Abstract
A strain of lactic acid bacteria from cheese was isolated, that showed strong growth inhibitory effects on Streptococcus mutans. The API 50CH system and 16S rDNA sequencing verified that this was a novel strain, and was named Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus VHProbi M14. The strain inhibited the growth of S. mutans and Fusobacterium nucleatum under mixed culture conditions, coaggregated with S. mutans and F. nucleatum, and reduced the adhesion of S. mutans and F. nucleatum on cultured human primary gingival epithelial (HPGE) cells. The pH, peroxidase and protease sensitivity testing found antibacterial substances of protein- and peptide-like structures in addition to organic acids. The antimicrobial substances were sensitive to hydrolysis with trypsin, papain and pineapple protease and were inactived at temperatures above 100°C. Ammonium sulphate-precipitated proteins from the M14 strain retained the ability to inhibit the growth of S. mutans and F. nucleatum. The M14 strain contained 23 bacteriocin-related genes encoding for metabolites, belonging to class II bacteriocins. The M14 strain also showed inhibitory effects on 8 other pathogenic strains (A. actinomycetemcomitans, C. albicans, E. coli, G. vaginalis, P. acnes, P. gingivalis, S. aureus, S. enteritids), and thus has a broad spectrum of bacterial inhibition. This new isolate has been identified as having potential to be used as a probiotic bacterium in clinical applications.
Introduction
Oral diseases can be acute or chronic with a high global prevalence, and oral health is a primary component of in the maintenance of human health. Oral disease is associated with a wide variety of illnesses and disorders, including dental caries, periodontal disease, tooth loss, oral cancer [1], resulting from oral infections of some pathogenic bacteria, such as Streptococcus mutans [2, 3] and Fusobacterium nucleatum [4, 5]. A healthy oral cavity can be maintained by promoting advantageous bacteria that inhibit those bacterial species causing oral diseases [6].
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) constitute an order of gram-positive bacteria sharing common morphological, molecular, and physiological characteristics. They are nonsporulating, non-respiring, but have aerotolerant cocci or rods, and produce lactic acid as one of the main products of carbohydrate fermentation [7]. LAB are present in the mouth, intestines, skin, and vagina of humans [8, 9], and may account for approximately 1% of the cultivable oral microbiota [10]. The most commonly isolated Lactobacilli in the oral cavity are L. casei, L. delbrueckii, L. fermentum, L. rhamnosus, and L. salivarius species [11–15]. The oral cavity also contains a number of other genera, such as S. mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, F. nucleatum, and Prevotella intermedia [16]. These bacteria can be either pathogenic or non-pathogenic to the host, that concomitantly inhabit the oral cavity. However, with over-proliferate, microbial dysbiosis can lead to the development of a variety of oral diseases such as dental caries and periodontitis [17]. The main cause of dental caries is that S. mutans forms plaque biofilms through surface protein binding to sites on acquired membranes on the tooth surface. The inhibition and removal of dental plaque biofilm are thus important for preventing caries [18]. Probiotics can disrupt the biofilms formed by S. mutans by co-agglutinating and adhering to pathogenic bacteria [18, 19]. Recently, the antimicrobial properties of LAB and their roles in the prevention of common oral diseases have been recognized [20], with the list of the LAB species with probiotic activity rapidly increasing. Some studies have shown the beneficial effects of these probiotics in the oral cavity leading to a reduction in the risk of dental caries. For example, Zhang et al reported that L. plantarum K41 effectively inhibited S. mutans-caused biofilm formation and thus possesses a potential inhibitory effect on dental caries in vivo [21]. Nase et al. (2001) reported reduction of early childhood caries (ECC) in children consuming L. rhamnosus GG fermented milk products containing antimutans immunoglobulin G [22]. Simark-Mattsson et al. (2007) showed that L. paracasei, L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus were strong inhibitors both reference and clinical isolates of S. mutans [14]. Nikawa et al. (2004) showed that consumption of bovine milk fermented with L. reuteri was also effective in oral carriage reduction of S. mutans, resulting in a reduction in the risk of dental caries [23].
The antimicrobial mechanisms of LAB are complicated with the production of organic acids such as lactic and acetic acids from carbohydrate fermentation [20, 24]. These organic acids can enter the cells of pathogenic bacteria to reduce intracellular pH and affect cell metabolism [24]. Some bacteria such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Pediococcus produce hydrogen peroxide and/or bacteriocins (proteinaceous compounds) that exhibit antimicrobial properties [24–27]. Hydrogen peroxide is a strong oxidising agent that may rapidly penetrate the cell walls of microorganisms and inactivation the cells [28]. Bacteriocins isolated from LAB can destroy the integrity of the outer membrane of pathogenic bacteria [29].
Considering potentials of using LAB in the prevention of oral diseases, this research aimed to screen LAB strains from various sources for their capacity to inhibit oral pathogenic bacteria. We obtained 11 strains that showed significant inhibitory effects on the growth of S. mutans, and the isolate with a strong inhibition effect was identified as a novel Lactobacilli rhamnosus strain. We nominally named the bacteria L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14, and investigated its anti-pathogenic, genomic and phenotypic characteristics.
Materials and methods
Isolation and identification of LAB strains
Yoghurt, kimchi, cheese, and soya juice acquired from various retail stores and samples collected further analysis. The samples were immediately placed on ice and transported to Vland Biotech Company Laboratory, Qingdao, China. Samples (10 g) were weighed, diluted by 10 folds with normal saline, and homogenized with a paddle homogenizer (Scientz-11L, Ningbo, China) at 10 strokes/s for 5 min. The homogenate was then sequentially diluted by 10fold 3 times (10−1, 10−2 and 10−3). Diluted samples, 100 μL each, were cultured on Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) agar plates in anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 48 h. Colonies grew on the plates for 2 days, and those colonies of different shapes were selected for Gram staining and were microscopically examined. The rod-shaped and Gram-positive strains were preliminarily considered to be potential LAB candidates.
Bacteriostatic activity of the isolated potential LAB strains was then assessed using the Oxford cup diffusion agar method with some modifications as follows [21, 30]. S. mutans was initially used as the indicator strain. Firstly, 50 μL of S. mutans suspension (108 CFU/mL) was evenly spread with a spreader on brain-heart infusion (BHI) agar medium in Petri dishes. Then, Oxford cups were placed on the surfaces of the cultures, and 100 μL of the isolate strain suspension was dripped onto the surface. Finally, prepared Petri dishes were incubated at 37°C for 48 h to allow the pathogen to grow. The diameter of the inhibition zone was measured to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the isolates. All tests were performed in triplicate.
The isolates were subjected to a standard biochemical test using the API CH50 system (Biomerieux, Marcy, l’Etoile, France) and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. A large fragment of the 16S rDNA gene was amplified by PCR, using the universal primers 27F [5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG] and 1492R [5’- GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT] [31]. PCR amplification conditions consisted of preheating at 95°C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 95°C (40 s), 42°C (40 s), and 72°C (2 min), plus one additional cycle with a final 20-min chain elongation [32]. The PCR products were then purified with a Wizard PCR Preps DNA Purification System and sequenced with a Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (BGI, China) and a model 310 automatic sequencer. The closest known relatives of the new isolates were identified by database sequence searches, and the sequences of closely related strains were retrieved from the GenBank libraries or Ribosomal Database Project databases (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). A phylogenetic tree was then constructed using the NJ (Neighbor-Joining) method with MEGA 11.0 software (https://www.megasoftware.net/), and the bacterial species were identified. Those strains identified as LAB (referred to the isolate or isolates in the following context) were then used in further studies.
Pathogenic bacteria and culture conditions
Pathogenic bacterial strains tested in this study and their culture conditions are shown in Table 1. These are pathogens that can cause oral diseases, skin diseases, intestinal diseases and female gynaecological diseases, and are purchased from the BeNa Culture Collection Centre (Beijing, China).
Table 1. Pathogenic bacteria and their culture conditions.
Pathogenic bacteria | Culture conditions |
---|---|
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans BNCC336945 | Grown on Columbia blood agar (CBA) plates for 48–72 h in anaerobic conditions at 37°C |
Fusobacterium nucleatum BNCC336949 | |
Gardnerella vaginalis BNCC 354890 Porphyromonas gingivalis BNCC353909 | |
Candida albicans ATCC10231 | Grown on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plates for 24 h in aerobic conditions at 37°C |
Escherichia coli ATCC25922 | Grown on nutrient agar (NA) plates for 24 h in aerobic conditions at 37°C |
Salmonella enteritids ATCC14028 | |
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 | |
Propionibacterium acnes ATCC6919 | Grown on reinforced clostridial agar (RCA) plates for 24 h in anaerobic conditions at 37°C |
Streptococcus mutans ATCC25175 | Grown on brain-heart infusion agar (BHIA) plates for 24 h in aerobic conditions at 37°C |
Growth inhibition test, coaggregation test, and antagonistic adhesion test with HPGE cells
Two strains of oral pathogens (S. mutans and F. nucleatum) were used as the indicator bacteria to determine the antibacterial inhibitory properties of the isolated LAB strains.
The isolated LAB strains were scribed from glycerol tubes onto MRS agar plates and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h. Single colonies were then picked from the tubes and incubated in MRS broth medium at 37°C for 24 h. S. mutans was cultured in BHI broth medium, and F. nucleatum was cultured in BHI broth medium supplemented with 5% bovine serum.
The isolates was tested for inhibitory effect on pathogenic bacteria by co-culture in vitro according to the method described by Yang [33]. The BHI broth (10 mL) was initially mixed with 2.0% (v/v) of the isolated strain culture (109 CFU/mL) or S. mutans ATCC 25175 culture (109 CFU/mL) as the inoculants, and cultured at 37°C for 30 h. Samples were taken at 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 30 h, respectively, to determine the viable bacterial counts (CFU/mL) for each species. F. nucleatum was cultured in an anaerobic condition. The selective media used were respectively: MRS agar for Lactobacillus, Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar for S. mutans, and Differentia Clostridial Agar supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood for F. nucleatum. The distinction between colonies of F. nucleatum and the isolated strain (Lacticaseibacillus) was determined with the aid of a microscopic (Axiolab5, Carl Zeiss, Suzhou, China.). All tests were conducted in triplicate. The inhibition rate (%) was calculated as follows:
The isolates were tested for their congregation capacity with S. mutans and F. nucleatum. The test was performed using a spectrophotometric assay [21, 34] with some modifications. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000×g for 15 min, washed three times with the coaggregation buffer (pH 7, containing 0.001 Mol/L Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane) 0.1 mmol/L CaCl2, 0.1 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.15 Mol/L NaCl. Cisar et al. [35], and re-suspended in the coaggregation buffer at a concentration of approximately 109 CFU/mL. The equal volumes (1 mL each) of the isolate, S. mutans or F. nucleatum suspension and a coaggregation pair (the isolate + S. mutans or the isolate + F. nucleatum) suspension were mixed, vortexed for 10 s, and incubated at 37°C for 2, 4, and 6 h precipitate the cell aggregates. The supernatant fluid (0.2 mL) was carefully removed for optical density readings (OD) at 600 nm using a spectrophotometer (Multiskan FC, Thermo scientific Shanghai, China). All tests were conducted in triplicate. The percentage of co-aggregation was calculated as follows [21]:
where A0 and B0 represent the OD values of the isolate, and S. mutans or F. nucleatum respectively at time 0, and Ct represents the OD values of the mixture 2, 4, 6 h, respectively.
Adhesion of oral bacteria to the surface of the oral cavity is required for colonization and for subsequent development of disease, therefore, prevention of adhesion of pathogens should prevent the disease [36]. In this study, human primary gingival epithelial (HPGE) cells (iCell Company, Shanghai, China) were used to determine the antagonistic adhesion of the isolated bacteria to S. mutans, or F. nucleatum. The test was performed using the Esteban-Fernández method with some modifications [37]. Adhesion tests were performed onto a 24-well chamber slide plate. The HPGE cells were seeded (2.5×105 cells/well) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 18 h, then briefly washed twice with the medium before the following testing was undertaken.
The fresh isolated strain and pathogen (S. mutans and F. nucleatum) cultures (109CFU/mL) were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.0) and suspended with the same volume of Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 culture medium that contained 10% fetal bovine serum. The OD600 absorbance was adjusted to 0.4–0.5 with the 1640 culture medium. The isolated strain and pathogen suspensions were mixed at a ratio of 1:1, and 500 μL of the mixture was added onto the prepared 24-well HPGE plate. Each treatment had three wells (repeats). HPGE cells incubated with S. mutans or F. nucleatum alone were used as the controls. The plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 120 min. The cells were then washed three times with PBS, fixed with methanol, Giemsa stained for 5 min, washed with PBS, and air dried. Pathogenic bacterial adhesion to each HPGE cell was observed using a microscope with a 100× oil lens (Axiolab5, Carl Zeiss, Suzhou, China.). Fifty cells in each well were observed and the pathogens adhered onto the surface of each HPGE cell was counted, and the mean for 50 counts were calculated for each well. The adhesion index was then calculated as followings:
Antibacterial test against pathogens
The antibacterial effect of the isolated strains on 10 strains of pathogenic bacteria was tested, as shown in Table 1. The isolates were grown in MRS broth at 37°C overnight. The broth was then centrifuged at 6,500×g for 5 min, and the supernatant was harvested and filtered through a 0.22μm membrane. Both the fermentation broth and supernatant were used to test their antibacterial activity against the pathogenic bacteria. Oxford cup agar diffusion assay [21, 30] as described above was used, except with the Candida albicans strain. The inhibition of the isolates of C. albicans was tested using the method described by Simark-Mattsson and Riley [14, 38] with some modifications. Firstly, 8 μL of overnight cultures of the isolated strain was spotted onto a MRS Petri dish, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h to allow some inhibitory compounds to be metabolized. Then, 7 mL of Stachybotrys glucose semi-solid medium containing 0.5% (v/v) of C. albicans (108 CFU/mL) was poured onto the plate. When the plate was solidified, the plate was then incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 24–48 h. The plate was examined regularly for presence of an inhibition circle around the colonies. All tests were conducted in triplicate.
Determination of antibacterial substances in the isolates
Many substances, such as organic acids, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins, produced by LAB have the ability to inhibit bacteria, so the compounds in supernatant of the cultured isolates were tested for antibacterial effects on S. mutans and F. nucleatum as followings. All tests were conducted in triplicate.
Hydrogen peroxide production
Hydrogen peroxide from the isolated strain was determined using a modified method described by Eschenbach et al. [39]. The isolate was cultured on MRS plates containing 10 g/L glucose, 0.25 g/L tetramethylbenzidine, and 0.01 g/L horseradish peroxidase (200 U/mg protein, Macklin, Shanghai, China) at 37°C in a CO2 atmosphere for 48 h. Colonies showing blue-coloured rings around the colony were classified as being H2O2 producers.
Heat sensitivity and pH
Supernatants from antimicrobial cultures grown in MRS for 48 h was divided into six aliquots. Two aliquots were adjusted with 1 Mol/L of HCl or 1 Mol/L of NaOH to pH 5.5 and 6.8 respectively. Three aliquots were adjusted with 1 Mol/L of NaOH to pH 6.8, and treated, respectively, at 80°C and 100°C for 30 min, or 120°C for 15 min [40]. The Oxford cup agar diffusion test was used to determine antibacterial activity in 100 μL of the supernatant.
Sensitivity to proteolytic enzymes
The sensitivity of the antibacterial substance in the supernatant of the isolated strains to proteolytic enzymes was tested using the method described by Hong and Wang [41, 42]. Supernatant was prepared by centrifuging the cultured isolate at 6500×g for 5 min, transferred into a clean test tube, and its pH was adjusted to 6.8 with 0.1 Mol/L sodium hydroxide. Proteolytic enzymes, trypsin (250 U/mg, Sigma, Saint Louis, American), papain (100 U/mg, Doing Higer, Ningjing, China), and pineapple protease (100 U/mg, Doing Higer, Ningjing, China) were respectively dissolved in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) to make a concentration of 100 mg/mL. 200 uL of the enzyme preparation was then added into 20 mL of supernatant, so the final concentration of the enzyme was 1 mg/mL. The supernatant containing the enzyme was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and then at 80°C for 10 min to inactivate the enzyme. Before evaluating the antibacterial activity, the pH value was checked and readjusted to the initial pH at 6.8 with 1 Mol/L of HCl. The Oxford cup agar diffusion method was used to determine antibacterial activity in 100 μL of the supernatant.
Ammonium sulphate-precipitated proteins [43]
The supernatant was obtained by centrifuging the culture of the isolated strains at 13,000×g for 12 min. Ammonium sulphate was then added into the supernatant to achieve a saturation level of 70%, stirred slowly for 1 h and left to settle at 4°C overnight to precipitate proteins of the isolated strain. The solution was centrifuged at 13,000×g for 12 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was dissolved in the 1/10 of the original volume of phosphate buffer (25 mmol/L, pH 6.8). The Oxford cup agar diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activity in 100 μL of the precipitated protein solution.
Bacteriocin production
Bacteriocin production of the isolated strains was determined using the method described by Sookkhee et al. [40] with some modifications. Briefly, the culture of the isolates strain in MRS broth (Luqiao, Beijing) under CO2 at 37°C for 48 h was centrifuged at 6,500×g for 5 min, and supernatant was collected and adjusted pH at 7.0. Supernatant was lyophilized, and the powder was then constituted in distilled water at a concentration of 600 g/L and filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane before testing against S. mutans and F. nucleatum. In the test against S. mutans, the reconstituted supernatant was firstly diluted by 2-fold using doubled BHI broth, which was then further diluted with BHI broth to the final concentrations of 150, 120, 90, 60, 30, 18, and 0 (BHI buffer only) g/L. 200 uL of each solution was added to a 96-well, flat-bottom microtitre plate, with triplicates for each concentration. Then, 2 uL of S. mutans suspension (109 CFU/mL), incubated overnight before being used, was added to each well, and 50 uL of liquid paraffin was then added carefully to the surface on to prevent moisture loss. The plates were then placed in an aerobic chamber and incubated at 37°C for 30 h. When tested against F. nucleatum, the concentrations of the reconstituted supernatant were 18, 15, 12, 9, 6, 3, and 0 g/L, and 5 uL of the F. nucleatum suspension (109 CFU/mL) was added to each well. The OD600 value (Multiskan FC, Thermo Scientific Shanghai, China) was recorded in 60 min intervals for 30 h and used to calculate the inhibition rate as follows:
where OD600N is the OD600 value for a given concentration of the reconstituted supernatant, and OD600C is the OD600 value for the control (0 g/L).
The inhibition rates and the corresponding supernatant concentrations were plotted to calculate the IC50 value using the SPSS program (IBM SPSS Statistics 20 V20.0, America).
Whole genome sequencing the isolate
The isolates, freshly cultured in broth was inoculated into 500 mL MRS broth medium at 1% (v/v) inoculum and incubated at 37°C for 22h, then centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min. The bacteria were collected, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sent in dry ice to the Majorbio Sequencing Centre (Shanghai, China). DNA was extracted from the bacterial cultures following recommended procedures of the respective manufacturer (DP302, Tiangen, Beijing, China). A combined strategy using the Illumina Hiseq 2500 and PacBio RS II single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing platforms was used to sequence the genome of this strain [44]. The genome sequences were deposited to public depository databases (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Bioinformatics analysis of the genome sequence of the strain was undertaken using the software available on the Majorbio website to determine the bacteriocin gene clusters, the composition of bacteriocin synthesis gene clusters and the type of synthesized bacteriocin. Sequence function annotations were made using NR Database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/). Secondary metabolites were analyzed using Antismash 4.0.2 software (https://dl.secondarymetabolites.org/releases/4.0.2/). Metabolic system analysis included annotation of carbohydrate-active enzymes [45] and analysis of gene clusters for secondary metabolite synthesis [46]. The sequence function was compared using BLAST+ software (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/2.3.0/).
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as a mean ± SD. Where applicable, a 2-tailed Student’s t-test was used to analyze the differences between treatments (Excel software; Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).
Results
Identification of Lactobacilli rhamnosus VHProbi M14
A total of 346 bacterial strains were isolated from different sources used in this study. Among them, 11 strains were all identified as LAB and showed significant inhibitory effects on the growth of S. mutans. The strain isolated from cheese strongly inhibited the growth of S. mutans with an inhibition zone of 2.30 ± 0.15 cm, and identified as a novel Lactobacilli rhamnosus strain. We nominally called the strain L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 (referred to the M14 strain) and its detailed characteristics are reported here.
The M14 strain was then subject to a range of biochemical tests. The strain could ferment N-acetylglucosamine, aesculin glycerol, amidon, amygdaline, D-arabinose, L-arabinose, L-arabitol, arbulin, cellobiose, dulcitol, fructose, galactose, gentiobiose, gluconate, glucose, inositol, mannose, mannitol, maltose, melezitose, α-methyl-D-glucoside, lactose, rhamnose, ribose, salicin, sorbitol, sucrose, D-tagatose, and trehalose. The strain was defective in fermenting adonitol, D-arabitol, erythritol, D-fucose, L-fucose, glycogen, inulin, 2-ketogluconate, 5-ketogluconate, D-lyxose, α-methyl-D-mannoside, melibiose, β-methyl-D-xyloside, sorbose, turanoseraffinose, xylitol, D-xylose, and L-xylose. The results were uploaded to the API system and the strain was identified as belonging to genus L. rhamnosus. Then, the 16S rDNA sequence of the strain was uploaded to the NCBI database and the strain was found to be close to genus L. rhamnosus by BLAST comparison. The 16s rDNA sequences of 19 closely related strains were selected, downloaded, and the phylogenetic tree (Fig 1) was constructed by Neighbor-Joining method using MEGA11.0 software. The M14 strain had the highest homology with L. rhamnosus strain DM065.
The M14 strain was thus named L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14. The 16s rDNA sequence was uploaded to the NCBI databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OP824792).
Inhibition of the M14 strain on pathogens and antagonistic adhesion of HPGE cells
The effects of the M14 strain on the growth of S. mutans and F. nucleatum are shown in Fig 2. S. mutans in pathogen control started to grow at 4 h and reached the log phase at 8 h. The bacterial counts for S. mutans were significantly greater than those for the S. mutans + M14 treatment (P < 0.05), and the inhibition rate maintained greater than 86% from 8 to 30 h. In the inhibition test for F. nucleatum, F. nucleatum in pathogen control grew slowly from 4 to 24 h and then reached the log phase, while the bacteria on the F. nucleatum + M14 treatment did not show any growth trends. After 16 h, the inhibition rates of the M14 strain on F. nucleatum were all greater than 90%.
The M14 strain efficiently coaggregated with S.mutans and F. nucleatum, are shown in Fig 3. The coaggregation rate of the M14 strain with S. mutans and F. nucleatum increased over the period of 6 h. Coaggregation rates for strain M14 and S. mutans at 2, 4 and 6 h were 31.7% ± 3.1%, 33.8% ± 2.5% and 40.0% ± 0.1% respectively. Co aggregation rates for strain M14 and F. nucleatum at 2, 4 and 6 h were 8.1% ± 0.9%, 15.8% ± 2.7% and 21.8% ± 2.4% respectively.
The anti-adhesive effect of the M14 strain on adhesion of S. mutans and F. nucleatum onto HPGE cells is shown in Fig 4. As shown in Fig 4a1 and 4b1, S. mutans and F. nucleatum showed a strong attachment on HPGE cells. The adhesion index was 32.8 ± 2.54 for F. nucleatum and 10.3 ± 1.52 for S. mutans respectively. After a 2-h co-culture of the M14 strain with each of the pathogens, the adhesion index decreased to 18.93 ± 0.69 for F. nucleatum and 2.01 ± 0.67 for S. mutans, respectively (Fig 4a2 and 4b2). The reductions of the adhesion index were significant (P < 0.05). Therefore, the M14 strain showed a significant inhibitory effect on the adhesion of S. mutans and F. nucleatum onto HPGE cells.
Antibacterial test of the M14 strain
The antibacterial effects of the M14 strain on the periodontal pathogens (A. actinomycetemcomitans, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis), the caries pathogen (S. mutans), skin pathogens (P. acnes, S. aureus), the intestinal pathogens (E. coli, S. enteritids) and vaginitis pathogens (C. albicans, G. vaginalis) are shown in Table 2. The zone of inhibition of the fementation broth ranged from 1 cm to 2.47 cm, while the zone of inhibition of the supernatant was relatively smaller. The supernatant had no inhibitory effect on C. albicans and P. acnes, presumably because these two pathogens require higher concentrations of inhibitory substances.
Table 2. Antibacterial effects (zone of inhibition, cm) of L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 on pathogens.
Pathogenic bacteria | The fermentation broth | The supernatant |
---|---|---|
A. actinomycetemcomitans BNCC336945 | 1.00 ± 0.10 | 0.93± 0.06 |
C. albicans ATCC10231 | 2.10 ± 0.15 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
E. coli ATCC25922 | 1.66 ± 0.18 | 1.17 ± 0.08 |
F. nucleatum BNCC336949 | 1.69 ± 0.09 | 1.60 ± 0.05 |
G. vaginalis BNCC 354890 | 1.45 ± 0.15 | 1.18 ± 0.03 |
P. acnes ATCC6919 | 2.47 ± 0.19 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
P. gingivalis BNCC353909 | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 1.13 ± 0.12 |
S. aureus ATCC 6538 | 1.70 ± 0.20 | 1.47 ± 0.03 |
S. enteritids ATCC14028 | 1.72 ± 0.06 | 1.34 ± 0.11 |
S. mutans ATCC25175 | 2.30 ± 0.15 | 1.70 ± 0.10 |
Antibacterial substances in the M14 strain
The M14 strain did not show any blue-coloured ring around its colonies on plates containing 0.25 g/L tetramethylbenzidine and 0.01 g/L horseradish peroxidase, therefore, the M14 sprain does not produce hydrogen peroxide.
The inhibition capacity of the M14 strain decreased as the pH increased from 4.3 up to 6.8, but remained active at pH 6.8. This indicates the presence of other antibacterial substances in addition to organic acids (Table 3). Compared with the non-enzyme control, the proteolytic treatment of the M14 strain supernatant by trypsin, pineapple protease and papain, reduced the inhibition zone values, indicating that some of the antibacterial substances were proteins or peptides which are sensitive to the proteases. Excluding the interference of organic acids in the supernatant, the zone of inhibition around S. mutans and F. nucleatum was measured as 1.30 ± 0.05 cm and 1.39 ± 0.01 cm respectively; the inhibition zone values for the supernatant of the M14 strain culture at 80°C were 1.23 ± 0.03 cm and 1.42 ± 0.06 cm, respectively, indicating that the inhibitory substance was still active, but the antibacterial ability lost fully at temperature 100°C (Table 3). The ammonium sulphate-precipitated proteins in the M14 strain supernatant also displayed antibacterial activity against S. mutans and F. nucleatum (Table 3). These tests showed that the antimicrobial substances may consist of organic acids and protein-based antimicrobial peptides.
Table 3. Antibacterial effects (zone of inhibition, cm) of L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 on pathogens under different conditions.
Conditions | S. mutans | F. nucleatum | |
---|---|---|---|
pH | pH 4.3 (Original) | 1.70 ± 0.10 | 1.60 ± 0.05 |
pH 5.5 | 1.42 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.05 | |
pH 6.8 | 1.25 ± 0.05 | 1.40 ± 0.02 | |
Proteases (pH 4.3) | Non-enzyme control | 1.70 ± 0.10 | 1.65 ± 0.10 |
Trypsin | 0.90 ± 0.00 | 1.01 ± 0.03 | |
Papain | 1.15 ± 0.05 | 1.21 ± 0.02 | |
Pineapple protease | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.20 ± 0.04 | |
Temperature (pH 6.8) | Control | 1.30 ± 0.05 | 1.39 ± 0.01 |
80°C | 1.23 ± 0.03 | 1.42 ± 0.06 | |
100°C | - | - | |
120°C | - | - | |
Ammonium sulphate precipitation (pH 6.8) | 1.30 ± 0.00 | 1.55 ± 0.05 |
Fig 5 shows the inhibitory effects of the reconstituted lyophilized supernatant of the M14 strain on the growth curves of S. mutans and F. nucleatum. As the growth period was extended, the reconstituted lyophilized supernatant had significant inhibitory effects on the growth of S. mutans (Fig 5a). At the 120 g/L concentration, there was no significant growth of the pathogen in 24 h. Below 120 g/L, the growth of S. mutans was inhibited to various degrees, and was depended on the supernatant concentration. S. mutans grew more slowly with increasing concentrations of the inhibitory substances. The inhibition rates were calculated separately for different concentrations at 15 hours of the growth (static period) (Table 4). The IC50 value was 58.96 g/L for S. mutans growth up to 15 h. In the case of F. nucleatum (Fig 5), there was insignificant growth of the pathogen within a 30h time period at the 15 g/L concentration. Below concentrations of 15 g/L, the growth of F. nucleatum was inhibited to various degrees, and was dependent on supernatant concentrations. F. nucleatum grew more slowly with increasing concentrations of inhibitory substances. The inhibition rates were calculated separately for different concentrations for the first 28 h of growth (static period) (Table 5). The IC50 value was 12.52 g/L for F. nucleatun for growth in the first 28 h.
Table 4. The inhibition rates of the concentrations of reconstituted lyophilized supernatant of L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 to the growth of S. mutans.
Concentrations (g/L) | 0 | 18 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. mutans | 0.0%±0.0% | 3.1%±0.1% | 12.3%±1.3% | 36.0%±2.2% | 82.2%±1.3% | 95.7%±1.1% | 98.5%±0.2% |
Table 5. The inhibition rates of the concentrations of reconstituted lyophilized supernatant of L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 to the growth of F. nucleatum.
Concentrations (g/L) | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F. nucleatum | 0.0%±0.0% | 0.7%±1.1% | 1.2%±1.2% | 2.5%±0.8% | 41.9%±0.8% | 93.6%±1.2% | 96.6%±1.3% |
Genome annotation and bioinformatics analysis
The whole genome sequence of the M14 strain was uploaded into the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP095384.1/) and the total length of the genome was 2898403 bp, and could encode 2687 genes, accounting for 84.89% of the whole genome, with an average length of 915.13 bp, with a gene density of 93% and a GC content of 47.29%.
The analysis of gene clusters for secondary metabolite synthesis [43] showed that the secondary metabolites of the M14 strain included mainly SPK3-related coding genes of family I (cluster1) and cluster2 bacteriocin-related coding genes belonging to family II. There were 23 bacteriocin-related coding genes (Fig 6), with gene clusters starting at base 2320116 and ending at base 2339997 on the scaffold. The coding gene numbers ranged from 2201 to 2223, and the predicted functions of these 23 genes is shown in Table 6. Proteins ranged in size from 52 to 479 amino acids and were responsible for a range of biological functions (Table 6).
Table 6. Details of the gene clusters for the secondary metabolite bacteriocin synthesis by L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14.
Gene ID | Location | Cluster ID | NR Description | Number of amino acids |
---|---|---|---|---|
gene2201 | Chromosome | cluster2 | aldo/keto reductase | 360 |
gene2202 | Chromosome | cluster2 | threonine/serine exporter family protein | 451 |
gene2203 | Chromosome | cluster2 | hypothetical protein | 116 |
gene2204 | Chromosome | cluster2 | bacteriocin secretion accessory protein | 459 |
gene2205 | Chromosome | cluster2 | peptide cleavage/export ABC transporter | 730 |
gene2206 | Chromosome | cluster2 | GHKL domain-containing protein | 431 |
gene2207 | Chromosome | cluster2 | LytTR family transcriptional regulator DNA-binding domain-containing protein | 258 |
gene2208 | Chromosome | cluster2 | hypothetical protein | 81 |
gene2209 | Chromosome | cluster2 | bacteriocin immunity protein | 99 |
gene2210 | Chromosome | cluster2 | - | 73 |
gene2211 | Chromosome | cluster2 | class IIb bacteriocin, lactobin A/cerein 7B family | 52 |
gene2212 | Chromosome | cluster2 | MULTISPECIES: bacteriocin | 61 |
gene2213 | Chromosome | cluster2 | Gar-IM | 105 |
gene2214 | Chromosome | cluster2 | garvicin Q family class II bacteriocin | 66 |
gene2215 | Chromosome | cluster2 | MULTISPECIES: class IIb bacteriocin, lactobin A/cerein 7B family | 52 |
gene2216 | Chromosome | cluster2 | MULTISPECIES: bacteriocin | 61 |
gene2217 | Chromosome | cluster2 | hypothetical protein | 61 |
gene2218 | Chromosome | cluster2 | MULTISPECIES: hypothetical protein | 268 |
gene2219 | Chromosome | cluster2 | CPBP family intramembrane metalloprotease | 268 |
gene2220 | Chromosome | cluster2 | hypothetical protein | 64 |
gene2221 | Chromosome | cluster2 | Rrf2 family transcriptional regulator | 146 |
gene2222 | Chromosome | cluster2 | MFS transporter | 475 |
gene2223 | Chromosome | cluster2 | hypothetical protein | 110 |
Discussion
The present study isolated a novel LAB strain and named it as L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14. S. mutans and F. nucleatum are the main pathogens causing dental caries and periodontal disease in the oral cavity. The M14 strain was found to inhibit the growth of the two pathogens under co-culture conditions, because the M14 strain produced organic acids or other antibacterial substances. The M14 strain efficiently co-aggregated with S.mutans and F. nucleatum. The levels of aggregation differed between the pathogens and increased with time. Not all Lactobacillus strains can aggregate with harmful bacteria [47], so the coaggregation assay may be a useful complement to screen probiotic candidates with possible anti-caries properties. These tests indicate that L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 is a potential oral probiotic. We also found that L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 displayed antibacterial activity on other pathogens, such as oral pathogens P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans, intestinal pathogens Salmonella and Escherichia coli, skin pathogens P. acnes and S. aureus, and female vaginal pathogens G. vaginalis and C. albicans. Salmonella and E. coli are both pathogens that cause diarrhoea in children [48]. P. acnes is a gram-positive bacterium, found ubiquitously as a commensal on the surface of the skin, bowel, conjunctival surface, oral mucosa, and even the external ear canal. It can not only cause acne on the skin, but may also play a role in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and ulcerative colitis [49]. G. vaginalis is a bacterial vaginitis (BV) pathogen affecting women of childbearing age worldwide [50]. C. albicans is the most common fungal pathogen in humans, which can cause a variety of diseases such as periodontitis and fungal vaginitis [51, 52]. The ability of strain M14 to inhibit the growth of these pathogens provides theoretical support for its later application in these areas. We will further research the function in these areas.
We further investigated the characteristics of the antibacterial substances in the M14 strain using S. mutans and F. nucleatum as indicator pathogen species. The antibacterial substance in the M14 strain was free of hydrogen peroxide but consisted of organic acids and protein-based antibacterial peptides. We identified that bacteriocins (genes 2211, 2214, 2215) belonged to class II bacteriocins. Examples of class II bacteriocins include salivacin 140 from L. salivarius [20], and acidocin J1229 from L. acidophilus [53], Plantaricin EF, Plantaricin JK from L. plantarum L-ZS9 [43]. The activity of bacteriocins of class II is due to pore formation in the cytoplasmic membra [53]. The inhibitory ability of bacteriocins of class IIb is dependent on the synergistic action of the bipeptides [54]. Comparative analysis of the proteins encoded by genes 2211, 2212, 2214, 2215 and 2216 using BLAST showed that these proteins are similar to the bacteriocin proteins of strains L. rhamnosus GG, IDCC 3201, HN001 and DSM20021. LGG was able to inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella paratyphi B and Salmonella enterica [55]. The HN001 strain can also inhibit the growth of methanogens and/or archaea bacteria [56]. Rhamnose IDCC 3201 has potent inhibitory activity against various pathogens responsible for inflammatory responses in the gastrointestinal tract (i.e. Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhi), respiratory system (i.e. Streptococcus pneumoniae) and vagina (i.e. Candida albicans) [57]. DSM 20021 strain can reduce the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria [58]. All these strains contain bacteriocin-related genes and have the ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria. This also suggests that L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 has the similar genetic background, as these other probiotic bacteria, to synthesize bacteriocins, consistent with M14’s antibacterial ability.
Probiotics are also gaining attention as a new type of oral care product. The function of L. rhamnosus VHProbi M14 as a potential oral probiotic will be further investigated in animal caries and periodontitis models. We will also later verify the role of this strain in the prevention and treatment of dental caries and periodontitis through clinical trials. We then expect to develop oral care products containing this strain and its metabolites.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the grants from the Mountain Tai New Strategy Industry Leader Program (Grant No. tscy20180317). The person who received the financial support was Zhi Duan.
References
- 1.Mann S, Park MS, Johnston TV, Ji GE, Hwang KT, Ku S. Oral probiotic activities and biosafety of Lactobacillus gasseri HHuMIN D. Microbial Cell Factories. 2021;20(1):1–24. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01563-w . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kuramitsu H. The virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans. In: Fischetti RPN, Ferretti Joseph J., Portnoy Daniel A., Rood Julian I., editor. Gram-Positive Pathogens. 2nd ed: Wiley Online Library; 2014. p. 340–6. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Banas JA. Virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans. Front Biosci. 2004;9:1267–77. doi: 10.2741/1305 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Claesson R, Edlund MB, Persson S, Carlsson J. Production of volatile sulfur compounds by various Fusobacterium species. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1990;5(3):137–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1990.tb00411.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Boever EH, Loesche WJ. Assessing the contribution of anaerobic microflora of the tonngue to oral malodor. J Ame Dental Assoc. 1995;126(10):1384–93. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meurman JH, Stamatova I. Probiotics: contributions to oral health. Oral Dis. 2007;13(5):443–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01386.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lahtinen S, Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Wright AV. Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects. 4th ed. Wright AV, Axelsson L, editors. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012. 2 p. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahrné S, Nobaek S, Jeppsson B, Adlerberth I, Wold AE, Molin G. The normal Lactobacillus flora of healthy human rectal and oral mucosa. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85(1):88–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00480.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee DE, Huh CS, Ra J, Choi ID, Jeong JW, Kim SH, et al. Clinical evidence of effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 on skin aging: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;25(12):2160–8. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1509.09021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res. 1994;8(2):263–71. doi: 10.1177/08959374940080022001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Colloca ME, Ahumada MC, López ME, Nader-Macías ME. Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from healthy subjects. Oral Dis. 2000;6(4):227–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2000.tb00118.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kõll-Klais P, Mändar R, Leibur E, Marcotte H, Hammarström L, Mikelsaar M. Oral lactobacilli in chronic periodontitis and periodontal health: Species composition and antimicrobial activity. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005;20:354–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00239.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maukonen J, Mättö J, Suihko ML, Saarela M. Intra-individual diversity and similarity of salivary and faecal microbiota. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(Pt 12):1560–8. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47352-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simark-Mattsson C, Emilson CG, Håkansson EG, Jacobsson C, Roos K, Holm S. Lactobacillus-mediated interference of mutans streptococci in caries-free vs. caries-active subjects. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007;115(4):308–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00458.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Teanpaisan R, Dahlén G. Use of polymerase chain reaction techniques and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for differentiation of oral Lactobacillus species. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21(2):79–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00259.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mayanagi G, Kimura M, Nakaya S, Hirata H, Sakamoto M, Benno Y, et al. Probiotic effects of orally administered Lactobacillus salivarius WB21-containing tablets on periodontopathic bacteria: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(6):506–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sampaio-Maia B, Caldas IM, Pereira ML, Pérez-Mongiovi D, Araujo R. The oral microbiome in health and its implication in oral and systemic diseases. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2016;97:171–210. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2016.08.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee S-H, Kim Y-J. A comparative study of the effect of probiotics on cariogenic biofilm model for preventing dental caries. Arch Microbiol. 2014;196:601–9. doi: 10.1007/s00203-014-0998-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kolenbrander PE. Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annual Rev Microbiol. 2000;54(1):413–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arihara K, Ogihara S, Mukai T, Itoh M, Kondo Y. Salivacin 140, a novel bacteriocin from Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salicinius T140 active against pathogenic bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996;22(6):420–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1996.tb01194.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang G, Lu M, Liu R, Tian Y, Vu VH, Li Y, et al. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence by Lactobacillus plantarum K41 isolated from traditional Sichuan pickles. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:774. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00774 mc7203412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Näse L, Hatakka K, Savilahti E, Saxelin M, Pönkä A, Poussa T, et al. Effect of long-term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children. Caries Res. 2001;35(6):412–20. doi: 10.1159/000047484 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nikawa H, Makihira S, Fukushima H, Nishimura H, Ozaki Y, Ishida K, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri in bovine milk fermented decreases the oral carriage of mutans streptococci. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;95(2):219–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brul S, Coote P. Preservative agents in foods. Mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;50(1–2):1–17. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00072-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Green G, Dicks LM, Bruggeman G, Vandamme EJ, Chikindas ML. Pediocin PD-1, a bactericidal antimicrobial peptide from Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83(1):127–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00241.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kanatani K, Oshimura M, Sano K. Isolation and characterization of acidocin A and cloning of the bacteriocin gene from Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(3):1061–7. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.3.1061-1067.1995 mc167361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McGroarty JA, Tomeczek L, Pond DG, Reid G, Bruce AW. Hydrogen peroxide production by Lactobacillus species: correlation with susceptibility to the spermicidal compound nonoxynol-9. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(6):1142–4. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.6.1142 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ando Y, Tsuzuki T. The effect of hydrogen peroxide on spores of Clostridium perfringens. Lett Applied Microbiol. 1986;2. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Khalaf H, Nakka SS, Sandén C, Svärd A, Hultenby K, Scherbak N, et al. Antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus and bacteriocin PLNC8 αβ on the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0810-8 mc4990846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mao Y, Zhang X, Xu Z. Identification of antibacterial substances of Lactobacillus plantarum DY-6 for bacteriostatic action. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8(6):2854–63. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1585 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(2):697–703. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991 mc207061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang W, Wei Y. Experiment research of antagonistic effects of two probiotics on halitosis pathogens. Dental Med. 2015;35(2):179–82. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Handley PS, Harty DW, Wyatt JE, Brown CR, Doran JP, Gibbs AC. A comparison of the adhesion, coaggregation and cell-surface hydrophobicity properties of fibrillar and fimbriate strains of Streptococcus salivarius. J Gen Microbiol. 1987;133(11):3207–17. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-11-3207 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cisar JO, Kolenbrander PE, McIntire FC. Specificity of coaggregation reactions between human oral streptococci and strains of Actinomyces viscosus or Actinomyces naeslundii. Infect Immun. 1979;24(3):742–52. doi: 10.1128/iai.24.3.742-752.1979 mc414369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ofek I, Hasty DL, Sharon N. Anti-adhesion therapy of bacterial diseases: prospects and problems. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38(3):181–91. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00228-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Esteban-Fernández A, Zorraquín-Peña I, Ferrer MD, Mira A, Bartolomé B, González de Llano D, et al. Inhibition of oral pathogens adhesion to human gingival fibroblasts by wine polyphenols alone and in combination with an oral probiotic. J Agri Food Chem. 2018;66(9):2071–82. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05466 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Riley TV, Mee BJ. Simple method for detecting Bacteroides spp. bacteriocin production. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13:594–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.594-595.1981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Eschenbach DA, Davick PR, Williams BL, Klebanoff SJ, Young-Smith K, Critchlow CM, et al. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(2):251–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.2.251-256.1989 mc267286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sookkhee S, Chulasiri M, Prachyabrued W. Lactic acid bacteria from healthy oral cavity of Thai volunteers: inhibition of oral pathogens. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;90(2):172–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01229.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hong J, Quan L-H, Heu S, Jung KS, Han S-W, Moon E, et al. A new antimicrobial substance produced by Staphylococcus pasteuri isolated from vegetables. Food Sci Biotech. 2014;23:983–90. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang XM, Jiang Y, Liu F, Sun ZL, Wang DY, Xu WM, et al. Identification of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria and induction of bacteriocin synthesis. Food Sci. 2016;37(21):170–5. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201621029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang X, Zhao B, Zhang XM, Li PL. Screen of bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria the analysis of bacteriocin related genes. Acta China Agri Univ. 2013;18(4):168–77. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 2012;1(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18 mc3626529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D490–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178 mc3965031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blin K, Wolf T, Chevrette MG, Lu X, Schwalen CJ, Kautsar SA, et al. AntiSMASH 4.0-improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W36–W41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx319 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Twetman L, Larsen U, Fiehn NE, Stecksén-Blicks C, Twetman S. Coaggregation between probiotic bacteria and caries-associated strains: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):284–8. doi: 10.1080/00016350902984237 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ramos A M, olarte J. Observations on the use of antibiotics in children with diarrhea, infected with different types of Shigella, Salmonella and Escherichia coli enteropathogen. Boletin medico del Hospital Infantil de Mexico. 1962;19:225–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sakhamuru S, Kambampati S, Wasim S, Kukkar V, Malik BH. The role of propionibacterium acnes in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and ulcerative colitis: how this connection may inspire novel management of these conditions. Cureus. 2020;12(10). doi: 10.7759/cureus.10812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(2):223–38. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00075-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shao MK, Qi WJ, Hou MY, Luo DD. Analysis of pathogenic factors of Candida albicans and the effect of vaginal immunization on recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in mice. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2022;48(3):857–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Oka I, Shigeishi H, Ohta K. Co-infection of oral Candida albicans and Porphyromonas gingivalis is associated with active periodontitis in middle-aged and older Japanese people. Medicina. 2022;58(6):723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tahara T, Kanatani K. Isolation, partial characterization and mode of action of acidocin J1229, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus JCM 1229. J Applied Bacteriol. 1996;81(6):669–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03563.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nissen-Meyer J, Rogne P, Oppegård C, Haugen HS, Kristiansen PE. Structure-function relationships of the non-lanthionine-containing peptide (class II) bacteriocins produced by gram-positive bacteria. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2009;10(1):19–37. doi: 10.2174/138920109787048661 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Guo M, Zhang C, Zhang C, Zhang X, Wu Y. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus reduces the pathogenicity of Escherichia coli in chickens. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:664604. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664604 mc8203825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Attwood GT, Crouzet L, Bassett SA, Dekker JW, Hill JP, inventorsInhibiting the growth of methane-producing bacteria and/or archaea in the fore stomach of ruminant animals comprises administering to a ruminant animal Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strain HN001. AU2022.
- 57.Chae SA, Ramakrishnan SR, Kim T, Kim SR, Bang WY, Jeong CR, et al. Anti-inflammatory and anti-pathogenic potential of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 isolated from feces of breast-fed infants. Microb Pathog. 2022;173(Pt A):105857. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105857 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lizardo M, Magalhães RM, Tavaria FK. Probiotic adhesion to skin keratinocytes and underlying mechanisms. Biol. 2022;11(9):1372. doi: 10.3390/biology11091372 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]