Abstract
Recent epidemiological interest has focused on separation of neural tube defects (NTD) into subgroups which may differ pathogenetically and aetiologically, for example, 'upper' and 'lower' spina bifida. In order to validate the use of pathologists' lesion descriptions by epidemiologists and others, a postal survey of 18 European perinatal pathologists, identified by EUROCAT registries, was conducted. Pathologists were asked, anonymously, to describe and identify the lesions in 15 photographs of midtrimester termination fetuses. There was a 50% response rate. Even taking into consideration the limitations of dealing with photographs rather than the fetuses themselves, there was often marked variation in the descriptions. Standardisation of terminology and international consensus about the type of detail recorded for NTD are urgently needed.
Full text
PDF




Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barson A. J. Spina bifida: the significance of the level and extent of the defect to the morphogenesis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1970 Apr;12(2):129–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1970.tb01881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dolk H., De Wals P., Gillerot Y., Lechat M. F., Ayme S., Cornel M., Cuschieri A., Garne E., Goujard J., Laurence K. M. Heterogeneity of neural tube defects in Europe: the significance of site of defect and presence of other major anomalies in relation to geographic differences in prevalence. Teratology. 1991 Nov;44(5):547–559. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420440508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drainer E., May H. M., Tolmie J. L. Do familial neural tube defects breed true? J Med Genet. 1991 Sep;28(9):605–608. doi: 10.1136/jmg.28.9.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frecker M. F., Fraser F. C., Heneghan W. D. Are 'upper' and 'lower' neural tube defects aetiologically different? J Med Genet. 1988 Jul;25(7):503–504. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.7.503-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall J. G., Friedman J. M., Kenna B. A., Popkin J., Jawanda M., Arnold W. Clinical, genetic, and epidemiological factors in neural tube defects. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Dec;43(6):827–837. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmes L. B., Driscoll S. G., Atkins L. Etiologic heterogeneity of neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1976 Feb 12;294(7):365–369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197602122940704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khoury M. J., Erickson J. D., James L. M. Etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Apr;115(4):538–548. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LAURENCE K. M. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF SPINA BIFIDA CYSTICA: DETAILED ANALYSIS OF 407 CASES. Arch Dis Child. 1964 Feb;39:41–57. doi: 10.1136/adc.39.203.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemire R. J., Beckwith J. B., Shepard T. H. Iniencephaly and anencephaly with spinal retroflexion. A comparative study of eight human specimens. Teratology. 1972 Aug;6(1):27–36. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420060105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemire R. J. Neural tube defects. JAMA. 1988 Jan 22;259(4):558–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mariman E. C., Hamel B. C. Sex ratios of affected and transmitting members of multiple case families with neural tube defects. J Med Genet. 1992 Oct;29(10):695–698. doi: 10.1136/jmg.29.10.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seller M. J., Kalousek D. K. Neural tube defects: heterogeneity and homogeneity. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1986;2:77–87. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320250612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seller M. J. Neural tube defects and sex ratios. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Mar;26(3):699–707. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320260325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toriello H. V., Higgins J. V. Possible causal heterogeneity in spina bifida cystica. Am J Med Genet. 1985 May;21(1):13–20. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320210103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






