Abstract
Background
Safety of thioguanine in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is sparsely recorded. This study was aimed to document the safety of thioguanine during pregnancy and birth.
Methods
In this multicentre case series, IBD patients treated with thioguanine during pregnancy were included. Data regarding disease and medication history, pregnancy course, obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes were collected.
Results
Data on 117 thioguanine-exposed pregnancies in 99 women were collected. Most [78%] had Crohn’s disease and the mean age at delivery was 31 years. In 18 pregnancies [15%], IBD flared. Obstetric and infectious complications were seen in 15% [n = 17] and 7% [n = 8] of pregnancies, respectively. Ten pregnancies [8.5%] resulted in a first trimester miscarriage, one in a stillbirth at 22 weeks of gestational age and one in an induced abortion due to trisomy 21. In total, 109 neonates were born from 101 singleton pregnancies and four twin pregnancies. One child was born with a congenital abnormality [cleft palate]. In the singleton pregnancies, 10 children were born prematurely and 10 were born small for gestational age. Screening for myelosuppresion was performed in 16 neonates [14.7%]; two had anaemia in umbilical cord blood. All outcomes were comparable to either the general Dutch population or to data from three Dutch cohort studies on the use of conventional thiopurines in pregnant IBD patients.
Conclusion
In this large case series, the use of thioguanine during pregnancy is not associated in excess with adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.
Keywords: Inflammatory bowel disease, pregnancy, thioguanine
1. Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] often affects young adults during their reproductive years. Maintaining remission during conception and pregnancy is crucial, considering that active disease is associated with an increased risk of worse perinatal outcomes.1,2 Consequently, it is important that both maternal and fetal safety of maintenance therapy during pregnancy is balanced with the potential risk of disease relapse.
Exposure to azathioprine [AZA] or mercaptopurine [MP] during conception and pregnancy is considered sufficiently safe for responsible continuation during pregnancy, and its use has not been associated with a higher risk of preterm birth or low birthweight.3 In a recent European consensus guideline, it is therefore recommended to continue thiopurine therapy during pregnancy.4
Thioguanine [TG] is another thiopurine derivative that has recently been licensed in The Netherlands for use in IBD after failure of conventional thiopurines. As a result it has been increasingly prescribed. In contrast to AZA and MP, TG is converted in fewer enzymatic steps to the pharmacologically active 6-thioguanine nucleotides [6-TGN].5 Since the effector metabolites are similar for all thiopurines but less additional metabolites are formed during the conversion of TG, it could be just as safe for pregnancy, although data are scarce. Our group published one report showing no adverse pregnancy outcomes in two patients with Crohn’s disease treated with TG, and in another small case series [n = 19] TG appeared responsibly safe for both mother and fetus.6,7 Due to limited data on TG in pregnancy, it remains uncertain how to advise patients what to do regarding continuation of TG during the [intended] conception period and pregnancy. We therefore evaluated the teratogenicity and safety of TG during pregnancy in a large group of female IBD patients.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study design
This multicentre case series was performed from December 2014 till March 2022 in 24 centres in The Netherlands. Patients were identified by their treating physician and included if they were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC], or IBD-unclassified [IBD-U] according to clinical, endoscopic, and/or histological criteria and if they were exposed to TG during their pregnancy. Co-medication, such as biologics, was allowed. Thioguanine exposure was defined as use of TG at any time during estimated conception and/or pregnancy. In some cases, the researchers were notified by the treating physician when patients became pregnant and data were collected prospectively; in other patients, the researchers were notified after the delivery and data were collected retrospectively. Five patients described by van den Berg in 2016 were also included.6
The primary aim of this study was to describe the number and characteristics of birth defects, the rate of preterm delivery (<37 weeks gestational age [GA]), and small for GA ([SGA] [<10th percentile]).8 Secondary endpoints were the rate and type of other obstetric complications (ie, pregnancy-induced hypertension [PIH], pre-eclampsia including ‘haemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet levels’ [HELLP],9 intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP], placental abruption, hyperemesis gravidarum, gestational diabetes), infectious complications during pregnancy, the mode of delivery, and neonatal myelotoxicity.
2. 2. Maternal and IBD-related characteristics
The following patient characteristics were collected by the treating physician: age at delivery, intoxications [ie, smoking, alcohol, or drug use during conception or pregnancy], type of IBD, dosage of TG, disease duration and duration of TG use at conception, prior surgeries, obstetric history, and co-medication. Disease was classified according to the Montreal classification.10 Data on duration between diagnosis, TG treatment, and conception were calculated in rounded years.
2.3. Pregnancy and neonatal characteristics
The following data on pregnancy and neonatal outcome were collected: method of conception including the need for assisted reproduction, disease activity during pregnancy, antibiotic-treated infections during pregnancy, obstetric complications, mode of delivery, gender, birthweight, gestational age at birth, Apgar score [1 and 5 min], congenital abnormalities, and neonatal complications.
Assisted reproduction was defined as any of the following procedures that resulted in a pregnancy: ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization [IVF], intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI], or intrauterine insemination [IUI]. A loss of pregnancy before the 16th week was considered a miscarriage and after 16 weeks a stillbirth or immature delivery.11
Prematurity was defined as birth before 37 weeks. Small for gestational age [SGA] was defined as birthweight below the 10th percentile of the gestational age computed in the national pregnancy cohort, and large for gestational age was defined as above the 90th percentile.8
If measured, 6-TGN concentrations in red blood cells during pregnancy and in umbilical cord blood were mostly determined with the method of Dervieux.12 To compare our data with existing literature, in which the method developed by Lennard and Singleton was generally used to determine metabolite levels, 6-TGN concentrations measured with the Dervieux method were divided by 1.4.13,14
Anaemia in newborns was defined according to the reference ranges proposed by Jopling et al., which account for gestational age; leukopenia was defined as a leukocyte count below 5 × 109/l and thrombocytopenia as a platelet count below 150 × 109/l.15,16 None of the newborns was tested for hepatotoxicity. Outcomes were compared with the general Dutch population and with data from three Dutch cohort studies on the use of conventional thiopurines in pregnant IBD patients.15,17–19
2.4. Statistical considerations
Categorical variables were described as numbers with percentages. Continuous variables were presented as means with standard deviation [SD] or as medians with interquartile ranges [IQR1–IQR3], depending on their distribution. Normality was tested by visual inspection of histograms and with the Shapiro–Wilk test. SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis.
2.5. Ethical statement
The research medical ethics committee [REC] of the VU University Medical Centre approved this study with file number 2014.530 and waived the need for written informed consent.
3. Results
3.1. Maternal characteristics
Data on 117 pregnancies in 99 women were collected. Most women were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease [78%] and 67 [57%] were primigravid. The mean age at delivery was 31 years [SD 4.2]. In total, 109 neonates were born from 101 singleton pregnancies and four twin pregnancies. TG was used throughout all three trimesters in 80% with a median daily dose of 20 mg [IQR 10–20 mg]. In the other patients TG was stopped for the following reasons: patient preference [n = 3], start of biologics [n = 2], side effects [n = 1], breastfeeding wish [n = 1], and unknown [n = 1]. One patient ceased therapy on pharmacist advice at 10 weeks, but restarted 3 months later due to disease activity. Two patients started with TG after conception, due to either skewed metabolism with conventional thiopurines [n = 1] or the necessity of co-medication with allopurinol [n = 1]. Twelve patients did not use TG during all three trimesters due to a miscarriage, spontaneous abortion or still birth; 43 patients [37%] used co-medication at the start of pregnancy. Additional maternal characteristics are provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Maternal characteristics | N = 117 |
---|---|
Age at delivery in years, mean [SD] | 31 [4.2] |
Disease duration in years, median [IQR] | 6 [4–10] |
Inflammatory bowel disease subtype, n [% of cases]: | |
- Ulcerative colitis | 23 [19.7%] |
- Crohn’s disease | 91 [77.8%] |
- IBD undetermined | 3 [2.6%] |
Montreal classification UC, n [% of cases]: | |
E: extension of colitis: | |
- E1 proctitis | 2 [8.7%] |
- E2 left-sided colitis | 11 [47.8%] |
- E3 extensive colitis | 9 [39.1%] |
- Missing | 1 [4.4%] |
Montreal classification CD, n [% of cases]: | |
A: age at diagnose | |
- A1 [≤16 years] | 9 [9.9%] |
- A2 [17–40 year] | 82 [90.1%] |
- A3 [≥40 years] | 0 [0%] |
L: disease location | |
- L1: only terminal ileum | 31 [34.1%] |
- L2: only colon | 23 [25.3%] |
- L3: ileum and colon | 34 [37.4%] |
- +L4: locations proximal to ileum | 4 [4.4%] |
- +P: perianal disease | 20 [22.0%] |
- Missing | 3 [3.3%] |
B: behaviour: | |
- B1: non-stricturing, non-penetrating | 69 [75.8%] |
- B2: stricturing | 11 [12.1%] |
- B3: penetrating | 9 [9.9%] |
- Missing | 2 [2.2%] |
Previous IBD surgery, n [% of cases] | 15 [12.8%] |
Smoking status, n [% of cases] | |
- Current | 6 [5.1%] |
- Former [before pregnancy] | 4 [3.4%] |
- Never | 99 [84.6%] |
- Missing | 8 [6.8%] |
Gravidity [>1], n [% of cases] | 50 [42.7%] |
Previous miscarriage, n [% of cases] | 11 [22.0%] |
Assisted reproduction, n [% of cases] | 17 [15%] |
- ICSI | 3 [2.6%] |
- IVF | 7 [6.0%] |
- IUI | 6 [5.1%] |
- Ovarian stimulation | 1 [0.9%] |
Thioguanine dosage, mg, median [IQR] | 20 [10-20] |
Thioguanine used during trimester, n [% of cases] | |
- Trimester 1 | 107 [91.5%] |
- Trimester 2 | 98 [83.8%] |
- Trimester 3 | 103 [88.0%] |
- Trimesters 1–3 | 94 [80.3%] |
IBD co-medication at conception, n [% of cases] | 43 [36.8%] |
- Mesalazine | 22 [18.8%] |
- Anti-TNF-α | 21 [17.9%] |
- Glucocorticoids | 5 [4.2%] |
- Vedolizumab | 1 [0.9%] |
- Ustekinumab | 1 [0.9%] |
- Other | 9 [7.7%] |
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; UC, ulcerative colitis, CD, Crohn’s disease; IVF, in vitro fertilization; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IUI, intrauterine insemination; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
3.2. Pregnancy complications
One or more other obstetric complications were observed in 17 pregnancies [15%] [Table 2]. Eight patients [7%] developed infectious complications during their pregnancy which required antibiotics, no one had to be hospitalised. Additional details are provided in Table 2. In one pregnancy, the mother developed postpartum fever of unknown origin, for which she was admitted for 3 days. No other infectious complications during labour or postpartum were reported. In 18 pregnancies [15%], there was a flare in IBD disease activity of varying severity, which was treated with budesonide [n = 7], prednisone [n = 5], anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-α [n = 2], topical therapy [n = 5], and/or by restarting TG [n = 1] 3 months after discontinuation. In two pregnancies, the flare did not lead to any additional treatment. In two other pregnancies TG was ceased after the flare as the therapeutic effect was judged to be apparently insufficient, precluding unnecessary use during further pregnancy. The median maternal 6-TGN level during pregnancy was 464 pmol/108 RBC [n = 33, IQR 288–633.5].
Table 2.
Singleton pregnancies [n = 113] | Twin pregnancies [n = 4] | All pregnancies [n = 117] | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of live-born children | 101 | 8 | 109 |
Birthweight in g, median [IQR] | 3355 [2965–3726] | 2470 [2400–2510] | 3294 [2810–3696] |
Gestational age in weeks, median [IQR] | 39 [38–40] | 36.71 [35.43–37.14] | 39 [37.9–40] |
Preterm birth, n [% of cases] | 10 [10.2, n = 98]] | 6 [75] | 16 [15.1, n = 106] |
Small for gestational age, n [% of cases] | 10 [10.5, n = 95]] | 3 [37.5] | 13 [12.6, n = 103] |
Large for gestational age, n [% of cases] | 9 [9.5, n = 95] | 0 [0] | 9 [8.7, n = 103] |
Congenital abnormalities in live-born children, n [% of cases] | 1 [1] | 0 [0] | 1 [0.9] |
APGAR score < 7 after 5 min, n [% of cases] | 5 [6, n = 84] | 1 [12.5] | 6 [6.5, n = 92] |
Partial placental abruption, n [% of cases] | 1 [0.9] | 0 [0] | 1 [0.85] |
PIH, n [% of cases] | 3 [2.7] | 1 [12.5] | 4 [3.4] |
Gestational diabetes, n [% of cases] | 6 [5.3] | 0 [0] | 6 [5.1] |
Pre-eclampsia [including HELLP], n [% of cases] | 6 [5.3] | 1 [12.5] | 7 [6] |
Infectious maternal complications during pregnancy which required antibiotics, n [% of cases] | 8 [7.1] | 0 [0] | 8 [6.8] |
- Pneumonia | 1 [0.9] | 0 [0] | 1 [0.85] |
- Cystitis | 4 [3.5] | 0 [0] | 4 [3.4] |
- Gastroenteritis | 2 [1.8] | 0 [0] | 2 [1.7] |
- STD | 1 [0.9] | 0 [0] | 1 [0.85] |
IQR, interquartile range; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet level; STD, sexually transmitted diseases.
Ten pregnancies resulted in a first-trimester miscarriage [8.5%] and one patient had an induced abortion due to trisomy 21 of the fetus, at the age of 39.
One pregnancy resulted in a stillbirth at 22 weeks. Chorionic villus sampling was performed because of a thickened nuchal fold and revealed no chromosomal abnormalities. During this pregnancy, repeated vaginal bleedings resulted in a haemoglobin level of 4.9 mmol/l in this subject. Around 20 weeks’ GA, a premature rupture of membranes occurred, resulting in a stillborn baby of 314 g.
Most patients [n = 72, 69%] had a vaginal delivery. In 33 of the 105 completed pregnancies [31%], a caesarean section was performed: 18 were elective and 15 occurred in an emergency setting. In 10 cases, the indication for an elective caesarean section was related to the underlying IBD, ie, perianal disease. In the other eight patients, the indications were: placenta praevia [n = 1], previous caesarean section [n = 3], preeclampsia [n = 2], and unknown [n = 2]. The indications for an emergency caesarean were: fetal distress [n = 6], obstructed labour [n = 4], severe preeclampsia [n = 3], labour prior to the scheduled caesarean due to perianal disease [n = 1], and unknown [n = 1].
3.3. Neonatal outcomes
The median gestational age of the singleton newborns was 39 weeks [IQR 38–40 weeks] with a median birthweight of 3355 g [IQR 2965–3726 g]. One neonate was born with a cleft palate. During pregnancy, this neonate had been exposed to both adalimumab and TG and no genetic cause was detected. The median gestational age of the twins was 37 weeks with a median birthweight of 2470 g [IQR 2400–2510 g]. None of them had congenital abnormalities. Additional neonatal characteristics are provided in Table 2.
There was a trend towards higher prematurity [17.6%] and SGA [23.5%] rates in singleton pregnancies with active disease compared with those in remission [9.8% and 7.7%, respectively], with odds ratios of 1.98 [95% CI 0.47–8.41] and 3.69 [95% CI 0.91–14.92] respectively.
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit was indicated in eight newborns [7%] for the following indications: prematurity [n = 6], glucose monitoring/ neonatal hypoglycaemia [n = 1], or disturbances in the normal transitional process [n = 1]. Seventeen neonates [16%] were admitted to the neonatology ward unit for a variety of indications: prematurity [n = 4], glucose monitoring/ neonatal hypoglycaemia [n = 6], jaundice [n = 2], disturbances in the normal transitional process [n = 1], a suspected infection [n = 1], moaning and transient hypotonia [n = 1], observation because of a positive group B streptococcus [GBS] test [n = 1], and intrauterine exposure to TG [n = 1].
One of the newborns, initially admitted due to hypoglycaemia, developed hematochezia with an international normalised ratio [INR] of prothrombin time of 2.0 with a normal platelet count. After correcting the elevated INR with 1 mg of vitamin K, the rectal blood loss resolved, comprising a differential diagnosis including a Meckel’s diverticulum, colitis [either infectious, allergic, or caused by cytomegalovirus], or coagulopathy. Although this newborn developed a transient thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of 54 × 109/l, the rectal blood loss did not re-occur. In nine other newborns, the paediatrician was consulted mostly routinely due to maternal medication use [n = 8].
Laboratory testing for myelosuppresion in either umbilical cord blood or neonatal vein puncture was performed routinely in 16 neonates. Two of the tested neonates [13%] had anaemia at birth [Hb 8.3 and 7.4 mmol/L, respectively] and none had thrombocytopenia or leukopenia at birth. Umbilical cord 6-TGN concentration was only measured in one newborn [224 pmol/108 RBC]; the corresponding maternal 6-TGN concentration was not available. In 98 pregnancies, TG was continued after birth and breastfeeding was given to 38% of these children, without any reported complications. During one pregnancy TG was stopped at 28 weeks’ GA at patient request due to a breastfeeding wish; the reason why the other patients did not breastfeed was not reported.
3.4. Comparison with Dutch reference populations
Our outcomes were compared with the general Dutch population and with data from three Dutch cohort studies on the use of conventional thiopurines in pregnant IBD patients [Table 3.].15,17–19 Due to the relatively high percentage of twins [7.3%] in our cohort and the fact that twin pregnancies are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, both singleton pregnancies [n = 113] and all pregnancies [n = 117] were compared separately with the aforementioned reference populations.20 Neonatal outcomes matched with our rate of congenital abnormalities, birthweight, and gestational age at birth [Table 3.]. In addition, the rate of miscarriages, flare of disease activity, and rate of caesarean sections were comparable to our cohort [Table 3.].
Table 3.
Our cohort [singleton and twin pregnancies] | Our cohort [only singleton pregnancies] |
Jharap et al. [2014]15 | Kanis et al. [2017]18 | Kanis et al. [2021]17 | Perined [2020]19 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thioguanine [n = 117] | Thioguanine [n = 113] | Thiopurines [n = 41] |
Thiopurines [n = 146] | Non-exposed [n = 263] | Thiopurine monotherapy [n = 240] | Non-exposed [n = 564] | General Dutch population [n = 159 582] | |
Miscarriages [%] | 10 [8.5] | 10 [8.8] | 7 [17] | 35 [24.0] | 43 [16.3] | - | - | - |
Number of live-born children | 109 | 101 | 31 | 108 | 203 | 240 | 564 | 159 582 |
Twin pregnancies | 4 [7.3% of infants] | 0 | 1 [6.4 % of infants] | - | - | Max 8a | Max 8a | 0 |
Disease activity during pregnancy per live birth [%] | 17 [15.6] | 17 [16.8] | - | 31 [28.7] | 69 [34.7] | 45 [19] | 145 [26] | - |
Birthweight in g, median [IQR] | 3294 [2810–3696] | 3355 [2965–3726] | 3410 [3200 –3680] | 3360 [3018–3630] | 3326 [2898–3640] | 3300 [3000–3600] | 3300 [3000–3700] | 3000–3499 |
Gestational age in weeks, median [IQR] | 39 [37.9–40] | 39 [38–40] | 39 [38–40.1] | 38.6 [37.4–40] | 39.0 [38–40] | 39 [38–40] | 39 [38–40] | 39 [38–40] |
Preterm birth, n [% of infants] | 16 [15.1, n = 106] | 10 [10.2, n = 98] | 3 [9.7] | 12 [11.4] | 21 [10.4] | 33 [14] | 61 [11] | 8148 [5.1] |
Small for gestational age [%] | 13 [12.6, n = 103] | 10 [10.5, n = 95] | - | b | b | b | b | 14 422 [9.04] |
Low birthweight [%] | 10 [9.7, n = 103] | 6 [6.3, n = 95] | - | 10 [9.4] | 21 [10.4] | - | - | 6791 [4.3] |
Congenital abnormalities in live-born children [%] | 1 [0.9] | 1 [1] | 2 [6.5] | 4 [3.9] | 4 [2.1] | 8 [3] | 10 [2] | 854 [0.54] |
Caesarean section [%] | 33 [30] | 31 [31] | 14 [47] | - | - | 75 [32] | 142 [25] | 26 998 [16.9] |
IQR, interquartile range; Max, maximum.
a1000 live-born children included in this study, not specified in which subgroup the twin pregnancies occurred.
bCould not be determined due to the use of different definitions of small for gestational age.
4. Discussion
In this extended case series, the use of TG during pregnancy in IBD patients was not in excess associated with adverse maternal or neonatal outcome compared with cohort studies on the use of conventional thiopurines in pregnant IBD patients or the general population.
Conventional thiopurine treatment with AZA or MP during pregnancy in IBD patients is considered to be responsibly safe.4 Since the effector metabolites are similar for all thiopurines, but less additional metabolites are formed during the conversion of TG, a comparable impact on pregnancy outcome could be expected. In our study, the risk of a premature delivery in the singleton pregnancies [10%] was comparable to the risk reported in a study including 1712 pregnant IBD patients, in which 10% of the non-exposed and 13% of the conventional thiopurine exposed singleton pregnancies was a preterm delivery.3 In a Dutch study including 1000 children born to mothers with IBD, a similar risk of premature delivery was observed in both non-exposed [11%] and thiopurine-exposed [14%] patients, succesively.17 Since the risk of SGA is highly dependent on the reference population, we decided to compare our results only with Dutch populations.21 In the previously mentioned Dutch study, 3% of the thiopurine-exposed and 4% of the non-exposed children were born SGA, which is lower than the SGA rate in our cohort [10.5%].17 This difference is most likely caused by the use of a different and older Dutch reference curve and a different definition of SGA, namely a weight below 2 SD for gestational age.22 When we used the same definition and curve, in our population none of the children was born SGA, which would suggest that TG exposure in IBD patients is not associated with an increased risk of SGA. Moreover in the general population in The Netherlands, the risk of SGA in singleton pregnancies is 9%, which is more in line with our findings.19
The rate of congenital malformations among the live-born children in our cohort, namely one cleft palate, was lower than the pooled incidence rate of 2.1% found in a recent meta-analysis including infants born to women with IBD.23 A Dutch study, including 1000 children born to mothers with IBD, observed that 3.3% of the thiopurine-exposed children had a congenital abnormality, which was comparable [p = 0.2] to the 1.8% found in the non-exposed children.17 Comparable to intrauterine exposure to conventional thiopurines,3,17 intrauterine exposure to TG is in this series not associated in excess with abnormalities.
The rate of gestational diabetes in our cohort was comparable to the 5% prevalence reported in Europe, and the risk of a caesarean section was similar to the incidence reported in literature.3,24–26 A retrospective single-centre cohort study performed in The Netherlands observed that the incidence rate of preeclampsia varied between 6.2% and 8.2%, depending on the used definition.27 The rate of pre-eclampsia in our cohort was comparable to both the Dutch study and the incidence rate in Europe [5.3%].28
Of the pregnant women in our case series, 7% had an infectious complication requiring antibiotics, which is much lower than the observed percentage by a drug utilisation study in The Netherlands, which observed that 21% of all pregnant women were prescribed at least one antibiotic.29 We cannot rule an under-reporting of infectious complications in our study, even though we asked the treating physician who shared the data whether there were any medication changes during pregnancy. It remains possible that antibiotics were prescribed by the general practitioner without the knowledge of the gastroenterologist or gynaecologist. This makes it difficult to determine the precise maternal infection risk during TG therapy in our case series, although it is reassuring that none of the pregnant women needed to be admitted for an infection.
Primarily due to different definitions used in studies, the risk of neonatal anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia after intrauterine exposure to conventional thiopurines differs among studies. One study observed a neonatal anaemia rate of 60% [Hb < 10 mmol/L] and another observed a rate of 6% [Hb < 8.4 mmol/L].15,30 If we applied definitions similar to the ones applied in these studies, we calculated rates of 31% and 13%, respectively. The precise incidence of neonatal anaemia remains, however, difficult to determine since normal haemoglobin ranges of neonates are lacking due to ethical concerns of drawing blood from neonates to determine such ranges; therefore reference ranges are used. This makes it difficult to decide if intrauterine exposure to both conventional thiopurines and TG gives a true risk of myelotoxicity in neonates.
Breastfeeding was infrequently given in this cohort compared with the 69% breastfed children in the general Dutch population.31 A possible explanation might be a maternal fear of potential harmful effects to the infant or negative advice from the medical specialist due to a lack of data. Studies concerning the safety of maternal conventional thiopurine use described that breastfeeding is considered to be safe and is to be recommended due to beneficial effects, even though low concentrations of thiopurine metabolites could be detected in breast milk.32–34 Since TG has the same active metabolites one may assume that breastfeeding during TG treatment is safe, although data are lacking.
In this study a relative large cohort is represented, but we need to acknowledge several limitations. First, the inclusion of multiple pregnancies from the same individual [15%] could induce bias. Second, because of the design of the study, disease activity at conception was not documented and also dosage of medication was not calculated in mg/kg since data on maternal weight at conception were not registered consistently. Furthermore, in this series a formal control group with IBD patients treated with conventional thiopurines and a non-IBD control group are lacking, which makes it challenging to interpret our results. However, recently large, prospective studies about the safety of conventional thiopurines during conception and pregnancy have been published, including studies with a [comparable] Dutch population. This makes it possible to [indirectly] compare our results with existing literature and, as far as possible with a case series, draw a conclusion about the safety of TG during conception and pregnancy. Since maternal 6-TGN levels are only determined in 33 women, no firm conclusions can be drawn about the association between these levels and the occurrence of maternal and/or neonatal complications. We also recognise the probable existence of missed and therefore unreported cases. The under-reporting of miscarriages is also likely, since very early pregnancies might not be reported to the treating physician and miscarriages may occur before women know about a pregnancy.35 Moreover in the majority of neonates, follow-up was relatively short term and therefore nothing can be said about the long-term health outcomes.
In conclusion, intrauterine exposure to TG is not associated in excess with adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Follow-up data of the exposed children are needed to determine the long-term health outcomes.
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Hans Lubbinge from Tjongerschans Ziekenhuis for the inclusion of patients.
Contributor Information
Femke Crouwel, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Melek Simsek, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjon A de Boer, Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris J J Mulder, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emma M van Andel, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Rob H Creemers, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine [Co-MIK], Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Dirk P van Asseldonk, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Ad A van Bodegraven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine [Co-MIK], Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Carmen S Horjus, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Marijn C Visschedijk, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Angelique L M Weusthuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Margien L Seinen, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bindia Jharap, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Fiona D M van Schaik, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ishfaq Ahmad, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, The Netherlands.
Paul J Boekema, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Greetje J Tack, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Louktje Wormmeester, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Treant Zorggroep, Emmen-Hoogeveen-Stadskanaal, The Netherlands.
Maurice W M D Lutgens, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Petra G A van Boeckel, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Lennard P L Gilissen, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Marjon Kerkhof, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
Maurice G V M Russel, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Frank Hoentjen, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Maartje E Bartelink, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Johan P Kuijvenhoven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Jeroen W J Maljaars, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willemijn A van Dop, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Janneke Wonders, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Michael M P J A van der Voorn, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Hans J C Buiter, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanne K de Boer, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Funding
This work was supported as an investigator sponsored study by Teva Nederland who provided a courtesy medical review of the manuscript. The authors independently designed and conducted the study and prepared the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
FC, MAdB, CJJM, EMvA, RHC, CSH, MCV, ALMW, MLS, BJ, IA, PJB, GJT, LW, MWMDL, PGAvB, MK, MGVMR, FH, MEB, WAvD, JW, MMPJAvdV and HJCB have nothing to declare. MS has received an unrestricted research grant from TEVA. DPvA served as speaker, adviser, and/or principal investigator for Dr Falk, Ferring, Galapagos/Gilead, and Takeda, and received research grants from Janssen and Dr Falk. AAvB served as speaker, adviser, and/or principal investigator for AbbVie, Arandal, Arena Pharmaceuticals/Pfizer, Celgene, Ferring, Galapagos/Gilead, Janssen/Johnson and Johnson, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Pfizer, Receptos, Roche, Takeda, TEVA, Bristol Myers Squibb, and received research grants from TEVA, Eurostars funding, ZonMW, and Pfizer. FDMvS served as adviser for Takeda, Galapagos, and Dr Falk. LPLG has served as a speaker for AbbVie and Boston, and received a grant from Ferring to develop e-learning about therapeutic drug monitoring. JPK has served as an adviser for AbbVie and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson. PWJM has served as a speaker for Janssen, Galapagos, and Takeda, and received research grants from Galapagos and Takeda. NKdB has served as a speaker for AbbVie and MSD, has served as consultant and principal investigator for TEVA Pharma BV and Takeda, and received unrestricted research grants from Dr. Falk, TEVA Pharma BV, MLDS, and Takeda.
Author Contributions
FC, MS, MAdB, CJJM, and NKdB contributed to the design of the study. FC, MS, CJJM, EMvA, RHC, DPvA, AAvB, CSH, MCV, ALMW, MLS, BJ, FDMvS, IA, PJB, GJT, HL, LW, MWMDL, PGAvB, LPLG, MK, MGVMR, FH, MEB, JPK, PWJM, WAvD, JW, MMPJAvdV, and NKdB identified and included patients. FC analysed the data. FC drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.
Conference presentation: a previous version of this manuscript was presented as a poster presentation at the online ECCO conference of 2021 and as an oral presentation at the Dutch Digestive Disease Days 2021.
References
- 1. Nørgård B, Hundborg HH, Jacobsen BA, Nielsen GL, Fonager K.. Disease activity in pregnant women with Crohn’s disease and birth outcomes: a regional Danish cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1947–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Tandon P, Lee EY, Maxwell C, et al. Fecal calprotectin may predict adverse pregnancy-related outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 2021;66:1639–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mahadevan U, Long MD, Kane SV, et al.; Crohn’s Colitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after fetal exposure to biologics and thiopurines among women with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2021;160:1131–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. van der Woude CJ, Ardizzone S, Bengtson MB, et al.; European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. The second European evidenced-based consensus on reproduction and pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2015;9:107–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zaza G, Cheok M, Krynetskaia N, et al. Thiopurine pathway. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2010;20:573–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. van den Berg SA, de Boer M, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, et al. Safety of tioguanine during pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2016;10:159–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. de Boer NK, Van Elburg RM, Wilhelm AJ, et al. 6-Thioguanine for Crohn’s disease during pregnancy: thiopurine metabolite measurements in both mother and child. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:1374–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hoftiezer L, Hof MHP, Dijs-Elsinga J, et al. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al.; International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy [ISSHP]. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertension 2018;13:291–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel J-F.. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 2006;55:749–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Federatie Medische Specialisten. Miskraam. 2020. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/miskraam/startpagina_-_miskraam.html,2022. Accessed October, 2022.
- 12. Dervieux T, Boulieu R.. Simultaneous determination of 6-thioguanine and methyl 6-mercaptopurine nucleotides of azathioprine in red blood cells by HPLC. Clin Chem 1998;44:551–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lennard L, Singleton HJ.. High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of the methyl and nucleotide metabolites of 6-mercaptopurine: quantitation of red blood cell 6-thioguanine nucleotide, 6-thioinosinic acid and 6-methylmercaptopurine metabolites in a single sample. J Chromatogr 1992;583:83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wilhelm AJ, de Boer KHN, de Graaf P, et al. . TDM monografie thiopurines. 2018. https://tdm-monografie.org/thiopurines/. Accessed March, 2022.
- 15. Jharap B, de Boer NKH, Stokkers P, et al.; Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis. Intrauterine exposure and pharmacology of conventional thiopurine therapy in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2014;63:451–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jopling J, Henry E, Wiedmeier SE, Christensen RD.. Reference ranges for haematocrit and blood haemoglobin concentration during the neonatal period: data from a multihospital health care system. Pediatrics 2009;123:e333–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kanis SL, Modderman S, Escher JC, et al.; Initiative on Crohns and Colitis [ICC]. Health outcomes of 1000 children born to mothers with inflammatory bowel disease in their first 5 years of life. Gut 2021;70:1266–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kanis SL, de Lima-Karagiannis A, de Boer NKH, van der Woude CJ.. Use of thiopurines during conception and pregnancy is not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes or health of infants at one year in a prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;15:1232–41.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dutch Birth Registry (Perined). 2022. www.peristat.nl Accessed April 14, 2022.
- 20. Murray SR, Stock SJ, Cowan S, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth prevention in multiple pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol2018;20:57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Katz J, Wu LA, Mullany LC, et al. Prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and its mortality risk varies by choice of birth-weight-for-gestation reference population. PLoS One 2014;9: e92074–e92074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Visser GHA, Eilers PHC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Merkus HMWM, Wit JM.. New Dutch reference curves for birthweight by gestational age. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:737–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Leung KK, Tandon P, Govardhanam V, Maxwell C, Huang V.. The risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with maternal inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020;27:550–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Eades CE, Cameron DM, Evans JMM.. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;129:173–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bortoli A, Pedersen N, Duricova D, et al. ; European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] Study Group of Epidemiological Committee [EpiCom]. Pregnancy outcome in inflammatory bowel disease: prospective European case-control ECCO-EpiCom study, 2003–2006. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:724–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Tandon P, Diong C, Chong RY, Nguyen GC.. Regional variation in pregnancy outcomes amongst women in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;2021:3037128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bouter AR, Duvekot JJ.. Evaluation of the clinical impact of the revised ISSHP and ACOG definitions on preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2020;19:206–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, et al. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2013;170:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. de Jonge L, Bos HJ, van Langen IM, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Bakker MK.. Antibiotics prescribed before, during and after pregnancy in the Netherlands: a drug utilization study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014;23:60–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Flanagan E, Wright EK, Hardikar W, et al.; PICCOLO Study Group. Maternal thiopurine metabolism during pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease and clearance of thiopurine metabolites and outcomes in exposed neonates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021;53:810–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nederlands Centrum Jeugdgezondheid. Rapport peiling melkvoeding 2018 [Milk feeding survey report 2018]. 2020. https://assets.ncj.nl/docs/4353efb6-135e-4ef4-8afb-a1b6f772995c.pdf. Accessed March, 2022.
- 32. Sau A, Clarke S, Bass J, et al. Azathioprine and breastfeeding—is it safe? BJOG 2007;114:498–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Christensen LA, Dahlerup JF, Nielsen MJ, Fallingborg JF, Schmiegelow K.. Azathioprine treatment during lactation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;28:1209–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gardiner SJ, Gearry RB, Roberts RL, Zhang M, Barclay ML, Begg EJ.. Exposure to thiopurine drugs through breast milk is low based on metabolite concentrations in mother-infant pairs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62:453–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988;319:189–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]