Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2023 May 19;74(10):2933–2936. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad105

Going north: adaptation of soybean to long-day environments

Johann Vollmann 1,, Mária Škrabišová 2
PMCID: PMC10199110  PMID: 37208832

Abstract

This article comments on:

Zhu X, Leiser WL, Hahn V, Würschum T. 2023. The genetic architecture of soybean photothermal adaptation to high latitudes. Journal of Experimental Botany 74,2987–3002

Keywords: Flowering time regulation, maturity, photoperiod, soybean, stem termination


In plant breeding, understanding genetic variation in the photoperiodic control of flowering time of crop plants such as soybean is a prerequisite for managing adaptation to new environments. Zhu et al. (2023) analyzed a large diversity panel of >1500 early maturity soybean lines to disclose the genetic architecture behind the timing of flowering and maturity. Their findings confirm known maturity loci and reveal new candidate genes and alleles as well as environmental interactions of individual quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for flowering and maturity time. The results shed light on the complexity of the regulatory network which controls the timing of flowering in soybean. This supports the fine-tuning of plant architectures through the combination of stem termination and flowering genes towards a better adaptation of soybean to high latitudes or other stressful environments.

In high latitude environments, proper timing of the reproductive cycle is the most important feature of environmental adaptation in annual flowering plants to reach maturity and viable seed development before killing frost occurs. Photoperiod and vernalization have been identified as the most relevant pathways to control flowering time in addition to different endogenous factors including gibberellic acid, plant age, and other regulators. With respect to photoperiod, day length is perceived by photoreceptors in leaves, and long-distance signals such as the Arapidopsis thaliana regulator FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) can initiate the flowering process at the shoot apex or in axillary meristems (Srikanth and Schmid, 2011). In agricultural crop plants, the appropriate regulation of flowering time is a prerequisite for the extension of planting areas away from the original place of domestication to regions diverging in latitude. Therefore, breeding for adaptation to new target environments differing in latitude and day length requires genetic variation in response to photoperiod, which is particularly relevant for optimizing the yield potential of short-day plants such as maize or soybean when transferred to high latitude regions.

Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) is an important source of protein and oil for human food and animal feed production grown annually on >125 Mha world-wide (FAOSTAT, 2023). The rapid expansion of soybean acreage in the tropics for livestock feed production is associated with massive deforestation, increased greenhouse gas emission, and loss of biodiversity (Song et al., 2021). Alternatively, soybean production in higher latitude arable farming regions through sustainable intensification is a way to mitigate negative production as well as climate change impacts (Nendel et al., 2023). Recent examples of soybean extension to northern production regions include Europe (Central, Northern Europe), Far-East Russia (Amur, Primorsky regions), North-East China (Heilongjiang, Jilin), and Canada (Manitoba, Quebec, Saskatchewan).

More than just maturity groups and E-genes

Soybean cultivars are commonly classified into 13 maturity groups (MGs) which provides a rough approximation with respect to their environmental adaptation. Moreover, a series of E-genes and the J locus have been described to control flowering time; most of them are orthologs of known Arabidopsis flowering genes (Cao et al., 2017; Dietz et al., 2022). Among all E loci described, E1, E2, E3, and E4 are considered to have the strongest effect on flowering and maturity in high latitude environments (Kurasch et al., 2017). In the present issue, Zhu et al. (2023) take a new look at that matter, identifying important factors to facilitate breeding progress in adaptation of soybean to such higher latitudes. In a diversity panel of >1500 early maturity soybean lines subject to genome-wide association mapping, they describe 30 putative QTLs for flowering time and 27 QTLs for time to maturity. Among the candidate genes predicted from individual QTLs, the well-known E loci and the J locus were identified. The effect of J was previously known for adaptation to short day length regions (tropics) through down-regulation of transcription of the E1 promoter (Lu et al., 2017); J haplotypes found here apparently affect high latitude adaptation as well, probably through interaction with the E1 locus. In addition, the Dt2 locus controlling semi-determinate stem growth was predicted as a candidate gene for affecting time to maturity. A new allele at the E4 locus (e4-par) causing earlier maturity than other recessive alleles was found in soybean lines of mainly Central European origin (Zhu et al., 2023). The complexity of the regulatory network for controlling flowering and maturity time is further illustrated by the fact that individual E-haplotypes derived from allelic variants at loci E1–E4 exhibit a wide range of maturity times spanning from MG 000 to MG I; this indicates a significant influence of additional factors (QTLs) on flowering time as also described for other sets of soybeans (Fu et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2021). These additional QTLs were shown to exhibit a strong environmental interaction in Zhu et al. (2023), thus implicating a potential of the candidate genes (GmAP1d and GmFRL1) in breeding for going north.

Fine-tuning plant architecture

Moving soybean production from drought-affected areas of South Europe to higher latitudes of Central and Northern Europe (Nendel et al., 2023) requires phenological adaptation and tuning of plant architecture for optimum performance in any particular environment. As shown by Zhu et al. (2023), this is facilitated by appropriate timing through flowering and maturity QTLs. Remarkably, they also identified the Dt2 locus as a candidate gene for time to maturity in their diversity panel. Although the direct influence of Dt2 on time to maturity appears to be small, particular combinations of flowering/maturity and Dt2 alleles can produce highly distinct phenotypes suitable for various specific environmental needs (Box 1). In soybeans of late maturity backgrounds grown in lower latitudes, determinate genotypes (dt1) are utilized to avoid excessive plant height associated with lodging and to achieve timely maturity. In addition, tall determinate (dt1-t) alleles have previously been introduced as well and, in combination with appropriate flowering/maturity alleles at E1–E3 loci, these combinations can also produce plant architectures with plant height and number of nodes adapted to high yielding environments (Kim et al., 2022). In contrast to late maturity genotypes, the semi-determinate (Dt2) stem growth character is more often utilized in early maturity soybeans (MG III to 000), as indicated by the rather frequent occurrence of the Dt2 allele in the re-sequenced panel published here (Zhu et al., 2023). Moreover, significant proportions of recently released European commercial cultivars (LIDEA, 2022) and cultivars from the northern eco-region of China (Liu et al., 2015) carry the Dt2 trait which illustrates its relevance in early maturity soybean production. The Dt2 locus is known to be in epistatic interaction with Dt1, and the dominant Dt2 allele causing the semi-determinate stem growth habit has been characterized as a recent gain-of-function mutation that must have occurred after domestication, as it is not known from wild types of soybean (Ping et al., 2014). Detailed characterization of the Dt2 MADS box transcription factor has revealed multiple genomic binding sites and pleiotropic interactions with genomic regions modulating flowering time, water use efficiency, stomatal development, stress response, and hormone signaling (Zhang et al., 2019) which is prompting further investigation of agronomic traits affected to avoid possible trade-offs. Existing natural variation of Dt2 was shown to also impact adaptation and yield-related traits (Liang et al., 2022).

Box 1. Soybean plant architecture is controlled by stem termination and flowering time.

A MADS-box transcription factor is modulating semi-determinate versus indeterminate soybean stem termination (locus Dt2 in genotypes with Dt1 background). The dominant allele Dt2 causes the cessation of stem elongation through the formation of a terminal flower raceme, whereas dt2 causes indeterminate stem growth with flower formation in stem nodes only (Fig. 1A). Flowering and maturity time differences caused by different alleles at the E1 and E2 loci reveal either a very early (Fig. 1B; MG 000) or a later maturity (Fig. 1C; MG 0 to I). Different allelic combinations of E loci and Dt2 (semi-determinate) versus dt2 (indeterminate) stem termination have drastic effects on phenotype, with differences in stem length, stem diameter, number of nodes per stem, distribution of inflorescences and pods along the stem, and finally seed yield.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Soybean plant architecture and maturity time. (A) Terminal flower formation in the dominant Dt2 genotype (left) and flower formation in stem nodes of the recessive dt2 allele with indeterminate stem growth (right). (B) Early and (C) late maturity caused by different alleles at the E1 and E2 loci.

Domestication, adaptation, and selection

Along with pod shattering, seed hardness, and several other characteristics, stem growth habit and flowering time are considered key domestication and diversification traits of soybean, and photoperiodic response genes such as E1–E4 are playing a major role in local adaptation (Sedivy et al., 2017). With respect to earlier flowering date, selection processes from wild annual soybeans through farmers’ landraces and finally modern released cultivars, and from southern to northern genotypes have been described in the Chinese soybean germplasm pool in terms of allele changes at QTL regions (Liu et al., 2021). Both exclusion of alleles and emergence of new alleles occurred during these natural and artificial selection processes. The strongest reduction of wild alleles was found between landraces and released cultivars, and wild alleles were also reduced in the adaptation process from southern to northern populations. On the level of soybean E-genes, such processes of change in the occurrence of different allele frequencies and E-haplotypes between Asian, North American, and European populations were also described (Langewisch et al., 2017; Miladinović et al., 2018), reflecting adaptation processes to growing environments. Based on the QTL–allele matrix for time to flowering of the Chinese soybean germplasm pool analyzed, a further genomic selection potential for earliness of 4–11 d was predicted (Liu et al., 2021), which would additionally support the selection for adaptation to higher latitudes.

Finally, modulation of flowering time might also be important for changing soybean cropping patterns in agronomic adaptation to climate change for different production environments. This could involve either earlier or later sowing dates to escape periods of drought or high temperature during critical stages of development. Both strategies would require additional plasticity in adaptation to modified photoperiods, time to maturity, and duration of the seed filling period, as supported by the present findings (Zhu et al., 2023).

Acknowledgements

Open access funding of this publication was provided by the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.

Contributor Information

Johann Vollmann, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria.

Mária Škrabišová, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cao D, Takeshima R, Zhao C, Liu B, Jun A, Kong F.. 2017. Molecular mechanisms of flowering under long days and stem growth habit in soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 1873–1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dietz N, Chan YO, Scaboo A, et al. 2022. Candidate genes modulating reproductive timing in elite US soybean lines identified in soybean alleles of Arabidopsis flowering orthologs with divergent latitude distribution. Frontiers in Plant Science 13, 889066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FAOSTAT. 2023. Food and agriculture data. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu M, Wang Y, Ren H, et al. 2017. Genetic dynamics of earlier maturity group emergence in south-to-north extension of Northeast China soybeans. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 133, 1839–1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim J-H, Scaboo A, Pantalone V, Li Z, Bilyeu K.. 2022. Utilization of plant architecture genes in soybean to positively impact adaptation to high yield environments. Frontiers in Plant Science 13, 891587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kurasch AK, Hahn V, Leiser WL, et al. 2017. Identification of mega-environments in Central Europe and effect of allelic variations at maturity E loci on adaptation of European soybean. Plant, Cell & Environment 40, 765–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Langewisch T, Lenis J, Jiang G-L, Wang D, Pantalone V, Bilyeu K.. 2017. The development and use of a molecular model for soybean maturity groups. BMC Plant Biology 17, 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liang Q, Chen L, Yang X, et al. 2022. Natural variation of Dt2 determines branching in soybean. Nature Communications 13, 6429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LIDEA. 2022. No. 1 non-GMO soybean breeder in Europe. Online brochure. Lescar, France: Lidea Seeds. https://lidea-seeds.com/to-download/soybean-catalogue. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu G, Zhao L, Averitt BJ, Liu Y, Zhang B, Chang R, Ma Y, Luan X, Guan R, Qiu J.. 2015. Geographical distribution of GmTfl1 alleles in Chinese soybean varieties. Crop Journal 3, 371–378. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu F, He J, Wang W, Xing G, Zhao J, Li Y, Gai J.. 2021. Genetic dynamics of flowering date evolved from later to earlier in annual wild and cultivated soybean in China. Crop Science 61, 2336–2354. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lu S, Zhao X, Hu Y, et al. 2017. Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. Nature Genetics 49, 773–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miladinović J, Ćeran M, Đorđević V, Balešević-Tubić S, Petrović K, Đukić V, Miladinović D.. 2018. Allelic variation and distribution of the major maturity genes in different soybean collections. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nendel C, Reckling M, Debaeke P, et al. 2023. Future area expansion outweighs increasing drought risk for soybean in Europe. Global Change Biology 29, 1340–1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ping J, Liu Y, Sun L, et al. 2014. Dt2 is a gain-of-function MADS-domain factor gene that specifies semideterminacy in soybean. The Plant Cell 26, 2831–2842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sedivy EJ, Wu F, Hanzawa Y.. 2017. Soybean domestication: the origin, genetic architecture and molecular bases. New Phytologist 214, 539–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Song X-P, Hansen MC, Potapov P, et al. 2021. Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation. Nature Sustainability 4, 784–792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Srikanth A, Schmid M.. 2011. Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68, 2013–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang S-R, Wang H, Wang Z, Ren Y, Niu L, Liu J, Liu B.. 2017. Photoperiodism dynamics during the domestication and improvement of soybean. Science China Life Sciences 60, 1416–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang D, Wang X, Li S, Wang C, Gosney MJ, Mickelbart MV, Ma J.. 2019. A post-domestication mutation, Dt2, triggers systemic modification of divergent and convergent pathways modulating multiple agronomic traits in soybean. Molecular Plant 12, 1366–1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu X, Leiser WL, Hahn V, Würschum T.. 2023. The genetic architecture of soybean photothermal adaptation to high latitudes. Journal of Experimental Botany 74, 2987–3002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES