Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2023 Apr 12;24(8):7149. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087149

Cytotoxic Steroidal Saponins Containing a Rare Fructosyl from the Rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. latifolia

Tian-Yi Li 1,, Yang Du 1,, Min-Chang Wang 2, Ke Liu 2, Yang Liu 1, Yu Cao 1, Yuan-Yuan Wang 1, Wen-Wen Chen 1, Xiao-Ying Qian 1, Peng-Cheng Qiu 1, Hai-Feng Tang 1,*, Yun-Yang Lu 1,*
Editor: Milen I Georgiev
PMCID: PMC10138723  PMID: 37108310

Abstract

A phytochemical investigation of the steroidal saponins from the rhizomes of Paris polyohylla var. latifolia led to the discovery and characterization of three new spirostanol saponins, papolatiosides A–C (13), and nine known compounds (412). Their structures were established via extensive spectroscopic data analysis and chemical methods. Interestingly, compounds 1 and 2 possessed a fructosyl in their oligosaccharide moiety, which is rare in natural product and was firstly reported in family Melanthiaceae. The cytotoxicity of these saponins against several human cancer cell lines was evaluated by a CCK-8 experiment. As a result, compound 1 exhibited a significant cytotoxic effect on LN229, U251, Capan-2, HeLa, and HepG2 cancer cells with IC50 values of 4.18 ± 0.31, 3.85 ± 0.44, 3.26 ± 0.34, 3.30 ± 0.38 and 4.32 ± 0.51 μM, respectively. In addition, the result of flow cytometry analysis indicated that compound 1 could induce apoptosis of glioma cells LN229. The underlying mechanism was explored by network pharmacology and western bolt experiments, which indicated that compound 1 could induce glioma cells LN229 apoptosis by regulating the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.

Keywords: Paris polyphylla var. latifolia, fructosyl, spirostanol saponins, apoptosis, network pharmacology

1. Introduction

Natural products have contributed significantly to the discovery of novel anticancer drugs. Steroidal saponins, as common natural products, are found in a wide range of natural plants, including traditional Chinese medicine such as Paris polyphylla and Panax ginseng. A series of steroidal saponins with good antitumor or antiviral activity were also produced, including diosgenin, Paris saponin H, Ginsenoside Rd, and so on. Steroidal saponins have demonstrated outstanding pharmacological effects, such as anti-inflammatory [1], anti-viral [2], immunomodulatory [3], and antitumor [4] activities. Especially, modern pharmacological research has shown that steroidal saponins exhibited a significant resistant effect to different cancer cells through a variety of molecular mechanisms, such as apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of migration, and invasion [5,6,7,8]. Therefore, steroidal saponins might be the source of new potential anti-cancer drugs.

The genus Paris (family Melanthiaceae) consists of 33 species and 15 varieties, most of which are distributed in the tropical and temperate regions of Asia and Europe [9]. It is a famous traditional Chinese medicine with antitumor, hemostatic, antimicrobial, and antalgic properties. The dried rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. chinensis and Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis are documented as Paridis Rhizoma to elucidate the medicinal value and quality standard of Paris in the 2020 edition of Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The phytochemical investigation revealed that steroidal saponins were the predominant secondary metabolites in genus Paris. Paris polyphylla var. latifolia [10], a variant of the genus Paris, is widely distributed in southwest China. To date, it has only been previously studied in our research group [11,12]. Therefore, this study focused on the cytotoxic steroidal saponins in Paris polyphylla var. latifolia. As a result, three new steroidal saponins (13) and nine known ones (412) were obtained from the rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. latifolia. Compounds 1 and 2 possessed a fructose in their oligosaccharide moiety, which was rare in natural product and was firstly reported in the family Melanthiaceae. Then, the inhibitory effect of the isolated compounds against several human cancer cell lines was evaluated using the CCK-8 method. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited a significant inhibition effect on cancer cells with IC50 values from 3.26 ± 0.34 μM to 22.3 ± 1.33 μM. Moreover, the underlying mechanism of Paris saponins inhibiting the proliferation of glioma cells was explored by network pharmacology, and the mechanism of compound 1 on the apoptosis of glioma cells was further confirmed by flow cytometry and western blot experiments. Herein, we report the isolation, structure elucidation, cytotoxic evaluation, and mechanism exploration of the steroidal saponins from Paris polyphylla var. latifolia.

2. Results

2.1. Isolated Compounds from Paris polyphylla var. latifolia

Separation of the water saturated n-BuOH fraction of an ethanol extract of the rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. latifolia by silica gel chromatography and preparative HPLC afforded three new spirostanol saponins, papolatiosides A–C (13), along with nine known compounds (412) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of compounds 112.

2.2. Structure Elucidation of the New Compounds

Compound 1, white amorphous powder, was positive to Liebermann Burchard and Molisch chemical reactions, which indicated that it might be a steroidal glycoside. Its molecular formula was determined as C45H72O17 based on the ion peak of HR-ESI-MS at m/z 885.4854 [M + H] + (calculated for C45H73O17, 885.4848). In the 1H-NMR spectrum (Table 1), four methyl protons were detected at δH 0.80 (3H, s, H-18), 1.05 (3H, s, H-19), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-21), and 0.79 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H-27), and one olefinic methine proton signal was found at δH 5.38 (1H, br s, H-6). In the 13C-NMR spectrum (Table 1), the corresponding methyl carbon signals were observed at δC 16.8 (C-18), 19.9 (C-19), 14.9 (C-21), and 17.5 (C-27), and the trisubstituted double bond carbons were obtained at δC 141.89 (C-5) and δC 122.65 (C-6). Moreover, there was a quaternary ketal carbon at δC 110.6 (C-22). In the HMBC spectrum, the cross peaks between H-19 (δH 1.05) and C-5 (δC 141.89) and between H-6 (δH 5.38) and C-4 (δC 39.6)/C-8 (δC 32.8)/C-10 (δC 38.0) indicated that the double bound was located at C-5/C-6. Therefore, the aglycone was identified as diosgenin with a double bond located at C-5/C-6 by analyzing NMR data and comparing it with known compounds [13].

Table 1.

13C and 1H NMR data of aglycone moieties for compounds 13 in CD3OD.

Numbers Compounds [δH mult. (J in Hz)]
1 a 2 a 3 a
1 38.5 1.88 o, 1.10 br s 38.5 1.86 o,1.10 br s 38.5 1.89 m, 1.09 br s
2 30.8 1.94 o, 1.29 o 30.7 1.94 o,1.29 o 30.7 1.92 m,1.29 o
3 79.6 3.58 m 79.7 3.54 m 79.2 3.59 m
4 39.6 2.44 m, 2.31 t 39.6 2.43 m, 2.30 t 39.5 2.45 m, 2.30 m
5 141.9 141.9 - 141.9
6 122.7 5.38 br s 122.7 5.38 br s 122.4 5.39 br s
7 33.2 2.01 m, 1.56 m 33.2 2.00 m, 1.56 m 33.0 2.04 m, 1.60 m
8 32.8 1.65 m 32.8 1.65 m 32.8 1.65 m
9 51.7 0.97 m 51.7 0.97 m 51.6 1.05 m
10 38.0 38.0 - 38.0
11 22.0 1.56 m, 1.51 br s 22.0 1.56 m, 1.50 br s 21.5 1.64 m, 1.54 m
12 40.9 1.76 o, 1.19 br s 40.9 1.76 m, 1.19 m 39.1 1.92 m, 1.36 br s
13 41.4 41.4 - 44.9
14 57.8 1.14 m 57.8 1.14 m 55.9 1.28 o
15 32.7 1.97 m, 1.28 o 32.7 1.98 m, 1.28 o 34.1 2.34 m, 1.54 m
16 82.2 4.39 q (7.4) 82.2 4.39 q (7.4) 83.7 4.91 m
17 63.7 1.74 br s 63.7 1.74 br s 56.3 2.93 dt (8.0, 1.8)
18 16.8 0.80 s 16.8 0.81 s 14.7 0.68 s
19 19.9 1.05 s 19.8 1.04 s 19.8 1.05 s
20 42.9 1.90 m 42.9 1.90 m 138.5
21 14.9 0.96 d (7.0) 14.9 0.96 d (7.0) 123.0 5.66 br s, 6.21 br s
22 110.6 110.6 - 173.5
23 32.4 1.70 d (4.6) 32.4 1.70 d (4.6)
24 29.9 1.62 m, 1.41 m 29.9 1.62 m, 1.41 m
25 31.4 1.59 o 31.5 1.59 m
26 67.9 3.44 m, 3.32 o 67.9 3.44 m, 3.31 m
27 17.5 0.79 d (6.5) 17.5 0.79 d (6.5)

a Tested in 13C-NMR (200 Hz) and 1H-NMR (800 Hz). o indicates overlapped.

The 13C NMR spectrum showed 45 carbon signals, 27 of which were assigned to the aglycone moiety and the remaining 18 carbons to the sugar moiety. The presence of monosaccharides in 1 was further confirmed by acid hydrolysis and GC analyses. The results of the GC-MS analysis showed D-glucose (D-Glc), L-rhamnose (L-Rha), and D-fructose (D-Fru) in a ratio of 1:1:1 by comparing the retention times with the corresponding authentic samples. In the 1H-NMR spectrum, two anomeric protons were observed at δH 4.49 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-1 of Glc) and δH 5.20 (br s, H-1 of Rha), and the corresponding carbon signals were obtained at δC 100.9 (C-1 of Glc) and δC 102.2 (C-1 of Rha) by analyzing the HSQC correlations, respectively. In the 13C-NMR spectrum, there was a specific quaternary carbon at δC 105.2, which was identified as the anomeric carbon of D-Fru. Then, the assignments of protons and carbons in each monosaccharide were determined by analyzing the 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC and TOCSY spectra (Table 2). The β configuration of D-glucopyranosyl was revealed by the anomeric proton coupling constants (J = 7.8 > 7.0 Hz) and the α configuration of L-rhamnopyranosyl was confirmed by the chemical shifts of C-5 of Rha (δC 69.8) [14,15]. The β configuration of D-fructofuranosyl was confirmed by the chemical shifts of δC 62.1 (C-1 of Fru), 105.2 (C-2 of Fru), 79.2 (C-3 of Fru), 76.6 (C-4 of Fru), 83.7 (C-5 of Fru) and 64.2 (C-6 of Fru) [16]. The linkage sequences of monosaccharides were determined by the correlations in the HMBC spectrum, which were observed from δH 3.66 (H-1 of Fru) to δC 61.6 (C-6 of Glc), δH 5.20 (H-1 of Rha) to δC 78.9 (C-2 of Glc), and δH 4.49 (H-1 of Glc) to δC 79.6 (C-3 of the aglycone) (Figure 2). The α orientation of H-3 was deduced from the correlations of H3-19 (δH 1.05) to Hβ-1 (δH 1.10), and Hα-1 (δH 1.88) to H-3 (δH 3.58) in the NOESY spectrum [15]. The 25R configuration was deduced from the difference in the geminal protons of H-26 (∆δH = 0.12 < 0.48) [17]. Thus, the structure of compound 1 was elucidated as diosgenin-3-O-β-D-fructofuranosyl-(1→6)-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside.

Table 2.

13C and 1H NMR data of sugar portion for compounds 13 in CD3OD.

Sugars 1 a 2 a 3 a
δ C δH
(J in Hz)
δ C δH
(J in Hz)
δ C δH
(J in Hz)
Glc Glc Glc
1 100.9 4.49 d (7.8) 100.5 4.53 d (7.8) 100.4 4.50 d (7.8)
2 78.9 3.38 m 78.5 3.39 m 78.8 3.40 m
3 79.1 4.08 m 77.7 3.62 m 77.8 3.25 m
4 71.2 3.42 m 78.7 3.87 m 78.6 3.51 m
5 76.2 3.32 m 74.8 3.51 m 76.5 3.35 m
6 61.6 3.93 m, 3.74 m 61.0 3.86 m, 3.79 m 61.9 3.82 m, 3.69 m
Rha Rha Rha
1 102.2 5.20 br s 102.1 5.23 br s 102.1 5.22 br s
2 72.2 3.90 m 72.2 3.88 m 72.2 3.89 m
3 72.4 3.65 m 72.4 3.65 m 72.4 3.65 m
4 74.0 3.39 m 73.9 3.38 m 73.9 3.39 m
5 69.8 4.12 m 69.8 4.12 m 69.7 4.12 m
6 18.0 1.23 d (6.3) 17.9 1.23 d (6.3) 17.9 1.23 d (6.3)
Fru Araf Araf
1 62.1 3.66 s, 3.57 s 109.8 5.11 d (1.6) 109.9 5.01 d (1.7)
2 105.2 - 83.2 3.99 m 83.2 3.97 m
3 79.2 3.46 d (8.7) 78.1 3.86 m 78.0 3.86 m, 3.62 m
4 76.6 4.01 t 86.0 4.07 m 85.9 4.07 m
5 83.7 3.73 d (4.9) 62.9 3.62 m 63.0 3.85 m, 3.72 m
6 64.2 3.72 d (9.9), 3.66 m
Fru
1 60.5 3.70 s, 3.68 s
2 109.6 -
3 82.7 4.06 m
4 79.0 3.57 t
5 85.1 3.94 m
6 63.0 3.62 m

a Tested in 13C-NMR (200 Hz) and 1H-NMR (800 Hz).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Key 1H-1H COSY, HMBC correlations of compound 1. (b) Key NOESY correlations of compound 1.

Compound 2, white amorphous powder, was positive to Liebermann Burchard and Molisch chemical reactions, which indicated that it might be a steroidal glycoside. Its molecular formula was determined as C50H80O21, which was deduced from the ion peak of HR-ESI-MS at m/z 1017.5258 [M + H] + (calculated for C50H81O21, 1017.5270). In the 1H-NMR spectrum, four methyl protons were detected at δH 0.81 (3H, s, H-18), 1.04 (3H, s, H-19), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-21), and 0.79 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H-27), and one olefinic methine proton signal was found at δH 5.38 (1H, br s, H-6) (Table 1). In the 13C-NMR spectrum, the corresponding methyl carbon signals were observed at δC 16.8 (C-18), 19.8 (C-19), 14.9 (C-21), and 17.5 (C-27) and the trisubstituted double bond carbons were obtained at δC 141.9 (C-5) and δC 122.7 (C-6). The comparison of the 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR signals of compound 2 with those of 1 indicated these two compounds possessed the same aglycone moiety. The difference was found in the oligosaccharide moiety.

The results of acid hydrolysis and GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of D-glucose (D-Glc), L-rhamnose (L-Rha), L-arabinose (L-Ara), and D-fructose (D-Fru) in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 by comparing the retention times with the corresponding authentic samples. In the 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra, three anomeric proton signals were offered at δH 4.53 (d, J = 7.81 Hz, H-1 of Glc), 5.23 (br s, H-1 of Rha), and 5.11 (d, J = 1.63 Hz, H-1 of Ara) with the corresponding carbon signals at δC 100.5 (C-1 of Glc), δC 102.1 (C-1 of Rha), and δC 109.77 (C-1 of Ara). In the 13C-NMR spectrum, the characteristic quaternary carbon signal at δC 109.6 was identified as the anomeric carbon of D-Fru. The assignments of 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR signals associated with the oligosaccharide moiety were derived from the 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and TOCSY spectra (Table 2). In the HMBC spectrum, the cross peaks from H-1 (δH 5.11, L-Ara) to C-4 (δC 86.0, L-Ara) and H-4 (δH 4.07, L-Ara) to C-1 (δC 109.8, L-Ara) revealed the formation of L-arabinofuranosyl. The β configuration of D-glucopyranosyl and D-fructofuranosyl and the α configuration of L-rhamnopyranosyl were identified the same way with compound 1 (Figure 3). The small 3JH-1, H-2 (1.63 Hz) of H-1 of L-Araf and the characteristic carbon signals of C-1 (δC 109.8), C-2 (δC 83.2), C-4 (δC 86.0), and C-5 (δC 62.9) suggested the α configuration of L-Araf [18]. The linkage of monosaccharide was determined by the correlations from δH 5.23 (H-1 of Rha) to δC 78.5 (C-2 of Glc), δH 5.11 (H-1 of Araf) to δC 78.7 (C-4 of Glc), δH 3.68 (H-1 of Fru) to δC 61.0 (C-6 of Glc), and δH 4.53 (H-1 of Glc) to δC 79.7 (C-3 of the aglycone) in the HMBC spectrum (Figure 3). Based on the above evidence, the structure of compound 2 was elucidated as diosgenin-3-O-β-D-fructofuranosyl- (1 → 6)- [α-L-arabinofuranosyl- (1→4)]- [α-L-rhamnopyranosyl- (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations of compound 2. (b) Key NOESY correlations of compound 2.

Compound 3 was obtained as white amorphous powder and was positive to Liebermann Burchard and Molisch chemical reactions. Its molecular formula was determined as C39H58O16 based on the ion peak of HR-ESI-MS at m/z 781.3653 [M − H] + (calculated for C39H57O16, 781.3647). In the 1H-NMR spectrum, two methyl protons were observed at δH 0.68 (3H, s, H-18), 1.05 (3H, s, H-19), and one olefinic methine proton signal was found at δH 5.39 (1H, br s, H-6) (Table 1). In the 13C-NMR spectrum, the corresponding methyl carbon signals were observed at δC 14.7 (C-18), 19.8 (C-19) and the trisubstituted double bond carbons were obtained at δC 142.0 (C-5) and δC 122.4 (C-6). Additionally, one carbonyl carbon signal was detected at δC 173.45 (C-22). By comparing the 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data with those of the known compound 5 [19], the aglycone of 3 was determined to be the same as 5, which contained a γ-butyrolactone structure in ring E.

Acid hydrolysis and GC-MS analysis of 3 revealed that the monosaccharides were D-Glc, L-Rha and L-Ara in a ratio of 1:1:1. This was further confirmed by the anomeric signals at δH 4.50 (d, J = 7.81 Hz, H-1 of Glc) with δC 100.4 (C-1 of Glc), δH 5.22 (br s, H-1 of Rha), with δC 102.1 (C-1 of Rha), and δH 5.01 (d, J = 1.68 Hz, H-1 of Ara) with δC 109.9 (C-1 of Ara) in the 1H NMR and 13C-NMR spectra (Table 2). The β configuration of D-glucopyranosyl and the α configurations of L-arabinopyranosyl and L-rhamnopyranosyl were identified as the same way with compounds 1 and 2. The linkage sequence of monosaccharide was determined by the correlations in the HMBC spectrum, which were from δH 5.22 (H-1 of Rha) to δC 78.8 (C-2 of Glc), δH 5.01 (H-1 of Araf) to δC 78.6 (C-4 of Glc), and δH 4.50 (H-1 of Glc) to δC 79.2 (C-3 of the aglycone) (Figure 4). Thus, the structure of 3 was determined to be 3β,16β-dihydroxy-pregn-5,20-dien-carboxylic acid (22,16)-lactone-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Key 1H-1H COSY, HMBC correlations of compound 3; (b) Key NOESY correlations of compound 3.

2.3. Structure Identification of the Known Isolated Compounds

The nine known compounds were identified as pregna-5,16-diene-3β-ol-20-one-3-O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1 → 4)-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1 → 2)]-β-D-glucopyranoside (4) [20], chonglouoside SL-8 (5) [19], pallidifloside D (6) [21], parispseudoside A (7) [22], 3-O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1 → 4)-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1 → 2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-β-D-chacotriosyl-26-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (8) [23], aethioside A (9) [24], spongipregnolosides A (10) [25], hypoglaucin H (11) [26], parispseudoside B (12) [24] by using the same set of methods as the new compounds.

2.4. Cytotoxicities of Compounds 112 against Cancer Cell lines

The CCK-8 method was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the isolated compounds against the HeLa, U251, LN229, Capan-2, HepG2, and NHA cell lines. The results showed that compounds 1 and 2 exhibited significant cytotoxic activity, with IC50 values ranging from 3.26 ± 0.34 μM to 22.3 ± 1.33 μM against five cancer cell lines, while the remaining compounds were inactive. None of the compounds had significant cytotoxic activity against normal human NHA astrocytes (Table 3). The results above were consistent with the findings in our previous research, which indicated that spirostanol saponins bound with oligosaccharide at C-3 of the aglycone possess stronger cytotoxicity than the furostanol saponins and cholestanol-type saponins, which means that the opening of the F-ring could reduce the cytotoxic activity of spirostanol saponins [27]. Compound 1 is the first fructosyl-containing steroid saponins in Melanthiaceae, which has strong cytotoxicity. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of 1 and 2 confirmed that the spirostanol saponins possessing a three-glycosyl oligosaccharide chain at C-3 showed higher cytotoxicity than the others.

Table 3.

Cytotoxicites of compounds 112 against five cancer cell lines.

Compounds IC50 ± SD (μM)
LN229 U251 Capan-2 HeLa HepG2 NHA
1 4.18 ± 0.31 3.85 ± 0.44 3.26 ± 0.34 3.30 ± 0.38 4.32 ± 0.51 >50
2 15.39 ± 0.47 15.76 ± 0.65 20.37 ± 1.05 22.3 ± 1.33 18.76 ± 1.25 >50
3 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
4 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
5 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
6 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
7 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
8 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
9 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
10 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
11 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
12 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
Doxorubicin a 0.35 ± 0.05 0.21 ± 0.04 0.18 ± 0.02 0.18 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.02 >50

a Positive control.

2.5. Prediction of Potential Targets of Paris Saponins against Glioma by Network Pharmacology

2.5.1. The Collection of Potential Targets of Paris Saponins

According to the literature, seven common spirostanol Paris saponins with strong antitumor activity were selected. The 2D molecular structure of Paris saponins (polyphyllin Ⅰ, polyphyllin Ⅱ, polyphyllin Ⅵ, paris saponin Ⅶ, polyphyllin H, dioscin and gracillin) were obtained from the PubChem database, and the SMILES of Paris saponins were confirmed by CAS number in the Pubchem database. As a result, more than 100 targets for each Paris saponins were found. After summarizing and removing the repeated parts, a total of 207 targets were identified for these compounds (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Intersectional targets of Paris saponins.

2.5.2. The Common Targets of Paris Saponins against Glioma

A total of 5435 glioma-related gene targets were found in the GeneCards database. The Glioma-related genes and drug-target genes were screened through Venn mapping to screen out 151 common targets. The Uniprot database was used to rectify and normalize (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The Venn diagram of Paris saponins and glioma targets.

2.5.3. PPI Network of Paris Saponins and Glioma

PPI networks can study the molecular mechanisms and drug targets of complex diseases from a systematic perspective. Cytoscape was used to treat the targets. The darker the color in the figure, the deeper the interaction with other targets. A PPI network of Paris saponins and glioma-related targets was constructed (Figure 7). The circles represent proteins, and the lines represent interactions, and 151 targets were summarized (Figure 8). A total of 151 targets were involved and a total of 33 major targets were screened by MCODE. As a result, GRB2, SRC, STAT3, PIK3CA, PTPN11 have the most interactions in 33 circles (Figure 9).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

PPI network of the 151 targets.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The target of Paris saponins in preventing and treating glioma cancer.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

The key target of Paris saponins in preventing and treating glioma cancer screened by MCODE.

2.5.4. KEGG Function Analysis

KEGG analysis revealed that key targets were mainly enriched in 9 signal pathways (Figure 10), including EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, the Ras signaling pathway, the Calcium signaling pathway, Adherens junction, Gap junction, Transcriptional misregulation in cancer, bladder cancer, the Adipocytokine signaling pathway and Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. Among them, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance and the Ras signaling pathway are mostly enriched. The results suggest that Paris saponins may play a role in the treatment of glioma through the aforementioned ways.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Analysis of KEGG Function.

2.5.5. GO Function Enrichment Analysis

GO enrichment analysis showed the anti-tumor effect of Paris saponins in biological processes. The abscissa is the GO pathway, and the ordinate is the enrichment score. The results are shown in bubble charts. The results show that BP have positive regulation in the transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway (Figure 11). The enrichment target in CC is mostly receptor complex (Figure 11). The enrichment targets in MF are mostly plasma membrane signaling receptor complex (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Analysis of GO Function.

2.6. Compound 1 Induce the Apoptosis of Glioma Cells LN229 by Activating EGFR/PI3K/Akt/Mtor Pathway

Flow cytometry analysis was used to measure the apoptosis effect of compound 1 against glioma cells LN229. Annexin V+/PI represents the apoptotic cells and annexin V/PI represents the living cells. After being treated with different concentrations of compound 1 for 24 h, the ratio of apoptotic LN229 was increased, while the ratio of living cells was decreased, which indicated that compound 1 could induce the apoptosis of glioma cells significantly (Figure 12a). Then, the expression of the apoptosis-related proteins was examined by western blot experiment. The results showed that the expression of Bax/Bcl-2, cleaved caspase 3, and cytochrome c in the compound 1 treated with LN229 were significantly increased compared with the control group (Figure 12b). Furthermore, the results of western blot showed that compound 1 significantly suppressed the phosphorylation levels of EGFR in LN229, while having no evident effect on the expression of total EGFR. Similarly, the expression level of p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR was decreased in LN229 cells after treatment with compound 1 (Figure 12c). In conclusion, all these data suggested that compound 1 treatment could inactivate EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in glioma cells LN229.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Compound 1 induced apoptosis of glioma cells LN229. (a) LN229 were treated with graded concentrations of compound 1 and stained with PI and Annexin V-FITC for flow cytometry analyses; (b) compound 1 increase the expression Bax/Bcl-2, cytochrome c and cleaved caspase 3; (c) compound 1 could regulated protein expression in EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. (n = 3, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to the control group. ## p < 0.01, compared to group 2 μM).

3. Discussion

According to the literature, D-glucose, L-arabinose, and D-rhamnose are common in the oligosaccharide of steroidal saponins, while fucose is rare [9]. Therefore, fructosyl has only been found in the natural product once from the family Agavaceae [16]. Interestingly, two naturally occurring fructosyl-containing steroidal saponins were isolated and identified from P. polyphylla var. latifolia in this study. Furthermore, this is the first study to report fructosyl-containing steroidal saponins from genus Paris and the family Melanthiaceae.

The method of network pharmacology was used to explore the underlying mechanism of compound 1 to inhibit the proliferation of glioma cells LN229. Network pharmacology is a drug research strategy proposed on the basis of system biology and multidirectional pharmacology. By constructing the “glioma-Paris saponins” interaction network and screening key targets and biological processes, we evaluated the potential mechanism of Paris saponins against glioma from the overall level, and tested the accuracy of the network pharmacological prediction by taking the new compound 1 as an example in vitro.

EGFR is overexpressed in most human glioblastomas and plays a key role in tumor formation [28]. Therefore, treatments specifically targeting EGFR and its downstream pathways in glioblastoma cells may have potential therapeutic effects. It is well known that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is regulated by EGFR and is closely related to cell growth, autophagy, and proliferation [29]. In this study, key proteins in the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, such as p-EGFR, p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR, were significantly inhibited by compound 1.

In summary, the phytochemical investigation of Paris polyphylla var. latifolia resulted in the isolation of three new saponins (13), and nine known saponins (412). Compounds 1 and 2 possessed a fructosyl in their oligosaccharide moiety, which was rare in natural product and was firstly reported in family Melanthiaceae. Meanwhile, the results of cytotoxic assay showed that compounds 1 and 2 possessed significant cytotoxic effects on LN229, U251, Capan-2, HeLa and HepG2 cancer cells. The result of network pharmacology screening indicated that EGFR might be the potential target of Paris saponins against glioma cells. In addition, the results of flow cytometry and western bolt experiments confirmed that compound 1 induces glioma cell apoptosis by regulating the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. The findings in this study indicated that compound 1 could be a potential inhibitor of EGFR for the treatment of glioma.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 241 MC digital polarimeter (German PerkinElmer Corporation, Boelingen, Germany). 1D and 2D-NMR spectral experiments were measured in CD3OD on a Bruker AVANCE-800 spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany) with TMS as an internal standard. The HR-ESI-MS spectra were carried out on AB SCIEX X500R high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). GC-MS analysis was performed on an Agilent GC-MS 6890-5973 instrument equipped with an RXI-5 SIL MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). Column chromatography (CC) was operated on a Sephadex LH-20 (GE-Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), Pure C-810 middle pressure liquid chromatography (BUCHI, Flawil, Switzerland), and silica gel H (10−40 µm, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., Qingdao, China). Standards for D-glucose (D-Glc), L-rhamnose (L-Rha), D-fructose (D-Fru), and L-arabinose (L-Ara) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Plant Materials

The rhizomes of Paris polyohylla var. latifolia were collected from Baoji, Shannxi Province, China, in August 2021 and identified by the corresponding author Hai-Feng Tang. The voucher specimen (No. 20210802) was deposited in the Department of Chinese Materia Medica and Natural Medicines, School of Pharmacy, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China.

4.3. Extraction and Isolation

The dried rhizomes of Paris polyohylla var. latifolia (2.8 kg) were chopped and refluxed with 70% ethanol (10.0 L) quintic (each 2 h). The ethanol solution was mixed and condensed by a vacuum rotary evaporator to receive a syrupy residue (611.7 g). Then, the syrupy residue was suspended in water (3.5 L) and extracted with petroleum ether and water saturated n-BuOH, successively. The water saturated n-BuOH layer was evaporated to afford the total saponins (135.0 g). The total saponins were separated by silica gel column chromatography and gradually eluted by CH2Cl2-MeOH-H2O (100:0:0, 50:1:0, 20:1:0, 8:1:0.1, 6:1:0.1, 7:2.5:0.1 and 6.5:3.5:0.1) to offer 19 sub-fractions (Fr.1–Fr.19) based on the result of the TLC analysis.

Fr.14 was purified by a Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography to remove pigmentum and to afford Fr.14-1 (4.2 g), Fr.14-2 (5.0 g), and Fr.14-3 (430.5 mg). Fr.14-1 was purified by a semi-preparative HPLC using MeCN-H2O (35:65) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 15.0 mL/min to afford compounds 9 (5.7 mg, tR = 28.9 min) and 10 (7.6 mg, tR = 31.2 min).

Fr.15 was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography to remove pigmentum and was further purified by middle pressure liquid chromatography to obtain Fr.15-1 (128.5 mg) and Fr.15-2 (245.6 mg). Compounds 1 (9.8 mg, tR = 18.0 min), 2 (15.8 mg, tR = 18.5 min), 3 (15.2 mg, tR = 21.0 min), 4 (25.6 mg, tR = 21.8 min), 5 (28.5 mg, tR = 25.0 min), 6 (40.7 mg, tR = 29.0 min), and 11 (70.4 mg, tR = 31.0 min) were offered by semi-preparative HPLC eluting with MeCN-H2O (40:60) at a flow rate of 15.0 mL/min from Fr.15-1.

Fr.16 was separated by silica gel column chromatography and eluted with CH2Cl2-MeOH-H2O (8:1:0.1, 8:2:0.2, 7:2.5:0.1, and 6:3:0.1) to give Fr.16-1 (1.1 g) and Fr.16-2 (430.5 mg). Fr.16-1 was separated on middle pressure liquid chromatography to afford Fr.16-1-1 (64.7 mg), Fr.16-1-2 (57.4 mg), and Fr-16-1-3 (145.3 mg). Then, Fr.16-1-1 and Fr.16-1-3 were isolated by semi-preparative HPLC eluting with MeCN-H2O (7:12, 2:3) at a flow rate of 15.0 mL/min to afford compounds 7 (9.1 mg, tR = 24.3 min), 8 (21.4 mg, tR = 28.5 min) and 12 (16.5 mg, tR = 37.5 min), respectively.

  • Compound 1: white amorphous solid; αD22=71.2 (c 0.1, MeOH); 1H (800 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C (200 MHz, CD3OD) NMR data, see Table 1 and Table 2; HR-ESI-MS m/z 885.4854 [M + H]+ (calculated for C45H73O17, 885.4848).

  • Compound 2: white amorphous solid; αD22=87.3 (c 0.1, MeOH); 1H (800 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C (200 MHz, CD3OD) NMR data, see Table 1 and Table 2; HR-ESI-MS m/z 1017.5258 [M + H]+ (calculated for C50H81O21, 1017.5270).

  • Compound 3: white amorphous solid; αD22=129.5 (c 0.1, MeOH); 1H (800 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C (200 MHz, CD3OD) NMR data, see Table 1 and Table 2; HR-ESI-MS m/z 781.3653 [M − H] (calculated for C39H57O16, 781.3647).

4.4. Acid Hydrolysis of Compounds 13 and GC-MS Analysis

The absolute configuration of monosaccharides of compounds 13 was analyzed by GC-MS according to the method described in the literature [30]. Compounds 13 (2.0 mg each) were heated for 90 min at 110 °C in a tube containing 1 mL of 2 M trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). This dilutes the reaction mixture in 2 mL of distilled water and reduces it with 100 mg NaBH4, acetylated with acetic anhydride at 100 °C for 1 h. Standard monosaccharides (D-Glc, L-Rha, L-Araf and D-Fru, 2.0 mg each) were treated as acetylated derivatives using the same methodology. Finally, the acetylated products were analyzed by the following methods: GC-MS was performed under the following conditions: carrier gas He (1.0 mL/min), injection volume of 1.0 μL, injector, temperature of 250 °C. The column temperature program rose within 120–250 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min and remained at 250 °C for 5 min.

The absolute configuration of the sugar fraction in compounds 13 was identified as D-Glc (tR = 29.83 min), L-Rha (tR = 18.62 min), L-Araf (tR = 19.94 min), and D-Fru (tR = 30.87 min), comparing retention time to standard monosaccharides.

4.5. Network Pharmacologic Prediction

4.5.1. The Collection of Potential Targets of Paris Saponins

The SMILES of Paris saponins (polyphyllin I, polyphyllin II, polyphyllin VI, paris saponin VII, polyphyllin H, dioscin and gracillin) were obtained from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (accessed on 1 July 2022) by confirming the CAS number. The SMILES were imported into the Swisstarget database (http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/) (accessed on 2 July 2022), the parameters were set, “Human Protein Targets Only” were set, and the targets were obtained. Next, the gene information and protein targets were corrected using the Uniprot database (http://www.uniprot.org/uploadlists/) (accessed on 3 July 2022) to obtain more reliable targets.

4.5.2. The Collection of Gene Targets Related to Glioma

The GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/) (accessed on 23 June 2022) is a searchable, integrative database that provides comprehensive information on all annotated and predicted human genes. The knowledgebase automatically integrates gene-centric data from 150 web sources, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, genetic, clinical, and functional information. The gene targets related to glioma were searched using this database, with “glioma” as the key word, to obtain gene targets related to glioma.

4.5.3. Screening of Potential Targets

The Glioma-related targets and the targets of Paris saponins were screened using Venn (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/) (accessed on 6 July 2022). Their intersection could be the potential targets of Paris saponins against glioma.

4.5.4. Construction of a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network

The String database (https://string-db.org/) (accessed on 7 July 2022) can be used as an effective protein interaction network database. Importing the potential targets to the String, the filter condition was set to “Human sapiens” and credibility to “medium confidence (0.400)”, then a Protein-Protein Interaction Network was built and the results were used to construct the primary target network in Cytoscape 3.9.0.

4.5.5. Biological Function Annotation and Pathway Analysis

A total of 38 targets were enriched by KEGG and GO. We selected the top ten items in GO and constructed a bar chart. In addition, the significantly enriched pathways were screened and bubble graphs were drawn.

4.6. In Vitro Biological Experiments

4.6.1. Cell Culture

U251 (human glioma cells), HeLa (human cervical cancer cells), and HepG2 (human hepatic cancer cells) were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (China), and Capan-2 (human pancreatic cancer cells) were obtained from Nanjing Cobioer Biosicences (Nanjing, China). American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) provided LN229 (human glioma cells). NHA (Gibco Human Astrocytes) and Gibco Astrocyte Medium (DMEM, N-2 Supplement, One Shot fetal bovine serum) were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The LN229, U251, HepG2 and HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM (Procell, Wuhan, China). The Capan-2 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Procell, Wuhan, China) and NHA cells were cultured in Gibco Astrocyte Medium, supplemented with 10% FBS (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and 1% Penicillin–Streptomycin (Elabscience Biotechnology Co.,Ltd, Wuhan, China) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

4.6.2. Antibodies and Reagents

Primary antibodies against Bax (50599-2-Ig), Bcl-2 (26593-1-AP), Akt (10176-2-AP), p-Akt (28731-1-AP), PI3K (20584-1-AP), p-PI3K (60225-1-Ig), mTOR (28273-1-AP), p-mTOR (67778-1-Ig), Cytochrome C (10993-1-AP), β-actin (20536-1-AP), HRP-Goat-Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (SA00001-1), and HRP-Goat-Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (SA00001-2) were obtained from Proteintech Group, Inc. (Rosemont, USA). Primary antibodies against EGFR (WL0682a), p-EGFR (WL03432) and cleaved caspase 3 (WL01992) were obtained from Wanleibio (Shenyang, China).

4.6.3. Cytotoxic Assay

In the exponential phase of the growth, five tumor cell lines and one normal human astrocytes were plated onto 96-well plates at a concentration of 8000 cells/well for 24 h. Compounds 112 were prepared to various concentrations (64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 and 0.5 µM in medium containing less than 0.1% DMSO) and incubated in 96-well plates (each concentration in four-fold wells) for 24 h. Cell viability was determined according to reported assay methods using the commercial CCK-8 kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). The optical density (OD) of each well was measured with an AMR-100 microplate reader at 450 nm (Allsheng Corporation, Hangzhou, China). Cytotoxicity emerged as the value of the drug concentration at the inhibition of cell growth by 50% (IC50). The experiments were conducted for three independent replicates, and Doxorubicin was used as the positive control.

4.6.4. Flow Cytometry Analysis for Apoptosis

Flow cytometry was used to analyze the effect of 1 on the apoptosis of glioma cells LN229. Cells were treated with different concentrations of 1 for 24 h. Then, the cells were collected and washed twice with cold PBS for five minutes (1000 rpm). The cells were analyzed for apoptosis by flow cytometry (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) using the Annexin V-FITC/PI assay kit.

4.6.5. Western Blot Analysis

The LN229 cells were treated with various concentrations of 1 or 0.1% DMSO for 24 h. A BCA Protein Assay Kit was used to measure the protein concentration, then equal amounts of protein samples were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked for 2 h in Tris-buffered saline with PBST buffer, containing 5% skim milk. Then, the membranes were incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies overnight at 4 ℃. Then, the membranes were washed with PBST and reacted with a secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody. Image Lab 5.2.1 (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to analyze the blots after detection using enhanced chemiluminescence (Millipore). Data analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Data from three independent experiments were presented as mean ± SD. Differences between various experimental and control groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by unpaired Student’s T test, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.D.; Funding acquisition, H.-F.T.; Investigation, Y.L., W.-W.C. and P.-C.Q.; Methodology, M.-C.W.; Project administration, H.-F.T.; Software, K.L., Y.-Y.W. and X.-Y.Q.; Supervision, Y.-Y.L.; Validation, Y.C.; Writing–original draft, T.-Y.L.; Writing–review & editing, Y.-Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding Statement

This research was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81973192), Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province (2021ZDLSF04-07), Key Scientific Research Project of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2021-02-ZZ-003), Natural Science Basic Research Program Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2022JM-493), and Social R&D Program of Shaanxi Province (2022SF-314).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Passos F.R.S., Araujo-Filho H.G., Monteiro B.S., Shanmugam S., Araujo A.A.S., Almeida J., Thangaraj P., Junior L.J.Q., Quintans J.S.S. Anti-inflammatory and modulatory effects of steroidal saponins and sapogenins on cytokines: A review of pre-clinical research. Phytomedicine. 2022;96:153842. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sharma P., Tyagi A., Bhansali P., Pareek S., Singh V., Ilyas A., Mishra R., Poddar N.K. Saponins: Extraction, bio-medicinal properties and way forward to anti-viral representatives. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021;150:112075. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang X.F., Cui Y., Huang J.J., Zhang Y.Z., Nie Z., Wang L.F., Yan B.Z., Tang Y.L., Liu Y. Immuno-stimulating properties of diosgenyl saponins isolated from Paris polyphylla. Bioorg Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:2408–2413. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao Y.Z., Zhang Y.Y., Han H., Fan R.P., Hu Y., Zhong L., Kou J.P., Yu B.Y. Advances in the antitumor activities and mechanisms of action of steroidal saponins. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2018;16:732–748. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(18)30113-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kang L.P., Huang Y.Y., Zhan Z.L., Liu D.H., Peng H.S., Nan T.G., Zhang Y., Hao Q.X., Tang J.F., Zhu S.D., et al. Structural characterization and discrimination of the Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis and Paris vietnamensis based on metabolite profiling analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017;142:252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Niu W., Xu L., Li J., Zhai Y., Sun Z., Shi W., Jiang Y., Ma C., Lin H., Guo Y., et al. Polyphyllin II inhibits human bladder cancer migration and invasion by regulating EMT-associated factors and MMPs. Oncol. Lett. 2020;20:2928–2936. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qu L.L., Ma X.X., Fan D.D. Ginsenoside Rk3 Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development through Targeting the Gut-Liver Axis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021;69:10121–10137. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dong S., Guo X., Han F., He Z., Wang Y. Emerging role of natural products in cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2022;12:1163–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ding Y.G., Zhao Y.L., Zhang J., Zuo Z.T., Zhang Q.Z., Wang Y.Z. The traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological properties of Paris L. (Liliaceae): A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021;278:114293. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thapa C.B., Paudel M.R., Bhattarai H.D., Pant K.K., Devkota H.P., Adhikari Y.P., Pant B. Bioactive secondary metabolites in Paris polyphylla Sm. and their biological activities: A review. Heliyon. 2022;8:e08982. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hua D., Zhang W., Lu Y.Y., Liu Y., Wang X.Y., Li H., Tang H.F. Steroidal saponins and lignan glycosides from the rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. latifolia. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2018;81:27–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2018.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu Y., Qiu P., Wang M., Lu Y., He H., Tang H., Zhang B.L. New Steroidal Saponins Isolated from the Rhizomes of Paris mairei. Molecules. 2021;26:6366. doi: 10.3390/molecules26216366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu X., Wang L., Wang H., Dai Y., Ye W.C., Li Y.L. Steroidal saponins from Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Phytochemistry. 2012;81:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu L.L., Ling S.S., Gao W.T., Li Y.X., Xiao L.G., Ni W., Ji Y.H., Liu H.Y. Parisfargosides A-E, five new cholestane glycosides from the rhizomes of Paris fargesii. Fitoterapia. 2022;158:105174. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2022.105174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qin X.J., Zhang L.J., Zhang Y., Ni W., Yang X.Z., Yu Q., Yan H., An L.K., Liu H.Y. Polyphyllosides A-F, six new spirostanol saponins from the stems and leaves of Paris polyphylla var. chinensis. Bioorg Chem. 2020;99:103788. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takaashi Y., Mimaki Y., Kuroda M., Sashida Y. Recurvosides A-E, New Polyhydroxylated Steroidal Saponins from Nolina recurvata Stems. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:2281–2292. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(94)01098-K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Agrawal P.K. 25R/25S stereochemistry of spirostane-type steroidal sapogenins and steroidal saponins via chemical shift of geminal protons of ring F. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2003;41:965–968. doi: 10.1002/mrc.1278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li H.Z., Ding J., Cheng C.R., Chen Y., Liang X.Y. β-L-Arabinofuranosylation Conducted by 5-O-(2-pyridinecarbonyl)-L-arabinofuranosyl Trichloroacetimidate. Carbohydr. Res. 2018;460:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qin X.J., Chen C.X., Ni W., Yan H., Liu H.Y. C(22)-steroidal lactone glycosides from stems and leaves of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Fitoterapia. 2013;84:248–251. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miyamura M., Nakano K., Nohara T., Tomimatsu T., Kawasaki T. Steroid Saponins from Paris polyphylla SM.-Supplement. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1982;30:712–718. doi: 10.1248/cpb.30.712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shen S., Li G., Huang J., Chen C., Ren B., Lu G., Tan Y., Zhang J., Li X., Wang J. Steroidal saponins from Fritillaria pallidiflora Schrenk. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:785–794. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xiao C.M., Huang J., Zhong X.M., Tan X.Y., Deng P.C. Two New Homo-aro-cholestane Glycosides and a New Cholestane Glycoside from the Roots and Rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. pseudothibetica. Helv. Chim. Acta. 2009;92:2587–2595. doi: 10.1002/hlca.200800426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huang Y., Wang Q., Ye W.C., Cui L.J. A New Homo-cholestane Glycoside from Paris polyphylla var. chinensis. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2005;3:138–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tagawa C., Okawa M., Ikeda T., Yoshida T., Nohara T. Homo-cholestane glycosides from Solanum aethiopicum. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:4839–4841. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01147-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yin J., Kouda K., Tezuka Y., Tran Q.L., Miyahara T., Chen Y., Kadota S. Steroidal glycosides from the rhizomes of Dioscorea spongiosa. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66:646–650. doi: 10.1021/np0205957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nohara T., Yabuta H., Suenobu M., Hida R., Miyahara K., Kawasaki T. Steroid glycosides in Paris polyphylla SM. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1973;21:1240–1247. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu Y., Liu M.Y., Bi L.L., Tian Y.Y., Qiu P.C., Qian X.Y., Wang M.C., Tang H.F., Lu Y.Y., Zhang B.L. Cytotoxic steroidal glycosides from the rhizomes of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Phytochemistry. 2022;207:113577. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eskilsson E., Rosland G.V., Solecki G., Wang Q., Harter P.N., Graziani G., Verhaak R.G.W., Winkler F., Bjerkvig R., Miletic H. EGFR heterogeneity and implications for therapeutic intervention in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:743–752. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zaryouh H., De Pauw I., Baysal H., Peeters M., Vermorken J.B., Lardon F., Wouters A. Recent insights in the PI3K/Akt pathway as a promising therapeutic target in combination with EGFR-targeting agents to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Med. Res. Rev. 2022;42:112–155. doi: 10.1002/med.21806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fan R., Xie Y., Zhu C., Qiu D., Zeng J., Liu Z. Structural elucidation of an acidic polysaccharide from Citrus grandis ‘Tomentosa’ and its anti-proliferative effects on LOVO and SW620 cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;138:511–518. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES