Abstract
Cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) promotes tumor progression through the recruitment of growth factors and the acquisition of stemness, invasiveness, and drug resistance. CD44 has multiple isoforms including CD44 standard (CD44s) and CD44 variants (CD44v), which have common and unique functions in tumor development. Therefore, elucidating the function of each CD44 isoform in a tumor is essential for the establishment of CD44-targeting tumor therapy. We have established various anti-CD44s and anti-CD44v monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) through the immunization of CD44v3–10-overexpressed cells. In this study, we established C44Mab-6 (IgG1, kappa), which recognized the CD44 variant 3-encoded region (CD44v3), as determined via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. C44Mab-6 reacted with CD44v3–10-overexpressed Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells (CHO/CD44v3–10) or some cancer cell lines (COLO205 and HSC-3) via flow cytometry. The apparent KD of C44Mab-6 for CHO/CD44v3–10, COLO205, and HSC-3 was 1.5 × 10−9 M, 6.3 × 10−9 M, and 1.9 × 10−9 M, respectively. C44Mab-6 could detect the CD44v3–10 in Western blotting and stained the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sections in immunohistochemistry. These results indicate that C44Mab-6 is useful for detecting CD44v3 in various experiments and is expected for the application of tumor diagnosis and therapy.
Keywords: CD44, CD44 variant 3, monoclonal antibody, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry
1. Introduction
The cell surface glycoprotein known as cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) is broadly expressed by epithelial, mesenchymal, and hematopoietic cells and is involved in adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM), lymphocyte homing, and lymphocyte activation [1]. A growing body of evidence reveals the critical roles of CD44 in tumor progression and metastasis [2,3]. The human CD44 gene consists of 19 exons, 10 of which are constant in all variants, and makes up the standard form of CD44 (CD44s) [4]. Furthermore, a large number of CD44 variants (CD44v) are generated due to alternative splicing. The CD44v consists of 10 constant exons in combination with the remaining 9 variant exons.
The translated CD44 usually receives post-translational modifications, such as N-/O-linked glycosylation or proteoglycans, including chondroitin sulfate, keratan sulfate, and heparan sulfate, which lead to further diversity in CD44 function [5,6,7,8]. Therefore, the molecular weights of CD44s and CD44v are 75–95 kDa and 100~250 kDa, respectively [5]. These CD44 isoforms have both overlapping and unique functions. Both CD44s and CD44v (pan-CD44) possess hyaluronic acid (HA)-binding motifs that promote interaction with the microenvironment, which mediates cellular homing, migration, adhesion, and proliferation [9].
CD44v is overexpressed in tumors, and it plays critical roles in the promotion of tumor invasion, metastasis, cancer-initiating properties [10], and resistance to therapies [2,11]. CD44v has the ability to bind to heparin-binding growth factors, including fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) [7]. These growth factors bind to a heparan sulfate side chain attached to the SGSG sequence encoded by variant exon 3 [7,12]. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans play critical roles in cell proliferation and motility through presenting the growth factors to receptors. Therefore, the CD44 variant exon 3-containing isoform (CD44v3) can recruit heparin-binding growth factors to their receptor and promote growth-factor-receptor-mediated signal transduction [13,14,15]. Furthermore, the v6-encoded region forms a complex with hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor MET, which is essential for activation [16]. The v8–10-encoded region interacts with a cystine–glutamate transporter (xCT) subunit and mediates the oxidative stress resistance through the regulation of the intracellular redox state [17].
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) exhibit important properties, such as self-renewal, resistance to therapy, and the promotion of tumor metastasis [18,19,20]. Several cell surface and intracellular proteins have been reported as CSC markers in hematopoietic malignancy and solid tumors [21,22]. Among them, CD44 has been identified as a CSC marker in several solid tumors. In breast cancer, the CD44+CD24−/lowLineage− population was first shown to be 10- to 50-fold enriched with the ability to form tumors in immunodeficient mice relative to unfractionated tumor cells [23]. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the CD44-high CSCs from HNSCC exhibited elevated migration, invasiveness, and stemness [24,25] and could form metastatic foci in the lungs of immunodeficient mice. In contrast, the CD44-low populations failed to form the metastatic proliferation [26]. In the above studies, anti-pan-CD44 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used to isolate the CSCs from cultured cells and patient-derived tumor tissues. Furthermore, several CD44v-specific mAbs were reported to separate CSCs from colorectal cancer by using anti-CD44v6 [27] and anti-CD44v9 [28] mAbs. Therefore, specific mAbs against CD44s and CD44v are required for the isolation of CSCs and the analysis of their properties in detail.
By using the Cell-Based Immunization and Screening (CBIS) method, we established an anti-pan-CD44 mAb, namely, C44Mab-5 (IgG1, kappa) [29]. We further established another anti-pan-CD44 mAb, namely, C44Mab-46 (IgG1, kappa), via the immunization of CD44v3–10 ectodomain (CD44ec) [30]. Both C44Mab-5 and C44Mab-46 have been revealed to recognize the standard exon (1 to 5)-encoding sequences at the N-terminus [31,32,33]. Furthermore, both C44Mab-5 and C44Mab-46 are available for flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analyses in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) [29] and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas [30]. We further converted the mouse IgG1 subclass antibody (C44Mab-5) into an IgG2a subclass antibody (5-mG2a) and further produced a defucosylated version (5-mG2a-f) by using fucosyltransferase 8-deficient ExpiCHO-S (BINDS-09) cells. The 5-mG2a-f exhibited in vitro antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity against OSCC cell lines (HSC-2 and SAS). Furthermore, the 5-mG2a-f suppressed the growth of the HSC-2 and SAS xenograft [34].
Recently, we established an anti-CD44v5 mAb [35] and an anti-CD44v6 mAb [36] via the CBIS method, an anti-CD44v7/8 mAb [37] via the immunization of CD44ec, and an anti-CD44v4 mAb via peptide immunization [38]. In this study, we developed a novel anti-CD44v3 mAb, namely, C44Mab-6 (IgG1, kappa), via the CBIS method and evaluated its applications, such as flow cytometry, Western blot, and immunohistochemical analyses.
2. Results
2.1. Development of C44Mab-6 as an anti-CD44v3 mAb
The CBIS method involves the immunization of antigen-overexpressed cells and high-throughput hybridoma screening by using flow cytometry. We prepared CD44v3–10-overexpressed Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells (CHO/CD44v3–10), as an immunogen (Figure 1). The cells were immunized into mice, and hybridomas were plated into 96-well plates. We next performed flow-cytometry-based, high-throughput screening to select the supernatants, which were positive for CHO/CD44v3–10 cells and negative for CHO-K1 cells. After the limiting dilution, anti-CD44 mAb-producing clones were finally established. Among them, C44Mab-6 (IgG1, kappa) was shown to recognize CD44 p231–250 peptide (AGWEPNEENEDERDRHLSFS), which corresponds to variant-3-encoded sequence (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1). In contrast, C44Mab-6 never recognized other extracellular region peptides of CD44v3-10. These results indicated that C44Mab-6 specifically recognizes the CD44 variant 3-encoded sequence.
2.2. The Reactivity of C44Mab-6 to CD44-Expressing Cells in Flow Cytometry
The reactivity of C44Mab-6 to CHO/CD44v3–10, CHO/CD44s, and CHO-K1 cells was investigated by using flow cytometry. C44Mab-6 dose-dependently recognized CHO/CD44v3–10 cells (Figure 3A). In contrast, C44Mab-6 recognized neither CHO/CD44s (Figure 3B) nor CHO-K1 (Figure 3C) cells. C44Mab-46, which is an anti-pan-CD44 mAb [30], recognized both CHO/CD44v3–10 and CHO/CD44s cells (Supplementary Figure S1). We next examined the reactivity of C44Mab-6 to a colorectal cancer cell line (COLO205) and an OSCC cell line (HSC-3). COLO205 was selected in this study from various cancer cell lines because C44Mab-6 showed very high reactivity to it. Furthermore, HSC-3 was selected because HNSCC was shown to be the second highest CD44-expressing cancer type in the Pan-Cancer Atlas [39]. C44Mab-6 could recognize a colorectal cancer cell line COLO205 (Figure 3D) and an oral squamous cell line HSC-3 (Figure 3E) in a dose-dependent manner.
2.3. The Binding Affinity of C44Mab-6 to CD44-Expressing Cells
The binding affinity of C44Mab-6 to CHO/CD44v3–10, COLO205, and HSC-3 was determined by using flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 4, the KD of CHO/CD44v3–10 COLO205 and HSC-3 was determined as 1.5 × 10−9 M, 6.3 × 10−9 M, and 1.9 × 10−9 M, respectively. These results indicated that C44Mab-6 possesses a high affinity for CD44v3–10 and endogenous CD44v3-expressing cells.
2.4. Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis was preformed to investigate the specificity of C44Mab-6. As shown in Figure 5A, C44Mab-6 detected CD44v3–10 as showing more than 180-kDa bands. However, C44Mab-6 did not detect any bands from lysates of CHO-K1 and CHO/CD44s cells at more than 48-kDa. An anti-pan-CD44 mAb, namely, C44Mab-46, recognized the lysates from both CHO/CD44s (~75 kDa) and CHO/CD44v3–10 (>180 kDa) (Figure 5B). These results indicated that C44Mab-6 specifically detects exogenous CD44v3–10 but not CD44s.
2.5. Immunohistochemical Analysis by Using C44Mab-6 against Tumor Tissues
Immunohistochemical analysis against the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of OSCC was conducted to assess the availability of C44Mab-6. We used sequential sections of OSCC tissue microarray and compared the staining patterns of C44Mab-6 and C44Mab-46. Clear membranous staining was observed for C44Mab-6 and C44Mab-46 in a well-differentiated OSCC section (Figure 6A,B). Figure 6C,D showed an OSCC section with the stromal invaded phenotype. C44Mab-6 strongly stained stromal-invaded OSCC and could clearly distinguish tumor cells from the surrounding stroma cells (Figure 6C). In contrast, C44Mab-46 stained both invaded tumor and stromal cells (Figure 6D). In Figure 6E and F, C44Mab-6 partially stained tumor cells but not stromal cells (Figure 6E). In contrast, C44Mab-46 mainly stained stromal cells (Figure 6F). We summarized the data of immunohistochemical analysis of CD44 expression in tumor cells in Table 1; C44Mab-6 stained 44 out of 50 (88%) cases of OSCC. We also stained FFPE sections of colorectal cancer tissue microarray and found that C44Mab-6 stained 7 out of 40 (18%) cases (Supplementary Table S2). However, the C44Mab-6 reactivity was faint and partly localized compared to that of C44Mab-46 (Supplementary Figure S2). These results indicated that C44Mab-6 is useful for the immunohistochemical analysis of FFPE tumor sections.
Table 1.
No. | Age | Sex | Anatomic Site | Pathology Diagnosis | TNM | Grade | Type | C44Mab-6 | C44Mab-46 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 78 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | + |
2 | 40 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
3 | 75 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | + | + |
4 | 35 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
5 | 61 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
6 | 41 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | + | + |
7 | 64 | M | Tongue | SCC of right tongue | T2N2M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
8 | 76 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
9 | 50 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
10 | 44 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N1M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
11 | 53 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
12 | 46 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | + | + |
13 | 50 | M | Tongue | SCC of root of tongue | T3N1M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | + |
14 | 36 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
15 | 63 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | + |
16 | 46 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | - |
17 | 58 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | + | + |
18 | 64 | M | Lip | SCC of lower lip | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
19 | 57 | M | Lip | SCC of lower lip | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
20 | 61 | M | Lip | SCC of lower lip | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
21 | 60 | M | Gum | SCC of gum | T3N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | + | + |
22 | 60 | M | Gum | SCC of gum | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
23 | 69 | M | Gum | SCC of upper gum | T3N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
24 | 53 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T2N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | + | + |
25 | 55 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | + |
26 | 58 | M | Tongue | SCC of base of tongue | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
27 | 63 | M | Oral cavity | SCC | T1N0M0 | 1 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
28 | 48 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T1N0M0 | 1–2 | Malignant | ++ | + |
29 | 80 | M | Lip | SCC of lower lip | T1N0M0 | 1–2 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
30 | 77 | M | Tongue | SCC of base of tongue | T2N0M0 | 1–2 | Malignant | +++ | ++ |
31 | 59 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | + | - |
32 | 77 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T1N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
33 | 56 | M | Tongue | SCC of root of tongue | T2N1M0 | 2 | Malignant | + | + |
34 | 60 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N1M0 | 2 | Malignant | ++ | ++ |
35 | 62 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | +++ | ++ |
36 | 67 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | +++ | ++ |
37 | 47 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
38 | 37 | M | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N1M0 | 2 | Malignant | - | - |
39 | 55 | F | Tongue | SCC of tongue | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | ++ | + |
40 | 56 | F | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | +++ | + |
41 | 49 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T1N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | - | - |
42 | 45 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | - | - |
43 | 42 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T3N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | +++ | ++ |
44 | 44 | M | Jaw | SCC of right drop jaw | T1N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | ++ | +++ |
45 | 40 | F | Tongue | SCC of base of tongue | T2N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | - | ++ |
46 | 49 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T1N0M0 | 2 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
47 | 56 | F | Tongue | SCC of base of tongue | T2N0M0 | 3 | Malignant | - | + |
48 | 42 | M | Bucca cavioris | SCC of bucca cavioris | T3N0M0 | 3 | Malignant | +++ | +++ |
49 | 87 | F | Face | SCC of left face | T2N0M0 | 3 | Malignant | + | + |
50 | 50 | M | Gum | SCC of gum | T2N0M0 | 3 | Malignant | - | - |
-: No stain; +: Weak intensity; ++: Moderate intensity; +++: Strong intensity.
3. Discussion
In this study, we developed C44Mab-6 by using the CBIS method (Figure 1) and determined its epitope as a variant 3-encoded region of CD44 (Figure 2 and supplemental Table S1). Then, we showed the usefulness of C44Mab-6 for multiple applications, including flow cytometry (Figure 3 and Figure 4), Western blotting (Figure 5), and immunohistochemistry (Figure 6).
An anti-CD44v3 mAb (clone 3G5) was previously developed and widely used for various applications [40]. The 3G5 was developed by the immunization of COS1-produced CD44v3-10-Fc protein. The specificity to the exon was determined via indirect immunofluorescent staining of COS1 cells which expressed CD44v3–10, CD44v6–10, CD44v7–10, CD44v8–10, and CD44v10 [40]. Therefore, the 3G5 is thought to recognize the peptide or glycopeptide structure of CD44v3. However, the detailed binding epitope of 3G5 has not been determined. As shown in Supplementary Table S1, C44Mab-6 recognized CD44 p231–250 peptide (AGWEPNEENEDERDRHLSFS) but not CD44 p241–260 peptides (DERDRHLSFSGSGIDDDEDF). The underlined SGSG sequence is a heparan sulfate-modified sequence in the variant-3-encoded region [7,12]. Therefore, the recognition of C44Mab-6 is probably not affected by the heparan sulfate modification.
Head and neck cancers are derived mainly from the oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, and nasal cavity [41]. SCC is the common type. As shown in Figure 6, C44Mab-6 clearly stained the membrane of OSCC and recognized a human OSCC cell line, namely, HSC-3 (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The CD44v3-high and aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 (ALDH1)-high population of HSC-3 exhibited a potent tumorigenic potential in immunodeficient NOD/SCID mice [42]. The population showed increased stemness-related transcriptional factors, including OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG [42]. In a future study, we will investigate the application of C44Mab-6 to isolate cancer stem-like cells from cancer cell lines and/or OSCC tissues. We will further establish the strategy to deplete the cancer stem-like cells for tumor therapy. We have just started the cDNA cloning of C44Mab-6 heavy and light chains for therapeutic application. We have investigated the antitumor activity by using class-switched and defucosylated IgG2a mAbs [34,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. The defucosylated IgG2a mAbs can be produced by fucosyltransferases 8-deficient CHO-K1 cells, exhibited potent ADCC activity in vitro, and suppressed the xenograft growth [34,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Therefore, the production of defucosylated C44Mab-6 is one of the strategies to evaluate antitumor activity in vivo.
The HNSCC treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of these modalities [50]. Despite the progress of the therapies, drug resistance and metastasis are still the main causes of death [51]. In a preclinical study, a pan-CD44 mAb was applied to the novel modalities, including near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT). The CD44 mAb–photoactivatable dye IRDye700DX conjugate exhibited significant antitumor effects after the NIR-light exposure against CD44-expressing OSCC [52]. However, a pan-CD44 mAb, namely, C44Mab-46, recognized not only tumor cells but also stromal tissues (Figure 6D,F) and probably immune cells, which are important for antitumor immunity. Therefore, CD44v is a more rational tumor antigen for NIR-PIT, which could be a new modality for OSCC with locoregional recurrence.
Zen et al. established a unique mAb (clone C3H7), which recognized the basolateral membranes of epithelium and inhibited both the adhesion of epithelial cells to immobilized CD11b/CD18 and the transepithelial migration of leukocytes [53]. CD11b/CD18, also known as Macrophage-1 antigen, is a leukocyte integrin that is essential for firm adhesion to epithelial cells and the transepithelial migration of leukocytes [54]. However, the receptor of CD11b/CD18 on epithelial cells has not been identified. They revealed that the antigen of C3H7 is CD44v3, which specifically binds to CD11b/CD18 through its heparan sulfate moieties [53]. The C3H7 antigen was increased via treatment with pro-inflammatory cytokine, including interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α in epithelial monolayers [53], which supports the previous finding that CD44v3 is increased in inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis [55]. C44Mab-6 also recognized the basolateral surface of colorectal cancer cells (Supplementary Figure S2A). Further investigations are required for the relationship between CD44v3 expression and the transepithelial migration of leukocytes. The study could provide the basis for the development of novel therapeutic applications of anti-CD44v3 mAbs, including C44Mab-6.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies have been developed for a variety of hematopoietic malignances and solid tumors [56]. CAR-T cells have demonstrated remarkable success in treating CD19+ B cell leukemias [57]. However, CAR-T therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been elusive because of target restriction and phenotypic heterogeneity [58]. Mutations of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) genes were identified as common driver mutations associated with poor prognosis of AML patients [59]. Tang et al. showed that AML cells expressed high levels of CD44 mRNA, and the expression of AML-derived FLT3 and DNMT3A mutants promote the transcription of CD44 mRNA through suppression of CpG island methylation in the CD44 promoter [60]. They also found that AML patients with FLT3 or DNMT3A mutations had higher expression of CD44v6 compared to normal specimens. Furthermore, they showed that CD44v6 CAR-T cells exhibited potent anti-leukemic effects [60]. Therefore, CD44v6 is thought to be a rational antigen of CAR-T therapy for AML with FLT3 or DNMT3A mutations.
Since CD44 mRNA is upregulated in AML, there is a possibility that other CD44 variants are also transcribed and expressed in AML. In a humanized mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) progression from chronic phase to blast crisis, a CD44 variant (CD44v8–10) was elevated, which is required for the maintenance of stemness [61]. Although we have examined the reactivity of C44Mab-6 against cell lines derived from hematopoietic malignancy and found increased reactivity in several cell lines, further studies are required for the selective expression of CD44v3 in leukemia cells, but not in hematopoietic stem cells, to ensure its safety as a CAR-T antigen.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Lines
COLO205 (a human colorectal cancer cell line) was obtained from the Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer at Tohoku University (Sendai, Japan). HSC-3 (a human OSCC cell line) and LN229 (a human glioblastoma cell line) were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (Osaka, Japan). P3X63Ag8U.1 (P3U1: a mouse multiple myeloma) and CHO-K1 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). HSC-3 and LN229 were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan), supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B. CHO-K1, COLO205, and P3U1 were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics, as indicated above. All the cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
4.2. Construction of Expression Plasmids and Stable Transfectants
By using LN229 cDNA as a template, CD44s cDNA was amplified by using HotStar HiFidelity Polymerase Kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). We obtained CD44v3–10 cDNA from the RIKEN BRC through the National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan. The CD44s and CD44v3–10 cDNAs were cloned into pCAG-Ble-ssPA16 vector with signal sequence and N-terminal PA16 tag (GLEGGVAMPGAEDDVV) [29,62,63,64,65], which is detected by NZ-1, which was originally developed as an anti-human podoplanin mAb [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]. The pCAG-Ble/PA16-CD44s and pCAG-Ble/PA16-CD44v3–10 vectors were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by using a Neon transfection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and CHO/CD44s and CHO/CD44v3–10 were finally established, as described previously [36].
4.3. Production of Hybridomas
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tohoku University (Permit number: 2019NiA-001). The female BALB/c mice (CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) were intraperitoneally immunized with CHO/CD44v3–10 (1 × 108 cells) with Imject Alum (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) as an adjuvant. The three additional immunizations per week and a booster injection were performed two days before the harvest of the spleen cells. The hybridomas were produced via the fusion of splenocytes and P3U1 cells by using polyethylene glycol 1500 (PEG1500; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The supernatants, which were positive for CHO/CD44v3–10 cells and negative for CHO-K1 cells, were selected by using the SA3800 Cell Analyzers (Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
4.4. ELISA
We obtained fifty-eight peptides, which cover the extracellular domain of CD44v3–10 [31], from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA). We immobilized them on Nunc Maxisorp 96-well immunoplates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 1 µg/mL for 30 min at 37 °C. Immunoplate washing was performed by using HydroSpeed Microplate Washer (Tecan, Zürich, Switzerland) with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 (PBST; Nacalai Tesque, Inc.). After the blocking with 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBST for 30 min at 37 °C, C44Mab-6 (10 µg/mL) was added to each well. Then, the wells were further incubated with anti-mouse immunoglobulins–peroxidase conjugate (1:2000 diluted; Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C. One-Step Ultra TMB (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used for enzymatic reactions. An iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA) was used to measure the optical density at 655 nm.
4.5. Flow Cytometry
CHO-K1, CHO/CD44s, CHO/CD44v3–10, COLO205, and HSC-3 cells were obtained by using 0.25% trypsin and 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA; Nacalai Tesque, Inc.). The cells were treated with C44Mab-6, C44Mab-46, or blocking buffer (control) (0.1% BSA in PBS) for 30 min at 4 °C. Then, the cells (1 × 105 cells/sample) were treated with anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) for 30 min at 4 °C. The data were analyzed by using the SA3800 Cell Analyzer and SA3800 software ver. 2.05 (Sony Corp.).
4.6. Determination of Dissociation Constant (KD) via Flow Cytometry
In CHO/CD44v3–10 cells, we prepared from 130 to 0.008 nM (diluted by 1/2) of C44Mab-6. In COLO201 and HSC-3 cells, we prepared from 1300 to 0.08 nM (diluted by 1/2) of C44Mab-6. The serially diluted C44Mab-6 was suspended with 2 × 105 cells. Then, the cells were incubated with anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (1:200). BD FACSLyric and BD FACSuite software version 1.3 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were used for the fluorescence data analyses. The KD was determined by the fitting binding isotherms to built-in one-site binding models of GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
4.7. Western Blot Analysis
The 10 μg of cell lysates were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis by using polyacrylamide gels (5–20%; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan). The separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The blocking was performed by using 4% skim milk (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) in PBST. The membranes were incubated with 10 μg/mL of C44Mab-6, 10 μg/mL of C44Mab-46, or 1 μg/mL of an anti-β-actin mAb (clone AC-15; Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) and then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulins (diluted 1:1000; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Finally, the signals were enhanced by using a chemiluminescence reagent, ImmunoStar LD (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), and were detected by a Sayaca-Imager (DRC Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
4.8. Immunohistochemical Analysis
FFPE sections of OSCC tissue array (OR601c) and colorectal carcinoma tissue array (CO483a) were purchased from US Biomax Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA). The tissue arrays were autoclaved in EnVision FLEX Target Retrieval Solution High pH (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 20 min. After blocking with SuperBlock T20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), the sections were incubated with C44Mab-6 (1 μg/mL) and C44Mab-46 (1 μg/mL) for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were further incubated with the EnVision+ Kit for mouse (Agilent Technologies Inc.) for 30 min. Then, a chromogenic reaction using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; Agilent Technologies Inc.) was conducted. Hematoxylin (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) was used for the counterstaining. To examine the sections and obtain images, we used Leica DMD108 (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24098411/s1.
We listed the information of anti-CD44 mAbs in our original “Antibody Bank” (http://www.med-tohoku-antibody.com/topics/001_paper_antibody_PDIS.htm#CD44 (accessed on 5 May 2023)).
Author Contributions
H.S., K.K., N.G., K.I., T.O. and T.T. performed the experiments. M.K.K. and Y.K. designed the experiments. H.S. and Y.K. analyzed the data. H.S. and Y.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tohoku University (Permit number: 2019NiA-001) for studies involving animals.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in the article and supplementary material.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Funding Statement
This research was supported in part by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Numbers: JP22ama121008 (to Y.K.), JP22am0401013 (to Y.K.), JP22bm1004001 (to Y.K.), JP22ck0106730 (to Y.K.), and JP21am0101078 (to Y.K.), and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) grant nos. 21K20789 (to T.T.), 22K06995 (to H.S.), 21K07168 (to M.K.K.), and 22K07224 (to Y.K.).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Ponta H., Sherman L., Herrlich P.A. CD44: From adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat. Rev. Mol.Cell Biol. 2003;4:33–45. doi: 10.1038/nrm1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hassn Mesrati M., Syafruddin S.E., Mohtar M.A., Syahir A. CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator of Cancer Progression. Biomolecules. 2021;11:1850. doi: 10.3390/biom11121850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zöller M. CD44: Can a cancer-initiating cell profit from an abundantly expressed molecule? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:254–267. doi: 10.1038/nrc3023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yan Y., Zuo X., Wei D. Concise Review: Emerging Role of CD44 in Cancer Stem Cells: A Promising Biomarker and Therapeutic Target. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2015;4:1033–1043. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mereiter S., Martins Á.M., Gomes C., Balmaña M., Macedo J.A., Polom K., Roviello F., Magalhães A., Reis C.A. O-glycan truncation enhances cancer-related functions of CD44 in gastric cancer. FEBS Lett. 2019;593:1675–1689. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takahashi K., Stamenkovic I., Cutler M., Dasgupta A., Tanabe K.K. Keratan sulfate modification of CD44 modulates adhesion to hyaluronate. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:9490–9496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.16.9490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bennett K.L., Jackson D.G., Simon J.C., Tanczos E., Peach R., Modrell B., Stamenkovic I., Plowman G., Aruffo A. CD44 isoforms containing exon V3 are responsible for the presentation of heparin-binding growth factor. J. Cell Biol. 1995;128:687–698. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brown T.A., Bouchard T., St John T., Wayner E., Carter W.G. Human keratinocytes express a new CD44 core protein (CD44E) as a heparan-sulfate intrinsic membrane proteoglycan with additional exons. J. Cell Biol. 1991;113:207–221. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Slevin M., Krupinski J., Gaffney J., Matou S., West D., Delisser H., Savani R.C., Kumar S. Hyaluronan-mediated angiogenesis in vascular disease: Uncovering RHAMM and CD44 receptor signaling pathways. Matrix Biol. 2007;26:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.08.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guo Q., Yang C., Gao F. The state of CD44 activation in cancer progression and therapeutic targeting. FEBS J. 2021;289:7970–7986. doi: 10.1111/febs.16179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morath I., Hartmann T.N., Orian-Rousseau V. CD44: More than a mere stem cell marker. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016;81:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jackson D.G., Bell J.I., Dickinson R., Timans J., Shields J., Whittle N. Proteoglycan forms of the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 are alternatively spliced variants containing the v3 exon. J. Cell Biol. 1995;128:673–685. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.DiGabriele A.D., Lax I., Chen D.I., Svahn C.M., Jaye M., Schlessinger J., Hendrickson W.A. Structure of a heparin-linked biologically active dimer of fibroblast growth factor. Nature. 1998;393:812–817. doi: 10.1038/31741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Spivak-Kroizman T., Lemmon M.A., Dikic I., Ladbury J.E., Pinchasi D., Huang J., Jaye M., Crumley G., Schlessinger J., Lax I. Heparin-induced oligomerization of FGF molecules is responsible for FGF receptor dimerization, activation, and cell proliferation. Cell. 1994;79:1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yayon A., Klagsbrun M., Esko J.D., Leder P., Ornitz D.M. Cell surface, heparin-like molecules are required for binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to its high affinity receptor. Cell. 1991;64:841–848. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90512-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Orian-Rousseau V., Chen L., Sleeman J.P., Herrlich P., Ponta H. CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling. Genes Dev. 2002;16:3074–3086. doi: 10.1101/gad.242602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ishimoto T., Nagano O., Yae T., Tamada M., Motohara T., Oshima H., Oshima M., Ikeda T., Asaba R., Yagi H., et al. CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc(-) and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maitland N.J., Collins A.T. Cancer stem cells—A therapeutic target? Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2010;12:662–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prince M.E., Ailles L.E. Cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:2871–2875. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ailles L.E., Weissman I.L. Cancer stem cells in solid tumors. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007;18:460–466. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu S.S., Cirillo N. The molecular markers of cancer stem cells in head and neck tumors. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020;235:65–73. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tahmasebi E., Alikhani M., Yazdanian A., Yazdanian M., Tebyanian H., Seifalian A. The current markers of cancer stem cell in oral cancers. Life Sci. 2020;249:117483. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Al-Hajj M., Wicha M.S., Benito-Hernandez A., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:3983–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee Y., Shin J.H., Longmire M., Wang H., Kohrt H.E., Chang H.Y., Sunwoo J.B. CD44+ Cells in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Suppress T-Cell-Mediated Immunity by Selective Constitutive and Inducible Expression of PD-L1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:3571–3581. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prince M.E., Sivanandan R., Kaczorowski A., Wolf G.T., Kaplan M.J., Dalerba P., Weissman I.L., Clarke M.F., Ailles L.E. Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:973–978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610117104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Davis S.J., Divi V., Owen J.H., Bradford C.R., Carey T.E., Papagerakis S., Prince M.E. Metastatic potential of cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:1260–1266. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Todaro M., Gaggianesi M., Catalano V., Benfante A., Iovino F., Biffoni M., Apuzzo T., Sperduti I., Volpe S., Cocorullo G., et al. CD44v6 is a marker of constitutive and reprogrammed cancer stem cells driving colon cancer metastasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:342–356. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kimura Y., Goi T., Nakazawa T., Hirono Y., Katayama K., Urano T., Yamaguchi A. CD44variant exon 9 plays an important role in colon cancer initiating cells. Oncotarget. 2013;4:785–791. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yamada S., Itai S., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Detection of high CD44 expression in oral cancers using the novel monoclonal antibody, C(44)Mab-5. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2018;14:64–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2018.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goto N., Suzuki H., Tanaka T., Asano T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Monoclonal Antibody for Multiple Applications against Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5535. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Takei J., Asano T., Suzuki H., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Epitope Mapping of the Anti-CD44 Monoclonal Antibody (C44Mab-46) Using Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis and Surface Plasmon Resonance. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021;40:219–226. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Asano T., Kaneko M.K., Takei J., Tateyama N., Kato Y. Epitope Mapping of the Anti-CD44 Monoclonal Antibody (C44Mab-46) Using the REMAP Method. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021;40:156–161. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Asano T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Development of a Novel Epitope Mapping System: RIEDL Insertion for Epitope Mapping Method. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021;40:162–167. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takei J., Kaneko M.K., Ohishi T., Hosono H., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Sano M., Asano T., Sayama Y., Kawada M., et al. A defucosylated antiCD44 monoclonal antibody 5mG2af exerts antitumor effects in mouse xenograft models of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2020;44:1949–1960. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kudo Y., Suzuki H., Tanaka T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 variant 5 Monoclonal An-tibody C44Mab-3 for Multiple Applications against Pancreatic Carcinomas. Antibodies. 2023;12:31. doi: 10.3390/antib12020031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ejima R., Suzuki H., Tanaka T., Asano T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 6 Monoclonal Antibody C(44)Mab-9 for Multiple Applications against Colorectal Carcinomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:4007. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Suzuki H., Ozawa K., Tanaka T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 7/8 Monoclonal Antibody, C44Mab-34, for Multiple Applications against Oral Carcinomas. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1099. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Suzuki H., Tanaka T., Goto N., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Development of a Novel Anti-CD44 Variant 4 Monoclonal Antibody C44Mab-108 for Immunohistochemistry. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023;45:1875–1888. doi: 10.3390/cimb45030121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ludwig N., Szczepanski M.J., Gluszko A., Szafarowski T., Azambuja J.H., Dolg L., Gellrich N.C., Kampmann A., Whiteside T.L., Zimmerer R.M. CD44(+) tumor cells promote early angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2019;467:85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fox S.B., Fawcett J., Jackson D.G., Collins I., Gatter K.C., Harris A.L., Gearing A., Simmons D.L. Normal human tissues, in addition to some tumors, express multiple different CD44 isoforms. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4539–4546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mody M.D., Rocco J.W., Yom S.S., Haddad R.I., Saba N.F. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2021;398:2289–2299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01550-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bourguignon L.Y., Wong G., Earle C., Chen L. Hyaluronan-CD44v3 interaction with Oct4-Sox2-Nanog promotes miR-302 expression leading to self-renewal, clonal formation, and cisplatin resistance in cancer stem cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:32800–32824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.308528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li G., Suzuki H., Ohishi T., Asano T., Tanaka T., Yanaka M., Nakamura T., Yoshikawa T., Kawada M., Kaneko M.K., et al. Antitumor activities of a defucosylated anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in colorectal carcinoma xenograft models. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2023;51:1–14. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2023.5221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nanamiya R., Takei J., Ohishi T., Asano T., Tanaka T., Sano M., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Handa S., Tateyama N., et al. Defucosylated Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody (134-mG2a-f) Exerts Antitumor Activities in Mouse Xenograft Models of Canine Osteosarcoma. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2022;41:1–7. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kawabata H., Suzuki H., Ohishi T., Kawada M., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. A Defucosylated Mouse Anti-CD10 Monoclonal Antibody (31-mG2a-f) Exerts Antitumor Activity in a Mouse Xenograft Model of CD10-Overexpressed Tumors. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2022;41:59–66. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kawabata H., Ohishi T., Suzuki H., Asano T., Kawada M., Suzuki H., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. A Defucosylated Mouse Anti-CD10 Monoclonal Antibody (31-mG2a-f) Exerts Antitumor Activity in a Mouse Xenograft Model of Renal Cell Cancers. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2022;41:320–327. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Asano T., Tanaka T., Suzuki H., Li G., Ohishi T., Kawada M., Yoshikawa T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. A Defucosylated Anti-EpCAM Monoclonal Antibody (EpMab-37-mG2a-f) Exerts Antitumor Activity in Xenograft Model. Antibodies. 2022;11:74. doi: 10.3390/antib11040074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tateyama N., Nanamiya R., Ohishi T., Takei J., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Hosono H., Saito M., Asano T., Tanaka T., et al. Defucosylated Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody 134-mG2a-f Exerts Antitumor Activities in Mouse Xenograft Models of Dog Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Overexpressed Cells. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021;40:177–183. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Takei J., Ohishi T., Kaneko M.K., Harada H., Kawada M., Kato Y. A defucosylated anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody 13-mG2a-f exerts antitumor effects in mouse xenograft models of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2020;24:100801. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xing D.T., Khor R., Gan H., Wada M., Ermongkonchai T., Ng S.P. Recent Research on Combination of Radiotherapy with Targeted Therapy or Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review for Radiation Oncologists. Cancers. 2021;13:5716. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Muzaffar J., Bari S., Kirtane K., Chung C.H. Recent Advances and Future Directions in Clinical Management of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers. 2021;13:338. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nagaya T., Nakamura Y., Okuyama S., Ogata F., Maruoka Y., Choyke P.L., Allen C., Kobayashi H. Syngeneic Mouse Models of Oral Cancer Are Effectively Targeted by Anti-CD44-Based NIR-PIT. Mol. Cancer Res. 2017;15:1667–1677. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zen K., Liu D.Q., Li L.M., Chen C.X., Guo Y.L., Ha B., Chen X., Zhang C.Y., Liu Y. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan form of epithelial CD44v3 serves as a CD11b/CD18 counter-receptor during polymorphonuclear leukocyte transepithelial migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:3768–3776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807805200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Colgan S.P., Comerford K.M., Lawrence D.W. Epithelial cell-neutrophil interactions in the alimentary tract: A complex dialog in mucosal surveillance and inflammation. ScientificWorldJournal. 2002;2:76–88. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2002.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rosenberg W.M., Prince C., Kaklamanis L., Fox S.B., Jackson D.G., Simmons D.L., Chapman R.W., Trowell J.M., Jewell D.P., Bell J.I. Increased expression of CD44v6 and CD44v3 in ulcerative colitis but not colonic Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 1995;345:1205–1209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91991-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Oliveira G., Wu C.J. Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2023;23:295–316. doi: 10.1038/s41568-023-00560-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Haslauer T., Greil R., Zaborsky N., Geisberger R. CAR T-Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:8996. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Döhner H., Estey E., Grimwade D., Amadori S., Appelbaum F.R., Büchner T., Dombret H., Ebert B.L., Fenaux P., Larson R.A., et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129:424–447. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Patel J.P., Gönen M., Figueroa M.E., Fernandez H., Sun Z., Racevskis J., Van Vlierberghe P., Dolgalev I., Thomas S., Aminova O., et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1079–1089. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tang L., Huang H., Tang Y., Li Q., Wang J., Li D., Zhong Z., Zou P., You Y., Cao Y., et al. CD44v6 chimeric antigen receptor T cell specificity towards AML with FLT3 or DNMT3A mutations. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022;12:e1043. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Holm F., Hellqvist E., Mason C.N., Ali S.A., Delos-Santos N., Barrett C.L., Chun H.J., Minden M.D., Moore R.A., Marra M.A., et al. Reversion to an embryonic alternative splicing program enhances leukemia stem cell self-renewal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:15444–15449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506943112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kato Y., Yamada S., Furusawa Y., Itai S., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Sano M., Harada H., Fukui M., Kaneko M.K. PMab-213: A Monoclonal Antibody for Immunohistochemical Analysis Against Pig Podoplanin. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2019;38:18–24. doi: 10.1089/mab.2018.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Furusawa Y., Yamada S., Itai S., Sano M., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Fukui M., Harada H., Mizuno T., Sakai Y., et al. PMab-210: A Monoclonal Antibody Against Pig Podoplanin. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2019;38:30–36. doi: 10.1089/mab.2018.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Furusawa Y., Yamada S., Itai S., Nakamura T., Yanaka M., Sano M., Harada H., Fukui M., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. PMab-219: A monoclonal antibody for the immunohistochemical analysis of horse podoplanin. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019;18:100616. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Furusawa Y., Yamada S., Itai S., Nakamura T., Takei J., Sano M., Harada H., Fukui M., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y. Establishment of a monoclonal antibody PMab-233 for immunohistochemical analysis against Tasmanian devil podoplanin. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019;18:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kato Y., Kaneko M.K., Kuno A., Uchiyama N., Amano K., Chiba Y., Hasegawa Y., Hirabayashi J., Narimatsu H., Mishima K., et al. Inhibition of tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation using a novel anti-podoplanin antibody reacting with its platelet-aggregation-stimulating domain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;349:1301–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chalise L., Kato A., Ohno M., Maeda S., Yamamichi A., Kuramitsu S., Shiina S., Takahashi H., Ozone S., Yamaguchi J., et al. Efficacy of cancer-specific anti-podoplanin CAR-T cells and oncolytic herpes virus G47Delta combination therapy against glioblastoma. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics. 2022;26:265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2022.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ishikawa A., Waseda M., Ishii T., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y., Kaneko S. Improved anti-solid tumor response by humanized anti-podoplanin chimeric antigen receptor transduced human cytotoxic T cells in an animal model. Genes Cells. 2022;27:549–558. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tamura-Sakaguchi R., Aruga R., Hirose M., Ekimoto T., Miyake T., Hizukuri Y., Oi R., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y., Akiyama Y., et al. Moving toward generalizable NZ-1 labeling for 3D structure determination with optimized epitope-tag insertion. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2021;77:645–662. doi: 10.1107/S2059798321002527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kaneko M.K., Ohishi T., Nakamura T., Inoue H., Takei J., Sano M., Asano T., Sayama Y., Hosono H., Suzuki H., et al. Development of Core-Fucose-Deficient Humanized and Chimeric Anti-Human Podoplanin Antibodies. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2020;39:167–174. doi: 10.1089/mab.2020.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Fujii Y., Matsunaga Y., Arimori T., Kitago Y., Ogasawara S., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y., Takagi J. Tailored placement of a turn-forming PA tag into the structured domain of a protein to probe its conformational state. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:1512–1522. doi: 10.1242/jcs.176685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Abe S., Kaneko M.K., Tsuchihashi Y., Izumi T., Ogasawara S., Okada N., Sato C., Tobiume M., Otsuka K., Miyamoto L., et al. Antitumor effect of novel anti-podoplanin antibody NZ-12 against malignant pleural mesothelioma in an orthotopic xenograft model. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1198–1205. doi: 10.1111/cas.12985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kaneko M.K., Abe S., Ogasawara S., Fujii Y., Yamada S., Murata T., Uchida H., Tahara H., Nishioka Y., Kato Y. Chimeric Anti-Human Podoplanin Antibody NZ-12 of Lambda Light Chain Exerts Higher Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity and Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Compared with NZ-8 of Kappa Light Chain. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2017;36:25–29. doi: 10.1089/mab.2016.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ito A., Ohta M., Kato Y., Inada S., Kato T., Nakata S., Yatabe Y., Goto M., Kaneda N., Kurita K., et al. A Real-Time Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Method for the Detection of Oral Cancers in Mice Using an Indocyanine Green-Labeled Podoplanin Antibody. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018;17:1533033818767936. doi: 10.1177/1533033818767936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tamura R., Oi R., Akashi S., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y., Nogi T. Application of the NZ-1 Fab as a crystallization chaperone for PA tag-inserted target proteins. Protein Sci. 2019;28:823–836. doi: 10.1002/pro.3580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Shiina S., Ohno M., Ohka F., Kuramitsu S., Yamamichi A., Kato A., Motomura K., Tanahashi K., Yamamoto T., Watanabe R., et al. CAR T Cells Targeting Podoplanin Reduce Orthotopic Glioblastomas in Mouse Brains. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2016;4:259–268. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kuwata T., Yoneda K., Mori M., Kanayama M., Kuroda K., Kaneko M.K., Kato Y., Tanaka F. Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) with the "Universal" CTC-Chip and An Anti-Podoplanin Antibody NZ-1.2. Cells. 2020;9:888. doi: 10.3390/cells9040888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nishinaga Y., Sato K., Yasui H., Taki S., Takahashi K., Shimizu M., Endo R., Koike C., Kuramoto N., Nakamura S., et al. Targeted Phototherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy Targeting Podoplanin. Cells. 2020;9:1019. doi: 10.3390/cells9041019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fujii Y., Kaneko M., Neyazaki M., Nogi T., Kato Y., Takagi J. PA tag: A versatile protein tagging system using a super high affinity antibody against a dodecapeptide derived from human podoplanin. Protein Expr. Purif. 2014;95:240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kato Y., Kaneko M.K., Kunita A., Ito H., Kameyama A., Ogasawara S., Matsuura N., Hasegawa Y., Suzuki-Inoue K., Inoue O., et al. Molecular analysis of the pathophysiological binding of the platelet aggregation-inducing factor podoplanin to the C-type lectin-like receptor CLEC-2. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:54–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00634.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kato Y., Vaidyanathan G., Kaneko M.K., Mishima K., Srivastava N., Chandramohan V., Pegram C., Keir S.T., Kuan C.T., Bigner D.D., et al. Evaluation of anti-podoplanin rat monoclonal antibody NZ-1 for targeting malignant gliomas. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2010;37:785–794. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in the article and supplementary material.