Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Nov 15;19(5):1963–1973. doi: 10.1002/alz.12844

Pulse pressure trajectories predict brain microstructure in community-dwelling older adults: Associations with executive function and modification by APOE

Humberto Parada Jr 1,2,3,*, Jaclyn Bergstrom 4, Katherine J Bangen 5,6, Emilie T Reas 7
PMCID: PMC10182213  NIHMSID: NIHMS1843357  PMID: 36377803

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Effects of chronic arterial stiffness on brain aging remain unclear. We therefore examined whether long-term trajectories of pulse pressure (PP) predicted brain microstructure, microstructure mediated PP-executive function associations, and APOE genotype modified PP-microstructure associations.

METHODS:

We examined associations of PP trajectories with brain microstructure measured using restriction spectrum imaging in 146 community-dwelling older adults, whether microstructure mediated PP trajectory-executive function associations, and whether PP-RSI correlations were modified by APOE-ε4 status.

RESULTS:

Participants with trajectories of high PP had lower restricted isotropic diffusion (RI) compared to those with low PP trajectories and PP-executive function associations were mediated by subcortical and white matter RI. High PP more strongly correlated with lower RI and higher hindered diffusion among APOE-ε4 carriers than non-carriers.

DISCUSSION:

Prolonged elevated PP predicts microstructural abnormalities which may contribute to impaired executive function. APOE-ε4 carriers may be most vulnerable to the adverse effects of PP on brain microstructure.

Keywords: blood pressure, pulse pressure, diffusion MRI, aging, cognitive function

INTRODUCTION

A long preclinical period precedes the onset of cognitive decline and dementia, with mounting evidence that midlife is a critical window for minimizing the impact of vascular risk factors on cognitive decline [1]. The age-related arterial stiffening that begins around midlife is hypothesized to play a central role in brain aging [2], as increased pulsatility of the brain’s microvasculature [3] can disrupt cerebrovascular function and induce microbleeds [4] and ischemia [5], which may result in cumulative pathology that impairs cognitive and brain function. Prospective epidemiologic studies have reported that midlife pulse pressure (PP) or pulse wave velocity, proxy measures of arterial stiffness, predict cognitive decline [610] and dementia risk [1014], however, effects of prolonged arterial stiffness prior to cognitive symptom onset remain unclear. Associations of PP with brain and cognitive outcomes are particularly pronounced among individuals carrying the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele, the strongest genetic risk factor for sporadic AD [15]; higher PP better predicts brain atrophy and cognitive decline [1618], and more strongly correlates with amyloid burden [19], for APOE ε4 carriers that non carriers. Characterizing effects of chronic arterial stiffness on neurobiological aging, and identifying those most vulnerable to its adverse consequences, could prove pivotal for personalized therapeutic approaches to preserve brain health.

The cognitive domains that appear to be affected by arterial stiffness include attention [20], memory [6,20], language [21], and executive function [20]. Consistent with this literature, in the Rancho Bernardo Study (RBS) a 10 mmHg increase in PP was associated with a 9% increase in the odds of low performance on the Halstead-Reitan Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B), a test of visuomotor tracking and executive function [22], among participants younger than 80 years [23]. Despite accumulating evidence for a potentially causal role for PP in the pathology of cognitive decline, the neurobiological mechanisms appear complex and warrant further examination using methods optimized to detect subtle cytoarchitectural brain abnormalities.

Multicompartment diffusion models such as restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) [24], which characterizes cellular microstructure by quantifying the magnitude and direction of water diffusion among distinct tissue compartments, are well suited to detect early neural injury. We previously reported that RSI is highly sensitive to subtle cytoarchitectural changes associated with cognitive function in normal aging [25] and prodromal AD [26]. Among a sample of cognitively-normal adults of the RBS, PP at the time of MRI correlated with lower restricted isotropic diffusion, a measure of intracellular integrity, in global white matter and subcortical regions [25].

Herein, we extend our previous cross-sectional work by considering repeated assessments of blood pressure to evaluate lifespan PP trajectories relative to microstructural brain integrity among a sample of community-dwelling older adult RBS participants free of dementia. This study had three primary aims: First, we characterized PP trajectories from midlife to older age to examine whether lifespan PP trajectories predict brain microstructure. Second, we evaluated the clinical relevance of observed microstructural abnormalities by assessing if they mediated cognitive function. Third, we examined whether APOE genotype modified PP-microstructure correlations to determine whether effects of PP on brain microstructure differed according to AD genetic risk.

METHODS

Study Population

Participants were from the RBS, a community-based cohort of older adults established in 1972–1974 to identify cardiovascular, metabolic, and cognitive aging risk factors, with follow-up visits approximately every four years since enrollment through 2016 [27]. Of the 221 RBS participants alive and eligible to participate in this study, we included 154 men and women who underwent an MRI assessment in 2014–2016 and met inclusion criteria including no safety contraindication for MRI and no history of stroke, neurological disease, head injury, or treatment for an alcohol use disorder. We excluded six participants due to poor MRI data quality, one participant who had severe white matter disease, and one participant who had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <24 (derived from the Modified Mini-mental State-Exam, 3MS, as described below) resulting in an analytic sample of 146 participants.

Study procedures were approved by the UC San Diego Institutional Review Board and all participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

Imaging Data Acquisition and Processing

Details of the MRI data acquisition and processing have been previously described [28]. All MRI procedures occurred at the University of California, San Diego Center for Functional MRI. MRI assessment was done using 3.0 Tesla Discovery 750 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an eight-channel phased array head coil. The MRI sequence included a three-plane localizer; a sagittal 3D fast spoiled gradient echo T1-weighted volume optimized for maximum gray/white matter contrast (TE=3.2ms, TR=8.1ms, inversion time=600ms, flip angle=8°, FOV=24cm, frequency=256, phase=192, voxel size=1×1×1.2 mm, scan time 8:27); and an axial 2D single-shot pulsed-field gradient spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence (45-directions, b-values=0, 500, 1500, 4000 s/mm2 and 15 gradient directions for each non-zero b-value; TE=80.6ms, TR=8s, frequency=96, phase=96, FOV=24cm, slice thickness=2.5mm, scan time 6:34).

The MRI data were processed using FreeSurfer (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) with in-house Matlab scripts, as previously described [29]. Gray and white matter and cerebrospinal fluid boundaries were delineated on high-resolution T1-weighted structural images and subcortical regions were segmented based on a probabilistic atlas [30]. RSI data were registered to the T1 volume using mutual information after coarse pre-alignment to atlas brains. Using probabilistic atlas-based tract segmentation (AtlasTrack [31]), individual white matter fiber path streamlines were traced and labeled by comparing DTI-derived diffusion orientations to atlas fiber orientations.

Computed RSI metrics included restricted isotropic diffusion (RI), neurite density (ND), hindered isotropic diffusion (HI), and isotropic free water (IF). RI reflects small spherical spaces such as cell bodies or synapses. ND measures oriented restricted diffusion while accounting for crossing fibers, and reflects the intracellular compartment attributable to dendrites and axons. HI reflects the extraneurite fraction or large cell bodies. IF predominantly reflects cerebrospinal fluid. All RSI metrics were computed in five subcortical regions including the hippocampus, caudate, putamen, thalamus, and amygdala. Because fiber architecture is poorly characterized by the hindered fraction, HI was not examined in white matter tracts. All other RSI metrics were computed in 15 white matter fiber tracts. Cortical gray matter was not examined, given our previously reported associations between PP and subcortical and white matter, but not gray matter, microstructure [25]. To assess potential contributions of atrophy to microstructural measures, volume in subcortical regions and across all white matter were computed and adjusted for total intracranial volume.

Cognitive Assessment

Cognitive function was assessed at time of MRI using a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests including the 3MS and Trails B. The MMSE is a measure of global cognitive function and a brief, objective screening measure of dementia with a maximum score of 30 points [32] and the 3MS is an expanded version of the MMSE designed to permit derivation of the MMSE score [33]. As MMSE scores below 24 indicate moderate cognitive impairment [34], this cutoff was used to exclude individuals with suspected dementia. Trails B [22] assesses executive function and consists of 24 circles on a piece of paper with half the circles containing the numbers 1–12 and the other half containing the letters A-L. Participants are asked to draw lines connecting the circles in ascending order, alternating between connecting numbers and letters. Trails B performance is evaluated by the time required to complete the test, with a maximum completion time of 300s. Thus, higher scores indicate poorer performance.

Pulse Pressure Assessment

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at a maximum of eight clinic visits from 1984–2016, over a mean follow-up period of 23.6 (minimum=4.9, maximum=31.5) years, by a nurse certified in the Hypertension Detection Follow-up Protocol [35]. At each clinic visit, two blood pressure readings were taken at least 30 seconds apart using a regularly calibrated standard mercury sphygmomanometer after having participants sit quietly for five minutes. The two SBP and two DBP measurements were averaged and PP at each clinic visit was calculated as the difference between SBP and DBP (i.e., SBP–DBP). Use of anti-hypertension medications (yes or no) including calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, vasopressors, or diuretics, was validated at each clinic visit by a nurse who examined containers and prescriptions brought to the clinic.

Covariate Assessment

Potential confounders of associations between PP and brain microstructure or cognitive function were obtained by self-report and included age (years), sex (male or female), education (years), alcohol consumption (non-drinker or drinker in the past year) and frequency (1 or more times per week or less than 1 time per week), smoking status (never or former/current smoker), exercise ≥3 times per week (no or yes), body mass index calculated from height and weight (kg/m2), history of cardiovascular disease including angina, heart attack, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, or transient ischemic attack (no or yes), and history of diabetes (no or yes). Genotyping of the apolipoprotein E locus (APOE) was done using the Illumina Global Screening Array (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) on genomic DNA extracted from whole blood samples. Participants were dichotomized as APOE ε4 carriers (ε3/ε4 or ε4/ε4; there were no ε2/ε4) or ε4 non-carriers (ε2/ε3 or ε3/ε3).

Statistical Analysis

We employed latent class growth modeling [36] to identify groups of participants with distinct long-term PP trajectories based on a PP measurements made from 1984 to 2016. PP was modeled as a function of age using a censored normal model with linear, quadratic, or cubic terms and with adjustment for time-varying use of anti-hypertension medications. We determined the best-fitting solution by comparing the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) values for two- and three-group models; a lower BIC indicates a better fitting model. After participants were assigned to their PP trajectory group, we examined differences in demographic characteristics by PP trajectory group using χ2 tests for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables.

To determine whether PP trajectory predicted brain microstructure, we used multiple linear regression to examine associations between PP trajectory group and each RSI metric per one-standard deviation increase. Base models were adjusted for age and sex. To determine if associations were attributable to atrophy, sensitivity analyses further adjusted for volume in the respective subcortical region or across global white matter for fiber tracts (all volume measures adjusted for intracranial volume). We also examined statistical interactions between PP trajectory and APOE status in base models. Fully-adjusted models additionally included covariates that were a priori selected as potential confounders of the associations between PP trajectories and brain microstructure.

To further probe modifying effects of APOE genotype on associations between PP and microstructure, we computed partial correlations (r), adjusted for age and sex, between continuous PP at the time MRI metrics were collected, stratified by APOE status. Partial correlations between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers were compared using Fisher r-to-Z transformations.

We used linear regression to examine the association between PP trajectory and Trails B performance. To examine the mediating role of RSI metrics on the association between PP trajectory and Trails B performance, we used the MacKinnon approach [37]: using linear regression, we estimated associations between PP trajectory and each RSI metric (a-pathway); associations between each RSI metric and Trails B performance, adjusting for PP trajectory group (b-pathway); and the product of the two (a*b pathway), which reflects the indirect effect of PP trajectory group on Trails B performance via RSI. Mediation exists if βab is larger or smaller than 0 and if 95% bias-corrected bootstrap (boot=10,000) confidence limits, estimated using the SAS PROCESS macro [38], excludes 0.

Analyses were conducted using SAS Version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Because of the multiple brain regions examined, a threshold of P<0.01 was set to determine statistical significance for associations between PP and microstructure. After selecting regions demonstrating a statistically significant association, significance for mediation analyses and for comparing correlation strengths by APOE status was set to P<0.05.

RESULTS

Participant characteristics

Characteristics for the 146 study participants are reported in Table 1. Mean age at time of MRI was 76.6 (SD=6.8) years. The majority of participants were female (61.6%), never smoked (58.9%), consumed alcohol (85.5%), and had no history of cardiovascular disease (87.7%), and 23.2% were APOE ε4 carriers. Compared to the overall RBS sample of participants who were alive and eligible for study participation, those included in the analytic sample were similar in most characteristics, but were more likely to be female (61.6% vs. 55.7%) and were less likely to have a history of cardiovascular disease (12.3% vs. 20.4%).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Rancho Bernardo Study participants in 2014-2016 (n=221) and the analytic sample included in this study (n=146) overall and by pulse pressure trajectory group.

Latent Class Assignment of Pulse Pressure (PP) Trajectory
Overall
Low PP (n=96)
High PP (n=50)
Characteristic n (%) n (%) n (%) P a

Age (years), mean (SD) 76.6 (7.8) 75.9 (8.2) 78.0 (7.1) 0.14
Sex
 Female 90 (61.6) 57 (59.4) 33 (66.0)
 Male 56 (38.4) 39 (49.6) 17 (34.0) 0.44
Education (years), mean (SD) 14.9 (2.1) 15.0 (2.2) 14.7 (1.9) 0.48
Alcohol consumption in the past year
 Non-drinker 21 (14.5) 12 (12.6) 9 (18.0)
 Drinker 124 (85.5) 83 (87.4) 41 (82.0) 0.38
 1 or more times per week 93 (75.0) 60 (72.3) 33 (80.5)
 Less than 1 time per week 31 (25.0) 23 (27.7) 8 (19.5)
 Missing 1 1 0
Smoking status
 Never smoker 85 (58.6) 56 (59.0) 29 (58.0)
 Former or current smoker 60 (41.4) 39 (41.0) 21 (42.0) 0.91
 Missing 1 1 0
Exercise, ≥3 times per week
 No 35 (24.1) 22 (23.2) 13 (26.0)
 Yes 110 (75.9) 73 (76.8) 37 (74.0) 0.70
 Missing 1 1 0
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD) 26.0 (4.0) 25.6 (3.9) 26.5 (4.1) 0.22
 Missing 4 4 0
History of cardiovascular disease
 No 128 (87.7) 86 (88.6) 42 (84.0)
 Yes 18 (12.3) 10 (10.4) 8 (16.0) 0.33
History of diabetes
 No 131 (89.7) 85 (88.5) 46 (92.0)
 Yes 15 (10.3) 11 (11.5) 4 (8.0) 0.51
APOE ε4
 ε4 non-carriers 106 (76.8) 68 (76.4) 38 (77.6)
 ε4 carriers 32 (23.2) 21 (23.6) 11 (22.4) 0.88
 Missing 8 7 1
MMSE, mean (SD) 28.9 (1.3) 28.9 (1.3) 28.9 (1.3) 0.98
Trails B (seconds), mean (SD) 87.2 (41.1) 88.4 (46.1) 84.6 (28.8) 0.60
a

P-values from independent samples t-tests for continuous covariates or χ2 tests for categorical covariates.

The majority of participants (92%) had four or more PP measurements. Latent class modeling determined that a two-group model provided an optimal fit, resulting in two PP trajectory groups. Although PP increased with age at similar rates for both groups, participants separated according to consistently lower or higher PP than expected for age. For the predicted low PP trajectory group (n=96), PP increased from 34.42 mmHg at age 51 years to 50.4 mmHg at age 77 years and for the predicted high PP trajectory group (n=50), PP increased from 44.0 mmHg at age 51 years to 67.2 mmHg at age 77 years (Figure 1). Participants in the PP trajectory groups did not differ on any demographic or health variable examined, nor on MMSE or Trails B scores (P≥0.14; Table 1).

Figure 1. Predicted pulse pressure (PP) trajectories (Low PP or High PP).

Figure 1.

PP trajectories were classified using latent class growth modeling based on a maximum of eight pulse pressure measurements made from 1984 to 2016 among the 146 Rancho Bernardo Study participants.

Associations between pulse pressure trajectory and brain microstructure

In base models, RI was lower in the hippocampus (β=−0.42, 95%CI=−0.74, −0.11), amygdala (β=−0.43, 95%CI=−0.75, −0.11), thalamus (β=−0.50, 95%CI=−0.84, −0.17), parahippocampal cingulum (PHC; β=−0.47, 95%CI=−0.77, −0.16), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF; β=−0.42, 95%CI=−0.72, −0.11), and inferior fronto-occipital (IFO) fasciculus (β=−0.38, 95%CI=−0.67, −0.09), for those with high PP compared to low PP trajectories (P<0.01, Figure 2 and Table 2). Results were essentially unchanged after full adjustment (Supplemental eTable 1) or after adjustment for volume of the respective subcortical region or global white matter (Supplemental eTable 2).

Figure 2. Differences in RSI metrics by pulse pressure (PP) trajectory group.

Figure 2.

Beta estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown for the difference in standardized RSI metrics [restricted isotropic (blue), neurite density (red), isotropic free water (black), and hindered isotropic (purple)] between High PP (n=50) versus Low PP (n=96) trajectory groups from multiple linear regression models adjusted for age (continuous, years) and sex (male or female). Abbreviations: ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; IFO, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; PHC, parahippocampal cingulum; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; SIFC, striatal inferior frontal cortex; SCS, superior corticostriate; IFSFC, inferior-frontal superior-frontal cortex. *P<0.01

Table 2.

Beta (β) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from age- and sex-adjusted multiple linear regression models for associations between latent class assignment of pulse pressure (PP) trajectory (High PP versus Low PP) and RSI metrics in subcortical regions and fiber tracts (n=146).

Restricted Isotropic
Neurite Density
Isotropic Free Water
Hindered Isotropic
Region β (95% CI)a P β (95% CI)a P β (95% CI)a P β (95% CI)a P

Subcortical
Hippocampus −0.42 (−0.74, −0.11) <0.01* −0.01 (−0.32, 0.29) 0.93 −0.12 (−0.42, 0.17) 0.40 0.31 (0, 0.63) 0.05
Amygdala −0.43 (−0.75, −0.11) <0.01* −0.10 (−0.44, 0.25) 0.58 −0.07 (−0.38, 0.24) 0.67 0.36 (0.02, 0.69) 0.04
Thalamus −0.50 (−0.84, −0.17) <0.01* −0.35 (−0.69, −0.01) 0.05 −0.04 (−0.34, 0.26) 0.81 0.44 (0.1, 0.78) 0.01
Caudate −0.06 (−0.41, 0.28) 0.72 0.08 (−0.21, 0.36) 0.59 0.05 (−0.27, 0.36) 0.77 −0.03 (−0.33, 0.27) 0.85
Putamen −0.06 (−0.43, 0.32) 0.77 0.02 (−0.34, 0.39) 0.89 −0.07 (−0.41, 0.28) 0.69 0.11 (−0.26, 0.47) 0.56
Fibers
All fibers −0.27 (−0.55, 0.00) 0.05 −0.12 (−0.43, 0.18) 0.42 0.03 (−0.24, 0.3) 0.82
Fornix −0.25 (−0.52, 0.01) 0.06 −0.23 (−0.49, 0.03) 0.09 0.05 (−0.19, 0.29) 0.70
Cingulum −0.22 (−0.51, 0.08) 0.14 0.04 (−0.31, 0.38) 0.83 −0.05 (−0.38, 0.28) 0.76
Parahippocampal cingulum −0.47 (−0.77, −0.16) <0.01* −0.01 (−0.36, 0.33) 0.93 −0.04 (−0.38, 0.31) 0.83
Corticospinal tract −0.21 (−0.52, 0.09) 0.16 −0.07 (−0.39, 0.26) 0.68 −0.07 (−0.36, 0.22) 0.62
Anterior thalamic radiation −0.21 (−0.48, 0.07) 0.14 −0.03 (−0.33, 0.26) 0.82 −0.06 (−0.33, 0.20) 0.64
Uncinate fasciculus −0.29 (−0.57, −0.01) 0.05 −0.13 (−0.46, 0.20) 0.44 −0.13 (−0.43, 0.17) 0.40
Inferior longitudinal fasciculus −0.42 (−0.72, −0.11) <0.01* −0.11 (−0.44, 0.22) 0.51 0.06 (−0.23, 0.34) 0.70
Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus −0.38 (−0.67, −0.09) <0.01* −0.22 (−0.53, 0.09) 0.16 0.07 (−0.19, 0.33) 0.60
Forceps major −0.29 (−0.59, 0.02) 0.07 −0.04 (−0.36, 0.29) 0.83 0.23 (−0.06, 0.51) 0.12
Forceps minor −0.18 (−0.46, 0.11) 0.22 −0.10 (−0.39, 0.20) 0.52 0.00 (−0.29, 0.30) 0.98
Corpus callosum −0.24 (−0.51, 0.03) 0.08 −0.16 (−0.45, 0.13) 0.27 0.19 (−0.08, 0.45) 0.17
Superior longitudinal fasciculus −0.32 (−0.63, −0.01) 0.04 −0.03 (−0.36, 0.31) 0.88 0.05 (−0.27, 0.37) 0.75
Striatal inferior frontal cortex −0.08 (−0.35, 0.19) 0.56 −0.20 (−0.53, 0.14) 0.25 −0.14 (−0.44, 0.17) 0.37
Superior corticostriate −0.23 (−0.53, 0.07) 0.13 −0.03 (−0.37, 0.31) 0.85 −0.08 (−0.38, 0.22) 0.60
Inferior-frontal superior-frontal cortex −0.08 (−0.37, 0.22) 0.61 −0.02 (−0.35, 0.31) 0.92 −0.03 (−0.34, 0.29) 0.87
a

Model is adjusted for age (continuous, years) and sex (male or female).

*

P<0.01

APOE modifies associations between pulse pressure and brain microstructure

There were no significant interactions between PP trajectory and APOE status on any RSI measure at P<0.01, although trends for an interaction were observed for uncinate RI (P=0.09), IFO RI (P=0.08), and amygdala HI (P=0.06) (Supplemental eFigure 1). Because power to detect significant interactions was limited by small sample sizes, we evaluated whether differences in PP-microstructure associations were detectable when examining continuous measures of concurrent PP (Supplemental eTable 3). APOE-stratified partial correlations (age- and sex-adjusted) revealed significant correlations (P<0.01) for APOE ε4 carriers that were stronger than for non-carriers for RI in the hippocampus (Z=2.11; P=0.03), uncinate fasciculus (Z=2.38; P=0.02) and IFO (Z=2.33; P=0.02); and for HI in the amygdala (Z=2.25; P=0.02) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Differences in associations between pulse pressure and microstructure by APOE ε4 status.

Figure 3.

Partial correlations (r, adjusted for age and sex) between cross-sectional pulse pressure and RSI metrics (per standard deviation [SD] increase), stratified by APOE ε4 status, are shown for subcortical regions and fiber tracts in which correlations differed by APOE ε4 status [ε4 non-carriers (blue), n=106; ε4 carriers, n=32 (magenta)]. Note: Regression lines were computed at mean-centered age = 0 and sex = female.

Brain microstructure mediates effects of pulse pressure trajectory on executive function

Of the RSI measures that significantly (P<0.01) differed according to PP trajectory (Table 2), ILF RI (β=-6.94, 95%CI=-13.85, -0.03) and IFO RI (β=−8.42, 95%CI=-15.59, -1.26) were associated with lower Trails B performance in base models (Supplemental eTable 4). PP trajectory was not associated with Trails B in base (β=−7.61; SE=6.46, P=0.24) or fully-adjusted (β=−7.22; SE=6.20; P=0.23) models, however, ILF RI and IFO RI mediated the effects of PP trajectory on Trails B (ILF βab=2.69, 95%CI=0.10, 7.56; IFO βab=3.06, 95%CI=0.50, 8.48; Table 3). In fully-adjusted models, the mediating effect of ILF RI and IFO RI remained significant and RI in the amygdala and PHC became significantly associated with Trails B and mediated effects of PP trajectory group on Trails B (Table 3). In effect, higher PP trajectory was associated with poorer Trails B performance via reduced RI.

Table 3.

Results from single mediation analyses showing significant mediation of pulse pressure (PP) trajectory on Trails B performance by microstructure (n=146).

a-pathway
b-pathway
a*b-pathway
βa (SE) β b βa*βb (95% CI)

Amygdala (RI)
 Base Modela −0.43 (0.17) −4.52 (3.32) 1.94 (−1.42, 7.29)
 Fully-Adjusted Modelb −0.43 (0.16) −9.66 (3.32) 4.13 (0.91, 11.01)
Parahippocampal cingulum (RI)
 Base Modela −0.46 (0.16) −4.76 (3.47) 2.21 (−0.89, 6.81)
 Fully-Adjusted Modelb −0.45 (0.16) −8.35 (3.46) 3.77 (0.95, 9.93)
Inferior longitudinal fasciculus
 Base Modela −0.39 (0.15) −6.94 (3.49) 2.69 (0.10, 7.56)
 Fully-Adjusted Modelb −0.38 (0.16) −8.18 (3.48) 3.12 (0.53, 8.73)
Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (RI)
 Base Modela −0.36 (0.15) −8.42 (3.62) 3.06 (0.50, 8.48)
 Fully-Adjusted Modelb −0.39 (0.15) −9.10 (3.68) 3.59 (0.51, 10.21)
a

Model is adjusted for age (continuous, years) and sex (male or female),

a

Model is adjusted for age (continuous, years), sex (male or female), education (continuous, years), alcohol consumption (non-drinker or drinker), body mass index (continuous, kg/m2), history of cardiovascular disease (no or yes), APOE ε4 (ε4 non-carrier or ε4 carrier), pulse pressure trajectory group ( high PP vs. low PP ), and RSI measure (continuous, 1-SD unit), as appropriate.

The a-pathway reflects the effect of PP group on RSI, the b-pathway reflects the effect of RSI on Trails B, and the a*b-pathway indicates the indirect effect of PP group on Trails B via RSI (mediation).

DISCUSSION

This study examined whether trajectories of PP over a mean 24-year follow-up predict brain microstructure in older age. A third of participants had persistently elevated and increasing PP from midlife to late-life, which predicted subcortical and white matter microstructural abnormalities. PP-microstructure associations explained impairment in Trails B test performance, which captures a range of cognitive functions that are affected by normal aging, notably executive functions, attention, and processing speed, and were modified by APOE genotype, with most pronounced associations for APOE ε4 carriers.

Our results indicating that chronically elevated and increasing PP predicts microstructural brain injury are consistent with previous cross-sectional structural and diffusion MRI studies, which reported associations between estimates of arterial stiffness and brain atrophy [39,40] or loss of gray or white matter integrity [41]. Of note, one recent study [42], reported no association between PP and the prevalence of silent brain infarcts, periventricular hyperintensities or subcortical white matter hyperintensities, or cerebral microbleeds in a sample of older Japanese adults free of dementia. However, such cross-sectional observations cannot dissociate degenerative changes reflecting an acute response to recent vascular dysfunction from accumulated damage related to worsening arterial stiffening over prolonged periods preceding MRI. Among the few studies that have assessed longitudinal changes in arterial stiffness relative to brain health in older age, findings support the latter possibility. For instance, midlife PP and change in PP have been found to predict brain atrophy and cognitive decline 5–28 years later [16,17,40]. Notably, although midlife PP among our High PP group was within normal ranges [43], their slightly elevated levels relative to the Low PP group predicted both increased PP and microstructural injury related to poor executive function decades later. Thus, even subtle differences in midlife PP may be clinically meaningful for predicting brain aging and cognitive decline. Altogether, our results highlight the clinical utility of monitoring PP beginning in midlife to minimize the impact of chronic arterial stiffness on aging-related brain injury.

High PP was associated with reduced restricted and increased hindered diffusion within subcortical regions as well as limbic and association tracts, which may reflect neuronal loss, shrinkage, or expansion of the extracellular space. Results were unchanged after adjustment for subcortical or white matter volume and associations with free water were not observed, which would be expected in the presence of advanced atrophy, suggesting that vascular-related cytoarchitectural abnormalities were still mild in this relatively healthy sample, and perhaps amenable to therapeutic intervention. Elevated PP resulting from arterial stiffening due to aging and vascular risk factors results in a drop in mean arterial pressure and impaired arterial compliance, which can lead to transitory ischemia in the brain resulting in white matter lesions and microvascular damage due to the increased pulsatile stress that is transmitted into the cerebrovascular microcirculation [44]. Our findings suggest that this pulsatile stress may promote microscale neural injury detectable using multicompartment diffusion MRI that precedes macroscopic lesions which emerge with cerebrovascular disease.

The observed reduction in restricted diffusion in temporal regions and association fibers mediated effects of chronically elevated PP on worse executive function. These findings extend evidence from the SPRINT-MIND Study, which reported that white matter lesion volume contributed to 9.5% of executive function impairment associated with PP [20] to suggest that even subtle microstructural injury related to elevated PP has clinically significant effects on cognitive aging. The mediating regions identified here include long-range association fibers (ILF, IFO and PHC) supporting the integration of sensory and cognitive information, as well as the amygdala, which modulates efficiency of the executive control network [45]. Microstructural damage to these white matter tracts has been linked to impaired executive function in coronary artery disease [46], and amygdala atrophy has been observed in stroke/TIA patients, particularly in the presence of cognitive impairment [47]. Our results further suggest that cerebrovascular-related microstructural injury to white matter association tracts and the amygdala mediates executive function disturbance even in the absence of overt disease.

Higher PP correlated with lower restricted isotropic diffusion only among APOE ε4 carriers. This finding extends previous reports that APOE modifies associations of PP with brain atrophy, AD neuropathology, and cognitive outcomes [1619] to demonstrate particular vulnerability of APOE ε4 carriers to even subtle microstructural abnormalities that may proceed advanced neurodegenerative or cognitive changes. It also adds to mounting support for a causal or modifying role of vascular dysfunction in AD pathogenesis. APOE ε4 carriers have a predisposition to cerebral amyloid angiopathy [48], and higher midlife PP is associated with amyloid-β42 and phosphorylated tau [49], suggesting that exacerbation of AD pathology by arterial stiffening may be in a pivotal step in APOE ε4-mediated neurodegeneration.

This study had several strengths including the long-term follow-up and repeated blood pressure assessments among a well-characterized cohort of older adults, which allowed us to characterize patterns of arterial stiffness beginning midlife. Second, we used the multicompartment diffusion MRI technique RSI, which is more sensitive than conventional morphometric MRI or single-compartment diffusion MRI to nuanced brain injury that precedes gross lesions [25,26]. Several limitations should be noted. Although APOE modified associations between continuous PP and microstructure, we were limited in power to detect APOE differences in associations between microstructure and PP trajectory groups. The RBS cohort is comprised primarily of adults of Northern-European ancestry, and so results may not be generalizable to other populations. Although the participants included in this study were similar to those who were alive and who were invited to participate in study assessments, the analytic sample was more likely to be female and less likely to have a history of cardiovascular disease. These differences as well as the potential for selection bias common in research with older adults [50] may further limit the generalizability of our findings. Although high PP was associated with poor Trails B performance in the larger RBS cohort [23], we were likely underpowered to detect the total effect in this subsample of RBS participants; however, we observed significant mediated effects in the absence of a statistically significant total effect. As described by Rucker et al., significant mediated effects in the absence of total or direct effects may be due to power and sample size or to opposing indirect effects [51]. As we did not assess cerebrovascular perfusion or functional dynamics, future studies are needed to examine hemodynamic measures that may mediate differential effects of vascular dysfunction on brain microstructure or cognition. Subjects were screened for clinically significant cognitive impairment using the MMSE but did not undergo comprehensive neurological assessment. Thus, although mild cognitive deficits may have gone undetected, PP trajectory groups were precisely matched on cognitive status, such that any incipient cognitive impairments should be balanced between groups and not substantially influence our findings. Finally, as we relied on PP as a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness [52], which may result in exposure misclassification, validation is needed with studies measuring pulse pressure using assessments that meet current recommendations [53]. However, because PP is highly predictive of cardiovascular risk and arterial stiffness is a primary determinant of PP [54], any discrepancy between PP and arterial stiffness measures should not meaningfully alter the interpretation of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults free of dementia, prolonged elevated PP predicts subcortical and white matter microstructural abnormalities, particularly for those at risk for dementia, and may contribute to impaired executive function via microstructural injury. Monitoring PP beginning in midlife, even among those with slight abnormalities, may be a cost-effective and readily accessible approach to minimize the impact of arterial stiffening on brain health and reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Our findings underscore the importance of considering one’s genetic profile for personalized risk assessment and for guiding targeted therapeutic interventions, as well as the need for further investigation into additional demographic or lifestyle factors that may modify effects of vascular dysfunction on brain aging trajectories.

Supplementary Material

ef1
et1
et2
et3
et4

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT.

  1. Systematic Review: The authors reviewed the published peer-reviewed literature using traditional sources. The effects of pulse pressure (PP) on cognition and brain health have been previously examined in cross-sectional structural and diffusion MRI studies. The effects of chronic arterial stiffness on neurobiological aging, however, have been understudied. These relevant studies were appropriately cited.

  2. Interpretation: Consistent with findings in the public domain, we hypothesized that long-term elevated PP predicts brain microstructure and that microstructure mediates PP-executive function associations.

  3. Future Directions: We propose that pulsatile stress may promote microscale neural injury that precedes macroscopic lesions which emerge with cerebrovascular disease, and that monitoring PP may be a cost-effective approach to minimize the impact of arterial stiffening on brain health and reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Intervention studies that test these hypotheses will be critical to understanding the impact of chronic elevated PP on brain health.

Funding:

H Parada Jr was supported by the National Cancer Institute (K01 CA234317), the SDSU/UCSD Comprehensive Cancer Center Partnership (U54 CA132384 and U54 CA132379), and the Alzheimer’s Disease Resource Center for advancing Minority Aging Research at the University of California San Diego (P30 AG059299). ET Reas was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R00 AG057797) and a Warren Alpert Distinguished Scholars Award (20192684).

Data collection for the Rancho Bernardo Study of Healthy Aging (RBS) was provided primarily by the National Institutes of Health (including grant numbers: HV012160, AA021187, AG028507, AG007181, DK31801, HL034591, HS06726 and HL089622). Archiving and sharing of RBS data was supported by National Institute on Aging (AG054067). RBS data are available through the RBS website: https://knit.ucsd.edu/ranchobernardostudy/

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical standards: All procedures performed in the Rancho Bernardo Study of Healthy Aging involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Boards of the University of California, San Diego and were in compliance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the San Diego State University Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Qiu C Preventing Alzheimer’s disease by targeting vascular risk factors: hope and gap. J Alzheimers Dis 2012;32:721–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Hughes TM, Craft S, Lopez OL. Review of “the potential role of arterial stiffness in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease.” Neurodegener Dis Manag 2015;5:121–35. doi: 10.2217/nmt.14.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Mitchell GF, Van Buchem MA, Sigurdsson S, Gotal JD, Jonsdottir MK, Kjartansson Ó, et al. Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Brain 2011;134:3398–407. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Choi SY, Park HE, Seo H, Kim M, Cho SH, Oh BH. Arterial stiffness using cardio-ankle vascular index reflects cerebral small vessel disease in healthy young and middle aged subjects. J Atheroscler Thromb 2013;20:178–85. doi: 10.5551/jat.14753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Caughey MC, Qiao Y, Meyer ML, Palta P, Matsushita K, Tanaka H, et al. Relationship between central artery stiffness, brain arterial dilation, and white matter hyperintensities in older adults: The ARIC study-Brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2021:2109–16. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Waldstein SR, Rice SC, Thayer JF, Najjar SS, Scuteri A, Zonderman AB. Pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity are related to cognitive decline in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Hypertension 2008;51:99–104. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.093674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Elias PK, Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM. Blood pressure-related cognitive decline: Does age make a difference? Hypertension 2004;44:631–6. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000145858.07252.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Sha T, Cheng W, Yan Y. Prospective associations between pulse pressure and cognitive performance in Chinese middle-aged and older population across a 5-year study period. Alzheimer’s Res Ther 2018;10:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0355-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Liu L, Hayden KM, May NS, Haring B, Liu Z, Henderson VW, et al. Association between blood pressure levels and cognitive impairment in older women: a prospective analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. Lancet Heal Longev 2022;3:e42–53. doi: 10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00283-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Li C, Zhu Y, Ma Y, Hua R, Zhong B, Xie W. Association of cumulative blood pressure with cognitive decline, dementia, and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:1321–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Cui C, Sekikawa A, Kuller LH, Lopez OL, Newman AB, Kuipers AL, et al. Aortic Stiffness is Associated with Increased Risk of Incident Dementia in Older Adults. J Alzheimers Dis 2018;66:297–306. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Pase MP, Beiser A, Himali JJ, Tsao C, Satizabal CL, Vasan RS, et al. Aortic Stiffness and the Risk of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Stroke 2016;47:2256–61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Qiu C, Winblad B, Viitanen M, Fratiglioni L. Pulse pressure and risk of alzheimer disease in persons aged 75 years and older: A community-based, longitudinal study. Stroke 2003;34:594–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000060127.96986.F4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Jung Y, Choi DW, Park S, Jang SI, Park EC. Association between pulse pressure and onset of dementia in an elderly Korean population: A cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 1993;261:921–3. doi: 10.1126/science.8346443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Nation DA, Preis SR, Beiser A, Bangen KJ, Delano-wood L, Lamar M, et al. Pulse pressure is associated with early brain atrophy and cognitive decline modifying effects of APOE-E4. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Discord 2016;30:210–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].McFall GP, Wiebe SA, Vergote D, Westaway D, Jhamandas J, Bäckman L, et al. ApoE and pulse pressure interactively influence level and change in the aging of episodic memory: Protective effects among ε2 carriers. Neuropsychology 2015;29:388–401. doi: 10.1037/neu0000150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Bangen KJ, Beiser A, Delano-Wood L, Nation DA, Lamar M, Libon DJ, et al. APOE genotype modifies the relationship between midlife vascular risk factors and later cognitive decline. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:1361–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Rodrigue KM, Rieck JR, Kennedy KM, Devous MD, Diaz-Arrastia R, Park DC. Risk factors for β-amyloid deposition in healthy aging: Vascular and genetic effects. JAMA Neurol 2013;70:600–6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Zang J, Shi J, Liang J, Zhang X, Wei W, Yao C, et al. Pulse pressure, cognition, and white matter lesions: a mediation analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.654522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Yaneva-Sirakova T, Tarnovska-Kadreva R, Traykov L. Pulse pressure and mild cognitive impairment. J Cardiovasc Med 2012;13:735–40. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328357ba78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958;8:271–6. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Kritz-Silverstein D, Laughlin GA, McEvoy LK, Barrett-Connor E. Sex and age differences in the association of blood pressure and hypertension with cognitive function in the elderly: The Rancho Bernardo Study. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis 2017;4:165–73. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2017.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].White NS, Leergaard TB, D’Arceuil H, Bjaalie JG, Dale AM. Probing tissue microstructure with restriction spectrum imaging: Histological and theoretical validation. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34:327–46. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Reas ET, Laughlin GA, Hagler DJJ, Lee RR, Dale AM, McEvoy LK. Age and sex differences in the associations of pulse pressure with white matter and subcortical microstructure. Hypertension 2021;77:938–47. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Reas ET, Hagler DJ, White NS, Kuperman JM, Bartsch H, Cross K, et al. Sensitivity of restriction spectrum imaging to memory and neuropathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res Ther 2017;9:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0281-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Barrett-Connor E The Rancho Bernardo Study: 40 years studying why women have less heart disease than men and how diabetes modifies women’s usual cardiac protection. Glob Hear 2013;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Reas ET, Hagler DJ, Andrews MJ, Lee RR, Dale AM, McEvoy LK. Associations between age and brain microstructure in older community-dwelling men and women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Neurobiol Aging 2020;95:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Hagler DJ, Hatton SN, Cornejo MD, Makowski C, Fair DA, Dick AS, et al. Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Neuroimage 2019;202:116091. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341–55. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Hagler DJJ, Ahmadi ME, Kuperman J, Holland D, McDonald CR, Halgren E, et al. Automated white-matter tractography using a probabilistic diffusion tensor atlas: Application to temporal lobe epilepsy. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:1535–47. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:922–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lee Teng E, Chang Chui H. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry 1987;48:314–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Breton A, Casey D, Arnaoutoglou NA. Cognitive tests for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of dementia: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019;34:233–42. doi: 10.1002/gps.5016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program: Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Prev Med (Baltim) 1976;5:207–15. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(76)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Jones BL, Nagin DS. Advances in Group-Based Trajectory Modeling and an SAS Procedure for Estimating Them. Sociol Methods Res 2007;35:542–71. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 2007;58:593–614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Hayes AF. PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. 2012.
  • [39].den Heijer T, Skoog I, Oudkerk M, de Leeuw F-E, de Groot JC, Hofman A, et al. Association between blood pressure levels over time and brain atrophy in the elderly. Neurobiol Aging 2003;24:307–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Vuorinen M, Kåreholt I, Julkunen V, Spulber G, Niskanen E, Paajanen T, et al. Changes in vascular factors 28 years from midlife and late-life cortical thickness. Neurobiol Aging 2013;34:100–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Maillard P, Mitchell GF, Himali JJ, Beiser A, Tsao CW, Pase MP, et al. Effects of arterial stiffness on brain integrity in young adults from the framingham heart study. Stroke 2016;47:1030–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Mizuhara R, Mitaki S, Takamura M, Abe S, Onoda K, Yamaguchi S, et al. Pulse pressure is associated with cognitive performance in Japanese non-demented population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol 2022;22:4–11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02666-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Homan T, Bordes S, Cichowski E. Physiology, Pulse Pressure. [Updated 2021 Jul 15]. StatPearls [Internet]., Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482408/; 2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Palta P, Sharrett AR, Wei J, Meyer ML, Kucharska-Newton A, Power MC, et al. Central Arterial Stiffness Is Associated With Structural Brain Damage and Poorer Cognitive Performance: The ARIC Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e011045. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Herwig U, Baumgartner T, Kaffenberger T, Brühl A, Kottlow M, Schreiter-Gasser U, et al. Modulation of anticipatory emotion and perception processing by cognitive control. Neuroimage 2007;37:652–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Santiago C, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Saleem M, Oh PI, Black SE, et al. White matter microstructural integrity is associated with executive function and processing speed in older adults with coronary artery disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015;23:754–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Sachdev PS, Chen X, Joscelyne A, Wen W, Brodaty H. Amygdala in stroke/transient ischemic attack patients and its relationship to cognitive impairment and psychopathology: The Sydney stroke study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;15:487–96. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3180581fe6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Premkumar DRD, Cohen DL, Hedera P, Friedland RP, Kalaria RN. Apolipoprotein E-∈4 alleles in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cerebrovascular pathology associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 1996;148:2083–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Nation DA, Edland SD, Bondi MW, Salmon DP, Delano-Wood L, Peskind ER, et al. Pulse pressure is associated with Alzheimer biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults. Neurology 2013;81:2024–7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436935.47657.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Banack HR, Kaufman JS, Wactawski-Wende J, Troen BR, Stovitz SD. Investigating and remediating selection bias in geriatrics research: The Selection Bias Toolkit. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:1970–6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE. Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2011;5:359–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: Methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588–605. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Tang KS, Medeiros ED, Shah AD. Wide pulse pressure: A clinical review. J Clin Hypertens 2020;22:1960–7. doi: 10.1111/jch.14051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H. Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation 2003;107:2864–9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069826.36125.B4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ef1
et1
et2
et3
et4

RESOURCES