Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2023 Apr 30;4(2):102260. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102260

Calcium measurements in enzymatically dissociated or mechanically microdissected mouse primary skeletal muscle fibers

Sonia Youhanna 1, Joseph Bruton 1, Kent Jardemark 1, Håkan Westerblad 1,4,∗, Volker M Lauschke 1,2,3,5,∗∗
PMCID: PMC10165447  PMID: 37126446

Summary

Here, we provide a protocol for isolation of mouse primary skeletal muscle fibers using two alternative approaches—enzymatic dissociation or mechanical microdissection. We describe the procedures for surgical removal of muscle of interest and isolation of intact single-muscle fibers by either collagenase digestion or mechanical microdissection. We then detail intracellular calcium measurements by microinjecting or loading the isolated muscle fibers with membrane permeable calcium dyes. Finally, we outline steps for intracellular calcium quantification by fluorescent measurement.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Gineste et al.1

Subject areas: Cell culture, Cell isolation, Microscopy, Biotechnology and bioengineering

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • •

    Enzymatic dissociation or mechanical microdissection to isolate mouse muscle fibers

  • •

    Microinject or load isolated muscle fibers with membrane permeable calcium dyes

  • •

    Steps for intracellular calcium quantification by fluorescent measurement

  • •

    Microdissection preserves fiber microenvironment and maintains phenotypes and functions


Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.


Here, we provide a protocol for isolation of mouse primary skeletal muscle fibers using two alternative approaches—enzymatic dissociation or mechanical microdissection. We describe the procedures for surgical removal of muscle of interest and isolation of intact single-muscle fibers by either collagenase digestion or mechanical microdissection. We then detail intracellular calcium measurements by microinjecting or loading the isolated muscle fibers with membrane permeable calcium dyes. Finally, we outline steps for intracellular calcium quantification by fluorescent measurement.

Before you begin

Methods used for cell isolation may result in alterations of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which can impact cellular functionality and affect experimental outcomes in a wide variety of tissues, including liver,2 lung,3 bone4 and skeletal muscle.5,6 In this protocol, we describe two simplified methods for the isolation of single primary skeletal muscle fibers: 1) enzymatic isolation; and 2) surgical microdissection. We then detail how to use those isolated fibers for calcium measurements. The microdissection method results in improved maintenance of mitochondrial functionality, calcium handling and cellular transcriptomes. The protocol constitutes an adaptation and amalgamation of several enzymatic and microdissection techniques described earlier.7,8,9

Institutional permissions

All animal experiments have to comply with local ethical guidelines and protocols. The protocols used here were approved by the Stockholm North Local Animal Ethics Committee and complied with the Swedish Welfare Ordinance, and applicable regulations and recommendations from Swedish authorities.

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Collagenase type I Sigma-Aldrich C0130
Indo-1 pentapotassium, cell impermeant, 10 mM solution Molecular Probes I1202
Indo-1 acetoxymethyl (AM), membrane-permeable, salt Invitrogen I1223
Pluronic F-127 Sigma-Aldrich P2443
DMSO Sigma-Aldrich 472301
DMEM/F12 Thermo Fisher 21041025
Antibiotic-antimycotic solution (100×) Thermo Fisher 15240096
Fetal bovine serum Thermo Fisher 26140079
Tyrode solution Thermo Fisher J67607.K2

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Mouse (either sex, >5 weeks of age) Janvier C57BL/6JRj

Other

Pen-type stimulation electrode ADInstruments MLA0320
Muscle fiber chambers Aurora Scientific 1500A
Fluorescence system with two photomultiplier tubes IonOptix FSI-800
Surgical scissors (20 cm, straight) Sigma-Aldrich S3271
Micro-iris scissors Albert Heiss H-4260
Jeweller’s forceps Sigma-Aldrich F6521-1EA
SYLGARD™ 182 Silicone Elastomer Kit Dow Corning 1673998
Dissection tray with silicone base Home made none
Drawing pins Office Depot 12 mm
Aluminum Sigma-Aldrich GF08803616
Platinum Sigma-Aldrich 267244-1.4G
Generic current pulse stimulator World Precision Instruments SYS-A300
Micropipette glass Sutter Instrument Company, UK Cat. no. BF100-58-10
Oil Hydraulic Micromanipulator Narishige International Limited, UK Cat. No. NMO-203

Materials and equipment

  • •

    We herein describe the isolation of FDB muscles of 12 week old female C57BL/6JRj mice.

Note: The protocol is also compatible with the isolation of FDB muscles and from other strains, ages or sexes. Furthermore, it can serve as the starting point for isolation of other murine skeletal muscles beyond the FDB. In such case, depending on the muscle of interest, slight protocol adaptations might be necessary.

  • •

    Complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM/F12): DMEM/F12 supplemented with 1% of the 100x antibiotic antimycotic solution containing penicillin (final concentration: 100 U/mL), streptomycin (final concentration: 100 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (final concentration: 0.25 μg/mL).

  • •

    Supplemented collagenase: Immediately before experiment, dissolve 0.3% (w/v) collagenase in complete DMEM/F12 at room temperature and supplement it with 20% fetal bovine serum. Use within 4 h of preparation.

Note: Providers might not give an accurate measure of collagenase activity but activities around 280–345 U/mg should give optimal results.

  • •

    Prepare a 10x solution of Indo-1 AM and pluronic F-127 by dissolving them in DMSO as follows:

Reagent Final concentration Amount
Indo-1 AM 0.5 mM 100 μg
Pluronic F-127 8 mM 20 mg
DMSO – 200 μL
Total – 200 μL

The solution is to be freshly prepared on the day of the experiment and kept in the dark at room temperature (20°C–25°C).

  • •

    Dilute the prepared 10x indo-1 AM/pluronic F-127 solution 1:10 in 1 mL DMEM/F12 or Tyrode solution in a closed Petri dish for incubation of the isolated flexor digitorum brevis (FDB) fiber. The solution is to be freshly prepared on the day of the experiment and should be kept in the dark.

  • •

    The experimental setup and required instruments for microdissection, including jeweller’s forceps, micro-iris scissors, dissection tray and stimulation chamber are shown in Figures 1A–1C.

Note: Complete DMEM/F12 and Tyrode solution can be stored at 4°C for up to 1 week.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Equipment needed for isolation of FDB

(A) Tools used during the dissection and the isolation process. Scale bar = 2 cm.

(B) Image of the dissection tray with nylon rods. The procedure to open the split in the nylon rod where the proximal and distal tendons are inserted is shown.

(C) Stimulation chamber with perfusion probes (arrows) and stimulation electrodes (dashed box).

(D) Mouse paw with the FDB muscle exposed (dashed box). The FDB tendons and opposite ankle insert are shown.

Step-by-step method details

Part I. Surgical removal of FDB muscles

Inline graphicTiming: 30 min

This section describes the surgical removal of the FDB muscle, which serves as the substrate for the single fiber isolations described in the following part II.

  • 1.

    Sacrifice the animal according to the locally approved procedures.

  • 2.

    Remove the foot from the leg by amputating at the level of the ankle joint using sharp surgical scissors.

  • 3.

    Place the foot in prewarmed Tyrode solution.

  • 4.

    Pin the outermost toes of the isolated foot with dissection needles on the dissection pad with the plantar side of the foot facing upward (Figure 1D).

Note: We use the lid of a pipette tip box coated with a 1 cm thick layer of Sylgard 182 elastomer as the dissection pad.

  • 5.

    Remove the skin overlaying the FDB using dissection scissors.

  • 6.

    Grip and lift the proximal tendon of the FDB using forceps.

  • 7.

    Make a transverse incision to separate the FDB tendon from its origin at the back of the heel (calcaneus).

  • 8.

    Carefully cut and remove all soft and connective tissue between the FDB muscle and the underlying flexor digitorum longus (FDL) using forceps and dissection scissors (Figure 2A).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Always point the dissection scissors towards the FDL to minimize the risk of damaging fibers in the FDB.

  • 9.

    Cut the FDB tendons as far out on the toes as possible to leave a long distal tendon. This helps a lot in the later stages of single fiber dissections.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Make sure not to stretch the FDB muscle. This is best done by folding back the freed portion of the FDB onto the part of the FDB that remains joined by connective tissue to the underlying FDL muscle. Do not hold or pull the FDB upwards in the solution.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: During the whole procedure, ensure that the muscle does not dry out by covering the foot in warmed Tyrode solution.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Illustration of critical steps during the mechanical single fiber dissection

(A) Lifted FDB muscle (arrow). Scale bar = 1 cm.

(B) Enzymatically dissociated fibers after 15 min attachment. Scale bar = 500 μm.

(C) FDB muscle in the process of being separated into 3 digits (asterisks). The muscle is attached at both sides to the dissection tray via the nylon rods. Scale bar = 1 cm.

(D) Several intact single fibers (arrows) attached to the tendons. Scale bar = 500 μm.

(E) Single intact fibers after removal of damaged fibers and connective tissue. Scale bar = 500 μm.

(F) Intact viable single fiber (highlighted by arrow). Scale bar = 500 μm.

(G) T-clip template (left) and the final T-clip (right) are shown before attaching it to the single fiber. The labeled units on the ruler are in mm.

(H and I) Clean single fiber (H) and, for comparison, a fiber with remaining connective tissue (I) are shown at 4x magnification. Scale bars = 500 μm.

(J) Single fiber attached to T-clips and mounted in the stimulation chamber.

Part II. Isolation of single skeletal muscle fibers

Note that the following parts IIa and IIb are alternative methods for the isolation of single skeletal muscle fibers. For enzymatic dissociation, follow steps 10–18. For mechanical microdissection, follow steps 19–27.

Part IIa. Fiber isolation by enzymatic dissociation

Inline graphicTiming: 3–4 h

This part describes the isolation of primary single muscle fibers from FDB muscles by enzymatic dissociation.

  • 10.

    Place 50 mL of complete DMEM/F12 in an incubator at 37°C.

  • 11.

    Prepare 5 mL of supplemented collagenase type 1.

  • 12.

    Clean FDB muscles of tendons, connective tissue, and blood vessels.

  • 13.

    Incubate the cleaned muscle for 2–3 h at 37°C in the supplemented type 1 collagenase.

  • 14.

    Transfer muscles to 3 mL fresh DMEM/F12 that was prewarmed in step 10.

  • 15.

    Gently triturate the muscle using a regular blue plastic 1 mL pipette tip filled with 900 μL DMEM/F12.

Note: Pipette slowly 10–20 times up and down to separate the individual muscle fibers.

Note: One second up and one second down is the right timing.

  • 16.

    Transfer a volume of 300 μL of the resultant muscle fiber suspension in laminin-coated 35 mm glass-bottom Petri dishes.

  • 17.

    Allow fibers to attach for 15 min at 37°C (Figure 2B).

  • 18.

    Add a further 2.7 mL of supplemented DMEM/F12.

Note: Cells are ready for further experimentation up to 4 h after being attached in the Petri dish.

Part IIb. Fiber isolation by mechanical microdissection

Inline graphicTiming: 2 h

This part describes the isolation of primary single muscle fibers from FDB muscles by microdissection.

  • 19.

    Place the FDB muscle in a custom-made dissection tray equipped with a pair of hollow movable metal 10G syringe needles mounted at opposite ends (see setup in Figure 1B).

  • 20.

    Fix both tendons of the muscle by inserting the proximal and the distal tendons into the split ends of a nylon rod located inside the metal 10G syringe needles (Figure 2C).

Note: The nylon rods are pulled into the needles to hold the tendons tightly and the needles can be rotated as needed when cutting away fibers and connective tissue during the dissection.

  • 21.

    Make FDB fibers accessible by removing connective tissue, fat, and visible blood vessels using sharpened dissection forceps and scissors.

  • 22.

    Separate the FDB muscle longitudinally into three FDB digits.

Note: It is recommended to use a stereomicroscope with dark-field illumination with up to 40× magnification for this process.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: It is important to keep some muscle fibers of each FDB digit attached to the tendons at both sides (proximal and distal). These are the fibers that will be used for isolation.

  • 23.

    Mount one digit in the dissection tray and fix into the split rods on both sides (Figure 2D).

  • 24.

    Assess whether fibers are susceptible to electrical stimulation by applying single electrical stimuli using a pen stimulator at supramaximal voltage (≤10 V).

Note: A brief twitch contraction of a few milliseconds followed by relaxation shows that the fibers are intact and functional (Methods video S1).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: We use a pen-type stimulation electrode connected to a generic current pulse stimulator with up to 100V stimulation voltage (World Precision Instruments; model no. SYS-A300 or Aurora Scientific; model no. 701C).

  • 25.

    At 40× magnification, select a few twitching fibers that are positioned on the FDB surface and isolate those by cutting and removing all other fibers in small steps (Figure 2E).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Check the remaining fibers repeatedly to identify fibers that give a robust contraction upon electrical stimulation.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Make sure not to damage the fibers by overstretching the FDB digit.

  • 26.

    Decide on one fiber and carefully remove the other fibers using the jeweller’s forceps and micro-iris scissors (Figure 2F).

  • 27.

    Check that the isolated single fiber contracts upon electrical stimulation.

Method video S1. Electrical stimulation to confirm that fibers are intact and functional, related to step 24
Download video file (3.3MB, mp4)

Part III. Calcium measurements in microdissected muscle fibers

For measurements of calcium in enzymatically dissociated fibers, we refer to the interested reader to the accurate methodological descriptions in ref.10,11 Note that the following parts IIIa and IIIb are alternatives for calcium measurements. In our experience, the best results are obtained with injection of the dye. For injection with intracellular calcium indicator, follow steps 28–34. For loading the fiber with a membrane permeable dye, follow steps 35–37.

Part IIIa. Injection with intracellular calcium indicator

Inline graphicTiming: 45 min

This section describes the measurement of calcium in isolated single fibers by microinjection of an intracellular calcium dye.

  • 28.

    The proximal and distal tendons of the mechanically dissected single fibers are trimmed longitudinally and fitted into aluminum or platinum T-clips using two pairs of forceps to fold the T-clips.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: T-clips should be clamped to the tendon as close as possible to the muscle fiber as a long tendon can interfere with some downstream applications, such as force measurements (Figure 2G).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: It is essential to have an intact single fiber free of debris when using membrane permeable fluorescent calcium indicators, such as indo-1 AM or fura-2 dyes, because indicator trapped in remnant dead fibers can affect fluorescent measurements resulting in drastically increased experimental variability. For comparison, Figures 2H and 2I show a clean fiber and a fiber that was not well cleaned from connective tissue.

  • 29.

    Install a micropipette in a micromanipulator and load it with ∼0.5 μL of 10 mM indo-1 salt solution.

Note: If other calcium dyes are to be used, the concentration might need to be titrated for optimal results.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Pressure during injection is driven by inert nitrogen gas.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: It is recommended to use Picospritzer gas pressure pulse settings of ∼100 psi with a duration of 1–5 ms.

  • 30.

    Mount the fiber in the recording chamber between a force transducer and an adjustable holder (Figure 2J).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: During this procedure the stimulation chamber should be mounted onto an inverted microscope. Suitable stimulation chambers can be custom-made or are available commercially (e.g., Aurora Scientific; model no. 1500A). Suitable chambers have one mounting peg attached to a force transducer or fixed end and the other mounting peg attached to a movable screw. Superfuse the fiber with Tyrode solution at the desired temperature. For reference, the in vivo temperature of FDB muscles is 31°C (ref.12).

  • 31.
    Adjust the stimulation current intensity and fiber length to obtain maximum tetanic force.
    • a.
      To this end, determine the supramaximal stimulation intensity by stimulating with 70 Hz tetani at ∼1 min intervals and increase the voltage incrementally until the stimulation intensity is 10%–20% above that needed to achieve the maximum force.
    • b.
      Thereafter, adjust the fiber length by using the movable screw to the length that gives maximum tetanic force.
  • 32.

    Position the tip of the injection micropipette in close proximity to the fiber.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: The emitted fluorescence is measured with any suitable fluorescence system, which, for indo1 AM, has two photomultiplier tubes (e.g., HORIBA, Wedel, Germany or IonOptix, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Measure and subtract background fluorescence of the fiber prior to injection by recording the emitted fluorescence signal values at 405 and 495 nm.

  • 33.

    Inject the fiber with the dye.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: It is important to make sure that the fiber is in focus since imprecision can lead to an inaccurate estimate of the amount of injected dye.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: To control the amount of dye injected in the fiber, measure the increase in fluorescence signal at 405 nm–495 nm without stimulating the fiber. Withdraw the pipette when enough dye (∼two-times the background fluorescence) has been injected.

  • 34.

    Allow an even distribution of the dye through the myoplasm of the fiber by waiting for at least 20 min before starting the experimental recordings.

Part IIIb. Loading the fiber with a membrane permeable dye

Inline graphicTime: 1.5 h

This section describes the measurement of calcium in isolated single fibers by loading the fiber with a membrane permeable indicator.

  • 35.

    Incubate the fiber in the diluted indo-1 AM dye for at least 1 h at room temperature (20°C–25°C) to allow the dye to diffuse into the fiber.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: It is important to avoid that the fiber is drying out during loading in the stimulation chamber. This is done by placing a water filled cap from an Eppendorf tube in the incubation dish and ensuring that the lid is tightly sealed by wrapping it in Parafilm.

  • 36.

    Mount the fiber as described above.

  • 37.

    Superfuse with Tyrode solution for ∼30 min to remove any remaining dye outside of the fiber before starting the measurement.

Part IV. Quantification of calcium measurements

Inline graphicTime: 30 min

This part describes how intracellular calcium levels can be calculated based on fluorescent measurements of calcium indicators.

  • 38.

    After the fiber is loaded with the dye using either the injection technique or the loading method, measure the fluorescence in the dark with excitation at 360 nm and dual emission at 405 and 495 nm.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Always close the shutter for the excitation light when measurements are not performed to minimize light exposure of the dye-loaded fiber and prevent bleaching of the dye.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Measure the emitted fluorescence of the dye with a suitable fluorescence system (e.g., HORIBA, Wedel, Germany or IonOptix, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

  • 39.

    Stimulate the fiber with supramaximal electrical pulses (0.5 ms in duration).

  • 40.

    To obtain the steady-state [Ca2+]cyt frequency, stimulate the fiber for 350 ms at 15–150 Hz every 1 min.

  • 41.

    [Ca2+]cyt is calculated using the ratio of light emitted at 405 nm to that at 495 nm (R) in the following equation13:

[Ca2+]cvt=Kd∗β∗(R−Rmin)/(Rmax−R),

with Kd as the apparent dissociation constant of the used dye, Rmin as the ratio of 405 nm–495 nm emission at very low [Ca2+]cyt, Rmax as the ratio of 405 nm–495 nm emission at saturating [Ca2+]cyt and β as the ratio of the 495 nm signals at very low and saturating [Ca2+]cyt.

  • 42.

    For an example of calculating [Ca2+]cyt using the above equation in enzymatically dissected murine skeletal muscle we refer to the interested reader to ref.14

Expected outcomes

The mechanical microdissection method allows isolation of 3 (or up to 6 if each toe is split longitudinally into two) viable single fibers from one FDB whereas as many as 50–100 viable fibers can be isolated when the enzymatic dissociation method is used. Isolated fibers deteriorate in functionality and phenotype, and we do not typically culture them for >24 h. The advantage of isolating intact skeletal muscle fibers by mechanical microdissection is that one can study both contractile function and calcium homeostasis of the muscle fiber within an intact microenvironment. Moreover, the use of single fibers permits metabolic profiling independently of hypoxia or nutritional diffusion limits as is the case when analyzing larger bundles or whole muscles.

Limitations

The isolation of single skeletal muscle fibers by enzymatic dissociation does not preserve the native microenvironment, which impairs functional and metabolic outcomes.1 The limitations of microdissection are the technical sophistication and relatively low throughput.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Low viability of isolated single fibers (part I).

Potential solution

Make sure to keep longer tendons. Always use the tips of the micro-iris scissors to cut away material. Use only forceps with undamaged tips that meet and close exactly.

Problem 2

The fibers are not contracting (steps 24–27).

Potential solution

Increase stimulating intensity. Alternatively, if fibers might be damaged during isolation or handling, dissect new muscle bundles.

Problem 3

Difficulties in injecting indicator into the fiber (step 33).

Potential solution

The micro-electrode might be clogged or blocked. Use a new micro-electrode. Increase the Picospritzer gas pressure and/or the duration of the injection pulses.

Problem 4

Noisy fluorescence records (step 35).

Potential solution

Increase the time for the indicator to load into the muscle fiber. Be careful to increase the loading time by no more than 15 min as you run the risk of overloading, which will give very smooth records but will incorrectly report time and amplitude of the calcium signals.

Problem 5

Difficulty to visualize the calcium indicators after fiber injection (steps 38–40).

Potential solution

Check that the fiber is illuminated with the excitation light. Replace the dye after >1 month of daily use and repeated freeze–thaw cycles.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Volker Lauschke (volker.lauschke@ki.se).

Materials availability

All materials are commercially available as indicated.

Acknowledgments

The work in the authors’ laboratories is supported by the Swedish Research Council (2018-02576, 2019-01837, and 2021-02801), the Swedish Research Council for Sport Science (P2019-0060), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Grant VC-2021-0026), and the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany. Furthermore, this project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 875510. The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and EFPIA, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning McGill University, Kungliga Tekniska Hoegskolan, and Diamond Light Source Limited.

Author contributions

S.Y. and J.B. developed and wrote the protocol. K.J., H.W., and V.M.L. supervised the work and revised the protocol.

Declaration of interests

V.M.L. is the CEO and a shareholder of HepaPredict AB, as well as a co-founder and shareholder of PersoMedix AB.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102260.

Contributor Information

Håkan Westerblad, Email: hakan.westerblad@ki.se.

Volker M. Lauschke, Email: volker.lauschke@ki.se.

Data and code availability

This study did not generate any unique datasets or codes.

References

  • 1.Gineste C., Youhanna S., Vorrink S.U., Henriksson S., Hernández A., Cheng A.J., Chaillou T., Buttgereit A., Schneidereit D., Friedrich O., et al. Enzymatically dissociated muscle fibers display rapid dedifferentiation and impaired mitochondrial calcium control. iScience. 2022;25 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arteel G.E., Naba A. The liver matrisome – looking beyond collagens. JHEP Rep. 2020;2 doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burgstaller G., Oehrle B., Gerckens M., White E.S., Schiller H.B., Eickelberg O. The instructive extracellular matrix of the lung: basic composition and alterations in chronic lung disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2017;50 doi: 10.1183/13993003.01805-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin X., Patil S., Gao Y.-G., Qian A. The bone extracellular matrix in bone formation and regeneration. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:757. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Csapo R., Gumpenberger M., Wessner B. Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix – what do we know about its composition, regulation, and physiological roles? A narrative review. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:253. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang W., Liu Y., Zhang H. Extracellular matrix: an important regulator of cell functions and skeletal muscle development. Cell Biosci. 2021;11:65. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00579-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheng A.J., Westerblad H. Mechanical isolation, and measurement of force and myoplasmic free [Ca2+] in fully intact single skeletal muscle fibers. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12:1763–1776. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bekoff A., Betz W. Properties of isolated adult rat muscle fibres maintained in tissue culture. J. Physiol. 1977;271:537–547. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gallot Y.S., Hindi S.M., Mann A.K., Kumar A. Isolation, culture, and staining of single myofibers. Bio. Protoc. 2016;6 doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rausch M., Böhringer D., Steinmann M., Schubert D.W., Schrüfer S., Mark C., Fabry B. Measurement of skeletal muscle fiber contractility with high-speed traction microscopy. Biophys. J. 2020;118:657–666. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Milán A.F., Rincón O.A., Arango L.B., Reutovich A.A., Smith G.L., Giraldo M.A., Bou-Abdallah F., Calderón J.C. Calibration of mammalian skeletal muscle Ca2+ transients recorded with the fast Ca2+ dye Mag-Fluo-4. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Gen. Subj. 2021;1865 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bruton J.D., Lännergren J., Westerblad H. Effects of CO2-induced acidification on the fatigue resistance of single mouse muscle fibers at 28 degrees C. J. Appl. Physiol. 1998;85:478–483. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gomes P.A., Bassani R.A., Bassani J.W. Measuring [Ca2+] with fluorescent indicators: theoretical approach to the ratio method. Cell Calcium. 1998;24:17–26. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(98)90085-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Collet C., Allard B., Tourneur Y., Jacquemond V. Intracellular calcium signals measured with indo-1 in isolated skeletal muscle fibres from control and mdx mice. J. Physiol. 1999;520 Pt 2:417–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00417.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Method video S1. Electrical stimulation to confirm that fibers are intact and functional, related to step 24
Download video file (3.3MB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

This study did not generate any unique datasets or codes.


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES