Skip to main content
Renal Failure logoLink to Renal Failure
. 2023 May 17;45(1):2212080. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2212080

The association between lactate dehydrogenase to serum albumin ratio and the 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in intensive care: a retrospective cohort study

Minghao Liang a,*, Xiuhong Ren b,*, Di Huang c, Zhishen Ruan c, Xianhai Chen d,, Zhanjun Qiu d,
PMCID: PMC10193884  PMID: 37194715

Abstract

Background

The mortality rate of patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is high, and there is a need for early identification of SA-AKI patients with poor prognoses. This study investigated the relationship between the lactate dehydrogenase to serum albumin ratio (LAR) and prognosis in patients with SA-AKI.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with SA-AKI who are represented in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV). We used multivariable Cox regression analysis to determine adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis, survival curves, and curve fitting were used to evaluate a connection between the LAR and prognosis in patients with SA-AKI.

Results

There were a total of 6453 participants in this research. The average age of the participants was 63.9 ± 16.1 years, and the average LAR was 11.0 (7.6, 17.7)/IU/g. After controlling for variables, the HRs for 28-day mortality were 1.20 (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05–1.38, p = 0.008) and 1.61 (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.41–1.84, p < 0.001) for Tertile 2 (T2, 8.59≤ LAR< 14.66) and Tertile 3 (T3, LAR ≥ 14.66), respectively, compared to Tertile 1 (T1, LAR < 8.59). The outcomes for 90-day mortality and in-hospital death rate were comparable. The Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis revealed that the group with greater LAR had higher 28-day and 90-day death rates.

Conclusion

Our study shows that LAR is associated with poor prognosis in patients with SA-AKI. Higher LAR is associated with higher 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital mortality.

Keywords: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio, prognosis, MIMIC-IV, SA-AKI

Introduction

Sepsis, an extremely dangerous condition characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction, is caused by a dysregulated host response to infection [1] and often results in high mortality rates for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) [2]. As a common consequence of sepsis, sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is associated with high morbidity and a high fatality rate in critically ill patients [3].

Currently, there are no disease-modifying strategies for SA-AKI that allows us to be aggressive intervention. Most of the therapeutic approach is minimizing exposure to nephrotoxins, optimizing hemodynamics, achieving the source of the primary infection, and minimizing unnecessary fluid accumulation. Therefore, clinicians should identify patients with SA-AKI who have poor prognoses [4]. Clinicians may promote early intervention to minimize mortality by using clinical signs to predict illness severity and prognosis [5].

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which converts pyruvate to lactate, is a common enzyme involved in energy metabolism in cells [6]. It has been shown that metabolic reprogramming occurs during SA-AKI. Renal tubular epithelial cells (RTECs) first produce energy via glycolysis rather than by oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in a substantial conversion of pyruvate to lactate [7]. LDH is involved in this process. Albumin responds to systemic inflammation and nutritional status [8], and some studies have found an association between albumin levels and poor prognosis in sepsis [9] and acute kidney injury (AKI) [10]. It has been shown that the lactate dehydrogenase to serum albumin ratio (LAR) is a prognostic factor in patients with lower respiratory tract infections [11] and in those with severe infections [12]. LAR combines two clinically readily available indicators, LDH and albumin, and should be taken seriously. Therefore, we performed a retrospective cohort study in which we explored the relationship between the LAR and the prognosis of SA-AKI patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database who were admitted to the ICU.

Methods

Data sources

This retrospective observational study followed the guidelines set forth in Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) [13]. MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care–IV) is a large free public database that contains comprehensive clinical information about patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, a tertiary academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. MIMIC-IV is the result of a collaboration between Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The first author of this study, Minghao Liang, was enrolled in a learning program offered by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and was granted access to the MIMIC-IV database after passing the ‘Protecting Human Research Participants’ examination (ID: 11506836). All data in this database were deidentified to remove patient information, and all of the methods used in this study were performed according to relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the institutional review boards of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, Massachusetts, United States) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) (Record ID: 51261101).

Participants

Patients with sepsis who developed AKI within 7 days of ICU admission were included in the analysis. According to the MIMIC-IV database, 23,828 adult sepsis patients were hospitalized between 2008 and 2019, and 16,966 of these developed AKI. Sepsis was defined as a 2-point increase in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and documented or suspected infection [14–16]. AKI was determined using both serum creatinine (SCr) and urine output (UO) based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria [17]. Baseline SCr was defined as the patient’s lowest SCr value seven days before ICU admission or his or her first SCr value after ICU admission if no preadmission SCr was available [18]. If a patient was admitted to the ICU many times, we analyzed only the data on the first admission [19]. Patients who were released or passed away within 48 h after ICU admission were excluded from the study. We eliminated patients with end-stage renal illness identified by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code and patients for whom the available clinical data were inadequate [18].

Variables

Our study included the following variables. Demographic and admission data included age, sex, ethnicity, body weight, type of insurance, UO (Day 1 of ICU admission), AKI stage, and admission score. The latter included the SOFA score, the acute physiology score (APS) III, and scores on the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the Glasgow coma scale (GCS). At the time of ICU admission, vital signs (mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation level (SPO2)) were assessed. The interventions consisted of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and loop diuretics administered within the first 24 h following admission to the ICU. The laboratory tests included hemoglobin and chloride levels, white blood cell (WBC) count, SCr, sodium and glucose levels, pH, platelet count, potassium, bicarbonate, and total bilirubin. Comorbidities included septic shock, congestive heart failure, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic lung disease, malignant cancer, and liver disease. Infection sites included the lung, the urinary tract, the catheter, the soft tissue of the skin, and the abdominal cavity. The LAR was computed as the ratio of initial LDH (IU/L) to serum albumin (g/L) based on laboratory values upon ICU admission. If several results for the above parameters were returned within 24 h of the patient’s admission to the ICU, the first dataset was used.

Study endpoints

The primary endpoint in this study was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were death at 90 days and in-hospital mortality.

Statistical analysis

All variables with normal or skewed distributions are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. In the analysis of baseline characteristics, statistically significant differences among LAR tertiles (LAR <8.59; 8.59 ≤ LAR < 14.66; LAR≥ 14.66) were tested by one-way ANOVA (for normally distributed values), the Kruskal-Wallis H test (for data with a skewed distribution) and the Chi-square test (for categorical variables). We used univariate Cox proportional hazards models to test for links between prognostic factors and 28-day mortality. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were developed and used to evaluate the relationship between the LAR and 28-day and 90-day mortality. The relationship between the LAR and in-hospital mortality was also evaluated using logistic regression. We constructed and used three models to adjust for confounding factors. Confounding factors in the multivariate regression model were selected based on the results of univariate regression and clinical experience. Model 1 was adjusted only for sex and age; Model 2 was further adjusted for hemoglobin, MAP, SpO2, platelet count, pH, WBC count, SCr, and glucose, chloride, sodium, potassium, and bicarbonate levels, and Model 3 was further adjusted for septic shock, hypertension, myocardial infarction, liver disease, AKI stage, SOFA score, APSIII, CCI, diabetes mellitus, vasopressor use, malignant cancer, congestive heart failure, use of loop diuretics, use of RRT and site of infection. We used a Cox proportional hazards regression model with a cubic spline function and a smoothed curve fit to determine the nonlinear relationship between the LAR and 28-day mortality. If the results were calculated to be nonlinear, we used a recursive algorithm to calculate the inflexion point and then constructed a two-piecewise Cox proportional hazards regression model that included the values on both sides of the inflexion point. Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves were used to compare the survival probabilities of groups with different LAR levels. Stratified and interaction analyses were conducted according to sex, age, APS III, RRT use, vasopressor use, loop diuretic use, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, malignant cancer, septic shock, liver disease, and AKI stage. Fewer than five percent of the covariates had missing data in any of the analyses. Because the proportion of missing data was low, no imputation was conducted. We used PASS 15 software to calculate the sample size and set the two-sided alpha = 0.05 and the expected power to 0.9. The total sample size for the three groups was calculated to be 2481, and the obtained sample size of 6453 met the statistical requirements. All analyses were conducted using R software and Free Statistics software version 1.7. P values <0.05 were deemed significant.

Results

Population and baseline characteristics

Of the adult patients in the MIMIC-IV database, 23,828 satisfied the sepsis-3.0 criterion upon first ICU admission. A total of 6453 patients were ultimately included in this study (Figure 1). Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of the population sorted by LAR tertiles. The mean age of the patients was 63.9 ± 16.1 years, and 58.0% were male. The 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital death rates were 26%, 35%, and 23.9%, respectively. The patients in the highest LAR group (T3) had high values for weight, heart rate, respiration rate, SOFA score, APS III, AKI stage, WBC, LDH, LAR, SCr, glucose, and potassium. They were more likely to have ventilator use, vasopressor use, RRT use, loop diuretic use, septic shock, myocardial infarction, malignant cancer, and liver disease than were the other two groups. Participants with increased LAR had greater 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital mortality (all p < 0.001) than those with lower LAR levels.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flowchart of study patients.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants and outcome parameters.

Variable Lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio
  T1 T2 T3  
Total LAR <8.59 8.59 ≤ LAR <14.66 LAR ≥14.66  
(n = 6453) (n = 2150) (n = 2151) (n = 2152) p Value
Age (years) 63.9 ± 16.1 65.4 ± 15.6 65.2 ± 15.8 61.3 ± 16.6 <0.001
Male (%) 3745 (58.0) 1273 (59.2) 1233 (57.3) 1239 (57.6) 0.396
Ethnicity, white (%) 4100 (63.5) 1441 (67) 1376 (64) 1283 (59.6) <0.001
Weight (kg) 85.1 ± 26.7 84.9 ± 28.9 84.7 ± 25.4 85.8 ± 25.7 0.366
Medicare 2908 (45.1) 1029 (47.9) 1002 (46.6) 877 (40.8) <0.001
UO (ml) 1310.0 (775.0, 2100.0) 1420.0 (857.0, 2175.0) 1348.0 (820.0, 2094.0) 1175.0 (630.0, 2020.0) <0.001
AKI stage (%)         <0.001
 1 1058 (16.4) 397 (18.5) 365 (17) 296 (13.8)  
 2 2895 (44.9) 1086 (50.5) 1037 (48.2) 772 (35.9)  
 3 2500 (38.7) 667 (31) 749 (34.8) 1084 (50.4)  
Vital signs          
 Heart rate (bpm) 89.8 ± 17.6 86.1 ± 16.7 89.9 ± 17.5 93.6 ± 17.9 <0.001
 MAP (mmHg) 78.8 ± 12.5 79.4 ± 11.8 78.2 ± 13.0 78.8 ± 12.5 0.007
 Respiration rate (bpm) 20.5 ± 4.3 19.6 ± 3.8 20.3 ± 4.1 21.7 ± 4.6 <0.001
 SPO2 (%) 96.9 ± 2.3 97.1 ± 2.0 97.0 ± 2.2 96.6 ± 2.7 <0.001
Scoring system, points          
 SOFA score 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) <0.001
 APS III 69.2 ± 27.6 60.6 ± 24.1 68.3 ± 26.5 78.9 ± 28.9 <0.001
 CCI 6.1 ± 3.0 6.1 ± 2.9 6.2 ± 2.9 6.0 ± 3.1 0.055
 GCS 14.4 ± 1.9 14.4 ± 1.8 14.3 ± 2.0 14.4 ± 1.9 0.344
Laboratory results          
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 9.7 ± 2.3 9.9 ± 2.2 9.7 ± 2.3 9.6 ± 2.3 <0.001
 Platelets (k/uL) 152.0 (97.0, 220.0) 162.0 (109.0, 229.0) 158.0 (102.0, 227.0) 135.0 (78.0, 204.0) <0.001
 WBC (k/uL) 14.5 (10.1, 20.1) 13.0 (9.5, 17.8) 14.8 (10.4, 20.2) 16.1 (10.8, 22.3) <0.001
 Total bilirubin (mg/dL) 1.1 (0.6, 3.1) 0.8 (0.5, 2.1) 1.0 (0.6, 2.7) 1.7 (0.8, 4.5) <0.001
 LDH (IU/L) 309.0 (229.0, 478.0) 209.0 (176.0, 243.0) 311.0 (266.0, 366.0) 618.5 (468.0, 1060.0) <0.001
 Albumin (g/L) 29.2 ± 6.4 32.3 ± 5.9 28.6 ± 5.7 26.7 ± 6.1 <0.001
 LAR (IU/g) 11.0 (7.6, 17.7) 6.8 (5.7, 7.6) 11.0 (9.7, 12.5) 23.2 (17.7, 38.9) <0.001
 SCr (mg/dL) 1.1 (0.8, 1.8) 1.0 (0.7, 1.6) 1.1 (0.8, 1.7) 1.3 (0.9, 2.1) <0.001
 Glucose (mg/dL) 134.0 (108.0, 176.0) 130.0 (106.0, 165.0) 135.0 (109.0, 177.0) 140.0 (109.0, 190.0) <0.001
 pH 7.3 ± 0.1 7.4 ± 0.1 7.4 ± 0.1 7.3 ± 0.1 <0.001
 Chloride (mEq/L) 104.1 ± 7.4 103.7 ± 7.1 104.6 ± 7.4 104.0 ± 7.7 <0.001
 Sodium (mEq/L) 138.3 ± 6.2 138.1 ± 6.0 138.4 ± 6.2 138.2 ± 6.4 0.184
 Potassium (mEq/L) 4.3 ± 0.8 4.2 ± 0.7 4.2 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.9 <0.001
 Bicarbonate (mEq/L) 21.6 ± 5.2 22.8 ± 5.2 21.8 ± 4.8 20.2 ± 5.1 <0.001
Interventions          
 Ventilator use (%) 5128 (79.5) 1710 (79.5) 1706 (79.3) 1712 (79.6) 0.976
 Vasopressor use (%) 790 (12.2) 156 (7.3) 249 (11.6) 385 (17.9) <0.001
 RRT use (%) 238 (3.7) 35 (1.6) 57 (2.6) 146 (6.8) <0.001
 Loop diuretics use (%) 691 (10.7) 175 (8.1) 230 (10.7) 286 (13.3) <0.001
Comorbidities          
 Septic shock (%) 832 (12.9) 223 (10.4) 280 (13) 329 (15.3) <0.001
 Hypertension (%) 1698 (26.3) 631 (29.3) 562 (26.1) 505 (23.5) <0.001
 Diabetes mellitus (%) 1931 (29.9) 676 (31.4) 671 (31.2) 584 (27.1) 0.002
 Myocardial infarct (%) 1256 (19.5) 310 (14.4) 405 (18.8) 541 (25.1) <0.001
 Congestive heart failure (%) 2240 (34.7) 698 (32.5) 798 (37.1) 744 (34.6) 0.006
 Chronic pulmonary disease (%) 1765 (27.4) 612 (28.5) 586 (27.2) 567 (26.3) 0.294
 Malignant cancer (%) 997 (15.5) 294 (13.7) 325 (15.1) 378 (17.6) 0.002
 Liver disease (%) 1598 (24.8) 439 (20.4) 497 (23.1) 662 (30.8) <0.001
Site of infection          
 Lung (%) 2725 (42.2) 847 (39.4) 923 (42.9) 955 (44.4) 0.003
 Urinary (%) 1385 (21.5) 477 (22.2) 477 (22.2) 431 (20) 0.139
 Catheter (%) 202 (3.1) 65 (3.0) 64 (3.0) 73 (3.4) 0.691
 Skin soft tissue (%) 45 (0.7) 14 (0.7) 13 (0.6) 18 (0.8) 0.626
 Abdominal cavity (%) 407 (6.3) 162 (7.5) 125 (5.8) 120 (5.6) 0.016
 28-day mortality (%) 1728 (26.8) 388 (18) 540 (25.1) 800 (37.2) <0.001
 90-day mortality (%) 2285 (35.4) 576 (26.8) 738 (34.3) 971 (45.1) <0.001
 In-hospital mortality (%) 1542 (23.9) 327 (15.2) 467 (21.7) 748 (34.8) <0.001

Data are presented as the mean ± SD or median (IQR) for skewed variables or numbers (proportions) for categorical variables; T1, LAR < 8.59; T2, 8.59 ≤ LAR <14.66; T3, LAR ≥14.66. bpm: beats per minute; MAP: mean arterial pressure; SOFA score: sequential organ failure assessment score; APS III: acute physiology score III; CCI: Charlson comorbidity index; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; WBC: white blood cell count; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; LAR: lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio; SCr: serum creatinine; RRT: renal replacement treatment; AKI: acute kidney injury.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis

After performing univariate Cox regression analysis (Table S1), we developed and used three multivariable models to identify significant correlations between the LAR and various clinical outcomes. Table 2 displays the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the models. In the unadjusted model for factors, the HRs for 28-day mortality for the patients in the T2 and T3 groups were 1.44 (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.26–1.64, p < 0.001) and 2.37 (HR: 2.37, 95% CI: 2.10–2.68, p < 0.001), respectively, compared to the T1 reference group. After controlling for ethnicity, sex, MAP, SpO2, UO, age, hemoglobin, heart rate, platelet count, WBC, SCr, glucose, pH, chloride, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, AKI stage, SOFA score, APSIII, CCI, RRT use, loop diuretics use, septic shock, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, malignant cancer, hypertension, liver disease, vasopressor use and site of infection, the adjusted HRs for the T2 and T3 groups compared to T1 were 1.20 (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05–1.38, p = 0.008) and 1.61 (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.41–1.84, p < 0.001), respectively. When examined as a continuous variable, the LAR (log2) was linked to 28-day mortality. The impact size of LAR (log2) on 28-day mortality increased by 46% for every unit in the unadjusted model. The effect size increased by 14% for LAR (log2) in the fully adjusted model (Model 3). Investigation of in-hospital mortality and mortality after 90 days yielded comparable findings.

Table 2.

Hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] for mortality across groups divided according to the ratio of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin (LAR) level.

Variable Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value
Primary outcomes                
28-day mortality                
 LAR (log2) 1.46 (1.39−1.53) <0.001 1.55 (1.48–1.63) <0.001 1.37 (1.3–1.44) <0.001 1.14 (1.09–1.18) <0.001
 T1 (LAR < 8.59) 1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)  
 T2 (8.59 ≤ LAR <14.66) 1.44 (1.26−1.64) <0.001 1.45 (1.28–1.66) <0.001 1.40 (1.22–1.60) <0.001 1.20 (1.05–1.38) <0.001
 T3 (LAR ≥ 14.66) 2.37 (2.1−2.68) <0.001 2.59 (2.29–2.93) <0.001 2.17 (1.9–2.47) <0.001 1.61 (1.41–1.84) <0.001
 P for trend   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001
 Secondary outcomes                
90-day mortality                
 LAR (log2) 1.37 (1.31−1.43) <0.001 1.47 (1.41–1.54) <0.001 1.32 (1.25–1.38) <0.001 1.11 (1.07–1.15) <0.001
 T1 (LAR < 8.59) 1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)  
 T2 (8.59 ≤ LAR <14.66) 1.35 (1.21−1.5) <0.001 1.36 (1.22–1.52) <0.001 1.29 (1.16–1.45) <0.001 1.12 (1–1.26) 0.046
 T3 (LAR ≥ 14.66) 2.01 (1.81−2.23) <0.001 2.23 (2.01–2.47) <0.001 1.91 (1.71–2.14) <0.001 1.46 (1.3–1.63) <0.001
 P for trend   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001
In-hospital mortalitya                
 LAR (log2) 1.69 (1.58−1.81) <0.001 1.79 (1.67–1.92) <0.001 1.56 (1.44–1.69) <0.001 1.21 (1.14–1.28) <0.001
 T1 (LAR < 8.59) 1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)   1 (Ref)  
 T2 (8.59 ≤ LAR <14.66) 1.55 (1.32−1.81) <0.001 1.56 (1.33–1.82) <0.001 1.46 (1.24–1.73) <0.001 1.25 (1.05–1.49) 0.013
 T3 (LAR ≥ 14.66) 2.97 (2.56−3.44) <0.001 3.21 (2.77−3.73) <0.001 2.56 (2.17–3.00) <0.001 1.87 (1.57–2.23) <0.001
 P for trend   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001

Model 1 is adjusted for sex and age.

Model 2 is adjusted as is Model 1 and is also adjusted for ethnicity, heart rate, MAP, SpO2, UO, hemoglobin, platelets, WBC, SCr, glucose, pH, chloride, sodium, potassium, and bicarbonate.

Model 3 is adjusted as is Model 2 and is also adjusted for AKI stage, SOFA score, APSIII, CCI, septic shock, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarct, congestive heart failure, malignant cancer, liver disease, loop diuretic use, RRT use, vasopressor use and site of infection.

aLogistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the LAR and in-hospital mortality. The results are expressed as odds ratios (95% CIs).

LAR; lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Kaplan–Meier curves

To determine cumulative survival for the different LAR groups, 28-day survival curves were created for individuals with SA-AKI by categorizing them based on the LAR tertiles. The KM survival curve revealed that individuals with high LAR had substantially poorer 28-day survival and that 28-day survival decreased with decreasing baseline LAR (Figure 2). A similar finding was obtained using the 90-day mortality curve.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A): Kaplan–Meier curve of 28-day mortality for patients with SA-AKI. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve of 90-day mortality for patients with SA-AKI.

Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis

The subgroup analysis demonstrated a correlation between the LAR and 28-day mortality for patients of various statuses, as shown in Table 3. Although myocardial infarction and liver disease showed an interaction (P for interaction <0.05), there was a positive association between the LAR and 28-day mortality in each group (HR > 1 in each group). Other subgroups exhibited no significant interactions (P for interaction > 0.05).

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the association between 28-day mortality and LAR.

  No. of patients Lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio
p for interaction
  T1 T2 T3
  LAR < 8.59 8.59 ≤ LAR <14.66 LAR ≥ 14.66
Sex         0.381
 Male 3745 1 (Ref) 1.45 (1.21–1.74) 2.21 (1.85–2.64)  
 Female 2708 1 (Ref) 1.23 (1–1.52) 1.76 (1.44–2.15)  
Age         0.078
 <60 3118 1 (Ref) 1.30 (1–1.68) 1.55 (1.21–1.98)  
 ≥60 3335 1 (Ref) 1.37 (1.17–1.61) 2.24 (1.91–2.62)  
APS III         0.232
 <42 1001 1 (Ref) 1.64 (0.93–2.88) 2.63 (1.47–4.69)  
 ≥42 5452 1 (Ref) 1.3 (1.13–1.49) 1.87 (1.64–2.15)  
RRT         0.299
 Yes 238 1 (Ref) 1.12 (0.46–2.7) 1.23 (0.58–2.59)  
 No 6215 1 (Ref) 1.36 (1.19–1.56) 2.02 (1.76–2.31)  
Vasopressor use         0.465
 Yes 790 1 (Ref) 1.19 (0.79–1.78) 2.00 (1.37–2.92)  
 No 5663 1 (Ref) 1.38 (1.2–1.6) 1.98 (1.72–2.28)  
Loop diuretics use         0.099
 Yes 691 1 (Ref) 2 (1.33–3) 2.11 (1.41–3.16)  
 No 5762 1 (Ref) 1.3 (1.12–1.5) 2 (1.74–2.3)  
Myocardial infarct         0.017
 Yes 1256 1 (Ref) 1.66 (1.18–2.35) 3.13 (2.26–4.33)  
 No 5197 1 (Ref) 1.31 (1.13–1.52) 1.82 (1.57–2.11)  
Congestive heart failure         0.686
 Yes 2240 1 (Ref) 1.36 (1.09–1.69) 2.18 (1.75–2.7)  
 No 4213 1 (Ref) 1.42 (1.19–1.68) 2.01 (1.7–2.38)  
Malignant cancer         0.436
 Yes 997 1 (Ref) 1.49 (1.08–2.04) 2.67 (1.96–3.63)  
 No 5456 1 (Ref) 1.32 (1.13–1.53) 1.87 (1.61–2.16)  
Septic shock         0.439
 Yes 832 1 (Ref) 1.31 (0.95–1.81) 1.83 (1.35–2.49)  
 No 5621 1 (Ref) 1.37 (1.18–1.59) 2.03 (1.75–2.34)  
AKI stage         0.090
 1 1058 1 (Ref) 1.78 (1.19–2.66) 2.08 (1.36–3.18)  
 2 2895 1 (Ref) 1.31 (1.04–1.65) 2.25 (1.79–2.83)  
 3 2500 1 (Ref) 1.32 (1.09–1.59) 1.71 (1.44–2.04)  
Liver disease          
 Yes 1598 1 (Ref) 1.33 (1.04–1.69) 1.47 (1.16–1.86) <0.001
 No 4855 1 (Ref) 1.37 (1.16–1.61) 2.37 (2.02–2.78)  

HRs (95% CIs) were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models. Each stratification was adjusted for all factors included in Model 3 in Table 2 except the stratification factor itself. APS III, acute physiology score; RRT, renal replacement treatment; AKI, acute kidney injury.

Analyses of the nonlinear relationship

After correction for confounding variables, restricted cubic spline analysis revealed that the association between the LAR (log2) and 28-day mortality was nonlinear (Figure 3). We used the two-piecewise Cox proportional hazard model to fit the link between the LAR (log2) and 28-day mortality since the P value for the log-likelihood ratio test was less than 0.05. Using the recursive method with the two-part Cox proportional hazard model, the inflection point was determined to be 5.57. Within the inflection point of 5.57, a more significant positive connection between the LAR and 28-day mortality was observed; 28-day mortality increased by 29% for each unit LAR (log2) increase. When the LAR exceeded 5.57, there was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (Table 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Curve fitting of the LAR (log2) and 28-day mortality in patients with SA-AKI.

Table 4.

Threshold effect analysis of the relationship between the LAR (log2) and 28-day mortality in patients with SA-AKI.

Threshold of LAR (log2) HR (95% CI) p Value
<5.57 1.29 (1.20, 1.38) <0.001
≥5.57 1.00 (0.84, 1.20) 0.95
Likelihood ratio test   <0.001

The data have been adjusted for all of the factors included in Model 3 in Table 2.

Discussion

The results of this study show that the LAR is an independent predictor of 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital death in ICU patients with SA-AKI. LAR (log2) and 28-day mortality of SA-AKI patients in intensive care exhibited a nonlinear association. In patients with SA-AKI, survival decreases with increasing LAR.

The enzyme LDH is involved in energy metabolism and converts pyruvate to lactate in cells. It has been shown that LDH is an independent predictor of prognosis in individuals with sepsis [20] and AKI [21]. Inflammation, metabolic recoding, RTEC apoptosis, and shock play essential roles in SA-AKI [7]. RTECs, the most metabolically active cells in the kidney, undergo metabolic recoding in SA-AKI. Although aerobic respiration is normally the main mechanism of cellular energy production, in SA-AKI, RTECs first undergo glycolysis to convert pyruvate to lactate [22]. LDH activity increases during this process. During SA-AKI, infiltration by inflammatory cells and the presence of large amounts of inflammatory factors lead to the deterioration of renal function [23], and apoptosis of RTECs leads to the release of lactate dehydrogenase, resulting in elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels.

Albumin is an indicator of inflammation and systemic nutritional status, and studies have shown that albumin is associated with the prognosis of patients with sepsis [24]. Hypoproteinemia is considered an independent risk factor for the prognosis of AKI [25]. Some evidence suggests that albumin has a renoprotective mechanism. First, albumin may clear reactive oxygen species and prevent oxidative damage [26]. Second, albumin is essential in maintaining renal perfusion and glomerular filtration [27]. Finally, further studies have demonstrated that albumin can stimulate DNA synthesis in renal tubular cells through a signalling pathway involving Ca2+ [28]. Albumin plays a vital role in protecting the kidney and maintaining renal function. Lower albumin levels often indicate poor prognosis in individuals with AKI.

It has been shown that LAR is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with lower respiratory tract infections [11]. Further studies have indicated that LAR is associated with prognosis in patients with COVID-19 [29] and in those with nasopharyngeal carcinoma [30]. No studies that address whether the LAR can be used to assess the prognosis of patients with SA-AKI have been published. LAR uses two indicators, LDH and albumin, to determine the prognosis of patients with SA-AKI in terms of metabolic recoding, degree of inflammation, and nutritional status. Our study showed that LAR was associated with poor prognosis in patients with SA-AKI. This relationship remained stable when multivariate and subgroup analyses were used to reduce the effects of confounding factors.

Some limitations of this study must be considered. First, this is a retrospective study with some inevitable bias, and we adjusted some variables to ensure that the results were as accurate as possible. Second, we included only the values of the first LAR after ICU admission and did not follow its dynamics; however, the first LAR may more accurately predict the prognosis of SA-AKI. Finally, we included only patients who were admitted to the ICU for the first time, and this may have led to selection bias. Therefore, prospective studies are needed to validate our conclusions. Despite these drawbacks, our study of how the LAR is related to prognosis in individuals with SA-AKI is of interest.

Conclusion

LAR is a possible prognostic factor in patients with SA-AKI and is associated with poor outcomes. The greater the LAR is, the greater the 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital death rates.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [82274320 and 82204876], the Shandong Natural Science Foundation for Chinese Medicine Joint Fund Cultivation Project [ZR2021LZY027], and the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2020MH392].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Jie Liu of the Chinese PLA General Hospital’s Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery for advice on study design and for assistance with statistical analysis and with the editing of the manuscript.

Ethics statement

The review boards of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology evaluated and authorized the experiments involving human volunteers. According to national law and institutional regulations, written informed consent to participate in this study was not required.

Author contributions

Minghao Liang, Xiuhong Ren, and Di Huang contributed to the planning of the research, the assessment of the findings, and the editing of the paper. Data mining and text editing were performed by Zhishen Ruan and Xianhai Chen. Zhanjun Qiu contributed to the study design.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

In this work, we investigated publicly accessible datasets. These datasets are available at https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv.

References

  • 1.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kristina ER, Sarah CJ, Kareha MA, et al. . Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2020;395:200–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Peerapornratana S, Manrique-Caballero CL, Gómez H, et al. . Acute kidney injury from sepsis: current concepts, epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Kidney Int. 2019;96(5):1083–1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yoon SH, Choi B, Eun S, et al. . Using the lactate-to-albumin ratio to predict mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(5):1743–1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen K-F, Liu S-H, Li C-H, et al. . Development and validation of a parsimonious and pragmatic CHARM score to predict mortality in patients with suspected sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(4):640–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kottmann RM, Kulkarni AA, Smolnycki KA, et al. . Lactic acid is elevated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and induces myofibroblast differentiation via pH-dependent activation of transforming growth factor-β. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):740–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qiao J, Cui L.. Multi-Omics techniques make it possible to analyze sepsis-associated acute kidney injury comprehensively. Front Immunol. 2022;13:905601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li S, Shen Y, Chang B, et al. . Prognostic value of albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio for 28-Day mortality among patients with sepsis from various infection sites. Mediators Inflamm. 2022;2022(2022):3578528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delaney AP, Dan A, McCaffrey J, et al. . The role of albumin as a resuscitation fluid for patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(2):386–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murat SN, Kurtul A, Yarlioglues M.. Impact of serum albumin levels on contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology. 2015;66(8):732–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee B-K, Ryu S, Oh S-K, et al. . Lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio as a prognostic factor in lower respiratory tract infection patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;52:54–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jeon SY, Ryu S, Oh S-K, et al. . Lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio as a prognostic factor for patients with severe infection requiring intensive care. Medicine. 2021;100(41):e27538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Elm E V, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063–e1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Han D, Zhang L, Zheng S, et al. . Prognostic value of blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio for septic shock: an analysis of the MIMIC-III clinical database. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:e5595042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lu X, Wang X, Gao Y, et al. . Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for septic shock in immunocompromised patients: a cohort study from MIMIC. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;42:121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, et al. . Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury . Kidney Int. 2012;2:1–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luo X-Q, Yan P, Duan S-B, et al. . Development and validation of machine learning models for Real-Time mortality prediction in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:853102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feng M, McSparron JI, Kien DT, et al. . Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-III database. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):884–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Duman A, Akoz A, Kapci M, et al. . Prognostic value of neglected biomarker in sepsis patients with the old and new criteria: predictive role of lactate dehydrogenase. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(11):2167–2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang D, Shi L.. Serum lactate dehydrogenase level is associated with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(11):2341–2348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patil NK, Parajuli N, MacMillan-Crow LA, et al. . Inactivation of renal mitochondrial respiratory complexes and manganese superoxide dismutase during sepsis: mitochondria-targeted antioxidant mitigates injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;306(7):F734–743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gomez H, Ince C, De Backer D, et al. . A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock. 2014;41(1):3–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Takegawa R, Kabata D, Shimizu K, et al. . Serum albumin as a risk factor for death in patients with prolonged sepsis: an observational study. J Crit Care. 2019;51:139–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wiedermann CJ, Wiedermann W, Joannidis M.. Hypoalbuminemia and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of observational clinical studies. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(10):1657–1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iglesias J, Abernethy VE, Wang Z, et al. . Albumin is a major serum survival factor for renal tubular cells and macrophages through scavenging of ROS. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(5):F711–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.MacPhee PJ, Michel CC.. Fluid uptake from the renal medulla into the ascending vasa recta in anaesthetized rats. J Physiol. 1995;487(1):169–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee YJ, Han HJ.. Albumin-stimulated DNA synthesis is mediated by Ca2+/PKC as well as EGF receptor-dependent p44/42 MAPK and NF-κB signal pathways in renal proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294(3):F534–F541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shokr H, Marwah MK, Siddiqi H, et al. . Lactate dehydrogenase/albumin to-Urea ratio: a novel prognostic maker for fatal clinical complications in patients with COVID-19 infection. JCM. 2022;12(1):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Peng R-R, Liang Z-G, Chen K-H, et al. . Nomogram based on lactate dehydrogenase-to-Albumin ratio (LAR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:4019–4033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Data Availability Statement

In this work, we investigated publicly accessible datasets. These datasets are available at https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv.


Articles from Renal Failure are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES