Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2000 May;182(10):2937–2944. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.10.2937-2944.2000

NhaA, an Na+/H+ Antiporter Involved in Environmental Survival of Vibrio cholerae

Sophie Vimont 1, Patrick Berche 1,*
PMCID: PMC102005  PMID: 10781565

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae, the agent of cholera, is a normal inhabitant of aquatic environments, in which it survives under a wide range of conditions of pH and salinity. In this work, we identified the nhaA gene in a wild-type epidemic strain of V. cholerae O1. nhaA encodes a protein of 382 amino acids that is very similar to the proteins NhaA of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus (∼87% identity), and Escherichia coli (56% identity). V. cholerae NhaA complements an E. coli nhaA mutant, enabling it to grow in 700 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, indicating functional homology to E. coli NhaA. However, unlike E. coli, the growth of a nhaA-inactivated mutant of V. cholerae was not restricted at various pH and NaCl concentrations, although it was inhibited in the presence of 120 mM LiCl at pH 8.5. Nevertheless, using a nhaA′-lacZ transcriptional fusion, we observed induction of nhaA transcription by Na+, Li+, and K+. These results strongly suggest that NhaA is an Na+/H+ antiporter contributing to the Na+/H+ homeostasis of V. cholerae. nhaA-related sequences were detected in all strains of V. cholerae from the various serogroups. This gene is presumably involved in the survival and persistence of free-living bacteria in their natural habitat.


Vibrio cholerae is a normal inhabitant of aquatic environments, one of the bacterial species of the free-living flora found in estuarine areas (11). V. cholerae is the agent of cholera, a severe human diarrheal disease transmitted mainly by contaminated water and food. Cholera causes major outbreaks of disease worldwide, particularly under conditions of poverty and poor sanitation (2). Most epidemic strains of V. cholerae are clonal and belong to serogroup O1, but a new epidemic strain, O139, has recently emerged that is derived from the pandemic strain, O1, through a complex chromosomal rearrangement (4, 5, 13, 14, 47, 51). In contrast, most environmental strains of V. cholerae are nonpathogenic, and more than 155 serogroups have been described (3, 44, 45; T. Shimoda, G. B. Nair, B. C. Deb, M. J. Albert, R. B. Sack, and Y. Takeda, Letter, Lancet 341:1347, 1993). The estuarine environment is an ideal setting for the survival and persistence of V. cholerae, and the natural niche of this microorganism may well include crustaceans and molluscs, as part of the zooplankton (10, 42). V. cholerae is a halotolerant microorganism whose growth is stimulated by sodium, and it survives under a wide range of conditions of salinity and pH. V. cholerae strains are mostly isolated from environmental sites with NaCl concentrations between 0.2 and 2.0% (11), and bacteria survive in vitro in 0.25 to 3.0% salt, the optimal salinity being 2.0% (25). The pH of seawater is between 7 and 8, and the optimal pH for survival ranges from 7.0 to 9.0, depending on salinity (25). Resistance and survival in saline aquatic habitats may play a key role in the persistence of cholera and the emergence of new epidemics. Indeed, there is a close relationship between the titers of V. cholerae O1 and the temperature and salinity of estuary water (6, 10). The end of outbreaks in Bangladesh usually coincides with the beginning of the monsoons, when the salinity of the water decreases (6, 10).

Sodium proton antiporters play a major role in transporting Na+ across the cytoplasmic membrane of all living cells (22, 33, 55). They are widely distributed in cell membranes from bacteria to animals. In bacteria, the antiporter extrudes Na+ or Li+ in exchange for H+. The driving force for this process is an electrochemical potential of H+ across the membrane, which is established by either the respiratory chain or the H+-translocating ATPase. The Na+/H+ antiporter has several roles: (i) establishment of an electrochemical potential of Na+ across the cytoplasmic membrane, this being the driving force for Na+-coupled processes such as Na+/solute symport (9) and Na+-driven flagellar rotation (18); (ii) extrusion of Na+ and Li+, which are toxic if they accumulate to high concentrations in cells (19); (iii) intracellular pH regulation under alkaline conditions (22, 33); and (iv) cell volume regulation (33). Escherichia coli has two antiporters, NhaA (17) and NhaB (36), which specifically exchange Na+ or Li+ for H+. nhaA is the gene required for tolerance of Na+ and Li+ and for withstanding alkaline pH in the presence of Na+ (32). The expression of nhaA is positively regulated by nhaR, a member of the LysR family, and is induced by Na+ in a pH-dependent manner (7, 21, 38). nhaB, the housekeeping gene, itself confers limited sodium tolerance on cells but becomes essential if a lack of NhaA limits growth (35). The NhaA protein is predicted to have a putative secondary structure consisting of 12 transmembrane segments connected by hydrophilic loops (33, 41). This topology has recently been substantiated by using phoA fusions combined with epitope mapping and exposure to proteolysis from each side of the membrane (41). NhaA is an electrogenic antiporter that has been purified to homogeneity and reconstituted in a functional form in proteoliposomes (37, 48, 49). The two-dimensional crystal structure of NhaA has recently been determined (53). The H+/Na+ stoichiometry of NhaA is 2H+/Na+. The activity of NhaA is highly dependent on pH, with Vmax changing by over 3 orders of magnitude from pH 7 to 8 (48). A pH-dependent conformational change in loop VIII-IX plays a major role in this pH response (16). Interestingly, strong pH sensitivity is a characteristic of antiporters, as well as other transporters and proteins involved in pH regulation. Several amino acid residues involved in the pH sensitivity of NhaA have been identified: His-225 (15, 31, 40), Leu-73 (29), and Gly-338 (39).

As with E. coli and related species, V. cholerae has probably developed complex molecular mechanisms enabling it to grow and to survive in saline environments. Homologs to E. coli NhaA have been described in Vibrio parahaemolyticus (59% identity) and in Vibrio alginolyticus (58% identity), two closely related aquatic species (23, 28, 30). In addition, a homolog of E. coli NhaR (60% identity) has recently been described in V. cholerae (54).

In this work, we identified an NhaA homolog in a wild-type epidemic strain of V. cholerae O1. This protein acted as an Na+/H+ antiporter in E. coli. The growth of a V. cholerae nhaA mutant was inhibited by high concentrations of Li+, although this mutant was found to grow under various conditions of salinity and pH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture media.

In most experiments, we used the wild-type strain N18 of V. cholerae O1, isolated from a patient during the cholera epidemic of 1991 in Peru. We also used a collection of 15 strains of V. cholerae from various serogroups, including those designated O395 (O1), MO45 (O139), 206 (O139), 205 (O1), 212 (O2), 225 (O5), 178 (O6), 226 (O15), 228 (O34), 221 (O37), and 217 (O39), obtained from J. M. Fournier (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France). Four other strains of V. cholerae were generously provided by T. Shimada (Tokyo, Japan), designated 930 (O22), 71 (O22), 73 (O141), and 74 (O155). V. parahaemolyticus strain 75.2 was also obtained from J. M. Fournier. For DNA manipulations, we used the E. coli strains and plasmids listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Strain or plasmid Relevant characteristicsa Source or reference
Strains
V. cholerae
  N18 Wild-type O1: Peru 1991 J. M. Fournier (Institut Pasteur)
  SV1 N18 nhaA mutant This work
  SV2 N18 nhaA′-lacZ nhaA mutant This work
  SV3 N18 PnhaA′-lacZ This work
E. coli
  TG1 F′ traD36 lacIq Δ(lacZ)M15 proA+B+/supE Δ(hsdM-mcrB)5 (rK mK McrB) thi Δ(lac-proAB) Biolabs
  DH5α λpir recA1 gyrA (Nal) Δ(lacIZYA-argF) (φ80dlacΔ [lacZ]M15) pirRK6 27
  β2155 F′ traD36 lacIq Δ(lacZ)M15 proA+B+/thr-1004 pro thi strA hsdS Δ(lacZ)M15 ΔdapA::erm pir::RP4(::Kan from SM10) D. Mazel (Institut Pasteur) and unpublished data
  TA15 melBLid nhaA+ ΔlacZY 17
  NM81 TA15 ΔnhaA1::kan+ thr-1 32
  HITΔAB− HIT-1(nhaB mutant) ΔnhaA::Kanr 51
Plasmids
 pBR322 Ap Tc 53
 pHG329 Ap 47
 pUC1318ΩKm1 Ap Km; a pUC1318 derivative with a 1.5-kb ClaI fragment containing aphA-3 inserted at the SmaI site P. Trieu-Cuot, unpublished data
 pAT113/Sp Sp Mob+ (IncP), oriR pACYC184, att Tn1545, lacZα+, MCS pUC19 8
 plac-1 A pGP704 derivative with lacZ 1
a

Ap, Tc, Nal, Km or Kan, and Sp, resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, kanamycin and streptomycin, respectively. 

Bacteria were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (50 μg/ml), or spectinomycin (60 μg/ml). E. coli β2155 was grown in LB broth supplemented with diaminopimelic acid (10−3 mol/liter). When indicated, NaCl was added and the pH was adjusted with 20 mM Tricine-KOH. We also used nutrient broth (NB) (10 g each of Oxoid Lab Lemco and Oxoid Bacto Peptone per liter) with or without 120 mM NaCl, 120 mM LiCl, or 120 mM KCl at pH 8.5. Bacterial growth was usually followed by the measurement of optical density at 600 nm (OD600) or by counting colonies on plates after serial dilutions.

DNA manipulations and sequencing.

Chromosomal DNA purification, DNA ligation, bacterial transformation, agarose gel electrophoresis, colony hybridization, and Southern blotting were carried out by standard techniques, as described by Sambrook et al. (43). Plasmid DNA was purified on Qiagen columns according to the manufacturer's recommendations. All restriction enzymes and nucleic acid-modifying enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, Mass.). [α-32P]dCTP was obtained from Amersham Life Science, Inc. (Arlington Heights, Ill.). Oligonucleotides were purchased from Genset. PCR was used to prepare probes, and DNA fragments were amplified by reverse PCR with a Perkin-Elmer DNA Thermal Cycler 480 (Norwalk, Conn.): In a final volume of 100 μl, we mixed 100 ng of V. cholerae chromosomal DNA, 200 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 40 pmol of each primer, and 2 U of Taq polymerase (Promega) in 1× reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 50 mM KCl, and 1.5 mM MgCl2). The PCR mixture was subjected to a denaturation step (5 min at 95°C), followed by 35 cycles of amplification (60 s of denaturation at 95°C, 60 s of annealing at 55°C, and 90 s of elongation at 72°C) and a termination step (10 min at 72°C). The resulting amplicons were purified from agarose gels with a Geneclean kit (BIO 101, La Jolla, Calif.). The nucleotide sequence was determined by the dideoxy chain termination method with the ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer) and the ABI PRISM 310 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Computer analysis was carried out using the Mac Vector program (International Biotechnologies, Inc.) and BLAST software (National Center for Biotechnology Information). Amino acid alignments were analyzed with CLUSTAL W.

Genomic libraries and cloning of nhaA and probes.

Chromosomal DNA from V. cholerae O1 (N18) was digested with HindIII, and 3- to 7-kb DNA fragments selected by centrifugation on a sucrose gradient were inserted into pBR322. The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli HITΔAB−. The nhaA gene was then cloned from this library with an nhaA probe from V. parahaemolyticus (1,217 bp) obtained by PCR with the primers 5′-AATCGTTTATTAAGATAATAAATAT-3′ and 5′-TGAGTTACAAATCAGTTAAATACGA-3′. The primers used for reverse PCR were 5′-CTGAAGCTAAAGATGCCGAGTGGTT-3′ and 5′-GATCTTCATTTCATCACTGGCCTTT-3′. To complete the cloning of the V. cholerae nhaA, a second genomic library was constructed in E. coli TG1, using PstI DNA fragments (9 to 13 kb) inserted into pHG329. A specific internal 902-bp nhaA probe was prepared by amplifying a V. cholerae nhaA fragment with primers 5′-ATGTCTGACATGATTCGAGAT-3′ and 5′-CTGAAGCTAAAGATGCCGAGTGGTT-3′ to screen the second library.

To screen bacterial strains for the presence of nhaA, we prepared a specific 1,710-bp nhaA gene by amplifying the entire V. cholerae nhaA gene with primers 5′-CGGAATTCCGCAGACGGGTTTTATGCAGTTAT-3′ and 5′-CGGAATTCCGAGATTGGCGCGAACCTTAT-3′.

Construction of an nhaA mutant and complementation.

We constructed an nhaA-disrupted mutant from strain N18 of V. cholerae O1. A 548-bp PCR fragment corresponding to an internal fragment of nhaA was generated with V. cholerae O1 chromosomal DNA as a template, with the primers 5′-CGGAATTCCCTGCGATAGCGGCGGTAG-3′ and 5′-CGGAATTCCAGCATTGGCAAAAGCAAAC-3′. This fragment was flanked by EcoRI restriction sites which were used to insert it into the suicide vector plac-1, previously digested with EcoRI and dephosphorylated. The resulting plasmid was called plac-nhaA. A kanamycin resistance cassette (aphA-3), obtained by BamHI-digestion of pUC1318ΩKm1, was inserted into the BglII site of the vector to give pSV2. The lacZ gene was deleted by SmaI-KpnI digestion and religation to give pSV1. All these constructs were made in the E. coli DH5α λpir strain. For the final step, pSV1 was used to transform E. coli β2155, from which the plasmid was transferred into the wild-type V. cholerae strain by conjugation. Integration of this suicide plasmid into the wild-type chromosomal nhaA gene gave rise to the nhaA mutant, called SV1, confirmed by Southern blot analysis. For complementation assays, a 2,556-bp MluI blunted fragment derived from 10- to 11-kb fragments of a PstI genomic library and containing the entire nhaA gene was inserted into pAT113 or pHG329, previously digested with SmaI and dephosphorylated. pHG329ΩnhaA was then used to transform the nhaA mutant of E. coli, and pAT113/SpΩnhaA was introduced by conjugation into the nhaA mutant of V. cholerae.

Conjugative transfer was achieved by mixing 150 μl of an overnight culture of the donor strain in LB broth, washed and diluted 1 in 100, with 75 μl of an overnight culture of the recipient strain, washed and diluted 1 in 100 on a 0.45 μm-pore-size filter (Nalgene, Rochester, N.Y.). The filters were then placed onto LB-diaminopimelic acid plates and, after incubation at 37°C for 8 h, were resuspended in LB broth and streaked onto selective medium plates (LB agar supplemented with kanamycin). Cointegrate conjugants were isolated. We obtained mutants with a single homologous recombination, the genotype of which was confirmed by Southern blot analysis.

Transcriptional nhaA′-lacZ chromosomal fusions.

Two transcriptional nhaA′-lacZ fusions were constructed and introduced into the chromosome of strain N18 of V. cholerae. A first-fusion mutant strain (SV2), derived from V. cholerae O1, was constructed as follows: an internal nhaA fragment obtained by PCR as described above was inserted upstream from the lacZ gene in pSV2, a modified plac-1 vector. pSV2 was integrated by homologous recombination into the nhaA locus, interrupting the nhaA gene and placing the lacZ gene under the control of the promoter of the inactivated nhaA gene. A second-fusion mutant strain (SV3) was constructed by inserting the promoter region of nhaA into pSV3, a modified plac-1 vector, as follows: a 669-bp fragment containing a 623-bp sequence upstream of the nhaA initiation codon was generated by PCR with primers 5′-CGGAATTTCGTCATCCCACTCAATGAT-3′ and 5′-CGGAATTCCATCTTGAAGAAATCTCG-3′. This fragment (PnhaA) was flanked by EcoRI restriction sites, which were used to insert it into pSV2 that had been digested with EcoRI and dephosphorylated to give pSV3. The lacZ gene was integrated by homologous recombination under the control of the promoter of nhaA. In contrast to SV2, nhaA remains intact on the chromosome of N18 in this transcriptional fusion. As described above, all plasmid constructions were done in the E. coli DH5α λpir strain. For the final step, pSV2 or pSV3 was used to transform into E. coli β2155, from which they were transferred into the wild-type V. cholerae strain by conjugation. The genotype of the nhaA′-lacZ chromosomal fusions was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. For the determination of β-galactosidase activity, bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C in LB broth and diluted to an OD of 0.04 in NB-Tricine (pH 8.5) with or without NaCl, LiCl, or KCl. β-Galactosidase specific activity was determined at various times during bacterial growth as previously described (26) and expressed in Miller units. The formula used was as follows: activity = [OD420 − (1.75 × OD550)] × 1,000/(OD600 × t × 0.5).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence of V. cholerae O1 nhaA has been assigned no. AF051158 in the GenBank Nucleotide Sequence Database.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Characterization and distribution of nhaA in V. cholerae.

A HindIII genomic library from a wild-type epidemic strain N18 of V. cholerae O1, isolated in 1991 from a patient in Peru, was constructed in pBR322 and used to transform into E. coli HITΔAB−. This library was screened with an nhaA probe from V. parahaemolyticus, which hybridized to the chromosomal DNA of V. cholerae O1 under high-stringency conditions. We isolated a positive clone carrying a 4-kb HindIII fragment. It was entirely sequenced (4,191 bp), revealing the presence of three open reading frames (ORFs). One ORF was truncated at the 3′-OH extremity, and its sequence was homologous to the 3′ end of the nhaA gene of V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus. The sequence of the 5′-OH end of this gene was determined by sequencing an amplicon obtained by reverse PCR after SphI chromosomal DNA digestion and religation. We thus obtained a 5,976-bp sequence encompassing the complete region and constituted of four ORFs: ORF1, ORF2, nhaA, and ORF3 (Fig. 1A). ORF1 and ORF2 encoded putative proteins of unknown functions. The 5′-OH end of ORF3 encoded the N-terminal part (360 amino acids) of a putative protein, sharing 53% identity with gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase (also known as aminotransferase) of Haemophilus influenzae (gabT). The genetic organization of the nhaA region of V. cholerae is different from that of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, where nhaR, the transcriptional regulator of nhaA, is located downstream from the nhaA gene (24, 34).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

(A) Genetic organization of the nhaA locus of Vibrio cholerae O1. (B) CLUSTAL W alignment of E. coli and V. cholerae O1 NhaA proteins. Asterisks indicate amino acid identity, and dots indicate amino acid similarity. The conserved amino acid residues Asp-133, Asp-163, Asp-164, His-225, Leu-73, and G-338 are indicated with boldface circles. Helical structures spanning the membrane are indicated with open boxes and are numbered. The E. coli sequence data were taken from Taglicht et al. (48).

The nhaA gene of V. cholerae encodes a protein predicted to have 382 amino acids highly homologous to the NhaA of V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus (87 and 86% identity, respectively), H. influenzae (56% identity), Salmonella enteritidis (56% identity), E. coli (56% identity), and Helicobacter pylori (41% identity). E. coli NhaA has been extensively studied and is an Na+/H+ antiporter essential for its adaptation to salinity and alkalinity. As shown in Fig. 1B, E. coli NhaA has 12 extensive helical structures repetitively spanning the membrane (41). The deduced peptide sequence of V. cholerae closely resembles that of E. coli, with the same putative extensive helical structures (Fig. 1B). Three important aspartate residues (Asp-133, Asp-163, and Asp-164) that have been identified as essential in E. coli for NhaA activity are conserved in V. cholerae NhaA (20). The E. coli NhaA His-225 and Leu-73, identified by mutagenesis as residues involved in pH sensing (15, 29), are located in highly conserved regions of V. cholerae (Fig. 1B), and the Gly-338 residue which affects the pH response of NhaA (39) was also conserved in V. cholerae NhaA, suggesting that these proteins share functional properties.

We carried out Southern blotting at high stringency with a 1,710-bp nhaA probe containing the entire nhaA gene and HindIII-digested chromosomal DNA from 15 V. cholerae strains of various serogroups (O1, O2, O5, O6, O15, O22, O34, O37, O39, O139, O141, and O155). nhaA-related sequences were detected in all the strains tested, and the restriction pattern was the same in each case, except for two strains, O141 and O155 (data not shown).

The NhaA of V. cholerae is a functional homolog of E. coli NhaA.

We first investigated whether NhaA of V. cholerae was functional and acted as an Na+/H+ antiporter by introducing into the nhaA-inactivated mutant NM81 of E. coli (32) either the multicopy plasmid pHG/nhaA, which carries the entire V. cholerae nhaA with its promoter region, or pHG, as a control. E. coli NM81/pHG did not grow in LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/liter) and 0.7 M NaCl at pH 7.5 (Fig. 2). In contrast, bacterial growth was restored in the complemented mutant of E. coli transformed with V. cholerae nhaA (NM81/pHGΩnhaA), and the growth rate was similar to that of the wild-type E. coli strain, TA15, harboring pHG, although a 2-h shift was observed in the initial growth phase for the complemented strain (Fig. 2). This result indicated that V. cholerae NhaA is a functional homolog of E. coli NhaA and acts as an Na+/H+ antiporter.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Growth curves for E. coli strains TA15/pHG329 (■), NM81/pHG329 (○), and NM81/pHG329ΩnhaA (▵). Bacteria were grown in LB (pH 7.5), 0.7 M NaCl, and ampicillin (100 μg/ml).

Growth of an nhaA mutant of V. cholerae is inhibited by Li+.

An nhaA-inactivated mutant of V. cholerae O1, designated SV1, was constructed by inserting the suicide vector pSV1 by homologous recombination into nhaA from strain N18 (Fig. 3 and 4). In contrast to E. coli (32), no significant difference in growth was observed between the nhaA mutant and the wild-type strain in LB broth with various NaCl concentrations and pH values, up to 1.0 M NaCl and pH 9.5, conditions that inhibited bacterial growth of both the wild-type strain and the nhaA mutant of V. cholerae (data not shown). These results suggest that V. cholerae has developed several compensatory mechanisms to survive and to maintain its homeostasis in its aquatic saline environment.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Construction of pSV1, pSV2, and pSV3.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

SV1, SV2, and SV3 V. cholerae mutant strains obtained by simple allelic exchange. Coordinates correspond to the A of the translational start site. The suicide vectors pSV1, pSV2, and pSV3 used for recombination are indicated with double-headed arrows.

Bacterial growth was then tested in NB-Tricine supplemented with spectinomycin (60 μg/liter) and 120 mM LiCl (pH 8.5). We used the wild-type strain (N18) and its nhaA mutant transformed with pAT113 or pAT113/nhaA. In the presence of LiCl, the nhaA mutant did not grow, whereas the wild-type bacteria did (Fig. 5). No such effect was observed at neutral pH (data not shown). Bacterial growth was almost fully restored in the nhaA mutant complemented with pAT113/nhaA (Fig. 5). The inactivation of nhaA was therefore responsible for the lack of growth of the V. cholerae mutant in the presence of Li+, demonstrating that V. cholerae NhaA expresses a typical property of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter. Moreover, the inhibition of growth of the V. cholerae nhaA mutant in the presence of large amounts of LiCl in a pH-dependent manner is consistent with the recent finding that the growth of a V. cholerae nhaR mutant was not affected by various NaCl concentrations and alkaline conditions but was restricted in the presence of Li+ (54). However, the relevance of the NhaA-dependent resistance of V. cholerae to Li+ toxicity in the environment remains unclear.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

Growth curves of V. cholerae strains O1/pAT113-Sp (■), SV1/pAT113/Sp (○), and SV1/pAT113/SpΩnhaA (◊). Bacteria were grown in NB-Tricine (pH 8.5), 120 mM LiCl, and spectinomycin (60 μg/ml).

Transcription of the nhaA gene of V. cholerae is induced by Na+, Li+, and K+.

We constructed two nhaA′-lacZ chromosomal fusions, designated SV2 and SV3, in the wild-type strain (N18) of V. cholerae O1 (see Materials and Methods) (Fig. 3 and 4). The SV2 NhaA fusion strain was obtained by inserting an nhaA-lacZ transcriptional fusion into nhaA, thereby disrupting this gene and placing lacZ under the control of the nhaA promoter. However, since the nhaA′-lacZ fusion lacks active nhaA, neither the induction nor the stress conditions of this strain necessarily reflect those of the wild type. We therefore constructed another fusion strain to study the regulation of nhaA expression. The SV3 NhaA+ fusion strain was constructed by inserting a PnhaA-lacZ fusion containing the promoter region of nhaA into the chromosome of N18. In this strain, lacZ was also under the control of the nhaA promoter, but nhaA was intact. Bacteria grown overnight in LB broth at 37°C were diluted to an OD of 0.04 in NB-Tricine (pH 8.5) with or without NaCl, LiCl, or KCl (120 mM) and incubated 10 h at 37°C. No difference in bacterial growth was observed between SV2 and SV3 in NB-Tricine with or without NaCl or KCl (data not shown). In contrast, in NB-Tricine supplemented with 120 mM LiCl, growth of strain SV2 in which nhaA was inactivated was restricted, whereas growth of strain SV3 was not affected, confirming that the wild-type copy of nhaA was expressed in this later strain (data not shown).

β-Galactosidase activity was determined before the addition of salts (30 U) and during the exponential (t = 6 h) and early stationary (t = 10 h) growth phases (Fig. 6). We noticed that the overall level of β-galactosidase activity was lower for the SV2 strain than for the SV3 strain, with no clear explanation. However, we found that Na+, Li+, and K+ induced nhaA transcription in both SV2 and SV3 strains. Exposure to NaCl, LiCl, or KCl (120 mM) increased β-galactosidase activity, as compared to the control at 6 or 10 h. Maximal induction ratios were observed in the presence of NaCl: a 4- to 8-fold increase at 6 to 10 h for the SV2 NhaA- strain and a 1.5- to 2.6-fold increase at 6 to 10 h for the SV3 NhaA+ strain. The difference in nhaA induction between the SV2 and SV3 fusion strains can be explained by the presence of an active NhaA in SV3 which efficiently excreted Na+ at alkaline pH and reduced the intracellular concentration of Na+. Indeed, this intracellular Na+ concentration is the signal for induction in E. coli (12). Moreover, when strain SV2 or SV3 was grown in the presence of LiCl, we also observed an increase in the production of β-galactosidase, even though it was delayed when compared to that observed in the presence of NaCl: a 0.7- to 3.8-fold increase at 6 to 10 h for SV2 and a 0.7- to 3.3-fold increase at 6 to 10 h for SV3. These results correlate with those obtained with E. coli, where the expression of nhaA is also induced by Na+ and Li+ (21). However, in contrast, V. cholerae nhaA transcription was induced by KCl. The induction ratio with KCl was lower than that observed with NaCl for the SV2 strain; however, a similar pattern of induction was observed with SV3: a 1.8- to 3.4-fold increase at 6 to 10 h for SV2 and a 1.5- to 2.7-fold increase at 6 to 10 h for SV3. The reason for this discrepancy between V. cholerae and E. coli remains unclear. The induction of nhaA transcription might be related to osmotic shock or to complex regulatory mechanisms specific to V. cholerae. This halotolerant bacterium survives in ecosystems which are probably very different than those of E. coli and therefore may have developed unknown specific adaptative mechanisms to variations of osmolarity. These results indicate that (i) transcription of the nhaA gene was modulated by the presence of salts in the growth medium and that (ii) NaCl was a better inducer than LiCl or KCl for the nhaA transcription. In addition, NhaR, the positive regulator of nhaA in E. coli (12), is also present in V. cholerae (54). All these results suggest that the transcriptional regulation of V. cholerae nhaA may mimic that of nhaA in E. coli.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6

Effect of Na+, Li+, or K+ on the expression of nhaA′-lacZ in V. cholerae SV2 NhaA fusion strain (A) and V. cholerae SV3 NhaA+ fusion strain (B) at t = 6 or 10 h. Bacteria were grown in NB-Tricine (pH 8.5) either without the addition of salt (control), with 120 mM NaCl, with 120 mM LiCl, or with 120 mM KCl. Multiple assays of several independent growth experiments were performed, and the standard deviations for each determination are denoted by the line above each bar.

In conclusion, our results strongly suggest that the NhaA of V. cholerae is an Na+/H+ antiporter. This saline adaptation system may contribute to the survival and persistence of the free-living V. cholerae in its natural estuarine habitat. Moreover, this work also shows that several additional antiporter systems regulating Na+/H+ homeostasis may exist in V. cholerae. For example, an NhaB homolog was identified in V. cholerae (S. Vimont and P. Berche, unpublished data). An extensive study of these antiporter systems will improve our understanding of the epidemiology of cholera.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to Claude Parsot (Institut Pasteur) for the gift of plac-1, helpful discussions, and advice about plasmid constructions. We also thank Patrick Trieu-Cuot for helpful discussions and Vincent Escuyer for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank E. Padan for her gift of the E. coli TA15 and nhaA mutant NM81 strains, T. Tsuchiya for the E. coli nhaA nhaB mutant strain HITΔAB−, and D. Mazel for the E. coli mutant β2155.

This work was supported by INSERM and the University of Paris V and by a grant from the MRT.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allaoui A, Mounier J, Prevost M C, Sansonetti P J, Parsot C. icsB: a Shigella flexneri virulence gene necessary for the lysis of protrusions during intercellular spread. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:1605–1616. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb00885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barua D. History of cholera. In: Barua D, Greenough W B I, editors. Cholera. New York, N.Y: Plenum Medical; 1992. pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baumann P, Furniss A L, Lee J V. Genus I. Vibrio Pacini 1854, 411AL. In: Kreig N R, Holt J G, editors. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1984. pp. 518–538. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berche P, Poyart C, Abachin E, Lelievre H, Vandepitte J, Dodin A, Fournier J M. The novel epidemic strain O139 is closely related to the pandemic strain O1 of Vibrio cholerae. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:701–704. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.3.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bik E M, Bunschoten A E, Gouw R D, Mooi F R. Genesis of the novel epidemic Vibrio cholerae O139 strain: evidence for horizontal transfer of genes involved in polysaccharide synthesis. EMBO J. 1995;14:209–216. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb06993.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brown I I, Sirenko L A. The role of the sodium cycle of energy coupling in the emergence and persistence of natural foci of modern cholera. Biochemistry (Moscow) 1997;62:225–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carmel O, Rahav-Manor O, Dover N, Shaanan B, Padan E. The Na+-specific interaction between the LysR-type regulator, NhaR, and the nhaA gene encoding the Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1997;16:5922–5929. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.19.5922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Celli J, Trieu-Cuot P. Circularization of Tn916 is required for expression of the transposon-encoded transfer functions: characterization of long tetracycline-inducible transcripts reading through the attachment site. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28:103–117. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen C C, Tsuchiya T, Yamane Y, Wood J M, Wilson T H. Na+ (Li+)-proline cotransport in Escherichia coli. J Membr Biol. 1985;84:157–164. doi: 10.1007/BF01872213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Colwell R R. Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm. Science. 1996;274:2025–2031. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Colwell R R, Huq A. Vibrios in the environment: viable but nonculturable Vibrio cholerae. In: Wachsmuth I K, Blake P A, Olsvik O, editors. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1994. pp. 117–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dover N, Higgins C F, Carmel O, Rimon A, Pinner E, Padan E. Na+-induced transcription of nhaA, which encodes an Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli, is positively regulated by nhaR and affected by hns. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6508–6517. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.22.6508-6517.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dumontier S, Berche P. Vibrio cholerae O22 might be a putative source of exogenous DNA resulting in the emergence of the new strain of Vibrio cholerae O139. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998;164:91–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dumontier S, Trieu-Cuot P, Berche P. Structural and functional characterization of IS1358 from Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:6101–6106. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.23.6101-6106.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gerchman Y, Olami Y, Rimon A, Taglicht D, Schuldiner S, Padan E. Histidine-226 is part of the pH sensor of NhaA, a Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:1212–1216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gerchman Y, Rimon A, Padan E. A pH-dependent conformational change of NhaA Na(+)/H(+) antiporter of Escherichia coli involves loop VIII-IX, plays a role in the pH response of the protein, and is maintained by the pure protein in dodecyl maltoside. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:24617–24624. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.24617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goldberg E B, Arbel T, Chen J, Karpel R, Mackie G A, Schuldiner S, Padan E. Characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:2615–2619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Imae Y, Atsumi T. Na+-driven bacterial flagellar motors. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1989;21:705–716. doi: 10.1007/BF00762688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Inaba K, Kuroda T, Shimamoto T, Kayahara T, Tsuda M, Tsuchiya T. Lithium toxicity and Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. Biol Pharm Bull. 1994;17:395–398. doi: 10.1248/bpb.17.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Inoue H, Noumi T, Tsuchiya T, Kanazawa H. Essential aspartic acid residues, Asp-133, Asp-163 and Asp-164, in the transmembrane helices of a Na+/H+ antiporter (NhaA) from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1995;363:264–268. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00331-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karpel R, Alon T, Glaser G, Schuldiner S, Padan E. Expression of a sodium proton antiporter (NhaA) in Escherichia coli is induced by Na+ and Li+ ions. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:21753–21759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krulwich T A. Na+/H+ antiporters. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;726:245–264. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(83)90011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kuroda T, Shimamoto T, Inaba K, Tsuda M, Tsuchiya T. Properties and sequence of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1994;116:1030–1038. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mackie G A. Structure of the DNA distal to the gene for ribosomal protein S20 in Escherichia coli K12: presence of a strong terminator and an IS1 element. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:6965–6981. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.17.6965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miller C J, Drasar B S, Feachem R G. Response of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 to physico-chemical stresses in aquatic environments. J Hyg (London) 1984;93:475–495. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400065074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miller J H. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miller V L, Mekalanos J J. A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:2575–2583. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2575-2583.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nakamura T, Komano Y, Itaya E, Tsukamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Unemoto T. Cloning and sequencing of an Na+/H+ antiporter gene from the marine bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1190:465–468. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)90109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Noumi T, Inoue H, Sakurai T, Tsuchiya T, Kanazawa H. Identification and characterization of functional residues in a Na+/H+ antiporter (NhaA) from Escherichia coli by random mutagenesis. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1997;121:661–670. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nozaki K, Inaba K, Kuroda T, Tsuda M, Tsuchiya T. Cloning and sequencing of the gene for Na+/H+ antiporter of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;222:774–779. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olami Y, Rimon A, Gerchman Y, Rothman A, Padan E. Histidine 225, a residue of the NhaA-Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli is exposed and faces the cell exterior. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:1761–1768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Padan E, Maisler N, Taglicht D, Karpel R, Schuldiner S. Deletion of ant in Escherichia coli reveals its function in adaptation to high salinity and an alternative Na+/H+ antiporter system(s) J Biol Chem. 1989;264:20297–20302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Padan E, Schuldiner S. Molecular physiology of Na+/H+ antiporters, key transporters in circulation of Na+ and H+ in cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1185:129–151. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(94)90204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pinner E, Carmel O, Bercovier H, Sela S, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Cloning, sequencing and expression of the nhaA and nhaR genes from Salmonella enteritidis. Arch Microbiol. 1992;157:323–328. doi: 10.1007/BF00248676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pinner E, Kotler Y, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Physiological role of NhaB, a specific Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1729–1734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pinner E, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the nhaB gene, encoding a Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:11064–11068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pinner E, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Kinetic properties of NhaB, a Na+/H+ antiporter from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:26274–26279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rahav-Manor O, Carmel O, Karpel R, Taglicht D, Glaser G, Schuldiner S, Padan E. NhaR, a protein homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins (LysR), regulates nhaA, the sodium proton antiporter gene in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:10433–10438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rimon A, Gerchman Y, Kariv Z, Padan E. A point mutation (G338S) and its suppressor mutations affect both the pH response of the NhaA-Na+/H+ antiporter as well as the growth phenotype of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26470–26476. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rimon A, Gerchman Y, Olami Y, Schuldiner S, Padan E. Replacements of histidine 226 of NhaA-Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. Cysteine (H226C) or serine (H226S) retain both normal activity and pH sensitivity, aspartate (H226D) shifts the pH profile toward basic pH, and alanine (H226A) inactivates the carrier at all pH values. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26813–26817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.26813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rothman A, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Topological analysis of NhaA, a Na+/H+ antiporter from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:32288–32292. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.50.32288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sakazaki R. Bacteriology of Vibrio and related organisms. In: Barua D, Greenough III W B, editors. Cholera plenum. New York, N.Y: Plenum Medical Book Company; 1992. pp. 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shimada T, Sakazaki R. Additional serovars and inter-O antigenic relationships of Vibrio cholerae. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1977;30:275–277. doi: 10.7883/yoken1952.30.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shimada T E, Arakawa E, Itoh K, Okitsu T, Matsushima A, Asai Y, Yamai S, Nakajato T, Nair G B, Albert M J, Takeda Y. Extended serotyping scheme for Vibrio cholerae. Curr Microbiol. 1994;28:175–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stewart G S, Lubinsky-Mink S, Jackson C G, Cassel A, Kuhn J. pHG165: a pBR322 copy number derivative of pUC8 for cloning and expression. Plasmid. 1986;15:172–181. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(86)90035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stroeher U H, Jedani K E, Dredge B K, Morona R, Brown M H, Karageorgos L E, Albert M J, Manning P A. Genetic rearrangements in the rfb regions of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:10374–10378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Taglicht D, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Overproduction and purification of a functional Na+/H+ antiporter coded by nhaA (ant) from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:11289–11294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Taglicht D, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Proton-sodium stoichiometry of NhaA, an electrogenic antiporter from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:5382–5387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thelen P, Tsuchiya T, Goldberg E B. Characterization and mapping of a major Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:6553–6557. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.20.6553-6557.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vimont S, Dumontier S, Escuyer V, Berche P. The rfaD locus: a region of rearrangement in Vibrio cholerae O139. Gene. 1997;185:43–47. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00625-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Watson N. A new revision of the sequence of plasmid pBR322. Gene. 1988;70:399–403. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Williams K A, Geldmacher-Kaufer U, Padan E, Schuldiner S, Kuhlbrandt W. Projection structure of NhaA, a secondary transporter from Escherichia coli, at 4.0 A resolution. EMBO J. 1999;18:3558–3563. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.13.3558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Williams S G, Carmel-Harel O, Manning P A. A functional homolog of Escherichia coli NhaR in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:762–765. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.3.762-765.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yun C H, Tse C M, Nath S K, Levine S A, Brant S R, Donowitz M. Mammalian Na+/H+ exchanger gene family: structure and function studies. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:G1–G11. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1995.269.1.G1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES