Abstract
Starting with highly fluorinated benzoates, we develop the directed photocatalytic hydrodefluorination (HDF) of fluorinated aryl benzoates and demonstrate its synergistic use with other HDF strategies, along with C–H arylation, decarboxylative coupling and decarboxylative protonation to access most fluorination patterns found in benzoate derivatives and by extension, benzene derivatives via a molecular sculpting approach. Mild reaction conditions and excellent regioselectivity make the approach ideal for synthesis. This approach provides access to 16 benzoate derivatives with different fluorination patterns from just a couple of highly fluorinated, commercially available benzoic acids. We synthesize key intermediates or the API for sitagliptin, diflunisal, and other pharmaceutically important molecules. Importantly, we provide key insights into relative rates of defluorination and strategies to alter these rates. We provide demonstrations of the synergistic use of HDF and related technologies to rapidly enhance the synthetic complexity of these simple commercially available perfluoroarenes into complex partially fluorinated molecules.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Organofluorine motifs have become an essential component in pharmaceuticals and agricultural products.1 Despite their frequent use, fluorinated arenes are unnatural and must be synthesized. Many fluorination patterns require intense synthetic processes, with subtle alterations in the fluorination pattern often requiring entirely new synthetic sequences. This hampers exploration of fluorinated chemical space. Common protocols to access multifluorinated arenes often utilize either the halogen exchange reaction (halex process) which requires extreme temperature or the Balz-Schiemann reaction which allows aryl amino groups to be converted to the corresponding aryl fluoride via the corresponding diazonium. Usually, the diazonium must be isolated as the BF4− salt, significantly increasing the risk of explosion. Not surprisingly, recent efforts have focused on the modernization and innovation of fluorination strategies, including catalytic fluorination of prefunctionalized arenes,2 directed C−H fluorinations,3 strategies to catalyze the halex reaction,4 and improvements to the diazotization techniques (Scheme 1A).5 Although these strategies offer, in principle, the possibility of achieving multifluorinated arenes, in practice this remains challenging, which stems from the synthesis of appropriate precursors. Alternatively, in the case of C–H fluorination, a lack of versatility in terms of the regioselectivity hampers utilization.
An alternative approach to selective fluorine installation is selective fluorine removal (or functionalization) from a fully or highly fluorinated molecule. This can be achieved using perfluoroarenes, which unlike partially fluorinated arenes, are synthesized more readily and are commercially available. Complete fluorination- though an intense process, removes any selectivity issues, is straightforward, and is accomplished industrially on a large scale. Thus, selective defluorination could be a convenient approach to multifluorinated arenes, akin to fluorine sculpting. Furthermore, if this technology is realized and coupled to C–H functionalization iteratively could lead to unprecedented achievements in the levels of complexity of the organofluorines that can be synthesized.6
The challenge then shifts from making a C–F bond to selectively breaking just one of many C–F bonds. This idea has been developed by many researchers over the years, and while attractive, still faces challenges.7
Previous efforts have been fraught with difficulty. Site-selectivity remains a major challenge in metal-catalyzed C–F bond functionalizations, and once activated, many transition metal complexes form strong metal–F bonds often resulting in sluggish catalytic turnover that requires high energy reductants that form stronger M–F bonds (i.e., Si–F).8 Among C–F functionalization reactions, a mechanistically unique and increasingly broad class of reactions is the photocatalytic reductive fragmentation of C–F bonds, which complements other C–F bond functionalization methods.7a, 7c, 8b, 9 Previously, we showed that visible light and a photocatalyst could be used to accomplish reductive fragmentation, giving rise to the photocatalytic HDF (photo-HDF) reaction, which displayed mild reaction conditions and broad functional group tolerance. Importantly, visible light provided the driving force needed to break the strong C–F bonds via an outer sphere electron transfer process10 which prevented the formation of problematic M–F bonds. Thus, our group focused on the development of the photocatalytic reductive fragmentation strategy and has shown that under very mild conditions aryl C–F bonds can be selectively substituted with H,11 alkyl,12 alkenyl,13 prenyl,14 and aryl15 groups. Taken together with Hashmi’s16 and Bissember’s17 aminomethinylation, this strategy significantly expands accessible fluorinated systems. Others have applied this strategy to related fluorinated systems and the photoredox approach has proved productive in benzylic defluorination18 and allylic systems19 as well. However, a relatively low lying LUMO is a prerequisite for electron transfer, suggesting that this strategy will not be extendable to simple aliphatic fluorides that do not possess such a vacant orbital.
In our efforts to develop the photocatalytic C–F functionalization we discovered that within polyfluoroarenes the normal, or electronically controlled, C–F regioselectivity could be completely altered by the incorporation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond between an acidic N–H and an aryl–F situated in an ortho position on the ring.20 Unfortunately, after publication of our findings we discovered that some of the spectra had been modified by one author, making it impossible to know the scope of the reaction and the conclusions uncertain. Thus, we retracted the paper.20 However, at its root we believed the concept was valid and we wished to carefully demonstrate this concept as it was expected to be an important tool in the arsenal of C–F functionalization reactions.
Because of its synthetic versatility, we chose to focus our attention on the benzoate motif. Herein, we carefully develop the photocatalytic directed HDF (photo-d-HDF) of polyfluorobenzoic acid derivatives and demonstrate that, when used in concert with a handful of other related reactions, it can provide diverse access to fluorinated chemical space. The fluorinated congeners of benzoic acid which we can access by application of this strategy are shown in Scheme 1B. Importantly, while existing methods work well to obtain some of these fluorinated benzoates (i.e., highly, and sparsely fluorinated), the partially fluorinated benzoates (i.e., 2–3 F) are more difficult to access. The fluorine sculpting strategy can be rationally applied to access all these analogs. The value of the defluorination strategy is enhanced by coupling it to other chemical technologies, and we demonstrate the symbiosis through the expedited synthesis of several medicinally relevant molecules.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We posited that rationally placed hydrogen bonds could accelerate the fragmentation of fluorides that were not inherently favored by orbital overlap (i.e., electronically controlled) in the radical anion which is formed after electron transfer from the photocatalyst. Furthermore, we believed that the hydrogen bond would help bend the C–F bond out of planarity accelerating mesolytic cleavage and stabilize the newly formed fluoride ion. Key experiments demonstrate the critical nature of a moderately acidic intramolecular hydrogen bond in facilitating a switch in regioselectivity of the photo-HDF reaction (Scheme 2). The pentafluorobenzamide with an N–H leads to ortho-HDF (eqn 1). In contrast, when the N–H is replaced with N–Me (eqn 2), HDF occurs at the para-position. Thus, we re-explored this chemistry in hopes of fully understanding its nature and limitations and to demonstrate its synthetic utility when used in conjunction with the photo-HDF to access the various fluorinated motifs. Herein, we identify specific conditions that allow remarkable synthetic control over the order and location of hydrodehalogenation. The conditions utilize just a handful of highly similar substrates to nearly completely enumerate the fluorinated chemical space. We anticipate this knowledge will streamline exploration of fluorinated chemical space.
Our study involved just three different fluorobenzoic acid cores (Figure 1, top), which are commercially available and derived from the halex process, with 2 and 3 being the most prominent by-products of the synthesis of 1.21 The benzoic acid cores were then functionalized to give their corresponding amides or esters (Figure 1, bottom). Our studies explored the effects of these groups on the regioselectivity and reactivity of the photo-HDF reaction, then strategically employed them to achieve unique multifluorinated patterns. In some cases, the starting material is not obvious upon inspection of the product. Consequently, we have utilized a nomenclature system that indicates the core (1-3), the functional group R (a-h), the number of hydrogens (H0–5), and indicates an isomeric form of the product when more than one exists (A and B). We initiated our studies using conditions previously established for the electronically controlled photo-HDF reaction and explored the effect of the amide group.11 Specifically, we used diisopropyl ethyl amine (DIPEA) as our reductant, blue LEDs, and 0.25 mol% fac-Ir(ppy)3, (Figure 2). We investigated both electron poor and sterically congested amides. Para-cyano substituted (1bH0), bis-meta-CF3-substituted (1eH0), and para- sulfonamide (1fH0) preferred the directed-HDF ortho-product over the electronically controlled para-product which was the preferred product of the sterically congested amides (1cH0 and 1dH0). The para-cyano gave the best ratio of directed to electronic product and seemed to be insensitive to temperature increase whereas the bis-meta-CF3-substituted amide (1eH0) tended towards the di-HDF product. Thus, for many of our following studies we primarily used the nitrile derived amide. Indeed, with the para-cyano amide, the photo-d-HDF product was dominant, 1bH1A (Eqn 3, Scheme 3), yielding the ortho-HDF product in 65% isolated yield. With increased DIPEA loading and more reaction time, a second HDF event took place which occurred at the other ortho position giving a 65% yield of 1bH2A, with only a minimal amount of 2,4-di-HDF product being observed (3.5 rr, eqn 4). We found, however, that water played a critical role in the reaction and could be conveniently used to intentionally disrupt the directed-HDF and accelerate the electronic-HDF (vide infra). Presumably, the presence of water disrupts the relatively fragile intramolecular hydrogen bond within the organofluorine thereby increasing the barrier to mesolytic fragmentation of the ortho fluoride from the radical anion.22 Further, the coordination of water may induce other structural changes that shift the preference towards the para-fluorine. Finally, the water molecules are free to solvate any of the fluorides from about the ring, and as a result, seems to mostly just accelerate the electronically preferred fluoride fragmentation.23 When all solvents and reagents were dried prior to use, the directed product dominated (photo-d-HDF), but when just a few equivalents of water were added to otherwise unchanged conditions, we observed a return in the C–F fragmentation regioselectivity to electronic control (photo-HDF), which peaked around 300 equivalents of water. Under these conditions, the reaction gave us the electronically dictated para-HDF product, 1bH1B (Eqn 5) in excellent yield, 87%, despite having a directing group attached. Heating this reaction and increasing the DIPEA equivalents led to a second defluorination event which occurred at the ortho position giving us the 2,4 di-H product 1bH2B (61%, eqn 6). In contrast, under dry conditions with excess DIPEA, the acidic amide will undergo tri-HDF to give 1bH3 in excellent yield (90%, eqn 7), which forms by directed-HDF, followed by directed- HDF, and ultimatly electronic-HDF.
Thus, by simply controlling the moisture content, the equivalents of DIPEA, reaction temperature, and reaction time, we were able to access 5 different fluorinated congeners in good to excellent yields from a single fluorinated core.
We next sought to systematically develop routes to access other multifluorinated patterns. We began by laying out a clear strategy to enumerate the different tetra-fluorobenzoates (Scheme 4). First, if the 4-H product was desired, the most straightforward route was the photo-HDF of commercially available benzoate methyl ester (89%, eqn 8), though as mentioned the amide under wet conditions will also yield the 4-H product (eqn 10). Equation 9 and 11 demonstrate the directed-HDF strategy to obtain the ortho-H amide as the major product. The meta-H benzoate was obtained by starting with meta-Cl benzoate or amide (eqn 12, 94%, eqn 13, 92%). This relies on the halogen control which is observed when there is a heavier halogen atom on the same ring- despite its position on the ring. Thus, halogen control outcompetes both electronic- and directed-HDF.10a Thus, from 2 cores all potential mono-H motifs can be obtained.
We turned our attention towards obtaining the di-hydrofluoro benzoates (Scheme 5). The difference in rate constants for mono- and di-reduction is significant, and selectivity can be achieved by varying the equivalents of amine and the reaction temperature, along with careful monitoring of reaction progress. The di-H product obtained under electronic control is the 2,4 di-H product which was obtained starting with the methyl benzoate (eqn 14). Again, using the amide 1bH0 under dry conditions (eqn 15) we were able to mostly shut down electronic HDF and instead obtain 2,6-di-HDF as the product 1bH2A in a good yield (65%) and good selectivity (3.5 rr). In contrast, the 2,4-di-HDF product could be obtained by intentionally adding water to the reaction (eqn 16), with excellent selectivity. Typically, the easiest way to obtain a meta-H was to utilize halogen control strategy using starting material derived from commercially available 3-chlorotetrafluorobenzoic acid. Coupling halogen control with photo-d-HDF (eqn 17, eqn 18) we obtained the 2,5 di-H products (2bH2, 2aH2) in excellent yields (87%, 81%). Importantly, the first dehalogenation directs the second event to occur para to the first, i.e., neither 2,3-, 3,5- nor the 3,4-defluorinated products are observed. If 3,5-motifs are desired, then halogen controlled di-dechlorination of 3aH0 and 3bH0 (eqn 19, eqn 20) provide 3aH2 and 3bH2 in excellent yields (82%, 85%). The 3,4-defluorinated motif can be obtained by first employing borohydride based HDF24 conditions developed earlier by our group,24 followed by the photo-HDCl (photocatalytic hydrodechlorination) to yield 2dH2 in 75% overall yield (eqn 21). While the SNAr based- and photocatalytic-HDF selectivity often coincide, their selectivity diverges when heavier atoms are involved. Similar experiments with the ester failed and were plagued by carbonyl chemistry.25 In total, this allows access to four different di-H benzoyl motifs, one pattern of which is a medicinally relevant organofluorine used in the synthesis of Januvia.1c
We next investigated the tri-HDF series (Scheme 6). Again, the degree of hydrodehalogenation, i.e., di- versus tri-HDF, can often be controlled by the equivalents of amine, and the reaction temperature. For example, while di-HDF of 1aH0 gives 1aH2 in excellent yield (eqn14, Scheme 5), increasing the loading of DIPEA from 1.2 to 5 equivalents, increasing the temperature from 45 °C to 65 °C, and extending the reaction time from 12 to 24 h, allows the tri-HDF of substrate 1bH0 to give 1bH3 in excellent yield, 85% (eqn 22, Scheme 6). Despite a different reaction path, the same pattern emerged with both our standard p-cyanophenyl amide (b, eqn 23) as well as the pharmaceutically relevant para-sulfonamide motif (f, eqn 24). They were isolated in excellent to good yields. Next, we sought to access the 2,4,5-tri-H pattern by use of halogen control followed by ortho and a para di-photo-HDF on an amide derived from 2,6-di-isopropyl aniline (eqn 25, Scheme 6). The amide was chosen because we anticipated that it would prefer HDF at the 4-position based on its preference for 4-HDF observed early on in our studies (Fig. 2). Indeed, this resulted in a 3,6-difluorobenzoyl motif (2dH3) being isolated in good yield (83%). Experiments with the benzoate (eqn 26) also gave the same product and suggested that this was the electronic product. Taking advantage of the para-cyano amide’s directing ability, the 3,5-dichloro (3) motif was used with halogen control to expose both meta-Hs and then photo-d-HDF to remove an ortho-fluorine to obtain 3bH3A in excellent yield (87%, eqn 27). This approach allows access to few different fluorination patterns which are challenging to access and yet are found in several important molecules such as teflubenzuron,26 omarigliptin,27 dolutegravir,27a,28 dabrafenib,27a,29 cobimetinib,27a and diflunisal.30 Next, we turned our attention towards obtaining the 2,6-di-fluorobenzoate derivative (3bH3B, eqn 28). Attempts to obtain this compound using the dichloromethyl benzoate (3a) were unsuccessful. While photo-HDCl occurred rapidly, further HDF was not feasible. Extended re action times and in the presence of water only led to slow hydrolysis of the intermediate. While use of the amide did lead to further directed-HDF, we were still not able to achieve the 3,4,5-tri-H pattern. We successfully achieved this pattern by first use of NaBH4 in DMSO24 which selectively gave HDF via nucleophilic aromatic substitution to give 3bH1 in high yield (85%). Subsequent addition of 5 equivalents of DIPEA to 3bH1 at 65 °C with irradiation resulted in the di-photo-HDCl to give 3bH3B in two-steps with a combined 77% yield (eqn 28).
We next investigated the routes to generate the monofluorinated isomers through selective HDF (Scheme 7). Admittedly, the molecular sculpting approach is less attractive when an arene contains only a single fluorine, especially in the case of a simple benzoate. However, we believe that this systematic study may be informative in the case of more structurally complex fluorinated molecules. Thus, we asked which, if any, of the mono-fluorobenzoyl motifs we could obtain. We found that the meta-F benzoate could be synthesized by starting with the amide (1bH0) which we found underwent ortho-, ortho-, para-, and finally meta-defluorination under prolonged reaction times to provide access to mono-fluorinated derivative 1bH4 (enq 29) in good yield (68%). The key to reaction was increasing the reaction temperature, DIPEA loading, and lengthening the reaction time. Access to the para-fluoro motif was achieved by starting with the reaction of amide 3bH0 (eqn 30) and exploiting halogen control to first remove the meta-chlorines, followed by di-photo-d-HDF to remove the ortho fluorines to give 3bH4A in 70% yield. The same strategy could be employed using the much bulkier (3d, eqn 31) amide which is also an effective directing group to yield 3dH4 in similar yield (63%). This result, might seem surprising, given the previously observed preference for 4-HDF by this group (Fig 2), but can be rationalized by first dechlorination which directs the next HDF event to occur para to the first installment of hydrogen.31 Finally, to complete the sequence, we needed to develop a strategy to obtain the ortho-F product. We were able to achieve this using the previously described SNAr-HDF, followed by di-photo-HDCl, followed by photo-d-HDF to remove one of two remaining fluorines to yield 3bH4B in 67% (eqn 32). While this would be a moderate yield for a single- step transformation, it is remarkable considering that two chlorines and two fluorines were selectively substituted in this transformation. Finally, to complete our study, we turned our attention towards obtaining the desfluorobenzoate (3bH5, Scheme 8). We anticipated 3bH4B was key to obtaining this objective. Previously, Tan32 has shown that fac-Ir(ppy)3 when used with tBuOK is capable of defluorinating ortho-fluorinated benzamides to afford an annulated product that presumably proceeds through a similar radical anion intermediate. Hence, by adding 100 equivalents of water which we found necessary, we were able to drive the final HDF and complete hydrodehalogenation in excellent 1-step yield (94%) from 3bH4, or a 73% 3-step yield starting from 3b.
Having provided strategies to rapidly access several fluorinated benzoate congeners, some of which would be difficult to access via traditional methods, we wanted to explore the applicability of our products.
Benzoates, of course, can serve as a precursor for many other functional groups, including a proton, as demonstrated by Goossen33 and others’34 copper-catalyzed decarboxylative protonation. Indeed, we found that the copper catalyzed decarboxylative conditions reported by Goossen to be straight forward to use with our benzoate products. Recently, Neufeldt and Topczewski35 studied the palladium catalyzed decarboxylative cross-coupling of fluorinated benzoates and observed that the presence of ortho fluorines facilitated the decarboxylation step. However, under these conditions,33 we found that decarboxylation occurred rather smoothly regardless of fluorine content, though the kinetics of the reactions were not followed. For example, when carboxylic acid 3hH2 was subjected to Cu2O, and 1,10-phenanthroline in NMP/quinoline (3:1) at 170 °C for 17 hours, 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene was produced (5, Scheme 9) in excellent yield 89%, while the 4-fluoro substrate (entry 4) resulted in a 70% yield. It should be noted that these reactions were performed in a sealed microwave vial to prevent the loss of the significantly more volatile product. However, in all cases we examined, the acid is readily accessible via the acidic hydrolysis of the corresponding defluorinated benzamides and basic hydrolysis of the ester motifs (see SI for details) and all readily underwent decarboxylative protonation.
Next, building further upon Liu’s Cu(I) based decarboxylative-cross coupling technology,36 we attempted to directly synthesize biaryls with aryl halides (Scheme 10). First, we established the desired fluorination pattern via photocatalytic dehalogenation, followed by hydrolysis to obtain the difluorinated acid. This acid was directly coupled with brominated methylated methyl salicylate to forge the key C–C bond connecting the two aryl rings found in the commercial anti-inflammatory drug, diflunisal (8), which was realized after demethylation.37 A moderate yield for the coupling step was obtained whereas the demethylation step was high yielding (93%). This scheme illustrates the power of the molecular sculpting approach when combined with other transformations to access important fluorinated molecules.
In addition to the ability to decarboxylatively cross-couple the benzoate motif, Fagnou,38 Daugolis,39 and others40 have shown that the enhanced acidity of C–Hs (compared to non-fluorinated arenes), such as those found on highly fluorinated arenes, can be exploited for cross-couplings. Thus, we investigated the ability to wed the photocatalytic sculpting technique with C–H functionalization chemistry (Scheme 11). After subjecting substrates to photocatalytic dehalogenation, we were able to facilitate the palladium catalyzed C–H functionalizations in good yields. Starting with the HDF product 1aH1, we were able to obtain the cross-coupled product 9 in excellent yield, 93%. In contrast, the dechlorinated product 2aH1 could be utilized for the formation of the coupled product at the 3-position. Additionally, we demonstrated C–H cinnamylation was feasible.41 Specifically, the HDF product 1aH1 was treated with cinnamyl chloride Pd-catalyst and cesium carbonate to provide 11 in good yield (eqn 36). Together, these results demonstrate the rational use of molecular sculpting and direct C–H functionalization strategies to rapidly expand accessible organofluorine chemical space. Furthermore, the process can be iterative, further enhancing the utility of this sequence. When the new biaryl compound 9 (eqn 37, Scheme 12) was resubjected to photocatalysis, a fluorine ortho to the ester and meta to the aryl group was re moved to form a new trifluorobiaryl, 9a. Similarly, if biaryl 10 was resubjected to photocatalysis, the 2-fluoro group (ortho to the ester group) was removed to form another trifluorobiaryl, 10a (eqn 38). This result, along with eqn 18 suggest that the position ortho to the ester is more electronically activated than the para position when there is a meta substituent (aryl or H) directing the HDF, and when present, will preferentially fragment the 2-F. Importantly, this highlights the ability to inter-weave HDF and C–H coupling followed by another HDF event to afford molecules that would otherwise be synthetically challenging to access.
Often, chemists are faced with the task of creating entirely new synthetic routes to access highly related fluorinated analogs. Thus, we believe our approach is attractive. By applying just a few related strategies from a few commercially reagents, we can expeditiously access many fluorinated analogs. To highlight the relevance of this chemistry we attempted to provide expedited paths to commercially valuable organofluorines.
The tetrafluorobenzoyl motif which is found in the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (1fH1, Scheme 13), is believed to regulate the intraocular pressure of the eye and has been studied as an anti-glaucoma medication that can be used topically.42 Performing the HDF reaction under wet conditions affords the electronically controlled HDF product 1fH1. The substrate is only modestly soluble in MeCN but its solubility can be increased sub-stantially when DMSO is added as a cosolvent along with water as an additive, which result in the high yield of the electronically controlled HDF product (eqn 39).
While we have demonstrated several examples of how the molecular sculpting approach can provide convenient access to important fluorinated molecules, it is also important to realize that it may also facilitate the study of drugs in other ways. For instance, retigabine was a drug that was marketed as an anticonvulsant,43 though it has since been removed from the market.44 In the development of the drug several related organofluorine impurities were produced in low yield (<1.5%, Scheme 14). The safety profile of these impurities had to be assessed, as is often the case, and thus, required synthesis. Because the impurities are produced in (hopefully) low quantities via the synthetic route to the drug, typically, entirely new routes must be developed, requiring valuable time and effort. Here we demonstrate an efficient synthesis of a fluorinated impurity of retigabine in two steps from commercial material. The impurity contained 4-fluorobenzamide with a cyclic urea, and we hoped that this amide would efficiently undergo the di-photo-d-HDF to yield the desired product after di-photo-HDCl occurred. The starting amide was of moderate solubility in MeCN, so dry DMSO was added to increase solubility. Indeed, this approach provides rapid access to this fluorinated impurity in 57% yield and could expedite access to such impurities.
Januvia is an important anti-diabetic drug marketed by Merck. The trifluorination pattern found in the key acid used in the synthesis of Januvia can be obtained using a combination of halogen control and photo-d-HDF on the amide 1bH0, followed by homologation of the acid via a Wolff rearrangement (Scheme 15). The key intermediate 12 was obtained without the need for chromatography in excellent yield, 79%.45
In conclusion, we have investigated the ability to utilize the photo-d-HDF of fluorinated arenes. We have identified and highlighted several control elements available to synthetic chemist that will expedite their efforts to access and explore fluorinated chemical space. We have identified several key factors that control the photo-HDF, they are:
Halogen size
Substituent electronics (para directing)
-
Substituent H-bonding (directed HDF)
The disruptive/accelerative effect of water
The disruptive effect of steric bulk
Namely, we have seen that halogen control will reliably remove the heaviest halogen. Specifically, we have observed that a chlorine will be preferentially fragmented over a fluorine- regardless of its position.14 Secondary to the halogen control, is the inherent electronic control of substrate, and in the case of an ester and amide group is para to the carbonyl group, followed by ortho, followed by the other ortho. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding from non-bulky amides makes up the tertiary control element and will preferentially undergo directed-HDF at the ortho positions. Acidic aryl amides work well, but the phenomenon may extend beyond this motif. In the event that the electronic and the directed product are not the same, the exact regioselectivity will be a function of the acidity of the amide and can range from synthetically useful to excellent. Importantly, the presence of water in the reaction plays an important role of disrupting the hydrogen bond directing effect and can be used to intentionally return the selectivity to the electronically controlled product. We have also seen that the addition of water can be used help accelerate defluorination- in the event that the HDF is sluggish. Additionally, if an amide is bulky, it may also inhibit the hydrogen bond directing effect and result in the electronically controlled product, albeit sluggishly. Finally, we have observed that fluorines flanked by hydrogen are less prone to fragment- which may be a result of the structure of the radical anion, and which is expected to have a significant effect on the rate and regioselectivity of mesolytic fragmentation of fluoride.46
We have investigated four complementary techniques for building various useful fluorination patterns, they are:
SNAr HDF
decarboxylative coupling
decarboxylative protonations
C–H functionalizations
Specifically, we have shown how the SNAr-HDF, while often giving the same selectivity as electronic control, diverges in the presence of heavier halogens. Finally, we also demonstrated how the benzoyl group could first be used to yield the appropriate fluorination pattern, and then subsequently decarboxylated to yield fluorinated benzenes, and fluorinated biaryls. Furthermore, we showed that iterative HDF and C–H functionalization was possible. Given the number of C–Hs that can now be systematically revealed, we anticipate the utility of these two technologies should be synergistically enhanced. Finally, we have applied the defluorination strategies in several different scenarios in hopes of highlighting how it may be used to enhance the access to organofluorine space.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank the National Institutes of Health NIH NIGMS (5R01GM115697 and R35GM139613) and the Herman Frasch Fund for Chemical Research for financial support of this work. A portion of this work was performed on the Bruker Neo 800 MHz spectrometer equipped with a TCI cryo-probe at the Oklahoma Statewide Shared (OSS) NMR Facility located at Oklahoma State University (Stillwater, OK), which is supported by NSF Award No. DBI-1726397.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Statement
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at http://pubs.acs.org.” 1H, 13C, 19F spectra, as well as key 2-D NMR spectra, other characterization, and synthetic procedures (FID). FAIR Data is available as Supporting Information for Publication and includes the primary NMR FID files for compounds: [1aH1, 1aH2, 1aH3, 1bH1A, 1bH1B, 1bH2A, 1bH2B, 1bH3, 1eH1, 1fH1, 1fH3, 1hH1, 2aH1, 2aH2, 2aH3, 2bH1, 2bH2, 2dH1, 2dH2, 2dH3, 3aH0, 3aH2, 3bH1, 3bH2, 3bH3A, 3bH3B, 3bH4A, 3bH4B, 3bH5, 3dH0, 3dH4, 3gH0, 3gH4, 3hH2, 3hH3, 3hH4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 9a, 10a, NMe-1bH1B, 2hH2, 1dH0, 1cH0, 3bH0, 2dH0, 2bH0, 2aH0, NMe-1bH0, 1iH0, 1fH0, 1eH0, 1bH0, and 1bH4].” (zip)
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its online supplementary material.
REFERENCES
- 1.(a) Inoue M; Sumii Y; Shibata N, Contribution of organofluorine compounds to pharmaceuticals. Acs Omega 2020, 5 (19), 10633–10640; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ogawa Y; Tokunaga E; Kobayashi O; Hirai K; Shibata N, Current contributions of organofluorine compounds to the agrochemical industry. Iscience 2020, 101467; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang J; Sánchez-Roselló M; Aceña JL; Del Pozo C; Sorochinsky AE; Fustero S; Soloshonok VA; Liu H, Fluorine in pharmaceutical industry: fluorine-containing drugs introduced to the market in the last decade (2001–2011). Chem. Rev 2014, 114 (4), 2432–2506; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Upadhyay C; Chaudhary M; De Oliveira RN; Borbas A; Kempaiah P; Rathi B, Fluorinated scaffolds for antimalarial drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2020, 15 (6), 705–718; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Hagmann WK, The many roles for fluorine in medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem 2008, 51 (15), 4359–4369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Ma J-A; Cahard D, Asymmetric fluorination, trifluoromethylation, and perfluoroalkylation reactions. Chem. Rev 2004, 104 (12), 6119–6146; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lectard S; Hamashima Y; Sodeoka M, Recent advances in catalytic enantioselective fluorination reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal 2010, 352 (16), 2708–2732; [Google Scholar]; (c) Furuya T; Kamlet AS; Ritter T, Catalysis for fluorination and trifluoromethylation. Nature 2011, 473 (7348), 470–477; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Valero G; Companyó X; Rios R, Enantioselective organocatalytic synthesis of fluorinated molecules. Eur. J. Chem 2011, 17 (7), 2018–2037; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Campbell MG; Ritter T, Modern carbon–fluorine bond forming reactions for aryl fluoride synthesis. Chem. Rev 2015, 115 (2), 612–633; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Yang X; Wu T; Phipps RJ; Toste FD, Advances in catalytic enantioselective fluorination, mono-, di-, and trifluoromethylation, and trifluoromethylthiolation reactions. Chem. Rev 2015, 115 (2), 826–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Szpera R; Moseley DF; Smith LB; Sterling AJ; Gouverneur V, The fluorination of C− H bonds: developments and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58 (42), 14824–14848; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lou S-J; Chen Q; Wang Y-F; Xu D-Q; Du X-H; He J-Q; Mao Y-J; Xu Z-Y, Selective C–H Bond Fluorination of Phenols with a Removable Directing Group: Late-Stage Fluorination of 2-Phenoxyl Nicotinate Derivatives. ACS Catal. 2015, 5 (5), 2846–2849. [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Adams D; Clark J, Nucleophilic routes to selectively fluorinated aromatics. Chem. Soc. Rev 1999, 28 (4), 225–231; [Google Scholar]; (b) Adams DJ; Clark JH; McFarland H, The formation of 4, 4′-difluorobenzophenone from 4, 4′-dinitrodiphenylmethane. J. Fluorine Chem 1998, 92 (2), 127–129. [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Milner DJ, Fluoroaromatics from arylamines, a convenient one-pot conversion using nitrosonium tetrafluoroborate. Synth. Commun 1992, 22 (1), 73–82; [Google Scholar]; (b) Shinhama K; Aki S; Furuta T; Minamikawa J. i., Facile Conversion of Arenediazonium Salts to the Corresponding Fluoroarenes Using Boron Trifluoride Diethyl Ether Complex. Synth. Commun 1993, 23 (11), 1577–1582; [Google Scholar]; (c) Laali KK; Gettwert VJ, Fluorodediazoniation in ionic liquid solvents: new life for the Balz–Schiemann reaction. J. Fluorine Chem 2001, 107 (1), 31–34. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Wang M; Shi Z, Methodologies and strategies for selective borylation of C–Het and C–C bonds. Chem. Rev 2020, 120 (15), 7348–7398; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Elsby MR; Liu J; Zhu S; Hu L; Huang G; Johnson SA, Influence of N-Heterocyclic Carbene Steric Bulk on Selectivity in Nickel Catalyzed C–H Bond Silylation, Germylation, and Stannylation. Organometallics 2018, 38 (2), 436–450; [Google Scholar]; (c) Xia P-J; Ye Z-P; Hu Y-Z; Xiao J-A; Chen K; Xiang H-Y; Chen X-Q; Yang H, Photocatalytic C–F bond borylation of polyfluoroarenes with NHC-boranes. Org. Lett 2020, 22 (5), 1742–1747; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lim S; Song D; Jeon S; Kim Y; Kim H; Lee S; Cho H; Lee BC; Kim SE; Kim K, Cobalt-Catalyzed C–F Bond Borylation of Aryl Fluorides. Org. Lett 2018, 20 (22), 7249–7252; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Johnson SA; Doster ME; Matthews J; Shoshani M; Thibodeau M; Labadie A; Hatnean JA, A mechanistic investigation of carbon–hydrogen bond stannylation: synthesis and characterization of nickel catalysts. Dalton trans. 2012, 41 (26), 8135–8143; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Sun M; Tao M; Zhao L; Li W; Liu Z; He C-Y; Feng Z, Iron-catalyzed C–F bond silylation and borylation of fluoroarenes. Org. Chem. Front 2021, 8 (19), 5322–5327; [Google Scholar]; (g) Doster ME; Hatnean JA; Jeftic T; Modi S; Johnson SA, Catalytic C− H Bond Stannylation: A New Regioselective Pathway to C− Sn Bonds via C− H Bond Functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132 (34), 11923–11925; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Pabst TP; Chirik PJ, Development of Cobalt Catalysts for the meta-Selective C (sp2)–H Borylation of Fluorinated Arenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144 (14), 6465–6474; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Tian Y-M; Guo X-N; Kuntze-Fechner MW; Krummenacher I; Braunschweig H; Radius U; Steffen A; Marder TB, Selective photocatalytic C–F borylation of polyfluoroarenes by Rh/Ni dual catalysis providing valuable fluorinated arylboronate esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140 (50), 17612–17623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Ahrens T; Kohlmann J; Ahrens M; Braun T, Functionalization of fluorinated molecules by transition-metal-mediated C–F bond activation to access fluorinated building blocks. Chem. Rev 2015, 115 (2), 931–972; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kiplinger JL; Richmond TG; Osterberg CE, Activation of carbon-fluorine bonds by metal complexes. Chem. Rev 1994, 94 (2), 373–431; [Google Scholar]; (c) Amii H; Uneyama K, C− F bond activation in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev 2009, 109 (5), 2119–2183; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Clot E; Eisenstein O; Jasim N; Macgregor SA; McGrady JE; Perutz RN, C− F and C− H bond activation of fluorobenzenes and fluoropyridines at transition metal centers: how fluorine tips the scales. Acc. Chem. Res 2011, 44 (5), 333–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Weaver J; Senaweera S, C–F activation and functionalization of perfluoro-and polyfluoroarenes. Tetrahedron 2014, 41 (70), 7413–7428; [Google Scholar]; (b) Kuehnel MF; Lentz D; Braun T, Synthesis of fluorinated building blocks by transition-metal-mediated hydrodefluorination reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52 (12), 3328–3348; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Aizenberg M; Milstein D, Catalytic activation of carbon-fluorine bonds by a soluble transition metal complex. Science 1994, 265 (5170), 359–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Stahl T; Klare HF; Oestreich M, Main-group Lewis acids for C–F bond activation. ACS Catal. 2013, 3 (7), 1578–1587; [Google Scholar]; (b) Shen Q; Huang Y-G; Liu C; Xiao J-C; Chen Q-Y; Guo Y, Review of recent advances in CF bond activation of aliphatic fluorides. J. Fluorine Chem 2015, 179, 14–22; [Google Scholar]; (c) Yan G; Qiu K; Guo M, Recent advance in the CF bond functionalization of trifluoromethyl-containing compounds. Org. Chem. Front 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Pierini AB; Vera DMA, Ab initio evaluation of intramolecular electron transfer reactions in halobenzenes and stabilized derivatives. J. Org. Chem 2003, 68 (24), 9191–9199; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Costentin C; Robert M; Savéant J-M, Fragmentation of aryl halide π anion radicals. Bending of the cleaving bond and activation vs driving force relationships. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126 (49), 16051–16057; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Saveant JM, Catalysis of chemical reactions by electrodes. Acc. Chem. Res 1980, 13 (9), 323–329. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Senaweera SM; Singh A; Weaver JD, Photocatalytic hydrodefluorination: facile access to partially fluorinated aromatics. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136 (8), 3002–3005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Singh A; Kubik J; Weaver JD, Photocatalytic C–F alkylation; facile access to multifluorinated arenes. Chem. Sci 2015, 6 (12), 7206–7212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Singh A; Fennell CJ; Weaver J, Photocatalyst size controls electron and energy transfer: selectable E/Z isomer synthesis via C–F alkenylation. Chem. Sci 2016, 7 (11), 6796–6802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Priya S; Weaver III JD, Prenyl praxis: a method for direct photocatalytic defluoroprenylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140 (47), 16020–16025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Senaweera S; Weaver JD, Dual C–F C –H Functionalization via photocatalysis: Access to multifluorinated biaryls. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (8), 2520–2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xie J; Rudolph M; Rominger F; Hashmi ASK, Photoredox‐Controlled Mono-and Di-Multifluoroarylation of C (sp3)− H Bonds with Aryl Fluorides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56 (25), 7266–7270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nicholls TP; Robertson JC; Gardiner MG; Bissember AC, Identifying the potential of pulsed LED irradiation in synthesis: copper-photocatalysed C–F functionalisation. Chem. Commun 2018, 54 (36), 4589–4592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.(a) Sugihara N; Suzuki K; Nishimoto Y; Yasuda M, Photoredox-Catalyzed C–F Bond Allylation of Perfluoroalkylarenes at the Benzylic Position. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen K; Berg N; Gschwind R; König B, Selective single C (sp3)–F bond cleavage in trifluoromethylarenes: Merging visible-light catalysis with Lewis acid activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (51), 18444–18447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Xiao T; Li L; Zhou L, Synthesis of functionalized gem-difluoroalkenes via a photocatalytic decarboxylative/defluorinative reaction. J. Org. Chem 2016, 81 (17), 7908–7916; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen H; Anand D; Zhou L, Photoredox Defluorinative Alkylation of 1-Trifluoromethyl Alkenes and 1, 3-Butadienes with 1, 4-Dihydropyridines as Alkylation Reagents. Asian J. Org. Chem 2019, 8 (5), 661–664. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khaled MB; El Mokadem RK; Weaver III JD, Hydrogen bond directed photocatalytic hydrodefluorination: overcoming electronic control. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (37), 13092–13101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 21.Knunyants IL; Yakobson GG, Syntheses of Fluoroorganic Compounds. Springer Science & Business Media: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 22.(a) Dalvit C; Invernizzi C; Vulpetti A, Fluorine as a hydrogen-bond acceptor: Experimental evidence and computational calculations. Eur. J. Chem 2014, 20 (35), 11058–11068; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Schneider H-J, Hydrogen bonds with fluorine. Studies in solution, in gas phase and by computations, conflicting conclusions from crystallographic analyses. Chem. Sci 2012, 3 (5), 1381–1394. [Google Scholar]
- 23.(a) The absolute hydration of fluoride has been measured to be between −102 and −112 kcal/mol at 298 K. For comparison, hydration of hydroxide is between −91 and −110 kcal/mol at 298 K, see ref,; ;; (b) Zhan C-G; Dixon DA, Hydration of the fluoride anion: structures and absolute hydration free energy from first-principles electronic structure calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108 (11), 2020–2029. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schoch TD; Mondal M; Weaver JD, Catalyst-Free Hydrodefluorination of Perfluoroarenes with NaBH4. Org. Lett 2021, 23 (5), 1588–1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Under these reaction conditions we observed demethylation of the methyl ester.
- 26.Harsanyi A; Sandford G, Organofluorine chemistry: applications, sources and sustainability. Green chem. 2015, 17 (4), 2081–2086. [Google Scholar]
- 27.(a) Zhou Y; Wang J; Gu Z; Wang S; Zhu W; Aceña JL; Soloshonok VA; Izawa K; Liu H, Next generation of fluorine-containing pharmaceuticals, compounds currently in phase II–III clinical trials of major pharmaceutical companies: new structural trends and therapeutic areas. Chem. Rev 2016, 116 (2), 422–518; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen P; Feng D; Qian X; Apgar J; Wilkening R; Kuethe JT; Gao Y-D; Scapin G; Cox J; Doss G, Structure–activity-relationship of amide and sulfonamide analogs of omarigliptin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2015, 25 (24), 5767–5771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garrido C; Soriano V; Geretti AM; Zahonero N; Garcia S; Booth C; Gutierrez F; Viciana I; de Mendoza C, Resistance associated mutations to dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) in HIV-infected patients–impact of HIV subtypes and prior raltegravir experience. Antivir. Res 2011, 90 (3), 164–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rheault TR; Stellwagen JC; Adjabeng GM; Hornberger KR; Petrov KG; Waterson AG; Dickerson SH; Mook RA Jr; Laquerre SG; King AJ, Discovery of dabrafenib: a selective inhibitor of Raf kinases with antitumor activity against B-Raf-driven tumors. ACS Med. Chem. Lett 2013, 4 (3), 358–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.(a) Isanbor C; O’Hagan D, Fluorine in medicinal chemistry: A review of anti-cancer agents. J. Fluorine Chem 2006, 127 (3), 303–319; [Google Scholar]; (b) Hannah J; Ruyle W; Jones H; Matzuk A; Kelly K; Witzel B; Holtz W; Houser R; Shen T, Novel analgesic-antiinflammatory salicylates. J. Med. Chem 1978, 21 (11), 1093–1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Konovalov VV; Laev SS; Beregovaya IV; Shchegoleva LN; Shteingarts VD; Tsvetkov YD; Bilkis I, Fragmentation of radical anions of polyfluorinated benzoates. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104 (2), 352–361. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dai P; Ma J; Huang W; Chen W; Wu N; Wu S; Li Y; Cheng X; Tan R, Photoredox C–F Quaternary Annulation Catalyzed by a Strongly Reducing Iridium Species. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (2), 802–806. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goossen LJ; Manjolinho F; Khan BA; Rodriguez N, Microwave-assisted Cu-catalyzed protodecarboxylation of aromatic carboxylic acids. J. Org. Chem 2009, 74 (6), 2620–2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.(a) Zheng Q; Morimoto M; Takanohashi T, An efficient production of benzene from benzoic acid in subcritical water using a copper (I) oxide catalyst. Green Chem. 2015, 17 (2), 791–794; [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Z; Fu Z; Zhang H; Long J; Song Y; Cai H, A simple protocol for Cu-catalyzed protodecarboxylation of (hetero) aromatic carboxylic acids. New J Chem 2016, 40 (4), 3014–3018; [Google Scholar]; (c) Cahiez G; Moyeux A; Gager O; Poizat M, Copper-Catalyzed Decarboxylation of Aromatic Carboxylic Acids: En Route to Milder Reaction Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal 2013, 355 (4), 790–796; [Google Scholar]; (d) Yousefi R; Hosseini A; Tajbakhsh M, Copper (II) Acetylacetonate/Tetrabutylammonium Hydrogen Sulfate: A New System for Decarboxylation of Aromatic Carboxylic Acids under Amine‐Free Conditions. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6 (42), 11747–11752. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Humke JN; Daley RA; Morrenzin AS; Neufeldt SR; Topczewski JJ, Combined Experimental and Computational Mechanistic Investigation of the Palladium-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Cross-Coupling of Sodium Benzoates with Chloroarenes. J. Org. Chem 2021, 86 (17), 11419–11433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shang R; Fu Y; Wang Y; Xu Q; Yu HZ; Liu L, Copper-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Cross-Coupling of Potassium Polyfluorobenzoates with Aryl Iodides and Bromides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2009, 48 (49), 9350–9354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Forghieri M; Laggner C; Paoli P; Langer T; Manao G; Camici G; Bondioli L; Prati F; Costantino L, Synthesis, activity and molecular modeling of a new series of chromones as low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2009, 17 (7), 2658–2672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lafrance M; Rowley CN; Woo TK; Fagnou K, Catalytic intermolecular direct arylation of perfluorobenzenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128 (27), 8754–8756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Do H-Q; Daugulis O, A general method for Copper-catalyzed arene cross-dimerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133 (34), 13577–13586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen F; Min Q-Q; Zhang X, Pd-catalyzed direct arylation of polyfluoroarenes on water under mild conditions using PPh3 ligand. J. Org. Chem 2012, 77 (6), 2992–2998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yu YB; Fan S; Zhang X, Copper-and Phosphine-Ligand-Free Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Allylation of Electron-Deficient Polyfluoroarenes with Allylic Chlorides. Eur. J. Chem 2012, 18 (46), 14643–14648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pastorekova S; Vullo D; Casini A; Scozzafava A; Pastorek J; Nishimori I; Supuran CT, Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Inhibition of the tumor-associated isozymes IX and XII with polyfluorinated aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem 2005, 20 (3), 211–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hempel R; Schupke H; McNeilly PJ; Heinecke K; Kronbach C; Grunwald C; Zimmermann G; Griesinger C; Engel J; Kronbach T, Metabolism of retigabine (D-23129), a novel anticonvulsant. Drug Metab. Dispos 1999, 27 (5), 613–622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Clark S; Antell A; Kaufman K, New antiepileptic medication linked to blue discoloration of the skin and eyes. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2015, 6 (1), 15–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Savile CK; Janey JM; Mundorff EC; Moore JC; Tam S; Jarvis WR; Colbeck JC; Krebber A; Fleitz FJ; Brands J, Biocatalytic asymmetric synthesis of chiral amines from ketones applied to sitagliptin manufacture. Science 2010, 329 (5989), 305–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shchegoleva L; Beregovaya I; Schastnev P, Potential energy surface of C6F6− radical anion. Chem. Phys. Lett 1999, 312 (2–4), 325–332. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its online supplementary material.