Abstract
The development of efficient CO2 capture and utilization technologies driven by renewable energy sources is mandatory to reduce the impact of climate change. Herein, seven imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) with different anions and cations were tested as catholytes for the CO2 electrocatalytic reduction to CO over Ag electrode. Relevant activity and stability, but different selectivities for CO2 reduction or the side H2 evolution were observed. Density functional theory results show that depending on the IL anions the CO2 is captured or converted. Acetate anions (being strong Lewis bases) enhance CO2 capture and H2 evolution, while fluorinated anions (being weaker Lewis bases) favour the CO2 electroreduction. Differently from the hydrolytically unstable 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Triflate was the most promising IL, showing the highest Faradaic efficiency to CO (>95%), and up to 8 h of stable operation at high current rates (−20 mA & −60 mA), which opens the way for a prospective process scale-up.
Subject terms: Electrocatalysis, Electrocatalysis, Carbon capture and storage, Atomistic models, Chemical engineering
Room-temperature ionic liquids are increasingly investigated as electrolytes for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction thanks to their high intrinsic ionic conductivities, wide electrochemical potential windows, and high CO2 absorption capacities and solubilities. Here, seven imidazolium-based ionic liquids are investigated as electrolytes for the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to CO using a silver foil cathode, with their stability, co-catalytic effects, and varying selectivities elucidated.
Introduction
The emission of carbon dioxide is one of the problems receiving the most attention worldwide since it is one of the main causes of the greenhouse effect and the climate change, which threatens not only national economies but also the global environment1–3. Currently, three alternatives to address this problem are being examined: the first one is based on CO2 emissions reduction by using less carbon-rich forms of fuel for energy production and increase of renewable energies use4,5; the second one, concerns the development of new systems for CO2 capture and storage6–8; and the last one is related to the use of CO2 as feedstock for the synthesis of useful chemicals or fuels9–12. In this work, the electrochemical (EC) CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) aided by ionic liquid (IL)-based electrolytes is analyzed for the selective production of CO, which can be exploited along or in mixture with H2 (as Syngas) to be used as fuel or as intermediate for industrial processes (e.g., Fischer Tropsch13, hydroformylation reaction14, methanol synthesis15). This is not an easy task because CO2 is a very stable gaseous linear molecule; thus, due to the carbon atom sp hybridization and delocalized electrons in π-orbitals, it is very difficult to activate and reduce. For this reason, both the use of a new-designed electrocatalyst (e.g., based on Cu, Zn, Ag)16–21 in conjunction with electrolytes optimization are two crucial strategies under investigation in the research community.
Regarding the latter, on which this work is focused, room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are being increasingly used as electrolytes for EC CO2RR thanks to their good intrinsic ionic conductivity, wide electrochemical potential windows and high CO2 absorption capacity and solubility16,22, with respect to aqueous-based electrolytes. Generally, RTILs have been coupled to metallic electrodes for the CO2RR (i.e. Ag, Au, Pt), but the best onset potential and current density values were reached with silver electrodes23. The most common ionic liquids used for the CO2RR contain imidazolium-based cations like 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium [BMIM]+ and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium [EMIM]+, with different anions (see Table S1 in the supporting information, SI). At the same time, based on the different chemical nature of the anion in the RTIL, the interaction of the cation with the CO2 and the electrode surface can be affected. Imidazolium-halide-based ionic liquids (e.g. containing [BF4]−, [PF6]−) are of large interest due to the stability of the cation ring and the anion hygroscopicity24. But, unfortunately, RTILs with fluorine-based anions are subject of debates about their potential decomposition into the toxic hydrofluoric acid (HF), which discourages their use as green electrolytes25,26. Another advantage of RTILs is their ability to stabilize EC CO2RR reaction intermediates, such as the CO2•- anion radical that is the rate-determining step (RDS) of the reaction at high current densities27. For instance, Motobayashi et al.28 observed RTIL cations stabilizing the CO2•- radical intermediate by using surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS). Ratschmeier et al.29 also demonstrated the CO formation via an electrostatically stabilized CO2•- radical by the RTILs cation by using in operando IR absorption spectroscopy and in situ sum-frequency generation spectroscopy. Thus, RTILs play a fundamental role as co-catalysts lowering the EC CO2RR overpotential13,30,31. On the other hand, the nature of anion also significantly affects the CO2 electroreduction performance: as an example, Golru et al.32 demonstrated that more hydrophilic anions can let more water molecules accumulate at the electrode surface and consequently enhance the side H2 evolution reaction (HER).
Based on this background, herein, seven imidazolium-based ILs (with and without fluorinated anions) were investigated as electrolytes for the EC conversion of CO2 to CO by using an Ag foil as cathode. They were chosen because of their higher CO2 capture ability than aqueous electrolytes. Since pure ILs have a high viscosity, which directly affects their conductivity and transport properties, an organic solvent was used as dilutant. The stability and co-catalytic effect of the imidazolium-based salts were investigated from the experimental and theoretical points of view. The catholyte properties such as conductivity and viscosity have been studied in detail to identify the best conditions for the CO2RR electrocatalytic tests. The role of the anion and the cation were studied and correlated to a change in the products selectivity. We experimentally and theoretically demonstrate for the first time that the role of the IL anions is to tune the ratio between the cations [EMIM]+ or [BMIM]+ and the carbene species (EMIM: or BMIM:) in the electrolyte and, consequently, the CO2 capture and electrochemical conversion features of the ILs. When using acetate as anion, the dissolved CO2 is chemically and irreversible absorbed by the carbene and, thus, not available for the EC CO2RR. Moreover, the proton exchange equilibrium between the [EMIM]+ and the acetate (being a strong Lewis base), greatly favors the formation of the carbene EMIM: that leads to a covering of the Ag electrode surface. Instead, by using fluorinated anions (weak Lewis bases), a greater concentration of IL-cations favors the EC CO2RR, by stabilizing the adsorbed CO2 (i.e., CO2* formation) at the Ag surface, as well as by decreasing the overpotential of all the reaction intermediates of the CO2-to-CO EC conversion process. Finally, durability tests of the most promising catholyte based on [BMIM][SO3CF3] were carried out to evaluate its long-term performance for a future improvement and scale up of the system.
Results and discussion
Catholytes properties: conductivity and viscosity
The ILs that were investigated as electrolytes for the CO2 electroreduction reaction are listed in Table 1. Because of their high viscosity, pure ILs present very low conductivity. For this experimental work, making the catholytes as conductive as possible was fundamental to lower the total cell overpotential, considering the distance between the electrodes and the use of a bipolar membrane separating the two chambers. Thus, to decrease the electrolyte resistance, diluting the ILs in a suitable solvent was essential.
Table 1.
Ionic Liquid | Abbreviation | Cation | Anion |
---|---|---|---|
1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate | [BMIM][BF4] | ||
1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Acetate | [BMIM][CO2CH3] | ||
1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Triflate | [BMIM][SO3CF3] | ||
1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Trifluoroacetate | [BMIM][CO2CF3] | ||
1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Acetate | [EMIM][CO2CH3] | ||
1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Triflate | [EMIM][SO3CF3] | ||
1-Butyl-2,3-Dimethylimidazolium Acetatea | - |
aThis IL was used only to confirm the proposed mechanism of reaction of [BMIM] [CO2CH3] and [EMIM][CO2CH3].
Figure 1 shows the viscosity (columns) and conductivity (squares) values of pure ionic liquids and compares them with their respective viscosity (light blue columns) and conductivity (pink squares) in a 0.3 M solution in acetonitrile. A large decrease in viscosity and a sharp increase in conductivity can be noticed when switching from the pure ILs to their respective solution. Pure [EMIM][CO2CH3] and [BMIM][CO2CH3] present the highest viscosities, η = 123 mPa s and η = 217 mPa s, respectively. The lower conductivity of the two acetate salts than of the other ILs probably is due to hydrogen bonds that the acetate anion can form with other anion-cation specie in solution or due to the strong cation-anion interaction that cause a low IL ionicity33,34. The viscosity is similar for all the IL solutions in ACN and equal to ~0.4/0.7 mPa s. This can be linked to the fact that all the solutions are very diluted ([IL] = 0.3 M). The properties of the final solutions in terms of viscosity almost reflect the properties of the pure solvent. Indeed, the pure acetonitrile has a viscosity equal to η = 0.15 mPa s. From the point of view of conductivity, ACN shows a very low value, σ = 5 µs cm−1, while pure ILs present higher values in a range between σ[BMIM][CO2CH3] = 1.1 mS cm−1 and σ[EMIM][SO3CF3] = 8.1 mS cm−1. The dissolution of ILs in acetonitrile permit to reach higher values of conductivity than such of the pure solvent, ranging from σ[BMIM][CO2CH3] = 8.8 mS cm−1 to σ[BMIM][BF4] = 24.6 mS cm−1. The trend is the same for the 0.3 M IL solutions saturated either in N2 or in CO2. Small variations of the viscosity are observed, in the order of a maximum of 0.3 mPa s, when passing from N2 to CO2 saturated solutions. However, more notable variations were appreciated for the conductivity values, which increased in the order of a maximum of 3 mS cm−1 in CO2 with respect to N2, especially for acetate-containing ILs and [BMIM][BF4].
Electrochemical stability of ILs at negative potentials
The ILs stability is of paramount importance in selecting the appropriate one for a specific application. The electrochemical stability of such substances is usually expressed by the width of the electrochemical window, that refers to the difference in voltage between the oxidation and reduction potentials of the ionic liquid35. The limit potential to evaluate such window is an arbitrary cut-off absolute value of the current density (ICut-Off), which is commonly set between 0.01 and 1 mA cm−2,36–39. Many other parameters might influence the width of the potential window, being the most important one the type of working electrode and in a lesser extent, the scan rate. Generally, the most used working electrodes are made of platinum, glassy carbon (GC) and tungsten35. Besides the advantages of acetonitrile when used as solvent of the imidazolium salts, due to the increment of conductivity because of a decrease in the viscosity of the ionic liquid, McEwen et al.40 demonstrated that acetonitrile along with butylene carbonate provide a wide window of stability of about 4.0 V vs Agwire. In the first case, because of the highly conductive characteristic and in the second, due to the substitution of the imidazolium cation in the C2 position with an alkyl group that increases the steric hindrance. In this work, a ICut-Off of 1 mA cm−2 was selected. To calculate the stability window, it was chosen to perform the tests with the same two compartment cell used for the CO2RR and with the same WE, CE and membrane, to have similar overpotentials to those encountered during the electrocatalytic tests. The experimental conditions used to measure the stability window are summarized in Table S2 (SI). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were recorded in the IL-based solutions in ACN saturated with an inert gas (N2), to study the contribution to the current variation of the electrolyte under test. Measurements in a CO2 saturated atmosphere were not performed to avoid the contributions to the current variation made by the CO2RR. Moreover, due to the redox potential of Ag, which was used as working electrode, the oxidation region could not be investigated to avoid the transformation of Ag(s) into Ag+ or Ag2+ when applying a positive potential. On the other hand, only the range of negative potentials is of interest for studying the behavior of the electrolytes in CO2 reduction condition. In terms of the potential reached to obtain the fixed ICut-Off, the trend observed is the following (see Fig. S4, SI): [EMIM][SO3CF3] = −2000 mV > [BMIM][CO2CF3] = −1995 mV > [BMIM][BF4] = [BMIM][SO3CF3] = −1900 mV > [BMIM][CO2CH3] = −1887 mV > [EMIM][CO2CH3] = −1860 mV (where all the potential values are referenced to the Ag/AgCl electrode). According to Kazameiabnavi et al.41, the electrochemical stability window of these type of ionic liquids is limited by the reduction potential of the cations and the oxidation potential of the anions. It is evident from the above-described results, that the change in the cathodic potential is not so significative. This could be explained because the reduction potential of 1-alkyl-3-methilimidazolium cations remains almost constant despite the length of the alkyl group, since they contain identical imidazolium ring structures. Thus, the slight differences could be related to the different conductivity values of the solutions. In fact, considering the four ionic liquids with the same cation [BMIM]+, the lowest stability window was obtained for the [BMIM][CO2CH3], which has the lowest conductivity and highest viscosity of the here studied ILs (as reported in Fig. 1). Likewise, considering the two ionic liquids with the same [EMIM]+ cation, a higher potential stability window was obtained for the [EMIM][SO3CF3] than for [EMIM][CO2CH3], because of the higher conductivity of the triflate-based solution, while the latter has similar characteristics in terms of viscosity and conductivity to [BMIM][CO2CH3]. In general, ILs with fluorinated anion are more conductive, less viscous, and therefore have a slightly wider window of cathodic electrochemical stability. Since these measurements were done in the absence of CO2, the cathodic current increase can be attributed both to the HER and to the decomposition of the catholyte itself. To experimentally confirm the extend of the H2 production, crono-potentiometry (CP) studies at −20 mA cm−2 with N2-saturated solutions of [BMIM][SO3CF3] and [BMIM][CO2CH3] were performed and a FEH2 = 13% and FEH2 = 15% were obtained, respectively (Fig. S5 and Fig. S6, SI). Moreover, a color variation of the catholyte solution from transparent to dark yellow was noticed (see Figs. S5A, B, S6A, B). Considering both that the faradaic efficiency values for the HER were far from 100% and that the catholyte changed color, it was observed that in the absence of other Faradaic reactions (being in absence of CO2RR) the IL decomposition is highly probable. As demonstrated by De Vos et al.35 through NMR analyses, alteration of imidazolium-based ILs concern only the cation, in particular at the C2 position with the loss of aromaticity and the possible formation of radicals, dimers, disproportionation reaction and cagelike structures.
Equilibrium CO2-Ag-ILs: comparison based on different IL counterions
Before voltammetry studies were performed, the catholyte was purged with an inert gas (N2) to remove oxygen and other gaseous impurities, followed by saturation with CO2, at room temperature. CO2 and electrolyte interactions that can occur during the saturation phase, before the electrochemical test, will be discussed in following.
It is widely known in literature that some RTILs have a high ability to capture CO242. This peculiarity is found in ILs with carboxylate-functionalized anions, e.g. the acetate anion in this work, since they are able to chemisorb the CO2 molecule. Maginn et al.43 classified CO2-[BMIM][CO2CH3] a case with strong intermolecular interactions and complex formation. Chin et al.44 showed a mechanism where CO2 is captured as a bicarbonate group on this IL. Blath et al.45 performed infrared spectroscopy on [EMIM][CO2CH3] to study the CO2-IL interaction. They compared IR-spectra of the untreated IL in its pure condition with the CO2-treated one. In the latter spectrum, they found a peak at 2345 cm−1 that represents the CO2 dissolved and chemical unbounded, and a second peak at 1663 cm−1 that Tommasi et al.46 correlated with the carboxylate formation.
The mechanism behind the CO2 capture by [CO2CH3]−-containing ILs can be described as follows: according to aqueous solutions equilibrium, acetic acid is a weak acid47, and consequently acetate is a strong conjugated base. According to Watanabe et al.33, strong ILs anion can be considered as Lewis bases. Therefore, the proton exchange equilibrium between the [EMIM]+ and the acetate shown in Fig. 2 (left), greatly favors the formation of the carbene species, namely EMIM: (B in Fig. 2), which is a Lewis base. The formed carbene species will then react with the dissolved CO2 (a Lewis acid), forming carboxylate species (C in Fig. 2, right)48. Cabaço et al.49 and Chiarotto et al.50 also experimentally demonstrated that in the case of acetate-based ILs, carbene species are formed from the [BMIM]+ cation, which reacts with CO2 to form [BMIM]−CO2, whereas the proton released by the ring interacts with the anion to produce acetic acid.
By replacing the [CO2CH3]− anion with the [CO2CF3]−, the behavior of the IL towards the CO2 molecule radically changes. Considering the lower basic strength of [CO2CF3]− in comparison to the [CO2CH3]− anion in aqueous equilibrium51, the force of the base to tear the H in C2 decreases and the formation of the carbene is strongly reduced, leading to less carboxylate development. In this case, the capability of ILs to capture CO2 is negligible and, consequently, CO2 is only dissolved in the solution via weak van der Waals interactions. This occurs also in the case of other fluorinated anions such as [SO3CF3]− and [BF4]52,53. Therefore, the quantity of deprotonated cations (or carbene species) in the system tightly depends on the nature of the anion. The stronger the conjugate-base anion, the greater the tendency to deprotonate the cation. Based on this, we envisage that the role of anions is then to tune the ratio between [EMIM]+/EMIM: in the solution and thus the CO2 capturing feature of the IL.
It is known that Ag, the cathode employed in this study, also behaves as a Lewis acid, and, as such, it can react with the carbene species present in the electrolyte solution. To characterize the reactivity of carbene with respect to the CO2 and Ag surface, we have first studied the possible reactions by means of DFT. The Ag(111) facet was used for the study being the most representative of the electrode surface, as confirmed by XRD analysis (See Fig. S7, SI). The reactions can be studied by computing the binding energies (BE) of carbene and CO2 and carbene and Ag(111), referenced to the isolated molecules and surface. The CO2 binding energy (BE) is negative in both cases: BECO2-EMIM: = −0.60 eV and BECO2-BMIM: = −0.67 eV for EMIM: and BMIM:, respectively. The binding energy of EMIM: on the Ag(111) surface results to be BEAg(111)-EMIM: = −1.86 eV. Moreover, NEB calculations prove that all these reactions are barrierless and spontaneously occur (see results in Fig. S8, SI). Since BEAg(111)-EMIM: < BECO2-EMIM:, we can argue that carbenes preferably bind to the Ag electrode surface and the remaining carbene species in the solution capture the dissolved CO2 via chemical reaction (i.e. chemical absorption). These results demonstrate that EMIM: occupies the active sites of the Ag catalyst surface. It has been shown that entropic and enthalpic corrections do not change these conclusions54. To sum up, in the case of ILs with acetate anions, a high quantity of neutral carbenes (EMIM: or BMIM:) are present in solution, which react with the CO2 molecules and with the electrode surface. In the case of ILs with fluorinated anions, carbenes are not widely formed, thus, the imidazolium remains the dominant species in the electrolyte and CO2 remains dissolved in the solution as a neutral specie. [EMIM]+ and [BMIM]+ will then be attracted to the electrode interface, under the action of the electric field, participating in the CO2RR process.
Electrochemical study of CO2RR in IL-based solutions
The CO2 reduction activity of Ag in presence of different ILs was studied by CV, linear sweep voltammetries (LSV) and CPs.
Cyclic voltammetry study in N2 and CO2
The results of CVs recorded after the catholyte outgassing in N2 and saturation in CO2 are reported in Fig. S9 (SI). The onset values (i.e. potential applied to start a Faradaic process) obtained with all ionic liquids in N2- and CO2-saturated atmospheres show that, in general, reduction processes in the presence of CO2 take place at more positive applied potentials than in N2, mirroring the electrolyte conductivity trends discussed in the previous sections. CV curves in presence of CO2 for the two ILs with acetate, [BMIM]/[EMIM][CO2CH3], lie at lower potentials (in absolute value) than in the case of fluorinated ILs. This can be related to the electrolyte being richer in protons, hence favoring any reduction process. Acetate-containing ILs present a larger number of available protons for two fundamental reasons. Firstly, they have a higher water content than the fluorinated ones, being more hydrophilic. Secondly, as discussed, the acetate anions favor the production of carbene molecules by deprotonating [EMIM]+ or [BMIM]+ and turning into acetic acid. Water and CH3COOH can then serve as proton reservoirs from which reduction reactions can proceed already at lower cathodic potentials than in the case of fluorinated ILs, where the few available protons originate from the membrane, due to anolyte crossover or, possibly, some traces of water in the non-perfectly anhydrous ACN. This suggests that, in principle, acetate-containing ILs could reduce CO2 more easily than fluorinated ones, but also the high availability of protons can favor the HER. Hence, it is the inline gas analysis, performed during the CPs and discussed in section 3.3.3, that allows to identify the species that are reduced.
Linear sweep voltammetry study in CO2
The LSV curves performed in CO2 saturated atmosphere with the six investigated ILs are reported in Figs. S10, S14 (SI). The comparison between the pure ACN (black line) and the 0.3 M ILs solutions (colored lines) shows how the presence of the ILs positively influences the onset potential of the CO2RR, i.e. the potential at which the reaction starts to occur. Regardless of the nature of the anion and cation, the LSV curves with all ILs report much higher currents, in the same potential range, than pure ACN. From these analyzes it can be concluded that each solution of [IL] = 0.3 M was more active in the CO2 reduction processes than pure ACN. Figure S10A compares the four different ILs with the [BMIM]+ cation, to evaluate the sole influence of the anion in the Ag electroactivity. Figure S10B compares two different [EMIM]-based ILs. The specific ILs activity, the respective curves position, and the total current densities achieved were a function of the proton concentration in the solution and the viscosity/conductivity properties. Acetate-containing ILs show a lower onset potential value in accordance with what was highlighted and discussed for the CVs. CP studies were conducted at different current values (see section 3.3.3) to investigate the real reduction process in progress, i.e. to confirm whether it was HER or CO2RR.
Potentiometry study in CO2
CPs were recorded to assess the stability and selectivity of the EC CO2RR reaction at different fixed currents (I = −20/−10/−5 mA). To distinguish which reaction is taking place, the gas products from the cathode chamber were analyzed through an inline µ-GC for all the duration of the test, as described in the Experimental section. The CP trends with the different ILs electrolytes are reported in Fig. S11 (SI) at the highest current value. In general, the cathodic potential during the CPs with [BMIM][BF4] electrolyte is stabilized at a lower value (e.g., −1.65 V vs Ag/AgCl at −20 mA) than with the other ILs due to its high conductivity (i.e. 28 mS cm−1, see Fig. 1). [BMIM][SO3CF3], [EMIM][SO3CF3] and [BMIM][CO2CF3] have about the same conductivity value (~24 mS cm−1) and, their CPs stabilized at nearly the same potential (e.g. −1.8 V vs Ag/AgCl at −20 mA). [BMIM][CO2CH3] has a much lower conductivity value (about 11 mS cm−1) and its CP stabilized at a higher cathodic potential (e.g., −2.1 V vs Ag/AgCl at −20 mA). Hence, a correlation between conductivity viscosity and cathodic potentials during CPs was clearly observed.
Concerning the selectivity towards the CO2 reduction, the results from the analysis of the gaseous products during the CPs were used to calculate the FE towards CO and H2, and the results are reported in Fig. 3. A change in the selectivity between the CO2RR to CO and the HER was observed by varying the type of ionic liquid. From the bar graph it can be appreciated that ILs with fluorinated anions have a greater tendency to favor the reduction reaction of CO2 to CO instead of favoring HER at all the studied current values. In particular, [BMIM][SO3CF3] maintains a FECO > 95% at any current density. For [EMIM][SO3CF3] there is a decrease in CO production, going from the maximum FECO~95% at I = −20 mA to FECO~85–90% for I = −10 mA and I = −5 mA, respectively. In the case of [BMIM][BF4] and [BMIM][CO2CF3] the highest selectivity for CO (FECO = 93% and 97%) was obtained at I = −10 mA and at I = −5 mA, respectively. At the same time, by using ILs with acetate anion, H2 was the major gaseous product obtained. By applying a current of I = −5 mA, both in the case of [BMIM][CO2CH3] and [EMIM][CO2CH3], the maximum production of CO is obtained, reaching FECO = 20% and 17%, respectively.
This is in accordance with what has been described in the reaction mechanism in Fig. 2: when using as catholyte an IL containing the [CO2CH3]− anion, carbene molecules are formed which either chemisorb on the electrode surface or react with the CO2 in solution carboxylates. Either way, the electroreduction of dissolved CO2 is inhibited and hydrogen is the most abundant product. The low amount of CO collected when using the [CO2CH3]-containing ILs (i.e., FECO < 20%) is probably due to the reduction of not-bonded CO2 in solution that manages to reach the electrode surface. On the contrary, by using fluorinated ILs, there is a greater concentration of the cations ([EMIM]+ or [BMIM]+) that favors the CO2RR. Indeed, those positively charged species are attracted to the Ag electrode surface, under the action of the electric field, because of the negative applied potential at the cathode that induces the negative charging of the electrode. Based on Gang Li et al.55 results, due to electrostatic attractions, the negative WE is randomly covered by the positively charged cations of fluorinated IL in the innermost charged layer.
To sum up, in case of acetate-containing ILs, the chemisorbed carbene species at the Ag electrode surface (see section 3.3.4) make it slightly active for CO2RR (FE < 20%) and very active for HER. So, the catalyst has not been totally poisoned, losing its catalytic activity, but when covered by carbene it plays an inhibitory role not favoring the conversion of CO2, probably due to steric hindrance. The covering of the electrode by the carbene, together with the formation of the carboxylate, are two side reactions which disadvantage the electrochemical conversion of CO2. However, the different selectivity induced by different imidazolium-based ILs with different anions and the mechanism behind such behavior have not been previously investigated and, thus, it was in deep studied here by theoretical calculations as shown in the section 3.4. It is also worth highlighting that the here reported results evidenced a preferential selectivity for the CO2RR when using the [SO3CF3]− anion against the most used [BF4]−.
Analysis of Ag electrode surface after EC tests
The formation of carbenes and their chemisorption on the Ag surface is supported by the results of Raman and XPS characterizations of the electrode after testing it by a CP at −20 mA in [BMIM][CO2CH3] for 2 h. After the electrochemical test, the electrode was rinsed thoroughly with ACN before the Raman analysis, to remove all physisorbed molecules.
In Fig. 4, the Raman spectra of [BMIM][CO2CH3] diluted in ACN, and of the electrode after the test are shown. In the spectrum of the pure electrolyte, all peaks can be assigned to the vibrational modes (marked by the dotted vertical lines) of the anions and cations in the acetate-IL56 and of ACN57. Such assigned modes are reported in Table 2. In the spectrum of the electrode after test, the frequency range between 900 and 1100 cm−1 presents strong components attributed to vibrational modes of the Ag electrode, see Fig. S12B. In Fig. 4, despite the cleaning in ACN, the spectrum of the post-test electrode still shows peaks in correspondence to the peaks of the pure electrolyte attributed to the cation. In particular, the black spectrum shows peaks at 1600 cm−1, characteristic of the aromatic stretching mode νC=C, at 1245 cm−1, of the skeleton stretching νC-C and at 1381 cm−1, characteristic of νC_Im-N. It is crucial to notice that no peaks related to acetate anions or to acetonitrile are present.
Table 2.
[CO2CH3]− | [BMIM]+ | ACN | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ν (cm−1) | mode | ν (cm−1) | mode | ν (cm−1) | mode |
635 | δOCO + νCC | 388 | δC-Et-N | 380 | δC-C≡N |
899 | δOCO + νCC | 440 | δNC_Im | 750 | Octave |
1334 | νCO | 597 | νEt-N + νMe-N | 920 | νC-C |
1567 | Anti νCO | 701 | νEt-N + νMe-N | 1370 | CH3 deform. |
830 | νC-C-C but | 2200 | νC≡N | ||
957 | νC_Et | ||||
1019 | ring deform. | ||||
1089 | δH_Et | ||||
1118 | δH_Et | ||||
1245 | νC-C skel | ||||
1295 | Twist–(CH2)n | ||||
1381 | δH_Et + νC_Im-N | ||||
1417 | δH_Me | ||||
1451 | δH_Et | ||||
1600 | νC=C ar |
Consequently, the presence of adsorbed carbenes on the electrode surface can be deduced, since its Raman peaks appear in the spectrum of the cleaned post-test electrode, while no peaks of the acetate anion are present, suggesting that the remaining molecules on the surface are not in the cationic form. In the SI (Fig. S12), Raman spectra comparing each electrolyte components (a) and fresh silver electrode (B), before testing, are reported.
The high-resolution XPS spectra of the Ag3d peaks of both the pristine (fresh) and the post-test electrode are reported in the upper and lower panels of Fig. 5a, respectively. The post-test electrode spectrum shows additional components at slightly lower binding energies than the Ag(0) peaks, which are consistent with the formation of a chemical bond with silver changing its oxidation state. This is confirmed by the concurrent analysis of the N1s spectra of the pure electrolyte (upper panel) and post-test electrode (lower panels) in Fig. 5b. In the upper panel, the pure electrolyte shows a single-component peak at 401.5 eV, given by the N atoms in the imidazole ring58. The peak in the spectrum of the post-test electrode shows two components, at 401.2 eV and 398.95 eV. The higher energy component is in agreement with the reported binding energies attributed in the literature to the N atoms in adsorbed carbene molecules59–61. The low-energy component is consistent with the binding energy of amines (N-H)61,62. Amine groups are absent from the pure electrolyte but can be easily produced by the decomposition of the IL during the prolonged electrochemical test.
The Ag electrode was also analyzed by FESEM and EDX analysis after the CP in [BMIM][CO2CH3]. Before these analyses, the electrode was rinsed several times with ACN to remove any residues and not chemisorbed species as confirmed by EDX analysis (see Table S3, SI). FESEM images of the fresh (Fig. S13A, SI) and post-tested and cleaned electrode (Fig. S13C, SI) evidence an increase of the roughness of the electrode surface. According to recent results from Jaramillo et al.63, this could be attributed to Ag reconstruction, which should be due to oxidation and reduction of the material during the electrochemical measurements or to Ostwald ripening processes.
Furthermore, to indirectly demonstrate the formation of the carbene according to the mechanism explained in the previous sections, the imidazole ring was methylated the C2 position by synthesizing the 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium acetate. Thus, the more acidic C2 carbon in the imidazolium ring, which is the most proton-releasing, was capped by the methyl group and, therefore, it cannot be deprotonated. This would lead to an inability to form the carbene in C2 position. Thus, the 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium acetate was diluted in acetonitrile and then tested in the H-cell for the EC CO2RR and the results are reported in the SI (Fig. S14). From the gaseous products trend, measured during a CP of one hour at I = −20 mA, it can be deduced that the production of CO was favored over the production of H2 (FECO = 68,7%; FEH2 = 24,4%). Thus, by using 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium acetate, a larger amount of CO was collected with respect to [BMIM] and [EMIM] acetate ILs. This confirms that the acetate anion did not strip any hydrogen from the C2 position of the imidazole and no carbene was formed. However, comparing the performance of 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium acetate with the fluorinated ionic liquids, the amount of CO produced was lower. Following the reaction mechanism of Feng et al.64, stabilization of the CO2RR reaction intermediates was found to be less effective when conducted by the hydrogens at C4 and C5, than by the hydrogen at C2.
The Raman spectra comparing the Ag electrode after the test and after testing and washing with ACN are shown in Fig. S15 (SI). The electrode after testing shows the characteristic peaks of the imidazole and acetate functional groups already assigned in Table 2 (see Fig. S15, purple line). Instead, the electrode after testing and washing with ACN shows the characteristic peaks of pure Ag (Fig. S15, black line), indicating that any organic compound remained chemisorbed on the electrode surface, which excludes the presence of carbene residues and, once again, confirms our previous results and discussion.
DFT insight into the EC CO2RR mechanism over Ag surface
The role of the cation as co-catalyst in the electrochemical CO2 reduction was proved by DFT calculations.
Figure 6 shows how the presence of the IL cation in the form ([EMIM]+ or [BMIM]+) helps to stabilize the activation of the CO2 at the interface of the Ag(111) electrode and how it helps to decrease the overpotential not only of the first-rate determining step but also of all the reaction intermediates involved in the EC CO2RR to CO. Indeed, the CO2RR pathway from CO2 to CO via adsorbed CO2 on the electrode surface (*CO2) is reported. When [EMIM]+ is explicitly considered in the simulation, the Gibbs energy variation follows the blue line in the reaction paths in Fig. 6a, b. All reaction steps are downhill when an external potential (E) of −1.67 V vs. Ag/AgCl is applied (left panel), in agreement with the experimental results exhibiting the CO2 conversion to CO. At the same applied potential, in the absence of the IL (red line), the crucial intermediate *CO2 is still uphill with a Gibbs energy variation of about +0.25 eV. This step reaches the equilibrium (right panel) only at a higher applied potential, E = −2.12 V vs. Ag/AgCl. This clearly demonstrates the role of the IL in promoting the *CO2 formation, thus lowering the onset potential of the RDS of the CO2RR, which is the formation and stabilization of the *CO2 species. Indeed, electrostatic interactions (non-covalent bonds) are formed between the *CO2 adsorbed on the Ag surface and IL cation, as shown in previous literature works65,66.
The CO2RR occurs on undercoordinated Ag atoms at (111) surface, i.e. the active sites at the electrode surface. By negatively charging the electrode, [BMIM]+ or [EMIM]+ are attracted to the surface and form a sort of imidazolium cation monolayer around the working electrode. The source of electrons, necessary for the reaction is the electrode, while protons originate from the membrane or from additional proton sources, such as water or acetic acid, particularly in the case of [EMIM]/[BMIM][CO2CH3]. The larger availability of protons in the latter cases enhances HER by further reducing the active sites for CO2RR, already hindered by adsorbed carbenes.
In Fig. 6c, d the activation of CO2 to *CO2 and the protonation of the latter are shown, respectively. CO2 is chemisorbed on the electrode surface, which acts as an electron donor. The cation, electrostatically attracted to the electrode surface is located near the active site of the CO2RR and stabilizes its intermediates through hydrogen bonds. We found that the cation is positioned parallel to the flat surface of the electrode to maximize interactions with both the Ag and CO2. Instead, [EMIM]+ or [BMIM]+ were not found to form any bond with Ag, contrary to what has been demonstrated with EMIM: and BMIM: that bond to Ag as illustrated Fig. 2-right, which explains the lowest selectivity for the CO2RR of the [CO2CH3]-based ILs in comparison to the [SO3CF3]-based ILs.
[BMIM][SO3CF3] stability
From the previous comparison between all six ionic liquids, it emerged that the best performances are those of [BMIM][SO3CF3], especially in terms of high selectivity towards the CO2 to CO conversion (see results of CPs in 3). For this reason, we have selected this IL for further investigations towards its practical application. Its stability and selectivity towards the EC CO2RR was proved in two consecutive long-term tests of 8 h, at two different applied currents. In Fig. 7a, the first 8 h CP at −20 mA is reported. A stable CO production (FECO = 94%) is observed throughout the time, while the production of H2 is close to zero (FEH2 = 0.5%). To evaluate eventual performance variations at higher and more relevant current values, a subsequent CP for additional 8 h at I = −60 mA was performed and the results are shown in Fig. 7b. A constant production of CO (FECO = 95%) was also measured at this higher current value and the HER was maintained close to zero (FEH2 = 0.3%). A good stability of the potential was maintained along the entire duration of both tests, as can be seen from the black lines in Fig. 7a, b. It can be concluded that [BMIM][SO3CF3] shows on average a constant potential, high production of CO (FE > 95%), almost zero production of H2 till a total of 8 h of continuous operation at relevant current values of up to −60 mA.
Conclusions
Seven imidazolium salts were tested for the electrocatalytic CO2 conversion to CO diluted in acetonitrile to reduce their viscosity. Acetonitrile was chosen as solvent thanks to its ability to solubilize ILs and its lower molecular weight than most organic solvents, which guarantees high conductivity and low viscosity. It was demonstrated that the anionic part of imidazolium salts influences the CO2 solubility and the final conductivity of the solution, depending on fluorination degree of the anion. In particular, the type of anion regulates the ratio between cations and carbenes. Theoretically, it was demonstrated that the active species to work as co-catalyst in CO2RR is the cation. Instead, the carbene species can bind the electrode surface Ag(111) and decrease active sites for the EC CO2RR. It was found that imidazolium salts of acetate are more selective towards the production of H2 because of the anion role, while under the same conditions, imidazolium salts of triflate show a very high selectivity towards the production of CO (FECO > 95%), which is even better than the most employed imidazolium salts of tetrafluoroborate. The [BMIM][SO3CF3]-based electrolyte also shown a promising stability for a total of 16 h under relevant current values (I = −20 and −60 mA).
Our experimental and theoretical results proved that all the studied ILs lower the onset potential of the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction, compared to the performance of the pure organic solvent. However, the selectivity towards the CO production instead of the H2 evolution depends on the IL anion. Future developments will concern the analysis of other ILs, different solvents, electrochemical cell configurations and a more in-depth study on the role of the ionic mobility of the cation and anion at different IL concentrations in the electrolyte solutions.
Experimental methods
Chemicals
The electrochemical studies were performed by using ionic liquids made of imidazolium salts because of their higher affinity for CO2. All the ILs listed in Table 1 were synthesized and supplied by IOLITEC GmbH (high purity grade) and used without any further purification.
The purity for the triflates was above 99%, measured by ion chromatography, while for the alkanoates >98% of purity was supplied. The water content of ionic liquid with acetate anion is in the range of 0.6–0.8%. For the triflate-containing ILs it is below 1000 ppm.
Electrochemical cell and set-up
The EC CO2RR tests with each IL-based electrolyte were done in a two-compartment H-type cell (see set-up scheme, Supplementary Fig. S1, SI). The cell used for the experiment and all other glassware were cleaned with Milli-Q water (R > 18.2 MΩ, 25 °C) by several rinsing cycles in an ultrasound bath and dried under nitrogen stream.
The cathodic chamber contained the working electrode (WE: Ag Foil) and the reference electrode (RE: Ag/AgCl in saturated KCl), which were immersed in a solution of the ionic liquid in an organic solvent. Due to their high viscosity, ionic liquids are often mixed with organic solvents or water67. Because of the low solubility of CO2 and the competitive HER, a aqueous solutions is usually avoided. Acetonitrile (ACN) is highly suitable among the organic solvents found in literature since, in addition to increase the conductivity and decrease the viscosity of imidazolium salts, it is commonly used for the CO2 electro-reduction because the CO2 solubility in it is eight times greater than in water and it is electrochemically stable68. Therefore, a solution of 0.3 M IL in ACN was used for the EC CO2RR tests.
In the anodic chamber, a nickel mesh was used as counter electrode (CE), immersed in an aqueous solution of a strong basic electrolyte to promote a stable oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Potassium hydroxide (0.1 M KOH) was chosen because of its high conductivity, which also affects the total ohmic drops of the system and enhances the effective passage of current69,70. However, to avoid the transport of K+ ions from the anodic chamber to the cathodic one through the employed membrane, the use of a more concentrated KOH solution (e.g. 1 M) with a higher conductivity is not recommended since it was verified that a high concentration of K+ in the catholyte promotes the formation of a precipitate in the IL-based electrolyte. The salt formed was collected, dried and further analysed by ion chromatography (IC) and compared to original samples prepared separately to confirm that it is composed by a salt with a potassium cation and the anion of the IL under use, confirming migration through the membrane (see Fig. S2, SI).
The cell chambers were separated by a commercial bipolar membrane (BM, Fumasep FBM by Fumatech). The BM consists of an anion exchange layer (AEL), and a cation exchange layer (CEL) that were installed facing the anode and cathode compartments of the cell, respectively. At the interface between the AEL and CEL, water dissociates into OH- and H+ ions. The membrane was stored in a saturated solution of sodium chloride and before its use it was activated with a solution of H2SO4 0.1 M (CEL side) and KOH 0.1 M (AEL side) already assembled in the H-cell. This configuration prevented the mixing of the chambers content and avoids further oxidation of the products formed during the CO2 reduction. Further information regarding the ions transport mechanism through the bipolar membrane is illustrated in the SI, Fig. S3.
Electrocatalytic CO2RR tests methods
The cell was equipped with a gas inlet/outlet, enabling the air purging with N2 and then with CO2. The N2 and CO2 stored in cylinders were sent to the cathodic compartment at a constant rate (20 mL/min), defined by a mass flow controller (Bronkhorst EL-FLOW), and bubbled directly in the electrolyte solution that was magnetically stirred to facilitate the CO2 dissolution and mass transport towards the cathode. Before the electrochemical tests, the solution was outgassed with N2 and then saturated with CO2. The electrochemical measurements were performed with a VoltaLab PGZ 301 Dynamic Potensiostat equipped with VoltaMaster 4 Software. The gas outlet of the cathodic compartment passes through a Genie filter to remove the moisture and then it was analyzed with a Varian 490 Micro GC equipped with a PPQ and a Molsieve columns. This allows the online analysis of the gaseous products generated during electrochemical tests.
Potentiodynamic electrochemical measurements were carried out to study the electrochemical stability window of each ionic liquid. Cyclic voltammetries (CVs) in N2 were performed in a variable potential window up to reach 1 mA cm−2 of anodic and cathodic currents.
For the electrocatalytic tests, CVs in N2 and CO2, linear sweep voltammetries (LSVs) and a chronopotentiometry (CP) were performed to evaluate the EC CO2 reduction in the imidazolium-based electrolytes saturated with CO2 at −20 mA for 2 h. During the CP, gaseous products were online analyzed with the Micro GC. The stability of the most performing IL was also evaluated under relevant applicative conditions through two CPs at −20 mA and −60 mA for 8 hours of continuous operation.
Electrical conductivity of ILs
The electrical conductivity of each IL solution was measured with a conductivity meter with a two electrodes sensor (PC 80+ DHS by XS Instruments). The probe has a cell constant of 1 cm. A minimum volume of 5 mL of the pure ionic liquid, or its solution in ACN, were required to guarantee the full immersion of the probe in the liquid media into a glass vial of 20 mL. After each measurement, the probe was rinsed several times with Milli-Q water and dried with paper to avoid water contamination in subsequent solutions, which could alter the conductivity value.
Viscosity of ILs
Viscosity measurements were performed with an Anton Paar Physica MCR 302 rotational rheometer. A 50 mm diameter parallel plate mode was used, and the gap between the two plates was set to 0.2 mm. A constant temperature of 25 °C was fixed. The viscosity of the pure ionic liquids and their solutions in ACN were measured with a rotation shear ramp ranging from 10 1/s to 10000 1/s.
Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDX)
A ZEISS Supra 40 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) was employed to characterize the morphology of the Ag electrode. To quantify the elemental composition of the sample, Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDX) characterization was performed via an in-house equipment (Oxford EDS microanalysis through a Si(Li) detector cooled with Liquid-N2).
Raman spectroscopy
Raman spectra were obtained at room temperature (298 K) using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer and a fiber-optic SuperHead Raman probe. The instrument is equipped with a multicanal CCD UV (1024 × 256 pixels) detector and 785 nm laser was used as excitation source to deliver a laser power of 100 mW. The electrode samples were measured with a 50x UV LWD confocal volume Olympus objective, 1 s of acquisition time to get 30 spectra for each sample. The liquid samples were collected in disposable plastic containers fit inside the superhead probe sample holder and cover with aluminum foil to prevent interference of the ambient light during the Raman measurements.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out by using a PHI 5000 VersaProbe (Physical Electronics) system. The X-ray source was a monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). Spectra were analyzed using Multipak 9.7 software. All core-level peak energies were referenced to C1s peak at 284.8 eV (C-C/C-H) and the background contribution in high resolution (HR) scans was subtracted by means of a Shirley function. For liquid analysis, an ionic liquid droplet has been directly positioned on a conductive double-sided tape on the sample holder and left in the loading chamber overnight, in order to let the volatile species to be pumped-out from the system by a turbomolecular pump. After required time the sample did not show any modification during the loading in the main chamber or during X-rays irradiation. The pressure inside the main chamber remained below 10−5 Pa during the entire measurement.
Computational details
DFT calculations were performed with the Quantum ESPRESSO code71. Electronic wavefunctions were expanded in plane-waves (PW), the exchange and correlation effects were modeled by the Perdew−Burke−Ernzerhof (PBE) functional72 and the electron-ion interaction was described by optimized ultrasoft pseudopotentials73. In all calculations a PW energy cutoff of 32 Ry (320 Ry) for the wavefunctions (electron densities) was adopted. All structures were relaxed by minimizing the atomic forces; convergence was assumed when the maximum component of the residual forces on the ions was smaller than 10−5 Ry/bohr. The Brillouin zone of the bulk Ag unit cell was sampled using a 10 × 10 × 10 shifted Monkhorst-Pack mesh and accordingly reduced in supercell calculations, to keep a constant k-point density. The calculated Ag lattice parameter resulted in 4.154 Å, in good agreement with previous DFT results74 and experimental values75. Surface calculations were performed with orthorhombic supercells containing slabs of four atomic layers where the atomic positions of the bottom surface layer were kept fixed to bulk positions during geometry optimizations. To avoid spurious interactions between periodic replicas, a vacuum region of at least 10 Å was added in the direction perpendicular to the surface.
The thermodynamic study of the electrochemical reactions was carried out within the grand canonical formulation proposed in76. By using a self-consistent continuum solvation model (SCCS), provided by the ENVIRON module77, and charged simulation cells, this method extends the Computational Hydrogen Electrode approach78, allowing to obtain the Gibbs free energy changes, at fixed electrode potential, also of reaction steps in which a different number of electrons and protons is exchanged. The chemical potentials of gas species (H2, CO2 and CO) were obtained following standard ideal-gas methods, considering 1 atm partial pressure, and T = 298 K. For the calculation of the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the Gibbs energy of the adsorbates, all degrees of freedom have been assumed as vibrational and treated in the harmonic approximation. To correct the systematic error introduced by the PBE functional in the energetics of the C = O bonds, following the procedure reported in ref. 79,80 we obtained corrections of −0.36 eV and +0.07 eV to the electronic energies of the CO and CO2 molecules, respectively.
Because of the low polarity, solvation effects due to the ACN solvent were treated implicitly through the SCCS by specifying the solvent static permittivity and surface tension at standard conditions. The use of the grand canonical approach and the SCCS allowed to explicitly investigate the stabilization effect of the cations on the CO2RR intermediates, by introducing a cation molecule ([EMIM]+) in the simulation cell.
The search for possible transition states of the studied reactions and the calculation of the corresponding activation energy was performed by means of Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) calculations81.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Action program under the SunCoChem project (Grant Agreement No 862192). The CINECA award under the ISCRA initiative and HPC@ POLITO are acknowledged for the availability of high-performance computing resources and support. Emmanuele Parisi and Elena Simone has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 949229). The authors want to thank Federico Dattila (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-3951) for FESEM and EDX analysis, Pietro Zaccagnini (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-5531) for the help in viscosity measurements and the fruitful discussions about the results, Hilmar Guzmán (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-2233) for the help in the electrochemical setup optimization and Maria Jose Rubio for the preliminary tests.
Author contributions
S.H. conceived the project. A.F. designed and performed the experimental studies with the supervision of S.H. E.P. and E.S. carried out Raman analysis. A.F. and M.R.F. interpreted Raman spectra. M.C. did XPS analysis and interpretation. F.R., M.R.F. designed and performed DFT simulations. G.C. supervised DFT simulations and proposed the reaction mechanism. N.R. contributed to the study of the reaction mechanism. B.I. and T.J.S.S. synthesized and supplied the ionic liquids. A.F. prepared writing-original draft. All the authors discussed results, reviewed the manuscript, and approved its final version.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Chemistry thanks Zhiji Han and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Should any raw data files be needed in another format they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the electronic structure calculations mentioned in the manuscript have been uploaded on the Materials Cloud repository and can be found at the link: https://archive.materialscloud.org/deposit/records/1713.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Francesca Risplendi, Email: francesca.risplendi@polito.it.
Simelys Hernández, Email: simelys.hernandez@polito.it.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42004-023-00875-9.
References
- 1.Reche I, Gallardo I, Guirado G. Electrochemical studies of CO2 in imidazolium ionic liquids using silver as a working electrode: a suitable approach for determining diffusion coefficients, solubility values, and electrocatalytic effects. RSC Adv. 2014;4:65176–65183. doi: 10.1039/C4RA11297K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson TR, Hawkins E, Jones PD. CO2, the greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering work of Arrhenius and callendar to today’s earth system models. Endeavour. 2016;40:178–187. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seneviratne SI, et al. The many possible climates from the Paris Agreement’s aim of 1.5 °C warming. Nature. 2018;558:41–49. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0181-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Friedemann, A. J. Life after Fossil Fuels: A Reality Check on Alternative Energy Vol. 81 (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021).
- 5.Xu L, Xiu Y, Liu F, Liang Y, Wang S. Research progress in conversion of CO2 to valuable fuels. Molecules. 2020;25:3653. doi: 10.3390/molecules25163653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garcia JA, Villen-Guzman M, Rodriguez-Maroto JM, Paz-Garcia JM. Technical analysis of CO2 capture pathways and technologies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022;10:108470. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sullivan I, et al. Coupling electrochemical CO2 conversion with CO2 capture. Nat. Catal. 2021;4:952–958. doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00699-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang X, Wang J, Song Z, Zhou T. Data-driven ionic liquid design for CO2 Capture: molecular structure optimization and DFT verification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021;60:9992–10000. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kumaravel, V., Bartlett, J. & Pillai, S. C. Photoelectrochemical conversion of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) into fuels and value-added products. ACS Energy Lett. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02585 (2020).
- 10.Quan Y, Zhu J, Zheng G. Electrocatalytic reactions for converting CO2 to value‐added products. Small Sci. 2021;1:2100043. doi: 10.1002/smsc.202100043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Corral D, et al. Advanced manufacturing for electrosynthesis of fuels and chemicals from CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021;14:3064–3074. doi: 10.1039/D0EE03679J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kou Z, et al. Fundamentals, on-going advances and challenges of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2022;5:82–111. doi: 10.1007/s41918-021-00096-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hernández S, et al. Syngas production from electrochemical reduction of CO2: Current status and prospective implementation. Green. Chem. 2017;19:2326–2346. doi: 10.1039/C7GC00398F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Franke R, Selent D, Börner A. Applied hydroformylation. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:5675–5732. doi: 10.1021/cr3001803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De María R, Díaz I, Rodríguez M, Sáiz A. Industrial methanol from syngas: Kinetic study and process simulation. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2013;11:469–477. doi: 10.1515/ijcre-2013-0061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feng J, Zeng S, Feng J, Dong H, Zhang X. CO2 Electroreduction in ionic liquids: a review. Chin. J. Chem. 2018;36:961–970. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201800252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu X, et al. Understanding trends in electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction rates. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shi C, Chan K, Yoo JS, Nørskov JK. Barriers of electrochemical CO2 reduction on transition metals. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016;20:1424–1430. doi: 10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koshy DM, et al. Chemical modifications of Ag catalyst surfaces with imidazolium ionomers modulate H2Evolution rates during electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:14712–14725. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c06212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Han Z, Kortlever R, Chen HY, Peters JC, Agapie T. CO2 reduction selective for C≥2 products on polycrystalline copper with N-substituted pyridinium additives. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017;3:853–859. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang J, et al. Selective CO2 electrochemical reduction enabled by a tricomponent copolymer modifier on a copper surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:2857–2865. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jenkins HDB. Ionic liquids-an overview. Sci. Prog. 2011;94:265–297. doi: 10.3184/003685011X13138407794135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tanner EEL, Batchelor-McAuley C, Compton RG. Carbon dioxide reduction in room-temperature ionic liquids: The effect of the choice of electrode material, cation, and anion. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:26442–26447. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10564. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Faggion D, Gonçalves WDG, Dupont J. CO2 electroreduction in ionic liquids. Front. Chem. 2019;7:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Freire MG, Neves CMSS, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP, Fernandes AM. Hydrolysis of tetrafluoroborate and hexafluorophosphate counter ions in imidazolium-based ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2010;114:3744–3749. doi: 10.1021/jp903292n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Swatloski RP, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. Ionic liquids are not always green: hydrolysis of 1-butyl-3- methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate. Green. Chem. 2003;5:361–363. doi: 10.1039/b304400a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Firet NJ, Smith WA. Probing the reaction mechanism of CO2 electroreduction over Ag films via operando infrared spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2017;7:606–612. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Motobayashi K, Maeno Y, Ikeda K. In situ spectroscopic characterization of an intermediate of CO2 electroreduction on a Au electrode in room-temperature ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2022;126:11981–11986. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ratschmeier B, Braunschweig B. Cations of ionic liquid electrolytes can act as a promoter for CO2 electrocatalysis through reactive intermediates and electrostatic stabilization. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125:16498–16507. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang Y, et al. Activation of CO2 by ionic liquid EMIM-BF4 in the electrochemical system: a theoretical study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:23521–23531. doi: 10.1039/C5CP02008E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Al-Omari AA, Yamani ZH, Nguyen HL. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction: from homogeneous catalysts to heterogeneous-based reticular chemistry. Molecules. 2018;23:1–12. doi: 10.3390/molecules23112835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sharifi Golru S, Biddinger EJ. Effect of anion in diluted imidazolium-based ionic liquid/buffer electrolytes for CO2 electroreduction on copper. Electrochim. Acta. 2020;361:136787. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ueno K, Tokuda H, Watanabe M. Ionicity in ionic liquids: correlation with ionic structure and physicochemical properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12:1649–1658. doi: 10.1039/b921462n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.MacFarlane DR, et al. On the concept of ionicity in ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009;11:4962–4967. doi: 10.1039/b900201d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.DeVos N, Maton C, Stevens CV. Electrochemical stability of ionic liquids: general influences and degradation mechanisms. ChemElectroChem. 2014;1:1258–1270. doi: 10.1002/celc.201402086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou F, et al. Highly selective electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide on silver electrode with aqueous ionic liquids. Electrochem. commun. 2014;46:103–106. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.06.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou ZBin, Matsumoto H, Tatsumi K. Cyclic quaternary ammonium ionic liquids with perfluoroalkyltrifluoroborates: synthesis, characterization, and properties. Chem. A Eur. J. 2006;12:2196–2212. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.O’Mahony AM, Silvester DS, Aldous L, Hardacre C, Compton RG. Effect of water on the electrochemical window and potential limits of room-temperature ionic liquids. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2008;53:2884–2891. doi: 10.1021/je800678e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Buzzeo MC, Hardacre C, Compton RG. Extended electrochemical windows made accessible by room temperature ionic liquid/organic solvent electrolyte systems. ChemPhysChem. 2006;7:176–180. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200500361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.McEwen AB, Ngo HL, LeCompte K, Goldman JL. Electrochemical properties of imidazolium salt electrolytes for electrochemical capacitor applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999;146:1687–1695. doi: 10.1149/1.1391827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kazemiabnavi S, Zhang Z, Thornton K, Banerjee S. Electrochemical stability window of imidazolium-based ionic liquids as electrolytes for lithium batteries. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2016;120:5691–5702. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ramdin M, De Loos TW, Vlugt TJH. State-of-the-art of CO2 capture with ionic liquids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012;51:8149–8177. doi: 10.1021/ie3003705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Report, Q. T. Design and Evaluation of Ionic Liquids as NovelCO2Absorbents. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/969140 (2005).
- 44.Chinn et al. US 7527775 B2—CO2 removal from gas using ionic liquid absorbents. US patent 7527775 (2009).
- 45.Blath J, Deubler N, Hirth T, Schiestel T. Chemisorption of carbon dioxide in imidazolium based ionic liquids with carboxylic anions. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;181–182:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tommasi I, Sorrentino F. Synthesis of 1,3-dialkylimidazolium-2-carboxylates by direct carboxylation of 1,3-dialkylimidazolium chlorides with CO2. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:6453–6456. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.06.106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Goldberg RN, Kishore N, Lennen RM. Thermodynamic quantities for the ionization reactions of buffers. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2002;31:231–370. doi: 10.1063/1.1416902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shiflett MB, et al. Phase behavior of CO2 in room-temperature ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-ethylimidazolium acetate. ChemPhysChem. 2012;13:1806–1817. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201200023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cabaço MI, et al. Understanding chemical reactions of CO2 and its isoelectronic molecules with 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate by changing the nature of the cation: The case of CS2 in 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium acetate studied by NMR spectroscopy and density functio. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;140:244307. doi: 10.1063/1.4884820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chiarotto I, Feroci M, Inesi A. First direct evidence of N-heterocyclic carbene in BMIm acetate ionic liquids. An electrochemical and chemical study on the role of temperature. N. J. Chem. 2017;41:7840–7843. doi: 10.1039/C7NJ00779E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Samanta SR, Cai R, Percec V. A rational approach to activated polyacrylates and polymethacrylates by using a combination of model reactions and SET-LRP of hexafluoroisopropyl acrylate and methacrylate. Polym. Chem. 2015;6:3259–3270. doi: 10.1039/C5PY00082C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Trummal A, Lipping L, Kaljurand I, Koppel IA, Leito I. Acidity of strong acids in water and dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2016;120:3663–3669. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fieser, L. F., Fieser, M., Ho, T.-L. & Ho, T.-L. Tetrafluoroboric acid. In Fieser and Fieser’s Reagents for Organic Synthesis, (eds Fieser, L. F., Fieser, M. & Ho, T.-L.) 10.1002/9780471264194.fos09591.pub3 (2017).
- 54.Urushihara M, Chan K, Shi C, Nørskov JK. Theoretical study of EMIM+ adsorption on silver electrode surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:20023–20029. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li MG, et al. The electrochemical interface of Ag(111) in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquid—a combined in-situ scanning probe microscopy and impedance study. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;197:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thomas M, et al. Simulating the vibrational spectra of ionic liquid systems: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and its mixtures. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;141:024510. doi: 10.1063/1.4887082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Neelakantan, P. Raman Spectrum of Acetonitrile. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. USA60, 422–424 (1964).
- 58.Aydogan Gokturk P, et al. XPS-evidence for in-situ electrochemically-generated carbene formation. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;234:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jiang L, et al. N -Heterocyclic carbenes on close-packed coinage metal surfaces: Bis-carbene metal adatom bonding scheme of monolayer films on Au, Ag and Cu. Chem. Sci. 2017;8:8301–8308. doi: 10.1039/C7SC03777E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dery S, et al. Flexible NO2 -functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene monolayers on Au (111) surface. Chemistry. 2019;25:15067–15072. doi: 10.1002/chem.201903434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Amit E, et al. Electrochemical deposition of N-heterocyclic carbene monolayers on metal surfaces. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19500-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lewis RJ, et al. N-Heterocyclic carbene modified palladium catalysts for the direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:15431–15436. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c04828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hatsukade T, Kuhl KP, Cave ER, Abram DN, Jaramillo TF. Insights into the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 on metallic silver surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:13814–13819. doi: 10.1039/C4CP00692E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lau GPS, et al. New insights into the role of imidazolium-based promoters for the electroreduction of CO2 on a silver electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:7820–7823. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sahm CD, et al. Tuning the local chemical environment of ZnSe quantum dots with dithiols towards photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chem. Sci. 2022;13:5988–5998. doi: 10.1039/D2SC00890D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sahm CD, et al. Imidazolium-modification enhances photocatalytic CO2 reduction on ZnSe quantum dots. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:9078–9087. doi: 10.1039/D1SC01310F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sánchez-Sánchez, C. M. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 in imidazolium-based ionic liquids. Encycl. Interfacial Chem. Surf. Sci. Electrochem. 539–551 (2018)
- 68.Matsubara Y, Grills DC, Kuwahara Y. Thermodynamic aspects of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction in acetonitrile and with an ionic liquid as solvent or electrolyte. ACS Catal. 2015;5:6440–6452. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lv JJ, et al. A highly porous copper electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1–8. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.König M, Vaes J, Klemm E, Pant D. Solvents and supporting electrolytes in the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. iScience. 2019;19:135–160. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter21, 395502 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 72.Farhat D. Bookworms and party animals: an artificial labour market with human and social capital accumulation. J. Educ. Work. 2014;27:1–42. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2012.711944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rappe AM, Rabe KM, Kaxiras E, Joannopoulos JD. Optimized pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B. 1990;41:1227–1230. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Haas P, Tran F, Blaha P. Calculation of the lattice constant of solids with semilocal functionals. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Liu LG, Bassett WA. Compression of Ag and phase transformation of NaCl. J. Appl. Phys. 1973;44:1475–1479. doi: 10.1063/1.1662396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hörmann NG, Andreussi O, Marzari N. Grand canonical simulations of electrochemical interfaces in implicit solvation models. J. Chem. Phys. 2019;150:041730. doi: 10.1063/1.5054580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dupont C, Andreussi O, Marzari N. Self-consistent continuum solvation (SCCS): the case of charged systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2013;139:1–9. doi: 10.1063/1.4832475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Liu X, et al. pH effects on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 towards C2 products on stepped copper. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07970-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Peterson AA, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, Rossmeisl J, Nørskov JK. How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010;3:1311–1315. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00071j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Garino, N. et al. Facilely synthesized nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide functionalized with copper ions as electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 5, 2 (2021).
- 81.Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. Climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000;113:9901–9904. doi: 10.1063/1.1329672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lin-Vien, D. et al. The Handbook of Infrared and Raman Characteristic Frequencies of Organic Molecules. Elsevier Science 1991, ISBN: 9780080571164
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Should any raw data files be needed in another format they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the electronic structure calculations mentioned in the manuscript have been uploaded on the Materials Cloud repository and can be found at the link: https://archive.materialscloud.org/deposit/records/1713.