Abstract
Purpose
To identify novel susceptibility loci for retinal vascular tortuosity, to better understand the molecular mechanisms modulating this trait, and reveal causal relationships with diseases and their risk factors.
Design
Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) of vascular tortuosity of retinal arteries and veins followed by replication meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR).
Participants
We analyzed 116 639 fundus images of suitable quality from 63 662 participants from 3 cohorts, namely the UK Biobank (n = 62 751), the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension (n = 397), and OphtalmoLaus (n = 512).
Methods
Using a fully automated retina image processing pipeline to annotate vessels and a deep learning algorithm to determine the vessel type, we computed the median arterial, venous and combined vessel tortuosity measured by the distance factor (the length of a vessel segment over its chord length), as well as by 6 alternative measures that integrate over vessel curvature. We then performed the largest GWAS of these traits to date and assessed gene set enrichment using the novel high-precision statistical method PascalX.
Main Outcome Measure
We evaluated the genetic association of retinal tortuosity, measured by the distance factor.
Results
Higher retinal tortuosity was significantly associated with higher incidence of angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, and hypertension. We identified 175 significantly associated genetic loci in the UK Biobank; 173 of these were novel and 4 replicated in our second, much smaller, metacohort. We estimated heritability at ∼25% using linkage disequilibrium score regression. Vessel type specific GWAS revealed 116 loci for arteries and 63 for veins. Genes with significant association signals included COL4A2, ACTN4, LGALS4, LGALS7, LGALS7B, TNS1, MAP4K1, EIF3K, CAPN12, ECH1, and SYNPO2. These tortuosity genes were overexpressed in arteries and heart muscle and linked to pathways related to the structural properties of the vasculature. We demonstrated that retinal tortuosity loci served pleiotropic functions as cardiometabolic disease variants and risk factors. Concordantly, MR revealed causal effects between tortuosity, body mass index, and low-density lipoprotein.
Conclusions
Several alleles associated with retinal vessel tortuosity suggest a common genetic architecture of this trait with ocular diseases (glaucoma, myopia), cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndrome. Our results shed new light on the genetics of vascular diseases and their pathomechanisms and highlight how GWASs and heritability can be used to improve phenotype extraction from high-dimensional data, such as images.
Financial Disclosure(s)
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Keywords: GWAS, Retina, Microvasculature, Tortuosity, Mendelian randomization
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in developed countries1, 2, 3 and a major societal health burden. Though several risk factors for CVD development, such as age, smoking, and hypertension, have been firmly established, the degree of importance of vascular properties as risk factors is unclear. Retinal fundus photos allow noninvasive in vivo assessment of the vascular system of the superficial inner retina, i.e., the central and branch veins and arteries plus the venules and arterioles. These vessels are composed of tightly sealed endothelial cells (ECs) forming the inner blood-retina barrier, encased by smooth muscle cells (SMCs) forming the vessel wall.4,5 Automatic segmentation of retinal vessels in fundus images is well established, and computer-aided image analysis started entering clinical care to screen and diagnose ocular and systemic diseases.6 In diabetes, for example, hyperglycemia induces damage to the ECs and pericytes of the inner blood-retina barrier contributing to retinal edema and hemorrhage.7
Pathological changes in the retinal vessels often coincide with those in the microvasculature of other organs and may precede the progression of systemic vascular diseases. The retinal vasculature can provide insights into neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and vascular dementia.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 In addition, abnormalities in retinal parameters, such as vascular calibers and tortuosity, are of diagnostic value for systemic diseases, including increased risk of diabetes,13, 14, 15 obesity,16 and CVD17,18 (such as stroke,19, 20, 21, 22 coronary heart disease,23 peripheral artery disease,24 hypertension,21,25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 atherosclerosis,19,21,34 myocardial infarction,35,36 and nephropathies37,38).
In recent years, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been used to link genes with phenotypes extracted from fundus images, such as vessel size,39,40 optic disc morphology,41,42 vascular density,43 fractal dimensions,43 and vessel tortuosity.44 The diameter of the retinal microvasculature was associated with genes TEAD1, TSPAN10, GNB3, and OCA2.39 A recently published study43 on vascular density and fractal dimensions reported 7 and 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these traits respectively, including OCA2, MEF2C, and GNB3. Retinal vessel tortuosity has been associated with SNPs that map to the genes ACTN4 and COL4A2.44 Tortuosity of the vasculature was reported in the context of coronary artery disease (CAD)44 and connective tissue disease.45 These results demonstrated that GWAS on retinal traits extracted at a single time point can reveal genes with a potential role in modulating vascular properties and related pathomechanisms.
Here, we report the results of the largest GWAS on vessel tortuosity to date using images and genotypes from 62 751 subjects in the UK Biobank (UKBB) and from 397 and 512 subjects of the much smaller, yet independent, population-based cohorts, the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension (SKIPOGH)46,47 and OphtalmoLaus.48 Our study was motivated by the clinical relevance of this trait to diseases9,13,28,45,49,50 and by the fact that significant associations were already reported in much smaller sample sizes,44 making further discoveries likely. We constructed an automated image analysis pipeline to extract retinal tortuosity from these data as a biomarker. We report the correlation with patient records, SNPs, genes, pathways (set of genes), tissue expression, pathomechanisms, and causal effects associated with this biomarker. Our findings advance the understanding of the molecular players and mechanisms contributing to retinal vessel morphology, which may be important also for other vasculatures and associated diseases.
Methods
Data: Genotypes, Phenotypes, and Fundus Images
The UKBB is a population-based cohort of approximately 488 000 subjects with rich, longitudinal phenotypic data and a median 10-year follow-up.51,52 We analyzed 173 837 standard retinal 45° color fundus images from 84 825 individuals, captured using a Topcon Triton 3D OCT 1000. Genotyping was performed on Axiom arrays for a total of 805 426 markers, from which approximately 96 million genotypes were imputed. We used the subset of 15 599 830 SNPs that had been assigned an rsID. We performed an additional quality control (QC) step by filtering out SNPs with minor allele frequency < 5 × 10−4. Our choice of low minor allele frequency cut-off was motivated by the large power of the UKBB. With our sample size of 62 751 of subjects after QC (see below), we still expect about 30 subjects to have ≥ 1 minor allele, so the effect size estimate is still reasonably robust. Finally, we applied a filtering procedure53 to remove SNPs with imputation quality < 0.3. In addition to genomic information, the UKBB also provided us with phenotypic information from the patient records, particularly with diagnosis dates for: type-2 diabetes, angina, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, stroke, hypertension and smoking status. Age, sex, and principal components of genotypes were used to correct for biases in the genetic associations.
We performed replication via a meta-analysis of 2 independent, population-based cohorts: SKIPOGH46,47 and OphtalmoLaus.48 The SKIPOGH is a family-based, cross-sectional study exploring the role of genes and kidney hemodynamics in blood pressure regulation and kidney function in the general population, comprising 1054 genotyped individuals. One thousand three hundred fifty-two retinal fundus images were available from 518 participants. The genotyping was performed with the Illumina Omni 2.5 chip. OphtalmoLaus is a substudy of Cohorte Lausannoise (CoLaus), a population-based cohort comprising 6188 genotyped individuals. Seven thousand two hundred fifty-two fundus images were available from 1015 subjects. CoLaus has as its objective to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of CVD risk factors and metabolic syndrome; participants were phenotyped accordingly. The genotyping was performed using the 500K Affymetrix chip technology. Like in the UKBB, in both Swiss cohorts retinal fundus images were captured using Topcon Triton devices. Genotype imputation for SKIPOGH and CoLaus was performed using Minimac 3 as algorithm and version 1.1 from the Haplotype Reference Consortium (http://www.haplotype-reference-consortium.org) as reference panel. For an overview of our pipeline see Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pipeline and results. Relevant phenotypes, genotypes, and fundus images were collected from the UK Biobank, OphtalmoLaus, and the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension (SKIPOGH). After quality control, the images were processed by deep learning, classifying arteries and veins. A range of tortuosity measures were then calculated which provided the phenotypes for the genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The primary results were 173 novel genetic trait loci. These associations include signals which were shared between retinal tortuosity and several diseases (metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases). Their aggregation on annotated gene-sets identified relevant pathways and gene ontology (GO) terms. Tissue-wide expression analysis revealed expression in the arteries and heart. Correlation analysis revealed associations between retinal tortuosity and cardiometabolic diseases. LDSR = linkage disequilibrium score regression; MAF = minor allele frequency; PC = principle component; SNPs = single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Automated Analysis of Color Fundus Images and QC
We extended the software ARIA54 to perform batch segmentation and positional annotation of blood vessels, using the default parameters.55 The exclusion criteria were based on upper and lower thresholds on the total length of the vasculature and on the number of vessels (Supplemental Text 1). Roughly 2 of 3 images passed this strict QC (116 639 out of 173 837 in the UKBB). Based on ARIA's vessel annotations, we calculated a tortuosity measure known as the distance factor (DF),56 defined as:
where the total vessel length, , is divided by the Euclidean distance between the vessel segment endpoints, . Distance factor is referred to in a recent review as the arc over chord ratio.57 In addition to DF, we also calculated 6 other tortuosity phenotypes based on alternative measures using integrals over the curvature along the vessel (Supplemental Text 2).
We phenotyped each individual by calculating median retinal tortuosities, then averaging the values derived from 1 image of the left and 1 from the right eye, when available. If only 1 retinal image was available we used the value of this image. In the few cases where multiple images were available for the same eye, we only considered 1 image from the earliest time point (for the resulting distribution, refer to Supplemental Text 3).
Deep Learning Classification of Arteries and Veins
We calculated pixel-wise artery and vein classifications using the deep learning algorithm Little W-Net.58 For each vessel segment recognized by ARIA, we used the difference between pixels classified as arterial and venous as a score that was required to be positive or negative for the segment to be annotated as artery or vein, respectively. On a set of 44 images, manually annotated by an ophthalmologist (H.A.), we obtained an area under the curve of 0.93 and an accuracy of 0.88. Thus, we performed vessel type classification for the entire set of retinal fundus images; computing artery- and vein-specific tortuosity values (Supplemental Text 4).
Genome-wide Association Analyses
We ran genetic association studies on tortuosity of arteries, of veins, and combining both vessel types (from UKBB color fundus images [CFIs]). We used BGENIE,59 applying linear regression to confounder-corrected, quantile-quantile normalized, and retinal vessel tortuosity on the genotypes of the matching subjects imputed to a panel of approximately 15 million genetic variants. In order to account for confounding effects,60 the following variables were provided as covariates, as usual in GWAS: age, sex, and principle component (PC) of the genotypes (we considered only PCs with a significant correlation to tortuosity, namely 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18). A sensitivity analysis controlling for additional covariates, including age-squared, spherical power, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, eye-related diseases and conditions, assessment-center, and genotyping array, indicated only minor impact on the significant association P-values (Supplemental Text 14). We considered SNPs to be nominally significant if their P-value was below the classical Bonferroni threshold of 5 × 10−8 (i.e., correcting for an estimated 1 million of independent SNPs). A list of independent SNP was obtained by performing linkage disequilibrium (LD) pruning using the LD pair function of the R package LD linkR.61 Two SNPs were considered independent if they had LD r2 < 0.1 or were > 500 000. bases apart (Supplemental Dataset 1).
Replication Metacohort
As the SKIPOGH cohort includes subjects with a high degree of relatedness, we used the EMMAX function of the Efficient and Parallelizable Association Container Toolbox (EPACTS) software62 and the kinship matrix in the model to account for family structure. We also included the recruitment center as a covariable. For the GWAS on the OphtalmoLaus cohort, we used the same parameters and tools as for the discovery cohort. Results from SKIPOGH and OphtalmoLaus were meta-analyzed using an inverse-variance weighting scheme for the respective effect sizes. Due to the small sample size of the replication cohort, we only attempted replication for the SNPs and genes that were significant in the discovery cohort.
Heritability Estimates
We used LD Score Regression63 to estimate the SNP-based heritability of our tortuosity measures.
Novel Method for Gene-Based Tests
We used PascalX,64 a novel high-precision pathway scoring algorithm that we developed, building on our Pascal65 tool, to aggregate SNP-wise summary statistics into gene scores using a sum of χ2 statistics: PascalX takes into account LD by effectively transforming the sum of χ2 from all SNPs within the gene window into a new basis of independent “Eigen-SNPs” corresponding to a weighted sum of χ2 statistics. Using multiple-precision arithmetics, PascalX computes the corresponding null cumulative probability distribution to essentially arbitrary precision, while other tools usually only approximate the underlying distribution. We thus computed P-values up to a precision of 10−100, allowing for accurate scoring of genes with contributions from extremely significant SNPs, which become increasingly frequent in highly powered GWASs such as this one.
We used the following configurations: We computed gene scores from SNPs lying within a window of 50 kb before the transcription start site and 50 kb after the transcript end. The annotation of the gene positions was based on the Genome Reference Consortium Human genome build 37 (GRCh37/hg19) downloaded from the Ensembl biomart66; we considered only protein-coding and lincRNA genes. The reference panel from the UK10K project67 was used to estimate the SNP-SNP correlations (LD effects). PascalX uncovered 265 significant genes (after Bonferroni correction for 25 489 gene-based tests P < 0.05/25 489 2.0 × 10−6).
Gene Set Enrichment
We used PascalX64 to compute gene set enrichment scores based on ranking derived from the gene-based tests. As a large number of genes have inflated P-values in highly powered GWASs, this ranking approach was more conservative. We first computed scores for 2868 canonical pathways (BioCarta, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), protein interaction database (PID), Reactome, and WikiPathways), then extended our analysis to the 31 120 pathways in MSigDB (version 7.2).68 To adjust for statistical dependence and coexpression, genes that are < 100 kb apart were “fused” (i.e., considered as single entities termed “fusion genes”65).
Tissue-wide Gene Expression Analysis
We performed tissue-wide gene expression analysis using PascalX64 on the whole GTEx69 (version 8) dataset, comprising 54 tissues. We defined gene sets based on the significant genes from each of our 3 GWAS on DF tortuosity (artery, vein, and combined). PascalX was used to perform an enrichment analysis that indicated whether these sets were over-expressed in any particular tissue. PascalX corrected for the co-expression of gene subclusters within each gene set by merging nearby genes to fusion genes. We computed the fusion genes expression values in transcripts per kilobase million from the raw read counts. These values values were made uniform via ranking, transformed to χ2-distributed random variables, summed, and tested against a χ2 distribution with as many degrees of freedom as there were “fusion genes” in each set. We applied a Bonferroni threshold: P = 0.05/54 = 9.2 × 10−4.
Shared Genetic Signal With Disease
We computed the overlap between DF tortuosity SNPs (from the combined-vessel GWAS) and disease-related SNPs. To this end, we first identified which of the independent SNPs in the combined-vessel GWAS were listed in the GWAS Catalog.70 We then extended this analysis by considering DF tortuosity SNPs in LD (r2 > 0.8) with disease-related SNPs in the GWAS Catalog.
Mendelian Randomization Analysis
We performed 2-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR)71,72 to search for evidence of causal effects between DF tortuosity (from the combined-vessel GWAS) and the following traits: body mass index (BMI), CAD, systolic blood pressure, and lipid traits, namely high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol, and triglycerides. For each trait, we used independent (r2 < 0.01) significant (P < 5 × 10−8) SNPs as instrumental variables. All summary statistics (estimated univariate effect size and standard error) originated from the most recent meta-analyses (not including UKBB individuals) and were downloaded from the publicly available National Institutes of Health Genome-wide Repository of Associations between SNPs and Phenotypes.73 We only used SNPs on autosomal chromosomes available in the UK10K reference panel,67 which allowed us to estimate the LD among these SNPs and prune them. We removed strand ambiguous SNPs. Causal estimates were based on the inverse variance weighted method74 and calculated using the MR R package.75
Code Availability
The code used to measure the tortuosity phenotypes is available at: https://github.com/BergmannLab/Retina-tortuosity.
Ethics Approval
The UKBB has obtained Research Tissue Bank approval from its ethics committee that covers our use of the resource. The UKBB Research Ethics Committee approval number is 16/NW/0274. OphtalmoLaus obtained ethics approval from La Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche sur l'être humain (project PB_2019-00168). The same commission approved ethics for SKIPOGH (Protocols 92/07 and 303/12). All 3 studies adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained informed consent from all subjects.
Results
Baseline Characteristics and Tortuosity Quantification
Following QC measures, we analyzed 116 639 images from 62 751 subjects of the UKBB (mean ± standard deviation age = 56 ± 8 years; 35 098 females at birth [54%]; 4618 smokers [7%]). We analyzed 1352 images from 379 subjects of the SKIPOGH cohort (mean ± standard deviation age = 48 ± 16 years; 211 females [53%]; 107 smokers [27%]). We analyzed 7254 images from 512 subjects of the OphtalmoLaus cohort (mean ± standard deviation age = 51 ± 10 years; 270 females [53%]). Baseline characteristics and disease prevalence are presented in Supplemental Text 6. For an overview of our pipeline see Figure 1. Note that we did not explicitly exclude subjects with retinal diseases or other ocular conditions from the dataset, but that images from such subjects often did not pass our QC standards (Supplemental Text 1).
The distributions of DF tortuosity were similar across cohorts: long-tailed, left-skewed, with means ranging from 1.030 (UKBB) to 1.034 (OphtalmoLaus). Distance factor was higher in the elderly population (Cohen’s d = 0.49, P = 1 × 10−195) and in women (Cohen’s d = 0.049, P = 9 × 10−10). Overall, DF was higher in veins (Cohen’s d = 0.13, P = 9 × 10−142). For details about the stratified analysis of the DF phenotype in the UKBB see Supplemental Text 3.
We extracted 6 additional tortuosity measures based on alternative mathematical definitions. Correlations analysis and dimensionality reduction in terms of principle components showed that the DF is most similar to the path integral of the squared curvature (3) and least similar to the path integral of the curvature (2). The other alternative measures (4–7) were similar to each other, very different from 2 and of intermediate similarity to the DF and 3 (Supplemental Text 2).
Vessel Tortuosity Correlates With Disease Status
We found that the DF tortuosity of arteries was associated with hypertension (beta = 0.19, P = 3 × 10−56) and angina (beta = 0.09, P = 6 × 10−4), but not with myocardial infarction, stroke, or deep vein thrombosis. In the case of veins, the DF was significantly associated with hypertension (beta = 0.25, P = 7 × 10−99), angina (beta = 0.18, P = 2 × 10−10), myocardial infarction (beta = 0.12, P = 2 × 10−4), stroke (beta = 0.16, P = 5 × 10−5), and deep vein thrombosis (beta = 0.11, P = 5 × 10−4). For predictive power over disease status, see Supplemental Text 7.
Vessel Tortuosity GWASs Identify 173 Novel Loci
We identified 7072 significantly associated SNPs in the combined-vessel GWAS on DF tortuosity in the UKBB (Supplemental Dataset 4A). The vessel type specific GWAS resulted in 6563 significantly associated SNPs for arteries, and 2896 SNPs for veins when using a Bonferroni threshold of 5 × 10−8 (Supplemental Dataset 4B, C). We applied LD pruning, identifying 128 independent loci in the combined-vessel GWAS, 116 in the artery-specific GWAS, and 63 in the vein-specific GWAS. Accounting for overlap between these sets (Supplemental Text 9), we obtained a total of 175 independent lead SNPs (Figure 2A–C). The top 10 SNPs are listed in Table 1, ordered by significance (for complete listings, see Supplemental Dataset 1). Among the significantly associated variants, rs1808382 and rs7991229 had been previously reported44 (Supplemental Text 8), whereas the remaining 173 independent lead SNPs represented novel loci associated (Supplemental Dataset 5).
Figure 2.
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) P-values and effects. A, Manhattan plot of Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) of retinal vessel tortuosity, combining all vessel types (both arteries and veins). The red line indicates the genome-wide significance level after Bonferroni correction (P = 5 × 10−8). Oblique dashes on top of peaks mark extremely significant P-values that have been cropped. Squares mark the position of disease SNPs (Table 4). The trait was corrected for phenotypic variables which showed a statistically significant association, i.e.: age, sex, and a subset of principal components of genotypes. B, Manhattan plots of the vessels-specific GWAS (artery-specific on top, vein-specific at the bottom). Confounder correction, significance level and cropping of extremely significant P-values as in the (A). C, GWAS q-q plot: arteries in red, veins in blue, combined-vessels signal in black; the genome-wide significance level is represented as a green dashed line. D, Statistically significant correlation between the measured effect sizes in the discovery cohort (UK Biobank [UKBB], n = 62 751) and replication metacohort (the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension plus OphtalmoLaus, n = 911). We considered all lead (independent) SNPs in the UKBB. We tested all 136 SNPs with matching rsIDs in the replication metacohort except 1 censored outlier (rs187691758), 89 of which had the same sign of their effect size estimate in the UKBB. The resulting Pearson correlation is r = 0.36; P = 1.18 × 10−5. E, Benjamini-Hochberg procedure on discovery lead SNPs from the UKBB yields 4 hits in the replication cohort using false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.2.
Table 1.
Top Retinal Tortuosity SNPs
| Chr | SNP | EA | RA | Freq | beta | −log10P | GWAS Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | rs9559797 | G | C | 0.580 | −0.162 | 182.4 | artery and vein |
| 19 | rs16972767 | G | A | 0.473 | −0.150 | 164.6 | artery and vein |
| 4 | rs17008193 | T | C | 0.403 | −0.089 | 55.0 | artery and vein |
| 7 | rs187691758 | A | G | 0.005 | 0.627 | 53.2 | vein |
| 4 | rs12506823 | G | A | 0.406 | 0.083 | 47.9 | artery and vein |
| 2 | rs2571461 | T | G | 0.601 | −0.082 | 47.1 | artery and vein |
| 15 | rs12913832 | A | G | 0.744 | 0.080 | 43.6 | artery and vein |
| 12 | rs11045245 | A | G | 0.375 | 0.073 | 37.3 | artery |
| 5 | rs784420 | A | G | 0.281 | 0.078 | 37.0 | artery and vein |
| 4 | rs11727963 | G | A | 0.166 | 0.092 | 35.1 | artery |
The 10 most significant distance factor tortuosity SNPs, ordered by P-value. For full results, refer to the list of 175 independent lead SNPs in Supplemental Dataset 1.
beta = effect size estimate; Chr = chromosome; EA = effect allele; freq = allele frequency of effect allele; GWAS = genome-wide association study; GWAS type = vessel type to which the signal applied; RA = reference allele; SNP = rsIDs of the single nucleotide polymorphism; −log10P = normalized P-value in the discovery cohort.
Heritability of DF is Larger than for Other Tortuosity Measures
The SNP-based heritability differed substantially across tortuosity measures, with DF receiving the highest estimate (h2SNP = 0.25, standard error [SE] = 0.025). This was approximately twice the heritability estimate of the 6 alternative curvature-based measures (0.11 ≤ h2SNP ≤ 0.13, 0.011 ≤ SE ≤ 0.012, Supplemental Text 2). We did not observe any significant genomic inflation (Table 2). Heritability also varied depending on vessel type (h2SNP = 0.23 [SE = 0.020] for arteries, and h2SNP = 0.15 [SE = 0.021] for veins). The distribution of the DF phenotype for each vessel type is shown in Supplemental Text 3.
Table 2.
SNP-Based Heritability
| GWAS Type | h2SNP | lambda GC | Mean Chi2 | Intercept | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| combined-vessel | 0.25 (0.025) | 1.14 | 1.31 | 1.01 (0.01) | 0.03 (0.03) |
| artery | 0.23 (0.020) | 1.12 | 1.27 | 1.00 (0.01) | < 0 |
| vein | 0.15 (0.021) | 1.10 | 1.18 | 1.00 (0.01) | < 0 |
h2SNP = portion of phenotypic variance cumulatively explained by the SNPs; GWAS = genome-wide association study; intercept = linkage disequilibrium score regression intercept (values close to 1 indicates little influence of confounders, mostly of population stratification); lambda GC = inflation, measure of the effect of confounding and polygenicity acting on the trait; ratio = ratio of the proportion of the inflation in the mean Chi2 that is not due to polygenicity (a ratio close to, or smaller than, 0 is desirable as it indicates low inflation from population stratification); SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism. Standard error are given in parentheses.
Replication of Lead SNPs and Genes in a Small Metacohort
The sample size of the replication metacohort (n = 909) is too low to replicate any of our discoveries with a fixed Bonferroni P-value threshold to correct for multiple hypotheses testing. We therefore used the well-established Benjamini–Hochberg procedure,76 which fixes a false discovery rate (FDR), corresponding to a variable threshold that is less stringent for SNPs with lower rank. With this procedure, for FDR = 0.1 (so expecting 1 in 10 positives to be false) we replicated 4 SNPs (rs10788873, rs2571461, rs501943, and rs35252676, indicated in Fig 2E) and at FDR = 0.5, 4 additional SNPs replicate. At FDR = 0.05 we could not replicate any of our hits. For genes, we found that 58 replicated at FDR = 0.5 but none at FDR = 0.1. Clearly, our replication metacohort lacks power, but many candidate SNPs, and even more so candidate genes, have more significant P-values than expected. Consistently, we observed a Pearson correlation of r = 0.36 (P = 1.18 × 10−5) between the SNP effect size estimates in the 2 studies (Fig 2D and Supplemental Text 5), and r = 0.13 (P = 0.02) between normalized gene ranks (Fig 3D).
Figure 3.
Gene P-values and replication scores. A, Gene-based Manhattan plot of retinal vessel tortuosity, combining all vessel types (both arteries and veins). Two hundred three genes were significant in arteries, 123 in genes, and 265 when combining the vessel types. Gene-based tests were computed by PascalX.64 The red line indicates the genome-wide significance level after Bonferroni correction (P = 5 × 10−8). Squares mark the position of particularly relevant genes (see corresponding Results section). B, Gene-based Manhattan plots of the vessels-specific genome-wide association study (artery-specific on top, vein-specific at the bottom). C, q-q plot of gene P-values: arteries in red, veins in blue, combined-vessel signal in black; the genome-wide significance level is represented as a green dashed line. D, Statistically significant correlation between q-q normalized genes’ P-values in the discovery (UK Biobank) and in the replication metacohort (the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension + OphtalmoLaus). Only genes that were significant in the discovery cohort were considered. The resulting Pearson correlation is r = 0.13 (P = 0.02). E, Benjamini-Hochberg procedure replicates 58 hits at false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.5 in the replication metacohort. We used a candidate approach, meaning only genes that were significant in the discovery cohort were considered.
Tortuosity Genes and Pathways Affect Vascular Tissue Remodeling and Angiogenesis
Mapping the SNP-wise association signals onto genes (Methods), we identified 265 significant genes in the discovery GWAS combining vessel types, 203 in the artery-specific GWAS, and 123 in the vein-specific GWAS. Accounting for overlap between these sets (Supplemental Text 9), we obtained a total of 312 genes (Fig 3A–C). Top genes are reported in Table 3 (for a complete listing, see Supplemental Dataset 6A–C). Among those, we replicate the 3 genes in 2 independent loci (ACTN4/CAPN12, COL4A2) that were found in a previous GWAS study on tortuosity.44 A large fraction of these genes carried annotations related to vessel integrity, vascular tissue remodeling and angiogenesis. Specifically, we identified a cluster of highly significant genes on chromosome 19, including ACTN4 (related to actin filament bundling), TNS1 (cross-linking of actin filaments), and CAPN12 (involved in structural integrity to blood vessel walls). This locus also included 3 genes involved in adhesion to the connective tissue77: LGALS7, LGALS7B, and LGALS4. We also replicated the highly significant association of tortuosity with 2 type IV collagen genes, COL4A2 and COL4A1,44 the latter of which has already been associated with familial retinal arteriolar tortuosity.78 SYNPO2, related to actin polymerization, vascular injury,79 and ocular growth,80 also received a highly significant association. Finally, among the artery-specific genes, we found FLT1 coding for VEGFR1, which plays a role in vessel formation and vascular biology81 (see Discussion for further details and interpretation of these results).
Table 3.
Top Retinal Tortuosity Genes
| Gene | Chr | Base Pair | −log10P Combined | −log10P Artery | −log10P Vein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTN4 | 19 | 39 138 289 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| CAPN12 | 19 | 39 220 827 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| EIF3K | 19 | 39 109 735 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| LGALS7 | 19 | 39 261 611 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| LGALS7B | 19 | 39 279 851 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| COL4A2 | 13 | 110 958 159 | > 100 | > 100 | 9.5 |
| LGALS4 | 19 | 39 292 311 | > 100 | 34.5 | > 100 |
| MAP4K1 | 19 | 39 078 281 | > 100 | 34.3 | > 100 |
| TNS1 | 2 | 218 664 512 | > 100 | 32.7 | 16.9 |
| ECH1 | 19 | 39 306 062 | > 100 | 15.3 | > 100 |
| AC104534.3 | 19 | 39 310 806 | > 100 | 14.0 | > 100 |
The 15 most significant distance factor tortuosity genes, for each genome-wide association study (combining all vessels, considering only arteries, and only veins). P-values were computed by PascalX64 (precision cutoff: 1 × 10−100). For full results, refer to Supplemental Dataset 6A–C.
Gene set enrichment (Methods) yielded 78 significant sets in total (Fig 4), with the strongest signals arising from the combined and artery-specific analysis (Supplemental Text 9 and Supplemental Dataset 7A–C). Similarly to genes, many of the pathways pointed to specific biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions related to vessel integrity and remodeling. These included “human retinal fibroblasts,” “vascular SMCs” (both in the kidney and the neuroepithelium), and “epithelium development.” We also observed a pathway related to “VEGFs,” VEGFA-VEGFR2, which is a well-known therapeutic target for ocular diseases. We highlight several transcription factors and binding motifs for further experimentation (Fig 4B). The role of integrity and development of blood vessels for tortuosity was supported by the enrichment of several gene ontology terms such as “circulatory system development,” “anatomical structure morphogenesis,” and “tube development.” The enriched terms “cell-substrate junction,” “anchoring junction,” “actin,” and “actomyosin” revealed some of the molecular players involved (see Discussion for more details).
Figure 4.
Enriched pathways and gene-sets. Arteries in red, veins in blue, combined-vessel signal in black: scores for 31 120 gene-sets in MSigDB (v7.2)82 were calculated by PascalX.64 Only gene-sets for which significance was reached by ≥ 1 genome-wide association study are shown. The red dashed line indicates Bonferroni-threshold (−log10P = 5.7). The number of genes in each set is indicated in squared brackets. Gene-set names have been shortened and some redundant gene ontology (GO) categories are not shown. For details, refer to the extended plot in Supplemental Text 13. A, Enrichment in GO categories. B, Enrichment in pathways referring to a particular molecule (typically a transcription factor) or binding motif. C, Enrichment in gene-set obtained from transcriptomic analysis of tissues of treated cell types. TGF = transforming growth factor.
Compared to the DF analysis, the alternative tortuosity measures had lower heritability and fewer enriched genes and pathways. However, some were unique and disease-relevant, such as a pathway related to “abnormal cardiac ventricle morphology” (Supplemental Text 2).
Tortuosity Genes Are Overexpressed in Arteries and Heart Tissues
Performing enrichment analyses across expression data from 54 tissues, we found that tortuosity genes were overexpressed in 3 types of arteries (i.e., aorta, tibial artery and coronary artery), 2 heart tissues (i.e., ventricle and atrial appendage), and, less significantly, fibroblasts and muscular tissues. The profile of enrichment significance values across tissues for tortuosity genes detected by combined-vessel type GWAS analysis is more similar to that of the artery-specific GWAS than that of vein-specific one (Fig 5), which did not result in any significant tissue associations (for a strict Bonferroni threshold of P = 0.05/54 = 9.2 × 10−4).
Figure 5.
Tissue expression results. Arteries in red, veins in blue, combined-vessel signal in black: tissue-specific gene expression analysis of GTEx (version 8)69 performed using PascalX.64 We defined sets based on the significant genes from each of the 3 genome-wide association studies we carried out and asked whether they were over-expressed in a particular tissue. Only top tissues are shown here, for full results refer to Fig S19.
Tortuosity Loci Are Known Disease Variants
Nine of the discovered tortuosity loci had been previously reported as disease variants that mapped to specific genes (Table 4): 3 loci were linked to vascular diseases (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and arterial hypertension), 2 loci were linked to ocular diseases (glaucoma and myopia), 3 loci were linked to other systemic diseases (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, type 2 diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease), and 1 loci was linked to digestive conditions (diverticular disease). Similarly, we identified 12 loci influencing both tortuosity and disease risk factors. We also uncovered 26 additional disease variants that have not been confidently mapped to a specific gene (Supplemental Text 10).
Table 4.
Pleiotropic Disease-Variants
| Shared SNP | Disease GWAS | Gene | −log10P | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs875107 | diverticular disease | ANO1 | 22.5 | 83 |
| rs7588567 | glaucoma | NCKAP5 | 21.2 | 84 |
| rs7119 | type 2 diabetes | HMG20A | 17.5 | 85 |
| rs936226 | hypertension | CYP1A2 | 14.7 | 86 |
| rs757978 | chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) | FARP2 | 10.4 | 87 |
| rs2753462 | myopia | FARP2 | 10.4 | 88 |
| rs6725887 (∗) | coronary heart disease | WDR12 | 9.6 | 89 |
| rs6725887 (∗) | myocardial infarction | WDR12 | 9.6 | 90 |
| rs9381040 | Alzheimer's disease | TREML2 | 6.0 | 91 |
| rs11083475 | heart rate (rhythm disorders) | ACTN4 | > 100 | 92 |
| rs9555695 | waist-hip ratio (obesity) | COL4A2 | > 100 | 93 |
| rs2571445 | lung function (pulmonary disease) | TNS1 | > 100 | 94 |
| rs3791979 | intraocular pressure (open angle glaucoma) | TNS1 | > 100 | 95 |
| rs17263971 | eGFR (Chronic Kidney Disease) and retinal dysfunction | SYNPO2 | 28.7 | 79,96 |
| rs35252676 | pulse pressure (CVD) | LHFPL2 | 26.6 | 97 |
| rs1378942 (∗) | diastolic blood pressure (CVD) | CSK | 23.4 | 98 |
| rs1378942 (∗) | mean arterial pressure (CVD) | CSK | 23.4 | 99 |
| rs17355629 | pulse pressure (CVD) | LRCH1 | 19.6 | 100 |
| rs7655064 | waist-hip ratio (obesity) | MYOZ2 | 14.5 | 93 |
| rs6495122 | diastolic blood pressure (CVD) | CPLX3 | 14.5 | 101 |
| rs12913832 | intraocular pressure (open angle glaucoma) | HERC2 | 12.3 | 102 |
| rs9303401 | cognitive ability (mental disorders) | PPM1E | 10.01 | 103 |
CVD = cardiovascular diseases; eGFR= estimated glomerular filtration rate; GWAS = genome-wide association study; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.
List of variants identified in the tortuosity GWAS (combined-vessel analysis) which were found to be associated with a disease outcome or risk factor in an independent study. We report only exact variants (same rsID in both tortuosity and disease GWAS), which we could confidently map to a gene. Gene P-values were computed by PascalX.64 Variants associated with > 1 disease are marked by a star (∗).
Genetic Overlap With Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
We expanded our analysis of disease variants to SNPs belonging to the same LD block (Fig 6). We observe a sizable number of tortuosity-associated variants that overlap with CVD (54 SNPs). Several traits related to metabolic syndrome also stand out: blood pressure (55 SNPs for systolic blood pressure, 49 for diastolic blood pressure, and 15 for pulse pressure), blood cholesterol levels (54 SNPs), BMI (54 SNPs), blood pressure linked to alcohol intake and smoking (44 SNPs for systolic blood pressure + alcohol, 27 for diastolic blood pressure + alcohol), and type 2 diabetes (5 SNPs). In addition, other CVD risk factors share a high number of variants associated with tortuosity, such as protein levels (27 SNPs) and type 1 diabetes (9 SNPs). Finally, we detected an overlap with various eye morphology traits, including optic disc morphometry (40 SNPs).
Figure 6.
Overlap in genetic signals with diseases and other complex traits. Arteries in red, veins in blue, combined-vessel signal in black: number of variants shared with other traits reported in the genome-wide association study Catalog70 (also considering single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] in high linkage disequilibrium with the lead SNP, r2 > 0.8). Only traits with ≥ 5 shared associations are included (for a full list, including rsIDs, refer to the Supplemental Dataset 3). The traits with the highest number of shared SNPs belong to metabolic syndrome (blood pressure, body mass index [BMI], blood cholesterol levels) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This analysis was generated using functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations (FUMA).104 DBP = diastolic blood pressure; IBD = inflammatory bowel disease; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; PSC = primary sclerosing cholangitis; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; T1 = type 1; T2 = type 2.
Causal Effects Between Tortuosity, BMI, and LDL
Using inverse-variance weighting Mendelian Randomisation (MR), we observed that exposure to elevated (standardized) levels of LDL reduced the tortuosity of veins by 3% (P = 0.02) and arteries by 5% (P = 0.001). Conversely, increased venous (but not arterial nor combined) tortuosity reduced BMI by 4.4% (P = 0.01) (Supplemental Text 11).
Discussion
Blood vessel tortuosity is a complex trait whose variation is induced in part during developmental angiogenesis and vascular differentiation and in part through vessel remodeling due to pathological processes in adult life. Both sources of variation are modulated by the environment, but also genetically through gene and regulatory variants that subtly modulate these processes. In order to better understand the involved genetic architecture, we conducted the largest GWAS on retinal vessel tortuosity to date, identifying 173 novel loci and pinpointing numerous genes and gene-sets enriched with these primary association signals. Leveraging the unprecedented number of hits, we performed MR that revealed the causal relationships between retinal tortuosity, BMI, and blood lipids. This provides context for the considerable overlap we observed between variants associated with vessel tortuosity and cardiometabolic diseases as well as their risk factors. Our results were consistent with the overexpression of tortuosity-related genes in the aorta, tibial artery, coronary artery, and heart tissues. We found these genes to be involved in the development of blood vessels, the maintenance of vessel integrity, and the remodeling as a consequence of disease processes.
Vessel Integrity
Several enriched gene ontology categories that are integral to vessel development were enriched, namely “morphogenesis of anatomical structures,” “development of circulatory system,” and “tube development.” Similarly gene ontology categories pertinent to the structural integrity of vessels and the stability of specific tissues were highlighted: “cell-substrate junction” and “anchoring junction” which are responsible for the mechanical attachment of a cell and its cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix. Molecularly, “actin cytoskeleton,” “actin binding,” “actin filament bundle organization,” and “positive regulation of actin filament bundle assembly” highlighted the important role of actin.
Among the top hits, we found genes directly related to vessel integrity. The product of ACTN4 contributes to cell adhesion and to assembly of the tight junction by mediating actin filament bundling. The paralogues COL4A1 and COL4A2 provide structural support and elasticity to connective tissues by forming the heterotrimer α1α1α2, which is the most abundant collagen in the basement membrane.105 We found both COL4A2 and ACTN4 to be overexpressed in vascular tissues (Supplemental Text 12). Two more genes with actin-related activity were also among our top hits: TNS1, which promotes cell migration and regulates angiogenesis,106 and SYNPO2, which is activated by actin polymerization, highly expressed in SMCs79 and known to provide structural integrity to blood vessel walls.107 Finally, we identified 3 genes coding for galectins, which are involved in adhesion to the connective tissue via modulation of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions77: LGALS7, its paralog LGALS7B and LGALS4.
Vessel Remodeling
Pathological stresses such as inflammation, infection, or injury can cause remodeling of vessels, manifesting as occlusions, kinks, tubulations, or other collateral formation of vessels. Pathway analysis identified gene sets of ECs (4 sets), SMCs (2 sets), fibroblasts (1 set), and pericytes (1 set) which are the basic cell types composing vessel walls. Dysregulated response of vascular SMC can induce hypertension, and excessive proliferation of these cells contributes to CVD progression.108 Endothelial cells dysfunction can lead to hyperpermeability, neurovascular decoupling, and proinflammatory responses.7 We identified a gene set for “human retinal fibroblasts'' consistent with the fact that this cell type is the most common in connective tissue and involved in maintaining the extracellular matrix. Under stress, fibroblasts proliferate, resulting in the accumulation of extracellular materials that ultimately limits elasticity.109 In addition, we found enrichment in a gene set related to “mesangial cells,” which are kidney-specific pericyte cells. Retinal capillaries are composed of ECs and pericytes. These contractile cells control blood flow in capillaries110 and their function is inhibited under stress, such as in high glucose conditions typical in diabetes.111 Therefore, dysregulation of these gene sets has the potential to induce vessel remodeling under stress.
We identified genes directly involved in vessel remodeling. In particular, FLT1 plays a role in the process of collateral vessel formation, which is a form of vascular remodeling in response to stress, such as hypoxia or hypertension.112 FLT1 is transcribed in several tissues, including arteries and heart,69 and translated into VEGFR1. VEGFR1 is upregulated in response to microinflammation in the early stages of several vascular diseases.112 In the retina, VEGFR1 is observed in ECs, SMCs, pericytes, and RPE cells (which modulate fibroblast proliferation), and excess VEGFR1 contributes to vessel leakage and angiogenesis.112
Associations With Diseases
We detected pleiotropic effects of tortuosity loci, which we showed to be independently associated with CAD, myocardial infarction, hypertension, diabetes, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Alzheimer’s disease, myopia, and glaucoma. We also found tortuosity related genes to be involved in disease pathomechanisms. ACTN4, our top hit, was recently associated with vasorelaxation,113 a mechanism that can lead to hypertension when malfunctioning. The lead SNP in ACTN4 tortuosity (rs1808382) is also independently associated with CAD.44 COL4A1 mutation has been reported as the cause of familial retinal arteriolar tortuosity78 and cerebral small vessel disease114 vessel leakage and hyperpermeability.115 Fittingly, COL4A2 also figured among our variants with pleiotropic effects on disease risk (Table 4). Variants in the fetal genome near FLT1 have been associated with preeclampsia,116 a condition of pregnant women presenting with hypertension and damage to the liver and kidneys, whose underlying mechanism involves abnormal formation of blood vessels in the placenta.117 Retinal vessel modifications have been observed to precede clinical onset of preeclampsia and persist up to 12 months postpartum.118, 119, 120
We elucidated causal links between tortuosity and disease risk factors by applying MR. Specifically, we established that elevated LDL exposure causally reduces arterial tortuosity. High-LDL is known to cause the buildup of atherosclerotic plaque,121 which has been clinically linked to arterial tortuosity.122,123 In fact, arteriosclerosis may make retinal arterial walls less flexible and thereby reduce their DF. We observed a negative causal effect of venous tortuosity on BMI, despite the known positive correlation between BMI and retinal tortuosity,124 suggesting that environmental factors may play a role in the relationship between BMI and vascular tortuosity.
Limitations
This study was subject to the following limitations: First, we focused on the DF as a tortuosity measure, since the corresponding GWAS revealed many more significant loci, genes, and pathways, as well as a higher heritability estimate in comparison to the alternative curvature-based tortuosity measures. These measures are more sensitive to local physiological vessel features, such as aneurysms or sharp bending (“kinks”), while DF only captures the total vessel elongation. Yet, they may also be more sensitive to the vessel segmentation procedure than the DF. Interestingly, the GWAS for these measures revealed several specific genes and pathways that were not significant in the DF analysis, which may be associated with pathologies manifesting as local disruptions in the microvascular network. Further work is needed to elucidate to what extent the stronger association signals for the DF are due to its robustness as a tortuosity measure or its quality to capture total vessel elongation as the most physiologically relevant trait. Second, due to the small size of our replication metacohort, we essentially just had sufficient power to verify an overall concordance with the discovery cohort in terms of the highly significant correlation between SNP- and gene-effect sizes, providing independent evidence that they were not driven by any artifacts specific to the UKBB.51 Even though we could only replicate very few of our SNP-wise hits (4/136 at FDR = 0.1), the situation was somewhat better at the level of genes (57/262 at FDR = 0.5), underlining the usefulness of signal aggregation from SNPs to genes.64,65 Our specific findings should thus be viewed as discoveries in the United Kingdom population that still need to be replicated in a much bigger cohort than our Swiss metacohort. Finally, we did not attempt to stratify this population by existing diseases, including retinal disorders or other ocular conditions, nor remove subjects with a retinal image from 1 eye only, all of which may affect our results.
This study exploits advanced automated image processing to characterize different vessel type specific retinal tortuosity measures from retinal fundus images of close to 70 000 subjects to conduct a high-powered GWAS on this trait. The resulting significant association signals allowed us to provide novel insights into the genetic architecture of retinal tortuosity. Specifically, we identified a large number of genes, annotated gene-sets and tissues relevant for this trait, and revealed pleiotropic links with and causal effects to or from disease-related traits. Our study makes important methodological advancements in the large-scale analysis of medically relevant images, which can be applied to other retinal and nonretinal features both in fundamental and clinical research. Our findings provide a significant progress in understanding of molecular players and mechanisms modulating retinal vessel tortuosity and their links to ocular and cardiometabolic diseases, which is fundamental for developing better tools for their diagnosis and treatment.
Acknowledgments
This work was conducted using data from the UKBB (application ID 43805), SKIPOGH, and OphtalmoLaus. The authors thank Micha Hersch for inspiring this project, to the UKBB team for their support and responsiveness, and to all UKBB participants for sharing their personal data. The authors also thank aSciStance Ltd for their help in revising the manuscript.
Manuscript no. XOPS-D-22-00114.
Footnotes
Supplemental material available atwww.aaojournal.org.
Disclosure(s):
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE disclosures form.
The authors made the following disclosures:
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (#FN 310030_152724/1 to S.B.) and by the Swiss Personalized Health Network (2018DRI13 to Thomas J. Wolfensberger). The SKIPOGH study was also supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (#FN 33CM30-124087 to M.B.). The OphtalmoLaus study was supported by the Claire et Selma Kattenburg Foundation.
HUMAN SUBJECTS: The UK Biobank has obtained Research Tissue Bank approval from its ethics committee that covers our use of the Resource. The UK Biobank Research Ethics Committee approval number is 16/NW/0274. OphtalmoLaus obtained ethics approval from La Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche sur l'être humain (project PB_2019-00168). The same commission approved ethics for SKIPOGH (Protocols 92/07 and 303/12). All 3 studies adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained informed consent from all subjects.
Author Contributions:
Conception and design: Tomasoni, Bergmann
Data Collection: Tomasoni, Lazaros, Bochud, Schlingemann, Bergin, Bergmann
Analysis and interpretation: Tomasoni, Beyeler, Vela, Mounier, Porcu, Corre, Krefl, Button, Abouzeid, Schlingemann, Bergin, Bergmann
Obtained funding: N/A
Overall responsibility: Tomasoni, Beyeler, Vela, Lazaros, Schlingemann, Bergin, Bergmann
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.Wilkins E., Wilson L., Wickramasinghe K., et al. 2017. European cardiovascular disease statistics 2017.https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/european-cardiovascular-disease-statistics-2017 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Federal Statistical Office . Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS); 2021. Cause of Death Statistics. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rana J.S., Khan S.S., Lloyd-Jones D.M., Sidney S. Changes in mortality in top 10 causes of death from 2011 to 2018. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36:2517–2518. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06070-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Díaz-Coránguez M., Ramos C., Antonetti D.A. The inner blood-retinal barrier: cellular basis and development. Vis Res. 2017;139:123–137. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klaassen I., Van Noorden C.J.F., Schlingemann R.O. Molecular basis of the inner blood-retinal barrier and its breakdown in diabetic macular edema and other pathological conditions. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;34:19–48. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liew G., Wang J.J., Mitchell P., Wong T.Y. Retinal vascular imaging: a new tool in microvascular disease research. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:156–161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.784876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Duh E.J., Sun J.K., Stitt A.W. Diabetic retinopathy: current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. JCI Insight. 2017;2 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.MacCormick I.J.C., Czanner G., Faragher B. Developing retinal biomarkers of neurological disease: an analytical perspective. Biomark Med. 2015;9:691–701. doi: 10.2217/bmm.15.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patton N., Aslam T., Macgillivray T., et al. Retinal vascular image analysis as a potential screening tool for cerebrovascular disease: a rationale based on homology between cerebral and retinal microvasculatures. J Anat. 2005;206:319–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00395.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liao H., Zhu Z., Peng Y. Potential utility of retinal imaging for Alzheimer's disease: a review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:188. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dumitrascu O.M., Qureshi T.A. Retinal vascular imaging in vascular cognitive impairment: current and future perspectives. J Exp Neurosci. 2018;12 doi: 10.1177/1179069518801291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Baker M.L., Hand P.J., Wang J.J., Wong T.Y. Retinal signs and stroke: revisiting the link between the eye and brain. Stroke. 2008;39:1371–1379. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Weiler D.L., Engelke C.B., Moore A.L.O., Harrison W.W. Arteriole tortuosity associated with diabetic retinopathy and cholesterol. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:384–391. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gulshan V., Peng L., Coram M., et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–2410. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mookiah M.R.K., Acharya U.R., Fujita H., et al. Application of different imaging modalities for diagnosis of diabetic macular edema: a review. Comput Biol Med. 2015;66:295–315. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang J.J., Taylor B., Wong T.Y., et al. Retinal vessel diameters and obesity: a population-based study in older persons. Obesity. 2006;14:206–214. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Poplin R., Varadarajan A.V., Blumer K., et al. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:158–164. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0195-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Flammer J., Konieczka K., Bruno R.M., et al. The eye and the heart. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1270–1278. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seidelmann S.B., Claggett B., Bravo P.E., et al. Retinal vessel calibers in predicting long-term cardiovascular outcomes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Circulation. 2016;134:1328–1338. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ikram M.K., Ong Y.T., Cheung C.Y., Wong T.Y. Retinal vascular caliber measurements: clinical significance, current knowledge and future perspectives. Ophthalmologica. 2013;229:125–136. doi: 10.1159/000342158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawasaki R., Cheung N., Wang J.J., et al. Retinal vessel diameters and risk of hypertension: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2386–2393. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283310f7e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ikram M.K., de Jong F.J., Bos M.J., et al. Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam study. Neurology. 2006;66:1339–1343. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liew G., Mitchell P., Rochtchina E., et al. Fractal analysis of retinal microvasculature and coronary heart disease mortality. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:422–429. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wintergerst M.W.M., Falahat P., Holz F.G., et al. Retinal vasculature assessed by OCTA in peripheral arterial disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:3203. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Konstantinidis L., Guex-Crosier Y. Hypertension and the eye. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:514–521. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smith W., Wang J.J., Wong T.Y., et al. Retinal arteriolar narrowing is associated with 5-year incident severe hypertension: the Blue Mountains Eye study. Hypertension. 2004;44:442–447. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000140772.40322.ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wong T., Mitchell P. The eye in hypertension. Lancet. 2007;369:425–435. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60198-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cheung C.Y.-L., Zheng Y., Hsu W., et al. Retinal vascular tortuosity, blood pressure, and cardiovascular risk factors. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:812–818. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wong T.Y., Shankar A., Klein R., et al. Prospective cohort study of retinal vessel diameters and risk of hypertension. BMJ. 2004;329:79. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38124.682523.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dimmitt S.B., West J.N., Eames S.M., et al. Usefulness of ophthalmoscopy in mild to moderate hypertension. Lancet. 1989;1:1103–1106. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92384-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Leung H., Wang J.J., Rochtchina E., et al. Impact of current and past blood pressure on retinal arteriolar diameter in an older population. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1543–1549. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000125455.28861.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wong T.Y., Klein R., Sharrett A.R., et al. Retinal arteriolar diameter and risk for hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:248–255. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-4-200402170-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ikram M.K., Witteman J.C.M., Vingerling J.R., et al. Retinal vessel diameters and risk of hypertension: the Rotterdam study. Hypertension. 2006;47:189–194. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000199104.61945.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sharrett A.R., Hubbard L.D., Cooper L.S., et al. Retinal arteriolar diameters and elevated blood pressure: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:263–270. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Woo S.C.Y., Lip G.Y.H., Lip P.L. Associations of retinal artery occlusion and retinal vein occlusion to mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Eye. 2016;30:1031–1038. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rim T.H., Han J.S., Oh J., et al. Retinal vein occlusion and the risk of acute myocardial infarction development: a 12-year nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22351. doi: 10.1038/srep22351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sabanayagam C., Xu D., Ting D.S.W., et al. A deep learning algorithm to detect chronic kidney disease from retinal photographs in community-based populations. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e295–e302. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Park H.C., Lee Y.-K., Cho A., et al. Diabetic retinopathy is a prognostic factor for progression of chronic kidney disease in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jensen R.A., Sim X., Smith A.V., et al. Novel genetic loci associated with retinal microvascular diameter. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016;9:45–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ikram M.K., Sim X., Jensen R.A., et al. Four novel loci (19q13, 6q24, 12q24, and 5q14) influence the microcirculation in vivo. PLoS Genet. 2010;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Springelkamp H., Mishra A., Hysi P.G., et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel loci associated with optic disc morphology. Genet Epidemiol. 2015;39:207–216. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Han X., Qassim A., An J., et al. Genome-wide association analysis of 95 549 individuals identifies novel loci and genes influencing optic disc morphology. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:3680–3690. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zekavat S.M., Raghu V.K., Trinder M., et al. Deep learning of the retina enables phenome- and genome-wide analyses of the microvasculature. Circulation. 2022;145:134–150. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Veluchamy A., Ballerini L., Vitart V., et al. Novel genetic locus influencing retinal venular tortuosity is also associated with risk of coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39:2542–2552. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Welby J.P., Kim S.T., Carr C.M., et al. Carotid artery tortuosity is associated with connective tissue diseases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1738–1743. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pruijm M., Ponte B., Ackermann D., et al. Heritability, determinants and reference values of renal length: a family-based population study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2899–2905. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2900-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ponte B., Pruijm M., Ackermann D., et al. Reference values and factors associated with renal resistive index in a family-based population study. Hypertension. 2014;63:136–142. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Firmann M., Mayor V., Vidal P.M., et al. The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-8-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tapp R.J., Owen C.G., Barman S.A., et al. Associations of retinal microvascular diameters and tortuosity with blood pressure and arterial stiffness: United Kingdom Biobank. Hypertension. 2019;74:1383–1390. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Heneghan C., Flynn J., O'Keefe M., Cahill M. Characterization of changes in blood vessel width and tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity using image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2002;6:407–429. doi: 10.1016/s1361-8415(02)00058-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sudlow C., Gallacher J., Allen N., et al. UKBB: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bycroft C., Freeman C., Petkova D., et al. The UKBB resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562:203–209. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pistis G., Porcu E., Vrieze S.I., et al. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:975–983. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bankhead P., Scholfield C.N., McGeown J.G., Curtis T.M. Fast retinal vessel detection and measurement using wavelets and edge location refinement. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Al-Diri B., Hunter A., Steel D., et al. REVIEW - a reference data set for retinal vessel profiles. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:2262–2265. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Smedby O., Högman N., Nilsson S., et al. Two-dimensional tortuosity of the superficial femoral artery in early atherosclerosis. J Vasc Res. 1993;30:181–191. doi: 10.1159/000158993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Abdalla M., Hunter A., Al-Diri B. 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI) 2015. Quantifying retinal blood vessels’ tortuosity — review.https://www.karger.com/Company Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 58.Galdran A., Anjos A., Dolz J., et al. The little W-net that could: state-of-the-art retinal vessel segmentation with minimalistic models. arXiv. 2020 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2009.01907. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bycroft C., Freeman C., Petkova D., et al. Genome-wide genetic data on ∼500,000 UKBB participants. bioRxiv. 2017:166298. doi: 10.1101/166298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pain O., Dudbridge F., Ronald A. Are your covariates under control? How normalization can re-introduce covariate effects. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26:1194–1201. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0159-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Myers T.A., Chanock S.J., Machiela M.J. LDlinkR: an R package for rapidly calculating linkage disequilibrium statistics in diverse populations. Front Genet. 2020;11:157. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kang H.M. 2016. EPACTS: efficient and parallelizable association container toolbox.https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/EPACTS [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zheng J., Erzurumluoglu A.M., Elsworth B.L., et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:272–279. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Krefl D., Bergmann S. PascalX v0.0.1. Zenodo. 2021 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4429922. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lamparter D., Marbach D., Rueedi R., et al. Fast and rigorous computation of gene and pathway scores from SNP-based summary statistics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kinsella R.J., Kähäri A., Haider S., et al. Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1093/database/bar030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Huang J., Howie B., McCarthy S., et al. Improved imputation of low-frequency and rare variants using the UK10K haplotype reference panel. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8111. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Liberzon A., Subramanian A., Pinchback R., et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1739–1740. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lonsdale J., Thomas J., Salvatore M., et al. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:580–585. doi: 10.1038/ng.2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Buniello A., MacArthur J.A.L., Cerezo M., et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D1005–D1012. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Burgess S., Small D.S., Thompson S.G. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26:2333–2355. doi: 10.1177/0962280215597579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Smith G.D., Ebrahim S. “Mendelian randomization”: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:1–22. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Genome-wide repository of associations between SNPs and phenotypes. In: National Institutes of Health (NIH) [internet] https://grasp.nhlbi.nih.gov/
- 74.Burgess S., Butterworth A., Thompson S.G. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013;37:658–665. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yavorska O.O., Burgess S. MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1734–1739. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat. 2000;25:60–83. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kuwabara I., Kuwabara Y., Yang R.-Y., et al. Galectin-7 (PIG1) exhibits pro-apoptotic function through JNK activation and mitochondrial cytochrome c release. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:3487–3497. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109360200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zenteno J.C., Crespí J., Buentello-Volante B., et al. Next generation sequencing uncovers a missense mutation in COL4A1 as the cause of familial retinal arteriolar tortuosity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:1789–1794. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2800-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Turczyńska K.M., Swärd K., Hien T.T., et al. Regulation of smooth muscle dystrophin and synaptopodin 2 expression by actin polymerization and vascular injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:1489–1497. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.305065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Karouta C., Kucharski R., Hardy K., et al. Transcriptome-based insights into gene networks controlling myopia prevention. FASEB J. 2021;35 doi: 10.1096/fj.202100350RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shibuya M. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1/Flt-1): a dual regulator for angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2006;9:225–230. doi: 10.1007/s10456-006-9055-8. discussion 231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Subramanian A., Tamayo P., Mootha V.K., et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Maguire L.H., Handelman S.K., Du X., et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 39 new susceptibility loci for diverticular disease. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1359–1365. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0203-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Osman W., Low S.-K., Takahashi A., et al. A genome-wide association study in the Japanese population confirms 9p21 and 14q23 as susceptibility loci for primary open angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:2836–2842. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sim X., Ong R.T.-H., Suo C., et al. Transferability of type 2 diabetes implicated loci in multi-ethnic cohorts from Southeast Asia. PLoS Genet. 2011;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.German C.A., Sinsheimer J.S., Klimentidis Y.C., et al. Ordered multinomial regression for genetic association analysis of ordinal phenotypes at Biobank scale. Genet Epidemiol. 2020;44:248–260. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Slager S.L., Skibola C.F., Di Bernardo M.C., et al. Common variation at 6p21.31 (BAK1) influences the risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:843–846. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-413591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tedja M.S., Wojciechowski R., Hysi P.G., et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis highlights light-induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nat Genet. 2018;50:834–848. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0127-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Mehta N.N. Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011:327–329. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.960443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kathiresan S., Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium. Voight B.F., et al. Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants. Nat Genet. 2009;41:334–341. doi: 10.1038/ng.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lambert J.C., Ibrahim-Verbaas C.A., Harold D., et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1452–1458. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.den Hoed M., Eijgelsheim M., Esko T., et al. Identification of heart rate-associated loci and their effects on cardiac conduction and rhythm disorders. Nat Genet. 2013;45:621–631. doi: 10.1038/ng.2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kichaev G., Bhatia G., Loh P.-R., et al. Leveraging polygenic functional enrichment to improve GWAS power. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wain L.V., Shrine N., Miller S., et al. Novel insights into the genetics of smoking behaviour, lung function, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UK BiLEVE): a genetic association study in UKBB. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:769–781. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00283-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Khawaja A.P., UKBB Eye and Vision Consortium. Cooke Bailey J.N., et al. Genome-wide analyses identify 68 new loci associated with intraocular pressure and improve risk prediction for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50:778–782. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Stapleton C.P., Heinzel A., Guan W., et al. The impact of donor and recipient common clinical and genetic variation on estimated glomerular filtration rate in a European renal transplant population. Am J Transplant. 2019;19:2262–2273. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Warren H.R., Evangelou E., Cabrera C.P., et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. Nat Genet. 2017;49:403–415. doi: 10.1038/ng.3768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Newton-Cheh C., Johnson T., Gateva V., et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41:666–676. doi: 10.1038/ng.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wain L.V., Verwoert G.C., O'Reilly P.F., et al. Genome-wide association study identifies six new loci influencing pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1005–1011. doi: 10.1038/ng.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Giri A., Hellwege J.N., Keaton J.M., et al. Trans-ethnic association study of blood pressure determinants in over 750,000 individuals. Nat Genet. 2019;51:51–62. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0303-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Levy D., Ehret G.B., Rice K., et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet. 2009;41:677–687. doi: 10.1038/ng.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Craig J.E., Han X., Qassim A., et al. Multitrait analysis of glaucoma identifies new risk loci and enables polygenic prediction of disease susceptibility and progression. Nat Genet. 2020;52:160–166. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0556-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Seshadri S., DeStefano A.L., Au R., et al. Genetic correlates of brain aging on MRI and cognitive test measures: a genome-wide association and linkage analysis in the Framingham study. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8 Suppl 1:S15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-S1-S15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Watanabe K., Taskesen E., van Bochoven A., Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Sand J.M.B., Genovese F., Gudmann N.S., Karsdal M.A.. Type IV collagen, In: M.A. Karsdal. Biochemistry of Collagens, Laminins and Elastin 2nd Edition. 2019 Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128098479/biochemistry-of-collagens-laminins-and-elastin. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Shih Y.-P., Sun P., Wang A., Lo S.H. Tensin1 positively regulates RhoA activity through its interaction with DLC1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853:3258–3265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Fonović M., Turk B. Cysteine cathepsins and extracellular matrix degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840:2560–2570. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yang D., Sun C., Zhang J., et al. Proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells under inflammation is regulated by NF-κB p65/microRNA-17/RB pathway activation. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41:43–50. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Dick M.K., Miao J.H., Limaiem F. Histology, fibroblast. StatPearls [internet] 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541065/ [PubMed]
- 110.Kur J., Newman E.A., Chan-Ling T. Cellular and physiological mechanisms underlying blood flow regulation in the retina and choroid in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:377–406. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wakisaka M., Nagao T. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 in mesangial cells and retinal pericytes and its implications for diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy. Glycobiology. 2017;27:691–695. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwx047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Uemura A., Fruttiger M., D'Amore P.A., et al. VEGFR1 signaling in retinal angiogenesis and microinflammation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;84 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Won K.-J., Lee K.P., Kim D.-K., et al. Monoclonal antibody against α-actinin 4 from human umbilical vein endothelial cells inhibits endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. J Vasc Res. 2013;50:210–220. doi: 10.1159/000350588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Vahedi K., Alamowitch S. Clinical spectrum of type IV collagen (COL4A1) mutations: a novel genetic multisystem disease. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24:63–68. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834232c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Trouillet A., Lorach H., Dubus E., et al. Col4a1 mutation generates vascular abnormalities correlated with neuronal damage in a mouse model of HANAC syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;100:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.McGinnis R., Steinthorsdottir V., Williams N.O., et al. Variants in the fetal genome near FLT1 are associated with risk of preeclampsia. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1255–1260. doi: 10.1038/ng.3895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Al-Jameil N., Aziz Khan F., Fareed Khan M., Tabassum H. A brief overview of preeclampsia. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6:1–7. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1682w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Nagy Z.Z. Review of the ophthalmic symptoms of preeclampsia. Dev Health Sci. 2020;3:21–23. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lupton S.J., Chiu C.L., Hodgson L.A.B., et al. Changes in retinal microvascular caliber precede the clinical onset of preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2013;62:899–904. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Soma-Pillay P., Pillay R., Wong T.Y., et al. The effect of pre-eclampsia on retinal microvascular caliber at delivery and post-partum. Obstet Med. 2018;11:116–120. doi: 10.1177/1753495X17745727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ference B.A., Ginsberg H.N., Graham I., et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2459–2472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Han H.-C. Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. J Vasc Res. 2012;49:185–197. doi: 10.1159/000335123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kwa V.I.H., van der Sande J.J., Stam J., et al. Retinal arterial changes correlate with cerebral small-vessel disease. Neurology. 2002;59:1536–1540. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000033093.16450.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Tapp R.J., Owen C.G., Barman S.A., et al. Retinal vascular tortuosity and diameter associations with adiposity and components of body composition. Obesity. 2020;28:1750–1760. doi: 10.1002/oby.22885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






