Abstract
Introduction
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the first-line choice for the acute treatment of migraine attacks for decades; however, the safety of a particular NSAID is related to its treatment dose, duration, and mechanism of action. Although adverse event (AE) risks differ substantially among individual migraine treatments, increased or prolonged exposure to any NSAID elevates risks and severity of AEs.
Methods
For this narrative review, we conducted a literature search of PubMed until July 2022, focusing on the history, mechanism of action, and treatment guidelines informing the safety and efficacy of celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.
Results
Here we discuss the mechanisms of action of nonselective NSAIDs vs. cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, and how these mechanisms underlie the AEs associated with these treatments. We review the clinical trials that influenced the regulatory history of NSAIDs, specifically COX-2 inhibitors, the role of traditional and new formulations of NSAIDs including celecoxib oral solution, and special considerations in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.
Conclusions
Low-dose formulations of NSAIDs, such as celecoxib oral solution, provide acute migraine analgesia with similar or fewer associated cardiovascular and gastrointestinal events than previous formulations.
Keywords: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs, Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, COX-2, Migraine
Key Summary Points
| The treatment dose, duration of therapy, and mechanism of action contribute to the safety of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). |
| Inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 enzyme leads to increased gastric bleeding, whereas COX-2 inhibition may increase the frequency of cardiovascular events. |
| In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved celecoxib oral solution, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, for the acute treatment of migraine in adults with or without aura. |
| As the FDA recommends using the shortest duration and lowest effective dose of NSAIDs, celecoxib oral solution is particularly suited for intermittent treatment of acute migraine pain, providing its effective analgesia with relatively low overall drug exposure and AE risks. |
Introduction
For over a century, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been among the most widely used treatments worldwide [1]. Nonprescription and prescription NSAID formulations are available to treat a variety of inflammatory and pain conditions, including migraine [2]. Compared with other treatments used for migraine, NSAIDs function in both the central and peripheral nervous systems and can provide analgesia at any time during a migraine attack [2–5]. Up to half of all persons with migraine use only nonprescription NSAIDs to treat their attacks, often taking suboptimal dosages [6].
The treatment dose, duration of therapy, and mechanism of action contribute to the safety of a particular NSAID. NSAIDs reduce prostaglandin synthesis by either nonselective cyclooxygenase [COX] inhibition (nsNSAIDs) or selective COX-2 inhibition [7]. The risk of adverse events (AEs) differs substantially among migraine drug treatments, but increased or prolonged exposure to any NSAID heightens the risks and worsens the severity of potential AEs [7–10]. Well-established side effects associated with NSAID usage include an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) AEs, such as GI bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke [3, 4]. Approximately 25% of the US population who have taken NSAIDs required medical attention due to side effects [11]. Serious, yet rare AEs associated with NSAIDs include acute kidney damage, chronic kidney disease, hepatotoxicity, acute and chronic hepatitis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, skin photosensitivity, and toxic epidermal necrolysis [12, 13].
NSAIDs are a first-line therapy for the acute treatment of migraine attacks [14]. Despite the associated risks, NSAIDs provide established safety and efficacy and remain integral in acute migraine treatment. Current NSAIDs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil® migraine), and diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution (Cambia®) [2]. In 2020, the FDA also approved the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib oral solution (Elyxyb™) due to its proven efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine attacks [15, 16]. Often used off-label as a monotherapy, naproxen is FDA-approved for acute migraine treatment but only when used in combination with sumatriptan (Treximet®) [17, 18]. NSAIDs prescribed off-label to treat migraine with limited efficacy data are flurbiprofen, ketoprofen, and ketorolac [2].
Apropos to the use and concerns of NSAIDs for migraine therapy, here we review the history, mechanism of action, and treatment guidelines informing the safety of celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine attacks [19]. This manuscript is based on previously performed and published studies and does not contain any new human participant or animal studies performed by any of the authors.
History of Safety Concerns of COX-2 Inhibitors and Nonselective NSAIDs
Inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2 activity and subsequent reduction of prostanoid production drives the function of nonselective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs) and increases the risk of AEs (Fig. 1). Platelets are a major source of the platelet aggregating and vasoconstricting hormone thromboxane (TxA2), which is produced from arachidonic acid by COX-1. NSAIDs (e.g., low-dose aspirin treatment) provide cardioprotection by inhibiting COX-1, thereby reducing TxA2 [20–22]. The gastric mucosa also produces TxA2, which functions locally to provide gastric protection by increasing blood flow, mucus production, and bicarbonate secretion [23]. Inhibition of gastric TxA2 leads to the gastric irritation and bleeding associated with NSAID use [24]. Prostaglandin I2 (PGI2, prostacyclin) is produced from arachidonic acid by COX-2 in cardiac, renal, and endothelial tissue [4, 20]. PGI2 normally functions to increase nitric oxide generation, vasodilation, and pain signaling [4, 20]. Further, PGI2 suppresses platelet aggregation, thereby counteracting TxA2 and maintaining platelet activity in a COX-dependent manner. COX-2 inhibition produces anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects by reducing the production of PGI2 [4, 20]. However, the reduction of PGI2 increases platelet aggregation and may be the mechanism underlying the increased thrombotic CV AEs (e.g., stroke, MI) associated with COX-2 inhibitors, albeit without conclusive proof [22, 25, 26].
Fig. 1.

Effects of COX inhibition on prostaglandin signaling in the GI, cardiovascular, and renal systems and the associated AEs related to COX inhibition. Created with BioRender.com. AEs adverse events, COX cyclooxygenase, GI gastrointestinal, MI myocardial infarction, nsNSAID nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, PGE2 prostaglandin E2, PGI2 prostaglandin I2 (prostacyclin)
Due to its selective COX-2 inhibition, increased CV events were hypothesized before the original FDA approval of celecoxib for the treatment of arthritis pain in 1998 [4, 27]. Celecoxib reduces PGI2, which may lead to the three potential mechanisms by which selective COX-2 inhibitors cause CV AEs: elevated blood pressure (BP), accelerated atherogenesis/atherosclerosis, and exaggerated thrombotic response to atherosclerotic plaque rupture [4, 25, 27]. Deletion of the COX-2 gene increased BP in preclinical mouse models [28]; however, later clinical trials reported heterogenous effects on BP by COX-2 selective inhibitors, as rofecoxib, but not celecoxib, increased BP [29–31]. Studies in mice also showed that PGI2 protects from atherogenesis and atherosclerosis, but a reduction of PGI2 by COX-2 inhibition may diminish this protection [4]. Additionally, COX-2 inhibitors may accelerate atherogenesis by suppressing production of PGE2, a prostaglandin formed by both COX-1 and COX-2 [4]. Finally, PGI2 is a potent inhibitor of platelet function, and COX-2 inhibition accelerated thrombotic processes in several animal models [4]. Together, these three mechanisms may contribute to the CV AEs sometimes observed with NSAIDs, particularly selective COX-2 inhibitors.
In clinical trials, elevated CV risks appear to be class-specific to selective COX-2 inhibitors with increased COX-2 specificity, higher dose, and longer duration increasing the AE risk exposure [21, 29–32]. Many NSAIDS (e.g., ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen, and celecoxib) increase the risk of heart failure by approximately two-fold, linked in part to the renal COX-2-mediated effects on BP and sodium retention [22, 32]. In 2005, the Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx (APPROVe) trial found elevated CV risks (i.e., thrombotic events, heart failure, or pulmonary edema) in participants taking rofecoxib compared with placebo approximately 18 months after treatment initiation [33]. The Adenoma Prevention With Celecoxib (APC) trial also reported elevated risk of death from CV causes, MI, stroke, or heart failure beginning approximately 15 months after initiation of celecoxib compared with placebo [34]. The Celecoxib for the Prevention of Colorectal Sporadic Adenomatous Polyps (PreSAP) trial did not replicate these findings of increased CV risk [35, 36]. By 2008, evidence was published that the risk of MI increased with higher doses and longer duration of treatment with NSAIDs; low-dose celecoxib (< 200 mg/d) only slightly elevated MI risk (relative risk [RR]: 1.23), whereas higher doses exhibited a more pronounced increase in MI risk (RR: 1.57) [7]. These data support avoidance of COX-2 inhibitor use in patients with, or at high risk for, CV disease [20].
All NSAIDs carry some degree of increased risk of CV events [3, 37]. Due to its high RR of MI and CV events, valdecoxib (Bextra®) was withdrawn from the market, and for the same reason, the FDA never approved lumiracoxib [4, 38]. Diclofenac, which is a partially selective COX-2 inhibitor, also slightly increases RR for MI. Although generally considered safe, treatment with ibuprofen or naproxen elevates the risk of CV events, with ibuprofen also increasing the risk of GI and renal AEs as well as death from any cause [7, 32, 37–39]. The similar AE rates reported for ibuprofen and naproxen in clinical trials argue against a single “safe” NSAID [20]. Thus, ongoing use of NSAIDs for the acute treatment of migraine attacks requires medical supervision [40].
A recent meta-analysis and two epidemiological studies did not corroborate the elevated CV risks observed in previous clinical trials and showed no increased CV risk with celecoxib, regardless of dosage [26, 41, 42]. Real-world prescribing patterns of COX-2 inhibitors revealed that most patients received lower dosages (≤ 200 mg/d) and shorter durations (≤ 90 days) than those used in clinical trials (200–800 mg/d for up to several years), which may explain these findings [43].
Regulatory History of Nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2 Selective NSAIDs
Nonselective NSAID use may account for upward of 30% of GI bleeding cases in the US, resulting in 3200–16,500 deaths annually in the 1990s [11, 13, 44–47]. For this reason, the prescribing information for all NSAIDs contains a black box warning that “NSAIDs cause an increased risk of serious GI AEs including bleeding, ulceration, and perforation of the stomach or intestines, which can be fatal” [48]. Selective COX-2 inhibitors were originally designed to reduce GI complications associated with nsNSAIDs. Celecoxib capsule formulation (Celebrex®), a selective COX-2 inhibitor, was FDA-approved in December 1998 for the acute treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in adults, followed shortly thereafter by rofecoxib [9, 49]. Compared with nsNSAIDs, treatment with celecoxib was associated with reduced risk of upper GI ulcerations by two- to eight-fold, which contributed to its approval [50–52].
Within 2 years of FDA approval, clinical trial results revealed an increase in CV events in participants taking COX-2 inhibitors, particularly rofecoxib. The Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research (VIGOR) study results showed an increased incidence of thrombotic CV events; those taking supramaximal doses of rofecoxib experienced increased RRs of up to twofold for hypertension, 2.5-fold for CV AEs, and fourfold for MI [53–55]. By 2005, an external review board for the APPROVe trial terminated the study because participants receiving rofecoxib had a fourfold increase in the risk of serious thromboembolic events, mainly acute MI and ischemic stroke, compared with placebo [33, 56]. Although no deaths resulted from CV events in the APPROVe or VIGOR trials, due to the nature of the CV events and availability of other analgesics, the manufacturer voluntarily withdrew rofecoxib from the market in September 2004 [54, 55, 57].
In 2005, the FDA published that there may be a class effect of increased CV risk for all NSAIDs and required the addition of a black box warning that all prescription NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors, carry risk of serious CV thrombotic events (i.e., MI and ischemic stroke) [35, 58–60]. The FDA also required all sponsors of prescription NSAIDs to conduct a comprehensive review and analysis evaluating the risk of serious CV AEs [35].
By 2005, another COX-2 inhibitor, valdecoxib, was shown to increase the risks up to fourfold for CV AEs (MI, cardiac arrest, stroke, pulmonary embolism) and Stevens–Johnson syndrome compared with placebo in individuals receiving treatment for postoperative pain after a coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) [61–63]. In April 2005, the FDA decided the overall risk–benefit profile was unfavorable for valdecoxib and requested its withdrawal from the market [35, 41, 57, 58].
While multiple clinical trials provided unfavorable safety results for rofecoxib and valdecoxib, celecoxib has exhibited a reassuring safety profile in comparison with other COX-2 inhibitors and some nsNSAIDs [35, 52]. In 2000, the Prevention of Colorectal Sporadic Adenomatous Polyps Study (CLASS) found that celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) was as safe as diclofenac or ibuprofen in approximately 8000 individuals with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis; no differences were observed for serious CV AEs among the celecoxib, diclofenac, and ibuprofen treatment arms after 6 months of treatment [52]. In 2005, the US National Cancer Institute suspended the APC trial after participants taking supramaximal doses of celecoxib daily displayed a 2.5-fold (for 400 mg) or 3.4-fold (for 800 mg) increase in major CV event risk compared with placebo [34, 56]. The PreSAP study also reported an RR for serious CV AEs of 1.30 for participants taking celecoxib with no additional risk of death (RR: 1.06) [36]. Conversely, the placebo-controlled Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) showed no increase in CV events in more than 2500 elderly persons taking 200 mg of celecoxib daily for up to 46 months [64]. In 2005, an FDA panel declared that the “benefits of celecoxib outweighed the potential risks in properly selected and informed patients” and requested that the manufacturer conduct additional long-term controlled clinical trials of celecoxib to better evaluate the potential increased risk of serious CV AEs [35].
The FDA approved diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in 2009, which reinforced the idea that NSAIDs are safe and effective treatments [65, 66]. Although diclofenac is somewhat selective for COX-2 inhibition, at therapeutic IC80 doses, it inhibits COX-1 by approximately 70%, effectively functioning as an nsNSAID [65, 67].
Evidence from several large clinical trials supports the elevated risk of CV events across the entire class of NSAIDs [38, 39, 68–70]. The manufacturer of celecoxib capsules initiated two studies enrolling participants with arthritis: the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen or Naproxen (PRECISION) trial for the FDA and the Standard Care vs. Celecoxib Outcome (SCOT) trial for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [39, 70]. Treatment with celecoxib was noninferior to ibuprofen, naproxen, and diclofenac with regard to the frequency of CV events [39, 70]. Meta-analysis provided evidence that the risk of CV events is slightly elevated across many NSAIDs, but the PRECISION study showed that these risks do not differ significantly between celecoxib and other commonly used NSAIDs (Table 1) [38, 39]. Additionally, treatment with celecoxib was associated with significantly fewer GI AEs than ibuprofen or diclofenac and fewer renal AEs than ibuprofen [39]. These results may have contributed to a subsequent increase in the usage of COX-2 inhibitors for the treatment of pain. With the small number of published trials concerning the use of celecoxib in single migraine attacks, the preceding results relating to the chronic use of celecoxib provide valuable insights into the single-dose situation.
Table 1.
Relative risk of AEs compared with placebo or nonuse for each NSAID commonly used to treat migraine attacks or other headache disorders from selected publications
| NSAID | CV events, RR, % (95% CI) | MI, RR, % (95% CI) | Ischemic stroke, RR, % (95% CI) | GI AEs, RR, % (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | 0.89 (0.84–0.94) [85] | 0.85 (0.73–0.99) [85] | 0.81 (0.76–0.87) [85] | 1.56 (1.38–1.78) [85] |
| 0.91 (0.87–0.96) [86] | 0.87 (0.77–0.97) [86] | 0.88 (0.80–0.96) [86] | 1.57 (1.38–1.78) [86] | |
| Celecoxib | 1.10 (0.67–1.79) [64] | 0.69 (0.41–1.14) [8] | 0.96 (0.13–6.92) [26] | 1.45 (1.17–1.81) [76] |
| 1.04 (0.81–1.33) [70] | 0.91 (0.38–2.19) [64] | 1.04 (0.87–1.23) [88] | < 2 [3] | |
| 1.30 (0.65–2.62) [36] | 1.24 (0.91–1.82) [37] | 1.20 (1.00–1.44) [89] | ||
| 2.3 (0.9–5.5) [34] | 1.36 (0.95–1.96) [87] | 1.47 (0.52–4.20) [64] | ||
| 1.87 (0.39–8.90) [26] | ||||
| Diclofenac | 1.40 (1.27–1.55) [90] | 1.70 (1.19–2.41) [32] | 0.94 (0.59–1.49) [88] | 1.89 (1.16–3.09) [32] |
| 1.41 (1.12–1.78) [32] | 1.50 (1.06–2.04) [37] | 1.18 (0.79–1.78) [32] | 3.34 (2.79–3.99) [76] | |
| 1.5 (1.4–1.7) [74] | 1.7 (1.4–2.0) [74] | 1.55 (1.45–1.66) [89] | 4.4 (3.5–5.5) [74] | |
| 1.80 (1.49–2.18) [7] | 1.7 (1.4–2.0) [74] | |||
| Ibuprofen | 1.18 (1.11–1.25) [90] | 1.48 (1.00–2.26) [37] | 0.88 (0.73–1.06) [88] | 1.84 (1.54–2.20) [76] |
| 1.44 (0.89–2.33) [32] | 1.56 (0.90–2.71) [7] 2.22 | 0.97 (0.42–2.24) [32] | < 2 [3] | |
| (1.10–4.48) [32] | 1.45 (1.31–1.61) [89] | 3.97 (2.22–7.10) [22, 32] | ||
| Indomethacin1 | 1.30 (1.19–1.41) [90] | 1.22 (0.82–1.83) [87] | 1.20 (0.85–1.69) [88] | 4.14 (2.91–5.90) [76] |
| 1.36 (0.67–2.79) [7] | 1.24 (1.00–1.54) [89] | |||
| Ketorolac2 | – | 2.02 (1.00–4.09) [87] | 1.90 (1.39–2.60) [89] | > 5 [3] |
| 11.5 (5.56–23.78) [76] | ||||
| Naproxen3 | 0.93 (0.69–1.27) [32] | 0.84 (0.52–1.35) [32] | 0.94 (0.80–1.11) [88] | 4.10 (3.22–5.23) [76] |
| 1.09 (1.02–1.16) [90] | 1.12 (0.74–1.69) [7] | 0.97 (0.59–1.60) [32] | 4.22 (2.71–6.56) [22, 32] | |
| 1.63 (1.04–2.55) [64] | 1.49 (0.69–3.22) [64] | 1.46 (1.22–1.74) [89] | ||
| Rofecoxib4 | 1.45 (1.33–1.59) [90] | 1.58 (1.07–2.17) [37] | 1.28 (1.06–1.53) [88] | 2.32 (1.89–2.86) [76] |
| 2.32 (0.89–6.74) [33] | 1.15 (0.74–1.79) [8] | 2.13 (0.81–5.60) [64] | ||
| 6.50 (0.70–60.33) [7] |
AEs adverse events, CI confidence interval, CV cardiovascular, GI gastrointestinal, MI myocardial infarction, RR relative risk
1Indicated for headache, not migraine
2Available for intravenous or intramuscular administration
3Indicated for migraine in combination with sumatriptan
4Withdrawn from the market
Notably, the increased risks of CV and renal AEs are associated with longer-term usage of NSAIDs; thus, low-dose and/or acute administration of NSAIDs should confer much lower risk of AEs while still effectively reducing pain. Recent results from two pivotal trials support that celecoxib oral solution demonstrates significant efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine attacks [15, 16]. Participants reported significant improvements in freedom from the most bothersome symptom and freedom from headache pain at 2 h postdose compared with placebo (see Fig. 2) [15, 16]. These two clinical trials reported no serious treatment-related or unexpected AEs and few mild, manageable AEs—only dysgeusia and nausea increased in frequency [15, 16]. In light of these safety and efficacy results, in 2020 the FDA approved celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine in adults with or without aura.
Fig. 2.
A greater proportion of participants reported headache pain freedom after administration of 120 mg of celecoxib oral solution than with placebo (by postdose timepoint using the last observation carried forward).
Reproduced from Lipton et al. [15] under CC BY-NC 4.0 license terms [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/]
Nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2 Selective NSAIDs in Migraine Treatment Guidelines
The American Headache Society (AHS) published a consensus statement for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in 2021 to include an array of first-line treatments for migraine, including acute therapies such as triptans, ergotamine derivatives, small-molecule calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (“gepants”), combination analgesics (acetaminophen/aspirin/caffeine), NSAIDs (aspirin, diclofenac, naproxen, and ibuprofen), and neuromodulation devices [2]. Recently approved first-line therapies with proven efficacy include lasmiditan, rimegepant, ubrogepant, remote electrical neuromodulation, and celecoxib oral solution [2]. The AHS advised that patients using NSAIDs for more than 15 days per month may develop medication-overuse headache and should be candidates for preventive migraine treatments [2]. The latest treatment guidelines for migraine from the European Headache Federation and the European Academy of Neurology list only NSAIDs as first-line therapies; they recommend triptans as second-line treatments and ditans and gepants as third-line treatments [71]. NSAIDs continue to have strong support internationally for the acute treatment of migraine attacks; thus, clinicians and patients are in need of safe and effective NSAID formulations.
The Role of Traditional NSAIDs and New Formulations in Migraine Treatment
Given the COX-2 hypothesis that increased dose, duration, and COX-2 selectivity of an NSAID increases its risk of CV and other AEs, the development of NSAID reformulations allow for lower and safer effective doses [3, 26, 48]. The decision of which NSAID to reformulate is critical as higher relative COX-2 selectivity (see Fig. 3) is associated with increased CV and bleeding AE risks. For example, valdecoxib is more selective for COX-2 than celecoxib in vitro, and valdecoxib is associated with higher CV risk. Thus, the relatively lower COX-2 selectivity of celecoxib, compared with valdecoxib, positions it favorably from a pharmacologic perspective to achieve efficacy outcomes with less CV risk [26]. As the FDA recommends using the shortest duration and lowest effective dose of NSAIDs [35, 48], celecoxib oral solution is particularly suited for diseases that cause acute pain and require intermittent treatment, such as migraine, allowing for effective analgesia with lower overall drug exposure and AE risks.
Fig. 3.

Relative COX-2 selectivity of NSAIDS commonly used in the treatment of migraine attacks or headache disorders with rofecoxib included for reference. COX Clyclooxygenase, IC80 concentration that inhibits 80% of the maximal response
It is important to evaluate the relative safety of NSAIDs in individual patients, whether used on- or off-label, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks (Table 1). Low-dose diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution is available via prescription for the acute treatment of migraine attacks with efficacy as early as 30 min postdose [72, 73]. Common AEs reported with diclofenac treatment include vomiting and upper abdominal pain; further, diclofenac poses an increased CV health risk compared with no usage of NSAIDs or use of paracetamol or ibuprofen [74]. Nasal ketorolac tromethamine (Sprix®) is the only nasal spray NSAID currently marketed and FDA-approved for moderate to severe pain [75]. It is not FDA-approved for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, but it is often prescribed for these attacks. Due to its high COX-1 selectivity, ketorolac has the highest associated risk of serious GI events with more than a fivefold increase compared with no usage of NSAIDs [13, 76].
Ibuprofen and naproxen are common non-prescription medications used for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, although they are not FDA-approved for the indication. They are not exempt from the elevated AE risks associated with all NSAIDs, particularly with longer-term use. Several studies (ADAPT, PRECISION, SCOT, and a recent meta-analysis) provided evidence that celecoxib confers risks of CV events similar to naproxen and ibuprofen (see Table 1) [37, 39, 64, 70]. Both naproxen and ibuprofen are associated with significantly higher risk of GI events than celecoxib, and ibuprofen carries significantly more risk for renal events [39].
Celecoxib oral solution is the only selective COX-2 inhibitor currently FDA-approved for the treatment of acute attacks in adults with migraine with or without aura [35, 48]. Its self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) allows for rapid absorption and increased bioavailability, compared with the capsule formulation [77]. Many of the AEs associated with celecoxib and other NSAIDs develop over time from accumulated drug exposure due to relatively high or prolonged dosing. When administered at low, intermittent doses, the acute use of celecoxib oral solution appears to have fewer safety concerns than other NSAIDs [15, 16, 26, 48]. In two identical clinical trials of celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine, there were no serious treatment-related AEs reported [15, 16]. These trials provide evidence that celecoxib oral solution is safe and effective within 2 h post-dose for the treatment of migraine attacks [15, 16].
Considerations in the Use of COX-2 Selective NSAIDs, including celecoxib oral solution, in Migraine
Certain patients require special considerations prior to the initiation of celecoxib oral solution and other NSAIDs. Those with a history of MI have an increased risk of reinfarction and death with NSAID treatment [78, 79]. However, celecoxib appears to be associated with some of the lowest RR for CV events or bleeding in this clinical scenario—lower than diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen (Table 1) [10].
Many individuals with migraine take daily aspirin, which is cardioprotective, but there is no consistent evidence that concurrent use of aspirin with NSAIDs mitigates the increased risk of serious CV thrombotic events [48]. The AHS warns about GI AEs (bleeding, ulceration, perforation) associated with NSAIDs, particularly in the elderly and those with a history of GI bleeding or peptic ulcer disease [2]. Notably, the decreased frequency of GI AEs is likely mechanistic and class-related for selective COX-2 inhibitors [80].
All NSAIDs, except aspirin, are contraindicated in those with a history of CABG [35]. This is due to an extrapolation of results from a study of patients undergoing CABG who received valdecoxib or parecoxib showed a fourfold increase in CV events [35, 62].
When used too frequently, certain acute treatments for migraine, such as triptans, ergots, and butalbital-containing medications, are associated with an increased risk of progression from episodic to chronic migraine [81, 82]. NSAIDs do not carry this risk in those with fewer than ten monthly migraine days, a group that constitutes more than 80% of persons with migraine [83].
Individuals with gastroparesis, nausea, difficulty swallowing, or a history of bariatric surgery may not be able to quickly administer or absorb oral medications [84]. Rather than tablets, alternative formulations that are absorbed more rapidly with or without food or drink are generally more effective; these include nasal or intramuscular ketorolac, diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution, and celecoxib oral solution [2, 15, 66, 75].
Conclusions
NSAIDs remain an integral part of the acute treatment paradigm for migraine. All NSAIDs, including selective COX-2 inhibitors, confer some elevated risk of CV and GI events, although the level of risk differs between individual NSAIDs. With their high RR of CV events, rofecoxib and valdecoxib were withdrawn from market in 2005, and all NSAIDs, including celecoxib, received a black box warning about increased risk of CV events.
The degree of AE risk appears to increase with dose, duration, and COX-2 selectivity. CV and GI events occur more frequently with long-term usage or high daily dosages; lower exposure to NSAIDs is preferable. Disease states associated with acute pain, like migraine, are more amenable to employing NSAIDs with lower risk of the AEs associated with chronic or high-dose NSAID usage. Thus, the benefits of NSAID treatment may outweigh the risks for many patients. Individualizing treatment according to a patient’s specific needs and risk factors optimizes safe and effective NSAID analgesic use.
New technologies and formulations may help mitigate risks associated with NSAIDs. Celecoxib oral solution is the only selective COX-2 inhibitor designed as a low-dose oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Clinical trials demonstrated that it is safe and effective and associated with mild AEs and minimal increased risk of CV events, similar to other NSAIDs. New formulations of NSAIDs may provide alternative low-dose, acute analgesia with fewer associated CV and GI events than previous NSAID formulations.
Acknowledgements
Funding
The journal’s Rapid Service Fee and editorial assistance were financially supported by Collegium Pharmaceutical.
Medical Writing and Editorial Assistance
Professional writing and editorial support was provided by Nestor G. Davila, PhD,¯ of MedLogix Communications, LLC, Itasca, Illinois, USA, under the direction of the authors and was funded by Collegium Pharmaceutical.
Author Contributions
All named authors (Jessica Ailani, Stephanie J. Nahas, Deborah I. Friedman and Todd Kunkel) meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work, as a whole, and have approved this version to be published.
Disclosures
Jessica Ailani has received honoraria, institutional fees, or stock shares from AbbVie, Aeon, Amgen, Axsome, BioDelivery Sciences International (Collegium Pharmaceutical), Biohaven, CtrM, Current Pain and Headache Reports (section editor), Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Impel, Linpharma, Lundbeck, Nesos, Neurolief, Satsuma, SELF (medical reviewer), Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theranica, Unusual Headache Syndromes, and Zosano. Deborah I. Friedman has received honoraria, fees, or clinical trial grants from AbbVie, BioDelivery Sciences International (Collegium Pharmaceutical), Biohaven Biopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Impel Neuropharma, Linpharma, Lundbeck, Merck, Neurology Reviews, Satsuma, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Zosano and is on the medical advisory board or board of directors at Healthy Women, Spinal CSF Leak Foundation, and the Southern Headache Society. Stephanie J. Nahas has received honoraria, fees, or research support from Alder Biopharmaceuticals (Lundbeck Seattle Biopharmaceuticals), Allergan (AbbVie Inc.), the American Academy of Neurology, the American Headache Society, Amgen (Novartis), Axsome Therapeutics, BioDelivery Sciences International (Collegium Pharmaceutical), Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Evolve Med Ed, Fenix Group International, Jackson & Campbell, the Massachusetts Medical Society, MedLink Neurology, MJH Life Sciences, the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, the Neurology Learning Network, the Pennsylvania Neurologic Society, Springer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, WebMD/Medscape, Wolters-Kluwer, and Theranica. Todd Kunkel is an employee of Collegium Pharmaceutical.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This manuscript is based on previously performed and published studies and does not contain any new human participant or animal studies performed by any of the authors.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- 1.Montinari MR, Minelli S, De Caterina R. The first 3500 years of aspirin history from its roots—a concise summary. Vascul Pharmacol. 2019;113:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2018.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, Board of Directors of the American Headache S The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2021;61(7):1021–1039. doi: 10.1111/head.14153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Domper Arnal MJ, Hijos-Mallada G, Lanas A. Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events associated with NSAIDs. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021;21(3):373–384. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1965988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grosser T, Yu Y, Fitzgerald GA. Emotion recollected in tranquility: lessons learned from the COX-2 saga. Annu Rev Med. 2010;61:17–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-011209-153129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smyth EM, Grosser T, Wang M, Yu Y, FitzGerald GA. Prostanoids in health and disease. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:S423–S428. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800094-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Law S, Derry S, Moore RA. Naproxen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10):CD009455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009455.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garcia Rodriguez LA, Tacconelli S, Patrignani P. Role of dose potency in the prediction of risk of myocardial infarction associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(20):1628–1636. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Reilly M, Jaskowiak J, Kishel L, Chittams J, et al. Patients exposed to rofecoxib and celecoxib have different odds of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(3):157–164. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-3-200502010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Accessdata.fda.gov. Drug approval package: Celebrex (Celecoxib) NDA# 20-998. [online] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/98/20998.cfm#:~:text=Approval%20Date%3A%2012%2F31%2F1998. 1998. Accessed May 31, 2022.
- 10.Kang DO, An H, Park GU, Yum Y, Park EJ, Park Y, et al. Cardiovascular and bleeding risks associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(5):518–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dean L, Kane M, et al. Celecoxib therapy and CYP2C9 genotype. In: Pratt VM, Scott SA, Pirmohamed M, Esquivel B, Kane MS, Kattman BL, et al., editors. Medical genetics summaries. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bindu S, Mazumder S, Bandyopadhyay U. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: a current perspective. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;180:114147. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McEvoy L, Carr DF, Pirmohamed M. Pharmacogenomics of NSAID-induced upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:684162. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.684162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pardutz A, Schoenen J. NSAIDs in the acute treatment of migraine: a review of clinical and experimental data. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2010;3(6):1966–1987. doi: 10.3390/ph3061966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lipton RB, Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Tepper SJ, Dodick DW. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of DFN-15 (celecoxib oral solution, 25 mg/mL) in the acute treatment of episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2020;60(1):58–70. doi: 10.1111/head.13663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lipton RB, Munjal S, Tepper SJ, Iaconangelo C, Serrano D. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of celecoxib oral solution (ELYXYB) in acute treatment of episodic migraine with or without aura. J Pain Res. 2021;14:2529–2542. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S322292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Syed YY. Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium: a review in migraine. Drugs. 2016;76(1):111–121. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0521-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Loder E, Burch R, Rizzoli P. The 2012 AHS/AAN guidelines for prevention of episodic migraine: a summary and comparison with other recent clinical practice guidelines. Headache. 2012;52(6):930–945. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves Elyxyb (celecoxib) oral solution for acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults, https://www.drugs.com/newdrugs/fda-approves-elyxyb-celecoxib-oral-solution-acute-migraine-without-aura-adults-5223.html, 2020. Accessed May 31, 2022.
- 20.Pepine CJ, Gurbel PA. Cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs: additional insights after PRECISION and point of view. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(12):1352–1356. doi: 10.1002/clc.22814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bugiardini R, Pavasovic S, Yoon J, van der Schaar M, Kedev S, Vavlukis M, et al. Aspirin for primary prevention of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in persons with diabetes and multiple risk factors. EClin Med. 2020;27:100548. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grosser T, Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA. The cardiovascular pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38(8):733–748. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wallace JL. Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn't the stomach digest itself? Physiol Rev. 2008;88(4):1547–1565. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stiller CO, Hjemdahl P. Lessons from 20 years with COX-2 inhibitors: importance of dose–response considerations and fair play in comparative trials. J Intern Med. 2022;292:557–574. doi: 10.1111/joim.13505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fitzgerald GA. Coxibs and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1709–1711. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cheng BR, Chen JQ, Zhang XW, Gao QY, Li WH, Yan LJ, et al. Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0261239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McAdam BF, Catella-Lawson F, Mardini IA, Kapoor S, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Systemic biosynthesis of prostacyclin by cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: the human pharmacology of a selective inhibitor of COX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(1):272–277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.1.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu Y, Ricciotti E, Scalia R, Tang SY, Grant G, Yu Z, et al. Vascular COX-2 modulates blood pressure and thrombosis in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(132):132ra54. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Curtis E, Fuggle N, Shaw S, Spooner L, Ntani G, Parsons C, et al. Safety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis: outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(Suppl 1):25–44. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00664-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sampalis JS, Brownell LA. A randomized, double blind, placebo and active comparator controlled pilot study of UP446, a novel dual pathway inhibitor anti-inflammatory agent of botanical origin. Nutr J. 2012;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sowers JR, White WB, Pitt B, Whelton A, Simon LS, Winer N, et al. The effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with hypertension, osteoarthritis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):161–168. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Coxib and traditional NSAID Trialists’ (CNT) Collaboration. Bhala N, Emberson J, Merhi A, Abramson S, et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2013;382(9894):769–779. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60900-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Oxenius B, Horgan K, et al. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1092–1102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Solomon SD, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Wittes J, Fowler R, Finn P, et al. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1071–1080. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.US Food and Drug Administration. Memorandum: analysis and recommendations for Agency action regarding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiovascular risk; 2005.
- 36.Arber N, Eagle CJ, Spicak J, Rácz I, Dite P, Hajer J, et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):885–895. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bally M, Dendukuri N, Rich B, Nadeau L, Helin-Salmivaara A, Garbe E, et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction with NSAIDs in real world use: Bayesian meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ. 2017;357:j1909. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S, Hildebrand P, Tschannen B, Villiger PM, et al. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:c7086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nissen SE, Yeomans ND, Solomon DH, Luscher TF, Libby P, Husni ME, et al. Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, naproxen, or ibuprofen for arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Antman EM, Bennett JS, Daugherty A, Furberg C, Roberts H, Taubert KA, et al. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an update for clinicians: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1634–1642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.181424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hernandez-Diaz S, Varas-Lorenzo C, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98(3):266–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hirayama A, Tanahashi N, Daida H, Ishiguro N, Chachin M, Sugioka T, et al. Assessing the cardiovascular risk between celecoxib and nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Circ J. 2014;78(1):194–205. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arellano FM, Yood MU, Wentworth CE, Oliveria SA, Rivero E, Verma A, et al. Use of cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors (COX-2) and prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in UK and USA populations. Implications for COX-2 cardiovascular profile. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15(12):861–872. doi: 10.1002/pds.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hawkey CJ, Langman MJ. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: overall risks and management. Complementary roles for COX-2 inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2003;52(4):600–608. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.4.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schwartz JI, Vandormael K, Malice MP, Kalyani RN, Lasseter KC, Holmes GB, et al. Comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen on renal function in elderly subjects receiving a normal-salt diet. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;72(1):50–61. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.126182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tarone RE, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK. Nonselective nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal bleeding: relative and absolute risk estimates from recent epidemiologic studies. Am J Ther. 2004;11(1):17–25. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200401000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wolfe MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(24):1888–1899. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906173402407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.ELYXYB-CELECOXIB-celecoxib liquid [package insert]. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=a0bfcba9-0af6-4b45-80e3-c4c94065b777, 2020. Accessed June 27, 2022.
- 49.Topol EJ. Failing the public health–rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1707–1709. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Grosser T, Fries S, FitzGerald GA. Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(1):4–15. doi: 10.1172/JCI27291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Goldstein JL, Silverstein FE, Agrawal NM, Hubbard RC, Kaiser J, Maurath CJ, et al. Reduced risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications with celecoxib, a novel COX-2 inhibitor. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(7):1681–1690. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA. 2000;284(10):1247–1255. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.10.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R, Davis B, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(21):1520–1528. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sibbald B. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) voluntarily withdrawn from market. CMAJ. 2004;171(9):1027–1028. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wooltorton E. What's all the fuss? Safety concerns about COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib (Vioxx) and celecoxib (Celebrex) CMAJ. 2002;166(13):1692–1693. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sooriakumaran P. COX-2 inhibitors and the heart: are all coxibs the same? Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(966):242–245. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.042234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cotter J, Wooltorton E. New restrictions on celecoxib (Celebrex) use and the withdrawal of valdecoxib (Bextra) CMAJ. 2005;172(10):1299. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lenzer J. FDA advisers warn: COX 2 inhibitors increase risk of heart attack and stroke. BMJ. 2005;330(7489):440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7489.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ong CK, Lirk P, Tan CH, Seymour RA. An evidence-based update on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Med Res. 2007;5(1):19–34. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2007.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Young D. FDA labors over NSAID decisions: panel suggests COX-2 inhibitors stay available. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005;62(7):668–672. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.7.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.La Grenade L, Lee L, Weaver J, Bonnel R, Karwoski C, Governale L, et al. Comparison of reporting of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in association with selective COX-2 inhibitors. Drug Saf. 2005;28(10):917–924. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528100-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, Langford RM, Hoeft A, Parlow JL, et al. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1081–1091. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ott E, Nussmeier NA, Duke PC, Feneck RO, Alston RP, Snabes MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125(6):1481–1492. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.ADAPT Research Group Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the randomized, controlled Alzheimer's Disease Anti-Inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) PLoS Clin Trials. 2006;1(7):e33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Warner TD, Giuliano F, Vojnovic I, Bukasa A, Mitchell JA, Vane JR. Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(13):7563–7568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Accessdata.fda.gov. Drug Approval Package: Cambia (Diclofenac) Powder for Oral Solution NDA# 022165. [online]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2009/022165s000TOC.cfm, 2009. Accessed June 27, 2022.
- 67.Walker C. Are all oral COX-2 selective inhibitors the same? A consideration of celecoxib, etoricoxib, and diclofenac. Int J Rheumatol. 2018;2018:1302835. doi: 10.1155/2018/1302835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Reed GW, Abdallah MS, Shao M, Wolski K, Wisniewski L, Yeomans N, et al. Effect of aspirin coadministration on the safety of celecoxib, naproxen, or ibuprofen. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(16):1741–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Solomon DH, Husni ME, Wolski KE, Wisniewski LM, Borer JS, Graham DY, et al. Differences in safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in patients with osteoarthritis and patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(4):537–546. doi: 10.1002/art.40400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.MacDonald TM, Hawkey CJ, Ford I, McMurray JJV, Scheiman JM, Hallas J, et al. Randomized trial of switching from prescribed non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to prescribed celecoxib: the standard care vs. celecoxib outcome trial (SCOT) Eur Heart J. 2017;38(23):1843–1850. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Eigenbrodt AK, Ashina H, Khan S, Diener HC, Mitsikostas DD, Sinclair AJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(8):501–514. doi: 10.1038/s41582-021-00509-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Diener HC, Montagna P, Gacs G, Lyczak P, Schumann G, Zoller B, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac potassium sachets in migraine: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in comparison with diclofenac potassium tablets and placebo. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(5):537–547. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lipton RB, Grosberg B, Singer RP, Pearlman SH, Sorrentino JV, Quiring JN, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a new powdered formulation of diclofenac potassium for oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine: results from the International Migraine Pain Assessment Clinical Trial (IMPACT) Cephalalgia. 2010;30(11):1336–1345. doi: 10.1177/0333102410367523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Schmidt M, Sørensen HT, Pedersen L. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ. 2018;362:k3426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Accessdata.fda.gov. Drug Approval Package: Sprix (Ketorolac Tromethamine) Nasal Spray NDA# 022382. [online], https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2010/022382_sprix_toc.cfm, 2010. Accessed June 27, 2022.
- 76.Castellsague J, Riera-Guardia N, Calingaert B, Varas-Lorenzo C, Fourrier-Reglat A, Nicotra F, et al. Individual NSAIDs and upper gastrointestinal complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (the SOS project) Drug Saf. 2012;35(12):1127–1146. doi: 10.1007/BF03261999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pal A, Shenoy S, Gautam A, Munjal S, Niu J, Gopalakrishnan M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of DFN-15, a novel oral solution of celecoxib, versus celecoxib 400-mg capsules: a randomized crossover study in fasting healthy volunteers. Clin Drug Investig. 2017;37(10):937–946. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0548-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Schjerning Olsen AM, Lindhardsen J, Gislason GH, McGettigan P, Hlatky MA, Fosbol E, et al. Impact of proton pump inhibitor treatment on gastrointestinal bleeding associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among post-myocardial infarction patients taking antithrombotics: nationwide study. BMJ. 2015;351:h5096. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Boulakh L, Gislason GH. Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients after myocardial infarction—a systematic review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(10):1387–1394. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1186648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Goldstein JL, Correa P, Zhao WW, Burr AM, Hubbard RC, Verburg KM, et al. Reduced incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers with celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, compared to naproxen in patients with arthritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(4):1019–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bigal ME, Serrano D, Buse D, Scher A, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Acute migraine medications and evolution from episodic to chronic migraine: a longitudinal population-based study. Headache. 2008;48(8):1157–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Diener HC, Holle D, Solbach K, Gaul C. Medication-overuse headache: risk factors, pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(10):575–583. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lipton RB, Serrano D, Nicholson RA, Buse DC, Runken MC, Reed ML. Impact of NSAID and Triptan use on developing chronic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. Headache. 2013;53(10):1548–1563. doi: 10.1111/head.12201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Parkman HP. Migraine and gastroparesis from a gastroenterologist's perspective. Headache. 2013;53(Suppl 1):4–10. doi: 10.1111/head.12112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zheng SL, Roddick AJ. Association of aspirin use for primary prevention with cardiovascular events and bleeding events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019;321(3):277–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 86.Zhao B, Wu Q, Wang L, Liao C, Dong Y, Zu J, et al. Pros and cons of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a secondary study of trial sequential analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:592116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 87.Shau WY, Chen HC, Chen ST, Chou HW, Chang CH, Kuo CW, et al. Risk of new acute myocardial infarction hospitalization associated with use of oral and parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammation drugs (NSAIDs): a case-crossover study of Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database and review of current evidence. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012;12:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 88.Roumie CL, Mitchel EF, Jr., Kaltenbach L, et al. Nonaspirin NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, and the risk for stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(7):2037–45. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 89.Chang CH, Shau WY, Kuo CW, et al. Increased risk of stroke associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a nationwide case-crossover study. Stroke. 2010;41(9):1884–90. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 90.McGettigan P, Henry D. Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(9):e1001098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

