Abstract
Objective:
To describe the Na concentration of pre-packaged foods available in Hong Kong.
Design:
The Na concentrations (mg/100 g or mg/100 ml or per serving) of all pre-packaged foods available for sale in major supermarket chains in Hong Kong were obtained from the 2017 Hong Kong FoodSwitch database. Median and interquartile range (IQR) of Na concentration for different food groups and the proportion of foods and beverages considered low and high Na (<120 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml and >600 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml, respectively) were determined.
Setting:
Hong Kong.
Participants:
Not applicable.
Results:
We analysed 11 518 pre-packaged products. ‘Fruit and vegetables (including table salt)’ had the highest variability in Na concentration ranging from 0 to 39 000 mg/100 g, followed by ‘sauces, dressings, spreads and dips’ ranging from 0 to 34 130. The latter also had the highest median Na concentration (mg/100 g or mg/100 ml) at 1180 (IQR 446–3520), followed by meat and meat products (median 800, IQR 632–1068) and snack foods (median 650, IQR 453–926). Fish and fish products (median 531, 364–791) and meat and meat products (median 444, IQR 351–593) had the highest Na concentration per serving. Overall, 46·7 and 26·7 % of products were low and high in Na, respectively.
Conclusions:
Our results can serve as a baseline for food supply interventions in Hong Kong. We have identified several food groups as priority areas for reformulation, demonstrating the potential of such initiatives to improve the healthiness of the food supply in Hong Kong.
Keywords: Sodium, Salt, Pre-packaged food, Reformulation, Hong Kong
Excess Na consumption is a leading dietary risk factor for death and disability globally(1). High intakes of Na increase blood pressure(2), which is a major risk factor for CVD(3–5). In Hong Kong, CVD is a leading cause of death and in 2014/2015 the prevalence of high blood pressure among the adult population was 28 % (26 % for females and 30 % for males)(6). The WHO has established a global target for a 30 % relative reduction in mean population Na intake by 2025, towards the goal of 2000 mg/d per person(2). Despite this, most populations globally continue to exceed this recommendation(2,3,7,8). In Hong Kong, the estimated average Na intake across the adult population is 3520 mg/d(9), and more than 60 % of adults exceed the WHO recommended Na limit(10).
Many countries around the world have developed and initiated strategies to achieve the WHO goal target for Na(11). In Hong Kong, a number of Na-reduction strategies have been implemented, including a nutrition labelling scheme for pre-packaged foods(12) and the release of voluntary Na reduction targets for bread(9). Moreover, national-level dietary guidelines worldwide commonly recommend reducing discretionary salt use and limiting high Na ingredients during food preparation and at the table(11), as well as encouraging consumers to utilise nutrition labels to select lower Na alternatives(13). While individual efforts to reduce Na intake are important, it is likely to be more effective for highly motivated people(14). Moreover, individual efforts are likely undermined by the saturation of high Na-containing pre-packaged foods in the food supply, which are the leading source of dietary Na in many countries(15,16). Therefore, through product reformulation, it is expected that the food industry should be able to play a key role in achieving improvements to population Na intake.
In the UK, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has worked with the food industry since 2006 to establish voluntary Na reduction targets for processed foods. By 2011, this resulted in a 7 % reduction in the overall mean Na levels of processed foods(17) and has partly contributed to the 15 % decrease in the average salt intake from 9·5 to 8·1 g/d in the UK population between 2001 and 2011(18,19). While average consumption of Na still remains higher than the WHO guideline, it highlights the importance and efficacy of product reformation through setting Na targets for pre-packaged foods.
Data from other countries suggest that Na levels vary considerably within food categories(20,21). Such wide variabilities imply potential feasibility to reformulate those pre-packaged products to reduce their Na content. Hong Kong is a cosmopolitan city whose food supply contains both locally produced and overseas-imported pre-packaged foods. However, there has been no study carried out to date on the Na content of pre-packaged food in the Hong Kong food supply. This has made it difficult for the government and food industry to establish reformulation targets for Na, as it is unclear what levels would be appropriate, as well as which categories and specific pre-packaged foods should be prioritised.
The primary aim of this paper is to assess the Na concentration of pre-packaged foods in Hong Kong and to identify the food categories that contain the highest Na concentration. The secondary aim is to determine the proportion of products classified as low Na or as high Na as stipulated by the current Food and Drugs (Composition and Labelling) Regulations in Hong Kong(22).
Method
Data source and collection
The 2017 Hong Kong FoodSwitch database was used to obtain food product information used for the present study. To our knowledge, this is the only pre-packaged food database with nutrient information available in Hong Kong. This database contains information about all pre-packaged foods and beverages that were available for sale during a cross-sectional store survey in June 2017. Using a non-probabilistic approach, three megastores were selected from each of the three major supermarket chains in Hong Kong, namely AEON (selling a wide range of popular Japanese imported products), ParknShop and Wellcome (selling a wide range of local and imported groceries including those from typical local household brands). The largest megastore (based on information provided by the supermarket) of each chain was selected due to the wide range of products available for collection at these stores. The stores were located in different geographic areas including New Territories East (ParknShop), Hong Kong Island West (Wellcome) and Hong Kong Island East (AEON) – all of which are affluent areas. These chains each have several stores open for business in Hong Kong, including more than 300 stores for ParknShop, more than 240 stores for Wellcome and twelve stores for AEON. Together, these supermarket chains account for about 60 % of the market share for pre-packaged foods in Hong Kong(23). The remaining 40 % are small retailers, internet stores and others. Data were collected from trained research assistants who obtained several photographs of each product including the barcode, the front of package and the nutrition information panel using a bespoke smartphone application.
Data entry and processing
For each food and beverage, the brand name, product name and barcode were recorded into FoodSwitch according to the information displayed on the pack. Nutrition information was obtained directly from the nutritional information panel and included information regarding the nutrient content per 100 g or per 100 ml and per serving for all macro-and micro-nutrients listed including Na. Automatic conversion to Na concentration per 100 g or per 100 ml was performed if the Na content was displayed per serving or per package. In addition, manual conversion of Na concentration in milligrams was carried out if the Na concentration was displayed in grams. Where salt in gram was reported on the pack, the amount of salt in grams was multiplied by 40 %, followed by multiplication of 1000 to convert into milligrams of Na.
Product categorisation and exclusion criteria
Products were categorised based on the food categorisation system developed by the George Institute for Global Health(24). This food categorisation system classifies products into twenty food groups. Several food groups, namely non-food (n = 1), special food (n = 310) and unable to be categorised (n = 40) were excluded, leaving fourteen food groups for the final analysis. Due to the presence of multiple nutritional information panels, variety packs with multiple flavours were excluded. Products were also excluded if they displayed incomplete nutrition information, nutritional information panels only in a foreign language and/or a suspected incorrect Na value (Fig. 1). Where the same product was available in more than one store or where the same product was available in different pack sizes, only one product was retained.
Serving size information
To enhance the public health relevance, we analysed the Na concentration in a ‘typical serving’ of a food or beverage. As there is no standard portion size for each of the food groups analysed, we calculated the median Na concentration in a typical serving, that is, Na (mg/100 g or mg/100 ml)/100 × typical serving (g or ml)(25). The typical serving size was calculated by taking the most common serving size listed on the nutrition information panel for each of the fourteen food groups.
Definition of low and high sodium
Using the Food and Drugs (Composition and Labelling) Regulations in Hong Kong, the proportion of products in each food group meeting the definition of low Na (i.e., <120 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml) and high Na (i.e., >600 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml) was calculated and reported.(22)
Data analysis
Data were analysed using SPSS (version 25; IBM Corporation) in 2018–2019. Median, interquartile range and overall range of Na (mg) concentration were calculated and reported per 100 g or per 100 ml and per typical serving size.
Results
Of the 13 121 products collected and recorded in the FoodSwitch database, 351 products from three food groups (non-food, special food and unable to be categorised) were excluded, 934 products were excluded for having the same nutritional information but in different package sizes and 318 products were excluded for various reasons, with the top three reasons being the presence of multiple nutritional information panels (n = 98), suspected incorrect Na values (n = 86) and missing nutritional information panels for products not exempt from carrying this information (n = 69) (Fig. 1). As a result, 11 518 products from fourteen food groups were included in the analysis. Of these 14 food groups, products were further classified into fifty-eight food categories, 124 major subcategories and 26 minor subcategories.
Median sodium concentration
Overall, the three food groups with the highest median Na concentration (mg/100 g or mg/100 ml of food/beverage) were sauces, dressings, spreads and dips (median 1180, IQR 446–3520), meat and meat products (median 800, IQR 632–1068) and snack foods (median 650, IQR 453–926) (Table 1). In contrast, edible oils and oil emulsions (median 0, IQR 0–4), sugars, honey and related products (median 6, IQR 0–14) and non-alcoholic beverages (median 10, IQR 1–34) were the food groups with the lowest median Na concentration (Table 1). Overall, there was a wide variation in the Na concentration within most food categories. For example, the Na concentration (mg/100 g) of processed meat ranged from 60 to 5300, canned fish ranged from 84 to 6400 and flavoured noodles ranged from 256 to 7930 (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table S1).
Table 1.
Food group | n | Na concentration* | Low Na † (%) | High Na ‡ (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | IQR | Range | ||||
All products | 11 518 | 135 | 13–607 | 0–39 000 | 46·7 | 26·2 |
Sauces, dressings, spreads and dips | 1244 | 1180 | 446–3520 | 0–34 130 | 12·0 | 68·1 |
Meat and meat products | 501 | 800 | 632–1068 | 0–5300 | 6·4 | 79·0 |
Snack foods | 550 | 650 | 453–926 | 0–4074 | 1·8 | 55·8 |
Fish and fish products | 359 | 531 | 364–791 | 8–6400 | 5·6 | 42·6 |
Convenience foods | 593 | 406 | 242–600 | 0–10 956 | 15·2 | 24·5 |
Bread and bakery products | 1120 | 322 | 189–476 | 0–2000 | 11·7 | 11·8 |
Eggs | 76 | 140 | 138–158 | 92–2561 | 1·3 | 9·2 |
Cereal and grain products | 1649 | 127 | 4–1001 | 0–27 000 | 48·6 | 33·4 |
Fruit and vegetables | 1301 | 120 | 10–620 | 0–39 000 | 50·0 | 25·1 |
Dairy | 1088 | 52 | 36–96 | 0–3500 | 77·2 | 11·8 |
Confectionery | 919 | 38 | 6–80 | 0–3875 | 85·7 | 0·9 |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 1666 | 10 | 1–34 | 0–19 900 | 88·6 | 0·9 |
Sugars, honey and related products | 256 | 6 | 0–14 | 0–330 | 92·2 | 0·0 |
Edible oils and oil emulsions | 196 | 0 | 0–4 | 0–1300 | 80·1 | 5·6 |
IQR, interquartile range.
Table rows sorted in descending order by median Na concentration, by food category.
Units for Na concentration include both mg/100 g for foods and mg/100 ml for beverages.
Threshold value for low Na: Na concentration <120 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml of food/beverage.
Threshold value for high Na: Na concentration >600 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml of food/beverage.
Median sodium concentration per typical serving size
Across all foods and beverages, the most common serving size reported on the nutrition information panel was 100 g or 100 ml (Table 2). This ranged from 15 g for sauces, dressings, spreads and dips and edible oils and oil emulsions, up to 100 g for fish and fish products, convenience foods, fruit and vegetables, dairy and non-alcoholic beverages. Overall, the three food groups with the highest median Na concentration per typical serving size (mg per serving) were fish and fish products (median 531, IQR 364–791), meat and meat products (median 444, IQR 351–593) and convenience foods (median 406, IQR 242–600) (Table 2). In contrast, edible oils and oil emulsions (median 0, IQR 0–1), sugars, honey and related products (median 1, IQR 0–3) and non-alcoholic beverages (median 10, IQR 1–34) were the food groups with the lowest median Na concentration per typical serving size (Table 2).
Table 2.
Food group | Typical serving size* | Na concentration per serving size† | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Median | IQR | Range | ||
All products | 100 | 135 | 13–607 | 0–39 000 |
Fish and fish products | 100 | 531 | 364–791 | 8–6400 |
Meat and meat products | 56 | 444 | 351–593 | 0–2944 |
Convenience foods | 100 | 406 | 242–600 | 0–10 956 |
Snack foods | 28 | 361 | 252–514 | 0–2263 |
Sauces, dressings, spreads and dips | 15 | 176 | 67–525 | 0–5094 |
Fruit and vegetables | 100 | 120 | 10–620 | 0–39 000 |
Bread and bakery products | 30 | 98 | 57–144 | 0–606 |
Eggs | 50 | 70 | 69–79 | 46–1281 |
Dairy | 100 | 52 | 36–96 | 0–3500 |
Cereal and grain products | 30 | 38 | 1–303 | 0–8182 |
Confectionery | 40 | 15 | 2–32 | 0–1550 |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 100 | 10 | 1–34 | 0–19 900 |
Sugars, honey and related products | 20 | 1 | 0–3 | 0–66 |
Edible oils and oil emulsions | 15 | 0 | 0–1 | 0–194 |
IQR, interquartile range.
Table rows sorted in descending order by median Na concentration per serving, by food category.
The typical serving size (g) is the most frequent serving size reported on packs within each food category.
Units for Na concentration include both mg per serving (g or ml).
Comparison against low and high sodium definitions
In comparison with the Hong Kong Food and Drugs Composition and Labelling Regulations, just under half (46·7 %) of pre-packaged food products analysed met the low Na definition and slightly more than a quarter (26·3 %) met the high Na definition. The food groups with the highest proportion of products classified as high Na were meat and meat products (79 %); sauces, dressings, spreads and dips (68·1 %); snack foods (55·8 %); fish and fish products (42·6 %) and cereal and grain products (33·4 %) (Table 1).
Discussion
The current study comprehensively examined the Na concentration of pre-packaged foods available for sale in Hong Kong. Our findings can serve as a baseline to assess the impact of Na-related initiatives in Hong Kong on changes to the pre-packaged food supply. In other countries, including Australia and the UK, regular monitoring of the Na in the food supply has been undertaken for many years by government and other research groups(26–29). Such evaluations are frequently used to assess the effectiveness of both government and non-government Na reduction initiatives and are often evaluated at both the food group and food company level(26–29).
Among the fourteen food groups analysed, sauces, dressings, spreads and dips had the highest Na concentration per 100 g or per 100 ml. This is consistent with prior research conducted in the UK using the same food group categorisation system as used in the current study(21). The high Na concentration was largely driven by Asian sauces, which is disconcerting given these sauces are commonly consumed in Hong Kong(10). However, across all sauces, dressings, spreads and dips, the typical serving size was only 15 ml (much less than other categories), and therefore, the total contribution of these products to total Na intakes is much less of a concern. In fact, fish and meat products had the highest Na concentration across all food groups when serving size was accounted for. Although these foods are often nutrient rich, the Na content in a typical serving accounted for over 20 % of the WHO maximum Na limit(2). As such, our findings highlight the possibility that those who frequently consume high Na fish and meat products including anchovies, bacon and dried meat could be at increased risk of exceeding their recommended daily intake of Na.
Similar to prior research in other countries(20,21,30), the Na concentration of products within the same food category varied considerably, highlighting the potential impact for reformulation. Targeting reformulation towards foods and beverages with a wide range in Na content should be the priority, as this suggests it is technologically feasible to reduce Na levels. In the current study, the food categories with the highest variability in Na included bread, canned fish, flavoured noodles and processed meat. Moreover, only a small portion of products in these four categories were low in Na. Furthermore, flavoured noodles and processed meat had 95 and 83 % of all products meeting the high Na definition, respectively, highlighting the need to lower the Na content in these foods.
Reformulation has been carried out worldwide as reflected by the growing emergence of low Na and reduced Na products(31). Since 2017, food manufacturers in Hong Kong have been allowed to place a ‘low salt’ or ‘no salt’ logo on their products if the Na level does not exceed 120 or 40 mg/100 g or mg/100 ml, respectively(32). The results in the present study show that about 50 and 25 % of pre-packaged foods were low and high in Na, respectively. However, many of the products included in the current analysis are naturally low in Na, including plain rice, confectionery, milk, sugars, honey, jam and cooking oils. As such, our results are biased towards an overestimation in the proportion of low Na products on the market. Nonetheless, it is disconcerting that there is still a considerable proportion of foods on the market that is high in Na.
Reducing the Na content in packaged foods is not without constraints. Na serves a functional purpose as a preservative(33) and contributes to the sensory and quality properties of food(34). For this reason, some food categories may face more technological challenges when reducing the Na content(34). For example, the shelf life of meat and meat products may be shortened as a result of potential Na reduction due to its preservation properties(34). Moreover, reduced consumer acceptability towards products containing less Na and subsequently lower sales volume may be a concern for food manufacturers and may contribute to a reluctance to reformulate. However, research to date suggests that reducing the Na content of bread and processed meat does not result in lowered consumer acceptability(33,35). Regardless, it is recommended that manufacturers gradually reduce Na levels in their products to increase acceptability amongst consumers(33,34). Ideally, reasonable targets for manufacturers with a grace period for implementation should be considered in the development of any government targets.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively analyse the Na content of a large sample of pre-packaged foods sold in Hong Kong. To date, studies on the Na concentration of foods in Hong Kong have been limited by small samples sizes and analyses across specific food categories(36,37). Our study substantially adds to the prior literature through the use of a large nutrition dataset that utilises a standardised method for obtaining nutrition information from products available from major supermarket chains in Hong Kong. This provided us with a reliable dataset across a comprehensive range of products and a large sample size to assess the Na concentration of products within and across food groups. Our analysis of Na concentration per 100 g or per 100 ml and per serving allowed us to consider the findings within the broader context of reformulation as well as public health by considering what would be consumed in a typical serving.
However, there are some limitations in the current study. Firstly, the Na content was solely obtained from nutrition information labels affixed on pre-packaged foods instead of determined by chemical analysis. However, this is the most reliable and economic means to obtain nutritional information secondary to conducting laboratory tests, especially for a comprehensive coverage of the pre-packaged food supply. Products were categorised according to universal pre-defined categories which may have not been developed to be adequately country- and culturally sensitive. However, efforts were made to match products to the most appropriate food group. We also made small adjustments to account for cultural preferences, for example, the food group ‘eggs’ was not included in previous analyses in western countries(21) because eggs are naturally low in Na and are not a major source of Na intake. However, some eggs sold in Hong Kong are preserved, such as century eggs, which contain considerable amounts of Na and are a popular food, and therefore, ‘eggs’ were included in our analysis. Lastly, pre-packaged foods were collected from a convenience sample of three supermarket megastores, and therefore, it is unlikely we have complete coverage of all pre-packaged products sold in Hong Kong. For example, other food stores, such as convenience stores, cater to different markets and may sell a different variety of products as compared with supermarkets, such as a more diverse range of ready-to-eat convenience foods, beverages and snacks. Nevertheless, data were collected from the largest branches of the supermarket chains, and it is likely the dataset is broadly representative of products available for sale in Hong Kong.
To date, there has been limited research examining which food categories contribute most to Na intakes in Hong Kong. Previous government estimates have relied on the Total Diet Study approach, which involves analysing small samples of commonly consumed foods in Hong Kong to obtain nutrient information(10,38). The results are then combined with population-based food intake data based a food consumption survey. However, as only a limited number of products were sampled for Na information, it is likely this method under-estimates Na intake(10). Future research is required to more accurately estimate the contribution of food categories to population Na intakes in Hong Kong in order to provide further insight into which food categories should be targeted as part of Na reduction initiatives(39).
Conclusion
Reducing the Na concentration of pre-packaged food is a challenging issue globally. The large variations in Na content found in the current study demonstrate considerable potential and feasibility for the food industry to reformulate to reduce Na levels. Currently, food categories such as flavoured noodles, processed meat, canned fish and bread should be the priority for reformulation to improve the food supply in Hong Kong to help reduce population Na intake.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements: None. Financial support: None. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: J.C.Y.L. supervised. A.S.C.W. conceived and designed the study. A.S.C.W. and D.H.C. conducted the study and analysed the data. All authors were involved in data interpretation and critically reviewed and provided written comments on the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: No human participants were involved.
Supplementary material
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020002360.
References
- 1. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators (2019) Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. World Health Organization (2016) Salt reduction; available at https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/salt-reduction (accessed April 2020).
- 3. Mozaffarian D, Fahimi S & Singh G (2014) Global sodium consumption and death from cardiovascular causes. New Engl J Med 371, 624–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. He FJ, Li J & MacGregor GA (2013) Effect of longer-term modest salt reduction on blood pressure. Coch Database Syst Rev 2013, CD004937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Kandala N-B et al. (2009) Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 339, b4567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Centre for Health Protection (2019) Hypertension; available at https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/healthtopics/content/25/35390.html (accessed April 2020).
- 7. Liu ZM, Ho SC, Tang N et al. (2014) Urinary sodium excretion and dietary sources of sodium intake in Chinese postmenopausal women with prehypertension. PLoS One 9, e104018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Woo J (1998) Nutrition and health issues in the general Hong Kong population. Hong Kong Med J 4, 383–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Centre for Food Safety (2019) Reduction of dietary sodium and sugar; available at https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_rdss/FAQ_Sodium_Public.html (accessed April 2020).
- 10. Centre for Food Safety (2014) The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Minerals. Hong Kong: Food and Environmental Hygiene Department; available at https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_firm/files/Report_on_the_1st_HK_Total_Diet_Study_Minerals_e.pdf (accessed April 2020). [Google Scholar]
- 11. Trieu K, Neal B, Hawkes C et al. (2015) Salt reduction initiatives around the world – a systematic review of progress towards the global target. PLoS One 10, e0130247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Centre for Food Safety (2020) Nutrition labelling scheme; available at https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/whatsnew/whatsnew_act/whatsnew_act_19_Nutrition_Labelling_Scheme.html (accessed April 2020).
- 13. Elfassy T, Yi S, Eisenhower D et al. (2015) Use of sodium information on the nutrition facts label in New York city adults with hypertension. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 278–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Campbell NR, Johnson JA & Campbell TS (2012) Sodium consumption: an individual’s choice? Int J Hypertens 2012, 860954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ha SK (2014) Dietary salt intake and hypertension. Electrolyte Blood Press 12, 7–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Candeias V et al. (2009) Salt intakes around the world: implications for public health. Int J Epidemiol 38, 791–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Eyles H, Webster J, Jebb S et al. (2013) Impact of the UK voluntary sodium reduction targets on the sodium content of processed foods from 2006 to 2011: analysis of household consumer panel data. Prev Med 57, 555–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. He F, Brinsden H & MacGregor G (2014) Salt reduction in the United Kingdom: a successful experiment in public health. J Hum Hypertens 28, 345–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hyseni L, Elliot-Green A, Lloyd-Williams F et al. (2017) Systematic review of dietary salt reduction policies: evidence for an effectiveness hierarchy? PLoS One 12, e0177535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Arcand J, Au JT, Schermel A et al. (2014) A comprehensive analysis of sodium levels in the Canadian packaged food supply. Am J Prev Med 46, 633–642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Webster JL, Dunford EK & Neal BC (2009) A systematic survey of the sodium contents of processed foods. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 413–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hong Kong e-Legislation (2016) Cap. 132W Food and Drugs (Composition and Labelling) Regulations; available at https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap132W (accessed April 2020).
- 23. Euromonitor International (2019) Supermarkets in Hong Kong, China: Passport. London, UK: Euromonitor International. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dunford EK & Neal B (2017) FoodSwitch and use of crowdsourcing to inform nutrient databases. J Food Compos Anal 64, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Coyle D, Ndanuko R, Singh S et al. (2019) Variations in sugar content of flavored milks and yogurts: a cross-sectional study across 3 countries. Curr Dev Nutr 3, nzz060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sacks G, Mialon M, Vandevijvere S et al. (2014) Comparison of food industry policies and commitments on marketing to children and product (re)formulation in Australia, New Zealand and Fiji. Crit Public Health 25, 299–319. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Trevena H, Neal B, Dunford E et al. (2014) An evaluation of the effects of the Australian Food and Health Dialogue targets on the sodium content of bread, breakfast cereals and processed meats. Nutrients 6, 3802–3817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Jones A, Magnusson R, Swinburn B et al. (2016) Designing a healthy food partnership: lessons from the Australian Food and Health Dialogue. BMC Public Health 16, 651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tedstone A, Nicholas J, Clark R et al. (2018) Salt Targets 2017: Progress Report. London UK: Public Health England; available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/765571/Salt_targets_2017_progress_report.pdf (accessed April 2020). [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ni Mhurchu C, Capelin C, Dunford EK et al. (2011) Sodium content of processed foods in the United Kingdom: analysis of 44,000 foods purchased by 21,000 households. Am J Clin Nutr 93, 594–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zandstra EH, Lion R & Newson RS (2016) Salt reduction: moving from consumer awareness to action. Food Qual Pref 48, 376–381. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Centre for Food Safety (2018) “Salt/Sugar” label scheme for prepackaged food products; available at https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_rdss/programme_Salt_Sugar_Label_Scheme.html (accessed April 2020).
- 33. Jaenke R, Barzi F, McMahon E et al. (2017) Consumer acceptance of reformulated food products: a systematic review and meta-analysis of salt-reduced foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57, 3357–3372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Buttriss JL (2013) Food reformulation: the challenges to the food industry. Proc Nutr Soc 72, 61–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Belz MC, Ryan LA & Arendt EK (2012) The impact of salt reduction in bread: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 52, 514–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Centre for Food Safety (2019) Sodium content of savoury snacks in Hong Kong; available at https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_rafs/programme_rafs_n_01_08.html (accessed April 2020).
- 37. Coyle D (2018) Salt Levels in Common Processed Foods in Hong Kong. Sydney: The George Institute for Global Health; available at georgeinstitute.org/sites/default/files/foodswitch_hk_final_report.pdf (accessed April 2020). [Google Scholar]
- 38. Centre for Food Safety (2017) Total Diet Study; available at https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_firm/programme_tds_1st_HKTDS.html (accessed April 2020).
- 39. Bhat S, Marklund M, Henry M et al. (2020) A systematic review of the sources of dietary salt around the world. Adv Nutr 11, 677–686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020002360.