Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2023 May 10;9(19):eadf1725. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf1725

Revealing molecular diffusion dynamics in polymer microspheres by optical resonances

Jiawei Wang 1,*, Jin Li 1, Shengqi Sun 1, Haiyun Dong 2, Lan Wu 1, Engui Zhao 3,*, Feng He 1, Xing Ma 4, Yong Sheng Zhao 2,*
PMCID: PMC10171802  PMID: 37163586

Abstract

Understanding the diffusion of small molecules in polymer microsystems is of great interest in diverse fundamental and industrial research. Despite the rapidly advancing optical imaging and spectroscopic techniques, entities under investigation are usually limited to flat films or bulky samples. We demonstrate a route to in situ detection of diffusion dynamics in polymer micro-objects by means of optical whispering-gallery mode resonances. Through mode tracking, interactions between solvent molecules and polymer microspheres, including sorption, diffusion, and swelling can be quantitatively analyzed. A turning point of mode response is observed, while the diffusion exceeds the sub-wavelength-thick outermost layer as the radial extent of resonances and starts penetrating the inner core. The estimated solubility in the glassy polymer is consistent with the predicted value using Flory-Huggins theory. Besides, the non-Fickian contribution is analyzed in such a glassy polymer-penetrant system. Our work represents a high-precision and label-free approach to describing characteristics in diffusion dynamics.


Molecular diffusion dynamics in polymer microspheres can be understood by tracking optical whispering-gallery mode resonances.

INTRODUCTION

Assessing interactions between small molecules in polymers, such as sorption, diffusion, and permeation, as a long-standing research topic, is unquestionably valuable in a plethora of fields such as medicine (1), energy storages (2), and sensors (3). Notably, the diffusion kinetics in a polymer-penetrant system is highly dependent on multiple physical properties, especially the state of the amorphous polymer. It can be classified into three regimes, namely, Fickian (case-I) diffusion in which the rate of penetrant diffusion governs, case-II diffusion in which the polymer relaxation dominates (4), and non-Fickian (anomalous) diffusion in which diffusion and relaxation occur with comparable rates (5, 6). In addition to the classical gravimetric technique (5), various precision measurement techniques using optical principles have been explored, such as fluorescence imaging (7), laser interferometry (8), Raman spectroscopy (9), dynamic reflection spectroscopy (1012), and Fourier transform infrared–attenuated total reflection spectroscopy (13). However, most of the characterizations are mainly performed on flat films or periodic yet macroscopic structures. To clarify the diffusion dynamics, especially anomalous diffusion in polymer with tiny mass or scale down to a few micrometers, new methods with improved sensitivity and spatial resolution are highly desirable.

Since the groundbreaking work by Arnold and Vollmer in 2002 (14), whispering gallery mode (WGM) optical microcavities have been widely recognized as a highly sensitive detection system with a rapidly extended scope, including physical, chemical, and biological sensing (1518). In dielectric microstructures with a circular cross section, such as microspheres (14, 19), microtubes (20, 21), and microrings (22), the total internal reflection of light waves along the concave cavity boundary results in efficient optical confinement and high-Q WGM resonances (23). Primarily, WGM optical microcavity sensors have been exploited for the detection of any solid (bio-)materials in the vicinity of the cavity surface being adsorbed and polarized through interactions with the evanescent field (24, 25). In addition to sensing in an aqueous environment, extensive studies have been performed on gas molecules, sparking applications in vapor sensing (2630), humidity sensing (31, 32), and discriminations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (22, 33).

In most of the aforementioned cases, the WGM microcavity itself as the transducer is perceived to be “static.” One should revisit this assumption more carefully while the sensor is made by nonsolid WGM cavities (34). Under such circumstances, the interaction would no longer be limited to the surface. Hence, the light-analyte interaction does not have to be restricted by the evanescent wave fraction. Notably, the same mechanism applies to WGM cavities made of polymers (3538), such as polystyrene (PS) (39), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (40), and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPA) (41). The polymer-solvent interaction and resulting swelling may occur in both air and aqueous environment over a relatively long time scale and also contribute to the perturbations of optical resonances (26, 33, 41). In this request, a theoretical model based on perturbative approach was proposed recently to describe the complex process of glassy polymer microspheres immersed in a solvent bath (42). Somewhat unexpectedly, the diffusion kinetics of penetrant molecules with varying amounts in polymers have not yet been experimentally addressed with WGM-based optical sensing techniques. Sharp optical resonances in polymer spheres may contribute to fresh insights into understanding molecular diffusion in polymers as a ubiquitous phenomenon, especially those known with complex dynamics in the glassy state or close to the glassy-to-rubbery transition.

Here, we report an experimental observation and quantitative description of diffusion dynamics in glassy polymer microspheres with a diameter of a few micrometers by means of analyzing optical resonances. While previous reports of WGM gas sensors focus on measuring the number of molecules absorbed on the surface, our approach here reveals that optical resonances of polymer microspheres are not only sensitive to the concentration of penetrant molecules in ambient environment but also strongly dependent on the progress of permeation and swelling of the polymer matrix. By real-time tracking of resonant wavelength shifts and mode linewidth changes, different stages of interactions covering the adsorption at the surface, outermost layer-limited diffusion, and further diffusion until saturation can be distinguished. The characterized mode responses indicate a good consistency with perturbative theories and numerical simulation results. Key parameters including the penetrant concentration and solubility in glassy polymer can be extracted by analyzing the mode shifts at different stages. This work represents an approach to understanding the widely existing anomalous diffusion phenomena in polymer microstructures.

RESULTS

Principle

Figure 1 (A and B) illustrates the working principle of analyzing diffusion kinetics in a polymer microsphere by tracking WGM resonances. The resonance frequencies are strongly dependent on the sphere size (i.e., radius R) and refractive indices of both the sphere material (nc) and the environment (ne). Using an asymptotic approximation, the resonance condition can be expressed as follows (43)

ωm(l)ncRc=νξl(ν2)1/3+ncnek=0kmaxdk(nc,ne,ξl)νk/3(nc2/ne21)(k+1)/2 (1)

where ω is the angular frequency of the resonance, l is the radial mode order, m is the azimuthal mode order, ν = l + 1/2, ξl denotes the l-th zero of the Airy function, and c is the speed of light. The coefficient dk depends on the polarization state of the light, i.e., the transverse electric (TE) or transverse magnetic (TM) mode [e.g., see d0d8 for k = 0 to 8 in the previous study (43)]. As to the fundamental TE mode along the radial direction (p = 1) as the simplest case, the mode volume is well confined at the outermost layer of the microsphere (see Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1. WGMs supported in polymer microspheres are sensitive to perturbations by solvent molecules.

Fig. 1.

(A) Left: Schematic of a TE-polarized WGM supported in a polymer microsphere and the interaction with ethanol molecules in ambient environment. Right: Schematic in a cross-sectional view of a segment of the microsphere with the depicted diffusion-caused swollen layer, where the deep blue part stands for the original volume and the light blue part stands for the expanded volume. The undiffused glassy layer at the core region is denoted in green. (B) Scanning electron microscopy image and bright-field optical microscope image of PS microspheres. (C) Measured resonant mode spectrum containing both TM and TE modes with different azimuthal mode orders. (D) Polarization- and wavelength-resolved image showing TE and TM modes. a.u., arbitrary units.

For a polymer microsphere in the rubbery state exposed to the mixture of air and penetrant molecules, a simple Fickian diffusion model can be applied. While the process temperature Te (room temperature here) is notably lower than the glassy-to-rubbery state transition temperature Tg (~ 94°C; see Materials and Methods), the diffusion dynamics of polymer in the glassy state might be anomalous and also hard to predict because of the slow relaxation (44). According to previous studies of non-Fickian diffusion such as alcohol diffused into a glassy polymer (4547), generally, a sharp glass-rubber interface can be formed (Fig. 1B), which is attributed to the threshold process in a glassy-to-rubbery state transition (6, 48). The diffusion coefficient Dg of alcohol molecules into glassy polymers (e.g., ~10−12 to 10−11 cm2/s at room temperature) can be orders of magnitude lower than that in rubbery polymers (Dr ~ 10−8 cm2/s) (49). Hence, the depth of diffusion L increases gradually over time, and the microsphere gets swelled with a change of radius ΔR.

Assuming a local equilibrium is reached, the volume fraction of diffused penetrant can be expressed as ηs=ν¯U0, where U0 is the solubility and v is the molar volume (~0.058 dm3/mol for ethanol). According to previous reports using gravimetric methods (45, 50, 51), the interaction between PS and ethanol follows the simple assumption that the volumes of the polymer and the solvent are additive. Therefore, the volume fraction of the polymer can be written as ηc = 1 - ηs. Besides, the diffusion leads to a radial inhomogeneity of the refractive index of the microsphere. As a composite system containing two materials that are randomly interspersed, the refractive index of the diffused layer nd can be estimated using the Bruggeman model (see section S1) (52). Hence, the change in the refractive index is Δn = ndnc.

Considering the resonance condition in Eq. 1 that nωR ≈ const, the overall effect on the mode resonance wavelength Δλ can be summarized as (24)

ΔλλΔRR+Δnn (2)

Given that the refractive index of the penetrant ns is usually lower than nc (e.g., ns ~ 1.36 for ethanol and nc ~ 1.59 for PS at 590 nm), Δn is a negative value. Therefore, the two components, ΔR/R and Δn/n may contribute with the opposite sign and thus “compete” against each other, leading to distinct responses at different stages of the diffusion process.

Tracking of diffusion dynamics

WGM resonances of single microspheres were characterized using a confocal microscopic photoluminescence (PL) system (see Materials and Methods and fig. S2 to S4). Two sets of resonant modes can be discerned (see Fig. 1C and fig. S4). Polarization-resolved spectroscopy in Fig. 1D confirms the pair of TE and TM modes at the fundamental radial mode order. The extracted Q factor (i.e., the inverse mode linewidth relative to its wavelength, Q = λ/δλ) of TE modes is considerably higher than that of TM modes. This is attributed to the potentially higher scattering loss of the TM mode caused by the strong evanescent field interacting with the surface roughness rather than that of the TE mode. To seek the best accuracy of spectral resolution, most of the following studies are conducted on the basis of TE modes.

While the prepared mixture of ethanol and air was injected into a homemade chamber, in situ spectral measurements were carried out (see Materials and Methods). Figure 2A presents the time course of mode wavelength shift at an ethanol concentration of 200 parts per million (ppm; i.e., 8.9 × 10−3 mol/m3). Initially, the resonances experience a clear spectral blue shift, which contradicts the results in conventional WGM-based gas detection where only red shift was observed (31, 33). When the penetration is limited at the outermost layer strongly overlapping with the WGM field, the mode response is dominated by the refractive index change [see Fig. 2B (left)]. The shift gradually reaches a saturated blue shift value of Δλouter ~ −0.36 nm at tD ~ 900 s.

Fig. 2. Evolution of resonance modes in a low-load condition.

Fig. 2.

(A) Mode wavelength shift as a function of time upon a penetrant concentration of 200 ppm. Inset: Zoomed-in view at t = 0 to 1200 s. (B) Schematics presenting two stages of diffusion interacting differently with the WGM, respectively.

By considering the mode distribution of WGM resonances together with Eq. 2, the mode responses can be theoretically studied. Apart from the diffusion and swelling, slow relaxation of the polymer may occur as well. A complete analysis considering both effects of diffusion-induced swelling and polymer relaxation is given in section S2. According to previously characterized volume relaxation of PS by dilatometer (53) and the prediction of refractive index change using the Lorentz-Lorenz equation, the calculation shows that polymer relaxation makes a very minor contribution in the mode responses and hence can be negligible. Therefore, for simplicity, the following analysis adopts the approximation of neglected relaxation-induced effects. Applying the asymptotic approximation in Eq. 1, the radial extent Rres can be expressed as

RresR(3π)2/32[q1/4nck0R0]2/3 (3)

While L approaches Rres, the maximum shift can be derived from Eq. 2 as

Δλouterλ=1ncRnd(1ηs)R3ηs(RRres)33 (4)

Δλouter can be a negative value in the case that the cavity radius R is sufficiently large and the refractive index change dominates the responses.

As revealed in Fig. 2A, the blue shift trend ceases at the turning point t ~ 900 s, and a continuous red shift emerges. This observation indicates that L surpasses the radial extent of WGMs, and the sphere core is ingressed and gradually swelled [see Fig. 2B (right)]. The rate can be estimated by adopting Fickian’s law of diffusion

dLdt=K(UUth)γ (5)

where the kinetic parameter K and the nonlinear coefficient γ are phenomenological constants, U is the penetrant molar concentration, and Uth is the concentration at a threshold level triggering the transition from the originally glassy state to the rubbery state. Because of the low concentration of penetrant molecules, the diffusion is very slow, and a saturation point of the red shift is not observed after ~4 hours of measurement.

Further experiments were carried out at a largely increased ethanol concentration of 150-fold. One can find a clear-mode red shift at the beginning stage [t = 0 to 65 s; see Fig. 3 (A and B)], which is absent in the low-concentration case in Fig. 2A. By introducing a large number of penetrant molecules into the vicinity of the microsphere, physical absorption of molecules leads to a quick formation of a thin molecular film at the surface (54), and thus, the effective cavity radius is slightly increased up to an equilibrium reached at tA ~ 65 s. In such a high-concentration case, the number of molecules captured per unit of time at the very initial stage (t < tA) is much larger than the diffused one, and hence, the accumulation of molecules on the surface leads to mode red shift.

Fig. 3. Evolution of resonance modes in a high-load condition.

Fig. 3.

(A) Measured resonant spectra at different stages. (B) Mode wavelength shift (top) and Q factor (bottom) as a function of time upon a penetrant concentration of 30,000 ppm. Insets: Zoomed-in view of (B) at t = 0 to 300 s.

For t = 65 to 200 s, the mode blue shift agrees with the observation in Fig. 2A, indicating that the diffusion at the outermost layer governs the response. One can note that the duration tD (~115 s) is much shorter than that (~900 s) in the low gas loading condition (Fig. 2). This acceleration confirms that dL/dt is strongly dependent on the penetrant concentration. As implied in Eq. 5, the substantial increment of U speeds up the diffusion process by about eightfold. Despite the giant difference in concentration and tD in the two cases, the measured Δλouter are still comparable (−0.36 nm in Fig. 2A and −0.55 nm in Fig. 3B). This is attributed to the similar solubility U0 at an unmodified temperature (considering that the laser heating effect is very minor here), and the characterized Δλouter values still follow the estimation with Eq. 4.

Similar to the accelerated diffusion at the outermost layer upon a high ethanol concentration, one can discern a relatively fast diffusion toward the sphere core. At t = 200 to 6900 s, the resonance is continuously red shifted until reaching a saturated value of Δλmax = 2.3 nm (comparing to the wavelength at t = tA while the initial equilibrium is established). While the polymer sphere is fully diffused (i.e., L = R), the maximum shift can be derived on the basis of Eq. 2 as follows

Δλmaxλ=1nc(1ηs)3nd (6)

In addition to the tracking of resonant mode shift, the diffusion dynamics can also be understood by the evolution of Q factors. One can find a minor increment of Q from ~750 to ~870 at t = 0 to 20 s, which is consistent with previous reports studying molecular adsorption on a cavity surface (54). As the surface roughness could be reduced upon the formation of a uniform thin film, the scattering loss is potentially mitigated. A slight fluctuation of the Q factor around ~720 is observed at t = 65 to 200 s, followed by a notable degradation to ~300 at t = 200 to 6900 s. We attribute this to the spatial inhomogeneity of the diffusion and swelling process, as part of the microsphere close to (or in direct contact with) the substrate might not be well exposed to the environment. Hence, the originally circular-shaped cross section may get deformed, leading to increased optical scattering and leakage loss and an inhomogeneously broadened resonance lineshape (see detailed discussions in section S3). After the saturation point, the swelled microsphere is exposed to air overnight (~ 9 hours). The resonant wavelength is almost shifted back, and the high-Q resonance is also recovered. This indicates that penetrant molecules are released and the whole process is reversible, which agrees with the same process characterized using time-resolved reflection spectroscopy on distributed Bragg reflectors (55).

Full process with retrieved parameters

Figure 4A shows an overview of the full process covering four stages. Stage I is the molecular adsorption at the polymer surface, occurring within the first few tens of seconds and leading to a quick spectral red shift. It is followed by stage II as a relatively long process of the initial diffusion at the outermost layer of the microsphere, in which the effects of Δn and ΔR compete with each other. Stage III is the further inward diffusion up to an equilibrium with a fully swelling condition. Depending on the sphere size and also the molecular concentration, the duration tF may take ~10- to 100-fold longer than tD at stage II, leading to a continuous spectral red shift up to a saturated value and also a degradation of Q factor. At last, the penetrant molecules get desorbed on a long time scale, leading to the recovery of resonant wavelength and Q factor.

Fig. 4. Overview of molecular diffusion dynamics with retrieved key parameters.

Fig. 4.

(A) Summarized evolution of interactions between ethanol molecules and corresponding optical resonance signals, including adsorption, diffusion, and desorption. (B) Calculated mode shift as a function of molecular layer thickness using perturbation theory. (C) Measured mode red shift as a function of penetrant concentration. Dots: Experimental data. Line: A linear fit. (D) Numerically simulated mode shifts as a function of the depth of diffusion L upon ηs of 1 and 2%. Two green dashed lines present the calculated values for ηs = 2% using Eqs. 4 and 6. Two gray solid lines present the measured values in Fig. 3B. (E) Estimated mass uptake ratio as a function of time in a log-log scale.

For surface adsorption at stage I, the mode red shift can be analyzed using perturbation theory

Δλλ=E(r)Δε(r)E(r)2E(r)ε(r)E(r) (7)

where E(r)and ε(r) are the distribution of electric field and permittivity, respectively. Δε(r)denotes the local variation of permittivity induced by the surface molecular layer. Here, two-dimensional (2D) numerical simulations based on the finite element method (COMSOL Multiphysics Wave Optics module) were used to calculate the mode response at stage I (see Materials and Methods). In Fig. 4B, the calculated mode shift is linearly proportional to the thickness of the thin molecular layer on the sphere surface. The estimated surface sensitivity is ~0.114 nm/nm.

To ascertain the origin of stage I, we repeat the studies upon different concentrations (see Fig. 4C). The red shift becomes spectrally resolved at sufficiently high concentrations (>1000 ppm), which explains the absence of initial red shift in Fig. 2. By summarizing the maximum mode shift at stage I as a function of the penetrant concentration, a nice linear relationship with a spectral sensitivity S of ~0.3 pm/ppm is obtained, which is consistent with the observations of surface sensing using both organic and inorganic WGM microcavities (56, 57).

Here, numerical simulations were carried out to study the relationship between Δλ and L at stages II and III (see section S4 and fig. S10). Two sets of results with ηs of 1 and 2% as examples are presented in Fig. 4D. For ηs = 2%, the simulated Δλouter at L = 0.3 μm agrees nicely with the calculated value based on Eq. 4. Here, we would like to point out that the competition-governed mode response at stage II is dependent on multiple parameters, especially the exact mode field distribution. Here, the dependence on the optical polarization state is investigated by comparing the mode evolutions of both TM and TE modes (see section S5 and fig. S11). For the TM mode, the appearance of blue shift is a bit “delayed” compared to that of the TE mode, which agrees with the theory that the radial extent Rres for TM mode is slightly larger than that of the TE mode (fig. S11A). Besides, the competition at stage II is highly size dependent (see section S6). As implied by Eq. 4, the transition from red shift and blue shift occurs at R of ~2.2 μm (see fig. S12). With further experiments using microspheres with a reduced R ~ 1.5 μm, a distinct response at stage II is observed. Instead of mode blue shift, here, a moderate red shift is observed (fig. S13), which is further corroborated by the simulation results (fig. S14).

For stage III, the swelling-induced red shift gradually dominates the response and becomes saturated, while L approaches R. The simulated Δλmax ~ 2.3 nm matches nicely with both the theoretical value based on Eq. 6. In practice, Δλmax at equilibrium can be used to extract the actual volume fraction (or solubility) of ethanol in PS. According to Flory-Huggins theory, while the polymer matrix is fully swollen, the thermodynamic equilibrium condition can be written as (45)

lnηs+(1-ηs)+χ(1-ηs)2=0 (8)

where χ is the dimensionless Flory-Huggins interaction parameter between polymer and penetrant. χ varies linearly with 1/Te and thus can be expressed as χ = a + b/Te, where a and b are empirical parameters. According to previous gravimetric measurements (45), the volume fraction of ethanol in PS at 20°C is calculated as 2.3%, which agrees nicely with our estimated value (~2%) probed by optical resonances.

For stage III in which the swelling solely governs the mode shift, the diffusion kinetics can be further understood by assessing the time course of diffused mass. Considering the relative mass uptake ΔM(t)ΔMmax in a polymer-penetrant system (58), a power-law expression can be written as

ΔM(t)ΔMmaxΔR(t)ΔRmax=Δλ(t)λΔn/nΔλmaxλΔn/n=CtN (9)

where C is a constant and N determines the diffusion behavior, namely, Fickian diffusion (N = 0.5), non-Fickian diffusion (0.5 < N < 1), and case II diffusion (N = 1).

As summarized in a log-log plot in Fig. 4E, for ΔMMmax < 0.5, a smooth t0.5 dependence is observed (58). One can estimate Dg at a glassy PS through fitting with the following equation

ΔM(t)ΔMmaxΔλ(t)λΔn/nΔλmaxλΔn/n=2RDgtπ (10)

The extracted diffusion coefficient Dg here is ~10−11 cm2/s, showing a good agreement with previous reports using flat polymer films and gravimetric methods (11, 12). As a slow effect at Te << Tg, Dg is about two orders lower than the values above Tg. Notably, instead of a saturation followed by a plateaus region, a slope > 0.5 is observed, indicating the non-Fickian contribution of the sorption. Such a phenomenon with dynamics beyond the Fickian equilibration has also been observed by the conventional gravimetric method long ago (49).

DISCUSSION

In summary, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a route of studying diffusion dynamics in polymer microspheres using optical resonances. While conventional WGM microcavity sensors focus on detecting specific or nonspecific adsorptions onto the surface, our report shows that optical resonances can be pivoted to understanding microscopic thermodynamics. A complete picture containing four stages of interaction in a penetrant-microsphere system is unveiled and quantitatively depicted by tracking the spectral shift and linewidth change of resonances. Assuming a thermodynamic equilibrium can be gradually reached, the solubility of penetrant in polymer at a particular temperature can be retrieved by virtue of the tracked mode evolution. Compared with other previously developed optical techniques assessing diffusion dynamics, here our WGM resonance-enabled approach offers noninvasive, in situ precise measurements for understanding diffusion dynamics with clearly revealed time courses, which is particularly advantageous for miniaturized systems of glassy polymer far below Tg with potentially low solubility of solvent.

The technique can be further applied to studying microsystems interacting with various types of organic or inorganic molecules in either ambient or aqueous environments. Moreover, our demonstrated in situ route could be versatile and applicable to a big variety of polymer microstructures (e.g., polygons, cylinders, disks, and tubes) supporting WGM resonances, which avoids the complexity of designing and fabricating distributed Bragg reflectors in previously reported Flory-Huggins sensors (11, 59, 60). The polymer structure is not limited to miniaturized objects with a size of a few micrometers. Polymer-based WGM cavities with a larger size (up to about millimeters) and those with alternative designs such as freestanding ones or polymer-coated cavities (61, 62), could be particularly favorable in leveraging ultrahigh-Q resonances (Q ~ 104 to 109) and resolving tiny changes at different stages throughout the interaction. All in all, the work is envisaged to unveil diffusion dynamics in a noninvasive manner by resonant light probing and also unleash vast potential applications to tap in, for instance, the drug load/release performance in delivery systems, the degradation of environmental pollutants, and the lifetime assessment of polymer devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation

The mature chemical synthesis technology of monodisperse microspheres offers good homogeneity, high-quality surface morphology, and also flexibility in surface functionalization. In experiments, commercially available monodisperse PS microspheres doped with rhodamine B dyes (1% w/v; So-Fe Biomedicine) were adopted. The microsphere surface was functionalized with a carboxyl (COOH) group. The characterized glass transition temperature is ~94°C. Two sets of PS microsphere samples with a diameter of 6 and 3 μm (coefficient of variance, <10%) were studied. The 1:100 diluted suspension of microspheres was drop-cast onto a quartz substrate and sealed into a homemade chamber with a volume of ~0.7 cm3. The chamber was constructed with a substrate, a spacer, and a 0.17-mm-thick cover glass and sealed by ultraviolet-curing optical adhesives (NOA 68). Microfluidic PTFE Teflon tubing was integrated into the inlet and outlet of the chamber. Gas samples containing a mixture of ethanol and air with different concentrations were prepared in 1-liter Teflon bags and delivered to the chamber by a syringe. The ethanol concentration varies from 200 ppm to the highest saturable value (~60,000 ppm).

Optical characterizations

In situ spectral measurements were conducted using a confocal microscopic PL system. Excitation was conducted using a continuous-wave (CW) laser (Cobolt Samba, 532 nm) and a long-working distance objective lens (Olympus LMPLFLN 50×; numerical aperture, 0.5) with a spot size ≈ 1 μm2. For long-time measurements of molecular interactions, resonant modes in PL signals upon CW pumping were analyzed instead of lasing modes (fig. S3) upon pulsed pumping due to their better stability. The focusing spot was aligned to the rim of individual microspheres to maximize the excitation and collection efficiency of WGMs. The power of laser excitation onto the sample was adjusted to ~0.4 μW using a neutral density filter (optical density, 4) to avoid any photobleaching and potential heating effect, which may perturb the WGMs and cause additional resonance drifts. The emission light was guided to the spectrometer with 600 blz/mm and an electrically cooled charge-coupled device camera. The polarization state was determined using a rotatable half-wave plate and a fixed polarization analyzer. Spatially resolved mapping was performed using a motorized stage with a step of 0.2 μm.

Numerical simulation

2D numerical simulations were performed on the basis of the finite-element method (COMSOL Multiphysics Wave Optics module). A circular-shaped perfect matching layer as the outermost boundary was introduced for simulating the mode field distribution. Fine meshing with a size of ~2 nm was applied to the outermost region of the cavity overlapping with the resonant optical fields. The eigenmodes and eigenfrequencies for both TM and TE modes around 590 to 600 nm were numerically solved and tracked upon varying conditions of sorption and diffusion.

Acknowledgments

We thank X. Gong for fruitful discussions and X. Liu and Y. Wang for technical support.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 62105080, 22090023, and 22005050) and GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant no. 2020A1515110328, 2021A1515110606, and 2023A1515011944).

Author contributions: Conceptualization: J.W., E.Z., and Y.S.Z. Methodology: J.W., H.D., and X.M. Experiment: S.S., J.L., E.Z., and J.W. Numerical simulation: J.L. and J.W. Data analysis: S.S., L.W., and F.H. Theoretical analysis: J.W., J.L., and H.D. Paper writing: J.W., Y.S.Z., and J.L.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Sections S1 to S6

Figs. S1 to S14

References

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.N. Kamaly, B. Yameen, J. Wu, O. C. Farokhzad, Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: Mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem. Rev. 116, 2602–2663 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Y. Shi, L. Peng, Y. Ding, Y. Zhao, G. Yu, Nanostructured conductive polymers for advanced energy storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 6684–6696 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.F. A. A. Nugroho, I. Darmadi, L. Cusinato, A. Susarrey-Arce, H. Schreuders, L. J. Bannenberg, A. B. da Silva Fanta, S. Kadkhodazadeh, J. B. Wagner, T. J. Antosiewicz, A. Hellman, V. P. Zhdanov, B. Dam, C. Langhammer, Metal–polymer hybrid nanomaterials for plasmonic ultrafast hydrogen detection. Nat. Mater. 18, 489–495 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.T. P. Gall, R. C. Lasky, E. J. Kramer, Case II diffusion: Effect of solvent molecule size. Polymer 31, 1491–1499 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D. Pierleoni, M. Minelli, G. Scherillo, G. Mensitieri, V. Loianno, F. Bonavolonta, F. Doghieri, Analysis of a polystyrene-toluene system through "dynamic" sorption tests: Glass transitions and retrograde vitrification. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 9969–9981 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.G. Mensitieri, G. Scherillo, C. Panayiotou, P. Musto, Towards a predictive thermodynamic description of sorption processes in polymers: The synergy between theoretical EoS models and vibrational spectroscopy. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 140, 100525 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.D. Wang, C. He, M. P. Stoykovich, D. K. Schwartz, Nanoscale topography Influences polymer surface diffusion. ACS Nano 9, 1656–1664 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.J. E. Saunders, H. Chen, C. Brauer, M. Clayton, W. Chen, J. A. Barnes, H.-P. Loock, Quantitative diffusion and swelling kinetic measurements using large-angle interferometric refractometry. Soft Matter 11, 8746–8757 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.T.-M. Chang, S. S. Xantheas, A. E. Vasdekis, Mesoscale polymer dissolution probed by Raman spectroscopy and molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 10581–10587 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Y. Zhang, Q. Fu, J. Ge, Photonic sensing of organic solvents through geometric study of dynamic reflection spectrum. Nat. Commun. 6, 7510 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.P. Lova, G. Manfredi, C. Bastianini, C. Mennucci, F. Buatier de Mongeot, A. Servida, D. Comoretto, Flory–Huggins photonic sensors for the optical assessment of molecular diffusion coefficients in polymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 16872–16880 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.P. Lova, H. Megahd, D. Comoretto, Thin polymer films: Simple optical determination of molecular diffusion coefficients. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2, 563–568 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Y. A. Elabd, M. G. Baschetti, T. A. Barbari, Time-resolved Fourier transform infrared/attenuated total reflection spectroscopy for the measurement of molecular diffusion in polymers. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 41, 2794–2807 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.F. Vollmer, D. Braun, A. Libchaber, M. Khoshsima, I. Teraoka, S. Arnold, Protein detection by optical shift of a resonant microcavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4057–4059 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.X. Jiang, A. J. Qavi, S. H. Huang, L. Yang, Whispering-gallery sensors. Matter 3, 371–392 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.D. Yu, M. Humar, K. Meserve, R. C. Bailey, S. N. Chormaic, F. Vollmer, Whispering-gallery-mode sensors for biological and physical sensing. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 83 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.X.-C. Yu, S.-J. Tang, W. Liu, Y. Xu, Q. Gong, Y.-L. Chen, Y.-F. Xiao, Single-molecule optofluidic microsensor with interface whispering gallery modes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2108678119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Hu, Y. S. Zhao, Smart protein-based biolasers: An alternative way to protein conformation detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 19187–19192 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.T. Reynolds, N. Riesen, A. Meldrum, X. Fan, J. M. M. Hall, T. M. Monro, A. François, Fluorescent and lasing whispering gallery mode microresonators for sensing applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1600265 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.J. Wang, D. Karnaushenko, M. Medina-Sánchez, Y. Yin, L. Ma, O. G. Schmidt, Three-dimensional microtubular devices for lab-on-a-chip sensing applications. ACS Sens. 4, 1476–1496 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.J. Wang, Y. Yin, Q. Hao, Y. Zhang, L. Ma, O. G. Schmidt, Strong coupling in a photonic molecule formed by trapping a microsphere in a microtube cavity. Adv. Opt. Mater. 6, 1700842 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.K. Scholten, X. Fan, E. T. Zellers, A microfabricated optofluidic ring resonator for sensitive, high-speed detection of volatile organic compounds. Lab Chip 14, 3873–3880 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.K. J. Vahala, Optical microcavities. Nature 424, 839–846 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.F. Vollmer, S. Arnold, Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: Label-free detection down to single molecules. Nat. Methods 5, 591–596 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.S. Subramanian, H.-Y. Wu, T. Constant, J. Xavier, F. Vollmer, Label-free optical single-molecule micro- and nanosensors. Adv. Mater. 30, e1801246 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.S. Zhang, S.-J. Tang, S. Feng, Y.-F. Xiao, W. Cui, X. Wang, W. Sun, J. Ye, P. Han, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, High-Q polymer microcavities integrated on a multicore fiber facet for vapor sensing. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1900602 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Y. Kong, Z. Zhao, Y. Wang, S. Yang, G. Huang, Y. Wang, C. Liu, C. You, J. Tan, C. Wang, B. Xu, J. Cui, X. Liu, Y. Mei, Integration of a metal-organic framework film with a tubular whispering-gallery-mode microcavity for effective CO2 sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 48, 58104–58113 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.M. Gao, C. Wei, X. Lin, Y. Liu, F. Hu, Y. S. Zhao, Controlled assembly of organic whispering-gallery-mode microlasers as highly sensitive chemical vapor sensors. Chem. Commun. 53, 3102–3105 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.A. R. Ali, C. M. Elias, Ultra-sensitive optical resonator for organic solvents detection based on whispering gallery modes. Chemosensors 5, 2227–9040 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.C. Lemieux-Leduc, R. Guertin, M.-A. Bianki, Y.-A. Peter, All-polymer whispering gallery mode resonators for gas sensing. Opt. Express 29, 8685–8697 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.W. Y. Heah, H. Yamagishi, K. Fujita, M. Sumitani, Y. Mikami, H. Yoshioka, Y. Oki, Y. Yamamoto, Silk fibroin microspheres as optical resonators for wide-range humidity sensing and biodegradable lasers. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 5653–5657 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.A. Qiagedeer, H. Yamagishi, M. Sakamoto, H. Hasebe, F. Ishiwari, T. Fukushima, Y. Yamamoto, A highly sensitive humidity sensor based on an aggregation-induced emission luminogen-appended hygroscopic polymer microresonator. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 799–803 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.A. Qiagedeer, H. Yamagishi, S. Hayashi, Y. Yamamoto, Polymer optical microcavity sensor for volatile organic compounds with distinct selectivity toward aromatic hydrocarbons. ACS Omega 6, 21066–21070 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.S. Avino, A. Krause, R. Zullo, A. Giorgini, P. Malara, P. De Natale, H. P. Loock, G. Gagliardi, Direct sensing in liquids using whispering-gallery-mode droplet resonators. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2, 1155–1159 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.L. Burratti, F. De Matteis, M. Casalboni, R. Francini, R. Pizzoferrato, P. Prosposito, Polystyrene photonic crystals as optical sensors for volatile organic compounds. Mater. Chem. Phys. 212, 274–281 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.C. Fenzl, T. Hirsch, O. S. Wolfbeis, Photonic crystals for chemical sensing and biosensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 3318–3335 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.T. Endo, Y. Yanagida, T. Hatsuzawa, Colorimetric detection of volatile organic compounds using a colloidal crystal-based chemical sensor for environmental applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 125, 589–595 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.W. Zhang, J. Yao, Y. S. Zhao, Organic micro/nanoscale lasers. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1691–1700 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.J. Wang, Q. Hao, Y. Yin, L. Ma, O. G. Schmidt, Surface-enhanced Raman scattering enabled by metal-coated dielectric microspheres. Phys. Status Solidi B Basic Res. 256, 1800379 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.T. Wienhold, S. Kraemmer, S. F. Wondimu, T. Siegle, U. Bog, U. Weinzierl, S. Schmidt, H. Becker, H. Kalt, T. Mappes, S. Koeber, C. Koos, All-polymer photonic sensing platform based on whispering-gallery mode microgoblet lasers. Lab Chip 15, 3800–3806 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.D.-Q. Yang, J.-H. Chen, Q.-T. Cao, B. Duan, H.-J. Chen, X.-C. Yu, Y.-F. Xiao, Operando monitoring transition dynamics of responsive polymer using optofluidic microcavities. Light. Sci. Appl. 10, 128 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.M. R. Foreman, F. Vollmer, Optical tracking of anomalous diffusion kinetics in polymer microspheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 118001 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.S. Schiller, Asymptotic expansion of morphological resonance frequencies in Mie scattering. Appl. Optics 32, 2181–2185 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.O. J. Karlsson, J. M. Stubbs, L. E. Karlsson, D. C. Sundberg, Estimating diffusion coefficients for small molecules in polymers and polymer solutions. Polymer 42, 4915–4923 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.G. Bernardo, D. Vesely, Equilibrium solubility of alcohols in polystyrene attained by controlled diffusion. Eur. Polym. J. 43, 938–948 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.N. E. Schlotter, Diffusion of small molecules in glassy polymer thin films studied by waveguide Raman techniques. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1692–1699 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.T. Alfrey Jr., E. F. Gurnee, W. G. Lloyd, Diffusion in glassy polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp. 12, 249–261 (1966). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.G. Scherillo, M. Galizia, P. Musto, G. Mensitieri, Water sorption thermodynamics in glassy and rubbery polymers: Modeling the interactional issues emerging from FTIR spectroscopy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 8674–8691 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.A. R. Berens, H. B. Hopfenberg, Diffusion of organic vapors at low concentrations in glassy PVC, polystyrene, and PMMA. J. Membr. Sci. 10, 283–303 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.M. S. Eroğlu, O. Güven, Characterization of network structure of poly(glycidyl azide) elastomers by swelling, solubility and mechanical measurements. Polymer 39, 1173–1176 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.G. B. McKenna, J. A. Hinkley, Mechanical and swelling behaviour of well characterized polybutadiene networks. Polymer 27, 1368–1376 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.R. J. Gehr, R. W. Boyd, Optical properties of nanostructured optical materials. Chem. Mater. 8, 1807–1819 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.K. Adachi, T. Kotaka, Volume and enthalpy relaxation in polystyrene. Polym. J. 14, 959–970 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Y. Yin, J. Wang, X. Wang, S. Li, M. R. Jorgensen, J. Ren, S. Meng, L. Ma, O. G. Schmidt, Water nanostructure formation on oxide probed in situ by optical resonances. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax6973 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.S. Gao, X. Tang, S. Langner, A. Osvet, C. Harreiss, M. K. S. Barr, E. Spiecker, J. Bachmann, C. J. Brabec, K. Forberich, Time-resolved analysis of dielectric mirrors for vapor sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 36398–36406 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.L. Ma, S. Li, V. A. Quinones, L. Yang, W. Xi, M. Jorgensen, S. Baunack, Y. Mei, S. Kiravittaya, O. G. Schmidt, Dynamic molecular processes detected by microtubular opto-chemical sensors self-assembled from prestrained nanomembranes. Adv. Mater. 25, 2357–2361 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.A. K. Mallik, G. Farrell, D. Liu, V. Kavungal, Q. Wu, Y. Semenova, Silica gel coated spherical micro resonator for ultra-high sensitivity detection of ammonia gas concentration in air. Sci. Rep. 8, 1620 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.G. Bernardo, Diffusivity of alcohols in amorphous polystyrene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 127, 1803–1811 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.H. Megahd, P. Lova, D. Comoretto, Universal design rules for Flory–Huggins polymer photonic vapor sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2009626 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.H. Megahd, C. Oldani, S. Radice, A. Lanfranchi, M. Patrini, P. Lova, D. Comoretto, Aquivion–poly(N-vinylcarbazole) holistic Flory–Huggins photonic vapor sensors. Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2002006 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.K. Gardner, Y. Zhi, L. Tan, S. Lane, Y. F. Xiao, A. Meldrum, Whispering gallery mode structure in polymer-coated lasing microspheres. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34, 2140–2146 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.D. Yang, A. Wang, J.-H. Chen, X.-C. Yu, C. Lan, Y. Ji, Y.-F. Xiao, Real-time monitoring of hydrogel phase transition in an ultrahigh Q microbubble resonator. Photon. Res. 8, 497–502 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.N. Tanio, T. Nakanishi, Physical aging and refractive index of poly(methyl methacrylate) glass. Polym. J. 38, 814–818 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.A. A. Askadskii, G. L. Slonimskii, Universal system of calculation for determining the glass transition temperature of polymers. Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R. 13, 2158–2160 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.H. Looyenga, Dielectric constants of homogeneous mixture. Mol. Phys. 9, 501–511 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.N. Tanio, T. Nakanishi, Physical aging and refractive index of optical polymer glass. Kobunshi Ronbunshu 66, 31–35 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.T. Mitsui, Y. Wakayama, T. Onodera, Y. Takaya, H. Oikawa, Observation of light propagation across a 90 corner in chains of microspheres on a patterned substrate. Opt. Lett. 33, 1189–1191 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Sections S1 to S6

Figs. S1 to S14

References


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES