Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0281496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281496

Parkin-mediated mitophagy is negatively regulated by FOXO3A, which inhibits Plk3-mediated mitochondrial ROS generation in STZ diabetic stress-treated pancreatic β cells

Ji Yeon Shim 1,#, Jin Ook Chung 2,#, Dawa Jung 3,#, Pil Soo Kang 3, Seon-Young Park 2, Ayse Tuba Kendi 4, Val J Lowe 4,*, SeungBaek Lee 4,5,*
Editor: Prasanth Puthanveetil6
PMCID: PMC10155949  PMID: 37134105

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most researched metabolic diseases worldwide. It leads to extensive complications such as cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, retinopathy, and peripheral and central nervous system through an inability to produce or respond to insulin. Although oxidative stress-mediated mitophagy has been reported to play an important role in the pathogenesis of DM, specific studies are still lacking as well as remain highly controversial. Here, we found that Parkin-mediated mitophagy in pancreatic β cells under streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic stress was induced by Polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3) and inhibited by the transcription factor Forkhead Box O3A (FOXO3A). STZ stress induces mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin through Plk3-mediated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which causes pancreatic cell damage. Conversely, FOXO3A acts as negative feedback to prevent diabetic stress by inhibiting Plk3. Meanwhile, antioxidants including N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and natural COA water scientifically block these mitochondrial ROS and mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin by inhibiting Plk3. Through a 3D organoid ex vivo model, we confirmed that not only ROS inhibitors but also mitophagy inhibitory factors such as 3-MA or Parkin deletion can compensate for pancreatic cell growth and insulin secretion under STZ diabetic stress. These findings suggest that the Plk3-mtROS-PINK1-Parkin axis is a novel mitophagy process that inhibits pancreatic β-cell growth and insulin secretion and FOXO3A and antioxidants may provide new alternatives for effective diabetes treatment strategies in the future.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by abnormally high blood glucose, which can lead to serious microvascular (diabetic kidney disease, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic neuropathy) and macrovascular (coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease) complications [118]. DM is a heterogeneous disease with a common feature of hyperglycemia [1, 3, 12, 19]. Pancreatic β-cell dysfunction resulting in a relative or absolute insulin deficiency is a key process in the development of DM [3, 6, 8, 9, 15, 18, 19]. In addition, residual β-cell function even in patients with preexisting DM might be associated with better clinical outcomes, including less hypoglycemia and microvascular complications [26, 815, 1720]. Therefore, protecting the secretory function of β-cell is important from a clinical viewpoint for the treatment of DM [2, 3, 7, 11, 12, 18, 19]. Although many studies are being conducted on the development of therapeutic agents as well as the study of diabetes-related mechanisms, there are still very few alternatives to the causes and specific solutions. Streptozotocin (STZ) is one of the convenient agents for the study of diabetes-related mechanisms occurring in cells by direct treatment in animals and pancreatic cells [1, 9, 1517].

Recently, oxidative stress is well known to be associated with the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases, including diabetes and complications [1, 8, 11, 12, 14, 1921]. Increased ROS levels were observed in diabetic states, which are closely related to increased modified mitochondrial metabolites, altered mitochondrial proteins, and decreased expression of antioxidant enzymes [7, 1012, 14, 1921]. In the diabetic heart, mitochondria overproduce mitochondrial ROS by hyperglycemic conditions, which play an important role in the formation and development of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) [4, 5, 10, 16, 22, 23]. Also, excessive amounts of glucose increase mitochondrial ROS in hyperglycemia-sensitive cells, which impairs mitochondrial function in the cells [11, 19, 24]. And ROS induces insulin resistance in the body by inactivating the mechanism of interaction between the insulin receptor and the glucose transport system [3, 24]. Diabetes is also a key regulator of atherosclerosis through ROS [10, 12]. Mitophagy, one of autophagy, is stimulated by decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and an increase in ROS [5, 21, 2527]. This triggers the recruitment of PTEN Induced Kinase 1 (PINK1)-Parkin complex in the mitochondrial outer membrane [17, 21, 22, 2529]. Upon mitochondrial depolarization, PINK1 accumulates in the outer membrane of mitochondria and induces phosphorylation of Ser65 of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin, resulting in its translocation to the mitochondria [17, 21, 22, 27, 28]. Mitophagy plays a role in maintaining cellular metabolism by preventing oxidative stress in the diabetic heart [4, 5, 22, 23]. Expression of mitophagy, including autophagy, was markedly suppressed in the heart of the T1D animal model [6, 16, 30]. However there are recent many reports that the activation of mitophagy has a negative effect on DCM, high-fat diet (HFD) in patients with T2D, or hyposalivation of the submandibular gland in db/db mice, so there are still a lot of controversies [5, 17, 22, 23, 31]. Therefore, Parkin-mediated mitophagy research on diabetes requires various approaches and specific mechanism studies using in vitro cell studies, in vivo animal experiments, and ex vivo 3D organoid systems.

In this study, we found the mitochondrial translocation of Parkin in pancreatic β cells under STZ diabetes-induced stress. Parkin is affected by Plk3-induced mitochondrial ROS, and at this time, PINK1 phosphorylation results in the recruitment of Parkin into the mitochondria. Conversely, FOXO3A induced by antioxidants directly inhibits Plk3, thus suppressing the ultimate role of mitophagy in STZ-treated pancreatic cells. Although the mitophagy of Parkin has a negative effect on beta cell growth and insulin secretion, antioxidants and mitophagy inhibitors can inhibit Parkin translocation for mitophagy by inhibiting PINK1 activity.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cell lines and reagents

All cell lines were sourced from commercial vendors. Beta TC-6 and Beta TC-tet mouse islet cell lines (S1 Fig in S1 File) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) with 15% FBS and Streptomycin and Penicillin. The cells and reagents were prepared in the same way as in the previous study [9]. Briefly, this medium was sterilized immediately by filtration using a membrane with a porosity of 0.2 micrometers. Streptozotocin (STZ, CAS 18883-66-4) was purchased from Calbiochem. Carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP, C2759), N-acetylcysteine (NAC, 616-91-1), Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 7722-84-1), and 3-methyladenine (3-MA, M9281) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. MitoSOX was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Paraformaldehyde Solution (MFCD00133991) and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 62248) were purchased from Thermo Scientific.

2.2. Transmission electron microscopy

After STZ treatment, two Beta TC-6 and Beta TC-tet mouse pancreas islet cells were washed with 1xPBS at 4°C, and then attached cells were separated from the culture dish with Trypsin-EDTA. The centrifuged pancreas β cells were fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer (0.1M sodium cacodylate, 2mM MgCl2) at 4°C. Samples were washed at least 3 times with cacodylate buffer stored in a cold state, and then post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour. The samples were reacted with propylene oxide for solvent displacement and embedded in Eponate 812 (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) resin, and the samples were sectioned with an ultramicrotome. Sections were examined at 60 kV with a JEM-1200EX electron microscope (JEOL; Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) and there the organelles were observed and quantified.

2.3. Plasmids, gene silencing by siRNAs and lentiviral shRNAs

Parkin’s constructs have been described previously [28, 29, 32]. GFP, Flag-tagged PINK1, or Flag-FOXO3A or were purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA). Plk3 WT plasmid was generated by inserting the full-length Plk3 cDNA amplified from the pcDNA3-HA-Parkin plasmid. FOXO3A siRNAs were purchased from Invitrogen (Tokyo, Japan). Lentiviral-Parkin or PINK1 shRNAs were manufactured by dividing the gene target area into three areas and detailed sequence information is described in section S1 Fig in S1 File.

2.4. Transient transfection, viral infection, and stable transduction

For transient overexpression studies, Beta TC-6 cells are first discarded of the existing serum-containing medium, rinsed 3 times with 1xPBS, and then replaced with a serum-free medium and left for 5 minutes. Then, the cells were transiently transfected with Flag or Flag-tagged Plk3 (or GFP-tagged PINK1 and Parkin) with a transfection reagent such as lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). After 6 hours, discard the serum-free medium containing the transfection reagent and rinse again with 1xPBS. After changing the medium to which fresh serum has been added, the cells are cultured for 24 h, and then, gene expression is checked under a fluorescence microscope. For viral infection, Beta TC-6 cells were performed at a cell density of 60–70%, and the cell culture medium was pretreated with polybrene one day before. PINK1, Parkin, or FOXO3A lentiviral shRNAs (S1 Fig in S1 File) were infected with cells for 12 hours and then replaced with fresh medium. Cells infected with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) were selectively harvested. Control shRNA was simultaneously performed as a negative control. Infection or transfection of vectors was prepared in the same way as in the previous study [9, 28, 3234].

2.5. Measurement of mitochondrial ROS production or Parkin mitochondria translocation using immunofluorescence assay

Beta TC-6 cells were treated with STZ (50 μM) for 12 h or Carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP, 10 μM) for 4 h. Cells were washed 3 times with 1xPBS and then cells were fixed with 0.3% formaldehyde. And then cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope and quantified. For measurement of mitochondrial ROS production, cells were transfected with DNA vectors using lipofectamine for gene overexpression or infected with lentiviral vector for suppression of specific gene. Cells were transfected or infected with the indicated plasmids (Flag or Flag-PINK1, HA-Plk3, Control shRNA or PINK1 shRNA) and then cells were treated with streptozotocin for 18 h or H2O2 (10 μM) for 12 h (sometimes, 10 mM NAC or natural COA water). Cells were stained with MitoSOX (5 μM) for 30 min and then cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence assay and quantified. For measurement of Parkin mitochondrial recruitment, GFP-Parkin overexpressed beta cells were transfected with or infected with the indicated plasmids (Flag or Flag-PINK1, HA-Plk3, Control shRNA or PINK1 shRNA) and then cells were treated with streptozotocin for 18 h or H2O2 (10 μM) for 12 h. Cells were washed 3 times with 1xPBS and then cells were fixed with 0.3% formaldehyde. Among the cells overexpressed in GFP-Parkin, only the cells simultaneously expressed with HA-Plk3 were observed under a fluorescence microscope and quantified. The experiment was conducted three times independently. Intracellular ROS production was measured using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus LX71 microscope), and the images were analyzed using MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging, Westchester, PA). Analysis using a fluorescent microscope was prepared in the same way as in the previous study [9, 28, 32, 33].

2.6. Western blot analysis and antibodies

Protein lysate samples from two different pancreatic beta-cell lines were lysed by RIPA lysis buffer on ice supplemented with protease inhibitors, including 1 mM PMSF. Protein lysate samples were separated by preparing stacking gel and 10–15% separating gel during 4–8 h, and then transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked in TBS-T buffer in 5% fat-free milk for one hour at room temperature. Next, the PVDF membrane was incubated with primary antibodies. The membrane was washed three times for 1% TBST and subsequently incubated for one hour with related rabbit anti-mouse IgG-HRP secondary antibodies (Abcam). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies recognizing PINK1 (ab23707) or Plk3 (PA5-97143) were obtained from Abcam or Invitrogen. Rabbit polyclonal antibody recognizing Parkin (#2132), LC3B (#2775), or VDAC (V2139) was purchased from Cell Signaling or Sigma. Anti-beta-actin mouse antibodies were purchased from Sigma. Protein change confirmation analysis using immunoblotting has been described previously [9, 28, 3234].

2.7. Mitochondria and cytosolic fractionation

To confirm the protein expression of Parkin translocation to the mitochondria, Beta TC-6 mouse pancreas islet cells β cells were harvested in Mitochondria/Cytosol Fractionation Kit (Abcam, ab65320). Briefly, single pancreatic cells (1x107) from which the culture medium was cleared were placed in 1 ml of 1x Cytosol Extraction Buffer Mix (containing DTT and Protease Inhibitors) at 4°C for 10 minutes. Single pancreatic cells were homogenized by passing through a chilled tissue grinder 50 times. At this time, it was checked whether there were any shining cells (cell membranes) from passage 40. Homogenize cells were centrifuged at 600 × g (3000 rpm) to discard the pellet containing the nucleus and damaged cells, and the supernatant was collected. In the supernatant transferred to a new tube, the re-supernatant was collected for the cytoplasmic fraction via a speed centrifuge at 10,000 x g (14,000 rpm) for 30 min. Here, the pellet was solubilized with 100 μl of the Mitochondrial Extraction Buffer Mix (containing DTT and protease inhibitors) for mitochondrial fractionation. VDAC antibody was used as a marker of mitochondria and tubulin antibody was used as a cytoplasmic marker.

2.8. 3D organoid assay and insulin measurement

For 3D organoid assays, mouse islet Beta TC-6 or Beta TC-tet cells were cultured on NanoCulture plates (Scivax, Japan). Pancreatic cells grown in a 2D tissue culture dish were made into a single cell state using 2xTrypsin-EDTA, and after centrifugation (600 × g, 3000 rpm), 500 cells were prepared to enter each well of the culture dish. After seeding cells, cell sphere numbers were observed and recovered for 6 or 7 days. To check whether the pancreatic cells secrete insulin under 50 nM STZ or 10 nM H2O2, pancreatic cells were cultured for 5 days in five different 3D NanoCulture plates. At the same time, cells were also treated with antioxidants (including 1 μM NAC or natural COA water) for 5 days or mitophagy inhibition factors (including 5 μM 3-MA or Parkin shRNA), and then cell spheres formation were observed with a microscope for insulin secretion study. Cells were incubated with 3 mM glucose or 25 mM glucose in KRBH buffer for 1 h. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of the supernatant medium was measured by Crystal Chem ELISA kit (Downers Grove, IL) 3D organoid study ex vivo was prepared in the same way as in the previous study [9, 33, 34]. The amount of insulin secreted by pancreatic cell spheres was normalized to total cell protein.

2.9. Statistical analysis

At least three independent replicates were assessed for each of the in vitro or ex vivo experiments, and pooled data were presented as mean ± standard error. Results were expressed as individual data points or as the mean ± S.D. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical comparisons of scatter plots and bar graphs were performed by using either the one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or 2-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons with Holm-Sidak post hoc test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05(*), P<0.01(**), and P<0.001(***), ns: not significant. Statistical analysis has been described previously [9, 28, 3234].

3. Results

3.1. The mitochondrial translocation of Parkin for mitophagy is activated by mitochondrial ROS in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes stress

Since several recent studies have reported that diabetes is affected by mitophagy [5, 6, 13, 17, 22, 23, 25, 31], we hypothesized that Parkin could play an important role in mitochondria in pancreatic cells in diabetes. We observed many mitophagy-related vesicles in Beta TC-6 islet cell lines treated with streptozotocin (STZ) diabetes stress through electron microscopy (Fig 1A and 1B). These results were also found in another pancreatic cell, Beta TC-tet (Fig 1B). In addition, we confirmed that STZ stress increased the mitochondrial ROS to a level similar to that of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), a mitophagy inducer [6, 17, 21, 2729, 32] (Fig 1C and 1D). However, no changes in the expression of endogenous Parkin and PINK1 proteins in pancreatic β cells were observed with both STZ and CCCP treatments, although increased Cleavage of LC3 (LC-3II) expression was seen (Fig 1E). As the translocation of Parkin to depolarized mitochondria for mitophagy in cells damaged by ROS occurs in various cells [2, 46, 8, 1014, 16, 19, 25, 26, 31], we monitored the protein movement of Parkin under STZ diabetic stress. Parkin overexpressed in Beta TC-6 cells in general culture condition was blurred throughout the cells but aggregated in the form of Parkin-specific dots (Parkin puncta formation) [21, 27] in STZ-treated cells. (Fig 1F). Since CCCP induces a marked translocation of Parkin from the cytoplasm to the mitochondria [6, 17, 21, 27], it appears that STZ also translocates Parkin to depolarized mitochondria because punctuate staining of autophagosome-localized LC3-II in pancreatic cells under STZ treatment was observed at the same location as Parkin protein. In the mitochondrial fractionation assay, we also verified that Parkin protein expression was more detected in mitochondrial samples under STZ stimulation compared to controls, indicating that Parkin was translocated from the cytoplasm to mitochondria under diabetic stress (Fig 1G). These results suggest that Parkin is recruited to mitochondria using mitochondrial ROS for mitophagy under STZ diabetes stress.

Fig 1. The mitochondrial translocation of Parkin for mitophagy is activated by mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes stress.

Fig 1

(A, B) Beta TC-6 or Beta TC-tet cells were treated with streptozotocin (STZ, 50 μM) for 72 h. Cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde and then cut cell sections were observed with an electron microscope (A) and quantified (B). Scale bars, 2 μm. (C, D, E) Beta TC-6 cells were treated with STZ (50 μM) for 12 h or Carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP, 10 μM) for 4 h. Cells were stained with MitoSOX (5 μM) for 30 min, and cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (C) and quantified (D). Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with the antibodies indicated (E). Quantification of PlNK1, and Parkin levels relative to β-actin levels. (F) Cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and then cells were treated with streptozotocin and observed by fluorescence microscopy. (G) Beta TC-6 cells were treated with 50 μM STZ for 72 h. Cells homogenized with a grinder were classified into mitochondria and cytoplasm, and then protein changes were confirmed by immunoblotting with the antibodies indicated. ***P < 0.001. All experiments (IF) were repeated independently at least three times with similar results. Representative images, scale bar, 20 μm. All statistical comparison of scatter plot and bar graph was performed by repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons test.

3.2. PINK1 regulates mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin through mitochondrial ROS in diabetes stress

Previous studies have reported that activated PINK1, by mitochondrial damage, accumulates in the outer mitochondrial membrane and phosphorylates Parkin, thereby helping the recruitment of Parkin to dysfunctional mitochondria [5, 21, 22, 2528, 32]. This induces intracellular mitophagy by the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of Parkin [21, 22, 2528, 32]. First, we checked whether the STZ stress-induced mitochondrial ROS induction is regulated by PINK1. Deletion of PINK1 (Fig 2A, S1 Fig in S1 File) had no effect on mitochondrial ROS in Beta TC-6 pancreatic cells compared to Control (Fig 2B and 2C). STZ-treated PINK1-deleted cells were also similar to STZ-treated alone. Furthermore, we confirmed that cells treated with Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2), a key contributor to intracellular ROS-dependent signaling, also showed results like that of STZ stimulation conditions (Fig 2C). However, interestingly, the deleted PINK1 gene suppressed the translocation of Parkin to the mitochondria via STZ stress-induced mitochondrial ROS (Fig 2D and 2E). The same effect of deletion of PINK1 was also shown in other pancreatic cells, Beta TC-tet (Fig 2E). Using mitochondrial fractionation assay, we further confirmed whether the translocation of Parkin to mitochondria is regulated by PINK1. As shown in Fig 2F, Parkin protein was highly expressed in STZ-treated control shRNA (as Fig 1G), whereas it was significantly reduced in PINK1-deleted cells (Fig 2F). Taken together, these data suggest that PINK1 induces mitochondrial translocation of Parkin by diabetic stress-related mitochondrial ROS.

Fig 2. PINK1 regulates mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin through mitochondrial ROS in diabetes stress.

Fig 2

(A) Beta TC-6 cells were infected with the indicated plasmids and then cells were observed for changes in PINK1 protein by immunoblotting. (B, C, D, E) Beta TC-6 cells or Beta TC-tet were infected with the indicated and then cells were treated with streptozotocin for 18 h or H2O2 (10 μM) for 12 h. Cells were stained with MitoSOX (5 μM) for 30 min and then cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence assay (B) and quantified (C). Beta TC-6 cells or Beta TC-tet were transfected with GFP-Parkin and then cells were infected with the indicated plasmids (D, E). After 24h, Cells were treated with streptozotocin for 18 h, and then cells were observed by fluorescence microscopy (D) and quantified (E). Representative images, scale bar, 20 μm. Statistical comparison of scatter plot and bar graph was performed by repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s., non-specific. All experiments were repeated independently at least three times with similar results. (F) Beta TC-6 cells were infected with the indicated plasmids and then cells were treated with streptozotocin for 24 h, and then cells were then observed for protein changes by immunoblotting after mitochondrial fractionation.

3.3. FOXO3A block mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin by negatively regulating Plk3 increased by diabetic stress

To inhibit the mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin in abnormal pancreatic cells, we investigated how to reduce the mitochondrial ROS amplified by diabetic stress. In S2A Fig in S1 File, we found that N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), a ROS scavenger [7, 8, 10, 21, 26], significantly inhibited mitochondrial ROS in STZ-treated Beta TC-6 cells. Also, we have previously reported that natural COA water suppresses the generation of unstable mitochondrial ROS by negatively blocking STZ-induced Plk3 expression in pancreatic β cells [9], confirming that this effect is very comparable to that of NAC (S2A Fig in S1 File). We found that this antioxidant effect was equally suppressed in PINK1 gene overexpressed cells, suggesting that PINK1 is directly affected by mitochondrial ROS regulation. Furthermore, we hypothesized that antioxidants would have a negative effect on the mitochondrial translocation of Parkin stimulated by STZ diabetic stress-mediated mitochondrial ROS. The recruitment of Parkin in mitochondria in STZ-treated cells was dramatically prevented by both NAC and natural COA water (Fig 3A), suggesting that Parkin translocation is mitochondrial ROS-dependent. Interestingly, PINK1 overexpressing cells were not at all affected by antioxidant treatment, and Parkin’s mitochondrial recruitment proceeded smoothly. These results suggest that PINK1 is activated regardless of the presence of upstream mitochondrial ROS, as it is already activated intracellularly by PINK1 gene overexpression. This means that this diabetic stress process leads to the mitochondrial ROS-PINK1-Parkin axis. Here, we could understand that the mitochondrial ROS signaling system must precede the migration of PINK1 and Parkin to the outer mitochondrial membrane. As a previous study reported that STZ stress increases mitochondrial ROS through intracellular Plk3 gene activity [9], we investigated whether Plk3 is also involved in the mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin. As shown in S2B Fig in S1 File, we first confirmed that overexpression of Plk3 increased mitochondrial ROS in beta cells and this also showed the effect of recruiting Parkin to the mitochondria (Fig 3B). However, antioxidants including NAC and natural COA water completely blocked the ROS effects of Plk3 (S2B Fig in S1 File). Plk3-overexpressing pancreatic beta cells induced the mitochondrial ROS or Parkin’s mitochondrial recruitment in higher amounts when treated with STZ than Plk3 alone, however, these increased amounts were the same as when treated with STZ alone (S2B Fig in S1 File and Fig 3B) indicating that it is an effect of STZ rather than an effect increased by the overexpression of the Plk3 gene. Meanwhile, both antioxidants effectively suppressed all STZ stress-Plk3 effects, such as mitochondrial ROS generation and mitochondrial translocation of Parkin (S2B Fig in S1 File and Fig 3B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that Plk3 is the main regulator of the recruitment of Parkin to the mitochondrial membrane, including PINK1, which induces mitochondrial ROS under STZ diabetic stress. Taken together, it can be suggested that the diabetic stress signal has the Plk3-mtROS-PINK1-Parkin pathway. A recent study reported that transcription factor FOXO3A is closely related to autophagy proteins in somatic cells of various organs, including stem cells, and that it regulates ROS-related metabolism by regulating mitochondrial genes [3537]. We first confirmed that overexpression of the FOXO3A gene significantly inhibited the increase of mitochondrial ROS induced by STZ stress (S3 Fig in S1 File). We also found that this role of FOXO3A also had the effect of significantly reducing Parkin mitochondrial recruitment when compared to STZ-treated cells in mitochondrial fractionation and immunofluorescence assays (Fig 3C and 3D). Meanwhile, the deficiency of FOXO3A does not appear to decrease the mitochondrial translocation of Parkin even after the treatment with antioxidants (Fig 3D), suggesting that the presence of FOXO3A is important for antioxidants for their role. In addition, co-deletion of FOXO3A and Plk3 genes again reduced mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin more significantly compared to the FOXO3A gene alone (Fig 3D), suggesting that FOXO3A blocks mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin by negatively regulating Plk3 increased by diabetic stress.

Fig 3. FOXO3A block mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin by negatively regulating Plk3 increased by diabetic stress.

Fig 3

(A, B, D) GFP-Parkin overexpressed Beta TC-6 cells were treated with streptozotocin for 12 h and then cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids or treated with antioxidants including NAC (10 mM) or natural COA water for 12 h. Cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence assay and quantified. Statistical comparison of scatter plot and bar graph was performed by repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s., non-specific. All experiments were repeated independently at least three times with similar results. (C) Beta TC-6 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and then cells were treated with streptozotocin for 24 h, and then cells were then observed for protein changes by immunoblotting after mitochondrial fractionation.

3.4. The decrease in insulin secretion of pancreatic beta cells derived from mitophagy of Parkin in the 3D organoid (ex vivo) model is compensated by antioxidants or FOXO3A

To investigate whether pancreatic β cells secrete insulin in an ex vivo model, we cultured each different 3D organoid nanomaterial dishes [38, 39] from groups treated with various diabetes-induced stresses. First, we confirmed the growth of pancreatic β islet cells in the 3D ex vivo culture, and these cells began to take on a spherical shape after 5 days of culture (Fig 4A). As shown in Fig 4B and 4C, STZ damage blocked the growth of pancreatic β cells in the 3D organoid model, and this cell growth inhibition was also the same for H2O2. However, two antioxidants, NAC and natural COA water significantly protected the growth of STZ- or H2O2-damaged cells, suggesting that stabilized ROS in cells positively affects beta cell proliferation and maintenance (Fig 4B and 4C). These effects were also found in Parkin shRNA and 3-Methyladenine (3-MA), a mitophagy inhibition factors, and overexpression of FOXO3A suggesting that mitophagy negatively affects the growth of pancreatic cells, similar to the function of antioxidants In a previous study, we already reported that natural COA water significantly restored the restricted insulin secretion of pancreatic cells by STZ diabetic stress stimulation [9]. In 3D ex vivo culture (Fig 4D), most of the pancreatic cells stimulated with a low concentration of glucose (3 mM glucose) secreted very small amounts of insulin, but a large amount of insulin was measured in the group treated with a high concentration of glucose (25 mM glucose). We found that insulin secretion by high-concentration glucose stimulation in the supernatant medium of STZ-treated pancreatic β cells was significantly lower than that of control pancreatic cells and that this decrease in insulin secretion was restored by two antioxidants, NAC or natural COA water (Fig 4D). Similarly, the recovery of insulin secretion in beta cells decreased by STZ treatment was similarly confirmed in the loss of the Parkin gene, overexpression of FOXO3A, 3-MA treatment. Collectively, these data indicate that restricted mitochondrial ROS and mitophagy processes are required for stable cell proliferation and insulin secretion of pancreatic cells. From the above, we suggest that blocking the Plk3-Parkin-mediated mitophagy using antioxidants or FOXO3A gene might be one of the future diabetes treatment and prevention methods (Fig 4E).

Fig 4. The decrease in insulin secretion of pancreatic beta cells derived from mitophagy of Parkin in the 3D organoid (ex vivo) model is compensated by antioxidants or FOXO3A.

Fig 4

(A) The schematic model for experimental cell culture design. Unlike 2D (left), 3D organoid cell culture (right) contains special nanomaterial at the bottom of the culture dish, so the cells grow more stably and are almost formed in the shape of real cells like human organs or cells. (B, C) After 2 days of incubation in a 3D Nano-Culture Plate (NCP) dish, Beta TC-6 cells were treated with streptozotocin (5 μM) or H2O2 (1 μM) for 5 days. At the same time, cells were also treated with antioxidants (including 1 μM NAC or natural COA water), mitophagy inhibition factors including 5 μM 3-MA, Parkin shRNA, or FOXO3A for 5 days, and then cell spheres were observed with a microscope (B) and quantified (C). (D) Cells were incubated with 3 mM glucose or 25 mM glucose in KRBH buffer for 1 h. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of the supernatant medium in each classified cultured islet sphere sample (n = 3 per group) was measured by ELISA kit. Insulin secretion was normalized to total protein content. All statistical comparison of scatter plot and bar graph was performed by repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. All experiments were repeated independently at least three times with similar results. (E) The schematic model. Parkin is a key regulator of mitophagy-mediated pancreatic cell damage by mitochondrial translocation. The mitophagy role of the PINK1-Parkin axis is regulated by the increase in mitochondrial ROS induced by Polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3). Transcription factor FOXO3A induced by antioxidants directly inhibits Plk3, thus suppressing the ultimate role of mitophagy in STZ-treated pancreatic cells. FOXO3A as a negative feedback loop blocks mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin by negatively regulating Plk3 increased by diabetic stress, thereby stabilizing pancreatic cells.

4. Discussion

Parkin is a vital regulator and core organizer of mitophagy for the control of intracellular mitochondrial quality [17, 21, 22, 2529, 32]. As the role of Parkin’s mitophagy in recently reported diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) or diabetes-associated submandibular gland (SMG) disease are very controversial [5, 17, 22, 23, 31], future studies on diabetes related to Parkin are needed and this study is important in that regard. Although mitophagy-limited studies of the major role of Parkin have been successful [13, 40], we have shown that Parkin also functions as a novel E3 ligase for regulating the Cdc20/Cdh1 complex for cell division [32] and inhibits the function in colon inflammation-mediated necroptosis [28]. More specific studies of Parkin in diabetes are required. Our data showed that the expression of Parkin protein was not high in pancreatic cells compared to other organ normal cells and there was no protein change even under STZ treatment. However, Parkin was recruited to the mitochondria by diabetic stress stimulation, which played a key role in mitophagy function (Figs 1 and 2). We also found for the first time that Parkin-mediated mitophagy induced by diabetic stress inhibits pancreatic cell growth and insulin secretion in 3D organoid ex vivo model (Fig 4). Collectively, STZ diabetes-induced stimulation causes mitochondrial translocation of Parkin which is initiated by the Plk3-mtROS-PINK1 signal pathway (Figs 2 and 3). Notably, a series of processes mediated by Parkin in the long term is perceived as negative stimuli, at least in pancreatic cells, and this signaling mechanism selects processes that damage the cell itself rather than protect itself. One could suggest that mitophagy in the early stages of diabetes in pancreatic cells may be protective for cell growth but long-term mitophagy (i.e. chronic) diabetes-induced stress seems to inhibit cell growth. Also, mitochondrial ROS are closely related to metabolic diseases such as diabetes and diabetes-related complications [1, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 19, 20, 26]. In this case, Parkin’s mitochondrial recruitment is very important, and the increase in mitochondrial ROS caused by Plk3 might play a key role in PINK1 activation (Fig 3D). And antioxidants, such as NAC and natural COA water, control mitochondrial ROS by diabetes-induced damage and negatively regulate the Parkin-mediated mitophagy function by PINK1 in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Through this study, we suggested the possibility that high mitophagy activity by mitochondria ROS may play a key role in the development of diabetes through the inhibition of beta cell growth and decreased insulin secretion (Fig 4).

The association between Plk3 and diabetes has already been reported in diabetes-related cataracts [9, 41], but its mechanism and other studies have not been specifically reported. We found that Plk3 as a novel key regulator of diabetes mellitus by increasing mitochondrial ROS [9] and newly discovered that it is an early initiator regulating mitophagy (Fig 3). In this regard, the identification of the role of Plk3 in diabetes is expected to be a new starting point in future diabetes research. We also found that the FOXO3A gene negatively regulates Plk3 through this study. Although several studies have reported that FOXO3A plays an important role in the regulation of mitochondrial ROS metabolism and autophagy [3537], there has been no report on the relationship between FOXO3A and Plk3 or FOXO3A and Parkin’s mitochondrial recruitment. We first found that FOXO3A directly prevents mitophagy by blocking Plk3 when pancreatic cells are subjected to STZ diabetic stress in several experiments (Fig 3). This event blocks the mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin, which is regulated by Plk3. Furthermore, FOXO3A is a transcription factor so it would most likely repress Plk3 at the transcriptional level rather than the translational level even though further study would be needed to confirm this. In summary, FOXO3A causes a negative feedback loop by inhibiting the Plk3-PINK1-Parkin axis for mitophagy when diabetic damage is stimulated in pancreatic cells.

To obtain more accurate and practical research results, we introduced the ex vivo technique in this study. 3D ex vivo can implement cellular tissue most like human tissue, making it possible to more accurately predict the effects of various drugs and compounds [9, 33, 34, 38, 39]. In this experiment, we focused more on how mitochondrial ROS and mitophagy increased by STZ-induced diabetic damage affects pancreatic cell growth and insulin secretion (Fig 4). We could observe more clearly in the 3D experiment that the growth of pancreatic cells was inhibited due to the excessive secretion of mitochondrial ROS by STZ. Furthermore, it was also confirmed that the generation of mitophagy was totally blocked by inhibiting these mitochondrial ROS. In particular, the inhibition of the Parkin gene can be a new alternative as an effective diabetes suppression that can significantly restore the decrease in insulin secretion caused by diabetic stress (Fig 4). As such, the 3D organoid cell culture technology has been verified as an innovative experimental verification tool, so further in-depth research is needed. In particular, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a disease in which morbidity can be prevented if it can be diagnosed and treated at an early stage, therefore, it is necessary to develop a biomarker that can be applied to diabetic patients customized to identify the gene. FOXO3A, Plk3, Parkin, and PINK1 genes may be used in future precision medicine as biomarkers for diabetes. The genetic precision mapping found in this way may be able to provide patients with higher accuracy in the diagnosis process of early diabetes and complications prediction in future precision medicine. Of course, several challenges remain, such as clinical verification of whether these genes have high gene expression in different diabetic patient samples. In addition, there are still many studies to be done, such as the functional studies in pancreatic cells as E3 ligase of Parkin, the Plk3 regulation mechanism of ROS inhibitors (NAC, Trolox or natural COA water, etc.) or FOXO3A, and the insulin secretion process inhibition in the mitophagy process.

Supporting information

S1 File. Contains detailed information about the S1-S3 Figs.

(PDF)

S1 Data

(XLSX)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Department of Radiology (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), College of Nursing (Dankook University, Korea), Department of Internal Medicine (Chonnam National University Medical School, Korea), and U&Hang Clinic (Korea) for supporting experimentation and data analysis. We thank Christine Song (Mayo High School, Rochester, MN) for editing this paper.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

V.L., and S.B.L. supervised the project. This work was also supported by grant number E&P-RES20191001-02 to S.B.L. and by the Dorothea Berggren Charitable Foundation to V.L. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cole JB, Florez JC. Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(7):377–90. Epub 20200512. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0278-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patel R, Parmar N, Pramanik Palit S, Rathwa N, Ramachandran AV, Begum R. Diabetes mellitus and melatonin: Where are we? Biochimie. 2022. Epub 20220107. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2022.01.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boucher J, Kleinridders A, Kahn CR. Insulin receptor signaling in normal and insulin-resistant states. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(1). Epub 20140101. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009191 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3941218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaludercic N, Di Lisa F. Mitochondrial ROS Formation in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:12. Epub 20200218. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00012 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7040199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zheng H, Zhu H, Liu X, Huang X, Huang A, Huang Y. Mitophagy in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Roles and Mechanisms. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:750382. Epub 20210927. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.750382 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8503602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sidarala V, Pearson GL, Parekh VS, Thompson B, Christen L, Gingerich MA, et al. Mitophagy protects beta cells from inflammatory damage in diabetes. JCI Insight. 2020;5(24). Epub 20201217. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.141138 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7819751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Evans JL, Maddux BA, Goldfine ID. The molecular basis for oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005;7(7–8):1040–52. doi: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1040 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Newsholme P, Cruzat VF, Keane KN, Carlessi R, de Bittencourt PI Jr., Molecular mechanisms of ROS production and oxidative stress in diabetes. Biochem J. 2016;473(24):4527–50. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160503C . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee J, Chung JO, Park SY, Rajamohan N, Singh A, Kim J, et al. Natural COA water inhibits mitochondrial ROS-mediated apoptosis through Plk3 downregulation under STZ diabetic stress in pancreatic beta-cell lines. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2022;30:101247. Epub 20220311. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101247 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8921297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yuan T, Yang T, Chen H, Fu D, Hu Y, Wang J, et al. New insights into oxidative stress and inflammation during diabetes mellitus-accelerated atherosclerosis. Redox Biol. 2019;20:247–60. Epub 20181019. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.09.025 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6205410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107(9):1058–70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223545 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2996922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tangvarasittichai S. Oxidative stress, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(3):456–80. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i3.456 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4398902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dabravolski SA, Sadykhov NK, Kartuesov AG, Borisov EE, Sukhorukov VN, Orekhov AN. The Role of Mitochondrial Abnormalities in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14). Epub 20220716. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147863 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9321738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosen P, Nawroth PP, King G, Moller W, Tritschler HJ, Packer L. The role of oxidative stress in the onset and progression of diabetes and its complications: a summary of a Congress Series sponsored by UNESCO-MCBN, the American Diabetes Association and the German Diabetes Society. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;17(3):189–212. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.196 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haider S, Ahmed S, Tabassum S, Memon Z, Ikram M, Haleem DJ. Streptozotocin-induced insulin deficiency leads to development of behavioral deficits in rats. Acta Neurol Belg. 2013;113(1):35–41. Epub 20120810. doi: 10.1007/s13760-012-0121-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xiao Y, Wu QQ, Duan MX, Liu C, Yuan Y, Yang Z, et al. TAX1BP1 overexpression attenuates cardiac dysfunction and remodeling in STZ-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy in mice by regulating autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(5 Pt A):1728–43. Epub 20180221. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.02.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiang RL, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Cong X, Zhang ZJ, Wu LL, et al. Type 2 diabetes-induced hyposalivation of the submandibular gland through PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(1):232–44. Epub 20190612. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28962 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6851669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, Thomas W. Beta-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):832–6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.832 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pitocco D, Tesauro M, Alessandro R, Ghirlanda G, Cardillo C. Oxidative stress in diabetes: implications for vascular and other complications. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(11):21525–50. Epub 20131030. doi: 10.3390/ijms141121525 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3856020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.West IC. Radicals and oxidative stress in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2000;17(3):171–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00259.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Joselin AP, Hewitt SJ, Callaghan SM, Kim RH, Chung YH, Mak TW, et al. ROS-dependent regulation of Parkin and DJ-1 localization during oxidative stress in neurons. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(22):4888–903. Epub 20120807. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds325 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tang Y, Liu J, Long J. Phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase 1 and Parkin in diabetic heart: Role of mitophagy. J Diabetes Investig. 2015;6(3):250–5. Epub 20141216. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12302 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4420554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tong M, Saito T, Zhai P, Oka SI, Mizushima W, Nakamura M, et al. Mitophagy Is Essential for Maintaining Cardiac Function During High Fat Diet-Induced Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2019;124(9):1360–71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314607 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6483841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature. 2001;414(6865):813–20. doi: 10.1038/414813a . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fan P, Xie XH, Chen CH, Peng X, Zhang P, Yang C, et al. Molecular Regulation Mechanisms and Interactions Between Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitophagy. DNA Cell Biol. 2019;38(1):10–22. Epub 20181215. doi: 10.1089/dna.2018.4348 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schofield JH, Schafer ZT. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitophagy: A Complex and Nuanced Relationship. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;34(7):517–30. Epub 20200407. doi: 10.1089/ars.2020.8058 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vives-Bauza C, Zhou C, Huang Y, Cui M, de Vries RL, Kim J, et al. PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(1):378–83. Epub 20091204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911187107 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2806779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee SB, Kim JJ, Han SA, Fan Y, Guo LS, Aziz K, et al. The AMPK-Parkin axis negatively regulates necroptosis and tumorigenesis by inhibiting the necrosome. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(8):940–51. Epub 20190729. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0356-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6679774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moore DJ, West AB, Dikeman DA, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Parkin mediates the degradation-independent ubiquitination of Hsp70. J Neurochem. 2008;105(5):1806–19. Epub 20080201. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05261.x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4432938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xie Z, Lau K, Eby B, Lozano P, He C, Pennington B, et al. Improvement of cardiac functions by chronic metformin treatment is associated with enhanced cardiac autophagy in diabetic OVE26 mice. Diabetes. 2011;60(6):1770–8. Epub 20110511. doi: 10.2337/db10-0351 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3114402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mellor KM, Bell JR, Young MJ, Ritchie RH, Delbridge LM. Myocardial autophagy activation and suppressed survival signaling is associated with insulin resistance in fructose-fed mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50(6):1035–43. Epub 20110306. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.03.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee SB, Kim JJ, Nam HJ, Gao B, Yin P, Qin B, et al. Parkin Regulates Mitosis and Genomic Stability through Cdc20/Cdh1. Mol Cell. 2015;60(1):21–34. Epub 20150917. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.011 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4592523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim JJ, Lee SB, Yi SY, Han SA, Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. WSB1 overcomes oncogene-induced senescence by targeting ATM for degradation. Cell Res. 2017;27(2):274–93. Epub 20161213. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.148 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5339850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Song C, Kendi AT, Lowe VJ, Lee S. The A20/TNFAIP3-CDC20-CASP1 Axis Promotes Inflammation-mediated Metastatic Disease in Triple-negative Breast Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2022;42(2):681–95. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15527 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Audesse AJ, Dhakal S, Hassell LA, Gardell Z, Nemtsova Y, Webb AE. FOXO3 directly regulates an autophagy network to functionally regulate proteostasis in adult neural stem cells. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(4):e1008097. Epub 20190411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008097 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6478346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Warr MR, Binnewies M, Flach J, Reynaud D, Garg T, Malhotra R, et al. FOXO3A directs a protective autophagy program in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2013;494(7437):323–7. Epub 20130206. doi: 10.1038/nature11895 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3579002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ferber EC, Peck B, Delpuech O, Bell GP, East P, Schulze A. FOXO3a regulates reactive oxygen metabolism by inhibiting mitochondrial gene expression. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(6):968–79. Epub 20111202. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.179 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3354049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu C, Qin T, Huang Y, Li Y, Chen G, Sun C. Drug screening model meets cancer organoid technology. Transl Oncol. 2020;13(11):100840. Epub 20200818. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100840 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7451679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim J, Koo BK, Knoblich JA. Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(10):571–84. Epub 20200707. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7339799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Martin Gimenez VM, de Las Heras N, Lahera V, Tresguerres JAF, Reiter RJ, Manucha W. Melatonin as an Anti-Aging Therapy for Age-Related Cardiovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:888292. Epub 20220603. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.888292 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9204094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kanada F, Takamura Y, Miyake S, Kamata K, Inami M, Inatani M, et al. Histone acetyltransferase and Polo-like kinase 3 inhibitors prevent rat galactose-induced cataract. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):20085. Epub 20191227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56414-x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6934598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Prasanth Puthanveetil

7 Dec 2022

PONE-D-22-27165Parkin-mediated mitophagy is negatively regulated by FOXO3A, which inhibits Plk3-mediated mitochondrial ROS generation in STZ diabetic stress-treated pancreatic β cellsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lee,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 21 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Prasanth Puthanveetil

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse. New software must comply with the Open Source Definition.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“V.L., and S.B.L. supervised the project. This work was also supported by grant number E&P-RES20191001-02 to S.B.L. and by the Dorothea Berggren Charitable Foundation to V.L.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“Dr. Lowe is a consultant for AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Eisai Co. Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma, GE Healthcare, and Merck Research, and receives research support from GE Healthcare, Siemens Molecular Imaging, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, and NIH (NIA, NCI). Dr. Lee reported grants from E&P Co., Ltd. (South Korea) during the conduct of the study.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

7. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

8. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Authors,

We are writing to inform you that both the reviewers have demonstrated enthusiasm in your work. There are certain concerns that need to be addressed before it can be in the publishable form.

Please address all the concerns raised by our reviewers in your revised submission.

We will be waiting for the revised manuscript.

Best Wishes,

Academic Editor

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study titled ‘Parkin-mediated mitophagy is negatively regulated by FOXO3A, which inhibits Plk3-mediated mitochondrial ROS generation in STZ diabetic stress-treated pancreatic β cells’ was aimed at investigating FOXO3A activities in the negative regulation of Parkin-mediated mitophagy by inhibiting Plk3.

The introduction was concise; it provides background and includes relevant references, the first reference in the introduction has ‘[references]. [1-18]’, this is a typo. The research design is appropriate, and the methods adequately described. The results were clearly presented, and the conclusions supported by the results.

The abstract needs to be reworded. Please ensure all abbreviations are appropriately defined at first use.

The authors use a couple of third person pronoun ‘We’, not sure if that is ok. This could be reworded. The significance of this study needs to be stress more in conclusion. Grammar, spelling, and typos need to be checked.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, Shim et al describe regulation of Parkin translocation to mitochondria in the context of STZ treatment. Through genetic and pharmacological approaches, the authors connect STZ effects to Parkin mitochondrial translocation via mitochondrial ROS and several intermediate mechanisms involving FOXO3A, Plk3, and PINK1. These experiments are generally well-designed, and the data are robust, but some results are over-interpreted. One limitation that is not discussed is that the authors conflate mitophagy with mitochondrial translocation of Parkin. The authors should either bolster these experiments with complementary readouts of mitophagy or soften their language and point out this limitation. Finally, in many areas there is ambiguous or confusing language in the text, and the revised manuscript should be carefully edited. Nevertheless, the manuscript would be acceptable for publication if these issues were rectified.

Major comments:

1. Figure 3A. The authors claim “PINK1 overexpressing cells were not at all affected by antioxidant treatment”. There is no control showing PINK1-overexpressing cells (with and without STZ) in the absence of antioxidants that would be necessary to make this claim. It remains possible STZ increases Parkin translocation to mitochondria in PINK1-overexpressing cells in the absence of antioxidant treatment (and that this could be affected by antioxidants).

2. Figure 4D. Are differences in insulin secretion simply a result of differences in cellular insulin content? As insulin released into the medium appears to mirror sphere numbers (From Fig. 4C), the authors should also show insulin secretion normalized to insulin content to distinguish secretory defects from differences in cell number or insulin production.

Minor comments:

1. Figure 4C. It is claimed that “NAC and natural COA water significantly protected the growth of STZ- or H2O2-damaged cells, suggesting that stabilized ROS in cells positively affects beta cell proliferation and maintenance”, however the authors do not measure survival/death or proliferation (and sphere numbers are only shown for one time point) so the extent that each feature is affected and contributes to an increase in sphere number is unclear. The authors should soften the language or add relevant measurements.

2. The two panels shown in Figure 2C need to be labeled. Are these panels different cell lines?

3. “In Figure 3A, we found that NAC, a ROS scavenger, significantly inhibited mitochondrial ROS in STZ-treated Beta TC-6 cells”. This claim appears to refer to the experiment in Supplementary Figure S2A.

4. The text needs to be edited for clarify throughout, including but not limited to the below statements:

-Page 10: “…suggesting that PINK1 is a mitochondrial ROS-regulated downstream”. This appears to be a sentence fragment.

-Page 11: “the effect of Plk3 is within STZ stimulation”. What do the authors mean by “within STZ stimulation?”

-Page 12: “natural COA water under STZ diabetic stress stimulation positively prevents the inhibition of insulin secretion”. The term “positively prevents” is confusing.

-Page 12: “…treated with a large amount of glucose”. The appropriate term is “a high concentration” rather than “a large amount” of glucose.

-Page 12: “cells cultured in two antioxidants, NAC or natural COA water, still stably produced insulin in a similar amount to the control”. The authors should distinguish insulin secretion from insulin production, and it is unclear whether cellular insulin content was measured in Figure 4D to do so (see major comment 2 above).

-Page 13: “Notably, the role of Parkin’s mitophagy in our study”. Please clarify “Parkin’s mitophagy” or rephrase.

-Page 13: “FOXO3A directly blocks mitophagy by negatively blocking Plk3”. This statement would be clarified by removing the term “negatively”, or rephrasing.

5. The authors' response to the question “Describe where the data may be found” in the manuscript information table is as follows: “The data worked in the Mayo Clinic cannot be accessed and shared anywhere”. This appears to be an extraordinary exception, particularly when no data impacting patient privacy is used in this study. Such an institutional policy seems unlikely, as other investigators at this institution have deposited datasets into relevant databases (e.g., PMID: 34910509).

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0281496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281496.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


19 Jan 2023

In the document entitled 'PONE-D-22-27165-R2', we have responded to all the reviewers' comments in detail. Thank you again for the minor revisions.

Decision Letter 1

Prasanth Puthanveetil

25 Jan 2023

Parkin-mediated mitophagy is negatively regulated by FOXO3A, which inhibits Plk3-mediated mitochondrial ROS generation in STZ diabetic stress-treated pancreatic β cells

PONE-D-22-27165R1

Dear Dr. Lee,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Prasanth Puthanveetil

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Authors,

Thank you for responding to all the reviewers concerns.

We are delighted to accepted your work.

Please wait for the editorial and publishing staff's response for the next steps.

Looking forward to your future submissions.

Thanks,

Dr. Puthanveetil

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Prasanth Puthanveetil

24 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-27165R1

Parkin-mediated mitophagy is negatively regulated by FOXO3A, which inhibits Plk3-mediated mitochondrial ROS generation in STZ diabetic stress-treated pancreatic β cells

Dear Dr. Lee:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Prasanth Puthanveetil

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Contains detailed information about the S1-S3 Figs.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES