Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2023 Mar 21;8(2):e01198-22. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01198-22

Discovery of the Streamlined Haloarchaeon Halorutilus salinus, Comprising a New Order Widespread in Hypersaline Environments across the World

Ana Durán-Viseras a,b, Cristina Sánchez-Porro a, Tomeu Viver c, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis b,, Antonio Ventosa a,
Editor: Xiao-Hua Zhangd
PMCID: PMC10134839  PMID: 36943059

ABSTRACT

The class Halobacteria is one of the most diverse groups within the Euryarchaeota phylum, whose members are ubiquitously distributed in hypersaline environments, where they often constitute the major population. Here, we report the discovery and isolation of a new halophilic archaeon, strain F3-133T exhibiting ≤86.3% 16S rRNA gene identity to any previously cultivated archaeon, and, thus, representing a new order. Analysis of available 16S rRNA gene amplicon and metagenomic data sets showed that the new isolate represents an abundant group in intermediate-to-high salinity ecosystems and is widely distributed across the world. The isolate presents a streamlined genome, which probably accounts for its ecological success in nature and its fastidious growth in culture. The predominant osmoprotection mechanism appears to be the typical salt-in strategy used by other haloarchaea. Furthermore, the genome contains the complete gene set for nucleotide monophosphate degradation pathway through archaeal RuBisCO, being within the first halophilic archaea representatives reported to code this enzyme. Genomic comparisons with previously described representatives of the phylum Euryarchaeota were consistent with the 16S rRNA gene data in supporting that our isolate represents a novel order within the class Halobacteria for which we propose the names Halorutilales ord. nov., Halorutilaceae fam. nov., Halorutilus gen. nov. and Halorutilus salinus sp. nov.

IMPORTANCE The discovery of the new halophilic archaeon, Halorutilus salinus, representing a novel order, family, genus, and species within the class Halobacteria and phylum Euryarchaeota clearly enables insights into the microbial dark matter, expanding the current taxonomical knowledge of this group of archaea. The in-depth comparative genomic analysis performed on this new taxon revealed one of the first known examples of an Halobacteria representative coding the archaeal RuBisCO gene and with a streamlined genome, being ecologically successful in nature and explaining its previous non-isolation. Altogether, this research brings light into the understanding of the physiology of the Halobacteria class members, their ecological distribution, and capacity to thrive in hypersaline environments.

KEYWORDS: hypersaline environments, Halorutilales ord. nov., comparative genomics, streamlining, RuBisCO, microbial ecology, osmoadaptation

INTRODUCTION

Hypersaline ecosystems are extreme environments characterized by high salt concentrations, much greater than that of seawater and often close to salt saturation (1, 2). The interest of the scientific community on hypersaline environments have been hugely increased as possible analogues to life on other planets such as Mars (35), as well as by its biotechnological potential in the biomedicine and biotechnology fields (68).

These ecosystems, whether natural or manmade, are characterized by severe stresses for microbial organisms, due not only to high salt concentration, but to other factors, such as low nutrient and oxygen availability, alkalinity, high UV irradiance, and the possible presence of toxic compounds and heavy metals (2, 9). These conditions have selected for low class/family diversity, generally consisting of two major lineages i.e., the archaeal Halobacteria class and the bacterial family of Salinibacteraceae, class Rhodothermia (10, 11), but with relatively high species richness (microdiversity) within each class (12, 13). Members of the class Halobacteria are among the best adapted organisms to deal with the high salt concentration encountered in those habitats (14, 15), and are widely distributed in hypersaline systems, from marine salterns to salt lakes, coastal sabkhas, salt mines, hypersaline soda lakes, hypersaline soils, and salt-fermented seafood (1517).

The class Halobacteria of the phylum Euryarchaeota is one of the most diverse groups within the domain Archaea that, at the time of this writing, is constituted by 71 genera and 308 species (18, 19). Currently, the class Halobacteria is divided into 3 orders (Halobacteriales, Haloferacales, and Natrialbales), that each comprises 3 (Haloarculaceae, Halobacteriaceae, and Halococcaceae), 2 (Haloferacaceae and Halorubraceae) and 1 (Natrialbaceae) families, respectively (7, 20, 21).

Although traditional cultivation techniques have led to the isolation and description of hundreds of new groups of halophilic bacteria and archaea (19, 2230), a great number of recent culture-independent studies from hypersaline habitats have revealed the prominence of several yet-uncultivated lineages in these systems (3134). Most of these uncultivated groups represent dominant populations in hypersaline environments (31, 32, 35, 36), and are presumably slow growing and fastidious to isolate microorganisms. Thus, persistent efforts and improvements of the cultivation methodologies are still needed to bring these uncultivated lineages to culture (37). Within this context the term “culturomics” was coined to denote the application of high-throughput culturing efforts for the identification of a higher microbial culturable diversity (38).

Our recent exploration of the microbial diversity in Isla Cristina salterns (Huelva, Spain) following the “culturomics” approach (39, 40), has yielded the isolation of several novel haloarchaeal taxa, such as the new genera Halosegnis (40) and Haloglomus (26), as well as several new species of the genera Halonotius (41, 42) and Natronomonas (43). Indeed, subsequent ecological studies highlighted the wide geographical distribution of these groups and their substantial abundance in different hypersaline systems (26, 40, 42, 4447).

As part of the same isolation campaign in the multi-pond, manmade Isla Cristina saltern, a novel haloarchaeon, designated as strain F3-133T, was isolated in pure culture. Based on the genome-aggregate average amino acid identity (AAI; ≤ 51.7%) and 16S rRNA gene (≤ 86.3% identity), strain F3-133T was shown to be distantly related to any previously described haloarchaea. Here, we report the characteristic of its genome sequence, its environmental distribution based on available 16S rRNA gene amplicon and metagenomic data sets, as well as the ecophysiological strategies that underly its ecological success.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation of strain F3-133T by culturomics.

The culturomics approach was applied with the aim of isolating and characterizing the functional roles of the abundant saltern taxa lacking currently cultured representatives. Based on previously successful methodological approaches, for the isolation of other elusive microorganisms (26, 40), several growth media and conditions were tested. The water samples collected from the different saltern ponds of Isla Cristina (37° 12′ N 7° 19′ W) were serially diluted and plated on the different culture media. Plates were subsequently incubated under different conditions (aerobic, microaerophilic, or anaerobic, in dark or light) and for long-time periods (up to 3 months). During this period, colonies appearing on plates were carefully observed, and those of fastest growth and large morphology were labeled in order to be further discarded. Afterwards, an arduous high-throughput isolation screening of those unlabeled colonies with slow growth and tiny morphology was conducted resulting in more than 2,000 newly-isolated-single-colonies. These isolates were identified by 16S rRNA gene amplification. Isolates likely to represent new groups of microorganisms based on 16S rRNA gene identity, were selected for further characterization. Among them, 1 tiny, red-pigmented colony (<0.5 mm) with extremely slow growth, designated strain F3-133T, exhibited a remarkably low relatedness with any previously cultivated haloarchaea. Strain F3-133T was isolated from a culture medium containing pyruvate, which indeed has been considered as a key compound for the isolation of fastidious microorganisms (48), such as the halophilic archaeon Haloquadratum waslbyi, or the streamlined halophilic and marine bacteria Spiribacter salinus and Pelagibacter ubique, among others. Due to its very slow and limited growth under laboratory conditions, several attempts were required before the successful subculturing of strain F3-133T. The purity of the strain was subsequently checked by the colony morphology in the plate, microscopy and 16S rRNA gene amplification. Once its purity was confirmed, its genome was sequenced for further analyses.

Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy.

Complete 16S rRNA gene sequence (1470 nt) comparison of strain F3-133T against available sequences in public databases revealed relative low relatedness (≤86.3% identity) with any previously cultivated microorganism. Strain F3-133T proved to be most closely related to Halobacteria class representatives. Based on recently recommended values (e.g., 83 to 86% and 86 to 89% for the class-level and order-level classification, respectively [49, 50]), such 16S rRNA gene identity values indicate that strain F3-133T represents a new order or even a new class within the phylum Euryarchaeota.

In order to further clarify the taxonomic position of this strain, a concatenated alignment of 62 single-copy genes shared between strain F3-133T and representative members of different euryarchaeotal classes was used for an approximate maximum-likelihood tree reconstruction (Fig. 1A). Based on these results, strain F3-133T represents an independent clade, a sister taxon to the class Halobacteria, with 100% bootstrap support (Fig. 1A). Consistent with this phylogeny-based picture, strain F3-133T exhibited the highest AAI values (50 to 51%) to representatives of the class Halobacteria (Fig. 2A), with AAI values among Halobacteria members being substantially higher (58 to 62%) (Fig. 2A). Further comparison of strain F3-133T with all type species from all orders and families of the class Halobacteria with available genomes supported its placement as a distinct phylogenomic branch within the class (Fig. 1B), which was also consistent with the AAI values among the same genomes (Fig. 2B). Collectively, it is clear enough that the evidence from 16S rRNA gene, universal protein-coding gene phylogenies and AAI analysis consistently and clearly support the proposal of strain F3-133T as a novel order within the class Halobacteria, currently represented by a single family, genus, and species.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

FIG 1

Approximate maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated amino acid sequence alignment of 62 (A) and 94 (B) single-copy genes. Shown are strain F3-133T and the type strains of the type species of each type genus within all families of the class Halobacteria and representative members from the other classes of the phylum Euryarchaeota (A), and strain F3-133T and the type strains of all type species within the class Halobacteria (B). The DPANN representatives Candidatus Nanosalinarum J07AB56 and Candidatus Nanosalina J07AB43 were used as outgroups. Genome accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bootstrap values ≥70% are shown at branch points. Scale bars denotes 0.1 (A) and 1.0 (B) changes per nucleotide position.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

(A) Heatmap of AAI relatedness among strain F3-133T and the type strains of all type genera of the class Halobacteria and representative members of the other classes of the phylum Euryarchaeota. (B) Heatmap of AAI relatedness among strain F3-133T and the type strains of all type species within the class Halobacteria with available genomes. Genome accession numbers are specified on Fig. 1B and Table S4.

TABLE S4

Genomic size and DNA %G + C content of the type strains of the type species within the class Halobacteria with available genomes used for comparison in this study. Download Table S4, PDF file, 0.1 MB (139.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic analysis of strain F3-133T and closely related environmental sequences from publicly available clone library data sets revealed that there might be other new species or genera within the proposed new family and order to be described in the future (Fig. S1). The genomic sequences of representatives of these groups will provide better resolution of the class status and a more thorough taxonomic description of its extant diversity in the future.

FIG S1

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain F3-133T, its related environmental high-quality sequences from SILVA database, and the type strain sequences from all type species of the class Halobacteria. For the environmental sequences, their sample origin (given in the sequence entry) and the sequence accession number are shown. Bootstrap values are indicated at branch points. Scale bar denotes 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. Methanonatronarchaeum thermophilum AMET1T was used as outgroup. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 14.2 MB (14.5MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Ecological distribution.

To gain insight into the ecological distribution and relative abundance of strain F3-133T in hypersaline environments from around the world, a large number of available metagenomic and 16S rRNA gene amplicons data sets were screened (Tables S1 and S2). Among ~ 200 metagenomes assessed (Table S2), only three provided significant read recruitment plots against the F3-133T genome above the limit of detection of the metagenomic sequencing effort applied (Fig. 3). Specifically, F3-133T-like populations were present in the environment of origin, the brine of a pond of Isla Cristina saltern (42% total salts), as well as in a solar saltern in Velddrif (South Africa; 15% total salts) and a natural saline lake in the Chilean Altiplano (34% total salts) (Fig. 3), with a relative abundance of 0.1%, 0.03% and 0.02% of the total community, respectively. These results may indicate that strain F3-133T increases its population abundance from non-detectable levels (rare biosphere) to an abundant member of the community under its optimal environmental conditions. Therefore, these results not only revealed that strain F3-133T constitutes an abundant member of the microbial community in hypersaline environments widely distributed across the globe, but also reflected its versatility, being able to inhabit intermediate-to-high salinity systems. Moreover, the high number of reads recruiting below 95% identity in all three data sets suggested that there are likely additional, closely related, yet-to-be described species that are abundant (in order to be detected in the corresponding metagenomes) in these environments.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Read recruitment plot of metagenomic reads from (A) Isla Cristina solar saltern (PRJNA890281), (B) Velddrif solar saltern (ERR5981341), and (C) Chilean Altiplano lake against the genomic sequence of strain F3-133T. Within each plot: bottom middle panel represents the reads recruited, placed by position in the genome (X-axis) and percent of identity (Y-axis). Upper middle panel shows the sequencing depth per genome region in logarithmic scale. Bars at the bottom represent regions without mapping reads (sequencing depth of zero). Bottom right panel represents the number of nucleotide bases in logarithmic scale at each unit of nucleotide identity (y axis) in the bottom middle panel. Upper right panel exhibits the sequencing depth histogram across the genome. Left panel shows the color scale for the number of stacked reads per 2-dimensional bin in the bottom middle panel. The dark blue or light blue colors in the background of panels or the color lines correspond to matches with identity above and below 95% nucleotide identity cutoff.

TABLE S1

16S rRNA gene amplicon data sets and clone library sequences analyzed in this study that contained related sequences to strain F3-133T. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB (143.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Metagenomic data sets used in this study for the recruitment plot analysis of strain F3-133T. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.3 MB (295KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Further, screening of 16S rRNA gene amplicon or clone library data sets for close matches to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of F3-133T revealed a remarkable number of sequences (1024 amplicons and 3 clones) related at the species (>98.6% identity), genus (>95% identity), and family (>92% identity) levels in samples from inland and coastal hypersaline environments in Australia, Romania, Tunisia, or USA (Fig. 4A). The salinities of those environments ranged from 5.1% total salts (Lake Strawbridge sediment) to 34% total salts (Bajool saltern) (Table S1), which are indeed comparable to the salinities of the metagenomes in which strain F3-133T was found to be abundant (as specified above), further supporting the widespread presence of strain F3-133T and related species in a broad range of salinity niches. With respect to 16S rRNA gene amplicon data set matches at genus level, the highest relative abundances were found in the sediments of Strawbridge Lake (Australia) (up to 0.9% of the total community) (Fig. 4B). However, the number of matches at species level in this environment were much fewer (Fig. 4B), reaching the highest relative abundance (0.3% of the total) in the meromictic hypersaline lake of Fara Fund (Romania). This fact, together with the metagenomic-based results mentioned above, enforce the hypothesis that aquatic niches are the preferred habitat for this group of microorganisms. Overall, these results further corroborated the worldwide distribution of F3-133T and related species in a wide range of ecological niches associated with natural and manmade salterns, and suggested that more isolation efforts are needed to explore the extant diversity of this group of archaea.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

(A) Global distribution of strain F3-133T and related organisms in hypersaline environments based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon and clone library data sets. Circles denote the geographic location of the related 16S rRNA gene sequences found in different amplicon data sets, while squares represent the sequences from clone library data sets. The star symbol indicates the place where strain F3-133T was isolated. (B) Relative abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences related to F3-133T relative to all amplicon sequences in the corresponding data sets (at the geographic location highlighted with circles in [A]) assigned to the (same) family, genus, and species as strain F3-333T based on identity threshold as described in the Materials and Methods section. Note that in some samples same-species sequences dominated the relatives found (e.g., Fara Fund Lake, Romania) while in some other samples the related sequences were mostly assigned to different species and genera than F3-133T (e.g., Strawbridge Lake, Australia). RNA indicates transcriptomic data, while by default genomic data is used.

General genome characteristics.

The main genome characteristics of strain F3-133T are provided in Table S3. One of the most remarkable features is the relatively small genome size of this new taxon (2.1 Mb) compared to other characterized halophilic archaeal species. To the best our knowledge, this is within the smallest genome sizes reported for any described member of the class Halobacteria to date (together with Halodesulfurarchaeum formicicum HSR6T, Halanaeroarchaeum sulfurireducens HSR2T, and Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1T chromosome), with the available Halobacteria genomes to average ~ 4 Mb (Table S4). Small genomes in Archaea and Bacteria representatives are frequently associated with parasitic or symbiotic lifestyles, although free-living members in environments with low nutrient availability, such as aquatic ecosystems, can also exhibit small genomic sizes in comparison to nutrient-rich terrestrial ecosystems (51, 52). Moreover, smaller genome size species are often associated with an auxotrophic lifestyle (51, 53). These characteristics may also explain the preference of strain F3-133T and relatives to aquatic environments (as discussed above), as well as its narrow nutritional requirements (strain F3-133T can be only cultured in a defined medium with pyruvate, and is unable to use other compounds as carbon and energy sources) that presumably led to its fastidious growth during our culturomics isolation efforts. Further, autotrophy genes were also present in the F3-133T genome, indicating that it can be truly free-living.

TABLE S3

Summary statistics of strain F3-133T genome. Download Table S3, PDF file, 0.08 MB (83.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Moreover, a single rRNA operon was identified in the strain F3-133T genome, consistent with an oligotrophic lifestyle (54). The presence of a single rRNA operon may also be related to the slow growth phylotype (54) exhibited by strain F3-133T, which also makes its cultivation under laboratory conditions challenging. Notably, the genome of strain F3-133T is relatively low in DNA G+C content (59.8 mol%) in comparison with other halophilic archaea, which usually have G+C contents well above 60 mol% (Table S4), with the only known exceptions being Haloquadratum walsbyi (47.8 mol%), Halocatena pleomorpha SPP-AMP-1T (57.1 mol%), Halonotius pteroides CECT 7525T (59.5 mol%), and representatives of the Candidatus phylum Nanohaloarchaea (~ 40 mol%) (55).

The genome of strain F3-133T revealed a very low percentage of non-coding sequences and an outstanding short median and average intergenic spacers (Fig. S2) in comparison to any previously cultivated Halobacteria. Altogether, these unique features indicate a streamlined genomic strategy for this strain (51, 56). Specifically, under some circumstances, selection may lead to a genomic complexity reduction in organisms that have large effective population sizes and resting cell stages or periods without significance growth, resulting in ecological successful strategies in nature, as for Pelagibacter ubique (5759). Advances in multi-omics techniques revealed that the number of streamlined genomes in nature has been previously underestimated due to their fastidious growth under laboratory conditions (60). Besides, genome reduction is frequently associated with unusual nutritional requirements that necessitate specific cultivation approaches (56). In fact, strain F3-133T was isolated using a culture medium similar to the ones used for growing other streamlined organisms. Indeed, the streamlined genome of strain F3-133T probably accounts, at least in part, for the remarkable abundance and the worldwide-distribution of this new taxon in different hypersaline environments, but also to the previously unsuccessful attempts to isolate it. Lastly, small genome organisms are frequently related with relatively unchanging (stable) ecological niches, in contrast with fluctuating niches for which sigma factors play a crucial role (56). No sigma factors were identified in the isolate genome, corroborating its likely preferred distribution in aquatic ecosystems.

FIG S2

Scatter plots exhibiting the relation between length of intergenic regions and percentage of non-overlapping genes among strain F3-133T, and the type strain of all type species within the class Halobacteria with available genomes. Plots represent percentage of non-overlapping genes with respect to the average (A) and median (B) size of intergenic spacers, and to the average (C) and median (D) size of non-overlapping intergenic spacers. Genome accession numbers of Halobacteria representatives can be found on Table S4. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 10.2 MB (10.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Central metabolism.

Based on the bioinformatically annotated genome, strain F3-133T encodes genes involved in gluconeogenesis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and glyoxylate cycle (central carbohydrate metabolism; Fig. 5). However, as previously reported for other haloarchaea (40, 42, 61, 62), the gene coding for 6-phosphofructokinase involved in the lower part of the classical Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EM) pathway of glycolysis is absent in strain F3-133T, which could be alternatively replaced by the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (Fig. 5) (63). Strain F3-133T also possesses the pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase genes (porA and porB) involved in the oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Genome scale metabolic reconstruction of strain F3-133T. The figure summarizes glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) autotrophic carbon fixation (AMP pathway), nitrogen metabolism (assimilatory and dissimilatory nitrate reduction, denitrification, and ammonia assimilation), polyamine biosynthesis, and glyoxylate cycle. Double lines surrounding the cell depict cell membrane. All predicted transporters with known functions are shown along the cell membrane and each family of transporter is displayed on the key. The arrows on the transporters indicate the flow direction (import, export, or symport). Within the glycolysis pathway, the gray discontinuous arrow indicates the gene absent.

With respect to nitrogen metabolism, the genes encoding for nitrite reductases, i.e., nirA, nirB, and nirK, involved in assimilatory and dissimilatory nitrate reduction and denitrification, respectively, were all identified in the genome (Fig. 5). However, the remaining genes involved in these pathways, such as narB, narGHI, norBC, or nosZ, were not found, indicating that F3-133T is probably doing only specific steps (modular) of denitrification. Strain F3-133T also exhibited the high-affinity ammonium transporter (Amt) for ammonia uptake and the ABC transporter for the nitrogen derived compound spermidine (Fig. 5). The responsible genes for ammonia assimilation, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthase were also found in the genome (Fig. 5). Complete biosynthesis pathways of several amino acids (i.e., arginine, histidine, isoleucine, lysine, ornithine, proline, serine, threonine, and valine) were likewise identified.

Consistent with its physiological characterization, genes encoding archaellum were encountered in the genome (Fig. 5). Inorganic phosphate might be incorporated to the cell via an ABC transporter (pstSCAB). Rhodopsin-like sequences such as a sensory rhodopsin and a halorhodopsin were also identified in the genome (Fig. 5), suggesting a versatile metabolic flexibility under illuminated conditions. Additionally, strain F3-133T possesses genes encoding enzymes of the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway (Fig. 5).

Strain F3-133T encodes type III-like RuBisCO, and the associated AMP phosphorylase and ribose 1,5-biphosphate isomerase as part of the nucleotide monophosphate degradation pathway, which links nucleoside catabolism to glycolysis-gluconeogenesis (Fig. 5). The nucleotide monophosphate degradation pathway has been proposed in Archaea as part of a cyclic CO2 fixation pathway (61, 64), whereas this matter still remains unclear, and further examination will be necessary to understand its functional role in strain F3-133T. On the other side, this pathway has been suggested to be a relic of ancient heterotrophy considering ribose was likely the most abundant sugar available on early earth (65). The nucleotide monophosphate degradation pathway has been previously described for other archaeal representatives (i.e., representatives of the Ca. Asgardarchaeota, the methanogenic Methanonatronarchaeia, the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis, and the DPANN superphylum [6669]). Although several halophilic archaea encode ribose 1,5-biphosphate isomerase (64), the evidence of type III-like RuBisCO presence has been only recently reported in members of this group (70); making strain F3-133T one of the first known examples. Unexpectedly, strain F3-133T’s type III RuBisCO exhibited higher similarities to sequences from the archaeal phyla Candidatus Nanohaloarchaea or Division MSBL-1, than to Halobacteria class representatives. This fact reinforces the differences existing between strain F3-133T and the Halobacteria class clade that, collectively with the already discussed distant phylogenomic position among them, supports the hypothesis that this new taxon might even constitute a different new class within the Euryarchaeota phylum. Future analyses and discovery of new representatives from this group would corroborate these results and interpretations.

Adaptation to extreme salinity.

Considering the environmental distribution of strain F3-133T and closely related sequences at different salinity ranges, the isoelectric points (pIs) and amino acid frequencies of the predicted proteins annotated in the genome of strain F3-133T were calculated to shed light on its osmoregulatory adaptation mechanism. The proteome of the salt-in strategists Haloquadratum walsbyi, Halorubrum saccharovorum, or Salinibacter ruber, and the salt-out strategist Spiribacter salinus, and the non-halophile Escherichia coli were used for comparison. Results exhibited that the pI profile of strain F3-133T was similar to the salt-in Halobacteria representatives and Salinibacter ruber, with a single peak at around 4.0, pointing out the predominance of acidic residues (Fig. 6A). Accordingly, a prevalence of acidic amino acids (i.e., aspartate and glutamate) in comparison to basic amino acids (i.e., arginine and lysine) was observed for strain F3-133T, as well as for the other salt-in strategists analyzed (Fig. 6B). Therefore, it appears that strain F3-133T employs the salt-in strategy for balancing the osmotic pressure of the saline environments.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

(A) Comparison of isoelectric point of predicted proteins for strain F3-133T and selected genomes (graph title), shown as fraction of total genes (y axis). (B) Frequency of amino acids used in the proteome of strain F3-133T and other selected genomes.

In good agreement with a (hypothesized) salt-in osmoprotection mechanism (71, 72), several genes encoding for secondary transporters involved in Na+ extrusion, K+ uptake, and Cl homeostasis were also found in the genome of strain F3-133T (Fig. 5). Moreover, no genes related to the biosynthesis or transport of compatible solutes were identified, consistent with the hypothesis that a salt-out strategy is not used by strain F3-133T. Lastly, a small conductance mechanosensitive channel from the MscS family, which confers significant protection against rapid hypoosmotic shock (i.e., rapid transition from high to moderate salinity environments) (73), was also detected in the genome.

Physiology of strain F3-133T.

We carried out a detailed phenotypic characterization of the new isolate following the recommended minimal standards for describing new taxa of the class Halobacteria (74). These features included morphological, physiological, biochemical, and nutritional characteristics, as well as the determination of the membrane polar lipids, which has been proved to be an important feature for the characterization of haloarchaeal genera (74, 75). These results are shown in Table S5, Fig. S3 and S4, and in the new genus and species descriptions detailed below. Overall, all these results are in good agreement with the metabolic behavior identified by the genomic and metagenomic analysis, such as preference and tolerance for a range of salt concentrations, and the stringent nutritional requirements. Notably, strain F3-133T exhibits a very simplified chemotaxonomic profile, which is also consistent with its distant phylogenomic relationship with other members of the class Halobacteria. Further, the presence of the double chain length C20,C25 derived from PGP-Me as chemotaxonomic feature (Fig. S4) is not typically found in neutrophilic haloarchaeal species, which might also suggest the adaptability of this strain to thrive in environments with pH fluctuation. In the same way, the absence of glycolipids, as in strain F3-133T (Fig. S4), is a typical chemotaxonomic characteristic of haloalkaliphilic archaea. Indeed, glycolipids are associated with bacteriorhodopsin sequences, which were consistently absent in the genome of strain F3-133T (Fig. 5).

FIG S3

Phase-contrast photomicrograph of cells of strain F3-133T cultured in liquid medium under optimal conditions. Scale bar denotes 10 μm. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 13.2 MB (13.5MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) exhibiting the polar lipids profile of strain F3-133T in comparison to reference haloarchaeal species. The plate was revealed with 5% H2SO4 (in water) as spray reagent followed by heating at 160°C. BPG, biphosphatidylglycerol; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PGP-Me, phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester; PGS, phosphatidylglycerol sulfate; S-DGD-1, sulphated diglycosyl diether; S-TGD-1-PA, glycocardiolipin (sulfated triglycosyl diphytanyl archaeol ester linked to phosphatidic acid); S-TeGD, sulphated tetraglycosyl diether. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 13.1 MB (13.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

Phenotypic features of strain F3-133T. Download Table S5, PDF file, 0.2 MB (202.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Based on the taxogenomic comparison of strain F3-133T to available genomes and its physiology, we propose a new order, family, genus, and species within the class Halobacteria with the names Halorutilales ord. nov., Halorutilaceae fam. nov., Halorutilus gen. nov., and Halorutilus salinus sp. nov. to accommodate the new isolate as detailed below.

Description of Halorutilus gen. nov.

Halorutilus (Ha.lo.ru.ti’lus. Gr masc. n. hals, halos salt; L. masc. adj. rutilus red; N.L. masc. n. Halorutilus a red-pigmented halophilic/salt microorganism).

Cells are motile, short rods (0.4-0.7 × 1.1-1.4 μm) producing intense red-pigmented colonies. Extremely halophilic and aerobic. Photoheterotrophic metabolism. Catalase positive but oxidase negative. The polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester (PGP-Me), and one phospholipid chromatographically identical to sulfated mannosyl glucosyl diether (S-DGD-1).

The type species is Halorutilus salinus. The DNA G+C content is 59.8 mol% (genome). Phylogenetically affiliated to the class Halobacteria. The genome size is 2.1 Mb. Recommended 3 letter abbreviation: Hrt.

Description of Halorutilus salinus sp. nov.

Halorutilus salinus (sa .li'nusnus. N.L. masc. adj. salinus, salted, salty).

Cells are motile, short rods and pleomorphic (0.4-0.7 × 1.1-1.4 μm) (Fig. S3). Colonies are circular, entire, intense red-pigmented with a diameter of 1.5 mm on solid 25% salts medium after 21 days at 37°C. Growth occurs optimally at 25% (wt/vol) NaCl, pH 7.5, and 37°C. Nitrate and nitrite are reduced. The DNA G+C content is 59.8 mol% (genome). Other features are detailed in the genus description and in Table S5.

The type strain is F3-133T (= CCM 9157T = JCM 33312T), isolated from a water sample of a pond from Isla Cristina saltern (Huelva, Spain).

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Halorutilus salinus F3-133T is MK182271, and that of the complete genome is RKLV00000000.

Description of Halorutilaceae fam. nov.

Halorutilaceae (Ha.lo.ru.ti.la.ce’ae. N.L. masc. n. Halorutilus the type genus of the family; L. suff. -aceae ending to denote a family; N.L. fem. pl. n. Halorutilaceae the family the nomenclatural type of which is the genus Halorutilus).

The properties of the family are the same as for the representative genus Halorutilus. Currently, the family is monotypic and the type genus is Halorutilus. Phylogenetically affiliated to the class Halobacteria.

Description of Halorutilales ord. nov.

Halorutilales (Ha.lo.ru.ti.la’les. N.L. masc. n. Halorutilus the type genus of the order; L. fem. pl. n. suff. -ales ending to denote an order; N.L. fem. pl. n. Halorutilales the order the nomenclatural type of which is the genus Halorutilus).

The properties of the order Halorutilales are the same as for the representative genus Halorutilus. The type genus of the order is Halorutilus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation source and culture conditions of strain F3-133T.

Strain F3-133T was isolated from a pond water sample (23% wt/vol salinity and pH 7.5) collected from the Isla Cristina solar saltern (Huelva, Spain, 37°21’ N 7°33’W) during an extensive sampling campaign carried out in June 2016. Following the culturomics methodology previously described (40), and after several attempts, strain F3-133T was obtained in pure culture on a solid medium containing the following salt mixture (g/L): NaCl, 195; MgCl2·6H2O, 32.5; MgSO4·7H2O, 50.8; CaCl2, 0.83; KCl, 5.0; NaHCO3, 0.21; NaBr, 0.58, and supplemented with pyruvate (1 g/L) and casein digest (5 g/L). The pH was adjusted to 7.5, and purified agar (Oxoid) was added when necessary. This medium was also used for routine growth of the strain. For long-term preservation cultures were maintained at −80°C in this medium containing 20% (vol/vol) glycerol.

Physiological characterization.

Phenotypic features of strain F3-133T were performed following the methodology previously described by Durán-Viseras et al. (43), and according to the minimal standards established for the taxonomic description of novel taxa of the class Halobacteria (74). Determination of the polar lipid profile of strain F3-133T was carried out by high performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) and revealed using as spray reagents 5% H2SO4 (in water) (43). Halobacterium salinarum DSM 3754T and Halorubrum saccharovorum DSM 1137T were used as reference species for polar lipids characterization.

Genomic DNA extraction, sequencing, and data curation.

Genomic DNA of strain F3-133T was extracted, purified, and quantified following the methodology previously described by Durán-Viseras et al. (39). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the primer pairs ArchF/ArchR (76, 77) and sequenced by Sanger technology at StabVida (Caparica, Portugal). The whole genome shotgun sequencing of strain F3-133T was also performed by StabVida (Caparica, Portugal) using a 150 bp paired-end sequencing strategy, on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform. Sequencing reads were quality filtered and trimmed using BBTools v.38.44 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/), and then assembled with SPAdes v.3.12.0 (78). CheckM v1.0.5 (79) and Quast v2.3 (80) were used for assembly quality checks. Genes were predicted on the assembled contigs using Prodigal (81), and the predicted genes were then annotated with Prokka (82). BlastKOALA (83) was used to assign KO identifiers (K numbers) to orthologous genes present in the genomes analyzed and, subsequently, mapped to the KEGG pathways and KEGG modules (84) in order to perform metabolic pathway reconstructions. The Average Amino acid Identity (AAI) was determined for all-versus-all genome pairs using the tool AAI-Matrix from the Enveomics collection (85). Isoelectric points and amino acid frequencies of predicted proteins were estimated using the tools iep and pepstats, respectively, from the EMBOSS package (86).

16S rRNA gene and universal protein-coding gene phylogenetic analysis.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain F3-133T was compared to the sequences in the EzBioCloud server (87) and SILVA REF 138 database (88) to get the sequence identity to previously described taxa, and to identify related sequences for phylogenetic comparisons. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type strains of the type species of all genera of the class Halobacteria, and the identified related sequences were downloaded from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ and SILVA databases, respectively.

For the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic analysis, almost complete 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using the software MAFFT (89). Subsequently, the phylogenetic tree was constructed with the RaxML software (90).

For the phylogenomic analysis, core orthologous genes were determined using an all-versus-all BLASTp comparison among the translated CDS features of the annotated genomes under study, as implemented in the Enveomics collection toolbox (85). Afterwards, the translated single-copy core gene sequences were individually aligned with Muscle (91) and concatenated into a super-protein alignment. FastTreeMP v.2.1.8 (92) was used for the phylogenomic tree reconstruction by means of the approximately maximum-likelihood algorithm.

The online tool iTOL v.5.7 (93) was used to display the 16S rRNA gene-based and phylogenomic trees.

Ecological prevalence and estimated abundance of strain F3-133T in saline habitats.

The abundance of strain F3-133T in available metagenomes was assessed by read fragment recruitment plots (94). For this, the genome sequence of strain F3-133T was searched against all metagenomic reads from each data set (Table S2) using stand-alone BLASTn. Read recruitment plots were constructed using the enveomics collection (85) based on the best BLAST best-matches (with a cutoff 70% query coverage).

The identification and geographical distribution based on 16S rRNA gene data was performed as follows: firstly, the online tool IMNGS (95) was used to identify the publicly available amplicon project data sets containing 16S rRNA gene sequences related to strain F3-133T. The 16S rRNA gene of strain F3-133T was screened against all amplicon project data sets (Table S1) using BLASTn. Only BLAST best-matches with a minimum query size of 250 bp, 70% query coverage and identity ≥92, 95 and 98.6% (for family, genus, and species level relatedness, respectively) were considered. The geographical location of the data sets that provided matching sequences are displayed on the map (Fig. 4A), and the relative abundances of matches at family, genus, and species level relatedness in each data set is shown in Fig. 4B.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grant PID2020-118136GB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (to AV and CSP). A.V. was supported by grants from Junta de Andalucía (Spain) (P20_01066 and BIO-213), all including European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). K.T.K. was supported by the US National Science Foundation, award #1831582. Marine Microbiology Group is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities project PID2021-126114NB-C42, which is also supported by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). A.D.-V. was supported by a Margarita Salas postdoctoral research fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Universities (financed by the European Union, under the NextGenerationEU funds).

The authors would particularly like to thank Ramón Rosselló-Móra for providing access to the South Africa and Chile metagenomes used in this study and included in Fig. 3, and to Alicia García-Roldán for the Isla Cristina metagenome (Fig. 3). We thank Aharon Oren for his help on the nomenclature of the new taxa. We also thank Borja Aldeguer-Riquelme for the helpful methodological and scientific discussions.

No competing financial interests exist.

Contributor Information

Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis, Email: kostas.konstantinidis@gatech.edu.

Antonio Ventosa, Email: ventosa@us.es.

Xiao-Hua Zhang, Ocean University of China.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Edgerton ME, Brimblecombe P. 1981. Thermodynamics of halobacterial environments. Can J Microbiol 27:899–909. doi: 10.1139/m81-142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodríguez-Valera F. 1988. Characteristics and microbial ecology of hypersaline environments, p 3–30. In Rodríguez-Valera F (ed), Halophilic bacteria. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oren A. 2014. Halophilic archaea on Earth and in space: growth and survival under extreme conditions. Philos Trans R Soc A 372:20140194. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fox-Powell MG, Hallsworth JE, Cousins CR, Cockell CS. 2016. Ionic strength is a barrier to the habitability of Mars. Astrobiology 16:427–442. doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pontefract A, Zhu TF, Walker VK, Hepburn H, Lui C, Zuber MT, Ruvkun G, Carr CE. 2017. Microbial diversity in a hypersaline sulfate lake: a terrestrial analog of ancient mars. Front Microbiol 8:1819. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oren A. 2010. Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ Technol 31:825–834. doi: 10.1080/09593330903370026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amoozegar MA, Siroosi M, Atashgahi S, Smidt H, Ventosa A. 2017. Systematics of haloarchaea and biotechnological potential of their hydrolytic enzymes. Microbiology 163:623–645. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Corral P, Amoozegar MA, Ventosa A. 2020. Halophiles and their biomolecules: recent advances and future applications in biomedicine. Mar Drugs 18:33. doi: 10.3390/md18010033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mesbah NM, Wiegel J. 2012. Life under multiple extreme conditions: diversity and physiology of the halophilic alkalithermophiles. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4074–4082. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00050-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gomariz M, Martínez-García M, Santos F, Rodriguez F, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Gabaldón T, Rosselló-Móra R, Meseguer I, Antón J. 2015. From community approaches to single-cell genomics: the discovery of ubiquitous hyperhalophilic Bacteroidetes generalists. ISME J 9:16–31. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mora-Ruiz M del R, Cifuentes A, Font-Verdera F, Pérez-Fernández C, Farias ME, González B, Orfila A, Rosselló-Móra R. 2018. Biogeographical patterns of bacterial and archaeal communities from distant hypersaline environments. Syst Appl Microbiol 41:139–150. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Viver T, Orellana L, González-Torres P, Díaz S, Urdiain M, Farías ME, Benes V, Kaempfer P, Shahinpei A, Amoozegar MA, Amann R, Antón J, Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R. 2018. Genomic comparison between members of the Salinibacteraceae family, and description of a new species of Salinibacter (Salinibacter altiplanensis sp. nov.) isolated from high altitude hypersaline environments of the Argentinian Altiplano. Syst Appl Microbiol 41:198–212. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Viver T, Orellana LH, Díaz S, Urdiain M, Ramos‐Barbero MD, González‐Pastor JE, Oren A, Hatt JK, Amann R, Antón J, Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló‐Móra R. 2019. Predominance of deterministic microbial community dynamics in salterns exposed to different light intensities. Environ Microbiol 21:4300–4315. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oren A. 2014. Taxonomy of halophilic Archaea: current status and future challenges. Extremophiles 18:825–834. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0654-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oren A, Ventosa A, Kamekura M. 2017. Halobacteria. Bergey’s manual of systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., West Sussex, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ventosa A. 2006. Unusual micro-organisms from unusual habitats: hypersaline environments, p 223–254. In Prokaryotic diversity: mechanisms and significance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oren A. 2011. Ecology of halophiles, p 343–361. In Horikoshi K (ed), Extremophiles handbook. Springer Japan, Tokyo, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. 2020. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5607–5612. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oren A, Ventosa A. 2019. International committee on systematics of prokaryotes subcommittee on the taxonomy of Halobacteria and subcommittee on the taxonomy of Halomonadaceae. Minutes of the joint open meeting, 26 June 2019, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:3657–3661. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gupta RS, Naushad S, Baker S. 2015. Phylogenomic analyses and molecular signatures for the class Halobacteria and its two major clades: a proposal for division of the class Halobacteria into an emended order Halobacteriales and two new orders, Haloferacales ord. nov. and Natrialbales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1050–1069. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.070136-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gupta RS, Naushad S, Fabros R, Adeolu M. 2016. A phylogenomic reappraisal of family-level divisions within the class Halobacteria: proposal to divide the order Halobacteriales into the families Halobacteriaceae, Haloarculaceae fam. nov., and Halococcaceae fam. nov., and the order Haloferacales into the families Haloferacaceae and Halorubraceae fam. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 109:565–587. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0660-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu S, Wang J, Wang J, Du X, Ran Q, Chen Q, Sheng D, Li Y-Z. 2022. Halalkalibacterium roseum gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Balneolaceae isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72:e005339. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu K-L, Wang X-Q, Zhang T-S, Shang D-D, Du Z-J. 2021. Salibaculum halophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. and Salibaculum griseiflavum sp. nov., in the family Rhodobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71:e004808. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zuo Z, Zhao D, Zhou J, Han J, Xiang H. 2021. Halalkalirubrum salinum gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic archaeon isolated from a saline lake. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 114:83–94. doi: 10.1007/s10482-020-01502-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parada-Pinilla MP, Díaz-Cárdenas C, López G, Díaz-Riaño JI, Gonzalez LN, Restrepo S, Trujillo ME, Baena S. 2020. Salifodinibacter halophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic gammaproteobacterium in the family Salinisphaeraceae isolated from a salt mine in the Colombian Andes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5888–5898. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Durán-Viseras A, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2020. Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov., a new halophilic archaeon isolated from a marine saltern. Microorganisms 8:206. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen S, Xu Y, Sun S, Liu J, Chen F. 2020. Halomicrococcus hydrotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely halophilic archaeon isolated from a subterranean salt deposit. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:4425–4431. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sorokin DY, Yakimov M, Messina E, Merkel AY, Bale NJ, Sinninghe Damsté JS. 2019. Natronolimnobius sulfurireducens sp. nov. and Halalkaliarchaeum desulfuricum gen. nov., sp. nov., the first sulfur-respiring alkaliphilic haloarchaea from hypersaline alkaline lakes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:2662–2673. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sorokin DY, Elcheninov AG, Toshchakov SV, Bale NJ, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Khijniak TV, Kublanov IV. 2019. Natrarchaeobius chitinivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., and Natrarchaeobius halalkaliphilus sp. nov., alkaliphilic, chitin-utilizing haloarchaea from hypersaline alkaline lakes. Syst Appl Microbiol 42:309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sorokin DY, Khijniak TV, Elcheninov AG, Toshchakov SV, Kostrikina NA, Bale NJ, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Kublanov IV. 2019. Halococcoides cellulosivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely halophilic cellulose-utilizing haloarchaeon from hypersaline lakes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:1327–1335. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghai R, Pašić L, Fernández AB, Martin-Cuadrado AB, Mizuno CM, McMahon KD, Papke RT, Stepanauskas R, Rodriguez-Brito B, Rohwer F, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A, Rodríguez-Valera F. 2011. New abundant microbial groups in aquatic hypersaline environments. Sci Rep 1:135. doi: 10.1038/srep00135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fernández AB, Ghai R, Martín-Cuadrado AB, Sánchez-Porro C, Rodríguez-Valera F, Ventosa A. 2014. Prokaryotic taxonomic and metabolic diversity of an intermediate salinity hypersaline habitat assessed by metagenomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88:623–635. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vera-Gargallo B, Ventosa A. 2018. Metagenomic insights into the phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of the prokaryotic community dwelling in hypersaline soils from the Odiel Saltmarshes (SW Spain). Genes 9:152. doi: 10.3390/genes9030152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Spang A, Caceres EF, Ettema TJG. 2017. Genomic exploration of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of the archaeal domain of life. Science 357:eaaf3883. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Narasingarao P, Podell S, Ugalde JA, Brochier-Armanet C, Emerson JB, Brocks JJ, Heidelberg KB, Banfield JF, Allen EE. 2012. De novo metagenomic assembly reveals abundant novel major lineage of Archaea in hypersaline microbial communities. ISME J 6:81–93. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Podell S, Ugalde JA, Narasingarao P, Banfield JF, Heidelberg KB, Allen EE. 2013. Assembly-driven community genomics of a hypersaline microbial ecosystem. PLoS One 8:e61692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vartoukian SR, Palmer RM, Wade WG. 2010. Strategies for culture of ‘unculturable’ bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 309:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lagier J-C, Khelaifia S, Tidjani Alou M, Ndongo S, Dione N, Hugon P, Caputo A, Cadoret F, Ibrahima Traore S, Hadji Seck E, Dubourg G, Durand G, Mourembou G, Guilhot E, Togo A, Bellali S, Bachar D, Cassir N, Bittar F, Delerce J, Mailhe M, Ricaboni D, Bilen M, Prisca Makaya Dangui Nieko N, Mery Dia Badiane N, Valles C, Mouelhi D, Diop K, Million M, Musso D, Abrahão J, Ibraheem Azhar E, Bibi F, Yasir M, Diallo A, Sokhna C, Djossou F, Vitton V, Robert C, Marc Rolain J, La Scola B, Fournier P-E, Levasseur A, Raoult D. 2016. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat Microbiol 1:16203. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 39.Durán-Viseras A, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2021. Genomic insights into new species of the genus Halomicroarcula reveals potential for new osmoadaptative strategies in halophilic archaea. Front Microbiol 12:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.751746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Durán-Viseras A, Andrei AŞ, Vera-Gargallo B, Ghai R, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2021. Culturomics-based genomics sheds light on the ecology of the new haloarchaeal genus Halosegnis. Environ Microbiol 23:3418–3434. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Durán-Viseras A, Ventosa A, Sánchez-Porro C. 2019. Halonotius aquaticus sp. nov., a new haloarchaeon isolated from a marine saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:1306–1312. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Durán-Viseras A, Andrei A-S, Ghai R, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2019. New Halonotius species provide genomics-based insights into cobalamin synthesis in haloarchaea. Front Microbiol 10:1928. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Durán-Viseras A, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2020. Natronomonas salsuginis sp. nov., a new inhabitant of a marine solar saltern. Microorganisms 8:605. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Akpolat C, Fernández AB, Caglayan P, Calli B, Birbir M, Ventosa A. 2021. Prokaryotic communities in the thalassohaline Tuz Lake, deep zone, and Kayacik, Kaldirim and Yavsan Salterns (Turkey) assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Microorganisms 9:1525. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jookar Kashi F, Owlia P, Amoozegar MA, Kazemi B. 2021. Halophilic prokaryotes in Urmia Salt Lake, a hypersaline environment in Iran. Curr Microbiol 78:3230–3238. doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02583-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Martínez JM, Escudero C, Rodríguez N, Rubin S, Amils R. 2021. Subsurface and surface halophile communities of the chaotropic Salar de Uyuni. Environ Microbiol 23:3987–4001. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mani K, Taib N, Hugoni M, Bronner G, Bragança JM, Debroas D. 2020. Transient dynamics of archaea and bacteria in sediments and brine across a salinity gradient in a solar saltern of Goa, India. Front Microbiol 11:1891. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Oren A. 2015. Pyruvate: a key nutrient in hypersaline environments? Microorganisms 3:407–416. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms3030407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. 2017. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 11:2399–2406. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. 2015. Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rodríguez-Gijón A, Nuy JK, Mehrshad M, Buck M, Schulz F, Woyke T, Garcia SL. 2022. A genomic perspective across earth’s microbiomes reveals that genome size in Archaea and Bacteria is linked to ecosystem type and trophic strategy. Front Microbiol 12:1–9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.761869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kellner S, Spang A, Offre P, Szöllősi GJ, Petitjean C, Williams TA. 2018. Genome size evolution in the Archaea. Emerg Top Life Sci 2:595–605. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20180021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Grote J, Thrash JC, Huggett MJ, Landry ZC, Carini P, Giovannoni SJ, Rappé MS. 2012. Streamlining and core genome conservation among highly divergent members of the SAR11 clade. mBio 3:e00252–e00312. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00252-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Klappenbach JA, Dunbar JM, Schmidt TM. 2000. rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1328–1333. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1328-1333.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hamm JN, Erdmann S, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Angeloni A, Zhong L, Brownlee C, Williams TJ, Barton K, Carswell S, Smith MA, Brazendale S, Hancock AM, Allen MA, Raftery MJ, Cavicchioli R. 2019. Unexpected host dependency of antarctic Nanohaloarchaeota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:14661–14670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905179116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Giovannoni SJ, Thrash JC, Temperton B. 2014. Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology. ISME J 8:1553–1565. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dufresne A, Garczarek L, Partensky F. 2005. Accelerated evolution associated with genome reduction in a free-living prokaryote. Genome Biol 6:R14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lynch M, Conery JS. 2003. The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401–1404. doi: 10.1126/science.1089370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Giovannoni SJ, Tripp HJ, Givan S, Podar M, Vergin KL, Baptista D, Bibbs L, Eads J, Richardson TH, Noordewier M, Rappé MS, Short JM, Carrington JC, Mathur EJ. 2005. Genetics: genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 309:1242–1245. doi: 10.1126/science.1114057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Button DK, Robertson BR. 2001. Determination of DNA content of aquatic bacteria by flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1636–1645. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1636-1645.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Falb M, Müller K, Königsmaier L, Oberwinkler T, Horn P, von Gronau S, Gonzalez O, Pfeiffer F, Bornberg-Bauer E, Oesterhelt D. 2008. Metabolism of halophilic archaea. Extremophiles 12:177–196. doi: 10.1007/s00792-008-0138-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Anderson I, Scheuner C, Göker M, Mavromatis K, Hooper SD, Porat I, Klenk H-P, Ivanova N, Kyrpides N. 2011. Novel insights into the diversity of catabolic metabolism from ten haloarchaeal genomes. PLoS One 6:e20237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Verhees CH, Kengen SWM, Tuininga JE, Schut GJ, Adams MWW, de Vos WM, van der Oost J. 2003. The unique features of glycolytic pathways in Archaea. Biochem J 375:231–246. doi: 10.1042/BJ20021472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sato T, Atomi H, Imanaka T. 2007. Archaeal type III RuBisCOs function in a pathway for AMP metabolism. Science 315:1003–1006. doi: 10.1126/science.1135999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schönheit P, Buckel W, Martin WF. 2016. On the origin of heterotrophy. Trends Microbiol 24:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Aono R, Sato T, Yano A, Yoshida S, Nishitani Y, Miki K, Imanaka T, Atomi H. 2012. Enzymatic characterization of amp phosphorylase and ribose-1,5-bisphosphate isomerase functioning in an archaeal amp metabolic pathway. J Bacteriol 194:6847–6855. doi: 10.1128/JB.01335-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bulzu PA, Andrei AŞ, Salcher MM, Mehrshad M, Inoue K, Kandori H, Beja O, Ghai R, Banciu HL. 2019. Casting light on Asgardarchaeota metabolism in a sunlit microoxic niche. Nat Microbiol 4:1129–1137. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0404-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Castelle CJ, Banfield JF. 2018. Major new microbial groups expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life. Cell 172:1181–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sorokin D, Makarova KS, Abbas B, Ferrer M, Golyshin PN, Galinski EA, Ciordia S, Mena MC, Merkel AY, Wolf YI, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Koonin EV. 2017. Discovery of extremely halophilic, methyl-reducing euryarchaea provides insights into the evolutionary origin of methanogenesis. Nat Microbiol 2:17081. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sato T, Utashima S, Yoshii Y, Hirata K, Kanda S, Onoda Y, Qiang Jin J, Xiao S, Minami R, Fukushima H, Noguchi A, Manabe Y, Fukase K, Atomi H. 2022. A non-carboxylating pentose bisphosphate pathway in halophilic archaea. Commun Biol 5:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04247-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Oren A. 2011. Thermodynamic limits to microbial life at high salt concentrations. Environ Microbiol 13:1908–1923. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gunde-Cimerman N, Oren A, Plemenitaš A. 2018. Strategies of adaptation of microorganisms of the three domains of life to high salt concentrations. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:353–375. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Booth IR, Blount P. 2012. The MscS and MscL families of mechanosensitive channels act as microbial emergency release valves. J Bacteriol 194:4802–4809. doi: 10.1128/JB.00576-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Oren A, Ventosa A, Grant WD. 1997. Proposed minimal standards for description of new taxa in the order Halobacteriales. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:233–238. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-1-233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Oren A, Arahal DR, Ventosa A. 2009. Emended descriptions of genera of the family Halobacteriaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:637–642. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.008904-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.DeLong EF. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5685–5689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Arahal DR, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Volcani BE, Ventosa A. 1996. Phylogenetic analyses of some extremely halophilic archaea isolated from Dead Sea water, determined on the basis of their 16S rRNA sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3779–3786. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.10.3779-3786.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M. 2022. KEGG mapping tools for uncovering hidden features in biological data. Protein Sci 31:47–53. doi: 10.1002/pro.4172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. 2016. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 4:e1900v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Rice P, Longden L, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 16:276–277. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J. 2017. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gerhardt K, Ruiz-Perez CA, Rodriguez-R LM, Conrad RE, Konstantinidis KT. 2022. RecruitPlotEasy: an advanced read recruitment plot tool for assessing metagenomic population abundance and genetic diversity. Front Bioinform 1:1–5. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2021.826701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lagkouvardos I, Joseph D, Kapfhammer M, Giritli S, Horn M, Haller D, Clavel T. 2016. IMNGS: a comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci Rep 6:33721. doi: 10.1038/srep33721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

TABLE S4

Genomic size and DNA %G + C content of the type strains of the type species within the class Halobacteria with available genomes used for comparison in this study. Download Table S4, PDF file, 0.1 MB (139.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S1

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain F3-133T, its related environmental high-quality sequences from SILVA database, and the type strain sequences from all type species of the class Halobacteria. For the environmental sequences, their sample origin (given in the sequence entry) and the sequence accession number are shown. Bootstrap values are indicated at branch points. Scale bar denotes 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. Methanonatronarchaeum thermophilum AMET1T was used as outgroup. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 14.2 MB (14.5MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

16S rRNA gene amplicon data sets and clone library sequences analyzed in this study that contained related sequences to strain F3-133T. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB (143.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Metagenomic data sets used in this study for the recruitment plot analysis of strain F3-133T. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.3 MB (295KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Summary statistics of strain F3-133T genome. Download Table S3, PDF file, 0.08 MB (83.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Scatter plots exhibiting the relation between length of intergenic regions and percentage of non-overlapping genes among strain F3-133T, and the type strain of all type species within the class Halobacteria with available genomes. Plots represent percentage of non-overlapping genes with respect to the average (A) and median (B) size of intergenic spacers, and to the average (C) and median (D) size of non-overlapping intergenic spacers. Genome accession numbers of Halobacteria representatives can be found on Table S4. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 10.2 MB (10.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Phase-contrast photomicrograph of cells of strain F3-133T cultured in liquid medium under optimal conditions. Scale bar denotes 10 μm. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 13.2 MB (13.5MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) exhibiting the polar lipids profile of strain F3-133T in comparison to reference haloarchaeal species. The plate was revealed with 5% H2SO4 (in water) as spray reagent followed by heating at 160°C. BPG, biphosphatidylglycerol; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PGP-Me, phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester; PGS, phosphatidylglycerol sulfate; S-DGD-1, sulphated diglycosyl diether; S-TGD-1-PA, glycocardiolipin (sulfated triglycosyl diphytanyl archaeol ester linked to phosphatidic acid); S-TeGD, sulphated tetraglycosyl diether. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 13.1 MB (13.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

Phenotypic features of strain F3-133T. Download Table S5, PDF file, 0.2 MB (202.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2023 Durán-Viseras et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES