Abstract
Clonal myeloproliferation and development of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis are the major pathogenetic events in myelofibrosis (MF). The identification of novel antifibrotic strategies is of utmost importance since the effectiveness of current therapies in reverting BM fibrosis is debated. We previously demonstrated that osteopontin (OPN) has a profibrotic role in MF by promoting mesenchymal stromal cells proliferation and collagen production. Moreover, increased plasma OPN correlated with higher BM fibrosis grade and inferior overall survival in MF patients. To understand whether OPN is a druggable target in MF, we assessed putative inhibitors of OPN expression in vitro and identified ERK1/2 as a major regulator of OPN production. Increased OPN plasma levels were associated with BM fibrosis development in the Romiplostim-induced MF mouse model. Moreover, ERK1/2 inhibition led to a remarkable reduction of OPN production and BM fibrosis in Romiplostim-treated mice. Strikingly, the antifibrotic effect of ERK1/2 inhibition can be mainly ascribed to the reduced OPN production since it could be recapitulated through the administration of anti-OPN neutralizing antibody. Our results demonstrate that OPN is a novel druggable target in MF and pave the way to antifibrotic therapies based on the inhibition of ERK1/2-driven OPN production or the neutralization of OPN activity.
Subject terms: Myeloproliferative disease, Cell signalling, Pathogenesis
Introduction
Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by clonal myeloproliferation. Among them, myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by the development of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis [1], together with extramedullary hematopoiesis, constitutional symptoms, leukemic transformation, and shortened life expectancy. The hyperproliferation of the neoplastic clone and the overproduction of proinflammatory and profibrotic mediators are the two major events that drive the onset and progression of MF.
Great efforts aimed to unveil the molecular landscape of MPNs have led to the identification of the genomic lesions responsible for the clonal myeloproliferation, primarily the “driver” mutations affecting JAK2, MPL, and CALR genes that converge towards the constitutive activation of JAK/STAT signaling [2–5]. Several mechanisms underlying the abnormal production of proinflammatory and profibrotic mediators, such as reactive oxygen species [6, 7] and interleukins (e.g., IL-6) [8, 9], and the skewed crosstalk between the malignant hematopoietic cells and BM microenvironment, have been recently unveiled. Nevertheless, the elucidation of mechanisms leading to the development of BM fibrosis is still of primary importance to develop novel therapeutic strategies aimed to reverse the alteration of BM architecture and function. Current therapeutic options effectively improve splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and may improve anemia but do not efficiently reverse BM fibrosis [10–12]. Among the experimental therapies, Recombinant interferon-α (rIFN-α) has proven to normalize BM architecture and determine a clinical benefit in a sizable fraction of early stage PMF patients [13, 14]. In addition, the treatment with rIFN-α has been recently associated with a lower risk of MF progression and a lower mortality in comparison with hydroxyurea and phlebotomy in PV patients [15]. However, randomized trials are required to consolidate the impact of rIFN-α therapy on BM hystopathology. The development of novel therapeutic strategies to counteract the skewing of the BM architecture in addition to the clonal myeloproliferation is therefore one of the major unmet needs in MF management.
We previously demonstrated that the upregulation of the transcription factor MAF prompts the massive release of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines and growth factors in differentiated myeloid cells (mainly monocytes and megakaryocytes) derived from the malignant CD34 + HPCs. We focused on SPP1, the gene coding for osteopontin (OPN), and showed that SPP1 is a transcriptional target of MAF and that the overproduction of OPN at least partially contributes to the increased fibroblast proliferation and collagen production that underlies the development of myelofibrosis. OPN plasma levels resulted significantly increased in PMF patients in comparison with healthy donors and were remarkably higher in overt fibrotic versus pre-fibrotic PMF patients. Higher OPN plasma levels also correlated with shorter overall survival. Collectively our data point to a role of OPN in the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis, and especially in the development of BM fibrosis [16].
JAK2, MPL and CALR mutations converge toward the STAT5-mediated [2, 17, 18] induction of MAF expression [19] and in turn MAF transactivates the expression of SPP1. JAK1/2 inhibition by Ruxolitinib indeed reduced SPP1 expression in PMF HPCs and monocytes [16]. However, other mechanisms are likely involved to explain the overproduction of OPN since no remarkable differences in OPN plasma levels were found among JAK2, CALR-mutated and triple-negative PMF patients [16].
Here, we unveil that ERK1/2 signaling contributes to support the production of OPN since treatment with ERK1/2 inhibitor suppresses OPN secretion in vitro and in vivo. We show that pharmacological inhibition of OPN production by the administration of the ERK1/2 inhibitor Ulixertinib negatively interferes with the development of BM and spleen fibrosis in a MF mouse model. We also demonstrate that the antifibrotic effect of ERK1/2 inhibition can be mainly ascribed to the reduction of OPN expression and function, since the inhibition of OPN function through the administration of anti-OPN neutralizing antibody was able to constrain the development of BM and spleen fibrosis in a similar way to ERK1/2 inhibition.
Methods
Ethic statements
Human CD14+ monocytes were purified upon donor’s informed written consent from peripheral blood samples. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and after the approval by local ethics committees.
Compounds and reagents
Ulixertinib (BVD-523, cat# HY-15816) and Ruxolitinib (INCB18424, cat# HY-50856) were purchased by MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA).
The thrombopoietin mimetic Romiplostim (Nplate®) was kindly provided by Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA).
Anti-mouse OPN antibody (cat#BE0373, clone 103D6), the isotype control antibody (cat#BE0366, clone DV5-1) and the dilution buffer (cat#IP0070) were purchased by Bio X Cell (Lebanon, NH, USA).
Mice
All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Italian Ministry of Health (approval 23/2016_PR). Wild-type C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Mice were housed at the SPF animal facility of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. The Romiplostim-induced MF mouse model was established through the subcutaneous injection of either vehicle (saline) or Romiplostim (1 mg/kg of body weight; Amgen) once a week for 2 weeks in 6-to-8 weeks-old wild-type C57BL/6J mice, according to Maekawa et al. [20].
Ulixertinib 100 mg/kg, Ruxolitinib 60 mg/kg, a combination of Ulixertinib 75 mg/kg and Ruxolitinib 30 mg/kg or an equal volume of vehicle (i.e., DMSO 10% (v/v) in SBE-β-CD 20% (w/v) in saline) were orally administered by gavage twice daily.
Anti-mouse OPN antibody (15 mg/kg of body weight) or the isotype control antibody (15 mg/kg) were intraperitoneally injected once every 3 days for 2 weeks. Doses and administration schedule were selected based on previous studies [21, 22]. Blood samples were collected in K2-EDTA tubes (BD microtainer, cat#365974, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) by submandibular vein puncture and analyzed for hematological parameters at baseline (day 1, i.e., the day of the first administration of Romiplostim) and at days 4, 8, 11, and 15 by a Heska HT5 hematology analyzer (Heska, Loveland, CO, USA). Plasma samples were collected from all the blood samples. Spleen size was evaluated by ultrasound (US) Vevo 2100 Imaging System (FUJIFILM VisualSonics Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). Then, spleen volume was quantified using Vevo Lab 3.1.0 software (FUJIFILM VisualSonics Inc.). In detail, each spleen was divided in multiple sections by software and the drawing of spleen area in each slide allowed the software to automatically calculate spleen volume.
Mice were killed at day 15. The spleen index (i.e., spleen weigh/body weigh x100) was calculated. Spleens and femurs were fixed for 6 h in 10% buffered formalin (cat#05-01V15PKF, Bio-Optica Milan, Italy) for histological analyses.
Quantitation of BM fibrosis was performed by a pathologist in keeping with the WHO grading criteria [23] integrated with the addition of intermediate levels of fibrosis grading (MF-0.5 and MF-1.5) [24–26] as detailed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Grading | Description |
---|---|
MF-0 | no reticulin fibers corresponding to normal bone marrow |
MF-0.5 | focal areas with a loose network of reticulin with many intersections alternated with areas with no reticulin fibers |
MF-1 | loose network of reticulin with many intersections evenly distributed over the entire length of the femurs |
MF-1.5 | focal areas with a diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections |
MF-2 | diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections evenly distributed over the entire length of the femurs, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis |
MF-3 | diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis |
Plasma samples, BM, and spleen sections of JAK2floxed/+ and JAK2V617F/+ mice [27] were provided by A.M. Vannucchi.
Statistical analysis
Values are reported as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed data, or median and interquartile range for non-normally distributed values. The one-way ANOVA was performed to compare normally distributed values while the rank-based nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for data with a nonparametric distribution. P values were considered statistically significant when <0.05. Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
ERK1/2 inhibition reduces OPN production in vitro
Inhibitors of signaling pathways reported in literature to affect OPN expression [28–31] were evaluated in vitro for their ability to reduce OPN mRNA levels. Drugs clinically approved or currently tested in clinical trials and therefore endowed with a translational potential were selected and assayed in vitro in human primary CD14 + monocytes, that are one of the major sources of OPN among the neoplastic clone-derived hematopoietic cells in MF patients [16]. Among them, we focused on Ulixertinib given its ability to inhibit OPN expression (Fig. 1), unlike the other drugs tested (Supplementary Table 1).
Ulixertinib was selected as a potent and selective ERK1/2 inhibitor in order to counteract MAPK signaling pathway that has been reported to promote OPN production [30]. The remarkable reduction of phosphorylated RSK3 levels in treated monocytes demonstrated that Ulixertinib efficiently inhibited ERK1/2 activity in vitro (Fig. 1A). Increasing concentrations of Ulixertinib (0.25-to-15μM) did not affect cell viability (Fig. 1B) while remarkably reduced SPP1 expression levels detected by Real Time qRT-PCR (Fig. 1C) and OPN secretion evaluated by ELISA on culture supernatants (Fig. 1D, E) in human primary monocytes.
OPN plasma levels are increased in mice developing BM fibrosis
Next, we moved on to study the in vivo effects of OPN reduction in the development of BM fibrosis. To identify the most suitable mouse model, OPN plasma levels were firstly assessed in JAK2V617F/+ mice [27], that show a Polycythemia Vera-like phenotype and develop BM and spleen fibrosis with a late onset (i.e., from 7 months of age, Fig. 2A). Noteworthy, OPN plasma levels were remarkably increased in 7-to-8 months-old JAK2V617F/+ mice in comparison with age-matched JAK2floxed/+ and 5-to-6 months-old JAK2V617F/+ mice (Fig. 2B). However, in order to identify a model that develops BM fibrosis in a shorter time we took advantage of the MF mouse model induced by the administration of the thrombopoietin mimetic Romiplostim [20] that develops an overt BM and spleen fibrosis after 15 days of treatment (Fig. 2C). As shown in Fig. 2D, the development of BM and spleen fibrosis was associated with a remarkable increase of OPN plasma levels also in Romiplostim-treated mice. Given the dosing scheme of Ulixertinib (per os twice daily) and due to the potential adverse effects of a frequent and prolonged administration by gavage in mice, we focused on the Romiplostim-treated mice as the best model to evaluate the effects of OPN reduction on the development of BM and spleen fibrosis.
Ulixertinib costrains OPN production and BM fibrosis in MF mouse model
We therefore focused on the effects of ERK1/2 inhibition mediated by Ulixertinib in Romiplostim-treated mice. Ulixertinib was dosed twice daily from 3 days before the first administration of Romiplostim (set as day 1) and until the sacrifice (day 15, Fig. 3A). Blood count analysis showed the expected Romiplostim-induced severe thrombocytosis that was not reversed by Ulixertinib (Fig. 3B). Other hematological parameters such as mean platelet volume (MPV), white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (HCT) were similarly unaffected by ERK1/2 inhibition (Fig. S1). In addition, the treatment with Ulixertinib did not prevent the development of splenomegaly, that was evaluated in vivo at day 12 by Vevo 2100 ultrasound quantitative analysis of the spleen volume (Figs. 3C and S2) and after sacrifice at day 15 (data reported as spleen index, Fig. 3D). Noteworthy, we observed a strong correlation (R2 = 0.8674) between the spleen volume evaluated by ultrasound imaging and spleen index calculated post-mortem, at the same time point (Fig. S2E) demonstrating that the ultrasound evaluation of the spleen volume can provide a quantification of splenomegaly and reliable as the spleen index without requiring sacrifice.
Conversely, ERK1/2 inhibition had a major effect on OPN production and BM fibrosis. The increase of OPN production in Romiplostim-treated mice was significantly constrained by the administration of Ulixertinib, as demonstrated through the quantification of OPN plasma levels at 11 days (Fig. 4A). In addition, lower OPN plasma levels in Ulixertinib-treated mice were associated with a remarkable reduction of reticulin deposition in BM (Fig. 4B, C) and spleen (Fig. 4D). The histological examination upon Gordon and Sweet silver staining and the fibrosis grading of BM sections (Fig. 4B, C) highlighted the extensive deposition of coarse reticulin fibers with multiple intersections over the entire length of the femurs in MF mice receiving the vehicle. On the contrary, MF mice treated with Ulixertinib developed a remarkably lower level of BM fibrosis characterized by areas with no detectable reticulin fibers alternated with areas showing a loose network of thin reticulin fibers and very few foci with intersections of more dense fibers.
Spleen fibrosis was similarly reduced in MF-mice dosed with Ulixertinib in comparison with those receiving the vehicle (Fig. 4D).
The combination of Ulixertinib and Ruxolitinib reduces OPN plasma levels and BM fibrosis in MF mice
To date, JAK1/2 inhibition provides a therapeutic benefit displaying only limited effects on BM fibrosis both in patients and mouse models [10–12]. To assess whether the anti-fibrotic activity of Ulixertinib is maintained when coupled with JAK1/2 inhibitors, we compared the effects of the combination of Ulixertinib and Ruxolitinib with those of the treatment with single agents in MF mice (Fig. 5A).
None of the conditions tested was able to counteract the increase of platelet count (Fig. 5B) and volume (MPV, Fig. S3A) induced by Romiplostim. In a similar way, RBC, Hb, and HCT were unaffected by the treatment with Ulixertinib, Ruxolitinib or their combination (Fig. S3B, D). On the contrary, the combination of Ulixertinib 75 mg/kg and Ruxolitinib 30 mg/kg led to a significant reduction of WBCs at days 8 and 14 of treatment (Fig. S3E).
As expected, splenomegaly was markedly reversed by Ruxolitinib 60 mg/kg, as revealed by the analysis of spleen volume at day 12 (Fig. 5C) and spleen index at day 15 (Fig. 5D). In addition, mice receiving Ruxolitinib at half dosage (30 mg/Kg) in combination with Ulixertinib 75 mg/kg displayed a reversion of the splenomegaly comparable with that obtained by the treatment with Ruxolitinib at full dosage (60 mg/kg) (Fig. 5C, D).
Interestingly, the increase of OPN plasma levels observed upon treatment with Romiplostim was remarkably reduced by the ERK1/2 inhibition alone or in combination with JAK1/2 inhibition (Fig. 6A). Again, as demonstrated by the histological analysis of Gordon and Sweet-stained BM (Fig. 6B–C) and spleen sections (Fig. 6D), the marked decrease of plasma OPN concentration was associated with a remarkable reduction of fibrosis in mice treated with Ulixertinib alone or in combination with Ruxolitinib in comparison with mice treated with vehicle. On the other hand, the sole JAK1/2 inhibition reduced OPN plasma levels to a lower extent (Fig. 6A) and induced a slight but not statistically significant reduction of BM (Fig. 6B, C) and spleen fibrosis (Fig. 6D).
OPN neutralization constrains the development of BM fibrosis in MF mice
To further clarify the role of OPN in the development of BM and spleen fibrosis we evaluated the effects of the administration of an anti-mouse OPN neutralizing antibody in Romiplostim-treated mice (Fig. 7).
Starting from 3 days before the first Romiplostim administration, an anti-OPN antibody or an isotype control IgG2c were intraperitoneally injected once every 3 days (Fig. 7A). As shown above for the pharmacological inhibition of OPN production through ERK1/2 targeting, the administration of anti-OPN antibody did not affect platelet count (Fig. 7B) and volume (Fig. S4A), as well as other hematological parameters such as WBC, RBC, Hb and HCT (Fig. S4B, E). Moreover, the development of splenomegaly was unaffected by the administration of anti-OPN antibody, as demonstrated by the evaluation of the spleen index at sacrifice (Fig. 7C).
Noteworthy, mice treated with the anti-OPN antibody showed a striking reduction of reticulin deposition in spleen (Fig. 7D) and BM (Fig. 7E, F) in comparison with mice treated with the isotype control IgG2c. Interestingly, the comparison of the qualitative (Figs. 6C and 7E) and quantitative analyses of BM fibrosis (Figs. 6B and 7F) highlighted no remarkable differences between the pharmacological inhibition of OPN production through ERK1/2 targeting and the neutralization of OPN activity by the anti-OPN antibody (Fig. 7G).
Discussion
Primary myelofibrosis is the most aggressive among MPNs since it is characterized by an increased risk of leukemic progression and an inferior life expectancy [1]. No currently available pharmacologic approaches cure patients, since JAK1/2 inhibitors Ruxolitinib and Fedratinib are effective in reducing splenomegaly and inflammation-related symptoms but do not affect BM fibrosis and disease burden in most cases [10] and rIFN-α has proven to improve BM morphology only in a fraction of PMF patients [13, 14]. The interaction between the neoplastic clone and the surrounding microenvironment leads to the development of myelofibrosis. In particular, hematopoietic cells contribute to the development of fibrosis through the release of profibrotic molecules, like OPN, that can induce the deposition of collagen by mesenchymal stromal cells [16].In the present work we further unravel the involvement of OPN in MF pathogenesis by means of an in vivo mouse model and investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying its expression with the aim to develop novel therapeutic approaches to reduce OPN production and constrain the development of BM fibrosis.
Inhibitors of signaling pathways reported to affect SPP1 expression were evaluated in vitro in primary human monocytes given their key role in OPN production [16]. The in vitro results pointed to the ERK1/2 signaling as the most promising target since ERK1/2 inhibition by Ulixertinib successfully reduced both OPN expression and secretion. ERK1/2 pathway represents a promising therapeutic target in MF since JAK2 constitutive activation due to the presence of driver mutations results in the downstream activation of MAPK pathway together with STATs [32]. Moreover, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 activation overcomes JAK1/2 inhibition in vivo in MPN mouse models and the administration of MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 inhibitors in combination with Ruxolitinib displayed superior therapeutic efficacy in vivo by reducing splenomegaly, disease burden and myelofibrosis [24, 25].
Among the JAK2V617F knock-in mouse models [27, 33–36], the one with tissue-specific VavCRE-driven expression of JAK2V617F has been extensively used for the pre-clinic evaluation of new therapeutic strategies [27, 37] since it develops an MPN like phenotype mimicking Polycythemia Vera eventually evolving to a myelofibrotic stage in aged mice. Interestingly, we observed a remarkable increase in OPN plasma levels in JAK2V617F knock-in animals at the age they develop myelofibrosis in line with results from MPN patients where OPN plasma levels were remarkably higher in PMF versus Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera patients, as well as in overt versus pre-fibrotic PMF patients [16]. In a similar way, OPN plasma levels resulted increased in mice treated with the MPL agonist Romiplostim. These mice develop a MF-like condition characterized by megakaryocyte hyperplasia in the BM and spleen, thrombocytosis, splenomegaly and high-grade BM and spleen fibrosis [20]. The increase in OPN plasma levels precedes the development of BM and spleen fibrosis in Romiplostim-treated mice further supporting the idea of the involvement of OPN in fibrogenesis. Since Ulixertinib should be administered twice daily [38, 39] by oral gavage -that is an invasive procedure unsustainable in the long term- we selected the Romiplostim-treated mouse model to assess in vivo the efficacy of Ulixertinib in reducing OPN production and counteract the development of myelofibrosis.
In Romiplostim-treated mice hyperplastic megakaryopoiesis leads to the development of fibrosis, while extramedullary hematopoiesis is responsible for the onset of splenomegaly [20, 40]. Our results demonstrated that ERK1/2 inhibition did not affect spleen volume which is instead reduced by JAK1/2 inhibition. On the contrary, Ulixertinib was able to significantly reduce OPN plasma concentration and the same was observed for Ruxolitinib treatment even if to a lesser extent. This is in keeping with the in vitro data we previously published [16] showing that JAK1/2 inhibition reduces OPN expression levels in PMF primary cells. Strikingly, we observed that the reduction in OPN plasma levels was always followed by a decrease in BM and spleen fibrosis. Ulixertinib significantly reduced BM and spleen fibrosis while the decrease induced by Ruxolitinib was only partial, in line with the lower effect on OPN levels. We therefore tested whether the anti-fibrotic effect of Ulixertinib was maintained in combination with Ruxolitinib. The coupled ERK1/2 and JAK1/2 inhibition efficiently reversed both fibrosis and splenomegaly even when the dosages of Ulixertinib and Ruxolitinib were reduced. Collectively, these data provide the rationale for combining ERK1/2 and JAK1/2 inhibitors to act on different pathogenic features of MF.
These results further underline the role of OPN in MF pathogenesis as a key profibrotic factor downstream of ERK1/2 signaling. In keeping with this idea, we previously demonstrated that OPN expression is positively regulated by transcription factor MAF [16] that in turn can be induced by MEK/ERK activation [41].
In order to further clarify whether the antifibrotic effect of ERK1/2 inhibition could be actually ascribed to the reduction of OPN activity, we studied the effects of the administration of anti-OPN monoclonal antibodies in Romiplostim treated mice. Strikingly, OPN neutralization resulted in a significant decrease in BM and spleen fibrosis and recapitulated the anti-fibrotic effects of ERK1/2 inhibition. Indeed, BM fibrosis grading data showed that the decrease of BM fibrosis achieved through the administration of anti-OPN antibodies was overlapping with that obtained by the Ulixertinib-mediated inhibition of OPN production.
Our results demonstrate that the anti-fibrotic effect of Ulixertinib can be ascribed to the reduction of OPN production and further emphasize the importance of OPN as a promising novel target for the treatment of MF patients.
Our data demonstrate that the interference with OPN production (through ERK1/2 inhibition) or activity (through anti-OPN antibodies) constrains the development of BM and spleen fibrosis but does not affect the extramedullary hematopoiesis -and therefore splenomegaly- in a model of constitutive activation of Mpl signaling. Our results -especially those for ERK1/2 inhibition- are in keeping with the data by Brkic demonstrating that in mice transplanted with MPLW515L-transduced BM cells ERK1/2 inhibition leads to a reduction of fibrosis without significantly affecting spleen size [24]. Mpl signaling is indeed mediated by ERK1/2, together with JAK/STAT. Our data further support the idea that the overactivation of ERK1/2 drives the abnormal OPN overproduction that is at least partially responsible for the development of BM and spleen fibrosis. On the contrary, OPN does not affect the myeloproliferation and the extramedullary hematopoiesis that leads to splenomegaly, as shown by both pharmacological inhibition and OPN neutralization.
Pre-clinical evidence for the therapeutic benefit given by the combination of JAK1/2 inhibitors and MEK or ERK inhibitors has led to phase I clinical trials aimed to evaluate the MEK inhibitor Selumetinib in combination with Azacitidine (NCT03326310) or the ERK1/2 inhibitor LTT462 in combination with Ruxolitinib (NCT04097821). Our results provide further support to the hypothesis that ERK1/2 inhibition can improve the therapeutic efficacy of Ruxolitinib, especially in terms of BM fibrosis reduction. ERK1/2 inhibitor Ulixertinib is currently under investigation for the treatment of several advanced solid tumors—such as gastrointestinal malignancies- and a phase I/II study was conducted in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodisplastic Syndromes (NCT02296242) allowing the identification for the maximum tolerated dose in this cohort. Alternatively, metformin and statins, which inhibit ERK1/2 phosphorylation [42, 43], showed beneficial effects in several cancers [44, 45] and delayed myelofibrosis progression [46, 47]. Similarly, angiotensin-receptor blockers have been shown to inhibit ERK1/2 activity [48] and reduce OPN circulating levels in essential hypertension [49].
Different OPN-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have been successfully assessed in vivo in preclinical models. For instance, AOM1 (Pfizer Inc.) is a fully human monoclonal IgG2 that cross-reacts with human and mouse OPN. The activity of AOM1 was preclinically evaluated in a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancer and demonstrated an efficient inhibition of metastatic tumor growth [50]. However, no subsequent clinical evaluation of AOM1 was performed.
Only one anti-OPN antibody, ASK8007 (Astellas Pharma Inc.), has been clinically evaluated. ASK8007 is a humanized, monoclonal antibody that blocks OPN binding to multiple cell surface receptors, such as αvβ3, αvβ5 and α9β1 integrins as well as CD44. A phase I/II clinical trial in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis demonstrated that ASK8007 administration was well tolerated by patients with no safety concerns. However, the evaluation of co-primary efficacy endpoints highlighted a lack of clinical improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients after treatment with ASK8007 [51]. The lack of clinical response could be at least partially explained by the very fast turnover rate of human OPN, with a half-life ranging between 7 and 15 min, as calculated in the serum from three heathy human subjects [52]. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations suggest that sufficient target coverage by a conventional antibody would require very frequent infusions of antibody at high dosages given the very rapid OPN turnover rate [52]. Antibodies engineered to improve their pharmacokinetic, such as Sweeping Antibodies®, administered at high doses would allow an efficient OPN knockdown [53]. However, the feasibility of a strategy of OPN neutralization in human subjects still remains an open question.
Collectively our data univocally demonstrate the key role of OPN as an ERK1/2 downstream profibrotic effector in MF pathogenesis and point to the inhibition of OPN production by administration of Ulixertinib or the neutralization of OPN activity by anti-OPN antibodies as novel therapeutic approaches to constrain BM fibrosis development in MF patients.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the following grants from AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Milan, Italy): 5 × 1000 call “Metastatic disease: the key unmet need in oncology” to MYNERVA (MYeloid NEoplasms Research Venture AIRC), Project No. 21267 (a detailed description of the MYNERVA project is available at http://www.progettomynerva.it) and IG project #19818; the Italian Ministry of Health (project RF-2016- 02362930), and the Ministry of Education, University and Research (project #2017WXR7ZT_005). Sebastiano Rontauroli was supported by a AIRC fellowship for Italy (project number #23925 – 2019). We thank Antonella Mauro for providing technical support for in vivo experiments.
Author contributions
RM designed the study and supervised the manuscript; EB, SR, and LT performed in vivo experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; MM and SS performed reticulin stainings; MM, SS, and SF performed in vitro experiments; EG performed mouse organs isolation; MDa and GG performed ecographic evaluation; LF performed paraffin-embedding of mouse organs; CC and SP performed emocytometric analysis; FP performed western blot; NB, LC, MB, and PG provided JAK2V617F/+ mice samples; MM, LP and ML provided human samples; LL performed quantification of bone marrow fibrosis; ET, MDo, and AMV provided support in animal experiments and supervised the manuscript.
Data availability
Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Elisa Bianchi, Sebastiano Rontauroli, Lara Tavernari.
Contributor Information
Elisa Bianchi, Email: elisa.bianchi@unimore.it.
Rossella Manfredini, Email: rossella.manfredini@unimore.it.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41375-023-01867-3.
References
- 1.Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bianchi E, Norfo R, Pennucci V, Zini R, Manfredini R. Genomic landscape of megakaryopoiesis and platelet function defects. Blood. 2016;127:1249–59. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-607952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ortmann CA, Kent DG, Nangalia J, Silber Y, Wedge DC, Grinfeld J, et al. Effect of mutation order on myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:601–12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lundberg P, Karow A, Nienhold R, Looser R, Hao-Shen H, Nissen I, et al. Clonal evolution and clinical correlates of somatic mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2014;123:2220–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-537167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tenedini E, Bernardis I, Artusi V, Artuso L, Roncaglia E, Guglielmelli P, et al. Targeted cancer exome sequencing reveals recurrent mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia. 2014;28:1052–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Genovese E, Mirabile M, Rontauroli S, Sartini S, Fantini S, Tavernari L et al. The response to oxidative damage correlates with driver mutations and clinical outcome in patients with myelofibrosis. Antioxidants. 2022; 11. 10.3390/antiox11010113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Marty C, Lacout C, Droin N, Le Couédic JP, Ribrag V, Solary E, et al. A role for reactive oxygen species in JAK2 V617F myeloproliferative neoplasm progression. Leukemia. 2013;27:2187–95. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balliu M, Calabresi L, Bartalucci N, Romagnoli S, Maggi L, Manfredini R, et al. Activated IL-6 signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of, and is a novel therapeutic target for, CALR-mutated MPNs. Blood Adv. 2021;5:2184–95. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gleitz HLFE, Dugourd ALJF, Leimkühler NB, Snoeren IAM, Fuchs SNR, Menzel S, et al. Increased CXCL4 expression in hematopoietic cells links inflammation and progression of bone marrow fibrosis in MPN. Blood. 2020;136:2051–64. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019004095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96:145–62. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kiladjian J-J, Zachee P, Hino M, Pane F, Masszi T, Harrison CN, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in polycythaemia vera (RESPONSE): 5-year follow up of a phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e226–e237. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30207-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kvasnicka HM, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, Sun W, Cortes J, Kantarjian HM, et al. Long-term effects of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0585-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Silver RT, Vandris K, Goldman JJ. Recombinant interferon-α may retard progression of early primary myelofibrosis: a preliminary report. Blood. 2011;117:6669–72. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-320069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Silver RT, Barel AC, Lascu E, Ritchie EK, Roboz GJ, Christos PJ, et al. The effect of initial molecular profile on response to recombinant interferon-α (rIFNα) treatment in early myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2017;123:2680–7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abu-Zeinah G, Krichevsky S, Cruz T, Hoberman G, Jaber D, Savage N, et al. Interferon-alpha for treating polycythemia vera yields improved myelofibrosis-free and overall survival. Leukemia. 2021;35:2592–601. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01183-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ruberti S, Bianchi E, Guglielmelli P, Rontauroli S, Barbieri G, Tavernari L, et al. Involvement of MAF/SPP1 axis in the development of bone marrow fibrosis in PMF patients. Leukemia. 2018;32:438–49. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hasselbalch HC. The role of cytokines in the initiation and progression of myelofibrosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24:133–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tefferi A, Vaidya R, Caramazza D, Finke C, Lasho T, Pardanani A. Circulating interleukin (IL)-8, IL-2R, IL-12, and IL-15 levels are independently prognostic in primary myelofibrosis: a comprehensive cytokine profiling study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1356–63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.9490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rani A, Afzali B, Kelly A, Tewolde-Berhan L, Hackett M, Kanhere AS, et al. IL-2 regulates expression of C-MAF in human CD4 T cells. J Immunol. 2011;187:3721. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maekawa T, Osawa Y, Izumi T, Nagao S, Takano K, Okada Y, et al. Myeloproliferative leukemia protein activation directly induces fibrocyte differentiation to cause myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2709–16. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Klement JD, Poschel DB, Lu C, Merting AD, Yang D, Redd PS, et al. Osteopontin blockade immunotherapy increases cytotoxic t lymphocyte lytic activity and suppresses colon tumor progression. Cancers. 2021;13:1–15. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Honda M, Kimura C, Uede T, Kon S. Neutralizing antibody against osteopontin attenuates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. J Cell Commun Signal. 2020;14:223–32. doi: 10.1007/s12079-020-00554-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Facchetti F, Franco V, van der Walt J, Orazi A. European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica. 2005;90:1128–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brkic S, Stivala S, Santopolo A, Szybinski J, Jungius S, Passweg JR, et al. Dual targeting of JAK2 and ERK interferes with the myeloproliferative neoplasm clone and enhances therapeutic efficacy. Leukemia. 2021;35:2875–84. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01391-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stivala S, Codilupi T, Brkic S, Baerenwaldt A, Ghosh N, Hao-Shen H, et al. Targeting compensatory MEK/ERK activation increases JAK inhibitor efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. J Clin Investig. 2019;129:1596–611. doi: 10.1172/JCI98785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leimkühler NB, Gleitz HFE, Ronghui L, Snoeren IAM, Fuchs SNR, Nagai JS, et al. Heterogeneous bone-marrow stromal progenitors drive myelofibrosis via a druggable alarmin axis. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:637.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hasan S, Lacout C, Marty C, Cuingnet M, Solary E, Vainchenker W, et al. JAK2V617F expression in mice amplifies early hematopoietic cells and gives them a competitive advantage that is hampered by IFNa. Blood. 2013;122:1464–77. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-498956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nakamachi T, Nomiyama T, Gizard F, Heywood EB, Jones KL, Zhao Y, et al. PPARα agonists suppress osteopontin expression in macrophages and decrease plasma levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:1662–70. doi: 10.2337/db06-1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Craig AM, Smith JH, Denhardt DT. Osteopontin, a transformation-associated cell adhesion phosphoprotein, is induced by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate in mouse epidermis. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:9682–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)60584-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kato A, Okura T, Hamada C, Miyoshi S, Katayama H, Higaki J, et al. Cell stress induces upregulation of osteopontin via the ERK pathway in type II alveolar epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0100106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Kim JH, Jung TY, Seo J, Lee S, Kim MG, Leem KH, et al. Involvement of MAPK signaling pathway in the osteogenic gene expressions of Cervi Pantotrichum Cornu in MG-63 human osteoblast-like cells. Life Sci. 2014;94:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic J-P, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005;434:1144–8. doi: 10.1038/nature03546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mullally A, Lane SW, Ball B, Megerdichian C, Okabe R, Al-Shahrour F, et al. Physiological Jak2V617F expression causes a lethal myeloproliferative neoplasm with differential effects on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:584–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marty C, Lacout C, Martin A, Hasan S, Jacquot S, Birling MC, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm induced by constitutive expression of JAK2 V617F in knock-in mice. Blood. 2010;116:783–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-257063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li J, Spensberger D, Ahn JS, Anand S, Beer PA, Ghevaert C, et al. JAK2 V617F impairs hematopoietic stem cell function in a conditional knock-in mouse model of JAK2 V617F-positive essential thrombocythemia. Blood. 2010;116:1528–38. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-259747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Akada H, Yan D, Zou H, Fiering S, Hutchison RE, Mohi MG. Conditional expression of heterozygous or homozygous Jak2V617F from its endogenous promoter induces a polycythemia vera-like disease. Blood. 2010;115:3589–97. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-215848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bartalucci N, Tozzi L, Bogani C, Martinelli S, Rotunno G, Villeval JL, et al. Co-targeting the PI3K/mTOR and JAK2 signalling pathways produces synergistic activity against myeloproliferative neoplasms. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1385–96. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jiang H, Xu M, Li L, Grierson P, Dodhiawala P, Highkin M, et al. Concurrent HER or PI3K inhibition potentiates the antitumor effect of the ERK inhibitor ulixertinib in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:2144–55. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Germann UA, Furey BF, Markland W, Hoover RR, Aronov AM, Roix JJ, et al. Targeting the MAPK signaling pathway in cancer: Promising preclinical activity with the novel selective ERK1/2 inhibitor BVD-523 (ulixertinib) Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2351–63. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Malara A, Gruppi C, Abbonante V, Cattaneo D, De Marco L, Massa M, et al. EDA fibronectin–TLR4 axis sustains megakaryocyte expansion and inflammation in bone marrow fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2019;216:587–604. doi: 10.1084/jem.20181074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Annunziata CM, Hernandez L, Davis RE, Zingone A, Lamy L, Lam LT, et al. Amechanistic rationale for MEK inhibitor therapy in myeloma based on blockade of MAF oncogene expression. Blood. 2011;117:2396–404. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.MacHado-Neto JA, Fenerich BA, Scopim-Ribeiro R, Eide CA, Coelho-Silva JL, Dechandt CRP, et al. Metformin exerts multitarget antileukemia activity in JAK2V617F-positive myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cell Death Dis. 2018; 9. 10.1038/s41419-017-0256-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Yanae M, Tsubaki M, Satou T, Itoh T, Imano M, Yamazoe Y, et al. Statin-induced apoptosis via the suppression of ERK1/2 and Akt activation by inhibition of the geranylgeranyl-pyrophosphate biosynthesis in glioblastoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Morales DR, Morris AD. Metformin in cancer treatment and prevention. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:17–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062613-093128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1792–802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Campos PDM, Pagnano KB, Mancuso RI, Della Via FI, Tinoco ÂC, Assis-Mendonça GR, et al. Final results of the fibromet trial: an open label phase II study to evaluate metformin effects on bone marrow fibrosis and disease progression in primary myelofibrosis patients. Blood. 2021;138:2584. doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-151077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kristensen D, Oevlisen AK, Jakobsen LH, Severinsen MT, El-Galaly TCC, Roug AS. Statin use and the risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms in a population based cohort. Blood. 2022;140:6813–4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-157668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu GC, Oudit GY, Fang F, Zhou J, Scholey JW. Angiotensin-(1-7)-induced activation of ERK1/2 is cAMP/protein kinase A-dependent in glomerular mesangial cells. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2012;302:784–90. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00455.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lorenzen JM, Neunhöffer H, David S, Kielstein JT, Haller H, Fliser D. Angiotensin II receptor blocker and statins lower elevated levels of osteopontin in essential hypertension—results from the EUTOPIA trial. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209:184–8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shojaei F, Scott N, Kang X, Lappin PB, Fitzgerald AA, Karlicek S, et al. Osteopontin induces growth of metastatic tumors in a preclinical model of non-small lung cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012;31:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Boumans MJH, Houbiers JGA, Verschueren P, Ishikura H, Westhovens R, Brouwer E, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of the monoclonal antibody ASK8007 blocking osteopontin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, placebo controlled, proof-of-concept study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:180–5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Farrokhi V, Chabot JR, Neubert H, Yang Z. Assessing the feasibility of neutralizing osteopontin with various therapeutic antibody modalities. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26187-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Moorman HR, Poschel D, Klement JD, Lu C, Redd PS, Liu K. Osteopontin: a key regulator of tumor progression and immunomodulation. Cancers. 2020;12:1–31. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.