Abstract
The Southern Ocean is a major sink of atmospheric CO2, but the nature and magnitude of its variability remains uncertain and debated. Estimates based on observations suggest substantial variability that is not reproduced by process-based ocean models, with increasingly divergent estimates over the past decade. We examine potential constraints on the nature and magnitude of climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink from observation-based air–sea O2 fluxes. On interannual time scales, the variability in the air–sea fluxes of CO2 and O2 estimated from observations is consistent across the two species and positively correlated with the variability simulated by ocean models. Our analysis suggests that variations in ocean ventilation related to the Southern Annular Mode are responsible for this interannual variability. On decadal time scales, the existence of significant variability in the air–sea CO2 flux estimated from observations also tends to be supported by observation-based estimates of O2 flux variability. However, the large decadal variability in air–sea CO2 flux is absent from ocean models. Our analysis suggests that issues in representing the balance between the thermal and non-thermal components of the CO2 sink and/or insufficient variability in mode water formation might contribute to the lack of decadal variability in the current generation of ocean models.
This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Heat and carbon uptake in the Southern Ocean: the state of the art and future priorities'.
Keywords: Southern Ocean, carbon sink, climate, oxygen, interannual, decadal
1. Introduction
The Southern Ocean CO2 sink represents about 40% of the global oceanic CO2 sink. Large decadal variations have been evidenced from observations [1–6], which are not related directly to changes in emissions of CO2 from human activities but rather to variable climate conditions and/or variable external forcings and their influence on the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 [7–9]. It is essential to better characterize and simulate correctly the variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink in process-based ocean models to improve our understanding of the global carbon-cycle and its future evolution [9–13].
Two types of approaches widely used to estimate the oceanic CO2 sink and its spatio-temporal variability include ‘pCO2 products’, which are based on observations compiled in the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT) [14], and Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models (GOBMs), which are based on simulating the carbon cycle and its response to observed climate variability and changes in atmospheric CO2 [15]. Results from both methods suggest a relative stagnation of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink in the 1990s [2] and its reinvigoration in the 2000s [3]. However, they strongly disagree on the magnitude of these temporal variations, which are below 0.04 PgC yr−1 in GOBMs and around 0.08–0.18 PgC yr−1 in pCO2 products [11,15]. While pCO2 products might overestimate decadal variability due to sparse and unevenly distributed data [16,17], independent constraints from atmospheric CO2 inversions tend to support larger variability compared with GOBMs [15].
Here, we make use of a temporal decomposition methodology and of observation-based air–sea O2 fluxes to gain further insights on the variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. First, we isolate the climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink, i.e. the part of the CO2 sink caused only by fluctuations in climate, and decompose it into its short-term interannual component (i.e. year-to-year) and its longer-term decadal/sub-decadal component. This temporal decomposition aims to better identify the issues and underlying processes [16,18,19]. Second, we compare the climate-driven variability of air–sea fluxes of CO2 and O2, from both observational products and GOBMs, recognizing that CO2 and O2 are affected by the same processes, but in different proportions. Indeed, both O2 and CO2 in the ocean are influenced by thermal processes (e.g. warming of the surface ocean) in similar ways, while they are both also influenced by non-thermal processes (e.g. biological photosynthesis and respiration, and ocean circulation) largely in opposite ways [20,21].
The overall objective of this study is thus to provide potential constraints on the nature and magnitude of the climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink by examining the coherence between CO2 and O2 flux variability estimated by data products and ocean models. For this, we evaluate the ability of 10 GOBMs to simulate interannual and decadal variability in air–sea fluxes of CO2 and O2 inferred from observations, and examine the overall coherence between CO2 and O2 variability. We hypothesize that if observation-based air–sea fluxes of CO2 and O2 from completely independent methods suggest similar interannual and/or decadal variabilities, then these are true signals of climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink that GOBMs should simulate.
2. Data and methods
This study focuses on the period 1985 to 2018 and is based on monthly gridded data of air–sea fluxes of CO2 and O2 in the Southern Ocean from GOBMs and observation-based products. The Southern Ocean is defined here as the ocean area south of 30° S. The total oceanic CO2 sink (Total Flux) can be described as:
2.1 |
where Fluxant and Fluxnat are the air–sea fluxes of anthropogenic and natural CO2, respectively. The superscript ss (steady state) denotes fluxes under unchanging climate conditions (on time scales longer than a year), whereas ns (non-steady state) denotes fluxes that are solely affected by changing climate conditions. Therefore, captures the effect of rising atmospheric CO2 alone on the ocean CO2 sink, captures the flux of natural CO2 in a constant climate and captures the climate-driven variability of the ocean CO2 sink.
(a) . Air–sea CO2 fluxes
Each of the 10 GOBMs used here comprises an ocean physical model coupled with a marine biochemistry module (table 1). Models are forced with observed atmospheric CO2 mole fraction, and winds and other weather conditions from atmospheric reanalysis datasets (called ‘atmospheric forcing’). The 10 GOBMs differ through their use of different ocean physical models, representation of biogeochemistry, forcing products, spin-up strategies and spatial resolutions [15], all of which influence model representation of CO2 and O2 fluxes.
Table 1.
GOBMs | |||
---|---|---|---|
name | physical ocean model | biogeochemistry model | atmospheric forcing |
CESM-ETHZ | CESMv1.3 | BEC | JRA55 |
CNRM | NEMOv3.6 | PISCESv2 | JRA55 |
EC-Earth3-CC | NEMOv3.6 | PISCESv2 | JRA55 |
FESOM-REcoM | FESOM-1.4 | REcoM-2 | JRA55 |
MPIOM-HAMOCC | MPIOM | HAMOCC6 | NCEP |
IPSL | NEMOv3.6 | PISCESv2 | JRA55 |
NorESM1-OCv1.2 | MICOM | HAMOCC | NCEP |
MOM6-Princeton | MOM6-SIS2 | COBALTv2 | JRA55 |
NEMO-PlankTOM12 | NEMOv3.6 | PlankTOM12 | NCEP |
ORCA025-GEOMAR | NEMO-ORCA025 | MOPS | JRA55 |
pCO2 products | |||
---|---|---|---|
name | gas exchange parameterization | wind product | atmospheric CO2 fields |
CMEMS-LSCE-FFNN | quadratic exchange formulation [22] | ERA 5 | [23] |
CSIR-ML6 | quadratic exchange formulation [22] | ERA 5 | NOAA |
Jena-MLS | quadratic exchange formulation [22] | JMA55-do reanalysis | Jena CarboScope |
JMA-MLR | quadratic exchange formulation [22] | JRA55 | JMA-GSAM |
MPI-SOMFFN | quadratic exchange formulation [22] | ERA 5 | NOAA |
NIES-NN | quadratic exchange formulation [22] | ERA 5 | NOAA |
OS-ETHZ-GRaCER | quadratic exchange formulation [24] | JRA55, ERA5, NCEP1 | NOAA |
Watson2020 | Nightingale formulation [25] | CCMP | NOAA |
All 10 GOBMs performed standardized simulations as part of the RECCAP2 project (https://reccap2-ocean.github.io/), following a common protocol (electronic supplementary material). Models conducted a simulation ‘A’ designed to capture the Total Flux term (equation (2.1)). For this, models were all forced with similar observed atmospheric CO2 mole fraction, and with variable weather conditions (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Models performed another simulation ‘C’ to capture the terms, where models were again forced with observed atmospheric CO2 mole fraction, but this time with weather conditions reflecting a climatological year (e.g. looping over the same year). The climate-driven variability was obtained by subtracting simulation C from simulation A.
All eight pCO2 products used here were part of the RECCAP2 project. Each product estimates the oceanic CO2 sink and its variability based on the observations of sea surface fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) from the SOCAT database [14]. First, fCO2 observations are interpolated and extrapolated in time and space using statistical or machine learning methods. Second, the air–sea CO2 fluxes are calculated by subtracting the corresponding atmospheric CO2 mole fraction from the monthly (or daily) gridded ocean fCO2 estimates, and multiplying the difference by a gas-exchange coefficient, which is a function of wind speed. The eight pCO2 products differ through their use of different methods to produce the gridded maps of fCO2, and in the variety of gas-exchange parametrizations and ancillary datasets required in the calculation of air–sea CO2 fluxes (table 1). The pCO2 products estimate the ‘Total Flux’ component of equation (2.1). In order to isolate the climate-driven variability component , the model estimate of the air–sea CO2 fluxes driven by atmopsheric CO2 alone as captured by the multi-model average of simulation C was subtracted from the pCO2 products estimates.
For the remaining of the manuscript, air–sea CO2 fluxes refer to the climate-driven variability of the CO2 fluxes for simplicity, unless specified otherwise.
(b) . Air–sea O2 fluxes
All GOBMs provided monthly gridded air–sea O2 fluxes from their simulation ‘A’ except ORCA025-GEOMAR. Observation-based estimates are taken from an atmospheric inversion method that optimized air–sea fluxes of Atmospheric Potential Oxygen (APO) to track the observed changes in APO concentration [26]. APO combines atmospheric observations of O2 and CO2 (APO = O2 + 1.1 CO2) in a manner that is conservative with regard to land biosphere exchanges (−O2 : CO2 = 1.1 mol mol−1) [27]. The combustion of fossil fuels also influences APO. This contribution has been removed as part of the inversion method using fuel-specific O2 : CO2 ratios (globally weighted average −O2 : CO2 ≈ 1.4 mol mol−1). Therefore, APO data adjusted for the relatively well-known fossil fuel combustion are records of air–sea fluxes of O2 and CO2. It has been demonstrated that variability in APO air–sea flux is approximately equal to the variability in air–sea O2 fluxes [26,28]. Here, we assume that the variability in APO air–sea flux estimated by an atmospheric inversion provides an observation-based estimate of the variability in O2 air–sea fluxes.
The O2 air–sea fluxes are not influenced by a strong anthropogenic signal (i.e. Fluxant) as is the case for CO2 [26]. Following the principles of equation (2.1), the climate-driven variability in O2 air–sea fluxes is captured by the term . Therefore, this observation-based estimate can be used as an independent constraint to evaluate the ability of GOBMs to correctly simulate the oceanic processes that influence air–sea exchanges of O2, which impact the climate-driven variability of the CO2 sink as well.
Here, we use the atmospheric CarboScope APO inversion (https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/CarboScope), which is based on the TM3 atmospheric tracer transport model. The inversion optimizes APO observations at five stations (period 1994–2018) or nine stations (period 1999–2018). Observations are from the Scripps O2 program (https://scrippso2.ucsd.edu/). The temporal variations in air–sea O2 flux estimated with the APO inversion method depend mainly on the inversion configuration, the quality of the APO data and the number and location of stations [26]. As the inversion is based on atmospheric observations, it is totally independent of the pCO2 products, which are based on oceanic observations. Note that the spatial patterns of the O2 air–sea fluxes cannot be studied with the atmospheric inversion because of an insufficient number of sampling stations in the Southern Hemisphere to obtain robust estimates of finer-scale spatial features [26].
(c) . Time series decomposition
The interannual and decadal/sub-decadal (hereafter named decadal) components of the climate-driven CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes time series were isolated using the following signal decomposition methodology: (i) the long-term mean was removed to focus on the temporal variability, (ii) the seasonal cycle was removed by applying a 12-month moving average, (iii) the decadal component of this de-seasonalized time series was obtained by filtering this time series with a 48-month Hanning window, (iv) the interannual component was extracted by removing the decadal component from the original de-seasonalized time series, and (v) the interannual component was smoothed with a 5-month Hanning window to eliminate the small month-to-month variability. The Hanning window is a filtering function with a ‘bell-shaped’ curve used to smooth the signal by emphasizing the feature near the centre of the window. A 48-month wide window eliminates most year-to-year variability, and therefore isolates the decadal component. The significance of the correlation coefficients between two filtered time series takes into account the corresponding degree of freedom by considering the e-folding decay time of autocorrelation [29]. The standard deviation of each time series is used as a measure of the magnitude of the variability.
We apply similarly steps (i–v) above to time series of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) index [30] and to the atmospheric forcing time series of wind speed and Sea Surface Temperature (SST) from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), after removing their long-term trends using a linear fit. However, for the SAM index, step (ii) was not applied because there is no clear seasonal cycle and step (v) used a longer 18-month Hanning window because the SAM index signal is noisier than the climate-driven CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes time series.
3. Results
(a) . Overview of the recent changes in the Southern Ocean CO2 sink
On average over the year, the Southern Ocean is a sink for CO2. The CO2 uptake mostly occurs in the Subtropical Zone (between 30° S and the Subtropical Front) and the Subantarctic Zone (between the Subtropical and the Subantarctic Front). This is mainly driven by natural CO2 uptake due to the cooling of subtropical waters, which are transported southwards, and the anthropogenic CO2 uptake by recently upwelled waters with low anthropogenic CO2 concentrations, which are transported northwards [1,31]. In the Subpolar Zone (north of the seasonally ice-covered zone), there is a net outgassing of CO2 due to the upwelling of deep waters with a high concentration of dissolved inorganic carbon [1,31].
On average, the Southern Ocean CO2 sink increased by 30.6 Tmol yr−1 between the first and last decades (1985–1994 and 2009–2018, respectively) according to the pCO2 products (figure 1). GOBMs estimated a slightly lower increase of 24.5 Tmol yr−1, almost entirely caused by the response to the increasing atmospheric CO2 mole fraction (26.5 Tmol yr−1, dashed line in figure 1). Climate variability induced fluctuations in the Southern Ocean CO2 sink of approximately 6.9 Tmol yr−1 according to the pCO2 products and 3.3 Tmol yr−1 according to GOBMs, significantly larger than the fluctuations of about 1.9 Tmol yr−1 also estimated by GOBMs and caused by variability in atmospheric CO2 mole fraction only (estimated as the standard deviations of the detrended time series).
(b) . Simulated versus observed temporal variability of CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes
Temporal variations in the CO2 sink from the means of the GOBMs and pCO2 products are clearly different, both in phase and in magnitude (figure 2a). Most of the discrepancies are related to the amplitude of the decadal variability (figure 2c) which is uncorrelated and three times lower in GOBMs (2.0 Tmol yr−1) than in pCO2 products (6.3 Tmol yr−1). None of the 10 GOBMs simulates decadal variability that significantly correlates with that of the pCO2 product mean, and all GOBMs underestimate the magnitude of the pCO2 product mean by 24% to 77%. Moreover, all pCO2 products except one have a higher decadal amplitude than any other GOBM (table 2). However, only half of the individual pCO2 products are significantly and positively correlated with the mean pCO2 product signal, although the degree of freedom to test the significance of the correlation is small and some moderate or high positive correlation values (r ≥ 0.66) are considered non-significant. Longer time series are needed to increase the degree of freedom.
Table 2.
CO2 (Tmol yr−1) |
O2 (Tmol yr−1) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
decadal |
interannual |
decadal |
interannual |
|||||
r (pCO2 product mean versus) | amplitude | r (pCO2 product mean versus) | amplitude | r (APO inversion (5 stn.) versus) | amplitude | r (APO inversion (5 stn.) versus) | amplitude | |
pCO2 product mean | — | 6.31 | — | 1.68 | — | — | — | — |
APO inversion (5 stn.) | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2 | — | 26.1 |
GOBMs | ||||||||
CESM-ETHZ | 0.08 | 2.8 | 0.44 | 2.4 | 0.72 | 8.5 | 0.28 | 9.9 |
CNRM-electronic supplementary material | −0.12 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 0.53 | 14.9 | 0.36 | 9.4 |
EC-Earth3 | 0.35 | 2.9 | 0.62 | 2.7 | 0.45 | 11.9 | 0.41 | 9.8 |
FESOM_REcoM | −0.02 | 1.9 | 0.63 | 3.0 | 0.55 | 5.8 | 0.42 | 9.5 |
MPIOM-HAMOCC | 0.23 | 4.1 | 0.58 | 5.6 | −0.07 | 15.4 | 0.39 | 16.0 |
NEMO-PISCES | 0.08 | 3.1 | 0.48 | 2.3 | 0.55 | 10.6 | 0.43 | 9.6 |
NorESM | 0.07 | 1.5 | 0.07 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 9.1 | 0.30 | 8.9 |
MOM6-Princeton | −0.05 | 3.6 | 0.54 | 2.7 | 0.74 | 8.2 | 0.56 | 10.0 |
NEMO-PlankTOM12 | 0.2 | 2.4 | −0.32 | 2.1 | 0.62 | 16.6 | 0.20 | 11.3 |
GEOMAR | 0.06 | 2.9 | 0.57 | 3.1 | — | — | — | — |
GOBM mean | 0.12 | 2.1 | 0.64 | 2.1 | 0.63 | 8.5 | 0.46 | 8.3 |
pCO2 products | ||||||||
CMEMS-LSCEFFNN | 0.70 | 4.9 | 0.72 | 2.0 | — | — | — | — |
CSIR-ML6 | 0.97 | 6.7 | 0.91 | 2.1 | — | — | — | — |
Jena-MLS | 0.46 | 8.0 | 0.78 | 4.9 | — | — | — | — |
JMA-MLR | 0.66 | 5.8 | 0.61 | 1.6 | — | — | — | — |
MPI-SOMFFN | 0.95 | 13.7 | 0.55 | 2.3 | — | — | — | — |
NIES-NN | 0.63 | 2.7 | 0.68 | 1.2 | — | — | — | — |
OS-ETHZ-GRaCER | 0.94 | 5.8 | 0.79 | 2.0 | — | — | — | — |
Watson2020 | 0.96 | 13.5 | 0.66 | 2.6 | — | — | — | — |
APO inversion | ||||||||
APO inversion (9 stn.) | — | — | — | — | 0.79 | 24.7 | 0.68 | 28.1 |
The decadal variability in O2 fluxes is also lower in the GOBM mean (8.5 Tmol yr−1) than in the atmospheric inversion (22.2 Tmol yr−1), but they are significantly correlated (r = 0.63, figure 2d). However, the correlation between the GOBM mean and the inversion is not improved when using the version of the atmospheric inversion with nine stations. Only three of the nine GOBMs have a significant correlation with the atmospheric inversion using five stations (0.62 ≥ r ≥ 0.74), and two with the inversion using nine stations (0.74 ≥ r ≥ 0.77). All GOBMs underestimate the magnitude compared with the inversion estimate by 25% to 74%.
The interannual variabilities in CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes are more similar between the GOBM mean and the observation-based estimates (figure 2e,f). For CO2, the interannual variability is significantly correlated (r = 0.64) and similar in magnitude (2.1 Tmol yr−1 for GOBMs and 1.7 Tmol yr−1for pCO2 products). The median values of the interannual amplitude from all individual GOBMs and from all individual pCO2 products are similar (p-value = 0.0634; Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). Eight GOBMs have a positive correlation with the pCO2 product mean (0.44 ≥ r ≥ 0.63). All individual pCO2 products are positively correlated with the pCO2 product mean (0.55 ≥ r ≥ 0.91; table 2). For O2, the interannual variability is also significant correlated (r = 0.46 and r = 0.55 for the inversions with the five and nine stations, respectively). Six of the nine GOBMs are significantly correlated with the atmospheric inversion (0.36 ≥ r ≥ 0.56). However, the magnitude of the mean GOBM interannual variability (8.3 Tmol yr−1) is three times lower than that estimated by the atmospheric inversion (26.1 Tmol yr−1). Within the observation-based estimates, the winter season is more correlated with the interannual variations (r = 0.97 for CO2, and r = 0.96 for O2) than the summer season (r = 0.87 for CO2, and r = 0.71 for O2).
(c) . Simulated versus observed spatial variability of CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes
For the decadal component of the CO2 fluxes, there are clear differences between GOBMs and pCO2 products (figure 3a,b). First, the values are in general two times lower in GOBMs than in the pCO2 products. Second, in GOBMs, most of the highest magnitudes are south of or along the Subantarctic Front, apart from coastal regions south of Australia. In pCO2 products, areas south of the Subantarctic Front are also of importance, but they extend well to the north of this front and in all basins. For the decadal component of O2 air–sea fluxes in GOBMs, the areas south of the Subantarctic Front are of importance according to GOBMs (figure 3c).
For the interannual component of the CO2 fluxes, the areas of highest variability occur south of the Subantarctic Front in both GOBMs and pCO2 products (figure 3d,e). GOBMs highlight the importance of the Indian and Pacific sectors, a distinction less clear in the pCO2 products. For the interannual component of O2 fluxes (figure 3f), the area south of the Subantarctic Front is also of importance according to GOBMs, with also a larger influence of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, as for the decadal variability (figures 3c,f).
(d) . Relationship between observed variability of CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes
The observed decadal variability in air–sea CO2 flux from the pCO2 product mean is significantly correlated with the decadal variability in air–sea O2 fluxes inferred with the APO atmospheric inversion based on nine stations only (r = –0.81, figure 4a and table 3), but not with the five-station inversion. This significant correlation is mostly induced by three individual pCO2 products that have correlation values r ≤ –0.72 (table 2).
Table 3.
decadal |
interannual |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
APO inversion (5 stn.) | APO inversion (9 stn.) | APO inversion (5 stn.) | APO inversion (9 stn.) | |
pCO2 products | ||||
CMEMS-LSCEFFNN | −0.03 | −0.07 | −0.1 | −0.37 |
CSIR-ML6 | −0.45 | −0.69 | −0.41 | −0.64 |
Jena-MLS | −0.41 | −0.62 | −0.38 | −0.46 |
JMA-MLR | −0.26 | −0.08 | −0.17 | −0.34 |
MPI-SOMFFN | −0.58 | −0.72 | −0.25 | −0.55 |
NIES-NN | −0.23 | −0.37 | −0.26 | −0.43 |
OS-ETHZ-GRaCER | −0.31 | −0.76 | −0.5 | −0.62 |
Watson2020 | −0.41 | −0.75 | −0.25 | −0.43 |
pCO2 product mean | −0.47 | −0.81 | −0.4 | −0.64 |
The observed interannual variability in air–sea CO2 flux from the pCO2 product mean is significantly correlated with the interannual variability in air–sea O2 flux estimated with the APO atmospheric inversion with both five stations (r = –0.40) and nine stations (r = –0.64) (figure 4b and table 3). The significant correlation with the five-station inversion is supported by three out of the eight pCO2 products, while all pCO2 products except one support the significant correlation with the nine-station inversion (table 3).
Significant correlations between CO2 and O2 fluxes are all negative, suggesting that non-thermal processes, which influence CO2 and O2 in opposite direction, are the dominant source of variability on average over the Southern Ocean.
(e) . Relationships with the SAM index, wind speed and SST
On decadal time scale, significant correlations are found between the SAM and the CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes from GOBMs (r = –0.52 for CO2 and r = 0.73 for O2), but not between SAM and the observation-based air–sea fluxes (i.e. pCO2 products and atmospheric inversion, figure 5d,f). Therefore, the simulated influence of the SAM on the decadal variability could be either spurious or due to missing or poorly represented processes in most GOBMs.
On interannual time scale, significant correlations are found between the SAM and the CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes (figure 5e,g) in both models and observation-based fluxes (for GOBM fluxes, r = –0.71 for CO2 and r = 0.70 for O2; for observation-based fluxes, r = –0.56 for CO2 and r = 0.44 for O2). These results tend to support that the observed negative correlation between the interannual component of CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes (see previous section) is also related to the SAM index.
Negative correlations between CO2 and O2 fluxes on interannual time scale are associated with wind speed and occur in the Subpolar Zone (that extents from the Subantarctic Front to the September extent of sea ice; 15% of sea ice concentration, figure 6). In detail, in this region, correlations are mostly negative between CO2 fluxes and wind speed, and mostly positive between O2 fluxes and wind speed. Finally, and still in the Subpolar Zone, correlations are generally positive between CO2 fluxes and SST, and negative between O2 fluxes and SST. This suggests that interannual variations in the Southern Ocean CO2 sink are induced by processes occurring in the Subpolar Zone, with stronger CO2 outgassing events related to stronger winds, colder SST and stronger O2 ingassing events (and vice versa).
4. Discussion
The temporal variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink driven by climate variations can be decomposed into two components: a short-term interannual component and a decadal component (figure 2).
(a) . Interannual variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink
Our analysis suggests that pCO2 products accurately represent the climate-driven interannual variations of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. This is supported by the strong similarities between the interannual variabily of CO2 and O2 fluxes provided by two completely independent observation-based products (figure 4b and table 3). Our analysis further suggests that this interannual variability is predominately regulated by wintertime deep-water ventilation south of the Subantarctic Front. This is supported (i) by the negative sign of the correlation between CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes, which indicates the dominance of non-thermal processes [18], (ii) by the highest variability rates south of the Subantarctic Front, which corresponds to the location of ocean ventilation and outgassing of CO2 (ingassing of O2) [31,32], and (iii) by the higher correlation during the winter season pointing at a physical rather than a biological process. Therefore, the climatic processes regulating the wintertime ventilation of the Southern Ocean might also control the interannual variations of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink [33].
Our results indicate that the SAM could exert a strong control on the interannual variations of Southern Ocean CO2 sink (figure 5e,g). A positive (negative) SAM is related to an intensification (weakening) of the winds, which drive the upwelling intensity and carbon storage through the Ekman transport and other processes regulating the Mixed Layer Depth [2,34–36]. Years with stronger CO2 outgassing events in the Subpolar Zone are related to years experiencing stronger wind, colder SST (because of the upwelling of cold deep waters) and stronger O2 ingassing events (figure 6). Colder SST reinforces the ingassing of O2 in the Subpolar Zone (i.e. the thermal and non-thermal components reinforce each other), but dampens the outgassing of CO2.
Our results show that GOBMs simulate the interannual CO2 variability well, both in phase and in magnitude (figure 5e), including the SAM control of this variability. The correlation between the SAM index and the simulated and observed CO2 sink are similar for the interannual components (r = –0.64 and r = –0.51, respectively). This may be because the SAM is an atmospheric mode of variability and GOBMs are forced with atmospheric reanalysis dataset for wind forcing and surface heating whose variations are partly induced by the SAM.
The SAM is known to develop non-zonal atmospheric forcing in the Southern Ocean [37,38], inducing regional variations of the Mixed Layer Depth that influence the CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes [18,19,32,39], but such regional features are currently missing in pCO2 products (figure 3b), possibly because of insufficient observational coverage (electronic supplementary material, figure S7). GOBMs simulated some regional variabilities, with a strong influence of the Indo-Pacific sectors on the interannual component of the CO2 sink (figure 3a). Recently, the Indo-Pacific sectors were pointed out as the main regions for CO2 outgassing when considering new indirect estimates of air–sea CO2 fluxes derived from Biogeochemical-Argo float observations [33,40]. New observations maintained over several years will be needed to confirm these regional influences [33].
Our findings are slightly conflicting with previous results that argued for the influence of the summer season on the short-term interannual variability of the CO2 sink [19]. However, this later study [19] only compares the year-to-year variability of monthly pCO2 during the months associated with the annual maximum and minimum of pCO2 and not the flux itself. In winter, small changes of pCO2 can be amplified by the strong wintertime winds. Our suggestion that wintertime deep water ventilation events have a key role also implies that variability in gas transfer velocity has a second-order effect on interannual variations of O2 air–sea fluxes, contrary to [41] who estimated that it was the most important process controlling the variability of O2 air–sea fluxes. However, their sensitivity analysis was done with model outputs instead of performing separate model simulations with non-varying piston velocity or deep-water ventilation. Nonetheless, they highlighted that changes in the ventilation of O2-depleted deep water strongly influenced the temporal variations of O2 air–sea fluxes south of the Subantarctic Front. Moreover, they also found a relationship between air–sea O2 fluxes and the SAM index and argued that it is driven by the influence of the SAM index on the upwelling rate of O2-depleted deep waters.
Although the processes controlling the interannual variability of CO2 and O2 air–sea fluxes are emerging from our analysis, uncertainties remain on their magnitude. Whereas the variability in the CO2 sink is comparable between GOBMs and pCO2 products, GOBMs underestimate the interannual variability in O2 air–sea fluxes by a factor of two to three, as pointed out elsewhere [26,41–43]. Further work is needed to examine the plausible causes of this discrepancy.
(b) . Decadal variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink
The decadal component of the air–sea O2 fluxes (figure 4a) tends to support the existence of a decadal climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. Longer time series of atmospheric APO will be needed before this can be firmly confirmed, but the existence of significant large decadal variability is consistent with several studies based on different methods (e.g. [5], see review in [1,9]). Decadal variations in the Southern Ocean CO2 sink are mostly marked by a saturation period in the 1990s [2] and a reinvigoration period in the 2000s [3]. According to the pCO2 products, the climate-driven decadal variations are three times larger than the interannual variations (figure 2).
Although our analysis does not fully resolve the magnitude of the decadal variability, it does suggest it is real and larger than GOBMs simulate, even though it may not be as large as estimated by pCO2 products due to uneven sampling [16,17]. The relative performance of the GOBMs in reproducing O2 decadal variability is better than that of CO2 decadal variability, suggesting that the representation of the balance between thermal and non-thermal processes might be partly at fault in models. The balance between thermal and non-thermal components of the CO2 sink has been shown to play an important role in driving seasonal [1,44] and interannual [6] variability. In contrast to CO2 fluxes, for which the thermal and non-thermal components oppose each other, the thermal and non-thermal components involved in the O2 air–sea fluxes reinforce each other [26,45], which might explain why some GOBMs were able to reproduce the observed decadal variability in O2 air–sea fluxes and less the decadal changes in the CO2 sink.
The spatial extent of the decadal variability in the air–sea CO2 flux north of the Subantarctic Front suggests that Subantarctic Mode Water formation might also influence the decadal variability in the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. Areas just north of the Subantarctic Front are where the upper cell of the Southern Ocean overturning circulation contributes to the subduction of mode waters, which could have substantial influence on the decadal variability of the CO2 sink. The subduction of surface water into intermediate layers was already mentioned to explain some of the regionally enhanced CO2 sink in the eastern Pacific between 2012 and 2016 [6]. Such subduction phenomena occur at specific locations in the Southern Ocean [46,47], which could explain the asymmetrical spatial pattern observed in pCO2 products. Subantarctic Mode Water is particularly important for the transport and recirculation of absorbed anthropogenic CO2 [48], but less so on its temporal variability, which is lower than the variability associated with natural CO2 [49]. However, variations in the uptake flux of anthropogenic CO2 could enhance the climate-driven variability of the natural CO2 flux [1]. For instance, an enhanced upwelling rate south of the Subantarctic Front could either slightly increase the CO2 sink north of this front by increasing the subsequent subduction of surface water that absorbed anthropogenic CO2, or slightly decrease this CO2 sink by shortening the residence time of the surface water [46,49,50].
The current generation of GOBMs have coarse resolutions and most likely do not correctly simulate the formation of Subantarctic Mode Water [51], which is sensitive to oceanic currents, wind speed, Mixed Layer Depth, sea ice and eddies [46,48,52]. Other studies highlight the importance of eddies after a positive SAM event that compensate for the intensified upwelling [53,54]. Therefore, improvements of the physical and ice ocean models might be needed to correctly simulate the decadal variability of the CO2 sink, as well as the future evolution in the Southern Ocean [55,56].
Other possible sources of variability missing in GOBMs include the coupling with atmospheric dynamics, internal tracer anomalies (memory) and ecosystem variability. Atmospheric coupling is unlikely to be driving large decadal variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink since Earth System Models also do not generate a ratio between the decadal and interannual variability similar to the one suggested by the pCO2 products ensemble mean [18]. Internal anomalies in dissolved inorganic carbon and/or O2 concentration could in theory trigger variability in air–sea fluxes when those anomalies become in contact with the atmosphere, but more work would be needed to verify if such anomalies in the ocean interior exist and how they relate to the patterns of variability identified here. Finally, changes in marine ecosystems in response to variability in ocean properties could act to enhance or dampen the thermal and/or non-thermal components and therefore amplify the total signals [5,34]. Current generation GOBMs represent ecosystems that are largely driven by upwelled nutrients and do not yet include the more complex ecosystem responses, such as vertical migrations and salps/krill dipole that characterize the Southern Ocean (e.g. [57]). The importance of these processes for the variability in CO2 and O2 fluxes has not yet been examined.
5. Conclusion
The degree of concordance between observed and simulated variability in air–sea fluxes of CO2 and O2, at different time scales, was used to gain insights on climate-driven changes in the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. The interannual variations of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink derived from pCO2 products and models are consistent with the interannual variations in air–sea O2 flux derived from observations. The current generation of GOBMs can simulate the influence of stronger (weaker) winds during years of positive (negative) SAM that induce, in the Subpolar Zone, stronger (weaker) upwelling of deep waters and drive the short-term interannual variations of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. The decadal variations of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink, suggested by several pCO2 products, tends to be supported by the observed decadal variations of the air–sea O2 flux. However, GOBMs do not reproduce these decadal CO2 variations. Although the climate-driven processes associated with these decadal variations remain unclear, pCO2 products suggest an influence from regions associated with the formation of Subantarctic Mode Water, a physical process that might be poorly represented in GOBMs, while the relative performance of models in reproducing the decadal variability of O2 compared with CO2 suggests issues in representing the balance between thermal and non-thermal processes. More in-situ pCO2 data are required to confirm the influence of different Southern Ocean regions while more atmospheric APO data could help constrain the size of the decadal variability.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Erik Buitenhuis and David Willis for their work on the NEMO-PlankTOM12 model development. The research presented in this paper was carried out on the High Performance Computing Cluster supported by the Research and Specialist Computing Support service at the University of East Anglia.
Data accessibility
All MATLAB scripts and data discussed in the results are publicly available. This GitHub repository contains instructions on how to access them: https://github.com/nmayot/PTA_SouthernOcean.
The data are provided in the electronic supplementary material [58].
Authors' contributions
N.M.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft; C.L.Q.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing; C.R.: data curation, writing—review and editing; R.B.: data curation, writing—review and editing; L.B.: data curation, writing—review and editing; L.M.D.: data curation, writing—review and editing; M.G.: data curation, writing—review and editing; L.G.: data curation, writing—review and editing; N.G.: data curation, writing—review and editing; J.H.: data curation, writing—review and editing; Y.I.: data curation, writing—review and editing; T.I.: data curation, writing—review and editing; R.F.K.: data curation, writing—review and editing; P.L.: data curation, writing—review and editing; A.C.M.: data curation, writing—review and editing; L.P.: data curation, writing—review and editing; L.R.: data curation, writing—review and editing; J.S.: data curation, writing—review and editing; R.S.: data curation, writing—review and editing; A.W.: data curation, writing—review and editing; R.M.W.: data curation, writing—review and editing; J.Z.: data curation, writing—review and editing.
All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.
Conflict of interest declaration
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
N.M., C.L.Q., R.B., N.G., L.G. and A.C.M. acknowledge the funding from the European Commission through the H2020 project 4C (grant no. 821003). J.H., L.G., M.G. and N.G. acknowledge the funding from the European Commission through the H2020 project COMFORT project (grant no. 820989). C.L.Q. was funded by the UK Royal Society (grant no. RPR1191063). N.M. and R.M.W. were funded by UK's Natural Environment Research Council (SONATA: grant no. NE/P021417/1). J.S. received funding from the Research Council of Norway through project INES (grant no. 270061) and HPC resources provided by the National Infrastructure for HPC and Data Storage in Norway, UNINETT Sigma2 (grant no. nn/ns2980k). L.R. acknowledges the Princeton University Catalysis Initiative. N.G. and L.G. acknowledge funding from ETH Zürich. M.G. and R.S. acknowledge the ESM2025 project under the grant agreement number 101003536. M.G. also acknowledges funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Blue Growth research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 862923 (project AtlantECO). J.H. acknowledges support by the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association (Helmholtz Young Investigator Group Marine Carbon and Ecosystem Feedbacks in the Earth System [MarESys], grant number VH-NG-1301). The integration of the ORCA025-GEOMAR experiment was performed at the North German Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN) and was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (project PA 3075/2-1). The APO measurements were supported by a series of grants to the Scripps Institution of Oceanography from the US NSF and NOAA, most recently OPP-1922922 and NA20OAR4320278.
References
- 1.Gruber N, Landschützer P, Lovenduski NS. 2019. The variable Southern Ocean carbon sink. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 11, 159-186. ( 10.1146/annurev-marine-121916-063407) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Le Quéré C et al. 2007. Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink due to recent climate change. Science 316, 1735-1738. ( 10.1126/science.1136188) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Landschützer P, Gruber N, Bakker DCE. 2016. Decadal variations and trends of the global ocean carbon sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 1396-1417. ( 10.1002/2015GB005359) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rödenbeck C et al. 2015. Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean pCO2 mapping intercomparison (SOCOM). Biogeosciences 12, 7251-7278. ( 10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DeVries T et al. 2019. Decadal trends in the ocean carbon sink. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11 646-11 651. ( 10.1073/pnas.1900371116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Keppler L, Landschützer P. 2019. Regional wind variability modulates the Southern Ocean carbon sink. Sci. Rep. 9, 7384. ( 10.1038/s41598-019-43826-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Canadell JG et al. 2021. Global Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks. In Climate change 2021: The physical science basis contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (eds Masson-Delmotte V et al.), pp. 673-816. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 8.McKinley GA, Fay AR, Eddebbar YA, Gloege L, Lovenduski NS. 2020. External forcing explains recent decadal variability of the ocean carbon sink. AGU Adv. 1, e2019AV000149. ( 10.1029/2019AV000149) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gruber N, Bakker DCE, DeVries T, Gregor L, Hauck J, Landschützer P, McKinley GA, Müller JD. 2023. Trends and variability in the ocean carbon sink. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 119-134. ( 10.1038/s43017-022-00381-x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.DeVries T. 2022. The ocean carbon cycle. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 317–341. ( 10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-111307) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hauck J et al. 2020. Consistency and challenges in the ocean carbon sink estimate for the global carbon budget. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 571720. ( 10.3389/fmars.2020.571720) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li H, Ilyina T. 2018. Current and future decadal trends in the oceanic carbon uptake are dominated by internal variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 916-925. ( 10.1002/2017GL075370) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McKinley GA, Fay AR, Lovenduski NS, Pilcher DJ. 2017. Natural variability and anthropogenic trends in the ocean carbon sink. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 125-150. ( 10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060529) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bakker DCE, et al. 2022. Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas Database Version 2022 (SOCATv2022) (NCEI Accession 0253659) [cited 2022 Aug 22]. ( 10.25921/1h9f-nb73) [DOI]
- 15.Friedlingstein P et al. 2022. Global carbon budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811-4900. ( 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gloege L et al. 2021. Quantifying errors in observationally based estimates of ocean carbon sink variability. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2020G.B006788. ( 10.1029/2020GB006788) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hauck J, Nissen C, Landschützer P, Rödenbeck C, Bushinsky SM, Olsen A. 2023. Sparse and unevenlydistributed observations at high-latitudes dominate biases in air-sea CO2 flux estimates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20220068. ( 10.1098/rsta.2022.0068) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Resplandy L, Séférian R, Bopp L. 2015. Natural variability of CO2 and O2 fluxes: what can we learn from centuries-long climate models simulations? J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120, 384-404. ( 10.1002/2014JC010463) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gregor L, Kok S, Monteiro PMS. 2018. Interannual drivers of the seasonal cycle of CO2 in the Southern Ocean. Biogeosciences 15, 2361-2378. ( 10.5194/bg-15-2361-2018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Resplandy L, Keeling RF, Stephens BB, Bent JD, Jacobson A, Rödenbeck C, Khatiwala S. 2016. Constraints on oceanic meridional heat transport from combined measurements of oxygen and carbon. Clim. Dyn. 47, 3335-3357. ( 10.1007/s00382-016-3029-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sarmiento JL, Gruber N. 2006. Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics.
- 22.Wanninkhof R. 2014. Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean revisited. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 12, 351-362. ( 10.4319/lom.2014.12.351) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chevallier F. 2013. On the parallelization of atmospheric inversions of CO2 surface fluxes within a variational framework. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 783-790. ( 10.5194/gmd-6-783-2013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wanninkhof R. 1992. Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 97(C5), 7373-7382. ( 10.1029/92JC00188) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nightingale PD, Malin G, Law CS, Watson AJ, Liss PS, Liddicoat MI, Boutin J, Upstill-Goddard RC. et al. 2000. In situ evaluation of air-sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 373-387. ( 10.1029/1999GB900091) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rödenbeck C, Le Quéré C, Heimann M, Keeling RF. 2008. Interannual variability in oceanic biogeochemical processes inferred by inversion of atmospheric O2/N2 and CO2 data. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 60, 685-705. ( 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00375.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stephens BB, Keeling RF, Heimann M, Six KD, Murnane R, Caldeira K. 1998. Testing global ocean carbon cycle models using measurements of atmospheric O2 and CO2 concentration. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 12, 213-230. ( 10.1029/97GB03500) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Manning A, Keeling RF. 2006. Global oceanic and land biotic carbon sinks from the Scripps atmospheric oxygen flask sampling network. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 58, 95-116. ( 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00175.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Leith CE. 1973. The standard error of time-average estimates of climatic means. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 12, 1066-1069. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marshall GJ. 2003. Trends in the southern annular mode from observations and reanalyses. J. Clim. 16, 4134-4143. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gray AR, Johnson KS, Bushinsky SM, Riser SC, Russell JL, Talley LD, Wanninkhof R, Williams NL, Sarmiento JL. et al. 2018. Autonomous biogeochemical floats detect significant carbon dioxide outgassing in the high-latitude southern ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 9049-9057. ( 10.1029/2018GL078013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bushinsky SM, Gray AR, Johnson KS, Sarmiento JL. 2017. Oxygen in the southern ocean from argo floats: determination of processes driving air-sea fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 8661-8682. ( 10.1002/2017JC012923) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Prend CJ et al. 2022. Indo-pacific sector dominates southern ocean carbon outgassing. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007226. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hauck J, Völker C, Wang T, Hoppema M, Losch M, Wolf-Gladrow DA. 2013. Seasonally different carbon flux changes in the Southern Ocean in response to the southern annular mode. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 1236-1245. ( 10.1002/2013GB004600) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lenton A, Matear RJ. 2007. Role of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) in Southern Ocean CO2 uptake. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB2016. ( 10.1029/2006GB002714) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lovenduski NS, Gruber N, Doney SC, Lima ID. 2007. Enhanced CO2 outgassing in the Southern Ocean from a positive phase of the Southern Annular Mode. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB2026. ( 10.1029/2006GB002900) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fogt RL, Marshall GJ. 2020. The southern annular mode: variability, trends, and climate impacts across the southern hemisphere. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e652. ( 10.1002/wcc.652) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fogt RL, Jones JM, Renwick J. 2012. Seasonal zonal asymmetries in the southern annular mode and their impact on regional temperature anomalies. J. Clim. 25, 6253-6270. ( 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00474.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sallée JB, Speer KG, Rintoul SR. 2010. Zonally asymmetric response of the Southern Ocean mixed-layer depth to the Southern Annular Mode. Nat. Geosci. 3, 273-279. ( 10.1038/ngeo812) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen H, Haumann FA, Talley LD, Johnson KS, Sarmiento JL. 2022. The deep ocean's carbon exhaust. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007156. ( 10.1029/2021GB007156) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nevison CD, Munro DR, Lovenduski NS, Keeling RF, Manizza M, Morgan EJ, Rödenbeck C. 2020. Southern annular mode influence on wintertime ventilation of the southern ocean detected in atmospheric O2 and CO2 measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085667. ( 10.1029/2019GL085667) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Andrews O, Buitenhuis E, Le Quéré C, Suntharalingam P. 2017. Biogeochemical modelling of dissolved oxygen in a changing ocean. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160328. ( 10.1098/rsta.2016.0328) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McKinley GA, Follows MJ, Marshall J. 2000. Interannual variability of the air-sea flux of oxygen in the North Atlantic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2933-2936. ( 10.1029/2000GL011492) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mongwe NP, Vichi M, Monteiro PMS. 2018. The seasonal cycle of pCO2 and CO2 fluxes in the Southern Ocean: diagnosing anomalies in CMIP5 Earth system models. Biogeosciences 15, 2851-2872. ( 10.5194/bg-15-2851-2018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gruber N, Gloor M, Fan SM, Sarmiento JL. 2001. Air-sea flux of oxygen estimated from bulk data: implications For the marine and atmospheric oxygen cycles. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 783-803. ( 10.1029/2000GB001302) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Morrison AK, Waugh DW, Hogg A, Jones DC, Abernathey RP. 2022. Ventilation of the Southern Ocean Pycnocline. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 14, 405-430. ( 10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-011012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sallée JB, Speer K, Rintoul S, Wijffels S. 2010. Southern ocean thermocline ventilation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 509-529. ( 10.1175/2009JPO4291.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sallée JB, Matear RJ, Rintoul SR, Lenton A. 2012. Localized subduction of anthropogenic carbon dioxide in the Southern Hemisphere oceans. Nat. Geosci. 5, 579-584. ( 10.1038/ngeo1523) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.DeVries T, Holzer M, Primeau F. 2017. Recent increase in oceanic carbon uptake driven by weaker upper-ocean overturning. Nature 542, 215-218. ( 10.1038/nature21068) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gruber N et al. 2019. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007. Science 363, 1193-1199. ( 10.1126/science.aau5153) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sallée JB, Shuckburgh E, Bruneau N, Meijers AJS, Bracegirdle TJ, Wang Z, Roy T. 2013. Assessment of Southern Ocean water mass circulation and characteristics in CMIP5 models: historical bias and forcing response. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 1830-1844. ( 10.1002/jgrc.20135) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cerovečki I, Meijers AJS. 2021. Strong quasi-stationary wintertime atmospheric surface pressure anomalies drive a dipole pattern in the subantarctic mode water formation. J. Clim. 34, 6989-7004. ( 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12128) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dufour CO, Sommer JL, Gehlen M, Orr JC, Molines JM, Simeon J, Barnier B. 2013. Eddy compensation and controls of the enhanced sea-to-air CO2 flux during positive phases of the Southern Annular Mode. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 950-961. ( 10.1002/gbc.20090) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meredith MP, Hogg AM. 2006. Circumpolar response of Southern Ocean eddy activity to a change in the Southern Annular Mode. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L16608. ( 10.1029/2006GL026499) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bourgeois T, Goris N, Schwinger J, Tjiputra JF. 2022. Stratification constrains future heat and carbon uptake in the Southern Ocean between 30° S and 55° S. Nat. Commun. 13, 340. ( 10.1038/s41467-022-27979-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Terhaar J, Frölicher TL, Joos F. 2021. Southern Ocean anthropogenic carbon sink constrained by sea surface salinity. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd5964. ( 10.1126/sciadv.abd5964) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang G, Atkinson A, Pakhomov EA, Hill SL, Racault MF. 2022. Massive circumpolar biomass of Southern Ocean zooplankton: implications for food web structure, carbon export, and marine spatial planning. Limnol. Oceanogr. 67, 2516-2530. ( 10.1002/lno.12219) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mayot N et al. 2023. Climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6597304) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Mayot N et al. 2023. Climate-driven variability of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6597304) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Data Availability Statement
All MATLAB scripts and data discussed in the results are publicly available. This GitHub repository contains instructions on how to access them: https://github.com/nmayot/PTA_SouthernOcean.
The data are provided in the electronic supplementary material [58].