Abstract
Herein, we present a dataset based on the RNA-Seq analysis of liver tissue from bovine female fetuses at day 83 of gestation. The findings were reported in the main article, “Periconceptual maternal nutrition affects fetal liver programming of energy- and lipid-related genes” [1]. These data were generated to investigate the effects of periconceptual maternal vitamin and mineral supplementation and rates of body weight gain on the transcript abundance of genes associated with fetal hepatic metabolism and function. To this end, crossbred Angus beef heifers (n = 35) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design. The main effects tested were vitamin and mineral supplementation (VTM or NoVTM – at least 71 days pre-breeding to day 83 of gestation) and rate of weight gain (low (LG – 0.28 kg/d) or moderate (MG – 0.79 kg/d) – from breeding to day 83). The fetal liver was collected on day 83 ± 0.27 of gestation. After total RNA isolation and quality control, strand-specific RNA libraries were prepared and sequenced on the Illumina® NovaSeq 6000 platform to generate paired-end 150-bp reads. After read mapping and counting, differential expression analysis was performed with edgeR. We identified 591 unique differentially expressed genes across all six vitamin-gain contrasts (FDR ≤ 0.1). To our knowledge, this is the first dataset investigating the fetal liver transcriptome in response to periconceptual maternal vitamin and mineral supplementation and/or the rate of weight gain. The data described in this article provides genes and molecular pathways differentially programming liver development and function.
Keywords: Fetal development, Hepatic transcriptome, Liver, Minerals, Prenatal diet, Vitamins
Specifications Table
| Subject | Agricultural and Biological Sciences |
| Specific subject area | Animal Science, Omics: Transcriptomics |
| Type of data | RNA-Seq raw data (FASTQ format), text files, figures, and table |
| How the data were acquired | Total RNA isolation: RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (Qiagen®). Library construction: NEBNext® Ultra™ II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs®). Sequencing: Paired-end (150 bases × 2) High-throughput sequencing on the Illumina® NovaSeq 6000 platform. |
| Data format | Raw RNA-Seq files (FASTQ format) Raw read count files (.txt format) |
| Description of data collection | Fetal liver samples were collected on day 83 of gestation from 31 samples among four treatments [1]. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (Qiagen®). Strand-specific, paired-end RNA libraries were prepared and sequenced at 150 bp reads. Raw fastq files were analyzed, and cleaned reads were mapped to the B. taurus reference genome. Read counts from STAR were used for differential gene expression analysis using edgeR. |
| Data source location | Animal Nutrition and Physiology Center (ANPC) – North Dakota State University. Fargo, North Dakota, USA |
| Data accessibility | All relevant data (raw and processed RNA-Seq data) [2] were deposited on: Repository name: Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) Data identification number: GSE224419 Direct URL to data:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE224419 |
| Related research article | W.J.S. Diniz, A. K. Ward, K. L. Mccarthy, C. J. Kassetas, F. Baumgaertner, L. P. Reynolds, P. P. Borowicz, K. K. Sedivec, J. D. Kirsch, S. T. Dorsam, T. L. Neville, J. C. Forcherio, R. Scott, J. S. Caton, C. R. Dahlen. (2023). Periconceptual maternal nutrition affects fetal liver programming of energy- and lipid-related genes. Animals. 13 (2023) 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040600. [1] |
Value of the Data
-
•
This dataset provides insights into the effects of periconceptual maternal nutrition on fetal liver development, programming, and function.
-
•
This dataset can be mined under different bioinformatic approaches to identify novel targets and regulators of fetal liver programming during early gestation.
-
•
Other researchers can use this data for meta-analysis with a transcriptome profile generated at a different time point or maternal diet.
-
•
The dataset could be re-analyzed and integrated with public data to provide a comprehensive expression atlas of the hepatic tissue during early gestation.
Objective
Fetal growth is responsive to maternal nutrient intake. Macro and micronutrients play key roles in several biological functions and are essential for proper fetal development and metabolism. An increased number of studies have shown that maternal nutrition during the second and third trimesters of gestation can lead to long-term effects on offspring metabolism and health – reviewed in [3]. However, major developmental events occur during early gestation, including organogenesis. Additionally, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding the effects of mineral and vitamin supplementation and the rate of body weight gain during early gestation on fetal tissue programming. Therefore, the objective for generating this RNA-Seq dataset was twofold: (1) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in fetal livers from heifers under different plans of nutrition during early gestation, and (2) to identify biological processes and pathways that underlie hepatic function and metabolism in response to periconceptual maternal nutrition. Further details on the findings based on this dataset were reported in the main article [1]. The dataset herein described is the first one, to the best of our knowledge, that provides a genome-wide expression profile of the fetal liver in response to maternal diet during early gestation.
1. Data Description
We performed a whole transcriptome analysis of liver tissue from 31 female fetuses at day 83 of gestation to investigate the role of maternal vitamin and mineral supplementation and the rate of body weight gain during the periconceptual period on fetal liver transcriptome and the underlying biological pathways. Samples were arranged in a 2×2 factorial design with the main effects of vitamin and mineral supplementation and rate of weight gain [4]. Herein, we describe the strand-specific, RNA-Seq dataset generated on the Illumina® NovaSeq 6000 platform. The raw paired-end reads (fastq files) from 31 samples and the raw gene counts (text file) are publicly available on the GEO database (GEO accession ID: GSE224419). Below are described the files provided within the current data article. Table 1 shows the metadata, including the sample within each treatment, mapping statistics per sample – the number of raw reads, mapped reads, percentage of mapped reads, and the number of replicates per treatment. We generated, on average, 21.45 million cleaned reads per sample (range from 19.7 to 26.7M). On average, 94.5% of the total reads were uniquely mapped.
Table 1.
Descriptive summary of the experimental population and RNA sequencing statistics.
| Sample ID | GEO accession number | Reads (Million sequences) |
Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Clean | Aligned | % Aligned | |||
| LV_15 | GSM7021974 | 21.6 | 21.4 | 20.3 | 94.7% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_16 | GSM7021975 | 22.8 | 22.5 | 21.2 | 94.4% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_23 | GSM7021976 | 20.8 | 20.4 | 19.3 | 94.7% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_25 | GSM7021977 | 22.4 | 22.2 | 21.1 | 95.2% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_34 | GSM7021978 | 20.5 | 20.2 | 19.1 | 94.8% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_37 | GSM7021979 | 23.5 | 23.1 | 21.9 | 94.7% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_52 | GSM7021980 | 23.1 | 22.7 | 21.4 | 94.0% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_68 | GSM7021981 | 20.8 | 20.1 | 19 | 94.4% | NoVTM_LG |
| LV_22 | GSM7021982 | 21.5 | 21 | 19.9 | 94.6% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_24 | GSM7021983 | 27.1 | 26.7 | 25.2 | 94.3% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_28 | GSM7021984 | 20.7 | 20.4 | 19.4 | 95.0% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_3 | GSM7021985 | 23.7 | 23.4 | 22.1 | 94.4% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_31 | GSM7021986 | 20 | 19.7 | 18.5 | 94.2% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_35 | GSM7021987 | 21.3 | 20.9 | 19.7 | 94.5% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_43 | GSM7021988 | 23.3 | 23 | 21.8 | 94.5% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_74 | GSM7021989 | 20.4 | 20.1 | 18.9 | 94.2% | NoVTM_MG |
| LV_18 | GSM7021990 | 20.6 | 20.3 | 19.3 | 95.0% | VTM_LG |
| LV_29 | GSM7021991 | 20.5 | 20.2 | 19.1 | 94.7% | VTM_LG |
| LV_36 | GSM7021992 | 20.5 | 20.2 | 19.2 | 94.6% | VTM_LG |
| LV_41 | GSM7021993 | 20.5 | 20.2 | 18.4 | 91.2% | VTM_LG |
| LV_46 | GSM7021994 | 22.4 | 22.1 | 20.9 | 94.6% | VTM_LG |
| LV_59 | GSM7021995 | 23.6 | 23.3 | 22 | 94.5% | VTM_LG |
| LV_60 | GSM7021996 | 23.2 | 23 | 21.6 | 93.8% | VTM_LG |
| LV_65 | GSM7021997 | 20.3 | 20 | 19 | 95.2% | VTM_LG |
| LV_13 | GSM7021998 | 20.9 | 20.6 | 19.6 | 95.0% | VTM_MG |
| LV_20 | GSM7021999 | 20 | 19.7 | 18.7 | 94.8% | VTM_MG |
| LV_44 | GSM7022000 | 21.7 | 21.4 | 20.3 | 94.7% | VTM_MG |
| LV_45 | GSM7022001 | 23.1 | 22.8 | 21.6 | 94.9% | VTM_MG |
| LV_48 | GSM7022002 | 22.4 | 22.2 | 21.2 | 95.1% | VTM_MG |
| LV_67 | GSM7022003 | 21.3 | 21 | 20 | 95.4% | VTM_MG |
| LV_76 | GSM7022004 | 20.5 | 20.2 | 19.2 | 94.7% | VTM_MG |
| Average | 21.77 | 21.45 | 20.29 | 94.5% | VTM_MG | |
Fig. 1A shows the read quality (Phred score was > 30) of the sequencing data after fastQC analysis. The RNA-Seq mapping and read counting were performed using the STAR aligner. The mapping statistics results using –quantMode GeneCounts and the mapped features from STAR were summarized by MultiQC and are shown in Fig. 1B.
Fig. 1.
Overview of the RNA-Seq data and differential expression analyses of the liver of fetuses from heifers receiving or not vitamin-mineral supplementation (VTM or NoVTM) and fed to achieve different rates of body weight gain [low gain (LG) or moderate gain (MG)] during early gestation. (A) Overall Phred score; (B) The statistical results from read mapping; (C) Distributions of RNA-Seq data after normalization (CPM values) for 31 samples within four treatments. The treatments are color coded as red (NoVTM_LG), green (NoVTM_MG), cyan (VTM_LG), and purple (VTM_MG); (D) Number of unique and overlapping differentially expressed genes across contrasts for the main effects of mineral and vitamin and/or rate of weight gain.
Gene counts were normalized using the cpm function from edgeR. The representation of the distributions of RNA-Seq data after normalization (CPM values) for 31 samples within four treatments are shown in Fig. 1C. The boxplot shows a consistent average across the samples in the dataset. The pairwise differential expression analysis between the treatment groups revealed a total of 591 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across all six contrasts (FDR ≤ 0.1). The unique and overlapping differentially expressed genes that underlie the main factors of mineral and vitamin and/or rate of weight gain of gain are shown in Fig. 1D. The list of differentially expressed genes is available as a supplementary file within the main manuscript [1].
2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental design, treatments, and tissue collection
A 2×2 factorial arrangement of treatments was designed to investigate the main effects of mineral and vitamin supplementation (VTM vs. NoVTM) and rate of body weight gain (low gain [LG] vs. moderate gain [MG]). To this end, crossbred Angus beef heifers were stratified by body weight and randomly assigned to either the VTM or no VTM (NoVTM) supplementation. At breeding, heifers were randomly assigned to either a LG (0.28kg/d) or MG (0.79kg/d). The full description of experimental diets and nutritional composition are described elsewhere [1,3]. Thus, the treatments were arranged as (1) no vitamin and mineral supplementation and low gain (NoVTM_LG, n=9); (2) vitamin and mineral supplementation and low gain (VTM_LG, n=9); (3) no vitamin and mineral supplementation and moderate gain (NoVTM_MG, n=9), and (4) vitamin and mineral supplementation and moderate gain (VTM_MG, n=8).
Heifers were estrus synchronized and bred by artificial insemination using female-sexed semen from a single sire. On day 83±0.27 of gestation, the fetus was removed through ovariohysterectomy and dissected to collect the fetal liver. The liver tissue was snap-frozen on dry ice and stored at − 80 °C.
2.2. RNA isolation, library construction, sequencing, and data processing
To isolate the total RNA from the fetal liver, we used the RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (Qiagen®, Germantown, MA, USA, Cat. #73,404). The RNA quality and purity were evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and agarose gel electrophoresis. The RNA quantity was measured using the Qubit™ Broad Range RNA assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. #Q10210). Based on that, 31 samples (n=8 per group, except VTM_MG – n=7) met the quantity and quality parameters for library preparation.
Strand-specific RNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext® Ultra™ II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs®, Ipswich, MA, USA). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina® NovaSeq 6000 platform with read lengths of 2 150 base pairs and an estimated depth of 20 M reads/sample. Library preparation and sequencing were carried out at Novogene Co. (Nanjing, China).
Raw data were cleaned for filtering out sequencing adaptors and reads with a Phred score lower than 30. We used the FastQC v0.11.8 [5] tool for quality control and to estimate read statistics. To aggregate the files from FastQC, we used MultiQC v1.9 [6].
The reads that passed quality control were mapped to the Bos taurus reference genome (ARS-UCD 1.2) [7] using the STAR aligner v. 2.7.3a [8] and the gene annotation file (release 100) from the Ensembl database. To count the number of mapped reads per gene, the parameter –quantMode GeneCounts from STAR was used. The mapping statistic results from STAR were aggregated using the MultiQC software. Next, the read counting files from each sample were concatenated (read strand aligned with RNA - reverse) into one dataset and used for differential expression analysis.
2.3. Differential gene expression and functional over-representation analysis
The NOISeq v.2.26.0 [9] and edgeR v.3.24.3 [10] in the RStudio [11] v.1.1.442 environment for R v.3.5.1 [12] were used for post-mapping quality control. The edgeR R-package was used for filtering out genes not expressed or lowly expressed (filterByExpr function). Next, the differential expression analysis was carried out using edgeR. All pairwise comparisons between the groups resulted in six contrasts named as follows: (1) VTM_MG vs. NoVTM_LG, (2) VTM_MG vs. VTM_LG, (3) VTM_MG vs. NoVTM_MG, (4) VTM_LG vs. NoVTM_LG, (5) VTM_LG vs. NoVTM_MG, (6) NoVTM_MG vs. NoVTM_LG. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified after multiple testing corrections of the p-values based on the Benjamini-Hochberg methodology (FDR ≤ 0.1).
We used the UpSetR v.1.4.0 package [13] to visualize the intersections among different lists (n=6) of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Furthermore, overlaps across the DEGs list for the main effects of VTM and rate of body weight gain were retrieved using the InteractiVenn web tool [14] and represented as Venn diagrams. Biological processes and pathways underlying the DEGs for each contrast were retrieved using the ShinyGo v.0.76.2 web tool [15]. Significant results were identified after p-value multiple testing correction (FDR ≤ 0.05).
Ethics Statements
All animal experiments followed the relevant guidelines and regulations. The experimental design, animal management, and tissue collection were approved by the North Dakota State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #A19012).
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Wellison J.S. Diniz: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Alison K. Ward: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Kacie L. McCarthy: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation. Cierrah J. Kassetas: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Friederike Baumgaertner: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Lawrence P. Reynolds: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Pawel P. Borowicz: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Kevin K. Sedivec: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. James D. Kirsch: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Sheri T. Dorsam: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Tammi L. Neville: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. J. Chris Forcherio: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Ronald Scott: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Joel S. Caton: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Carl R. Dahlen: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
Authors J. C. Forcherio and R. Scott are employees of Purina Animal Nutrition LLC (Land O'Lakes, Inc., Arden Hills, MN, USA), which sponsored the sample analysis for this experiment. Purina Animal Nutrition LLC manufactured the Purina® Wind & Rain® Storm® AllSeason 7.5 Complete mineral, the VTM and NoVTM pellets, and the protein/energy supplement used in this study. The funders had no role in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results that were done entirely independently by North Dakota State University and Auburn University personnel.
All the other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Purina Animal Nutrition LLC (Land O'Lakes, Inc., Arden Hills, MN, USA) for supporting this research financially. The authors would also like to thank the North Dakota State Board of Agricultural Research and Education, Graduate Research Assistantship Program, and the North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station for their support of this effort and additional product support from Zoetis Animal Health (Parsippany NJ, USA) and ST Genetics (Navasota, TX, USA). Appreciation is expressed to personnel at the Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, the Animal Nutrition and Physiology Center for assistance with animal handling and feeding, and the NDSU Animal Science Nutrition Laboratory. This work used resources from the Center for Computationally Assisted Science and Technology (CCAST) at North Dakota State University and the Auburn University Easley Cluster. W.J.S.D. was financially supported by the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 58-6010-1-005, by the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station - Hatch program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Data Availability
References
- 1.Diniz W.J.S., Ward A.K., McCarthy K.L., Kassetas C.J., Baumgaertner F., Reynolds L.P., Borowicz P.P., Sedivec K.K., Kirsch J.D., Dorsam S.T., Neville T.L., Forcherio J.C., Scott R., Caton J.S., Dahlen C.R. Periconceptual maternal nutrition affects fetal liver programming of energy- and lipid-related genes. Animals. 2023;13:600. doi: 10.3390/ani13040600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.G.E.O. database, Transcriptomic profiling of liver tissues of 83 days fetuses in response to early maternal nutrient supplementation, (2023) April, 14th, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE224419.
- 3.Reynolds L.P., Diniz W.J.S., Crouse M.S., Caton J.S., Dahlen C.R., Borowicz P.P., Ward A.K. Maternal nutrition and developmental programming of offspring. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2022 doi: 10.1071/RD22234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Menezes A.C.B., McCarthy K.L., Kassetas C.J., Baumgaertner F., Kirsch J.D., Dorsam S.T., Neville T.L., Ward A.K., Borowicz P.P., Reynolds L.P., Sedivec K.K., Forcherio J.C., Scott R., Caton J.S., Dahlen C.R. Vitamin and mineral supplementation and rate of gain in beef heifers I: effects on dam hormonal and metabolic status, fetal tissue and organ mass, and concentration of glucose and fructose in fetal fluids at d 83 of gestation. Animals. 2022;12:1757. doi: 10.3390/ani12141757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.S. Andrews, FASTQC. A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data., (2010). https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
- 6.Ewels P., Magnusson M., Lundin S., Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rosen B.D., Bickhart D.M., Schnabel R.D., Koren S., Elsik C.G., Tseng E., Rowan T.N., Low W.Y., Zimin A., Couldrey C., Hall R., Li W., Rhie A., Ghurye J., McKay S.D., Thibaud-Nissen F., Hoffman J., Murdoch B.M., Snelling W.M., McDaneld T.G., Hammond J.A., Schwartz J.C., Nandolo W., Hagen D.E., Dreischer C., Schultheiss S.J., Schroeder S.G., Phillippy A.M., Cole J.B., Van Tassell C.P., Liu G., Smith T.P.L., Medrano J.F. De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing. Gigascience. 2020;9:1–9. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tarazona S., Furió-Tarí P., Turrà D., Di Pietro A., Nueda M.J., Ferrer A., Conesa A. Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Robinson M.D., McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.RStudio Team . 2020. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R.http://www.rstudio.com/ [Google Scholar]
- 12.R Core Team . 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.https://www.r-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
- 13.Conway J.R., Lex A., Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2938–2940. doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTX364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heberle H., Meirelles V.G., da Silva F.R., Telles G.P., Minghim R. InteractiVenn: a web-based tool for the analysis of sets through Venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformat. 2015;16:1–7. doi: 10.1186/S12859-015-0611-3/FIGURES/4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ge S.X., Jung D., Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2628–2629. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

