Abstract
The etiology of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) is associated with alterations in the production of amyloid beta (Aβ) species caused by mutations in the APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 genes. Mutations affect intra- or inter-molecular interactions and processes between the γ-secretase complex and amyloid precursor protein (APP), leading to the aberrant sequential cleavage of Aβ species. A 64-year-old woman presented with progressive memory decline, mild right hippocampal atrophy, and a family history of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). Whole exome sequencing was performed to evaluate AD-related gene mutations, which were verified by Sanger sequencing. A mutation-caused structural alteration of APP was predicted using in silico prediction programs. Two AD-related mutations, in APP (rs761339914; c.G1651A; p.V551M) and PSEN2 (rs533813519; c.C505A; p.H169N), were identified. The APP Val551Met mutation in the E2 domain may influence APP homodimerization through changes in intramolecular interactions between adjacent amino acids, altering Aβ production. The second mutation was PSEN2 His169Asn mutation, which was previously reported in five EOAD patients from Korea and China, with a relatively high frequency in the East Asian population. According to a previous report, the presenilin 2 protein was predicted to result in a major helical torsion by PSEN2 His169Asn mutation. Notably, the co-existence of APP Val551Met and PSEN2 His169Asn may induce a synergistic effect by both mutations. Future functional studies are needed to clarify the pathological effects of these double mutations.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, double mutations, amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 2
1. Introduction
Mutations in the genes encoding amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PS1), and presenilin 2 (PS2) proteins affect amyloid beta (Aβ) generation, leading to altered APP cleavage and the pathophysiology underlying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression [1]. Patients with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) have numerous mutations in the aforementioned genes related to the deposition of extracellular Aβ plaques and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles by tau proteins in the brain [2]. Aβ peptides are generated by the sequential cleavage of APP by β-secretase and γ-secretase [3]. In the first stage by β-secretase cleavage, the ectodomain of APP is removed, leaving a 99 amino acid C-terminal fragment (C99 or APP CTFβ) on the membrane [4]. In a previous report, a Swedish double mutation located adjacent to the β-secretase cleavage site of APP has been found to increase the production and secretion of Aβ [5]. C99 is cleaved from the transmembrane domain by the γ-secretase complex to release the APP intracellular domain (AICD) from the membrane to the cytoplasm, followed by sequential cleavage to produce Aβ peptides of different lengths [6]. PS1 and PS2 are crucial γ-secretase components, which belong to a multiprotein complex composed of intramembrane proteases as well as nicastrin, presenilin enhancer 2, and anterior pharynx defective 1 [7]. Mutations in PSEN1 or PSEN2 may cause the structural instability of γ-secretase, which affects the production of longer Aβ peptides during APP processing [8]. Based on the Alzforum database (http://www.alzforum.org/mutations, assessed on 14 February 2023), mutations in PSEN1 have been reported in 357 cases, which typically resulted in increased Aβ42 secretion compared with Aβ40 secretion [9]. PSEN2, which has 87 reported rare mutations, is highly homologous to PSEN1. Recent studies have reported several PSEN2 mutations in Asia, mostly in Korea and China [10]. Disease penetrations of PSEN2 mutations in AD seemed to be variable with clinical profiles and the age of onset ranging from 40 to 80 years across patients [11].
This article describes the clinical phenotype of a 64-year-old Korean woman with EOAD who had double mutations in APP and PSEN2, which included a novel APP Val551Met mutation and a PSEN2 His169Asn previously reported in Asian patients [12,13,14,15].
2. Results
2.1. Clinical Characterization
A 63-year-old right-handed woman with 12 years of education presented with progressive memory decline for 2 years before the first hospital visit. She had symptoms of forgetting passwords or being unable to recall a person’s name. She regularly misplaced items and often forgot words or stories while speaking. However, she managed her household without problems. She scored 27/30 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination; moreover, she had a global deterioration scale (GDS) score of 2. Neuropsychological testing revealed visuospatial dysfunction. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed mild right hippocampal atrophy (Figure 1A). Her initial diagnosis was AD-caused mild cognitive impairment. After 2 years, she presented with deterioration of memory deficits. She could not remember what she had just said; moreover, she could not find a familiar route. She scored Mini-Mental Status Examination score and GDS score of 24/30 and 3, respectively. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil, was administered at a dosage of 10 mg/day.
Figure 1.
Brain imaging, family pedigree, and genetic analysis of a patient as well as prediction of the mutation-induced protein structure. (A) Axial FLAIR, coronal T2 images of brain MRI, with the arrows indicating the right hippocampal atrophy. (B) Family tree identifying the proband (arrow) with the APP and PSEN2 mutations. (C,D) Sanger sequencing of APP and PSEN2 variant. Heterozygous variants were indicated by a black arrow and red box. (E,F) The prediction of the mutation-induced alterations in the intramolecular interactions. 2D and 3D prediction of the structure and interactions between amino acids in the wild-type (E) and mutant APP (F). Green and pink dot lines represent hydrogen bond and alkyl interaction, respectively.
A family history could not be fully defined; however, we could not rule out a possible familial case of the disease. Her mother had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in her early 70s and died in her 80s. There was no available information on grandparents or siblings. The patient had three siblings; additionally, all siblings lacked any neurodegenerative symptoms and refused genetic testing (Figure 1B).
2.2. Genetic Analysis and In Silico Prediction
Mutations were found in the APP (rs761339914) and PSEN2 (rs533813519) genes. Heterozygous substitutions of APP (G to A) and PSEN2 (C to A) were verified through standard Sanger sequencing, which altered the amino acids of APP at codon 551 (Valine to Methionine) and PS2 at codon 169 (Histidine to Asparagine) (Figure 1C,D). In the TOPMED and ExAC databases, the APP rs761339914 mutation was rarely reported, with frequencies of 0.000008 and 0.000025, respectively. The frequencies of PSEN2 rs533813519 were 0.000165 in ExAC and 0.000057 in TOPMED. Contrastingly, in the database of the Korean population, the PSEN2 mutation frequency was relatively higher (0.00078 in 8.3 KJPN and 0.0041 in KOREAN).
The APP Val551Met mutation was likely damaging and tolerated in Polyphen2 and SIFT, respectively. To investigate the effects of an amino acid substitution in mutant APP, 3D structures of the mutated protein sequences were predicted and visualized using Discovery Studio software. There were no differences in the structures of APP Val551Met and wild-type APP (Figure 1E,F). Contrastingly, in the intra-interaction among amino acids, Met551 exhibited a hydrophobic interaction with Leu480 of the other α-helix chain rather than Ala553. In silico analysis of PSEN2 His169Asn mutation has been previously described [12]. The His169Asn mutation was predicted to induce major helix torsion and additional stress on the surface interacting with transmembrane domain III.
Notably, cells with Tyr538His and Val562Ile mutations near Val551Met have shown decreased Aβ40 production [16]. Each mutation had different trends on Aβ processing and secretion, but this is inferred to be due to the intrinsic properties of the mutations. Among the mutations in the APP E2 domain, the Arg486Trp mutation was described in one patient with familial EOAD from a British cohort [17]. In other de novo cases, Lys496Gln has been reported in EOAD while Tyr538His and Val562Ile have been reported in late-onset AD [18,19,20]. Mutations in the E2 domain are considered a low-risk factor contributing to AD etiology and cannot solely cause the disease (Table 1).
Table 1.
Mutations in the E2 domain of APP.
Gene | Mutation | Family History | Functional Data | Clinical Phenotype |
Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
APP | E380K | De novo | Likely damaging in PolyPhen-2 and SIFT | LOAD | [18] |
R468H | De novo | No changes in Aβ40 or Aβ42 production in cells | None | [21] | |
A479S | De novo | None | [22] | ||
R486W | Familial | Likely damaging by in silico algorithms | EOAD | [17] | |
K496Q | De novo | Slight increase in Aβ40 in cells | EOAD | [19] | |
A500T | De novo | No changes in Aβ40 or Aβ42 production in cells | - | [21] | |
Y538H | De novo | Decrease in Aβ40 and Aβ42 in cells | LOAD | [20] | |
V562I | - | Slight decrease in Aβ40 secretion | - | [20] |
3. Discussion
Genetic analysis of rare variants in patients with EOAD may help elucidate the pathogenesis underlying AD by identifying protein structural or functional changes. In this study, a Korean patient with EOAD presented with a novel APP Val551Met mutation and a sixth PSEN2 His169Asn mutation in East Asia.
The APP Val551Met mutation was located at the ectodomain (E2), outside of the cleavage site by β- and γ-secretases. This novel mutation has a very low frequency in other genome-wide association databases (TOPMED and ExAC). The pathogenicity of mutations outside the β-secretase cleavage site remains unclear. However, mutations in the E2 could influence APP processing dynamics as the E2 domain of APP is responsible for APP self-dimerization [23,24,25]. Substitution mutations of the E2 domain could influence APP homodimerization, resulting in the alteration of Aβ production. For example, Aβ production is increased 6–8 times upon the formation of a stable APP dimer through the expression of a cysteine mutation in the ectodomain juxtamembrane region [24]. Therefore, the reduced APP dimerization resulting from the mutation in the ectodomain could have opposite effects. Recent studies have focused on predicting disease susceptibility by developing a polygenic risk score (PRS) for each disease-related variant [26]. Clinical implementation of PRS may facilitate diagnosis or inform treatment choices at an early stage of the disease. Regarding the application of the PRS strategy to rare variants, Lali et al. proposed a predictive rare variant genetic risk score to delineate the effect of the risk variant burden in numerous genes [27]. Although one APP Val551Met may have minor effects, its combination with PSEN2 His169Asn could facilitate the onset of AD.
PSEN2 His169Asn has been reported in one and four cases in Korea and China, respectively (Table 2) [12,13,14,15]. The clinical manifestation of the previous cases was presented to an early onset age of less than 65 years, with a progressive memory impairment similar to our patient. Although all cases strongly demonstrate the high-penetrance gene mutations of the AD pathology, the contribution of the mutation to the AD pathophysiology could be relatively modest given the reported age of onset in these patients compared with that in patients with PSEN1 mutations. PSEN2 His169Asn is located in TMIII, which is a highly conserved domain in proteins that includes other AD-related variants, including Met174Ile, Met174Val, Ser175Cys, Ser175Phe, and Phe183Ser. PSEN2 His169Asn was predicted to be structurally pathogenic by causing a significant twist in the helix, resulting from the substitution of histidine for asparagine [12]. Notably, since this mutation was only found in the Asian population, it could be a founder’s mutation continuously monitored in East Asia.
Table 2.
List of previously reported patients with PSEN2 His169Asn mutations.
Country | Sex | APOE Type | Family History | Age of Onset | First Clinical Symptom | Brain Imaging | Clinical Phenotype |
Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Korea | Female | ε3/3 | De novo | 50 | Memory loss | Atrophy and hypometabolism in the left temporal lobe | EOAD | [12] |
China | Female | ε3/4 | Familial | 68 | Memory loss | Bilateral temporal lobe atrophy; hypometabolism; positive PIB PET | LOAD | [13] |
Male | ε3/3 | De novo | 62 | Language difficulty and behavioral changes | Mild atrophy; hypometabolism; negative PIB PET | Frontotemporal dementia | [13] | |
- | ε3/3 | - | 64 | - | - | EOAD | [14] | |
Male | - | Familial | 63 | Memory loss | Temporal and bilateral hippocampal atrophy | EOAD | [15] |
A limitation of this study is that the family members of the patient did not undergo genetic testing for determining the origin of the APP Val551Met and PSEN2 His169Asn mutations.
4. Materials and Methods
Consent was obtained for processing genetic and clinical data for research purposes. Likely AD diagnosis was based on the criteria of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Veterans Healthcare Medical Center (2021-06-015).
4.1. DNA Purification and Genetic Analysis
Whole blood was collected in EDTA tubes and stored at −20 °C until use. Purified genomic DNA was collected from the whole blood using the QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of the purified DNA were analyzed, with samples being kept at −20 °C for further analysis. Whole-exome sequencing was applied to identify genetic variants in genes associated with neurodegenerative disorders. Purified DNA samples were sequenced using the Illumina platform. To confirm the presence of mutations, primers suitable for exons in APP and PSEN2 were designed (APP, forward primer: 5′-CCTTCTCGTTCCTGACAAGTGC-3′ and reverse primer: 5′-GGCAGCAACATGCCGTAGTCAT-3′; PSEN2, forward primer: 5′-CCCACCGTGGATGACCTAATA-3′ and reverse primer: 5′-CACTTGTGCCACATGGAGAG-3′), followed by PCR-based gene analysis using typical Sanger sequencing (Bioneer Inc., Daejeon, Republic of Korea). BigDye Terminator Cyclic sequencing was performed using an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The NCBI Gene (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene, assessed on 8 April 2022) and UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org, assessed on 8 April 2022) databases were used to verify gene and protein sequences.
4.2. In Silico Analyses
Two screening tools, PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/, assessed on 8 April 2022) and SIFT (https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/index.html, assessed on 8 April 2022) were used to determine the nature of the mutations, classifying them as either benign or potentially damaging. The possible pathogenicity of the APP and PS2 proteins was investigated using mutation-induced structural alterations. The 3D protein structures of the normal and mutant APP and PS2 proteins were estimated using Missense3D (http://missense3d.bc.ic.ac.uk/missense3d/, assessed on 17 October 2022). Visualization and interaction with surrounding amino acids were performed using Discovery Studio 3.5 Visualizer (BIOVIA, San Diego, CA, USA).
5. Conclusions
In this study, a Korean patient was presented with double mutations in both APP and PSEN2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case with double APP and PSEN2 rare variants. Further studies are warranted to investigate the possibility of independent synergistic effects of APP Val551Met and PSEN2 His169Asn. Similar to PRS, which recently incorporated common variants to predict disease susceptibility, integrating rare low-penetrance variations, including the double mutations, could help elucidate the mutations implicated in AD. Specifically, a genetic screening panel for East Asian-specific rare variants should include PSEN2 His169Asn to improve diagnostic accuracy and help elucidate AD pathogenicity.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the participants for providing the samples and their agreement to participate in this research.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.-J.K. and S.S.A.A.; methodology, K.H.S. and H.B.; software, K.H.S.; validation, K.H.S. and H.B.; investigation, K.H.S., H.B. and J.Y.; resources, H.B. and Y.-S.Y.; data curation, S.S.A.A. and M.-J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.H.S. and H.B.; writing—review and editing, K.H.S., M.-J.K. and S.S.A.A.; supervision, M.-J.K. and S.S.A.A.; project administration, S.S.A.A.; funding acquisition, J.Y. and S.S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Veterans Healthcare Medical Center (2021-06-015).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1A6A1A03038996) and a VHS Medical Center research grant, Republic of Korea (VHSM21041).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Selkoe D.J., Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016;8:595–608. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ayodele T., Rogaeva E., Kurup J.T., Beecham G., Reitz C. Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease: What Is Missing in Research? Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2021;21:4. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01090-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chow V.W., Mattson M.P., Wong P.C., Gleichmann M. An overview of APP processing enzymes and products. Neuromol. Med. 2010;12:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12017-009-8104-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vassar R., Kovacs D.M., Yan R., Wong P.C. The β-Secretase Enzyme BACE in Health and Alzheimer’s Disease: Regulation, Cell Biology, Function, and Therapeutic Potential. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:12787–12794. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3657-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haass C., Lemere C.A., Capell A., Citron M., Seubert P., Schenk D., Lannfelt L., Selkoe D.J. The Swedish mutation causes early-onset Alzheimer’s disease by β-secretase cleavage within the secretory pathway. Nat. Med. 1995;1:1291–1296. doi: 10.1038/nm1295-1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lichtenthaler S.F., Beher D., Grimm H.S., Wang R., Shearman M.S., Masters C.L., Beyreuther K. The intramembrane cleavage site of the amyloid precursor protein depends on the length of its transmembrane domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:1365–1370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.032395699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Strooper B. Aph-1, Pen-2, and Nicastrin with Presenilin Generate an Active γ-Secretase Complex. Neuron. 2003;38:9–12. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00205-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Szaruga M., Munteanu B., Lismont S., Veugelen S., Horré K., Mercken M., Saido T.C., Ryan N.S., De Vos T., Savvides S.N., et al. Alzheimer’s-Causing Mutations Shift Aβ Length by Destabilizing γ-Secretase-Aβn Interactions. Cell. 2017;170:443–456.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Annaert W.G., Levesque L., Craessaerts K., Dierinck I., Snellings G., Westaway D., George-Hyslop P.S., Cordell B., Fraser P., De Strooper B. Presenilin 1 Controls γ-Secretase Processing of Amyloid Precursor Protein in Pre-Golgi Compartments of Hippocampal Neurons. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:277–294. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Giau V.V., Bagyinszky E., Youn Y.C., An S.S.A., Kim S. APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 Mutations in Asian Patients with Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:4757. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dai M.-H., Zheng H., Zeng L.-D., Zhang Y. The genes associated with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Oncotarget. 2018;9:15132. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Giau V.V., Pyun J.M., Bagyinszky E., An S.S.A., Kim S. A pathogenic PSEN2 p.His169Asn mutation associated with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2018;13:1321–1329. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S170374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shi Z., Wang Y., Liu S., Liu M., Liu S., Zhou Y., Wang J., Cai L., Huo Y.R., Gao S., et al. Clinical and Neuroimaging Characterization of Chinese Dementia Patients with PSEN1 and PSEN2 Mutations. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2015;39:32–40. doi: 10.1159/000366272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xu Y., Liu X., Shen J., Tian W., Fang R., Li B., Ma J., Cao L., Chen S., Li G., et al. The Whole Exome Sequencing Clarifies the Genotype- Phenotype Correlations in Patients with Early-Onset Dementia. Aging Dis. 2018;9:696–705. doi: 10.14336/AD.2018.0208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma L., Zhang J., Shi Y., Wang W., Ren Z., Xia M., Zhang Y., Yang M. Gene mutations in a Han Chinese Alzheimer’s disease cohort. Brain Behav. 2019;9:e01180. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hsu S., Pimenova A.A., Hayes K., Villa J.A., Rosene M.J., Jere M., Goate A.M., Karch C.M. Systematic validation of variants of unknown significance in APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020;139:104817. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang G., Zhang D.-F., Jiang H.-Y., Fan Y., Ma L., Shen Z., Bi R., Xu M., Tan L., Shan B., et al. Mutation and association analyses of dementia-causal genes in Han Chinese patients with early-onset and familial Alzheimer’s disease. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019;113:141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.El Bitar F., Qadi N., Al Rajeh S., Majrashi A., Abdulaziz S., Majrashi N., Al Inizi M., Taher A., Al Tassan N. Genetic Study of Alzheimer’s Disease in Saudi Population. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;67:231–242. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sassi C., Guerreiro R., Gibbs R., Ding J., Lupton M.K., Troakes C., Lunnon K., Al-Sarraj S., Brown K.S., Medway C., et al. Exome sequencing identifies 2 novel presenilin 1 mutations (p.L166V and p.S230R) in British early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:2422.e13–2422.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sassi C., Guerreiro R., Gibbs R., Ding J., Lupton M.K., Troakes C., Al-Sarraj S., Niblock M., Gallo J.-M., Adnan J., et al. Investigating the role of rare coding variability in Mendelian dementia genes (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, GRN, MAPT, and PRNP) in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:2881.e1–2881.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schulte E.C., Fukumori A., Mollenhauer B., Hor H., Arzberger T., Perneczky R., Kurz A., Diehl-Schmid J., Hüll M., Lichtner P., et al. Rare variants in β-Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015;23:1328–1333. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sala Frigerio C., Lau P., Troakes C., Deramecourt V., Gele P., Van Loo P., Voet T., De Strooper B. On the identification of low allele frequency mosaic mutations in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015;11:1265–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee S., Xue Y., Hu J., Wang Y., Liu X., Demeler B., Ha Y. The E2 Domains of APP and APLP1 Share a Conserved Mode of Dimerization. Biochemistry. 2011;50:5453–5464. doi: 10.1021/bi101846x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Scheuermann S., Hambsch B., Hesse L., Stumm J., Schmidt C., Beher D., Bayer T.A., Beyreuther K., Multhaup G. Homodimerization of Amyloid Precursor Protein and Its Implication in the Amyloidogenic Pathway of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:33923–33929. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105410200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gralle M., Botelho M.G., Wouters F.S. Neuroprotective Secreted Amyloid Precursor Protein Acts by Disrupting Amyloid Precursor Protein Dimers. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:15016–15025. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808755200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lewis C.M., Vassos E. Polygenic risk scores: From research tools to clinical instruments. Genome Med. 2020;12:44. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00742-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lali R., Chong M., Omidi A., Mohammadi-Shemirani P., Le A., Cui E., Paré G. Calibrated rare variant genetic risk scores for complex disease prediction using large exome sequence repositories. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5852. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.