Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2022 Sep 5;11:995. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.125050.1

Case Report: A successful case of toxic epidermal necrolysis treated with plasmapheresis therapy

Wahyu Lestari 1,2,a, Vella Vella 1,2, Teuku Yasir 3,4, Teuku Zulfikar 5,6
PMCID: PMC10148083  PMID: 37128216

Abstract

Toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) is rare and can be life-threatening for patients. Appropriate management of TEN patients could give optimal results and prevent complications. One treatment modality for TEN is plasmapheresis, which is rarely available in most cases with severe TEN. Here we reported a successful treatment of severe TEN with plasmapheresis. A 40-year-old woman under tuberculosis therapy complained of shortness of breath that began four days prior to hospital admission and worsened ever since. The patient's skin was peeling with red spots and rashes all over the body for a week. During the examination, the patient was compos mentis, and the SCORTEN score was 2 with 12.1% risk of mortality rate. Dermatological examination of the face, trunk and extremities found extensive erosions, loose bullae filled with clear fluid, brown crusts, and generalized distribution with more than 30% epidermolysis. The patient was diagnosed with toxic epidermal necrolysis caused by antituberculosis therapy. We treated the patient by discontinuing the suspected drugs and administering the corticosteroids, but no improvement was observed. The patient underwent two cycle plasmaphereses with 5% albumin, resulting in 1.2 liter of plasma exchange. Re-epithelialization was observed after three days, and the patient was discharged on day 8. This case-report highlights the important role of plasmapheresis in treating the TEN patients. However, a study with larger sample sizes is warranted to validate the efficacy of plasmapheresis in TEN.

Keywords: toxic epidermal necrolysis, TEN, plasmapheresis, steroid, SCORTEN score

Introduction

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), a potentially life-threatening condition, is an acute immune reaction characterized by necrosis and exfoliation of the epidermis covering more than 30% of the surface area of the body. Epidermolysis causes red spots to appear, which subsequently turn into blisters. 1 , 2 Because of the high mortality rate of TEN, a comprehensive management of the condition includes fast diagnosis, prompt identification of the causative medication, intensive care treatment, and prognosis evaluation using the Severity of Illness for TEN (SCORTEN). 3 Supportive therapy, such as isolation, maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance, nutrition, pain management, antimicrobials, and wound dressing are considered sufficient for TEN patients. However, there is uncertainty about the optimal systemic therapy to treat TEN. 2

Drug-induced TEN is usually caused by anticonvulsants, allopurinol, and antibiotics. 4 Phenytoin was the most common cause in the anticonvulsant group, while sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim is the most common cause in the antibiotic group. 4 Antituberculosis agents have also been reported as the cause of TEN with isoniazid (INH) and streptomycin injection as the offenders. 5 7 However, TEN cases caused by antituberculosis agents were mostly reported in patients with immunosuppressant treatment, such as in HIV or SLE patients. 7 9 The timeline from presenting TEN symptoms to hospital admission usually varies from 4-15 days. 7 , 8 Here we report an immunocompetent patient with delayed TEN 30 days after antituberculosis therapy.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old woman, Acehnese civil servant, presented to the Dr Zaionel Abidin Hospital in Banda Aceh Indonesia with shortness of breath. One week before the admission, the patient’s skin was peeling; red blotches and rashes emerged all over the body. The patient also reported that their eyes were itchy. The patient was coughing up phlegm for three days before admission. There was no fever and no documented allergy history.

The patient had the same complaints in 2011 and 2013 and was diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis and Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS). However, the patient was unable to recall the drug(s) that was associated with it. The patient had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and tuberculosis and was routinely treated with insulin Novorapid 12-12-12, Levemir 0-0-0-12 and tuberculosis drugs. The patient's condition worsened since the patient took tuberculosis drugs for one month.

On physical examination, eyelid edema, bulbar conjunctiva, and tarsal superior and inferior hyperemia were observed; the mouth was excoriated and fissured. The genital area was within normal limits. On pulmonary examination, there was a decreased tactile fremitus, decreased breath sound and ronchi over the left lung suggesting pleural effusion. Resonant percussion and auscultation were vesicular in the right lung field. On the dermatological status, macules, erythematous plaques, multiple brownish crusts, and nummular-size plaques were observed on regio of facialis, superior and inferior thoracic, and superior and inferior extremities with epidermolysis > 90% of body surface area, and Nikolsky sign (+) ( Figure 1). The SCORTEN score was used to calculate the prognostic score and yielded a score of 2 with a possible mortality rate of 12.1%.

Figure 1. Skin abnormalities of patient before therapy in the facial and colli region (A), the trunk region (B), bilateral lower extremity et pedis region (C and D), posterior thoracic region (E) showed erythematous macules, bullae, erosions and brownish crusts with a positive Nikolsky sign.

Figure 1.

The blood test showed hemoglobin 13.6 g/dL, platelets 302.000/mm 3, leukocytes increased by 16.000/mm 3. Kidney and liver function, as well as blood sugar levels within normal limits. Blood gas analysis showed pH 7.497 mmHg, pCO 2 29.00 mmHg, pO 2 61 mmHg, bicarbonate 22.7 mmHg, total CO 2 23.6 mmHg, BE 0.3 mmol/L, and oxygen saturation 93.5%.

Histopathological examination showed mild acanthosis, vacuolar changes, and scattered apoptotic keratinocytes in the epidermis, consistent with TEN. The dermis has a perivascular infiltrate consisting of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils. There were no subcorneal spongiform and/or intraepidermal pustules.

Based on the physical examination and histopathology test result, the patient was diagnosed to have toxic epidermal necrolysis. The tuberculosis drug was discontinued because it was suspected the drug was the cause. Furthermore, the patient was taking oral prednisone and loratadine. After consultation to Department of Dermato-Venereology, the therapies were replaced by methylprednisolone injection 62.5 mg, oral mebhydrolin napadisylate 50 mg and combination of salicylic acid 3% and desoximethasone 0.25%, and vaseline album. Because there was no improvement observed, the patient was planned to undergo plasmapheresis with 5% albumin using the prismaflex machine. On the fourth day of plasmapheresis, the patient was given desoximethasone ointment as additional therapy. Methylprednisolone started to be tapped into 31.25 mg per day, fluconazole drip therapy200 mg/day and sun protection factor (SPF) 50 PA+ sunscreen was added on the fifth day.

After a week of therapy, the skin lesions improved, and the itchy skin complaints decreased. Purplish red macules with hypopigmented macules in the middle begin to diminish. Methylprednisolone injection therapy was replaced by oral treatment ( Figure 2). Re-epithelialization was observed after three days, and the patient was discharged on day eight.

Figure 2. Recovery of the patient after the therapy. Purplish red macules were reduced two weeks after therapy in face region (A), abdominal (B), bilateral inferior extremity and pedis (C), and dorsum region (D).

Figure 2.

Discussion

TEN is an immediate reaction to a treatment marked by skin death and peeling in the epidermis. Based on the distribution of skin lesions, patients are classified to: (1) SJS (<10% body area surface), (2) SJS-TEN overlapping (10%-30% body area surface); and (3) TEN (>30% body area surface). Following the skin eruption, there was mucosal involvement in two areas: the eyes and the mouth. This occurs in nearly 80% of all TEN patients. 1 , 10 Shortness of breath indicates pulmonary problems. Early pulmonary problems occur in about 25% of patients and are primarily manifested by an increased respiratory rate and cough. Therefore, the presence of these three main symptoms leads to TEN diagnosis. 10 , 11 TEN symptoms usually develop after 1-3 weeks of the drug suspected of causing the symptoms is administered. 12 TEN symptoms usually appear between 6 days to 14 days after taking antituberculosis therapy in tuberculosis patients. 13 , 14 Das et al. reported a TEN case in an immunocompetent adult with tuberculosis, however, the patient was elderly (67-years-old). 13 The longest duration between drug administration and TEN symptoms presentation was five weeks. 6 Our case is the first case that reports TEN presentations in an immunocompetent adult patient without underlying comorbidities. The delayed reaction in our patient might be related to type IV hypersensitivity reaction, where T-cells mediate against specific drug/peptide antigens. 15 The manifestation of type IV hypersensitivity ranges from mild such as maculopapular exanthema, contact dermatitis or drug eruption to life-threatening SJS and TEN. 16 Genetic polymorphism of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele also plays an important role in inducing TEN, with HLA-C*04:01 significantly associated to antituberculosis drug-induced hypersensitivity. 17

There are no laboratory tests to support the diagnosis of TEN. Laboratory tests are performed to evaluate severity, prognosis, and daily management of such a life-threatening condition. In general, blood gas analysis indicates respiratory alkalosis and associated with bronchial involvement. Arterial blood gas analysis should be monitored because serum bicarbonate levels below 20 mEq/L indicate a poor prognosis. 18 Acute respiratory failure progressed rapidly after the onset of skin involvement and was associated with a poor prognosis. 18

Therapeutic management of TEN patients necessitates prompt identification and the withdrawal of the suspected substance as soon as possible, accompanied by supportive and customized therapy. There is no best-specialized therapy for TEN until now. 19 In this case, tuberculosis drugs were stopped temporarily.

Supportive care includes: maintaining fluid, electrolytes, optimal ambient temperature of 28-30°C, nutrition, aseptic skincare without debridement, and eye care. 20 Skin erosion in TEN patients causes hemodynamic problem. Nasogastric tube as a feeding route was used because the lesions on the oral mucosa make eating difficult or impossible. 21 The eyelids should be gently cleaned daily with a sterile isotonic sodium chloride solution. A study found that acute conjunctivitis preceded the skin eruption in 42 cases and co-occurred in 21 cases. 21 Topical ocular steroids early in the disease could result in a good visual prognosis. 3 , 21

The use of corticosteroids is still controversial. Corticosteroids can prevent the disease prolongation if given during the initial phase. 3 However, studies found that steroids did not stop disease progression and were linked with increased mortality and side effects, particularly sepsis. 3 , 21 Corticosteroids reduce epidermal apoptosis by numerous methods, including inhibition of different cytokines such as TNF-α, inhibition of INF-γ, which can promote apoptosis, and inhibition of Fas-mediated keratinocyte death. 3 In the absence of clinical trials, specific guidelines for the use of systemic corticosteroids vary and are not indicated as the primary treatment for epidermal necrolysis.

Plasmapheresis is exchanging the patient's plasma and replacing it with 5% albumin, FFP, colloids, or crystalloids. The use of plasmapheresis could release the circulating drugs as well as their metabolites or inflammatory mediators such as cytokines and it is one of the modalities of adjuvant therapy in TEN. The use of plasma exchange is a relatively safe intervention in more severe forms of TEN due to the presence of inflammatory cytokines, autoantibodies, expressed immune complexes or other toxic substances that cannot be removed by dialysis. From epidemiological studies of TEN throughout Japan from 2005 to 2007, plasmapheresis is now only used as a last resort in TEN patients who do not improve with standard therapy, including high-dose corticosteroids or adequate IVIG, or for patients with severe clinical complications such as encephalopathy hepatic and in patients with TEN involving more than 70% BSA. 19 , 22 Previous studies that reported the use of plasmapheresis in TEN patients are presented in Table 1. Of 119 patients, antibiotics triggered TEN in 19.3% cases, while NSAID medication caused TEN in 14.3% cases. Most patients were initially treated with corticosteroids (92/119, 77.3%), however, as no improvement was observed, plasmapheresis was included in the management of TEN (64.7%) in combination with intravenous immunoglobulin in 32.8% patients (39/119). The majority of the patients survived the disease (101/119, 84.9%) with fatality only involving 18 patients (15.1%). The use of plasmapheresis in TEN patients is justified due to its activity in removing the offending drug metabolites and other cytotoxic mediators from the circulation. 23 Treatment with plasmapheresis reduced the severity of TEN in patients, 24 however, the efficacy of plasmapheresis in toxic epidermal necrolysis should be further evaluated. 19 , 22

Table 1. The use of total plasma exchange in toxic epidermal necrolysis cases.

Study design Total patients Mucosa involved Drug causing TEN Outcome TEN therapy Ref
Oral Genitalia Eyes Anal Anticonvulsant Antibiotic Allopurinol muscle relaxant NSAID CCB ART Immunomodulating agent Lived Died Plasmapheresis Steroid IVIG Antibiotics
Case series 7 7 4 4 1 3 2 2 - - - - - 7 0 7 - - - 27
Retrospective 8 - - - - - 4 - 2 2 - - - 7 1 8 - - - 28
Case series 13 11 4 12 2 5 3 1 - 3 1 - - 10 3 13 6 1 3 29
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - 1 - - - - 1 - 1 - 1 1 - - 30
Case series 5 5 - 5 - - - - - - - - - 4 1 5 4 5 4 31
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 32
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 33
Case report 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - 34
Case report 1 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 - 35
Case series 4 4 4 4 1 - 4 - - - - - - 3 1 4 4 1 3 36
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - 1 - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 37
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 38
Case series 3 3 `1 3 - - - 2 - - - - - 3 - 1 3 3 - 39
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 - - 22
Case report 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 40
Case report 1 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 41
Case report 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 - 1 42
Case report 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 43
Case report 1 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 - 1 1 44
Case report 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 45
Case series 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - - 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 46
Case report 1 1 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 - - 47
Cohort study 59 36 27 32 - 4 5 - - 7 - - - 51 8 19 58 16 - 48
case report 1 1 1 1 - 1 - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 49
case report 1 1 1 1 11 - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 50
119 85 56 78 19 15 23 5 2 17 1 1 6 101 18 77 92 39 25

ART: antiretroviral therapy; CCB: calcium channel blocker; IVIG: intravenous immune globulin; NSAID: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PE: plasmapheresis.

There are some the limitations of our study. There was no challenge test on which tuberculosis therapy caused the TEN in our patient. Drug challenge in patients with a history of drug hypersensitivity remains the gold standard in diagnosing the drug tolerance. However, drug challenge is contraindicative in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reaction with severe organ involvement. 25 Therefore, combining in vivo (such as patch test and intradermal testing) and ex vivo methods (enzyme linked immunospot and lymphocyte transformation test) to investigate the suspected drug have been previously recommended. 26 Our study relies on a relatively limited number of databases to describe the effectiveness of plasmapheresis as a treatment for TEN. This case did not consider comparisons between plasmapheresis therapy and other alternative therapies. Long-term studies and follow-up with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the efficacy of plasmapheresis as a treatment for TEN.

Conclusion

We report an immunocompetent patient with delayed TEN due to antituberculosis therapy with SCORTEN score 2 and 12.1% risk of mortality rate. Two cycle plasmaphereses with 5% albumin resulting in rapid re-epithelialization and rapid recovery. This case-report suggests the important role of plasmapheresis in treating TEN patients.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. Mockenhaupt M, Roujeau J-C: Epidermal Necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis). Fitzpatrick's Dermatology. 9e. edn. Kang S, Amagai M, Bruckner AL, et al., editors. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education;2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Peters J: Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Nurs. Times. 2000;96(36):43–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Su JR, Haber P, Ng CS, et al. : Erythema multiforme, Stevens Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported after vaccination, 1999-2017. Vaccine. 2020;38(7):1746–1752. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Papp A, Sikora S, Evans M, et al. : Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis by a multidisciplinary team. A review of literature and treatment results. Burns. 2018;44(4):807–815. 10.1016/j.burns.2017.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Muthaiah B, Panachiyil G, Babu T, et al. : Isoniazid Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in a HIV Positive Patient during Treatment for Extra Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Case Report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2019;13(3). 10.7860/JCDR/2019/40321.12719 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sudarsa PSS, Puspawati NMD, Purnama NKR, et al. : Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) in an elderly with comorbidities: a case report. Bali Med. J. 2020;9(1):323–326. 10.15562/bmj.v9i1.1647 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hmouda H, Laouani-Kechrid C, Karoui MN, et al. : A rare case of streptomycin-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with tuberculosis: a therapeutic dilemma. Ann. Pharmacother. 2005;39(1):165–168. 10.1345/aph.1E430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Asmae A, Mariame M, Karima S: Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: two cases report. PAMJ. 2021;38(236). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Costa VV, Almeida Sarmento V, Leite Ribeiro PM, et al. : Unusual oral findings of the toxic epidermal necrolysis in an HIV-infected patient: a case report. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;23(5):363–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Griffiths CE, Barker J, Bleiker TO, et al. : Rook's textbook of dermatology, 4 volume set. John Wiley & Sons;2016; vol. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hoetzenecker W, Mehra T, Saulite I, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis. F1000Res. 2016;5:951. 10.12688/f1000research.7574.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. AlQuliti K, Ratrout B, AlZaki A: Antiepileptic drugs toxicity: A case of toxic epidermal necrolysis in patient with phenytoin prophylaxis post-cranial radiation for brain metastases. Saudi Pharm. J. 2014;22(4):381–384. 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Das SK, Jana PK, Bandyopadhyay AK, et al. : Ethambutol and pyrazinamide-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in an immunocompetent adult with tuberculosis. Lung India. 2012;29(1):87–88. 10.4103/0970-2113.92376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Swami A, Gupta B, Bhattacharjee P: Response to Modified Antitubercular Drug Regime and Antiretroviral Therapy in a Case of HIV Infection with Disseminated Tuberculosis with Isoniazid Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2012;2012:1–3. 10.1155/2012/626709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Montañez MI, Mayorga C, Bogas G, et al. : Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis. Front. Immunol. 2017;8. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chen CB, Abe R, Pan RY, et al. : An Updated Review of the Molecular Mechanisms in Drug Hypersensitivity. J. Immunol. Res. 2018;2018:1–22. 10.1155/2018/6431694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ghattaoraya GS, Middleton D, Santos EJM, et al. : Human leucocyte antigen–adverse drug reaction associations: from a perspective of ethnicity. Int. J. Immunogenet. 2017;44(1):7–26. 10.1111/iji.12304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Anggraini DI: Nekrolisis Epidermal Toksik: Laporan Kasus pada Pasien Geriatri. J. AgromedUnila. 2017;4(1):156–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Diana R, Irawanto ME: Patofisiologi dan Manajemen Terapi Sindrom Stevens-Johnson (SSJ) dan Nekrolisis Epidermal Toksik. 2020.
  • 20. Mockenhaupt M: Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: clinical patterns, diagnostic considerations, etiology, and therapeutic management. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2014;33(1):10–16. 10.12788/j.sder.0058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Evalina R: Penanganan Luka Pada Stevens-Johnson's Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Medan. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Watari T, Sato S, Uojima H, et al. : Successful Combination Therapy Including Plasma Exchange for Severe Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. J. Gen. Fam. Med. 2016;17(3):232–237. 10.14442/jgfm.17.3_232 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Reddy S, Aron BK, Stewart J: A Life-Threatening Case of Torsemide-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Associated With the Treatment of Anasarca. Cureus. 2022;14(3). 10.7759/cureus.22895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Frantz R, Huang S, Are A, et al. : Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Review of Diagnosis and Management. Medicina. 2021;57(9):895. 10.3390/medicina57090895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Copaescu A, Gibson A, Li Y, et al. : An Updated Review of the Diagnostic Methods in Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:573573. 10.3389/fphar.2020.573573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Trubiano JA, Chua KYL, Holmes NE, et al. : Safety of cephalosporins in penicillin class severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020;8(3):1142–1146.e4. 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chaidemenos GC, Chrysomallis F, Sombolos K, et al. : Plasmapheresis in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Int. J. Dermatol. 1997;36(3):218–221. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00192.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Furubacke A, Berlin G, Anderson C, et al. : Lack of significant treatment effect of plasma exchange in the treatment of drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis? Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(11):1307–1310. 10.1007/s001340051063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bamichas G, Natse T, Christidou F, et al. : Plasma exchange in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ther. Apher. 2002;6(3):225–228. 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2002.00409.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Nomura T, Abe R, Fujimoto K, et al. : Plasma exchange; a promising treatment for toxic epidermal necrolysis with AIDS [4]. AIDS. 2004;18(18):2446–2448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lissia M, Figus A, Rubino C: Intravenous immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis combined treatment in patients with severe toxic epidermal necrolysis: Preliminary report. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2005;58(4):504–510. 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hassikou H, El Haouri M, Tabache F, et al. : Leflunomide-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(5):597–599. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sakai N, Yoshizawa Y, Amano A, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis complicated by multiple intestinal ulcers. Int. J. Dermatol. 2008;47(2):180–182. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03389.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kamada N, Yoneyama K, Togawa Y, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe hyperbilirubinemia: Complete re-epithelialization after bilirubin reduction therapies. J. Dermatol. 2010;37(6):534–536. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00770.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Aihara Y, Oyama Y, Ichikawa K, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis in a 4-year-old boy successfully treated with plasma exchange in combination with methylprednisolone and i.v. immunoglobulin. J. Dermatol. 2012;39(11):951–952. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2012.01534.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Košt́ál M, Bláha M, Lánská M, et al. : Beneficial effect of plasma exchange in the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: A series of four cases. J. Clin. Apher. 2012;27(4):215–220. 10.1002/jca.21213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Seczynska B, Nowak I, Sega A, et al. : Supportive therapy for a patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis undergoing plasmapheresis. Crit. Care Nurse. 2013;33(4):26–38. 10.4037/ccn2013555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Balint B, Stepic N, Todorovic M, et al. : Ibuprofen-induced extensive toxic epidermal necrolysis - A multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in a single case. Blood Transfus. 2014;12(3):436–439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Aihara M, Kano Y, Fujita H, et al. : Efficacy of additional i.v. immunoglobulin to steroid therapy in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. J. Dermatol. 2015;42(8):768–777. 10.1111/1346-8138.12925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Burger E, Gou D, Vandergriff T, et al. : Acute syndrome of pan-epidermolysis and thrombotic storm arising in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. JAAD Case Rep. 2018;4(9):877–879. 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. el-Azhary RA, Wang MZ, Wentworth AB, et al. : Treatment of severe drug reactions by hemodialysis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2018;57(2):177–182. 10.1111/ijd.13837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Santosa RA, Wahab Z, Kurniawan SP, et al. : Successful Treatment of Methampyrone-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange. Case Rep. Med. 2018;2018:1–4. 10.1155/2018/2182604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zielińska M, Matusiak Ł, Gołębiowski W, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis in an 8-year-old girl successfully treated with cyclosporin a, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2018;35(2):217–221. 10.5114/ada.2018.75247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Krajewski A, Mazurek MJ, Młyńska-Krajewska E: Successful therapy of recurrent toxic epidermal necrolysis using total plasma exchange, continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, and intravenous immunoglobulin—Case report. Dermatol. Ther. 2020;33(4):e13442. 10.1111/dth.13442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Krajewski A, Mlynska-Krajewska E, Kaczynska K, et al. : Covid-19 and ten treated with ivig and total plasma exchange: Simultaneous systemic treatment for both diseases. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2021;31(6):522–523. 10.18176/jiaci.0692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Lu J, Dong L, Zhang L, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis after therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric lupus patients and associated risk factors analysis. Lupus. 2021;30(3):465–472. 10.1177/0961203320981128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Totsuka M, Watanabe T, Takamura N, et al. : A pediatric case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome with acute liver failure, resulting in liver transplantation. J. Dermatol. 2021;48(9):1423–1427. 10.1111/1346-8138.15963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Watanabe T, Go H, Saigusa Y, et al. : Mortality and risk factors on admission in toxic epidermal necrolysis: A cohort study of 59 patients. Allergol. Int. 2021;70(2):229–234. 10.1016/j.alit.2020.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Abuzneid YS, Alzeerelhouseini HIA, Rabi D, et al. : Carbamazepine Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome That Developed into Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Review of the Literature. Case Rep Dermatol. Med. 2022;2022:1–4. 10.1155/2022/6128688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Peng Y, Yu Q, Zhang X, et al. : Toxic epidermal necrolysis during camrelizumab treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86(5):417–419. 10.1111/cod.14038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2023 Apr 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.137313.r168692

Reviewer response for version 1

Nurdjannah Jane Niode 1

In my opinion, this is an interesting case report which would be useful in practice for other practitioners, however I have a few suggestions regarding some points in the manuscript:

1. Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

The introductory section was short and concise, however the authors may add the specificity/uniqueness related to the case. In this case the authors can bring up a little discussion about the treatment (plasmapheresis) in the introduction. Moreover, the objective of case reporting should be in line with the title. In the introduction, the objective doesn’t match the title.

2. Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

In physical examination, it is better to explain the general condition of the patient and the vital signs (blood pressure heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature) should be stated, especially since heart rate is one of SCORTEN criteria.

Regarding the treatment, I suggest it is better to mention whether the patient received supportive therapy (IV line) to maintain fluid and electrolyte balance, and if the authors were using trade name for drugs, please add ® sign behind the trade name, also the specific name of the anti-tuberculosis drugs should be written. The authors also didn’t mention any treatment regarding eye disorders in this case.

3. Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

In this manuscript, the authors explain the relevant literature very well and in detail, however the authors need to add some explanations about the findings in this case and compare them with the relevant literature, not just discussing the literature. Furthermore, supportive care in discussion only exists in the literature but is not reflected in patient therapy either in case reports or discussions.

4. In references, it is better if the authors cited from the literature with maximum of 10 years, unless there is no other reference can substitute it. Here is my suggestion of a few references that could be replaced: Reference No.2 (year 2000), No.27 (year 1997), No.28 (year 1999), 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. Is reference no. 19, 21 cited from books?

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Partly

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Dermatology and venereology, Medical entomology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2022 Dec 5. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.137313.r156678

Reviewer response for version 1

Talha Bin Emran 1

I read the case report with great interest. The case is unique and has adequate description and analysis. Here are detailed evaluations:

  1. The title is clear, with a focus on the treatment of the case.

  2. The abstract consists of an introduction of the case, the main clinical findings, and the intervention, followed by a balanced conclusion.

  3. The introduction is brief but still adequate and explains why the case is important.

  4. The patient information is not provided, to follow the ethical issue. The figures are clear without personal information.

  5. The description of the case is adequate, including the follow-up.

  6. Some examinations were conducted to support the diagnosis. But the histopathological examination would be beneficial to readers if provided in the manuscript.

  7. The discussion is balanced. The authors also discussed the molecular aspect.

  8. One of the strengths of the study: the authors provided a literature review of the outcome of total plasma exchange in toxic epidermal necrolysis cases.

  9. Minor typo: Some conclusion parts should be non-italic: “CORTEN score 2 and 12.1% risk of mortality rate. Two cycle plasmaphereses with 5% albumin resulting in rapid recovery. ...”

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Clinical Biochemistry

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES