Skip to main content
Journal of Hematology & Oncology logoLink to Journal of Hematology & Oncology
letter
. 2023 May 12;16:53. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01446-0

Novel agents and evolving strategies in myelofibrotive neoplasm: an update from 2022 ASH annual conference

Andrew Wang 1,#, James Liu 2,#, Jeffrey J Pu 3,
PMCID: PMC10182587  PMID: 37173704

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a disorder characterized by the proliferation of myeloid precursors, commonly due to overactive JAK signaling. The discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation and subsequent development of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) results in reduced spleen size, improved symptom, and enhanced survival in MF patients. However, there are unmet needs of additional novel targeted therapies for this incurable disease due to the limited utility of first-generation JAKis, which are associated with dose-limiting cytopenia and disease recurrence. New targeted treatment strategies for MF are on the horizon. We are here to discuss the latest clinical research findings presented in the 2022 ASH Annual Meeting.

Keywords: Myelofibrotive neoplasm, Targeted therapy, Clinical research

To the editor

Myelofibrosis research has dramatically advanced in the last several years [1]. In this article, we summarized some of the most exciting developments and innovations in investigational targeted therapeutic agents and novel regimens in treating MF from the 2022 ASH Annual Meeting.

Targeted therapeutics of myelofibrosis

JAK2V617F is the most common mutation, leading to the overactivation of JAK/STAT signaling linked with clonal expansion in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) [2]. JAK/STAT pathway inhibition has become the cornerstone therapeutic strategy for patients with symptomatic MF. Ruxolitinib (RUX), Fedratinib and Pacritinib are FDA approved JAK1/2 inhibitors for treatment of intermediate and high-risk MF [2]. Even though these drugs change the landscape of MF management and provide significant clinical benefits, approximately 1/3 of MF patients either cannot tolerate the treatment, developing cytopenias during treatment, or do not respond to the therapy well [2]. In abstract 627 and 3028, the phase III MOMENTUM data demonstrate that Momelotinib (MMB), the first JAK1/2/ACVR1 inhibitor, reduced symptoms and spleen volumes, improved transfusion independence (TI), and prolonged survival in a group of symptomatic and anemic MF patients who failed JAKi treatment (Table 1) [3]. Additional analysis also shows that transfusion independence response (TI-R) at W24 is a potential surrogate for improved overall survival (OS) (Table 1). In abstract 628, MF patients treated with Pacritinib, another FDA approved JAK2 inhibitor, achieved greater TI in comparing the ones with best-available therapy (BAT) (24% vs. 5%, based on SIMPLIFY criteria; 37% vs. 7%, based on Gale criteria) in a phase III PERSIST-2 trial, which enrolled MF patients with severe thrombocytopenia. The possible mechanisms of erythropoietic benefit of Pacritinib were inhibition of activin A receptor, type I (ACVR1) (Table 1) [4]. In abstract 240, TP-3654, a selective oral PIM1 Kinase Inhibitor, was utilized in an ongoing Phase I/II study showing encouraging signs of clinical activity in spleen volume reduction (SVR), symptom improvement, and cytokine reduction in MF patients previously treated with JAKi. TP-3654 is well tolerated with limited myelosuppressive adverse events (Table 1) [5]. ASXL1 mutations confer poor prognosis in MF patients with low JAK2V617F allele burden. Abstract 4368 reports a Lysine-specific demethylase-1 (LSD1) inhibitor, IMG-7289, as an oral monotherapy, which reduced symptoms, SVR, BMF, TSS50 and selectively inhibited ASXL1 mutation clones with acceptable tolerability in a phase II study (Table 1) [6].

Table 1.

Selected studies on the novel single agent targeted therapeutic on myelofibrosis from the 2022 ASH annual meeting

Name Target Route Trial phase Inclusion criteria (prior treatments; subject age; spleen size) Subjects Baseline Characteristics Study duration (current /planned) Accrual
(current accrual #/target accrual #)
Efficacy Adverse Events Clinicaltrials.gov Registration References
MMB JAK1/2/ACVR1 PO III One prior JAKi for ≥ 90 days; ≥ 18 years; palpable spleen ≥ 5 cm N/A 27/96 months 195/195 TI-R (31%); SVR (100%) at W24

Thrombocytopenia

Anemia

Infection

Peripheral neuropathy

NCT04173494 [3]
Pacritinib JAK2/ACVR1 PO III JAKi-naïve patients; ≥ 18 years; palpable spleen ≥ 5 cm All patients had platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L 40/40 months 327/327 TL-R (24% on SIMPLIFY criteria, 37% on Gale criteria) at W24 Not reported NCT01773187 [4]
TP-3654 PIM1 PO I/II At least one prior JAKi; ≥ 18 years; palpable spleen ≥ 5 cm or SV ≥ 450 cm3 Median age of 70 years; median spleen volume of 2370 cm3 32/55 months 8/60 SVR (83%); TSS50 (66%); at W12

Nausea

Vomiting

Diarrhea

NCT04176198 [5]
IMG-7289 LSD1 PO II Prior JAKi or JAKi-naïve patients; ≥ 18 years; Median age of 68 years; median spleen volume of 1354 cm3 56/56 months 89/89 SVR (66%); TSS50 (19%); TI-R (90%); BMF (53%) at W24

Dysgeusia

Diarrhea

NCT03136185 [6]

Frontline “Add-on” targeted therapeutics of myelofibrosis

In the front-line setting, some novel targeted therapeutics are used in combination with RUX to improve the depth of response seen upfront with single agent RUX. In a pre-clinical study, Lu et al. shows that Siremadlin (SIR), an HDM2 inhibitor, was able to restore p53-mediated apoptosis in MF via combining with other pharmacological agents that disrupted the interplay between HDM2/p53, HIF1α and nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) pathways [7]. Furthermore, abstract 239 reports an phase I/II ADORE study Part 1 (phase Ib), where the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of SIR was established as 30 mg orally once daily on days 1–5/28-day cycle when added to the existing stable dose of RUX in patients who presented either persistent splenomegaly (spleen size ≥ 5 cm from the left costal margin or spleen volume ≥ 450 cm2 by MRI/CT scan) or continuous anemia (HgB < 11 g/dL) after at least 12 weeks of RUX monotherapy [8]. Good tolerability at 30 mg daily allowed patients to remain on SIR + RUX and to achieve robust SVR at W24 (Table 2). Pelabresib (PELA) is a selective Bromodomain and Extraterminal (BET) inhibitor to modify NFκB signaling related genes’ expression. In the MANIFEST phase II study, PELA combining with RUX (Arm 3) showed improved spleen volume reduction of 35% (SVR35) and total symptom score reduction of ≥ 50% (TSS50) and BMF improvement at any time (Table 2) in JAKi-naïve MF patients with intermediate-1/2 or high risks [9]. Navitoclax inhibits the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins (primarily BCL-XL). In the REFINE phase II study (Cohort 3; Abstract 237), navitoclax combining with RUX achieved SVR35 at W24 in all subgroups known to confer poor prognosis [10]. The paralleled reduction of both driver mutation JAKV617F’s VAF (36% patients achieved > 50% VAF reduction from baseline) and BMF indicates that this combination therapy regimen is promising (Table 2). In abstract 236, Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective inhibitor of PI3 kinase, was assessed as an “add-on” agent to RUX among MF patients with suboptimal response to RUX in a phase II trial. The trial data show improvement in both symptoms and spleen size [11]. Responder efficacy variables analysis (SV, MF-SAF, and MPN-SAF-TSS) indicates that the continuous daily dosing regimen was more efficacious than daily dosing for 8 weeks then following with weekly dosing. This combination therapy was associated with limited grade 3/4 AEs and TEAE-related discontinuations (Table 2). Selinexor (SEL) is a Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that inhibits XPO1, which leads to nuclear retention and activation of tumor suppressor proteins. Abstract 1734 presents a phase I/II study evaluating the impact of SEL + RUX combination in treating JAKi-naïve MF. The preliminary data from this study demonstrate a manageable safety profile and encouraging preliminary data on SV, symptoms and TI-R (Table 2) [12].

Table 2.

Selected studies on the novel targeted therapeutic in combination with RUX on myelofibrosis from the 2022 ASH annual meeting

Name Target Route Trial Phase Inclusion Criteria (prior treatments; subject age; spleen size) Subject Baseline Characteristics Study Duration (current /planned) Accrual
(current accrual #/target accrual #)
Efficacy Adverse Events Clinicaltrials.gov Registration References
SIR HDM2 PO Ib One prior JAKi; ≥ 18 years; palpable spleen ≥ 5 cm or SV ≥ 450 cm3 Median spleen volume of 1162 cm3 30/45 months 23/45 SVR35 (100%) at W24

Fatigue

GI toxicity

Anemia

Leukopenia

Thrombocytopenia

NCT04097821 [8]
PELA BET PO II One prior JAKi; ≥ 18 years; SV ≥ 450 cm3 Median age of 68 years 96/123 months 84/341 SVR35 (80%); MF-SAF-TSS50 (81%); BMF (40% ≥ 1 grade improvement) at any time

Thrombocytopenia

Anemia

NCT02158858 [9]
Navitoclax BCL-2 family PO II One Prior IAKi or JAKi-naïve patients; ≥ 18 years; splenomegaly JAKi-naïve pts; median age of 69 years; median SV of 1889 cm3 51/131 months 32/191 SVR35(59%) in high DIPSS score pts, BMF (35%) at W24 Not reported NCT03222609 [10]
Parsaclisib PI3K PO II Pts with existing stable regimen of RUX; ≥ 18 years; palpable spleen ≥ 10 cm Median age of 68 years; 47% of pts male; median SV of 2415 cm3 in QD/QW, 1878 cm3 in QD 63/63 months 74/74 SVR35 (7.1%); MPN-SAF-TSS50 (48.6%); BMF (33%) all daily dosing at W24

Pneumonia

Fatigue

Hypoxia

Dyspnea

Elevation of liver enzymes

Hypocalcemia

Thrombocytopenia

NCT02718300 [11]
SEL XPO1 PO I/II JAKi-naïve pts; ≥ 18 years; SV ≥ 450 cm3 Median age of 64 years 17/44 months 19/237 SVR35 (84%) at any time; TSS50 (69%) at W12

Nausea

Anemia

Vomiting

Thrombocytopenia

NCT04562389 [12]

Conclusion

The next-generation JAKi have been evaluated in clinical trials, some even being FDA approved, to manage RUX intolerant or resistant MF. Other non-JAK/STAT therapeutic molecules, such as epigenetic modifiers, apoptotic machinery, and intracellular signaling pathway inhibitors, are also being investigated in clinical settings as both a single agent and in combination with RUX. The future of MF management is bright and promising.

Abbreviations

ACVR1

Activin A receptor, type I

ASH

American Society of Hematology

BAT

Best Available Therapy

BET

Bromodomain and Extraterminal

BMF

Bone Marrow Fibrosis

HDM2

Human Double Minute-2

Hgb

Hemoglobin

JAK

Janus Kinase

JAKi

JAK inhibitor

LSD1

Lysine-specific demethylase-1

MF

Myelofibrosis

MMB

Momelotinib

MPN

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

NA

Not available

NFκB

Nuclear Factor Kappa B

OS

Overall Survival

PELA

Pelabresib

PI3K

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PIM1

Proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase 1

PO

Per os (oral administration)

QD

Once Daily

QoL

Quality of Life

QW

Once Weekly

RP2D

Recommended Phase 2 Dose

R/R

Relapsed/refractory

RUX

Ruxolitinib

SIR

Siremadlin

STAT

Signal transducer and activator of transcription

SV

Spleen Volume

SVR

Spleen Volume Reduction

SAF

Symptom Assessment Form

SINE

Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export

SL

Spleen Length

SQ

Subcutaneous

TEAE

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event

TI

Transfusion Independence

TI-R

Transfusion Independence Response

TSS

Total Symptom Score

VAF

Variant Allele Frequency

W12

Week 12

W24

Week 24

XPO1

Exportin-1

Author contributions

JJP designed this study. JJP, AW, and JL participated in manuscript writing. AW and JL contribute equally to this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study is supported by: AA&MDSIF research grant to JJP (146818), American Cancer Society Grant to JJP (124171-IRG-13-043-02), NIH/NCI Grant to JJP (P30CA023074).

Availability of data and materials

The material supporting the conclusion of this study has been included within the article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is not applicable for this summary.

Consent for publication

This is not applicable for this summary.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Andrew Wang and James Liu have contributed equally to this study.

References

  • 1.Hou JZ, Ye JC, Pu JJ, et al. Novel agents and regimens for hematological malignancies: recent updates from 2020 ASH annual meeting. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01077-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shantzer L, Berger K, Pu JJ. Primary myelofibrosis and its targeted therapy. Ann Hematol. 2017;96(4):531–535. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2785-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gerds AT, Mesa R, Vannucchi AM, et al. Updated results from the momentum phase 3 study of momelotinib (MMB) versus danazol (DAN) in symptomatic and anemic myelofibrosis (MF) patients previously treated with a JAK inhibitor. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022:627.
  • 4.Oh S, Mesa R, Harrison C, et al. Pacritinib is a potent ACVR1 inhibitor with significant anemia benefit in patients with myelofibrosis. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Louisiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.
  • 5.Chaer F, McCloskey J, Rein L, et al. Preliminary Data from the Phase I/II Study of TP-3654, a Selective Oral PIM1 Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with Myelofibrosis Previously Treated with or Ineligible for JAK Inhibitor Therapy. 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022:240.
  • 6.Pettit K, Gill H, Yacoub A, Bradley T. A phase 2 study of the LSD1 inhibitor bomedemstat (IMG-7289) for the treatment of advanced myelofibrosis (MF): updated results and genomic analyses. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Louisiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.
  • 7.Lu M, Xia L, Hoffman R. Pharmacological disruption of the interplay between HDM2-p53 and NFκB depletes myelofibrosis progenitor/stem cells and dampens the accompanying inflammatory Milieu. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.
  • 8.Heidel F, Perkins A, Reiter A, et al. Siremadlin, a human double minute-2 (HDM2) inhibitor, added to ruxolitinib after suboptimal response to ruxolitinib alone in patients with myelofibrosis: results from part 1 of the phase 1/2 adore study. In: 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.
  • 9.Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Patriarca A, et al. Pelabresib (CPI-0610) combined with ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor treatment-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: durability of response and safety beyond week 24. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.
  • 10.Passamonti F, Foran J, Tandra A, et al. The combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-Naïve patients with myelofibrosis mediates responses suggestive of disease modification. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.
  • 11.Yacoub A, Borate U, Rampal R, et al. Efficacy and safety of add-on parsaclisib to ruxolitinib therapy in myelofibrosis patients with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: final results from a phase 2 study. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022:236.
  • 12.Ali H, Kishtagari A, Maher K, et al. A Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study of selinexor plus ruxolitinib in patients with treatment-Naïve myelofibrosis. In: 64th ASH annual meeting and exposition. New Orleans, Lousiana: American Society of Hematology; 2022.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The material supporting the conclusion of this study has been included within the article.


Articles from Journal of Hematology & Oncology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES