Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284285

Administration of vitamin E and C enhances immunological and biochemical responses against toxicity of silver nanoparticles in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)

Khalid Javed Iqbal 1,*, Hamid Majeed 2, Khalid Jamshed Iqbal 3, Muhammad Asghar 4, Hamda Azmat 4, Mahroze Fatima 4, Noor Khan 5, Irfan Baboo 6, Amna Tehseen 1, Wazir Ali 4, Usama Saeed 7, Ayesha Khizar 4, Amber Fatima 4, Sobia Nisa 4, Simon John Davies 8
Editor: Muhammad A B Siddik9
PMCID: PMC10138201  PMID: 37104295

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the toxic effect of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) on biochemical biomarkers, immune responses, and the curative potential effects of vitamin C and E on grass carp. Fish (n = 420) with an average initial body weight of 8.045 ± 0.13 g were shifted to glass aquaria (36 x 18 x 18 inches, filled with 160-L tap water) in triplicates. Aquaria were randomly designated as A, B, C, D with alone Ag-NPs (Control (0), 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg/L) and E, F, G with Ag-NPs + Vit. C + Vit. E (0.25+0.25+0.25, 0.50+0.50+0.50, 0.75+0.75+0.75 mg/L). NPs particles were administrated viz, oral and intravenous routes for 7 days. The results indicated that both routes had non-significant effect, but levels of Ag-NPs had significant effect. Treatments C, D and G showed significant decrease in levels of RBC, HGB and HCT except for WBC and NEUT levels, which significantly increased. ALT, ALP, AST, urea, and creatinine showed significant increase in activity in the C, D, and G groups. CAT, SOD decreased significantly in all Ag-NPs alone groups, while significantly increased with vitamin E and C. LYZ, TP, ALB, GLB showed significant low activity in the B, C, and D groups while significantly high activity in the E, F, and G groups. Cortisol, glucose and triglycerides showed significant increase in the B, C, and D groups, while E, F, and G groups showed significant low levels of triglycerides, COR, and GLU. Cholesterol level was same across all treatment groups. In conclusion, vitamin E and C as powerful antioxidants protect the fish against Ag-NPs except high dose level of 0.75mg/L, while 0.25mg/L of Ag-NPs was presumably safe for C. idella.

1. Introduction

All instances of nano-technology include understanding, manipulating, and applying materials at the Nano scale (1 to 100 nm). Nano-particles have distinct advantages over bulk materials, making them valuable in a broad variety of industries and consumer goods [1]. Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) production and usage have increased considerably in recent years, accounting for more than 50% of global nanomaterial products in 2015, and this proportion is projected to climb by nearly 13% by 2024. The main reasons for this are Ag-NPs antimicrobial, optical, electrical, and magnetic properties. Because of their small size, nanoparticles are extensively used in a broad range of goods such as make-up and textiles all over the globe [2, 3]. Concerns have been raised regarding the release of Ag-NPs into the environment due to the high concentrations found in sewage sludge and effluent (in Europe and the US) of 1.3–4.4 mg/kg, as well as 9 μg/L (in Europe) and 10−1–10−4 μg/L (Europe, USA, Netherlands, European Union) in surface waters. An emerging field of research, aquatic nano-toxicology, has piqued attention. Aquatic animals are exposed to nanoparticles via a variety of sources, including food, water, and sediment [3].

According to research, Ag-NPs hurt various fish and mammals [35]. Pharmaceutical companies measure animal sensitivity and survival potential using LC50 tests [6]. Carps were exposed to a fatal dose of Ag-NPs for 96 hours [7]. Fish exposed to varying sub-lethal concentrations of Ag-NP LC50 (96h) showed changes in plasma biochemical concentrations (such as electrolytes and proteins), oxidative stress/cell damage markers (such as glucose and cortisol), lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferases, and alanine aminotransferases, antioxidant enzymes, and lipid peroxidation [4, 8]. Recent research found that chemically manufactured nanoparticles are 10 times more hazardous than green ones [9]. There are two techniques for NP synthesis [10]. Sputtering, etching, mechanical milling, and electro-explosion are used in one approach, while physical, chemical, and biological methods are used in the other [11]. Although traditionally produced NPs are pure, they are not cost-effective and may produce dangerous byproducts that have negative effects. These procedures need stabilizing and capping agents [12]. Plant extracts serve as the reducing medium in the green synthesis process, while phytochemicals serve as the capping agent, biocatalyst, and naturally occurring NP stabilizer [13]. High energy, high temperature, high pressure, costly equipment, and dangerous chemicals are not necessary in green synthesis of NPs [14]. Consequently, green synthesis of NPs is less expensive, non-toxic, and environmentally beneficial than pricy and dangerous methods [15, 16]. Very little is known about the toxicity of green produced NPs to fish. According to a prior research, common carp respond to exposure to waterborne NPs [17].

The plant Azadirachta (A.) indica, sometimes referred to as "neem," leaves are employed in current research for the production of Ag-NPs. The anti-ulcer, anti-tumor, anti-bacterial, analgesic, anti-yeast, anti-inflammatory, anti-fungal, anti-hyperglycemic, anthelminthic, and anti-malarial properties of A. indica leaves have been noted. Its leaves have been used to treat chicken pox, malaria, and neuromuscular problems [18]. Knowing what physiological changes occur when an important freshwater aquaculture species is exposed to green synthesize Ag-NPs enables us to establish a safe exposure threshold [19]. Hematology helps assess nanoparticle toxicity for aquatic animals [2]. Serum and hematological indicators are used to determine fish health [20]. They can assess the general status of cells, tissues, and organs as well as their pollutant-damaged targets [21]. Scientists acknowledge hematological indices and serum biochemical as significant stress indicators and critical biomarkers for fish health status [8, 21].

Supplements in fish diet may boost immune responses and health, raise growth rate, and protect fish from toxic toxins, influencing their physiology [22]. Most teleost fish lack the vitamin C-making enzyme L-gulonolactone oxidase [23]. This enzyme makes vitamin C. Vitamin C, is present in many foods and nutritional supplements [24]. It removes damaging free radicals to prevent lipid membrane instability [25]. It decreases environmental health risks [26, 27].

Tocopherol (vitamin E), a non-enzymatic antioxidant, may help the body deal with oxidative stress by decreasing circulating lipid peroxides [28]. The effects of vitamin E as a molecule are yet unknown, despite the growing body of research on its ability to inhibit oxidative stress [29]. Furthermore, the effects of Ag-NPs, vitamin C, and vitamin E on fish are completely unknown. Grass carp is an important cultivated profitable fish and a global distribution. Grass carp global production is about 4.6 million tons/year, accounting for 15.6% of global freshwater aquaculture production in 2011 [30]. It has very good taste and fast growth rate. In Pakistan it was introduced for the first time in 1994 from China [31].There is no information about the impact of green synthesized Ag-NPs on the aforementioned indices like hematological, serum and antioxidant parameters in Grass carp (C. idella), or whether or not vitamins C and E may mitigate the damage.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Ethical approval, experimental fish, design and conditions

All protocol and procedure was approved by guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals committee of The Islamia University Bahawalpur, Pakistan (No. Dr/792, 21-09-2022). For this study, 420 C. idella were obtained from the Bahawalpur fish hatchery, Government of Punjab, Pakistan. These fish had an average weight of 8.045±0.13g. The fish were delivered safely to the Department of Zoology at The Islamia University in Bahawalpur, Pakistan, within air-filled plastic bags. The fish were acclimated in laboratory aquariums for two weeks to reduce their stress levels. During the adjustment and adaptation phase, no deaths were reported. The fish were given commercial feed that contained 32% CP @ 3% body weight ratio twice a day. Particles of Ag-NPs were given orally and intravenously to C. idella. Three replicates of 42 glass aquariums (36 x 18 x 18 inches, filled with 160 liters of tap water) were set up, and fish were randomly distributed among them with the following designations: A (Control, Ag-NPs, 0.00 mg/L), B (Ag-NPs, 0.25 mg/L), C (Ag-NPs, 0.50 mg/L), D (Ag-NPs, 0.75 mg/L), E (Ag-NPs + Vit. C + Vit. E, 0.25+0.25+0.25 mg/L), F (Ag-NPs + Vit. C + Vit. E, 0.50+0.50+0.50 mg/L) and G (Ag-NPs + Vit. C + Vit. E, 0.75+0.75+0.75 mg/L). Both intravenous and oral aquaria were set up at the same time. The duration of the trial was 7 days. Through the gastric tube attached to the syringe, the medication was orally ingested and intravenously injected into the caudal vein. Dissolved oxygen levels were kept at 7.1±0.2 mg/L, water temperature was kept at 28.5±0.3°C, and the pH was kept at 7.4±0.1 throughout the duration of the experiment. Fish were subjected to a 12-hour photoperiod in a controlled laboratory setting.

2.2 Synthesis of silvers nano particles

Using Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf extract as a reducing agent, silver nanoparticles were synthesized biologically. Twenty grams of dried A. indica powder were mixed into one hundred milliliters of distilled water to make the extract. After 45 minutes at 40°C on a hot plate, the solution was cooled, filtered using Whatman filter paper, and placed in the fridge for later use. The silver nitrate solution was made up in a Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. reagent container of 200 ml capacity (1 mM). When the solution’s colour shifted from pale to colloidal brown, indicating the creation of nanoparticles, 5 ml of plant extract was added and agitated on a hot plate [32]. For 15 minutes, we centrifuged the solution at 6000 rpm. When 24 hours at 37°C in a beaker, the pellets were dry and ready to use after the supernatant was drained. By using the XRD method, the size of the Ag-NPs was determined to be 21 nm, and they were also detected using UV-Spectroscopy. LC50 was determined during preliminary experiment by following, 100 individuals of fish were placed in 10 glass aquaria (10 fish each) to determine 96Hr LC50 of grass carp. Stock solution of Ag-NPs was prepared and a total of ten concentrations were set in geometric series until the onset of LC50. Mortality of fish was noted and subject to probate analysis for final value of LC50. Then, green synthesized silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) were administered orally and intravenously in C. idella.

2.3 Blood and serum collection

At the end of the first week of the experiment, five fish were taken at random from each tank and given MS222 (150mg/L) to put them to sleep. Using a syringe, blood was drawn from the caudal vein. Blood was kept in EDTA blood vacutainers, which prevent the blood from clotting, for hematological purposes. Additionally, gel vacutainers were used to hold blood for serum biochemistry. After letting the blood clot, it was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes at 4°C to remove the serum, which was then frozen at -80°C until further analysis was performed.

2.4 Hematology parameters

An automated hematological analyzer was used in order to conduct the test on the blood (Sysmex KX-21N). Red blood cell count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were the parameters that were examined in fish. Other parameters included lymphocytes (LYM), monocytes (MONO), and neutrophils (NEUT).

2.5 Serum biochemistry and immunology

Serum tests for urea, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT), total protein (TP), glucose (GLU), cholesterol (CHO), albumin (ALB), and triglycerides were run by an automated biochemical analyzer (Micro Lab-300) (Tri). The ratio of total serum protein to albumin is used to calculate serum globulin (GLB) concentration [33].

2.6 Antioxidant and lysozyme activity

According to [34] approach, catalase (CAT) activity was measured by its capacity to lower the concentration of -H2O2 at 20nm. While photo reduction inhibition of nitro blue tetrazole (NBT) according to the technique of [35] was used to test superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Lysozyme (LYZ) activity was evaluated using [36] methodology.

2.7 Statistical analysis

Effects of silver nano particles on hematology, serum biochemistry, immunology, and antioxidant and lysozyme activity were evaluated by using factorial ANOVA. PROC GLM was used in SAS software (version 9.1). A 2 × 7 factorial arrangement of treatments were applied considering rout of administration and silver nano particle levels as main effects and their interaction were tested, too. For the comparison of significant treatment means Duncan’s Multiple Range test was applied considering P<0.05. Graphs were created by using GpraphPad Prism software. Following mathematical model was applied:

Yijk=μ+αi+βj+(α×β)ij+ϵijk

Where,

Yijk = Observation of dependent variable recorded on ith and jth treatment groups

μ = Population mean

αi = Effect of ith treatment group (rout of administration; i = 1, 2)

βj = Effect of jth treatment group (silver nano particle levels; j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)

(α × β)ij = Overall interaction effect

ϵijk = Residual effect associated with ith and jth treatment group, NID ~ 0, σ2

3. Results

Hematological parameters like RBC, WBC, HB, HCT, MCV, MCHC, LYM, MONO, and NEUT showed non-significant (P>0.05) differences with respect to interaction of dose level and dose route (oral or intravenous routes) of Ag-NPs (Table 2). Also, the mean effect of Ag-NPs on both dose routes, either oral or intravenous showed non-significant (P>0.05) difference (Table 1). However silver nanoparticles alone or with supplementation of vitamin E and C showed significant (P<0.05) mean effect on hematology with respect to different dose levels (Table 1). RBC, HGB, and HCT levels decreased significantly (P<0.05) at Ag-NPs levels of 0.50 and 0.75mg/L as compared to control and 0.25mg/L Ag-NPs. Similarly, Ag-NPs concentration of 0.75mg/L along with the supplementation of vitamin E and C showed significant (P<0.05) decrease in RBC, HGB and HCT with respect to other vitamin supplemented groups and control. WBC and NEUT showed the opposite trend; at 0.50 and 0.75mg/L NPs alone and 0.75mg/L NPs + vitamin E and C administration, their levels increased significantly (P<0.05) as compared to control, but at 0.25mg/L NPs dose, there was a non-significant (P>0.05) difference with control. While at 0.25 and 0.50mg/L NPs + vitamin E and C ingestion, levels of WBC and NEUT decreased significantly (P<0.05) as compared to others and there was a non-significant (P>0.05) difference with control. While MCV, MCH, MCHC, LYM and MONO showed non-significant (P>0.05) effect of Ag-NPs alone or with vitamin E and C (Table 1).

Table 2. Interaction of dose levels and dose route i.e. Oral and Intravenous effect of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs + V.E + V.C on hematology of C. idella.

Dose Levels Dose Route Parameters
RBC (106/μl) WBC (103/μl) HGB (g/dl) HCT (%) MCV (nm3) MCH (pg/cell) MCHC (g/dl) LYM (%) MONO (%) NEUT (%)
A Oral 2.09±0.01 171.04±0.46 9.15±0.03 35.32±0.75 168.10±1.25 168.10±1.25 31.28±0.81 82.96±1.00 2.50±0.08 21.37±1.19
Intra 2.09±0.01 172.44±1.54 9.15±0.02 36.01±0.31 168.26±2.39 168.26±2.39 30.94±0.67 82.00±1.35 2.38±0.05 20.76±0.91
B Oral 2.08±0.01 172.99±0.27 9.18±0.02 35.27±0.83 168.99±1.61 168.99±1.61 30.48±0.32 82.71±1.38 2.34±0.02 21.02±1.53
Intra 2.08±0.01 172.42±1.69 9.16±0.02 35.28±0.89 167.27±1.52 167.94±1.28 30.92±0.49 82.21±1.32 2.40±0.08 21.75±1.03
C Oral 1.94±0.12 185.73±3.95 8.29±0.01 30.14±0.46 166.10±0.50 167.43±1.34 31.56±0.59 81.60±1.80 2.35±0.02 26.48±0.83
Intra 1.94±0.11 186.23±0.87 8.28±0.02 29.80±0.66 166.46±1.00 167.79±0.98 30.78±0.50 83.26±1.55 2.35±0.00 26.79±1.02
D Oral 1.60±0.02 223.02±4.23 6.85±0.19 23.06±0.51 167.44±1.95 168.11±1.34 31.09±1.24 81.98±0.43 2.39±0.07 31.80±1.19
Intra 1.57±0.02 223.60±1.20 6.74±0.13 23.62±0.70 166.10±0.62 167.77±1.09 30.27±1.04 81.45±0.33 2.40±0.06 32.00±1.19
E Oral 1.92±0.31 172.04±1.13 9.16±0.03 35.98±0.78 166.04±1.20 167.71±0.57 30.47±0.60 83.81±1.29 2.48±0.07 21.50±1.21
Intra 1.93±0.27 172.99±1.56 9.14±0.01 35.18±0.94 166.78±0.78 167.11±0.39 30.20±0.53 82.53±1.10 2.40±0.15 21.03±0.34
F Oral 2.09±0.00 172.06±2.06 9.16±0.04 36.37±0.17 166.75±1.78 168.75±1.16 30.70±0.69 82.95±1.11 2.44±0.10 21.39±0.51
Intra 2.07±0.01 172.74±1.25 9.14±0.02 35.45±0.86 167.77±2.16 168.10±1.59 30.35±0.48 83.30±1.13 2.43±0.11 21.13±0.78
G Oral 1.78±0.02 204.54±0.08 7.99±0.04 26.83±0.46 166.31±1.57 166.97±0.83 30.69±1.05 82.54±1.96 2.34±0.08 28.17±0.89
Intra 1.77±0.02 201.34±1.89 7.99±0.02 26.80±0.29 168.04±1.31 168.04±1.31 30.76±1.07 82.56±1.07 2.35±0.03 28.28±0.84
Dose*Route (P-value) 1.000 0.48 0.79 0.29 0.43 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.49 0.91

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed through two-way ANOVA besides Duncan comparisons. Data with different superscript letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) in the same column mean significant differences among experimental groups (P<0.05).

Table 1. Mean effect of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs + V.E + V.C with respect to dose route and dose levels on hematology of C. idella.

Dose Route Parameters
RBC1 (106/μl) WBC2 (103/μl) HGB3 (g/dl) HCT4 (%) MCV5 (nm3) MCH6 (pg/cell) MCHC7 (g/dl) LYM8 (%) MONO9 (%) NEUT10 (%)
Oral 1.93±0.20 185.92±19.54 8.54±0.84 31.85±5.02 167.10±1.63 168.01±1.21 31.40±0.78 82.79±1.26 2.40±0.08 24.53±4.18
Intravenous 1.92±0.20 185.97±18.86 8.51±0.87 31.73±4.78 167.24±1.50 167.86±1.23 30.60±0.67 82.47±1.17 2.39±0.07 24.53±4.32
P-value 0.89 0.93 0.24 0.57 0.77 0.71 0.07 0.42 0.50 .99
Dose levels
A 2.09±0.01d 171.74±1.27a 9.15±0.02d 35.67±0.64d 168.18±1.71 168.18±1.71 31.11±0.69 82.48±1.18 2.44±0.09 21.07±1.00a
B 2.08±0.01cd 172.70±1.13a 9.17±0.02d 35.27±0.77d 168.13±1.68 168.46±1.42 30.70±0.44 82.46±1.24 2.37±0.06 21.39±1.23a
C 1.94±0.1cd 185.98±2.57b 8.29±0.01c 29.97±0.54c 166.28±0.73 167.61±1.07 31.17±0.65 82.93±1.54 2.35±0.01 26.63±0.85b
D 1.58±0.02a 223.31±2.80d 6.80±0.16a 23.34±0.63a 166.77±1.49 167.94±1.11 30.68±1.11 81.71±0.45 2.40±0.05 31.90±1.07d
E 1.93±0.26c 172.51±1.32a 9.15±0.02d 35.58±0.89d 166.41±0.99 167.41±0.55 30.84±0.86 83.17±1.28 2.44±0.11 21.26±0.84a
F 2.08±0.01cd 172.40±1.57a 9.15±0.03d 35.91±0.75d 167.26±1.86 168.43±1.29 30.53±0.57 83.12±1.02 2.43±0.09 21.26±0.61a
G 1.77±0.01b 202.94±2.12c 7.99±0.03b 26.81±0.34b 167.17±1.60 167.50±1.14 30.73±0.95 82.55±1.41 2.34±0.09 28.23±0.78c
P-value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.20 0.67 0.56 0.49 0.13 0.000

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed through two-way ANOVA besides Duncan comparisons. Data with different superscript letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) in the same column mean significant differences among experimental groups (P<0.05). 1Red blood cell, 2White blood cell, 3Hemoglobin, 4Hematocrit, 5Mean cell volume, 6Mean cell hemoglobin, 7Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, 8Lymphocytes, 9Monocytes, and 10Neutrophils

Liver function tests (Figs 13) represented the significantly (P<0.05) highest levels of ALT, ALP, and AST at 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone and 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs with vitamin E and C groups, while all other groups showed the least values. ALT, ALP, and AST at 0.25mg/L Ag-NPs alone, 0.50mg/L Ag-NPs with vitamin E and C, and control showed non-significant (P>0.05) difference when compared. When 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs with vitamin E and C were administered intravenously rather than orally, the overall response of ALT and ALP was observed to be high. Similarly, there was a significant (P<0.05) difference in ALT levels at 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone between oral and intravenous mode. ALP level was significantly (P<0.05) higher at 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone when compared to others, and there was also a significant (P<0.05) difference in ALP levels between oral and intravenous administration at 0.75mg/L NPs with vitamin E and C. AST also showed significant (P<0.05) high level at 0.75mg/L NPs alone as compared to other groups and at 0.50mg/L NPs alone AST level showed significant (P<0.05) difference between oral and intravenous mode. However, when vitamin E and C were supplemented with Ag-NPs, it significantly (P<0.05) decreased the ALT, ALP, and AST levels, except at 0.75 mg/L of Ag-NPs.

Fig 1. Liver function test ALT of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 1

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 3. Liver function tests ALP of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 3

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 2. Liver function tests AST of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 2

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Renal function tests (Figs 4 and 5) showed that at 0.50 and 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone and 0.75mg/L NPs with vitamin E and C, urea and creatinine levels were significantly (P<0.05) high as compared to control and other treatments. Urea level at 0.75mg/L NPs alone was significantly (P<0.05) higher as compared to others but also showed a significant (P<0.05) increase in urea level in intravenous mode as compared to oral mode at the same dose level (0.75mg/L NPs). Similar trend of urea level was observed at 0.75mg/L NPs with vitamin E and C, significantly (P<0.05) high in intravenous and low in oral mode. In creatinine dose of 0.75mg/L NPs showed significant (P<0.05) increase as compared to others. As vitamin E and C were ingested with NPs, urea and creatinine levels significantly (P<0.05) decreased, except at 0.75mg/L NPs + vitamin E and C.

Fig 4. Renal function test urea of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 4

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 5. Renal function test creatinine of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 5

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Antioxidant enzyme activity (Fig 6) showed that as the ingestion of NPs increased from 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg/L NPs, CAT and SOD enzyme activity also decreased significantly (P<0.05) as compared to control. But when the same levels of NPs (0.25, 0.50, and 0.75mg/L) were combined with 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75mg/L of vitamin E and C, CAT and SOD enzyme activity significantly (P<0.05) increased as compared to the ingestion of NPs alone. In CAT enzyme activity, ingestion of vitamin E and C causes an increased level but still a significant (P<0.05) difference with respect to control. CAT activity at dose levels of 0.25 and 0.75 mg/L NPs combined with vitamins was the same and the difference was non-significant (P>0.05) but significantly (P<0.05) high at 0.50 mg/L NPs when combined with vitamins. Similarly, SOD activity was significantly (P<0.05) lower with respect to control when NPs were combined with vitamins at levels of 0.50 and 0.75mg/L, but showed a non-significant (P>0.05) difference with control when ingested with 0.50mg/L PNs plus vitamin E and C.

Fig 6. Antioxidant enzymes activity (CAT & SOD) of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 6

Values represented as means ± SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Innate immunological biomarkers like LYZ, TP, ALB, and GLB (Figs 79). showed significant (P<0.05) decreased activity as the dose level of NPs increased from 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75mg/L with respect to control, and the activity of these biomarkers significantly increased when ingestion of NPs was combined with vitamin E and C. LYZ and ALB activity was significantly (P<0.05) high when given with NPs plus vitamins with respect to control and significantly (P<0.05) highest activity at a dose level of 0.50mg/L NPs plus vitamins as compared to others, but there was a non-significant (P>0.05) difference at 0.25 and 0.75mg/L NPs with combined vitamins. Similarly TP activity significantly (P<0.05) increased when given with NPs plus vitamins and significantly (P<0.05) highest activity at dose level of 0.75mg/L NPs plus vitamins as compared to others. TP activity was significantly (P<0.05) lower at 0.25 mg/L NPs + vitamin E and C compared to 0.50 mg/L NPs + vitamin E and C and control. At 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75mg/L NPs + vitamins, GLB activity was significantly (P<0.05) lower as compared to control, but at 0.25 and 0.75mg/L NPs + vitamins GLB activity was significantly (P<0.05) high as compared to the 0.50mg/L NPs + vitamins dose level and non-significant (P>0.05) among them.

Fig 7. Innate immunological biomarkers (LYZ) of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 7

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 9. Innate immunological biomarkers (ALB, GLB) of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 9

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 8. Innate immunological biomarkers (TP) of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 8

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Serum stress biomarkers like triglycerides (Tri), cortisol (COR) and glucose (GLU) (Figs 1012) showed a significant (P<0.05) increase as the dose of NPs increased from 0.25 to 0.75 mg/L alone when compared with control. When Ag-NPs were administered with vitamin E and C, these biomarkers showed a significant (P<0.05) low level at 0.75mg/L given alone in Tri, COR, and GLU. As the level of Ag-NPs increased, the effect of vitamin E and C significantly (P<0.05) decreased as compared to other treatments. Cholesterol (CHO) showed a non-significant (P>0.05) effect of NPs alone and with vitamin E and C when compared with control.

Fig 10. Serum stress biomarker COR & GLU of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 10

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 12. Serum stress biomarker CHO of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 12

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

Fig 11. Serum stress biomarker Tri. of C. idella exposed to different levels of Ag-NPs alone and Ag-NPs+vitamin E and C for 7 days period.

Fig 11

Values represented as means ±SD (n = 3). The different superscripts show significant differences (P<0.05).

4. Discussion

To evaluate the status of fish health and immunity, hematological parameters are considered the best indicators for determination of toxicological and feed additive effects [2]. In the current study, we determined the effects of Ag-NPs alone and with vitamin E and C containing different dose levels through oral and intravenous mode. At dose levels of 0.50 and 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone, RBC, HGB, and HCT levels decreased, while WBC and NEUT levels increased significantly as compared to control, and at 0.25mg/L Ag-NPs showed a non-significant difference as compared to control, but MCV, MCH, MCHC, LYM and MONO showed non-significant effect of Ag-NPs (Table 2). Similarly, [3] reported a significant decrease in RBC and HCT and an increase in WBC and NEUT at dose levels of 25% and 50% Ag-NPs through water exposure, but non-significant difference with control at a low concentration of 12.5%, which is consistent with our findings. Ag-NPs have an adverse effect on RBC lysis because they have polyunsaturated fatty acids in their cell membrane and cause peroxidation due to toxicity [37], disrupt RBC formation [38], and cause morphological changes [39]. Another study showed a significant decrease in RBC, HCT, and Hb when treated with Ag-NPs orally in L.rohita [5]. In our study, WBC levels increased and then decreased at low and high concentrations of Ag-NPs alone and with vitamin E and C. Similar results were reported [38, 40, 41] when metals, Ag-NPs and pollutants were exposed to fish. The concentration of WBC increased with the ingestion of NPs because they act as regulators to enhance the immune system in fish in the presence of toxicity in the body [42]. Ag-NPs + vitamin E and C ingestion at the level of 0.25 and 0.50mg/L showed RBC, HGB and HCT parameters significantly increased and WBC and NEUT significantly decreased as compared to Ag-NPs alone groups. Vitamin E and C have strong antioxidant properties that protect the hemolysis of HB and RBC and cause enhancement in their level. The reason for the decrease in WBC and NEUT is the positive effects of vitamin E and C on reducing the oxidative damage caused by NPs [43]. At 0.75mg/L NPs + vitamin E and C, hematological parameters showed a significantly low level and WBC and NEUT showed a significantly high level with respect to other vitamin supplemented groups. Same results were observed when TiO2-NPs supplemented with vitamin C [44]. The high concentration of TiO2-NPs cancelled the protective effect of vitamin E and C on hematology and shifted the curative effect of vitamin E and C on other organs of the body like the gills, kidney, and liver.

In the current research, liver function tests showed that at 0.50, 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone, and 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs + vitamin E and C, the levels of ALT, ALP, and AST were considerably high. Similarly [45] found that NPs toxicity damages the liver and raises the ALT, AST, and ALP enzymatic activity, similar to our research. A high concentration of Ag-NPs with vitamins E and C, according to [25], totally alleviate liver damage. Ag-NPs have the ability to harm fish cells and produce ROS that are poisonous and induce oxidative stress in the fish’s body [2, 46]. Ag-NPs infiltrate the cell membrane by diffusion and produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, and acids in hepatocytes [4, 47]. Ag-NP overdose caused hepatocyte destruction, which resulted in significantly elevated levels of ALT, ALP, and AST in the current investigation. Any toxicity or injury to the hepatic cells results in a change in the activity of these enzymes, which include AST, ALT, and ALP in the hepatic cell membrane [48, 49]. The activity of ALP, AST, and ALT is markedly reduced when vitamin E and vitamin C are given together with NPs. [50] also noted that vitamin E had a curative effect when combined with ZnO-NPs and that ALP, AST, and ALT activity had decreased. Liver enzyme activity is decreased by vitamins E and C [51]. By lowering liver enzyme activity, [25, 52] identified the antioxidant effect of vitamin C and vitamin E against ZnO-NP in fish.

Renal function tests demonstrated that at 0.50, 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs alone and 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs with vitamin E and C, urea and creatinine levels were significantly high as compared to control and other treatments. As vitamin E and C were ingested with Ag-NPs, urea and creatinine levels significantly decreased, except at 0.75mg/L Ag-NPs + vitamin E and C. The decrease in urea and creatinine may be due to renal damage, but it is also associated with liver and gill damage because of Ag-NPs. The exchange of these two parameters could not take place properly between water and blood in gills, so it causes the elevation of these parameters [25]. Similar to our results, a decrease in urea and creatinine against ZnO-NPs by supplementing vitamin E and C in fish [25].

The cytotoxicity of Ag-NPs leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn leads to oxidative stress in fish [53]. Therefore, ROS controls lipid peroxidation, membrane permeability shifts, oxidative damage, protein carobonylation, and DNA damage [54]. When Ag-NPs release metal ions, SOD reacts with them. Antioxidant enzymes like SOD and CAT help neutralise free radicals from metal ions, and CAT also converts H2O2 to water [55]. In this work, the ingestion of Ag-NPs led to a shift in CAT and SOD levels and an inhibition of their activities. When Ag-NPs were combined with vitamins E and C, the enzyme activity of the CAT and SOD groups recovered to pre-Ag-NPs levels. Consistent findings were also reported by [46, 54]. Another work by [56] shown that exposure to Ag-NPs reduces CAT activity, which in turn impacts the inhibition of SOD and CAT activity. Damage to fish organs from an excess of reactive oxygen species and the breakdown of antioxidant defence systems result from this. Vitamin E’s therapeutic effects against ZnO-NPs in Oreochromis niloticus were also shown by [52], who also revealed the same level of antioxidant enzyme activity as in the control group. In addition to boosting antioxidant defences, vitamin C has been shown to boost SOD and CAT activity on its own [57]. Vitamin E and C scavenging antioxidant activity was also observed by [2, 52].

TP, ALB, and GLB showed significantly decreased activity with the ingestion of Ag-NPs, and the activity of these biomarkers significantly increased when ingestion of Ag-NPs was combined with vitamin E and C. Innate immunological biomarkers like TP, ALB, and GLB are very important serum proteins that liver tissues produce and store. These biomarkers decreased in concentration, weakened the immune system, and reduced feed intake in cases of liver damage caused by toxicology [29, 58]. According to [38], Ag-NPs induce toxicity that causes the usage of these proteins due to stress and also damage kidney tissues, intestine damage and disrupt protein synthesis due to disorder in amino acid absorption. In line with our study, [59] reported that Ag-NPs reduce the TP, ALB, and GLB in Zebra fish. Similarly, [60] observed increased activity of total protein, albumin, and globulin when fish were administered with vitamin E. Lysozyme (LYZ) activity with the ingestion of NPs alone decreased and significantly increased when NPs were combined with vitamin E and C. In fish immunity, LYZ is an essential part of innate immunity and leukocytes produce and secrete it, which has extraordinary antimicrobial enzyme activity [61]. The liver produces immune globulin proteins that aid LYZ in phagocytosis and increase leukocyte activity [62]. In line with our findings, [63] demonstrated that Ag-NPs bind to these proteins, which then bind to LYZ to form the protein corona described in previous studies, depleting immune cells and causing significant oxidative damage. That’s why, in our study, LYZ activity impaired, increased the fish sensitivity towards disease and pathogens, and destabilized the immune system. In relation to our results, [64] reported that vitamin E and C significantly increase the total protein, LYZ, albumin, and globulin. Other studies also mentioned that vitamin C alone has strong antioxidant effects and reduces the toxic effects of NPs and increases the levels of TP, ALB, GLB, and LYZ in fish [25] and also has the ability to enhance leukocyte activity [65], lysozyme activity [66] and serum GLB and TP [67] to make the immune system strong.

GLU, Tri, and COR are three crucial biomarkers for assessing the severity of stress caused by disease or poisoning in fish [68]. In the current investigation, the consumption of Ag-NPs resulted in a considerable increase in Tri, GLU, and COR. Our findings are consistent with those of previous toxicity investigations of Ag-NPs [2, 69]. Adrenal cortex cells, which secrete cortisol and control glucose output from the liver through glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, are affected by Ag-NPs [70]. When under stress, the body responds by increasing GLU levels in the blood as a means of mitigating the negative effects of the situation. Cortisol levels that are too high are associated with liver damage and immune system suppression [38, 71]. Fish exposed to Ag-NPs have greater blood triglyceride levels, which gives the fish more energy to deal with the toxicological stress [72]. While Ag-NPs alone and in conjunction with vitamin E and C had no influence on cholesterol levels, similar to the findings of [3]. Our results demonstrated a considerable reduction in these indicators after ingestion of Ag-NPs with vitamins E and C. Vitamin E has a scavenging action and can restore cortisol, glucose, and lipid levels, according to research by [50, 52].

5. Conclusion

The current research shown that grass carp (C. idella) are protected against Ag-NPs toxicity by vitamin E and C as a powerful antioxidant. Restoring biomarker levels to those seen in the control group demonstrates protection. Except for the very lethal 0.75mg/L dosage of Ag-NPs, grass carp seem to be totally protected by vitamins E and C.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to everyone who contributed to the scientific and technical aspects of this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein journal of nanotechnology. 2018. Apr 3;9(1):1050–74. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.9.98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hedayati SA, Farsani HG, Naserabad SS, Hoseinifar SH, Van Doan H. Protective effect of dietary vitamin E on immunological and biochemical induction through silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) inclusion in diet and silver salt (Ag-NO3) exposure on Zebra fish (Danio rerio). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2019. Aug 1;222:100–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vali S, Mohammadi G, Tavabe KR, Moghadas F, Naserabad SS. The effects of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) sublethal concentrations on common carp (Cyprinus carpio): Bioaccumulation, hematology, serum biochemistry and immunology, antioxidant enzymes, and skin mucosal responses. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2020. May 1;194:110353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ale A, Rossi AS, Bacchetta C, Gervasio S, de la Torre FR, Cazenave J. Integrative assessment of silver nanoparticles toxicity in Prochilodus lineatus fish. Ecological Indicators. 2018. Oct 1;93:1190–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rajkumar KS, Kanipandian N, Thirumurugan R. Toxicity assessment on haemotology, biochemical and histopathological alterations of silver nanoparticles-exposed freshwater fish Labeo rohita. Applied Nano-science. 2016. Jan;6(1):19–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shah SL, Altindağ A. Alterations in the immunological parameters of Tench (Tinca tinca L. 1758) after acute and chronic exposure to lethal and sub-lethal treatments with mercury, cadmium and lead. Turkish journal of veterinary & animal sciences. 2005;29(5):1163–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khaleghi SR, Hedayati SA, Kashiri H, Paknejad H, Hosseinifar SH. Evaluation of dietary supplements of Pediococcus acidilactici bacteria and Agaricus bisporus mushroom powder on skin mucus immune indices of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exposed to Silver nano-particles. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shobana C, Rangasamy B, Poopal RK, Renuka S, Ramesh M. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Piper nigrum: tissue-specific bioaccumulation, histopathology, and oxidative stress responses in Indian major carp Labeo rohita. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018. Apr;25(12):11812–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mashjoor S, Aishahi M, Tulabi Dezfuli Z. Comparative toxicity assessment of chemical nano-silver and biosynthetic silver nanoparticles produced by marine macro-algae from the Persian Gulf in biomarker: Artemia nauplii. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2019. Mar 21;74(1):73–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Priyadarshana G, Kottegoda N, Senaratne A, de Alwis A, Karunaratne V. Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles by top-down approach from a high purity ore. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2015. Jan 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hasnidawani JN, Azlina HN, Norita H, Bonnia NN, Ratim S, Ali ES. Synthesis of ZnO nanostructures using sol-gel method. Procedia Chemistry. 2016. Jan 1;19:211–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Suntako R. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by a precipitation method on mechanical and morphological properties of the CR foam. Bulletin of Materials Science. 2015. Aug;38(4):1033–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Senthilkumar SR, Sivakumar T. Green tea (Camellia sinensis) mediated synthesis of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles and studies on their antimicrobial activities. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014;6(6):461–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nagar A, Nagar A. Biosynthesis, characterization of ZnO nanoparticles by using pyrus pyrifolia leaf extract and their photocatalytic activity. International journal of innovative research in science, engineering and technology abbreviation. 2015. 4: 9710–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sundrarajan M, Ambika S, Bharathi K. Plant-extract mediated synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Pongamia pinnata and their activity against pathogenic bacteria. Advanced powder technology. 2015. Sep 1;26(5):1294–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lingaraju K, Raja Naika H, Manjunath K, Basavaraj RB, Nagabhushana H, Nagaraju G, et al. Biogenic synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Ruta graveolens (L.) and their antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Applied Nanoscience. 2016. Jun;6(5):703–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hao L, Chen L. Oxidative stress responses in different organs of carp (Cyprinus carpio) with exposure to ZnO nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2012. Jun 1;80:103–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hashmat I, Azad H, Ahmed A. Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss)-A nature’s drugstore: an overview. Int Res J Biol Sci. 2012. Oct;1(6):76–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rahman MM. Role of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in aquaculture production systems. Frontiers in Life Science. 2015. Oct 2;8(4):399–410. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fazio F. Fish hematology analysis as an important tool of aquaculture: a review. Aquaculture. 2019. Feb 1;500:237–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hussain R, Mahmood F, Khan A, Javed MT, Rehan S, Mehdi T. Cellular and biochemical effects induced by atrazine on blood of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Pesticide biochemistry and physiology. 2012. May 1;103(1):38–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dawood MA, Koshio S, Ishikawa M, Yokoyama S, El Basuini MF, Hossain MS, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus or/and Lactococcus lactis on the growth, gut microbiota and immune responses of red sea bream, Pagrus major. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2016. Feb 1;49:275–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dabrowski K. Ascorbic acid status in the early life of whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.). Aquaculture. 1990. Jan 1;84(1):61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fracalossi DM, Allen ME, Yuyama LK, Oftedal OT. Ascorbic acid biosynthesis in Amazonian fishes. Aquaculture. 2001. Jan 15;192(2–4):321–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chien LT, Hwang DF. Effects of thermal stress and vitamin C on lipid peroxidation and fatty acid composition in the liver of thornfish Terapon jarbua. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2001. Jan 1;128(1):91–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roosta Z, Hajimoradloo A, Ghorbani R, Hoseinifar SH. The effects of dietary vitamin C on mucosal immune responses and growth performance in Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus caspicus) fry. Fish physiology and biochemistry. 2014. Oct;40(5):1601–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sandnes K. Vitamin C in fish nutrition-a review. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.John S, Kale M, Rathore N, Bhatnagar D. Protective effect of vitamin E in dimethoate and malathion induced oxidative stress in rat erythrocytes. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2001. Sep 1;12(9):500–4. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2863(01)00160-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alkaladi A, El-Deen NA, Afifi M, Zinadah OA. Hematological and biochemical investigations on the effect of vitamin E and C on Oreochromis niloticus exposed to zinc oxide nanoparticles. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2015. Sep 1;22(5):556–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang Y, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Ning Z, Li Y, Zhao Q, et al. The draft genome of the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) provides insights into its evolution and vegetarian adaptation. Nature genetics. 2015. Jun;47(6):625–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khan MS, Khan SA, Chaudhary ZI, Khan MN, Aslam A, Ashraf K, et al. Mercury intoxication in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Pakistan veterinary journal. 2004;24(1):33–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shankar SS, Rai A, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Rapid synthesis of Au, Ag, and bimetallic Au core–Ag shell nanoparticles using Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf broth. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2004. Jul 15;275(2):496–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bayunova L, Barannikova I, Semenkova T. Sturgeon stress reactions in aquaculture. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2002. Dec;18(4‐6):397–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chance M, Mehaly AC. Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology. 1977, 2, 764–817. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dis-mutases: II. Purification and quantitative relationship with water-soluble protein in seedlings. Plant physiology. 1977. Feb;59(2):315–8. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ellis AI. Lysozyme assays. Techniques in fish immunology. 1990;1:101–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Massarsky A, Abraham R, Nguyen KC, Rippstein P, Tayabali AF, Trudeau VL, et al. Nanosilver cytotoxicity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) erythrocytes and hepatocytes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2014. Jan 1;159:10–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shaluei F, Hedayati A, Jahanbakhshi A, Kolangi H, Fotovat M. Effect of subacute exposure to silver nanoparticle on some hematological and plasma biochemical indices in silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Human & experimental toxicology. 2013. Dec;32(12):1270–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sayed AE, Authman MM. The protective role of Spirulina platensis to alleviate the Sodium dodecyl sulfate toxic effects in the catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018. Nov 15;163:136–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Imani M, Halimi M, Khara H. Effects of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) on hematological parameters of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 2015. May;24(3):491–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Srivastava R, Punia P. Effect of heavy metal on biochemical and hematological parameters in Cyprinus carpio and its use as a bio-indicators of pollution stress. Journal of Eco-physiology and Occupational Health. 2011. Jun 1;11(1/2):21. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Burgos-Aceves MA, Lionetti L, Faggio C. Multidisciplinary haematology as prognostic device in environmental and xenobiotic stress-induced response in fish. Science of the total environment. 2019. Jun 20;670:1170–83. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hajirezaee S, Mohammadi G, Naserabad SS. The protective effects of vitamin C on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exposed to titanium oxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs). Aquaculture. 2020. Mar 15;518:734734. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Martínez-Álvarez RM, Morales AE, Sanz A. Antioxidant defenses in fish: biotic and abiotic factors. Reviews in Fish Biology and fisheries. 2005. Feb;15(1):75–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hao L, Chen L, Hao J, Zhong N. Bioaccumulation and sub-acute toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles in juvenile carp (Cyprinus carpio): a comparative study with its bulk counterparts. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2013. May 1;91:52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Choi JE, Kim S, Ahn JH, Youn P, Kang JS, Park K, et al. Induction of oxidative stress and apoptosis by silver nanoparticles in the liver of adult zebra fish. Aquatic Toxicology. 2010. Oct 15;100(2):151–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kettler K, Giannakou C, de Jong WH, Hendriks AJ, Krystek P. Uptake of silver nanoparticles by monocytic THP-1 cells depends on particle size and presence of serum proteins. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2016. Sep;18(9):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3595-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sookoian S, Pirola CJ. Alanine and aspartate aminotransferase and glutamine-cycling pathway: their roles in pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2012. Aug 8;18(29):3775. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Molina R, Moreno I, Pichardo S, Jos A, Moyano R, Monterde JG, et al. Acid and alkaline phosphatase activities and pathological changes induced in Tilapia fish (Oreochromis sp.) exposed subchronically to microcystins from toxic cyanobacterial blooms under laboratory conditions. Toxicon. 2005. Dec 1;46(7):725–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Al-Jassabi S, Khalil AM. Microcystin-induced 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in DNA and its reduction by melatonin, vitamin C, and vitamin E in mice. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2006. Oct;71(10):1115–9. doi: 10.1134/s0006297906100099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li J, Liang XF, Tan Q, Yuan X, Liu L, Zhou Y, et al. Effects of vitamin E on growth performance and antioxidant status in juvenile grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idellus. Aquaculture. 2014. Jun 20;430:21–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Farsani HG, Doria HB, Jamali H, Hasanpour S, Mehdipour N, Rashidiyan G. The protective role of vitamin E on Oreochromis niloticus exposed to ZnO-NP. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2017. Nov 1;145:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.de Lima R, Seabra AB, Durán N. Silver nanoparticles: a brief review of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of chemically and biogenically synthesized nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2012. Nov;32(11):867–79. doi: 10.1002/jat.2780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sayed AE, Soliman HA. Developmental toxicity and DNA damaging properties of silver nanoparticles in the catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2017. Oct 1;822:34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NP. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology. 2003. Feb 1;13(2):57–149. doi: 10.1016/s1382-6689(02)00126-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Atli G, Alptekin Ö, Tükel S, Canli M. Response of catalase activity to Ag+, Cd2+, Cr6+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ in five tissues of freshwater fish Oreochromis niloticus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2006. Jun 1;143(2):218–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Padayatty SJ, Katz A, Wang Y, Eck P, Kwon O, Lee JH, et al. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. Journal of the American college of Nutrition. 2003. Feb 1;22(1):18–35. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2003.10719272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tsipotis E, Shuja A, Jaber BL. Albumin dialysis for liver failure: a systematic review. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2015. Sep 1;22(5):382–90. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Palaniappan PR, Vijayasundaram V. The effect of arsenic exposure and the efficacy of DMSA on the proteins and lipids of the gill tissues of Labeo rohita. Food and chemical toxicology. 2009. Aug 1;47(8):1752–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dawood MA, Zommara M, Eweedah NM, Helal AI. Synergistic effects of selenium nanoparticles and vitamin E on growth, immune-related gene expression, and regulation of antioxidant status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biological trace element research. 2020. Jun;195(2):624–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Saurabh S, Sahoo PK. Lysozyme: an important defence molecule of fish innate immune system. Aquaculture research. 2008. Feb;39(3):223–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Holland MC, Lambris JD. The complement system in teleosts. Fish & shellfish immunology. 2002. May 1;12(5):399–420. doi: 10.1006/fsim.2001.0408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jovanović B, Palić D. Immunotoxicology of non-functionalized engineered nanoparticles in aquatic organisms with special emphasis on fish—Review of current knowledge, gap identification, and call for further research. Aquatic toxicology. 2012. Aug 15;118:141–51. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Harsij M, Kanani HG, Adineh H. Effects of antioxidant supplementation (nano‑selenium, vitamin C and E) on growth performance, blood biochemistry, immune status and body composition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under sub-lethal ammonia exposure. Aquaculture. 2020. May 15;521:734942. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhou Q, Wang L, Wang H, Xie F, Wang T. Effect of dietary vitamin C on the growth performance and innate immunity of juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2012. Jun 1;32(6):969–75. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.01.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lin MF, Shiau SY. Dietary L-ascorbic acid affects growth, nonspecific immune responses and disease resistance in juvenile grouper, Epinephelus malabaricus. Aquaculture. 2005. Feb 28;244(1–4):215–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nayak SK, Swain P, Mukherjee SC. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic and vitamin C on the immune response of Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Ham.). Fish & shellfish immunology. 2007. Oct 1;23(4):892–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Akbary P, Pirbeigi A, Jahanbakhshi A. Analysis of primary and secondary stress responses in bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) by anesthetization with 2-phenoxyethanol. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2016. Apr;13(4):1009–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Clark NJ, Shaw BJ, Handy RD. Low hazard of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate to the hematopoietic system of rainbow trout. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2018. May 15;152:121–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang X, Zhong Y, Tian H, Wang W, Ru S. Impairment of the cortisol stress response mediated by the hypothalamus–pituitary–interrenal (HPI) axis in zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to monocrotophos pesticide. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2015. Oct 1;176:10–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tort L, Balasch JC, Mackenzie S. Fish immune system. A crossroads between innate and adaptive responses. Inmunología. 2003. Jul 1;22(3):277–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lupatsch I, Santos GA, Schrama JW, Verreth JA. Effect of stocking density and feeding level on energy expenditure and stress responsiveness in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquaculture. 2010. Jan 7;298(3–4):245–50. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES