Abstract
Four spirochetes (F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ) were isolated from environmental sources: F1T and B21 from soils of an urban slum community in Salvador (Brazil), YaleT from river water in New Haven, Connecticut (USA) and AMB6-RJ from a pond in a horse farm in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). Isolates were helix-shaped, aerobic, highly motile and non-virulent in a hamster model of infection. Draft genomes of the strains were obtained and analysed to determine the relatedness to other species of the genus Leptospira . The analysis of 498 core genes showed that strains F1T/B21 and YaleT/AMB6-RJ formed two distinct phylogenetic clades within the ‘Pathogens’ group (group I). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) values of strains F1T/B21 and YaleT/AMB6-RJ to other previously described Leptospira species were below <84 % and <82 %, respectively, which confirmed that these isolates should be classified as representatives of two novel species. Therefore, we propose Leptospira yasudae sp. nov. and Leptospira stimsonii sp. nov. as new species in the genus Leptospira . The type strains are F1T (=ATCC-TSD-163=KIT0259=CLEP00287) and YaleT (=ATCC-TDS-162=KIT0258=CLEP00288), respectively.
Keywords: Leptospira, leptospirosis, pathogenic, whole-genome sequencing, soil, water
Leptospirosis is a globally distributed zoonotic disease that has its highest burden among vulnerable populations in both rural and urban slum environments in tropical developing countries [1, 2]. Leptospirosis is caused by spirochetes belonging to the genus Leptospira . This genus is divided into three distinct phylogenetic groups [3, 4]: group I or ‘Pathogens’ that contain virulent strains able to cause severe disease in humans and animals; group II or ‘Intermediates’ with species that can cause disease in certain circumstances; and group III or ‘Saprophytes’ which are free-living environmental micro-organisms not known to cause disease.
Recent studies by Thibeaux et al. have reported the isolation of 12 novel Leptospira species in soils from New Caledonia (French Polynesia) [5, 6]. Currently, the genus Leptospira comprises 35 different species: 13 belonging to group I ‘Pathogens’ (Leptospira adleri, Leptospira alexanderi , Leptospira alstonii, Leptospira barantonii, Leptospira borgpetersenii , Leptospira ellisii, Leptospira interrogans , Leptospira kirschneri, Leptospira kmetyi , Leptospira mayottensis , Leptospira noguchii , Leptospira santarosai and Leptospira weilii ), 11 to group II ‘Intermediate’ (Leptospira broomii, Leptospira fainei, Leptospira haakeii, Leptospira hartskeerlii, Leptospira inadai, Leptospira licerasiae, Leptospira perolatii, Leptospira neocaledonica, Leptospira saintgironsiae, Leptospira venezuelensis and Leptospira wolffii ), and 11 to group III ‘Saprophytes’ (Leptospira biflexa, Leptospira brenneri, Leptospira harrisiae, Leptospira idonii, Leptospira levettii, Leptospira macculloughii, Leptospira meyeri, Leptospira terpstrae , Leptospira vanthielii , Leptospira wolbachii and Leptospira yanagawae ). A recent study identified 30 new species from environmental sources in France, Algeria, Japan, Malaysia, Mayotte and New Caledonia, including pathogenic species similar to the isolates described here, revealing a massive diversity within genus Leptospira [7]. Here, we report the description of two novel pathogenic species of the genus Leptospira by using phenotypic characterization and whole-genome sequencing.
We isolated four leptospira-like strains in different sampling campaigns performed in Brazil and the USA. Strains F1T and B21 were obtained from soil samples collected in the community of Pau da Lima, an urban slum community located in the city of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. This community has high leptospirosis infection rates (37.8 per 1000 individuals per year) [8, 9] and pathogenic Leptospira species have been detected in its surface waters and soils [10, 11]. Briefly, during March 2013 and October 2015, 100 g samples of subsurface soil were collected in sterile containers from various sites at the bottom of one of the valleys that form this community. One millilitre of sterile double-distilled water was added to 1 g soil subsamples, vortexed for 1 min and the supernatant (~0.8 ml) added to 1 ml of 2×concentrated Ellinghausen–McCullough–Johnson–Harris (emjh) medium supplemented with 0.2 ml of 10×concentrated staff (sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, amphotericin B, fosfomycin and 5-fluorouracil) antibiotic cocktail [12]. Strain YaleT was isolated from the Mills River in New Haven, Connecticut, USA. A 1 L sample of freshwater was collected in February 2016, filtered through 0.22 µm SteriCup filter (Millipore) and 1 ml subsamples inoculated in EMJH tubes. Finally, strain AMB6-RJ was isolated from a pond located in a horse farm in Iguaba, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A sample of 10 ml was collected and 100 µl was inoculated in emjh mediu medium with an staff cocktail. After inoculation into EMJH medium, all samples were incubated at 30 °C and checked weekly by dark-field microscopy. When cultures were positive, samples were diluted and plated onto emjh plates (agar 1 % w/v) and incubated at 30 °C until subsurface colonies appeared (10–15 days). Single colonies were selected, transferred to fresh emjh liquid medium and incubated at 30 °C for further testing.
The isolated strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ showed a similar morphology and motility to other members of the genus Leptospira under dark-field microscopy (Fig. 1). Cells of strain F1T/B21 were helix-shaped, 14.2±2.5 µm long, ~0.2 µm in diameter and had a wavelength of ~0.6 µm. Cells of strain YaleT/AMB6-RJ were 17.5±2.7 µm long, ~0.2 µm in diameter and had a wavelength of ~0.6 µm. Phenotypic characterization of strains F1T and B21 was performed by assessing their growth in emjh medium at varying temperatures (13 and 37 °C, and at 30 °C in the presence of 8-azaguanine) [13]. Strain F1T/B21 grew in emjh at 13 and 37 °C, and showed a slight growth at 30 °C with the presence of 8-azaguanine. Strains YaleT/AMB6-RJ grew in emjh at 13 °C and at 30 °C with the presence of 8-azaguanine. Strain AMB6-RJ, but not YaleT, grew in emjh at 37 °C.
Fig. 1.
Dark-field photomicrographs of representative cells of strains F1T (a) and YaleT (b) showing a typical leptospiral morphology. Bars, 2 µm.
The whole-genome sequences of strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ were obtained at the Yale Centre for Genomic Analysis. Genomic DNA was prepared by centrifugation of 10 ml exponential-phase cultures and extraction with the Quick-DNA Universal Kit (Zymo). Libraries were reconstructed with the KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (Kapa Biosystems) and sequenced with a HighSeq 4000 Illumina platform (pair-end reads of 150 bp). Reads were pre-processed using BayesHamer [14] and de novo assembled with SPAdes 3.10.0 [15]. The quality of the final assemblies was analysed with quast [16] and then annotated with the rast tool kit (RASTtk) [17] in patric [18] (Table 1). Sequencing data generated in this work was deposited at GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ under the accession numbers QHCU00000000, QHCR00000000, QHCT00000000 and QHCS00000000 for strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ, respectively.
Table 1. Genomic statistics of the isolated Leptospira strains.
| Strain | GenBank accession | Size (Mbp) | G+C content (mol%) | No. of contigs | Average coverage (×) | Contig N50 | No. of genes |
No. of
proteins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leptospira stimsonii YaleT | QHCT00000000 | 4.837 | 42.60 | 46 | 396 | 589 757 | 4815 | 4682 |
| Leptospira stimsonii AMB6-RJ | QHCS00000000 | 4.745 | 42.60 | 23 | 161 | 1 099 403 | 4747 | 4599 |
| Leptospira yasudae F1T | QHCU00000000 | 4.445 | 45.50 | 25 | 190 | 623 593 | 4286 | 4162 |
| Leptospira yasudae B21 | QHCR00000000 | 4.458 | 45.50 | 28 | 345 | 472 231 | 4263 | 4127 |
The full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ and those of other Leptospira species were extracted from the genomes using Barrnap [19] in galaxy [20]. Sequences were aligned with muscle [21] and a maximum-likelihood tree reconstructed with PhyML 3.0 [22] using the GTR substitution model and 1000 bootstrap replicates with Leptonema illini DSM 21528 as the outgroup. The 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree showed that strains F1T and B21, and YaleT and AMB6-RJ formed two well-supported clusters within the ‘Pathogens’ species (Fig. 2). The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strains F1T and B21 was 100 % and their closest species was L. ellisii (99.8 %). Strains YaleT and AMB6-RJ also showed 100 % similarity between their 16S rRNA sequences and to Leptospira alstonii GWTS#1.
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree built with 16S rRNA gene full-length sequences using the maximum-likelihood method. Values at the nodes denote bootstrap support higher than 70 % based on 1000 resampling events. The bar indicates the proportion of nucleotide substitutions. Leptonema illini 3055T was used as the outgroup.
Due to the low variability of the 16S rRNA gene in the genus Leptospira [23, 24], we screened the genomes of strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ, and all of available genomes of described Leptospira s pecies and retrieved a set of highly conserved genes using Roary [25]. A total of 498 single copy genes were identified as the core genome, defined as those genes present in >95 % of the species with an identity higher than 55 %. The sequences were concatenated, aligned using mafft [26] (total alignment length was 505 301 bp) and phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using RAxML [27] with the GTR substitution model and 100 bootstrap replicates. The phylogeny showed that strains F1T and B21, and YaleT and AMB6-RJ formed two separate groups within the ‘Pathogens’ clade clearly distinct from the other species of the genus (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Core gene phylogeny. The tree was built with a concatenated alignment of 498 single copy genes present in all the analysed genomes, using RAxML with GTR substitution model. Nodes with a black circle denote 100 % bootstrap support based on 100 resampling events.
To conclusively determine if strains F1T/B21 and YaleT/AMB6-RJ constituted novel Leptospira species, we calculated their genomic relatedness to other Leptospira genomes using the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value [28] with JspeciesWS [29]. The ANI value between strains F1T and B21 was 98.72 %. In contrast, the ANI values between these strains and their closest related species, L. kmetyi , was below <82 %. Similarly, strains YaleT and AMB6-RJ had an ANI value of 95.18 %, with their closest relative, L. alstonii GWTS#1 below 85 %. In both cases, the ANI values of the closest species fell clearly below the 94–95 % threshold recommended for species delineation [30] (Tables 2 and S1, available in the online version of this article), confirming that those strains represented two novel Leptospira species.
Table 2. ANI values obtained by pairwise comparison of the genomes of strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ and all the described pathogenic Leptospira species (group I) using blast+ in JspeciesWS.
| Strain | Leptospira yasudae F1T | Leptospira yasudae B21 | Leptospira stimsonii YaleT | Leptospira stimsonii AMB6-RJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leptospira yasudae F1T | 100 | – | – | – |
| Leptospira yasudae B21 | 98.7 | 100 | – | – |
| Leptospira stimsonii YaleT | 77.6 | 77.5 | 100 | – |
| Leptospira stimsonii AMB6-RJ | 77.5 | 77.5 | 95.2 | 100 |
| Leptospira alexanderi L60T | 79.2 | 79.2 | 77.0 | 76.7 |
| Leptospira adleri FH2-B-D1T | 77.9 | 78.0 | 83.9 | 83.9 |
| Leptospira alstonii 80-412T | 80.6 | 80.5 | 77.8 | 77.6 |
| Leptospira alstonii GWTS#1 | 77.9 | 77.8 | 84.7 | 84.2 |
| Leptospira barantonii FH4-C-A1T | 81.5 | 81.4 | 77.7 | 77.7 |
| Leptospira borgpetersenii 56 604 | 79.2 | 79.2 | 76.9 | 76.7 |
| Leptospira ellisii ATI7-C-A5T | 76.9 | 76.9 | 75.4 | 75.4 |
| Leptospira interrogans L1-130 | 77.2 | 77.2 | 75.9 | 76.0 |
| Leptospira kirschneri 3522T | 77.8 | 77.7 | 76.2 | 76.3 |
| Leptospira kmetyi Bejo-Iso9T | 81.9 | 81.8 | 77.9 | 77.8 |
| Leptospira mayottensis 200901116T | 79.1 | 79.0 | 76.7 | 76.5 |
| Leptospira noguchii CZ214T | 77.3 | 77.3 | 76.0 | 76.0 |
| Leptospira santarosai 1342 KT | 79.5 | 79.4 | 77.0 | 77.1 |
| Leptospira weilii LT2116 | 79.6 | 79.6 | 77.2 | 77.0 |
Because of the phylogenetic location of these novel species within the ‘Pathogens’ group, we screened the genomes for previously characterized virulence-associated genes in L. interrogans Fiocruz L1-130 [3] using blast +blastp [31] implemented in galaxy [32]. Strains F1T/B21 and YaleT/AMB6-RJ shared high homologies with lipl32/LIC11352 (94.1 and 93.4 %, respectively) and catalase katE/LIC12032 (86.9 and 86.3 %, respectively). We also found homologs to Leptospira virulence regulator genes lvrA/LIC11709 (74.2 % for F1T/B21 and 62.3 % for YaleT/AMB6-RJ) and lvrB/LIC11708 (84.3 and 74.3 %) which are only found in the pathogenic group [33].
To evaluate the pathogenicity of strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ, we intraperitoneally infected groups of four 3 week old male Golden Syrian hamsters with 108 leptospires of each strain. As a control, infections were performed similarly using L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni strain L1-130 [34, 35]. Hamsters were monitored daily up to 21 days post-challenge for clinical signs of disease. Surviving animals at the end of the experiment or moribund animals presenting with difficulty moving, breathing or signs of bleeding or seizure were immediately sacrificed by inhalation of CO2. Kidneys were aseptically removed at day 21, and DNA was extracted [36] and analysed by qPCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene [37]. Hamster protocols were approved by the Yale Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (protocol #2017–11424). In contrast with hamsters infected with L. interrogans L1-130, euthanized after 4–5 days post-infection due to evident signs of disease, hamsters infected with strains F1T, B21, YaleT and AMB6-RJ showed no signs of acute disease and no DNA was detected in the kidneys 21 days post-challenge, indicating the lack of virulence in a hamster model of infection. Similar results were recently reported by Thibeaux et al. for three novel pathogenic species isolated from soil (L. barantonii, L. adleri and L. ellisii) [5]. These species are phylogenetically close to the two novel species described here (Fig. 3) and belong to the proposed ‘low-virulence pathogens’ group [5]. Further studies should be performed to identify other potential animal reservoirs and characterize the role that these species may play in animal and human leptospirosis.
In conclusion, the results of the phenotypic, genotypic and genomic analyses strongly support the hypothesis that strains F1T/B21 and YaleT/AMB6-RJ represent two novel species in the ‘Pathogens’ group of the genus Leptospira , for which the names Leptospira yasudae (F1T and B21) and Leptospira stimsonii (YaleT and AMB6-RJ) are proposed.
Description of Leptospira yasudae sp. nov.
Leptospira yasudae (ya.su′dae N.L. gen masc. n. yasudae, of Yasuda, named after Dr. Paulo H. Yasuda, a Brazilian microbiologist who made important contributions to the taxonomy of the genus Leptospira ).
Cells are 14.2±2.5 µm long, ~0.2 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.6 µm under dark-field microscopy. Cells are aerobic, highly motile and grow well in emjh medium at 13, 30 and 37 °C, but only slightly in emjh supplemented with 8-azaguanine. This strain could not induce acute disease or chronic carriage in a hamster model of infection. The type strain, F1T (=ATCC-TSD-163=KIT0259=CLEP00287), was isolated from topsoil sampled at the urban slum community of Pau da Lima in the city of Salvador (Brazil) in 2015. The G+C content of the genomic DNA of the type strain is 45.50 mol%.
Description of Leptospira stimsonii sp. nov.
Leptospira stimsonii (stim.so′ni.i. N.L. gen masc. n. stimsonii, of Stimson, named after Dr. A. M. Stimson, an American physician who in 1907 observed Leptospira interrogans for the first time in kidney tissue slices of a leptospirosis victim diagnosed as having died of yellow fever).
Cells are 17.5±2.7 µm long and ~0.2 µm in diameter, with a wavelength of ~0.6 µm under dark-field microscopy. Cells are aerobic, highly motile and grow well in emjh medium at 13, 30 and 30 °C with 8-azaguanine. This strain could not induce acute disease or chronic carriage in a hamster model of infection. The type strain, YaleT (=ATCC-TDS-162=KIT0258=CLEP00288), was isolated from the Mills River in New Haven, Connecticut, USA, in 2016. The G+C content of the genomic DNA of the type strain is 42.60 mol%.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health research grants R01 AI052473, U01 AI088752, R25 TW009338, R01 TW009504 and R01 AI121207.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the joint collaborative effort of the resident associations, community leaders and residents, which constitute the Urban Health Council of Pau da Lima as well as the members of the Leptospirosis Group from Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Salvador, Brazil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
Animal experiments were revised and approved by the Yale Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (protocol #2017–11424).
Footnotes
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains F1T and YaleT are MK070913 and MK070914 respectively, and the genome sequence accession numbers are QHCU00000000 and QHCT00000000, respectively.
Abbreviations: ANI, averagenucleotide identity; EMJH, Ellinghausen–McCullough–Johnson–Harris; STAFF, sulfamethoxazole,trimethoprim, amphotericin B, fosfomycin and 5-fluorouracil.
References
- 1.Costa F, Hagan JE, Calcagno J, Kane M, Torgerson P, et al. Global morbidity and mortality of leptospirosis: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torgerson PR, Hagan JE, Costa F, Calcagno J, Kane M, et al. Global burden of leptospirosis: estimated in terms of disability adjusted life years. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Picardeau M. Virulence of the zoonotic agent of leptospirosis: still terra incognita? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:297–307. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ko AI, Goarant C, Picardeau M. Leptospira: the dawn of the molecular genetics era for an emerging zoonotic pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:736–747. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thibeaux R, Iraola G, Ferrés I, Bierque E, Girault D, et al. Deciphering the unexplored Leptospira diversity from soils uncovers genomic evolution to virulence. Microb Genom. 2018;4 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thibeaux R, Girault D, Bierque E, Soupé-Gilbert ME, Rettinger A, et al. Biodiversity of environmental Leptospira: improving identification and revisiting the diagnosis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:816. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vincent AT, Schiettekatte O, Goarant C, Neela VK, Bernet E, et al. Revisiting the taxonomy and evolution of pathogenicity of the genus Leptospira through the prism of genomics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hagan JE, Moraga P, Costa F, Capian N, Ribeiro GS, et al. Spatiotemporal determinants of urban leptospirosis transmission: four-year prospective cohort study of slum residents in Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Felzemburgh RD, Ribeiro GS, Costa F, Reis RB, Hagan JE, et al. Prospective study of leptospirosis transmission in an urban slum community: role of poor environment in repeated exposures to the Leptospira agent. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schneider AG, Casanovas-Massana A, Hacker KP, Wunder EA, Begon M, et al. Quantification of pathogenic Leptospira in the soils of a Brazilian urban slum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Casanovas-Massana A, Costa F, Riediger IN, Cunha M, de Oliveira D, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of pathogenic Leptospira in surface waters from the urban slum environment. Water Res. 2018;130:176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chakraborty A, Miyahara S, Villanueva SY, Saito M, Gloriani NG, et al. A novel combination of selective agents for isolation of Leptospira species. Microbiol Immunol. 2011;55:494–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2011.00347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Johnson RC, Rogers P. Differentiation of pathogenic and saprophytic leptospires with 8-azaguanine. J Bacteriol. 1964;88:1618–1623. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.6.1618-1623.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nikolenko SI, Korobeynikov AI, Alekseyev MA. BayesHammer: Bayesian clustering for error correction in single-cell sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S1-S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seemann T. barrnap 0.7 : rapid ribosomal RNA prediction. 2013. https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap
- 20.Afgan E, Baker D, van den Beek M, Blankenberg D, Bouvier D, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W3–W10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morey RE, Galloway RL, Bragg SL, Steigerwalt AG, Mayer LW, et al. Species-specific identification of Leptospiraceae by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3510–3516. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00670-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bourhy P, Collet L, Brisse S, Picardeau M. Leptospira mayottensis sp. nov., a pathogenic species of the genus Leptospira isolated from humans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:4061–4067. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.066597-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2567–2572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cock PJ, Chilton JM, Grüning B, Johnson JE, Soranzo N. NCBI BLAST+ integrated into Galaxy. Gigascience. 2015;4:39. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0080-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Adhikarla H, Wunder EA, Mechaly AE, Mehta S, Wang Z, et al. Lvr, a signaling system that controls global gene regulation and virulence in pathogenic Leptospira . Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:45. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ko AI, Reis MG, Dourado CM, Johnson WD Jr, Riley LW, et al. Urban epidemic of severe leptospirosis in Brazil. Lancet. 1999;354:820–825. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)80012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nascimento AL, Ko AI, Martins EA, Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Ho PL, et al. Comparative genomics of two Leptospira interrogans serovars reveals novel insights into physiology and pathogenesis. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:2164–2172. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.7.2164-2172.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wunder EA, Figueira CP, Santos GR, Lourdault K, Matthias MA, et al. Real-time PCR reveals rapid dissemination of Leptospira interrogans after intraperitoneal and conjunctival inoculation of hamsters. Infect Immun. 2016;84:2105–2115. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00094-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smythe LD, Smith IL, Smith GA, Dohnt MF, Symonds ML, et al. A quantitative PCR (TaqMan) assay for pathogenic Leptospira spp. BMC Infect Dis. 2002;2:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-2-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



