,868.04) | |
Diabetes | ||
Yes (n = 72) | 15,790.19 (11,298.94–23,199.95) | <0.0001 |
No (n = 204) | 10,075.91 (6,977.58–15,562.41) | |
LVEF (R = -0.46, p = 9.8e-16) | ||
≥50% (n = 153) | 9,117.39 (6,294.03–13,132.71) | |
41%–49% (n = 37) | 15,507.25 (11,187.34–22,366.36) | p 1 < 0.0001 |
≤40% (n = 86) | 15,789.35 (10,373.27–23,843.91) | p 2 < 0.0001 |
NT-proBNP (R = 0.4, p = 7.9e-12) | ||
<125 pg/mL (n = 116) | 8,488.70 (5,824.16–12,065.34) | <0.0001 |
≥125 pg/mL (n = 156) | 14,813.76 (10,102.50–21,660.74) |
Data are shown as median (interquartile range) and used Mann-Whitney U test between two groups. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
p 1 and p 2 were the results of comparison between LVEF≥50% group with LVEF, 41%–49% and≤40% group in serum SSC5D levels, respectively.
Pearson correlation coefficient in R was used to analyze the correlation between serum SSC5D levels with the continuous LVEF, and NT-proBNP, level.
3.4 Predictive value of serum SSC5D
These results clarified that serum SSC5D levels were significantly elevated in patients with HF. Further, we explored the diagnostic value of serum SSC5D in patients with HF. Through univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models analysis, we discovered that log-transformed serum SSC5D levels were strongly positively associated with the prevalence of HF (OR:3.23, 95% CI:2.32–4.50, p < 0.001) (Table 3). Meanwhile, we divided the log-transformed SSC5D into tertiles and discovered that the highest SSC5D tertile was associated with a higher risk of HF (OR:11.02, 95% CI:5.53–21.97, p < 0.001). Subsequently, we adjusted the covariates to analyze the correlation between the SSC5D score and HF. After adjusting age and sex in Model 1 and other covariates (sex, age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, hemoglobin, creatinine, LDL-c, hs-CRP, BUN, HbA1c, and eGFR) in Model 2, log-transformed serum SSC5D levels were highly positively associated with a higher risk of HF (OR:3.60, 95% CI:2.53–5.11, p < 0.001 and OR:3.40, 95% CI:2.10–5.51, p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 3). Additionally, the highest SSC5D tertile had a higher risk of HF in Models 1 and 2 (OR:17.70, 95% CI:7.78–40.24, p < 0.001 and OR:11.83, 95% CI:4.30–33.09, p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Unadjusted | p-Value | Model 1 | p-Value | Model 2 | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||
logSSC5D (per SD) | 3.23 (2.32–4.50) | <0.001 | 3.60 (2.53–5.11) | <0.001 | 3.40 (2.10–5.51) | <0.001 |
SSC5D tertiles | 3.31 (2.35–4.66) | <0.001 | 4.16 (2.77–6.26) | <0.001 | 3.41 (2.05–5.67) | <0.001 |
Tertile 1 | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | |||
Tertile 2 | 3.61 (1.87–6.97) | <0.001 | 4.90 (2.38–10.10) | <0.001 | 4.03 (1.71–9.48) | 0.001 |
Tertile 3 | 11.02 (5.53–21.97) | <0.001 | 17.70 (7.78–40.24) | <0.001 | 11.83 (4.30–33.09) | <0.001 |
SSC5D concentration was normalized by log10 transformation to obtain normality and divided into tertiles.
Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2: Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, hemoglobin, creatinine, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypersensitive C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, HbA1c, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the SSC5D for HF. First, we determined the diagnostic accuracy of individual SSC5D value on heart failure, and the ROC curve results showed that the sensitivity and specificity value was 0.750 and 0.676, respectively, and the AUC value was 0.773 (Supplementary Figure S2). In addition, we discovered that the area under the curve (AUC) value of SSC5D was 0.831, which was markedly improved compared to that without SSC5D (AUC: 0.768) in Model 2 (Figure 4; Table 4). The ROC curve analysis showed that the specificity and sensitivity were 0.723 and 0.843, respectively, and the optimal cut-off value of SSC5D concentration for predicting HF was 10,853.98 pg/mL in Model 2 (Figure 4; Table 4). Taken together, these results indicate that SSC5D is a sensitive indicator of HF and may serve as a therapeutic target for treating HF.
TABLE 4.
ROC aera (AUC) | 95% CI | Specificity | Sensitivity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Without SSC5D | 0.768 | 0.708–0.828 | 0.792 | 0.630 |
With SSC5D | 0.831 | 0.777–0.884 | 0.723 | 0.843 |
4 Discussion
In this study, we identified a sensitive indicator of HF by screening for the expression of secreted genes in a human RNA-seq dataset. The transcriptional level of SSC5D was significantly higher in the failing heart than in the non-failing heart in both clinical and pre-clinical models. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the Ssc5d mRNA levels were markedly elevated after TAC and MI surgery. Combining the scRNA-seq data and published RNA-seq data, we demonstrated that Ssc5d is predominantly expressed in cardiac fibroblasts in the mouse heart. Notably, the measurement of serum SSC5D concentrations revealed that patients with HF had higher SSC5D levels than those in the control group, which may serve as a therapeutic target for treating HF.
SSC5D is a new soluble protein that has been identified as a new family member of glycoproteins of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich superfamily. A previous study indicated that SSC5D is predominantly expressed in monocytes/macrophages and T lymphocytes (Gonçalves et al., 2009).
However, our results demonstrated that Ssc5d was predominantly expressed in cardiac fibroblasts but was rarely expressed in cardiomyocytes, leukocytes, and endothelial cells. We speculate that this may be attributed to differential expression patterns in various tissues. However, whether Ssc5d is derived from cardiac fibroblasts must be verified in the future. Furthermore, studies have shown that abnormal expression of SSC5D is associated with various diseases, such as multiple myeloma (Laï et al., 1995), primary megakaryoblastic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia (Alvarez et al., 2001). Additionally, SSC5D is associated with inflammation. The protein level of SSC5D is significantly increased in the synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis (Balakrishnan et al., 2014). To date, no reports on the correlation between serum SSC5D levels and the incidence of HF exist. By re-analyzing the RNA-seq data of HF, this study demonstrated for the first time that fibroblast-derived SSC5D was remarkably upregulated in failing conditions.
Similar to SSC5D, S4D-SRCRB is a soluble member of group B SRCR-SF, which is considered to resemble SSC5D in amino acid composition and domain organization (Gonçalves et al., 2009). S4D-SRCRB plays a crucial role in innate immunity (Padilla et al., 2002). CD5L is also one of the SRCR-SF domains and contains three SRCR domains. The elevated CD5L levels often occur in infectious and inflammatory processes (Sanchez-Moral et al., 2021). Agra-Bermejo et al. suggested that isoproterenol treatment of patients with HF or atrial fibrillation significantly increased CD5L secretion from epicardial adipose tissue, which may activate the toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway and produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (Agra-Bermejo et al., 2020). Circulating CD5L is highly correlated with the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney dysfunction (Castelblanco et al., 2021). Moreover, CD5L promotes atherosclerosis by increasing the formation of macrophage foam cells and CD36-mediated oxidized low-density lipoprotein uptake (Amézaga et al., 2014). Similarly, Scavenger Receptors Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 were associated with atherosclerosis, and inhibition of Stabilin-1/Stabilin-2 can significantly reduce Erg1 expression in mononuclear macrophages, thus reducing the progression of atherosclerosis (Manta et al., 2022). Lysyl Oxidase-like2 (LOXL2), one of SRCR-SF, plays a key role in cardiovascular diseases, and directedly interacted with collagen IV and fibronectin to regulate deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components (Umana-Diaz et al., 2020). Additionally, LOXL2 regulates the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 signaling pathway to stimulate myofibroblast transformation in cardiac fibroblasts (Yang et al., 2016). Thus, we hypothesized that SSC5D may contribute to the augmentation of the cardiac immune response and ECM deposition via NF-κB and PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 or other pathways, further exacerbating cardiac dysfunction, which should be validated in the future.
5 Limitations
This study has some limitations: 1) Although we discovered that serum SSC5D levels are significantly increased in patients with HF, the role of SSC5D in HF remains unknown. 2) Although our findings suggest that SSC5D is mainly expressed in cardiac fibroblasts, it remains unclear whether SSC5D is associated with fibrosis during cardiac remodeling after HF and the underlying pathways. Therefore, further studies are required to elucidate the function and mechanisms of SSC5D in HF progression. 3) We did not validate the role of serum SSC5D in heart failure with a new validation cohort. Therefore, in future studies, a bigger sample size would be used to clarify the diagnostic and prognostic values of SSC5D on clinical heart failure patients.
6 Conclusion
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that elevated serum SSC5D levels are markedly associated with HF and function as a novel biomarker of clinical HF. Targeting SSC5D may provide therapeutic benefits for patients with HF in the future.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Lingfang Zhuang for providing technical assistance in R analysis and TAC and MI model surgery.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.81870245 and 82070334); The Third Round Cooperation Project (Hierarchical management of heart failure and primary prevention of sudden death in patients with heart failure) between Shanghai General Hospital and Songjiang District Municipal Health Commission; The “Star of Jiaotong University” Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical and Industrial Cross Research Foundation (YG2021ZD17). Science and Technology Tackling Project of Shanghai Songjiang District Science and Technology Commission (2020SJ288).
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital (2018KY250). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital (2021AW035).
Author contributions
YG analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. XL performed data statistical analysis. HC, GL, and XX collected blood samples, extracted serum, and recorded clinical data. JL and CZ drafted the tables and figures. YZG designed the study and provided critical revision of the manuscript. FW supervised the study, and wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1140856/full#supplementary-material
References
- Agra-Bermejo R. M., Cacho-Antonio C., Rozados-Luis A., Couselo-Seijas M., Fernandez A. L., Martinez-Cereijo J. M., et al. (2020). CD5L, macrophage apoptosis inhibitor, was identified in epicardial fat-secretome and regulated by isoproterenol from patients with heart failure. Front. Physiol. 11, 620. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez S., MacGrogan D., Calasanz M. J., Nimer S. D., Jhanwar S. C. (2001). Frequent gain of chromosome 19 in megakaryoblastic leukemias detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 32, 285–293. 10.1002/gcc.1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amézaga N., Sanjurjo L., Julve J., Aran G., Pérez-Cabezas B., Bastos-Amador P., et al. (2014). Human scavenger protein AIM increases foam cell formation and CD36-mediated oxLDL uptake. J. Leukoc. Biol. 95, 509–520. 10.1189/jlb.1212660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balakrishnan L., Bhattacharjee M., Ahmad S., Nirujogi R. S., Renuse S., Subbannayya Y., et al. (2014). Differential proteomic analysis of synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients. Clin. Proteomics 11, 1. 10.1186/1559-0275-11-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castelblanco E., Sarrias M. R., Betriu À., Soldevila B., Barranco-Altirriba M., Franch-Nadal J., et al. (2021). Circulating CD5L is associated with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in individuals with chronic kidney disease. Aging (Albany NY) 13, 22690–22709. 10.18632/aging.203615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das S. R., Drazner M. H., Dries D. L., Vega G. L., Stanek H. G., Abdullah S. M., et al. (2005). Impact of body mass and body composition on circulating levels of natriuretic peptides: Results from the dallas heart study. Circulation 112, 2163–2168. 10.1161/circulationaha.105.555573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du Y., Wang X., Li L., Hao W., Zhang H., Li Y., et al. (2020). miRNA-mediated suppression of a cardioprotective cardiokine as a novel mechanism exacerbating post-MI remodeling by sleep breathing disorders. Circ. Res. 126, 212–228. 10.1161/circresaha.119.315067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y., Cai L., Hong W., Zhang C., Tan N., Wang M., et al. (2022). Rewiring of 3D chromatin topology orchestrates transcriptional reprogramming and the development of human dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 145, 1663–1683. 10.1161/circulationaha.121.055781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonçalves C. M., Castro M. A., Henriques T., Oliveira M. I., Pinheiro H. C., Oliveira C., et al. (2009). Molecular cloning and analysis of SSc5D, a new member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich superfamily. Mol. Immunol. 46, 2585–2596. 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heidenreich P. A., Bozkurt B., Aguilar D., Allen L. A., Byun J. J., Colvin M. M., et al. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure. J. Card. Fail 28, e1–e167. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang W., Feng Y., Liang J., Yu H., Wang C., Wang B., et al. (2018). Loss of microRNA-128 promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration. Nat. Commun. 9, 700. 10.1038/s41467-018-03019-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuppe C., Ramirez Flores R. O., Li Z., Hayat S., Levinson R. T., Liao X., et al. (2022). Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction. Nature 608, 766–777. 10.1038/s41586-022-05060-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laï J. L., Zandecki M., Mary J. Y., Bernardi F., Izydorczyk V., Flactif M., et al. (1995). Improved cytogenetics in multiple myeloma: A study of 151 patients including 117 patients at diagnosis. Blood 85, 2490–2497. 10.1182/blood.v85.9.2490.bloodjournal8592490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee G. K. C., Tessier L., Bienzle D. (2019). Salivary scavenger and agglutinin (SALSA) is expressed in mucosal epithelial cells and decreased in bronchial epithelium of asthmatic horses. Front. Vet. Sci. 6, 418. 10.3389/fvets.2019.00418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manta C. P., Leibing T., Friedrich M., Nolte H., Adrian M., Schledzewski K., et al. (2022). Targeting of scavenger receptors stabilin-1 and stabilin-2 ameliorates atherosclerosis by a plasma proteome switch mediating monocyte/macrophage suppression. Circulation 146, 1783–1799. 10.1161/circulationaha.121.058615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Padilla O., Pujana M. A., López-de la Iglesia A., Gimferrer I., Arman M., Vilà J. M., et al. (2002). Cloning of S4D-SRCRB, a new soluble member of the group B scavenger receptor cysteine-rich family (SRCR-SF) mapping to human chromosome 7q11.23.23. Immunogenetics 54 621–634. 10.1007/s00251-002-0507-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ponikowski P., Voors A. A., Anker S. D., Bueno H., Cleland J. G., Coats A. J., et al. (2016). 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 18, 891–975. 10.1002/ejhf.592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quaife-Ryan G. A., Sim C. B., Ziemann M., Kaspi A., Rafehi H., Ramialison M., et al. (2017). Multicellular transcriptional analysis of mammalian heart regeneration. Circulation 136, 1123–1139. 10.1161/circulationaha.117.028252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez-Moral L., Ràfols N., Martori C., Paul T., Téllez É., Sarrias M. R. (2021). Multifaceted roles of CD5L in infectious and sterile inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 4076. 10.3390/ijms22084076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva R. A., Giordano R. J., Gutierrez P. S., Rocha V. Z., Rudnicki M., Kee P., et al. (2016). CTHRSSVVC peptide as a possible early molecular imaging target for atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1383. 10.3390/ijms17091383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tedeschi A., Agostoni P., Pezzuto B., Corra U., Scrutinio D., La Gioia R., et al. (2020). Role of comorbidities in heart failure prognosis Part 2: Chronic kidney disease, elevated serum uric acid. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 27, 35–45. 10.1177/2047487320957793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsutamoto T., Wada A., Sakai H., Ishikawa C., Tanaka T., Hayashi M., et al. (2006). Relationship between renal function and plasma brain natriuretic peptide in patients with heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47, 582–586. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Umana-Diaz C., Pichol-Thievend C., Marchand M. F., Atlas Y., Salza R., Malbouyres M., et al. (2020). Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich domains of Lysyl Oxidase-Like2 regulate endothelial ECM and angiogenesis through non-catalytic scaffolding mechanisms. Matrix Biol. 88, 33–52. 10.1016/j.matbio.2019.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Yang H. Y., Zang C. X., Shang J. M., Liu H., Zhang Z. H., et al. (2021). TLR2 potentiates SR-marco-mediated neuroinflammation by interacting with the SRCR domain. Mol. Neurobiol. 58, 5743–5755. 10.1007/s12035-021-02463-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinberg E. O., Shimpo M., Hurwitz S., Tominaga S., Rouleau J. L., Lee R. T. (2003). Identification of serum soluble ST2 receptor as a novel heart failure biomarker. Circulation 107, 721–726. 10.1161/01.cir.0000047274.66749.fe [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yancy C. W., Jessup M., Bozkurt B., Butler J., Casey D. E., Jr., Colvin M. M., et al. (2017). 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 70, 776–803. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang H., Shan L., Gao Y., Li L., Xu G., Wang B., et al. (2021). MicroRNA-181b serves as a circulating biomarker and regulates inflammation in heart failure. Dis. Markers 2021, 4572282. 10.1155/2021/4572282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J., Savvatis K., Kang J. S., Fan P., Zhong H., Schwartz K., et al. (2016). Targeting LOXL2 for cardiac interstitial fibrosis and heart failure treatment. Nat. Commun. 7, 13710. 10.1038/ncomms13710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Q., Pan L. L., Xue R., Ni G., Duan Y., Bai Y., et al. (2020). The anti-microbial peptide LL-37/CRAMP levels are associated with acute heart failure and can attenuate cardiac dysfunction in multiple preclinical models of heart failure. Theranostics 10, 6167–6181. 10.7150/thno.46225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang L., Jia K., Chen C., Li Z., Zhao J., Hu J., et al. (2022). DYRK1B-STAT3 drives cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure by impairing mitochondrial bioenergetics. Circulation 145, 829–846. 10.1161/circulationaha.121.055727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang L., Lu L., Zhang R., Chen K., Yan X. (2020). Comprehensive integration of single-cell transcriptional profiling reveals the heterogeneities of non-cardiomyocytes in healthy and ischemic hearts. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7, 615161. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.615161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.