Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Endocrine. 2022 Feb 11;76(3):612–619. doi: 10.1007/s12020-022-03008-9

Prolonged survival of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is associated with resectability, low tumor-infiltrating neutrophils/myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and low peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

Bin Xu 1, Lingxin Zhang 2, Reza Setoodeh 3, Abhinita S Mohanty 1, Iñigo Landa 4, Bonnie Balzer 3, Vera Tiedje 5, Ian Ganly 6, Snjezana Dogan 1, James A Fagin 5, Ronald Ghossein 1
PMCID: PMC10173871  NIHMSID: NIHMS1893525  PMID: 35149932

Abstract

Purpose:

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is the most lethal form of thyroid cancer with most patients dying of their disease within a few months. Only a very small percentage of long-term survivors (LTS) are alive for 2 year or longer. In this retrospective case-control study, we provided a comprehensive comparison between 46 ATC LTSs and 75 ATC control patients who suffered disease-specific mortality within 2 years, aiming to identify factors that may be associated with prolonged survival in ATC.

Methods:

A comprehensive clinicopathologic and molecular comparison was performed between 46 ATC LTSs and 75 ATC control patients. Peripheral neutrophil count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were recorded. The composition of the tumor microenvironment was compared using immunohistochemistry.

Results:

Compared with ATC control patients, ATC LTSs were characterized by 1) higher frequency of (primary) resection as well as clinicopathologic parameters attributed to resectability; 2) lower rate of concurrent RAS/BRAF and TERT promoter mutations; 3) lower peripheral neutrophil count and NLR; and 4) lower number of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils/myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). The survival benefits of low peripheral neutrophil counts and low NLR persisted even when controlling for distant metastasis status at presentation.

Conclusion:

In addition to traditional beneficial prognostic factors, e.g., surgical resection, factors attributed to resectability, and absence of co-existing RAS/BRAF and TERT promoter mutations, we herein show that tumor-infiltrating and circulating neutrophils/MDSC are adverse prognostic factors in ATC.

Keywords: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), tumor-infiltrating neutrophils, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognosis

Introduction

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare but lethal form of thyroid cancers with a median survival of 3–4 months based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data [1, 2], and 9 months in retrospective studies from large tertiary centers [35]. Only a very small subset of patients follows a less aggressive clinical course and survives for longer than two years after diagnosis. Such patients may be regarded as long-term survivors (LTS) in an otherwise rapidly fatal cancer type.

Distant metastasis is an independent adverse prognostic factor and the primary cause of mortality in ATC [4, 68]. Emerging evidence suggests that elevated tumor-infiltrating and circulating neutrophils and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC, a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells with an innate immune suppressive activity) are an essential component of the pre-metastatic niche, a pre-conditioned microenvironment that receives the cancer cells at distant sites [913]. High tumor-associated neutrophils/MDSC, high peripheral neutrophil count, and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the peripheral blood have been associated with adverse outcome, in particular increased risk for distant metastasis, in multiple human cancers [912, 14, 15]. Some recent studies have reported that peripheral neutrophilia is a common phenomenon in ATC [16] and a high NLR has been associated with decreased overall survival [17, 18] and progression free survival [18]. To date, there is no study which has reported the potential prognostic roles of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils/MDSC in ATC.

In this retrospective case control study, we gathered a unique study cohort of 46 ATC LTSs who survived for at least 2 years after the diagnosis of ATC from three tertiary centers. An ATC control group of 75 patients who suffered disease-specific death within 2 years of diagnosis was also included. Their comprehensive clinicopathologic features, molecular alterations, and characteristics of tumor immune microenvironment (in particular peripheral and tumor-infiltrating neutrophils/MDSC) were compared, aiming to identify any factor that may be associated with a more favorable outcome in this deadly disease.

Material and Methods

Patient population

The study was approved by the institutional review board of all participating sites. The study group was composed of 46 patients from three tertiary centers (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, US n=43, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: n=2, Cedar Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, US: n=1) with a diagnosis of ATC who were alive 2 years after the initial ATC diagnosis. Among them, 9 patients were alive 10 years or more after the diagnosis.

The control group was selected from the MSKCC database to include all patients with ATC who suffered disease-specific death within 2 years, and whose tumors underwent next generation sequencing using MSK-IMPACT platform (n=75).

Clinicopathologic features

The histology slides and patients’ chart were reviewed by an endocrine pathologist (BX) to gather the following clinicopathologic features: age, sex, type of pathologic specimen collected, presence of different cytologic features of ATC, mitotic index, atypical mitosis, necrosis, neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate within the tumor, the presence and type of pre-existing/co-existing differentiated thyroid carcinoma, therapy received, and clinical outcomes (including distant metastasis).

A subset of primary thyroid ATC underwent surgical resection, including 37 from the LTS group and 32 from the control group. For these tumors, additional parameters, such as size of primary tumor, size and percentage of ATC within the primary tumor, encapsulation, capsular invasion, vascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension (pathologic or gross), margin status, gross residual disease, and nodal metastasis, were documented.

Complete blood count (CBC) at the time of ATC diagnosis was reviewed to collect the absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte count. A NLR was calculated for each patient.

Immunohistochemistry for immune microenvironment

Immunohistochemistry was performed in a subset of patients, including 14 ATC LTSs and 12 ATC control patients. The following primary antibodies were used: PD-L1 (clone E1L3N, dilution 1:400, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), PRAME (EPR203301, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), MHC-I (clone A4, ready to use RTU, Ebioscience, Hatfield, UK), PD-1 (clone NAT 105, RTU, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, US), CD4 (clone SP35, 1:25, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, US), CD8 (clone 4B11, RTU, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), CD15 (clone MMA, RTU, Ventana), CD68 (clone KP1, RTU, Ventana, Oro Valley, AZ, US), CD163 (clone MRQ26, RTU, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), and FOXP3 (clone 236A/E7, 1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK).

For PD-L1, a combined positive score (CPS) was calculated as the sum of positive tumor cells and positive immune cells divided by the total tumor cells multiplied by 100. A CPS of ≥1 was considered to be positive for PD-L1. For preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), any nuclear positivity in the tumor cells was interpreted as positive. The percentage of tumor cells showing membranous immunopositivity of MHC-I was recorded and divided into three categories: positive (≥75%), heterogeneous (25–74% of TCs), and negative (<25% of TCs).

Finally, to measure the extent of inflammatory/immune cells, the number of positive cells labeled with CD68, CD163, CD15, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, and PD1 was counted at the hotspot within a high-power field (400X, field diameter: 0.55 mm). The hotspot was defined as the high-power field with the highest number of positive cells within viable ATC. Areas of tumor necrosis and differentiated thyroid carcinoma were excluded from the analysis.

MSK-IMPACT targeted next generation sequencing

Twenty ATC LTSs with material available and 75 control cases underwent targeted next generation sequencing using MSK-IMPACT platform. MSK-IMPACT is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved deep-coverage targeted next generation sequencing platform detecting single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletion (indels), copy number variants (CNVs) and fusion/structural variants in 368 to 468 oncogenes, using custom DNA probes designed for targeted sequencing of all exons and selected introns, including canonical and selected non-canonical transcripts [19].

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software 24.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, U.S.). Comparisons of clinicopathologic features, immune microenvironment and molecular alterations between ATC LTS and ATC control group were performed using Chi square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and two-tailed Student’s t test for continuous variables. Median overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using log rank test. Correlation between primary tumor size and peripheral neutrophil counts/NLR in the resected thyroid ATC was performed using Pearson correlation test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathologic features

The clinicopathologic characteristics of ATC LTS and ATC control group are summarized in Table 1. The median overall survival (OS) of the ATC LTS was 120 months (95% CI: 86–153 months), and the median OS of ATC control group was 6 months (95% CI: 5–7 months). The median distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) was 41 months for ATC LTSs (95% CI: 22–59 months) and 1 months for ATC control group (95% CI: 0–2 months).

Table 1. Comparison of clinicopathologic features, outcomes, and immune microenvironment between ATC long term survivor (ATC LTS) and ATC control group.

P values were obtained using log rank test for survival, Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square test for categorical variables, and two-tailed Student’s t test for continuous variable. Bold p values: significant p values. OS: overall survival, DMFS: distant metastasis free survival, SEM: standard error of mean, DTC: differentiated thyroid carcinoma, FTC: follicular thyroid carcinoma, HCC: Hurthle cell carcinoma, PDTC: poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, CPS: combined positive score.

ATC LTS (n=46) ATC control (n=75) P values

Outcome

Median OS (95% confidence interval), months 120 (86–153) 6 (5–7) <0.001
Median DMFS (95% confidence interval), months 41 (22–59) 1 (0–2) <0.001

Clinicopathologic features

Female: male ratio 26:20 (1.3:1) 40:35 (1.1:1) 0.439
Age 62 (29–85) 67 (33–88) 0.045
Specimen type
Cytology/biopsy/incision/excision 5/46 (11%) 34/75 (45%) 0.043
Resection 41/46 (89%) 41/75 (55%)
Predominant cytologic features of ATC
Epithelioid 14/46 (30%) 22/75 (29%) 0.804
Spindle 13/46 (28%) 18/75 (24%)
Squamous 6/46 (13%) 15/75 (20%)
Pleomorphic 7/46 (15%) 11/75 (15%)
Rhabdoid 3/46 (7%) 7/75 (9%)
Osteoclast giant cell-rich 3/46 (7%) 2/75 (3%)
Mitotic index, per 10 high power fields, median (range) 8 (1–42) 9 (0–45) 0.934
Necrosis 29/46 (63%) 60/75 (81%) 0.034
Atypical mitosis 38/46 (84%) 65/75 (88%) 0.593
Prior/co-existing DTC 28/46 (61%) 36/75 (48%) 0.077
FTC 0 2
HCC 3 2
PDTC 4 8
PDTC, HCC 3 0
PDTC, PTC 5 6
PTC 13 18
Distant metastasis at presentation 1/43 (2%) 42/75 (56%) <0.001
Chemotherapy 29/41 (71%) 49/74 (66%) 0.151
Radiation therapy 36/40 (90%) 64/74 (86%) 0.138
Kinase inhibitors 7/40 (18%) 26/74 (35%) 0.054
Immunotherapy 1/40 (3%) 14/74 (19%) 0.018

Resection for thyroid ATC n=37 (80%) n=32 (43%) <0.001

Size of the primary tumor (cm), median (range)* 4.3 (2.2–11.2) 6.0 (3.0–11.2) 0.003
Percentage of ATC in the primary tumor, median (range) 60% (2–100%) 100% (10–100%) 0.007
Maximal dimension of ATC (cm), median (range) 2.2 (0.4–8.5) 5.4 (0.9–9.5) <0.001
Encapsulation Encapsulated 8/37 (22%) 0/32 (0%) 0.006
Infiltrative 29/37 (78%) 32/32 (100%)
Vascular invasion 28/36 (78%) 28/31 (90%) 0.202
Pathologic evidence of extrathyroidal extension 23/31 (74%) 32/32 (100%) 0.002
Positive margin 19/36 (53%) 29/31 (94%) <0.001
Nodal metastasis 11/36 (31%) 19/30 (63%) 0.013
Gross residual disease 2/16 (13%) 14/27 (52%) 0.021
Gross extrathyroidal extension 11/16 (69%) 24/25 (96%) 0.026

Peripheral blood at the time of ATC diagnosis n=38 n=75

Absolute neutrophil count (K/mcL), mean±SEM 4.2±0.5 8.3±0.8 <0.001
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, mean±SEM 2.9±0.5 6.9±0.8 <0.001

Peripheral blood at the time of ATC diagnosis in patients without DM at presentation n=35 n =33

Absolute neutrophil count (K/mcL), mean±SEM 4.3±0.5 8.0±0.7 <0.001
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, mean±SEM 2.9±0.5 5.5±0.9 0.006

Tumor-associated immune microenvironment n=13 n=12

CD15-positive neutrophils, mean±SEM 55±15 155±34 0.012
PD-L1 Positivity 11 (85%) 8 (67%) 0.378
PD-L1 CPS score 49±11 42±11 0.656
PRAME 4 (31%) 1 (8%) 0.322
MHC-I on tumor cells
<25% 3 (23%) 0 (0%) 0.200
25–75% 3 (23%) 3 (25%)
>75% 7 (54%) 9 (75%)
CD68-positive macrophages, per high power field, mean±SEM 293±47 190±33 0.090
CD163-positive macrophages, mean±SEM 312±38 273±39 0.476
CD4-positive helper T cells, mean±SEM 79±22 95±16 0.551
CD8-positive cytotoxic T cells, mean±SEM 163±39 190±27 0.573
PD-1-positive immune cells, mean±SEM 70±26 60±14 0.745
FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells, mean±SEM 54±10 67±18 0.524
*

Refer to size of the entire tumor (ATC and DTC).

Compared with ATC control group, ATC LTSs were characterized by significantly higher frequency of resection (89% vs. 55%, p=0.043), higher rate of resection for primary thyroid ATC (80% vs. 43%, p<0.001), absence of distant metastasis at presentation (98% vs. 44%, p<0.001), and lower frequency of tumor necrosis (63% vs. 81%, p=0.034). Other clinical and pathologic features, including age, sex, cytologic features of ATC, mitotic index, atypical mitosis, presence of neutrophilic infiltrate within the tumor, and pre-existing/co-existing differentiated thyroid carcinoma did not differ between the two groups.

Sixty-nine patients underwent primary resection for thyroid ATC, including 37 (80%) ATC LTSs and 32 (43%) ATC control patients (p<0.001). Among them, ATC LTS had significant smaller size of primary tumors (median: 4.3 cm vs. 6.0 cm) and ATC component (median 2.2 cm vs. 5.4 cm), lower percentage (median: 60% vs. 100%) of ATC component, as well as lower rate of pathologic evidence of extrathyroidal extension (74% vs. 100%), positive margin (53% vs. 94%), nodal metastasis (31% vs. 63%), gross extrathyroidal extension (13% vs. 52%), and gross residual disease (13% vs. 52%, p<0.05, Table 1). Eight ATCs were encapsulated, all of which were from the ATC LTS group.

Nine patients were alive 10 years or more after the initial diagnosis of ATC, all of whom underwent resection for primary thyroid ATC (n=7) or locoregional recurrence (n=2). None had distant metastasis at presentation. Five (55%) patients developed distant metastases 5 months to 162 months after the initial resection of thyroid ATC. Three patients eventually died of their disease 120 months, 120 months, and 224 months after the initial diagnosis of ATC.

Peripheral neutrophil count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

Compared with ATC control patients who often exhibited peripheral neutrophilia with a mean absolute neutrophil count of 8.3 K/mcL and a mean NLR of 6.9, ATC LTS group had significantly lower neutrophil count (mean=4.2 K/mcL, p<0.001) and lower NLR ratio (mean=2.9, p<0.001, Table 1 and Figure 1).

Figure 1. ATC long term survivor is characterized with low CD15-positive tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)/neutrophils, low peripheral neutrophil count, and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Figure 1.

(A) The histograms showing the average CD15-MDSC per high power field (HPF), peripheral neutrophil count (K/mcL), and NLR differ significantly between ATC LTS and ATC control patients. Error bars represent standard errors of means. (B-C) CD15 immunohistochemistry in an ATC LTS (B) and an ATC control patient (C).

In the subgroup of patients without DM at presentation, the peripheral neutrophil count and NLR remained significantly higher in the ATC control group compared with ATC LTS (mean neutrophil count: 4.3 K/mcL in ATC LTS, 8.0 K/mcL in ATC control group, p<0.001; mean NLR: 2.9 in ATC LTS, 5.5 in ATC control group, p=0.006).

In patients who underwent primary resection of the thyroid gland for ATC, there was no correlation between primary tumor size and NLR or between primary tumor size and peripheral neutrophil count (Pearson correlation coefficient r ranges from −0.161 to 0.223, p> 0.05, Supplementary Figure 1).

Among all ATC patients studied, those with distant metastasis at presentation were associated with significantly higher neutrophil count (mean ± standard error of mean SEM: ATC without DM at presentation 6.0±0.5; ATC with DM at presentation 8.5±1.3, p=0.027) and higher NLR (mean± SEM: ATC without DM at presentation 4.1±0.5; ATC with DM at presentation 7.8±1.2, p<0.001).

Tumor microenvironment

Measurements of the immune microenvironment of ATC LTSs and ATC control group are shown in Table 1. Compared with the ATC control group, ATC LTSs were characterized by significantly lower number of CD15-positive tumor infiltrating-MDSC/neutrophils (mean±SEM: ATC LTS 55±15 per high power field; ATC control group 155±34 per high power field; p=0.012, Table 1 and Figure 1). In patients without distant metastases at presentation, there was a non-significant trend toward a lower number of CD15-positive tumor infiltrating-MDSC/neutrophils in the ATC LTS group compared to the ATC controls (mean±SEM: ATC LTS 57±16 per high power field; ATC control group 150±34 per high power field; p=0.056).

All other measurements, including the rate of PD-L1 positivity, PD-L1 CPS score, rate of PRAME positivity, MHC-1 expression in tumor cells, number of macrophages (CD68-positive or CD163-positive), PD-1-positive immune cells, CD8-positive cytotoxic T cells, CD4-positive helper T cells, and FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells did not differ between the two groups (p>0.05).

Molecular profile

The molecular profile of the two groups (ATC LTS: n=20; ATC control group: N=75) is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Molecular signature of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) according to survival time.

Figure 2.

ATC long term survivors (ATC LTS) have significantly higher frequency of RB1, KMT2C, BCOR and RMB10 alterations compared with ATC control group (*, p < 0.05). Other molecular alterations do not differ according to survival time. # indicates two patients who survived for at least 10 years.

Compared with ATC control group, there was a non-significant trend for ATC LTS to have fewer TERT promoter mutations (ATC LTS: 12/20, 60%; ATC control group: 60/75, 80%, p=0.080). Co-existence of a BRAF or RAS mutation with a TERT promoter mutation was seen in a significantly higher percentage in the ATC control group (50/75, 67%) compared with ATC LTS (7/20, 35%, p=0.019). Additionally, ATC LTS group was associated with a significantly higher frequency of RB1, KMT2C, BCOR, and RBM10 alterations (p=0.032, 0.017, 0.017, and 0.028 respectively).

Other molecular alterations, including those affecting BRAF, RAS, and TP53 did not differ between the two groups. The median mutation count was 6 for ATC LTSs (range 2–21) and 5 for ATC control group (range: 0–30, p=0.487).

Fusion events observed in the ATC LTS included KMT2C-HILPDA fusion, TP53 intragenic deletion, and NEGR1 intragenic deletion (one case each). CCDC6-RET, EZH2-CUL1, and NOTCH1-NALT1 fusions were detected in the ATC control groups (one case each).

Among the 20 ATC LTSs who were subjected to MSK-IMPACT, two patients had survived for at least 10 years. One tumor harbored BRAF V600E, FAT Q3902*, and TP53 R175H mutations. The other had mutations of TP53, NF1, NF2, RB1, FLCN, EP300, MED12, TEK, and PIK3CD mutations.

Discussion

The key findings of the current study are that ATC LTS is associated with clinicopathologic parameters related to resectability, low frequency of concurrent RAS/BRAF mutations and TERT promoter mutation, a tumor microenvironment characterized by low tumor-infiltrating MDSC/neutrophils, and absence of peripheral neutrophilia characterized by a low peripheral neutrophil count and a low NLR.

Recently, MDSCs/neutrophils have been identified as a major contributor for cancer progression and metastatic spread [913]. The bone marrow-derived MDSC/neutrophil is generated and mobilized through multiple tumor-secreting factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), resulting in peripheral neutrophilia [913]. Indeed, high peripheral neutrophil counts and NLR have been reported in multiple cancers to be associated with poorer overall survival and progression-free survival [15]. Several previous studies have also shown that peripheral neutrophilia is a common phenomenon in ATC and a high NLR is associated with decreased survival in ATC [1618]. The current study provides further confirmatory evidence between peripheral neutrophilia and prognosis of ATC, in which a prolonged survival in ATC patients is associated with low peripheral neutrophil count and low NLR. In our study, we have been able to show that this survival difference persists after controlling for stage parameters, such as distant metastasis at presentation.

The mechanisms by which neutrophils/MDSC promote distant metastasis is complex and involves preparation of the pre-metastatic niche, promoting survival of tumor cells, and suppression of T cell functions [913]. The pre-metastatic niche is a permissive microenvironment consisting of bone marrow-derived cells (including MDSC/neutrophils), soluble factors, and extracellular matrix, which provide congenial “soil” for disseminated tumor cells to arrest, survive, and colonize [913]. In this study, we have shown that higher circulating neutrophils/MDSC measured using peripheral neutrophil count and peripheral NLR is common in ATC with distant metastasis at presentation, providing supportive data of an association between neutrophils/MDSC and metastatic spread.

Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils have also been reported to be an adverse prognostic factor for various types of solid tumors [14, 20]. However, the prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating MDSC/neutrophil in ATC has yet to be determined. ATC is known to be heavily infiltrated by myeloid cells, in particular M2 macrophages and neutrophils [4, 21, 22]. Indeed, we have demonstrated using immunohistochemistry studies that ATC as a whole shows an immune/inflammatory-hot phenotype with abundant macrophages, neutrophils/MDSC, and multiple subsets of T lymphocytes. Additionally, our study provides the first evidence that tumor-infiltrating CD15-positive MDSC/neutrophils identified by immunohistochemistry within the ATC are prognostically relevant for ATC patients and that ATC LTS is associated with a significantly lower number of tumor-infiltrating MDSC/neutrophils. In patients without distant metastasis at presentation, there was a trend toward higher tumor-infiltrating CD15-positive MDSC/neutrophils in short term survival ATC compared to ATC LTS. This finding together with a significantly higher neutrophilic blood count in short term ATC survivors who are M0 suggest a role for MDSC/neutrophils in preparing the pre-metastatic niche before the distant disease becomes clinically manifest.

PD-L1 immunopositivity has been reported in a large proportion of ATC. The frequency of PD-L1 positivity ranges from 22% to 94% depending on the detection methods and the cutoff values used [2326]. Similarly, the PD-L1 immunopositivity in this study is 76% using a cutoff of CPS≥1. It remains controversial whether PD-L1 immunopositivity is prognostically relevant. A recent meta-analysis failed to demonstrate a significant association between PD-L1 immunoexpression and survival in ATC [25]. In the present study, no significant difference of PD-L1 has been detected between ATC LTS and ATC control patients, indicating that PD-L1 does not impact outcome in ATC.

PRAME is a cancer neoantigen that may serve as a target for cancer vaccination and adoptive T cell therapies [27]. PRAME expression has been detected in various human cancers, and is shown to be a prognostic biomarker associated with higher tumor stage, nodal metastasis, and poor disease-free survival in a recent meta-analysis [28]. MHC-I transports and displays cancer neoantigen to the surface of tumor cells, allowing CD8-positive T cells to recognize, bind, and eliminate tumor cells [29]. Down-regulation of MHC-I is a common strategy of immune evasion of many cancers, impairing natural immune response and host response to cancer vaccination [29]. In this study, we have shown that PRAME immunopositivity and MHC-I down-regulation are present in 20% and 36% of ATC, respectively. However, there is no significant difference between ATC LTS and ATC control cases.

The lack of significant prognostic difference of tumor microenvironment, PD-L1, PRAME, and MHCI should be interpreted with cautions given the small number of cases tested in each group. Future large-scale studies on tumor microenvironment in ATC are needed.

Previous studies have shown that surgical resectability, negative margin, smaller tumor size, and lack of regional and distant metastasis are independent prognostics factor associated with improved survival in ATC [1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 30]. Not surprisingly, the ATC LTS group in our study was enriched with ATC which were surgically resectable. These primary thyroid ATCs had smaller overall size of primary tumor, smaller size of ATC, lower percentage of ATC within tumors that also harbored a differentiated thyroid carcinoma component, negative margin, as well as absence of gross extrathyroidal extension, gross residual disease, nodal and distant metastasis. Our data provide further evidence that surgical resections and pathologic factors pertinent to resectability are prognostically relevant in ATC.

Several previous studies have identified potential adverse prognostic molecular factors in ATC, including TERT promoter mutation, particularly when it co-exists with BRAF/RAS mutation [4, 22]. In our study, we also reported that the ATC LTS cohort had a significantly lower percentage of cases with both TERT promoter mutations and BRAF/RAS mutation. The frequency of key oncogenic driver events (e.g., BRAF V600E and RAS mutations) and TP53 mutation does not differ between the two groups.

In conclusion, in this comprehensive comparison between ATC long term survivors and ATC control patients, we have identified multiple factors that are associated with prolonged survival including 1) a neutrophil-poor homeostasis and tumor microenvironment characterized by low peripheral blood neutrophil counts, low peripheral blood neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratios, and low tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells/neutrophils within the tumor, 2) surgical resection and multiple clinicopathological factors associated with resectability, and 3) a low frequency of concurrent RAS/BRAF mutations with TERT promoter mutation.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1

Funding statement:

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant of the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA008748 and a departmental RFA funded by PaigeAI (SK202-1328).

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement: No competing financial interests exist for all contributory authors. All of the research meets the ethics guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements of the country where the study was performed.

Data availability statement:

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Lin B, Ma H, Ma M, Zhang Z, Sun Z, et al. , (2019) The incidence and survival analysis for anaplastic thyroid cancer: a SEER database analysis. American journal of translational research 11: 5888–5896. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Janz TA, Neskey DM, Nguyen SA, Lentsch EJ, (2019) Is the incidence of anaplastic thyroid cancer increasing: A population based epidemiology study. World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery 5: 34–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prasongsook N, Kumar A, Chintakuntlawar AV, Foote RL, Kasperbauer J, et al. , (2017) Survival in Response to Multimodal Therapy in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 102: 4506–4514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu B, Fuchs T, Dogan S, Landa I, Katabi N, et al. , (2020) Dissecting Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Clinical, Histologic, Immunophenotypic, and Molecular Study of 360 Cases. Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association 30: 1505–1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mohebati A, Dilorenzo M, Palmer F, Patel SG, Pfister D, et al. , (2014) Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a 25-year single-institution experience. Annals of surgical oncology 21: 1665–1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hvilsom GB, Londero SC, Hahn CH, Schytte S, Pedersen HB, et al. , (2018) Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in Denmark 1996–2012: A national prospective study of 219 patients. Cancer epidemiology 53: 65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wendler J, Kroiss M, Gast K, Kreissl MC, Allelein S, et al. , (2016) Clinical presentation, treatment and outcome of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: results of a multicenter study in Germany. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies 175: 521–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sugitani I, Miyauchi A, Sugino K, Okamoto T, Yoshida A, et al. , (2012) Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: ATC Research Consortium of Japan cohort study of 677 patients. World journal of surgery 36: 1247–1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kos K, de Visser KE, (2021) Neutrophils create a fertile soil for metastasis. Cancer Cell 39: 301–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cole K, Pravoverov K, Talmadge JE, (2021) Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in metastasis. Cancer metastasis reviews 40: 391–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu M, Ma M, Tan Z, Zheng H, Liu X, (2020) Neutrophil: A New Player in Metastatic Cancers. Frontiers in immunology 11: 565165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Trovato R, Cane S, Petrova V, Sartoris S, Ugel S, et al. , (2020) The Engagement Between MDSCs and Metastases: Partners in Crime. Frontiers in oncology 10: 165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Law AMK, Valdes-Mora F, Gallego-Ortega D, (2020) Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells as a Therapeutic Target for Cancer. Cells 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shen M, Hu P, Donskov F, Wang G, Liu Q, et al. , (2014) Tumor-associated neutrophils as a new prognostic factor in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one 9: e98259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Valero C, Lee M, Hoen D, Weiss K, Kelly DW, et al. , (2021) Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mutational burden as biomarkers of tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nature communications 12: 729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sato T, Omura M, Saito J, Hirasawa A, Kakuta Y, et al. , (2000) Neutrophilia associated with anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid: production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and interleukin-6. Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association 10: 1113–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park J, Park J, Shin JH, Oh YL, Jung HA, et al. , (2021) Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio before and after Radiotherapy for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fukuda N, Toda K, Fujiwara YU, Wang X, Ohmoto A, et al. , (2020) Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker for Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib. In vivo (Athens, Greece) 34: 2859–2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheng DT, Mitchell TN, Zehir A, Shah RH, Benayed R, et al. , (2015) Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology. J Mol Diagn 17: 251–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, et al. , (2015) The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nature medicine 21: 938–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ryder M, Ghossein RA, Ricarte-Filho JC, Knauf JA, Fagin JA, (2008) Increased density of tumor-associated macrophages is associated with decreased survival in advanced thyroid cancer. Endocrine-related cancer 15: 1069–1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Landa I, Ibrahimpasic T, Boucai L, Sinha R, Knauf JA, et al. , (2016) Genomic and transcriptomic hallmarks of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers. The Journal of clinical investigation 126: 1052–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang GQ, Wei WJ, Song HJ, Sun ZK, Shen CT, et al. , (2019) PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH-LIGAND 1 OVEREXPRESSION IN THYROID CANCER. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 25: 279–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cameselle-Garcia S, Abdulkader-Sande S, Sanchez-Ares M, Rodriguez-Carnero G, Garcia-Gomez J, et al. , (2021) PD-L1 expression and immune cells in anaplastic carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma of the human thyroid gland: A retrospective study. Oncology letters 22: 553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Girolami I, Pantanowitz L, Mete O, Brunelli M, Marletta S, et al. , (2020) Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Is a Potential Biomarker of Disease-Free Survival in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of PD-L1 Immunoexpression in Follicular Epithelial Derived Thyroid Carcinoma. Endocrine pathology 31: 291–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Capdevila J, Wirth LJ, Ernst T, Ponce Aix S, Lin CC, et al. , (2020) PD-1 Blockade in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 38: 2620–2627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Al-Khadairi G, Decock J, (2019) Cancer Testis Antigens and Immunotherapy: Where Do We Stand in the Targeting of PRAME? Cancers 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li J, Yin J, Zhong J, Yang Z, Tang A, et al. , (2020) Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of PRAME Overexpression in Human Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. BioMed research international 2020: 8828579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dhatchinamoorthy K, Colbert JD, Rock KL, (2021) Cancer Immune Evasion Through Loss of MHC Class I Antigen Presentation. Frontiers in immunology 12: 636568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Glaser SM, Mandish SF, Gill BS, Balasubramani GK, Clump DA, et al. , (2016) Anaplastic thyroid cancer: Prognostic factors, patterns of care, and overall survival. Head & neck 38 Suppl 1: E2083–2090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

RESOURCES