ABSTRACT
The black-yeast-like Aureobasidium is discussed as a versatile cell factory for many biotechnological applications. This article describes the 25.05-Mb draft genome sequence of Aureobasidium pullulans NRRL 62031, which was isolated in Thailand. The genome sequence provides evidence for a plethora of synthesis pathways for valuable secondary metabolites.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Aureobasidium pullulans is a polyextremotolerant and polymorphic fungus (1, 2). It is ubiquitously distributed in temperate, cold, and arid areas and even in osmotically stressful habitats, which could be attributed to the high degree of metabolic plasticity and adaptation ability of this genus (3, 4). In past decades, different strains of Aureobasidium have been reported to produce pullulan, polymalic acid, liamocins, intracellular lipids, siderophores, single-cell proteins, and extracellular enzymes (e.g., amylases, proteases, lipases, cellulases, xylanases, mannanases, and transferases), which are of great interest for industrial, pharmaceutical, environmental, and agricultural applications (1, 2, 5, 6).
A. pullulans strain NRRL 62031 has been confirmed to secrete liamocins (7, 8), a lipase (9), and polymalic acid (10). To prepare DNA for sequencing, yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YEPD) medium was inoculated using a single colony and incubated at 30°C for 24 h in a shaking cabinet. DNA was isolated with the PureLink genomic DNA (gDNA) kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Briefly, the gDNA was fragmented by acoustic shearing with an S220 instrument (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA). The sheared DNA was purified using 0.8× AMPure PB beads (Pacific Biosciences [PacBio], Menlo Park, CA, USA) and end repaired by the addition of NEBNext Ultra II end repair enzyme mix. DNA libraries were validated using a high-sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape on the TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and were quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as well as real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The libraries were clustered and loaded on an Illumina HiSeq instrument. The qualified libraries were sequenced using a 2 × 150-bp paired-end configuration. The raw sequencing data generated from Illumina HiSeq sequencing were converted into standard FASTQ files and demultiplexed using bcl2fastq v2.17 software. The adapters and low-quality bases with quality scores of <20 were removed using Cutadapt v1.9.1, which yielded 6,471,033,031 bp of clean data. For genome assembly, k-mer analysis was performed using Velvet v1.2.10. SSPACE v3.0 was employed to align the sequencing reads to the contigs. The contigs were subsequently assembled into scaffolds depending on the pairwise relationship between the paired-end reads and the size of the inserted segments. GapFiller v1.10 was utilized to align all of the reads from the library to the scaffold sequences. The alignment was used to fill the gaps in the scaffolds, as well as to extend the scaffold sequences to obtain longer sequences with lower rates of undetermined (N) bases (11–15).
The final draft genome assembly comprises 25,051,135 bp, with an average GC content of 50.07%, and consists of 209 scaffolds (N50, 1,223,087 bp; L50, 9; sequencing depth, 244.86×). Analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters with antiSMASH v6.0 (16) using default parameters identified several secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters, such as a cluster associated with the production of melanin.
Data availability.
The whole-genome sequence has been deposited in the NCBI database under BioProject and BioSample accession numbers PRJNA800034 and SAMN25226490, respectively. This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JALBUZ000000000. The version described in this paper is version JALBUZ010000000. The raw sequencing data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under SRA accession number SRR17771678.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We have received funding from the Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (FNR) of the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) within the project ViRIDi Aurum (grant 2220NR262X), from the China Scholarship Council (grant 201906910036), from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement 863922 for the project MIX-UP, and from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project AureoFACTory (grant 031B1203). The laboratory of L.M.B. is partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy within the Cluster of Excellence FSC 2186 The Fuel Science Center.
Contributor Information
Till Tiso, Email: till.tiso@rwth-aachen.de.
Jason E. Stajich, University of California, Riverside
REFERENCES
- 1.Prasongsuk S, Lotrakul P, Ali I, Bankeeree W, Punnapayak H. 2018. The current status of Aureobasidium pullulans in biotechnology. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 63:129–140. doi: 10.1007/s12223-017-0561-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chi ZM, Wang F, Chi Z, Yue LX, Liu GL, Zhang T. 2009. Bioproducts from Aureobasidium pullulans, a biotechnologically important yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:793–804. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-1882-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bozoudi D, Tsaltas D. 2018. The multiple and versatile roles of Aureobasidium pullulans in the vitivinicultural sector. Fermentation 4:85. doi: 10.3390/fermentation4040085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zalar P, Gostinčar C, de Hoog GS, Uršič V, Sudhadham M, Gunde-Cimerman N. 2008. Redefinition of Aureobasidium pullulans and its varieties. Stud Mycol 61:21–38. doi: 10.3114/sim.2008.61.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Deshpande MS, Rale VB, Lynch JM. 1992. Aureobasidium pullulans in applied microbiology: a status report. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:514–527. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90122-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gostinčar C, Ohm RA, Kogej T, Sonjak S, Turk M, Zajc J, Zalar P, Grube M, Sun H, Han J, Sharma A, Chiniquy J, Ngan CY, Lipzen A, Barry K, Grigoriev IV, Gunde-Cimerman N. 2014. Genome sequencing of four Aureobasidium pullulans varieties: biotechnological potential, stress tolerance, and description of new species. BMC Genomics 15:549. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leathers TD, Price NPJ, Manitchotpisit P, Bischoff KM. 2016. Production of anti-streptococcal liamocins from agricultural biomass by Aureobasidium pullulans. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:199. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2158-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Saur KM, Brumhard O, Scholz K, Hayen H, Tiso T. 2019. A pH shift induces high-titer liamocin production in Aureobasidium pullulans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:4741–4752. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09677-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leathers TD, Rich JO, Anderson AM, Manitchotpisit P. 2013. Lipase production by diverse phylogenetic clades of Aureobasidium pullulans. Biotechnol Lett 35:1701–1706. doi: 10.1007/s10529-013-1268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manitchotpisit P, Skory CD, Peterson SW, Price NPJ, Vermillion KE, Leathers TD. 2012. Poly(β-l-malic acid) production by diverse phylogenetic clades of Aureobasidium pullulans. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:125–132. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zerbino DR, McEwen GK, Margulies EH, Birney E. 2009. Pebble and rock band: heuristic resolution of repeats and scaffolding in the Velvet short-read de novo assembler. PLoS One 4:e8407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hunt M, Newbold C, Berriman M, Otto TD. 2014. A comprehensive evaluation of assembly scaffolding tools. Genome Biol 15:R42. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2012. Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol 13:R56–R59. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, Wezel GPV, Medema MH, Weber T. 2021. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W29–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The whole-genome sequence has been deposited in the NCBI database under BioProject and BioSample accession numbers PRJNA800034 and SAMN25226490, respectively. This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JALBUZ000000000. The version described in this paper is version JALBUZ010000000. The raw sequencing data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under SRA accession number SRR17771678.