Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Apr 27;13:6911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33439-x

The impact of sarcopenia on overall survival in patients with pan-RAS wild-type colorectal liver metastasis receiving hepatectomy

Yao-Ren Yang 1,#, Chung-Sheng Shi 2,#, Sheng-Wei Chang 3, Yu-Ying Wu 1, Yu-Li Su 4, Geng-Ping Lin 5, Feng-Che Kuan 1,
PMCID: PMC10140270  PMID: 37106073

Abstract

Sarcopenia has been associated with conventional chemotherapy-related toxicity, postoperative complications and poor overall survival in patients with genotype-unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of sarcopenia and its change after perioperative cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy and hepatectomy in patients with RAS wild-type colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Patients with CRLM from 2007 to 2018 in Chang Gung Research Database were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics as well as skeletal muscle index (SMI) at baseline and dynamic changes after interventions were collected. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the effect of each parameter on overall survival (OS), and the Kaplan–Meier method was used to establish survival curves. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significance. Of 214 RAS wild-type mCRC patients who received both cetuximab and doublet chemotherapy, 77 who received upfront or subsequent hepatectomy were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 2.3 years. The rate of sarcopenia was higher in the patients who received neoadjuvant cetuximab-containing regimens than in those who received upfront hepatectomy (95% versus 63%, p = 0.001). Increased SMI after perioperative systemic therapy remained independently associated with better OS in multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.27/10% increase, p = 0.013). The patients with sarcopenia had a trend of worse OS than those without sarcopenia (median OS: 4.5 versus 3.6 years, log-rank p = 0.282). Improvement in sarcopenia ([SMI after intervention − initial SMI]/initial SMI × 100%) is an important prognostic factor for OS. Future research is warranted to investigate direct interventions for sarcopenia and the impact on OS.

Subject terms: Cancer, Health care, Risk factors

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide with the second highest mortality rate1,2. The overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been extended from 21 to 26–28 months after the addition of biologics to chemotherapy doublet35. The most common site of CRC metastasis is the liver, and surgical resection can further extend survival and is the only potential curative treatment for colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRLM)6,7. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway, can improve the response rate, depth of response and conversion rate in patients with oncogene in the rat sarcoma virus (RAS) wild-type mCRC8,9.

Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass plus impaired muscle strength or physical performance10, and it has been suggested to potentially be a poor prognostic factor for OS in both non-metastatic CRC and mCRC1117. Higher postoperative complications, especially infectious complications, have been shown in CRC patients with sarcopenia16,18,19. In addition, sarcopenic patients are susceptible to the toxicity of chemotherapy, and higher rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity, especially neutropenia, have been reported in patients with both non-metastatic CRC and mCRC20,21. A recent meta-analysis of studies with mostly conventional chemotherapy in RAS-unselected patients found that sarcopenia was associated with poorer OS in patients with CRLM after local therapy22.

However, whether sarcopenia is a prognostic or predictive factor for RAS wild-type patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection and perioperative cetuximab-based treatment is largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive roles of sarcopenia in mCRC and its treatment.

Materials and methods

Data collection

This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH-IRB No.201900703B0A3). Institutional Review Broad (IRB) approval was obtained, which included a waiver of individual patient consent. And the methods in this retrospective study were carried out in accordance with the approved guideline and regulation.

Patients who were initially diagnosed with CRLM were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD)23. Medical records were reviewed and patients who met the following criteria were enrolled: (1) CRLM with wild-type pan-RAS (including mutations of exon 2, 3, 4 in KRAS and NRAS), and (2) receiving cetuximab-containing regimens (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) within 180 days after diagnosis and hepatic metastasectomy, including either upfront or subsequent hepatectomy. Patients without complete staging information, including abdominal and chest computed tomography and colonoscopy were excluded. Those without pathologic evidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma were also excluded. The included patients were arbitrarily divided into two groups: those who received neoadjuvant cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy (CT) followed by hepatic (H) metastasectomy (CT-H group, n = 45), and those who received upfront hepatic metastasectomy followed by cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy (H-CT group, n = 32).

The patients’ demographic data were collected including sex and age (< 60 years or ≥ 60 years). Laboratory data at the initial diagnosis, including CEA (< 20 ng/ml or ≥ 20 ng/ml) and albumin (< 3.5 g/dl or ≥ 3.5 g/dl) were also recorded. Computed tomography taken within 3 months of the initial diagnosis was used to evaluate baseline skeletal muscle area (SMA) and liver tumor burden. Corresponding follow-up images were collected at around 3 months after cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy or hepatic metastasectomy to compare changes in muscle mass.

Diagnosis of sarcopenia: measurement of muscle mass

Two consecutive computed tomographic cross-sectional images extending from L3 to the iliac crest were used to measure SMA. A Hounsfield unit (HU) between − 29 and + 150 was identified as skeletal muscle24. Cross-sectional areas of all skeletal muscles, including the psoas muscle, abdominal wall muscles (rectus abdominus, internal and external obliques and transversus abdominus), and paraspinal muscles (erector spinae and quadratus lumborum) were summed. L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated as all SMA/height (cm2/m2), and the cut-off point for sarcopenia was defined according to Prado’s study (38.5 cm2/m2 for females and 52.4 cm2/m2 for males)24. The change in SMI was defined as (SMI after intervention − initial SMI)/initial SMI × 100%.

Statistical analysis

Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare differences between the two groups (H-CT group and CT-H group). OS was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis of CRLM to the date of death or loss of follow-up, whichever occurred first. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to establish survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare different curves. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the effect of each parameter on OS. We considered a two-sided p value < 0.05 as statistically significance. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

A total of 3,880 patients who were initially diagnosed with colorectal cancer and liver metastasis between January 2007 and January 2018 were identified in the CGRD (Fig. 1). Frontline cetuximab was not reimbursed by the Taiwan National Health Insurance program until December 2012. Of the 3,880 patients, 214 had wild-type RAS and received both cetuximab and doublet chemotherapy in a perioperative setting. Among these patients, 77 received hepatic metastasectomy. There were 45 and 32 patients in the CT-H and H-CT groups, respectively, of whom 40 and 27 had baseline and follow-up images.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Step-wise inclusion process.

Baseline characteristics

The demographics of the included patients are shown in Table 1. The baseline characteristics of the CT-H and H-CT groups were similar in sex, age, tumor sidedness, serum albumin and serum CEA, except for sarcopenia. Patients in the CT-H group had a significantly higher rate of sarcopenia (CT-H versus H-CT group: 95% versus 63%, p = 0.001). In addition, higher volume percentage of liver occupied by metastatic lesions have relatively lower initial SMI (Supplement Figs. 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of CT-H and H-CT patients.

Variables All CT-H H-CT p value
n % n % n %
Total 77 45 32
Sex 0.389
 Female 27 35.1 14 31.1 13 40.6
 Male 50 64.9 31 68.9 19 59.4
Age, years 0.082
 < 60 45 58.4 30 66.7 15 46.9
 ≥ 60 32 41.6 15 33.7 17 53.1
Sidedness of colon 0.422
 Left 46 59.7 25 55.6 21 65.6
 Right 8 10.4 4 8.9 7 21.9
 Rectal 23 29.9 16 35.6 4 12.5
Albumin, g/dl 0.855
 < 3.5 43 61.4 28 62.2 15 60.0
 ≥ 3.5 27 38.6 17 37.8 10 40.0
CEA, ng/ml 0.887
 < 20 49 73.1 29 72.5 20 74.1
 ≥ 20 18 26.9 11 27.5 7 25.9
Sarcopenia 0.001
 No 12 17.9 2 5.0 10 37.0
 Yes 55 82.1 38 95.0 17 63.0
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
SMI change after CT, % − 1.3 16.0 − 1.7 17.3 − 0.7 14.3 0.803
SMI change after OP, % − 5.4 17.2 − 3.5 17.7 − 14.8 11.4 0.094

The mean changes in SMI in the CT-H and H-CT groups after cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy were − 1.7% and − 0.7%, respectively (p = 0.803), and the mean changes after hepatectomy were − 3.5% and − 14.8%, respectively (p = 0.094).

Prognostic factors for overall survival

The median OS of the patients was 3.7 years, with a median follow-up of 2.3 years (Fig. 2A). In univariate analysis of OS, tumor sidedness [left-sided and rectum versus right-sided cancer] (p = 0.009 and p = 0.048, respectively), and the changes in SMI after chemotherapy (HR: 0.72 per 10-unit increase in SMI, p = 0.027) and hepatectomy (HR: 0.72 per 10-unit increase of SMI, p = 0.028) were significant prognostic factors. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, improvement in SMI after chemotherapy remained the only significant prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.27, p = 0.013) (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Median survival time for all patients: 3.7 years. (B) Median survival time for the patients with left-sided tumors: 4 years; rectal tumors: 2.9 years; right-sided tumors: 1.5 years; (C) median survival time for the CT-H group: 3.7 years and H-CT group: 4.0 years.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival.

Variables Crude HR p value adjusted HR p value
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Gender
 Female Ref Ref
 Male 1.25 (0.58–2.69) 0.574 1.18 (0.18–7.88) 0.866
Age, years
 < 60 Ref Ref
 ≥ 60 0.66 (0.31–1.41) 0.282 0.64 (0.11–3.70) 0.622
Sidedness of tumor
 Left-sided colon 0.28 (0.11–0.73) 0.009 0.06 (0.01–1.06) 0.054
 Right-sided colon Ref Ref
 Rectal 0.33 (0.11–0.99) 0.048 0.70 (0.05–9.46) 0.789
Albumin, g/dl
 < 3.5 Ref Ref
 ≥ 3.5 1.00 (0.47–2.14) 0.998 0.38 (0.07–2.06) 0.263
CEA, ng/ml
 < 20 Ref Ref
 ≥ 20 0.98 (0.41–2.38) 0.967 1.58 (0.21–11.8) 0.654
Sarcopenia
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 1.92 (0.57–6.44) 0.293 3.48 (0.26–47.2) 0.349
Treatment
 CT-H 0.78 (0.37–1.62) 0.505 0.35 (0.05–2.32) 0.274
 H-CT Ref Ref
 SMI change after CT* 0.72 (0.53–0.96) 0.027 0.27 (0.10–0.76) 0.013
 SMI change after OP* 0.72 (0.54–0.97) 0.028 1.52 (0.77–2.97) 0.226

*HRs were calculated by per 10% increase of SMI.

The OS rates of the patients with left-sided colon and rectal cancers were better than that of the patients with right-sided cancers (median OS: 4 and 2.9 years versus 1.5 years, log-rank p = 0.022) (Fig. 2B). There was no significant difference in OS between the CT-H and H-CT groups (log-rank p = 0.508) (Fig. 2C). There was a trend of better OS in the patients without sarcopenia (4.5 versus 3.6 years, log-rank p = 0.282) (Fig. 3A). The magnitude of change in SMI was positively correlated with OS (Fig. 3B,C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Median survival time of the patients with sarcopenia: 3.6 years: without sarcopenia: 4.5 years; (B) probability of death by percentage change in SMI after chemotherapy; (C) probability of death by percentage change in SMI after hepatectomy.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show a positive correlation between increased OS and SMI after perioperative treatment with a cetuximab-containing regimen in patients with RAS wild-type CRLM. A previous study reported an independent association between losing more than 9% of skeletal muscle per 3 months during palliative chemotherapy with poor OS. However, none of the enrolled patients received a cetuximab-containing regimen, and RAS mutation status was not reported15. While both cetuximab combined with doublet chemotherapy and hepatic metastasectomy can improve the outcomes of mCRC, we focused on the prognostic implications of sarcopenia and its change after treatment in this study. Our results showed that change in sarcopenia was a strong prognostic factor for OS in patients with RAS wild-type CRLM.

The operational definitions of sarcopenia are inconsistent across international working groups, but they are characterized by loss of muscle mass, muscle strength and performance2529. Measuring the total muscle area around the third lumber vertebrae (L3) using computed tomography can strongly predict the ratio of whole-body fat to fat-free mass, and it has become a very convenient tool to evaluate secondary sarcopenia in patients with colorectal cancer30. The widely used cut-off point of skeletal mass loss in sarcopenia is according to Prado’s study (38.5 cm2/m2 for females and 52.4 cm2/m2 for males)24. The prevalence of sarcopenia in a recent meta-analysis of trials with heterogenous definitions of sarcopenia varied greatly in patients with CRLM ranging from 17 to 65%22, due in part to different cut-off points. In the present study, approximately 82% of the patients had sarcopenia, and surprisingly the prevalence of sarcopenia was higher in the CT-H group than in the H-CT group (95% versus 63%, p = 0.001). This could be partially because those who received upfront cetuximab-containing systemic treatment had more severe initial involvement of the liver, which could cause physiologic derangements such as anorexia, organ dysfunction and decreased activity10. In addition, previous studies have suggested that CRLM is associated with an altered microenvironment with high levels of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-6, which could subsequently promote sarcopenia31,32.

Previous studies have suggested that sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor for OS in both non-metastatic CRC and mCRC1114. However, the correlation between sarcopenia and OS is inconclusive in patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM. A recent meta-analysis concluded that sarcopenia is associated with a poorer OS based on trials including mostly RAS-unselected patients receiving conventional chemotherapy without the current widely used biologics22. Thus, whether this conclusion can be applied to patients with wild-type RAS receiving cetuximab is unknown. In the present study, the patients with sarcopenia had a trend of poorer OS compared to those without sarcopenia (median OS: 3.6 years versus 4.5 years, log-rank p = 0.282), and the difference (> 10 months) is of clinical significance. In addition, all eight patients with right-sided tumors had sarcopenia, which may have diluted the effect in multivariate analysis since sidedness has been reported to be an important prognostic factor in these patients33.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study with relatively small number of patients. However, we enrolled patients receiving both perioperative cetuximab-based doublet chemotherapy and hepatectomy, which are considered to be important prognostic factors for OS in modern real-world practice. Second, sarcopenia was evaluated only by skeletal muscle mass without performance status or strength. We used the widely accepted criteria for sarcopenia, and showed a higher prevalence in patients with more severe involvement of liver metastasis. Third, there was an association between an improvement in sarcopenia and better OS, however it is not clear whether interventions for sarcopenia can impact survival itself.

Conclusion

Improvement in sarcopenia after perioperative treatment with a cetuximab-containing regimen is an important prognostic factor for OS in patients with RAS wild-type CRLM after hepatectomy. Future research is warranted to investigate direct interventions for sarcopenia and the impact on OS.

Supplementary Information

Author contributions

Y.-R.Y. and C.-S.S. designed and analyzed the study, and wrote the manuscript. S.-W.C., Y.-Y.W. and Y.-L.S. provided data curation and resources. G.-p.L. provided Formal analysis. F.-C.K. provided supervision, project administration, manuscript editing.

Data availability

Data and codes can be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yao-Ren Yang and Chung-Sheng Shi.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-33439-x.

References

  • 1.Sawicki, et al. A review of colorectal cancer in terms of epidemiology, risk factors, development, symptoms and diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:9. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aparicio J, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer. First line therapy for unresectable disease. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:12. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tournigand C, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized GERCOR study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22(2):229–237. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lenz HJ, et al. Impact of consensus molecular subtype on survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from CALGB/SWOG 80405 (alliance) J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37(22):1876–1885. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2005;55(1):10–30. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kopetz S, et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27(22):3677–3683. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Van Cutsem E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360(14):1408–1417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Van Cutsem E, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29(15):2011–2019. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vergara-Fernandez O, Trejo-Avila M, Salgado-Nesme N. Sarcopenia in patients with colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review. World J. Clin. Cases. 2020;8(7):1188–1202. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i7.1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Choi MH, et al. Sarcopenia is negatively associated with long-term outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(1):53–59. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hopkins JJ, et al. The impact of muscle and adipose tissue on long-term survival in patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2019;62(5):549–560. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.da Cunha LP, et al. Sarcopenia as an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective evaluation. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN. 2019;32:107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vashi PG, et al. Sarcopenia supersedes subjective global assessment as a predictor of survival in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blauwhoff-Buskermolen S, et al. Loss of muscle mass during chemotherapy is predictive for poor survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34(12):1339–1344. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang DD, et al. Sarcopenia, as defined by low muscle mass, strength and physical performance, predicts complications after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(11):O256–O264. doi: 10.1111/codi.13067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peng PD, et al. Sarcopenia negatively impacts short-term outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. HPB (Oxford) 2011;13(7):439–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00301.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakanishi R, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Surg. Today. 2018;48(2):151–157. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1564-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lieffers JR, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with postoperative infection and delayed recovery from colorectal cancer resection surgery. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;107(6):931–936. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barret M, et al. Sarcopenia is linked to treatment toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Nutr. Cancer. 2014;66(4):583–589. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2014.894103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jung H-W, et al. Effect of muscle mass on toxicity and survival in patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Support. Care Cancer. 2015;23(3):687–694. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2418-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Waalboer RB, et al. Sarcopenia and long-term survival outcomes after local therapy for colorectal liver metastasis: A meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2022;24(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsai MS, et al. Chang Gung Research Database: A multi-institutional database consisting of original medical records. Biomed. J. 2017;40(5):263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Prado CM, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: A population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):629–635. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Muscaritoli M, et al. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: Joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) "cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases" and "nutrition in geriatrics". Clin. Nutr. 2010;29(2):154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fielding RA, et al. Sarcopenia: An undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: Prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2011;12(4):249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morley JE, et al. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: An international consensus. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2011;12(6):403–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen LK, et al. Recent advances in sarcopenia research in Asia: 2016 update from the Asian Working Group for sarcopenia. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2016;17(8):767.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mourtzakis M, et al. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2008;33(5):997–1006. doi: 10.1139/H08-075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goodla L, Xue X. The role of inflammatory mediators in colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis. Cells. 2022;11:15. doi: 10.3390/cells11152313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Visser M, et al. Relationship of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha with muscle mass and muscle strength in elderly men and women: The Health ABC Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2002;57(5):M326–M332. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.5.M326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bajrić T, et al. Sarcopenia and primary tumor location influence patients outcome after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022;48(3):615–620. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data and codes can be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES