Abstract
DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair occurs by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous endjoining (NHEJ). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of both MATa and MATα inhibits NHEJ and facilitates DSB-initiated HR. We previously observed that DSB-initiated recombination between two his3 fragments, his3-Δ5′ and his3-Δ3′∷HOcs is enhanced in haploids and diploids expressing both MATa and MATα genes, regardless of the position or orientation of the his3 fragments. Herein, we measured frequencies of DNA damage-associated translocations and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in yku70 haploid mutants, defective in NHEJ. Translocation and SCE frequencies were measured in strains containing the same his3 fragments after DSBs were made directly at trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs. Wild type and yku70 cells were also exposed to ionizing radiation and radiomimetic agents methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), phleomycin, and 4-nitroquinolone-1-oxide (4-NQO). Frequencies of X-ray-associated and DSB-initiated translocations were five-fold higher in yku70 mutants compared to wild type; however, frequencies of phleomycin-associated translocations were lower in the yku70 haploid mutant. Frequencies of DSB-initiated SCEs were 1.8-fold higher in the yku70 mutant, compared to wild type. Thus, DSB-initiated HR between repeated sequences on non-homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids occurs at higher frequencies in yku70 haploid mutants; however, higher frequencies of DNA damage-associated HR in yku70 mutants depend on the DNA damaging agent.
Keywords: Recombination, Double-strand breaks, yKU70, Yeast
1. Introduction
Double-strand break (DSB) repair can occur by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR for DSB repair requires an undamaged chromatid, either a sister or a homolog, as a template for copying DNA, while NHEJ ligates ends of DSBs that have little or no homology. Genes that participate in both pathways show a remarkable degree of conservation from yeast to higher eukaryotes. Both pathways use Mre11, Rad50 and Xrs2 (NBS1), also called the MRX complex (for review, see [1]), which facilitates synapsis and processing of DSB ends to form single-stranded 3′ overhangs [2]. These 3′ single-stranded regions can serve as a substrate for proteins encoded by the RAD52 epistasis group genes, including RAD51, RAD55, RAD57, which catalyze synapsis and strand invasion of the undamaged sister chromatid or homolog with the broken end [3]. The resulting structure then serves to prime DNA synthesis across the gap generating Holliday intermediates that can be resolved to generate crossover and non-crossover events. MRX complex also participates in NHEJ by facilitating synapsis and subsequent ligation of both ends of the DSBs [1]. Proteins that participate in NHEJ include ku70 and ku80, Lig4 (ligase) [4], and in mammalian cells but not yeast, the catalytic subunit of DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA Pkcs) [5]. Because DSB ends are degraded, NHEJ is potentially mutagenic and can result in the loss of genetic material; whereas, HR repair of DSBs may result in the accurate repair of genetic material [5].
In mammalian cells, DSB repair occurs more frequently by NHEJ than HR, while HR is the preferred pathway for DSB repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast). As a consequence, mammalian cell lines deficient in NHEJ, such as the chinese hamster ovary (CHO) V3 cell line [6], are hypersensitive to X-rays, while yeast yku70 mutants are only X-ray sensitive when RAD52 (HR) is eliminated [7]. In mammalian cell lines deficient in NHEJ, HR is enhanced after DSBs are generated by site directed endonucleases [8]. HR repair may be preferred in mammalian cells when DSBs occur as a consequence of replication fork collapse, as induced by aphidicolin treatment in S phase, in which there is only one end of the DSB [9]. DNA-dependent PKcs may suppress HR when DSBs are made in either G1 or S phase [10] by phosphorylation of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) [11] and p53 [12].
In yeast, NHEJ pathway is repressed by expression of both MATa and MATα [13,14]), and thus, HR is enhanced between chromosome homologs in G1 diploid cells. MAT heterozygosity represses the expression of NEJ1 [15], which encodes a protein required for NHEJ [13,16]. However, a/a diploids and α/α diploids are still more X-ray resistant than a or α haploids [17,18], respectively, implying that ploidy is also a factor in DSB-repair mediated by HR. MAT heterozygosity or diploidy does not enhance either spontaneous or X-ray-associated recombination between sister chromatids, which are preferred substrates for DNA repair [19,20], but does increase spontaneous and X-ray-associated recombination between repeats on non-homologous chromosomes [17]. Besides repressing NHEJ, a/α cells express higher levels of RAD51 and RAD54 [21]; and thus other factors under a/α control may insure that HR is the preferred DSB repair pathway. These observations suggest that ploidy, mating type, and phase of the cell cycle are all factors that shift the balance of DSB repair between HR and NHEJ pathways.
yku70 and yku80 mutants, defective in NHEJ, exhibit higher frequencies of particular recombination events that are initiated after HO digestion at cut sites placed at ectopic locations. For example, yku70 haploid and a/a diploid mutants exhibit modestly higher frequencies of DSB-initiated intrachromosomal gene conversion events and allelic recombination, respectively, compared to wild type [22]. These recombination events occur predominantly by gene conversion that is not associated with crossovers [22]. However, yku70 and yku80 mutants exhibit lower frequencies of spontaneous, MMS- and X-ray-associated deletions that are generated by recombination between repeats [23]. These deletions may occur by RAD51-independent mechanisms involved in single-strand annealing (SSA) [24]. Thus, enhanced HR in yku70 mutants may depend on the recombination assay and the DNA damaging agent used to stimulate the HR event.
Besides defective NHEJ, yku70 mutants also fail to resume cell cycle progression or adapt after cell cycle arrest is triggered by a single DSB [25]. DSBs signal G2 arrest when single-strand binding protein (RP-A) binds to single-stranded DNA, which occurs by the action of nucleases if NHEJ does not repair the DSB [25]. Since adaptation precedes recombination for some homology-directed rearrangements [26], it is unclear whether yku70 mutants may exhibit enhanced frequencies of DSB-associated chromosomal rearrangements.
We had previously observed that a/α diploid cells exhibit higher levels of X-ray-associated homology-directed translocations, compared to a/a and α/α diploids [17]. Recombination occurring between his3 fragments on sister chromatids or non-homologs that is initiated by HO endonuclease-generated DSBs is increased in haploids expressing both MATa and MATα [27]. It would thus be logical that MAT heterozygosity increases DSB-initiated recombination by suppressing NHEJ. However, several questions remain. First, it is unclear whether yku70 mutants would exhibit higher frequencies of X-ray-associated HR, since yKU70 does not confer X-ray resistance. Second, it is unclear whether the mechanism for increasing DSB-associated SCE in a/α haploids results from suppressing NHEJ, since NHEJ may already be suppressed in S phase.
In this manuscript, we asked whether yku70 mutants exhibit higher levels of DSB-initiated SCE and translocations. We observed five-fold higher frequency of DSB-associated translocations in haploid yku70 mutants, and a 1.8-fold higher DSB-associated SCE frequency in yku70 mutant, compared to wild type. For diploid strains, we found no enhanced frequency of translocations, consistent with the idea that NHEJ does not contribute to suppressing homologous recombination in yeast diploid cells.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Strains and media
Standard media, including yeast extract, peptone, dextrose (YPD) and synthetic complete lacking histidine (SC-HIS) have been previously described [28]. Ura− isolates (5-fluoro-orotic acid resistant [FOAr]) were isolatated on FOA medium [28]. The strains used to measure homology-directed translocations and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) are listed in Table 1. These strains contain two truncated fragments of his3, his3-Δ3′ and his3-Δ5′ [19], as illustrated (Fig. 1). Directed translocations were measured in haploids and diploids, which were derived from one haploid containing the his3 fragments and one haploid lacking the truncated fragments.
Table 1.
Yeast strains
| Lab name | Genotypea | Source |
|---|---|---|
| YA102 | MATa ura3-52, his3-Δ200, ade2-101, 1ys2-801, trp1-Δ1, gal3− | M. Carlson |
| YB109 | MATα ura3-52, his3-Δ200, ade2-101, 1ys2-801, trp1-Δ1, gal3− leu2-3, 112 GAL1∷his3-Δ5′, trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs, lys2− (leaky) | This laboratory |
| YB204 |
MATα ura3-52, his3-Δ200, 1ys2-801, trp1-Δ1, gal3−
leu2-Δ1 trp1∷[his3-Δ3′∷HOcs, his3-Δ5′] |
This laboratory |
| YB110 | YB109 × YA102 | This laboratory |
| YB356 | MATα ura3-52, his3-Δ200, ade2-101, 1ys2-801, trp1-Δ1, gal3− | yku70∷URA3 |
| leu2-3,112,GAL1∷his3-Δ5′, trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs, lys2− (leaky),yku70∷URA3 | Disruption in YB109 | |
| YB357 | MATa yku70 | FOAr isolate derived from yku70∷URA3 disruption in YA102 |
| YB358 | YB356 × YB357 | |
| YB163 | MATa-inc trp1∷[his3-Δ3′∷HOcs, his3-Δ5′ | This laboratory |
| YB359 | MATa-inc trp1∷[his3-Δ3′∷HOcs, his3-Δ5′] yku70 | This laboratory |
Genotype the same as YA102 unless indicated.
Fig. 1.

Recombination assays used in this study. Ovals represent centromeres and lines represent chromosomes. For simplicity, the left arms of chromosomes are not included. The position and orientation of the his3 recombinational substrates are shown that are present in strains used to measure (A) reciprocal translocations; (B) unequal SCE. An “X” designates potential sites of crossovers, and the resulting chromosomal rearrangement is presented. An arrow and feathers denote HIS3. As indicated on the bottom of the figure, the 5′ deletion lacks the feathers and the 3′ deletion lacks the arrow. The two regions of sequence identity shared by the his3 fragments are indicated by decorated boxes; broadly spaced diagonal lines indicate a region of ~300 bp, and tightly spaced diagonal lines indicate a region of 167 bp.
To make yku70∷URA3 null mutants, we digested plasmidpHDFKO [29] with NotI, and selected for Ura+transformants [30] in strains YB109 and YA102. To confirm the phenotype of the yku70∷URA3 deletion, we determined whether the Ura+ transformants were temperature sensitive and whether they were defective in religating a linearized circular plasmid [31]. We confirmed the physical presence of yku70∷URA3 by detecting a ~2.1 kb PCR-generated fragment using primers 5′-GAACTTCTAATATATTCTGTG-3′ and 5′-ACCCTCTACCTTAGCATCCC-3′that anneal to YKU70 promoter and URA3, respectively. A Ura− isolate (YB357) was obtained on FOA medium from the yku70 mutant derived from YA102. Ura+ Leu+ yku70 diploid mutants to measure DSB-initated translocations were selected after mating yku70 haploid mutants, YB356 and YB357. To measure DSB-initiated SCE in a MATa-inc yku70 strain, a MATα yku70 segregant of a diploid cross of YB357 and YB204 was first obtained. YB359 is a yku70 MATa-inc meiotic segregant derived from a diploid cross of MATαyku70 and YB163 and contains trp1∷[his3-Δ3′ ∷HOcs, his3-Δ5′].
2.2. DNA damaging agents
Compounds used in this study included methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO), and phleomycin. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma or Aldrich Chemicals. Chemicals were dissolved in either dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethyl formamide (DMF) or water, depending on the specifications provided by the vendor.
2.3. Determining rates of spontaneous recombination and frequencies of DNA damage-associated recombination
The rates of spontaneous recombination were determined by the method of the median [32], as described by Esposito et al. [33]; 11 independent colonies were used for each rate calculation. We used the Mann–Whitney U-test [34] to determine the statistical significance of rate differences. The protocols used to measure DNA damage-associated recombination after exposure to MMS, 4-NQO, UV, and X-rays have been previously described [17,35]. The X-ray radiation source was purchased from Faxitron Inc. (Wheeling, IL), and the dose rate was 100 rad/min. The γ-ray source was a Nordion 1.8 kCi 137Cs irradiator at 6.9 krad/h. A 254 nM germicidal lamp (2 J/m2/s) was used for UV irradiation. After irradiation, cells were washed with sterile H2O and plated directly onto selective medium (SC-HIS) and the appropriate serial dilution was plated on YPD medium to measure viability.
We exposed cells to concentrations of chemicals that exhibit equivalent levels of lethality in both wild type and yku70 strains (Table 2). At least three independent experiments were done for each DNA damaging agent. The significance of the differences between yku70 mutants and wild type strains was determined using the two-tailed t-test [34].
Table 2:
HO endonuclease-stimulated translocation frequencies in wild type and yku70 mutants
| Genotype (strain)a | %Viability after HO inductionb | His+ recombinants/Trp+ CFU × 105: before HO inductionc, after HO inductiond | Ratioe | %Trp+ CFU/total CFU (%): before HO induction, after HO induction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haploid | ||||||
| Wild type (YB109) | 27 ± 2.1 | 7.4 ± 8 | 48 ± 12 | 6.4 | 95 ± 0.7 | 83 ± 1.4 |
| yku70 (YB356) | 7.8 ± 2.7 | 5.0 ± 5.3 | 285 ± 156 | 57 | 95 ± 0.7 | 57 ± 17 |
| Diploid | ||||||
| Wild type (YB110) | 97 ± 3.8 | 1.4 ± 1 | 24 ± 1.4 | 17 | 95 ± 2.5 | 82 ± 8 |
| ku70/ku70 (YB358) | 90 ± 18 | 1.3 ± 1.4 | 29 ± 4.3 | 22 | 88 ± 5 | 78 ± 5 |
For complete genotype, see Table 1.
Trp+ CFU after HO induction/Trp+ CFU before HO induction × 100%.
His+ recombinants before HO induction/Trp+ CFU before HO induction.
His+ recombinants after HO induction/Trp+ CFU after HO induction.
His+ frequency after HO induction/His+ frequency before HO induction.
2.4. Induction of HO endonuclease
The galactose-inducible HO gene present in plasmid pGHOT-GAL3 [36] was introduced into the designated strains by selecting for Trp+ transformants. Trp+ isolates were then cultured at 30 °C in liquid SC-TRP and diluted in YPL. At a density of approximately 107 cells/ml (mid log), glucose or galactose was added to a final concentration of 2%, to either repress or induce, respectively, the expression of HO endonuclease. After 2-h incubation at 23 °C, cells were directly plated onto SC-HIS to measure SCE formation and onto YPD to measure viability. Colonies were replica plated onto SC-TRP to measure the stability of pGHOT-GAL3.
2.5. Single-strand annealing (SSA)
To measure SSA frequencies, we measured the frequencies of his3 deletions resulting from HO-induced DSBs targeted at trp1∷his3Δ-5′his3Δ-3′∷HOcs. SSA creates one single his3 fragment, his3-Δ (5′, 3′) that lacks the HO cut site and both 3′ and 5′ ends of his3; isolates containing this deletion can no longer generate His+ recombinants. YPD isolates were patched onto YPD and replica plated onto SC-HIS and SC-TRP to count colonies that papillated to His+ and retained pGHOT-GAL3, respectively. In 10 Trp+ colonies that did not papillate to His+, we confirmed the presence of his3-Δ (5′, 3′) by detecting a 1.4 kb PCR product using primers 5′-CACGGCAGAGACCAATCAGTA-3′ and 5′-GCACTCCTGATTCCGCTAATA-3′ as previously described [37].
2.6. CHEF gels
Electrophoretic karyotypes of His+ recombinants were determined by pulse field electrophoresis. Undigested yeast DNA was resolved by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields (CHEF), using 220 V (6 V/cm) for 26 h at 90 s. pulse time [36].
3. Results
The purpose of this study was to determine whether frequencies of DNA damage-associated translocations and SCEs were higher in yku70 mutants, compared to wild type. The recombination assays used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. The strains used to measure homology-directed translocations contain the his3-Δ5′ substrate on chromosome IV and the his3-Δ3′∷HOcs on chromosome II, while the strains used to measure unequal SCE contain the two his3 fragments in tandem at the trp1 locus, as previously described [36]. Upon induction of HO endonuclease, a DSB is made directly at his3-Δ3′∷HOcs. We measured rates of spontaneous translocations in both yku70 and wild type strains and found that the rate of spontaneous translocations was increased in the mutant to 6.7 × 10−8 from 2 × 10−8. We then compared the recombination frequencies in wild type and yku70 haploids and diploids after induction of HO endonuclease and after exposure to radiation and radiomimetic chemical agents.
3.1. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) generate more homology-directed translocations in haploid yku70 mutants than in wild type
To determine whether HO endonuclease-initiated DSBs stimulated more translocations in yku70 mutants, we introduced the pGHOT-GAL3 plasmid in both wild type (YB109) and yku70 haploid (YB356) strains by selecting for Trp+ transformants. We found that the percent of viable cells and pGHOT-GAL3 retention after HO endonuclease induction were threefold and approximately two-fold greater in wild type compared to yku70, indicating that HO-induced DSB at trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs conferred more lethality in the haploid yku70 mutant (Table 2). We observed a six-fold greater increase in translocation frequencies in the yku70 haploid mutant than in the wild type strain (Table 2). These results demonstrate that NHEJ is important in repairing the HO-induced DSB at trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs and that the HO endonuclease-induced DSBs can generate more homology-directed translocations in mutants defective in NHEJ.
We also determined whether HO endonuclease-initiated DSBs generate more translocations in ku70 diploid mutants. We introduced the pGHOT-GAL3 plasmid in wild type (YB110) and yku70 (YB358) diploid mutants. After HO endonuclease induction in wild type and yku70 diploids, we observed the same percent viability and translocation frequencies (Table 2). The frequencies of DSB-initiated translocations in the yku70 and wild type haploid mutants were higher than those found in the YKU70 a/α diploids, consistent with previous results [27]. These results demonstrate yKU70 does not suppress DSB-initiated translocations in diploid strains and that mating type heterozygosity likely increases frequencies of DSB-initiated translocations by repressing NHEJ.
3.2. X-ray-associated translocation frequencies are higher in haploid yku70 mutants
To determine whether radiation stimulates more translocations in yku70 compared to wild type, we exposed log phase haploid cells to 8 krad of X-rays and 13.8 and 20.7 krad of γ-rays. We observed that frequencies of X-ray-associated translocations were higher in yku70 haploid mutant, compared to wild type, while the yku70 mutant was as X-ray resistant as wild type (Fig. 2). These results are consistent with the idea that yKU70 does not contribute to X-ray resistance in strains competent at HR. We observed a five-fold to sixfold higher frequency of ionizing radiation-associated translocations in yku70 mutants compared to wild type (Fig. 2). We did not observe any difference in UV-associated recombination between wild type and yku70 (data not shown). These results indicate that X-rays stimulate more translocations in the yku70 mutants than in wild type strains.
Fig. 2.

Translocation frequencies (left) and percent survival (right) in yku70 (YB356, diagonal shading), and wild type (YB109, solid black shading) strains after exposure to X-rays (8 krad) and γ-rays (13.8 and 20.7 krad).
We then determined whether the X-ray radio-mimetic agents MMS and phleomycin and the UV-mimetic agent 4-NQO stimulate more translocations in yku70 compared to wild type (Table 3). Log phase cells were exposed to these DNA damaging agents and translocation frequencies and viability were determined. We observed no difference in viability after cells were exposed to these DNA damaging agents. We observed no difference in the frequencies of MMS-associated and 4-NQO-associated translocations in yku70 and wild type haploid strains; however, frequencies of phleomycin-associated translocations were higher in wild type than in yku70 mutants. These results demonstrate that the enhanced recombination in yku70 mutants depends on the DNA damaging agent.
Table 3.
Frequencies of translocations after exposure to MMS, 4-NQO and phleomycin in wild type and yku70 mutants
| Genotype (strain)a | Frequency of His+ recombinants × 108b |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMS (%viability) |
Phleomycin (%viability) |
4-NQO (%viability) |
|||||
| 0 ul | 10 mM (0.1%) | 0 ul | 10 μM | 0 μl | 1 μM | 10 μM | |
| YKU70 (YB109) | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 240 ± 30 (74) | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 140 ± 64 (42) | <1 | 64 ± 12 (93) | 720 ± 84 (52) |
| yku70 (YB356) | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 270 ± 12 (74) | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 41 ± 21 (60) | 7.4 ± 6 | 49 ± 18 (92) | 374 ± 84 (61) |
For complete genotype, see Table 1.
His+ recombinants/CFu; n > 3.
3.3. Electrophoretic karyotypes of DNA damage-associated His+ recombinants
We previously observed that most spontaneous His+ recombinants from wild type contain reciprocal translocations, CEN2∷IV and CEN4∷II [19]. We therefore characterized the electrophoretic karyotypes of spontaneous and X-ray-associated translocations from wild type and yku70 haploids (Fig. 3). We observed that four out of four spontaneous His+ recombinants from wild type and three out of four spontaneous His+ recombinants from yku70 haploid strains contain reciprocal translocation. After exposure to 13.8 and 20.7 krad of ionizing radiation, we characterized the electrophoretic karyotype of seven His+ recombinants from wild type and eight from the yku70 strain. All eight His+ recombinants from the yku70 strain contained reciprocal translocations. We observed that three X-ray-associated His+ recombinants from wild type contained reciprocal translocations, while one contained non-reciprocal translocations, and three others contained atypical rearrangements. This data suggest that X-ray-associated rearrangements in yku70 mutants predominately occur by homologous recombination, whereas NHEJ may participate in the formation of X-ray-associated rearrangements in wild type.
Fig. 3.

Electrophoretic karyotype of γ-ray-associated His+ recombinants generated in the haploid wild type (YB109). (A) YB109 His−parent; (B) His+ recombinants containing CEN2∷IV and other translocation; (C) His+ recombinant containing other rearrangements; (D) His+ recombinant containing reciprocal translocation; (E) YB109 His− parent. Arrows indicate the positions of chromosomes II and IV, and translocations CEN2∷IV and CEN4∷II.
3.4. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) generate more SCEs in haploid yku70 mutants than in wild type
We previously observed that expression of MATa and MATα enhances DSB-initiated SCE events [27]. These results imply that repressing NHEJ will increase homologous recombination not only in the G1 stage but also in the G2 stage of the cell cycle. We introduced pGHOT-GAL3 in wild type (YB163) and in the yku70 (YB359) mutant, and measured SCE frequencies and viability after the induction of HO endonuclease (Table 4). We did not observe any significant decrease in viability after HO endonuclease was induced (P = 0.1). However, SCE frequencies were 1.8-fold higher in yku70 mutant, compared to wild type (P < 0.05). These results indicate that yku70 mutations confer a higher frequency of DSB-initiated SCE.
Table 4.
HO endonuclease-stimulated SCE frequencies in wild type and yku70 mutants
| Genotype (strain)a | %Viability after HO inductionb | His+ recombinants/Trp+ CFU × 105: before HO inductionc, after HO inductiond | Ratioe | Trp+ CFU/total CFU (%): before HO induction, after HO induction |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haploid | ||||||
| Wild type (YB163) | 78 ± 15 | 6.5 ± 3 | 79 ± 16 | 12 | 95 ± 0.7 | 83 ± 1.4 |
| yku70 (YB359) | 67 ± 11 | 12 ± 7 | 143 ± 45 | 12 | 88 ± 5 | 91 ± 2 |
For complete genotype, see Table 1.
Trp+ CFU after HO induction/Trp+ CFU before HO induction × 100%.
His+ recombinants before HO induction/Trp+ CFU before HO induction.
His+ recombinants after HO induction/Trp+ CFU after HO induction.
His+ frequency after HO induction/His+ frequency before HO induction.
3.5. Frequencies of intrachromosomal deletions are the same in yku70 and wild type
Because DSBs at trp1∷his3-Δ5′ his3-Δ3′∷HOcs can initiate both sister chromatid recombination and SSA [37], we also measured DSB-initiated SSA in wild type (YB163) and yku70 (YB359) strains. SSA annealing generates a deletion between the two his3 fragments that results in one truncated his3 fragment (Fig. 4). Strains containing the deletion can no longer generate His+ recombinants due to SCE. We therefore measured the percentage of cells that can no longer generate His+ recombinants in wild type and in yku70 mutants. We observed that 72 ± 4% (n = 3) could generate deletions in yku70 mutants, a percentage that was similar to wild type (75% [37]). These results indicate that yku70 mutants are not defective in SSA between two closely linked repeated sequences. Since SSA is the predominant mechanism for DSB repair at trp1∷his3-Δ3′ his3-Δ5′, these results are consistent with observations that induction of HO endonuclease does not confer higher levels of lethality in yku70 mutants, compared to wild type.
Fig. 4.

SCE initiated by a HO-induced DSB can initiate SSA, SCE and NHEJ in wild type and yku70 mutants. DSB repair can occur either by SSA or unequal SCE. Symbols representing his3-Δ5′ and his3-Δ3′ are described in the legend to Fig. 1. “A” and “B” are two sister chromatids. The left panel shows repair of the HO endonuclease-generated DSB by the SSA pathway, which generates intrachromosomal deletions and a his3 fragment lacking both the 5′ and 3′ ends. Right panel of the figure shows repair of the HO endonuclease-induced DSB by homologous recombination. Unequal SCE generates HIS3 as shown at the bottom right. SCE events are measured by selecting for His+ recombinants while intrachromosomal deletions are screened, since the deletion renders cells unable to generate His+ recombinants.
4. Discussion
In budding yeast, the choice between HR and NHEJ mechanisms for DSB repair can be influenced by ploidy, phase of the cell cycle, and MAT heterozygosity. We had previously observed that MAT heterozygosity enhances radiation-associated recombination between his3 fragments on non-homologous chromosomes [17] and recombination between his3 fragments initiated by HO endonuclease-generated DSBs, regardless of the orientation or location of the fragments [27]. Here, we observed that yku70 haploid mutants, defective in NHEJ, exhibit five-fold higher frequencies of DSB-associated translocations and 1.8-fold increase in DSB-initiated SCEs; yku70 diploid mutants did not exhibit a higher frequency of DSB-initiated translocations. Compared to wild type, we observed higher frequencies of X-ray-associated translocations, but not 4-NQO-, MMS-and phleomycin-associated translocations in yku70 haploid mutants. These results support the following conclusions: First, NHEJ represses the DSB-initiation of homology-directed chromosomal rearrangements in haploid cells. Second, yku70 mutations can confer higher frequencies of DSB-initiated HR in G2 cells. Third, enhanced frequencies of DNA damage-associated translocations in yku70 mutants depend on the type of recombinogenic lesion. Our results extend previous observations that frequencies of both allelic recombination and intrachromosomal gene conversion events are enhanced in yku70 mutants [22] and indicate that yKU70 can also reduce genetic instability by decreasing frequencies of chromosomal rearrangements that result from reciprocal exchange.
Our results are consistent with ideas that expression of MATa and MATα enhances DSB-initiated recombination between his3 fragments by repressing NHEJ [14]. Frequencies of DSB-initiated translocations in the yku70 haploid were significantly higher than in either wild type or yku70 diploids, possibly because of the high level of lethality that is conferred by HO-induced DSBs in the absence of a chromosomal homolog. Compared to the MATa/MATα diploid, MATa/MATα yku70 diploid mutants did not exhibit higher levels of DSB-initiated translocations since NHEJ was already repressed. Considering that MAT heterozygosity confers higher expression of RAD51 and RAD54 [21], it is also possible that there are additional mechanisms by which MAT heterozygosity or ploidy can enhance recombination.
We speculate that there are two reasons why yku70 mutants exhibited higher frequencies of DSB-initiated SCE and translocations but not higher frequencies of DSB-initiated intrachromatid deletions that likely occur by SSA. First, SSA is highly efficient in repairing DSBs, while frequencies of DSB-initiated unequal SCE and translocations are three magnitudes lower than DSB-initiated SSA. Thus, an increase in recombination frequencies in yku70 mutants may be easier to detect when recombination frequencies in wild type are low. Second, the genetic requirements for SSA, translocations, and SCE are different [37]. Cervelli and Galli [23] have suggested that Ku70 and Ku80 may recruit recombination proteins required for both spontaneous and DSB-initiated SSA; such proteins may not be required for SCE and translocations.
Our studies indicate that NHEJ is the major pathway for the repair of the HO-induced DSB at trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs in the haploid strains containing GAL1∷his3-Δ5′. We previously observed that HO endonuclease-induced DSBs at trp1∷his3-Δ3′∷HOcs initiate recombination with GAL1∷his3-Δ5′ at low frequencies, and the majority of cells that contain the HO-induced DSB are inviable [27]. Here we observed a three-fold higher level of lethality after HO induction in yku70 haploid mutants. Clikeman et al. [22] observed lower DSB-induced lethality in yku70 mutants when HR was initiated between homologs, suggesting that higher levels of HR decrease the lethality of DSBs in yku70 mutants. We suggest that one reason why we did not observe lower DSB-induced lethality in ku70 haploid mutant is that the recombination frequency between his3 fragments is low, thus rendering it more difficult for the relative increase in recombination to affect viability. Nonetheless, we observed a five-fold increase infrequencies of DSB-initiated translocations in yku70, compared to wild type, indicating that the DSBs generated in yku70 are more recombinogenic than in wild type. We speculate that DSB-initiation of HR could result from the greater availability of single-stranded DNA in yku70 mutants for binding of recombination proteins, as suggested by Frank-Vaillant and Marcand [38].
The modest increase in DSB-initiated SCE events in yku70 mutants is consistent with other studies that NHEJ participates in DSB repair in both S phase and G2 phases of the yeast cell cycle. For example, yng2 mutations, which confer MMS sensitivity and deficiency in the S phase DNA damage response [39], are synthetically lethal with yku70 mutations. In addition, NHEJ precedes HR repair of HO-induced DSBs when DSBs are made in either G1 or G2, although resection of the DSB proceeds faster in S phase [38]. Thus, results obtained in S. cerevisiae are consistent with those obtained in mammalian cell culture that have suggested that both HR and NHEJ participate in DSB repair in G2 [8,9]. Our results, however, are the first to indicate that DSBs are more efficient initiators of SCE when NHEJ is deficient.
We observed that DNA damage-associated translocations were enhanced in yku70 mutants after exposure to X-rays but not after exposure to 4-NQO, phleomycin and MMS. We do not know the exact difference between the types of DNA damage to indicate why one DNA damaging agent should stimulate more translocations in yku70 mutants than another. We suggest that the differences between the various DNA damaging agents may depend on how DSBs are generated by these DNA damaging agents and whether they can be repaired by NHEJ. For example, HO endonuclease-induced DSBs can be repaired by NHEJ when made at sites other than the MAT locus [22,36], and we suggest that a subset of X-ray-induced DSBs can also be repaired by NHEJ, since X-ray resistance is lower in yku70 rad52 double mutants, compared to rad52 mutants [7]. However, DSBs may not be repaired by NHEJ if the DSB is formed by replication fork collapse in which only end of a DSB is present [8]. Since both MMS, 4-NQO and phleomycin trigger S phase checkpoints, we speculate that one reason that MMS and phleomycin do not stimulate more translocations in yku70 mutants is that DSBs induced by these agents may initiate recombination after replication fork collapse [40].
In summary, we observed that yku70 null mutation confers higher levels of DSB-initiated recombination events between repeats on non-homologous chromosomes and between sister chromatid, and that a subset of DNA damaging agents can stimulate more recombination in yku70 mutants, compared to wild type. Thus, yku70 mutations could potentially stimulate other reciprocal exchange events initiated between repeated sequences in yeast. It would thus be interesting to determine whether mutations in the mammalian orthologues of yKU70 and yKU80 could also increase radiation-associated HR events that generate chromosomal rearrangements.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by CA70105 from the National Cancer Institute. We thank Gilbert Chu and Sarah Chang for the plasmids to disrupt yku70. We thank Chris Pettys for his technical assistance in pulse field gel electrophoresis and Cinzia Cera for carefully reading this manuscript.
References
- [1].Stracker TH, Theunissen JW, Morales M, Petrini JH, The Mre11 complex and the metabolism of chromosome breaks: the importance of communicating and holding things together, DNA Repair 3 (2004) 845–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Bressan DA, Baxter BK, Petrini JH, The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mol. Cell. Biol 19 (1999) 7681–7687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Krogh BO, Symington LS, Recombination proteins in yeast, Annu. Rev. Genet 38 (2004) 233–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Dudasova Z, Dudas A, Chovanec M, Non-homologous end-joining factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEMS Microbiol. Rev 28 (2004) 581–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Jackson SP, Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks, Carcinogenesis 23 (2002) 687–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Jeggo PA, DNA breakage and repair, Adv. Genet 38 (1998) 185–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Siede W, Friedl AA, Dianova I, Eckardt-Schupp F, Friedberg EC, The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku autoantigen homologue affects radiosensitivity only in the absence of homologous recombination, Genetics 142 (1996) 91–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Pierce AJ, Hu P, Han M, Ellis N, Jasin M, Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells, Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 3237–3242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Rothkamm K, Kruger I, Thompson LH, Lobrich M, Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle, Mol. Cell. Biol 23 (2003) 5706–5715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Allen C, Kurimasa A, Brenneman MA, Chen DJ, Nickoloff JA, DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 99 (2002) 3758–3763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Luo CM, Tang W, Mekeel KL, DeFrank JS, Anne PR, Powell SN, High frequency and error-prone DNA recombination in ataxia telangiectasia cell lines, J. Biol. Chem 271 (1996) 4497–4503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Mekeel KL, Tang W, Kachnic LA, Luo CM, DeFrank JS, Powell SN, Inactivation of p53 results in high rates of homologous recombination, Oncogene 14 (1997) 1847–1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Astrom SU, Okamura SM, Rine J, Yeast cell-type regulation of DNA repair, Nature 397 (1999) 310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Lee SE, Paques F, Sylvan J, Haber JE, Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths, Curr. Biol 9 (1999) 767–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kegel A, Sjostrand JO, Astrom SU, Nej1p, a cell type-specific regulator of nonhomologous end joining in yeast, Curr. Biol 11 (2001) 1611–1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Valencia M, Bentele M, Vaze MB, Herrmann G, Kraus E, Lee SE, Schar P, Haber JE, NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nature 414 (2001) 666–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Fasullo M, Dave P, Mating type regulates the radiation-associated stimulation of reciprocal translocation events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mol. Gen. Genet 243 (1994) 63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Heude M, Fabre F, a/Alpha-control of DNA repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: genetic and physiological aspects, Genetics 133 (1993) 489–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Fasullo MF, Davis RW, Recombinational substrates designed to study recombination between unique and repetitive sequences in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 84 (1987) 6215–6219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH, Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genetics 132 (1992) 387–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Basile G, Aker M, Mortimer RK, Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional regulation of the yeast recombinational repair gene RAD51, Mol. Cell. Biol 12 (1992) 3235–3246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Clikeman JA, Khalsa GJ, Barton SL, Nickoloff JA, Homologous recombinational repair of double-strand breaks in yeast is enhanced by MAT heterozygosity through yKU-dependent and -independent mechanisms, Genetics 157 (2001) 579–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Cervelli T, Galli A, Effects of HDF1 (Ku70) and HDF2 (Ku80) on spontaneous and DNA damage-induced intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mol. Gen. Genet 264 (2000) 56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Ivanov EL, Sugawara N, Fishman-Lobell J, Haber JE, Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genetics 142 (1996) 693–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Lee SE, Moor JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE, Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage, Cell 94 (1998) 399–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Galgoczy DJ, Toczyski DP, Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast, Mol. Cell. Biol 21 (2001) 1710–1718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Fasullo M, Bennett T, Dave P, Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MATa and MATα enhances the HO endonuclease-stimulation of chromosomal rearrangements directed by his3 recombinational substrates, Mutat. Res 433 (1999) 33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T, Methods in Yeast Genetics. A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- [29].Cheng S, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Rothstein RJ, One-step gene disruption in yeast, Methods Enzymol. 101 (1983) 202–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].DeMase D, Zeng L, Cera C, Fasullo M, The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PDS1 and RAD9 checkpoint genes control different DNA double-strand break repair pathways, DNA Repair (Amst.) 4 (2005) 59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Lea DE, Coulson CA, The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations, J. Genet 49 (1949) 264–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Esposito MS, Maleas DT, Bjornstad KA, Bruschi CV, Simultaneous detection of changes in chromosome number, gene conversion and intergenic recombination during mitosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Curr. Genet 6 (1982) 5–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Zar JH, Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- [35].Fasullo M, P. Dave R Rothstein, DNA-damaging agents stimulate the formation of directed reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mutat. Res 314 (1994) 121–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Fasullo M, Bennett T, AhChing P, Koudelik J, The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations, Mol. Cell. Biol 18 (1998) 1190–2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Dong Z, Fasullo M, Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes, Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003) 2576–2585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Frank-Vaillant M, Marcand S, Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination, Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 1189–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Choy JS, Kron SJ, NuA4 subunit Yng2 function in intra-S-phase DNA damage response, Mol. Cell. Biol 22 (2002) 8215–8225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Galli A, Schiestl RH, Cell division transforms mutagenic lesions into deletion-recombinagenic lesions in yeast cells, Mutat. Res 429 (1999) 13–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
