Abstract
The prognosis of patients undergoing emergency endovascular repair of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) depends on defect location, with root disease bearing worse outcomes than proximal or distal aortopathy. We speculate that a spatial gradient in aneurysmal tissue mechanics through the length of the ascending thoracic aorta may fuel noted survival discrepancies. To this end, we performed planar biaxial testing on 153 root, proximal, and distal segments of ATAA samples collected from 80 patients receiving elective open surgical repair. Following data averaging via surface fitting-based interpolation of strain-controlled protocols, we combined in-vitro and in-vivo measurements of loads and geometry to resolve inflation-extension kinematics and evaluate mechanical metrics of stress, stiffness, and energy at consistent deformation levels. Representative (averaged) experimental data and simulated in-vivo conditions revealed significantly larger biaxial stiffness at the root compared to either proximal or distal tissues, which persisted as the entire aorta stiffened during aging. Advancing age further reduced biaxial stretch and energy storage, a measure of aortic function, across all ATAA segments. Importantly, age emerged as a stronger predictor of tissue mechanics in ATAA disease than either bicuspid aortic valve or connective tissue disorders. Besides strengthening the general understanding of aneurysmal disease, our findings provide specifications to customize the design of stent-grafts for the treatment of ATAA disease. Optimization of deployment and interaction of novel endovascular devices with the local native environment is expected to carry significant potential for improving clinical outcomes.
Keywords: aortic root, planar biaxial testing, constitutive modeling, inflation-extension kinematics, aging
Graphical Abstract

Statement of Significance
Elucidating the lengthwise regional mechanics of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs) is critical for the design of endovascular devices tailored to the ascending aorta. Stent-grafts provide a less invasive alternative to support the long-term survival of ATAA patients ineligible for open surgical repair. In this study, we developed a numerical framework that combines semi-inverse constitutive and forward modeling with in-vitro and in-vivo data to extract mechanical descriptors of ATAA tissue behavior at physiologically meaningful deformation. Moving distally from the aortic root to the first ascending aortic branch, we observed a progressive decline in biaxial stiffness. Furthermore, we showed that aging leads to reduced aortic function and is a stronger predictor of mechanics than either valve morphology or underlying syndromic disorder.
1. Introduction
Thoracic aortic aneurysms are focal dilatations of the aortic wall that carry elevated risk of rupture and dissection. The current incidence of ruptured thoracic aneurysms is 1.6 per 100,000 persons/year and bears a mortality rate upwards of 90% [1, 2]. Early identification of vulnerable individuals and proper clinical management of the aneurysm are crucial to prevent these life-threatening events [3].
While most thoracic aortic aneurysms occur sporadically, 20% of patients inherit a single gene mutation that predisposes them to the disease [4]. Heritable conditions linked to thoracic aneurysms encompass syndromic disorders across multiple organ systems (e.g., Marfan Syndrome, MFS; Loeys-Dietz Syndrome, LDS; vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, EDS) or simply manifest as a family history of the disease [3]. Genetically triggered aortopathies often involve the aortic root and the ascending thoracic aorta [5, 6, 7], which combined harbor 60% of all thoracic aneurysms [8]. Contributing to the tally, half of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients present with aneurysms of the ascending aorta [9]. The disparate etiology of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs) motivates probing for both common traits and distinctive features across disease manifestations. Besides measuring higher strength in aneurysmal tissues from BAV patients compared with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) peers [10, 11, 12, 13], early evidence revealed differences in the microstructural and mechanical properties of the aneurysmal wall between MFS and non-MFS cohorts [14, 15, 16]. Proper interpretation of these findings hinges on further considerations regarding the age at which the disease manifests in each etiological group, given that aging alone contributes to both tissue and structural stiffening of the aortic wall [17, 18, 19].
Standard treatment for ATAA disease is open surgical repair to replace native tissues with a prosthetic vascular graft. While the outcomes of this procedure are generally favorable, 8–20% of patients with acute type A dissection are deemed too high risk [20, 21] and would benefit from a less invasive endovascular placement of a stent-graft in support of weakened tissues. Notwithstanding this need, there is currently no device with FDA approval for the thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of ATAA aortopathy. Clinical reports describing either trials of investigational stent-grafts or off-label use of commercial devices often classify the entire length of the ascending thoracic aorta as a single landing zone (i.e., the location of stent-graft attachment), extending from the sinotubular junction to the proximal branching of the innominate artery [22]. Motivated by clinical outcomes, our team has recently emphasized the need to further partition the ascending thoracic aorta (referred to as Zone 0) into three segments: Zone 0A or the aortic root, Zone 0B or the proximal half of the ascending aorta, from the distal coronary ostia to the right main pulmonary artery, and Zone 0C or the distal half, past the right main pulmonary artery [21]. Leveraging this modified classification, we have shown that, among the recipients of emergency ascending TEVAR, patients with root disease experience significantly worst outcomes than those with proximal or distal disease, with age acting as an additional independent predictor of mortality [21].
These clinical findings suggest that regional differences—yet to be explored—through the length of the aneurysmal ascending thoracic aorta may complement the well established circumferential variation in structural and mechanical properties between the anterior and posterior regions [23, 24, 25]. Lengthwise mechanical characterization of ATAA tissues thus becomes imperative for the design of dedicated stent-graft devices that optimize deployment and interaction with the native environment by accounting for the response of the specific landing zone. Toward this end, we have recently shown that the elastic energy storage under equibiaxial loading increases from the aortic root to the distal segment, prompting the need to further explore the regional mechanics of ATAA tissues [26].
To minimize assumptions on loading conditions and extract mechanical metrics at physiologically meaningful deformation levels, we have developed a numerical framework that combines in-vitro testing with in-vivo imaging and pressure measurements. Following this approach, we report here the first mechanical characterization of aneurysmal tissues through the length of the ascending thoracic aorta, according to our revised classification of Zone 0 [21]. Leveraging a diverse cohort of patients, we further evaluate the extent to which age and patient medical history, including valve morphology and syndromic disorder, contribute to tissue mechanics.
2. Materials & Methods
2.1. Patient Population
All research activities on human subjects received Institutional Review Board approval at the Cleveland Clinic (#16–900, approved 8/1/2016). Following written informed consent for data collection and publication, 80 adults undergoing elective replacement of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) were prospectively enrolled in the study and assigned to one of three mutually exclusive etiological groups: (1) patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), (2) patients with normal (tricuspid) aortic valve morphology suffering from a connective tissue disorder (CTD), and (3) patients with normal (tricuspid) aortic valve morphology without any known heritable condition predisposing to ATAA disease (TAV). Based on the relationship between age and ATAA function recently reported by our team [26] and accounting for the age at which the disease typically occurs with each predisposing factor, we further identified young (<40 year old), middle-aged (40 to 60 year old), and older (>60 year old) patient cohorts. Demographic data on the subjects included in the study and information on the average maximum diameter of the ATAA for each etiological group are listed in Table 1. Since no statistically significant differences emerged between male and female patients, data from both sexes were combined. Furthermore, since our analysis is intended to aid the design of endovascular devices that exclusively interact with ATAA tissues and on account of specimen availability, we did not pursue any comparison with age-matched, non-aneurysmal controls. Finally, although hypertension is a known risk factor for aneurysmal disease [27, 28, 3] and despite the prevalence (41/80 patients) of hypertension within our cohort, no comparisons were conducted to ascertain the independent effect of elevated blood pressure on ATAA mechanics, as most patients received anti-hypertensive treatment.
Table 1:
Characteristics of the patients enrolled in our study. Total number of patients, average (±SEM) and median patient age, number and percentage of female patients, average (±SEM) and median maximum ATAA diameter, as well as number and percentage of aortas that were frozen ahead of testing are reported for the mutually-exclusive BAV, CTD, and TAV etiological groups. Aortic size as measured from CT scans according to the centerline method [26].
| etiology | n | age (yrs) | female sex | max diam. (cm) | frozen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAV | 41 | 50.0±2.3, 52 | 13, 31.7% | 4.71±0.12, 4.86 | 8, 19.5% |
| CTD | 17 | 32.2±2.4, 31 | 7, 41.2% | 4.71±0.13, 4.64 | 3, 17.6% |
| TAV | 22 | 60.5±2.8, 61 | 5, 22.7% | 5.05±0.14, 5.08 | 5, 22.7% |
2.2. Planar Biaxial Testing
Sample Preparation.
A total of 153 square tissue samples were carved from root (Zone0A), proximal (0B), and distal (0C) segments [21] along the greater curvature of resected ATAAs, using a 15×15mm2 cutter with edges aligned to the anatomical circumferential and axial directions. Thickness was measured with a custom-built device at five locations across each specimen and averaged [26]. Tissues were either tested fresh or fast-frozen, to minimize changes in mechanical properties when same day testing could not be performed [29, 30]. Frozen samples were preserved at −80°C and thawed overnight in 4°C normal saline ahead of testing.
Experimental Apparatus.
Mechanical testing was performed with a customized planar biaxial system equipped with four motors (ADMET; Norwood, MA, USA) following established protocols [31, 32, 33, 34, 26, 35, 36]. A speckle pattern of India ink was applied via a rubber stamp onto the intimal side of tissues. Specimens were loaded onto the device using five equally spaced rakes along each edge, to yield a 10×10mm2 testing area. Anatomical circumferential and axial directions were aligned with in-plane loading axes 1 and 2, respectively (Fig. S1A). Tissue hydration was maintained by submersion into a heated saline bath at 37°C. A preload of 0.05N was applied to remove residual buckling. The displacement of the speckle pattern was recorded for calculation of in-plane Green-Lagrange strains via digital image correlation (VIC-2D Digital Image Correlation system v6.0.6, Correlated Solutions; Irmo, SC, USA).
Testing Protocols.
Tissue samples were first tested under global stretch ratios of 1:1 (equibiaxial displacement of the loading arms in the circumferential and axial directions, performed as first and last), 1:0.75, 1:0.5, 0.5:1, and 0.75:1. This set of six biaxial protocols was repeated 3x sequentially and with no interruptions at increasing values of maximum global stretch (+0.1) or until tissue failure. Initial maximum global stretch was set to 1.4 for most proximal and distal samples, and to 1.3 for the root and other samples that were perceived as fragile or were expected to rupture at lower deformation. Tissue was preconditioned for nine cycles in the first equibiaxial protocol of the set with the lowest maximum global stretch, four cycles in the first equibiaxial protocol of each subsequent set, and two cycles in all remaining protocols, with data collected on the following and last cycle. This preconditioning strategy ensured repeatable responses while avoiding damage to the tissues due to prolonged testing duration. Without further tissue manipulation, samples were then held at a fixed global stretch along one axis and cyclically deformed along the orthogonal direction, up to a maximum global stretch of either 1.3 or 1.4. Global stretch was applied at a quasi-static loading rate of 0.5 mm/s. Traces of all protocols implemented during biaxial testing, including preconditioning cycles, are illustrated in Fig. S2.
2.3. Biaxial Data Analysis
Negligible in-plane shear [37] prompted mapping of the reference into the current, deformed configuration as x1 = λ1X1, x2 = λ2X2, x3 = λ3X3, where XI (I = 1, 2, 3) and xi (i = 1, 2, 3) are the reference and current coordinate sets, respectively, and λj (j = 1, 2, 3) are the principal stretches aligned with the three anatomical directions of the aorta — circumferential, axial, and radial. The corresponding deformation gradient tensor F = ∂x/∂X admits matrix representation diag[λ1, λ2, λ3] in our reference system. Similarly, matrix diag[(λ12 − 1)/2, (λ22 − 1)/2, (λ32 − 1)/2] represents the Green-Lagrange strain tensor E = (C − I)/2, where C = FTF is the right Cauchy-Green deformation tensor, superscript T indicates the transpose, and I is the identity tensor. Experimental measures of in-plane Green-Lagrange strains facilitated calculation of in-plane stretches as and , while λ3 was determined by enforcing incompressibility through J = det(F) = λ1λ2λ3 = 1.
Noting that that the top and bottom surfaces of tissue samples are traction-free and the thickness is smaller compared to in-plane dimensions, the first Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor P assumes matrix form diag[f1/(L2H), f2/(L1H), 0], where f1 and f2 are the forces measured by the load cells, L1 and L2 are the undeformed rake-to-rake distances delimiting the testing area, and H is the undeformed thickness. The second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor is then obtained as S = F−1P and represented by matrix diag[P11λ2λ3, P22λ1λ3,0].
2.4. Biaxial Data Averaging
Since our biaxial testing approach controlled for the displacement of the loading arms and considering that the maximum global displacement imposed in each test changed according to the protocol or if the tissue failed prematurely, measured local strains varied substantially across ATAA samples. To facilitate data averaging and fair inter-group comparison, we fit biquintic Hermite surface elements to second Piola-Kirchhoff stress data in the Green-Lagrange strain plane [38, 39], and interpolated strain-controlled responses up to set loading conditions [18, 40, 25] (Fig. S1B).
Surface Fitting.
Experimental data in the E11, E22 plane (independent variables) were mapped onto the ξ, η ∈ {−1, 1} domain assuming a single bilinear element (Eqs. S1 and S2). The distribution of stress (dependent variable, either S11 or S22) in the ξ, η plane was captured with a four-node biquintic element (Fig. S1B). Six shape functions were defined (Eq. S3) to estimate the nodal stress, alongside its first, second, and cross derivatives with respect to ξ and η. The stress at point p of coordinates (ξp, ηp) was approximated as
| (1) |
where Nijk are the values of the shape functions at p and Sijk are the values of the stress and its derivatives at node i, with i=1:4 for the node number and j, k=0:2 for the orders of the derivative, excluding j+k> 2 to reduce the total number of nodal values from 36 to 24. The twenty four Sijk values were estimated by minimization (fminunc function; Matlab R2021a; Mathworks, Natick, MA) of the error function
| (2) |
where the first term is the least square solution for n data points and the second term is the double integral of the Sobolev norm (Eq. S4) for smoothing regions of sparse or noisy data [41, 38, 42, 43], with Sp indicating experimental data and approximated values from Eq. 1. Quality of fit relied upon the coefficient of determination
| (3) |
where is the mean of the experimental measures.
Data Interpolation.
Leveraging nodal Sijk values specific to each sample, we applied Eq. 1 to extract five strain-controlled data sets with standard E11 to E22 ratio of 1:1, 1:0.75, 1:0.5, 0.5:1, and 0.75:1, up to the largest experimental strain experienced by the least distensible tissue within each group (Fig. S1B).
Data Averaging.
Given the nonlinear stress-strain behavior of ATAA tissues, proper averaging of experimental data is necessary to estimate group representative material parameters [44, 45, 46, 37]. Average data sets were generated by calculating the mean and dispersion across samples of interpolated S11 and S22 values, at set E11 and E22 levels within the interpolation domain, and for each strain ratio protocol. Average Cauchy stress vs. stretch data sets were then obtained by applying σ = FSFT.
2.5. Constitutive Parameter Estimation
Aneurysmal tissue was modeled as a hyperelastic material endowed with a strain energy density potential in the form
| (4) |
where IC = λ12 + λ22 + λ32 is the first invariant of C with principal stretch directions 1,2,3 aligned with the anatomical circumferential, axial, and radial directions, μ (dimension of a stress) is a Neo-Hookean material parameter describing the isotropic contribution of the ground matrix, Q = a1E112 + a2E222 + 2a3E11E22 is a quadratic form in the components of E, and c (dimension of a stress) and a1, a2, a3 (non-dimensional) are Fung-type material parameters often used to capture the anisotropic behavior of collagen fibers in ATAA tissues [47, 48, 25]. For such a material, the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor is obtained as
| (5) |
where p is a Lagrange multiplier to enforce incompressibility. Best fit estimates of the 5 material parameters were obtained from the nonlinear least square minimization of the Euclidean norm of the error vector
| (6) |
where S is the experimental stress, is the theoretical stress from Eq. 5, and is the average experimental stress in either the circumferential or axial direction. Goodness of fit was expressed as root-mean-square-error (RMSE). Identification of constitutive parameters was performed on individual specimens as well as group average data sets.
2.6. In-vivo Mechanics Modeling
One of the main challenges of predicting the mechanical behavior of nonlinear tissues is that energy, stress, and stiffness depend on the deformation. With regard to ATAA disease, the scarcity of data describing in-vivo and traction-free geometries hinders accurate estimation of tissue strains under physiological loads. To overcome this hurdle while minimizing kinematics assumptions, we leveraged a property by which arteries preserve axial force independent of pressure when extended to their crossover axial stretch [49]. That is, the crossover axial stretch marks the intersection of axial force vs. axial stretch curves under different luminal pressures (Fig. S1D). Since operating above this limit is energetically sub-optimal, we assumed crossover axial stretch at systole, when the contraction of the heart imposes the largest axial deformation on ascending aortic tissues. We then leveraged experimental measures of traction-free thickness, systolic luminal radius, and systolic pressure to estimate the traction-free outer radius of ATAA samples and determine in-vivo circumferential stretch under inflation-extension kinematics, as detailed in loops 1–3 below (Fig. S1C).
Experimental Input.
For a subset of patients (59 out of 80), the luminal radii of root, proximal, and distal ATAA segments were measured intraoperatively under systolic and diastolic loads, using epiaortic (EA) and transesophageal (TEE) imaging. EA and TEE ultrasound was performed following sternotomy but prior to any intervention, to preserve the integrity of ATAA tissues. Anatomical landmarks facilitated identification of desired ATAA segments for image capturing. Blood pressure was monitored continuously during surgery via an arterial line, and recorded at the time of imaging. Additional details on the methods for in-vivo data measurement are reported in the Supplementary Material.
Inflation-Extension Kinematics.
The (R, Θ, Z) traction-free configuration of a pressurized and axially extended cylinder is mapped into the (r, θ, z) current configuration as r = r(R), θ = Θ, z = λzZ and admits a deformation gradient tensor F in the form diag[∂r/∂R, r/R, λz], where λz is the axial stretch. Assumption of incompressibility supports transformation of any reference radial position into the current configuration through , where the subscript i denotes the luminal radius. Given best fit parameters for the strain energy density function in Eq. 4, the Cauchy stress tensor for any given deformation reads
| (7) |
where p is a Lagrange multiplier.
Algorithm for Ro and λz,co Estimation.
LOOP 1: Accounting for the experimental measures of luminal radius at systolic pressure and traction-free tissue thickness, we resolved inflation-extension kinematics for a range of admissible axial stretches, to estimate the corresponding traction-free outer radius (Fig. S1C). Solution of radial equilibrium provided a theoretical value for the luminal pressure
| (8) |
where the subscript o indicates the outer radius. Estimates of Ro that minimized the difference between theoretical and given luminal pressure for each instance of λz were iteratively refined via the Newton-Raphson method.
LOOP 2: For each pair of Ro and λz, we resolved inflation-extension kinematics to identify the crossover axial stretch (Fig. S1C). Newton-Raphson was applied to determine the set of ro values that accommodated luminal pressures between 10 and 140mmHg, as calculated from Eq. 8. Solution of global axial equilibrium provided the corresponding axial force
| (9) |
The crossover axial stretch (λz,co) was extracted from the intersection of axial force vs. axial stretch data sets under different luminal pressures (Fig. S1D).
LOOP 3: After updating Ro based on the identified crossover axial stretch, we repeated LOOP 2 to ensure that the λz,co compatible with the revised traction-free dimensions deviated by <1% from the previous estimation (Fig. S1C).
Energy, Stress, and Stiffness Calculation.
Estimates of Ro and λz,co allowed calculation of systolic circumferential stretch as λθ = r/R. Upon solving for local deformation, elastic energy (W, Eq. 4), Cauchy stress (σ, Eq. 7), and linearized stiffness were evaluated at equispaced radial locations between the luminal and outer radii. The components of the linearized stiffness tensor were determined according to the small-on-large deformation approach [50]
| (10) |
where δ is the Kronecker delta, (i, j, k, l) ≡ (r, θ, z) and (I, J, K, L) ≡ (R, Θ, Z). We also evaluated tissue anisotropy through index A = 0.5·(λz,co − λθ)/(λz,co + λθ) [19]. Noting that constitutive parameters from planar biaxial data describe homogenized tissue behavior (i.e., neglecting the layered structure of the aortic wall), we obtained and report the through-thickness integral mean of all mechanical metrics.
Model Evaluation.
To assess the predictive capability of our modeling framework, we first compared estimates of traction-free inner radius with experimental measurements collected in a subset of ATAA samples. Freshly-harvested tissues were submerged en-bloc in saline solution within a 1×1cm2 grid container for imaging of distal and proximal edges. With the grid pattern for scaling, the luminal perimeter of the aorta was manually traced (roipoly function, Matlab v2021a; MathWorks, Natick MA) to measure the area (bwarea function, Matlab v2021a; MathWorks, Natick MA) and calculate the equivalent radius.
Second, we compared the through-thickness integral mean of predicted circumferential stress at systolic pressure and crossover axial stretch against the values that Koullias et al. [51] inferred under membrane assumption and for pressures of 100 and 220mmHg, as a function of ATAA size measured through EA echocardiography.
Third, we compared predicted cyclic (diastole to systole) biaxial strains to reported measurements in both ATAA disease [52] and aged but non-aneurysmal ascending aortas [53]. We solved inflation-extension kinematics (Figs. S1C) to match the luminal diameters determined from imaging of diastolic and systolic configurations, assuming that tissues experienced crossover axial stretch during cardiac systole. Cyclic (area) circumferential strain was calculated as 100·(πri,sys2 − πri,dia2)/(πri,dia2) and axial strain as 100·(λz,sys − λz,dia)/λz,dia, where subscripts sys and dia refer to systole and diastole, respectively.
2.7. Statistics
All values are reported as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Differences in mechanical metrics across groups were determined via one-way non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. We further relied on non-parametric Spearman’s rank-order correlation to evaluate the relationship between mechanical metrics and aging, where rs describes the strength and direction of the correlation.
3. Results
Average Cauchy stress vs. stretch data for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) tissues as a function of anatomical location, patient age, and underlying condition exhibited the expected transition from a low-stiffness response, capable of accommodating large deformations within a small stress range, toward a high-stiffness behavior of rapidly increasing stress upon further stretching (Figs. 1–2). Best fit material parameters that describe the average response for regional, chronological, and etiological groups with no less than 4 samples are reported in Table S1.
Figure 1:

Regional variation in representative equibiaxial Cauchy stress (σ) vs. stretch (λ) responses of ATAA tissues organized by etiology and age. Root, proximal, and distal behavior from young (A), middle-aged (B), and older (C) BAV patients. Root and proximal behavior from young (D) CTD patients. Root, proximal, and distal behavior from middle-aged (E) and older (F) TAV patients. Subscripts refer to circumferential (θ) and axial (z) directions. Individual data points are averages of interpolated equibiaxial responses across samples within each anatomical, chronological, and etiological group. Shaded areas visualize inter-specimen variability as ±SEM. The number of samples in each group is reported in Table S1. Average responses shown for groups with at least n=4 samples.
Figure 2:

Age-dependent variation in representative equibiaxial Cauchy stress (σ) vs. stretch (λ) responses of ATAA tissues organized by etiology and region. Root (A), proximal (B), and distal (C) behavior from young, middle-aged, and older BAV patients. Root (D), proximal (E), and distal (F) behavior from middle-aged and older TAV patients. Subscripts refer to circumferential (θ) and axial (z) directions. Individual data points are averages of interpolated equibiaxial responses across samples within each anatomical, chronological, and etiological group. Shaded areas visualize inter-specimen variability as ±SEM. The number of samples in each group is reported in Table S1. Average responses shown for groups with at least n=4 samples.
Within the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) cohort and up to a stretch of 1.4, the root of young patients experienced larger circumferential distensibility and axial extensibility compared to proximal and distal samples under equibiaxial loading (Fig. 1A), though this relationship reversed with age (Fig. 1B,C). Furthermore, the average biaxial response of proximal ATAA tissues did not differ from that of the distal segment in the youngest (Fig. 1A) and oldest patients (Fig. 1C), at least within the experimental range of stretches, though it approached the behavior of the root in the middle age group (Fig. 1B). These findings reflect the differential effect of aging on the three anatomical regions of ATAA samples in the presence of BAV. While the root experienced the largest progressive decrease in distensibility and extensibility with age (Fig. 2A), the most substantial changes in the mechanics of proximal ATAA tissues occurred between the young and middle age group, after which the biaxial response stabilized (Fig. 2B). Note that distal tissues in the oldest age group were not stretched beyond the initial low-stiffness behavior, hence more information is necessary to fully characterize the mechanical response of this segment (Fig. 2C).
Amongst patients suffering from a connective tissue disorder (CTD), the root appeared less distensible than proximal tissues even in the young age group (Fig. 1D). Given that syndromic aortopathies are often characterized by highly penetrant root aneurysms and manifest earlier in life, we did not have enough samples to generate average curves for the distal region at any time point nor for any patient above 40 years of age, thus the effect of aging could not be investigated for this etiological group.
Within the cohort of patients that had no prior connective tissue disorder diagnosis and exhibited normal valve morphology (TAV), the root was less distensible and extensible than the proximal and distal regions in the middle age group (Fig. 1E), though differences within the low-stiffness response faded beyond age 60 (Fig. 1F). These findings echo more substantial changes in the mechanical behavior of the proximal (Fig. 2E) and distal segments (Fig. 2F) with age, at least in the circumferential direction, compared to the root (Fig. 2D).
To extract quantitative information on the mechanical function of ATAA tissues, we supplemented the comparison of interpolated equibiaxial responses (Figs. 1–2) by solving inflation-extension kinematics to recapitulate in-vivo measures of systolic pressure and luminal diameter, under the assumption of energetically-optimal crossover axial stretch (Figs. S1D). We resorted to the crossover axial stretch to compare ATAA tissues at analogous deformed configurations that approach their in-situ state [49, 12]. Substantiating the validity of our approach, predicted values of traction-free luminal radii deviated by at most 20% from perioperative measurements on resected tissues from a subset of patients, with the majority of the estimates exhibiting <10% error (Fig. 3A). Given the inherent challenge of extracting reliable size information from digital images of flaccid tissues, our model predicted the traction-free geometry of ATAA samples with reasonable accuracy. Interestingly, a ±20% deviation from the estimated traction-free luminal radius did not alter the predicted crossover axial stretch, which therefore emerged as a robust property of ATAA tissues rather than geometry (Fig. S4). Furthermore, through-thickness integral means of calculated circumferential Cauchy stress under systolic luminal pressure and crossover axial stretch (average: 0.31±0.01 MPa) fell within the expected range for ATAA tissues at given diameters and for luminal pressures between 100 and 220mmHg [51] (Fig. 3B). Finally, average cyclic circumferential (11.1±0.6%, measured from imaging) and axial (7.6±0.8%, predicted by the model) strains in proximal and distal ATAA tissues within our patient cohort fell within less than half a standard deviation of average in-vivo measurements acquired through ECG-gated CT scans in ATAA patients [52] and MR imaging in older individuals [53] (Fig. 3C).
Figure 3:

Comparison of model predictions against independent experimental measurements of unloaded dimensions and reported levels of in-vivo circumferential stress or cyclic biaxial strains in patients suffering from ATAA disease. Estimates of unloaded inner radius (Ri) deviate by at most ±20% from intra-operative measurements on excised ATAA sample (A). Through-thickness integral mean of circumferential Cauchy stress at systolic pressure and crossover axial stretch fall within the reported range for ATAA patients [51] (B). Estimates of diastolic axial stretch yield cyclic circumferential and axial strains that are comparable to imaging-based measurements in patients with proximal and/or distal ATAA disease [52] and in older but non-aneurysmal individuals [53] (C).
Leveraging our model, we first compared regional properties independently of additional risk factors. While all three segments endured comparable circumferential stretch levels (Fig. 4D), the root displayed lower crossover axial stretch (1.29±0.02) than either proximal (1.37±0.03) or distal (1.39±0.03; p<0.05; Fig. 4A) tissues, albeit only the latter was significant. Given this trend, and because the circumferential stretch was larger than the axial stretch in most samples, the average anisotropy index remained negative in all three regions, yet it approached zero in distal segments, where the mechanical response under in-vivo loads turned fairly isotropic (Fig. 4G). Wall thickness increased from root (0.95±0.04 mm) to distal tissues (1.14±0.05 mm; p<0.01; Fig. 4H) and contributed to reducing the circumferential stress in the distal region (261±13 kPa) compared to both root (331±19 kPa; p<0.05) and proximal (332±16 kPa; p<0.01) segments (Fig. 4E). In contrast, no difference across regions surfaced in the axial stress (Fig. 4B). Nevertheless, the intrinsic stiffness of ATAA tissues progressively declined when moving distally from the heart, in both the axial (Root: 3.4±0.2 MPa, Prox: 2.9±0.2 MPa, Dist: 2.3±0.1 MPa; p<0.01 or p<0.05; Fig. 4C) and circumferential (Root: 5.8±0.3 MPa, Prox: 4.0±0.3 MPa, Dist: 2.8±0.3 MPa; p<0.01 or p<0.05; Fig. 4F) directions. Finally, the root stored less elastic energy (35±4 kPa) than more distal regions of ATAA samples, though only significantly so when compared to the proximal segment (52±5 kPa; p<0.01; Fig.4I).
Figure 4:

Material, geometrical, and structural properties of root, proximal, and distal segments of ATAA samples within our patient cohort. Metrics of stress (B, E), stiffness (C, F), anisotropy (G), thickness (H), and stored energy (I) are calculated at estimated crossover axial stretch (A) and circumferential stretch (D) to accommodate systolic pressure. Note the gradual decline in biaxial tissue stiffness with increasing distance from the heart. Statistical significance between regions denoted by overbar, with * for p<0.05 and ** for p<0.01.
Given the inherent regional differences in the biaxial mechanics of ATAA tissues, we evaluated the contribution of additional risk factors, i.e., older age, valve morphology, and the presence of a connective tissue disorder, within each anatomical segment. As expected from the qualitative comparison of average equibiaxial responses (Fig. 2), systolic deformation gradually decreased with advancing age in both the axial (Root: 1.39→1.20, rs=−0.672, p<0.01; Prox: 1.49→1.28, rs=−0.496, p<0.01; Dist: 1.59→1.27, rs=−0.816, p<0.01; Fig. 5A) and circumferential (Root: 1.48→1.30, rs=−0.650, p<0.01; Prox: 1.47→1.36, rs=−0.509, p<0.01; Dist: 1.45→1.33, rs=−0.530, p<0.01; Fig. 5D) directions. The age-induced decline of the axial stretch outpaced that of the circumferential stretch in distal tissues, where anisotropy progressively shifted from positive to negative (Dist: 0.09→−0.04, rs=−0.678, p<0.01; Fig. 5G). Wall thickness increased with advancing age across all regions of ATAA samples (Root: 0.78→1.07, rs=0.630, p<0.01; Prox: 0.88→1.09, rs=0.401, p<0.05; Dist: 0.82→1.30, rs=0.659, p<0.01; Fig. 5H). Concurrently, circumferential stress at the root (Root: 404→287 kPa, rs=−0.512, p<0.01; Fig. 5E) and axial stress at the root and in the distal segment of ATAA samples (Root: 304→197 kPa, rs=−0.525, p<0.01; Dist: 423→190 kPa, rs=−0.720, p<0.01; Fig. 5B) decreased as patients became older. Advancing age correlated with circumferential stiffening in the proximal and distal ATAA tissues (Prox: 3.2→5.1 MPa, rs=0.344, p<0.05; Dist: 1.8→3.8 MPa, rs=0.536, p<0.01; Fig. 5F), yet it did not affect axial stiffness at any anatomical location (Fig. 5C). Related to decreased deformation, energy storage in ATAA tissues gradually declined with age in all segments (Root: 52→21 kPa, rs=−0.683, p<0.01; Prox: 69→38 kPa, rs=−0.364, p<0.05; Dist: 91→30 kPa, rs=−0.746, p<0.01; Fig. 5I). Plots of all mechanical metrics against age are included in the Supplementary Material (Figs. S5–7).
Figure 5:

Material, geometrical, and structural properties of root, proximal, and distal regions of ATAA samples from young, middle-age, and older patients enrolled in our study. Metrics of stress (B, E), stiffness (C, F), anisotropy (G), thickness (H), and stored energy (I) are calculated at estimated crossover axial stretch (A) and circumferential stretch (D) to accommodate systolic pressure. Note the negative correlation between advancing age and aortic function (through energy storage) across all three segments of ATAA samples. Statistical significance between age groups denoted by overbar, with * for p<0.05 and ** for p<0.01.
Etiological differences in the mechanics of ATAA tissues primarily emerged within the distal segment, where a thicker wall (Fig. 6H) complemented lower biaxial stretches (Fig. 6A,D), axial stress (Fig. 6B), and energy storage (Fig. 6I) in TAV patients compared with either or both the BAV and CTD cohorts. The proximal region featured similar discrepancies across etiological groups but limited to circumferential stretch (Fig. 6D), axial stress (Fig. 6B), and energy storage (Fig. 6I). Aorthopaties related to BAV or CTD did not affect anisotropy (Fig. 6G), circumferential stress (Fig. 6E), or biaxial tissue stiffness (Fig. 6C,F) in proximal and distal tissues, nor any of the mechanical metrics at the root.
Figure 6:

Material, geometrical, and structural properties of root, proximal, and distal regions of ATAA samples from BAV, CTD, and TAV patients enrolled in our study. Metrics of stress (B, E), stiffness (C, F), anisotropy (G), thickness (H), and stored energy (I) are calculated at estimated crossover axial stretch (A) and circumferential stretch (D) to accommodate systolic pressure. Note the absence of consistent etiological differences across the three segments of ATAA samples. Statistical significance between etiological groups denoted by overbar, with * for p<0.05 and ** for p<0.01.
4. Discussion
Properly timed monitoring and treatment of aortic aneurysms is crucial for reducing the risk of premature death due to fatal dissection and/or rupture [54, 3, 2]. While endovascular repair has become a valuable option for the treatment of non-ruptured aneurysms in the abdominal and descending thoracic segments of the aorta, it has only been performed on ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) patients that are ineligible for open surgical repair, using either commercial devices off-label or investigational devices [55, 21]. Survival data from these studies show that patients with root disease experience worse outcomes than those with either proximal or distal disease [21]. Therefore, elucidating the uniqueness of the root in terms of structure, hemodynamics, and wall mechanics is imperative for the design of endovascular devices that can support the long-term survival of ATAA patients. To this end, we developed a methodological framework aimed to assess markers of lengthwise regional biomechanical dysfunction associated with ATAA disease.
We first sought to determine the representative (average) biaxial behavior of ATAA tissues as a function of region, age, and etiology. While our testing approach maximized the data yield by cycling a set of biaxial protocols through progressively higher stretch levels [56], it also increased inter-sample variability in the range of applied local strains. To circumvent this issue, previous studies have leveraged constitutive modeling to simulate consistent planar biaxial data [18]. As an alternative approach, we showed here that biquintic Hermite surfaces [41, 38] faithfully capture the stress-strain behavior of ATAA tissues (average goodness of fit R2=0.9846) and support direct interpolation of standard biaxial responses suitable for averaging (Fig. S1B). Besides facilitating qualitative cross-group comparisons [40, 57], average data supply representative constitutive descriptors for complementary finite element analysis (Table S1) [58, 59]. Notwithstanding these advantages, surface fitting limits the average behavior up to the maximum strain experienced by the least-stretched sample. This is particularly evident in the distal region, where a significant number of tissue specimens exhibited fairly linear stress-strain responses due to sub optimal loading that failed to engage collagen fibers (Fig. 2C). We thus recom mend that more data be collected to capture the full scope of the tissue behavior in this ATAA segment.
Paralleling findings for aneurysmal tissues in the abdominal aorta [60], the average equibiaxial Cauchy stress vs. stretch response in the low stiffness region of ATAA samples is qualitatively similar across all but young bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients, yet aging and proximity to the left ventricle anticipate the transition toward rapid strain-stiffening (Figs. 1,2). The trend toward reduced equibiaxial transition stretches that manifests in healthy human aortic tissues with advancing age [18] therefore persists with aneurysmal disease and is most prominent in the BAV cohort, due to the wider range of patient ages and the larger number of samples in this group. Earlier equibiaxial transition stretches at the root vs. more distal regions of ATAA [61] samples further mirror the behavior of the aortic sinus compared to the ascending aorta in healthy pigs [62] and humans [63]. Note, delayed transition and reduced stress at low-stiffness in root samples from BAV patients under 40 years-of-age (Fig. 1A) may indicate more severe microstructural disarray [64] compared to proximal and distal tissues and should be investigated by histological analysis.
Given the nonlinear response of ATAA tissues (Fig. S1B), mechanical metrics of stress, intrinsic stiffness, and elastic strain energy vary with the deformation. To determine the circumferential stretch compatible with patient-specific measures of traction-free wall thickness and systolic luminal diameter, we solved equilibrium equations for inflation-extension kinematics, constraining the axial stretch to fulfill the energetically-optimal, crossover condition that characterizes the axial force vs. length relationship for arterial samples (Fig. S1C) [65]. Minimization of modeling assumptions through incorporation of in-vivo data facilitated prediction of deformation-dependent mechanical metrics at patient- and region-specific biaxial stretches, permissive of more relevant and fair comparisons across groups (Figs. 4–6). In contrast, previous studies extracted either peak stretch/stress, tangential stiffness, or energy loss from either experimental [32, 63, 66, 16] or simulated equibiaxial responses [25], when the axial and circumferential directions experience the same loading conditions. The anisotropy of aneurysmal tissues and the high degree of variability in the mechanical response across samples (Figs. 1,2) render these circumstances unlikely to hold in-vivo, further emphasizing the value of our multi-modal analysis for quantifying biaxial deformations. Although frequently used to probe cardiovascular tissue mechanics, in-vivo imaging [67, 68, 23, 69] and in-vitro testing [14, 32, 63, 24, 16, 25] individually offer limited capabilities [70]. We showed here that coupling of data from both testing modalities with mechanical models of the aortic wall supports inferences of mechanical metrics at consistent and physiologically-meaningful levels of deformation (Fig. 3). Note, however, that in adult wild-type mice the systolic axial stretch of the ascending thoracic aorta extends to at most 85% of the crossover value, thereby suggesting the presence of an exertion reserve for supplementing elastic energy between rest and strenuous exercise, emotional distress, or fight/flight conditions [71]. Therefore, by selecting the crossover axial stretch, our model provides the upper bound of tissue stress, stiffness, and energy, especially considering that in-vivo pressure and luminal diameter were measured under anesthesia. Indeed, the through-thickness integral mean of circumferential stress approached values reported for ATAA tissues at 220mmHg pressure load [51], despite the average systolic pressure in our population not exceeding 150mmHg (Fig.3B). Further inaccuracies may have been introduced by using a cylindrical geometry assumption in the predictions of the mechanics for non-axisymmetric ATAAs.
In agreement with the global trend that emerged from the comparison of averaged equibiaxial data (Fig. 1), biaxial tissue stiffness under simulated inflation-extension kinematics at patient-specific systolic pressure is largest at the ATAA root and decreases toward the proximal and distal segments (Fig. 4C,F). The axial gradient in tissue stiffness along ATAA samples complements evidence of circumferential heterogeneity reported in previous studies [72, 25] and upholds the rapid stiffening of the aortic sinus compared to the rest of the non-aneurysmal ascending aorta from both porcine [62] and human cadaver [63] donors. Note, we have recently shown that circumferential tissue stiffness correlates with disease severity across mouse models of thoracic aortic aneurysm [73]. Stiffening of aneurysmal tissues is attributed to an earlier engagement of collagen fibers to compensate for the loss of integrity in the elastic laminae [74]. Interestingly, the elastic fiber network is looser and the collagen fibers are more haphazardly distributed at the root of the non-aneurysmal ascending aorta, compared to the proximal and distal regions [63]. Therefore, the inherent microstructure of the root may precipitate tissue stiffening in aneurysmal disease and synergize with increased procedural difficulty to worsen the outcomes of endovascular repair for this aortic segment [21]. Finally, root aneurysms have stronger genetic etiology, while proximal and distal disease is primarily linked to hemodynamics, particularly in BAV patients [75]. Overall, the structural, mechanical, and etiological gradients along ATAA samples urge for region-specific surgical interventions. We speculate that an adaptive design accounting for the intrinsic stiffness of the landing zone may help minimize the mechanical mismatch between stent-graft and aneurysmal tissues, reducing complications that could lead to poor surgical outcomes, particularly in the treatment of root disease [21].
The spatial gradient in circumferential tissue stiffness along ATAA samples persists when patients are grouped by age (Fig. 5F). A reflection of the positive correlation between aging and the circumferential stiffening of root, proximal, and distal tissues, this finding corroborates previous observations in both control [17, 18, 19] and aneurysmal [76, 72] samples. The age-dependent decline in biaxial stretches under systolic pressure load (Figs. 5A,D) further mirrors the lower crossover axial stretch of the non-aneurysmal descending thoracic aorta of older patients [19] and contributes to reducing the elastic energy available for diastolic blood flow augmentation (Fig. 5I). Decreased stored energy hinders the aged ATAA wall from acting as a pressure reservoir and may increase the workload on the heart or damage the microvasculature [77, 78]. Loss of elastic fiber integrity and deposition of collagen with both aging and aneurysmal disease [79, 80, 64] likely contribute to reducing the elastic energy storage within the aortic wall [81, 82, 74]. Overall, age emerges as the strongest predictor of tissue mechanics within our patient cohort.
Since ATAA disease is age-selective by etiology (Table 1), the reported divergence in mechanical descriptors between tricuspid aortic valve patients (TAV) and BAV [13, 12, 83, 84, 85, 11, 86] or syndromic aneurysm (CTD) [14, 15, 16] cohorts may depend, at least in part, on the age at which the disease typically manifests in these etiological groups. For instance, tissues from TAV patients enrolled in our study are thicker (Fig. 6H), operate at lower stretches (Fig. 6A,D), and store less elastic energy (Fig. 6I) compared to tissues in the BAV group, yet these differences are consistent with the average older age of TAV patients (Figs. S5–7). Aligned with this interpretation, Okamoto et al. showed that age influences the mechanical properties of aneurysmal ascending aortas, regardless of the underlying source of dilatation [14]. Recognizing the age discrepancy across etiologies, Sulejmani et al. limited the comparison between Marfan and non-Marfan thoracic aneurysmal tissues to patients above 40 years-of-age and noted larger equibiaxial transition strains in the Marfan group, though only significantly so in the circumferential direction [16]. This finding mirrors the delayed stiffening of the average equibiaxial responses in root tissues from CTD compared to TAV patients in our middle age cohort (Fig. S3C) and may reflect an abundance of thinner and loosely-packed collagen fibers with reduced load bearing capability [16]. Nevertheless, differences between CTD and TAV tissues fade when mechanical metrics are evaluated at patient-specific systolic pressure and crossover axial stretch within the same age group (Figs. S5–7). Leveraging finite element simulations, Xuan et al. further reported that tissues from the aortic sinuses experience larger circumferential stress compared to the sinotubular junction in Marfan patients alone [87], emphasizing the influence of axial location on mechanics (Fig. 4) and the perniciousness of root aortopathies associated with connective tissue disorders.
4.1. Conclusions
In response to the clinical need for alternative treatment options beyond open surgical repair, detailed characterization of the lengthwise regional mechanics of ATAA tissues offers invaluable guidance in formulating design specifications and testing parameters for the development and regulatory evaluation of endovascular devices catered specifically to the ascending aorta. Leveraging a multidisciplinary approach at the interface between clinical sciences and engineering, we coupled semi-inverse constitutive and forward modeling with in-vitro biaxial data and in-vivo blood pressure and diameter measurements to extract mechanical descriptors of aortic behavior at physiologically meaningful levels of deformation, while minimizing assumptions on tissue loading conditions. Our analysis revealed inherent axial regional differences in the biaxial mechanics of ATAA tissues across a diverse patient cohort, which persist with age and disease. Moving distally from the aortic root to the first ascending aortic branch, we observed an increase in crossover stretch, thickness, and energy storage, accompanied by a progressive decline in circumferential and axial stiffness. Furthermore, we showed that aging leads to reduced aortic function independent of anatomical location and is a stronger predictor of mechanical response than either valve morphology or underlying syndromic disorder. These findings further our current understanding of the regional biomechanical derangement in ATAA tissues and provide evidence to elucidate disease pathogenesis, predict lesion progression, and identify appropriate treatment course.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
The inherent biaxial stiffness of aneurysmal tissues declines when moving distally from the aortic root to the first ascending branch.
Aging leads to reduced aortic function and is a stronger predictor of aneurysmal mechanics than either valve morphology or underlying genetic disorder.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the High-Risk Cardiovascular Research Philanthropy Fund, The Stephens Family Endowed Chair, Educational Grants from Cook Medical, CryoLife, Gore Medical, Medtronic, and Terumo Aortic (to EER), NIH/NHLBI – UM1HL088955 (supporting BK as Clinical Research Scholar of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network), and NSF CAREER 2049088 (to RA).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- [1].Kuzmik GA, Sang AX, Elefteriades JA, Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms, Journal of Vascular Surgery 56 (2) (2012) 565–571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Gouveia E Melo R, Silva Duarte G, Lopes A, Alves M, Caldeira D, Fernandes E Fernandes R, Mendes Pedro L, Incidence and Prevalence of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Population-Based Studies., Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (March 2021). doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Pinard A, Jones GT, Milewicz DM, Genetics of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Diseases., Circulation research 124 (4) (2019) 588–606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Ostberg NP, Zafar MA, Ziganshin BA, Elefteriades JA, The Genetics of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissection: A Clinical Perspective., Biomolecules 10 (2) (January 2020). doi: 10.3390/biom10020182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Dietz HC, Cutting GR, Pyeritz RE, Maslen CL, Sakai LY, Corson GM, Puffenberger EG, Hamosh A, Nanthakumar EJ, Curristin SM, Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene., Nature 352 (6333) (1991) 337–339. doi: 10.1038/352337a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Albornoz G, Coady MA, Roberts M, Davies RR, Tranquilli M, Rizzo JA, Elefteriades JA, Familial Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and DissectionsâĂŤIncidence, Modes of Inheritance, and Phenotypic Patterns, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 82 (4) (2006) 1400–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T, Callewaert BL, Thomas GH, Pannu H, De Backer JF, Oswald GL, Symoens S, Manouvrier S, Roberts AE, Faravelli F, Greco MA, Pyeritz RE, Milewicz DM, Coucke PJ, Cameron DE, Braverman AC, Byers PH, De Paepe AM, Dietz HC, Aneurysm Syndromes Caused by Mutations in the TGF-β Receptor, New England Journal of Medicine 355 (8) (2006) 788–798. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Isselbacher EM, Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Circulation 111 (6) (2005) 816–828. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154569.08857.7A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Verma S, Siu SC, Aortic Dilatation in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve, New England Journal of Medicine 370 (20) (2014) 1920–1929. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1207059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Pasta S, Phillippi JA, Gleason TG, Vorp DA, Effect of aneurysm on the mechanical dissection properties of the human ascending thoracic aorta., The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 143 (2) (2012) 460–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Forsell C, Björck HM, Eriksson P, Franco-Cereceda A, Gasser TC, Biomechanical properties of the thoracic aneurysmal wall: differences between bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve patients., The Annals of thoracic surgery 98 (1) (2014) 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Ferrara A, Totaro P, Morganti S, Auricchio F, Effects of clinico-pathological risk factors on in-vitro mechanical properties of human dilated ascending aorta, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 77 (2018) 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Chung JC-Y, Wong E, Tang M, Eliathamby D, Forbes TL, Butany J, Simmons CA, Ouzounian M, Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves, Journal of the American Heart Association 9 (15) (2020) e016715–e016715. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Okamoto RJ, Wagenseil JE, DeLong WR, Peterson SJ, Kouchoukos NT, Sundt T. M. r., Mechanical properties of dilated human ascending aorta., Annals of biomedical engineering 30 (5) (2002) 624–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Jarrahi A, Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Ahmadi H, Experimental/numerical study to assess mechanical properties of healthy and Marfan syndrome ascending thoracic aorta under axial and circumferential loading, Materials Technology 31 (5) (2016) 247–254. doi: 10.1179/1753555715Y.0000000049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Sulejmani F, Pokutta-Paskaleva A, Ziganshin B, Leshnower B, Iannucci G, Elefteriades J, Sun W, Biomechanical properties of the thoracic aorta in Marfan patients., Annals of cardiothoracic surgery 6 (6) (2017) 610–624. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.09.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Haskett D, Johnson G, Zhou A, Utzinger U, Vande Geest J, Microstructural and biomechanical alterations of the human aorta as a function of age and location., Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology 9 (6) (2010) 725–736. doi: 10.1007/s10237-010-0209-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Roccabianca S, Figueroa CA, Tellides G, Humphrey JD, Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 29 (2014) 618–634. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Jadidi M, Habibnezhad M, Anttila E, Maleckis K, Desyatova A, MacTaggart J, Kamenskiy A, Mechanical and structural changes in human thoracic aortas with age., Acta biomaterialia 103 (2020) 172–188. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Trimarchi S, Nienaber CA, Rampoldi V, Myrmel T, Suzuki T, Mehta RH, Bossone E, Cooper JV, Smith DE, Menicanti L, Frigiola A, Oh JK, Deeb MG, Isselbacher EM, Eagle KA, Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 129 (1) (2005) 112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Roselli EE, Idrees JJ, Johnston DR, Eagleton MJ, Desai MY, Svensson LG, Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A proposed modification to the classification of landing zones, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 155 (4) (2018) 1381–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Fillinger MF, Greenberg RK, McKinsey JF, Chaikof EL, Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)., Journal of vascular surgery 52 (4) (2010) 1022–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Alreshidan M, Shahmansouri N, Chung J, Lash V, Emmott A, Leask RL, Lachapelle K, Obtaining the biomechanical behavior of ascending aortic aneurysm via the use of novel speckle tracking echocardiography., The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 153 (4) (2017) 781–788. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Chung J, Lachapelle K, Cartier R, Mongrain R, Leask RL, Loss of mechanical directional dependency of the ascending aorta with severe medial degeneration., Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology 26 (2017) 45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Sigaeva T, Sattari S, Polzer S, Appoo JJ, Di Martino ES, Biomechanical properties of ascending aortic aneurysms: Quantification of inter- and intra-patient variability, Journal of Biomechanics 125 (2021) 110542. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Durbak E, Tarraf S, Gillespie C, Germano E, Cikach F, Blackstone E, Emerton K, Colbrunn R, Bellini C, Roselli EE, Ex-vivo Biaxial Load Testing Analysis of Aortic Biomechanics Demonstrates Variation in Elastic Energy Distribution Across the Aortic Zone Zero, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Ince H, Nienaber CA, Etiology, pathogenesis and management of thoracic aortic aneurysm., Nature clinical practice. Cardiovascular medicine 4 (8) (2007) 418–427. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Bersi MR, Khosravi R, Wujciak AJ, Harrison DG, Humphrey JD, Differential cell-matrix mechanoadaptations and inflammation drive regional propensities to aortic fibrosis, aneurysm or dissection in hypertension., Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 14 (136) (November 2017). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Stineman MR, Gennarelli TA, Baisden JL, Pintar FA, Mechanics of fresh, refrigerated, and frozen arterial tissue., The Journal of surgical research 139 (2) (2007) 236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Salinas SD, Clark MM, Amini R, The effects of −80C short-term storage on the mechanical response of tricuspid valve leaflets, Journal of Biomechanics 98 (January 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Billiar KL, Sacks MS, Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp–Part I: Experimental results., Journal of biomechanical engineering 122 (1) (2000) 23–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Vande Geest JP, Sacks MS, Vorp DA, The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta., Journal of biomechanics 39 (7) (2006) 1324–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Kamenskiy AV, Dzenis YA, Kazmi SA, Pemberton MA, Pipinos II, Phillips NY, Herber K, Woodford T, Bowen RE, Lomneth CS, MacTaggart JN, Biaxial mechanical properties of the human thoracic and abdominal aorta, common carotid, subclavian, renal and common iliac arteries, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 13 (6) (2014) 1341–1359. doi: 10.1007/s10237-014-0576-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Cruz Perez B, Tang J, Morris HJ, Palko JR, Pan X, Hart RT, Liu J, Biaxial mechanical testing of posterior sclera using high-resolution ultrasound speckle tracking for strain measurements, Journal of Biomechanics 47 (5) (2014) 1151–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Ross CJ, Laurence DW, Echols AL, Babu AR, Gu T, Duginski GA, Johns CH, Mullins BT, Casey KM, Laurence KA, Zhao YD, Amini R, Fung KM, Mir A, Burkhart HM, Wu Y, Holzapfel GA, Lee CH, Effects of enzymebased removal of collagen and elastin constituents on the biaxial mechanical responses of porcine atrioventricular heart valve anterior leaflets, Acta Biomaterialia 135 (2021) 425–440. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Salinas SD, Farra YM, Khoiy KA, Houston J, Lee CH, Bellini C, Amini R, The role of elastin on the mechanical properties of the anterior leaflet in porcine tricuspid valves, PLoS ONE 17 (5 May) (May 2022). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Khoiy KA, Pant AD, Amini R, Quantification of Material Constants for a Phenomenological Constitutive Model of Porcine Tricuspid Valve Leaflets for Simulation Applications, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 140 (9) (May 2018). doi: 10.1115/1.4040126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Smith DB, Sacks MS, Vorp DA, Thornton M, Surface Geometric Analysis of Anatomic Structures Using Biquintic Finite Element Interpolation, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 28 (6) (2000) 598–611. doi: 10.1114/1.1306342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Barone WR, Amini R, Maiti S, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD, The impact of boundary conditions on surface curvature of polypropylene mesh in response to uniaxial loading, Journal of Biomechanics 48 (9) (2015) 1566–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Fata B, Zhang W, Amini R, Sacks MS, Insights into regional adaptations in the growing pulmonary artery using a meso-scale structural model: effects of ascending aorta impingement., Journal of biomechanical engineering 136 (2) (2014) 21009. doi: 10.1115/1.4026457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Bradley CP, Pullan AJ, Hunter PJ, Geometric modeling of the human torso using cubic hermite elements, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 25 (1) (1997) 96–111. doi: 10.1007/BF02738542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Eckert CE, Zubiate B, Vergnat M, Gorman JH, Gorman RC, Sacks MS, In vivo dynamic deformation of the mitral valve annulus, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 37 (9) (2009) 1757–1771. doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9749-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Amini R, Eckert CE, Koomalsingh K, McGarvey J, Minakawa M, Gorman JH, Gorman RC, Sacks MS, On the in vivo deformation of the mitral valve anterior leaflet: Effects of annular geometry and referential configuration, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 40 (7) (2012) 1455–1467. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0524-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Bellini C, Glass P, Sitti M, Di Martino ES, Biaxial mechanical modeling of the small intestine, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 4 (8) (2011) 1727–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Bellini C, Di Martino ES, A mechanical characterization of the porcine atria at the healthy stage and after ventricular tachypacing., Journal of biomechanical engineering 134 (2) (2012) 21008. doi: 10.1115/1.4006026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Bellini C, Di Martino ES, Federico S, Mechanical behaviour of the human atria., Annals of biomedical engineering 41 (7) (2013) 1478–1490. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0699-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Federico S, Grillo A, Giaquinta G, Herzog W, Convex Fung-type potentials for biological tissues, Meccanica 43 (3) (2008) 279–288. doi: 10.1007/s11012-007-9090-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Azadani AN, Chitsaz S, Mannion A, Mookhoek A, Wisneski A, Guccione JM, Hope MD, Ge L, Tseng EE, Biomechanical Properties of Human Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 96 (1) (2013) 50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Weizsäcker HW, Lambert H, Pascale K, Analysis of the passive mechanical properties of rat carotid arteries, Journal of Biomechanics 16 (9) (1983) 703–715. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90080-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Baek S, Gleason RL, Rajagopal KR, Humphrey JD, Theory of small on large: Potential utility in computations of fluidâĂŞsolid interactions in arteries, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 196 (31) (2007) 3070–3078. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Koullias G, Modak R, Tranquilli M, Korkolis DP, Barash P, Elefteriades JA, Mechanical deterioration underlies malignant behavior of aneurysmal human ascending aorta., The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 130 (3) (2005) 677–683. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].de Beaufort HWL, Nauta FJH, Conti M, Cellitti E, Trentin C, Faggiano E, van Bogerijen GHW, Figueroa CA, Moll FL, van Herwaarden JA, Auricchio F, Trimarchi S, Extensibility and Distensibility of the Thoracic Aorta in Patients with Aneurysm., European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery 53 (2) (2017) 199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Bell V, Mitchell WA, SigurÃřsson S, Westenberg JJM, Gotal JD, Torjesen AA, Aspelund T, Launer LJ, de Roos A, Gudnason V, Harris TB, Mitchell GF, Longitudinal and circumferential strain of the proximal aorta., Journal of the American Heart Association 3 (6) (2014) e001536. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Elefteriades JA, Rizzo JA, Epidemiology, prevalence, incidence, trends, Acute Aortic Disease. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; (2008) 89–98. [Google Scholar]
- [55].Roselli EE, Idrees J, Greenberg RK, Johnston DR, Lytle BW, Endovascular stent grafting for ascending aorta repair in high-risk patients., The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 149 (1) (2015) 144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Jadidi M, Razian SA, Habibnezhad M, Anttila E, Kamenskiy A, Mechanical, structural, and physiologic differences in human elastic and muscular arteries of different ages: Comparison of the descending thoracic aorta to the superficial femoral artery., Acta biomaterialia 119 (2021) 268–283. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Forneris A, Nightingale M, Ismaguilova A, Sigaeva T, Neave L, Bromley A, Moore RD, Di Martino ES, Heterogeneity of Ex Vivo and In Vivo Properties along the Length of the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Applied Sciences 11 (8) (2021). doi: 10.3390/app11083485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Xuan Y, Wang Z, Liu R, Haraldsson H, Hope MD, Saloner DA, Guccione JM, Ge L, Tseng E, Wall stress on ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms with bicuspid compared with tricuspid aortic valve, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 156 (2) (2018) 492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Avril S, Gee MW, Hemmler A, Rugonyi S, Patient-specific computational modeling of endovascular aneurysm repair: State of the art and future directions., International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering 37 (12) (2021) e3529. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Niestrawska JA, Regitnig P, Viertler C, Cohnert TU, Babu AR, Holzapfel GA, The role of tissue remodeling in mechanics and pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms., Acta biomaterialia (February 2019). doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Kramer B, Thompson M, Vianna E, Tarraf S, Snyder A, Gentle B, Gillespie C, Germano E, Cikach F, Pande A, Hargrave J, Colbrunn R, Bellini C, Roselli EE, Longitudinal versus Circumferential Biomechanical Behavior of the Aneurysmal Ascending Aorta, in: American Association for Thoracic Surgery 103rd Annual Meeting, [Submitted], 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Gundiah N, Matthews PB, Karimi R, Azadani A, Guccione J, Guy TS, Saloner D, Tseng EE, Significant material property differences between the porcine ascending aorta and aortic sinuses., The Journal of heart valve disease 17 (6) (2008) 606–613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Azadani AN, Chitsaz S, Matthews PB, Jaussaud N, Leung J, Tsinman T, Ge L, Tseng EE, Comparison of mechanical properties of human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses., The Annals of thoracic surgery 93 (1) (2012) 87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Nightingale M, Gregory A, Sigaeva T, Dobson GM, Fedak PWM, Appoo JJ, Di Martino ES, Biomechanics in ascending aortic aneurysms correlate with tissue composition and strength, JTCVS Open (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Van Loon P, Length-force and volume-pressure relationships of arteries., Biorheology 14 (4) (1977) 181–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Chung J, Lachapelle K, Wener E, Cartier R, De Varennes B, Fraser R, Leask RL, Energy loss, a novel biomechanical parameter, correlates with aortic aneurysm size and histopathologic findings, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 148 (3) (2014) 1082–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Modak RK, Koullias GJ, Govindarajulu US, Tranquilli M, Barash PG, Elefteriades JA, Ascending Aortic Aneurysms: Asymmetrical Differences in Aortic CrossSectional Wall Motion Detected by Epiaortic Echocardiography, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 24 (5) (2010) 776–779. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Kadoglou NPE, Moulakakis KG, Papadakis I, Ikonomidis I, Alepaki M, Spathis A, Karakitsos P, Lekakis J, Liapis CD, Differential effects of stent-graft fabrics on arterial stiffness in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair., Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists 21 (6) (2014) 850–858. doi: 10.1583/14-4772MR.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Andrea G, Jose R-P, Lydia D-S, Gisela T-T, Giuliana M, Laura G, Marina H, Filipa V, Laura G, Teresa G-A, M. JK, Oliver W, Augusto SA, David G-D, Arturo E, Influence of Aortic Dilation on the Regional Aortic Stiffness of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Assessed by 4-Dimensional Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 12 (6) (2019) 1020–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Cebull HL, Rayz VL, Goergen CJ, Recent Advances in Biomechanical Characterization of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- [71].Ferruzzi J, Di Achille P, Tellides G, Humphrey JD, Combining in vivo and in vitro biomechanical data reveals key roles of perivascular tethering in central artery function, PLOS ONE 13 (9) (2018) e0201379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Di Giuseppe M, Alotta G, Agnese V, Bellavia D, Raffa GM, Vetri V, Zingales M, Pasta S, Pilato M, Identification of circumferential regional heterogeneity of ascending thoracic aneurysmal aorta by biaxial mechanical testing, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 130 (2019) 205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Bellini C, Bersi MR, Caulk AW, Ferruzzi J, Milewicz DM, Ramirez F, Rifkin DB, Tellides G, Yanagisawa H, Humphrey JD, Comparison of 10 murine models reveals a distinct biomechanical phenotype in thoracic aortic aneurysms., Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 14 (130) (May 2017). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Cavinato C, Chen M, Weiss D, Ruiz-Rodríguez MJ, Schwartz MA, Humphrey JD, Progressive Microstructural Deterioration Dictates Evolving Biomechanical Dysfunction in the Marfan Aorta., Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 8 (2021) 800730. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.800730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Yassine NM, Shahram JT, Body SC, Pathogenic Mechanisms of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy, Frontiers in Physiology 8 (2017) 687. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Ferrara A, Morganti S, Totaro P, Mazzola A, Auricchio F, Human dilated ascending aorta: Mechanical characterization via uniaxial tensile tests., Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 53 (2016) 257–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].O’Rourke MF, Arterial aging: pathophysiological principles., Vascular medicine (London, England) 12 (4) (2007) 329–341. doi: 10.1177/1358863X07083392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Ferruzzi J, Bersi MR, Uman S, Yanagisawa H, Humphrey JD, Decreased Elastic Energy Storage, Not Increased Material Stiffness, Characterizes Central Artery Dysfunction in Fibulin-5 Deficiency Independent of Sex, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 137 (3) (2015). doi: 10.1115/1.4029431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Tsamis A, Krawiec JT, Vorp DA, Elastin and collagen fibre microstructure of the human aorta in ageing and disease: a review., Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 10 (83) (2013) 20121004. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Yousef S, Matsumoto N, Dabe I, Mori M, Landry AB, Lee S-R, Kawamura Y, Yang C, Li G, Assi R, Vallabhajosyula P, Geirsson A, Moeckel G, Humphrey JD, Tellides G, Quantitative not qualitative histology differentiates aneurysmal from nondilated ascending aortas and reveals a net gain of medial components, Scientific Reports 11 (1) (2021) 13185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92659-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Ferruzzi J, Bersi MR, Mecham RP, Ramirez F, Yanagisawa H, Tellides G, Humphrey JD, Loss of Elastic Fiber Integrity Compromises Common Carotid Artery Function: Implications for Vascular Aging., Artery research 14 (2016) 41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.artres.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Humphrey JD, Tellides G, Central artery stiffness and thoracic aortopathy., American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 316 (1) (2019) H169–H182. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00205.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Albinsson S, Della Corte A, Alajbegovic A, Krawczyk KK, Bancone C, Galderisi U, Cipollaro M, De Feo M, Forte A, Patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve exhibit distinct regional microrna signatures in mildly dilated ascending aorta., Heart and vessels 32 (6) (2017) 750–767. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0942-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Della Corte A, De Santo LS, Montagnani S, Quarto C, Romano G, Amarelli C, Scardone M, De Feo M, Cotrufo M, Caianiello G, Spatial patterns of matrix protein expression in dilated ascending aorta with aortic regurgitation: congenital bicuspid valve versus Marfan’s syndrome., The Journal of heart valve disease 15 (1) (2006) 20–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Choudhury N, Bouchot O, Rouleau L, Tremblay D, Cartier R, Butany J, Mongrain R, Leask RL, Local mechanical and structural properties of healthy and diseased human ascending aorta tissue., Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology 18 (2) (2009) 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Pham T, Martin C, Elefteriades J, Sun W, Biomechanical characterization of ascending aortic aneurysm with concomitant bicuspid aortic valve and bovine aortic arch, Acta Biomaterialia 9 (8) (2013) 7927–7936. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Xuan Y, DâĂŹSouza SN, Wang Z, Suarez Pierre A, Lawton JS, Ge L, Tseng EE, Patient-Specific Biomechanics in Marfan Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
