Abstract
Objective
Dobutamine is an inotropic agent given to patients with low cardiac output or undergoing cardiac surgery in intensive care units. Routine clinical care protocols recommend a target dilution concentration of 10 mg/mL dobutamine from the 250 mg/20 mL commercial solution.
This study aimed to assess the 1-year stability of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL diluted dobutamine solutions. Two types of 50 mL conditioning, polypropylene (PP) syringes or cyclic-oleofin-copolymer (COC) vials and two diluents (5% dextrose (D5W) and normal saline (NS)) were tested.
Methods
Reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with an ultraviolet detection stability-indicating method was developed for dobutamine and validated according to selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy and precision. Chemical stability was considered to have been maintained if the measured concentrations were >90% of the initial concentration with no colour change. Physical stability was assessed through sterility tests, pH and osmolality monitoring, and subvisible particle counting. Containers were stored at −20±5°C, +5±3°C and +25±2°C with 60%±5% relative humidity in a dark, closed environment.
Results
According to this study, the physicochemical stability of 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions prepared with D5W or NS is constant throughout a 365-day period when stored in COC vials, at all the aforementioned temperatures, whereas solutions in PP syringes required a refrigerated temperature and should not be administered after 21 days or 3 months when prepared with D5W or NS, respectively, or after 1 month at ambient temperature whatever the diluent.
Conclusion
Our results argue in favour of adopting the compounding of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions in COC vials in centralised intravenous additive services.
Keywords: critical care, drug compounding, safety, analytic sample preparation methods, administration, intravenous
Introduction
Dobutamine is commonly used for patients experiencing cardiogenic or septic shocks, severe heart failure or undergoing cardiac surgery in intensive care units.1 In France, injectable dobutamine solutions are available as 250 mg/20 mL packaged in glass vials.
Dobutamine monographs recommend intravenous administration by continuous infusion of the 250 mg/20 mL commercial solution diluted in either 5% dextrose (D5W) or normal saline solution (NS).2 Routine care protocols recommend a target dilution concentration of 10 mg/mL. Previous studies have highlighted the risks incurred by this supplementary step when performed in the wards,3–5 for example, high intervariability of dobutamine concentrations and risk of infection.6 7 Preparing ready-to-use 10 mg/mL injectable dobutamine solutions in centralised intravenous additive services (CIVAS) would eliminate this step and reduce risks.8 The stability of ready-to-use dobutamine solutions stored in plastic syringes has already been tested over several months, but the beyond-use-date (BUD) was never attained in those studies.9–11 Other stability studies at various concentrations have been performed in polyvinyl chloride (PVC),12–18 polyethylene (PE)18 or glass13 14 18 containers but only over short periods.
Ready-to-use vials in cyclic-oleofin-copolymer (COC) were specially designed to store injectable solutions:19 their mechanical properties20–22 offer far greater storage propensity than plastic syringes. Recent studies support the claim that COC vials offer longer stability than polypropylene (PP) syringes for midazolam and norepinephrine ready-to-use solutions.21 23 Freezing has never been tested before as a storage method to gain longer stability for ready-to-use dobutamine solutions, nor has the long-term stability of 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution diluted in D5W and NS and stored in PP syringes or COC vials.
This study aimed to compare the stability of 10 mg/mL ready-to-use dobutamine solutions stored in either PP syringes or COC vials and diluted in either D5W or NS and at frozen (−20±5°C), refrigerated (+5°C±3°C) or ambient temperatures (+25°C±2°C with 60%±5% relative humidity).
Products
A 250 mg/20 mL hydrochloride dobutamine commercial solution (Panpharma, Luitre, France) was compounded with excipients such as sodium metabisulfite, hydrochloric acid (HCl) and water for injection. Hydrochloride dobutamine standard reference used for the validation step corresponded to the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) standard reference.
Products used to prepare the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phase were 0.1 mM sodium acetate buffer, prepared with sodium acetate trihydrate (Merck, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), acetic acid (VWR International, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) and ultrapure water (using a PURELAB classic system; ELGA Véolia, Wasquehal, France), methanol (VWR International) and acetonitrile (VWR International).
Containers
COC vials were 50 mL AT-Closed vials (Batch: 0F10888156, Reference: VIA-500000; Aseptic Technologies, Gembloux, Belgium) and PP syringes were 50 mL luer-lock syringes (Batch: 1405208, Reference:300865; Plastipak, Becton Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Claix, France).
COC vials were designed especially for ready-to-use solutions24 and filled via an M1 filling station (Aseptic Technologies) connected to a peristaltic pump (Flexicon Pump PF6, Watson Marlow, La Queue-les-Yvelines, France) as previously reported.20
Chromatographic apparatus and conditions
Reversed-phase HPLC combined with an ultraviolet (UV) detector method measured the concentrations. The system (Agilent 1260 Infinity LC, Les Ulis, France) was equipped with a C18 column (Kinetex 5 µm, 150×4.6 mm; Phenomenex, Le Peck, France) maintained at +25°C. The wavelength of the UV detector (1260 MWD DEAAZ00942) was set at 280 nm according to the EP.25 The mobile phase A/B/C 84/4/12% (v/v) with isocratic elution (1.8 mL/min) was prepared with 0.1 mM sodium acetate buffer (EP) [A], pH adjusted to 4.0, methanol [B] and acetonitrile [C]. ChemStation software (Openlabs CDS, version 01.05), was used for calibration, data acquisition and interpretation. Injection volume was 5 µL throughout the study. All reagents were of analytical grade.
Stock solutions
Quality controls were prepared by dissolving hydrochloride dobutamine EP standard reference (20 mg dobutamine hydrochloride CRS D2954000) in 10 mL graduated flasks with D5W (Viaflo, Baxter, France; Batch: 17CL006) or NS (Viaflo, Baxter, France; Batch: 17K06T4A) to obtain 2 mg/mL stock solutions. Calibration solutions were prepared by diluting stock solutions with D5W (Curve A) or NS (Curve B) to obtain eight different standard levels: 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.3, 1.5 mg/mL. The two calibration curves were traced in triplicate using these eight levels.
Forced degradation study
The selectivity of the method was based on comparing the chromatogram of the quality control dobutamine solution with the chromatograms obtained from the degradation study. The extreme conditions applied to the stock solution to obtain about 20% degradation of the initial amount of dobutamine were:26
Dilution in 37% HCl for 6 hours at 80°C and 7 days at 80°C for D5W and NS, respectively, then neutralised by NaOH
Dilution in NaOH 0.05 M for 30 min at ambient temperature, then neutralised by HCl
Dilution in 30% (v/v) H2O2 for 1 day at 60°C
Storage in a heated chamber at 80°C for 14 days.
Degradation solutions were then diluted with D5W or NS to a 1 mg/mL target concentration prior to injection into the HPLC system.
Solution preparations
Injectable dobutamine solutions were prepared from the commercial 250 mg/20 mL (Batch: 70210) solutions by diluting with D5W or NS to obtain a 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution. These solutions were again diluted at 1/10 with D5W or NS before injection into the HPLC system.
Preparation and filling steps were executed in a controlled atmosphere (Laminar Flow MaxiSafe 2020; Thermo Scientific, Saint Herblain, France). PP syringes were manually prepared while the M1 filling station was used to fill and seal the caps on COC vials.20
A total of 320 syringes and 640 vials were prepared for each dilution condition (D5W and NS).
Half of the vials were stored upright and the remaining half upside down to assess the role of the stopper in the potential loss of stability.
Each container was stored in a dark enclosure for 365 days.
Respecting the Société Française de Pharmacie Clinique (French Society of Clinical Pharmacy)/Groupe d’Evaluation et de Recherche sur la Protection en Atmosphère Contrôlée (Evaluation and Research Group on Protection in Controlled Atmosphere) (SFPC/GERPAC) and the International Conference of Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Guidelines,26 27 three storage conditions were tested for each container (upright, upside-down vials, syringes): −20°C±5°C, +5°C±3°C and 25°C±2°C with 60%±5% relative humidity). Defrosting conditions for frozen containers were fixed at 4 hours’ ambient temperature. A dye ingress test was successfully performed.21
Operating conditions for the stability study
Stability was assessed at days 0, 7, 14, 21 and months M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, M10, M11, M12. Each syringe or vial was used once per analysis.
Visual inspection and measurement of dobutamine concentration were carried out at each time point. Visual inspection analysis targets the formation of visible particles, transparency, and colouring of the solution. Dobutamine concentration was measured using the HPLC-UV-validated method. Chemical stability was assumed to be maintained if three criteria were met: no colour change, measured concentrations >90% of the initial concentration and no formation of toxic degradation product.
pH monitoring and a non-visible particulate contamination assay were performed in triplicate at the beginning of the study and every month until the end of the study or until the date of the assumed loss of physicochemical stability. pH values were measured using a Hanna HI 223 pH meter (HannaInstrument, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). A light obscuration spectrometer (APSS-2000; Particle Measuring Systems, Dourdan, France) was used for the non-visible particulate contamination assay. Preparations met the required criteria if the number of particles was within the limits set by the EP for 50 mL containers, namely a maximum of 6000 particles of sizes ≥10 µm/container and 600 particles of sizes ≥25 µm/container.28
Sterility assay and osmolality measurements were made in triplicate for each condition at the beginning and at each reported BUD or at day 365 for solutions that had remained stable. The sterility test was conducted with the Müeller Hinton medium (CM0405 OXOID; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basingstoke, UK) at +22°C/+33°C. This medium was validated according to the requirements of the EP.29 Samples were filtrated via membranes with a 0.45 µm cellulose nitrate filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Göttingen, Germany) and membranes were incubated in the medium for 14 days. The sterility test was passed if there was no growth of microorganisms. Osmolality was measured using a micro-osmometer (Model 210; Fiske Associates, Norwood, MA, USA).
Statistical tests
Calibration ranges were established by plotting the peak area obtained for the calibration solutions of dobutamine diluted in D5W or NS versus the concentration of dobutamine contained in these solutions. An analysis of variance (ANOVA), preceded by a Cochran test, was used to assess the linearity of our method. Concentration measures on samples prepared at the eight concentration levels of the two calibration ranges were made in triplicate to evaluate intraday precision and accuracy. These measures were repeated on three consecutive days to evaluate interday precision.
Accuracy and precision were calculated using the recovery factor and the coefficient of variation, respectively. Total error was calculated as the sum of relative bias and interday precision. The limit of acceptance was set at ±10%.21 pH values and osmolality results obtained at the beginning and end of the study were compared with a non-parametric Wilcoxon test (α=5%) for each condition and storage tested, using R software (Version 1.2.1335; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Forced degradation study
The chromatogram of the stock solution was compared with those obtained from the forced degradation study (figure 1).
Figure 1.
Representative chromatograms of (A.1/A.2) 10 mg/mL dobutamine reference solution diluted in normal saline solution (NS)/5% dextrose (D5W), (B.1/B.2) 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution in NS/D5W diluted in 0.05 M NaOH, (C.1/C.2) 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution in NS/D5W diluted in HCl 37% (v/v) at 80°C, (D.1/D.2) 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution in NS/D5W diluted in H2O2 30% at 60°C.
Dobutamine was eluted at 2.3 min and 2.5 min when diluted in D5W or NS respectively. The peak at 1.1 min corresponds to the peak of D5W.
Degradation under basic conditions led to the formation of two products eluted at 2.7 and 2.9 min when diluted in D5W while the same two products were eluted at 2.8 and 3.2 min in NS. Degradation under acid conditions yielded one product eluted at either 6.3 min or 7.0 in D5W or NS. The other newly formed peaks corresponded to D5W degradation products.
Exposure to heat revealed no dobutamine degradation products, but some D5W degradation products. Exposure to oxidative conditions led to the apparition of many, not clearly separated peaks eluted between 0.9 and 1.8 min for D5W and between 0.9 and 1.6 min for NS. These peaks were associated with dobutamine and D5W degradation. The method was shown to be highly selective with no interference between the molecule and the degradation products.
HPLC validation assay for 0.5–1.5 mg/L range dobutamine solutions
The results for both calibration ranges are presented in table 1.
Table 1.
Calibration results
Parameters | Values for the calibration range diluted in D5W | Values for the calibration range diluted in NS |
Range (mg/L) | 0.5–1.5 | 0.5–1.5 |
Cochran test | ||
Experimental value | 0.26 | 0.24 |
Theoretical value (α=5%;8;6) | 0.36 | 0.36 |
Correlation test (ANOVA) | ||
Experimental value | 18 968.72 | 5708.49 |
Theoretical value (α=5%;6;18) | 4.07 | 4.07 |
Nonlinearity test (ANOVA) | ||
Experimental value | 1.67 | 0.47 |
Theoretical value (α=5%;1;18) | 2.32 | 2.32 |
Regression coefficient | ||
Slope | 1980.08 | 1928.28 |
Intercept | −20.41 | −37.44 |
Correlation coefficient | 0.997 | 0.996 |
Limit of detection (mg/L) | 0.032 | 0.054 |
Limit of quantification (mg/L) | 0.064 | 0.108 |
D5W, 5% dextrose; NS, normal saline solution.
An excellent correlation between the ratio of peaks and dobutamine concentrations was demonstrated statistically. Linearity hypothesis was not rejected for either calibration range with a confidence level of 95%. Trueness and precision results are summarised in table 2.
Table 2.
Precision and accuracy calibration results of the high-performance liquid chromatographic method
Calibration | Concentration (mg/mL) | Relative bias (%) | Interday precision (%) | Total error (%) | Accuracy (%) |
Dobutamine diluted in normal saline solution | 0.5 | 0.66 | 3.67 | 4.33 | 100.66 |
0.6 | 0.50 | 3.85 | 4.36 | 100.50 | |
0.7 | 0.39 | 3.95 | 4.33 | 100.39 | |
0.8 | 0.08 | 3.64 | 3.72 | 100.08 | |
0.9 | 2.10 | 5.33 | 7.43 | 97.90 | |
1.0 | 0.36 | 2.94 | 3.30 | 100.36 | |
1.3 | 0.03 | 3.09 | 3.12 | 100.03 | |
1.5 | 0.26 | 2.69 | 2.95 | 100.26 | |
Dobutamine diluted in 5% dextrose in water | 0.5 | 0.04 | 1.82 | 1.86 | 100.66 |
0.6 | 0.12 | 2.13 | 2.25 | 100.50 | |
0.7 | 1.83 | 3.75 | 5.58 | 100.39 | |
0.8 | 2.65 | 2.76 | 5.42 | 100.08 | |
0.9 | 0.11 | 1.30 | 1.41 | 97.90 | |
1.0 | 0.28 | 1.92 | 2.20 | 100.36 | |
1.3 | 0.01 | 1.59 | 1.60 | 100.03 | |
1.5 | 0.05 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 100.26 |
Accuracy and total error scores did not exceed the tolerated limits, which are [90%–110%] and <10%, respectively (table 2). The results of the validation assay prove the reliability of our method based on linearity, selectivity, sensitivity, accuracy and precision.
Physical stability of dobutamine
Solutions freshly prepared were transparent with no visible particles. The initial physical parameters of the stability solutions are presented in online supplemental table S1.
ejhpharm-2021-002748supp001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)
Colour modification
When stored in COC vials, the solutions remained clear and free from visible particles throughout the study. Faint colouring was observed in solutions stored in COC vials at ambient temperature but was considered too slight to justify the discontinuation of the study (online supplemental figure S1A). No colouring or visible particles were observed in PP syringes stored at refrigerated or frozen temperatures throughout the study. However, colour modification was observed from the first month (M1) for solutions prepared in D5W or NS and stored at ambient temperature in PP syringes. From the second month (M2), this colouring became absolute, leading to the interruption of the study in these test conditions. This evolution is presented in online supplemental figure S1B–D.
Non-visible particulate contamination assay
Results are summarised in online supplemental tables 2 and 3.
For dobutamine solutions prepared with D5W, non-visible particulate contamination was maintained within the EP thresholds whatever the storage temperature in both containers at refrigerated temperature. Particles ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm exceeded the recommended limit from the sixth month (M6) and third month (M3), respectively, for solutions stored in PP syringes at ambient room temperature. Finally, for PP syringes at frozen temperature, the first atypical value for ≥10 µm particles was measured after the first month (M1) and continued from M6 till the end of the study whereas no such value was measured for ≥25 µm particles.
For dobutamine solutions prepared with NS, the results obtained for the non-visible particle assay stored in COC vials, whatever the storage temperature, showed no deviations from EP thresholds. The results were identical for the 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions prepared with NS and stored in PP syringes at refrigerated temperature. However, both particles ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm exceeded the recommended limit from the second month (M2) for solutions stored in PP syringes at ambient temperature. For dobutamine solutions prepared with NS and stored at frozen temperature, the recommended thresholds were exceeded from the fourth (M4) and sixth (M6) months, for particles ≥10 µm and ≥25 µm, respectively.
pH monitoring and osmolality assay
The evolution of pH values is described in figure 2. The results of the osmolality assay are presented in table 3.
Figure 2.
Evolution of pH values of 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions diluted in normal saline solution or 5% dextrose and stored either in cyclic-oleofin-copolymer vials or polypropylene syringes stored at ambient (+25°C/60% relative humidity), refrigerated (+5°C) or frozen (−20°C) temperatures, throughout the 12-month study period. COC, cyclic-oleofin-copolymer; D5W, 5% dextrose; NS, normal saline solution; PP, polypropylene; RH, relative humidity.
Table 3.
Osmolality results obtained at the end of the stability study of the 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution diluted in 5% dextrose or normal saline solution and stored in either cyclic-oleofin-copolymer vials or polypropylene syringes stored at ambient (+25°C/60% relative humidity), refrigerated (+5°C) or frozen (−20°C) temperatures, throughout the 12-month study period.
Condition | Diluent | D5W | NS | ||||
Storage temperature | +25°C/60% RH | +5°C | −20°C | +25°C/60% RH | +5°C | −20°C | |
Upright COC vials | Time of measurement | M12 | M12 | M12 | M12 | M12 | M12 |
Osmolality values (mOsmol/kg) | 122±1 | 121±1 | 120±0 | 121±0 | 120±0 | 119±0 | |
Upside-down COC vials | Time of measurement | M12 | M12 | M12 | M12 | M12 | M12 |
Osmolality values (mOsmol/kg) | 121±0 | 121±1 | 120±1 | 121±0 | 120±1 | 120±1 | |
PP syringes | Time of measurement | M2* | M12 | M1* | M2* | M12 | M4* |
Osmolality values (mOsmol/kg) | 134±11 | 120±1 | 124±8 | 128±8 | 120±1 | 121±4 |
*The study was stopped once the stability of the solution had deteriorated.
COC, cyclic-oleofin-copolymer; D5W, 5% dextrose; M, month; NS, normal saline solution; PP, polypropylene; RH, relative humidity.
These results show no significant difference between pH values (n=3, p value ≥0.07) and osmolality values (n=3, p value >0.06), measured at the beginning and end of the study in all comparative conditions.
Chemical stability
The initial dobutamine concentrations were 10.54±0.31 mg/mL (n=3) and 10.18±0.15 mg/L (n=3) when diluted in D5W and NS, respectively. figure 3 shows that chemical stability was maintained over the 365-day study period for dobutamine solutions, whatever the diluent (D5W or NS) in COC vials and whatever the storage temperature condition, and in PP syringes at refrigerated or frozen temperature. Chemical stability was lost from M9 for solutions prepared with either D5W or NS stored in PP syringes at room temperature.
Figure 3.
Chemical stability of 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions diluted in normal saline solution or 5% dextrose and stored in either cyclic-oleofin-copolymer vials or polypropylene syringes at ambient (+25°C/60% relative humidity), refrigerated (+5°C) or frozen (−20°C) temperatures. COC, cyclic-oleofin-copolymer; D5W, 5% dextrose; NS, normal saline solution; PP, polypropylene; RH, relative humidity.
Sterility assay
Sterility was maintained throughout the 12-month study for every solution stored in COC vials whatever the storage condition and diluent, for solutions stored in PP syringes at refrigerated temperature and up to the BUD for the other conditions.
Discussion
The physicochemical stability of 10mg/mL dobutamine solutions prepared with D5W or NS was maintained throughout a 365-day period, when stored in COC-vials, at all temperature conditions tested(−20±5°C,+5±3°C and +25±2°C with 60%±5% relative humidity); and in PP-syringes but only when refrigerated. 10mg/mL dobutamine solutions stored after 1 month at ambient temperature when prepared with either D5W or NS. The rapid exceeding of subvisible particle contamination limits with PP syringes advocates limiting routine frozen storage of diluted intravenous dobutamine solutions. The faint colouring observed in solutions stored in COC vials at ambient temperature contributes to favouring storage at +5°C.
This is the first study to explore the stability of diluted dobutamine over a 1-year period.
Previous studies have evaluated the stability of diluted dobutamine, either in D5W,9 11–18 30 or NS,12–18 protected from light11 13 15 18 30 or not,9 10 14 17 exposed to various storage temperatures (ambient,9 11–14 16–18 30+35°C12 or refrigerated10–13 15 16 18 30), compounded in glass,13 14 18 polyvinyl chloride (PVC),12–18 polyethylene (PE)18 or PP9 11 containers. Some assessed the chemical stability of dobutamine solutions in PP syringes at ambient and refrigerated temperatures without reaching the BUD,9 11 but evaluation was over a shorter period (42 days maximum).
An innovative point in this study was particle contamination counting, not performed in previous studies.9 11–14 30 Subvisible particle contamination should be considered in stability studies as it is responsible for clinical consequences especially in critically ill patients receiving multidrug infusions.31 32
Some COC vials (with D5W, n=2/with NS, n=1) cracked during storage when frozen. This phenomenon was linked to dobutamine crystallisation (crystals found in cracks and analysed by HPLC-UV). Dobutamine concentrations measured in the cracked vials revealed an average loss of 4% of the initial concentration. The manufacturer explained that the maximal filling volume recommended for 50 mL COC vials was 45 mL before freezing because of expansion of the diluent, and confirmed that COC vials can be submitted to temperatures as low as −50°C.33 This cracking phenomenon was not observed in previous studies with cefuroxime, midazolam or norepinephrine but requires further investigation. Our study was pursued on uncracked vials. As for syringes, the above phenomenon did not occur in our study. However, Kirk et al reported a contraction of the PP syringe plunger during cooling, resulting in leakage of the solution past the plunger.34 We did not experience this phenomenon either in this or previous studies.
Data reporting the chemical stability of dobutamine submitted to extreme conditions is controversial. A recent article reported that dobutamine was stable in basic and thermal conditions but sensitive to degradation in acidic conditions,12 while another declared the opposite.11 Our degradation study suggests that dobutamine was sensitive to acidic, basic and oxidative conditions but not to heat. However, the impact of heat on dobutamine degradation is highly probable as colouring was observed but does not correspond to the appearance of any peak in the chromatograms. The limit of our HPLC-UV detection method was the undetectability of the dobutamine degradation product obtained from its thermal degradation. Regardless of extreme conditions leading to dobutamine degradation, the degradation mechanism is considered to be a free radical-mediated mechanism leading to the formation of dark-coloured polymers.35
The 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions stored in PP syringes in the dark turned brown before the end of the 12-month study period, showing a susceptibility to heat in this type of container.
There is no evidence that the coloured degradation products of dobutamine are not toxic. Colouring may indicate limited stability even though the drug concentration remained within acceptance limits. This finding is similar to that of other authors.11 13
Our results concur with previous studies affirming longer stability in COC vials than in PP syringes;20–23 COC vials also showed their superiority over PP syringes as regards subvisible particle contamination. The similarity of the results whatever the position of the vial during storage suggests that contact with the stopper has no impact on the stability of the 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution. This complies with the declared properties of COC vials meeting the criteria requirements for pharmaceutical primary containers.24
Our method is adapted to CIVAS, as are many previously published methods combining reversed-phase HPLC and UV detection.10–14
Finally, plastic syringes used to pose a problem for compounding as they were not made for storing drugs but this situation has recently been resolved as Becton Dickinson claims that their syringes now conform to drug storage.21
Conclusions
Our results advocate adopting the compounding of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions in COC vials in CIVAS and their storage at refrigerated temperature. Frozen storage is not recommended for COC vials because of the risk of cracking. PP syringes offer acceptable 1-year shelf-life stability for 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions when refrigerated.
What this paper adds.
What is already known on this subject
Medication errors linked to the dilution step can be avoided by preparing ready-to-use injectable solutions in hospital pharmacies.
As dobutamine is a high-risk medication, a dilution error may be deleterious for critically ill patients.
What this study adds
The stability of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL dobutamine solution depends on storage temperature, diluent and type of container.
The stability of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions diluted in 5% dextrose in water (D5W) and 0.9% NaCl was maintained for 12 months in cyclic-oleofin-copolymer (COC) vials at −20°C, +5°C and +25°C and in polypropylene (PP) syringes at +5°C.
In PP syringes at −20°C and +25°C, the beyond-use delay was shorter: 21 days (D5W) and 3 months (0.9% NaCl) at −20°C, and 1 month at +25°C.
Acknowledgments
We thank Alexandra Tavernier (MA, University of Glasgow, Professeur Agrégée, France) for English language and editing assistance.
Footnotes
Twitter: @Sixtine Gilliot
Contributors: S Gilliot: methodology, formal analysis, writing, revision and editing of the final version. HH: writing, revision and editing of the final version. NC: study conception, data curation, methodology, validation and revision of the final version. S Genay, CB, BD, PO: supervision, methodology, validation and revision of the final version.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository: Gilliot, Sixtine; Henry, Héloïse; Carta, Natacha; Genay, Stéphanie; Barthélémy, Christine; Décaudin, Bertrand; Odou, Pascal (2020), “Long-term stability of 10 mg/mL dobutamine injectable solutions dataset”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/cxs7y94kj8.1.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not required.
References
- 1. Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e011991. 10.1161/JAHA.119.011991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Summary of product characteristics of dobutamine Mylan 250 mg/20 ml, solution for intravenous infusion. Available: http://basedonneespublique.medicaments.gouv.fr/affichageDoc.php?specid=63149018&typedoc=R
- 3. Stucki C, Sautter A-M, Wolff A, et al. Accuracy of preparation of i.v. medication syringes for anesthesiology. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:137–42. 10.2146/ajhp110654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Valentin A, Capuzzo M, Guidet B, et al. Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study. BMJ 2009;338:b814. 10.1136/bmj.b814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dehmel C, Braune SA, Kreymann G, et al. Do centrally pre-prepared solutions achieve more reliable drug concentrations than solutions prepared on the ward? Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1311–6. 10.1007/s00134-011-2230-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Garnerin P, Pellet-Meier B, Chopard P, et al. Measuring human-error probabilities in drug preparation: a pilot simulation study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:769–76. 10.1007/s00228-007-0319-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ferner RE, Langford NJ, Anton C, et al. Random and systematic medication errors in routine clinical practice: a multicentre study of infusions, using acetylcysteine as an example. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001;52:573–7. 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01490.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hecq J-D. Centralized intravenous additive services (CIVAS): the state of the art in 2010. Ann Pharm Fr 2011;69:30–7. 10.1016/j.pharma.2010.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sautou-Miranda V, Gremeau I, Chamard I, et al. Stability of dopamine hydrochloride and of dobutamine hydrochloride in plastic syringes and administration sets. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1996;53:186–93. 10.1093/ajhp/53.2.186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pramar Y, Das Gupta V, Gardner SN, et al. Stabilities of dobutamine, dopamine, nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside in disposable plastic syringes. J Clin Pharm Ther 1991;16:203–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1991.tb00305.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Patel N, Taki M, Tunstell P, et al. Stability of dobutamine 500 mg in 50 ml syringes prepared using a Central Intravenous Additive Service. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2012;19:52–6. 10.1136/ejhpharm-2011-000027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Al Madfai F, Valah B, Zaidi STR, et al. Stability of dobutamine in continuous ambulatory delivery devices. J Clin Pharm Ther 2018;43:530–5. 10.1111/jcpt.12674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Das Gupta V, Stewart KR. Stability of dobutamine hydrochloride and verapamil hydrochloride in 0.9% sodium chloride and 5% dextrose injections. Am J Hosp Pharm 1984;41:686–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kirschenbaum HL, Aronoff W, Perentesis GP, et al. Stability of dobutamine hydrochloride in selected large-volume parenterals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1982;39:1923–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Allwood MC. The stability of four catecholamines in 5% glucose infusions. J Clin Pharm Ther 1991;16:337–40. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1991.tb00322.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Musami P, Stewart JT, Taylor EW. Stability of zidovudine and dobutamine hydrochloride injections in 0.9% sodium chloride and 5% dextrose injections stored at ambient temperature (23 +/– 2 deg C) and 4 deg C in 50-mL polyvinyl chloride bags up to 24 hours. Int J Pharm Compd 2004;8:73–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Stewart JT, Warren FW, King AD. Stability of ranitidine hydrochloride and seven medications. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994;51:1802–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zeidler C, Dettmering D, Schrammel W. Compatibility of various drugs used in intensive care medecine in polyethylene, PVC and glass infusion containers. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 1999;5:106–10. [Google Scholar]
- 19. AT-Closed Vial® . Aseptic technologies - safer & easier aseptic filling operations. Available: https://www.aseptictech.com/products/closed-vialr-0 [Accessed 7 Mar 2019].
- 20. Feutry F, Simon N, Genay S, et al. Stability of 10 mg/mL cefuroxime solution for intracameral injection in commonly used polypropylene syringes and new ready-to-use cyclic olefin copolymer sterile vials using the LC-UV stability-indicating method. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2016;42:166–74. 10.3109/03639045.2015.1038273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gilliot S, Masse M, Genay S, et al. Long-term stability of ready-to-use norepinephrine solution at 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2020;27:e93–8. 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Feutry F, Genay S, Velghe C. Stability of midazolam and noradrenaline stored in cyclic olefin copolymer AT-Closed Vials® and polypropylene syringes during 365 days. Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy 2017:2. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gilliot S, Masse M, Feutry F, et al. Long-term stability of ready-to-use 1-mg/mL midazolam solution. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020;77:681–9. 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. United States Pharmacopeia . General Chapters 661: Containers. Available: http://www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c661_viewall.html [Accessed 10 Sep 2019].
- 25. Dobutamine hydrochloride product monograph . European Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia 10th edition 2020.
- 26. SFPC (French Society of Clinical Pharmacy) and GERPAC (Evaluation and Research Group on Protection in Controlled Atmosphere) . SFPC, GERPAC, methodological guidelines for stability studies of hospital pharmaceutical preparations, Part I: Liquid preparations. Available: http://www.gerpac.eu/IMG/pdf/guide_stabilite_anglais.pdf [Accessed 2 Mar 2019].
- 27. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Expert Working Group . ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Stability testing of new drug substances and products Q1A (R2), Step 4 version; 2003: 1041–54. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q1A%28R2%29%20Guideline.pdf [Accessed 7 Mar 2019].
- 28. European Pharmacopoeia Commission . 2.9.19 Particulate contamination: sub-visible particles. Pharmacopoeia 10.2 edition 2020.
- 29. European Pharmacopoeia Commission . 2.6.1 Sterility. Pharmacopoeia 10.2 edition 2020.
- 30. Webster AA, English BA, McGuire JM, et al. Stability of Dobutamine Hydrochloride 4mg/mL in 5% Dextrose Injection at 5 and 23 deg C. Int J Pharm Compd 1999;3:412–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Benlabed M, Perez M, Gaudy R, et al. Clinical implications of intravenous drug incompatibilities in critically ill patients. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2019;38:173–80. 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Benlabed M, Martin Mena A, Gaudy R, et al. Analysis of particulate exposure during continuous drug infusion in critically ill adult patients: a preliminary proof-of-concept in vitro study. Intensive Care Med Exp 2018;6:38. 10.1186/s40635-018-0205-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Buckler RL, Kunkel EJ, Thompson ML, et al. Technological developments for small-scale downstream processing of cell therapies. Cytotherapy 2016;18:301–6. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kirk B, Melia C, Wilson J. Chemical stability of cyclophosphamide injection: the effect of low storage and microwave thawing. Br J Parenter Ther 1984:90–7. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bindoli A, Rigobello MP, Deeble DJ. Biochemical and toxicological properties of the oxidation products of catecholamines. Free Radic Biol Med 1992;13:391–405. 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90182-g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
ejhpharm-2021-002748supp001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository: Gilliot, Sixtine; Henry, Héloïse; Carta, Natacha; Genay, Stéphanie; Barthélémy, Christine; Décaudin, Bertrand; Odou, Pascal (2020), “Long-term stability of 10 mg/mL dobutamine injectable solutions dataset”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/cxs7y94kj8.1.