Skip to main content
Theranostics logoLink to Theranostics
. 2023 Apr 17;13(7):2319–2336. doi: 10.7150/thno.80749

Gαi1/3 mediate Netrin-1-CD146-activated signaling and angiogenesis

Ya Li 1,3,#, Jin-long Chai 1,#, Xin Shi 1,#, Yu Feng 2,#, Jia-jun Li 3,#, Li-na Zhou 4, Cong Cao 1,3,, Ke-ran Li 3,
PMCID: PMC10157725  PMID: 37153740

Abstract

Netrin-1 binds to the high-affinity receptor CD146 to activate downstream signaling and angiogenesis. Here, we examine the role and underlying mechanisms of G protein subunit alpha i1 (Gαi1) and Gαi3 in Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenic activity. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and endothelial cells, Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) and Erk activation was largely inhibited by silencing or knockout of Gαi1/3, whereas signaling was augmented following Gαi1/3 overexpression. Netrin-1 induced Gαi1/3 association with CD146, required for CD146 internalization, Gab1 (Grb2 associated binding protein 1) recruitment and downstream Akt-mTOR and Erk activation. Netrin-1-induced signaling was inhibited by CD146 silencing, Gab1 knockout, or Gαi1/3 dominant negative mutants. Netrin-1-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation, migration and tube formation were inhibited by Gαi1/3 short hairpin RNA (shRNA), but were potentiated by ectopic Gαi1/3 overexpression. In vivo, intravitreous injection of Netrin-1 shRNA adeno-associated virus (AAV) significantly inhibited Akt-mTOR and Erk activation in murine retinal tissues and reduced retinal angiogenesis. Endothelial knockdown of Gαi1/3 significantly inhibited Netrin1-induced signaling and retinal angiogenesis in mice. Netrin-1 mRNA and protein expression were significantly elevated in retinal tissues of diabetic retinopathy (DR) mice. Importantly, silence of Netrin-1, by intravitreous Netrin-1 shRNA AAV injection, inhibited Akt-Erk activation, pathological retinal angiogenesis and retinal ganglion cells degeneration in DR mice. Lastly, Netrin-1 and CD146 expression is significantly increased in the proliferative retinal tissues of human proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients. Together, Netrin-1 induces CD146-Gαi1/3-Gab1 complex formation to mediate downstream Akt-mTOR and Erk activation, important for angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.

Keywords: Netrin-1, Angiogenesis, Gαi1 and Gαi3, CD146, Diabetic Retinopathy

Introduction

Vascular dysfunction participates in the pathogenesis and progression of many human diseases, including heart failure, diabetes, cancer, retinal and many others 1-5. In the absence of stimulation, endothelial cells, located in the lumen of blood vessels 4, 5, rarely proliferate and remain in a quiescent state 4, 5. Nutrient deprivation or growth factor stimulation [e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)] can rapidly initiate angiogenesis to form new vessels 4-8.

Netrin-1 promotes neuronal axon outgrowth during the development of central nervous system 9. Netrin-1 has an N-terminal laminin repeat, three cysteine-rich epidermal growth factormodules and a Netrin-like domain 9. Netrin-1 can either promote or suppress endothelial cell activation and angiogenesis 10-13, depending on its concentration and the receptor it binds 10-14. Yu et al., reported that at low concentrations (<μg/mL) of Netrin-1 promoted migration, invasion and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and increased retinal neovascularization when injected intravitreally 15. At higher concentrations, however, Netrin-1 was shown to suppress angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo 15.

Netrin-1 binds the cognate receptor Unc-5 Netrin receptor B (UNC5B) in endothelial cells, causing the anti-angiogenic effect 10. Tu et al., have discovered CD146 (melanoma cell adhesion molecule, MCAM) as a functional receptor of Netrin-1 in endothelial cells 14. CD146 binds low concentrations of Netrin-1 at high affinity, activating endothelial cells to promote angiogenesis 14. Conditional knockdown of CD146 or a specific anti-CD146 antibody prevented Netrin-1-induced angiogenesis 14.

G protein subunit alpha i (Gαi) proteins have three members: Gαi1, Gαi2 and Gαi3. Gαi protein binding to G protein coupled receptors inhibits adenylyl cyclase activation and depletes cyclic AMP (cAMP) 16, 17. Our group and others have defined an essential role of Gαi1 and Gαi3 in mediating signaling transduction by multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) 18-27. Following epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation, Gαi1/3 and the adaptor protein Grb2 associated binding protein 1 (Gab1) associate with the EGFR to promote downstream Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR) 26, 27. Similarly, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) stimulation led to the formation of a KGFR-Gαi1/3-Gab1 complex, mediating downstream Akt-mTOR activation 25. Gαi1/3 also promoted endocytosis of VEGF-activated VEGFR and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-activated TrkB, thereby transducing downstream signaling 22, 23. YME1 Like 1 ATPase was found to increase Gαi1 expression and downstream Akt activation, promoting glioma cell growth 19. Our recent study showed that phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1) associated with GATA binding protein 4 to promote Gαi3 transcriptional and expression, thus increasing Akt-mTOR activation in endothelial cells 18.

Our group and others have also characterized the role of Gαi1/3 proteins in mediating signaling by non-RTK receptors. Gαi1/3 immunoprecipitated with interleukin-4 (IL-4)-stimulated IL-4Rα, promoting IL-4Rα endosome translocation and downstream Gab1-Akt activation in macrophages 28. R-spondin3 induced Gαi1/3 association with leucine-rich repeat G protein-coupled receptor 4 and Gab1 to mediate downstream Akt-mTOR activation 29. Here we explore the possible involvement of Gαi1/3 in Netrin-1-activated signaling and angiogenesis. We found that Netrin-1 induces CD146 and Gαi1/3 association to mediate downstream Akt-mTOR and Erk activation, thereby promoting angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

Reagents. Polybrene, LY294002, PD98059 and puromycin were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The antibodies utilized in the present study were listed in Table 1. Reagents for cell culture, including serum, medium, and antibiotics, were from Gibco-BRL (Suzhou, China).

Table 1.

Antibodies utilized in the present study.

Antibodies Company Catalog Number Concentration
Gαi1 Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-515658 1:2000
Gαi2 Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-13534 1:2000
Gαi3 Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-365422 1:2000
p-Akt S473 Cell Signaling Technology 9271 1:2000
Akt Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-56878 1:5000
p-S6K Cell Signaling Technology 9234 1:2000
S6K Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-8418 1:2000
p-S6 Cell Signaling Technology 4856 1:5000
S6 Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-74576 1:10000
p-Erk1/2 Cell Signaling Technology 9101 1:5000
Erk1/2 Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-514302 1:5000
GAPDH Proteintech 60004-1-Ig 1:10000
p-Gab1 Cell Signaling Technology 3233 1:2000
Gab1 Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-133191 1:2000
Neogenin Cell Signaling Technology 39447 1:2000
UNC5B Cell Signaling Technology 13851 1:2000
DCC Abcam ab273570 1:2000
CD146 Cell Signaling Technology 68706 1:2000
Tubulin Proteintech 66031-1-Ig 1:10000
PDGFR Cell Signaling Technology 3164 1:2000
Netrin-1 Abcam ab126729 1:1000
p-p38 Cell Signaling Technology 9211 1:2000
p38 Cell Signaling Technology 8690 1:5000
Active β-Catenin Cell Signaling Technology 19807 1:1000

Cells. The wild-type (WT) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), Gαi1 plus Gαi3 double knockout (“Gαi1/3 DKO”) MEFs, Gαi1, Gαi2 or Gαi3 single knockout (SKO) MEFs, WT and Gab1 KO MEFs were described in detail in our previous studies 21-23, 25, 26, 29. Culturing of primary HUVECs was reported previously 18, 22, 30.

Genetic modifications of Gαi1/3. Genetic modifications of Gαi1/3 by viral constructs, including Gαi1/3 shRNA (short hairpin RNA), overexpression, knockout (KO), or dominant negative mutations, in MEFs and HUVECs, were reported in detail in our previous studies 22, 23, 29. Stable cells were always selected by puromycin-containing complete medium and Gαi1/3 expression in the stable cells was verified by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting assays 20, 22, 23, 29.

CD146 and Netrin-1 shRNA. The generation of lentivirus-packed CD146 shRNA sequence (Genechem) in the GV248 vector (hU6-MCS-CBh-IRES-puromycin) was reported previously 18. Virus infection and stable cells formation were described previously 18. For in vivo studies, the Netrin-1 shRNA sequence (Genechem) was inserted into an adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) construct. These constructs were transfected to HEK-293 cells, generating adenovirus (AAV). The virus was then intravitreally injected to the mice.

Tube formation. The basement membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, Shanghai, China) was added to the 24-well plates for 30 min. HUVECs (at 1.0 × 105 cells per well) were inoculated onto the pre-coated plates and incubated in the humidified incubator setting at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 16h. A Zeiss microscope was used to take photographs of the tube formation. The average number of formed tubes was recorded.

5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining. An EdU proliferation kit (Beyotime, Nanjing, China) was utilized to detect cell proliferation. Brief, HUVECs with different treatments were incubated with EdU solution (50 μM) for 2h at 37°C. Following fixation and washing, cells were co-stained with DAPI for another 10 min. Thereafter, cells were photographed under a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss).

In vitro cell migration/invasion assays. HUVECs (at 5 × 104 cells per chamber) with different treatments were added to the upper chamber of Transwell inserts with 8 μm pore (Corning, Corning, NY). The chambers were pre-coated with (testing cell invasion) or without (testing cell migration) Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Shanghai, China). The completed medium with fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added to the lower chamber. Transwell chambers were then placed in the humidified incubator setting at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h, migrated/invaded cells were immersed into 3% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, stained with crystal violet, and photographed under a light microscope.

qRT-PCR. Total cellular and tissue RNA was extracted by Trizol Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) was utilized to transcribe cDNA. qRT-PCR was conducted through the ABI Prism 7900 detection system (Applied Biosystems, Shanghai, China). The reaction mixture included 2 μl cDNA template, 2 μl primers, and 10 μl of 2× SYBR Green PCR Mix (Takara). The melting temperature was always calculated. The comparative Ct method (2-ΔΔCt) was utilized to quantify expression of targeted mRNAs 31, with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) tested as the reference gene. All the mRNA primers were from Genechem (Shanghai, China).

Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays. The cellular/tissue lysates (20-30 μg per treatment) were first separated by 10-12.5% SDS-PAGE and were then transferred to a PVDF blot. The latter was incubated in 7.5% non-fat milk for 50 min at room temperature for blocking, and the primary antibody added overnight at 4°C. After washing, the PVDF blot was incubated with secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. Enhanced chemiluminescence procedure was then performed to visualize the targeted protein band. For Co-IP studies, the primary antibody was first added to the total cellular lysates overnight at 4°C. The Protein A/Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences, Shanghai, China) were then added to extract the protein-protein complex, which was tested by Western blotting analyses.

Phosphoproteomics. Phosphopeptide Enrichment: SDT buffer (4% SDS, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6) was added to the sample. The lysates were sonicated and then boiled for 15 min. After centrifuged at 14, 000g for 15 min, the supernatant was quantified with the BCA Protein Assay Kit (P0012, Beyotime). For digestion, 600 ug of proteins for each sample were reduced with 100 mM DTT for 5 min at 100 °C. Then the detergent, DTT and other low-molecular-weight components were removed using UA buffer (8 M Urea, 150 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5). Afterwards, 100 μL iodoacetamide was added to block reduced cysteine residues and the samples were incubated for 30 min in darkness. Finally, the protein suspensions were digested with 4 μg trypsin (Promega) in 40 μL 50 mM NH4HCO3 buffer overnight at 37 °C. After trypsin digestion, peptides were desalted by C18 column and vacuum-dried. The peptides' mixture was subjected to HiSelect Fe-NTA phosphopeptide enrichment kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A32993) according to the protocol. The Fe-NTA eluent were dried down via vacuum centrifugation at 45 °C and then dissolved in 0.1% Formic acid buffer. LC-MS/MS analysis: Each eluent was injected for nanoLC-MS/MS analysis. The peptide mixture was loaded onto the C18-reversed phase analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Acclaim PepMap RSLC 50um X 15cm, nano viper, P/N164943) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid) and separated with a linear gradient of buffer B (80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry with Q Exactive HF-X (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The scanning range of mother ion was 350-1500 m/z, and the resolution of primary mass spectrometry was 60,000. The AGC target was 3e6, with the primary maximum injection time 50 ms. The resolution of DIA (data-independent acquisition) was 30000, the AGC target was 1e6, with the normalized collision energy (NCE) was 28 eV. Data analysis: Raw Data of DIA were processed and analyzed by Spectronaut (Biognosys AG, Switzerland) with default settings. Retention time prediction type was set to dynamic iRT. Spectronaut will determine the ideal extraction window dynamically depending on iRT calibration and gradient stability. Q-value cutoff on precursor and protein level was applied 1%. After Student t test, differentially expressed proteins were filtered if their P value < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5.

Human tissues. As described 18, 22, six (6) different proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients with the lensectomy plus vitrectomy surgery, as well as three (3) age-matched traumatic retinectomy patients, were enrolled. The written-informed consent was obtained from each participant. PDR patients' anterior retinal hyperplastic membrane was stripped and fresh tissue specimens were stored in liquid nitrogen. The traumatic normal retina tissues were obtained and stored in liquid nitrogen as well. The protocols were according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Ethics Board of Soochow University.

Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic retinopathy (DR) mice. C57BL/6 mice (24-28 g, aged 6-8 weeks, male) were fasted overnight and then injected intraperitoneally with streptozotocin (STZ, 60 mg/kg, Sigma) for five consecutive days. The blood glucose levels obtained from the tail vein were measured one week after the final STZ injection and then once every week. Only mice with blood glucose level > 300 mg/dL were considered diabetic and further utilized in the study. Age-matched male mice were injected intraperitoneally with equal citrate buffer as mock controls (“Mock”).

Intravitreal injection of AAV and retinal vasculature detection. The adult C57BL/6 mice, as reported previously 18, 29, were anesthetized, and intravitreal injection of virus was reported previously 18, 29. Approximately 0.1 μL AAV was injected into the vitreous cavity with the needle directly above the optic nerve head. The isolectin B4 (IB4) staining of retinal vasculature, retinal trypsin digestion assaying of acellular capillary formation and retinal NeuN immunofluorescence staining were reported previously 18, 29. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Ethic Committee of Soochow University approved the protocols, and animal studies were in according to Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology statement.

Statistical analysis. Data were always with normal distribution and were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences were calculated by Student's t test (comparing two groups) and were measured by one-way analysis of variance plus Tukey's multiple comparison test (for three or more groups comparison). Values of P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Gαi1 and Gαi3 double knockout abolishes Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation in MEFs

To explore the potential involvement of Gαi1/3 proteins in Netrin-1-activated signaling, wild-type (WT) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and Gαi1 plus Gαi3 double knockout (“Gαi1/3 DKO”) MEFs (see our previous studies 21-23, 25, 26, 28, 29) were treated with Netrin-1 at different concentrations (5-100 ng/mL) 14, 15. As shown, Gαi1 and Gαi3 were depleted in Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs, whereas Gαi2 protein expression was intact (Figure 1A). Gαi1, Gαi2 and Gαi3 protein expression was unchanged following Netrin-1 treatment in WT MEFs (Figure 1A). Treatment with Netrin-1 (5-100 ng/mL) robustly increased phosphorylation of Akt, ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) and Erk1/2 in WT MEFs (Figure 1B), indicating Akt-mTOR and Erk activation (Figure 1B). Importantly, Netrin-1 signaling was almost completely blocked in Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs (Figure 1B). Total Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 expression was comparable between WT and DKO MEFs (Figure 1B).

Further studies showed that Netrin-1 (at 25 ng/mL, the dose found to induce the most significant Akt-mTOR and Erk activation, Figure 1B) increased phosphorylation of Akt, S6K, S6 and Erk1/2 in a time-dependent manner in WT MEFs (Figure 1C), which was abolished in Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs (Figure 1C). Exploring the respective roles of Gαi1 and Gαi3 in Netrin-1-induced signal transduction, Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL)-induced phosphorylation of Akt, S6K, S6 and Erk1/2 was partially decreased in Gαi1 SKO or Gαi3 SKO MEFs (Figure 1D), but completely blocked in Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs (Figure 1D). To explore whether Gαi2 is also important for Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation, WT and Gαi2 SKO MEFs were treated with Netrin-1 (at 25 ng/mL). Figure 1E showed that Netrin-1-induced phosphorylation of Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 was comparable between WT and Gαi2 SKO MEFs (Figure 1E). Total Akt, S6K, S6 and Erk1/2 expression was again not significantly changed in Gαi1/Gαi2/Gαi3 SKO MEFs (Figure 1D and E).

Gαi1 and Gαi3 are required for Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation in Cas9-Gαi1/3 DKO” MEFs

To further support the role Gαi1 and Gαi3 in Netrin-1-activated signaling, the CRISPR (clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) gene editing method 21, 22, 28, 29 was employed to deplete Gαi1 and Gαi3 in WT MEFs. Following stable cell selection and Gαi1/3 KO verification, the “Cas9-Gαi1/3 DKO” MEFs 21, 22, 28, 29 were formed. As shown, treatment with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) increased phosphorylation of Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 in control MEFs with Cas9-C control vector (“Cas9-C”) (Figure S1A). In Cas9-Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs, Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation was completely blocked (Figure S1A). Total Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 expression was again unchanged (Figure S1A).

Next, Gαi1 shRNA-containing lentiviral particles and Gαi3 shRNA-containing lentiviral particles 21, 22, 28, 29 were co-added to WT MEFs. Following puromycin selection, stable MEFs were formed and were named as “shGαi1/3” MEFs 21, 22, 28, 29. In comparison to control MEFs expressing a scramble shRNA (“shC”), Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL)-induced phosphorylation of Akt and Erk1/2 was significantly decreased in shGαi1/3 MEFs (Figure S1B). Total Akt and Erk1/2 expression was unaffected (Figure S1B). Thus, Gαi1/3 silencing prevents Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation.

To examine the effects of overexpression, Ad-Gαi1 and Ad-Gαi3 were co-transduced into WT MEFs, and stable Gαi1/3-overexpressing MEFs formed 21, 22, 28, 29 (“OE-Gαi1/3” MEFs). We found that Netrin-1-induced Akt and Erk1/2 phosphorylation was augmented in OE-Gαi1/3 MEFs (Figure S1C). Total Akt and Erk1/2 expression was unchanged (Figure S1C). Thus, Gαi1 plus Gαi3 overexpression augmented Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation, further supporting the essential roles of the two Gαi proteins in Netrin-1 signaling.

Gαi1 and Gαi3 associate with Netrin-1-stimualted CD146, required for CD146 internalization

Low concentrations of Netrin-1 bind CD146 to activate downstream signaling and angiogenesis 14, while Netrin-1 at high concentrations bind to DCC-UNC5B to suppress angiogenesis14. As Gαi1/3 DKO completely abolished Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation in MEFs, we examined whether Gαi1/3 DKO affected expression of key components of Netrin-1 signaling in MEFs. As shown, expression of DCC Netrin-1 receptor (DCC), Neogenin, UNC5B and CD146 was equivalent between WT and Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs (Figure 2A). The co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) results showed that following Netrin-1 stimulation, Gαi1 and Gαi3 associated with CD146, but not UNC5B, DCC and Neogenin, in WT MEFs (Figure 2B). Gab1, a key adaptor protein mediating Akt-mTOR and Erk activation 32-36, was also present in the CD146-Gαi1/3 complex in Netrin-1-treated MEFs (Figure 2B). Significantly, shRNA-induced silencing of CD146 prevented Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation in MEFs (Figure 2C).

Our previous studies have shown that Gαi1/3 associates with ligand-activated receptors to mediate receptor membrane internalization and downstream signaling 22, 23, 28, 37. Similarly, cell membrane-localized CD146 protein levels were rapidly decreased following treatment with Netrin-1 in WT MEFs (Figure 2D), while cytosolic CD146 levels were significantly increased (Figure 2D). Total CD146 protein and membrane-localized platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PGDFR) were unchanged (Figure 2D). Importantly, CD146 internalization was prevented in Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs (Figure 2E). Thus, Gαi1/3 association with Netrin-1-activated CD146 is required for CD146 internalization, essential for downstream signaling activation.

The adaptor protein Gab1, downstream of Gαi1 and Gαi3, mediates Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation

Since the adaptor protein Gab1 was part of the CD146-Gαi1/3 complex in Netrin-1-treated MEFs (see Figure 2), we tested its role in Netrin-1-induced signal transduction. In WT MEFs, following Netrin-1 treatment, Gab1 immunoprecipitated with CD146, Gαi1 and Gαi3 (Figure S2A), but did not associate with UNC5B, DCC and Neogenin (Figure S2A). Importantly, mimicking Gαi1/3 DKO's actions, Netrin-1-induced phosphorylation of Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 was completely abolished in Gab1 KO MEFs (Figure S2B), whereas Gαi1 and Gαi3 expression was intact (see our previous studies 22, 23, 28, 37). Gab1 acted as downstream of Gαi1 and Gαi3 as Netrin-1-induced Gab1 phosphorylation was completely abolished in Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs, but was partially attenuated in Gαi1 SKO MEFs or Gαi3 SKO MEFs (Figure S2C). Moreover, shRNA-induced silencing of Gαi1/3 (Figure S2D) or CRISPR/Cas9-induced Gαi1/3 DKO (Figure S2E) also prevented Netrin-1-induced Gab1 phosphorylation in MEFs. Ectopic overexpression of Gαi1 and Gαi3 further augmented Gab1 phosphorylation by Netrin-1 (Figure S2F). shRNA-induced silencing of CD146 also prevented Gab1 activation by Netrin-1 (Figure S2G).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gαi1 and Gαi3 associate with Netrin-1-stimualted CD146, required for CD146 internalization. Expression of listed signaling proteins of the Netrin-1 cascade in WT and Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs was shown (A). WT MEFs were treated with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 5 min, CD146-Gαi1/3-Gab1 association (“IP”) and expression (“Input”) was shown (B). DCC, Neogenin and UNC5B did not associate with Gαi1/3 in Netrin-1-treated WT MEFs (B). Puromycin-selected stable WT MEFs with CD146 shRNA (“shCD146”) or the scramble control shRNA (“shC”) were treated with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 15 min, expression of listed proteins was shown (C). WT MEFs were treated with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 1-5 min, expression of listed protein in membrane fraction lysates, cytosol fraction lysates and total cell lysates was tested (D). WT or Gαi1/3 DKO MEFs were treated with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 5 min, expression of listed protein in membrane fraction lysates and total cell lysates was tested (E). Quantifications were from five biological replicates (n = 5). *P < 0.05 versus “shC” or “0 min” (D). #P < 0.05.

Gαi1/3 dominant negative mutants disrupt Netrin-1-induced CD146-Gαi1/3-Gab1 association, CD146 internalization and signaling activation

To further explore the underlying mechanisms of Gαi1/3-mediated Netrin-1 signaling, the previously-described dominant negative (DN) strategies were utilized 21-23, 29. The DN-Gαi1/3 constructs replaced the conserved Gly (G) residue with Thr (T) in G3 box, aiming to block Gαi1/3 association with adaptor/associated proteins 25, 26. The DN-Gαi1 and DN-Gαi3 constructs were co-transduced into WT MEFs, and after selection stable MEFs, “DN-Gαi1/3”, formed. We found that Netrin-1-induced CD146-Gab1-Gαi1/3 association was disrupted by DN-Gαi1/3 in WT MEFs (Figure S3A). Importantly, Netrin-1-induced CD146 internalization was inhibited by DN-Gαi1/3 (Figure S3B). These results further supported that CD146-Gαi1/3 association was required for Netrin-1-induced CD146 internalization. Moreover, Netrin-1-induced phosphorylation of Gab1, Akt and Erk1/2 was largely inhibited by DN-Gαi1/3 (Figure S3C).

Gαi1/3 silencing prevents Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenesis activity in vitro

Next, we tested the potential role of Gαi1/3 in Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenesis activity in endothelial cells. In cultured primary HUVECs, treatment with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) led to CD146-Gαi1/3-Gab1 association, and no association with DCC, Neogenin, or UNC5B (Figure 3A). To silence Gαi1/3, Gαi1 and Gαi3 shRNA lentiviral particles 22, 29 were co-added to HUVECs, and following selection stable cells formed: “shGαi1/3” HUVECs. mRNA and protein expression of Gαi1 and Gαi3 were significantly decreased in shGαi1/3 HUVECs (Figure 3B-C), whereas Gαi2 mRNA and protein expression was unchanged (Figure 3B and C). Significantly, Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL, 5')-induced CD146 internalization was abolished byGαi1/3 silencing in HUVECs (Figure 3D), and Netrin-1-induced Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 phosphorylation was almost completely blocked (Figure 3E). Total Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 expression was intact (Figure 3E).

In shC control HUVECs, treatment with Netrin-1 promoted HUVEC proliferation and increased nuclear EdU incorporation (Figure 3F), which was blocked byshGαi1/3 (Figure 3F). Moreover, Netrin-1-induced in vitro cell migration (Figure 3G), invasion (Figure 3H) and tube formation (Figure 3I) were prevented after Gαi1/3 silencing. In HUVEC, Netrin-1-induced cell proliferation (EdU incorporation, Figure S4A), migration (Figure S4B) and tube formation (Figure S4C) were significantly inhibited (but not blocked) by the Erk1/2 inhibitor PD98059 or the PI3K-Akt-mTOR inhibitor LY294002. Importantly, PD98059 plus LY294002 co-treatment completely blocked Netrin-1-induced pro-angiogenic actions in HUVECs (Figure S4A-C). These results supported that PI3K-Akt-mTOR and Erk are two key cascades required for Netrin-1-induced pro-angiogenic actions in endothelial cells.

EctopicGαi1/3 overexpression amplifies Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenesis activity in vitro

We hypothesized that ectopic Gαi1/3 overexpression could augment Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenesis activity. To test this hypothesis, Gαi1 and Gαi3 expressing lentiviral particles were co-added to HUVECs and puromycin was added to select two stable colonies, namely “oeGαi1/3-Slc1” and “oeGαi1/3-Slc2”. As compared to the vector control HUVECs (“Vec”), mRNA and protein expression of Gαi1 and Gαi3 was robustly increased in oeGαi1/3 HUVECs (Figure 4A-B), whereas Gαi2 expression was unchanged (Figure 4B). Consequently, Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 phosphorylation in response to Netrin-1 was augmented in oeGαi1/3 HUVECs (Figure 4C). Ectopic Gαi1/3 overexpression also amplified Netrin-1-induced pro-angiogenesis activity in vitro. In oeGαi1/3-Slc1 and oeGαi1/3-Slc2 HUVECs, Netrin-1-induced cell proliferation (EdU-positive nuclei ratio, Figure 4D), in vitro cell migration (Figure 4E), invasion (Figure 4F) and tube formation (Figure 4G) were significantly augmented.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ectopic Gαi1/3 overexpression amplifies Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenesis activity in vitro. HUVECs were stably transduced the lentiviral Gαi1 expression construct plus the lentiviral Gαi3 expression construct, and puromycin was added to select two stable colonies, (“oeGαi1/3-Slc1” and “oeGαi1/3-Slc2”); Control HUVECs were transduced with the empty vector (“Vec”); Cells were treated with or without Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 15 min, expression of listed mRNAs and proteins was tested (A-C). HUVECs were cultivated for applied time periods, cell proliferation (by measuring EdU-positive nuclei ratio, D), migration (E), invasion (F) and tube formation (G) were tested by the described assays, with results quantified. The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 5, five biological replicates). Quantifications were from five biological replicates (n = 5). * P < 0.05 versus “Vec”.

Endothelial knockdown of Gαi1/3 abolishes Netrin-1-induced retinal angiogenesis in mice

To investigate the role of Netrin-1 in angiogenesis in vivo, C57B/6 mice were intravitreously injected with AAV5 Netrin-1 shRNA (“shNetrin-1-AAV”). Control mice were injected with the AAV5 with a scramble shRNA (“shC-AAV”). Ten days after virus injection, the retinal tissues were homogenized and analyzed by qRT-PCR and Western blotting assays. As shown, mRNA and protein expression of Netrin-1 was significantly decreased in shNetrin-1-AAV-injected retinal tissues (Figure 5A-B), whereas the mRNA and protein expression levels of Gαi1, Gαi2and Gαi3 were not altered (Figure 5A-B). The protein expression of DCC, Neogenin, UNC5B, CD146 and Gab1 in retinal tissues was equivalent between shNetrin-1-AAV and shC-AAV mice (Figure 5C). Significantly, phosphorylation of Gab1, Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 was decreased in shNetrin-1-AAV retinal tissues (Figure 5D). Endothelial staining with IB4, Figure 5E, revealed that shNetrin-1-AAV injection inhibited retinal angiogenesis in vivo. The retinas of shNetrin-1-AAV mice showed a significantly decreased number of vascular branches and branch points, and reduced retinal vascular complexity (Figure 5E-F).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Endothelial knockdown of Gαi1/3 abolishes Netrin-1-induced retinal angiogenesis in mice. The C57B/6 adult mice were intravitreously injected with the AAV5 with Netrin-1 shRNA (“shNetrin-1-AAV”) or the AAV5 with scramble control shRNA (“shC-AAV”). After 10 days, expression of listed mRNAs and proteins in the retinal tissues was tested (A-D and F). The retinal vasculature was measured by IB4 staining (E) and the average number of vascular branches per view was calculated (E). The C57B/6 adult mice were intravitreously injected with the AAV5-TIE1-Gαi1 shRNA construct plus the AAV5-TIE1-Gαi3 shRNA construct (“Gαi1/3-eKD”). Control mice were intravitreously injected with the AAV5-TIE1-scramble control shRNA (“Ct”). After 10 days, mice were then intravitreously injected with Netrin-1 (0.25 ng in 0.1 μL); After 30 min, retinal tissues were collected and expression of listed proteins was shown (G); The retinal tissues of Netrin-1-challenged control mice and Gαi1/3-eKD mice were collected and subject to phosphoproteomics analyses. Differential phosphorylated proteins were shown in the volcano plot and KEGG pathway analyses were performed (H). Alternatively, the retinal vasculature was measured by IB4 staining after 72h (I), and the average number of vascular branches per view was calculated (I). The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 5, five biological replicates). * P < 0.05 versus “shC-AAV” or vehicle control (“Veh”, saline). #P < 0.05. “N. S.” stands for non-statistical differences (P > 0.05). Scale bar = 100 μm.

To explore the role of Gαi1/3 in Netrin-1-induced angiogenesis in vivo, C57B/6 mice were intravitreously injected with the AAV5-TIE1-Gαi1 shRNA plus the AAV5-TIE1-Gαi3 shRNA, leading to endothelial knockdown ofGαi1/3 (“Gαi1/3-eKD”, as reported previously 29). Expression of Gαi1 and Gαi3, but not Gαi2, was significantly decreased in retinal tissues of Gαi1/3-eKD mice (Figure 5G). Importantly, intravitreous injection of Netrin-1 increased Akt, S6K and Erk1/2 phosphorylation in the retinal tissues of vector control (“Ct”) mice (Figure 5G), which was largely inhibited in Gαi1/3-eKD mice (Figure 5G).

The retinal tissues of Netrin-1-challenged control mice and Gαi1/3-eKD mice were collected and tissue lysates were subject to phosphoproteomics analyses. Differential phosphorylated proteins between the control and the Gαi1/3-eKD mice were shown in the volcano plot (Figure 5H). These proteins were then subject to KEGG pathway analyses and top 15 pathways were shown (Figure 5H). As demonstrated, besides the already-detected proteins in the PI3K-Akt-mTOR and Erk-MAPK cascades (Figure 5G), the phosphorylation levels of the proteins in other signaling cascades also showed significant differences in Gαi1/3-eKD retina tissues (Figure 5H). These pathways, including tight junction, transcriptional dysregulation in cancer, cancer-associated pathways, cell cycle, regulation of actin cytoskeleton and others (Figure 5H), are also closely associated with the PI3K-Akt-mTOR/Erk-MAPK cascades and are important for angiogenesis 38-44. These results, together with the in vitro findings that PD98059 plus LY294002 co-treatment blocked Netrin-1-induced pro-angiogenic actions in HUVECs (Figure S4), supported that PI3K-Akt-mTOR and Erk-MAPK activation should be key downstream signaling effectors of Gαi1/3 in mediating Netrin-1-induced angiogenesis.

IB4 staining assay results, Figure 5I, showed that Netrin-1 injection (for 48h) promoted retinal angiogenesis, causing an increased number of vascular branches and branch points, and enhanced retinal vascular complexity in control mice(Figure 5I), whereas Netrin-1 effects were almost completely blocked in Gαi1/3-eKD mice (Figure 5I). Thus, Gαi1/3 are important for Netrin-1-induced signaling and retinal angiogenesis in vivo.

Silencing of Netrin-1 inhibits pathological retinal angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy (DR) mice

We examined whether Netrin-1 expression was altered in the retinas of DR mice. Three months after STZ administration, retinas from DR (STZ-administrated) and mock control (PBS-administrated) mice were collected. As shown, Netrin-1 mRNA expression in retina tissues of DR mice was significantly higher than that in retinas of control mice (Figure 6A). Moreover, Netrin-1 protein upregulation was detected in the retinas of four representative DR mice (Figure 6B). When combining all 10 sets of the Netrin-1 blotting data, we found that Netrin-1 protein was significantly upregulated in retinas of DR mice (Figure 6C).

To investigate the potential role of Netrin-1 in pathological angiogenesis in DR mice, AAV5-Netrin-1 shRNA (shNetrin-1-AAV) or AAV5-scramble control shRNA (“shC-AAV”) were intravitreously injected into retinas of DR mice on day-30 after the last STZ administration, and signaling proteins tested two months later. Western blotting assay results showed that shNetrin-1-AAV silenced Netrin-1 mRNA and protein expression in retinal tissues of the DR mice (Figure 6D and E). Netrin-1 was upregulated, and Akt and Erk1/2 phosphorylation increased in DR mice's retinas (Figure 6F). Importantly, silencing of Netrin-1 inhibited Akt and Erk activation in the retinal tissues of DR mice (Figure 6F).

In addition, IB4 staining supported pathological retinal angiogenesis in DR mice with shC-AAV injection, showing an increased number of vascular branches and branch points, and enhanced retinal vascular complexity (Figure 6G). Moreover, the retinal trypsin digestion assay demonstrated that the number of retinal acellular capillaries were significantly increased in shC-AAV DR mice (Figure 6H). Remarkably, decreasing Netrin-1 levels, by intravitreous injection of shNetrin-1-AAV, ameliorated the pathological retinal angiogenesis in DR mice. Retinal pathological angiogenesis (IB4 staining, Figure 6G) and acellular capillary formation (Figure 6H) in the DR mice were largely inhibited after injection of shNetrin-1-AAV. These results support that decreasing Netrin-1 expression inhibited pathological retinal angiogenesis in DR mice.

Notably, mRNA and protein expression of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), were significantly increased in the retinal tissues of DR mice, indicative of inflammation (Figure 6I-J). Moreover, p38 phosphorylation and the active β-catenin levels were also increased (Figure 6K). Netrin-1 silencing failed to affect inflammation as well as p38 and β-catenin activation in the retinal tissues of DR mice (Figure 6I-K).

Silencing of Netrin-1 inhibits retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) degeneration in diabetic retinopathy (DR) mice

DR mice display significant neuronal degeneration possibly due to pathological angiogenesis, disrupted energy supply, inflammation and oxidative stress 45, 46. Staining with the neuronal marker NeuN, we found that the number of NeuN-stained RGCs was substantially decreased in retinas of shC-AAV DR mice (Figure 7A-B). Importantly, shNetrin-1-AAV-induced knockdown of Netrin-1 ameliorated RGCs degeneration in DR mice (Figure 7A-B).

Netrin-1-CD146 expression is increased in the proliferative retinal tissues of human PDR patients

Lastly, we examined whether Netrin-1 and CD146 expression was dysregulated in the proliferative retinal tissues of human patients. As described previously 18, 22, the retinal proliferative membrane tissues of six different human PDR patients, as well as retinas of three age-matched traumatic retinectomy patients were investigated. Fresh tissue lysates were examined. We found that Netrin-1 and CD146 mRNA (Figure 8A-B) and protein (Figure 8C) expression was significantly increased in the proliferative retinal tissues of human PDR patients.

Discussion

Dependent on the doses utilized, Netrin-1 can either inhibit or promote angiogenesis 10-12, 14, 47-50. Xu et al., have shown that Netrin-1 expression was significantly increased in retinal tissues of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mice 51, and decreasing Netrin-1 suppressed retinal neovascularization in OIR mice 51. Han et al., however found that the expression of Netrin-1 and its receptor UNC5B was decreased in rat corneal epithelium after corneal alkali burn 52. Interestingly, exogenous administration of Netrin-1 onto rat ocular surfaces was shown to suppress corneal neovascularization 52. Here we found that Netrin-1 mRNA and protein expression was significantly increased in the retinal tissues of DR mice. Importantly, Netrin-1 silencing by intravitreous injection of shNetrin-1 AAV largely inhibited pathological retinal angiogenesis in DR mice. Contrarily, intravitreous injection of Netrin-1 increased retinal angiogenesis in mice. These results support that Netrin-1 is a pro-angiogenic factor in mouse retina.

Low concentrations of Netrin-1 bind to the high-affinity receptor CD146 to promote angiogenesis 14. The underlying mechanisms of Netrin-1-CD146-activated angiogenesis are still elusive. Here, we show that Gαi1 and Gαi3 are essential proteins in mediating Netrin-1-induced signaling. In MEFs, Gαi1 and Gαi3 KO (using DKO/SKO MEFs or the CRISPR/Cas9 strategy), silencing (by shRNA) or dominant negative mutations largely inhibited Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation. In contrast, Gαi1 and Gαi3 overexpression augmented Netrin-1-induced signaling. In HUVECs Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation was prevented by Gαi1 and Gαi3 shRNA, but amplified after Gαi1 and Gαi3 overexpression.

Our studies have demonstrated a pivotal role of Gαi1 and Gαi3 in angiogenesis. Gαi1/3 silencing by shRNA lentivirus suppressed alkali burn-induced neovascularization in mouse cornea and decreased OIR-induced retinal neovascularization 22. Moreover, alkali burn- and OIR-induced angiogenesis was robustly inhibited in Gαi1/3 double knockout mice 22. PCK1 increased Gαi3 expression and downstream Akt-mTOR activation, promoting endothelial cell proliferation, migration, sprouting, and tube formation in vitro and retinal angiogenesis in vivo 18. Moreover, R-spondin3 induced leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 4 (LGR4)-Gαi1/3-Gab1 complex formation, required for Akt-mTOR activation, and decreasing Gαi1/3 expression inhibited R-spondin3-induced angiogenesis 29.

In the present study, we found that Gαi1 and Gαi3 are essential signaling proteins mediating Netrin-1-induced angiogenesis. Netrin-1-induced HUVEC proliferation, in vitro migration, invasion and tube formation were largely inhibited by Gαi1/3 double silencing, but were augmented after Gαi1 and Gαi3 overexpression. Importantly, endothelial knockdown of Gαi1/3 significantly inhibited Netrin1-induced signaling and retinal angiogenesis in mice.

CD146 expression in the endothelial cells is vital for cell proliferation, migration and tube formation in vitro 53, 54 and angiogenesis in vivo 55-58. Moreover, CD146 can also act as a co-receptor for VEGFR2, promoting VEGF signaling in endothelial cells 59. Silencing or block (using a monoclonal antibody) of CD146 inhibited angiogenesis 58, 60.We have previously shown that Gαi1 and Gαi3 association with receptors is required for receptor internalization 22, 23, 28, 37. With VEGF stimulation, Gαi1/3 dictated VEGFR2 endocytosis and subsequent signal transduction 22. Upon IL-4 treatment, Gαi1/3 immunoprecipitated with the intracellular domain of IL-4Rαin macrophages, mediating IL-4Rαendosomal trafficking and downstream Gab1-Akt activation 28. LPS stimulation resulted in Gαi1/3 association with CD14 in macrophages, promoting TLR4 endocytosis 37. Similarly, Gαi1/3 silencing or mutation in neurons inhibited BDNF-induced TrkB endocytosis and activation of downstream signaling 23.

In the present study, we show that Netrin-1 induced Gαi1/3 association with CD146 is required for CD146 internalization and Gab1 recruitment. Gαi1/3 KO, silencing or dominant negative mutations inhibited Netrin-1-induced CD146 internalization and Gab1 activation in MEFs and HUVECs. Therefore, Gαi1/3-mediated CD146 membrane internalization maybe a key mechanism for Netrin-1-activated signaling and angiogenesis.

Previous studies have proposed that Netrin-1 could act as a pro-angiogenesis factor and promote retinopathy progression in DR 12, 15, 47. Netrin-1 is able to attract both endothelial cells and axons simultaneously 48-50, and injection of low concentrations of Netrin-1 (100 ng/mL) accelerated retinal neovascularization in STZ-induced diabetic rats 15. We found that Netrin-1 mRNA and protein expression as well as Akt-Erk activation are significantly elevated in retinal tissues of DR mice. Decreasing Netrin-1 levels, by intravitreous Netrin-1 shRNA AAV injection, inhibited Akt-Erk activation, pathological retinal angiogenesis and RGC degeneration in DR mice. Importantly, mRNA and protein expression of Netrin-1 and CD146 was significantly elevated in the proliferative retinal tissues of PDR patients. These results, together with the previous findings showing Gαi1/3 upregulation in proliferative retinal tissues of PDR patients 22, further implicates increased Netrin-1-CD146-Gαi1/3 signaling in abnormal angiogenesis of PDR.

Conclusion

Netrin-1 induces CD146-Gαi1/3-Gab1 complex formation to mediate downstream Akt-mTOR and Erk activation, important for angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. DR is recognized as a microvascular disease. The anti-VEGF therapies have displayed remarkable efficacy in certain DR patients 61-63; Yet many patients are still unable to achieve clinically-significant visual improvement 61-63. As many other growth factors and various inflammatory cytokines also participate in the pathological angiogenesis in DR 61-63, it is extremely important to identify novel therapeutic targets required for DR progression 61-63. Our results imply that Netrin-1-CD146-Gαi1/3 signaling is responsible for abnormal angiogenesis of DR. This cascade represents a novel molecular therapeutic target of DR.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gαi1 plus Gαi3 double knockout abolishes Netrin-1-induced Akt-mTOR and Erk activation in MEFs. Wild-type (WT) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), Gαi1 plus Gαi3 double knockout (“Gαi1/3 DKO”) MEFs (A-C), Gαi1, Gαi2 or Gαi3 single knockout (SKO) MEFs (D-E) were treated with Netrin-1 at the applied concentrations for designated time periods, expression of listed proteins was shown, and protein phosphorylation was quantified (A-E). Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD, biological replicates). Quantifications were from five biological replicates (n = 5). *P < 0.05 versus “WT MEFs”. #P < 0.05. “N. S.” stands for non-statistical differences (P > 0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gαi1/3 shRNA prevents Netrin-1-induced signaling and pro-angiogenic activity in HUVECs. HUVECs were treated with Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 5 min, Gab1-immunoprecipitated proteins were tested by Co-IP assays (A), and expression of listed proteins was examined as well (“Input”) (A). Puromycin-selected stable HUVECs, with the lentiviral Gαi1 shRNA plus lentiviral Gαi3 shRNA (“shGαi1/3”) or scramble control shRNA (“shC”), were treated with or without Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 15 min, expression of listed mRNAs and proteins was tested (B, C and E). The shGαi1/3 HUVECs or the shC HUVECs were treated with or without Netrin-1 (25 ng/mL) for 5 min, expression of listed protein in membrane fraction lysates and total cell lysates was tested (D); HUVECs were also cultivated for applied time periods, cell proliferation (by measuring EdU incorporation, F), migration (G), invasion (H) and tube formation (I) were tested by the described assays, with results quantified. The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 5, five biological replicates). Quantifications were from five biological replicates (n = 5). * P < 0.05 versus “shC”. #P < 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Silence of Netrin-1 inhibits pathological retinal angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy (DR) mice. The retina tissues of STZ-administrated diabetic retinopathy mice (“DR”) and citrate buffer-administrated mock control mice (“Mock”) were separated, expression of Netrin-1 mRNA and protein was tested, and results quantified (A-C). At day-30 following STZ administration, the DR mice were intravitreously injected with AAV5-packed Netrin-1 shRNA (“shNetrin-1-AAV”) or AAV5-packed scramble control shRNA (“shC-AAV”), each at 0.1 μL; At day-90 after last STZ administration, retinal tissues were separated and expression of listed mRNAs and proteins was tested (D-F, I-K). The retinal vasculature was measured by IB4 staining (G, scale bar = 50 μm), and the average number of vascular branches per view measured (G). The retinal trypsin digestion was performed to detect acellular capillaries and the number of acellular capillaries (red arrows) recorded (H, scale bar = 500 μm). The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, biological replicates).* P < 0.05. “N. S.” stands for non-statistical differences (P > 0.05).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Silence of Netrin-1 inhibits RGC degeneration in diabetic retinopathy (DR) mice. At day-30 following last STZ administration, the DR mice were intravitreously injected with AAV5-packed Netrin-1 shRNA (“shNetrin-1-AAV”) or AAV5-packed scramble control shRNA (“shC-AAV”), each at 0.1 μL; At day-90 after STZ administration. NeuN immunofluorescence staining in the retinal slides of the mice were shown, and the number of NeuN-positive RGCs in GCL recorded (A and B).The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, biological replicates). “Mock” stands for mice with citrate buffer administration. “GCL”: ganglion cell layer, “ONL”: Outer nuclear layer, “INL”: Inner nuclear layer. * P < 0.05. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Netrin-1 and CD146 expression is increased in the proliferative retinal tissues of human proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients. The proliferative retinal membrane of six different PDR patients and retinas of three age-matched traumatic retinectomy patients (“Ctrl”) were homogenized, and mRNA and protein expression of Netrin-1 and CD146 in the fresh tissue lysates was examined (A-C). The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, biological replicates). * P < 0.05 versus “Ctrl”.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This work was generously supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171461, 82171080, 81922025, 81771457 and 81700859), a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Suzhou Science and Technology Development Program (SYS2020172). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contributions

All authors conceived, designed, and supervised the study, performed the experiments and analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Soochow University.

Availability of data and material

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and the Supplementary Materials.

Abbreviations

EdU

5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine

BDNF

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

cAMP

cyclic AMP

CRISPR

clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats

Cas9

CRISPR-associated protein 9

Co-IP

co-immunoprecipitation

DR

diabetic retinopathy

DCC

DCC Netrin-1 receptor

DN

dominant negative

DKO

double knockout

EGF

epidermal growth factor

FBS

fetal bovine serum

Gαi

G protein subunit alpha I

GCL

ganglion cell layer

Gab1

Grb2 associated binding protein 1

HUVEC

human umbilical vein endothelial cell

LGR4

leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 4

MEFs

mouse embryonic fibroblasts

IL-4

interleukin-4

IB4

isolectin B4

KGF

keratinocyte growth factor

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

OIR

oxygen-induced retinopathy

PCK1

phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1

PDR

proliferative diabetic retinopathy

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time PCR

S6K

ribosomal protein S6 kinase

RTKs

receptor tyrosine kinases

RGCs

retinal ganglion cells

shRNA

short hairpin RNA

SKO

single knockout

SD

standard deviation

STZ

streptozotocin

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-α

UNC5B

Unc-5 Netrin receptor B

VCAM-1

vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

vWF

von willebrand factor

WT

wild-type

References

  • 1.Rajendran P, Rengarajan T, Thangavel J, Nishigaki Y, Sakthisekaran D, Sethi G. et al. The vascular endothelium and human diseases. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9:1057–69. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.7502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garoffolo G, Pesce M. Vascular dysfunction and pathology: focus on mechanical forces. Vasc Biol. 2021;3:R69–R75. doi: 10.1530/VB-21-0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ruan Y, Jiang S, Musayeva A, Gericke A. Oxidative Stress and Vascular Dysfunction in the Retina: Therapeutic Strategies. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020. 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Eelen G, Treps L, Li X, Carmeliet P. Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Angiogenesis Updated. Circ Res. 2020;127:310–29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Potente M, Gerhardt H, Carmeliet P. Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis. Cell. 2011;146:873–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Augustin HG, Koh GY. Organotypic vasculature: From descriptive heterogeneity to functional pathophysiology. Science. 2017. 357. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Betz C, Lenard A, Belting HG, Affolter M. Cell behaviors and dynamics during angiogenesis. Development. 2016;143:2249–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.135616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Isogai S, Lawson ND, Torrealday S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM. Angiogenic network formation in the developing vertebrate trunk. Development. 2003;130:5281–90. doi: 10.1242/dev.00733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Serafini T, Kennedy TE, Galko MJ, Mirzayan C, Jessell TM, Tessier-Lavigne M. The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth-promoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6. Cell. 1994;78:409–24. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90420-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larrivee B, Freitas C, Trombe M, Lv X, Delafarge B, Yuan L. et al. Activation of the UNC5B receptor by Netrin-1 inhibits sprouting angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2433–47. doi: 10.1101/gad.437807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilson BD, Ii M, Park KW, Suli A, Sorensen LK, Larrieu-Lahargue F. et al. Netrins promote developmental and therapeutic angiogenesis. Science. 2006;313:640–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1124704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park KW, Crouse D, Lee M, Karnik SK, Sorensen LK, Murphy KJ. et al. The axonal attractant Netrin-1 is an angiogenic factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:16210–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405984101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lu X, Le Noble F, Yuan L, Jiang Q, De Lafarge B, Sugiyama D. et al. The netrin receptor UNC5B mediates guidance events controlling morphogenesis of the vascular system. Nature. 2004;432:179–86. doi: 10.1038/nature03080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tu T, Zhang C, Yan H, Luo Y, Kong R, Wen P. et al. CD146 acts as a novel receptor for netrin-1 in promoting angiogenesis and vascular development. Cell Res. 2015;25:275–87. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu Y, Zou J, Han Y, Quyang L, He H, Hu P. et al. Effects of intravitreal injection of netrin-1 in retinal neovascularization of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:6363–77. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S93166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiege K, Ali SR, Gewecke B, Novakovic A, Konrad FM, Pexa K. et al. Galphai2 is the essential Galphai protein in immune complex-induced lung disease. J Immunol. 2013;190:324–33. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Milligan G, Kostenis E. Heterotrimeric G-proteins: a short history. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(Suppl 1):S46–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yao J, Wu XY, Yu Q, Yang SF, Yuan J, Zhang ZQ. et al. The requirement of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 for angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabn6928. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn6928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu F, Chen G, Zhou L-N, Wang Y, Zhang Z-q, Qin X, YME1L overexpression exerts pro-tumorigenic activity in glioma by promoting Gαi1 expression and Akt activation. Protein & Cell. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Bian ZJ, Shan HJ, Zhu YR, Shi C, Chen MB, Huang YM. et al. Identification of Galphai3 as a promising target for osteosarcoma treatment. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:1508–20. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.68861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang Y, Liu YY, Chen MB, Cheng KW, Qi LN, Zhang ZQ. et al. Neuronal-driven glioma growth requires Galphai1 and Galphai3. Theranostics. 2021;11:8535–49. doi: 10.7150/thno.61452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun J, Huang W, Yang SF, Zhang XP, Yu Q, Zhang ZQ. et al. Galphai1 and Galphai3mediate VEGF-induced VEGFR2 endocytosis, signaling and angiogenesis. Theranostics. 2018;8:4695–709. doi: 10.7150/thno.26203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marshall J, Zhou XZ, Chen G, Yang SQ, Li Y, Wang Y. et al. Antidepression action of BDNF requires and is mimicked by Galphai1/3 expression in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E3549–E58. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722493115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu YY, Chen MB, Cheng L, Zhang ZQ, Yu ZQ, Jiang Q. et al. microRNA-200a downregulation in human glioma leads to Galphai1 over-expression, Akt activation, and cell proliferation. Oncogene. 2018;37:2890–902. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang YM, Zhang ZQ, Liu YY, Zhou X, Shi XH, Jiang Q. et al. Requirement of Galphai1/3-Gab1 signaling complex for keratinocyte growth factor-induced PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 activation. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:181–91. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cao C, Huang X, Han Y, Wan Y, Birnbaumer L, Feng GS. et al. Galpha(i1) and Galpha(i3) are required for epidermal growth factor-mediated activation of the Akt-mTORC1 pathway. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra17. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Z, Dela Cruz R, Ji F, Guo S, Zhang J, Wang Y. et al. G(i)alpha proteins exhibit functional differences in the activation of ERK1/2, Akt and mTORC1 by growth factors in normal and breast cancer cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-12-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bai JY, Li Y, Xue GH, Li KR, Zheng YF, Zhang ZQ. et al. Requirement of Galphai1 and Galphai3 in interleukin-4-induced signaling, macrophage M2 polarization and allergic asthma response. Theranostics. 2021;11:4894–909. doi: 10.7150/thno.56383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu G, Qi L-n, Zhang M-q, Li X-y, Chai J-l, Zhang Z-q, Gαi1/3 mediation of Akt-mTOR activation is important for RSPO3-induced angiogenesis. Protein & Cell. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Zhang XP, Li KR, Yu Q, Yao MD, Ge HM, Li XM. et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced corneal neovascularization. FASEB J. 2018;32:3782–91. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701074RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang W, Xu S, Yin M, Jin ZG. Essential roles of Gab1 tyrosine phosphorylation in growth factor-mediated signaling and angiogenesis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;181:180–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sarmay G, Angyal A, Kertesz A, Maus M, Medgyesi D. The multiple function of Grb2 associated binder (Gab) adaptor/scaffolding protein in immune cell signaling. Immunol Lett. 2006;104:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yart A, Mayeux P, Raynal P. Gab1, SHP-2 and other novel regulators of Ras: targets for anticancer drug discovery? Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003;3:177–92. doi: 10.2174/1568009033481976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu Y, Rohrschneider LR. The gift of Gab. FEBS Lett. 2002;515:1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02425-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hibi M, Hirano T. Gab-family adapter molecules in signal transduction of cytokine and growth factor receptors, and T and B cell antigen receptors. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;37:299–307. doi: 10.3109/10428190009089430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li X, Wang D, Chen Z, Lu E, Wang Z, Duan J. et al. Galphai1 and Galphai3 regulate macrophage polarization by forming a complex containing CD14 and Gab1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:4731–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503779112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Karar J, Maity A. PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Angiogenesis. Front Mol Neurosci. 2011;4:51. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chappell WH, Steelman LS, Long JM, Kempf RC, Abrams SL, Franklin RA. et al. Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR inhibitors: rationale and importance to inhibiting these pathways in human health. Oncotarget. 2011;2:135–64. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Akt takes center stage in angiogenesis signaling. Circ Res. 2000;86:4–5. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Altomare DA, Testa JR. Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24:7455–64. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim KA, Jung JH, Choi YS, Kim ST. Wogonin inhibits tight junction disruption via suppression of inflammatory response and phosphorylation of AKT/NF-kappaB and ERK1/2 in rhinovirus-infected human nasal epithelial cells. Inflamm Res. 2022;71:357–68. doi: 10.1007/s00011-022-01542-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cong X, Kong W. Endothelial tight junctions and their regulatory signaling pathways in vascular homeostasis and disease. Cell Signal. 2020;66:109485. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shiojima I, Walsh K. Role of Akt signaling in vascular homeostasis and angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2002;90:1243–50. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000022200.71892.9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rolev KD, Shu XS, Ying Y. Targeted pharmacotherapy against neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in early diabetic retinopathy. Neuropharmacology. 2021;187:108498. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang J, Liu R, Kuang HY, Gao XY, Liu HL. Protective treatments and their target retinal ganglion cells in diabetic retinopathy. Brain Res Bull. 2017;132:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wu W, Lei H, Shen J, Tang L. The role of netrin-1 in angiogenesis and diabetic retinopathy: a promising therapeutic strategy. Discov Med. 2017;23:315–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Castets M, Mehlen P. Netrin-1 role in angiogenesis: to be or not to be a pro-angiogenic factor? Cell Cycle. 2010;9:1466–71. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.8.11197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Castets M, Coissieux MM, Delloye-Bourgeois C, Bernard L, Delcros JG, Bernet A. et al. Inhibition of endothelial cell apoptosis by netrin-1 during angiogenesis. Dev Cell. 2009;16:614–20. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Navankasattusas S, Whitehead KJ, Suli A, Sorensen LK, Lim AH, Zhao J. et al. The netrin receptor UNC5B promotes angiogenesis in specific vascular beds. Development. 2008;135:659–67. doi: 10.1242/dev.013623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Xu H, Liu J, Xiong S, Le YZ, Xia X. Suppression of retinal neovascularization by lentivirus-mediated netrin-1 small hairpin RNA. Ophthalmic Res. 2012;47:163–9. doi: 10.1159/000331428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Han Y, Shao Y, Lin Z, Qu YL, Wang H, Zhou Y. et al. Netrin-1 simultaneously suppresses corneal inflammation and neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1285–95. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zheng C, Qiu Y, Zeng Q, Zhang Y, Lu D, Yang D. et al. Endothelial CD146 is required for in vitro tumor-induced angiogenesis: the role of a disulfide bond in signaling and dimerization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:2163–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kang Y, Wang F, Feng J, Yang D, Yang X, Yan X. Knockdown of CD146 reduces the migration and proliferation of human endothelial cells. Cell Res. 2006;16:313–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kebir A, Harhouri K, Guillet B, Liu JW, Foucault-Bertaud A, Lamy E. et al. CD146 short isoform increases the proangiogenic potential of endothelial progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res. 2010;107:66–75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.213827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Harhouri K, Kebir A, Guillet B, Foucault-Bertaud A, Voytenko S, Piercecchi-Marti MD. et al. Soluble CD146 displays angiogenic properties and promotes neovascularization in experimental hind-limb ischemia. Blood. 2010;115:3843–51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chan B, Sinha S, Cho D, Ramchandran R, Sukhatme VP. Critical roles of CD146 in zebrafish vascular development. Dev Dyn. 2005;232:232–44. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yan X, Lin Y, Yang D, Shen Y, Yuan M, Zhang Z. et al. A novel anti-CD146 monoclonal antibody, AA98, inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth. Blood. 2003;102:184–91. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jiang T, Zhuang J, Duan H, Luo Y, Zeng Q, Fan K. et al. CD146 is a coreceptor for VEGFR-2 in tumor angiogenesis. Blood. 2012;120:2330–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-406108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bu P, Gao L, Zhuang J, Feng J, Yang D, Yan X. Anti-CD146 monoclonal antibody AA98 inhibits angiogenesis via suppression of nuclear factor-kappaB activation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2872–8. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang W, Lo ACY. Diabetic Retinopathy: Pathophysiology and Treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Stitt AW, Curtis TM, Chen M, Medina RJ, McKay GJ, Jenkins A. et al. The progress in understanding and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;51:156–86. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Capitao M, Soares R. Angiogenesis and Inflammation Crosstalk in Diabetic Retinopathy. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:2443–53. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures.

Data Availability Statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and the Supplementary Materials.


Articles from Theranostics are provided here courtesy of Ivyspring International Publisher

RESOURCES