Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2023 Apr 9;11(4):976. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040976

Colletotrichum siamense Strain LVY 9 Causing Spot Anthracnose on Winterberry Holly in China

Lin Feng 1, Yahui Zhang 1, Weiliang Chen 1, Bizeng Mao 1,*
Editor: Martin Filion
PMCID: PMC10146105  PMID: 37110399

Abstract

Winterberry holly (Ilex verticillata) is an economically valuable landscaping ornamental plant. Serious outbreaks have been reported, in its leaf tips curl upward, irregular black brown spots appear on leaves, and extensive defoliation is commonly observed. The incidence in Hangzhou was estimated at 50% and resulted in large economic losses for growers in 2018. Samples were collected from the main cultivation area in Zhejiang Province. In total, 11 fungal isolates were obtained from diseased leaves through a single-spore purification method, and isolate LVY 9 exhibited strong pathogenicity. Based on morphology and molecular phylogenetic analyses based on multilocus sequence typing of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, actin (ACT), calmodulin (CAL), and chitin synthase (CHS-1) genes, we identified the pathogen as Colletotrichum siamense, causative agent of anthracnose of winterberry holly.

Keywords: winterberry holly, anthracnose, Colletotrichum siamense, pathogenicity, multilocus phylogeny

1. Introduction

Winterberry holly (Ilex verticillata) is a deciduous shrub that is especially valued for its masses of glossy, bright red berries in winter. Also known as Black Alder, its branches are often used for decoration during the holiday season [1]. Winterberry holly is widely cultivated in Europe, the United States, and other countries for its unique ornamental qualities and high adaptability. To date, there are more than 30 varieties cultivated and sold in Europe and America, such as “Oosterwijk”, “Winter Red”, “Berry heavy”, and “A. Gray”, among many others [2,3].

In China, in addition to their desirable floral qualities and broad marketability, especially in the Spring Festival [4]. The vivid red berries symbolize good luck and auspicious harvest. The cultivation area of winterberry holly has been rapidly expanding since 2006 in Zhejiang, Shandong, Fujian, Henan, Jilin, and Gansu provinces, as well as in other regions of China [3,5].

Fruit rot of deciduous holly (Ilex spp. L.) was recently reported as an emerging threat in nurseries in the mid-western and eastern USA [6]. Disease symptoms including early defoliation and withered or rotten fruit were observed throughout all of the fruit development and maturation period [7]. Previous work has indicated that multiple fungal pathogens such as Alternaria alternata, Diaporthe ilicicola, as well as other minor pathogens such as A. arborescens, Botryosphaeriaceae, Colletotrichum fioriniae, C.nymphaeae, D.eres, and Epicoccum nigrum can cause primary and/or secondary infections during the growing season through inoculation by wind, rain splash, and pollinators [8,9]. To date, there have been very few reports describing diseases of winterberry holly, so the relevant disease resistance mechanisms remain unclear.

In 2018, growers reported the occurrence of a new anthracnose disease of winterberry holly in Zhejiang province, China, with primary symptoms including black or brown leaves, irregular leaf spots, and sparse white mycelium. The incidence of diseased leaves ranged from 10% to 50%, severely affecting the aesthetic quality. It is of great economic significance determine the pathogenic agent underlying this disease so that a timely and effective management strategy can be deployed. Here, in this work, we isolate the causative agent of this new disease, and identify it as Colletotrichum siamense.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Pathogen Isolation

The symptomatic samples were collected from Zhejiang province in 2018 (Figure 1). Diseased leave tissues were surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s, and then 0.1% mercuric chloride solution for 3 min, rinsed five times by sterile distilled water, and air dried; the axenic tissues were subsequently cut into about 25 mm2 pieces and plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium containing 0.2 mg/mL−1 ampicillin sodium. The plates were incubated at 28 °C in the dark for 7–14 days. Pure mycelia were obtained by hyphae tip separation and stored in PDA slants covered by paroline at 4 °C [10,11].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Symptoms of diseased winterberry holly. (a) Symptomatic leaves change from green to yellowish green, and gradually become grayish brown Coalesced irregular leaf spots eventually resulted in early plant defoliation. The arrow points to the spot. (b,c) A large area of irregular black–brown leaf spots with dense white mycelia on winterberry holly’s defoliation. The arrow points to white mycelia.

2.2. Pathogenicity Test

Two inoculation methods were used for the pathogenicity assay. The vitro leaf method was described by Lin and Dissanayake [8,9,12]. One-month-old healthy leaves were collected from potted plants (A.Gray), surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol and immersed in sterile water-Tween 80 solutions (0.3% v/v) 3 times before inoculation. About 5 mm-diameter mycelial plugs were picked up from the culture medium and placed on left and right sides of the same leaf, then those leaves were incubated in a 10 cm2 petri dish containing a wet sterile filter paper, inoculated with sterile PDA as controls. There were 3 replicates of each isolate and the experiment was repeated three times. The dishes were placed in a growth chamber under artificial light (12/12 h light/dark) at 28 °C for 7 days. The second inoculation technique was described by Weir [13]: 1 × 106 conidia/mL of the spore suspensions were prepared in sterile distilled water. Leaves were wounded evenly by the sterilized needle, and then the front and back of the leaves of the biennial plants were sprayed with the suspensions. Sterile distilled water was used as control. Then, all plants were maintained in a greenhouse under 100% relative humidity at temperatures between 30 °C (day) and 28 °C (night) with natural photoperiods. The pathogen was re-isolated from leaf spots, and its identity confirmed by morphological characteristics, which is consistent with the Koch’s postulates.

2.3. Morphological Characteristics

Mycelia discs (7 mm in diameter) from 7-day-old PDA cultures were sub-cultured on PDA medium in incubator, at 28 °C. The mycelium growth was measured every day for 7 consecutive days, and the colony features (size and color) were recorded after 7 days [14]. The mycelia were removed from the surface of the plate to enhance the sporulation under a mixture of fluorescent white and UV light with 12 h dark at 20 °C for 15–20 days [13,15,16]. The conidia were examined visually and microscopically for morphological features, the mycelia (7 mm diameter) with conidia were observed in SEM (Hitachi Model SU-8010) [17,18,19].

Appressorium was produced using a slide culture technique [13]. A mycelium colony on PDA with 1 cm2 was placed in an empty petri dish (9 cm) and immediately covered with a sterile cover slip, then transferred into an empty square petri dish (10 cm) containing sterile water. After 14 days, the cover slip was removed, and a drop of lactic acid was added on a glass slide [13,14].

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

2.4.1. Genomic DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted using Ezup Column Fungi Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR reaction mixture contained 9 μL of sterile water, 13 μL of 2 × PCR Master Mix (TSINGKE, Beijing, China), 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), 1μL of genomic DNA. PCR was conducted in Applied Biosystems LongGene Thermal Cycler (LongGene Scientific Instruments (Hangzhou, China) Co., Ltd.) under the following conditions for the ITS: 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; and then followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplification programs for the other genes were the same except the annealing temperatures: ACT (58 °C ), CAL (59 °C ), CHS-1 (58 °C ), GAPDH (60 °C). The primers and references are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers used in this study, with sequences and sources.

Gene Product Name Primers Sequence (5′–3′) Reference
ACT Actin ACT-512F ACT-783R ATGTGCAAGGCCGGTTTCGC
TACGAGTCCTTCTGGCCCAT
[20]
CAL Calmodulin CL1C
CL2C
GAATTCAAGGAGGCCTTCTC
CTTCTGCATCATGAGCTGGAC
[13]
GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3- Phosphate dehydrogenase GDF
GDR
GCCGTCAACGACCCCTTCATTGA GGGTGGAGTCGTACTTGAGCATGT [21]
CHS-1 Chitin synthase CHS-79F CHS-345R TGGGGCAAGGATGCTTGGAAGAAG TGGAAGAACCATCTGTGAGAGTTG [20]
ITS Internal transcribed spacer ITS-1F
ITS-4
CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA
TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
[22]
[23]

2.4.2. Fungal Isolates Phylogenetic Analysis

The obtained sequences were edited by BioEdit 7.1.3.0 [24] and multiple alignments were generated with MAFFT 7.273 [25]. To construct the phylogenetic tree, available data for species of Colletotrichum were downloaded from the GenBank database (Table A1). Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using IQ-TREE [26,27] with the concatenation of the ACT, CAL, CHS-1, GAPDH, and ITS regions. The best evolutionary model was selected through Model Finder [28], as follows: TIM2 + F + R4 model for ACT, TIM + F + R3 for CAL, TIM + F + R3 for CHS-1, HKY + F + R2 for GAPDH and TIM2 + F + R3 for ITS. Confidence of the branch points was evaluated using 5000 bootstrap replicates. The ML values equal to or above 75% values were shown on a tree for significantly supported nodes. Bayesian Inference (BI) was applied to generate a phylogeny tree by MrBayes ver.3.2.6 [29]. GTR + F + I + G4 model was used to the analyses of the gene of ACT, CAL, CHS1, ITS and the HKY + F + G4 model for GAPDH following Ronquist and Huelsenbeck [29] for BI analyses with 200,000 replicates and the phylogenetic tree was sampled every 100 generations. The first 500 trees were removed for the burn-in phase. The consensus of the remaining trees was constructed with resulting node frequencies that were treated as Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP). BI posterior probability (BI-PP) values equal to or above 0.95 were determined to be significant. The tree was rooted with the outgroup, Monilochaetes infuscans.

3. Results

3.1. The Strain LVY 9 Was Pathogen of Anthracnose on Winterberry Holly through Koch’s Postulates

We identified and isolated eleven isolates (LVY 1–11) from symptomatic leaves of Ilexverticillata (Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province, China) based on morphological features and confirmation by Sanger sequencing. These isolates belonged to genera Colletotrichum, Alternaria, Botryosphaeria, Leptosphaeria, Cercospora, and Emericella, and subsequent pathogenicity tests indicated that only inoculation with Colletotrichum (isolate LVY 9) resulted in symptom formation on leaves in vitro. These symptoms included brown necrotic lesions with dense whitish-grey aerial mycelia, and a few bright orange conidial masses near the point of inoculation at 7 days post infection (dpi) (Figure 2a,b). The mycelia are grayish brown with white edge and reserve is turquoise after strain LVY 9 on PDA for 7 days. Colonies were round, swell, neat edge, with cottony radial growth of white. In particular, large clusters of bright orange conidia were produced on PDA for 30 d. These characteristics are very similar to those of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex. Following spray inoculations, similar symptoms appeared at 30 dpi in winterberry nursery fields (Figure 2c). In diseased plants, leaf tips of inoculated plants exhibited an obvious curly phenotype (Figure 2d). In addition, we observed irregular gray black spots on the leaves. We were able to successfully re-isolate the Colletotrichum isolates from these diseased plants, thereby fulfilling Koch’s postulates.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Symptoms of winterberry holly leaves after incubation with isolate LVY 9. In vitro inoculation, brown necrotic lesions with bright orange conidial masses appear (b) compared with control (a) after 7 days. The arrow points to orange conidia (b). In spray inoculation, grayish brown spots appear on tips of leaves with obvious curly phenotype compared with control (c) after 30 days. The arrow points to irregular spots (d). The mycelia are grayish brown with white edge (e) and reserve is turquoise (d) after strain LVY 9 on PDA for 7 d. Orange masses of conidia released from pycnidia after strain LVY 9 under a mixture of fluorescent white and UV light on PDA 20 d (g,h). The arrow points to orange conidia (g). Strain LVY 9 resembles Colletotrichum gloeosporioides by SEM and light microscopy.

To characterize the microscopic features of the pathogen, in addition to its symptoms and colony morphology, we selected a representative isolate for morphological characterization by SEM and light microscopy. On PDA medium, isolate LVY 9 colonies first appeared white, then became gray to dark grey, with an average growth rate of approximately 10.72 mm/day. Bright orange conidia and conidiophores were produced under continuous UV + fluorescent white lights with a 12:12 h light: dark cycle (Figure 2g). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that conidial dimensions were 7.8–12.7 × 2. 6–3.6 µm, and conidia were smooth-walled, hyaline, and cylindrical, with obtuse to slightly rounded ends (Figure 3a–c). Under light microscopy, appressoria (5.8–10.7 × 3.9–7.7 µm) were observed to form mostly from mycelium on slide cultures, and appeared brown to dark brown, ovoid, clavate, and slightly irregular in shape (Figure 3d–h). Morphological features of the isolate LVY 9 were highly similar to those of species belonging to the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex [13,30,31,32].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Conidia and appressorium characteristics of isolate LVY 9 on PDA. Conidia are smooth-walled, hyaline, and cylindrical, with obtuse to slightly rounded ends (ac). Bars = 10, 2, 1 µm, respectively; appressoria appear brown to dark brown, ovoid, clavate, and slightly irregular in shape(dg). Bars = 20, 10, 10, 5 µm, respectively.

3.2. Strain LVY 9 Was Identified as Colletotrichum siamense by Phylogenetic Analyses

For rigorous molecular identification, we used partial sequences from ACT (GenBank number: OQ652092), CAL (GenBank number: OQ652091), GAPDH (GenBank number: OQ652089), CHS-1 (GenBank number: OQ652090), and ITS (GenBank number: OQ651128) from isolate LVY9 for species level identification of the pathogen (see Table 1 for primers and source studies). Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic reconstruction of these concatenated sequences (2370 nucleotides) including ACT (1–311 bp), CAL (312–1119 bp), CHS-1 (1120–1420 bp), GADPH (1421–1736 bp), and ITS (1737–2370 bp) was congruent with that of a Bayesian inference (BI) tree for the five concatenated loci. Relationships among almost all of the reference isolates could be clearly distinguished at the species level. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis indicated that isolate LVY 9 clustered with C. siamense CBS 130,420, C. siamense ICMP 18,587, and C. siamense CBS 125,378, thus forming a distinct clade, which was highly supported in both ML-BS (100%) and BI-PP (1.0) models (Figure 4). Based on these findings, we concluded that the LVY9 isolate was a strain of C. siamense, the previously reported causative agent of anthracnose in winterberry holly.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree generated from the combined ACT, CAL, CHS-1, GAPDH and ITS sequence data of 59 taxa of Colletotrichum, of which 21 are in C.boninense complex, 34 are in C.gloeosporioides complex, 1 is in C.orbiculare complex, 1 is in C.acutatum complex, 2 are undefined. Clades with >75% ML_BS (left) and 0.50 BI-PP (right) are indicated by the corresponding support values. Parsimony and likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 95% are indicated at the nodes and branches with Bayesian posterior probabilities above 0.95 given in bold. The ex-type strains are in bold. Dashes indicate support values lower than 75% ML-BS and 0.50 BI-PP. The tree is rooted with Monilochaetes infuscans CBS 869.96. The red arrow points to strain LVY9.

4. Discussion

The asexual genus Colletotrichum is largely comprised of economically and agriculturally destructive plant pathogens [33], causing major losses in yield and productivity to a wide range of fruit, vegetable and ornamental crops such as strawberry, mango, chilli, pear, eggplant, cowpea, mandevilla and rhododendron [18,34,35,36,37,38]. Based on morphological studies and phylogenetic analyses using actin (ACT), calmodulin (CAL), chitin synthase 1 (CHS-1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and β-Tubulin 2 (TUB2), Damm and colleagues [15] effectively separated the C. acutatum species complex into 30 species, while Weir and coworkers [13] distinguished 22 species and one subspecies within the C. gloeosporioides species complex. In particular, C. siamense was reported to cause anthracnose on persea americana, pistacia vera, coffea arabica, vitis vinifera, malus domestica, and hymenocallis Americana [13]. Chunhua indicated that the 13 isolates of C. gloeosporioides species complex from the rubber tree in Hainan Province were identified as C.siamense and C. fructicola [39]. Simlarly, C. siamense was involved in walnut, pyrus spp., litchi pepper, amorphophallus konjac, photinia × fraseri in China [40,41,42,43,44]. In this work, we first report the presence of C. siamense, the causative pathogen for anthracnose of the ornamental plant winterberry holly, in China.

In the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex, C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and C. fructicola exhibit similar morphological characteristics including conidial size, shape, and appressoria formation. C. siamense is genetically close to C. fructicola, but C. fructicola has slightly longer and narrower cylindrical or subcylindrical conidia that have irregularly shaped, crenate, brown to dark brown appressoria, and branched hyphae [36,45]. However, the conidia of C. siamense are fusiform with obtuse to slightly rounded ends, occasionally oblong and ovoid. Previous reports also confirm that this species exhibits regular- to slightly irregular-shaped appressoria [14]. In contrast, C. gloeosporioides conidia appear cylindrical, although slightly tapered with obtuse or slightly rounded to oblong ends. The C. gloeosporioides appressoria are circular to slightly irregular, thus differing from those of C. siamense [14,46]. In this study, the shapes of the conidia and appressoria of isolates matched those of C. siamense, described by Prihastuti [14]. Moreover, the size of appressoria was similar to that of C. siamense, although the conidia described by Sharma [36,47] were smaller. Mycelial growth rates of isolates obtained in this study were also slower than those of the strain of C. siamense described by Yaowen [48]. We speculated that these morphological differences may be due (at least in part) to responses to the environment, growth media, and host.

Since morphological identification is important but not definitive for Colletotrichum, sequence analysis and infection behavior are also used to discriminate down to species level. As mentioned in previous studies, species in the C. gleosporioide species complex are genetically distinct from those in the C. boninense complex, but have highly similar micro-morphologiesm [13,15,16,49]. Initial sequence analyses relying on ITS were unable to satisfactorily distinguish among Colletotrichum species due to their high level of evolutionary conservation. In this work, we therefore used several genes to identify the LVY9 strain that were previously reported to successfully resolve Colletotrichum species [18,50]. Notably, ITS can separate C. gloeosporioides from all other Colletotrichum species, but cannot reliably separate C. siamense from C. alienum, C. fructicola, or C. tropicale. These species are best distinguished using CAL or TUB2 [13]. The causative agent of leaf spots on Sterculia nobilis in China was identified as C. siamense using a combination of ITS, ACT, GAPDH, CAL, CHS-1, and TUB2 genes [48]. In this study, we used a combinations of five genes (ACT, CAL, CHS-1, GAPDH and ITS) to identify the isolates obtained from winterberry holly, thus providing strong molecular evidence for the identification of the isolates as C. siamense.

C. siamense was originally described as a pathogen of coffee berries in Thailand [14]. This species has since been confirmed to infect more than 60 plant species worldwide [13,15,16]. This paper presents the first report describing C. siamense as the causal agent of anthracnose of winterberry holly in Zhejiang, China. As winterberry holly is commonly used as a bonsai or cut flower, the disease directly reduces its ornamental value. In addition, the occurrence of disease may harm the introduction and cultivation of winterberry holly. This identification of the disease-causing species facilitates the establishment of control measures, not only for winterberry holly, but for all of the known hosts of this pathogen. This study also provides a basis for future studies of the molecular mechanisms of this pathogenic interaction, identification of disease-resistant varieties, and creation of stable resistant materials.

5. Conclusions

According to Koch’s rule, The strain LVY9 was elected as the pathogen causing anthracnose of Winterberry Holly in Zhejiang Province, China. The strain LVY9 was identified as the C. gloeosporioides complex by observing the morphology features of mycelia, conidia and appressorium. The strain LVY9 was identified as C. siamense by further analysis of the phylogenetic tree that combined Actin, Calmodulin, Glyceraldehyde-3- Phosphate dehydrogenase, Chitin synthase and Internal transcribed spacer genes. So, we concluded that C. siamense was causative agent of anthracnose in winterberry holly.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for technical support and practical experimental shared by Youxiang Yu which is a staff of HangZhou Runtu Horticulture Technology Co., Ltd. In addition, we thank Seyed Ali Mirghasempour khoshkroudi and Yunfang He for proofreading the manuscript.

Appendix A

Table A1.

GenBank accession numbers of the accepted Colletotrichum species.

Colletotrichum
Species
Culture
Collection
GenBank Accession Number References
ITS GAPDH CAL ACT CHS-1
C.aenigma ICMP 18,608 * JX010244 JX010044 JX009683 JX009443 JX009774 [13]
C.aeschynomenes ICMP 17,673 *
ATCC 201,874
JX010176 JX009930 JX009721 JX009483 JX009799 [13]
C.alatae CBS 304.67 *
ICMP 17,919
JX010190 JX009990 JX009738 JX009483 JX009799 [13]
C.alienum ICMP 12,071 * JX010251 JX010028 JX009654 JX009572 JX009882 [13]
C.annellatum CBS 129,826
CH1 *
JQ005222 JQ005309 JQ005743 JQ005570 JQ005396 [16]
C.aotearoa ICMP 18,537 * JX010205 JX010005 JX009611 JX009564 JX009853 [13]
C.asianum ICMP 18,580 *
CBS 130,418
FJ972612 JX010053 FJ917506 JX009584 JX009867 [13]
C.beeveri ICMP 18,594 *
CBS 125,827
JQ005171 JQ005258 JQ005692 JQ005519 JQ005345 [16]
C.boninense MAFF 305,972 *
CBS 123,755
JQ005153 JQ005240 JQ005674 JQ005501 JQ005327 [13]
C.brasiliense CBS 128,501
PAS12 *
JQ005235 JQ005322 JQ005756 JQ005583 JQ005409 [16]
C.brassicicola CBS 101,059
LYN 16,331 *
JQ005172 JQ005259 JQ005693 JQ005520 JQ005346 [16]
C.clidemiae ICMP 18,658 * JX010265 JX009989 JX009645 JX009537 JX009877 [13]
C.cliviae CBS 125,375 * GQ485607 GQ856756 GQ849464 GQ856777 GQ856722 [17]
C.colombiense CBS 129,818
G2 *
JQ005174 JQ005261 JQ005695 JQ005522 JQ005348 [16]
C.constrictum ICMP 12,941 *
CBS 128,504
JQ005238 JQ005325 JQ005759 JQ005586 JQ005412 [16]
C.cordylinicola ICMP 18,579 MFLUCC 090,551 * JX010226 JX009975 HM470237 HM470234 JX009864 [13]
C.cymbidiicola IMI 347,923 * JQ005166 JQ005253 JQ005687 JQ005514 JQ005340 [16]
C.dacrycarpi ICMP 19,107 *
CBS 130,241
JQ005236 JQ005323 JQ005757 JQ005584 JQ005410 [16]
C.dracaenophilum CBS 118,199 * JX519222 JX546707 - JX519238 JX519230 [17]
C.fructicola CBS 125,397 *
ICMP 18,646
JX010173 JX010032 JX009674 JX009581 JX009874 [13]
C.fructicola CBS 238.49 *
ICMP 17,921
JX010181 JX009923 JX009671 JX009495 JX009839 [13]
C.fructicola ICMP 18,581 *
CBS 130,416
JX010165 JX010033 FJ917508 FJ907426 JX009866 [13]
C.gloeosporioides CBS 273.51 *
ICMP 19,121
JX010148 JX010054 JX009745 JX009558 JX009903 [13]
C.gloeosporioides STE-U4295 *
CBS 112,999
JQ005152 JQ005239 JQ005673 JQ005500 JQ005326 [16]
C.gloeosporioides IMI 356,878 *
ICMP 17,821
CBS 112,999
JX010152 JX010056 JX009731 JX009531 JX009818 [13]
C.hippeastri CSSG 1 *
CBS 125,376
JQ005231 JQ005318 JQ005752 JQ005579 JQ005405 [16]
C.hippeastri CBS 241.78 JX010293 JX009932 JX009740 JX009485 JX009838 [13]
C.horii NBRC 7478 *
ICMP 10,492
GQ329690 GQ32961 JX009604 JX009438 JX009752 [13]
C.kahawae subsp CBS 124.22*
ICMP 19,122
JX010228 JX009950 JX009744 JX009536 JX009902 [13]
C.kahawae subsp IMI 319,418 *
ICMP 17,816
JX010231 JX010012 JX009642 JX009452 JX009813 [13]
C.kahawae subsp ICMP 18,539 * JX010230 JX009966 JX009635 JX009523 JX009800 [13]
C.kahawae subsp CBS 237.49 *
ICMP 17,922
JX010238 JX010042 JX009636 JX009450 JX009840 [13]
C.karstii CBS 132,134 * HM585409 HM858391 HM582013 HM581995 HM582023 [16]
C.karstii CBS 128,550
ICMP 17,896
JQ005219 JQ005306 JQ005740 JQ005567 JQ005393 [16]
C.karstii CBS 118,401 JQ005192 JQ005279 JQ005713 JQ005540 JQ05366 [16]
C.lindemuthianum CBS 144.31 JQ005779 JX546712 - JQ005842 JQ005800 [17]
C.musae CBS 192.31
ICMP 17,923
JX010143 JX009929 JX009690 JX009587 JX009841 [13]
C.musae CBS 116,870 *
ICMP 19,119
JX010145 JX010047 JX009687 JX009551 JX009849 [13]
C.novae-zelandiae ICMP 12,944 *
CBS 128,505
JQ005228 JQ005315 JQ005749 JQ005576 JQ005402 [16]
C.nupharicola CBS 470.96 *
ICMP 18,187
JX010187 JX009972 JX009663 JX009437 JX009835 [13]
C.oncidii CBS 129,828 * JQ005169 JQ005256 JQ005690 JQ005517 JQ005343 [16]
C.parsonsiae ICMP 18,590 *
CBS 128,525
JQ005223 JQ005320 JQ005754 JQ005581 JQ005407 [16]
C.petchii CBS 378.94 * JQ005223 JQ005310 JQ005744 JQ005571 JQ005397 [16]
C.phyllanthi CBS 175.67
MACS 271 *
JQ005221 JQ005308 JQ005742 JQ005569 JQ005395 [16]
C.psidii CBS 145.29 *
ICMP 19,120
JX010219 JX009967 JX009743 JX009515 JX009901 [13]
C.queenslandicum ICMP 1778 * JX010276 JX009934 JX009691 JX009447 JX009899 [13]
C.salsolae ICMP 19,051 * JX010242 JX009916 JX009696 JX009562 JX009863 [13]
C.siamense CBS 125,378 *
ICMP 18,642
JX010278 JX010019 JX009709 GQ85675 GQ856730 [13]
C.siamense CBS 130,420 *
ICMP 19,118
HM131511 HM13147 JX009713 HM13157 JX009895 [13]
C.siamense ICMP 18,578 *
CBS 130,417
JX010171 JX009924 FJ917505 FJ907423 JX009865 [13]
C.simmondsii CBS 122,122,
BRIP 28,519 *
JQ948276 JQ948606 FJ917510 JQ949588 JQ948937 [16]
C.theobromicola CBS 124,945 *
ICMP 18,649
JX010294 JX010006 JX009591 JX009444 JX009869 [13]
C.theobromicola CBS 142.31 *
ICMP 17,927
JX010286 JX010024 JX009582 JX009516 JX009830 [13]
C.theobromicola MUCL 42,294 *
ICMP 17,957
JX010289 JX009962 JX009597 JX009575 JX009821 [13]
C.ti ICMP 4832 * JX010269 JX009952 JX009649 JX009520 JX009898 [17]
C.torulosum ICMP 18,586 *
CBS 128,544
JQ005164 JQ005251 JQ005685 GU27899 GU228291 [17]
C.tropicale CBS 124,949 *
ICMP 18,653
JX010264 JX010007 JX009719 JX009489 JX009870 [13]
C.xanthorrhoeae BRIP 45,094 *
ICMP 17,903
JX010261 JX009927 JX009653 JX009478 JX009823 [13]
C.yunnanense CBS 132,135 * JX546804 JX546706 - JX519239 JX519231 [17]

Note: * refers to ex-type strains of Colletotrichum species

Author Contributions

L.F. and Y.Z. conceived the idea and drafted the manuscript. L.F., Y.Z., B.M. and W.C. contributed in writing up and revision. L.F. and B.M. performed formatting. All the authors read the final version and approved its submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

The funding support from the Foundation of Study on the main diseases and control techniques for winterberry holly in China (2019-KYY-516108-0007).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Xiang W., Xu Z., Lin L., Yongjun Z., Weisong M. Monitoring system based on WSN for fresh cut branches of Ilex verticillata in the whole cold chain. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2017;48:394–400. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.S0.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Juanjuan M., Bin Z., Yin C., Xichen L., Jie Y., Qian C. Physiological responses of seedlings of four Ilex verticillata varieties to low temperature stress and a comparison of their cold resistance. J. Nanjing For. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2020;44:34–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weili W., Liping H., Minfen Y., Huwei Y., Daoliang Y., Liang Z., Youxiang Y., Jun L., Peng Z., Bingsong Z. Phylogenetic relationships among 12 cultivars of Ilex verticillata based on ISSR molecular markers. J. Zhejiang Agric. For. Univ. 2018;35:612–617. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yuzhen Y., Yunxia Z., Zhihao Z., Bingqing A. Diurnal changes of photosynthesis and relationship with the eco-physiological factors of IIex verticillata. J. Northwest Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. 2016;52:88–92. doi: 10.16783/j.cnki.nwnuz.2016.04.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dengfeng S., Bin W., Chuntao H., Minghua L., Tonghui Y., Jianhong Z. Transcriptome analysis of Ilex verticillata leaf treated by different concentrations acetic acid solution. Mol. Plant Breed. 2020;18:401–408. doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.018.000401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lin Z., Ziqian Y., Jianhua D., Youxiang Y., Yichen L. Regional introduction experiment of Ilex verticillate ‘Oosterwijk’. J. For. Eng. 2015;29:80–82. doi: 10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.06.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin S., Taylor N.J., Peduto Hand F. Identification and characterization of fungal pathogens causing fruit rot of deciduous holly. Plant Dis. 2018;102:2430–2445. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0372-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin S., Peduto Hand F. Investigations on the timing of fruit infection by fungal pathogens causing fruit rot of deciduous holly. Plant Dis. 2019;103:308–314. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-18-0973-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin S., Peduto Hand F. Determining the sources of primary and secondary inoculum and seasonal inoculum dynamics of fungal pathogens causing fruit rot of deciduous holly. Plant Dis. 2019;103:951–958. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-18-1694-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Qing B., Lifeng Z., Xiaoren C., Ni H., Wenxing X., Guoping W. Biological and molecular characterization of five Phomopsis species associated with pear shoot canker in China. Plant Dis. 2015;99:1704–1712. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0259-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noireung P., Phoulivong S., Fang L., Cai L., Eric H.C.M., Ekachai C., Jones E.B.G., Ali H.B., Hyde D.K. Novel species of Colletotrichum revealed by morphology and molecular analysis. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2012;33:347–362. doi: 10.7872/crym.v33.iss3.2012.347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dissanayake A.J., Liu M., Zhang W., Chen Z., Udayanga D., Chukeatirote E., Li X.H., Yan J.Y., Hyde K.D. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Diaporthe species associated with grapevine trunk disease in China. Fungal Biol. 2015;119:283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weir B.S., Johnston P.R., Damm U. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012;73:115–180. doi: 10.3114/sim0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Prihastuti H., Cai L., Chen H., McKenzie E.H.C., Hyde K.D. Characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with coffee berries in northern Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2009;39:89–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Damm U., Cannon P.F., Woudenberg J.H.C., Crous P.W. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012;73:37–113. doi: 10.3114/sim0010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Damm U., Cannon P.F., Woudenberg J.H.C., Johnston P.R., Weir B.S. The Colletotrichum boninense species complex. Stud. Mycology. 2012;73:1–36. doi: 10.3114/sim0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jayawardena R.S., Hyde K.D., Damm U., Cai L., Liu M., Li X.H., Zhang W., Zhao W.S., Yan J.Y. Notes on currently accepted species of Colletotrichum. Mycosphere. 2016;7:1192–1260. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cannon P.F., Damm U., Johnston P.R., Weir B.S. Colletotrichum-current status and future directions. Stud. Mycol. 2012;73:181–213. doi: 10.3114/sim0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xinlei F., Yingmei L., Rong M., Chenming T. Morphological and phylogenetic studies of Cytospora (Valsaceae, Diaporthales) isolates from Chinese scholar tree, with description of a new species. Mycoscience. 2014;55:252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2013.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carbone I., Kohn L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 1999;91:553–556. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Templeton M.D., Rikkerink E.H.A., Solon S.L., Crowhurst R.N. Cloning and molecular characterization of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-encoding gene and cDNA from the plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulate. Gene. 1992;122:225–230. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90055-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gardes M., Bruns T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993;2:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., Whitem T.J., editors. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 1990. pp. 315–332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hall T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. doi: 10.1021/bk-1999-0734.ch008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Katoh K., Standley D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nguyen L.T., Schmidt H.A., von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Minh B.Q., Nguyen M.A., von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:1188–1195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kalyaanamoorthy S., Minh B.Q., Wong T.K.F., Von Haeseler A., Jermiin L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinfotmatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schena L., Mosca S., Cacciola S.O., Faedda R., Sanzani S.M., Agosteo G., Sergeeva V., Lio G.M. Species of the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. boninense complexes associated with olive anthracnose. Plant Pathol. 2014;63:437–446. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12110. Corpus ID: 59138976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huang F., Chen G., Hou X., Fu Y., Cai L., Hyde K., Li H.Y. Colletotrichum species associated with cultivated citrus in China. Fungal Divers. 2013;61:61–74. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0232-y. Corpus ID: 15163531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rojas E., Rehner S., Samuels G., Bael S.V., Herre E., Cannon P., Chen R., Pang J., Wang R., Zhang Y., et al. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides associated with Theobroma cacao and other plants in Panamá: Multilocus phylogenies distinguish host-associated pathogens from asymptomatic endophytes. Mycologia. 2010;102:1318–1338. doi: 10.3852/09-244. Corpus ID: 44822023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dean R., Van Kan J.A.L., Pretorius Z.A., Hammond-kosack K.E., Dipietro A., Spanu P.D., Foster G.D. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;13:414–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Crouch J.A., Beirn L.A., Cortese L.M., Bonos S.A., Clarke B.B. Anthracnose disease of switchgrass caused by the novel fungal species Colletotrichum navitas. Mycol. Res. 2009;113:1411–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nam M., Park M., Lee H.D., Yu S. Taxonomic Re-evaluation of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Isolated from Strawberry in Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 2013;29:317–322. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.12.2012.0188. Corpus ID: 2295330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sharma G., Shenoy B.D. Colletotrichum fructicola and C. siamense are involved in chilli anthracnose in India. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2014;47:1179–1194. doi: 10.1080/03235408.2013.833749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li H.N., Jiang J.J., Hong N., Wang G.P., Xu W.X. First Report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing bitter rot of Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) in China. Plant Dis. 2013;97:1000. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-13-0084-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kyoko W., Hiromi I., Takashi S. Anthracnose of genus Mandevilla caused by Colletotrichum truncatum and C. siamense in Japan. Fungal Dis. 2016;82:33–37. doi: 10.1007/s10327-015-0635-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chunhua L., Huan Y., Xiaoyu Z., Xiaohan P., Wenbo L., Weiguo L., Fucong Z. Identification and phylogenetic analysis of anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum siamense and C. fructicola isolated from Rubber Tree in Hainan. Chin. J. Trop. Crops. 2018;39:129–136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2018.01.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qinghai W., Kun F., Dewei L., Shanguang N., Xiaoqin W. Walnut anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense in China. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2017;46:585–595. doi: 10.1007/s13313-017-0525-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fu M., Crous P.W., Bai Q., Zhang P.F., Xiang J., Guo Y.S., Zhao F.F., Yang M.M., Hong N., Wang G.P. Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose of Pyrus spp. in China. Pers. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fugal. 2019;42:421–435. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ling J.F., Song X.B., Xi P.G., Cheng B.P., Cui Y.P., Chen X., Peng A.T., Zhang L.H. Identification of Colletotrichum siamense causing litchi pepper spot disease in mainland China. Plant Pathol. 2019;68:1533–1542. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu J.P., Zhou J., Jiao Z.B. Amorphophallus konjac anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense in China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020;128:225–231. doi: 10.1111/jam.14460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shengfeng M., Haodong C., Yanjun L. First report of the Colletotrichum siamense species complex causing anthracnose on Photinia × fraseri Dress in China. Plant Dis. 2020;105:510. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1221-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lu Q., Wang Y., Li N., Ni D., Yang Y., Wang X. Differences in the characteristics and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum camelliae and C. fructicola isolated from the tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] For. Microbiol. 2018;9:30–60. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang S.Y., Su S.C., Liu T., Fan G., Wang J. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on pistachio (Pistacia vera) in China. Plant Dis. 2011;95:1314. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sharma G., Pinnaka A.K., Shenoy B.D. Resolving the Colletotrichum siamense species complex using ApMat marker. Fungal Divers. 2015;71:247–264. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0312-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yaowen Z., Rong S., Yixue M., Qiqin L., Wei L., Gaoqing Y. Colletotrichum siamense: A novel leaf pathogen of Sterculia nobilis Smith detected in China. For. Pathol. 2020;50:e12575. doi: 10.1111/efp.12575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Afanador-Kafuri L., Minz D., Maymon M., Freeman S. Characterization of Colletotrichum isolates from tamarillo, passiflora, and mango in colombia and identification of a unique species from the genus. Phytopathology. 2003;93:579–587. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.5.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gazis R., Rehner S., Chaverri P. Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences. Mol. Ecol. 2011;20:3001–3013. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES