Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 May 19;18(5):e0285926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285926

HIV infection and cardiovascular disease have both shared and distinct monocyte gene expression features: Women’s Interagency HIV study

Juan Lin 1, Erik Ehinger 2, David B Hanna 1, Qibin Qi 1, Tao Wang 1, Yanal Ghosheh 2, Karin Mueller 3, Kathryn Anastos 1,4, Jason M Lazar 5, Wendy J Mack 6, Phyllis C Tien 7, Joan W Berman 8, Mardge H Cohen 9, Igho Ofotokun 10, Stephen Gange 11, Chenglong Liu 12, Sonya L Heath 13, Russell P Tracy 14, Howard N Hodis 15, Alan L Landay 16, Klaus Ley 2,17,#, Robert C Kaplan 1,18,*,#
Editor: Andreas Zirlik19
PMCID: PMC10198505  PMID: 37205656

Abstract

Persistent inflammation contributes to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) as an HIV-associated comorbidity. Innate immune cells such as monocytes are major drivers of inflammation in men and women with HIV. The study objectives are to examine the contribution of circulating non-classical monocytes (NCM, CD14dimCD16+) and intermediate monocytes (IM, CD14+CD16+) to the host response to long-term HIV infection and HIV-associated CVD. Women with and without chronic HIV infection (H) were studied. Subclinical CVD (C) was detected as plaques imaged by B-mode carotid artery ultrasound. The study included H-C-, H+C-, H-C+, and H+C+ participants (23 of each, matched on race/ethnicity, age and smoking status), selected from among enrollees in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study. We assessed transcriptomic features associated with HIV or CVD alone or comorbid HIV/CVD comparing to healthy (H-C-) participants in IM and NCM isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. IM gene expression was little affected by HIV alone or CVD alone. In IM, coexisting HIV and CVD produced a measurable gene transcription signature, which was abolished by lipid-lowering treatment. In NCM, versus non-HIV controls, women with HIV had altered gene expression, irrespective of whether or not they had comorbid CVD. The largest set of differentially expressed genes was found in NCM among women with both HIV and CVD. Genes upregulated in association with HIV included several potential targets of drug therapies, including LAG3 (CD223). In conclusion, circulating monocytes from patients with well controlled HIV infection demonstrate an extensive gene expression signature which may be consistent with the ability of these cells to serve as potential viral reservoirs. Gene transcriptional changes in HIV patients were further magnified in the presence of subclinical CVD.

Introduction

In people living with HIV, chronic inflammation and immune activation contribute to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1], which by 2030 may affect three-quarters of this patient population [2]. Circulating blood biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation such as C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL)-6, CD14 and D-dimer correlate with atherosclerotic risk [37]. However, despite having reproducible associations with disease, these protein biomarkers are blunt instruments to understand the mechanisms and conditions by which HIV gives rise to CVD. Circulating factors, which can be produced by multiple tissues, do not provide cell type-specific information and their blood concentrations can vary depending upon the overall health of the liver, kidney, and other metabolic organs. Thus, the relationship of blood biomarkers with CVD can be confounded by factors that determine protein production, consumption and clearance. An alternative, accessible way to assess risk and mechanisms of disease is transcriptomic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The circulating monocyte might be an especially informative sentinel PBMC. In addition to being central to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, monocytes are activated as part of the HIV-related systemic inflammatory response and may serve as an HIV reservoir in treated infection [8].

Previously, we used RNA sequencing to study gene expression in circulating classical monocytes (CM) among persons with chronic HIV infection and/or atherosclerotic CVD [9]. In CM, defined as CD14+CD16- cells, both of these disease conditions were associated with a transcription signature of ~200 genes, versus matched disease-free controls. Approximately 20% of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were shared between HIV infection and CVD, including suppression of anti-inflammatory PPAR, RXR and LXR gene pathways and upregulated expression of IL-23, IL-6, IL-1α and tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 (TFPI-2). We also identified a beneficial effect of statin-based lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) on CM, such that use of LLT was associated with activated PPAR and LXR, along with suppression of genes related to the inflammatory cytokine cascade (IL6, TREM1, TNF, IL1a, IL1b, IFNg) and M1-associated transcription factors (RELA, HMGB1, FNKB1).

We applied the same experimental approach to the other two major subsets of monocytes, in order to characterize altered gene expression in the context of HIV infection, CVD and LLT use. Non-classical monocytes (NCM, CD14dimCD16+) are motile cells that patrol the endothelium and extravasate in response to damage [10]. We previously showed that in women with HIV, but not in comparably studied women without HIV infection, CVD was associated with lower cell surface expression of CXCR4 on NCM [11]. Intermediate monocytes (IM, CD14+CD16+) are specialized in antigen presentation [12] but do not have a well-defined function in HIV infection. Greater abundance of IM has been associated with CVD [13, 14]. While prior work has described transcriptomic features of circulating monocytes in HIV-1 infection [15] or CVD [16], the HIV- and CVD-associated gene expression profiles of NCM and IM have not been well described in joint fashion.

Materials and methods

Source population and participants’ selection

The Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) is a prospective multicenter cohort study of women with or at risk for HIV infection, which was initiated in 1994 and features semiannual core study visits [17]. An unselected sample of enrollees underwent high-resolution B-mode carotid artery ultrasound to image six locations in the right carotid artery [18]. Standardized procedures were used to image the near and far walls of the common carotid artery, carotid artery bifurcation, and internal carotid artery. All participants provided informed written consent and Institutional Review Board approval was obtained by each participating institution, with the study being compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki principles.

To study the independent and joint associations of HIV infection and CVD with gene expression of IM and NCM, comparisons across frequency-matched groups were performed. Using information from multiple data collection episodes (S1 Fig), participants were selected as four groups based on HIV serostatus and subclinical CVD status. CVD was defined as the presence of carotid artery plaque evidenced by an area with localized IMT >1.5 mm in at least one of the six imaged artery locations. The groups included those with comorbid HIV and CVD (H+C+), those with HIV alone (H+C-), those with CVD alone (H-C+), and those with neither HIV nor CVD (H-C-). Women who used LLT (in almost all instances, including a statin) were excluded from the C- groups. We created 23 quartets, each containing one participant from each of the four HIV/CVD groups. Within each quartet, participants were matched as closely as possible by race/ethnicity, age (within 5 years), smoking history, and calendar date (within 1 year). A total of 92 participants were selected from among 1,865 participants of the WIHS who had vascular imaging data. After exclusion of women with insufficient or low-quality RNA or inadequate availability of sample, there remained 87 in our IM study (22 H+C+, 22 H+C-, 20 H-C+, and 23 H-C-) and 88 in our NCM study (22 H+C+, 22 H+C-, 21 H-C+, and 23 H-C-).

PBMC thawing and monocyte isolation

At each WIHS visit, PBMCs were isolated from venous blood by standardized methods, frozen, and stored in liquid nitrogen in a specimen repository. Cryopreserved PBMCs stored in liquid nitrogen were warmed in 37°C water bath, then removed and immediately diluted with 1 mL of warm cRPMI and transferred and diluted again in an additional 8mL of warm cRPMI. Samples were then washed with PBS and stained with viability reagent (Ghost DyeTM Red 710, Tonbo Bioscience) according to manufacturer’s recommendation. Samples were stained with antibody cocktail containing CD14 (M5E2, Biolegend), CD16 (3G8, Biolegend), and dump channel: CD3 (OKT3, Tonbo Bioscience), CD19 (HIB19, Tonbo Bioscience), CD56 (5.1H11, Biolegend), CD66b (G10F5, Biolegend), gated based on living cells and excluding dump channel-positive cells. Intermediate monocytes were defined as CD14+CD16+ and non-classical monocytes were defined as CD14dimCD16+. Monocytes were sorted directly into TRIzol® LS Reagent (Life Technologies) and frozen at -80°C. FCS files were exported from FACS Diva (BD Bioscience) and processed using FlowJo v10.2 (FlowJo, LLC). The quantification of intermediate and non-classical monocytes are estimated from the FACS data from all PBMC samples.

RNA isolation and sequencing

All sorted samples frozen at -80°C were thawed to room temperature together and processed in one batch. A custom script on a Beckman Coulter Biomek FXP was used to extract total RNA from Trizol using the Direct-zol 96 MagBead RNA kit (Zymo, R2100). Ribosomal RNA was depleted using Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal Kit (Illumina, MRZH11124). 100 ng of each sample’s RNA was then prepared into sequencing libraries, according to manufacturer’s instructions, using the Truseq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, RC-122-2203). The resulting libraries were deep sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 4000, using single-end reads with lengths of 50 nucleotides. The single end, 50-bp RNA-Seq reads that passed Illumina filters, were filtered for reads aligning to tRNA, rRNA, and adapter sequences before RNA metrics were calculated. The reads were then aligned to human genome version hg19 (GRCh37.p13 (https://www.gencodegenes.org/releases/19.html)) using TopHat v1.4.1. Post mapping QC was conducted with RSeQC package for quality parameters such as read quality, read distribution, junction saturation, junction annotation and gene body coverage.

Statistical analysis

Demographic and behavioral variables, HIV-related risk factors, cardiometabolic risk factors, as well as serum inflammation and innate immunity markers, which were measured based on the core study visit closest to the PBMC visit, were compared across four participant groups.

The RNA sequencing generated, on average, 75 million reads per sample. Raw reads were mapped to 58,396 annotated Ensemble coding transcripts using Tophat v2. Noisy, low-expression transcripts with maximum raw counts less than 10 across samples were filtered out to increase the sensitivity of the analysis. Differential expression (DE) analysis was performed for three contrasts, comparing those with HIV alone, CVD alone, or comorbid HIV and CVD, versus the comparison group of H-C- women (Fig 1A). To remove the confounding effects of LLT use, another two contrasts compared those free of LLT (H+C+LLT-) and LLT users(H+C+LLT+) versus H-C- were conducted. DE analysis was only performed on protein coding genes that passed the filtering using the R package “DESeq2” [19]. The statistical model was additionally adjusted by the matching unit (e.g., quartet). To eliminate the effect of large fold changes due to low counts or high dispersion on DEG ranking, the “apeglm” method was used for effect size shrinkage [20]. For a given pairwise comparison, a DEG was recognized as a gene with FDR adjusted p-value less than 0.05 and log fold change (LFC) greater than 1 or less than -1. Heatmaps of DEGs of three comparisons were generated using the R package “ComplexHeatmap” [21] to visualize the expression profiles of all DEGs. Venn diagrams showed the relationships of gene signatures.

Fig 1. Results for intermediate monocyte analysis.

Fig 1

A. Schematic of study design showing five comparisons. HIV(H) + or—designates presence or absence of HIV infection. CVD(C) + or—designates presence of absence of cardiovascular disease. C+ groups were further stratified according to lipid lowering treatment (LLT) use. B. Volcano plots for differential gene expression analysis in comparisons of H+C-, H-C+ and H+C+ versus H-C-, as well as comparisons of H+C+LLT- and H+C+LLT+ versus H-C-. Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change|>1(S2 Table). C. Heatmap showing expression of top up- and down-regulated differentially expressed genes(DEGs) found in women with H+C+LLT- versus H-C- and their correlation with plasma HIV RNA (Viral load) and CD4+ T cell count (CD4 count). D. Top significantly activated pathways predicted by the fold change of DEGs found in H+C+LLT- vs. H-C- comparison (S2 Table), using ingenuity pathway analysis.

Fold change and adjusted p-values related to each DEG in pair wise comparisons were then uploaded into Qiagen’s system for Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Core analysis of IPA was subsequently performed and pathways and biofunctions with p-value≤0.05 were recognized as significant. Canonical pathways, diseases and functions that are most significantly enriched in each gene signature were identified.

The whole gene sets for IM and NCM were screened and filtered to remove low quality genes and outlier samples to improve the accuracy of network construction. A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was constructed using the R package “WGCNA”. For each module identified in IM and NCM, the expression profiles of module genes were summarized as the module eigenvalue (ME). Differences in MEs among HIV/CVD groups were compared via one-way ANOVA analysis. P-values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method. Correlations between MEs and HIV- or CVD-related clinical traits were also determined. Next, genes of specific target modules in IM and NCM were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) term assignment, as well as other ontology enrichment analyses from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), the Human Protein Atlas (HPA), and the Comprehensive Resource of mammalian protein complexes (CORUM) databases, using the R package “gprofiler”.

All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA) and R 3.5.3 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Geneva).

Results

A total of 92 participants were selected as four groups based on HIV and subclinical CVD status, as defined by presence of carotid artery plaque measured by B mode ultrasound. The groups included those with comorbid HIV and CVD (H+C+), HIV alone (H+C-) or CVD alone (H-C+), and those with neither HIV nor CVD (H-C-).

Participants were 45 years old (median) and 95% Black or Hispanic (S1 Table). Among women in the H+C+ and H+C- groups, over 84% used HAART, and 59% had undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA level; among these 44 women with HIV, only 14% had HIV RNA above 1000 copies/ml. The most pronounced clinical difference among the groups was LLT, which was used by about one-quarter of H-C+ women and over two-fifths of H+C+ women, while none of the H-C- or H+C- women used LLT.

Cell counts of IM and NCM were not significantly different across H+C+, H+C-, H-C+ and H-C- groups (P = 0.546 and 0.522, S2 Fig). After filtering low-expression transcripts, 18,505 and 18,670 protein-coding genes remained for analysis of IM and NCM, respectively. Differential expression analysis of three contrasts, comparing those with HIV alone, CVD alone, or comorbid HIV and CVD, versus the comparison group of H-C- women, were performed (Fig 1A).

Analyses of intermediate monocytes

For HIV infection alone (H+C-), as compared with H-C- comparators, no DEGs in IM were found (Fig 1B). Among women with CVD alone (H-C+ versus H-C-), NAIP was the only DEG found in IM (Fig 1B). Further analyses divided the H-C+ population into LLT+ and LLT- groups, and compared them with H-C- group. This analysis showed a weak gene expression signature for CVD alone in HIV-uninfected women, and little difference between those using LLT and those not using LLT (S2 Table).

By contrast, we detected an extensive DEG signature in IM associated with non-LLT users of comorbid HIV/CVD participants (H+C+ LLT- versus H-C-, Fig 1B). The signature of H+C+ differed depending on whether or not LLT was used. H+C+ LLT users (N = 10) had only one DEG in IM versus H-C- (HSPD1). In contrast, H+C+ women who were not using LLT (N = 12) had a signature of 59 DEGs in IM (57/59 up-regulated), versus H-C- (S2 Table). Up-regulated DEGs included known atherosclerosis genes such as the liver X receptor gene NR1H2 [22], and NEXN, TRAF1 [23], TLR7 and LGALS3BP [24], implicating tumor necrosis factor and toll-like receptor signaling and glycan-binding protein pathways. Many upregulated genes in the H+C+ signature (non-LLT users) have known roles in HIV infection, including several innate immune response genes previously shown to be stimulated by HIV in vitro (IFIT1/2/3, DDX58, MX1) [25], CCL3 and CCL4L2, which encode macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha and beta [26], complement factor B (CFB) of the alternative complement pathway [27, 28], interleukins/ interleukin receptors (IL7, IL18, IL15RA) and the interferon-stimulated genes e.g., ISG15, ISG20, USP18 [29]. Expression levels of top H+C+ associated genes were not consistently correlated with plasma HIV RNA or CD4+ T-cell count (Fig 1C). Only 1(1.7%) and 11(18.6%) of 59 IM DEGs were correlated with HIV RNA and CD4+ T cell count at P<0.05, respectively. These suggested that altered regulation of these DEGs was not driven by known HIV immunologic or virologic parameters.

Among the comorbid HIV and CVD group, further analysis comparing LLT users with non-LLT users revealed a 22-gene signature associated with LLT. Eighteen of them were down-regulated and 4 were up-regulated in LLT users (S3A and S3B Fig). The role of these 22 LLT-associated DE genes in IM was further investigated by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). Canonical pathways such as “Recognition of Bacteria and Viruses”, “Interferon Signaling” and “Interferon Induction and Antiviral Response” were found significantly enriched among these DEGs, suggesting that LLT had an anti-inflammation potential in IM of persons with H+C+ status (S3C Fig).

IPA was conducted based upon 59 DEGs associated with the H+C+LLT- group (S2 Table) to characterize the gene transcription signal associated with comorbid HIV and CVD. The top five significantly activated canonical pathways are illustrated in Fig 1D. These top pathways are mainly related to pathogen recognition, signal transduction and cellular immune response. Key genes encoding messenger molecules and RNA helicases, like IL18, CCL3, CXCL10, IFIH1 and DDX58, played an important role in these pathways. IPA analysis also revealed 19 unique disease and disorder functions that were significantly associated with these DEGs, the top five of which related to inflammatory response and immunological disease (S3A Table).

In addition, gene co-expression networks were built in IM by Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). This resulted in the detection of 8 gene modules, but no significant difference in module eigenvalues was observed in any of these IM modules across the four study groups.

In summary, among women with comorbid HIV and CVD, we observed a panoply of up-regulated genes in IM, which was extinguished by LLT use. IPA indicated that many of these DEGs are involved in cellular immune responses. In those with HIV infection, presence versus absence of LLT was associated with reduction in inflammatory and innate immune regulatory signals, whereas LLT effects on gene expression were muted among those without HIV. Neither HIV alone nor CVD alone produced a distinguishing IM gene transcription signature.

Analyses of non-classical monocytes

When compared with H-C- controls, women with HIV had altered gene expression in NCM irrespective of whether or not they had comorbid CVD. As was found for IM, in NCM the H+C+ group had the largest set of DEGs (versus H-C-, 90 DEGs, 64 up-regulated and 26 down-regulated, Fig 2A and 2B, S4 Table). Up-regulated DEGs of this gene signature included T-cell development, growth and proliferation genes (BATF, CCL5, CD2, EOMES) [30] and F2R, a recognized genetic locus influencing clinical CVD [31] and atherosclerosis development [32]. Several cell adhesion and migration related genes were down-regulated (ADAMTS1, ADGRG3, C5AR2, CSF3R). A smaller, partially overlapping set of 37 DEGs (35 up-regulated) was associated with HIV infection alone (H+C- vs H-C-, Fig 2A and 2B, S4 Table). Up-regulated DEGs for HIV alone involve innate or adaptive immune response (LAG3, CCL5, MCOLN2), T-cell proliferation (ITGAD), cell adhesion or migration (VCAM1, NUAK1, CCDC141, IL12A, KIF19) and signal transduction (IFNAR1, PLEKHG1) [33]. DEG signatures of the H+C+ and H+C- groups shared 21 genes, all of which were up-regulated in both groups. We next examined the correlation of plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ T-cell count with the expression of top DEGs associated with either H+C+ or H+C- (Fig 2C and 2D). NCM signature genes that were up-regulated in H+C+ and H+C- groups were more highly expressed in those with higher plasma HIV RNA and lower CD4+ T-cell. Conversely, down-regulated genes were associated with lower HIV RNA and higher CD4+ T-cell count. In addition, 37% and 32% of NCM DEGs were correlated with HIV RNA and CD4+ T cell count at P<0.05,respectively. These suggested that expression of NCM DEGs in the presence of HIV infection were associated with immunological and virologic status.

Fig 2. Results for non-classical monocyte analysis.

Fig 2

A. Venn Diagram of differential expression gene (DEGs) lists for the three major comparisons, all contrasted versus HIV(H)-CVD(C)- control group. B. Volcano plots for differential gene expression analysis in comparisons of H+C-, H-C+ and H+C+ versus H-C-, as well as comparisons of H+C+LLT- and H+C+LLT- versus H-C-. Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change |>1(S4 Table). C-D. Heatmap showing expression of top up- and down-regulated DEGs found in women with H+C+ (C) and women with H+C-(D) vs. H-C- and their correlation with HIV RNA (Viral load) and CD4+ T cell count (CD4 count). E. Top significantly activated or suppressed pathways predicted by the fold change of DEGs found in H+C- or H+C+ vs. H-C- comparison (S4 Table), using ingenuity pathway analysis.

We conducted IPA of the 90-gene signature of H+C+ and the 37-gene signature of H+C- (S4 Table) to identify common or distinct elements (S3B, S3C Table). Top activated canonical pathways for H+C+ were mainly related to T-lymphocyte signaling (Fig 2E). Up-regulation of six DEGs (GRAP2, LCK, PPP2R2B, BATF, EOMES and LAG3) and down-regulation of RASD1 contribute to the enrichment of these pathways. Top activated pathways in the H+C- signature were related to cytokine production and dysregulation, and major contributing DEGs to these pathways, CCL5, IFNG and IL12A, are all involved in type-1 helper T-cell (Th1) responses. In both H+C+ and H+C-, IPA identified up-regulation of inflammation as the lead disease and disorder while H+C+ additionally implicated immunological disease.

Further analyses examined the influence of LLT on gene transcription in NCM through stratification by LLT use (S5 Table). Among 12 H+C+ women who were not using LLT, we identified 25 DEGs versus H-C-. Of these DEGs, 16 (64%) overlapped with the 90 DEGs of the overall analysis of H+C+ versus H-C-, indicating results from the non-LLT users were consistent with those from the overall H+C+ group. When we compared expression profiles of LLT users versus non-LLT users among those with comorbid HIV and CVD, we identified only 3 DEGs which all were found significantly up-regulated in LLT users (MTRNR2L12, MTRNR2L1 and HSPD1). Thus, little difference in NCM gene expression was found between H+C+ women who were not using LLT and who were using LLT.

We also looked for genes with altered expression in NCM in the presence of CVD alone (H-C+ versus H-C-). In this comparison, only two DEGs (NUAK1 and AQP9) were identified (S4 Table). In summary, in analyses of NCM, the largest gene transcription signature was associated with HIV infection (whether or not CVD was also present), whereas CVD alone had a minimal NCM signature.

WGCNA was performed in NCM and detected 15 gene modules. Compared with H-C- participants, expression of the salmon (color) module in NCM was significantly elevated in both H+C- and H+C+ groups, while expression of the magenta module showed a statistically significant contrast being highest in H-C- and lowest in H+C+ (Fig 3). The genes contained in the salmon and magenta modules are listed in S6 Table. The salmon module includes a few genes involved in monocyte function (e.g. SYT11, CRTAM, MYO6), while the magenta module encodes many genes that involved in metabolism, as well as glycosaminoglycans and glycolipids (e.g. ADPGK, PDPK1, PRKAG2).

Fig 3. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis results in non-classical monocyte (NCM).

Fig 3

A. Comparison of module eigenvalues (MEs) of salmon module and expression profiles of 22 salmon module genes in NCM by HIV and CVD status. B. Comparison of module eigenvalue of magenta module and expression profiles of 70 magenta module genes in NCM by HIV and CVD status. C. Spearman correlation between MEs of all gene modules identified in NCM, and CVD- or HIV-related clinical features.

Module-trait relationships are presented as a correlation matrix between module eigenvalues and clinical features, and the significance of relationships is shown in color (Fig 3C). The elevated expression of the salmon module in NCM was significantly related to higher HIV RNA, lower CD4+ T cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio, and lipid alterations typical of HIV infection (increases in triglyceride levels, decreases in HDL-cholesterol levels, and no changes in LDL-cholesterol levels [34]). The associations of magenta module expression with most of these clinical features were also significant, but in an opposite direction of the salmon module. The salmon and magenta modules comprised 22 and 70 genes, respectively. Of 22 salmon genes, 10(45%) were found in the 37-gene signature of H+C- and 17(77%) were found the 90-gene signature of H+C+. Not much overlap was detected between NCM gene signatures and magenta module. Only 4 out of 70 magenta genes were found in the 90-gene signature of H+C+.

For the salmon module, the enriched Gene Ontology biological function terms in the annotation systems were mostly related to “Regulation of leukocyte activation” (adjusted p-value = 0.036) and “Identical protein binding” (adjusted p-value = 0.042). A few key genes that contributed to these terms are SYT11 (encodes synaptostigmin11 which is involved in endocytosis and vesicle recycling), CRTAM (mediates heterophilic cell-cell adhesion), MYO6 (encodes myosin-VI which mediates vesicular membrane trafficking and cell migration) and CD2 (interacts with lymphocyte function-associated antigen to mediate cell-cell adhesion). For magenta module genes, the top enriched terms in the KEGG pathway databases were “Insulin signaling pathway” (adjusted p-value = 0.008) and “Insulin resistance” (adjusted p-value = 0.04). Important contributors to the enrichment are PDPK1 (a serine/threonine kinase which acts as a master kinase in the transduction of signals from insulin), PRKAG2 (an energy sensor protein kinase that plays a key role in regulating cellular energy metabolism), RHOQ (a GTPase that causes the formation of filopodia) and PPP1CB (a phosphatase that is involved in the regulation of a variety of cellular processes).

Discussion

Neither HIV nor CVD was associated with differences in the number or distribution of IM and NCM. Several prior studies in the general (non-HIV) population have associated increased frequency of the CD14+ (particularly IM) cell population with clinical CVD events and plaque vulnerability [35, 36]. Studies on monocyte subtype distributions in patients with CVD and HIV have been conflicting [37, 38], although expansions of both NCM and IM have been described in a range of viral, autoimmune and inflammatory conditions [39]. Our data support the premise that shifts in gene transcription may be more important to HIV-related disease than changes in relative abundance of monocyte subsets.

Using RNA sequencing, we identified patterns of gene expression in circulating monocytes from women with HIV infection, subclinical CVD, or both conditions. This report using PBMC-derived IM and NCM complements our recent study of CM [9], and the combined data illustrates the relation of each monocyte subset with these clinical states (Table 1). Women who survive long-term HIV infection, even while on effective HAART, have changes in monocyte gene expression which may contribute to CVD complications of HIV infection.

Table 1. Summary of findings relating gene expression in classical, intermediate, and non-classical monocytes with HIV infection and subclinical CVD.

Classical monocytes Intermediate monocytes Non-classical monocytes
HIV alone signature Signature of ~200 DEGs None Signature of 37 DEGs
CVD alone signature Signature of ~200 DEGs. ~20% of the DEGs are shared between HIV alone and CVD alone, suggesting pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant pathways in common. Negligible (only one DEG in overall CVD group; three in those who were LLT users; one in those who were non-LLT users). Negligible (one DEG, NUAK1, a gene that was also found in HIV signature)
Comorbid HIV and CVD signature and effects of lipid lowering treatment (LLT) People with both HIV and CVD had a weak DEG signature (9 DEGs), less than expected from the sum of the two disease conditions. Further analyses accounting for LLT use found that HIV/CVD group who were non-LLT users had a 108 DEG signature. Meanwhile, LLT use abolished the gene expression signature in patients with comorbid HIV/CVD. Only one DEG was found (HSPD1), for members of the HIV/CVD comorbid group who were using LLT. In contrast, those not using LLT had a signature of 59 (mostly upregulated) DEGs. Although these DEGs include many genes with known roles in HIV infection, their expression levels were not associated with plasma HIV RNA or CD4+ T cell count. In people with both HIV and CVD, a 90-DEG signature was found, which included many of the DEGs associated with HIV alone. The degree of upregulation or downregulation of DEGs in the HIV alone or HIV/CVD comorbid group was correlated with plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ T cell count. Further analyses limited to non-LLT users produced an overlapping set of DEGs as the overall analysis of the HIV/CVD group.
Interpretation CVD and HIV switch on many of the same pro-inflammatory genes in CM. LLT reduces the CM gene expression response to baseline, such that the CVD signature of CM can only be detected in LLT-free patients IM gene expression is little affected by HIV or CVD alone. In IM, coexisting HIV and CVD produces a measurable gene transcription signature, which is abolished by LLT. The DEGs implicated are involved in pathways of HIV disease, although their expression is not associated with HIV clinical immunologic or virologic status. NCM is little affected by subclinical CVD alone. In NCM, HIV has a gene-upregulatory effect that correlates with HIV clinical status variables including viral load and CD4+ T cell count. The co-occurrence of CVD adds more genes to the proinflammatory gene signature of HIV. Use of LLTs dampens the pro-inflammatory signal of HIV/CVD.
Reference Ehinger et al, Cardiovasc Res 2021, PMID: 32658258 Present study Present study

First, HIV infection was associated with gene expression changes in NCM. Many of the affected genes are known to be involved in atherosclerosis or response to viral infection. In contrast, gene expression in IM was not altered with HIV infection per se.

Second, altered IM gene expression was confined to the group with both HIV and CVD. The IM DEGs associated with the HIV/CVD comorbid condition were not correlated with markers of HIV disease stage including plasma HIV RNA or CD4+ T cell count; this observation is important because it links altered IM gene expression with the presence of HIV-associated CVD, rather than with parameters reflecting HIV disease control.

Moreover, IM gene expression did not vary with the presence or absence of CVD in persons who were not infected with HIV. Thus, while IMs are recognized as a cell population involved in atherosclerosis [13, 14], the role of IMs may be especially important in HIV-associated mechanisms of CVD. In contrast with IMs, NCMs showed little evidence of association with CVD regardless of HIV status. Instead, DEGs we identified in NCM appeared to be attributable to HIV disease. NCM gene expression levels were found both to differ between HIV versus non-HIV groups as well as to correlate with immunological and virologic status.

In NCM, we were able to identify two gene modules that are associated with HIV and CVD in distinct ways. The salmon module, significantly up-regulated in women with HIV, includes genes involved in cell-cell adhesion, vesicular membrane trafficking and cell migration, which is consistent with the mobile function of NCM and suggests an increased capacity of NCM to patrol in the context of chronic HIV infection. The magenta module, significantly down-regulated in the HIV/CVD comorbid group, encompasses many genes involved in insulin signal transduction, metabolism, as well as glycosaminoglycans and glycolipids. The interactions between endothelial cells and monocytes are controlled by adhesion molecules that are in turn regulated by cellular glycosylation [40]. Down-regulation of glycosylation-related genes may lead to a reduction of post-translational modification of cell-surface adhesion molecules, which might in turn modulate the endothelial-monocyte interactions and mediate an anti-inflammatory effect of NCM.

Another clear finding is that inflammatory gene expression in all three monocyte populations (classical [9], intermediate and non-classical) appeared to be dampened by LLT. This suggests that the putative favorable immunological and anti-atherosclerotic effects of LLT may involve CM, IM and NCM. Forthcoming evidence from the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV study will provide guidance relating to the incorporation of statins as part of medical treatment for HIV [41].

The design of this study enabled us to contrast gene signatures of HIV and CVD because an identical study protocol and sample size was used for all participant strata. Women were mostly receiving state-of-the art treatment for HIV infection, which ensures generalizability of results in the contemporary era of effective HAART. Limitations include the cross-sectional nature of the study, the absence of male participants, and the potential for confounding variables to have influenced results, although we used a matched design as a rigorous way to control confounding. Future studies will be needed to elucidate how HIV-related factors, including the amount of HIV viral load, duration of ART and stage of HIV disease at diagnosis, etc., affect the differential gene expression of monocytes. In addition, including plaque stability in determination of subclinical CVD status will provide valuable information for plaque risk stratification.

Pathways and genes we identified to be up-regulated by HIV infection in monocytes may include candidates for intervention to reduce complications of HIV infection. LAG3 (CD223), a strongly up-regulated gene in NCM in both the H+C- and H+C+ conditions, is involved in antigen presentation by dendritic cells to T lymphocytes and is a checkpoint inhibitor target for investigative cancer and immunotherapy drugs [42, 43], while also being implicated in atherosclerotic disease [44]. Thus, leveraging the increased information available from RNA sequencing over candidate gene approaches [45], the study provides several new avenues for investigation the role of monocytes in cardiovascular complications of HIV infection.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Timeline of the study recruitment, data collection and sampling.

The Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) was initiated in 1994 and at the time of this study comprised six U.S. sites [17]. Recruitment in the WIHS occurred in two waves (1994–1995, 2001–2002) from HIV primary care clinics, hospital-based programs, community outreach, support groups, and other locations. The WIHS protocol involves semi-annual follow-up visits with detailed examinations, specimen collection, and structured interviews. Incorporated into our definition of cardiovascular disease were data from two waves of B-mode carotid artery ultrasound scans conducted approximately 7 years apart, first during 2004–2006 (Carotid ultrasound substudy scan #1) and again during 2010–2013 (Carotid ultrasound substudy scan #2). For the present report, from both the HIV infected and HIV-uninfected participants of WIHS, we selected groups both with and without subclinical cardiovascular disease (C); the C+ group was defined as those having at least 1 carotid artery plaque assessed at either vascular scan and the C- group was defined as no carotid artery plaque and either of the two scans. Women who used statin drugs for cholesterol lowering were excluded from the C- groups. We withdrew from the repository a sample of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) that had been collected from the semi-annual WIHS core visit that occurred as close as possible in time to the most recent vascular substudy visit. This study is based on transcriptomes of non-classical monocytes isolated from frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 88 WIHS participants at WIHS Visits 27 to 36 (corresponding to calendar years 2008 to 2012). If samples were not available or had adequate volume, an alternate was selected from an alternate visit before or after the carotid artery ultrasound scan.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Frequency of intermediate and non-classical monocytes to the total monocytes by HIV (H) and CVD(C) status.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Results for comparison between lipid lowering treatment (LLT) users and non-LLT users in intermediate monocytes analysis.

A. Volcano plots for differential gene expression analysis in comparisons of H+C+LLT+ versus H+C+LLT-. Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change|>1. B. Heatmap showing expression of top up- and down-regulated DEGs found in women with H+C+LLT+ versus H+C+LLT-. C. Top significantly enriched pathways predicted by the fold change of DEGs found in H+C+LLT+ vs. H+C+LLT- comparison, using ingenuity pathway analysis.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Characteristics of non-classical monocytes study participants, by HIV infection (H) and subclinical cardiovascular disease (C) status.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Differentially expressed genes in Intermediate monocytes, comparing groups with cardiovascular disease (C+) with or without HIV infection (H) and lipid lowering treatment (LLT), versus H-C- controls.

(DOCX)

S3 Table

Ingenuity pathway analysis core analysis results for differentially expressed genes in intermediate monocytes related to A. H+C+LLT- and non-classical monocytes related to B. H+C- C. H+C+.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Log fold change of differentially expressed genes in non-classical monocytes associated with HIV alone, CVD alone and comorbid HIV/CVD.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Differentially expressed genes in non-classical monocytes among women with subclinical cardiovascular disease (C), stratified by HIV infection (H) and lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) status.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Gene names of 22 salmon module genes and 70 Magenta module genes in non-classical monocytes.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

The study data are an open scientific resource that can be used for purposes consistent with study policies and participant informed consent. Researchers can request access through the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study Data Analysis and Coordinating Center (DACC), see the website for additional details: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/science/macswihs-combined-cohort-study#how-can-researchers-access-study-data?.

Funding Statement

Data in this manuscript were collected by the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), now the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). MWCCS (Principal Investigators): Atlanta CRS (Ighovwerha Ofotokun, Anandi Sheth, and Gina Wingood), U01-HL146241; Baltimore CRS (Todd Brown and Joseph Margolick), U01-HL146201; Bronx CRS (Kathryn Anastos and Anjali Sharma), U01-HL146204; Brooklyn CRS (Deborah Gustafson and Tracey Wilson), U01-HL146202; Data Analysis and Coordination Center (Gypsyamber D’Souza, Stephen Gange and Elizabeth Golub), U01-HL146193; Chicago-Cook County CRS (Mardge Cohen and Audrey French), U01-HL146245; Chicago-Northwestern CRS (Steven Wolinsky), U01-HL146240; Northern California CRS (Bradley Aouizerat, Jennifer Price, and Phyllis Tien), U01-HL146242; Los Angeles CRS (Roger Detels and Matthew Mimiaga), U01-HL146333; Metropolitan Washington CRS (Seble Kassaye and Daniel Merenstein), U01-HL146205; Miami CRS (Maria Alcaide, Margaret Fischl, and Deborah Jones), U01-HL146203; Pittsburgh CRS (Jeremy Martinson and Charles Rinaldo), U01-HL146208; UAB-MS CRS (Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Jodie Dionne-Odom, and Deborah Konkle-Parker), U01-HL146192; UNC CRS (Adaora Adimora), U01-HL146194. The MWCCS is funded primarily by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), with additional co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), National Institute On Aging (NIA), National Institute Of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke (NINDS), National Institute Of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute On Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute Of Nursing Research (NINR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), and in coordination and alignment with the research priorities of the National Institutes of Health, Office of AIDS Research (OAR). MWCCS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 (UCSF CTSA), UL1-TR003098 (JHU ICTR), UL1-TR001881 (UCLA CTSI), P30-AI-050409 (Atlanta CFAR), P30-AI-073961 (Miami CFAR), P30-AI-050410 (UNC CFAR), P30-AI-027767 (UAB CFAR), and P30-MH-116867 (Miami CHARM). This work is supported by R01-HL148094-01 (R.C. Kaplan & K. Ley), with additional support from R01 HL140976. D.B. Hanna was supported by K01-HL-137557. J.W. Berman was supported by 1R01MH112391. P.C. Tien was supported by the K24 AI 108516. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Neuhaus J, Angus B, Kowalska JD, La Rosa A, Sampson J, Wentworth D, et al. INSIGHT SMART and ESPRIT study groups. Risk of all-cause mortality associated with nonfatal AIDS and serious non-AIDS events among adults infected with HIV. AIDS. 2010; 24(5):697–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Twigg HL 3rd, Crystal R, Currier J, Ridker P, Berliner N, Kiem HP, et al. Refining Current Scientific Priorities and Identifying New Scientific Gaps in HIV-Related Heart, Lung, Blood, and Sleep Research. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017;33(9):889–897. doi: 10.1089/AID.2017.0026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coll B, Parra S, Alonso-Villaverde C, Aragonés G, Montero M, Camps J, et al. The role of immunity and inflammation in the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with HIV infection. Stroke. 2007;38(9):2477–84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuller LH, Tracy R, Belloso W, De Wit S, Drummond F, Lane HC, et al. INSIGHT SMART Study Group. Inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers and mortality in patients with HIV infection. PLoS Med. 2008;5(10): e203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ross AC, Rizk N, O’Riordan MA, Dogra V, El-Bejjani D, Storer N, et al. Relationship between inflammatory markers, endothelial activation markers, and carotid intima-media thickness in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(7):1119–27. doi: 10.1086/605578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bahrami H, Budoff M, Haberlen SA, Rezaeian P, Ketlogetswe K, Tracy R, et al. Inflammatory Markers Associated with Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(6): e003371. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hanna DB, Lin J, Post WS, Hodis HN, Xue X, Anastos K, et al. Association of Macrophage Inflammation Biomarkers with Progression of Subclinical Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis in HIV-Infected Women and Men. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(9):1352–1361. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wong ME, Jaworowski A, Hearps AC. The HIV Reservoir in Monocytes and Macrophages. Front Immunol. 2019; 10:1435. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ehinger E, Ghosheh Y, Pramod AB, Lin J, Hanna DB, Mueller K, et al. Classical Monocyte Transcriptomes Reveal Significant Anti-Inflammatory Statin Effect in Women with Chronic HIV. Cardiovasc Res. 2021; 117(4):1166–1177. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.K Buscher K, Marcovecchio P, Hedrick CC, Ley K. Patrolling Mechanics of Non-Classical Monocytes in Vascular Inflammation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2017; 4:80. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mueller KAL, Hanna DB, Ehinger E, Xue X, Baas L, Gawaz MP, et al. Loss of CXCR4 on non-classical monocytes in participants of the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) with subclinical atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2019; 115(6):1029–1040. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee J, Tam H, Adler L, Ilstad-Minnihan A, Macaubas C, Mellins ED. The MHC class II antigen presentation pathway in human monocytes differs by subset and is regulated by cytokines. PLoS One. 2017;12(8): e0183594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rogacev KS, Cremers B, Zawada AM, Seiler S, Binder N, Ege P, et al. CD14++CD16+ monocytes independently predict cardiovascular events: a cohort study of 951 patients referred for elective coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(16):1512–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wrigley BJ, Shantsila E, Tapp LD, Lip GY. CD14++CD16+ monocytes in patients with acute ischaemic heart failure.Eur J Clin Invest. 2013; 43:121–130. doi: 10.1111/eci.12023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levine AJ, Horvath S, Miller EN, Singer EJ, Shapshak P, Baldwin GC, et al. Transcriptome analysis of HIV-infected peripheral blood monocytes: gene transcripts and networks associated with neurocognitive functioning. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;265(1–2):96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu Y, Reynolds LM, Ding J, Hou L, Lohman K, Young T, et al. Blood monocyte transcriptome and epigenome analyses reveal loci associated with human atherosclerosis. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):393. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00517-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bacon MC, von Wyl V, Alden C, Sharp G, Robison E, Hessol N, et al. The Women’s Interagency HIV Study: an observational cohort brings clinical sciences to the bench. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12(9):1013–9. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1013-1019.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Lobo RA, Shoupe D, Sevanian A, Mahrer PR, et al. Estrogen in the Prevention of Atherosclerosis Trial Research Group. Estrogen in the prevention of atherosclerosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(11):939–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu A, Ibrahim JG, Love MI. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(12):2084–2092. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics.2016;32(18):2847–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tontonoz P, Mangelsdorf DJ. Liver X receptor signaling pathways in cardiovascular disease. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17(6):985–93. doi: 10.1210/me.2003-0061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Edilova MI, Abdul-Sater AA, Watts TH. TRAF1 Signaling in Human Health and Disease. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:2969. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shaked I, Hanna DB, Gleißner C, Marsh B, Plants J, Tracy D, et al. Macrophage inflammatory markers are associated with subclinical carotid artery disease in women with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus infection. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(5):1085–92. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.303153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zahoor MA, Xue G, Sato H, Murakami T, Takeshima SN, Aida Y. HIV-1 Vpr induces interferon-stimulated genes in human monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS One. 2014;9(8): e106418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Colobran R, Adreani P, Ashhab Y, Llano A, Esté JA, Dominguez O, et al. Multiple products derived from two CCL4 loci: high incidence of a new polymorphism in HIV+ patients. J Immunol. 2005;174(9):5655–64. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nozaki-Renard J, Kim T, Iino T, Tsukamoto T, Furutani-Seiki M, Tada T. Human complement component factor B rescues HIV-1-infected leukemic T cells from cytopathic death. Int Immunol. 1991;3(4):403–6. doi: 10.1093/intimm/3.4.403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rowson SA, Harrell CS, Bekhbat M, Gangavelli A, Wu MJ, Kelly SD, Reddy et al. Neuroinflammation and Behavior in HIV-1 Transgenic Rats Exposed to Chronic Adolescent Stress. Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7:102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dagenais-Lussier X, Loucif H, Cadorel H, Blumberger J, Isnard S, Bego MG, et al. Montreal Primary Infection Study Group. USP18 is a significant driver of memory CD4 T-cell reduced viability caused by type I IFN signaling during primary HIV-1 infection. PloS Pathog. 2019; 15(10): e1008060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kurachi M, Barnitz RA, Yosef N, Odorizzi PM, DiIorio MA, Lemieux ME, et al. The transcription factor BATF operates as an essential differentiation checkpoint in early effector CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(4):373–83. doi: 10.1038/ni.2834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gigante B, Bellis A, Visconti R, Marino M, Morisco C, Trimarco V, et al. Retrospective analysis of coagulation factor II receptor (F2R) sequence variation and coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(5):1213–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.140541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Posma JJ, Grover SP, Hisada Y, Owens AP 3rd, Antoniak S, Spronk HM, et al. Roles of Coagulation Proteases and PARs (Protease-Activated Receptors) in Mouse Models of Inflammatory Diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019; 39(1):13–24. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kaur S, Platanias LC. IFN-β-specific signaling via a unique IFNAR1 interaction. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14(9):884–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anastos K, Lu D, Shi Q, Tien PC, Kaplan RC, Hessol NA, et al. Association of serum lipid levels with HIV serostatus, specific antiretroviral agents, and treatment regimens. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45(1):34–42. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318042d5fe [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tapp LD, Shantsila E, Wrigley BJ, Pamukcu B, Lip GY. The CD14++CD16+ monocyte subset and monocyte-platelet interactions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(7):1231–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04603.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kashiwagi M, Imanishi T, Tsujioka H, Ikejima H, Kuroi A, Ozaki Y, et al. Association of monocyte subsets with vulnerability characteristics of coronary plaques as assessed by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212(1):171–6. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baker JV, Hullsiek KH, Singh A, Wilson E, Henry K, Lichtenstein K, et al. CDC SUN Study Investigators. Immunologic predictors of coronary artery calcium progression in a contemporary HIV cohort. AIDS. 2014;28(6):831–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Longenecker CT, Funderburg NT, Jiang Y, Debanne S, Storer N, Labbato DE, et al. Markers of inflammation and CD8 T-cell activation, but not monocyte activation, are associated with subclinical carotid artery disease in HIV-infected individuals. HIV Med. 2013;14(6):385–90. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wong KL, Yeap WH, Tai JJ, Ong SM, Dang TM, Wong SC. The three human monocyte subsets: implications for health and disease. Immunol Res. 2012; 53:41–57. doi: 10.1007/s12026-012-8297-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chacko BK, Scott DW, Chandler RT, Patel RP. Endothelial surface N-glycans mediate monocyte adhesion and are targets for anti-inflammatory effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands. J. Biol. Chem.2011; 286:38738–38747 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Grinspoon SK, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Ribaudo HJ. Leveraging a Landmark Trial of Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Introduction from the REPRIEVE Coprincipal Investigators. J Infect Dis. 2020. Jul 9;222(Suppl 1): S1–S7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Triebel F. LAG-3: a regulator of T-cell and DC responses and its use in therapeutic vaccination. Trends Immunol. 2003;24(12):619–22. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2003.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kleponis J, Skelton R, Zheng L. Fueling the engine and releasing the break: combinational therapy of cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12(3):201–8. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Golden D, Kolmakova A, Sura S, Vella AT, Manichaikul A, Wang XQ, et al. Lymphocyte activation gene 3 and coronary artery disease. JCI Insight. 2016;1(17): e88628. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.88628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sharma V, Bryant C, Montero M, Creegan M, Slike B, Krebs SJ, et al. Monocyte and CD4+ T-cell antiviral and innate responses associated with HIV-1 inflammation and cognitive impairment. AIDS. 2020; 34(9):1289–1301. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Andreas Zirlik

6 Mar 2023

PONE-D-23-02143HIV infection and cardiovascular disease have both shared and distinct monocyte gene expression features: Women's Interagency HIV StudyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kaplan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands yet. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process in point-to point fashion. Given that these points are adequately addressed, this paper will likely achieve the priority necessary for publication.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 20 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andreas Zirlik, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Major:

• Current analyses in the manuscript focus on peripheral transcriptomes, but their contribution to atherosclerosis remain unclear. It would be helpful to correlate the found signatures to publicly available transcriptomes of stable and unstable carotid plaques. Are the found signatures associating more or less with either one of the plaque phenotypes?

• Down this same track: Are the infected peripheral monocyte closer to monocytes in the plaque. The authors may use available monocyte transcriptomes from available scRNAseq studies.

• DE genes used as input for the pathway analysis are not evident from text or figures. These should be shown. Authors should label the corresponding genes in the volcano plots and explicitly state which genes were included in the pathway analysis, best as supplementary data file.

• E.g. Line 271 on page 7: "The role of these genes in IM was further investigated by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA)..." and Line 277 page 7: "IPA was conducted to 59 DEGs associated with the H+C+LLT- group to characterize the gene transcription signal associated with comorbid HIV and CVD..." Which genes were used?

• Line 250 on page 7: „By contrast, we detected an extensive DEG signature in IM associated with comorbid HIV/CVD (H+C+ versus H-C-, Fig 1B).“ In Figure 1B, no significantly regulated DEGs are shown for the comparison H+C+ vs H-C-. Line 299 on page 8: „As was found for IM, in NCM the H+C+ group had the largest set of DEGs….”. Please provide a list of genes.

Minor:

• The legends for the Volcano plots in Figures 1 & 2 are missing. I assume red dots are genes that show significant regulation.

• From the Methods section it becomes clear, that the authors performed DE Gene analysis in five comparisons including 6 groups (H+C-, H-C+, H+C+, H+C+LLT-, H+C+LLT+, H-C-). From this perspective, I find the schematic representation in Fig1a misleading, as only 4 groups are depicted. In addition, the orientation of the arrows towards the H-C- group is unclear. What is the intention of the authors?

• In Figure 1b, some significantly regulated genes in the volcano plots are named while others are not (compare volcano plots for H+C+LLT- vs H-C- to H+C+LLT-+vs H-C-). Why were these genes labelled and others not? Presentation of data should be consistent.

• In line with the previous comment: l. 254 on page 7: "Up-regulated DEGs included known atherosclerosis genes such as the liver X receptor gene NR1H222, and NEXN, TRAF123, TLR7 and LGALS3BP24....". Please labele in the volcano plot.

• The pathways shown in Figure 1D are not clearly associated with a particular group. Therefore, the authors are asked to add this information.

• I understand that DE genes with an adjusted p-value <0.05 were included in the pathway analysis. Were significant pathways detected by the adjusted or unadjusted p value? This is not clearly stated in the methods section. Unadjusted p-values are listed in Table S3. The authors are kindly requested to clarify this.

• Please label Figure 3A&B with the corresponding models and refer to them correctly in the text (see line 359, page 9).

Reviewer #2: This manuscript explores the difference in single cell transcriptome of Non Classical Monocytes and Intermediate Monocytes in PBMCs obtained from patient with HIV and CVD. The aim was to identified conserved differentially expressed gene signature in 92 patient divided in four groups according to their diagnosis (H-C- as a control, H+C-, H-,C+ and comorbidity of H+C+). This study is interesting because cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of mortality among people living with HIV and the use of PBMCs would be an affordable way to assess the risk and the mechanisms by which HIV engender CVD.

Comments:

The authors indicated that no difference in cell count was found, does this number refer to the quantification of the cells isolated from the CPT tube or the cells they isolated for sequencing? If the latter, can it really be said that there is no difference?

In the results section, second paragraph. The values at the beginning are being presented in percentage, please keep it, it will be easy to correlate the 59% with undetectable RNA and 6 patients with higher RNA.

Do the authors looked at whether the 59% of HIV-positive patients who did not have RNA in plasma have any difference with patients with detected RNA and CDV? Wouldn't the presence or absence of RNA affect the behavior of peripheral cells, in this case monocytes? Or even if the disease is at a very advanced stage. This could perhaps give an idea why in the heatmap of the groups with IHV+ are not so homogeneous.

Heine GH, Rogacev KS had previously reported that the number of intermediate monocytes may be a significant predictor of cardiovascular events. What could be attributed in this case to the no difference found in monocytes between patients with CVD and negative for HIV?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 May 19;18(5):e0285926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285926.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


17 Apr 2023

Response to Reviewer #1:

Major:

• Current analyses in the manuscript focus on peripheral transcriptomes, but their contribution to atherosclerosis remains unclear. It would be helpful to correlate the found signatures to publicly available transcriptomes of stable and unstable carotid plaques. Are the found signatures associating more or less with either one of the plaque phenotypes?

While the reviewer makes an excellent point, the distinction between stable and unstable plaques is beyond the capability of our vascular imaging method. Subclinical CVD status in our study is determined from carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) though B-mode ultrasound images. Although CIMT has been widely used and is the most valid determinant of subclinical atherosclerosis, it does not distinguish between stable and unstable plaques.

We have included this limitation in the discussion section.

Line 478: …In addition, including plaque stability in determination of subclinical CVD status will provide valuable information for plaque risk stratification.

Many transcriptomics studies have investigated the gene expression regulation in the progression of unstable plaques using bulk RNA-Seq. However, carotid plaques are characterized by heterogeneous cell populations in which the majority are T-cells, while our study focuses on intermediate and non-classical monocytes sorted in flow cytometry. A recent meta-analysis of scRNA-seq studies (Zernecke A et al. (2020, PMID: 32673538)) found monocytes form separate immune cell populations in mouse atherosclerotic aortas. Two mixed monocyte/DC subsets are well represented in all datasets with atherosclerosis, while few monocytes are present in healthy aortas. Of 559 marker genes of these monocyte-related cell subsets, 6 of them overlapped with our 90-gene NCM signature of comorbid HIV/CVD (CD2, LMNA, HOPX, GRASP, GPR35 and GPR171) and 2 of them overlapped with our 59-gene IM signature of comorbid HIV/CVD (PTGS2 and TRAF1).

• Down this same track: Are the infected peripheral monocytes closer to monocytes in the plaque. The authors may use available monocyte transcriptomes from available scRNAseq studies.

Thanks for this interesting question. The single-cell RNA sequencing assisted in characterizing the heterogeneous nature of immune cell populations in atherosclerosis. A few scRNAseq studies investigated immune landscape of mouse and human atherosclerotic plaques (Cochain et al. (2018, PMID: 29545365), Fernandez DM et al.(2019, PMID: 31591603), Depuydt MAC et al.(2020, PMID: 32981416),Vallejo J et al. (2021, PMID: 34343272), Zernecke A et al.(2022, PMID: 36190844)). Not all of these studies provide publicly available gene signature of monocytes, though.

We compared our results to Cochain et al. (2018) who performed scRNA-seq on CD45+ cells from the aortas of non-diseased and atherosclerotic LDL receptor–deficient (Ldlr−/−) mice. Among the 13 cell subsets, Cochain et al. (2018) identified five myeloid cell subsets, including monocytes, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, and three macrophage subsets. We compared two comorbid HIV/CVD-associated gene signatures found in our study, with the marker gene lists for monocyte from Cochain et al. (2018) . 5 out of 59 genes in IIM signature overlapped with the reference gene list (NRIH3, PTGS2, IL18, DHX58 and ISG15), while 5 out of 90 genes in NCM signature overlapped with the reference gene list (NOCT, GPR35, GAS2L3, FAM20C and CSF3R). These overlapped genes were mainly related to cellular interaction, immune response, and inflammatory responses.

In humans, Zernecke A et al. (2022) integrated scRNA-seq data from two studies. They recovered 10 clusters of cell subsets from a total of 2890 cells from 11 patients (n = 4 coronary vessels, n = 7 carotid endarterectomy specimens). Differential gene expression analyses across clusters identified cells corresponding to monocytes that are highly enriched for 116 marker genes. We examined the overlap between our comorbid HIV/CVD-associated gene signatures with these marker genes. Only 3 out of 59 genes in IIM signature overlapped with the reference gene signature (CCL4L2, CCL3 and PTGS2). None of 90 genes in NCM signature overlapped with the reference gene list.

While we believe technical and experimental design reasons contribute to the discordance of our signatures and signatures from above scRNA-seq studies, different transcriptomic features and function of monocytes within plaque and in blood are important and require further studies.

• DE genes used as input for the pathway analysis are not evident from text or figures. These should be shown. Authors should label the corresponding genes in the volcano plots and explicitly state which genes were included in the pathway analysis, best as supplementary data file.

We thank the reviewer for this helpful comment. While we are not able to label all DE genes in the volcano plot due to limited space on the plot, we have added a reference for each corresponding DE gene lists, including their names and log fold changes, in the figure’s titles and the main text in context of the pathway analysis.

Line 203: …in H+C+LLT- vs. H-C- comparison (S2 Table), using ingenuity pathway analysis.

Line 285: …IPA was conducted based upon 59 DEGs associated with the H+C+LLT- group (S2 Table) to characterize the gene transcription signal…

Line 339: …in H+C- or H+C+ vs. H-C- comparison (S4 Table), using ingenuity pathway analysis.

Line 342: …We conducted IPA of the 90-gene signature of H+C+ and the 37-gene signature of H+C- (S4 Table) to identify common or distinct elements (S3 Table B-C).

• E.g. Line 271 on page 7: "The role of these genes in IM was further investigated by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA)..." and Line 277 page 7: "IPA was conducted to 59 DEGs associated with the H+C+LLT- group to characterize the gene transcription signal associated with comorbid HIV and CVD..." Which genes were used?

We greatly appreciate the reviewer for pointing out this omission through careful and detailed review of our manuscript. The first IPA analysis (Line 271) was for 22 LLT-associated DEGs, while the IPA analysis in the following paragraph (Line 277) was for 59 comorbid HIV/ CVD-associated DEGs.

To avoid confusion, we have clarified this on line 280.

Line 280: The role of these 22 LLT-associated DE genes in IM was further investigated by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA).

• Line 250 on page 7: „By contrast, we detected an extensive DEG signature in IM associated with comorbid HIV/CVD (H+C+ versus H-C-, Fig 1B).“ In Figure 1B, no significantly regulated DEGs are shown for the comparison H+C+ vs H-C-. Line 299 on page 8: „As was found for IM, in NCM the H+C+ group had the largest set of DEGs….”. Please provide a list of genes.

Thank you for pointing out the need for more clarification. We have revised the text for clarity, which now reads (Line 258): By contrast, we detected an extensive DEG signature in IM associated with non-LLT users of comorbid HIV/CVD participants (H+C+LLT- versus H-C-, Fig 1B).

In addition, the information of 90 comorbid HIV/CVD associated DEG signature in NCM has been included in Supplementary table 4. We included a reference on Line 309.

Minor:

• The legends for the Volcano plots in Figures 1 & 2 are missing. I assume red dots are genes that show significant regulation.

Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification. Due to very limited space on the volcano plots, we clarified this in the title of Figure 1(Line 202) and Figure 2(Line 334): “Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change |>1.”

• From the Methods section it becomes clear, that the authors performed DE Gene analysis in five comparisons including 6 groups (H+C-, H-C+, H+C+, H+C+LLT-, H+C+LLT+, H-C-). From this perspective, I find the schematic representation in Fig1a misleading, as only 4 groups are depicted. In addition, the orientation of the arrows towards the H-C- group is unclear. What is the intention of the authors?

Thank you for this helpful comment. The schematic design of our study focuses on three major comparisons of H+C-, H-C+ and H+C+ to healthy participants (H-C-). However, during analysis, we noticed a potential confounding effect of LLT use. Therefore, two additional contrasts of H+C+LLT- and H+C+LLT+ vs. H-C- were performed in both IM and NCM.

Following your suggestion, we re-organized Figure 1A. Now it includes all five contrasts that have been studied, which is consistent with the method section. In addition, a label of “vs.” has been added near arrows to suggest the comparison group and the reference group of each contrast.

• In Figure 1b, some significantly regulated genes in the volcano plots are named while others are not (compare volcano plots for H+C+LLT- vs H-C- to H+C+LLT-+vs H-C-). Why were these genes labelled and others not? Presentation of data should be consistent.

• In line with the previous comment: l. 254 on page 7: "Up-regulated DEGs included known atherosclerosis genes such as the liver X receptor gene NR1H222, and NEXN, TRAF123, TLR7 and LGALS3BP24....". Please label in the volcano plot.

We thank the reviewers for this insightful comment. And we agree that labeling a few, but not all, DE genes on the volcano plots may bring some confusion. However, labeling hundreds of DE genes on these volcano plots is not practical due to the limited space. Therefore, we removed all DE gene labels from Figure 1B and Figure 2B. In addition, we add a reference of the DE gene information to the title of Figure 1B and 2B (Line 202 and Line 334).

Line202: … Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change|>1(S2 Table).

Line 334: …Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change |>1(S4 Table).

• The pathways shown in Figure 1D are not clearly associated with a particular group. Therefore, the authors are asked to add this information.

Thank you for pointing out this omission. A side label of “H+C+LLT-” has been added to Figure 1D to clarify this.

• I understand that DE genes with an adjusted p-value <0.05 were included in the pathway analysis. Were significant pathways detected by the adjusted or unadjusted p value? This is not clearly stated in the methods section. Unadjusted p-values are listed in Table S3. The authors are kindly requested to clarify this.

Thank you for pointing out this omission. The pathway significance was detected by the unadjusted p-value. We have now clarified our search method in the text as follows:

Lines 210: …Core analysis of IPA was subsequently performed and pathways and bio-functions with p-value≤0.05 were recognized as significant.

• Please label Figure 3A&B with the corresponding models and refer to them correctly in the text (see line 359, page 9).

Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification. Figure 3A and 3B are now being labeled as “Salmon Module” and “Magenta Module”, respectively.

Response to Reviewer #2:

This manuscript explores the difference in single cell transcriptome of Non Classical Monocytes and Intermediate Monocytes in PBMCs obtained from patient with HIV and CVD. The aim was to identified conserved differentially expressed gene signature in 92 patient divided in four groups according to their diagnosis (H-C- as a control, H+C-, H-,C+ and comorbidity of H+C+). This study is interesting because cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of mortality among people living with HIV and the use of PBMCs would be an affordable way to assess the risk and the mechanisms by which HIV engender CVD.

Comments:

1. The authors indicated that no difference in cell count was found, does this number refer to the quantification of the cells isolated from the CPT tube or the cells they isolated for sequencing? If the latter, can it really be said that there is no difference?

We thank the reviewers for this insightful comment. Identification and quantification of monocyte subtypes was done through flow cytometry analysis of PBMC samples. All monocytes were recovered from each PBMC sample. Then the relative frequency of each monocyte subtype was measured and compared across four HIV/CVD groups: H+C+, H+C-, H-C+ and H-C-. The sorted samples of each participant were frozen, and later, thawed to be used for subsequent RNA isolation and sequencing,

We have clarified this on line 157.

Line 157:…The quantification of intermediate and non-classical monocytes are estimated from the FACS data from all PBMC samples.

2. In the results section, second paragraph. The values at the beginning are being presented in percentage, please keep it, it will be easy to correlate the 59% with undetectable RNA and 6 patients with higher RNA.

We greatly appreciate your careful and detailed review of our manuscript. This has now been clarified in the text on Line 237: “among these 44 women with HIV, only 14% had HIV RNA above 1000 copies/ml.”

3. Do the authors looked at whether the 59% of HIV-positive patients who did not have RNA in plasma have any difference with patients with detected RNA and CDV? Wouldn't the presence or absence of RNA affect the behavior of peripheral cells, in this case monocytes? Or even if the disease is at a very advanced stage. This could perhaps give an idea why in the heatmap of the groups with IHV+ are not so homogeneous.

Thank you for the great suggestions. We agree that the presence of viremia is a factor that may affect the behavior of the monocytes. However, we were unable to compare groups of participants with versus without detected HIV-RNA, as the study was not designed for this comparison. Furthermore, participants in WIHS had relatively well controlled HIV disease, with access to effective therapy, so that the population may not have had sufficient variability in HIV disease severity to provide an informative comparison. We did include HIV disease stage related variables, including presence and absence of HIV RNA, among the many factors that were tested on the association with clustering pattern on the heat-map of DEGs. Unfortunately, we did not find any strong association between any of them to the expression pattern. Future studies will be needed to elucidate how these important HIV-related factors, including the amount of HIV viral load, duration of ART, advanced stage immunodeficiency and stage of HIV disease at diagnosis, etc., affect the differential gene expression of monocytes. We note this limitation on Line 475.

Line 475:… Future studies will be needed to elucidate how HIV-related factors, including the amount of HIV viral load, duration of ART and stage of HIV disease at diagnosis, etc., affect the differential gene expression of monocytes.

4. Heine GH, Rogacev KS had previously reported that the number of intermediate monocytes may be a significant predictor of cardiovascular events. What could be attributed in this case to the no difference found in monocytes between patients with CVD and negative for HIV?

Thank you for the thoughtful insight. We did notice that the results for comparison H-C+ vs. H-C- in our study are not consistent with a few prior studies.

One possible reason is that the primary endpoint of Rogacev KS et al.(2012, PMID: 22999728) was clinical CVD events, which is defined as the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, or nonhemorrhagic stroke. In our study, we focused on the subclinical CVD, which is defined as the presence of carotid artery plaque evidenced by an area with localized IMT >1.5 mm in at least one of the six imaged artery locations. Although the vulnerable atheromatous plaque has been recognized as an important factor involved in the progression and regression of atherosclerosis, the correlation between reduction of atheromatous plaques with significant decreases in risk for acute cardiovascular events has not been established yet.

In addition, our study has a relatively small sample size. Comparing to 951 subjects in Rogacev’s study, with around 22 participants in each group, we have a relatively low statistical power in detecting a difference in cell counts between patients with sCVD and negative for HIV (H-C+ vs. H-C-).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Andreas Zirlik

5 May 2023

HIV infection and cardiovascular disease have both shared and distinct monocyte gene expression features: Women's Interagency HIV Study

PONE-D-23-02143R1

Dear Dr. Kaplan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Andreas Zirlik, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Andreas Zirlik

11 May 2023

PONE-D-23-02143R1

HIV infection and cardiovascular disease have both shared and distinct monocyte gene expression features: Women's Interagency HIV Study

Dear Dr. Kaplan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Univ. Prof. Dr. Andreas Zirlik

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Timeline of the study recruitment, data collection and sampling.

    The Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) was initiated in 1994 and at the time of this study comprised six U.S. sites [17]. Recruitment in the WIHS occurred in two waves (1994–1995, 2001–2002) from HIV primary care clinics, hospital-based programs, community outreach, support groups, and other locations. The WIHS protocol involves semi-annual follow-up visits with detailed examinations, specimen collection, and structured interviews. Incorporated into our definition of cardiovascular disease were data from two waves of B-mode carotid artery ultrasound scans conducted approximately 7 years apart, first during 2004–2006 (Carotid ultrasound substudy scan #1) and again during 2010–2013 (Carotid ultrasound substudy scan #2). For the present report, from both the HIV infected and HIV-uninfected participants of WIHS, we selected groups both with and without subclinical cardiovascular disease (C); the C+ group was defined as those having at least 1 carotid artery plaque assessed at either vascular scan and the C- group was defined as no carotid artery plaque and either of the two scans. Women who used statin drugs for cholesterol lowering were excluded from the C- groups. We withdrew from the repository a sample of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) that had been collected from the semi-annual WIHS core visit that occurred as close as possible in time to the most recent vascular substudy visit. This study is based on transcriptomes of non-classical monocytes isolated from frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 88 WIHS participants at WIHS Visits 27 to 36 (corresponding to calendar years 2008 to 2012). If samples were not available or had adequate volume, an alternate was selected from an alternate visit before or after the carotid artery ultrasound scan.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Frequency of intermediate and non-classical monocytes to the total monocytes by HIV (H) and CVD(C) status.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Results for comparison between lipid lowering treatment (LLT) users and non-LLT users in intermediate monocytes analysis.

    A. Volcano plots for differential gene expression analysis in comparisons of H+C+LLT+ versus H+C+LLT-. Red genes indicate significance by FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold-change|>1. B. Heatmap showing expression of top up- and down-regulated DEGs found in women with H+C+LLT+ versus H+C+LLT-. C. Top significantly enriched pathways predicted by the fold change of DEGs found in H+C+LLT+ vs. H+C+LLT- comparison, using ingenuity pathway analysis.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Characteristics of non-classical monocytes study participants, by HIV infection (H) and subclinical cardiovascular disease (C) status.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Differentially expressed genes in Intermediate monocytes, comparing groups with cardiovascular disease (C+) with or without HIV infection (H) and lipid lowering treatment (LLT), versus H-C- controls.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table

    Ingenuity pathway analysis core analysis results for differentially expressed genes in intermediate monocytes related to A. H+C+LLT- and non-classical monocytes related to B. H+C- C. H+C+.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Log fold change of differentially expressed genes in non-classical monocytes associated with HIV alone, CVD alone and comorbid HIV/CVD.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Differentially expressed genes in non-classical monocytes among women with subclinical cardiovascular disease (C), stratified by HIV infection (H) and lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) status.

    (DOCX)

    S6 Table. Gene names of 22 salmon module genes and 70 Magenta module genes in non-classical monocytes.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The study data are an open scientific resource that can be used for purposes consistent with study policies and participant informed consent. Researchers can request access through the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study Data Analysis and Coordinating Center (DACC), see the website for additional details: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/science/macswihs-combined-cohort-study#how-can-researchers-access-study-data?.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES