Abstract
Antiplatelet agents are used worldwide mainly for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events on a long-term basis for mortality benefit. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a well-known adverse effect. Various factors are to be considered while choosing antiplatelet agents to prevent the risk of bleed and rebleed incidents. These range from deciding on the agent, timing of therapy, underlying indications, coadministration of proton pump inhibitor, etc. At the same time, one must weigh the risks of cardiovascular events secondary to the stoppage of antiplatelet therapy. With this review, we have tried to guide the clinician on decision-making regarding the care of patients on management of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding, stoppage, restarting of agents, and measures to prevent a recurrence. We have focused on aspirin and clopidogrel as they are among the most widely used antiplatelet agents.
Keywords: proton pump inhibitor, endoscopy, gastrointestinal bleed, clopidogrel, aspirin
Introduction and background
Antiplatelet agents are used worldwide for various indications. However, this is associated with the adverse effect of gastrointestinal bleeding. The pros and cons of agents are to be considered while initiating them. Existing literature shows the incidence of gastrointestinal bleed rates to be 0.7-1.3% for aspirin, 1.3% for clopidogrel, and 1.2-2% among those on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel [1-3].
Han et al. performed a study on antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal injury, where patients were randomised to receive aspirin plus placebo, clopidogrel plus placebo or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after six months of dual antiplatelet therapy. The incidence of bleeding at 12 months post-DAPT was 0% for aspirin, 1.2% for clopidogrel and 5.4% in the DAPT group [4].
The mortality rate in the bleeding group was 24.6% compared to 4.7% in the non-bleeding group [5]. Different agents have varying mechanisms of action. Aspirin acts by irreversible acetylation and inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme while clopidogrel causes competitive irreversible blockade of P2Y12. Other newer antiplatelet agents are reversible P2Y12 blockers (ticagrelor), GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab) etc [6]. Regarding the indications of antiplatelet agents, they are prescribed for primary prevention and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. They may be given as monotherapy or dual therapy. Various indications of platelet are mentioned in the table [7-9] (Table 1).
Table 1. Indications of antiplatelet agents.
| Monotherapy | Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) | Antiplatelet + anticoagulant |
| Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases | Post coronary stenting for 12 months | Cardioembolic stroke |
| Secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases | Post coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) | Acute myocardial infarction |
| NSTEMI | Atrial fibrillation with myocardial infarction | |
| Short-term following high-risk transient ischemic attack and post-ischemic cerebrovascular accident | ||
| Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease involving polyvascular bed (≥ 2 vascular beds) |
There are a few scenarios where antiplatelet agents are combined with anticoagulants. In cases with high-risk atherosclerosis, combining low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin can help reduce major cardiovascular events like myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accidents [9]. Among those with indications for long-term anticoagulation like atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, single or dual antiplatelet therapy may be added to ongoing anticoagulants temporarily. Considering the high risk of bleed associated with the combination of antiplatelets and anticoagulants, it is advised to give triple therapy for one week following coronary stenting for acute coronary syndrome and to decide on further management after assessing the risk of bleed and ischemia. If a patient is at high risk of ischemia, then triple therapy can be continued for one month followed by switching to dual therapy with a single antiplatelet and single anticoagulant. If the patient is at high risk of bleeding, then they should be switched to dual therapy within one week instead of one month [10-11].
With this review, we have tried to guide the clinician on minimizing the risk of antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleeding, management of bleeding scenarios and how to go about restarting the agents. We have also focused on the factors to be considered for the prevention of antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleeding in the future. The main focus of this review is on aspirin and clopidogrel which are the most widely used agents at present.
Review
Mechanism and risk factors of antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleed
There are various mechanisms behind antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleeding. Aspirin causes inhibition of protective COX enzymes while clopidogrel results in suppression of platelet-derived growth factor, reduced angiogenesis and delayed ulcer healing [12]. Apart from gastrointestinal bleeding, antiplatelet use is associated with bleed in other sites like intracerebral, surgical sites etc [13]. Common risk factors for antiplatelet-induced bleeding are mentioned in Table 2. The risk is 1.3% within the first 30 days of dual antiplatelet therapy [14]. Vascular ectasia is causative for about 4% of non-variceal upper GI haemorrhages [15].
Table 2. Risk factors for antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleed.
| Risk factors |
| Dual antiplatelet therapy |
| Prolonged usage |
| Co-administration of anticoagulants |
| Other conditions predisposing the individual to bleed |
| Underlying peptic ulcer disease |
| Esophageal varices |
| Vascular ectasia |
Drug interactions are to be considered if they could potentially increase the potency of antiplatelet agents and related bleeding. Potential interactions of some of the commonly used agents are mentioned for reference [16-18] (Table 3).
Table 3. Drug interactions with antiplatelet agents.
| Drug interactions with antiplatelet agents | |
| Antibiotic | |
| Amoxicillin | Increases aspirin levels by reducing renal clearance |
| Cefepime | Increases the effect of aspirin by competing for renal tubular clearance |
| Ceftazidime | Increases the effect of aspirin by competing for renal clearance |
| Piperacillin | Salicylic acid can be displaced from protein-binding sites |
| Other agents | |
| Hydrochlorothiazide | Increases the effect of aspirin by competing for renal clearance |
| Calcium carbonate | Calcium carbonate at moderate doses may cause aspirin toxicity while at higher doses it results in increased aspirin excretion |
Aspirin vs clopidogrel
There are several studies comparing the gastrointestinal effects of aspirin and clopidogrel with conflicting reports [3,4,19-22] (Table 4). However, considering the possibility of interactions of clopidogrel with proton pump inhibitors (PPI), it may be better to consider aspirin over clopidogrel.
Table 4. Studies comparing the incidence of antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleeding.
RCT: Randomised control trial; PPI: proton pump inhibitor; SAPT: Single antiplatelet therapy; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy
| Reference | Type of study | Description of sample | Result |
| Aspirin-associated gastrointestinal bleed | |||
| Chan et al., 2005 [19] | RCT | 320 patients were enrolled among whom 161 received clopidogrel and 159 received aspirin plus esomeprazole | Aspirin plus esomeprazole was found to be superior to clopidogrel in the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding. The incidence of ulcer bleeding was 8.6% in patients who received clopidogrel and 0.7% in patients who received aspirin and esomeprazole. |
| Hsiao et al., 2002 [20] | Retrospective cohort study | Cases over a period of 6 years who were hospitalised for gastrointestinal complications prior to initiation of antiplatelet agents were considered. It was done to assess the risk of recurrent gastrointestinal complications among those at high risk. | Aspirin plus PPI was associated with a reduced risk of major gastrointestinal complications compared to clopidogrel combined with PPI. The Incidence of hospitalisation for major gastrointestinal complications was 0.103 per person-year in the aspirin plus PPI group compared to 0.152 per person-year in the clopidogrel plus PPI group. |
| Clopidogrel associated with lesser gastrointestinal bleed | |||
| CAPRIE trial, 1996 [21] | RCT | Those with evidence of atherosclerosis were randomised to receive aspirin or clopidogrel | Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to clopidogrel(0.72 % vs 0.52%) (p=0.05) |
| Aspirin and clopidogrel having equal effects with respect to gastrointestinal bleed | |||
| Han et al., 2021 [4] | RCT | Those with no ulcerations or bleeding on capsule endoscopy done after 6 months of DAPT post-percutaneous intervention were randomised to receive aspirin plus placebo, clopidogrel plus placebo or aspirin plus clopidogrel. For an additional 6 months following which a repeat capsule endoscopy was done to look for gastrointestinal mucosal injury. | Aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapy had similar effects on the gastrointestinal mucosa |
| Ng et al. 2008 [22] | RCT | Those with aspirin-induced peptic ulcer disease treated with omeprazole were randomised to receive clopidogrel or low-dose aspirin | A prospective study among those who had developed peptic ulcers while on aspirin was randomised to receive aspirin plus PPI or clopidogrel PPI. Minor gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 45% of the clopidogrel group compared to 42% in the aspirin group, however, it was not statistically significant (p=0.709). |
| SAPT vs DAPT | |||
| Han et al., 2021 [4] | RCT | Those with no ulcerations or bleeding on capsule endoscopy done after 6 months of DAPT post-percutaneous intervention were randomised to receive aspirin plus placebo, clopidogrel plus placebo or aspirin plus clopidogrel. For an additional 6 months following which a repeat capsule endoscopy was done to look for gastrointestinal mucosal injury | SAPT causes lesser gastrointestinal injury compared to DAPT(68.1% vs 95.2%,p =0.006) Newer ulcers were higher in DAPT group (38.1%) compared to SAPT group (8.5%). |
| Diener et al., 2004 [3] | RCT | Those with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and at least one additional vascular risk factor and already receiving clopidogrel 75 mg/day.were randomised to receive aspirin or a placebo in addition to clopidogrel. | Life-threatening bleed was higher in the DAPT group compared to clopidogrel monotherapy (2.6% vs 1.3%) (p<0.0001) |
Management of upper gastrointestinal bleed
Cases of upper gastrointestinal bleed may not present with frank hematemesis and melena in all cases. In such scenarios, the following are to be looked for to suspect gastrointestinal bleeding drop in haemoglobin, reactive thrombocytosis and elevated urea. Patients already on antiplatelet agents who have an episode of upper gastrointestinal bleeding should be treated for their bleeding after stopping the agent and then when the time comes to resume the antiplatelet drugs the indications should be clearly looked into. If the patient is on antiplatelet agents for primary prevention, consider discontinuation of the antiplatelet agent.
If an antiplatelet agent was being taken for secondary prevention, then the practitioner should decide on further management on the basis of the risk of rebleed and underlying indication for antiplatelet therapy. If the patient is at low risk of rebleed, then antiplatelet agents can be resumed immediately after endoscopy. On the other hand, if the patient is at high risk of gastrointestinal bleed then the practitioner should look at the status of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). If the bleed was within four weeks of bare metal stent or six months of a drug-eluting stent, then it is recommended to restart antiplatelet agents within three days in view of the high risk of stent thrombosis. If the bleed occurred beyond this period, then we can wait for up to five days after the last dosing. The risk of rebleeding can be assessed from endoscopy findings. Visible vessels and adherent clots are two findings suggestive of a high risk of rebleeding [23].
Supportive management is in the form of blood products, and parenteral fluids to be provided on basis of clinical assessment. Definitive management including proton pump infusion and endoscopy-guided interventions. Gastrointestinal endoscopy has the following roles in case of suspected antiplatelet-induced upper gastrointestinal bleed [24] (Table 5).
Table 5. Role of endoscopy in antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleed.
| Role of endoscopy in antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleed | |
| Diagnostic | Assess the risk of rebleed |
| Confirm the bleed is due to an antiplatelet agent by ruling out other causes like variceal bleed | |
| The severity of ulcer (Forest grading etc) | |
| H. pylori testing | |
| Therapeutic | Sclerotherapy, clipping |
At present, there are no antidotes for rapid reversal like that for anticoagulants. Neurocritical care guidelines advise a single dose of desmopressin for antiplatelet-induced intracranial haemorrhages but not for gastrointestinal bleeding. Desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) improves platelet function by increasing the release of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and factor VIII from the endothelium [25].
Management of lower gastrointestinal bleed
Apart from upper gastrointestinal bleeding, antiplatelet agents can also cause lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In a 10-year prospective study by Ray et al., lower gastrointestinal bleed contributed to 45% of cases of antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleeding. Amongst cases of lower gastrointestinal bleed, the most common source was the small intestine (84%) followed by the colon (16%) [26]. The following flowchart may guide decision-making regarding antiplatelet therapy in lower gastrointestinal bleeding [27] (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Management of lower gastrointestinal bleed in a patient on antiplatelet therapy.
PTCA: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy
Restarting antiplatelet agent
Recovery of platelet aggregation function after stoppage of antiplatelet agent occurs faster with aspirin (four days) compared to clopidogrel (10 days) [28,29]. While reintroducing the antiplatelet on the basis of indication, one has to think of the same two points that were considered while stopping the agents - an indication of antiplatelet therapy and severity of the bleed.
Regarding monotherapy, if the patient was on clopidogrel, then they should switch to aspirin which has a relatively lower risk of bleed. If the patient was on aspirin then to restart the same agent [19], one must consider various factors to reduce the risk of bleeding in the future [30-32] (Table 6).
Table 6. Strategies to reduce the risk of rebleeding .
| Strategies to reduce the risk of rebleed | |
| Number of agents | To review the indication for dual antiplatelet therapy |
| Dosage | Start with a lower dose and gradually escalate to the target dose |
| Frequency | Alternate day dosing followed by daily dosage |
| Drug interactions | Consider drug interactions that can potentially increase the dose of antiplatelet in the future |
| Proton pump inhibitor cover | While administering proton pump inhibitors, it is also important to consider interaction with clopidogrel that may reduce the efficacy of Clopidogrel. Clopidogrel is a prodrug that is converted to its active form in the liver by the CYP2C19 enzyme and is inhibited by proton pump inhibitors. The extent of inhibition of enzymes is as following: omeprazole>pantoprazole>lansoprazole>rabeprazole. Interaction can be reduced by changing the timing of administration with PPI given early morning and clopidogrel at bedtime |
| H.pylori | Testing for H.pylori and eradication |
| Patient education | Patient awareness regarding signs of bleed like dark-coloured stools and early presentation to the nearest healthcare facility |
| Dual antiplatelet therapy | In the case of dual antiplatelet therapy, prefer clopidogrel over ticagrelor as a second agent |
While prescribing antisecretory agents along with antiplatelet agents, proton pump inhibitors are preferred over H2 receptor antagonists. H2 receptor antagonists were not found to be very effective at preventing clopidogrel-induced gastrointestinal bleeding as compared to proton pump inhibitors [33].
If the patient was on dual antiplatelet therapy, then it is of utmost importance to review the indication for a second antiplatelet agent. There are several instances that occur post-coronary stenting and post-ischemic cerebrovascular accidents where the patient is on a second antiplatelet agent beyond recommended duration. Some recommend switching from dual antiplatelet therapy to a single agent after three months of percutaneous intervention for those at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, provided the patient is at low risk of an ischemic event [34].
H. pylori eradication plays role in primary as well as secondary prevention of antiplatelet-induced bleeding. A randomised control trial by Hawkey et al. tested the efficacy of H. pylori eradication in preventing aspirin-associated gastrointestinal bleeding. It was noted that H. pylori eradication helped reduce the occurrence of aspirin-induced gastrointestinal bleeding, however, the effect was found to last for two and half years on follow-up and not beyond that. It would be ideal to test for H. pylori prior to initiating an antiplatelet agent for the long term in every case [35].
Scoring systems can be used to assess the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in those on antiplatelet agents. The (ABC)2D score is one such scoring system. Scoring systems are necessary to predict the events of gastrointestinal bleeding. It also helps the physician in giving a prognosis based on the risk score. However, it has not been used on a large scale. It is based on seven factors (i.e., an age of >65 years, anaemia, recent major bleeding, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, no-proton pump inhibitors use, combined use of oral anticoagulants, and dual antiplatelet therapy [5].
Conclusions
Antiplatelet agents are used worldwide on a long-term basis and it is imperative to know the potential adverse effect of gastrointestinal bleeding and the management of the same. Broadly speaking, it is the indication of antiplatelet therapy and the severity of the bleed that have to be considered while managing antiplatelet-induced bleeds. Several strategies like proton pump inhibitor cover, eradication of H. pylori, and consideration of drug interactions should be considered to prevent antiplatelet-induced gastrointestinal bleeding in the first place. Aspirin plus PPI would be preferred over clopidogrel or clopidogrel plus PPI .
In a nation like India where a lot of medications are available, the prescription of antiplatelet agents is to be regulated and monitored. Dosing and duration of antiplatelet therapy are to be reviewed at each visit. Patient awareness is also of utmost importance considering the widespread use of antiplatelet therapy and the mortality risk associated with antiplatelet therapy-induced gastrointestinal bleeds.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- 1.Treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Yasuda H, Matsuo Y, Sato Y, et al. World J Crit Care Med. 2015;4:40–46. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy: practical guidance for restarting therapy and avoiding recurrences. Pipilis A, Makrygiannis S, Chrisanthopoulou E, Sourlas N, Kaliambakos S, Ntailianas P. https://www.hellenicjcardiol.org/archive/full_text/2014/6/2014_6_499.pdf. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2014;55:499–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Lancet. 2004;364:331–337. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16721-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for assessment of antiplatelet therapy-induced gastrointestinal injury. Han Y, Liao Z, Li Y, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:116–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.A new score for predicting acute gastrointestinal bleeding in patients administered oral antiplatelet drugs. Lv M, Zheng X, Wu T, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:571605. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.571605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Current and novel antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Jourdi G, Lordkipanidzé M, Philippe A, Bachelot-Loza C, Gaussem P. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:13079. doi: 10.3390/ijms222313079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Effect of aspirin on mortality in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Raju N, Sobieraj-Teague M, Hirsh J, O'Donnell M, Eikelboom J. Am J Med. 2011;124:621–629. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324:71–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.When and how to combine antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs? Espinola-Klein C. https://reference.medscape.com/drug/amoxil-amoxicillin-342473. Hamostaseologie. 2022;42:73–79. doi: 10.1055/a-1724-4922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1289–1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink ME, et al. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–816. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mechanism of the irreversible inhibition of human cyclooxygenase-1 by aspirin as predicted by QM/MM calculations. Tóth L, Muszbek L, Komáromi I. J Mol Graph Model. 2013;40:99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2012.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Intracranial Hemorrhage During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Ha AC, Bhatt DL, Rutka JT, Johnston SC, Mazer CD, Verma S. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1372–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Endoscopic treatment outcomes in watermelon stomach patients with and without portal hypertension. Dulai GS, Jensen DM, Kovacs TO, Gralnek IM, Jutabha R. Endoscopy. 2004;36:68–72. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Amoxil (amoxicillin) dosing, indications, interactions, adverse effects, and more. [ Jan; 2023 ];Chiu PW. https://reference.medscape.com/drug/amoxil-amoxicillin-342473#3 Clin Endosc. 2023 52:416–418. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Drug interaction checker [Internet]. Drug Interactions Checker - Medscape Drug Reference Database. [ Jan; 2023 ]. 2023. https://reference.medscape.com/drug-interactionchecker https://reference.medscape.com/drug-interactionchecker
- 18.DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, et al. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00945. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:0–72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:238–244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.A comparison of aspirin and clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitors for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Hsiao FY, Tsai YW, Huang WF, Wen YW, Chen PF, Chang PY, Kuo KN. Clin Ther. 2009;31:2038–2047. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet. 1996;348:1329–1339. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09457-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clopidogrel plus omeprazole compared with aspirin plus omeprazole for aspirin-induced symptomatic peptic ulcers/erosions with low to moderate bleeding/re-bleeding risk -- a single-blind, randomized controlled study. Ng FH, Wong BC, Wong SY, Chen WH, Chang CM. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:359–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.New look at antiplatelet agent-related peptic ulcer: an update of prevention and treatment. Hsu PI. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:654–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Endoscopic management of peptic ulcer bleeding: recent advances. Chiu PW. Clin Endosc. 2019;52:416–418. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Desmopressin in critically ill neurosurgical patients: An overview. Ching-Gonzalez A, Meza-Valle C, Muñoz-Báez K, et al. J Transl Crit Care Med. 2020;2:23–27. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Incidence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving aspirin with or without clopidogrel over 10 years- An observational study. Ray G. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11:7750–7755. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1298_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology. Oakland K, Chadwick G, East JE, et al. Gut. 2019;68:776–789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Recovery time of platelet function after aspirin withdrawal. Lee J, Kim JK, Kim JH, et al. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2014;76:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of clopidogrel treatment in healthy volunteers. Weber AA, Braun M, Hohlfeld T, Schwippert B, Tschöpe D, Schrör K. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:333–336. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Proton pump inhibitors: do differences in pharmacokinetics translate into differences in clinical outcomes? Fock KM, Ang TL, Bee LC, Lee EJ. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47:1–6. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lansoprazole for the prevention of recurrences of ulcer complications from long-term low-dose aspirin use. Lai KC, Lam SK, Chu KM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:2033–2038. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Letter by Kim et al regarding article, “Clinically significant bleeding with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for invasive management: a randomized clinical trial”. Kim Y, Johnson TW, Jeong MH. Circulation. 2020;141:0–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Taha AS, McCloskey C, Prasad R, Bezlyak V. Lancet. 2009;374:119–125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61246-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/AmericanHeart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. Circulation. 2022;145:0. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Helicobacter pylori eradication for primary prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding in older patients prescribed aspirin in primary care (heat): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hawkey C, Avery A, Coupland CA, et al. Lancet. 2022;400:1597–1606. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01843-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

