Abstract
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling is an important pathway for promoting the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, including cancer. The roles of TGF-β signaling are heterogeneous and versatile in cancer development and progression, both anticancer and protumoral actions are reported. Interestingly, increasing evidence suggests that TGF-β enhances disease progression and drug resistance via immune-modulatory actions in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of solid tumors. A better understanding of its regulatory mechanisms in the TME at the molecular level can facilitate the development of precision medicine to block the protumoral actions of TGF-β in the TME. Here, the latest information about the regulatory mechanisms and translational research of TGF-β signaling in the TME for therapeutic development had been summarized.
Keywords: Transforming growth factor-β, tumor microenvironment, cancer, immunity, cancer immunotherapy
Introduction
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) cytokine superfamily is composed of highly pleiotropic molecules, including TGF-β, activin, inhibin, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), etc., which are important for regulating tissue inflammation, fibrosis, cell apoptosis, and proliferation [1]. TGF-β1, 2, and 3 have been defined as three isoforms of TGF-β in mammals [2]. They have been encoded as precursors with 70–80% homology and control basic cell behaviours [3]. However, only TGF-β1 is almost ubiquitous in mammalian tissues. TGF-β1 can be directly activated by different transactivating proteins, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), plasmin, and acid. Therefore, TGF-β1 is one of the key mediators for executing the physiological and pathological actions of TGF-β signaling [4]. For example, TGF-β is a key activator for tissue fibrosis [5]. It promotes the fibrotic phenotype of immune cells and vascular cells [6, 7]. It also triggers the up-regulation of proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase sarcoma (Src) and brain-specific homeobox/POU domain protein (Pou4f1) for macrophage-myofibroblast transformation (MMT) [8, 9]. Long non-coding RNAs are expressed under the facilitation of TGF-β signaling for enhancing tissue inflammation and fibrosis [10, 11].
Importantly, increasing evidence demonstrates the versatile roles of TGF-β signaling in cancer development and progression. Not only can it suppress carcinogenesis, but it also promotes tumor growth [12, 13] and progression contradictorily [14, 15]. TGF-β signaling is significant in the immunoregulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in both adoptive and innate immunity. For instance, TGF-β1 can silence the anticancer activities of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells via transcriptional regulation [15]. It also triggers the generation of cancer-associated fibroblasts via MMT [16]. Both suggest the therapeutic potential of targeting TGF-β signaling in search of immunotherapy against solid tumors. This review systemically summarised the latest updates of TGF-β signaling in TME, as a better understanding of its overall development from basic research to translational works for anticancer therapy.
Canonical TGF-β pathway
TGF-β superfamily is a group of multifunctional cytokines, including three different mammalian subtypes, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 [2]. TGF-β1 is the most common, widely expressed, and well investigated isoform. In fact, the majority of secreted TGF-β are stored in the extracellular matrix (ECM) as latent complexes which act as a reservoir. A latency associated peptide (LAP) and a mature TGF-β undergo non-covalent association to form the small latent complex (SLC) of TGF-β. Often, the LAP in the SLC covalently binds to a binding protein, forming the large latent complex (LLC) [17]. Despite its abundance, downstream signaling of the pathway is prohibited without ligand activation. Multiple mediators are responsible for the release and activation of LAP-TGF-β. Integrin, thrombospondin, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), plasma kallikrein, and plasmin are examples of activators [18]. The latency of TGF-β release and activation provides a means to regulate the bioavailability of TGF-β locally. Local changes in the ECM under pathological conditions are detected and responded to the release of TGF-β from the latent complexes to facilitate tissue repair.
Once activated, the TGF-β ligand regulates cellular processes by binding to TGF-β type I receptors (TβRI) and TβRII, both of which are transmembrane protein serine/threonine kinases [19]. After binding of TGF-β to TβRII, it will recruit TβRI and form a functional heterologous complex. Activation of receptor-associated mothers against decapentaplegics (R-Smad), namely mothers against decapentaplegics 1 (Smad1), 2, 3, 5, and 8, is triggered when TβRII transphosphorylases the glutamine synthetase (GS) domain of TβRI which results in the activation of TβRI kinase. Then R-Smads and common-mediator Smad (Co-Smad) combine with Smad4 to form a heterotrimeric complex which later translocates into the nucleus for regulation of transcriptional activity [20, 21]. The Smad complex cooperates with other transcription factors, chromatin binding proteins, transcription co-activators, and co-repressors at the genome level [22].
In particular, Smad2 and Smad3 are phosphorylated by activated TGF-β receptors, while Smad1, 5, and 8 are downstream of BMP receptors [22]. Additionally, there is a subfamily of inhibitory Smads (I-Smads), with members including Smad6 and Smad7. I-Smads block the signaling through multiple mechanisms which serve as essential negative feedback for preventing the hyperactivation of TGF-β signaling [23]. For example, Smad6 binds to Smad1 and thereby prevents its binding to Smad4. Smad7 blocks the phosphorylation and activation of Smad2/3 by competing with their binding to TβRI [5]. The canonical TGF-β pathways are summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Canonical pathway of TGF-β signaling. TGF-β communicates through the Smad and non-Smad signaling pathways. TGF-β interacts with TβRII in the Smad pathway, which phosphorylates TβRI and activates Smad2 and Smad3 (R-Smads). Activated Smad2/3 produces R-Smads-Co-Smad complexes with Smad4 (Co-Smad), which interact with several transcription factors and co-activators and control the transcription of target genes. BMPs bind to homomeric type II receptors, which transphosphorylate homomeric type receptorsors to generate both Smad-dependent and independent signaling. Phosphorylated R-Smad (Smad1, 5, or 8) binds with Smad4 and co-translocates into the nucleus during Smad-dependent signaling. P: phosphorylation
Non-canonical TGF-β pathway
Besides the canonical pathway, TGF-β achieves its biological actions via a number of non-canonical pathways in a Smad-independent manner which is listed as follows and summarized in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Non-canonical pathways of TGF-β signaling. TGF-β triggers Ras homolog gene family member A (RhoA)/Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) and then activates the p-Lin-11/Isl-1/Mec-3 kinases (LIMK) to mediate epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). TGF-β signaling can also activate protein kinase B (AKT) via phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) for regulating translational responses though the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and S6 kinase. In addition, TGF-β activates tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), which facilitates the activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/MAPK via the MAPK kinase 3/6 (MKK3/6) and MKK4 pathways, respectively, resulting in the control of cell death, proliferation, metastasis, growth, and angiogenesis. Furthermore, TGF-β can interact with Ras, which then triggers the gene regulatory actions via the rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF), MAPK kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2), and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) to regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation
ERK
TGF-β activated TβRI phosphorylates Src homology and collagen A (ShcA) protein on the serine and tyrosine residues on the receptors [24]. The ShcA protein acts as a docking site for binding of the Son of sevenless (Sos) protein and growth factor receptor binding protein 2 (GRB2) [25]. The formation of a Shc/GRB2/Sos complex converts Ras into its guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound active form. It phosphorylates c-RAF for the activation of MEK1/2 kinase, which serves to regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation [26, 27].
JNK/p38
TGF-β activates JNK and p38 MAPK through TRAF6 and TAK1 [28]. TRAF6 undergoes K63-linked polyubiquitination to activate TAK1, which promotes MKK3/6 and MKK4-mediated activation of p38 MAPK and JNK/MAPK respectively [29]. The p38 MAPK and JNK/MAPK execute TGF-β-mediated regulatory actions via activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) [30] or EMT [31].
Rho-like GTP hydrolases
RhoA GTP hydrolase (GTPase) involves in TGF-β-mediated cytoskeletal regulation and stabilization of adhesion junctions, abnormalities in these processes may cause EMT [32]. RhoA is activated under the action of TGF-β, resulting in higher levels of RhoA binding to GTP [33]. This stimulates the formation of actin stress fibres [34]. GTP-RhoA also turns on ROCK and then activates LIMK, which inactivates an actin depolymerizing factor (cofilin). At the tight junctions of the epithelial cells, the activity of RhoA is directly regulated by TGF-β [35] to mediate EMT for invasion of mesenchymal cells and endothelial activation [36].
PI3K/AKT
TGF-β also activates PI3K to promote the activation of AKT via mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) [37], which regulates cell survival, migration, and growth. Downstream of AKT, S6 kinase 1, can be triggered by activated mTOR. However, AKT can cooperate with Smad3 to inhibit its transcription-mediated activity, thereby attenuating TGF-β-induced apoptosis [38]. AKT also inhibits a tumor suppressor and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) protein forkhead box O (FoxO) transcription factor to prevent the Smad-mediated growth arrest and metastasis [39, 40]. Interestingly, RAS and TGF-β signaling induces the secretion of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and its autocrine activity by upregulating PDGF receptors. It results in the activation of PI3K and the accumulation of nuclear β-catenin. EMT is promoted [41–43].
Other TGF-β-dependent mechanisms
The Abelson tyrosine kinases (c-Abl) has been identified as an important mediator in TGF-β signaling for tissue fibrosis and fibroblast formation [44]. Activated c-Abl mediates the TGF-β-induced morphological changes, extracellular matrix gene expression, and fibroblasts’ proliferations [44]. Besides, protein kinase A (PKA) has been discovered to take part in TGF-β-mediated gene transcription without cyclic adenosine monophosphate’s (cAMP’s) involvement in pancreatic acinar cells [45]. PKA can be activated by a Smad3/Smad4 complex by interacting with its regulatory subunits, which is essential in CREB-dependent growth inhibition [25].
Signaling crosstalk with other pathways
The TGF-β pathway is integrated into the intracellular signaling network through crosstalk with other signaling pathways, and these crosstalk activities play crucial roles in the regulation of a variety of biological responses. The TGF-β signaling crosstalk with other pathways are summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Crosstalk between the TGF-β pathway and other signaling pathways. TGF-β and Wnt signaling interact to activate the transcription of gastrin by the complex of Smad3 and β-catenin to promote gastrointestinal cancer. Downstream transcription factor Yes-associated protein (YAP) in Hippo signaling can also form a complex with Smad3 to drive malignant development. The Notch intracellular domain (NICD) from Notch signaling is required for TGF-β-induced EMT. High Gli2 levels in hedgehog accelerate TGF-β/Smad3-induced EMT and tumor growth. Wnt: wingless-related integration; Gli2: glioma-associated oncogene 2
TGF-β and Wnt signaling interact to activate the transcription of the Wnt target gene for gastrin, a promoter of gastrointestinal cancer, suggesting that the two may work together to induce carcinogenesis. [46]. The downstream transcription factor YAP in Hippo signaling may also crosstalk with TGF-β signaling. YAP-transcriptional enhancer factor domain family member 4 (TEAD4)-Smad3-p300 complex forms at the connective tissue growth factors (CTGF) promoter in mesothelioma cells increasing the expression of CTGF for driving malignant development [47]. Notch signaling is required for TGF-β-induced EMT and cell differentiation in keratinocytes, normal murine mammary gland epithelial cells, and primary kidney tubular epithelial cells [48]. High Gli2 levels are noted in various malignant tumor cells, including melanoma, breast cancer, glioblastoma, and ovarian cancer. High TGF-β levels also exhibit in these samples [49]. High Gli2 expression is related to decreased E-cadherin’s expression and enhanced tumor cell invasion which may accelerate TGF-β-induced EMT and tumor growth [50].
TGF-β signaling in cancer cells
In normal and premalignant cells, TGF-β strengthens homeostasis and inhibits tumor progression by inducing cell arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis, directly or indirectly through its impact on the matrix (including inhibition of inflammation and matrix-derived mitogen).
Inhibitory roles in cancer formation
TGF-β plays a vital role in cancer, acting as a tumor suppressor in the initial stages of tumorigenesis. TGF-β primarily reduces cell proliferation by activating cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors and suppressing the expression of cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene (C-MYC) [51]. TGF-β inhibits cell proliferation in neurons, epithelial cells, and hematopoietic cells via targeting CDK and its inhibitor (CDK-I) [17]. CDK involves in the regulation of cell cycle progression after the Gap 1 phase (G1) in cell proliferation [52]. TGF-β also stimulates the expression of CDK-I inhibitors, such as P15INK4B, P21CIP1, and P27KIP1 [53]. These inhibitors block the cyclin-CDK complex, resulting in the arrest of the cell cycle in the G1 phase [54].
P15 suppresses cell cycle progression in the latter stages of G1 by primarily inhibiting the communication between CDK4/6 and cyclin D. P21 directly binds to the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and cyclin E-CDK2 complex to inhibit PCNA-dependent DNA replication and CDK’s activity respectively. Moreover, P27 interacts with the cyclin E-CDK2 complex by removing it from the cyclin D-CDK4 complex [54]. Inactivating these CDK complexes inhibits the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (pRb). Cell cycle progression requires the phosphorylation of pRb, and its suppression prevents G1 cells from entering the S phase [52]. Meanwhile, TGF-β suppresses cell growth by down-regulating the expression of the C-MYC oncogene that promotes cell division and permits cells to reproduce uncontrollably [52]. Besides, TGF-β reduces the expression of inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (Id1), Id2, and Id3 [55, 56]. The Id-protein family consists of nuclear factors related to the transition from G1 to S phase in the cell cycle. Cell growth is decelerated when Id proteins are inhibited. TGF-β is also associated with an antiproliferative response via the Smad-dependent pathway [53]. Inhibition of P70 S6 kinase by TGF-β through the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) pathway will lead to cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase [57].
The Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways are the two major mechanisms by which TGF-β induces apoptosis in a variety of cell types, hence suppressing tumor development. The lack of Smad4 accelerates the malignant evolution of tumors caused by carcinogenic stimuli [58]. Pro-apoptotic proteins are involved in the Smad-dependent pathways, such as Src homologous inositol phosphatase (SHIP), death-associated protein kinase (DAPK), and TGF-β-induced early gene 1 (TIEG1). By coupling Smads to mitochondrial-based pro-apoptotic processes, DAPK facilitates TGF-β-dependent apoptosis and stimulates the release of cytochrome C. SHIP interferes with the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, leading to cell death [59].
TIEG1 causes oxidative stress by generating ROS [60]. Cell apoptosis is promoted, thereby inhibiting tumor growth. The stress activate protein kinase (SAPK)/JNK signaling pathway induced by deleted in pancreatic cancer 4 (DPC4) is also involved in TGF-β signaling, leading to cell apoptosis [61]. TGF-β-mediated apoptosis is required for caspase activation in the TGF-β-independent pathway. TGF-β suppresses the production of anti-apoptotic genes such as B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-extra large (Bcl-xL), and X-linked apoptotic inhibitor (XLAP) [62]. Furthermore, TGF-β stimulates the production of numerous pro-apoptotic genes, including caspase 3, caspase 8, and Bcl-2 interaction killer (BIK). Death domain-associated protein (DAXX) is a protein related to the FAS receptor and is also involved in TGF-β-induced apoptosis by activating JNK [63].
Pathogenic roles in cancer progression
In many cancers, there are mutations or deletions of TGF-β receptors or Smads in the TGF-β pathway, leading to the inactivation or disturbance of the signaling [58]. The EMT of tumor cells is essential for cancer metastasis. It is required for the advancement of fibrosis, cancer, and embryonic development [36]. TGF-β-induced EMT increases tumor invasion and dissemination during cancer growth and progression by releasing and transporting tumor cells into the environment. It controls the transcription of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Snail, and vimentin in multiple malignancies [64]. In terms of cytoskeletal remodeling, consistent expression of the myofibroblast is supported by TGF-β and adhesion-mediated signaling. After EMT, epithelial cells lose their polarity, tight junctions, and intercellular adhesion, gaining the potential to migrate [65]. The capacity of tumor cells to metastasize is enhanced by reducing cell adhesion [66].
Angiogenesis during tumor growth is critical since tumor cells need an increased supply of nutrients and oxygen for proliferation and invasion [67]. Endothelial cells highly participate in angiogenesis, which indicates increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in the neovascular system [68]. TGF-β signaling modulates the activity of endothelial cells in a complex manner. TGF-β1 promotes the release of pro-angiogenic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and CTGF. VEGF induces endothelial cells to assemble capillaries for generating and maintaining tumor angiogenesis whereas CTGF enhances capillary density, thereby accelerating cancer progression [69]. The anti-cancer effects of TGF-β are often lost in cancers. Many studies have analyzed the role of TGF-β in the development of resistance to anti-cancer drugs, but its underlying mechanism is still unclear [70]. For example, TGF-β1 promotes oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer patients through EMT [71].
TGF-β signaling in TME
TGF-β plays an important role in TME. It regulates the infiltration of inflammatory cells, inhibits immune surveillance, and promotes the recruitment of macrophages and monocytes, thereby promoting the progression of metastasis [16, 72–74]. Therefore, TGF-β is essential for the immune regulation of TME and different immune cells (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
TGF-β functions in cancer immune surveillance. TGF-β directly promotes T helper 17 (TH17) cell differentiation into forkhead/winged helix transcriptional factor P3 (FoxP3+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) and suppresses cytotoxic CD8+ T cell development to drive cancer progression. TGF-β regulates the differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis of B cells. It increases the activity and infiltration of tumor-educated B cells in order to inhibit T cells and NK cells proliferation and their antitumor effects. It also controls the class switch from immunoglobulin M (IgM) to IgA in B cells. TGF-β causes NK cells dysfunction and reduces the proliferation and survival of NK cells. TGF-β also inhibits the production of cytotoxic cytokines. TGF-β alters DCs’ function, thereby inhibiting NK cells and promoting T cell differentiating into Treg. TGF-β induces the M2 differentiation of macrophage and then increases the recruitment of Treg cell. TGF-β secreted by tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) can also suppress the cytotoxicity of T cells. TGF-β induces the N2 differentiation of neutrophils. TGF-β secreted by tumor associated neutrophils (TANs) increases cancer cell stemness and attenuates T cell response. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)-derived TGF-β inhibits B cell differentiation and T cell function, helping cancer cells to avoid immune surveillance. ↑: increases; ↓: decreases; DCs: dendritic cells
Protumoral effect of TGF-β signaling in TME
TGF-β represses the antitumor effect of T-cells and their proliferation and recruitment [75]. TGF-β inhibits cytotoxic T cell proliferation by impeding their cell cycles or downregulating interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptors. TGF-β inhibits CD4+ T-box expressed in T cells (T-bet) and promotes Tregs through Smad3 and NFAT [76, 77]. Treg cell differentiation requires mTORC1 downregulation and TGF-β transcriptional reprogramming [78]. TGF-β reduces the antitumor activity of cytotoxic T cell by converting naive CD4+ T cells into TH17 and inducible Treg (iTreg) [79]. TGF-β lowers the level of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) perforin, granzyme A and B, FAS, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). TGF-β also inhibits Smad2/anaplastic lymphoma kinase 5 (ALK5)-mediated CD8+ T cell tumor invasion. Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 1’s (SATB1’s) TGF-β suppression increases T follicular helper (Tfh) proliferation [80]. In patients with liver gastrointestinal cancer cells and gastric cancer [80, 81], TGF-β upregulation is associated with low numbers of CD1a+ and CD83+ DCs in the tumor stroma. TGF-β upregulates the expression of the first member of the B7 family (B7H1) and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein ligand (GITRL) in DCs, which substantially promotes the formation of Treg in lung cancer [82]. TGF-β1 released by cancer stem cells is involved in the generation of DC-mediated immunotolerance in liver cancer [83]. In pancreatic cancer, TGF-β contributes to the T lymphocyte-driven inhibition of DC antitumor immunity [84]. In vitro research indicates that co-culturing mature DCs with melanoma cells decreases TGF-β synthesis, hence promoting T-cell proliferation [85]. In a canine transferrable tumor model, tumor-derived TGF-β impairs DCs’ maturation, which may be reversed by IL-6 through Smad2/3 nuclear translocation interference [86].
TGF-β pathway increases the expression of CD39 and CD73 in MDSCs by activating hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and hence suppressing T cells’ and NK cells’ activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [86]. TGF-β involves in tumor-induced dysfunction of NK cells in breast cancer [87]. TGF-β converts NK cells into intermediate type 1 innate lymphoid cells (intILCs) to limit innate immune surveillance in the TME, this innate lymphoid cell (ILC)-like phenotype loses the metastasis-restraining function of NK cells [88]. TGF-β1 promotes tumor-associated NK cells to become non-cytotoxic in prostate cancer via weakening NK group 2D (NKG2D) and DNAX accessory molecule 1 (DNAM-1) [89]. Loss of circulating NK cells with activating receptors [NK protein 30 (NKp30), NKp46, NKG2D, and DNAM-1] is linked to gastric cancer progression [90]. TGF-β1 also suppresses NK cell development in lung cancer and melanoma via a Smad3/erythroid-derived 4 binding protein 4 (E4BP4) axis [15]. TGF-β1 produced from platelets increases neutrophil recruitment to tumors and enhances metastasis in tumor-bearing mice [91]. TGF-β represses the N1 anticancer phenotype of neutrophils [92]. Sagiv et al. [93] showed that TGF-β therapy causes N1-like high-density neutrophils to become N2-like low-density neutrophils in the TME. TAN also releases TGF-β2 to stimulate microRNA-301-3p (miR-301-3p)-related stem cell features in oncogenic hepatocytes to increase angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [94]. TGF-β signaling in neutrophils reduces T cells’ response and produce a metastatic environment in colorectal cancer (CRC) [95].
Besides immune cells, cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) induces EMT in human NSCLC cells through Smad3 activation [96]. CAFs induce prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration, and treatment resistance through TGF-β [96, 97]. Evidence shows that CAF-derived TGF-β enhances lung adenocarcinoma development [98]. TGF-β signaling enhances the invasiveness of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) while promoting EMT [99]. In addition, CAFs induce malignancy by secreting TGF-β1 [100] and activating Smad2/3/4-mediated homeobox transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR) transcription [100]. TGF-β is known to promote myofibroblast differentiation and contractility. Functional markers expression in human fibroblasts, including alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), tenascin-C (TNC), prolyl 4 hydroxylase (P4H), and fibroblast activation protein (FAP), is also supported [101]. Noticeably, TGF-β1 accelerates oral SCC invasion by activating autophagy in CAFs [102]. TGF-β signaling downregulates isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) in fibroblasts to increase glutamine metabolization and tumor development [103] whereas TGF-β1 in CAF-derived exosomes activates the Smad pathway [104]. Paracrine TGF-β1 from CAFs promotes breast cancer cell EMT [105]. Cancer cell-derived TGF-β enhances CAF’s fibrogenic activation and breast cancer cell intravasation and extravasation [106]. Exosome-harboured TGF-β enhances fibroblast differentiation into CAFs [107]. Recently, the research found that TAM might trans-differentiate into cancer-associated fibroblasts in lung carcinoma through a TGF-β/Smad3-dependent pathway known as “macrophage-myofibroblast transition”, as shown by single-cell RNA-sequencing analyses [16]. TAMs also promote de novo neurogenesis by “macrophage to neuron-like cell transition”. It exhibits neuronal phenotypes and expresses pain receptor which associates with cancer-driven nocifensive behaviors [73].
Anticancer effect of TGF-β signaling in TME
In contrast, limited anticancer effects of TGF-β signaling have been identified in TME. For example, TGF-β regulates B cell differentiation, proliferation, and death [108]. It is also one of the cytokines that control B cell IgM-to-IgA class switching. In Peyer’s patches, IgA switching requires B cell-DC contact because DC-expressed integrin the alpha v beta 8 integrin (αvβ8) triggers TGF-β to increase B cell maturation and IgA synthesis. TGF-β1-induced TGF-MDSCs show reduced immunosuppressive effects, improved antigen-presenting capacity, and higher cancer-killing capability [109]. Smad4 can impede cell conversion by inhibiting the non-canonical TGF-β pathway in NK cells [110].
Clinical implications of TGF-β signaling in cancer therapy
Due to its potentials in promoting tumor growth, the TGF-β-signaling pathway provides prospective options for targeted treatment. To investigate the effects of TGF, knockout mice of TGF-β associated proteins have been studied as summarized in Table 1. In addition, following the completion of experiments on animals and the establishment of targets, clinical research on a variety of medications aiming at distinct components in the TGF-β pathway has been conducted. Some of which are currently being produced and evaluated (Figure 5).
Table 1.
Overview of knockout or knock-in mouse models of TGF-β-associated protein
| Knockout mouse model | Phenotype | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Smad5 | Embryonic fatal; faulty vascular development, ventral closure, cardiac development, and craniofacial development; aberrant heart looping and embryonic turning | [111, 112] |
| Smad3 | A reduced size compared to littermate controls | [15, 113] |
| Smad7 | Body sizes were smaller than wild-type mice | [114] |
| Activin βA | Newborn fatality; cranial defects (cleft palate and loss of whiskers, upper incisors, lower incisors, and lower molars) | [115, 116] |
| Activin βB | Large litters but delayed parturition; breastfeeding issues; birth abnormalities in eyelid closure | [117] |
| Activin βC | No noticeable abnormalities; viable | [118] |
| Activin βE | No noticeable abnormalities; viable | [118] |
| Activin βB knockin to the activin βA locus | Reversal of activin A-deficient neonatal mortality. Defects in the development of the hair, gonads, external genitalia, and somatic growth | [119] |
| Growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF-9) | Viable; female infertility; one-layer primary follicle stage halt of folliculogenesis | [120, 121] |
| Inhibin α | Female infertility; secondary male infertility; granulosa/Sertoli cell and adrenal tumors; cachexia-like condition | [122] |
| Activin receptor type II | Infertility in females is caused by a folliculogenesis abnormality; delayed fertility in males; undersized gonads; 25% of mice die at birth owing to mandible deformities | [116] |
| FKBP12 | Due to cardiomyopathy and neural tube abnormalities, the majority of mice perish between embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) and delivery | [123] |
| Follistatin | Neonatal fatality; craniofacial abnormalities, development retardation, and skin abnormalities | [111] |
Figure 5.
Overview of TGF-β signaling therapeutic targets
Antibodies
Over the years, antibodies targeting the three human TGF-β isoforms TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 have been developed and studied.
Fresolimumab (GC1008) is a monoclonal IgG4 antibody designed to reduce effector immune cell function through the neutralization of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3, it was clinically investigated as monotherapy or in combination with radiotherapy in renal cell carcinoma, pleural mesothelioma, NSCLC, metastatic breast cancer and glioma phase I and II clinical trials in which it showed promising antitumor activities with minimal toxicities [124].
NIS793, another human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that is designed to neutralize the pan TGF-β ligands, was well-tolerated in phase I clinical trial. Currently, it is being investigated in phase I to III clinical trials, working in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs or immune cell checkpoint inhibitors [125].
With the success seen in fresolimumab, SAR439459 was developed with an altered Fc region. Such improvement led to the reinvigoration of NK and T cells and sensitisation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade on T cells in preclinical settings [126]. Currently, SAR439459 is being investigated in a phase I clinical trial in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
TβM1(LY2382770) is a highly selective TGF-β1 neutralizing antibody that was previously assessed in a phase I dose-escalation study of metastatic cancer. Although TβM1 showed no sign of toxicity in the study, no clinical benefits could be observed due to increased tumor markers after administration [127]. TβM1 development was put to an end after this study.
XPA-42-089 is an α-pan-TGF-β antibody which is designed to block TGF-β1 and TGF-β2. A preclinical study showed that XPA-42-089-mediated TGF-β blockade led to the restoration of anti-tumor immunity in a PD-1 resistant immunosuppressive environment [125].
Unlike the aforementioned antibodies, ABBV-151 is a monoclonal antibody specifically designed to block the GARP-TGF-β1 complex, subsequently blocking the release of TGF-β1. It is currently being investigated in phase I clinical trial in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody budigalimab in patients with metastatic solid tumor [128].
To target the latent complex that retains inactive TGF-β, anti-LAP was developed. LAP is encoded by the TGF-β1 gene and cleaved by furin to reassemble with TGF-β, which then be stored on the cell surface as a latent complex. LAP is upregulated on Foxp3+ regulatory T cells which suppress anti-tumor immunity in the cancer microenvironment. In a preclinical study, anti-LAP treatment enhanced adaptive immune response against cancer reduced CD103+ regulatory T cell numbers and promoted CD8+ T effector cells antitumor activity [129].
264RAD targets the TGF-β pathway through αvβ6 and αvβ8 integrin inhibition which is distinct from the mentioned antibodies. 264RAD treatment showed improvements on xenograft mice survival, and reduction in tumor proliferation, growth, and migration in breast cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma preclinical models [130].
C6D4 is an αVβ8 neutralizing antibody that inhibited colonic carcinoma and prostatic tumor growth in a preclinical study published recently [131]. αVβ8 is crucial to the activation of the TGF-β pathway and is frequently overexpressed in a variety of tumor cells. It was reported that C6D4 treatment increased cytotoxic T cell anti-tumor activity and promoted the recruitment of immune cells to tumor centers. Particularly, various cancers expressing a high level of αVβ8 are not usually associated with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, suggesting anti-αVβ8 is a potential immunotherapeutic agent working independently of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
Interestingly, another αVβ8 antibody, ADWA-11 also inhibited tumor growth in various human cancers in combination with radiotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors in another preclinical study [132]. Congruent with the previously mentioned study, ADWA-11 treatment restored cytotoxic T cell’s function in vitro, solidifying that αVβ8 could potentially serve as an immunotherapy target.
SRK-181 is a monoclonal antibody designed to prevent latent TGF-β1 activation. Before the phase I clinical trial, SRK-181 demonstrated its ability to overcome anti-PD-1 resistance in mice xenograft models. Currently, SRK-181 treatment was well-tolerated in test subjects and led to tumor regression in an ongoing phase I clinical trial [133].
Finally, LY3022859, an anti-TβRII IgG1 monoclonal antibody, was one of the first anti-TGF-β antibodies to be clinically evaluated [134]. Unfortunately, the clinical trial was halted prematurely because the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined during the study. A dose higher than 25 mg was deemed unsafe due to uncontrollable cytokine release.
Antisense oligonucleotides
Oligonucleotide-based gene regulators, such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting messenger RNA (mRNA), are potential agents for the treatment of disorders resistant to conventional small molecule medications. These gene regulators can be built easily based on the target sequence, without taking into account the complicated protein structures and give knock-down of targets [135]. As prospective therapeutic agents for the treatment of fibrosis in various organs, such as the heart, kidney, and gut, ASOs and siRNAs targeting TGF-β and the related downstream factors have been deployed [136–139].
ISTH0036 is a 14-mer modified antisense oligodeoxynucleotide for targeting TGF-β2 RNA. The first-in-human phase I study of ISTH0036 in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma showed potential clinical efficacy. The results showed that a single dose of ISTH0036 which selectively inhibited TGF-β2 mRNA was safe [140].
ISTH0047 or ISTH1047 significantly reduces TGF-β1 or TGF-β2 expression in various human and mouse glioma cells. ISTH0047-mediated TGF-β2 inhibition reduces the highly invasive phenotype of LN-229 gliomas and eliminates the expression of phosphorylated Smad 2 (pSmad2) [141]. ISTH0047 elevates the expression of CD86 in TAMs and inhibits lung metastasis in syngeneic orthotopic renal cell carcinoma and breast cancer tumor models by reducing the expression of TGF-β2 [142].
Trabedersen (AP 12009) specifically and effectively inhibits TGF-β2 expression in patient-derived malignant glioma cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells [143]. Trabedersen inhibits the migration of pancreatic carcinoma, glioma, and malignant melanoma cells by interfering with the autocrine loop of TGF-β2 secretion [144]. In a randomized and controlled phase IIb study, trabedersen transiently reduced TGF-β2 levels to reverse TGF-β2—mediated immunosuppression, and increased patients’ survival rate [145].
Bifunctional fusion proteins
Bifunctional fusion proteins yield efficacy by binding to two distinct molecules. A subset of bifunctional fusion proteins consists of a unique class of antibody-cytokine fusions that may enhance anticancer immunity [146].
4T-Trap is a bispecific receptor decoy that efficiently binds to CD4+ T cells and inhibits Th cell TGF-β signaling in tumor-draining lymph nodes as revealed by surface plasmon resonance. 4T-Trap blocks TGF-β signaling to increase Th2 cell differentiation and induces tumor cell death [147].
AVID200 is an engineered receptor ectodomain-based trap that neutralizes TGF-β1 and TGF-β3. This protein trap inhibits TGF-β1—induced p57Kip2 expression and blocks the activation of Smad2 by neutralizing recombinant TGF-β1 (rTGF-β1) and rTGF-β3 in myelofibrosis progenitor cells. AVID200 inhibits the expression of pSTATS3 in mesenchymal stromal cells treated with rTGF-β1 [148].
Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) simultaneously targets TGF-β and PD-L1 in breast carcinoma cells. M7824 reduces the expression of TGF-β and blocks PD-L1 on CD8+ T cells to activate their anti-tumor responses in murine models of human solid carcinomas [149]. M7824 prevents fibronectin and vimentin initiation in PC-9 and A549 cells by preventing Smad2 and Smad3 activation in response to TGF-β1 [150]. M7824 blocks PD-L1-dependent immunosuppression in NSCLC. It can be safely managed and has antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors [151].
SHR-1701, a bispecific fusion protein, increases IFN-γ and Ki-67 expression in peripheral CD8+ T cells in patients with impaired lymphocyte recovery by blocking the TGF-β/TβR downstream pSmad2 signaling pathway and rescues the downstream phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) pathway of PD-1/PD-L1 [152]. In phase I trial, SHR-1701 showed safety and antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. It is observed that the level of pSmad2 in immune cells might predict the response to SHR-1701 [153].
Soluble TβRII-Fc (sTβRII-Fc) binds with TGF-β1 and inhibits TGF-β1-dependent Smad3 phosphorylation in vitro [154]. An Adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-based oncolytic virus expressing sTβRII-Fc fusion protein (Ad.sTβRFc) and a 01/07 based adenoviral vector expressing the soluble form of TβRII fused with human Fc IgG1 gene (mhTERTAd.sTβRFc) vectors can induce the secretion of TβRII-Fc into the tumor-bone microenvironment. Undesirable TGF-β signaling in breast tumor cells, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts is observed to be inhibited [155]. sTβRII-Fc protein binds with TGF-β1 and inhibits TGF-β-stimulated p38 MAPK to interfere with breast cancer invasion and metastasis [156].
Soluble β-glycan/TβRIII mainly activates TGF-β2-Smad signaling and the expression of TβRIII reduces the anti-tumor function of TGF-β2 in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Downregulation of TβRIII reduces TGF-β-independent cell migration by increasing lamellipodia formation via focal adhesion kinase (FAK)-PI3K signaling [157].
Small molecules inhibitors
TGF-β1 and its receptor, TβRI are essential components of the TGF-β signaling pathway important for immune response. Studies revealed an increased level of TGF-β1 and TβRI in different cancer samples, such as gastric cancer and hepatocarcinoma. Over-expression of TβRI in tumor and its response to TGF-β1 would lead to dysregulation of cell growth and proliferation, which was found to have a close association with malignancies development [158]. However, the complete knockout of TβRI in mice would result in life-threatening chondrodysplasia [159]. Thus, inhibition but not the elimination of TβRI can be a possible direction of immunotherapeutic research. In the following section, small molecules inhibitor of TβRI would be introduced.
AZ12601011 and AZ12799734 are identified as two small molecule inhibitors of TβRI. They are found to be more effective than SB-431542 and galunisertib, the other two inhibitors of the receptor. AZ12601011 inhibits TβRI-mediated phosphorylation of Smad2 while AZ12799734 inhibits the TGF/BMP pathway. Thus, AZ12799734 not only suppresses the level of pSmad2 but also that of pSmad1 [160]. Both pSmad2 and pSmad1 are important mediators in the TGF-β pathway. Blocking the synthesis of pSmad2 and pSmad1 can impede the downstream cascade.
Galunisertib (LY2157299) is orally administered, lowering pSmad2 production in the TGF-β pathway by inhibiting TβRI. Clinical trials suggested that 150 mg galunisertib two times a day with durvalumab 1,500 mg Q4W as a combination therapy provides a period of tumor progression free survival in metastasizing pancreatic cancer [161]. It was found to be antineoplastic and radio-sensitizing, effective in hindering cancer cell migration in radiotherapy-resistant subjects with head and neck carcinoma (HNSCC). The anti-tumor effect is observed only in cell lines whose TGF-β pathway remains intact, which agrees with its role as a TβRI inhibitor [162]. In glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), NK cells cause the lysis of glioblastoma stem cells. However, the TGF-β pathway turns NK cells in the TME into an inhibitory phenotype, posing obstacles to the body’s natural immunity toward the tumor. Galunisertib is thus researched as a potential immunotherapeutic for GBM [163]. It also involves in the discussion on therapies for glioma and other advanced malignancies [164].
GFH018, another small molecule inhibitor of TβRI, has been under clinical investigation on its effectiveness as therapy of phase I/II advanced solid tumor [165]. Results have not yet been released but it was believed that the combined use with toripalimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting on PD-1 [166] would be useful in battling against the advanced solid tumor.
LY3200882 is a newly designed, selective adenosine triphosphate (ATP)–competitive inhibitor of the serine-threonine kinase domain of TβRI. It was proved to be a stronger inhibitor than Galunisertib preclinically [167]. The LY3200882 domain induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) of tumor and the maturation of DCs through its inhibition on TβRI. By interfering with the TGF-β pathway, the immunosuppressive TME is reversed, and immune cells can be revitalized. Studies had shown its possibile to be a drug for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) which is a highly recurrent, extensively metastasized malignancies with a few currently available treatments [168].
SB431542 promotes the non-anchoring growth of A549 cells and at the same time inhibits cell colonization in colon cancer which is suppressed and mediated by the TGF-β pathway respectively. It inhibits TβRI ALK4, 5, and 7. SB431542 blocks the formation of Smad2/3-Smad4 complexes and the translocation of Smad2/3 into the nucleus for transcription modification involved in the TGF-β pathway. The results of western blots further confirmed the reduction in end-protein expression of the pathway. However, it is noteworthy that SB431542 also inhibits TGF-β-mediated suppressive function on tumor such as the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis so it should only be used when the tumor is unresponsive to these functions at first [169].
SD-208 downregulates paracrine and autocrine signaling of TGF-β in the LN308 human glioma sample. SD-208 was added to increase the ability of lymphocytes and T cells to lyse cancer cells. Their release of IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were boosted as well. Although SD-208 can serve as both TβRI/II inhibitors, its specificity to TβRI is 100 folds more than that of the latter. The application of SD-208 seems not to affect cancer cell’s viability or proliferation but it is proven to slow down its progression and metastases [170]. Its use on the melanoma is also under investigation. As SD-208 reduces pSmad3 and inhibits Smads-specific transcription in the TGF-β pathway, it reduced the size of the osteolytic lesion due to bone metastases of melanoma in mice samples after 4 weeks of administration [171].
Vactosertib as known as TEW7197 was discovered as a specific TβRI inhibitor admitted orally. In a clinical trial regarding its effect on advanced solid tumors, it was found that no significant side effects have been caused in most patients but only fatigue [172]. As most other inhibitors mentioned, it can inhibit Smad2/3 activation in the TGF-β pathway. When used alone, it activates apoptosis in multiple myeloma (MM) cells and slows down its progression in vitro. Its use in combination with pomalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug used in MM is found to have augmented tumor suppressive effect on mice models [173]. The use of vactosertib with pembrolizumab on microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer patients who were previously treated is also under investigation [174]. As a potent inhibitor, combination therapy in concern with vactosertib is being actively pursued in order to overcome the tumors’ resistance to other drugs available now.
YL-13027 is also a highly selective oral inhibitor of TβRI being used in phase I trial to test on its efficacy in treating the advanced solid tumor. It has a half-life of about 4.2 h on average. Unlike vactosertib, YL-13027 seems to induce adverse events (AEs) in a higher proportion of cancer subjects. It was reported that 12 out of 13 patients experienced AEs such as reduced hemoglobin (38.5%) and blood phosphorus (23.1%) [175].
Some small molecule inhibitors of TβRI were identified but are under research. PF-06952229 was found to have antineoplastic effects, especially in patients with metastasized breast cancer and solid tumors. Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate the pharmaceutical profile of the drug [176]. TD-1058’s use and mechanism were never published. The clinical trial on its use on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was terminated [177, 178].
Cancer vaccines
TGF-β is an essential regulator of the immunosuppressive state found in malignancies, and this has led to the creation of TGF-β specific vaccines. Tumor cell vaccines (TCVs) harness the antigen-presenting ability of immune cells and tumor antigens to enhance the body’s immune response against carcinoma. Tumor recurrence is also prevented due to the immunological memory of the immune cells. It is noted in much research that at the later stage of tumor progression, the tumor grows and metastasizes while bypassing the immunosurveillance. Thus, TCVs may only be an adjuvant in the early stage or residue disease [179].
Belagenpumatucel-L, an allogeneic TCV has been put into clinical trials to test its efficacy in treating advanced NSCLC and as a maintenance therapy for NSCLC [180, 181]. Belagenpumatucel-L consists of 4 TGF-β2-antisense gene-modified, irradiated, allogeneic NSCLC cell lines. Significant improvement in progression free survival by 12.4 months was observed in NSCLC patients receiving belagenpumatucel-L within 1 month after the termination of chemotherapy. It is noted that time after termination of initial therapy is critical in calculating the efficacy of belagenpumatucel-L as found that there is no obvious survival difference between patients receiving belagenpumatucel-L and placebo after a certain period [181].
Gemogenovatucel-T, as known as Vigil, is an autologous DNA transfected TCV. It provides anti-tumor effects by helping the immune system to recognize new foreign antigens and suppresses TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 levels by a furin-targeting RNA. At the intradermal injection site, the expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a cytokine responsible for the generation of DCs is promoted [182]. DCs are known to be one of the most potent antigen-presenting cells in the body. The use of Vigil in ovarian cancers was being studied. In a phase 2b trial, 3.1 months longer recurrence-free survival was recorded in the group of patients receiving Vigil instead of a placebo. Among the 47 patients receiving Vigil, only 3 experienced AEs with no grade 3 or 4 events reported [183].
Based on the comprehensive and detailed description above of the prospective options for targeted treatment on the TGF-β pathway, the Table 2 is summarized.
Table 2.
Overview of TGF-β signaling immunotherapies
| Type | Treatment | Mechanism | Status | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | Fresolimumab | Neutralization of TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 | Phase II | [124] |
| NIS793 | Neutralization of pan TGF-β ligands | Phase II | [125] | |
| SAR439459 | Neutralization of TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 | Phase I/II | [126] | |
| TβM1 (LY2382770) | Selective neutralization of TGF-β1 | Phase I | [127] | |
| XPA-42-089 | Blockage of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 | Preclinical | [125] | |
| ABBV-151 | Blockage of the GARP-TGF-β1 complex and the release of TGF-β1 | Preclinical | [128] | |
| Anti-LAP | Reducing the latent release of inactive TGF-β from LAP/TGF-β complex | Phase I | [129] | |
| 264RAD | Inhibition on αvβ6 and αvβ8 integrin | Preclinical | [130] | |
| Anti-αVβ8 (ADWA-11) | Neutralization of αVβ8 | Preclinical | [131] | |
| Anti-αVβ8 (C6D4) | Neutralization of αVβ8 | Preclinical | [132] | |
| SRK-181 | Binding to latent TGF-β to prevent its activation | Phase I | [133] | |
| IMC-TR1 (LY3022859) | Inhibition on TβRII | Phase I | [134] | |
| ASOs | ISTH0036 | Selective inhibition on TGF-β2 mRNA | Phase I | [140] |
| ISTH0047 or ISTH1047 | Reduction of TGF-β1 or TGF-β2 expression | Preclinical | [141] | |
| Trabedersen (AP 12009) | Inhibition on TGF-β2 expression | Phase I/II/III | [143] | |
| Bifunctional fusion protein | 4T-Trap | Binding to CD4 and inhibiting Th cell TGF-β signaling | Preclinical | [147] |
| AVID200 | Neutralization of TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 | Phase I | [148] | |
| Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) | Reduction in expression of TGF-β and blockage of PD-L1 on CD8+ T cells | Phase II/III | [149] | |
| SHR-1701 | Blockage of TGF-β/TβR pathway and rescue on PD-1/PD-L1 pathway | Phase I | [152] | |
| sTβRII-Fc | Inhibition on TGF-β1-dependent Smad3 phosphorylation | Preclinical | [154] | |
| Soluble β-glycan/TβRIII | Activating the TGF-β2-Smad signaling and the expression of TβRIII | Preclinical | [157] | |
| Small-molecule inhibitors | AZ12601011, AZ12799734 | Inhibition on TβRI-mediated phosphorylation of Smad2 and BMP pathway | Preclinical | [160] |
| Galunisertib (LY2157299) | Inhibition on TβRI-mediated phosphorylation of Smad2 | Phase I/II | [161] | |
| GFH-018 | Inhibition on TβRI | Phase I/II | [165] | |
| LY3200882 | Competitive inhibition on the serine-threonine kinase domain of TβRI | Phase I/II | [167] | |
| PF-06952229 | Inhibition on TβRI | Phase I | [169] | |
| SB431542 | Inhibition on TβRI | Preclinical | [171] | |
| SD-208 | Inhibition on both TβRI and TβRII | Preclinical | [171] | |
| TD-1058 | Inhibition on TβRI | Phase I | [178] | |
| Vactosertib (TEW7197) | Inhibition on TβRI | Phase I/II | [172] | |
| YL-13027 | Inhibition on TβRI | Phase I | [175] | |
| TCVs | Belagenpumatucel-L | Expressing the antisense strand of the TGF-β2 to suppress the expression of TGF-β2 | Phase II/III | [181] |
| Gemogenovatucel-T | Suppression on TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 levels by a furin-targeting RNA | Phase II | [182] |
Conclusion
TGF-β tumor-suppressive effects are often lost in advanced tumors, while tumor pro-invasive functions prevail. The increase in the secretion of TGF-β in the TME stimulates cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion. CAF induction, angiogenesis, and local immunosuppression are promoted, further contributing to tumor progression and metastasis. Several complementary pieces of evidence from preclinical and translational studies indicated that inhibition of the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway could be a potential cancer treatment. However, the transition from preclinical research to clinical practice has been unsuccessful and largely hindered. None of the TGF-β inhibitors evaluated in clinical trials was approved for cancer treatment because TGF-β is essential for several normal physiological processes in the human body, such as the gene deletion of TGF-β1, autoimmunity, abundant T cell proliferation and activation, and Th1 differentiation. The destruction of TGF-β1/Smad3 in the in vivo model leads to impaired immunity, indicating its importance in T cell development. In addition, inhibition of TGF-β signaling can lead to the development of keratoacanthoma (KA) and SCC by causing chronic inflammation of the skin and intestines [184, 185]. Several TβRI inhibitors promote the incidence of heart valve bleeding and its inflammatory or degenerative changes [186]. Although the combined use of TGF-β inhibitors and other checkpoint inhibitors is popular in the immunotherapy era, only some patients respond to the treatment. This highlights the need for the revaluation of laboratory data and analysis of the downstream modulators of the TGF-β pathway to identify potential therapeutic targets.
Thankfully, new research has shown that multiple unique TGF-β1/Smad3-dependent downstream regulators may control TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling without impacting its physiological activities. Src and Pou4f1 have been identified as important downstream regulators of TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling [8, 9]. These two transcription factors restore renal fibrosis via the signaling pathway and have high therapeutic potential. The miRNA and long non-coding RNA related to TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling are also under investigation. For example, upregulating the transcription of anti-fibrotic miR-200c and miR-141 can inhibit tumor cell metastasis and invasion [187, 188]. Besides, inhibition of Smad3-dependent long non-coding RNA erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4 intracellular domain fragment (Erbb4-IR) suppresses the proliferation of esophageal SCC by upregulating the tumor suppressor gene miRNA-145 to activate cancer cells apoptosis [189]. In addition, the function of TGF-β1/Smad3 is highly dependent on the environment, and its tumor suppressive effect is reported in a cell-type-specific manner [190, 191]. The pathogenic effects of immune cells mediated through the TGF-β pathway in the TME, especially those mediated by the members of innate immunity such as macrophages, neutrophils, and DCs have been elucidated thoroughly in new cancer treatments [192]. These downstream goals may uncover new cancer treatment options.
In conclusion, a better understanding of the downstream signaling of TGF-β will reveal precise therapeutic targets in the microenvironment of cancer fibrosis, and further studies may determine their pathogenic roles in the TME as well as their therapeutic potential in cancer.
Abbreviations
- AEs:
adverse events
- AKT:
protein kinase B
- Bcl-2:
B cell lymphoma-2
- BMP:
bone morphogenetic protein
- CAF:
cancer associated fibroblasts
- CDK:
cyclin-dependent kinase
- Co-Smad:
common-mediator mothers against decapentaplegic
- CTGF:
connective tissue growth factors
- DCs:
dendritic cells
- EMT:
epithelial mesenchymal transition
- G1:
Gap 1 phase
- GTP:
guanosine triphosphate
- Id1:
inhibitor of DNA binding 1
- IFN-γ:
interferon-γ
- IgM:
immunoglobulin M
- JNK:
c-Jun N-terminal kinase
- LAP:
latency associated peptide
- MAPK:
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MDSC:
myeloid-derived suppressor cells
- miR-301-3p:
microRNA-301-3p
- MKK3/6:
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3/6
- mRNA:
messenger RNA
- mTOR:
mammalian target of rapamycin
- NK:
natural killer
- NSCLC:
non-small-cell lung cancer
- PD-1:
programmed cell death protein 1
- PD-L1:
programmed cell death ligand 1
- PI3K:
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- pSmad2:
phosphorylated mothers against decapentaplegic 2
- RhoA:
Ras homolog gene family member A
- R-Smads:
receptor-associated mothers against decapentaplegics
- rTGF-β1:
recombinant transforming growth factor-β
- SCC:
squamous cell carcinoma
- ShcA:
sarcoma homology 2 domain containing transforming protein A
- Src:
sarcoma
- TAK1:
transforming growth factor-activated kinase 1
- TAM:
tumor-associated macrophage
- TCVs:
tumor cell vaccines
- TGF-β:
transforming growth factor-β
- TH17:
T helper 17
- TME:
tumor microenvironment
- TRAF6:
tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6
- Tregs:
regulatory T cells
- TβRI:
transforming growth factor-β receptors I
- Wnt:
Wingless-related integration site
- YAP:
Yes-associated protein
Declarations
Author contributions
MKKC and ELYC equally contributed to: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization. ZZJ, ASWC: Investigation, Data curation, Writing—review & editing. CL, KTL, KFT: Conceptualization, Methodology. PMKT: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [RGC 14106518, 14111019, 14111720]; RGC Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme [PDFS2122-4S06]; Health and Medical Research Fund [10210726]; The Chinese University of Hong Kong’s Faculty Innovation Award [4620528], Direct Grant for Research [4054510, 4054668], Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme [NL/LT/PDFS2022/0360/22lt], CU Medicine Passion for Perfection Scheme [PFP202210-004] and Global Physician-Leadership Stream programme. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
References
- 1.Tang PM, Zhang YY, Mak TS, Tang PC, Huang XR, Lan HY. Transforming growth factor-β signalling in renal fibrosis: from Smads to non-coding RNAs. J Physiol. 2018;596:3493–503. 10.1113/JP274492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Voisin A, Damon-Soubeyrand C, Bravard S, Saez F, Drevet JR, Guiton R. Differential expression and localisation of TGF-β isoforms and receptors in the murine epididymis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:995. 10.1038/s41598-020-57839-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moses HL, Roberts AB, Derynck R. The discovery and early days of TGF-β: a historical perspective. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8:a021865. 10.1101/cshperspect.a021865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mourskaia AA, Dong Z, Ng S, Banville M, Zwaagstra JC, O’Connor-McCourt MD, et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 is the predominant isoform required for breast cancer cell outgrowth in bone. Oncogene. 2009;28:1005–15. 10.1038/onc.2008.454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meng XM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. TGF-β: the master regulator of fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:325–38. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fotopoulou C Khan T Bracinik J Glasbey J Abu-Rustum N Chiva L et al.; CovidSurg Gynecological Cancer Collaborators. Outcomes of gynecologic cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international, multicenter, prospective covidSurg-gynecologic oncology cancer study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227:735.E1–25. 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sonnylal S, Denton CP, Zheng B, Keene DR, He R, Adams HP, et al. Postnatal induction of transforming growth factor β signaling in fibroblasts of mice recapitulates clinical, histologic, and biochemical features of scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:334–44. 10.1002/art.22328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tang PM, Zhang YY, Xiao J, Tang PC, Chung JY, Li J, et al. Neural transcription factor Pou4f1 promotes renal fibrosis via macrophage-myofibroblast transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:20741–52. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119:e2200781119. 10.1073/pnas.1917663117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tang PM, Zhou S, Li CJ, Liao J, Xiao J, Wang QM, et al. The proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase Src is essential for macrophage-myofibroblast transition during renal scarring. Kidney Int. 2018;93:173–87. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tang PM, Zhang YY, Lan HY. LncRNAs in TGF-β-driven tissue fibrosis. Noncoding RNA. 2018;4:26. 10.3390/ncrna4040026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang Y, Tang PM, Niu Y, García Córdoba CA, Huang XR, Yu C, et al. Long non-coding RNA LRNA9884 promotes acute kidney injury via regulating NF-kB-mediated transcriptional activation of MIF. Front Physiol. 2020;11:590027. 10.3389/fphys.2020.590027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boulter L, Bullock E, Mabruk Z, Brunton VG. The fibrotic and immune microenvironments as targetable drivers of metastasis. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:27–36. 10.1038/s41416-020-01172-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao H, Wei J, Sun J. Roles of TGF-β signaling pathway in tumor microenvirionment and cancer therapy. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;89:107101. 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.David CJ, Massagué J. Publisher correction: Contextual determinants of TGFβ action in development, immunity and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:479. Erratum for: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:419–35. 10.1038/s41580-018-0018-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tang PM, Zhou S, Meng XM, Wang QM, Li CJ, Lian GY, et al. Smad3 promotes cancer progression by inhibiting E4BP4-mediated NK cell development. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14677. 10.1038/ncomms14677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tang PC, Chung JY, Xue VW, Xiao J, Meng XM, Huang XR, et al. Smad3 promotes cancer-associated fibroblasts generation via macrophage-myofibroblast transition. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9:2101235. 10.1002/advs.202101235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xu X, Zheng L, Yuan Q, Zhen G, Crane JL, Zhou X, et al. Transforming growth factor-β in stem cells and tissue homeostasis. Bone Res. 2018;6:2. 10.1038/s41413-017-0005-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Y, Fan W, Link F, Wang S, Dooley S. Transforming growth factor β latency: a mechanism of cytokine storage and signalling regulation in liver homeostasis and disease. JHEP Rep. 2021;4:100397. 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yan X, Chen YG. Posttranslational modifications of TGF-β receptors. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1344:49–61. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2966-5_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bierie B, Moses HL. Tumour microenvironment: TGFβ: the molecular Jekyll and Hyde of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:506–20. 10.1038/nrc1926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Cohen R, Cros J, Faivre S, Raymond E, et al. Targeting the TGFβ pathway for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;147:22–31. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hill CS. Transcriptional control by the SMADs. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8:a022079. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Miyazawa K, Miyazono K. Regulation of TGF-β family signaling by inhibitory Smads. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9:a022095. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee MK, Pardoux C, Hall MC, Lee PS, Warburton D, Qing J, et al. TGF-β activates Erk MAP kinase signalling through direct phosphorylation of ShcA. EMBO J. 2007;26:3957–67. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang YE. Non-Smad signaling pathways of the TGF-β family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9:a022129. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Finnson KW, Almadani Y, Philip A. Non-canonical (non-SMAD2/3) TGF-β signaling in fibrosis: mechanisms and targets. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020;101:115–22. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Balmanno K, Cook SJ. Tumour cell survival signalling by the ERK1/2 pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:368–77. 10.1038/cdd.2008.148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yamashita M, Fatyol K, Jin C, Wang X, Liu Z, Zhang YE. TRAF6 mediates Smad-independent activation of JNK and p38 by TGF-β. Mol Cell. 2008;31:918–24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Choi ME, Ding Y, Kim SI. TGF-β signaling via TAK1 pathway: role in kidney fibrosis. Semin Nephrol. 2012;32:244–52. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2012.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kirsch K, Zeke A, Tőke O, Sok P, Sethi A, Sebő A, et al. Co-regulation of the transcription controlling ATF2 phosphoswitch by JNK and p38. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5769. 10.1038/s41467-020-19582-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu J, Lamouille S, Derynck R. TGF-β-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res. 2009;19:156–72. 10.1038/cr.2009.5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Qin CD, Ma DN, Zhang SZ, Zhang N, Ren ZG, Zhu XD, et al. The Rho GTPase Rnd1 inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma and is a favorable anti-metastasis target. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:486. 10.1038/s41419-018-0517-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:247–69. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Oakes PW, Wagner E, Brand CA, Probst D, Linke M, Schwarz US, et al. Optogenetic control of RhoA reveals zyxin-mediated elasticity of stress fibres. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15817. 10.1038/ncomms15817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ozdamar B, Bose R, Barrios-Rodiles M, Wang HR, Zhang Y, Wrana JL. Regulation of the polarity protein Par6 by TGFβ receptors controls epithelial cell plasticity. Science. 2005;307:1603–9. 10.1126/science.1105718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. EMT: 2016. Cell. 2016;166:21–45. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hamidi A, Song J, Thakur N, Itoh S, Marcusson A, Bergh A, et al. TGF-β promotes PI3K-AKT signaling and prostate cancer cell migration through the TRAF6-mediated ubiquitylation of p85α. Sci Signal. 2017;10:eaal4186. 10.1126/scisignal.aal4186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Conery AR, Cao Y, Thompson EA, Townsend CM Jr, Ko TC, Luo K. Akt interacts directly with Smad3 to regulate the sensitivity to TGF-β induced apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:366–72. 10.1038/ncb1117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Das TP, Suman S, Alatassi H, Ankem MK, Damodaran C. Inhibition of AKT promotes FOXO3a-dependent apoptosis in prostate cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2111. 10.1038/cddis.2015.403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guo X, Ramirez A, Waddell DS, Li Z, Liu X, Wang XF. Axin and GSK3-β control Smad3 protein stability and modulate TGF-β signaling. Genes Dev. 2008;22:106–20. 10.1101/gad.1590908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fischer AN, Fuchs E, Mikula M, Huber H, Beug H, Mikulits W. PDGF essentially links TGF-β signaling to nuclear β-catenin accumulation in hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Oncogene. 2007;26:3395–405. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jechlinger M, Sommer A, Moriggl R, Seither P, Kraut N, Capodiecci P, et al. Autocrine PDGFR signaling promotes mammary cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1561–70. 10.1172/JCI24652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gotzmann J, Fischer AN, Zojer M, Mikula M, Proell V, Huber H, et al. A crucial function of PDGF in TGF-β-mediated cancer progression of hepatocytes. Oncogene. 2006;25:3170–85. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yuki R, Tatewaki T, Yamaguchi N, Aoyama K, Honda T, Kubota S, et al. Desuppression of TGF-β signaling via nuclear c-Abl-mediated phosphorylation of TIF1γ/TRIM33 at Tyr-524, -610, and -1048. Oncogene. 2019;38:637–55. 10.1038/s41388-018-0481-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Du X, Zhang L, Li X, Pan Z, Liu H, Li Q. TGF-β signaling controls FSHR signaling-reduced ovarian granulosa cell apoptosis through the SMAD4/miR-143 axis. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2476. 10.1038/cddis.2016.379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lei S, Dubeykovskiy A, Chakladar A, Wojtukiewicz L, Wang TC. The murine gastrin promoter is synergistically activated by transforming growth factor-β/Smad and Wnt signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:42492–502. 10.1074/jbc.M404025200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fujii M, Toyoda T, Nakanishi H, Yatabe Y, Sato A, Matsudaira Y, et al. TGF-β synergizes with defects in the Hippo pathway to stimulate human malignant mesothelioma growth. J Exp Med. 2012;209:479–94. 10.1084/jem.20111653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zavadil J, Cermak L, Soto-Nieves N, Böttinger EP. Integration of TGF-β/Smad and Jagged1/Notch signalling in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. EMBO J. 2004;23:1155–65. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Steg AD, Katre AA, Bevis KS, Ziebarth A, Dobbin ZC, Shah MM, et al. Smoothened antagonists reverse taxane resistance in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:1587–97. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Javelaud D, Alexaki VI, Dennler S, Mohammad KS, Guise TA, Mauviel A. TGF-β/SMAD/GLI2 signaling axis in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5606–10. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kim BG, Malek E, Choi SH, Ignatz-Hoover JJ, Driscoll JJ. Novel therapies emerging in oncology to target the TGF-β pathway. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:55. 10.1186/s13045-021-01053-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:518–28. 10.1038/nrm3629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang Y, Alexander PB, Wang XF. TGF-β family signaling in the control of cell proliferation and survival. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9:a022145. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Besson A, Dowdy SF, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: cell cycle regulators and beyond. Dev Cell. 2008;14:159–69. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Keklikoglou I, Koerner C, Schmidt C, Zhang JD, Heckmann D, Shavinskaya A, et al. MicroRNA-520/373 family functions as a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer by targeting NF-κB and TGF-β signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2012;31:4150–63. 10.1038/onc.2011.571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cao Y, Liu X, Zhang W, Deng X, Zhang H, Liu Y, et al. TGF-β repression of Id2 induces apoptosis in gut epithelial cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:1089–98. 10.1038/onc.2008.456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Elliott RL, Blobe GC. Role of transforming growth factor β in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2078–93. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Massagué J. TGFβ in cancer. Cell. 2008;134:215–30. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vergadi E, Ieronymaki E, Lyroni K, Vaporidi K, Tsatsanis C. Akt signaling pathway in macrophage aactivation and M1/M2 polarization. J Immunol. 2017;198:1006–14. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kammoun M, Piquereau J, Nadal-Desbarats L, Même S, Beuvin M, Bonne G, et al. Novel role of Tieg1 in muscle metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative capacities. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2020;228:e13394. 10.1111/apha.13394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Demagny H, Araki T, De Robertis EM. The tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 is regulated by phosphorylations that integrate FGF, Wnt, and TGF-β signaling. Cell Rep. 2014;9:688–700. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ramjaun AR, Tomlinson S, Eddaoudi A, Downward J. Upregulation of two BH3-only proteins, Bmf and Bim, during TGF β-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 2007;26:970–81. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pan WW, Zhou JJ, Liu XM, Xu Y, Guo LJ, Yu C, et al. Death domain-associated protein DAXX promotes ovarian cancer development and chemoresistance*. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:13620–30. 10.1074/jbc.M112.446369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Loh CY, Chai JY, Tang TF, Wong WF, Sethi G, Shanmugam MK, et al. The E-cadherin and N-cadherin switch in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition: signaling, therapeutic implications, and challenges. Cells. 2019;8:1118. 10.3390/cells8101118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pastushenko I, Mauri F, Song Y, de Cock F, Meeusen B, Swedlund B, et al. Fat1 deletion promotes hybrid EMT state, tumour stemness and metastasis. Nature. 2021;589:448–55. 10.1038/s41586-020-03046-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Heerboth S, Housman G, Leary M, Longacre M, Byler S, Lapinska K, et al. EMT and tumor metastasis. Clin Transl Med. 2015;4:6. 10.1186/s40169-015-0048-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249–57. 10.1038/35025220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Guo X, Wang XF. Signaling cross-talk between TGF-β/BMP and other pathways. Cell Res. 2009;19:71–88. 10.1038/cr.2008.302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fang L, Li Y, Wang S, Li Y, Chang HM, Yi Y, et al. TGF-β1 induces VEGF expression in human granulosa-lutein cells: a potential mechanism for the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:450–60. 10.1038/s12276-020-0396-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Oshimori N, Oristian D, Fuchs E. TGF-β promotes heterogeneity and drug resistance in squamous cell carcinoma. Cell. 2015;160:963–76. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chung JY, Chan MK, Li JS, Chan AS, Tang PC, Leung KT, et al. TGF-β signaling: from tissue fibrosis to tumor microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:7575. 10.3390/ijms22147575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pickup M, Novitskiy S, Moses HL. The roles of TGFβ in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:788–99. 10.1038/nrc3603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tang PC, Chung JY, Liao J, Chan MK, Chan AS, Cheng G, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing uncovers a neuron-like macrophage subset associated with cancer pain. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabn5535. 10.1126/sciadv.abn5535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thomas DA, Massagué J. TGF-β directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions during tumor evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:369–80. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Liu S, Ren J, Ten Dijke P. Targeting TGFβ signal transduction for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:8. 10.1038/s41392-020-00436-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chen ML, Pittet MJ, Gorelik L, Flavell RA, Weissleder R, von Boehmer H, et al. Regulatory T cells suppress tumor-specific CD8 T cell cytotoxicity through TGF-β signals in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:419–24. 10.1073/pnas.0408197102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Tone Y, Furuuchi K, Kojima Y, Tykocinski ML, Greene MI, Tone M. Smad3 and NFAT cooperate to induce Foxp3 expression through its enhancer. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:194–202. 10.1038/ni1549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Volta V, Pérez-Baos S, de la Parra C, Katsara O, Ernlund A, Dornbaum S, et al. A DAP5/eIF3d alternate mRNA translation mechanism promotes differentiation and immune suppression by human regulatory T cells. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6979. 10.1038/s41467-021-27087-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhu J, Davidson TS, Wei G, Jankovic D, Cui K, Schones DE, et al. Down-regulation of Gfi-1 expression by TGF-β is important for differentiation of Th17 and CD103+ inducible regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206:329–41. 10.1084/jem.20081666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Crotty S. T follicular helper cell differentiation, function, and roles in disease. Immunity. 2014;41:529–42. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gulubova M, Manolova I, Ananiev J, Kjurkchiev D, Julianov A, Altunkova I. Relationship of TGF-β1 and Smad7 expression with decreased dendritic cell infiltration in liver gastrointestinal cancer metastasis. APMIS. 2013;121:967–75. 10.1111/apm.12096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ni XY, Sui HX, Liu Y, Ke SZ, Wang YN, Gao FG. TGF-β of lung cancer microenvironment upregulates B7H1 and GITRL expression in dendritic cells and is associated with regulatory T cell generation. Oncol Rep. 2012;28:615–21. 10.3892/or.2012.1822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhong M, Zhong C, Cui W, Wang G, Zheng G, Li L, et al. Induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells by activated TGF-β/Akt/Smad2 signaling in RIG-I-deficient stemness-high human liver cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:439. 10.1186/s12885-019-5670-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pu N, Zhao G, Gao S, Cui Y, Xu Y, Lv Y, et al. Neutralizing TGF-β promotes anti-tumor immunity of dendritic cells against pancreatic cancer by regulating T lymphocytes. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2018;43:123–31. 10.5114/ceji.2018.77381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wiguna AP, Walden P. Role of IL-10 and TGF-β in melanoma. Exp Dermatol. 2015;24:209–14. 10.1111/exd.12629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lin CS, Chen MF, Wang YS, Chuang TF, Chiang YL, Chu RM. IL-6 restores dendritic cell maturation inhibited by tumor-derived TGF-β through interfering Smad 2/3 nuclear translocation. Cytokine. 2013;62:352–9. 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mamessier E, Sylvain A, Thibult ML, Houvenaeghel G, Jacquemier J, Castellano R, et al. Human breast cancer cells enhance self tolerance by promoting evasion from NK cell antitumor immunity. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:3609–22. 10.1172/JCI45816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gao Y, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F, Bald T, Ng SS, Young A, Ngiow SF, et al. Tumor immunoevasion by the conversion of effector NK cells into type 1 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:1004–15. 10.1038/ni.3800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Pasero C, Gravis G, Guerin M, Granjeaud S, Thomassin-Piana J, Rocchi P, et al. Inherent and tumor-driven immune tolerance in the prostate microenvironment impairs natural killer cell antitumor activity. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2153–65. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Han B, Mao FY, Zhao YL, Lv YP, Teng YS, Duan M, et al. Altered NKp30, NKp46, NKG2D, and DNAM-1 expression on circulating NK cells is associated with tumor progression in human gastric cancer. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:6248590. 10.1155/2018/6248590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Labelle M, Begum S, Hynes RO. Platelets guide the formation of early metastatic niches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E3053–61. 10.1073/pnas.1411082111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Fridlender ZG, Sun J, Kim S, Kapoor V, Cheng G, Ling L, et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-β “N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:183–94. 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sagiv JY, Michaeli J, Assi S, Mishalian I, Kisos H, Levy L, et al. Phenotypic diversity and plasticity in circulating neutrophil subpopulations in cancer. Cell Rep. 2015;10:562–73. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zhou SL, Yin D, Hu ZQ, Luo CB, Zhou ZJ, Xin HY, et al. A positive feedback loop between cancer stem-like cells and tumor-associated neutrophils controls hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2019;70:1214–30. 10.1002/hep.30630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jackstadt R, van Hooff SR, Leach JD, Cortes-Lavaud X, Lohuis JO, Ridgway RA, et al. Epithelial NOTCH signaling rewires the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer to drive poor-prognosis subtypes and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:319–36.E7. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sun DY, Wu JQ, He ZH, He MF, Sun HB. Cancer-associated fibroblast regulate proliferation and migration of prostate cancer cells through TGF-β signaling pathway. Life Sci. 2019;235:116791. 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Shan G, Gu J, Zhou D, Li L, Cheng W, Wang Y, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-secreted exosomal miR-423-5p promotes chemotherapy resistance in prostate cancer by targeting GREM2 through the TGF-β signaling pathway. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:1809–22. 10.1038/s12276-020-0431-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sato R, Imamura K, Semba T, Tomita Y, Saeki S, Ikeda K, et al. TGFβ signaling activated by cancer-associated fibroblasts determines the histological signature of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4751–65. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Bordignon P, Bottoni G, Xu X, Popescu AS, Truan Z, Guenova E, et al. Dualism of FGF and TGF-β signaling in heterogeneous cancer-associated fibroblast activation with ETV1 as a critical determinant. Cell Rep. 2019;28:2358–72.E6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Stuelten CH, Busch JI, Tang B, Flanders KC, Oshima A, Sutton E, et al. Transient tumor-fibroblast interactions increase tumor cell malignancy by a TGF-β mediated mechanism in a mouse xenograft model of breast cancer. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9832. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Denys H, Derycke L, Hendrix A, Westbroek W, Gheldof A, Narine K, et al. Differential impact of TGF-β and EGF on fibroblast differentiation and invasion reciprocally promotes colon cancer cell invasion. Cancer Lett. 2008;266:263–74. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tan ML, Parkinson EK, Yap LF, Paterson IC. Autophagy is deregulated in cancer-associated fibroblasts from oral cancer and is stimulated during the induction of fibroblast senescence by TGF-β1. Sci Rep. 2021;11:584. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2022;12:12714. 10.1038/s41598-020-79789-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Hou X, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xiong W, Mi J. TGFBR-IDH1-Cav1 axis promotes TGF-β signalling in cancer-associated fibroblast. Oncotarget. 2017;8:83962–74. 10.18632/oncotarget.20861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Li W, Zhang X, Wang J, Li M, Cao C, Tan J, et al. TGFβ1 in fibroblasts-derived exosomes promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:96035–47. 10.18632/oncotarget.21635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Jena BC, Das CK, Banerjee I, Das S, Bharadwaj D, Majumder R, et al. Paracrine TGF-β1 from breast cancer contributes to chemoresistance in cancer associated fibroblasts via upregulation of the p44/42 MAPK signaling pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;186:114474. 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ren J, Smid M, Iaria J, Salvatori DCF, van Dam H, Zhu HJ, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived Gremlin 1 promotes breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21:109. 10.1186/s13058-019-1194-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ringuette Goulet C, Bernard G, Tremblay S, Chabaud S, Bolduc S, Pouliot F. Exosomes induce fibroblast differentiation into cancer-associated fibroblasts through TGFβ signaling. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16:1196–204. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Reboldi A, Arnon TI, Rodda LB, Atakilit A, Sheppard D, Cyster JG. IgA production requires B cell interaction with subepithelial dendritic cells in Peyer’s patches. Science. 2016;352:aaf4822. 10.1126/science.aaf4822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Jayaraman P, Parikh F, Newton JM, Hanoteau A, Rivas C, Krupar R, et al. TGF-β1 programmed myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) acquire immune-stimulating and tumor killing activity capable of rejecting established tumors in combination with radiotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1490853. 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1490853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Cortez VS, Ulland TK, Cervantes-Barragan L, Bando JK, Robinette ML, Wang Q, et al. SMAD4 impedes the conversion of NK cells into ILC1-like cells by curtailing non-canonical TGF-β signaling. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:995–1003. 10.1038/ni.3809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Chang H, Zwijsen A, Vogel H, Huylebroeck D, Matzuk MM. Smad5 is essential for left-right asymmetry in mice. Dev Biol. 2000;219:71–8. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Chang H, Huylebroeck D, Verschueren K, Guo Q, Matzuk MM, Zwijsen A. Smad5 knockout mice die at mid-gestation due to multiple embryonic and extraembryonic defects. Development. 1999;126:1631–2. 10.1242/dev.126.8.1631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Zanninelli G, Vetuschi A, Sferra R, D’ngelo A, Fratticci A, Continenza MA, et al. Smad3 knock-out mice as a useful model to study intestinal fibrogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:1211–8. 10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Tojo M, Takebe A, Takahashi S, Tanaka K, Imamura T, Miyazono K, et al. Smad7-deficient mice show growth retardation with reduced viability. J Biochem. 2012;151:621–31. 10.1093/jb/mvs022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ferguson CA, Tucker AS, Christensen L, Lau AL, Matzuk MM, Sharpe PT. Activin is an essential early mesenchymal signal in tooth development that is required for patterning of the murine dentition. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2636–49. 10.1101/gad.12.16.2636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Matzuk MM, Kumar TR, Bradley A. Different phenotypes for mice deficient in either activins or activin receptor type II. Nature. 1995;374:356–60. 10.1038/374356a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Vassalli A, Matzuk MM, Gardner HA, Lee KF, Jaenisch R. Activin/inhibin beta B subunit gene disruption leads to defects in eyelid development and female reproduction. Genes Dev. 1994;8:414–27. 10.1101/gad.8.4.414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Lau AL, Kumar TR, Nishimori K, Bonadio J, Matzuk MM. Activin β C and β E genes are not essential for mouse liver growth, differentiation, and regeneration. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6127–37. 10.1128/MCB.20.16.6127-6137.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Brown CW, Houston-Hawkins DE, Woodruff TK, Matzuk MM. Insertion of Inhbb into the Inhba locus rescues the Inhba-null phenotype and reveals new activin functions. Nat Genet. 2000;25:453–7. 10.1038/78161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Elvin JA, Yan C, Wang P, Nishimori K, Matzuk MM. Molecular characterization of the follicle defects in the growth differentiation factor 9-deficient ovary. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:1018–34. 10.1210/mend.13.6.0309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Carabatsos MJ, Elvin J, Matzuk MM, Albertini DF. Characterization of oocyte and follicle development in growth differentiation factor-9-deficient mice. Dev Biol. 1998;204:373–84. 10.1006/dbio.1998.9087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Li Q, Karam SM, Coerver KA, Matzuk MM, Gordon JI. Stimulation of activin receptor II signaling pathways inhibits differentiation of multiple gastric epithelial lineages. Mol Endocrinol. 1998;12:181–92. 10.1210/mend.12.2.0060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Bassing CH, Shou W, Muir S, Heitman J, Matzuk MM, Wang XF. FKBP12 is not required for the modulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor I signaling activity in embryonic fibroblasts and thymocytes. Cell Growth Differ. 1998;9:223–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Morris JC, Tan AR, Olencki TE, Shapiro GI, Dezube BJ, Reiss M, et al. Phase I study of GC1008 (fresolimumab): a human anti-transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) monoclonal antibody in patients with advanced malignant melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90353. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dodagatta-Marri E, Meyer DS, Reeves MQ, Paniagua R, To MD, Binnewies M, et al. α-PD-1 therapy elevates Treg/Th balance and increases tumor cell pSmad3 that are both targeted by α-TGFβ antibody to promote durable rejection and immunity in squamous cell carcinomas. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:62. 10.1186/s40425-018-0493-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Greco R, Qu H, Qu H, Theilhaber J, Shapiro G, Gregory R, et al. Pan-TGFβ inhibition by SAR439459 relieves immunosuppression and improves antitumor efficacy of PD-1 blockade. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1811605. 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1811605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Cohn A, Lahn MM, Williams KE, Cleverly AL, Pitou C, Kadam SK, et al. A phase I dose-escalation study to a predefined dose of a transforming growth factor-β1 monoclonal antibody (TβM1) in patients with metastatic cancer. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:2221–31. 10.3892/ijo.2014.2679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Trelford CB, Dagnino L, Di Guglielmo GM. Transforming growth factor-β in tumour development. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:991612. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.991612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Gabriely G, da Cunha AP, Rezende RM, Kenyon B, Madi A, Vandeventer T, et al. Targeting latency-associated peptide promotes antitumor immunity. Sci Immunol. 2017;2:eaaj1738. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaj1738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Reader CS, Vallath S, Steele CW, Haider S, Brentnall A, Desai A, et al. The integrin αvβ6 drives pancreatic cancer through diverse mechanisms and represents an effective target for therapy. J Pathol. 2019;249:332–42. 10.1002/path.5320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Takasaka N, Seed RI, Cormier A, Bondesson AJ, Lou J, Elattma A, et al. Integrin αvβ8-expressing tumor cells evade host immunity by regulating TGF-β activation in immune cells. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e122591. 10.1172/jci.insight.122591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Dodagatta-Marri E, Ma HY, Liang B, Li J, Meyer DS, Chen SY, et al. Integrin αvβ8 on T cells suppresses anti-tumor immunity in multiple models and is a promising target for tumor immunotherapy. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109309. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Welsh BT, Faucette R, Bilic S, Martin CJ, Schürpf T, Chen D, et al. Nonclinical development of SRK-181: an anti-latent TGFβ1 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Int J Toxicol. 2021;40:226–41. 10.1177/1091581821998945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Tolcher AW, Berlin JD, Cosaert J, Kauh J, Chan E, Piha-Paul SA, et al. A phase 1 study of anti-TGFβ receptor type-II monoclonal antibody LY3022859 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;79:673–80. 10.1007/s00280-017-3245-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Dean NM, Bennett CF. Antisense oligonucleotide-based therapeutics for cancer. Oncogene. 2003;22:9087–96. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.van Rooij E, Sutherland LB, Thatcher JE, DiMaio JM, Naseem RH, Marshall WS, et al. Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13027–32. 10.1073/pnas.0805038105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Hwang M, Kim HJ, Noh HJ, Chang YC, Chae YM, Kim KH, et al. TGF-β1 siRNA suppresses the tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the kidney of ureteral obstruction. Exp Mol Pathol. 2006;81:48–54. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2005.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Cheng K, Yang N, Mahato RI. TGF-β1 gene silencing for treating liver fibrosis. Mol Pharm. 2009;6:772–9. 10.1021/mp9000469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Izzo R, Bevivino G, De Simone V, Sedda S, Monteleone I, Marafini I, et al. Knockdown of Smad7 with a specific antisense oligonucleotide attenuates colitis and colitis-driven colonic fibrosis in mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:1213–24. 10.1093/ibd/izy062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Pfeiffer N, Voykov B, Renieri G, Bell K, Richter P, Weigel M, et al. First-in-human phase I study of ISTH0036, an antisense oligonucleotide selectively targeting transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGF-β2), in subjects with open-angle glaucoma undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188899. 10.1371/journal.pone.0188899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Papachristodoulou A, Silginer M, Weller M, Schneider H, Hasenbach K, Janicot M, et al. Therapeutic targeting of TGFβ ligands in glioblastoma using novel antisense oligonucleotides reduces the growth of experimental gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:7189–201. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Huber-Ruano I, Raventós C, Cuartas I, Sánchez-Jaro C, Arias A, Parra JL, et al. An antisense oligonucleotide targeting TGF-β2 inhibits lung metastasis and induces CD86 expression in tumor-associated macrophages. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2278–85. 10.1093/annonc/mdx314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Hau P, Jachimczak P, Schlingensiepen R, Schulmeyer F, Jauch T, Steinbrecher A, et al. Inhibition of TGF-β2 with AP 12009 in recurrent malignant gliomas: from preclinical to phase I/II studies. Oligonucleotides. 2007;17:201–12. 10.1089/oli.2006.0053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Schlingensiepen KH, Schlingensiepen R, Steinbrecher A, Hau P, Bogdahn U, Fischer-Blass B, et al. Targeted tumor therapy with the TGF-β2 antisense compound AP 12009. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:129–39. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Bogdahn U Hau P Stockhammer G Venkataramana NK Mahapatra AK Suri A et al.; Trabedersen Glioma Study Group. Targeted therapy for high-grade glioma with the TGF-β2 inhibitor trabedersen: results of a randomized and controlled phase IIb study. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13:132–42. 10.1093/neuonc/noq142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Murer P, Neri D. Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins: a novel class of biopharmaceuticals for the therapy of cancer and of chronic inflammation. N Biotechnol. 2019;52:42–53. 10.1016/j.nbt.2019.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Li S, Liu M, Do MH, Chou C, Stamatiades EG, Nixon BG, et al. Cancer immunotherapy via targeted TGF-β signalling blockade in TH cells. Nature. 2020;587:121–5. 10.1038/s41586-020-2850-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Varricchio L, Iancu-Rubin C, Upadhyaya B, Zingariello M, Martelli F, Verachi P, et al. TGF-β1 protein trap AVID200 beneficially affects hematopoiesis and bone marrow fibrosis in myelofibrosis. JCI Insight. 2021;6:e145651. 10.1172/jci.insight.145651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Knudson KM, Hicks KC, Luo X, Chen JQ, Schlom J, Gameiro SR. M7824, a novel bifunctional anti-PD-L1/TGFβ Trap fusion protein, promotes anti-tumor efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with vaccine. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1426519. Erratum in: Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1584435. 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1426519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.David JM, Dominguez C, McCampbell KK, Gulley JL, Schlom J, Palena C. A novel bifunctional anti-PD-L1/TGF-β trap fusion protein (M7824) efficiently reverts mesenchymalization of human lung cancer cells. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1349589. 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1349589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Paz-Ares L, Kim TM, Vicente D, Felip E, Lee DH, Lee KH, et al. Bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in second-line treatment of patients with NSCLC: results from an expansion cohort of a phase 1 trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:1210–22. 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Cheng B, Ding K, Chen P, Ji J, Luo T, Guo X, et al. Anti-PD-L1/TGF-βR fusion protein (SHR-1701) overcomes disrupted lymphocyte recovery-induced resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022;42:17–36. 10.1002/cac2.12244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Feng J, Tang D, Wang J, Zhou Q, Peng J, Lou H, et al. SHR-1701, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGFβ, for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a clinical expansion cohort of a phase I study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:5297–305. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Hu Z, Robbins JS, Pister A, Zafar MB, Zhang ZW, Gupta J, et al. A modified hTERT promoter-directed oncolytic adenovirus replication with concurrent inhibition of TGFβ signaling for breast cancer therapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010;17:235–43. Erratum in: Cancer Gene Ther. 2010;17:906. 10.1038/cgt.2009.72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Hu Z, Gerseny H, Zhang Z, Chen YJ, Berg A, Zhang Z, et al. Oncolytic adenovirus expressing soluble TGFβ receptor II-Fc-mediated inhibition of established bone metastases: a safe and effective systemic therapeutic approach for breast cancer. Mol Ther. 2011;19:1609–18. 10.1038/mt.2011.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Wang ZG, Zhao W, Ramachandra M, Seth P. An oncolytic adenovirus expressing soluble transforming growth factor-β type II receptor for targeting breast cancer: in vitro evaluation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:367–73. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Nishida J, Miyazono K, Ehata S. Decreased TGFBR3/betaglycan expression enhances the metastatic abilities of renal cell carcinoma cells through TGF-β-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Oncogene. 2018;37:2197–212. 10.1038/s41388-017-0084-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Wang J, Xiang H, Lu Y, Wu T. Role and clinical significance of TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 in malignant tumors (review). Int J Mol Med. 2021;47:55. 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Wang W, Chun H, Baek J, Sadik JE, Shirazyan A, Razavi P, et al. The TGFβ type I receptor TGFβRI functions as an inhibitor of BMP signaling in cartilage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:15570–79. 10.1073/pnas.1902927116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Spender LC, Ferguson GJ, Hughes GD, Davies BR, Goldberg FW, Herrera B, et al. Preclinical evaluation of AZ12601011 and AZ12799734, inhibitors of transforming growth factor β superfamily type 1 receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2019;95:222–34. 10.1124/mol.118.112946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Melisi D, Oh DY, Hollebecque A, Calvo E, Varghese A, Borazanci E, et al. Safety and activity of the TGFβ receptor I kinase inhibitor galunisertib plus the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab in metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002068. 10.1136/jitc-2020-002068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Jank BJ, Lenz T, Haas M, Kadletz-Wanke L, Campion NJ, Schnoell J, et al. Radiosensitizing effect of galunisertib, a TGF-β receptor I inhibitor, on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Invest New Drugs. 2022;40:478–86. 10.1007/s10637-021-01207-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Shaim H, Shanley M, Basar R, Daher M, Gumin J, Zamler DB, et al. Targeting the αv integrin/TGF-β axis improves natural killer cell function against glioblastoma stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:e142116. 10.1172/JCI142116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Rodon J, Carducci MA, Sepulveda-Sánchez JM, Azaro A, Calvo E, Seoane J, et al. First-in-human dose study of the novel transforming growth factor-β receptor I kinase inhibitor LY2157299 monohydrate in patients with advanced cancer and glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:553–60. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Peng D, Fu M, Wang M, Wei Y, Wei X. Targeting TGF-β signal transduction for fibrosis and cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:104. 10.1186/s12943-022-01569-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Zhang L, Hao B, Geng Z, Geng Q. Toripalimab: the first domestic anti-tumor PD-1 antibody in China. Front Immunol. 2022;12:730666. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.730666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Yap TA, Vieito M, Baldini C, Sepúlveda-Sánchez JM, Kondo S, Simonelli M, et al. First-in-human phase I study of a next-generation, oral, TGFβ receptor 1 inhibitor, LY3200882, in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6666–76. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Zhang P, Qin C, Liu N, Zhou X, Chu X, Lv F, et al. The programmed site-specific delivery of LY3200882 and PD-L1 siRNA boosts immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer by remodeling tumor microenvironment. Biomaterials. 2022;284:121518. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Halder SK, Beauchamp RD, Datta PK. A specific inhibitor of TGF-β receptor kinase, SB-431542, as a potent antitumor agent for human cancers 1. Neoplasia. 2005;7:509–21. 10.1593/neo.04640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Uhl M, Aulwurm S, Wischhusen J, Weiler M, Ma JY, Almirez R, et al. SD-208, a novel transforming growth factor β receptor I kinase inhibitor, inhibits growth and invasiveness and enhances immunogenicity of murine and human glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7954–61. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Mohammad KS, Javelaud D, Fournier PG, Niewolna M, McKenna CR, Peng XH, et al. TGF-β-RI kinase inhibitor SD-208 reduces the development and progression of melanoma bone metastases. Cancer Res. 2011;71:175–84. Erratum in: Cancer Res. 2011;71:2023. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Keedy VL, Bauer TM, Clarke JM, Hurwitz H, Baek I, Ha I, et al. Association of TGF-β responsive signature with anti-tumor effect of vactosertib, a potent, oral TGF-β receptor type I (TGFBRI) inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3031. 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.303130199311 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Malek E, Kim BG, Valent J, Driscoll J, Caimi P, Kim SJ, et al. Preclinical studies and a phase I trial of the TGF-β receptor inhibitor, vactosertib (TEW-7197), in combination with pomalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to bortezomib or lenalidomide. Blood. 2018;132:1962. 10.1182/blood-2018-99-112449 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Kim TW, Lee KW, Ahn JB, Lee J, Ryu J, Oh B, et al. Efficacy and safety of vactosertib and pembrolizumab combination in patients with previously treated microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3573. 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.3573 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Li J, Liu T, Bao H, Xu Z, Shu Y, Zheng B. A phase I study of a TGF-β receptor I kinase inhibitor YL-13027 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3098. 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.3098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 176.PF-06952229 treatment in adult patients with advanced solid tumors [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03685591 [Google Scholar]
- 177.Spagnolo P, Kropski JA, Jones MG, Lee JS, Rossi G, Karampitsakos T, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: disease mechanisms and drug development. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;222:107798. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.TD-1058 first-in-human study in healthy subjects and subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04589260 [Google Scholar]
- 179.Yannelli JR, Wroblewski JM. On the road to a tumor cell vaccine: 20 years of cellular immunotherapy. Vaccine. 2004;23:97–113. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.12.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Nemunaitis J, Nemunaitis M, Senzer N, Snitz P, Bedell C, Kumar P, et al. Phase II trial of belagenpumatucel-L, a TGF-β2 antisense gene modified allogeneic tumor vaccine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009;16:620–4. 10.1038/cgt.2009.15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Giaccone G, Bazhenova LA, Nemunaitis J, Tan M, Juhász E, Ramlau R, et al. A phase III study of belagenpumatucel-L, an allogeneic tumour cell vaccine, as maintenance therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2321–9. 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Walter A, Rocconi RP, Monk BJ, Herzog TJ, Manning L, Bognar E, et al. Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil) maintenance immunotherapy: 3-year survival benefit in homologous recombination proficient (HRP) ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;163:459–64. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Rocconi RP, Grosen EA, Ghamande SA, Chan JK, Barve MA, Oh J, et al. Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil) immunotherapy as maintenance in frontline stage III/IV ovarian cancer (VITAL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1661–72. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30533-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Hong S, Lee HJ, Kim SJ, Hahm KB. Connection between inflammation and carcinogenesis in gastrointestinal tract: focus on TGF-β signaling. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:2080–93. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i17.2080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Lacouture ME, Morris JC, Lawrence DP, Tan AR, Olencki TE, Shapiro GI, et al. Cutaneous keratoacanthomas/squamous cell carcinomas associated with neutralization of transforming growth factor β by the monoclonal antibody fresolimumab (GC1008). Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64:437–46. 10.1007/s00262-015-1653-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Herbertz S, Sawyer JS, Stauber AJ, Gueorguieva I, Driscoll KE, Estrem ST, et al. Clinical development of galunisertib (LY2157299 monohydrate), a small molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:4479–99. 10.2147/DDDT.S86621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, et al. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:593–601. 10.1038/ncb1722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Burk U, Schubert J, Wellner U, Schmalhofer O, Vincan E, Spaderna S, et al. A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:582–9. 10.1038/embor.2008.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang R, Wang B, Hua P, Li J. LncRNA Erbb4-IR promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by downregulating miR-145. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:17566–72. 10.1002/jcb.29023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Sharma S, Hofbauer TM, Ondracek AS, Chausheva S, Alimohammadi A, Artner T, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote fibrous vascular occlusions in chronic thrombosis. Blood. 2021;137:1104–16. 10.1182/blood.2020005861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Torres Á, Muñoz K, Nahuelpán Y, R Saez AP, Mendoza P, Jara C, et al. Intraglomerular monocyte/macrophage infiltration and macrophage-myofibroblast transition during diabetic nephropathy is regulated by the A2B adenosine receptor. Cells. 2020;9:1051. 10.3390/cells9041051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Xue VW, Chung JY, Córdoba CAG, Cheung AH, Kang W, Lam EW, et al. Transforming growth factor-β: a multifunctional regulator of cancer immunity. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3099. 10.3390/cancers12113099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.





