The authors regret that the following amendments should be made:
Line #17 should read: “However, concerns about complications such as ceramic breakage, squeaking and/or noise, combined with […]”
Line #95 should read: “Of the 345 enrolled patients, 232 had more than 5 years of follow-up in the IDE study, and 186 hips in 185 patients enrolled in the (PAS) (COC 28, N = 105 hips in 104 patients; COC 36, N = 81).”
Line #97 should read: “Of this group, 142 patients (COC 28 N = 76; COC 36 N = 66) represent the cohort studied.”
Line #143 should read: “Radiographs were examined for radiolucencies, interface gaps, acetabular migration, or inclination change, sclerotic lines, and osteolysis.”
Lines #159-160 should read: “Descriptive statistics include mean values + (standard deviations) or counts and percentages.”
Lines #173-179 should read: “For all KM or proportional hazards analyses, the COC28 and COC36 data for all subjects were pooled from both IDE and PAS studies so that all originally enrolled IDE subjects had as much time to event data present as possible for these analyses, particularly the inclusion of event and follow-up data amongst subjects that did not roll over into the PAS. No correction for multiple testing was included as all P-values provided are to facilitate clinical judgment.”
Lines #184-185 should read: “From the initial enrollment of 186 hips (COC 28 N = 105 hips in 104 patients, COC 36 N = 81) at more than 10 years of follow-up 142 patients (COC 28 N = 76, COC 36 N = 66) were examined.”
Line #189 should read: “Utilizing all IDE and PAS data combined, the COC 28 and COC 36 groups at mean 10.5-year follow-up […]”
Lines #275-276 should read: “In our study, bearing fracture (liner) only occurred intraoperatively 1 time during the IDE portion.”
Line #314 should read: “The average time to the report of squeaking as 3.9 years ± 2.40) years for all patients […]”
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.