Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0286034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286034

A theoretical model of factors influencing online consumer purchasing behavior through electronic word of mouth data mining and analysis

Qiwei Wang 1, Xiaoya Zhu 2,*, Manman Wang 1, Fuli Zhou 1, Shuang Cheng 1
Editor: Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan3
PMCID: PMC10194948  PMID: 37200302

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has impacted and changed consumer behavior because of a prolonged quarantine and lockdown. This study proposed a theoretical framework to explore and define the influencing factors of online consumer purchasing behavior (OCPB) based on electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM) data mining and analysis. Data pertaining to e-WOM were crawled from smartphone product reviews from the two most popular online shopping platforms in China, Jingdong.com and Taobao.com. Data processing aimed to filter noise and translate unstructured data from complex text reviews into structured data. The machine learning based K-means clustering method was utilized to cluster the influencing factors of OCPB. Comparing the clustering results and Kotler’s five products level, the influencing factors of OCPB were clustered around four categories: perceived emergency context, product, innovation, and function attributes. This study contributes to OCPB research by data mining and analysis that can adequately identify the influencing factors based on e-WOM. The definition and explanation of these categories may have important implications for both OCPB and e-commerce.

1. Introduction

A prolonged quarantine and lockdown imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the human lifestyle worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted various sectors such as manufacturing, import and export trade, tourism, catering, transportation, entertainment, especially retail and hence the global economy. Consumer behavior has gradually shifted toward contactless services and e-commerce activities owing to the COVID-19 [1].

Consumers are relying on e-commerce more than ever to protect their health. Recent advances in information technology, digital transformation, and the Internet helped consumers to encounter the COVID-19 to meet the needs of the daily lives, which led to an increase in the importance of e-commerce and changes in consumers’ online purchasing patterns [2]. When consumers shop online, their behavior is considered non-traditional, and is illustrated by a new trend and current environment. To analyze the influencing factors of online consumer purchasing behavior (OCPB), it is necessary to consider several factors, such as the price and quality of a product, consumers’ preferences, website design, function, security, search, and electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM) [3]. As the current website design and payment security have become a user-friendly and guaranteed system compared with a decade ago, some factors are no longer considered as essential. By contrast, greater diversity and complexity have become the main characteristics of the influencing factors. Furthermore, under the traditional sales model, consumers’ purchase decisions were simple, while online consumers have more options in terms of shopping channels and decision choices. Meanwhile, in recent years, consumers’ preferences have gradually shifted from standardized products to customized and personalized. In line with these changes, information technology and data science, such as big data analytics, data mining from e-WOM, and machine learning (ML), adaptively analyze data regarding online consumers’ needs to obtain more accurate data.

Since the concept of big data was proposed in 2008, it has been applied and developed lasting 14 years, emerging as a valuable tool for global e-commerce recently. However, most enterprises have failed to seize the benefits generated from big data. In the context of big data, a huge number of comments were posted regarding e-malls (Amazon, Taobao, etc.) and online social media (blogs, Bulletin Board System, etc.). For instance, Amazon was the first e-commerce company to establish an e-WOM system in 1995, which provided the company with valuable suggestions from online consumers. E-WOM has greater credibility and persuasiveness, compared with traditional word of mouth (WOM), which is limited by various subjective factors. Moreover, e-WOM has the advantage of containing not only structured data (e.g., ratings) but also unstructured data (e.g., the specific content of consumer reviews). However, e-WOM provides product-related information that cannot be directly transformed to a research objective. Thus, an innovative method of big data analytics needs to be utilized to explore the influencing factors of OCPB, which shows the advantage of interdisciplinary applications.

The research problems are to explore the factors influencing OCPB through e-WOM data mining and analysis and explain the most important influencing factors for online consumers that are likely to exist in the future within the context of the COVID-19. The study fulfills the literature gaps on exploring influencing factors of OCPB from the perspective of e-WOM. The study makes a significant contribution to the consumer study because its findings can adequately identify the influencing factors of OCPB. It also provides the theoretical and managerial implications of its findings including how e-commerce platforms can use such data to adapt their platforms and marketing strategies to diverse situations.

The remainder of this is organized as follows. Section 1 presents the introduction. Section 2 discusses the literature review and hypotheses. Section 3 provides the methodology, including data mining and analysis. Section 4 describes the results, including K-means results, performance metrics, hypotheses results, and a theoretical model. Sections 5 and 6 provide discussion and conclusion, respectively.

2. Literature review and hypotheses

2.1 Influencing factors of OCPB

Online shopping has an increasing sales volume each year, which has become huge challenges for offline retailers. Venkatesh et al. [4] found that culture, demographics, economics, technology, and personal psychology were the main antecedents of online shopping, and the main drivers of online shopping were congruence, impulse buying behavior, value consciousness, risk, local shopping, shopping enjoyment, and browsing enjoyment by a comprehensive model of consumers online purchasing behavior. Within the context of COVID-19, OCPB is positively impacted by attitude toward online shopping [5]. Melović et al. [6] focused on millennials’ online shopping behavior and noted that the demographic characteristics, the affirmative characteristics, risks and barriers of online shopping were the key influencing factors. Based on the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory model, consumers’ actual impulsive shopping behavior is impacted by arousal and pleasure [7]. Furthermore, the influencing factors of consumers’ purchase behavior toward green brands are green perceived quality, green perceived value, green perceived risk, information costs saved, and purchase intentions by perceived risk theory [8]. The positive and negative effects of corporate social responsibility practices on consumers’ pro-social behavior are moderated by consumer-brand social distance, although it also impacts consumer behavior beyond the consumer-brand dyadic relationship [9]. Green perceived value, functional value, conditional value, social value, and emotional value may impact green energy consumers’ purchase behavior [10]. Recipients’ behavior and WOM predict distant consumers’ behavior [11]. Moreover, consumer behavior is significantly impacted by financial rewards, perceived intrusiveness, attitudes toward e-mail advertising, and intentions toward the senders [12]. Store brand consumer purchase behavior is positively impacted by store image perceptions, store brand price-image, value consciousness, and store brand attitude [13]. A meta-analysis summarizes the influencing factors of consumer behavior, household size, store brands, store loyalty, innovativeness, familiarity with store brands, brand loyalty to national brands, price consciousness, value consciousness, perceived quality of store brands, perceived value for money of store brands, and search versus experience positively impact consumer behavior, whereas price–quality consciousness, quality consciousness, price of store brands, and the consequences of making a mistake in a purchase negatively impact consumer behavior [14].

Based on protection motivation theory and theory of planned behavior (TPB), consumers are more likely to use online shopping channels than offline channels during the COVID-19 pandemic [15]. The TPB is also adapted to explain the influencing factors of consumers’ behavior in different areas. For instance, the attitude, perceived behavioral control, policy information campaigns, and past-purchase experiences significantly impact consumers’ purchase intention, whereas subjective and moral norms show no significant relationship based on the extended TPB [16]. Although green purchase behavior has different antecedents, only personal norms and value for money have fully significant relationships with green purchase behavior, environmental concern, materialism, creativity, and green practices. Functional value positively influences purchase satisfaction, physical unavailability, materialism, creativity, and green practices, and negatively influences the frequency of green product purchase by extending the TPB [17]. Meanwhile, Nimri et al. [18] utilized the TPB in green hotels and showed that knowledge and attitudes, as well as subjective injunctive norms, positively impacted consumers’ purchase intention. Yi [19] observed that attitude, social norm, and perceived behavioral control positively impacted consumers’ purchase intention based on the TPB. The factors of supportive behaviors for environmental organizations, subjective norms, consumer attitude toward sustainable purchasing, perceived marketplace influence, consumers’ knowledge regarding sustainability-related issues, and environmental concern are the influencing factors of consumers sustainable purchase behavior [20]. Consumers’ green purchase behavior is impacted by the intention through support of the TPB [21].

2.2 Influencing factors of emergency context attribute

Consumers exhibited panic purchase behavior during the COVID-19, which might have been caused by psychological factors such as uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety [22]. In the reacting phase, consumers responded to the perceived unexpected threat of the COVID-19 and intended to regain control of lost freedoms; in the coping phase, they addressed this issue by adopting new behaviors and exerting control in other areas, and in the adapting phase, they became less reactive and accommodated their consumption habits to the new normal [23]. The positive and negative e-WOMs may have significant influence on online consumers’ psychology. Specifically, e-WOM that conveys positive emotions (pride, surprise) tends to have a greater impact on male readers’ perception of the reviewer’s cognitive effort than female readers, whereas e-WOM that conveys negative emotions (anger, fear) has a greater impact on cognitive effort of female readers than male readers [24]. When online consumers believe their behavioral effect is feasible and positive, while their behavioral decision is related to the behavioral outcome [25]. Traditionally, there are five stages of consumer behavior that include demand identification, information search, evaluation of selection, purchase, and post-purchase evaluation. In addition, online purchase behavior involved in the various stages can be categorized into: attitude formation, intention, adoption, and continuation. Most of the important factors that influence online purchasing behavior are attitude, motivation, trust, risk, demographics, website, etc. “Internet Adoption” is widely used as a basic framework for studying “online buying adoption”. Psychological and economic structures associated with the IT adoption model can be used as the online consumer’s behavior models for innovative marketers. The adoption of online purchasing behavior is explained by different classic models of attitude behavior [26]. Consumer behaviors represented by customer trust and customer satisfaction, influence repurchase and positive WOM intentions [27]. Return policy leniency, cash on delivery, and social commerce constructs were significant facilitators of customer trust [28]. Meanwhile, seller uncertainty was negatively influenced by return policy leniency, information quality, number of positive comments, seller reputation, and seller popularity [29]. Social commerce components were a necessity in complementing the quality dimensions of e-service in the environment of e-commerce [30]. Perceived security, perceived privacy and perceived information quality were all significant facilitators of online customer trust and satisfaction [31].

E-service quality, consumer social responsibility, green trust and green perceived value have a significant positive impact on green purchase intention, whereas greenwashing has a significant negative impact on green purchase intention. In addition, consumer social responsibility, green WOM, green trust and green perceived value positively moderated the relationship between e-service quality and green purchase intention, while greenwashing and green participation negatively moderated the relationships [32]. Large-scale online promotions provide mobile users with a new shopping environment in which contextual variables simultaneously influence consumer behavior. There is ample evidence suggesting that mobile phone users are more impulsive during large-scale online promotion campaigns, which are the important contextual drivers that lead to the occurrence of mobile users’ impulse buying behavior in the “Double 11” promotion. The results show that promotion, impulse buying tendency, social environment, aesthetics, and interactivity of mobile platforms, and available time are the key influencing factors of impulse buying by mobile users [33]. Environmental responsibility, spirituality, and perceived consumer effectiveness are the key psychological influencing factors of consumers’ sustainable purchase decisions, whereas commercial campaigns encourage young consumers to make sustainable purchases [34]. The main psychological factors affecting consumers’ green housing purchase intention include the attitude, perceived moral obligation, perceived environmental concern, perceived value, perceived self-identity, and financial risk. Subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, performance risk, and psychological risk are not included. Meanwhile, the purchase intention is an important predictor of consumers’ willingness to buy [35]. The perceived control of flow and focus will positively affect the utilitarian value of consumers, while focus and cognitive enjoyment will positively impact the hedonic value. Moreover, utilitarian value has a greater impact on satisfaction than hedonic value. Finally, hedonic value positively impacts unplanned purchasing behavior [36]. Utilitarian and hedonic features achieve high purchase and WOM intentions through social media platforms and also depend on gender and consumption history [37].

Therefore, we present the following hypothesis:

  • Hypothesis 1 (H1): Perceived emergency context attribute is the influencing factor of OCPB.

2.3 Influencing factors of perceived product attribute

Product quality and preferential prices are the major factors considered by online consumers, especially within the context of the COVID-19. Specifically, online shopping offers lower price, more choices for better quality products, and comparison between them [1]. Under the circumstance of online reviews, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) selling a new product carefully decides whether to adopt the first phase remanufacturing entry strategy or to adopt the phase 2 remanufacturing entry strategy under certain conditions. Meanwhile, the OEM adopts penetration pricing for new and remanufactured products, when the actual quality of the product is high. Otherwise, it adopts a skimming pricing strategy, which is different from uniform pricing when there are no online reviews. Online reviews significantly impact OEM’s product profits and consumer surplus. Especially when the actual quality of the product is high enough, the OEM and the consumer will be also reciprocal [38]. Online reviews reduce consumers’ product uncertainty and improve the effect of consumer purchase decisions [39, 40]. Uzir et al. [41] utilized the expectancy disconfirmation theory to prove that product quality positively impacts customer satisfaction, while product quality and customer satisfaction are mediated by customer’s perceived value. Product quality and customer’s perceived value will have greater influence with higher frequency of social media use. Nguyen et al. [42] studies consumer behavior from a cognitive perspective, and theoretically develops and tests two key moderators that influence the relationship between green consumption intention and behavior, namely the availability of green products and perceived consumer effectiveness.

Both sustainability-related and product-related texts positively influence consumer behavior on social media [43]. Online environment, price, and quality of the products are significantly impacted by OCPB. Godey et al. [44] explained the connections between social media marketing efforts and brand preference, price premium, and loyalty. Brand love positively impacts brand loyalty, and both positively impact WOM and purchase intention [45]. Brand names have a systematic influence on consumer’s product choice, which is moderated by consumer’s cognitive needs, availability of product attribute information, and classification of brand names. In the same choice set, the share of product choices with a higher brand name will increase and be preferred even if it is objectively inferior to other choices. Consumers with low cognitive needs use the heuristic of “higher is better” to select options labeled with brand names and choose brands with higher numerical proportions [46].

  • Therefore, we present the following hypothesis:

  • Hypothesis 2 (H2): Perceived product attribute is the influencing factor of OCPB.

2.4 Influencing factors of perceived innovation attribute

Product innovation increases company’s competitive advantage by attracting consumers, whereas the enhancement of innovative design according to consumer behavior accelerates the development of sustainable product [47, 48]. The innovation, WOM intentions and product evaluation can be improved positively by emotional brand attachment and decreased by perceived risk [49]. Based on the perspective of evolutionary, certain consumer characteristics, such as buyer sophistication, creativity, global identity, and local identity, influence firms’ product innovation performance, which can increase the success rate of product innovation, and enhance firms’ research and development performance [50]. However, technological innovation faces greater risk as it depends on market acceptance [51]. Moreover, electronic products rely more on technological innovation compared with other products, which maintain the profit and market [52]. The technological innovation needs to apply logical plans and profitable marketing strategies to reduce consumer resistance to innovation. Thus, Sun [53] explains the relationship between consumer resistance to innovation and customer churn based on configurational perspective, whereas the results show that response and functioning effect are significant but cognitive evaluation is not.

Based on the perspective of incremental product innovation, aesthetic and functional dimensions positively impact perceived quality, purchase intention, and WOM, whereas symbolic dimension only positively impacts purchase intention and WOM. By contrast, aesthetic and functional dimensions only positively impact perceived quality, whereas symbolic dimension positively impacts purchase intention and WOM. Furthermore, perceived quality partially mediates the relationship between aesthetic and functional dimensions and purchase intention and WOM by incremental product innovation, whereas perceived quality fully mediates the relationship between aesthetic and functional dimensions and purchase intention and WOM by radical product innovation [54]. Contextual factors, such as size of organizations and engagement in research and development activity, moderate the relationship between design and product innovation outcomes [55]. For radical innovations, low level of product innovation leads to more positive reviews and less inference of learning costs. As the functional attribute of radical innovations is not consistent with existing products, it is difficult for consumers to access relevant product category patterns and thus transfer knowledge to new products. The product innovation of aesthetics, functionality, and symbolism positively impact willingness to pay, purchase intention, and WOM through brand attitude [56]. This poor knowledge transfer results in consumers feeling incapable of effectively utilizing radical innovations, resulting in greater learning costs. In this case, product designs with low design novelty can provide a frame of reference for consumers to understand radical innovations. However, incremental product innovation shows no significant difference between a low and high level of design newness [57].

Therefore, we present the following hypothesis:

  • Hypothesis 3 (H3): Perceived innovation attribute is the influencing factor of OCPB.

2.5 Influencing factors of perceived motivation attribute

The research has proven that almost all consumers’ purchases are motivated by emotion. Under this circumstance, an increase in online consumers’ positive emotions increases, their purchase frequency, whereas an increase in online consumers’ negative emotions reduces their purchase frequency. Additionally, user interface quality, product information quality, service information quality, site awareness, safety perception, information satisfaction, relationship benefits and related benefit factors have negative impacts on consumers’ online shopping emotionally. Nevertheless, only product information quality, user interface quality, and safety perception factors have positive effects on online consumer sentiment [58]. E-WOM carries emotional expressions, which can help consumers express the emotions timely. Pappas et al. [59] divides consumers’ motivation into four factors, namely entertainment, information, social-psychological, and convenience, while emotions into two factors, namely positive and negative. Specifically, according to complexity and configuration theories, a conceptual model by a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis examines the relationship between a combination of motivations, emotions, and satisfaction, while results indicate that both positive and negative emotions can lead to high satisfaction when combing motivations.

From the perspective of SOR theory, consumers’ motivation is greatly influenced by self-consciousness, while conscious cognition plays the role of intermediary. First, after being stimulated by the external environment, online consumers will form “cognitive structure” depending on their subjectivity. Instead of taking direct action, they deliberately and actively obtain valid information from the stimulus process, considering whether to choose the product, and then react. Second, the stimulation stage in the retail environment can often attract the attention of consumers and cause the change of their psychological feelings. This stimulation is usually through external environmental factors, including marketing strategies and other objective influences. Third, organism stage is the internal process of an individual. It is a consumers’ cognitive process about themselves, their money, and risks after receiving the information they have seen or heard. Reaction includes psychological response and behavioral response, which is the decision made by the consumer after processing the information [60]. Based on literature review, 10 utilitarian motivation factors, such as desire for control, autonomy, convenience, assortment, economy, availability of information, adaptability/customization, payment services, absence of social interaction, and anonymity and 11 hedonic motivation factors, such as visual appeal, sensation seeking/entertainment, exploration/curiosity, escape, intrinsic enjoyment, relaxation, pass time, socialize, self-expression, role shopping, and enduring involvement with a product or service, are refined [61]. Consumers’ incidental moods can improve online shopping decisions impulsivity, while decision making process can be divided into orientation and evaluation [62]. Sarabia‐Sanchez et al. [63] combine K-means cluster and ANOVA analyses to explore the 11 motivational types of consumer values, which are achievement, tradition, inner space, universalism, hedonism, ecology, self-direction (reinforcement, creativity, harmony, and independence), and conformity.

Therefore, we present the following hypothesis:

  • Hypothesis 4 (H4): Perceived motivation attribute is the influencing factor of OCPB.

3. Materials and methods

3.1 Research design

Given the present study’s objective to identify the influencing factors of OCPB, we analyzed e-WOM using big data analysis. To obtain accurate data of the influencing factors on OCPB, smartphones were the main object of data crawling. The rationale behind this choice is as follows. First, the time people spend using their smartphones is gradually increasing. Nowadays, smart phones are not only used for telephone calls or text messages, but also for taking photographs, recording video, surfing the web, online chatting, online shopping, and other such uses [64]. Second, smartphones have become a symbol of personal identification, as users’ using fingerprint or facial scans are frequently used to unlock devices, conduct online transactions, and make reservations, etc. Finally, smartphones’ software and hardware are updated frequently, so they may be considered high-tech products. Therefore, smartphones were chosen as the research object to determine which influencing factors affect OCPB.

Fig 1 shows the e-WOM data mining process and methods used. A dataset obtained from Taobao.com and Jingdong.com was collected by utilizing a Python crawling code, additional details of which are provided in Section 2.3. Section 2.4 addresses issues regarding language complexity. Moreover, Section 2.5 refers to the clustering of the influencing factors of OCPB through the K-means method of ML.

Fig 1. Research techniques used in this study.

Fig 1

3.2 Data collection

The data were crawled from the e-commerce platforms Jingdong.com and Taobao.com by utilizing Python software. Jingdong and Taobao are the most powerful and popular platforms in China having professional e-WOM and user-friendly review systems. Specifically, the smartphone brands selected for analysis were Apple, Samsung, and Huawei because these three smartphone companies occupy the largest percentage of the smartphone market.

The authors determined that the analysis of the influencing factors of OCPB would be more persuasive and realistic by choosing smartphone models with high usage rate and liquidity. Thus, products reviews were crawled for the purchase of newly launched smartphones from Apple, Samsung, and Huawei in 2022. Specifically, to guarantee high-quality data, reviews from Taobao flagship stores and Jingdong directly operated stores were selected. However, we only collected reviews’ text content instead of images, videos, ratings, or rankings, the rationale was to ensure the reliability of data and meet research objectives. For instance, some e-commerce sellers attempt to increase their sales volume through deceitful methods, such as by faking ratings, rankings, and positive comments. Furthermore, online sellers and e-commerce companies (rather than consumers) often decide which smartphones are highest-rated and highest-selling. Finally, nowadays, the content of online reviews is not limited to text, as they also involve pictures, videos, and ratings, which have limited contribution in analyzing influencing factors of OCPB. Thus, the analyzed data regarding e-WOM in reviews was limited to text content.

In addition, to accurately reflect the real characteristics of OCPB during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study period ranged between February and May, 2022 (4 months). During that 4-month period, consumers exhibited a preference for buying products from e-commerce platforms. Specifically, the number of text reviews for the aforementioned types of smartphones was 51,2613 and 44,3678 in Taobao and Jingdong, respectively, for a total of 956,291 reviews.

3.3 Textual review processing method

As the crawled data exhibited noise, several data cleaning methods were adopted to filter noise and transform unstructured data of complex contextual review into structured data. Fig 1 shows the main procedures of the reviews’ pre-processing and the details are as follows.

First, to identify the range of sentences and for further data processing, sentences were apportioned using Python’s tokenizer package.

Second, this study employed Python’s Jieba package to perform word segmentation. The Jieba package is the Python’s best Chinese word segmentation module, comprising three modes. The exact mode was used to segment the sentences as accurately as possible, so they may be suitable for textual context analysis. The full mode was used to scan and process all words in each sentence, although it had a relatively high speed, it had a low capacity to resolve ambiguity. Additionally, the search engine mode segmented long words a second time, which allowed for the improvement of the recall rate, and was suitable for engine segmentation based on Jieba’s exact mode.

Third, stop words were deleted by referring to a stop words list. These included conjunctions, interjections, determiners, and meaningless words, among others. Finally, Python’s Word-to-vector (Word2vec) package was imported in the next step. Word2vec is an efficient training word vector model proposed by Mikolov [65, 66]. The basic starting point was to match pairs of similar words. For instance, when “like” and “satisfy” appeared in a same context, they showed a similar vector, as both words had a similar meaning. Kim et al. [67] stated that a word could be considered a single vector and real numbers in the Word2vec model. In fact, most supervised ML models could be summarized as f(x)−>y. Moreover, x could be considered a word in a sentence, while y could be considered this word in the context. Word2vec aimed to decide whether the sample of (x,y) could match the laws of natural language. Namely, after the process of Word2vec, the combination of word x and word y could be reasonable and logical or not. Table 1 shows the results of text processing.

Table 1. Text processing results.

Satisfy Very Screen Earphone Need Sound effect
Automatic Photograph Super Remote distance Powerful Record Moment
Speed Same Run Frames per second 44 Fast

3.4 Influencing factors analysis by K-means

ML styles are divided into supervised and unsupervised algorithms. This study mainly utilized unsupervised algorithms to analyze the clusters of influencing factors of OCPB. Unsupervised algorithms consist in the clustering of unknown or unmarked objects without a trained sample [68]. This study utilized K-means to cluster the influencing factors.

For a given sample set, the K-means algorithm divides the sample set into k clusters according to the distance between samples. The main algorithm’s logic is to make the points in the cluster as close as possible, and to make the distance between the clusters as large as possible. Assuming that clusters can be divided into (C1,C2,…,Ck), the Euclidean distance of E is shown in Eq 1.

E=i=1,xCikxμi22Ci, (1)

Here, ui is the mean vector of Ci:

μi=1|Ci|xCix. (2)

The main procedures of K-means were the following.

Step 1 consisted of inputting the samples D = {x1,x2,…xm}, K is the number of clusters, and appears as C = {C1,C2,…Ck}.

In Step 2, K samples were randomly selected from data set D as the initial K centroid vectors: {μ1,μ2,…μk}.

In Step3, for i = 1,2,…,m, the distance between samples xi and centroid vectors μj(j = 1,2,…k) was calculated: dij=xiμj22, xi is marked as the category λj, and μi is the smallest value of dij. Currently to update Cλj=Cλj(xi).

In Step 4, for any clusters Cj, all samples in (j = 1,2,…,k) needed to be recalculated according to the new centroid vectors: μj=1|Cj|xCix.

For Step5, it was necessary to repeat Steps 3 and 4, until all the centers μ remained steady. The final clustering result can be shown as C = {C1,C2,…Ck}.

The main procedures of K-means, according to Jain [69], are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Main procedures of K-means.

Select k users as centroids based on the dataset
Input: u, training users; k, the number of clusters
Output: {c1,c2,…ck}, k centroids
1. Determine the expected numbers of clusters, k
2. Select the users consistently at random from u, as initial starting points.
3. Assign each user to the cluster with the nearest centroid.
4. Calculate the mean of all clusters and update the centroid value according to the mean value of that cluster.
5. Repeat Steps 3 and 4, until no user changes its cluster membership or any other convergence criteria are met.
6. Return {c1,c2,…ck}

4. Results

4.1 K-means results

Based on the main procedures of K-means (Table 2), the results are presented in Figs 24.

Fig 2. Results of K-means clustering for Jingdong.

Fig 2

Fig 4. Combined results of K-means clustering for both Jingdong and Taobao.

Fig 4

Fig 3. Results of K-means clustering for Taobao.

Fig 3

Four clusters of influencing factors of OCPB can be clearly identified in the analyses of the Jingdong dataset, Taobao dataset, and combined Jingdong and Taobao dataset. After checking the context of four clusters, even though small differences were found, their influence was found to be negligible for our analyses. Thus, Fig 4 was chosen as the benchmark of influencing factors of OCPB. In Section 4.3, the explanation and analysis of influencing factors of OCPB will be presented.

4.2 Performance metrics

First, performance metrics of sum of the square errors (SSE) and silhouette coefficient were adapted to verify the clustering results of K-means.

When the number of clusters does not reach the optimal numbers K, SSE decreases rapidly with the increase of the number of clusters, while SSE decreases slowly after reaching the optimal numbers, and the maximum slope is the optimal numbers K.

SSE=i=1kpCi|pmi|2 (3)

Where Ci is the ith cluster, p is the sample point in Ci (the mean value of all samples in Ci), and SSE is the clustering error of all samples, which represents the quality of clustering effect.

Fig 5 indicates that the SSE decreases rapidly when K equals the number of four.

Fig 5. SSE of K-means.

Fig 5

Meanwhile, the silhouette coefficient can be shown as:

sci=biaimax(bi,ai) (4)

The range of sci is between -1 and 1, the clustering effect is bad when sci is below zero, whereas the clustering effect is good when sci is near 1 conversely.

Based on Fig 6, it is obviously to show that the silhouette coefficient reaches highest when K equals the number of four. Therefore, the results of the SSE and the silhouette coefficient jointly prove the number of K is four.

Fig 6. Silhouette coefficient of K-means.

Fig 6

4.3 Hypotheses results

Based on the K-means analysis, this section presents the influencing factors identified in the data from Jingdong and Taobao, which indicate the influencing factors influencing OCPB.

The first cluster comprises the perceived emergency context attribute, such as logistics, expressage, delivery, customer service, promotion, and reputation.

The second cluster comprises the perceived product attribute, such as appearance, brand, hand feeling, color, cost-performance ratio, price, design, and usability.

The third cluster comprises the perceived innovation attribute, such as photograph, quality and effects, screen quality, audio and video quality, pixel density, image resolution, earphone capabilities, and camera specifications.

The fourth cluster comprises the influencing factors, such as processing speed, operation, standby time, battery, system, internal storage, chip, performance, and fingerprint and face recognition, which cannot represent the perceived motivation attribute.

The results match the findings of Zhang et al. [70] to some extent, who identified 11 smartphone attributes based on online reviews: performance, appearance, battery, system, screen, user experience, photograph, price, quality, audio and video, and after-sale service. In addition, other scholars have explained the relationship between feature preferences and customer satisfaction [71, 72], usage behavior and purchase [73, 74], importance and costs of smartphones’ features and services [75], brand effects [76], and purchase behavior of people of different ages and gender groups [7779]. Thus, H1, H2 and H3 are supported, while H4 is not supported according to the results of the K-means analysis.

4.4 Theoretical framework and validity of OCPB influencing factors

Kotler’s five product level model states that consumers have five levels of need comprising the core level, generic level, expected level, augmented level, and potential level. First, the core benefit is the fundamental need or want that consumers satisfy by consuming a product or service. Second, the generic level is a basic version of a product made up of only those features necessary for it to function. Third, the expected level includes additional features that the consumer might expect. Fourth, the augmented level refers to any product variations or extra features that might help differentiate a product from its competitors and make the brand a preferred choice amongst its competitors. Finally, a potential product includes all augmentations and improvements that a product might experience in the future [80].

In contrast with these levels, this study proposed the four influencing factors of OCPB. Based on Table 3, first, the perceived emergency context H1 is not included in Kotler’s five products level, while the influencing factor expresses the significant characteristics of OCPB compared with Kotler’s model. Second, the perceived product attribute H2 could be considered the core and generic level. Third, the perceived innovation attribute H3 could be considered the potential level. Fourth, the results of H4 mainly reflects additional or special function of product, which meets the definition of the expected and augmented level. To refine the theoretical framework, H4 changes to the perceived functionality attribute by combing the explanation of the expected and augmented level, instead of the perceived motivation attribute. The details are shown in Fig 7.

Table 3. OCPB hypotheses results.

Influencing factors Hypotheses results Examples (Statistical Frequency*)
Perceived emergency context attribute H1 support E-commerce (14597), take delivery of goods (12104), logistics (8611), expressage (8552), customer service (7256), packaging (5940), promotion (1246), and reputation (662)
Perceived product attribute H2 support Brand (11163), appearance (10045), hand feel (7825), satisfaction (3335), color (2513), cost-performance ratio (1638), price (1453), design (817), and usability (535)
Perceived innovation attribute H3 support Photograph (13129), quality and effects (11766), screen quality (11597), audio and video quality (7347), camera (1883), pixel density (1386), picture (890), image resolution (778), earphone capabilities (707), and model (641)
Perceived motivation attribute H4 Not Support Speed (12241), operation (11573), standby time (7116), battery (2773), system (2703), internal storage (1178), chip (1022), performance (982), fingerprint and face recognition (904), and quick charge (636)

*Statistical Frequency: Only numbers greater than 500 are counted

Fig 7. The theoretical framework of OCPB influencing factors.

Fig 7

Fig 7 shows the four influencing factors of the theoretical framework of OCPB. Specifically, according to Kotler’s five products level, the perceived product attribute is the necessary influencing factor of OCPB, which meets the core drive and basic requirement. For instance, the core drive of purchasing of a smartphone is the core function of communication, and then the appearance, brand, color, etc. The perceived functionality attribute is the additional influencing factor of OCPB, which meets the expected and augmented requirement. For instance, when smartphones are in the same price range, consumers prefer to choose a smartphone belonging to better quality, smarter design, or better functionality. Moreover, the perceived innovation attribute is the attractive influencing factor of OCPB, which reflects the potential level. For instance, most consumers are the Apple fans mostly because the Apple products offer innovative usage experience and different technology elements yearly. Finally, the perceived emergency context attribute is the adaptive influencing factor of OCPB, which shows the main distinction with Kotler’s five products level. Further, because of the COVID-19, consumers only have online channel to purchase product under a prolonged quarantine and lockdown. Thus, in the emergency context, consumers primarily consider whether the product can be purchased in the e-commerce platform, whether the product can be delivered normally, or whether the packaged has been disinfected fully.

5. Discussion

Traditional consumer behavior is mainly affected by psychological, social, cultural, economic, and personal factors [81, 82]. Park and Kim [83] conducted an empirical study to identify the key influencing factors that impact OCPB, which include service information quality, user interface quality, security perception, information satisfaction, and relational benefit. Further, Sata [84] conducted an empirical study and found that price, social group, product features, brand name, durability and after-sales services were important to consumers’ buying behavior when choosing a smartphone for purchase. Simultaneously, some studies have utilized big data technology to explore OCPB, exploring online consumers’ attitude toward products in different countries, and identified product features. However, these studies do not identify the influencing factors of OCPB and ignore e-WOM. To better explain OCPB influencing factors, e-WOM should be integrated into the theoretical framework and used in practical applications. Thus, this study contributes to OCPB research by data mining and analysis that can adequately identify the influencing factors based on e-WOM.

5.1 Theoretical implications

First, perceived emergency context attribute is the influencing factor of OCPB. Because of the COVID-19, e-commerce is the priority choice for consumers under circumstances of prolonged quarantine and lockdown, and then considering logistics and delivery. Furthermore, customer service, packaging, promotion, and reputation are critical to online consumers.

Second, perceived product attribute is the influencing factors of OCPB. The basic features of product, such as appearance, brand, hand feeling, price, and design, positively attract online consumers. Elegant appearance, famous brand, better hand feeling, lower price, and better design would be more impactful to OCPB.

Third, perceived innovation attribute is the influencing factor of OCPB. For smartphone, online consumers would show more interest in the innovation of speed, operation, standby time, chip, etc. Scientific and technological innovation for most products could improve the level of OCPB. Thus, the guarantee and improvement of functionality of a product could create more opportunities for online consumers to make purchasing decisions.

Fourth, according to Kotler’s five products level, perceived product attribute satisfies the characteristics of core drive and basic, while the perceived innovation attribute satisfies the characteristics of the potential level. Because hypothesis of perceived motivation attribute is not supported. Based on the analyzing results, the perceived functionality attribute is refined instead of the perceived motivation functionality attribute, which satisfies the expected and augmented. Meanwhile, the perceived emergency context attribute is not included, which shows the main difference with Kotler’s five products level.

5.2 Managerial implications

The influencing factors of OCPB were clustered into four categories: perceived emergency context, product, innovation, and function attributes. The definition and explanation of these categories may have important managerial implications for both OCPB and e-commerce. First, the findings of this study suggest that e-commerce enterprises should pay more attention to improving the quality, user experience, and additional design features of their products to arouse the interest of OCPB. However, this may be difficult for e-commerce enterprises because achieving these goals requires updating the software and hardware constantly, which involves significant investment. For most scientific and technical corporations, making heavy investments is not particularly difficult, however, service-type enterprises and small and medium enterprises may have insufficient funds to afford such heavy investments. This is the main reason that most online consumers buy products from famous brands instead of small and medium enterprises. Therefore, to improve their situation, both types of companies could jointly develop products or services, for instance, small and medium enterprises may purchase patents from large enterprises, jointly researching and developing products, or large enterprises could share their achievements at a price.

Second, the pandemic has accelerated the spread of e-commerce considerably, changing consumers’ shopping style in the process. Accordingly, e-commerce enterprises should adapt their marketing strategies, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing, due to the rapid development of the economy and its dynamic environment. For instance, e-commerce platforms should realize that changes in OCPB will continue to contribute to the growth of the e-commerce market. Moreover, e-commerce enterprises should combine their online presence with brick-and-mortar stores. Even more importantly, e-commerce enterprises should successfully operate their supply chain to adapt to the implementation of lockdown measures and the closing of manufacturing factories. Consumers should exercise caution when facing e-commerce enterprises’ adaptive financial policy, such as interest-free rates, which may cause financial burden.

Third, e-commerce enterprises should offer a simple and smooth shopping experience, clearly display practical information, increase the value of goods (by improving the quality, design, and performance of products or services) and improve their brand image for online consumers. However, e-commerce enterprises sometimes rely on certain fraudulent methods to increase their sales volume, such as falsifying positive e-WOM and deleting negative feedback, as was identified during the data processing stage. Therefore, online consumers should select online stores cautiously to avoid buying products of poor quality or performance.

Fourth, nowadays, technology is constantly evolving at an accelerated rate, particularly in the smartphone industry, as companies launch new products with innovative functions each year. Thus, e-commerce enterprises should strive to innovate to secure their position in the market. In addition, consumers should reconsider the need to experience the state-of-the-art products because these may have high prices.

6. Conclusion and limitations

In conclusion, during the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers highly preferred to buy products online, because most brick-and-mortar stores were closed due to lockdowns and social distancing measures. Additionally, with the rapid development of e-commerce, online shopping has become the most popular shopping style because it allows consumers to not only save time and money, but also review e-WOM before purchasing a product. Moreover, e-WOM is much more reliable compared with traditional WOM. Thus, this study proposed a theoretical framework to explore and define the influencing factors of OCPB based on e-WOM data mining and analyzing. The data were crawled from Jingdong and Taobao, while the data process was also fully demonstrated. Comparing the results, the influencing factors of OCPB were clustered around four categories: perceived emergency context, product, innovation, and function attributes. Moreover, perceived emergency context attribute is the main difference compared with Kotler’s five products level, while perceived product attribute meets the core and generic level, perceived functionality attribute meets the expected and augmented level, and perceived innovation attribute meets the potential level.

However, this study still has certain limitations. First, the data were crawled from Chinese e-commerce websites, hence, they may not be generalized in contexts where the influencing factors and dimensions may vary compared with other countries or regions. Second, this study only explored and defined the antecedents of OCPB. Data should be added from Western e-commerce websites. Moreover, the present study’s results should be compared with Western studies to generate a more comprehensive view of the antecedents of OCPB. Future studies should explore the underlying mechanisms influencing OCPB.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Henan Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (grant number. 2020CZH012), the Henan Key Research and Development and Promotion Special (Soft Science Research) (grant number. 222400410126), the Jiangsu Province Social Science Foundation Youth Project (grant number. 21GLC012) and the Doctor Fund of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (grant number. 2020BSJJ022, 2019BSJJ017). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mejía-Trejo J. COVID-19 ads on purchase intention of online consumer behavior as business innovation activity: A contribution to the uses and gratification theory. Electron Commer R A. 2021; 49:101086. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vanhala M, Lu C, Peltonen J, Sundqvist S, Nummenmaa J, Järvelin K. The usage of large data sets in online consumer behaviour: A bibliometric and computational text-mining–driven analysis of previous research. J Bus Res. 2020; 106:46–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richard M-O, Habibi MR. Advanced modeling of online consumer behavior: The moderating roles of hedonism and culture. J Bus Res. 2016; 69(3):1103–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Venkatesh V, Speier-Pero C, Schuetz S. Why do people shop online? A comprehensive framework of consumers’ online shopping intentions and behaviors. Inform Technol Peopl. 2022; 35(5):1590–620. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Camacho LJ, Ramírez-Correa PE, Salazar-Concha C. Consumer Ethnocentrism and Country of Origin: Effects on Online Consumer Purchase Behavior in Times of a Pandemic. Sustain. 2022; 14(1):348. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Melović B, Šehović D, Karadžić V, Dabić M, Ćirović D. Determinants of Millennials’ behavior in online shopping–Implications on consumers’ satisfaction and e-business development. Technol Soc. 2021; 65:101561. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu Y, Li Q, Edu T, Jozsa L, Negricea IC. Mobile shopping platform characteristics as consumer behavior determinants. Asia Pac J market Lo. 2019; 32(7):1565–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang HJ. Determinants of consumers’ purchase behaviour towards green brands. Serv Ind J. 2017; 37(13–14):896–918. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mantovani D, de Andrade LM, Negrão A. How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2017; 36:156–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sangroya D, Nayak JK. Factors influencing buying behaviour of green energy consumer. J Clean Prod. 2017; 151:393–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Batinic B, Appel M. Mass communication, social influence, and consumer behavior: two field experiments. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013; 43(7):1353–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chang HH, Rizal H, Amin H. The determinants of consumer behavior towards email advertisement. Internet Res. 2013; 23(3):316–37. doi: 10.1108/10662241311331754 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Diallo MF, Chandon JL, Cliquet G, Philippe J. Factors influencing consumer behaviour towards store brands: evidence from the French market. Int J Retail Distrib, 2013; 41(6):422–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fan X, Qian Y, Huang P. Factors influencing consumer behaviour towards store brand: a meta-analysis. Int J Market Res. 2012; 54(3):407–30. doi: 10.2501/ijmr-54-3-407-430 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moon J, Choe Y, Song H. Determinants of consumers’ online/offline shopping behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4):1593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ali MR, Shafiq M, Andejany M. Determinants of consumers’ intentions towards the purchase of energy efficient appliances in Pakistan: An extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Sustain. 2021; 13(2):565. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dangelico RM, Nonino F, Pompei A. Which are the determinants of green purchase behaviour? A study of Italian consumers. Bus Strateg Environ. 2021; 30(5):2600–2620. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nimri R, Patiar A, Jin X. The determinants of consumers’ intention of purchasing green hotel accommodation: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2020; 45:535–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yi S. Determinants of consumers’ purchasing behavior for certified aquaculture products in South Korea. Sustain. 2019; 11(14):3840. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Joshi Y, Rahman Z. Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustain Prod Consump. 2017; 10:110–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yadav R, Pathak GS. Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecolog Econ. 2017; 134:114–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Omar NA, Nazri MA, Ali MH, Alam SS. The panic buying behavior of consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the influences of uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2021; 62:102600. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guthrie C, Fosso-Wamba S, Arnaud JB. Online consumer resilience during a pandemic: An exploratory study of e-commerce behavior before, during and after a COVID-19 lockdown. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2021; 61:102570. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen MJ, Farn CK. Examining the influence of emotional expressions in online consumer reviews on perceived helpfulness. Inform Process Manag. 2020; 57(6):102266. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Krishna A, Strack F. Reflection and impulse as determinants of human behavior. Knowledge and Action,Springer, Cham; 2017. p. 145–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chawla M, Khan MN, Pandey A. Online buying behaviour: A brief review and update. J Manag Res. 2015; 9(2/4):1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Al-Adwan A. S., Al-Debei M. M., & Dwivedi Y. K. E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Technol Soc. 2022; 71, 102083. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Al-Adwan A. S., Alrousan M. K., Yaseen H., Alkufahy A. M., & Alsoud M. Boosting Online Purchase Intention in High-Uncertainty-Avoidance Societies: A Signaling Theory Approach. J Open Inno: Technol Mark Complex, 2022; 8(3), 136. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Al-Adwan A. S., & Yaseen H. Solving the product uncertainty hurdle in social commerce: The mediating role of seller uncertainty. Int J Inform Manage Data Insights, 2023; 3(1), 100169. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Al-Adwan A. S., & Al-Horani M. A. Boosting customer e-loyalty: An extended scale of online service quality. Inform, 2019; 10(12), 380. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-Adwan A. S., Kokash H., Adwan A. A., Alhorani A., & Yaseen H. Building customer loyalty in online shopping: the role of online trust, online satisfaction and electronic word of mouth. Int J Electron Market Retailing, 2020; 11(3), 278–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmad W, Zhang Q. Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology. J Clean Prod. 2020; 267:122053. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu Q, Zhang F. Study on the influencing factors of mobile users’ impulse purchase behavior in a large online promotion activity. J Electron Commer Or. 2019; 17(2):88–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Joshi Y, Rahman Z. Consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour: Modeling the impact of psychological factors. Ecolog Econ. 2019; 159:235–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tan WL, Goh YN. The role of psychological factors in influencing consumer purchase intention towards green residential building. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2018; 2018(11):788–807. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee CH, Wu JJ. Consumer online flow experience: The relationship between utilitarian and hedonic value, satisfaction and unplanned purchase. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017; 117(10):2452–2467. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mikalef P, Pappas IO, Giannakos M. Consumer intentions on social media: a fsQCA analysis of motivations. Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society: Springer, Cham; 2016. p. 371–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yan X, Han X. Optimal pricing and remanufacturing entry strategies of manufacturers in the presence of online reviews. Ann Oper Res. 2021; 316:59–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vana P, Lambrecht A. The effect of individual online reviews on purchase likelihood. Marketing Sci. 2021; 40(4):708–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu X, Liao H. Learning judgment benchmarks of customers from online reviews. OR Spectrum. 2021; 43(4):1125–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Uzir MUH, Jerin I, Al</au, Hamid ABA, Latiff ASA. Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates? Heliyon. 2020; 6(12):e05710. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nguyen HV, Nguyen CH, Hoang TTB. Green consumption: Closing the intention‐behavior gap. Sustain Dev. 2019; 27(1):118–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shen Z. Mining sustainable fashion e-commerce: social media texts and consumer behaviors. Electron Commer Res. 2023; 23:949–971. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Godey B, Manthiou A, Pederzoli D, Rokka J, Aiello G, Donvito R, et al. Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior. J Bus Res. 2016; 69(12):5833–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fetscherin M, Boulanger M, Gonçalves Filho C, Souki GQ. The effect of product category on consumer brand relationships. J Prod Brand Manag. 2014; 23(2):78–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gunasti K, Ross WT Jr. How and when alphanumeric brand names affect consumer preferences. J Marketing Res. 2010; 47(6):1177–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bhardwaj BR. Adoption, diffusion and consumer behavior in technopreneurship. Int J Emerg Mark. 2021; 16(2):179–220. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Slater SF, Mohr JJ, Sengupta S. Radical product innovation capability: literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2014; 31(3):552–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Aboulnasr K, Tran GA. Is love really blind? The effect of emotional brand attachment on the perceived risk of really new products. J Prod Brand Manag. 2020; 29(1):81–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oh GEG, Aliyev M, Kafouros M, Au AKM. The role of consumer characteristics in explaining product innovation performance: Evidence from emerging economies. J Bus Res. 2022; 149:713–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Colombo MG, von Krogh G, Rossi-Lamastra C, Stephan PE. Organizing for radical innovation: wexploring novel insights. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2017; 34(4):394–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nielsen JH, Escalas JE, Hoeffler S. Mental simulation and category knowledge affect really new product evaluation through transportation. J Exp Psychol Gen: Appl. 2018; 24(2):145–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sun Y. Case based models of the relationship between consumer resistance to innovation and customer churn. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102530. J J Retailing Consum Serv. 2021; 61:102530. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Xue J. An investigation into the effects of product design on incremental and radical innovations from the perspective of consumer perceptions: evidence from China. Creat Innov Manag. 2019; 28(4):501–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Roper S, Micheli P, Love JH, Vahter P. The roles and effectiveness of design in new product development: A study of Irish manufacturers. Res Pol. 2016; 45(1):319–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Homburg C, Schwemmle M, Kuehnl C. New product design: Concept, measurement, and consequences. J Market. 2015; 79(3):41–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mugge R, Dahl DW. Seeking the ideal level of design newness: Consumer response to radical and incremental product design. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2013; 30:34–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cinar D. The effect of consumer emotions on online purchasing behavior. Tools and Techniques for Implementing International E-Trading Tactics for Competitive Advantage. USA: IGI Global; 2020. p. 221–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pappas IO, Papavlasopoulou S, Mikalef P, Giannakos MN. Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs: An fsQCA approach. Int J Inform Manage. 2020; 53:102128. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang Z, Zhang N, Wang J. The Influencing Factors on Impulse Buying Behavior of Consumers under the Mode of Hunger Marketing in Live Commerce. Sustain. 2022; 14(4):2122. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Martínez-López F. J. P-G, C., Gázquez-Abad JC, Rodríguez-Ardura I. Online consumption motivations: an integrated theoretical delimitation and refinement based on qualitative analyses. Strategic e-Business Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. p. 347–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Huang YF, Kuo FY. How impulsivity affects consumer decision-making in e-commerce. Electron Commer R A. 2012; 11(6):582–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sarabia‐Sanchez FJ, Vigaray MDDJ, Hota M. Using values and shopping styles to identify fashion apparel segments. Int J Retail Distrib. 2012; 40(3):180–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhong Q, Liang S, Cui L, Chan HK, Qiu Y. Using online reviews to explore consumer purchasing behaviour in different cultural settings. Kybernetes. 2019; 48(6):1242–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2013:3111–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of ICLR Workshops Track. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kim D, Seo D, Cho S, Kang P. Multi-co-training for document classification using various document representations: TF–IDF, LDA, and Doc2Vec. Inform Sciences. 2019; 477:15–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pantano E, Giglio S, Dennis C. Making sense of consumers’ tweets: Sentiment outcomes for fast fashion retailers through Big Data analytics. Int J Retail Distrib. 2018; 47(9):915–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jain AK. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern recogn lett. 2010; 31(8):651–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang H, Rao H, Feng J. Product innovation based on online review data mining: A case study of Huawei phones. Electron Commer Res. 2018; 18(1):3–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Okudan GE, Chiu MC, Kim TH. Perceived feature utility-based product family design: a mobile phone case study. J Intell Manuf. 2013; 24(5):935–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Haverila M. Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users. Australas Mark J. 2011; 19(4):238–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim MJ, Park J. Mobile phone purchase and usage behaviours of early adopter groups in Korea. Behav Inform Technol. 2014; 33(7):693–703. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kımıloğlu H, Nasır VA, Nasır S. Discovering behavioral segments in the mobile phone market. J Consum Market. 2010; 27(5):401–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Economides AA, Grousopoulou A. Students’ thoughts about the importance and costs of their mobile devices’ features and services. Telemat Inform. 2009; 26(1):57–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Petruzzellis L. Mobile phone choice: technology versus marketing. The brand effect in the Italian market. Eur J Market. 2010; 44(5):610–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Balakrishnan V, Raj RG. Exploring the relationship between urbanized Malaysian youth and their mobile phones: A quantitative approach. Telemat Inform. 2012; 29(3):263–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Singh J, Goyal BB. Mobile handset buying behavior of different age and gender groups. Int J Bus Manage. 2009; 4(5):179–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Suominen A, Hyrynsalmi S, Knuutila T. Young mobile users: Radical and individual–Not. Telemat Inform. 2014; 31(2):266–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kotler P. Principles of marketing. Boston: Pearson; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gajjar NB. Factors affecting consumer behavior. Int J Res Humanities Soc Sci. 2013; 1(2):10–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ramya N, Ali SM. Factors affecting consumer buying behavior. Int J Appl Res. 2016; 2(10):76–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Park CH, Kim YG. Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. Int J Retail Distrib Manage. 2003; 31(1):16–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sata M. Factors affecting consumer buying behavior of mobile phone devices. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2013; 4(12):103–12. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan

2 May 2023

PONE-D-23-11851A Theoretical Model of Factors Influencing Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior through Electronic Word of Mouth Data Mining and AnalysisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. ZHU,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 16 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

   "The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Henan Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (grant number. 2020CZH012), the Henan Key Research and Development and Promotion Special (Soft Science Research) (grant number. 222400410126), the Jiangsu Province Social Science Foundation Youth Project (grant number. 21GLC012) and the Doctor Fund of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (grant number. 2020BSJJ022, 2019BSJJ017).Conceptualization: Xiaoya Zhu.

Data curation: Manman Wang.

Formal analysis: Fuli Zhou, Shuang Cheng.

Funding acquisition: Qiwei Wang, Xiaoya Zhu, Manman Wang, Fuli Zhou, Shuang Cheng

Investigation: Qiwei Wang.

Methodology: Qiwei Wang.

Project administration: Xiaoya Zhu, Manman Wang, Fuli Zhou, and Shuang Cheng

Resources: Qiwei Wang.

Software: Qiwei Wang.

Supervision: Qiwei Wang, Xiaoya Zhu, Manman Wang, Fuli Zhou, Shuang Cheng

Writing – original draft: Qiwei Wang.

Writing – review & editing: Qiwei Wang."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. You should list all authors and all affiliations as per our author instructions and clearly indicate the corresponding author.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

I am pleased to inform you that we have reviewed your manuscript and find it to be of high quality and relevance to our journal's scope. Congratulations on your excellent work! However, to ensure that your manuscript meets the highest standards of academic excellence, we recommend that you carefully address the reviewers' comments, which we have attached with this email. The comments highlight some minor revisions that can enhance the clarity and impact of your work. We kindly request that you carefully consider each of the reviewers' comments and address them appropriately in your revised manuscript. Once you have made the necessary changes, please resubmit your manuscript through our online submission system.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: As a journal reviewer, I would like to commend the authors for their rigorous data analysis process and the comprehensive results presented in the article. However, there are two minor aspects that need to be addressed by the authors in order to increase the quality of this paper.

The introduction section can be strengthening by clearly highlighting the research problem, significance, and gaps in the literature. This would help outline the main contributions of this submission.

It has been noticed that you have cited a bit old research (2010, 2011, 2013). You are suggested to update these citations with recent and well-established ones.

Reviewer #2: This is a well-written paper with good contributions. All important elements of a good academic research paper are presented in this submission. I would suggest a few minor amendments.

1. The abstract appears to be more focused on reporting results rather than effectively communicating the central idea(s) explored in the paper and the contribution it makes to the scientific community's existing knowledge. Its lack of coherence makes it challenging to follow.

2. The discussion section should first compare the findings of this research with those of prior research. Both theoretical and practical implications should be reported in a separate section.

3. The literature review, particularly the literature related to the SOR and WOM, should be strengthen by including well-established and related research.

This includes but is not limited to:

- E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102083

- Boosting Online Purchase Intention in High-Uncertainty-Avoidance Societies: A Signaling Theory Approach. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030136

- Solving the product uncertainty hurdle in social commerce: The mediating role of seller uncertainty. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100169

- Boosting Customer E-Loyalty: An Extended Scale of Online Service Quality. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120380

- Building customer loyalty in online shopping: the role of online trust, online satisfaction and electronic word of mouth. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2020.108132

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Malek alsoud

Reviewer #2: Yes: Dr Husam Yaseen

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0286034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286034.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 May 2023

Dear Editors and Reviews:

Thank you for your correspondence and for the feedback provided by the reviewers regarding our manuscript titled “A Theoretical Model of Factors Influencing Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior through Electronic Word of Mouth Data Mining and Analysis”. These valuable and constructive comments have assisted in revising and enhancing our paper, in addition to providing significant guidance to our research. We have carefully examined and addressed all provided comments, and hope that the corrections meet with approval. The main revisions made to the paper and our corresponding responses to the reviewers' comments are listed below.

Responds to the Journal Requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: We have modified our manuscript to ensure compliance with PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

2. Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: The cover letter contains a statement indicating that "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available.

Response: We have uploaded a separate file consisting of the study's minimal data.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager.

Response: The corresponding author has updated the ORCID iD.

5. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. You should list all authors and all affiliations as per our author instructions and clearly indicate the corresponding author.

Response: we have included a title page with information for all authors in our main document.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references.

Response: Our reference list has been carefully reviewed and verified to be both complete and accurate.

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Responds to the reviewers’ comments:

Reviewer #1: As a journal reviewer, I would like to commend the authors for their rigorous data analysis process and the comprehensive results presented in the article. However, there are two minor aspects that need to be addressed by the authors in order to increase the quality of this paper.

The introduction section can be strengthening by clearly highlighting the research problem, significance, and gaps in the literature. This would help outline the main contributions of this submission.

It has been noticed that you have cited a bit old research (2010, 2011, 2013). You are suggested to update these citations with recent and well-established ones.

Response: Firstly, the introduction section has been rewritten to address the reviewers' comments. The research problem, significance, and gaps in the literature have all been included in the introduction. Secondly, outdated references from 2010, 2011, and 2013 have been removed and replaced with more recent references.

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2: This is a well-written paper with good contributions. All important elements of a good academic research paper are presented in this submission. I would suggest a few minor amendments.

1. The abstract appears to be more focused on reporting results rather than effectively communicating the central idea(s) explored in the paper and the contribution it makes to the scientific community's existing knowledge. Its lack of coherence makes it challenging to follow.

Response: The abstract section has been rewritten to enhance the logical flow and coherence of the paper, as suggested by the reviewers.

2. The discussion section should first compare the findings of this research with those of prior research. Both theoretical and practical implications should be reported in a separate section.

Response: In the discussion section, we have compared the findings of our research with those of prior research, and have separated the theoretical and practical implications into distinct sections.

3. The literature review, particularly the literature related to the SOR and WOM, should be strengthen by including well-established and related research.

This includes but is not limited to:

- E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102083

- Boosting Online Purchase Intention in High-Uncertainty-Avoidance Societies: A Signaling Theory Approach. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030136

- Solving the product uncertainty hurdle in social commerce: The mediating role of seller uncertainty. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100169

- Boosting Customer E-Loyalty: An Extended Scale of Online Service Quality. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120380

- Building customer loyalty in online shopping: the role of online trust, online satisfaction and electronic word of mouth. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2020.108132

Response: Additionally, we have incorporated the listed references suggested by the reviewer to strengthen the literature review.

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

We have made our best effort to improve the manuscript and greatly appreciate the Editors and Reviewers' earnest work. We hope that the revised manuscript meets with approval.

Thank you once again for your valuable comments and suggestions.

Best regards,

Dr. Xiaoya Zhu

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan

7 May 2023

A Theoretical Model of Factors Influencing Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior through Electronic Word of Mouth Data Mining and Analysis

PONE-D-23-11851R1

Dear Dr. ZHU,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan

10 May 2023

PONE-D-23-11851R1

A Theoretical Model of Factors Influencing Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior through Electronic Word of Mouth Data Mining and Analysis

Dear Dr. ZHU:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES