Skip to main content
Foods logoLink to Foods
. 2023 Apr 13;12(8):1640. doi: 10.3390/foods12081640

Identification of Antibacterial Components and Modes in the Methanol-Phase Extract from a Herbal Plant Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn

Yingping Tang 1,2, Pan Yu 1,2, Lanming Chen 1,2,*
Editors: Loris Pinto, Jesus Fernando Ayala-Zavala
PMCID: PMC10137656  PMID: 37107435

Abstract

The increase in bacterial resistance and the decline in the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents are challenging issues for the control of infectious diseases. Traditional Chinese herbal plants are potential sources of new or alternative medicine. Here, we identified antimicrobial components and action modes of the methanol-phase extract from an edible herb Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn, which had a 68.18% inhibition rate against 22 species of common pathogenic bacteria. The extract was purified using preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (Prep-HPLC), and three separated fragments (Fragments 1–3) were obtained. Fragment 1 significantly elevated cell surface hydrophobicity and membrane permeability but reduced membrane fluidity, disrupting the cell integrity of the Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens tested (p < 0.05). Sixty-six compounds in Fragment 1 were identified using Ultra-HPLC and mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS). The identified oxymorphone (6.29%) and rutin (6.29%) were predominant in Fragment 1. Multiple cellular metabolic pathways were altered by Fragment 1, such as the repressed ABC transporters, protein translation, and energy supply in two representative Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains (p < 0.05). Overall, this study demonstrates that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn is a promising candidate for antibacterial medicine and food preservatives.

Keywords: Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn, antibacterial component, antibacterial mode, pathogenic bacteria, transcriptome, traditional Chinese herb

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria continue to be a global concern for public health, causing millions of deaths worldwide per year [1]. Since the introduction of sulfonamides in 1933, a large number of antibiotics have been applied in clinics [2]. Nevertheless, in recent decades, the overuse and/or misuse of antibiotics have accelerated the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, leading to ineffective drug treatment [3]. It was estimated that at least 700,000 people worldwide die each year due to antimicrobial resistance [4].

Pharmacophagous plants are recognized as a rich source of phytochemicals with antimicrobial potential [5]. Phytocompounds extracted from such plants are long known for their therapeutic uses, and characterized by safety and low toxicity [6]. The application of herbal products may be a better choice for the extensive and imprudent use of synthetic antibiotics [7]. For example, In China, approximately 34,984 native higher plant species have been recorded [8]. Of these, the herbal plant Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn was first recorded in the earliest pharmaceutical book “Divine Farmer’s Classic of Materia Medica” during the Warring States period (475–221 B.C.) in China. It belongs to the phylum of Angiospermae, the class of Dicotyledoneae, the order of Rosales Bercht. and J. Presl, and the family of Rosaceae Juss. P. kleiniana Wight et Arn is widely distributed in China, and many Asian countries such as Japan, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, and North Korea. Its whole plant has been used as a traditional Chinese medicine to treat fever, arthritis, malaria, insect and snake bites, hepatitis, and traumatic injury [9]. Recently, Zhou et al. identified bioactive components from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn with anti-human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) protease activity [10]. Liu et al. developed an efficient method for the rapid screening and separation of α-glucosidase inhibitors from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn [11]. Li et al. [12] found antihyperglycemic and antioxidant effect of the total flavones of P. kleiniana Wight et Arn in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats, which may be helpful in the prevention of diabetic complications associated with oxidative stress [12]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few studies so far in the current literature on antibacterial activity of P. kleiniana Wight et Arn. Tao et al. [9] reported that total flavonoids from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn (TFP) inhibited biofilm formation and virulence factor production in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The TFP also damaged cell membrane integrity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These results supported potential application of the TFP as a novel natural bioactive preservative in food processing [13]. Song et al. also reported that bioactive components extracted from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn showed antibacterial effects against S. aureus, Candida albicans, P. aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli, but not against the mold Aspergillus niger [14].

To further exploit bioactive nature products in P. kleiniana Wight et Arn, in the present study, we extracted bacteriostatic components in P. kleiniana Wight et Arn using the methanol and chloroform method [15,16]. Antimicrobial action modes of the methanol-phase extract were further investigated. The results of this study provide useful data for potential pharmaceutical application of P. kleiniana Wight et Arn against the common pathogenic bacteria.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Antibacterial Activity of Crude Extracts from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

Antibacterial substances in the fresh P. kleiniana Wight et Arn were extracted using the methanol and chloroform method [15,16]. The water loss rate of the fresh plant sample was 94.12% after freeze-drying treatment of the sample. The extraction rates of the methanol-phase and chloroform-phase crude extracts were 31.13% and 25.43%, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the chloroform-phase extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn had a 50.00% inhibition rate, which inhibited one species of Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus, and 10 species of Gram-negative bacteria, including Bacillus cereus A1-1, B. cereus A2-2, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC13047, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC15611, Shigella dysenteriae CMCC51252, Shigella flexneri CMCC51572, Shigella sonnei ATCC25931, Vibrio cholerae Q10-54, Vibrio mimicus bio-56759, Vibrio parahemolyticus ATCC33847, V. parahemolyticus B3-13, V. parahemolyticus B5-29, V. parahemolyticus B9-35, V. parahemolyticus A1-1, and Vibrio vulnificus ATCC27562 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Antibacterial activity of crude extracts from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn.

Strain Inhibition Zone (Diameter, mm) MIC (mg/mL)
CPE MPE CPE MPE
Aeromonas hydrophila ATCC35654 - - - -
Bacillus cereus A1-1 7.03 ± 0.01 10.54 ± 0.48 50 6.25
Bacillus cereus A2-2 7.11 ± 0.02 10.54 ± 0.75 50 1.56
Enterobacter cloacae ATCC13047 7.00 ± 0.11 7.11 ± 0.26 50 50
Enterobacter cloacae C1-1 - - - -
Escherichia coli ATCC8739 - 7.62 ± 0.37 - 25
Escherichia coli ATCC25922 - - - -
Escherichia coli K12 - 7.51 ± 0.29 - 25
Enterobacter sakazakii CMCC45401 - - - -
Klebsiella pneumoniae 8-2-10-8 - - - -
Klebsiella pneumoniae 8-2-1-14 - - - -
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC9027 - 10.51 ± 0.41 - 6.25
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 - 8.14 ± 0.32 - 25
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards) Le Minor and Popoff serovar Choleraesuis ATCC13312 - - - -
Salmonella paratyphi-A CMCC50093 - - - -
Salmonellaenterica subsp. enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards) Le Minor and Popoff serovar Vellore ATCC15611 7.09 ± 0.09 10.11 ± 0.61 50 6.25
Salmonella E1-1 - - - -
Shigella dysenteriae CMCC51252 7.02 ± 0.11 9.29 ± 0.51 50 12.5
Shigella flexneri CMCC51572 7.82 ± 0.20 10.17 ± 0.20 25 6.25
Shigella flexneri ATCC12022 - - - -
Shigella flexneri CMCC51574 - 9.17 ± 0.21 - 12.5
Shigella sonnei ATCC25931 7.00 ± 0.11 8.19 ± 0.51 50 25
Shigella sonnet CMCC51592 - - - -
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 7.03 ± 0.14 9.41 ± 0.27 50 12.5
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC8095 7.07 ± 0.15 10.15 ± 0.24 50 6.25
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 7.78 ± 0.10 9.21 ± 0.01 25 12.5
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538 7.62 ± 0.61 9.55 ± 0.37 25 12.5
Staphylococcus aureus D1-1 7.11 ± 0.25 7.00 ± 0.51 50 50
Vibrio alginolyticus ATCC17749 - 10.11 ± 0.24 - 3.13
Vibrio alginolyticus ATCC33787 - - - -
Vibrio cholerae GIM1.449 - 7.00 ± 0.14 - 50
Vibrio cholerae Q10-54 7.22 ± 0.10 7.02 ± 0.21 50 50
Vibrio fluvialis ATCC33809 - 7.12 ± 0.03 - 50
Vibrio harvey ATCC BAA-1117 - - - -
Vibrio harveyi ATCC33842 - - - -
Vibrio mimicus bio-56759 7.21 ± 0.41 11.00 ± 0.32 25 3.13
Vibrio parahemolyticus ATCC17802 - 10.67 ± 1.21 - 1.56
Vibrio parahemolyticus ATCC33847 8.63 ± 0.24 7.14 ± 0.12 12.5 50
Vibrio parahemolyticus B3-13 7.17 ± 0.29 12.33 ± 0.65 50 3.13
Vibrio parahemolyticus B4-10 - 11.26 ± 0.34 - 6.25
Vibrio parahemolyticus B5-29 7.17 ± 0.04 13.77 ± 0.85 50 3.13
Vibrio parahemolyticus B9-35 7.20 ± 0.09 13.15 ± 0.44 25 3.13
Vibrio parahemolyticus A1-1 7.13 ± 0.15 10.35 ± 0.58 50 3.13
Vibrio vulnificus ATCC27562 7.65 ± 0.44 7.01 ± 0.23 25 50

Note: CPE: chloroform-phase extract. MPE: methanol-phase extract. -: no bacteriostasis activity. Inhibition zone: diameter includes the disk diameter (6 mm). MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. Values were means ± standard deviation (S.D.) of three parallel measurements.

Of note, the methanol-phase crude extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn inhibited the growth of 15 bacterial species, including one species of Gram-positive S. aureus, and 14 species of Gram-negative bacteria, P. aeruginosa ATCC9027, S. typhimurium ATCC15611, S. dysenteriae CMCC51252, S. flexneri CMCC51572, S. flexneri CMCC51574, S. sonnei ATCC25931, V. alginolyticus ATCC17749, V. cholerae Q10-54, V. fluvialis ATCC33809, V. mimicus bio-56759, V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802, and V. vulnificus ATCC27562, which showed a 68.18% inhibition rate (Table 1, Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Inhibition activity of the methanol-phase crude extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn against the four representative bacterial strains. (A-1D-1) V. parahemolyticus B5-29, V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802, S. aureus ATCC25923, and S. aureus ATCC8095, respectively. (A-2D-2) corresponding negative controls, respectively.

In this study, the methanol and chloroform extract method exhibited a broader antibacterial spectrum, consistent with our previous reports [15,16]. Previous studies also reported effective extraction of bioactive compounds from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn. For example, Tao et al. [13] extracted TFP in P. kleiniana Wight et Arn using an ethanol-water solution, and the obtained extract was further partitioned using petroleum ethers, chloroform and ethyl acetate. The extracted TFP inhibited survival and virulence of P. aeruginosa, and MRSA. Song et al. [14] extracted bioactive compounds from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn using ethanol and ethyl acetate, and the obtained extract showed antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, C. albicans, and E. coli. The difference in bioactive compounds extracted from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn using the different methods may explain the distinct antibacterial profiles between this study and the previous reports [13,14].

We further determined minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the crude extracts from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn, and the results are shown in Table 1. The MICs of the chloroform-phase extract ranged from 12.5 mg/mL to 50 mg/mL against the eleven species of the bacteria. Notably, for the methanol-phase extract, the MICs were between 1.56 mg/mL and 50 mg/mL against the fifteen bacterial species. Of these, the growth of B. cereus A2-2 and V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802 was the most strongly repressed by the methanol-phase extract with the MICs of 1.56 mg/mL, followed by V. alginolyticus ATCC17749, V. mimicus bio-56759, V. parahemolyticus B3-13, V. parahemolyticus B5-29, V. parahemolyticus B9-35, and V. parahemolyticus A1-1 with MICs of 3.13 mg/mL. In addition, the growth of B. cereus A1-1, P. aeruginosa ATCC9027, S. typhimurium ATCC15611, S. flexneri CMCC51572, S. aureus ATCC8095, and V. parahemolyticus B4-10 was also inhibited by the methanol-phase extract with lower MICs (6.25 mg/mL). Of these pathogens, for example, V. alginolyticus is a foodborne marine Vibrio that can cause gastroenteritis, otitis media, otitis externa, and septicemia in humans [17]. V. mimicus can also cause gastroenteritis in humans due to contaminated fish consumption and seafood [18]. P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen and can cause serious infections, especially in patients with compromised immune systems [19].

Recently, Song et al. [14] reported that the ethyl acetate extract of P. kleiniana Wight et Arn inhibited E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and C. albicans, with MICs of 5 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, and 5 mg/mL, respectively. Tao et al. reported the MIC value of the TFP against MRSA was 20 μg/mL [9].

These results indicated that the methanol-phase crude extract had a higher inhibition rate (68.18%), showing a more broad inhibitory profile with much lower MICs (1.56–50 mg/mL) against the pathogens tested, as compared to the chloroform-phase crude extract (50.00%; 12.5–50 mg/mL). Thus, the methanol-phase crude extract was chosen for further analysis in this study.

2.2. Purification of the Methanol-Phase Crude Extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

Based on the obtained results, a large amount of the methanol-phase crude from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn was prepared and further purified using Prep-HPLC analysis. As shown in Figure S1, three separated fragments (designated Fragments 1–3) were observed via scanning at OD211 for 12 min, including Fragment 1 (2.45 min), Fragment 2 (6.75 min), and Fragment 3 (9.83 min). The main peak of the methanol-phase crude was observed to occur at 2.45 min, wherein the absorption peak of Fragment 1 reached its maximum.

The three single fragments were subjected for antibacterial activity analysis. Fragment 1 had strong inhibitory effects on V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802, V. parahemolyticus B5-29, V. parahemolyticus B9-35, V. parahemolyticus B3-13, and V. parahemolyticus B4-10. In addition, the growth of the other six strains was also effectively repressed, including B. cereus A2-2, V. parahemolyticus A1-1, S. flexneri CMCC51572, S. aureus ATCC25923, S. aureus ATCC8095, and S. aureus ATCC6538 (Table 2). Of these, V. parahaemolyticus is a Gram-negative halophilic bacterium that can cause diseases in marine animals, leading to huge economic losses to the aquaculture. V. parahaemolyticus can also cause gastrointestinal infections and other health complications in humans [20]. B. cereus is a Gram-positive foodborne pathogen that can cause diarrhea and emesis [21]. S. flexneri is a Gram-negative intracellular pathogen that invades colonic cells and causes bloody diarrhea in humans [22]. S. aureus is a Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen leading to food poisoning as well as human and animal infectious diseases [23,24].

Table 2.

Antibacterial activity of Fragment 1 of the methanol-phase extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn.

Strain Inhibition Zone (Diameter, mm) MIC (mg/mL)
B. cereus A2-2 8.03 ± 0.45 6.25
S. flexneri CMCC51572 7.50 ± 0.50 6.25
S. aureus ATCC25923 8.03 ± 0.40 12.5
S. aureus ATCC8095 9.53 ± 0.35 6.25
S. aureus ATCC6538 7.10 ± 0.36 50.0
V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802 10.31 ± 0.62 6.25
V. parahemolyticus A1-1 8.57 ± 0.60 25.0
V. parahemolyticus B3-13 10.37 ± 0.32 6.25
V. parahemolyticus B4-10 10.30 ± 0.50 12.5
V. parahemolyticus B5-29 11.30 ± 0.26 6.25
V. parahemolyticus B9-35 11.27 ± 0.40 12.5

We also determined MICs of Fragment 1 against the four species of pathogenic bacteria (Table 2). The synergistic effect may explain the observed MICs of Fragment 1 (6.25–50 mg/mL), as compared to the methanol-phase extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn. Among the Gram-negative pathogens, V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802 and V. parahemolyticus B5-29 were the most sensitive strains to Fragment 1, with MICs of 6.25 mg/mL. For the Gram-positive pathogen, the growth of S. aureus ATCC8095 and S. aureus ATCC25923 was also effectively repressed, with MICs of 6.25 mg/mL and 12.5 mg/mL, respectively.

Conversely, the other two peaks (Fragments 2 and 3) showed weak or no antibacterial activity. To further investigate possible antibacterial modes of Fragment 1, the two Gram-negative strains V. parahemolyticus ATCC17802 and V. parahemolyticus B5-29, and two Gram-positive stains S. aureus ATCC8095 and S. aureus ATCC25923 were chosen for the further analysis in this study.

2.3. Bacterial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity, Membrane Fluidity and Permeability Changes Triggered by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

2.3.1. Cell Surface Hydrophobicity

Cell surface hydrophobicity is an important cellular biophysical parameter that affects cell surface interactions and cell–cell communication [25]. In this study, the hexadecane was used as a probe to assess cell surface hydrophobicity change. The difference between before and after the absorbance value of bacterial fluid can indicate the change of hydrophobicity, and the larger the difference, the more hydrophobicity of the surface [26]. The cell surface hydrophobicity of the four experimental groups (1× MIC of Fragment 1) was significantly increased, as compared to the control groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). For instance, after being treated with Fragment 1 for 2 h, bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity was significantly increased, including V. parahaemolyticus B5-29 (8.62%, 1.42-fold), V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 (8.27%, 1.50-fold), S. aureus ATCC25923 (10.34%, 1.24-fold), and S. aureus ATCC8095 (12.20%, 1.19-fold) (p < 0.05). Increasing treatment time, the cell surface hydrophobicity was further increased. After the 4 h treatment, the cell surface hydrophobicity was the most significantly increased (11.97%, 1.97-fold) in the V. parahaemolyticus B5-29 treatment group. The highest increase (15.96%, 2.63-fold) was also observed in V. parahaemolyticus B5-29, after treatment for 6 h. The results indicated that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly increase the cell surface hydrophobicity of both Gram-negative V. parahemolyticus and Gram-positive S. aureus pathogens.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of Fragment 1 (1× MIC) from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn on cell surface hydrophobicity, membrane fluidity and outer membrane permeability of the four bacterial strains. (AC) cell surface hydrophobicity, membrane fluidity, and outer membrane permeability, respectively. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; and ***: p < 0.001.

2.3.2. Cell Membrane Fluidity

Cell membrane is a natural barrier to prevent extracellular substances from freely entering the cell [27]. In this study, as shown in Figure 2B, when compared to the control groups, the membrane fluidity of V. parahaemolyticus B5-29, S. aureus ATCC25923, and S. aureus ATCC8095 did not change significantly after treatment with Fragment 1 (1× MIC) for 2 h and 4 h. However, a significant decrease (1.16-fold, 1.25-fold, and 1.24-fold) was observed in these three treatment groups after treatment for 6 h, respectively (p < 0.05). In addition, a significant decrease in cell membrane fluidity was only found in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 after treatment for 4 h (1.16-fold) and 6 h (1.24-fold), respectively (p < 0.05). These results indicated that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly reduce the cell membrane fluidity of both Gram-negative V. parahemolyticus and Gram-positive S. aureus pathogens.

2.3.3. Cell Membrane Permeability

β-galactosidase is a macromolecular protein naturally found in the interior of cells that can hydrolyze the substrate o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranosi (ONPG) to galactose and o-nitrophenol in yellow. If the inner membrane of bacterial cells is damaged, ONPG will quickly enter the cell [28]. In this study, the ONPG was used as a probe to assess whether the bacterial inner membrane is damaged. As illustrated in Figure 3D, the inner cell membrane permeability of S. aureus ATCC8095 did not change significantly after treatment with Fragment 1 (1× MIC) from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn for 2 h (p > 0.05); conversely, significant increases were observed in V. parahaemolyticus B5-29, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, and S. aureus ATCC25923 treatment groups (1.15-fold, 1.18-fold, and 1.04-fold), respectively (p < 0.05). After being treated for 4 h, the highest increase was found in V. parahaemolyticus B5-29 (1.22-fold). After treatment for 6 h, significant increases were also observed in V. parahaemolyticus B5-29, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, S. aureus ATCC25923, and S. aureus ATCC8095 (1.20-fold, 1.17-fold, 1.07-fold, and 1.08-fold), respectively (p < 0.05). These results indicated that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly increase the inner cell membrane permeability of both Gram-negative V. parahemolyticus and Gram-positive S. aureus pathogens.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of Fragment 1 (1× MIC) from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn on the bacterial inner cell membrane permeability. (AD) V. parahaemolyticus B5-29, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, S. aureus ATCC25923, and S. aureus ATCC8095, respectively. The treatment groups were overall significantly different from the control groups (p < 0.05), except the S. aureus ATCC8095 group treated for 2 h (D).

Outer membrane permeability was assessed by measuring the uptake of a hydrophobic fluorescent probe N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine (NPN) [29]. The outer membrane permeability increased significantly in the four treatment groups, after being treated with Fragment 1 for 2 h (1.38-fold to 1.66-fold) (p < 0.01), and 4 h (1.77-fold to 2.72-fold), respectively (p < 0.001) (Figure 2C). The highest increase was found in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 (2.70-fold), after treatment for 6 h. These results indicated that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly increase the outer cell membrane permeability of the Gram-negative V. parahemolyticus and Gram-positive S. aureus pathogens. Recently, Tao et al. also reported that the TFP from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn increased cell membrane permeability of MRSA [13].

Taken together, the results of this study demonstrated that Fragment 1 (1× MIC) from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly increase the cell surface hydrophobicity and membrane permeability, but decreases the cell membrane fluidity of both Gram-negative V. parahemolyticus and Gram-positive S. aureus pathogens. Antibacterial compounds (e.g., flavonoids) in Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn may have interacted with lipid components of the bacterial cell membrane. The disorder in lipid chains resulted in changed permeability and fluidity of the bacterial cell membrane [30]. The compounds may also have interacted with the bacterial cell surface proteins, leading to the altered nanomechanical properties, which consequently changed cell surface hydrophobicity and fluidity [31]. The two common pathogens V. parahemolyticus and S. aureus were chosen for further analysis in this study. The former is the leading sea foodborne pathogen worldwide [20], while the latter leads to food poisoning, as well as human and animal infections [23].

2.4. Bacterial Cell Surface Structure Changes Triggered by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

Based on the obtained results in this study, the representative Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 and Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC25923 strains were chosen for further scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. As shown in Figure 4, the cells of V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 were intact in shape with a flat surface, showing a typical rod-like structure, while those of S. aureus ATCC25923 were also intact and clear, showing a typical spherical structure. In remarkable contrast to the control groups, the bacterial morphological structures were altered to varying degrees in the treatment groups triggered by Fragment 1 (1× MIC) for different times.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The SEM observation of cell surface structure of the two bacterial strains treated with the 1× MIC of Fragment 1 for different times. (A): V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802; (B): S. aureus ATCC 25923.

For the Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, its cell surface was slightly shrunken after being treated with Fragment 1 for 2 h. After 4 h of treatment, the cell surface was more wrinkled and was slightly depressed, the cell membrane was folded and some contents were exuded. After 6 h of the treatment, the cells were severely deformed and crumpled, with a large amount of content leaked.

For the Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC25923, its cell surface was rough and slightly wrinkled, but certain cells were depressed, with a small amount of content leaked after the treatment for 2 h. Upon the increased treatment time (4 h), more cells were obviously wrinkled and deformed with the irregularly spherical, and more content leaked out. The cell morphological structure was seriously damaged after being treated for 6 h.

These results demonstrated that Fragment 1 (1× MIC) from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can severely damage the cell surface structure of both Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus and Gram-positive S. aureus after treatment for 6 h.

2.5. Identification of Potential Antibacterial Compounds in Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

Potential antibacterial components in Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn were further identified using UHPLC-MS analysis. As shown in Table 3, a total of 66 different compounds were identified. The highest relative percentage of the compounds was D-maltose (6.77%), followed by oxymorphone (6.29%), rutin (6.29%), D-proline (5.41%), and L-proline (5.41%). In addition, alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, sesquiterpenoids, fatty acyls, and organic acids were also detected (Table 3).

Table 3.

Compounds identified in Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn via UHPLC–MS analysis.

Peak
No.
Identified Compound Compound Nature Rt (min) Formula Exact Mass Peak Area (%)
1 D-Maltose Carbohydrates 0.76 C12H22O11 342.1162 6.77%
2 Oxymorphone Phenanthrenes and derivatives 11.18 C17H19NO4 301.1314 6.29%
3 Rutin Flavonoids 12.99 C27H30O16 281.0899 6.29%
4 D-Proline Amino acid and derivatives 0.76 C5H9NO2 115.0633 5.41%
5 L-Proline Amino acid and derivatives 0.73 C5H9NO2 115.0633 5.41%
6 L-Glutamic acid Amino acid and derivatives 0.66 C5H9NO4 147.0532 5.20%
7 Sucrose Carbohydrates 0.89 C12H22O11 342.1162 3.62%
8 Cynaroside Flavonoids 12.98 C21H20O11 282.162 3.37%
9 Piperlonguminine Alkaloids 10.57 C16H19NO3 273.1365 3.21%
10 5-Aminovaleric acid Amino acid and derivatives 1.11 C5H11NO2 117.079 3.12%
11 D-Glutamine Carboxylic acids and derivatives 0.66 C5H10N2O3 146.0691 2.99%
12 L-Lysine Amino acid and derivatives 0.64 C6H14N2O2 146.1055 2.99%
13 p-Octopamine Phenols 3.84 C8H11NO2 153.079 2.96%
14 Oleic acid Fatty acyls 13.03 C18H34O2 282.2559 2.91%
15 Isoquercitrin Flavonoids 10.58 C21H20O12 274.1933 2.44%
16 L-Pipecolic acid Amino acid and derivatives 0.69 C6H11NO2 129.079 2.31%
17 Moracin C Phenols 0.67 C19H18O4 129.0426 2.31%
18 Kojibiose Fatty acyls 0.72 C12H22O11 342.1162 2.22%
19 Gluconic acid Carbohydrates 0.69 C6H12O7 196.0583 1.97%
20 Betaine Alkaloids 1.06 C5H11NO2 117.079 1.51%
21 L-Valine Amino acid and derivatives 0.93 C5H11NO2 117.079 1.49%
22 D-alpha-Aminobutyric acid Carboxylic acids and derivatives 0.65 C4H9NO2 103.0633 1.46%
23 cis-Aconitic acid Organic acids and derivatives 1.46 C6H6O6 174.0164 1.34%
24 Lactulose Organooxygen compounds 0.77 C12H22O11 342.1162 1.33%
25 Turanose Fatty acyls 0.79 C12H22O11 342.1162 1.33%
26 L-Pipecolic acid Amino acid and derivatives 1.47 C6H11NO2 129.079 1.15%
27 DL-Norvaline Amino acid and derivatives 1.05 C5H11NO2 117.079 1.11%
28 L-Asparagine Amino acid and derivatives 0.64 C4H8N2O3 132.0535 1.11%
29 Malic acid Hydroxy acids and derivatives 0.8 C4H6O5 134.0215 0.90%
30 Trigonelline Alkaloids 0.82 C7H7NO2 137.0477 0.90%
31 Acetamide Alkaloids 13.95 C2H5NO 59.03711 0.88%
32 Beta-D-fructose 2-phosphate Organooxygen compounds 0.75 C6H13O9P 260.0297 0.77%
33 22-Dehydroclerosterol Steroids 12.59 C29H46O 410.3549 0.76%
34 Artemisinin Sesquiterpenoids 13.02 C15H22O5 282.1467 0.72%
35 Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside flavonoids 6.29 C27H30O15 594.1585 0.54%
36 L-Homoserine Amino acid and derivatives 0.67 C4H9NO3 119.0582 0.52%
37 L-Threonine Amino acid and derivatives 0.64 C4H9NO3 119.0582 0.50%
38 Palmitic acid Lipids 12.92 C16H32O2 256.2402 0.49%
39 O-Acetylethanolamine Alkaloids 0.67 C4H9NO2 103.0633 0.46%
40 Galactose 1-phosphate Organooxygen compounds 0.65 C6H13O9P 260.0297 0.46%
41 Glucose 1-phosphate Organooxygen compounds 13 C6H13O9P 260.0297 0.45%
42 Adenosine 5′-monophosphate Nucleotide and its derivates 1.38 C10H14N5O7P 347.0631 0.43%
43 L-Arginine Amino acid and derivatives 0.6 C6H14N4O2 174.1117 0.43%
44 Maltotriose Organooxygen compounds 1.23 C18H32O16 504.169 0.40%
45 Indole Alkaloids 3.82 C8H7N 117.0578 0.38%
46 D-Glucose 6-phosphate Carbohydrates 0.65 C6H13O9P 260.0297 0.37%
47 D-Aspartic acid Alkaloids 0.76 C4H7NO4 133.0375 0.36%
48 Vitexin rhamnoside Flavonoids 6.78 C27H30O14 578.1636 0.35%
49 L-Aspartic acid Amino acid and derivatives 0.63 C4H7NO4 133.0375 0.33%
50 Maltol Flavonoids 0.9 C6H6O3 126.0317 0.33%
51 Astragalin Flavonoids 6.52 C21H20O11 448.1006 0.32%
52 3-Hydroxy-3-methylpentane-1,5-dioic acid Amino acid and derivatives 2.32 C6H10O5 162.0528 0.31%
53 Campesterol Steroids and steroid derivatives 12.18 C28H48O 400.3705 0.30%
54 L-Ornithine Amino acid and derivatives 0.55 C5H12N2O2 132.0899 0.30%
55 Adenosine Nucleotide and its derivates 2.58 C10H13N5O4 267.0968 0.29%
56 Vidarabine Purine nucleosides 2.28 C10H13N5O4 267.0968 0.27%
57 Nicotinic acid Nicotinic acid derivatives 0.73 C6H5NO2 123.032 0.27%
58 Pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside Flavonoids 1.11 C21H20O10 100.0524 0.26%
59 L-Citruline Amino acid and derivatives 0.66 C6H13N3O3 175.0957 0.26%
60 Diallyl disulfide Miscellaneous 0.68 C6H10S2 146.0224 0.26%
61 Sarracine Alkaloids 13.14 C18H27NO5 337.1889 0.22%
62 N-Acetylputrescine Phenolamides 1.79 C6H14N2O 130.1106 0.22%
63 Salicylic acid Organic acid 7.06 C7H6O3 138.0317 0.22%
64 5-Methylcytosine Nucleotide and its derivates 2.26 C5H7N3O 125.0589 0.21%
65 Ellagic acid Phenols 6.12 C14H6O8 302.0063 0.21%
66 Isodiospyrin Quinones 11.28 C22H14O6 374.079 0.21%

Highly concentrated sugar solutions, such as the D-maltose identified in this study, are known to be effective antimicrobial agents [32]. Previous research has indicated that the antibacterial activity of phenanthrenes and derivatives, such as the oxymorphone identified in this study, was primarily related to the destruction of the bacterial cell wall structure [33]. Plant extracts contain a large number of bioactive compounds, mainly polyphenols including flavonoids and phenolic compounds. Flavonoids, such as the rutin identified in this study, could exert antibacterial activity via damaging the cytoplasmic membrane, inhibiting energy metabolism and synthesis of nucleic acids [34]. Tao et al. also reported the major compounds of the TFP were 3-O-methylducheside A, naringenin, rutin and quercetin [9,13]. Phenols, such as the p-octopamine identified in this study, are potent antibacterial agents against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria via the disruption of the bacterial membrane, leading to bacterial lysis and leakage of intracellular contents [35]. Indole alkaloids, such as the indole identified in this study, possess not only intriguing structural features but also biological/pharmacological activities e.g., antimicrobial activity [36]. Additionally, amino acids and its derivatives, such as the D-proline, L-proline, glutamic acid, 5-aminovaleric acid, lysine, pipecolic acid, and L-valine identified in this study, are a kind of antibacterial agent with the advantages of being not easily drug-resistant, and having low toxicity or harmless metabolites [37].

2.6. Differential Transcriptomes Triggered by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

To obtain the genome-wide gene expression changes triggered by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn, we determined transcriptomes of the Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 and the Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC25923 pathogens treated with Fragment 1 (1× MIC) for 6 h using the Illumina RNA sequencing technology. A complete list of differently expressed genes (DEGs) in the two strains are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA database under the accession number PRJNA906658.

2.6.1. The Major Changed Metabolic Pathways in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802

Approximately 13.07% (580 of 4436 genes) of V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 genes were differentially expressed in the treatment group, as compared to the control group. Of these, 238 DEGs showed higher transcriptional levels (fold change ≥ 2.0), whereas 342 DEGs were significantly down-regulated (fold change ≤ 0.5) (p < 0.05). Sixteen significantly altered metabolic pathways were identified in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802, including the citrate cycle; glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism; fatty acid degradation; glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism; oxidative phosphorylation; pyruvate metabolism; propanoate metabolism; beta-Lactam resistance; ABC transporters; two-component system; alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism; phosphotransferase system (PTS); butanoate metabolism; lysine degradation; quorum sensing (QS); and nitrogen metabolism (Figure 5, Table 4).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The major changed metabolic pathways in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802 mediated by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn. (A) The Volcano plot of the DEGs. (B) The significantly altered metabolic pathways in the bacterium. Different colors represented significant levels of the enriched genes.

Table 4.

The major altered metabolic pathways in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802.

Metabolic Pathway Gene ID Gene Name Fold Change Gene Description
Citrate cycle WU75_19785 sucA 0.146 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase
WU75_07425 pckA 0.465 Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
WU75_19790 sucB 0.133 Dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase
WU75_11550 acnB 0.143 Bifunctional aconitate hydratase 2/2-methylisocitrate dehydratase
WU75_19795 sucC 0.134 Succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit beta
WU75_19800 sucD 0.16 Succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit alpha
WU75_19770 sdhD 0.199 Succinate dehydrogenase
WU75_19780 sdhB 0.157 Succinate dehydrogenase
WU75_19765 sdhC 0.182 Succinate dehydrogenase
WU75_13785 fumA 0.497 Fumarate hydratase
WU75_09605 icd 0.179 Isocitrate dehydrogenase
WU75_19775 sdhA 0.144 Succinate dehydrogenase
WU75_06430 mdh 0.177 Malate dehydrogenase
WU75_16530 lpd 0.35 Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism WU75_19760 gltA 0.129 Type II citrate synthase
WU75_19150 aceA 0.37 Isocitrate lyase
WU75_19145 aceB 0.352 Malate synthase
WU75_00290 aceB 0.315 Malate synthase
WU75_10840 phbB 0.277 3-ketoacyl-ACP reductase
WU75_03265 katE 2.389 Catalase
Fatty acid degradation WU75_22235 fadB 0.151 Multifunctional fatty acid oxidation complex subunit alpha
WU75_08655 fadE 0.184 Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
WU75_20175 fadJ 0.204 Multifunctional fatty acid oxidation complex subunit alpha
WU75_22230 fadA 0.208 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
WU75_20180 fadA 0.305 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
WU75_10835 atoB 0.433 Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase
WU75_10445 atoB 0.445 Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase
WU75_12560 fadE 0.452 Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
WU75_19885 fadD 0.493 Long-chain fatty acid—CoA ligase
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism WU75_14910 gcvP 0.113 Glycine dehydrogenase
WU75_14915 gcvH 0.127 Glycine cleavage system protein H
WU75_10395 betA 0.162 Choline dehydrogenase
WU75_14930 gcvT 0.184 Glycine cleavage system protein T
WU75_16130 lysC 0.187 Aspartate kinase
WU75_14920 glyA 0.203 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase
WU75_16140 ectB 0.222 Diaminobutyrate-2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase
WU75_16145 ectA 0.246 L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase
WU75_10400 betB 0.259 Betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase
WU75_00565 sdaA 0.264 Serine dehydratase
WU75_16135 ectC 0.27 Ectoine synthase
WU75_02030 trpB 0.397 Tryptophan synthase subunit beta
WU75_05755 thrC 0.429 Threonine synthase
WU75_05760 thrB 0.47 Serine kinase
WU75_05330 glxK 0.495 Glycerate kinase
Oxidative phosphorylation WU75_06010 petC 0.195 Cytochrome C
WU75_06015 petB 0.209 Cytochrome B
WU75_14570 ccoO 0.228 Peptidase S41
WU75_14575 ccoN 0.272 Cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
WU75_14560 ccoP 0.301 Cytochrome Cbb3
WU75_06485 ppa 0.339 Inorganic pyrophosphatase
WU75_06020 petA 0.442 Ubiquinol-cytochrome C reductase
WU75_14565 ccoQ 0.475 Cytochrome C oxidase
WU75_02240 cyoC 0.478 Cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase subunit III
WU75_19125 ppk2 2.159 Polyphosphate kinase
WU75_09420 cydA 3.637 Cytochrome d terminal oxidase subunit 1
WU75_09415 cydB 4.11 Cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase subunit 2
WU75_09410 cydX 5.362 Membrane protein
Pyruvate metabolism WU75_01940 yiaY 0.171 Alcohol dehydrogenase
WU75_03655 lldD 0.276 Lactate dehydrogenase
WU75_22155 dld 0.322 Lactate dehydrogenase
WU75_16665 oadA 0.324 Oxaloacetate decarboxylase
WU75_16060 aldB 0.397 Aldehyde dehydrogenase
WU75_20855 gloA 2.451 Lactoylglutathione lyase
WU75_12805 pta 8.464 Phosphate acetyltransferase
WU75_02150 ackA 8.851 Acetate kinase
WU75_12810 ackA 10.365 Acetate kinase
WU75_09685 pflD 12.853 Pyruvate formate-lyase
WU75_00810 gloA 13.536 Glyoxalase
Propanoate metabolism WU75_15760 prpF 0.402 3-methylitaconate isomerase
WU75_15770 prpC 0.435 Methylcitrate synthase
beta-Lactam resistance WU75_09315 acrA 6.699 Hemolysin D
WU75_09310 acrB 8.911 Multidrug transporter
WU75_09925 acrA 40.366 Hemolysin D
ABC transporters WU75_10385 proW 0.106 ABC transporter permease
WU75_16175 proX 0.116 Glycine/betaine ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_10390 proX 0.122 Glycine/betaine ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_12775 oppC 0.133 Peptide ABC transporter permease
WU75_10380 proV 0.138 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_09655 aotM 0.143 Amino acid ABC transporter permease
WU75_09665 aotJ 0.144 Nickel transporter
WU75_13090 yejA 0.151 Diguanylate cyclase
WU75_12770 oppB 0.164 Oligopeptide transporter permease
WU75_12780 oppD 0.172 Oligopeptide transporter ATP-binding component
WU75_09660 aotQ 0.176 ABC transporter
WU75_16170 proW 0.199 Glycine/betaine ABC transporter permease
WU75_08085 oppA 0.201 Peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_07210 yejA 0.204 Diguanylate cyclase
WU75_12765 oppA 0.214 Peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_07220 yejB 0.22 Hypothetical protein
WU75_07215 yejE 0.221 Peptide ABC transporter permease
WU75_09670 aotP 0.228 Amino acid transporter
WU75_12785 oppF 0.228 Peptide ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_04720 oppA 0.341 Peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_16165 proV 0.343 Glycine/betaine ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_14765 aapQ 0.377 Amino acid ABC transporter permease
WU75_03180 malE 0.4 Sugar ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_14775 aapP 0.405 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_04605 vcaM 0.406 Multidrug ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_14055 mdlB 0.411 Multidrug ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_10275 rbsD 0.438 D-ribose pyranase
WU75_05845 btuF 0.487 Vitamin B12-binding protein
WU75_14760 aapJ 0.491 Amino acid ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_03185 malK 2.175 Maltose/maltodextrin transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_19815 znuA 2.204 Zinc ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_19810 znuC 2.491 Zinc ABC transporter ATPase
WU75_02265 artP 2.617 Arginine ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_19805 znuB 2.666 Membrane protein
WU75_00425 macB 14.353 Macrolide transporter
Two-component system WU75_07480 glnG 0.186 Nitrogen regulation protein NR(I)
WU75_13735 mcp 0.218 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_15795 tctB 0.237 TctB
WU75_21750 dctD 0.288 C4-dicarboxylate ABC transporter
WU75_13155 ttrB 0.31 4Fe-4S ferredoxin
WU75_21770 dctP 0.31 C4-dicarboxylate ABC transporter
WU75_01920 mcp 0.32 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_21745 dctB 0.352 ATPase
WU75_10200 phoA 0.353 Alkaline phosphatase
WU75_21765 dctQ 0.368 C4-dicarboxylate ABC transporter permease
WU75_00210 dctD 0.406 C4-dicarboxylate ABC transporter
WU75_16210 qseC 0.423 Histidine kinase
WU75_23015 fliC 0.435 Flagellin
WU75_07100 mcp 0.453 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_13380 crp 0.457 Transcriptional regulator
WU75_09825 mcp 0.471 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_16525 hapR 0.477 LuxR family transcriptional regulator
WU75_15800 tctA 0.485 Tripartite tricarboxylate transporter TctA
WU75_14800 mcp 0.491 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_06085 tolC 2.068 Outer membrane channel protein
WU75_15630 dcuB 2.125 C4-dicarboxylate transporter
WU75_06045 degP 2.148 Serine endoprotease DegQ
WU75_04355 mcp 2.163 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_10915 luxQ 3.377 ATPase
WU75_22175 mcp 4.001 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_02450 pfeR 4.828 Transcriptional regulator
WU75_18570 cpxA 10.981 Two-component sensor protein
WU75_18575 cpxR 26.5 Transcriptional regulator
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism WU75_06265 glmS 0.037 Glucosamine-fructose-6-phosphate Aminotransferase
WU75_07465 glnA 0.123 Glutamine synthetase
WU75_04655 putA 0.145 Pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase
WU75_14680 - 0.286 NAD-glutamate dehydrogenase
WU75_05875 carB 0.343 Carbamoyl phosphate synthase large subunit
WU75_05820 gltB 0.414 Glutamate synthase
WU75_05825 gltD 0.44 Glutamate synthase
WU75_05880 carA 0.46 Carbamoyl phosphate synthase small subunit
WU75_18095 pyrI 0.462 Aspartate carbamoyltransferase regulatory subunit
WU75_18090 pyrB 0.466 Aspartate carbamoyltransferase catalytic subunit
WU75_20915 ansA 2.141 Cytoplasmic asparaginase I
WU75_01110 ansB 2.718 L-asparaginase II
WU75_18550 aspA 7.015 Aspartate ammonia-lyase
PTS WU75_03285 ptsN 0.462 PTS fructose transporter subunit IIA
WU75_12990 ptsG 0.5 PTS glucose transporter subunit IIBC
WU75_17910 celC 2.36 Molecular chaperone TorD
WU75_14970 fruB 2.451 Bifunctional PTS system fructose-Specific transporter subunit IIA/HPr protein
WU75_19555 ptsH 3.973 PTS sugar transporter
WU75_00455 ulaB 3.977 PTS ascorbate transporter subunit IIB
WU75_19550 ptsI 4.075 Phosphoenolpyruvate-protein Phosphotransferase
WU75_00460 cmtB 4.118 PTS system mannitol-specific Transporter subunit IIA
WU75_01640 cmtB 4.539 PTS mannitol transporter subunit IIA
WU75_14960 fruA 5.096 PTS fructose transporter subunit IIBC
WU75_00450 ulaA 6.946 PTS beta-glucoside transporter subunit IIBC
Butanoate metabolism WU75_01985 acsA 0.334 Acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase
WU75_10825 phaC 0.336 Poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate) synthetase
Lysine degradation WU75_21960 ldcC 7.207 Lysine decarboxylase LdcC
QS WU75_07805 - 0.109 Cytochrome C
WU75_07800 - 0.181 ABC transporter permease
WU75_07795 - 0.202 ABC transporter permease
WU75_07810 ddpD 0.216 ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_11620 - 0.218 Peptide ABC transporter permease
WU75_11630 - 0.233 Peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein
WU75_11625 - 0.261 Peptide ABC transporter permease
WU75_11610 ddpF 0.358 Chemotaxis protein
WU75_11615 ddpD 0.484 Sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
WU75_21410 aphA 2.288 Transcriptional regulator
Nitrogen metabolism WU75_00760 ncd2 0.276 2-nitropropane dioxygenase
WU75_10810 napA 2.286 Nitrate reductase
WU75_15655 nirD 3.934 Nitrite reductase
WU75_10815 napB 6.27 Nitrate reductase
WU75_08850 hcp 63.107 Hydroxylamine reductase

In the citrate cycle, all the DEGs (n = 14) were significantly repressed (0.146-fold to 0.35-fold) (p < 0.05) in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 after treatment by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn. For instance, the DEGs (sucABCD, WU75_19785 and WU75_19790, WU75_19795, and WU75_19800), encoding a 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, a dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase, and succinyl-CoA synthetase subunits alpha and beta, respectively, were highly inhibited (0.146-fold, 0.133-fold, 0.134-fold, and 0.16-fold) (p < 0.05). Moreover, the DEGs (sdhABCD, WU75_19775, WU75_19780, WU75_19765, and WU75_19770) encoding a succinate dehydrogenase were also highly repressed (0.144-fold to 0.199-fold) (p < 0.05), which links two essential energy-producing processes, the citrate cycle and oxidative phosphorylation [38]. The inhibited key enzymes in the citrate cycle highlighted inactive energy production in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 triggered by Fragment 1.

In the propanoate metabolism, all the DEGs (n = 2) were significantly inhibited (0.402-fold to 0.435-fold) in the V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 treatment group (p < 0.05). For example, the DEG (prpC, WU75_15770) encoding a 2-methylcitrate synthase was significantly inhibited (0.435-fold) (p < 0.05). It has been reported that the strategic inhibition of organic acid catabolism in P. aeruginosa through inhibition of PrpC activity may be a potent mechanism to halt the growth of this pathogen [39].

In the glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, five of the six DEGs were significantly repressed (0.129-fold to 0.277-fold) (p < 0.05). For instance, the DEGs (aceAB, WU75_19150, WU75_19145, and WU75_00290), encoding an isocitrate lyase and a malate synthase of the glyoxylate shunt (GS) carbon cycle, were significantly inhibited (0.315-fold to 0.370-fold) (p < 0.05). The GS could avoid unnecessary reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation by bypassing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) production, and respiration, eventually helping cells to survive in harsh conditions [40,41].

In the glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism, all the DEGs (n = 15) were significantly inhibited (0.113-fold to 0.495-fold) in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 (p < 0.05). For example, the DEGs (ectBAC, WU75_16140, WU75_16145, and WU75_16135), encoding a diaminobutyrate-2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, a 2% 2C4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase, and an ectoine synthase, which are involved in the synthesis of ectoine that is commonly found in halophilic and halotolerant microorganisms to maintain cell osmotic balance [42]. Additionally, in the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism, ten of the thirteen DEGs were significantly down-regulated (0.037-fold to 0.466-fold) in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 as well (p < 0.05). Conversely, the DEGs (ansAB, WU75_20915, and WU75_01110) were up-regulated (2.141-fold and 2.718-fold) (p < 0.05), which encoded a cytoplasmic asparaginase I and a L-asparaginase II. The asparaginase I is required for bacterial growth on asparagine as the sole nitrogen source [43], while asparaginases are important in maintaining nitrogen balance and the levels of amino acids within cells [43]. These results indicated that the amino acid synthesis was inhibited in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 mediated by Fragment 1.

For the ABC transporters, 29 of the 35 DEGs were significantly down-regulated (0.106-fold to 0.491-fold) in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 (p < 0.05). Of these, the DEGs (proVXW, WU75_10380, WU75_10390, and WU75_10385), encoding a choline ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, a choline ABC transporter substrate-binding protein, and a choline ABC transporter permease subunit that are responsible for the choline transport, were all significantly repressed (0.106-fold to 0.138-fold). The DEGs (oppABCDF, WU75_12765, WU75_12770, WU75_12775, WU75_12780, and WU75_12785) encoding a peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein, an oligopeptide transporter permease, a peptide ABC transporter permease, an oligopeptide transporter ATP-binding component, and a peptide ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, respectively, were all highly repressed (0.172-fold and 0.214-fold). Additionally, the DEGs (yejABE, WU75_13090, WU75_07210, WU75_07220, and WU75_07215) encoding a diguanylate cyclase, an ABC transporter permease subunit, and a peptide ABC transporter permease, respectively, were highly repressed as well (0.151-fold and 0.220-fold). The ABC transporter YejABEF is required for resistance to antimicrobial peptides and virulence of Brucella melitensis [44]. These results indicated that the inhibited ABC transporters likely led to the repressed substance transport and harmful substances discharged in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802.

In the oxidative phosphorylation, nine of the thirteen DEGs were significantly down-regulated in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 (0.195-fold to 0.478-fold) (p < 0.05). Oxidative phosphorylation is a major metabolic pathway to obtain energy required for cell growth and proliferation [45] (Huang et al., 2019). For instance, the DEGs (ccoNOQ, WU75_14575, WU75_14570, and WU75_14565) were significantly inhibited (0.228-fold to 0.475-fold) (p < 0.05), which regulated the bacterial adhesion in environmental stresses in V. alginolyticus [45].

In the QS, most DEGs (n = 9) were significantly inhibited (0.109-fold to 0.484-fold) (p < 0.05), e.g., cytochrome c (WU75_06010), cytochrome B (WU75_06015), and peptidase S41 (WU75_14570). For instance, the cytochrome c mediates electron-transfer in the respiratory chain and acts as a detoxifying agent to dispose of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [46].

In contrast, in the PTS, nine of the eleven DEGs were significantly up-regulated (2.36-fold to 6.946-fold) in the V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 treatment group (p < 0.05). Of these, the DEGs (fruA, WU75_14960; ulaA, WU75_00450), encoding a PTS fructose transporter subunit IIBC and a PTS beta-glucoside transporter subunit IIBC, respectively, were highly up-regulated (5.096-fold and 6.946-fold) (p < 0.05).

In the nitrogen metabolism, most of the DEGs (n = 4) were significantly up-regulated (2.286-fold to 63.107-fold) (p < 0.05). Remarkably, the DEG (hcp, WU75_08850) encoding a hydroxylamine reductase was strongly up-regulated (63.107-fold) (p < 0.05), and is involved in the processes of scavenging hydroxylamine with NO detoxification [47].

In the two-component system, 19 DEGs were significantly inhibited (0.186-fold to 0.491-fold), whereas 9 DEGs were significantly enhanced (2.068-fold to 26.5-fold) (p < 0.05). The two-component system is one of the primary pathways by which bacteria adapt to environmental stresses [48]. For instance, the DEGs (cpxAR, WU75_18570, and WU75_18575) encoding a two-component sensor protein and a transcriptional regulator were strongly up-regulated (10.981-fold and 26.500-fold) (p < 0.05). The CpxAR is a key modulator of capsule export that facilitates Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae survival in the host [49]. It also regulates cell membrane permeability and efflux pump activity and induces multidrug resistance (MDR) in Salmonella enteritidis [50].

Additionally, in the beta-lactam resistance, all the DEGs (acrAB, WU75_09925, WU75_09315, and WU75_09310) were strongly up-regulated (6.699-fold to 40.366-fold) in the V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 treatment group (p < 0.05), which encoded a multidrug efflux resistance nodulation division (RND) transporter periplasmic adaptor subunit and a multidrug transporter. The RND family efflux pumps, including the major pump AcrAB-TolC, are important mediators of intrinsic and evolved antibiotic resistance [51].

Taken together, these results indicated that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly change sixteen metabolic pathways in the Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, which consequently led to repressed substance transporting, energy production, and protein translation, but enhanced stringent response, and harmful substance discharging, and thereby cell death.

2.6.2. The Major Changed Metabolic Pathways in S. aureus ATCC25923

Approximately 7.3% (196 of 2672 genes) of S. aureus ATCC25923 genes were differentially expressed in the treatment group, as compared to the control group. Of these, 156 DEGs showed higher transcriptional levels (fold changes ≥ 2.0), whereas 40 DEGs were significantly down-regulated (fold changes ≤ 0.5) (p < 0.05). Based on the comparative transcriptomic analysis, seven significantly altered metabolic pathways were identified in S. aureus ATCC25923, including the two-component system; nitrogen metabolism; riboflavin metabolism; arginine and proline metabolism; atrazine degradation; alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism; and pyrimidine metabolism (Figure 6, Table 5).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The major changed metabolic pathways in S. aureus ATCC25923 triggered by Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn. (A) The Volcano plot of the DGEs. (B) The significantly altered metabolic pathways in the bacterium.

Table 5.

The major altered metabolic pathways in S. aureus ATCC25923.

Metabolic Pathway Gene ID Gene Name Fold Change Gene Description
Two-component system KQ76_00500 - 0.373 Capsular biosynthesis protein
KQ76_00560 wecC 0.490 UDP-N-acetyl-D-mannosamine dehydrogenase
KQ76_12475 nreC 2.117 Nitrate respiration regulation response regulator NreC
KQ76_12480 nreB 2.276 Nitrate respiration regulation sensor histidine kinase NreB
KQ76_12485 nreA 2.433 Nitrate respiration regulation accessory nitrate sensor NreA
KQ76_10520 agrB 2.565 Histidine kinase
KQ76_03245 graS 2.989 Histidine kinase
KQ76_10785 kdpF 5.371 ATPase
KQ76_04230 dltC 28.924 Alanine-phosphoribitol ligase
Nitrogen metabolism KQ76_12490 narI 3.529 Nitrate reductase
KQ76_12515 nirD 4.199 Nitrite reductase
KQ76_12520 nirB 5.060 Nitrite reductase
KQ76_12460 narT 6.376 Nitrate transporter NarT
KQ76_12500 narH 5.799 Nitrate reductase
KQ76_12505 narZ 8.442 Nitrate reductase
KQ76_12495 narJ 10.404 Nitrate reductase
Riboflavin metabolism KQ76_09200 ribE 0.373 Riboflavin synthase subunit alpha
KQ76_09195 ribBA 0.413 GTP cyclohydrolase
KQ76_09205 ribD 0.430 Diaminohydroxyphosphoribosylaminopyrimidine deaminase
KQ76_09190 ribH 0.480 6,7-dimethyl-8-ribityllumazine synthase
Arginine and proline metabolism KQ76_09185 fadM 0.109 Proline dehydrogenase
KQ76_00580 - 0.218 Aldehyde dehydrogenase
KQ76_13360 - 0.303 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase
KQ76_11235 rocF 0.461 Arginase
Atrazine degradation KQ76_11915 ureC 0.406 Urease subunit alpha
KQ76_11910 ureB 0.412 Urease subunit beta
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism KQ76_13360 - 0.303 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase
KQ76_05770 carB 2.158 Carbamoyl phosphate synthase large subunit
KQ76_05765 carA 3.084 Carbamoyl phosphate synthase small subunit
Pyrimidine metabolism KQ76_05745 pyrR 2.968 Phosphoribosyl transferase
KQ76_05760 pyrC 3.115 Dihydroorotase
KQ76_05755 pyrB 3.213 Aspartate carbamoyltransferase

In the arginine and proline metabolism, all the DEGs (n = 4) were significantly down-regulated at the transcription levels (0.109-fold to 0.461-fold) in S. aureus ATCC25923 (p < 0.05). The arginine metabolism converts L-arginine to urea and L-ornithine, which are further metabolized into proline and polyamides that drive collagen synthesis and bioenergetic pathways critical for cell proliferation, respectively [52]. For instance, the DEG (rocF, KQ76_11235) encoding an arginase was significantly down-regulated (0.461-fold) (p < 0.05), and was associated with the ability of Helicobacter pylori to establish chronic infections [53].

All the DEGs (n = 4) in the riboflavin metabolism were also significantly inhibited (ribBADEH, 0.3734-fold to 0.480-fold) (p < 0.05). In this pathway, the redox cofactors flavin mononucleotide and flavin adenine dinucleotide and their precursor riboflavin play important roles in many cellular processes, such as respiration, DNA repair, biosyntheses of heme groups, cofactors and nucleotides, fatty acid beta-oxidation, and bioluminescence [54].

Bacteria use two-component signal transduction systems to elicit adaptive responses to environmental changes [55]. In this study, seven DEGs in the two-component system were significantly up-regulated (2.117-fold to 28.924-fold) in S. aureus ATCC25923 (p < 0.05). For instance, the DEGs (agrB, KQ76_10520; and graS, KQ76_03245) encoding histidine kinases were significantly up-regulated by 2.565-fold and 2.989-fold, respectively (p < 0.05). The accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum-sensing system contributes to its pathogenicity of S. aureus [56]. GraS, the sensor histidine kinase of the GraXRS system, has been suggested to directly activate the response regulator ArlR [53]. Loss of the ArlR alone impairs the ability of S. aureus to respond to host-imposed manganese starvation and glucose limitation [57].

Interestingly, expression of all the DEGs (n = 7) in the nitrogen metabolism was significantly increased at the transcription level (3.529-fold to 10.404-fold) in S. aureus ATCC25923 (p < 0.05). The seven DEGs (nirBD, narHIJZT) were all involved in nitrate reduction [58,59,60]. Of these, the NirD (KQ76_12515) was a small subunit of cytoplasmic NADH-dependent nitrite reductase complex NirBD [61,62]. Over-expression of nirD limits RelA-dependent accumulation of guanosine 5′-triphosphate 3′-diphosphate ((p)ppGpp) in vivo and can prevent activation of the stringent response during amino acid starvation in E. coli [62].

In the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism, two DEGs (carBA, KQ76_05770 and KQ76_05765) encoding carbamoyl phosphate synthase were significantly up-regulated (2.154-fold and 3.084-fold) in S. aureus ATCC25923 (p < 0.05). The interface residues located near the CarB region of carboxy phosphate synthetic domain plays a key role in carbamoyl phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase (CAD) complex regulation in the pyrimidine biosynthesis [63]. Correspondingly, in the pyrimidine metabolism, four DEGs (pyrBCR, KQ76_05755, KQ76_05760, and KQ76_05745) were also significantly up-regulated (2.968-fold to 3.213-fold) (p < 0.05), and encoded an aspartate carbamoyltransferase, a dihydroorotase, and a phosphoribosyl transferase, respectively. The pyrimidines are involved in the synthesis of DNA, RNA, lipids, and carbohydrates. The pyrimidine metabolism is involved in the synthesis, degradation, salvage, interconversion, and transport of these compounds [64].

Taken together, these results indicate that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn can significantly influence seven metabolic pathways in the Gran-positive S. aureus ATCC25923. Of these, the two-component system, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and nitrogen metabolism were also changed in the Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, which led to the enhanced regulation of stringent response in the two pathogens. On the other hand, we also found distinct transcriptomic profiles between the Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens triggered by Fragment 1. For example, consistent with the results obtained from the cell structure analysis, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 was more sensitive to Fragment 1 treatment, as more metabolic pathways were altered, such as the citrate cycle, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, fatty acid degradation, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, pyruvate metabolism, propanoate metabolism, beta-lactam resistance, ABC transporters, PTS, butanoate metabolism, lysine degradation, and QS, which resulted in cell destruction and even death.

In addition, to validate the transcriptome data, we tested 16 representative DEGs (Table S1) via reverse transcription real time-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis, and the resulting data were generally correlated with those yielded from the transcriptome analysis (Table S2).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains and culture media used in this study are listed in Table S3. Vibrio strains and non-Vibrio strains were incubated as described in our recent studies [15,16,65].

3.2. Extraction of Bioactive Substances from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn

Fresh P. kleiniana Wight et Arn was purchased from the Qian Shan Zhen Pin shop in Guiyang City (26°36′5.01″ N, 106°41′19.90″ E), Guizhou Province, China, in October of 2021. Bioactive substances were extracted from the samples using the methanol and chloroform method described in our recent reports [15,16,66]. Briefly, aliquot of a 500 g of the whole plant sample was lyophilized, pulverised, powded, sonicated, and then filtered and collected for the secondary extraction. The methanol and chloroform phases were separated and then concentrated using the Rotary Evaporator (IKA, Staufen, Germany) [15,16].

3.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Assay

The susceptibility of the bacterial strains (Table S3) to the extracts from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn were determined according to the standard method issued by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA (CLSI, M100-S23, 2018). The antibacterial activity was defined as described previously [15,16]. Broth dilution testing (microdilution) (CLSI, M100-S18, 2018) was used to determine MICs of the extracts. The MIC was defined as described previously [15,16].

3.4. Prep-HPLC Analysis

Aliquots of the extracted samples (10 mg/mL) were resolved, centrifuged, filtered, and subjected for the Prep-HPLC Analysis, using Waters 2707 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) linked with UPLC Sunfire C18 column (5 µm, 10 × 250 mm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with the same parameters and elution conditions described in our recent reports [15,16].

3.5. UHPLC–MS Analysis

The UHPLC–MS analysis was conducted using the EXIONLC System (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) by Shanghai Hoogen Biotech, Shanghai, China [67].

3.6. Bacterial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity and Membrane Fluidity Assays

The cell surface hydrophobicity was measured according to the method of Cui et al. [68]. The cell membrane fluidity was measured according to the method of Kuhry et al. [69], using the 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH, Sangon, Shanghai, China).

3.7. Cell Membrane Permeability Analysis

Cell outer membrane permeability was measured according to the method of Wang et al. [70], with the NPN solution (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The inner membrane permeability was measured according to the method of Huang et al. [71], with the ONPG solution (Sangon, Shanghai, China).

3.8. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Assay

The preparation of the samples for the SEM analysis was performed using the method described in our recent reports [15,16,72]. The samples were observed using the Scanning Electron Microscope (Tescan Mira 3 XH, Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic, 5.0 kV, 30,000×).

3.9. Illumina RNA Sequencing

The bacterial cell culture at the mid-LGP was treated with Fragment 1 (1× MIC) from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn for 6 h, and then collected via centrifugation for the total RNA preparation [15,16,72]. Three independently prepared RNA samples for each strain were subjected for the Illumina RNA sequencing analysis, using Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, Santiago, CA, USA) [72].

3.10. RT-qPCR Assay

The RT-qPCR assay was performed according to the method described in our recent reports [15,16,72]. The oligonucleotide primers were designed (Table S1), and synthesized via Sangon (Shanghai, China).

3.11. Data Analysis

The DEGs were analyzed as described in our recent reports [15,16,72]. All tests were carried out in triplicate. The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the least-significant difference (LSD) method and homogeneity of variance test. There was no significant difference between the control and the treatment groups if the generalized p-values were more than 0.05; conversely, there was significant difference if p-values were less than 0.05.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the methanol-phase extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn showed an inhibition rate of 68.18% against 22 species of common pathogenic bacteria. The methanol-phase extraction inhibited the growth of one species of Gram-positive S. aureus, and 14 species of Gram-negative bacteria, including B. cereus, E. cloacae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium 1, S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. flexneri, S. sonnei, V. alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, V. mimicus, V. parahemolyticus, and V. vulnificus strains. This extract was further purified using the Prep-HPLC, and three separated fragments were obtained. Fragment 1 significantly increased bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity and membrane permeability and decreased membrane fluidity, disrupting the cell integrity of the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as S. aureus ATCC25923, S. aureus ATCC8095, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802, and V. parahaemolyticus B5-29. The MIC values of Fragment 1 ranged from 6.25 mg/mL to 50 mg/mL. A total of 66 different compounds in Fragment 1 were identified. The highest relative percentage of the compounds was D-maltose (6.77%), followed by oxymorphone (6.29%), rutin (6.29%), D-proline (5.41%), and L-proline (5.41%). Highly concentrated sugar solutions, such as the D-maltose identified in Fragment 1, are known to be effective antimicrobial agents. The identified oxymorphone and rutin could exert antibacterial activity via damaging the bacterial cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane, respectively. Multiple cellular metabolic pathways altered by Fragment 1 in the representative Gram-negative V. parahaemolyticus ATCC17802 and Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC25923 pathogens after treatment with Fragment 1 (1× MIC) for 6 h (p < 0.05). These results indicated that the energy supply and protein translation of the tested strains was inhibited, the signal transduction was blocked, and the ability to pump foreign harmful substances was reduced, leading to cell death. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that Fragment 1 from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn is a promising candidate for antibacterial medicine and food preservatives.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12081640/s1, Table S1: The oligonucleotide primers designed and used in the RT-qPCR assay; Table S2: The relative expression of representative DEGs by the RT-qPCR assay; Table S3: The bacterial strains and media used in this study; Figure S1: The Prep−HPLC diagram of purifying the methanol-phase crude extract from P. kleiniana Wight et Arn.

Author Contributions

Y.T.: major experiments, data curation, and writing—original draft; P.Y.: writing—review and editing; L.C.: funding acquisition, conceptualization, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials. The complete lists of DEGs in the two strains are available in the NCBI SRA database (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/bioproject/, accessed on 29 November 2022) under the accession number PRJNA906658.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission, grant number 17050502200, and National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31671946.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Bueno E., Pinedo V., Cava F. Adaptation of Vibrio cholerae to hypoxic environments. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:739. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stocco G., Lucafò M., Decorti G. Pharmacogenomics of antibiotics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5975. doi: 10.3390/ijms21175975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bombaywala S., Mandpe A., Paliya S., Kumar S. Antibiotic resistance in the environment: A critical insight on its occurrence, fate, and eco-toxicity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021;28:24889–24916. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13143-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mancuso G., Midiri A., Gerace E., Biondo C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: The most critical pathogens. Pathogens. 2021;10:1310. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gomes F., Rodrigues M.E., Martins N., Ferreira I.C.F.R., Henriques M. Phenolic plant extracts versus penicillin G: In vitro susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12:128. doi: 10.3390/ph12030128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomford N.E., Senthebane D.A., Rowe A., Munro D., Seele P., Maroyi A., Dzobo K. Natural products for drug discovery in the 21st century: Innovations for novel drug discovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1578. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chandra G., Mukherjee D., Ray A.S., Chatterjee S., Bhattacharjee I. Phytoextracts as antibacterials: A review. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2020;17:523–533. doi: 10.2174/1570163816666191106103730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Volis S. Securing a future for China’s plant biodiversity through an integrated conservation approach. Plant Divers. 2018;40:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tao J., Yan S., Zhou C., Liu Q., Zhu H., Wen Z. Total flavonoids from Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn inhibits biofilm formation and virulence factors production in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021;279:114383. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou Y.Q., Li S.M., Wei X., Yang X., Xiao J.W., Pan B.W., Xie S.X., Zhou Y., Yang J., Wei Y. Identification and quantitative analysis of bioactive components from Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn with anti HIV-1 proteases activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022:1–4. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2022.2162513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu M., Huang X., Liu Q., Li X., Chen M., Zhu Y., Chen X. Separation of α-glucosidase inhibitors from Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn using solvent and flow-rate gradient high-speed counter-current chromatography target-guided by ultrafiltration HPLC-MS screening. Phytochem. Anal. 2019;30:661–668. doi: 10.1002/pca.2839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li S., Tan J., Zeng J., Wu X.W.X., Zhang J. Antihyperglycemic and antioxidant effect of the total flavones of Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn. in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017;30:171–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tao J., Yan S., Wang H., Zhao L., Zhu H., Wen Z. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of total flavonoids from Potentilla kleiniana Wight et Arn on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its potential application to stainless steel surfaces. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2022;154:112631. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xuan S.H., Hong I.K., Lee Y.J., Kim J.W., Park S.N. Biological activities and chemical components of Potentilla kleiniana Wight & Arn. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020;34:3262–3266. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1557171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu Y., Yang L., Liu P., Jin Y., Qin S., Chen L. Identification of antibacterial components in the methanol-phase extract from edible herbaceous plant Rumex madaio Makino and their antibacterial action modes. Molecules. 2022;27:660. doi: 10.3390/molecules27030660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fu J., Wang Y., Sun M., Xu Y., Chen L. Antibacterial activity and components of the methanol-phase extract from rhizomes of pharmacophagous plant Alpinia officinarum Hance. Molecules. 2022;27:4308. doi: 10.3390/molecules27134308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang J., Ding Q., Yang Q., Fan H., Yu G., Liu F., Bello B.K., Zhang X., Zhang T., Dong J., et al. Vibrio alginolyticus triggers inflammatory response in mouse peritoneal macrophages via activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:769777. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.769777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hernández-Robles M.F., Natividad-Bonifacio I., Álvarez-Contreras A.K., Tercero-Alburo J.J., Quiñones-Ramírez E.I., Vázquez-Salinas C. Characterization of potential virulence factors of Vibrio mimicus isolated from fishery products and water. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021;2021:8397930. doi: 10.1155/2021/8397930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dey R., Rieger A.M., Stephens C., Ashbolt N.J. Interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Acanthamoeba polyphaga observed by imaging flow cytometry. Cytom. Part A. 2019;95:555–564. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu J., Qin K., Wu C., Fu K., Yu X., Zhou L. De Novo sequencing provides insights into the pathogenicity of foodborne Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:652957. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.652957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huang Y., Flint S.H., Palmer J.S. Bacillus cereus spores and toxins—The potential role of biofilms. Food Microbiol. 2020;90:103493. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ojha R., Dittmar A.A., Severin G.B., Koestler B.J. Shigella flexneri diguanylate cyclases regulate virulence. J. Bacteriol. 2021;203:e0024221. doi: 10.1128/JB.00242-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li H., Tang T., Stegger M., Dalsgaard A., Liu T., Leisner J.J. Characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from retail foods in Beijing, China. Food Microbiol. 2021;93:103603. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guo Y., Song G., Sun M., Wang J., Wang Y. Prevalence and therapies of antibiotic-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:107. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Danchik C., Casadevall A. Role of cell surface hydrophobicity in the pathogenesis of medically-significant fungi. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:594973. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Soundharrajan I., Kim D., Kuppusamy P., Muthusamy K., Lee H.J., Choi K.C. Probiotic and triticale silage fermentation potential of Pediococcus pentosaceus and Lactobacillus brevis and their impacts on pathogenic bacteria. Microorganisms. 2019;7:318. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu X., Sha L., Liu Q., Zhao Y., Fang H., Cao Y., Zhao J. Recent advances in cell membrane camouflage-based biosensing application. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021;194:113623. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang M., Yu Y., Lian L., Li W., Ren J., Liang Y., Xue F., Tang F., Zhu X., Ling J., et al. Functional mechanism of antimicrobial peptide bomidin and its safety for Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2022;14:169–179. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09857-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bojkovic J., Richie D.L., Six D.A., Rath C.M., Sawyer W.S., Hu Q., Dean C.R. Characterization of an acinetobacter baumannii lptD deletion strain: Permeability defects and response to inhibition of lipopolysaccharide and fatty acid biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 2015;198:731–741. doi: 10.1128/JB.00639-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Veiko A.G., Olchowik-Grabarek E., Sekowski S., Roszkowska A., Lapshina E.A., Dobrzynska I., Zamaraeva M., Zavodnik I.B. Antimicrobial activity of quercetin, naringenin and catechin: Flavonoids inhibit Staphylococcus aureus-induced hemolysis and modify membranes of bacteria and erythrocytes. Molecules. 2023;28:1252. doi: 10.3390/molecules28031252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zdybicka-Barabas A., Stączek S., Pawlikowska-Pawlęga B., Mak P., Luchowski R., Skrzypiec K., Mendyk E., Wydrych J., Gruszecki W.I., Cytryńska M. Studies on the interactions of neutral Galleria mellonella cecropin D with living bacterial cells. Amino Acids. 2019;51:175–191. doi: 10.1007/s00726-018-2641-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mizzi L., Maniscalco D., Gaspari S., Chatzitzika C., Gatt R., Valdramidis V.P. Assessing the individual microbial inhibitory capacity of different sugars against pathogens commonly found in food systems. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2020;71:251–258. doi: 10.1111/lam.13306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fan X., Kong D., He S., Chen J., Jiang Y., Ma Z., Feng J., Yan H. Phenanthrene derivatives from asarum heterotropoides showed excellent antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021;69:14520–14529. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tan Z., Deng J., Ye Q., Zhang Z. The antibacterial activity of natural-derived flavonoids. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2022;22:1009–1019. doi: 10.2174/1568026622666220221110506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kachur K., Suntres Z. The antibacterial properties of phenolic isomers, carvacrol and thymol. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020;60:3042–3053. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1675585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wibowo J.T., Ahmadi P., Rahmawati S.I., Bayu A., Putra M.Y., Kijjoa A. marine-derived indole alkaloids and their biological and pharmacological activities. Mar. Drugs. 2021;20:3. doi: 10.3390/md20010003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li H., Li Y., Wang Y., Liu L., Dong H., Satoh T. Membrane-active amino acid-coupled polyetheramine derivatives with high selectivity and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Acta Biomater. 2022;142:136–148. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sharma P., Maklashina E., Cecchini G., Iverson T.M. The roles of SDHAF2 and dicarboxylate in covalent flavinylation of SDHA, the human complex II flavoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:23548–23556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007391117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dolan S.K., Wijaya A., Kohlstedt M., Gläser L., Brear P., Silva-Rocha R., Wittmann C., Welch M. Systems-wide dissection of organic acid assimilation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Reveals a Novel Path to Underground Metabolism. Mbio. 2022;13:e0254122. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02541-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Park C., Shin B., Park W. Alternative fate of glyoxylate during acetate and hexadecane metabolism in Acinetobacter oleivorans DR1. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:14402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50852-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Durall C., Kukil K., Hawkes J.A., Albergati A., Lindblad P., Lindberg P. Production of succinate by engineered strains of Synechocystis PCC 6803 overexpressing phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and a glyoxylate shunt. Microb. Cell Factories. 2021;20:39. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01529-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang H., Liang Z., Zhao M., Ma Y., Luo Z., Li S., Xu H. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for ectoine production with a fermentation strategy of supplementing the amino donor. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:824859. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.824859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yun M.K., Nourse A., White S.W., Rock C.O., Heath R.J. Crystal structure and allosteric regulation of the cytoplasmic Escherichia coli L-asparaginase I. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;369:794–811. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Z., Bie P., Cheng J., Lu L., Cui B., Wu Q. The ABC transporter YejABEF is required for resistance to antimicrobial peptides and the virulence of Brucella melitensis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31876. doi: 10.1038/srep31876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Huang L., Huang L., Zhao L., Qin Y., Su Y., Yan Q. The regulation of oxidative phosphorylation pathway on Vibrio alginolyticus adhesion under adversities. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8:e00805. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Santucci R., Sinibaldi F., Cozza P., Polticelli F., Fiorucci L. Cytochrome c: An extreme multifunctional protein with a key role in cell fate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;136:1237–1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maza-Márquez P., Lee M.D., Detweiler A.M., Bebout B.M. Millimeter-scale vertical partitioning of nitrogen cycling in hypersaline mats reveals prominence of genes encoding multi-heme and prismane proteins. ISME J. 2022;16:1119–1129. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01161-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tierney A.R., Rather P.N. Roles of two-component regulatory systems in antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019;14:533–552. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu F., Yao Q., Huang J., Wan J., Xie T., Gao X., Sun D., Zhang F., Bei W., Lei L. The two-component system CpxA/CpxR is critical for full virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:1029426. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1029426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hu M., Huang X., Xu X., Zhang Z., He S., Zhu J., Liu H., Shi X. Characterization of the role of two-component systems in antibiotic resistance formation in Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. mSphere. 2022;7:e0038322. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00383-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Blair J.M.A., Siasat P., McNeil H.E., Colclough A., Ricci V., Lawler A.J., Abdalaal H., Buckner M.M.C., Baylay A., Busby S.J., et al. EnvR is a potent repressor of acrAB transcription in Salmonella. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022;78:133–140. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Oberlies J., Watzl C., Giese T., Luckner C., Kropf P., Müller I. Regulation of NK cell function by human granulocyte arginase. J. Immunol. 2009;182:5259–5267. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim S.H., Sierra R.A., McGee D.J., Zabaleta J. Transcriptional profiling of gastric epithelial cells infected with wild type or arginase-deficient Helicobacter pylori. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yurgel S.N., Johnson S.A., Rice J., Sa N., Bailes C., Baumgartner J., Pitzer J.E., Roop R.M., II, Roje S. A novel formamidase is required for riboflavin biosynthesis in invasive bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2022;298:102377. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lai R.Z., Parkinson J.S. Monitoring two-component sensor kinases with a chemotaxis signal readout. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1729:127–135. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7577-8_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tan L., Huang Y., Shang W., Yang Y., Peng H., Hu Z., Wang Y., Rao Y., Hu Q., Rao X., et al. Accessory gene regulator (agr) allelic variants in cognate Staphylococcus aureus strain display similar phenotypes. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:700894. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.700894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Párraga Solórzano P.K., Shupe A.C., Kehl-Fie T.E. The sensor histidine kinase ArlS is necessary for Staphylococcus aureus to activate ArlR in response to nutrient availability. J. Bacteriol. 2021;203:e0042221. doi: 10.1128/JB.00422-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Loiseau L., Vergnes A., Ezraty B. Methionine oxidation under anaerobic conditions in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2022;118:387–402. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fang J., Yan L., Tan M., Li G., Liang Y., Li K. Nitrogen removal characteristics of a marine denitrifying Pseudomonas stutzeri BBW831 and a simplified strategy for improving the denitrification performance under stressful conditions. Mar. Biotechnol. 2023;25:109–122. doi: 10.1007/s10126-022-10185-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alvarez L., Sanchez-Hevia D., Sánchez M., Berenguer J. A new family of nitrate/nitrite transporters involved in denitrification. Int. Microbiol. 2019;22:19–28. doi: 10.1007/s10123-018-0023-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harborne N.R., Griffiths L., Busby S.J., Cole J.A. Transcriptional control, translation and function of the products of the five open reading frames of the Escherichia coli nir operon. Mol. Microbiol. 1992;6:2805–2813. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Léger L., Byrne D., Guiraud P., Germain E., Maisonneuve E. NirD curtails the stringent response by inhibiting RelA activity in Escherichia coli. Elife. 2021;10:e64092. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kanagarajan S., Dhamodharan P., Mutharasappan N., Choubey S.K., Jayaprakash P., Biswal J., Jeyaraman J. Structural insights on binding mechanism of CAD complexes (CPSase, ATCase and DHOase) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021;39:3144–3157. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1761877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Garavito M.F., Narváez-Ortiz H.Y., Zimmermann B.H. Pyrimidine metabolism: Dynamic and versatile pathways in pathogens and cellular development. J. Genet. Genom. 2015;42:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xu M., Fu H., Chen D., Shao Z., Zhu J., Alali W.Q., Chen L. Simple visualized detection method of virulence-associated genes of Vibrio cholerae by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Y., Chen L., Pandak W.M., Heuman D., Hylemon P.B., Ren S. High Glucose Induces Lipid Accumulation via 25-Hydroxycholesterol DNA-CpG Methylation. iScience. 2020;23:101102. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shan X., Fu J., Li X., Peng X., Chen L. Comparative proteomics and secretomics revealed virulence, and coresistance-related factors in non O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae recovered from 16 species of consumable aquatic animals. J. Proteom. 2022;251:104408. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cui J., Hölzl G., Karmainski T., Tiso T., Kubicki S., Thies S., Blank L.M., Jaeger K.E., Dörmann P. The glycine-glucolipid of Alcanivorax borkumensis is resident to the bacterial cell wall. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022;88:e0112622. doi: 10.1128/aem.01126-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kuhry J.G., Duportail G., Bronner C., Laustriat G. Plasma membrane fluidity measurements on whole living cells by fluorescence anisotropy of trimethylammoniumdiphenylhexatriene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1985;845:60–67. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(85)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang Z., Qin Q., Zheng Y., Li F., Zhao Y., Chen G.Q. Engineering the permeability of Halomonas bluephagenesis enhanced its chassis properties. Metab. Eng. 2021;67:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Huang B., Liu X., Li Z., Zheng Y., Wai Kwok Yeung K., Cui Z., Liang Y., Zhu S., Wu S. Rapid bacteria capturing and killing by AgNPs/N-CD@ZnO hybrids strengthened photo-responsive xerogel for rapid healing of bacteria-infected wounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;414:128805. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yang L., Wang Y., Yu P., Ren S., Zhu Z., Jin Y., Yan J., Peng X., Chen L. Prophage-related gene VpaChn25_0724 contributes to cell membrane integrity and growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus CHN25. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:595709. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.595709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials. The complete lists of DEGs in the two strains are available in the NCBI SRA database (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/bioproject/, accessed on 29 November 2022) under the accession number PRJNA906658.


Articles from Foods are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES