Abstract
The susceptibilities of 43 pharyngeal isolates of Capnocytophaga to beta-lactam antibiotics, alone or in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors, were tested by an agar dilution method. The 34 beta-lactamase-positive strains were highly resistant to beta-lactams, but the intrinsic activities of clavulanate, tazobactam, and sulbactam against Capnocytophaga, even beta-lactamase producers, indicates that these beta-lactamase inhibitors could be used for empirical treatment of neutropenic patients with oral sources of infection.
The genus Capnocytophaga is composed of a group of capnophilic, gram-negative fusiform bacteria that are part of the normal oral flora in humans and animals. Capnocytophaga species have been identified as the cause of a variety of infections in immunocompetent hosts (18). In immunocompromised and neutropenic patients, Capnocytophaga spp. have been isolated more frequently from patients with bloodstream infections, including bacteremia (2, 5, 9), and patients with endocarditis (4) with severe chemotherapy-induced ulcerations (8). Variations in the prevalence, number, and proportion of Capnocytophaga spp. have been shown to occur in the dental plaque of pediatric cancer patients undergoing a course of immunosuppressive chemotherapy (22). In general, many antibiotics, including penicillins, clindamycin, macrolides, and quinolones, are effective in treating Capnocytophaga infections (6, 10, 11, 21). However, strains that produce beta-lactamases and that cause septicemia have recently been described (1, 7, 9, 19). These beta-lactamase-producing strains increase the risk of infection in neutropenic patients, especially during chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibilities of 43 Capnocytophaga strains isolated from neutropenic pediatric patients to beta-lactams and beta-lactamase inhibitors.
Forty-three Capnocytophaga strains were isolated by swabbing the throats of pediatric cancer patients undergoing a course of chemotherapy in the Department of Pediatric Oncology at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sud (Rennes, France). Two reference strains (Escherichia coli CIP 7624 and Staphylococcus aureus CIP 7625) were also included in the study. Throat samples were collected with sterile swabs, which were immediately taken to the Department of Microbiology, dispersed in sterile distilled water, and inoculated onto TBBP agar (4% Trypticase soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood, 0.1% yeast extract [AES Laboratory, Combourg, France], 100 μg of polymyxin per ml, 50 μg of bacitracin [Sigma] per ml) (15). The agar plates were incubated in a 10% CO2 atmosphere for 5 days at 37°C. The isolates were identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram staining, negative catalase and oxidase reactions, and API ZYM profiles (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) (13, 23).
All isolates were tested for beta-lactamase production by a chromogenic cephalosporin nitrocefin method (Cefinase; BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) by the recommended procedure (Becton Dickinson). The test results were recorded after 20 min.
One susceptibility testing method, not standardized for Capnocytophaga spp., was performed to determine the resistance phenotypes of the strains. An agar dilution procedure with Columbia agar base (44 g/liter; AES Laboratory) supplemented with 1% Polyvitex (BioMérieux), and 1% hemoglobin (Difco) and with antibiotics at various concentrations (21) was used to study the effectiveness of several beta-lactam antibiotics against the 43 pharyngeal Capnocytophaga colonizers. Pure preparations of the following antimicrobial agents were kindly supplied by the manufacturers: amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and clavulanate (SmithKline Beecham Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa.), sulbactam (Pfizer Inc, New York, N.Y.), piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam and tazobactam (Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, N.Y.), mecillinam (Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ballerup, Denmark), imipenem and cefoxitin (Merck Sharp & Dohme, West Point, Pa.), aztreonam (Squibb Manufacturing, Humacao, P.R.), cefotaxime (Roussel UCLAF, Romainville, France), ceftazidime (Glaxo Wellcome, Stevenage, United Kingdom), and moxalactam (Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, Ind.). Clavulanate was also combined with amoxicillin at a ratio of 1:2 and with ticarcillin at a ratio of 1:15; tazobactam-piperacillin was tested at a ratio of 1:8. Stock solutions of 6,400 μg/ml were prepared as recommended by the manufacturers, and serial twofold dilutions were prepared to give final concentrations in the agar medium ranging from 0.03 to 128 μg/ml. Fresh Capnocytophaga cultures grown for 48 h in brucella broth (AES Laboratory) were diluted in Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco) and inoculated onto the test medium with an automatic multipoint inoculator (Denley, Billingshurst, United Kingdom) to give an inoculation spot of 104 CFU. Control plates containing no antibiotics before each set of antibiotic-containing plates were inoculated. Reference organisms were included on each plate to assess the reproducibility of the assay. The plates were incubated for from 48 h to 5 days at 37°C in 10% CO2.
All 43 strains belonged to the Capnocytophaga ochracea-C. sputigena group. Thirty-four of the isolates produced beta-lactamase according to the nitrocefin test. The MIC breakpoints used are those recommended for anaerobes by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (16). The susceptibilities of the 43 Capnocytophaga strains to three beta-lactam antibiotics and three beta-lactamase inhibitors, alone or in combination, expressed as the range of MICs and the MICs at which 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of the strains are inhibited, are shown in Table 1. No significant differences were noted when the incubation was prolonged up to 5 days or when the results of the susceptibility tests were recorded after a 48-h incubation period (data not shown). The 9 beta-lactamase-negative strains were sensitive to the beta-lactams tested, whereas the 34 beta-lactamase-positive strains were highly resistant, especially to amoxicillin, ticarcillin, and mecillinam. The results for the cephalosporins were more variable, but all were more active against the beta-lactamase-negative strains. Cefoxitin remained active, as did imipenem and aztreonam, although most beta-lactamase-positive strains were resistant to ceftazidime. The addition of clavulanate to amoxicillin or ticarcillin or the addition of tazobactam to piperacillin resulted in low MICs for all isolates. The MIC measurements (Table 1) indicated that the three beta-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam) all had nearly the same intrinsic activity against the Capnocytophaga strains. The reproducibility of the MIC determinations for the reference strains was good for all the antimicrobial agents tested and varied only by a twofold dilution in separate measurements, as expected (1).
TABLE 1.
In vitro activities of 10 beta-lactams and three beta-lactamase inhibitors, alone or in combination, against Capnocytophaga speciesa
| Agent | MIC (μg/ml)
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-lactamase-positive isolates (n = 34)
|
Beta-lactamase-negative isolates (n = 9)
|
Resistance breakpointsb | ||||
| 50% | 90% | Range | 50% | Range | ||
| Amoxicillin | ≥128 | ≥128 | 1–≥128 | 0.5 | ≤0.03–1 | NDc |
| Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (2:1) | 1 | 2 | ≤0.03–2 | ≥0.03 | ≤0.03–0.5 | 16/8 |
| Ticarcillin | 64 | ≥128 | 1–≥128 | 0.5 | ≤0.03–2 | 128 |
| Ticarcillin + clavulanic acid (15:1) | 2 | 2 | ≤0.03–2 | 0.06 | ≤0.03–0.12 | ND |
| Piperacillin | 16 | 64 | 0.12–≥128 | 0.06 | ≤0.03–0.25 | 128 |
| Piperacillin + tazobactam (8:1) | 0.5 | 2 | ≤0.03–2 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03–0.06 | ND |
| Mecillinam | 16 | ≥128 | 0.5–≥128 | 0.25 | ≤0.03–0.5 | ND |
| Imipenem | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.03–2 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03–0.5 | 16 |
| Aztreonam | 0.5 | 0.5 | ≤0.03–2 | 0.12 | ≤0.03–0.5 | ND |
| Cefoxitin | 2 | 8 | 0.12–16 | 0.06 | ≤0.03–1 | 64 |
| Cefotaxime | 1 | 16 | ≤0.03–32 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03 | 64 |
| Ceftazidime | 16 | 64 | ≤0.03–≥128 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03–2 | ND |
| Moxalactam | 16 | 32 | ≤0.03–64 | 0.12 | ≤0.03–1 | 64 |
| Clavulanic acid | 1 | 2 | ≤0.03–4 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03–1 | ND |
| Sulbactam | 2 | 4 | 0.5–4 | 1 | 0.06–4 | ND |
| Tazobactam | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.06–2 | ND |
The activities were determined after 2 days of incubation of the Capnocytophaga spp.
NCCLS-recommended breakpoints (testing for anaerobes) for resistance; strains for which MICs at or above the indicated MIC are considered resistant.
ND, not determined.
The bacterial flora of the throat is a complex ecosystem. In pediatric cancer patients, it is influenced by the disease itself as well as numerous drugs, including antimitotics, corticosteroids, and antibiotics, which may lead to the selection of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Resistance to antibiotics acts as a virulence factor, favoring the spread of localized and systemic infections. Periodic sampling of the pharyngeal flora of neutropenic children using appropriate media has been used to detect the presence of Capnocytophaga. However, susceptibility testing by routine culture techniques is difficult because Capnocytophaga is a slowly growing, fastidious organism. Many different media have been used to determine MICs. In this study, beta-lactam MIC reproducibility was better on hemoglobin-supplemented medium with a 48-h incubation, which is in agreement with the work of Rummens et al. (21). The agar dilution technique is recognized as the best method for evaluation of the susceptibility to antimicrobial agents of Capnocytophaga and other fastidious anaerobic bacteria (19, 21).
The results of this study support initial observations that beta-lactamase production is becoming increasingly common in Capnocytophaga spp., as in other oral bacteria (3, 12, 17), but the location of the gene(s) coding for these beta-lactamases is not yet determined. Most investigators report that Capnocytophaga remains susceptible to imipenem and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. However, susceptibilities to other beta-lactams have been found to vary. Rummens et al. (21) investigated the in vitro activities of antimicrobial agents against Capnocytophaga strains, while Foweraker et al. (7) studied a strain that was resistant to cephalosporins (MICs, ≥16 μg/ml). Roscoe et al. (20) characterized a membrane-associated low-efficiency cephalosporinase that appears to be similar to the enzyme described by Foweraker et al. (7). Bilgrami et al. (2) reported a case of Capnocytophaga bacteremia caused by a resistant strain that was susceptible to a number of beta-lactam antibiotics but resistant to ceftazidime (MIC, 32 μg/ml). Gomez-Garces et al. (9) described a multidrug-resistant strain for which the MICs were similar to those reported here. Although imipenem and cefoxitin are always very active against Capnocytophaga (7, 9, 20), it is interesting that aztreonam and moxalactam are not. Variable susceptibilities have generally been reported for these beta-lactam antibiotics (10, 14, 21).
The intrinsic activities of beta-lactamase inhibitors, already described for clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species, with sulbactam being the most effective (24), have led to their combination with beta-lactam antibiotics for empirical antibiotic treatment of suspected bacteremia of oral origin in neutropenic patients, especially when Capnocytophaga is involved. Their use should be encouraged, as they are effective against both beta-lactamase producers and cephalosporin-resistant strains.
REFERENCES
- 1.Arlet G, Sanson-Le Pors M J, Casin I M, Ortenberg M, Perol Y. In vitro susceptibility of 96 Capnocytophaga strains, including a β-lactamase producer, to new β-lactam antibiotics and six quinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:1283–1284. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.8.1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bilgrami S, Bergstrom S K, Peterson D E, Hill D R, Dainiak N, Quinn J J, Ascensao J L. Capnocytophaga bacteremia in a patient with Hodgkin's disease following bone marrow transplantation: a case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:1045–1049. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.5.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bueno L C, Walker C B. Purification and characterization of a beta-lactamase produced by Prevotella intermedia. J Dent Res. 1994;73:430. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Buu-Hoi A, Joundy S, Acar J F. Endocarditis caused by Capnocytophaga ochracea. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1061–1062. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.1061-1062.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Forlenza S W. Capnocytophaga sepsis: a newly recognised clinical entity in granulocytopenic patients. Lancet. 1980;15:567–568. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91057-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Forlenza S W, Newman M G, Horikoshi A L, Blachman U. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Capnocytophaga. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981;19:144–146. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Foweraker J E, Hawkey P M, Heritage J, Van Landuyt H W. Novel β-lactamase from Capnocytophaga sp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1501–1504. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.8.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gandola C, Butler T, Badger S, Cheng E, Beard S. Septicemia caused by Capnocytophaga in a granulocytopenic patient with glossitis. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:851–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gomez-Garces J L, Alos J I, Sanchez J, Cogollos R. Bacteremia by multidrug-resistant Capnocytophaga sputigena. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:1067–1069. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.1067-1069.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hawkey P M, Smith S D, Haynes J, Malnick H, Forlenza S W. In vitro susceptibility of Capnocytophaga species to antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:331–332. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.2.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kolotronis A. Susceptibility of Capnocytophaga to antimicrobial agents. J Chemother. 1995;7:414–416. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.5.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lacroix J M, Walker C B. Identification of a streptomycin resistance gene and a partial Tn3 transposon coding for a beta-lactamase in a periodontal strain of Eikenella corrodens. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 1992;36:740–743. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.4.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Laughon B E, Syed S A, Loesche W J. API ZYM system for identification of Bacteroides spp., Capnocytophaga spp., and spirochetes of oral origin. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15:97–102. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.97-102.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin R D, Hsueh P R, Chang S C, Luh K T. Capnocytophaga bacteremia: clinical features of patients and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates. J Formos Med Assoc. 1998;97:44–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mashimo P A, Yamamoto Y, Nakamura M, Slots J. Selective recovery of oral Capnocytophaga spp. with sheep blood agar containing bacitracin and polymyxin B. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;17:187–191. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.2.187-191.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. 4th ed. Approved standard. NCCLS document M11-A14. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nyfors S, Könönen E, Takala A, Jousimies-Somer H. β-Lactamase production by oral anaerobic gram-negative species in infants in relation to previous antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1591–1594. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.7.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Parenti D M, Snydman D R. Capnocytophaga species: infections in nonimmunocompromised and immunocompromised hosts. J Infect Dis. 1985;151:140–147. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.1.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roscoe D, Clarke A. Resistance to Capnocytophaga species to β-lactam antibiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:284–285. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.2.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roscoe D L, Zemcov J V, Thornber D, Wise R, Clarke A M. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and β-lactamase characterization of Capnocytophaga species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2197–2220. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.10.2197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rummens J L, Gordts B, Van Landuyt H W. In vitro susceptibility of Capnocytophaga species to 29 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;30:739–742. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.5.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sixou J L, De Meideiros-Batista O, Gandemer V, Bonnaure-Mallet M. The effect of chemotherapy on the supra gingival plaque of pediatric cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 1998;34:476–483. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(98)00062-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Slots J. Enzymatic characterization of some oral and nonoral gram-negative bacteria with the API ZYM system. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;14:288–294. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.288-294.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Suh B, Shapiro T, Jones R, Satishchandran V, Truant A L. In vitro activity of beta-lactamase inhibitors against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;21:111–114. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00020-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
