Abstract
Summary
Pelvic-acetabular fractures lead to high mortality in elders and their association between different groups is not known. Our results indicate that older age with pelvic-acetabular fracture was significantly associated with mortality. This finding may help planning and allocating healthcare resources, risk stratification, and optimizing the treatment of pelvic fractures.
Purpose
Pelvic or acetabular fractures are among main outcomes of low-energy trauma such as falls, especially in older adults. They represent approximately 3–8% of all fractures and are associated with a high mortality rate ranging from 4 to 28%. This study is aimed at comparing the incidence and trends of hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures in the Taiwanese general population, gender differences in adults aged over 65 years, and mortality risk between pelvic or acetabular fractures and hip fractures and surgery trends in patients with these fractures.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted extracting data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of patients diagnosed with hip fracture and pelvic acetabular fracture between 2000 and 2018.
Results
Older age with pelvic-acetabular fracture was significantly associated with increased mortality. No significant differences were found in comorbidities between the two fracture groups. Results provide clear epidemiological evidence for trends in pelvic-acetabular fractures in Taiwan and demonstrate the need for better strategies to manage these fractures and comorbidities, particularly in older adults.
Conclusion
Findings of this study may aid in planning and allocating healthcare resources, risk stratification, and optimizing the treatment of pelvic fractures among older adults in Taiwan.
Keywords: Acetabular fracture, Aging, Epidemiology, Hip fracture, Incidence, National Health Insurance Research Database, Pelvic fracture
Introduction
The hip joint is the largest weight-bearing joint in the human body, and it requires the coordinated movement of the pelvic bone, acetabulum, and femoral head to perform its essential functions. Due to the high levels of stress and impact that the hip joint experiences, bones in this region can fracture. While fractures in the pelvic bone, acetabulum, and femoral head can exhibit similar symptoms and be colloquially referred to as “hip fractures,” they are distinct fractures in the medical system. Fractures of the pelvic and acetabular bones occur in the pelvis and acetabulum, respectively. However, in orthopedics, the term “hip fracture” specifically refers to a fracture in the proximal femur. Understanding the differences between these types of fractures is essential for proper diagnosis and treatment.
Pelvic or acetabular fractures are rare injuries compared to fractures in other regions of the body, representing only about 3–8% of all fracture cases and associated with a high mortality rate of about 4–28% [1]. Pelvic fractures are one of the main results of low energy trauma such as falls, particularly in older adults. Similar to hip fractures, pelvic fractures are associated with high hospitalization rates, significant morbidity, and mortality and may lead to serious individual and socioeconomic burdens. Most patients with pelvic fractures die not from the pelvic fracture itself, but from the associated injury and decline in health status [2]. Pelvic fractures are underestimated osteoporotic or fragility fractures [3]. Compared to hip fractures, pelvic fractures have not yet been thoroughly investigated. A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 5454 patients with pelvic fractures concluded that, in stable and alert trauma patients, a thorough clinical examination will detect pelvic fractures with a sensitivity of nearly 100% [4]. The diagnosis and differentiation of pelvic fractures with stable or unstable vital signs is particularly important from the perspective of medical management during emergency care prior to hospitalization. In addition, even if most pelvic fractures are not life-threatening, evaluating possible associated injuries is essential [5]. Comprehensive epidemiological surveillance of pelvic fractures in the presence of other injuries may provide more adequate information for pre-hospital responders and/or in-hospital staff.
Acetabular fractures, similar to pelvic fracture, are one of the most complex injuries in orthopedic medicine. Acetabular fractures mainly occur due to the impact of the femoral head on the articular surface. The fracture pattern depends on the position of the hip at the time of impact; for example, external rotation may lead to an anterior fracture pattern, and internal rotation may lead to a posterior fracture pattern [6]. Falls on the greater trochanter in older adults are likely to result in anterior column and/or wall fractures [7]. The studies of Letournel et al. [8, 9] increased the understanding among orthopedic specialists of surgical approaches for acetabular fractures, including reduction techniques, complications, and results. Good to excellent functional results have been reported in up to 80% of surgically treated acetabular fractures over 20 years [8, 9]. A variety of factors may influence clinical outcomes following acetabular fractures, including pre-existing conditions, injury-related factors, surgical considerations, and postoperative complications [6]. In addition, the quality of joint reduction is critical in determining the clinical outcomes. Age is clearly a risk factor for acetabular fractures; a previous study pointed to a marked increase in the incidence of acetabular fractures in older patients as the population ages [10].
Due to increasing in the older adult population globally, increased incidence of pelvic and acetabular fracture had already been reported in various geographic areas worldwide. This suggested that the burden of pelvic and acetabular fractures has become highly relevant for society in general and, in particular, for local and national healthcare systems. However, investigations regarding the incidence, mortality, and treatment trends of pelvic and acetabular fractures have primarily been conducted in Europe, including in Finland, Sweden, Germany, Austria, and France [11]. A previous study that reviewed 236 patients with pelvic fractures showed that 64.4% were injured in motor vehicle accidents, with a mean hospital stay of 16.8 days [12]. Another study including 128 women and 220 men with pelvic fractures also showed a mean hospital stay of 16.5 days [13]. But similar studies are not reported within the whole populations of Asian countries [14].
Taiwan is also facing an aging society just as, in Western countries, it is necessary to describe healthcare utilization and determine the burden of pelvic and acetabular fractures. The National Health Insurance (NHI) covers nearly all people in Taiwan, which is suitable for epidemiologic investigations [15]. Using evidence based on Taiwan’s national registry health data enables a more systematic investigation of the morbidity and mortality of in-hospital traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures and the impact of major comorbidities. To figure out the incidence, mortality, and treatments between pelvic-acetabular fractures and hip fractures over time in a Taiwanese adult population, this retrospective study was conducted by analyzing patients’ data from NHI research database. We hypothesized that although the pelvic and acetabular fractures were similar to hip fracture in symptoms, they were led to different outcomes. This study should potentially aid in planning and allocating healthcare resources, risk stratification, and optimizing the treatment.
Methods
Study design and data source
This population-based, retrospective study extracted patient data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which contains comprehensive healthcare data, including sex, date of birth, employment, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses, procedures, surgeries, medication usage, and catastrophic illness, of approximately 23 million residents in Taiwan. The NHI Program of Taiwan, which was launched in 1995, provides universal and comprehensive healthcare coverage for approximately 99.9% of Taiwan residents [16] and diagnosis and procedure using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM).
Ethics statement
Because NHIRD consists of de-identified secondary data released to the public for research purposes, this study was exempt from full review by the IRB, and the informed consent of patients was waived. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan.
Study population
The data of patients diagnosed with hip fracture and pelvic-acetabular fracture between 2000 and 2018 were extracted from the NHIRD. Inclusion criteria for patient selection were individuals who had been diagnosed with hip fracture (group 1) and pelvic-acetabular fracture (group 2) between the years 2000 and 2018. The index date was the date of first diagnosis of hip fracture or pelvic-acetabular fracture. Individuals younger than 65 years old and patients died or withdraw from the NHI before the index date were excluded. Four patients in group 1 were selected based on propensity score matching (PSM) with each patient in group 2, including age, sex, index year, and baseline comorbidities. Hip fractures were identified using ICD-9-CM: 820.0, 820.2, 733.14; ICD-10-CM: S72.019A, S72.023A, S72.033A, S72.043A, S72.099A, S72.109A, S72.143A, S72.23XA, and M84.459A. Pelvic and acetabular fractures were identified by ICD-9-CM: 808.0, 808.2, 808.4, and 808.8 and ICD-10-CM: S32.409A, S32.501A, S32.501A, S32.509A, S32.309A, S32.609A, S32.810A, S32.811A, S32.82XA, S32.89XA, and S32.9XXA.
Main outcome and comorbidities
The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause mortality. All individuals were observed from the index date until the occurrence of death, withdrawal from NHIRD, or the end of follow-up (December 31, 2018), whichever came first. Regarding comorbid conditions, the most common risk factors that may affect fragility fractures were included such as Parkinson’s disease (ICD-9-CM: 332; ICD-10-CM: G20), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (ICD-9-CM: 585; ICD-10-CM: N18), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (ICD-9-CM: 491, 492, 496; ICD-10-CM: J41-J44), stroke (ICD-9-CM: 430-438; ICD-10-CM: I60-I69), heart failure (ICD-9-CM: 428; ICD-10-CM: I50), coronary artery disease (CAD) (ICD-9-CM: 410-414; ICD-10-CM: I20.0, I20.1, I20.8, I20.9, I21. I22, I24.1, I24.8, I24.9, I25.1, I25.2), dementia (ICD-9-CM: 290, 294.1, 331.0-331.2; ICD-10-CM: F03.90), osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM: 733.0; ICD-10-CM: M81), and diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250; ICD-10-CM: E08-E13).
Statistical analysis
Categorical and continuous variables are shown as counts (percentage) and mean ± standard deviation (SD), respectively. Chi-square was used to evaluate between-group differences for categorical variables, and Student’s t-test was used to evaluate continuous data. Annual incidence rates of hip fracture and pelvic-acetabular fracture from 2000 to 2018 were calculated by sex in subjects older than 65 years. Crude (cHRs) and adjusted (aHRs) hazard ratios were calculated with confidence intervals (CIs) using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models to compare the mortality rates between hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) software, and R software was used to draw the cumulative incidence curves by Kaplan-Meier method. A p value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistical significance.
Results
Baseline characteristics of the study population
Table 1 summarizes the baseline demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions between patients with pelvic-acetabular fractures (n = 18,726) and hip fractures (n = 74,904). The proportion of males in the two groups was 32.13% (hip fracture) and 31.75% (pelvic-acetabular fracture), respectively. Most patients were aged between 65 and 79 years (65.50% of pelvic-acetabular fracture group) and (65.02% of hip fracture group). Mean ages of patients with hip fracture and pelvic-acetabular fractures were 76.63 and 76.47 years, respectively. All comorbidities compared between hip and pelvic-acetabular fracture were significant as the standardized mean difference (SMD) < 0.1. This included Parkinson’s disease, ESRD, COPD, stroke, heart failure, CAD, dementia, osteoporosis, and diabetes (Table 1).
Table 1.
Patients’ baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities between pelvic-acetabular fracture and hip fracture
| Hip fracture (N = 74904) | Pelvic-acetabular fracture (N = 18726) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | SMD | |
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 50,838 | 67.87 | 12,780 | 68.25 | 0.008 |
| Male | 24,066 | 32.13 | 5946 | 31.75 | 0.008 |
| Age (years) | |||||
| 65–79 | 48,700 | 65.02 | 12,265 | 65.50 | 0.010 |
| > 79 | 26,204 | 34.98 | 6461 | 34.50 | 0.010 |
| Years, mean (SD) | 76.63 | (7.55) | 76.47 | (7.59) | 0.020 |
| Comorbidities | |||||
| Parkinson’s disease | 3792 | 5.06 | 1163 | 6.21 | 0.050 |
| ESRD | 1514 | 2.02 | 557 | 2.97 | 0.061 |
| COPD | 28,113 | 37.53 | 7088 | 37.85 | 0.007 |
| Stroke | 26,510 | 35.39 | 6605 | 35.27 | 0.003 |
| Heart failure | 13,994 | 18.68 | 3683 | 19.67 | 0.025 |
| CAD | 34,346 | 45.85 | 8703 | 46.48 | 0.013 |
| Dementia | 7804 | 10.42 | 2007 | 10.72 | 0.010 |
| Osteoporosis | 29,759 | 39.73 | 7486 | 39.98 | 0.005 |
| Diabetes | 31,320 | 41.81 | 7850 | 41.92 | 0.002 |
| Follow-up, years [mean (SD)]† | 4.74 | (4.19) | 5.18 | (4.48) | 0.101 |
†Student’s t-test
SMD, standardized mean difference. A standardized mean difference of 0.1 or less indicates a negligible difference
ESRD, end-stage renal disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CAD, coronary artery disease
Incidence of hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures between 2000 and 2018 of age > 65 years old in Taiwan
Figures 1 and 2 showed the temporal trends of hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures in Taiwanese older than 65 between the years 2000 and 2018. Figure 1 showed the annual incidence of hip fractures among patients > 65 years by sex. Hip fracture incidence was higher in older females than that in males. For both males and females, hip fracture incidence gradually declines in older adults > 65 years of age.
Fig. 1.
Temporal trends of hip fracture from 2000 to 2018 in Taiwan. Annual incidence of hip fracture from 2000 to 2018 in Taiwan. Among patients older than 65 years by gender
Fig. 2.
Temporal trends of pelvic-acetabular fracture from 2000 to 2018 in Taiwan. Annual incidence of pelvic-acetabular fracture from 2000 to 2018 in Taiwan. Among patients older than 65 years by gender
Figure 2 showed incidence of pelvic-acetabular fractures among patients > 65 years, where women had twice incidence rate than the entire study period. Also, for both males and females, the incidence of pelvic-acetabular fracture gradually declined in older adults > 65 years.
Cumulative incidence of death during follow-up between patients with hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures of age > 65 years old
Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves by Cox proportional hazards analysis, indicating that patients with hip fractures had significantly higher cumulative incidence of mortality than those with pelvic-acetabular fractures (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Examination of the ten leading causes of death in the study cohort are summarized in Supplementary Table S1 and S2. In patients with pelvic-acetabular fractures, the top three causes of death were pneumonia, unspecified diabetes mellitus without complications, and multiple fractures involving both upper limbs and upper limb with rib(s) and sternum. In patients with hip fracture, the top three causes of deaths were pneumonia, unspecified DM without complications, and unspecified COPD.
Fig. 3.
Cumulative incidence of death during follow-up period between patients with hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures
Risk factors of death in patients with pelvic-acetabular fracture and hip fracture of age > 65 years old
Table 2 summarizes the hazard ratios of death in the study population. After adjusting for confounders in the multivariable regression model, pelvic-acetabular fractures were associated with significantly lower risk of mortality than hip fractures (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81–0.84). Male sex (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.33–1.39) and advanced age (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.14–2.22), on the other hand, were associated with significantly increased risk of mortality. Comorbidities associated with significantly increased risk of mortality included Parkinson’s disease (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08–1.16), ESRD (aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.42–2.69), COPD (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11–1.15), stroke (aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13–1.17), heart failure (aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.37–1.43), dementia (aHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.23–1.31), and diabetes (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20–1.24). Osteoporosis, on the contrary, showed a significantly reduced risk or mortality in hip fracture than pelvic-acetabular fracture (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87–0.91).
Table 2.
Risk factors of death in patients with hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures
| Death | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | n | PY | IR | cHR | (95% CI) | aHR | (95% CI) |
| Fracture type | |||||||
| Hip | 41,318 | 355,051 | 116.37 | 1.00 | (Reference) | 1.00 | (Reference) |
| Pelvic-acetabular | 9449 | 96,933 | 97.48 | 0.84 | (0.82, 0.86)*** | 0.82 | (0.81, 0.84)*** |
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | 32,611 | 313,316 | 104.08 | 1.00 | (Reference) | 1.00 | (Reference) |
| Male | 18,156 | 138,668 | 130.93 | 1.25 | (1.23, 1.27)*** | 1.36 | (1.33, 1.39)*** |
| Age | |||||||
| 65–79 | 28,965 | 338,166 | 85.65 | 1.00 | (Reference) | 1.00 | (Reference) |
| > 79 | 21,802 | 113,818 | 191.55 | 2.29 | (2.25, 2.33)*** | 2.18 | (2.14, 2.22)*** |
| Comorbidities | |||||||
| Parkinson’s disease | 3068 | 19,044 | 161.10 | 1.46 | (1.40, 1.51)*** | 1.12 | (1.08, 1.16)*** |
| ESRD | 1507 | 5173 | 291.34 | 2.55 | (2.42, 2.68)*** | 2.55 | (2.42, 2.69)*** |
| COPD | 20,916 | 151,237 | 138.30 | 1.39 | (1.37, 1.42)*** | 1.13 | (1.11, 1.15)*** |
| Stroke | 19,404 | 137,679 | 140.94 | 1.41 | (1.39, 1.44)*** | 1.15 | (1.13, 1.17)*** |
| Heart failure | 11,686 | 65,084 | 179.55 | 1.77 | (1.73, 1.81)*** | 1.40 | (1.37, 1.43)*** |
| CAD | 24,178 | 188,036 | 128.58 | 1.28 | (1.25, 1.30)*** | 0.99 | (0.97, 1.01) |
| Dementia | 6080 | 32,775 | 185.51 | 1.73 | (1.68, 1.77)*** | 1.27 | (1.23, 1.31)*** |
| Osteoporosis | 18,919 | 168,592 | 112.22 | 1.00 | (0.98, 1.02) | 0.89 | (0.87, 0.91)*** |
| Diabetes | 21,070 | 164,366 | 128.19 | 1.24 | (1.22, 1.26)*** | 1.22 | (1.20, 1.24)*** |
PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate per 1000 person-years; cHR, crude hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio
†Adjusted by sex, age, and comorbidities
*p value < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
ESRD, end-stage renal disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CAD, coronary artery disease
Risk of death in patients with pelvic-acetabular fracture versus hip fracture stratified by duration of follow-up of age > 65 years old
As shown in Table 3, Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to compare the risk of the death in patients with pelvic-acetabular fractures versus hip fractures, stratified by different duration of follow-up. After adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities, patients with pelvic-acetabular fractures had significantly lower risk of death among follow-up durations 3 to 6 years (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87–0.96) and > 6 years (aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76–0.83) as compared to those with hip fractures.
Table 3.
Risk of death in patients with pelvic-acetabular fracture versus hip fracture, stratified by follow-up duration
| Hip fracture | Pelvic-acetabular fracture | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up duration, years | n | PY | IR | n | PY | IR | cHR | (95% CI) | aHR | (95% CI) |
| < 3 | 20,153 | 166,444 | 121.08 | 4390 | 42,407 | 103.52 | 1.00 | (0.97, 1.03) | 1.00 | (0.96, 1.03) |
| 3–6 | 10,115 | 95,872 | 105.51 | 2309 | 26,131 | 88.36 | 0.93 | (0.89, 0.97)** | 0.91 | (0.87, 0.96)*** |
| > 6 | 11,050 | 92,736 | 119.16 | 2750 | 28,396 | 96.85 | 0.81 | (0.78, 0.85)*** | 0.79 | (0.76, 0.83)*** |
PY: person-years; IR: incidence rate per 1,000 person-years; cHR : crude hazard ratio; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio
†adjusted by sex, age, comorbidities
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001
Risk of death in pelvic-acetabular fracture versus hip fracture stratified by sex, age, and comorbidities
Table 4 summarizes the risk of death between pelvic-acetabular fracture versus hip fracture stratified by age, sex, and comorbidities. Compared with hip fracture, pelvic-acetabular fractures were associated with significantly lower mortality among males (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76), females (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86–0.91), patients aged 65–79 years (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.74–0.78), and above 79 years (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88–0.94). Similarly, pelvic-acetabular fractures were significantly associated with lower mortality than hip fractures among patients with or without most comorbidities.
Table 4.
Risk of death between pelvic-acetabular fracture and hip fracture patients stratified by sex, age, and comorbidities
| Hip fracture | Pelvic-acetabular fracture | Crude | Adjusted | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | n | PY | IR | n | PY | IR | cHR | cCI | p value | aHR† | aCI | p value |
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | 26,349 | 247,966 | 106.26 | 6262 | 65,350 | 95.82 | 0.90 | (0.88, 0.93)*** | < 0.001 | 0.89 | (0.86, 0.91)*** | < 0.001 |
| Male | 14,969 | 107,085 | 139.79 | 3187 | 31,584 | 100.91 | 0.74 | (0.71, 0.76)*** | < 0.001 | 0.73 | (0.70, 0.76)*** | < 0.001 |
| Age | ||||||||||||
| 65–79 | 23,749 | 264,602 | 89.75 | 5216 | 73,564 | 70.90 | 0.79 | (0.76, 0.81)*** | < 0.001 | 0.76 | (0.74, 0.78)*** | < 0.001 |
| > 79 | 17,569 | 90,449 | 194.24 | 4233 | 23,369 | 181.14 | 0.93 | (0.90, 0.96)*** | < 0.001 | 0.91 | (0.88, 0.94)*** | < 0.001 |
| Comorbidities | ||||||||||||
| Parkinson’s disease | ||||||||||||
| No | 38,928 | 340,630 | 114.28 | 8771 | 92,310 | 95.02 | 0.83 | (0.81, 0.85)*** | < 0.001 | 0.82 | (0.80, 0.84)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 2390 | 14,421 | 165.73 | 678 | 4624 | 146.64 | 0.88 | (0.81, 0.96)** | 0.003 | 0.87 | (0.8, 0.95)** | 0.0016 |
| ESRD | ||||||||||||
| No | 40,211 | 351,315 | 114.46 | 9049 | 95,497 | 94.76 | 0.83 | (0.81, 0.85)*** | < 0.001 | 0.82 | (0.8, 0.84)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 1107 | 3736 | 296.31 | 400 | 1437 | 278.43 | 0.95 | (0.85, 1.06) | 0.3686 | 0.94 | (0.84, 1.06) | 0.3048 |
| COPD | ||||||||||||
| No | 24,341 | 236,767 | 102.81 | 5510 | 63,979 | 86.12 | 0.84 | (0.81, 0.86)*** | < 0.001 | 0.82 | (0.8, 0.85)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 16,977 | 118,283 | 143.53 | 3939 | 32,954 | 119.53 | 0.84 | (0.81, 0.87)*** | < 0.001 | 0.82 | (0.8, 0.85)*** | < 0.001 |
| Stroke | ||||||||||||
| No | 25,571 | 246,620 | 103.69 | 5792 | 67,685 | 85.57 | 0.83 | (0.80, 0.85)*** | < 0.001 | 0.81 | (0.79, 0.83)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 15,747 | 108,431 | 145.23 | 3657 | 29248 | 125.03 | 0.86 | (0.83, 0.89)*** | < 0.001 | 0.84 | (0.81, 0.87)*** | < 0.001 |
| Heart failure | ||||||||||||
| No | 32,016 | 304,466 | 105.16 | 7065 | 82,434 | 85.70 | 0.81 | (0.79, 0.84)*** | < 0.001 | 0.81 | (0.79, 0.83)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 9302 | 50,585 | 183.89 | 2384 | 14,499 | 164.43 | 0.90 | (0.86, 0.94)*** | < 0.001 | 0.88 | (0.84, 0.92)*** | < 0.001 |
| CAD | ||||||||||||
| No | 21,765 | 207,600 | 104.84 | 4824 | 56,348 | 85.61 | 0.82 | (0.79, 0.84)*** | < 0.001 | 0.81 | (0.78, 0.83)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 19,553 | 147,451 | 132.61 | 4625 | 40,585 | 113.96 | 0.86 | (0.83, 0.89)*** | < 0.001 | 0.84 | (0.82, 0.87)*** | < 0.001 |
| Dementia | ||||||||||||
| No | 36,420 | 329,546 | 110.52 | 8267 | 89,664 | 92.20 | 0.84 | (0.82, 0.86)*** | < 0.001 | 0.82 | (0.8, 0.84)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 4898 | 25,505 | 192.04 | 1182 | 7270 | 162.59 | 0.84 | (0.79, 0.90)*** | < 0.001 | 0.85 | (0.79, 0.90)*** | < 0.001 |
| Osteoporosis | ||||||||||||
| No | 26,038 | 221,809 | 117.39 | 5810 | 61,583 | 94.34 | 0.81 | (0.79, 0.83)*** | < 0.001 | 0.79 | (0.77, 0.81)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 15,280 | 133,242 | 114.68 | 3639 | 35,350 | 102.94 | 0.90 | (0.86, 0.93)*** | < 0.001 | 0.89 | (0.85, 0.92)*** | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | ||||||||||||
| No | 24,234 | 225,912 | 107.27 | 5463 | 61,707 | 88.53 | 0.83 | (0.80, 0.85)*** | < 0.001 | 0.81 | (0.79, 0.84)*** | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 17,084 | 129,139 | 132.29 | 3986 | 35,227 | 113.15 | 0.85 | (0.82, 0.88)*** | < 0.001 | 0.84 | (0.81, 0.87)*** | < 0.001 |
PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate per 1000 person-years; cHR, crude hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio
†Adjusted by sex, age, and comorbidities
*p value < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
ESRD, end-stage renal disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CAD, coronary artery disease
Discussion
To date, no studies have compared the epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures, including morbidity, mortality, and management, in the entire population of an Asian country. This study investigated and compared the incidence and trends of hip fractures and pelvic-acetabular fractures in the general population of adults aged over 65 years in Taiwan from 2000 to 2018. The study also assessed demographic and comorbid risk factors for death after pelvic-acetabular and hip fractures and the mortality rates between pelvic-acetabular and hip fractures. Study results showed that women had higher rates of pelvic-acetabular and hip fractures than men and both types of fracture occurred commonly in subjects aged 60 to 79 years. Individuals with pelvic-acetabular fractures were less likely to die than those with hip fractures. However, older age significantly increased mortality in patients with pelvis and hip fractures. Common comorbidities in the aging population such as COPD, CAD, stroke, and DM were all significantly associated with greater risk of death in pelvic-acetabular fractures and hip fractures as compared with no such comorbidities. In addition, we found that pneumonia was the leading cause of death for pelvic-acetabular fractures and hip fractures during follow-up.
More than 90% of hip fracture patients are over the age of 65 years and have comorbidities. Both of these factors have a strong impact on patients’ prognosis and treatment [17]. Although the annual incidence of pelvic-acetabular fractures and hip fractures appears to be increasing gradually, the incidence is decreasing in adults older than 65 years. Pelvic fractures are one of the major outcomes of low-energy trauma, such as falls, and are clinically associated with high hospitalization rates and high mortality similar to hip fractures [18]. The incidence of pelvic fractures has increased in various regions of the world due to the increasing global geriatric population, suggesting that the burden of pelvic fractures will be highly relevant to society as a whole, and particularly to our healthcare system. Current research on morbidity, mortality, and treatment trends for pelvic and acetabular fractures has mainly been conducted in certain countries in Europe. Similar to trends in Taiwan, the trends of pelvis and hip fracture incidence have been rising gradually in recent years. A previous study indicated that trends in the incidence of pelvic and femoral fractures varied widely in Sweden between 2001 and 2016 [19]. While the incidence of femoral fractures, including the hip, femoral shaft, and distal femur decreased or remained constant over the study year, the incidence of pelvic fractures increased. In that study, mortality rates varied between fractures, with the highest rate of death in patients with hip fractures [19].
Several studies in Germany also reported that the incidence of pelvic fractures increased with age. One previous study indicated that the incidence of pelvic fractures among older people in Germany was estimated to be even higher when compared to other countries [20]. In the same study population, increased mortality rates were found in the first several months after pelvic fracture, even after adjustment for sex, age, type of pelvic fracture, insurance, healthcare costs, comorbidities, and level of care. In Germany, pelvic fractures are projected to become increasingly relevant to society as a whole, especially the German healthcare system, due to demographic changes and the aging population worldwide [21]. Other previous studies have indicated that the number of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in Finland is growing faster than the aging population and that effective prevention is urgently needed to control these age-related increases in fractures [22]. The same study showed that between 1970 and 2002, a marked increase was seen in the number and incidence of low-trauma pelvic fracture admissions in Finnish women aged 80 years or older. Another study also noted that the annual number of pelvic ring fractures among older people in Finland is increasing at a rate that cannot be explained by demographic changes alone [23]. For general fractures, effective preventive measures are needed to control the occurrence of fractures including focusing on reducing risk factors such as bone loss, falls, and fractures in older adults who are prone to falls.
An Austrian study reported that patients aged 65 and older with pelvic fractures had a higher risk of death [24]. In terms of fracture rates, Austria has one of the highest rates of hip fractures and distal forearm fractures globally. Furthermore, the observed number of pelvic fractures was even higher than expected. Similar to Taiwan, Austria has a social health insurance system that covers 99.9% of the country’s population. It has one of the lowest self-reported unmet medical needs in the European Union, but Austria still spends far more on hospitalization than most countries. A previous French study clarified that the incidence of acetabular and pelvic fractures is increasing rapidly, especially in older adults, with a substantial increase expected by 2030 [23]. In addition, treatment is increasingly resorting to surgery. Public health strategies are needed to reduce morbidity and improve treatment. Further research is needed to determine the best strategy, as there is currently no consensus on treatment, especially in the older adult population.
Taiwan has also entered the aging society as in Western countries. It is necessary to describe the use of healthcare to determine the burden of pelvic fractures. According to global trends, the incidence of pelvic-acetabular fractures in the older adult population is expected to double in the next 20 years [6]. The past two decades have greatly contributed to the understanding of pelvic-acetabular fracture morphology, biomechanics, associated comorbidities, and principles of fracture fixation, providing the perfect foundation for the development of this subspecialty. The advent of different types of plates for specific fractures, the advent of newer surgical approaches, the use of therapeutic agents to prevent intraoperative blood loss, and advances in radio-diagnosis have also had a dramatic impact on the management outcomes of these complex injuries. However, real-world evidence from the developing world is relatively scarce.
The present study reports the temporal trends of pelvic-acetabular and hip fractures in Taiwan during the past 20 years, as well as associated trends of mortality. Pelvic-acetabular fractures have a high mortality rate, and older age in this study was significantly associated with increased mortality. This study was the first report to assess trends in pelvic-acetabular fractures over 20 years in Taiwan, and results may provide clear epidemiological evidence for trends in pelvic-acetabular fractures in Taiwan. Results also demonstrate the need for better strategies by which to manage these fractures and comorbidities in older adults. Since the number of pelvic-acetabular fractures and hip fractures is increasing, and advanced age significantly affects the prognosis of these fractures, results of the present study have certain clinical implications. In particular, the mortality rate for both types of fractures is high, highlighting the importance of optimal treatment. As surgery emerges as the treatment of choice, suggesting that geriatric-appropriate surgery and better postoperative care must be developed for this specific patient subgroup. The findings of this study will aid in planning and allocating healthcare resources, risk stratification, and optimizing the treatment of pelvic fractures.
Limitations
The present study gained strength from the large population-based database but the retrospective nature of the study has certain inherent limitations, including that result cannot be generalized to other populations or locations and follow-up data for each patient is limited, which limits long-term evaluation. The NHI database did not provide information on the actual severity of fractures such as severity assessed by injury severity score (ISS) using the diagnostic code system. We also had no information about each patient’s lifestyle factors such as exercise level or daily activity, which may have added insight into risk factors and causes of fracture.
Conclusions
The present study is the first to report an assessment of the trends of pelvic-acetabular fractures in Taiwan over a 65-year period. The incidence and mortality of these two fractures are high in Taiwan, and older age and comorbidities are significantly associated with increased mortality in the study population. The results emphasize the need to develop better strategies for both preventing and managing these fractures among older adults.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Health Data Science Center, China Medical University Hospital, for providing administrative and technical support.
Funding
This study was supported in part by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center (MOHW110-TDU-B-212-124004) and China Medical University Hospital (DMR-111-105). This study also received funding support from the Health Data Science Center, China Medical University Hospital.
Data Availability
The dataset used in this study is held by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). The Ministry of Health and Welfare must approve our application to access this data. Any researcher interested in accessing this dataset can submit an application form to the Ministry of Health and Welfare requesting access. Please contact the staff of MOHW (Email: stcarolwu@mohw.gov.tw) for further assistance. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Address: No.488, Sec. 6, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 115, Taiwan (ROC). Phone: +886-2-8590-6848.
Declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Disclaimer
The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Harrison A, Ordas-Bayon A, Chimutengwende-Gordon M, Fortune M, Chou D, Hull P, Carrothers A, Rawal Factors associated with mortality in older patients sustaining pelvic or acetabular fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(7):1547–1556. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03873-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao W, Zhao J, Liu T, Liu Z, Liu L, Zhang Y. Incidence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thrombosis following pelvic and acetabular fractures: a retrospective case-control study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02972-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Focus on fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47(1):1–2. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01550-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sauerland S, Bouillon B, Rixen D, Raum MR, Koy T, Neugebauer EA. The reliability of clinical examination in detecting pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(2):123–128. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0631-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marrinan S, Pearce MS, Jiang XY, Waters S, Shanshal Y. Admission for osteoporotic pelvic fractures and predictors of length of hospital stay, mortality and loss of independence. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):258–261. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trikha V, Tornetta P. Management of pelvi-acetabular injuries: global scenario and future trends. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(6):961–962. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Court-Brown CM, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, Biant LC, McQueen M. The changing epidemiology of fall-related fractures in adults. Injury. 2017;48(4):819–824. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Letournel E (1993) The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:62–76 [PubMed]
- 9.Letournel E (1993) Open treatment of acute calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:60–67 [PubMed]
- 10.Navarre P, Gabbe BJ, Griffin XL, Russ MK, Bucknill AT, Edwards E, Esser MP. Outcomes following operatively managed acetabular fractures in patients aged 60 years and older. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(12):1735–1742. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0728.R1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Giannoudis PV, Pohlemann T, Bircher M. Pelvic and acetabular surgery within Europe: the need for the co-ordination of treatment concepts. Injury. 2007;38(4):410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Poole GV, Ward EF, Muakkassa FF, Hsu HS, Griswold JA, Rhodes RS (1991) Pelvic fracture from major blunt trauma. Outcome is determined by associated injuries. Ann Surg 213(6):532–538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Poole GV, Ward EF. Causes of mortality in patients with pelvic fractures. Orthopedics. 1994;17:691–696. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19940801-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rommens PM, Hofmann A (2013) Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury, pp 1733–1744 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Zhang XS, Leu FY, Yang CW, Lai LS. Healthcare-based on cloud electrocardiogram system: a medical center experience in middle Taiwan. J Med Syst. 2018;42:39. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0892-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hsing AW, Ioannidis JP. Nationwide population science: lessons from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1527–1529. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, Friedman SM. The impact of comorbidity on perioperative outcomes of hip fractures in a geriatric fracture model. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012;3:129–134. doi: 10.1177/2151458512463392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eggenberger E, Hildebrand G, Vang S, Ly A, Ward C. Use of CT Vs. MRI for diagnosis of hip or pelvic fractures in elderly patients after low energy trauma. Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39:179–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lundin N, Huttunen TT, Enocson A, Marcano AI, Felländer-Tsai L, Berg HE. Epidemiology and mortality of pelvic and femur fractures-a nationwide register study of 417,840 fractures in Sweden across 16 years: diverging trends for potentially lethal fractures. Acta Orthop. 2021;92:323–328. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1878329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andrich S, Haastert B, Neuhaus E, Frommholz K, Arend W, Ohmann C, Grebe J, Vogt A, Brunoni C, Jungbluth P, Thelen S, Dintsios CM, Windolf J, Icks A. Health care utilization and excess costs after pelvic fractures among older people in Germany. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32:2061–2072. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05935-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Andrich S, Haastert B, Neuhaus E, Neidert K, Arend W, Ohmann C, Grebe J, Vogt A, Jungbluth P, Rösler G, Windolf J, Icks A. Epidemiology of pelvic fractures in Germany: considerably high incidence rates among older people. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Parkkari J, Kannus P, Niemi S, Pasanen M, Järvinen M, Lüthje P, Vuori I. Secular trends in osteoporotic pelvic fractures in Finland: number and incidence of fractures in 1970–1991 and prediction for the future. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59:79–83. doi: 10.1007/s002239900090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S, Sievanen H. Low-trauma pelvic fractures in elderly Finns in 1970–2013. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:577–580. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Behanova M, Haschka J, Reichardt B, Dimai HP, Resch H, Zwerina J, Kocijan R (2022) Pelvic fractures-an underestimated problem? Incidence and mortality risk after pelvic fracture in Austria, 2010-2018. J Clin Med 11(10):2834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset used in this study is held by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). The Ministry of Health and Welfare must approve our application to access this data. Any researcher interested in accessing this dataset can submit an application form to the Ministry of Health and Welfare requesting access. Please contact the staff of MOHW (Email: stcarolwu@mohw.gov.tw) for further assistance. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Address: No.488, Sec. 6, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 115, Taiwan (ROC). Phone: +886-2-8590-6848.