Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
. 2023 Jan 6;108(6):1290–1297. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad004

Systemic Activation of the Kynurenine Pathway in Graves Disease With and Without Ophthalmopathy

Hans Olav Ueland 1,, Arve Ulvik 2, Kristian Løvås 3, Anette S B Wolff 4,5, Lars Ertesvåg Breivik 6,7, Ann-Elin Meling Stokland 8, Eyvind Rødahl 9,10, Roy Miodini Nilsen 11, Eystein Husebye 12,13,#, Grethe Åstrøm Ueland 14,#
PMCID: PMC10188306  PMID: 36611247

Abstract

Context

Graves disease (GD) is one of the most common autoimmune disorders. Recent literature has shown an immune response involving several different inflammatory related proteins in these patients.

Objective

This work aimed to characterize the kynurenine pathway, activated during interferon-γ (IFN-γ)–mediated inflammation and cellular (T-helper type 1 [Th1] type) immunity, in GD patients with and without thyroid eye disease (TED).

Methods

We analyzed 34 biomarkers by mass spectrometry in serum samples from 100 patients with GD (36 with TED) and 100 matched healthy controls. The analytes included 10 metabolites and 3 indices from the kynurenine pathway, 6 microbiota-derived metabolites, 10 B-vitamers, and 5 serum proteins reflecting inflammation and kidney function.

Results

GD patients showed significantly elevated levels of 7 biomarkers compared with healthy controls (omega squared [ω2] > 0.06; P < .01). Of these 7, the 6 biomarkers with the strongest effect size were all components of the kynurenine pathway. Factor analysis showed that biomarkers related to cellular immunity and the Th1 responses (3-hydroxykynurenine, kynurenine, and quinolinic acid with the highest loading) were most strongly associated with GD. Further, a factor mainly reflecting acute phase response (C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A) showed weaker association with GD by factor analysis. There were no differences in biomarker levels between GD patients with and without TED.

Conclusion

This study supports activation of IFN-γ inflammation and Th1 cellular immunity in GD, but also a contribution of acute-phase reactants. Our finding of no difference in systemic activation of the kynurenine pathway in GD patients with and without TED implies that the local Th1 immune response in the orbit is not reflected systemically.

Keywords: Graves disease, thyroid eye disease, kynurenine pathway, autoimmune, cellular immunity, Th1 response


Graves disease (GD) is one of the most common autoimmune disorders with an annual incidence of 20 to 30 per 100 000 individuals (1). Thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAbs) most often stimulate the thyroid gland to overproduce thyroid hormones, resulting in hyperthyroidism. A systemic activation of the immune system is seen, involving various cytokines, T and B lymphocytes (2, 3).

Approximately 40% of patients with GD develop orbital manifestations, known as thyroid eye disease (TED) (4). A cross-binding of TRAbs and autoantibodies against insulin-like growth factor 1 to CD34+ fibroblasts is essential in the initiation of the orbital inflammatory response (5). T-helper type 1 (Th1)-mediated immunity is consistently observed in TED (6).

Interferon γ (IFN-γ) is an activator of the Th1 immune response and stimulates the release of neopterin from macrophages. In addition, IFN-γ stimulates the oxidative cleavage of tryptophan (Trp) to kynurenine (Kyn) by enhancing the activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (7). This is the first (enzymatic) step of the kynurenine pathway where Kyn degrades further to other metabolites collectively termed kynurenines (Supplementary Fig. S1 (8)). Several of the kynurenines have immunomodulatory properties, and the serum kynurenine-tryptophan ratio (KTR) and neopterin are sensitive markers of IFN-γ–mediated inflammation (9).

The kynurenine pathway plays a role in a broad spectrum of inflammatory diseases. Elevated Kyns have been associated with cardiovascular disease (10), inflammatory bowel disease (11), and rheumatoid arthritis (12). Increased levels of kynurenines and metabolites have also been reported in patients with chronic kidney disease (13). There is evidence of alterations in the kynurenine pathway in different neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders (14, 15). Interleukin-6 has been proposed as an inducer of the kynurenine pathway in patients with chronic schizophrenia (16).

We recently showed that IFN-γ was significantly raised in patients with GD in general, with particularly high levels of interleukin-6 in the subgroup with TED (17). Here, we further explore the IFN-γ–mediated inflammation in this cohort of GD patients with and without TED by mapping the intermediates of the kynurenine pathway, relevant vitamin cofactors, and microbial-derived breakdown products of tryptophan (indoles).

Materials and Methods

Participants

In the time period 2013 to 2021, 100 patients with GD were randomly included into the Norwegian register of organ-specific autoimmune disorders (ROAS). At inclusion they all underwent a general clinical examination and blood samples were collected. From a pool of healthy control samples stored in our biobank, we selected samples from 100 age- and sex-matched controls (Table 1). All individuals signed a letter of consent for participation in future research projects. Before inclusion, they received written information about the present study and were offered the possibility to withdraw if they so desired. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Western Norway approved the ROAS biobank (institutional review board No. 00001872, ref. 2013/1504) and the present study (ref. 2021/7624).

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of patients and healthy controls at inclusion

Patients with GD HCs
Demographic characteristics
ȃn 100 100
ȃAge, y 42 (15-70) 39 (15-70)
ȃFemale sex 77 (77%) 77 (77%)
ȃBody mass index 25 (17-49) 24 (16-36)
ȃSystolic blood pressure, mm Hg 120 (90-192) 124 (90-154)
ȃSmoking history
ȃȃCurrent smoker 22 (22%) 4 (4%)
ȃȃEx-smoker 18 (18%) 0 (0%)
ȃȃNever smoker 60 (60%) 96 (96%)
Status of thyroid disease
ȃȃHyperthyroidism 40 (40%)
ȃȃEuthyroid 59 (59%)
ȃȃHypothyroidism 1 (1%)
Biochemical tests
ȃȃs-Free-thyroxine (pmol/L) 20 (7-81)
ȃȃs-Triiodothyronine (pmol/L) 7.1 (1.3-31)
ȃȃTSH, mU/L 0.01 (0.01-9.0)
ȃȃTRAb, U/L 5.4 (1-40)
ȃȃTPOAb positive 37 (37%)
Current thyroid treatment
ȃȃAntithyroid drugs 87 (87%)
ȃȃLevaxin substitution 14 (14%)
ȃȃNone 11 (11%)
ȃȃUnknown 2 (2%)
Autoimmune comorbiditiesa 30 (30%) 0 (0%)
ȃȃAddison disease 17 (17%)
ȃȃDiabetes mellitus type 1 7 (7%)
ȃȃVitiligo 6 (6%)
ȃȃCeliac disease 5 (5%)
ȃȃVitamin B12 deficiency 2 (2%)
ȃȃHypoparathyroidism 2 (2%)
ȃȃSjögren syndrome 1 (1%)
ȃȃGuillain-Barré syndrome 1 (1%)
ȃȃRheumatoid arthritis 1 (1%)

Categorical data are given as n (%); continuous data are given as median (range).

Abbreviations: GD, Graves disease; HCs, healthy controls; s-, serum-; TED, thyroid eye disease; TPOAb, thyroid peroxidase antibody; TRAb, thyrotropin receptor antibody; TSH, thyrotropin.

Patients with Addison disease were treated with cortisone, diabetes mellitus type 1 with insulin, vitamin B12 deficiency with supplementation, celiac disease had dietary restriction, and hypoparathyroidism used calcium and vitamin D supplementation. None of the patients were on anti-inflammatory treatment.

Clinical Data

Clinical data were obtained from ROAS and from hospital records. GD patients were categorized as having TED if they had characteristic symptoms or signs when included in ROAS. Development of TED after inclusion were recorded at follow-up. Severity of TED was classified according to the European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) classification (18) and inflammatory activity by clinical activity score (CAS) (19). We defined active TED as a CAS of 3 out of 7 or higher.

Thyroid Status

Serum levels of free thyroxine (fT4) (Roche catalog No. 12017709, RRID:AB_2756378), thyrotropin (TSH) (Roche catalog No. 11731459, RRID:AB_2756377), 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine (T3) (Roche catalog No. 11731360122, RRID:AB_2827369), thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) (Roche catalog No. 11820818, RRID:AB_2631044), and TRAb (Roche catalog No. 04 388 780 190, RRID:AB_2801453) were analyzed at the Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) (Roche Cobas).

Analysis of Inflammatory Markers and Metabolites

Serum samples from all participants were obtained nonfasting between 0900 hours and 1400 hours, and stored at −80 °C. Analyses for biomarkers were performed at the laboratory of Bevital, Bergen, Norway (Bevital.no). Trp, kynurenines, and downstream metabolites, indoles, neopterin, cotinine, and B-vitamers were analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), calprotectin (S100A), and cystatin C were assayed by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. Details regarding the limit of detection and coefficient of variation for the essential biomarkers are published on Bevital's home pages at Bevital.no. Cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine were applied as indicator of recent nicotine exposure (20).

As a part of the tryptophan-kynurenine pathway, we analyzed serum samples for concentrations of Trp, Kyn, kynurenic acid (KA), quinaldic acid (Qld), 3-hydroxykynurenine (HK), anthranilic acid (AA), xanthurenic acid (XA), 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (HAA), picolinic acid (Pic), and quinolinic acid (QA). We measured neopterin as a marker of IFN-γ activity.

We also analyzed 6 different microbiota-derived metabolites of Trp collectively called indoles: indole-3-aldehyde (IAld), indole-3-acetate (IAA), indole-3-propionate (IPA), indole-3-lactate (ILA), 3-indoxyl sulphate (3IS) and indole-3-acetamide (IAM).

The following markers related to B-vitamin status were analyzed: pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PLP), pyridoxal (PL), 4-pyridoxic acid (PA), riboflavin, flavin mononucleotide (FMN), nicotinamide (NAM) and N1-methylnicotinamide (mNAM). Thiamine monophosphate (TMP) concentration was used to adjust for variation in serum samples handling before freezing, as TMP is converted to thiamine at room temperature (21).

Ratios and Indices

We calculated the ratio between Kyn and Trp (KTR) as a measure of IDO activity, which catalyzes the first, rate limiting, and IFN-γ–responsive step of the kynurenine pathway (22). Many of the metabolites downstream of Kyn are considered immunomodulatory and their formation are catalyzed by vitamin B6- and B2-dependent enzymes. We calculated the HK ratio (HKr), composed of HK and the 4 kynurenines that are products of the PLP-dependent enzymes, kynurenine transaminase and kynureninase (HK: (KA + AA + XA + HAA)). HKr is a functional marker of B6 status (23). The PAR index (PAr) was calculated as the ratio of PA divided by the sum of PLP plus PL (PA: (PLP + PL)), and reflects altered vitamin B6 metabolism during inflammation (24).

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to describe cases and controls. All measured biomarkers were checked for missing data, and log-transformed before conducting analyses. Missing data for body mass index (BMI) (13.5%) and CRP (4.5%) were imputed once (single imputation) using the predictive mean matching algorithm as implemented in the mice package in R (25). The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) was used to map the correlations between biomarkers. Information on active smoking was obtained using both data on self-reported smoking and measured serum cotinine levels. All individuals with a serum cotinine level above 85 nmol/L were considered active smokers (20).

To estimate the difference in log-transformed biomarker data between GD and healthy controls, we used linear regression models with robust SE estimation to account for potential correlation that arose by matching of cases and controls. The estimated differences were further adjusted for age, BMI, and smoking, as well as for sample storage (TMP), and reported together with 99% CIs or adjusted P values. As healthy controls were sex-matched one-to-one with GD cases, adjustment for sex were not found necessary. Age matching allowed for a variation between ±5 years, and adjustments for age were therefore performed. To account for nonlinear relationship with the biomarkers, the variables age and BMI were included as polynomial quadratic regression terms (ie, age + age2 and BMI + BMI2).

To quantify the effect size of the estimated difference in biomarkers between the disease groups, we calculated the partial omega squared (ω2) statistics (26, 27), which measure how much of the variation in the biomarker is explained by the difference between GD and healthy controls. The calculation of the partial ω2 statistics was based on type 3 sum of squares from the adjusted linear regression models, excluding robust SE estimation, as this option is currently not available in the effectsize package in R (28). The following thresholds of the ω2 statistics have been suggested for the strength of associations: ω2 less than 0.01 (very small); 0.01 less than or equal to ω2 and less than 0.06 (small); 0.06 less than or equal to ω2 and less than 0.14 (medium); ω2 greater than or equal to 0.14 (large) (29). The ω2 statistics can in some cases be negative. Finally, to identify the most important biomarkers for GD, the paired combination of −log 10 (adjusted P value) and partial ω2 statistics for each biomarker is depicted in a graphical format with the aforementioned ω2 thresholds. The level of statistical significance was set to .01, corresponding to a –log 10 (adjusted P value) of 2.

Factor analysis was performed on a subset of the biomarkers: the kynurenines, PLP, the protein biomarkers, CRP, SAA, S100A, and cystatin C, and the covariates smoking and BMI. We chose to present a 2-factor solution where the 2 factors explained 40.3% of the total variation (a third factor increased the total explained variation to only 47.0%). The individual scores of the 2 factors, labeled as GD patients or healthy controls, were used to generate a score plot (see Supplementary material for further details (8)). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.2.0).

Results

Participants

A total of 100 GD patients (77 females) were included with a median age of 41.5 (15-70) years. Fifty-nine of these patients were included within 2 months after presentation of hyperthyroidism. When included, 87 patients had started treatment for their hyperthyroidism, while 13 were treatment naive. Basic characteristics of the study patients and their treatments at inclusion are given in Table 1.

Sixty-four percent of the patients were included during their first episode of hyperthyroidism, and the median number of relapses of hyperthyroidism was 1 (range, 0-4). After a median follow-up time of 36 months (range, 6-240 months) from the first episode of hyperthyroidism, 34 had received definitive treatment by either radioiodine (n = 18), total thyroidectomy (n = 10), or a combination of both modalities (n = 6). In 9 patients, the indication for definitive treatment was TED. During radioiodine treatment, 7 patients received prednisolone according to EUGOGO guidelines (18). After radioiodine treatment, 3 patients developed TED; 1 of these patients had received prednisolone.

Twenty-nine patients had clinical characteristics of TED at inclusion, of whom 7 patients had a CAS score of 3 or greater. The median time after diagnosis of GD to development of TED was 0 months (range, 0-240 months). Seven patients developed TED within 72 months after inclusion, 2 of them within the first 6 months. The severity of TED according to the EUGOGO classification was mild in 27, moderate to severe in 8, and sight-threatening in 1 patient.

There were no significant differences in age, sex, and BMI between the GD patients with and without TED. There were more smokers among patients with TED (39%) compared with patients without TED (22%) (P < .05). No significant differences in serum levels of TRAb or fT4 were observed between the 2 groups.

Kynurenines and Markers of Inflammation

Four out of 34 biomarkers (cotinine, trans-3′-hydroxycotinine, IAM, and TMP) were excluded from further analyzes because of low detection rate (< 60%) both in patients and healthy controls. The concentrations of the remaining 30 biomarkers are given in Table 2. Adjusted for age, smoking, and BMI, by linear regression, 7 biomarkers were significantly elevated with a medium effect size (P < .01; 0.06 < ω2 < 0.14) (Fig. 1) in patients with GD compared to healthy controls. The 6 most elevated biomarkers included neopterin and metabolites that were part of or functionally linked to the kynurenine pathway, namely HKr, PAr, Kyn, KTR, and QA. In addition, cystatin C was significantly elevated with medium effect size (Fig. 2).

Table 2.

Levels of biomarkers in patients with Graves disease and healthy controls

Biomarker All patients with GD HCs P
Tryptophan and kynurenines
ȃTryptophan, µmol/L 66.7 (38.6-111.0) 70.8 (38.0-120.0) .71
ȃKynurenine, µmol/L 1.9 (0.94.4) 1.6 (0.8-4.3) < .001
ȃKynurenic acid, nmol/L 46.2 (14.7-162.0) 52.3 (20.7-128.0) .14
ȃQuinaldic acid, nmol/LL 7.6 (2.1-28.5) 8.2 (3.2-26.1) .23
ȃ3-Hydroxykynurenine, nmol/L 54.2 (1.2-232.0) 46.2 (4.4-101) < .001
ȃAnthranilic acid, nmol/L 17.3 (5.0-202.0-) 17.2 (5.6-85.7) .45
ȃXanthurenic acid, nmol/L 17.5 (4.9-55.1) 20.9 (5.1-51.4) < .001
ȃ3-Hydroxyanthranilic acid, nmol/L 43.4 (1.2—132.0) 42.6 (2.6-105.0) .83
ȃPicolinic acid, nmol/L 45.1 (11.5-140.0) 56.8 (19.4-118.0) .003
ȃQuinolinic acid, nmol/L 419.0 (201.0-1260.0) 331.0 (169.0-3740.0) < .001
Indoles
ȃIndole-3-aldehyde, µmol/L 11.1 (3.4-148) 17.3 (7.0-191.0) .30
ȃIndole-3-acetate, µmol/L 1.9 (0.6-7.8) 2.1 (0.7-5.4) .99
ȃIndole-3-propionate, µmol/L 1.6 (0.1-36.2) 1.7 (0.3-7.9) .04
ȃIndole-3-lactate, nmol L−1 0.56 (0.43-0.68) 0.64 (0.54-0.78) .002
ȃ3-Indoxyl sulphate, µmol/L 5.0 (0.1-18.9) 4.7 (0.7-13.5) .49
Ratios and indexes
ȃKynurenine-tryptophan ratio 30 (15-68) 20 (12-113) < .001
ȃ3-Hydroxykynurenine ratio 42 (1-221) 34 (3-53) < .001
ȃPAr index 0.4 (0.1-1.6) 0.3 (0.1-0.6) < .001
B-vitamers
ȃPyridoxal 5-phosphate, nmol/L 33.7 (3.9-247.0) 39.7 (11.5-163.0) .03
ȃPyridoxal, nmol/L 18.8 (4.7-2630.0) 20.3 (6.4-80.5) .18
ȃ4-Pyridoxic acid, nmol/L 20.6 (5.7-1088.3) 19.0 (7.2-49.7) .01
ȃRiboflavin, nmol/L 16.2 (4.6-202.0) 14.1 (4.8-53.1) .02
ȃFlavin mononucleotide, nmol/L 5.2 (1.7-56.9) 4.4 (1.7-15.5) .23
ȃNicotinamide, nmol/L 171.0 (57.9-1220.0) 205.9 (69.1-478.0) .15
ȃN1-methylnicotinamide, nmol/L 110.5 (25.5-990.0) 107.0 (40.4-302.0) .97
Markers of inflammation
ȃC-reactive protein, µg/mL 1.5 (0.1-24.6) 0.9 (0.1-7.3) < .003
ȃSerum amyloid A, µg/mL 2.4 (0.7-53.8) 1.8 (0.5-13.2) .02
ȃCalprotectin, S100A, µg/mL 0.6 (0.1-6.7) 1.1 (0.2-2.5) < .001
ȃNeopterin, nmol/L 17.7 (5.1-58.4) 8.9 (4.5-64.3) < .001
Others
ȃCystatin C, µg/mL 0.8 (0.4-1.9) 0.7 (0.3-2.0) < .001

Data are given as median (range). P value estimated by Mann-Whitney U test.

Abbreviations: GD, Graves disease; HCs, healthy controls.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Combination plot of effect size against significance level in biomarkers between GD and healthy controls. X-axis: effect size estimated by omega squared (ω2). Y-axis: significance level as −log 10 (adjusted P value). Blue line: represents significance level at P = .01. Blue dots: biomarker suppressed in GD. Red dots: biomarker elevated in GD. ω2 and P values for difference in biomarkers were obtained from a linear regression model, adjusted for age, BMI, and smoking. AA, anthranilic acid; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; FMN, flavin mononucleotide; GD, Graves disease; HK, 3-hydroxykynurenine; IAA, indole-3-acetate; IAld, indole-3-aldehyde; ILA, indole-3-lactate; IPA, indole-3-propionate; KA, kynurenic acid; KTR, kynurenine-tryptophan-ratio; Kyn, kynurenine; mNAM, N1-methylnicotinamide; NAM, nicotinamide; PA, 4-pyridoxic acid; Pic, picolinic acid; PL, pyridoxal; PLP, pyridoxal 5′-phosphate; QA, quinolinic acid; Qld, quinaldic acid; Ribo, riboflavin; SAA, serum amyloid A; S100A, calprotectin; Trp, tryptophan; XA, xanthurenic acid; 3IS, 3-indoxyl sulfate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Score plot from factor analysis showing scores from factor 1 (acute-phase inflammation) and 2 (Th1 cellular immunity) labeled by outcome status (GD or healthy control). The filled symbols indicate the central estimates, and the dark-shaded zones and the light-shaded zones the 50 percentile and the 95 percentile, respectively. The scale on each axis is SD of the factor scores. The difference between Graves disease (GD) and healthy control was 0.69 SD on factor 1 and 0.83 SD on factor 2 as indicated by dashed lines.

For the other biomarkers including CRP, S100A, SAA, indoles, and B-vitamers, the effect sizes were small (0.01 ≤ ω2 < 0.06) or very small (ω2 < 0.01) (Fig. 1).

In GD patients, we observed moderate correlation of fT4 with KTR (r = 0.31; P = .002) and cystatin C (r = 0.37; P < .001). None of the biomarkers correlated with the level of TRAb. The correlation between Kyn and QA was strong (r = 0.7; P < .05).

When comparing the treatment-naive subgroup (n = 13) with patients on antithyroid drugs (n = 87), we did not find significant differences in any biomarker levels.

We did not observe significant differences with medium or higher effect size in any biomarkers between GD patients with and without TED using the same analyses as previously mentioned. When separated further into subgroups of patients with active TED (CAS score ≥ 3), moderate to severe TED, TED at inclusion, or development of TED after inclusion, none of these groups had significantly different biomarker concentrations.

Factor Analysis

A factor analysis was performed to simplify the interpretation of our data. Fig. 2 shows the factor analysis of selected biomarkers labeled by outcome status (GD or healthy control). The 2-factor solution indicates that variations in kynurenine levels are organized roughly along 2 axes. Factor 1 represents acute-phase inflammation with negative loadings of CRP and SAA. In contrast, factor 2 was dominated by strong loadings of Kyn, QA, and HK, and thereby Th1-mediated immunity. Factor 2 was more strongly associated with GD than Factor 1. A more thorough description of the factor analysis including loading pattern of the different biomarkers on factors 1 and 2 are given in the Supplementary material (8).

Discussion

We observed elevated levels of 7 different inflammatory-related biomarkers in GD patients compared with healthy controls using modern mass spectrometry methods. Elevated levels of neopterin, Kyn, KTR, and QA demonstrate enhanced metabolism along the kynurenine pathway and the cell-mediated Th1 response, while increased HKr and PAr indicate alterations in vitamin B6 status and metabolism in GD patients, irrespective of TED status.

The autoimmune T-helper type 2 response in GD is well known, but the importance of Th1-mediated immunity is debated (2, 3). By factor analysis (see Fig. 2), we demonstrated biomarkers related to cellular immunity and Th1 response to be associated with GD.

The observed alteration in serum levels of neopterin, KTR, and kynurenines (QA and Pic) indicates increased activity of the kynurenine pathway. We confirmed elevated serum neopterin levels in patients with GD (30). Neopterin is a direct marker of IFN-γ activity and activation of the cellular immune system (31). Elevated IFN-γ levels have previously been observed in patients with GD both compared to healthy controls and compared to patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis (32, 33). KTR reflects IDO activity (34) and is highly correlated with neopterin. Conflicting observations of KTR in GD have been published (35, 36). Genetic factors, disease stage, and presence of leukocyte infiltration in the thyroid gland could explain the discrepancy. Our observations support increased KTR and IDO activity in GD patients. Further, we found increased QA and suppressed Pic in GD patients. High QA has earlier been found in relation to multiple neurologic diseases (37), but QA and the QA/Pic ratio has not been studied in GD. A high QA/Pic ratio may reflect insufficient amino-β-carboxymuconate-epsilon-semialdehyde-carboxylase (ACMSD) activity when the kynurenine pathway is upregulated due to inflammation, thereby directing the pathway toward NAD+ synthesis to support mitochondrial electron transport and energy production (38).

We observed elevated levels of cystatin C, a sensitive biomarker for changes in glomerular filtration rate often used to diagnose and evaluate patients with kidney disease (39). Inconsistent reports exist on cystatin C and thyroid disease (40-43). Our findings support an increased cystatin C level in patients with GD with and without TED. Instead of a decrease in renal function, stimulatory effects of 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine and transforming growth factor β1 on cystatin C production may be the underlying mechanism in GD (44).

HKr is established as a functional marker of B6 status (23), and PAr reflects increased catabolism of vitamin B6 during inflammation (24). We observed high values of HKr and PAr in GD patients indicating decreased vitamin B6 status possibly caused by increased demand (HKr), and alterations in vitamin B6 handling and metabolism (PAr). These changes were associated with only a moderate reduction in PLP in GD patients. To our knowledge, altered vitamin B6 status has not been reported in GD before. Supplementation with B6 should be investigated for this group of patients.

We did not observe any differences in components of the kynurenine pathway in GD patients with and without TED. This indicates that changes specific to orbital Th-1–mediated immune response (6) is not sufficiently reflected in the circulation, possibly due to the relatively small volume of the orbital compartment compared to the total body volume.

Factor analysis demonstrated that biomarkers related to Th1-cellular immunity were strongly associated with GD. Interestingly, cystatin C was closely linked to the Th1-related factor. In addition, we found a moderate association between the acute-phase–related factor and GD. Chronic low-grade, acute-phase–like inflammation has earlier been observed in other autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, primary biliary cirrhosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (45, 46). Altogether, our observations support the presence of a chronic low-grade, acute-phase–like inflammation in addition to the cellular Th1-immune reaction in GD.

Smoking is a known modulator of the immune system, and we found differences in smoking habits between patients with GD and healthy controls. Therefore, smoking was adjusted for in the linear regression analysis and accounted for in the factor analysis.

Our study has some weaknesses. Coexistence of additional autoimmune disorders in 30% of the patients may have influenced our findings. In addition, only 7 out of 36 TED patients had active disease at inclusion. A higher proportion of active TED might have increased our chances to detect a specific biomarker pattern for TED. Furthermore, serum samples were not drawn in the fasted state, which potentially could yield different concentrations both of Trp and the kynurenines.

In conclusion, our study promotes the role of Th1-mediated immunity in GD, as we demonstrate an increased activity of the kynurenine pathway and IFN-γ–mediated immune response. We also found evidence for decreased functional vitamin B6 status and altered metabolism of vitamin B6 vitamers in GD patients as indicated by the biomarkers HKr and PAr. Further, association of acute-phase reactants and GD speaks in favor of a chronic low-grade inflammation. Lack of difference in IFN-γ–mediated inflammation between GD patients with and without ophthalmopathy indicates that the immune response in the orbit is not reflected systemically. This supports local immunological features as being important in the development of TED.

Acknowledgments

The professional assistance of Prof Emeritus Per Magne Ueland and technician Elisabeth Tombra Halvorsen is greatly appreciated.

Abbreviations

3IS

3-indoxyl sulfate

AA

anthranilic acid

BMI

body mass index

CAS

clinical activity score

CRP

C-reactive protein

EUGOGO

European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy

FMN

flavin mononucleotide

fT4

free thyroxine

GD

Graves disease

HAA

3-hydroxyanthranilic acid

HK

3-hydroxykynurenine

HKr

HK ratio

IAA

indole-3-acetate

IAld

indole-3-aldehyde

IAM

indole-3-acetamide

IDO

indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IFN-γ

interferon-γ

ILA

indole-3-lactate

IPA

indole-3-propionate

KA

kynurenic acid

KTR

kynurenine-tryptophan ratio

Kyn

kynurenine

mNAM

N1-methylnicotinamide

NAM

nicotinamide

PA

4-pyridoxic acid

PAr

PAR index

Pic

picolinic acid

PL

pyridoxal

PLP

pyridoxal 5-phosphate

QA

quinolinic acid

Qld

quinaldic acid

ROAS

Norwegian register of organ-specific autoimmune disorders

S100A

calprotectin

SAA

serum amyloid A

TED

thyroid eye disease

Th1

T-helper type 1

TMP

thiamine monophosphate

TPOAb

thyroid peroxidase antibody

TRAb

thyrotropin receptor antibody

Trp

tryptophan

TSH

thyrotropin

XA

xanthurenic acid

Contributor Information

Hans Olav Ueland, Department of Ophthalmology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Arve Ulvik, Bevital A/S, Laboratoriebygget, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Kristian Løvås, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Anette S B Wolff, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science and K.G. Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Lars Ertesvåg Breivik, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science and K.G. Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Ann-Elin Meling Stokland, Department of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.

Eyvind Rødahl, Department of Ophthalmology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Roy Miodini Nilsen, Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5063 Bergen, Norway.

Eystein Husebye, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science and K.G. Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Grethe Åstrøm Ueland, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.

Financial Support

This work was supported by grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Regional Health Authorities of Western Norway.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Data Availability

All data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the present study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Abraham-Nordling M, Byström K, Törring O, et al. Incidence of hyperthyroidism in Sweden. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(6):899‐905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Smith TJ, Hegedüs L. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1552‐1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rapoport B, McLachlan SM. Graves’ hyperthyroidism is antibody-mediated but is predominantly a Th1-type cytokine disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4060‐4061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chin YH, Ng CH, Lee MH, et al. Prevalence of thyroid eye disease in Graves’ disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2020;93(4):363‐374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Smith TJ, Hegedüs L. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1552‐1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fang S, Lu Y, Huang Y, Zhou H, Fan X. Mechanisms that underly T cell immunity in graves’ orbitopathy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:648732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Taylor MW, Feng G. Relationship between interferon-γ, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism. FASEB J. 1991;5(11):2516‐2522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ueland HO, Ulvik A, Løvås K, et al. Supplementary data for “Systemic activation of the kynurenine pathway in Graves disease with and without ophthalmopathy.” Zenodo. Deposited December 6, 2022. 10.5281/zenodo.7403278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9. Zuo H, Tell GS, Ueland PM, et al. The PAr index, an indicator reflecting altered vitamin B-6 homeostasis, is associated with long-term risk of stroke in the general population: the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK). Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(1):105‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sulo G, Vollset SE, Nygård O, et al. Neopterin and kynurenine–tryptophan ratio as predictors of coronary events in older adults, the Hordaland Health Study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1435‐1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Forrest CM, Gould SR, Darlington LG, Stone TW. Levels of purine, kynurenine and lipid peroxidation products in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;527:395‐400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Forrest CM, Kennedy A, Stone TW, Stoy N, Darlington LG. Kynurenine and neopterin levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis during drug treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;527:287‐295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Saito K, Fujigaki S, Heyes MP, et al. Mechanism of increases in L-kynurenine and quinolinic acid in renal insufficiency. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000;279(3):F565‐F572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Myint AM, Kim YK. Network beyond IDO in psychiatric disorders: revisiting neurodegeneration hypothesis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;48:304‐313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Stone TW, Darlington LG. The kynurenine pathway as a therapeutic target in cognitive and neurodegenerative disorders. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;169(6):1211‐1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schwieler L, Larsson MK, Skogh E, et al. Increased levels of IL-6 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with chronic schizophrenia—significance for activation of the kynurenine pathway. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40(2):126‐133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ueland HO, Ueland GÅ, Løvås K, et al. Novel inflammatory biomarkers in thyroid eye disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;187(2):293‐300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bartalena L, Kahaly GJ, Baldeschi L, et al. ; EUGOGO . The 2021 European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of Graves’ orbitopathy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185(4):G43‐G67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mourits MP, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM, Koornneef L. Clinical activity score as a guide in the management of patients with graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997;47(1):9‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kim S. Overview of cotinine cutoff values for smoking status classification. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(12):1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Settembre E, Begley TP, Ealick SE. Structural biology of enzymes of the thiamin biosynthesis pathway. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13(6):739‐747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Midttun Ø, Hustad S, Ueland PM. Quantitative profiling of biomarkers related to B-vitamin status, tryptophan metabolism and inflammation in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009;23(9):1371‐1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ulvik A, Midttun Ø, McCann A, et al. Tryptophan catabolites as metabolic markers of vitamin B-6 status evaluated in cohorts of healthy adults and cardiovascular patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111(1):178‐186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ulvik A, Midttun Ø, Pedersen ER, Eussen SJ, Nygård O, Ueland PM. Evidence for increased catabolism of vitamin B-6 during systemic inflammation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):250‐255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K, Robitzsch A. Package ‘mice’: multivariate imputation by chained equations. CRAN Repos. 2019.
  • 26. Jossberger H. Toward Self-Regulated Learning in Vocational Education: Difficulties and Opportunities. Open University; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Olejnik S, Algina J. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol Methods. 2003;8(4):434‐447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ben-Shachar M, Lüdecke D, Makowski D. Effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. J. Open Source Softw. 2020;5(56):2815. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kirk RE. Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Educ Psychol Meas. 1996;56(5):746‐759. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wagner R, Hayatghebi S, Rosenkranz M, Reinwein D. Increased serum neopterin levels in patients with Graves’ disease. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1993;101(4):249‐254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Murr C, Widner B, Wirleitner B, Fuchs D. Neopterin as a marker for immune system activation. Curr Drug Metab. 2002;3(2):175‐187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Matsubayashi S, Kasuga Y, Sakatsume Y, Akasu F, Volpé R. Serum interferon gamma levels in autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Invest Med. 1990;13(5):271‐274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Balázs C, Türke B, Vámos Á. Determination of serum neopterin levels in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Orv Hetil. 2012;153(29):1127‐1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Fuchs D, Forsman A, Hagberg L, et al. Immune activation and decreased tryptophan in patients with HIV-1 infection. J Interferon Res. 1990;10(6):599‐603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang S, Mao C, Zhao Z, et al. Increased TTS abrogates IDO-mediated CD4+ T cells suppression in patients with Graves’ disease. Endocrine. 2009;36(1):119‐125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Leskela S, Rodríguez-Muñoz A, de la Fuente H, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(7):2822‐2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lugo-Huitrón R, Ugalde Muñiz P, Pineda B, Pedraza-Chaverrí J, Ríos C, Pérez-de la Cruz V. Quinolinic acid: an endogenous neurotoxin with multiple targets. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:104024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Palzer L, Bader JJ, Angel F, et al. Alpha-amino-beta-carboxy-muconate-semialdehyde decarboxylase controls dietary niacin requirements for NAD+ synthesis. Cell Rep. 2018;25(5):1359‐1370.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40(2):221‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wiesli P, Schwegler B, Spinas GA, Schmid C. Serum cystatin C is sensitive to small changes in thyroid function. Clin Chim Acta. 2003;338(1-2):87‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Suzuki Y, Matsushita K, Seimiya M, et al. Paradoxical effects of thyroid function on glomerular filtration rate estimated from serum creatinine or standardized cystatin C in patients with Japanese Graves’ disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;451:316‐322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ye Y, Gai X, Xie H, Jiao L, Zhang S. Impact of thyroid function on serum cystatin C and estimated glomerular filtration rate: a cross-sectional study. Endocr Pract. 2013;19(3):397‐403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Fricker M, Wiesli P, Brändle M, Schwegler B, Schmid C. Impact of thyroid dysfunction on serum cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1944‐1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kotajima N, Yanagawa Y, Aoki T, et al. Influence of thyroid hormones and transforming growth factor-β1 on cystatin C concentrations. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(4):1365‐1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Plant MJ, Williams AL, O’Sullivan MM. et al. et al. Relationship between time-integrated C-reactive protein levels and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(7):1473‐1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Bell S, Faust H, Schmid A, Meurer M. Autoantibodies to C-reactive protein (CRP) and other acute-phase proteins in systemic autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998;113(3):327‐332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the present study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES