Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Jun 14;88(10):6284–6293. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00805

Visible-Light Photoredox Catalysis in Water

Camilla Russo , Francesca Brunelli , Gian Cesare Tron ‡,*, Mariateresa Giustiniano †,*
PMCID: PMC10204095  PMID: 35700388

Abstract

graphic file with name jo2c00805_0032.jpg

The use of water in organic synthesis draws attention to its green chemistry features and its unique ability to unveil unconventional reactivities. Herein, literature about the use of water as a reaction medium under visible-light photocatalytic conditions is summarized in order to highlight challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, this Synopsis has been divided into four different sections focused on (1) the unconventional role of water in photocatalytic reactions, (2) in-/on-water reactions, (3) water-soluble photocatalysts, and (4) photomicellar catalytic systems.


Wohler’s synthesis of urea, developed in 1828 and performed by heating an aqueous solution of ammonium cyanate, is commonly considered the starting point for synthetic organic chemistry. Similarly, many name reactions developed in the 19th century, e.g., the Curtius rearrangement, the Pictet–Spengler reaction, and the Sandmeyer reaction, to cite a few, were first developed in aqueous media.1 At the beginning of the 20th century, the advent of organometallic chemistry, with the Grignard reagents, made the switch to the era of organic solvents, which started to be readily available thanks to the rapidly expanding petroleum industry. The organomagnesium halides, indeed, were decomposed by water “with violence”, thus requiring rigorously anhydrous conditions. Nevertheless, Nature chooses water as a solvent to perform many elegant biochemical transformations that rely on the exploitation of hydrophobic energies to promote substrate binding into enzyme pockets and drugs into receptors. In the 1980s, Breslow, fascinated by the possibility of exploiting such a hydrophobic effect to accelerate cycloaddition reaction rates, reported his seminal results about the Diels–Alder reaction.2 His pioneering studies marked the dawn of a renewed interest in the use of water as a reaction medium. Water, indeed, meets many green chemistry principles: it is inflammable, incombustible, nontoxic, cheap, readily available, polar, and easy to separate from nonpolar immiscible organic solvents. In addition to these green features, water is unique for its exclusive ability to trigger new reactivities relying on unconventional reaction mechanisms. While literature about water as a reaction medium for organic synthesis has been collected in both books and authoritative reviews,1,3 the potential and limitations of its use in visible-light photocatalytic transformations have received little attention so far. Visible-light photocatalysis represents one of the most exciting and flourishing fields in organic synthesis by virtue of the possibility of generating open-shell species under very mild reaction conditions and exploiting them in many transformations not always achievable via ground-state reactivities. Importantly, the latter also involve the late-stage editing of complex molecular architectures such as drugs, thus leading visible-light photocatalysis to cross the limits of academia and become a powerful tool for many pharmaceutical companies to either generate compounds in a more efficient manner or to gain access to completely new and patentable chemical entities.4 Additionally, photoredox catalysis can be considered a green chemistry tool: light is a free renewable energy source, the photocatalysts are used in low amounts, no high temperatures, pressures, or harsh conditions are required so that less hazardous operating conditions, and minor energy consumption are made available.5 At the same time, the high chemoselectivities and functional group orthogonality facilitate purification steps and waste disposal by minimizing the formation of unwanted side products. Accordingly, merging the green innate properties of photoredox catalysis with the use of water as a reaction medium would boost the development of sustainable organic processes available for both drug manufacturing and materials chemistry. In addition, the exclusive ability of water to unravel new chemical behaviors and to drive unconventional reaction pathways breaks new ground for future advancements in the field. The aim of this Synopsis is to shed light on the opportunities and challenges offered by visible-light photoredox catalysis in water. Recently, Kobayashi drew attention to the urgent need of a conceptual classification of chemical processes performed by using water as the sole reaction medium and proposed to adopt in water reactions as a general term when water is used as a reaction medium.6 According to Lipshutz, depending on the conditions, water could promote on water reactions (i.e., when no solvation of the reagents occurs), with water reactions (i.e., water present within the medium), and in water reactions (where the use of additives enables the solubilization of starting materials and catalysts).7 The literature in the field has been divided herein in four different sections focused on (1) the unconventional role of water in photocatalytic reactions, (2) in-/on-water reactions, (3) water-soluble photocatalysts, and (4) photomicellar catalytic systems.

1. Water Is Special: Unconventional Roles in Visible-Light Photocatalytic Reactions

1.1. Water and Electron Donors as Reductive Equivalents

Light-driven reduction of organic substrates by harnessing water and an electron donor (such as a tertiary aliphatic amine) as reductive equivalents and an organo-metallic or a coordination complex as a hydride-transfer agent could be classified as cooperative photoredox catalysis.8 A seminal report is represented by the chemoselective photoreduction of aldehydes such as benzaldehyde 1 (Scheme 1) in the presence of ketones (e.g., 2) reported by König in 2015.9 The authors used triethanolamine (TEOA) as a sacrificial electron donor, proflavine (PF) as the photocatalyst, and [Cp*Rh(III)(bpy)Cl]Cl (Rhcat) as the mediator, while the effective reducing agent was found to be [Cp*Rh(III)(bpy)H]Cl (Rh(III)-H) (Scheme 1). This study highlights the role of water as the hydride source when combined with an electron donor under visible-light irradiation, although a DMF/H2O 1:1 is required to achieve optimum yields.

Scheme 1. Chemoselective Photoreduction of Aldehydes in the Presence of Ketones.

Scheme 1

Recently, Lloret-Fillol and co-workers reported a light-driven reduction of aldehydes 5 (Scheme 2) and aromatic ketones 6 by using a dual metal catalyst formed by an aminopyridine cobalt complex 7, forming a [Co–H] intermediate, and [Cu(bathocuproine)(Xantphos)](PF6) PSCu as photoredox catalyst (Scheme 2).10 This methodology, relying on earth-abundant elements, uses water and an electron donor (Et3N or iPr2EtN) as the hydride source and is performed in aqueous mixtures (80–60% water) with exquisite selectivity toward aryl ketones 6 in the presence of terminal olefins, both aliphatic ketones and aldehydes, and alkynes.

Scheme 2. Light-Driven Reduction of Aldehydes and Aromatic Ketones.

Scheme 2

1.2. Enhancing the Reductive Power of Ruthenium Photocatalysts

Tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) Ru(bpy)32+ is among the most popular photocatalysts thanks to its long-lived metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) excited state and the feasibility of both oxidative and reductive catalytic cycles. However, based on its standard potential (RuIII/RuII −1.29 V vs SCE),11 it is unable to promote more demanding transformations, which thus require more expensive and higher energy iridium complexes. Goez and Naumann, while investigating the feasibility of a pinacol coupling approach under sustainable photocatalytic conditions, found that the one-electron reduced forms (OER) of Ru(bpy)32+ exhibited a reductive power greater by 0.2 eV in water than in acetonitrile.12 This chemical behavior was also confirmed by laser flash photolysis studies. The catalytic system exploited ascorbate as a sacrificial donor and, in case of hydrophobic starting materials, SDS micelles or cyclodextrins to overcome solubility problems (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3. Photocatalytic Pinacol Coupling.

Scheme 3

Alternatively, [Ru(dmb)3]2+ was used as PC; dmb: tris(4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II).

1.3. Role of Water in Reductive Proton Transfer from Carbonyls to Alcohols

Wan et al. showed that water could also have a key role to promote a formal intramolecular photoredox reaction of 2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone (11, Scheme 4) and other analogues.13 When 2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone 11 was irradiated in water with UV light sources a formal intramolecular redox product 12 formed, which readily oxidized to anthraquinone 13 under air or oxygen (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4. Intramolecular Reductive Proton Transfer from Carbonyls to Alcohols.

Scheme 4

1.4. Water-Promoted Rate Acceleration

It is not uncommon to find visible-light photoredox catalytic synthetic protocols where optimum reaction conditions require the addition of amounts of water—ranging from a few equivalents to precise volume ratios—to either miscible (e.g., CH3CN, DMF, DMSO) or immiscible (e.g., DCM, EtOAc) organic solvents. Representative reports where the presence of water in the reaction medium proved to accelerate the reaction rate involve the visible-light photocatalytic iridium-promoted synthesis of isoxazolidines 16 by Rueping et al. (Scheme 5).14 In the search for experimental evidence supporting the mechanistic basis of such rate acceleration, the authors hypothesized that a photoredox promoted water splitting could have provided active species such as HO, HO, and H2O2. However, this hypothesis was ruled out while the cycloaddition reaction could benefit from a catalytic role of the species such as, e.g., H3O+ and H2O, present in the reaction mixture.

Scheme 5. Iridium-Promoted Synthesis of Isoxazolidines.

Scheme 5

Unfortunately, most of the synthetic protocols involving water either as additive or cosolvent did not investigate the mechanistic rational underpinning the beneficial effect of water. It is worth noting that many useful radical precursors such as alkyl and aryl bromides, diazonium salts, carboxylic acids and esters, and trifluoroborate salts,15 to cite a few, are stable in neutral aqueous conditions. As a matter of example, the latter have been involved in a deboronative cyanation reaction promoted by a ruthenium-based photocatalyst, a hypervalent iodine oxidant, a cyanide source, and TFA as an additive (Scheme 6). The different nature of the starting materials required a biphasic 1:1 DCM/H2O solvent system, whereas 2:1 mixtures of organic solvents such as acetone/DCM and HFIP/DCM led to decreased yields.16

Scheme 6. Deboronative Cyanation.

Scheme 6

1.5. LUMO-Lowering Effect

Among the exclusive features of water, Zeitler et al. reported a LUMO lowering effect observed for α-carbonyl acetates 20 as radical precursors in the photocatalytic cross-coupling with styrenes 21 (Scheme 7).17 In more detail, the authors employed fac-Ir(ppy)3 as a photocatalyst to promote the formation of an alkyl radical from α-acetylated acetophenone derivatives 20 (Scheme 7). The latter represented challenging substrates due to their redox potential (Ered= −1.72 V in MeCN vs SCE). Interestingly, the presence of water proved to induce a LUMO lowering effect by increasing the Ered to −1.54 V vs SCE, effect that was still enhanced with the use of a water-compatible Lewis acid such as Nd(OTf)3 (Ered = −1.27 V vs SCE). In the absence of the Lewis acid, the 1,4-difunctionalized product was not detected.

Scheme 7. Photocatalytic Cross-Coupling of α-Carbonyl Acetates with Styrenes.

Scheme 7

1.6. Water Influencing Chemoselectivity

Besides acting as a solubilizing agent for polar substrates, water could also be harnessed for its nonsolvent properties toward lipophilic hydrophobic additives and/or reagents. A remarkable example of such ability was reported by Jui and co-workers for the radical conjugate addition of nitrogen heterocycles 23 to electron-poor alkenes 24 (Scheme 8). By performing the reaction in DMSO with percentages of water spanning from 0 to 33% the authors demonstrated how the limiting reactant solubility, i.e., the Hantzsch ester (HE), improved selective formation of the Michael addition products 25 over the formation of the reduced nitrogen heterocycles 26 (Scheme 8).18

Scheme 8. Radical Conjugate Addition of Nitrogen Heterocycles to Electron-Poor Alkenes.

Scheme 8

More recently, Qing described how the switch from THF to a DMF/H2O mixture enabled the chemoselective synthesis of hydro- and dibromofluoromethylated adducts 29 (Scheme 9), respectively, starting from alkenes 27 and dibromofluoromethane 28.19 By performing the reaction in THF-d8 deuterated product was formed, thus confirming the role of THF as the hydrogen source. On the other hand, while the use of the sole DMF as the solvent still afforded a mixture of both hydro- and dibromofluoromethylated products, the use of a 1:4 DMF/H2O solvent system completely suppressed the formation of the hydrobromofluoromethylated adduct.

Scheme 9. Chemoselective Synthesis of Hydro- and Dibromofluoromethylated Adducts.

Scheme 9

2. In-/On-Water Reactions

A number of visible-light photoredox catalytic transformations have been reported in water albeit involving slightly or not soluble reagents/additives/photocatalysts. Accordingly, it is quite difficult to classify them as real in water or on water reactions as proposed by Lipshutz.3 For instance, such photochemical methodologies included the direct arylation of N-heteroarenes 30 with aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate salts 31 as radical precursors and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as the photoredox catalyst, both poorly soluble in water (Scheme 10),20 the catalytic dehydrogenation of cyclic amines 34 promoted by a ruthenium-based photocatalyst and a cobalt-based cocatalyst [Co-35] (Scheme 11),21 and the metal-free oxidative radical cyclization of N-biarylglycin esters 37 leading to phenanthridine-6-carboxylate derivatives 38 (Scheme 12).22

Scheme 10. Direct Arylation of N-Heteroarenes with Aryldiazonium Tetrafluoroborate Salts.

Scheme 10

Scheme 11. Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Cyclic Amines.

Scheme 11

Scheme 12. Metal-Free Oxidative Radical Cyclization of N-Biarylglycin Esters.

Scheme 12

Other interesting visible-light-assisted methodologies were represented by the C3-H acylation of quinoxaline-2(1H)-ones 39,23 the synthesis of 1,2-amino alcohols 43 by decarboxylative coupling of amino acids 42 derived α-amino radicals to carbonyl compounds 5,24 and the epoxyacylation and hydroacylation of olefins 44 and 45 using methylene blue and persulfate as the oxidant (Scheme 13).25 In all these cases, the use of water as solvent demonstrated to be superior to common organic solvents such as MeCN, DMSO, MeOH, and DMF. Unfortunately, the reasons why water led to an increase in the reaction yields were not investigated in detail.

Scheme 13. (a) C3–H Acylation of Quinoxaline-2(1H)-ones 41. (b) Synthesis of 1,2-Amino alcohols 43. (c) Epoxyacylation and Hydroacylation of Olefins 44 and 45.

Scheme 13

More recently, the role of water as reaction medium for photodimerizations was highlighted by Ramamurthy et al. in light-promoted cycloaddition reactions of sparingly water-soluble compounds such as coumarin, indene, cinnamic acid, and acenaphthylene. The observed increased reactivity with respect to organic solvents was ascribed to hydrophobic association due to poor solubility of the substrates, which, however, required irradiation of large volumes to collect reasonable amounts of the products.26

3. Water-Soluble Photocatalysts

Most of iridium– and ruthenium–polypyridyl complexes used as visible-light photoredox catalysts show very poor water solubility (from <1 to 1000 ppm) depending on both their substitution pattern and the anionic partner.27 Curiously, even in organic solvents, they are often used at loadings exceeding their maximum solubility, probably limiting the reaction efficiencies as recently investigated by Jespersen et al.27 On the other hand, the development of visible-light photocatalysts enabling homogeneous conditions in water represents an attractive field of investigation including, for example, recent reports by Roelfes et al.28 and Conrad et al.29 developing water-soluble iridium photoredox catalysts by changing the dative ligands (e.g., tert-butyl) in [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 with either quaternary ammonium functional groups or carboxylic acid residues, respectively. The Roelfes catalyst, [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dNMe3bpy)]Cl3 (Figure 1), was harnessed to modify dehydroalanine (Dha) residues in peptides and proteins, in water and under physiologically relevant conditions, with short reaction times and with low reagent and catalyst loadings.28

Figure 1.

Figure 1

[Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 and its water-soluble analogue [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dNMe3bpy)]Cl3.

Ligand manipulation of the same iridium complex by introducing carboxylic acid moieties on the bipyridyl ligand led to catalyst 49 with improved water solubility but with similar oxidation potential thanks to the retention of fluoro and trifluoromethyl functional groups (E1/2red[*IrIII/IrII] = +0.76 V vs SCE for the hemisalt [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2((CO2H)(CO2)bpy)]2·HPF6) (Scheme 14). Such a photocatalyst was applied to the trifluoromethylation of acyl tyrosine amide and an unprotected dipeptide Asp-Tyr (48, Scheme 14) in phosphate-buffered saline solvent (DPBS) using Langlois reagent as the CF3 radical source under blue LED light irradiation.29

Scheme 14. Trifluoromethylation of Unprotected Dipeptide 48 in Phosphate-Buffered Saline Solvent.

Scheme 14

Despite their excellent photoredox properties, the use of precious metal-based catalysts represents a huge limitation to the green potential of chemical transformations induced by renewable energy sources such as visible light. In the search for more sustainable protocols, Wu et al. achieved bromination and iodination of 8-aminoquinoline amides in water by merging FeCl3 with a water-soluble organic photocatalyst such alizarin red S.30 The reaction also required K2S2O8 as the oxidant and KBr as an additive and proceeded at room temperature under air and household light irradiation to afford halogenated quinolines 52 and 53 (Scheme 15) in good to excellent yields regardless of the presence of electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups on the benzamide ring.

Scheme 15. Bromination and Iodination of 8-Aminoquinoline Amides in Water.

Scheme 15

Romero, Teixidor et al. focused on metallacarboranes systems, describing that very low loadings of [Co(C2B9H11)2] (0.1 to 0.01 mol %) could promote the oxidation of aromatic and aliphatic alcohols 54 in water with up to quantitative conversion thanks to their high solubility (Scheme 16). Interestingly, the addition of [NMe4]Cl enabled an easy recovery of the photocatalyst by precipitation.31

Scheme 16. Oxidation of Aromatic and Aliphatic Alcohols in Water.

Scheme 16

The same photocatalytic system was also applied to the oxidation of alkenes 56 to epoxides 57 in water, whereas the widely used photosensitizer tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) ([Ru(bpy)3]2+) showed very low efficiency. Actually, catalyst loading of 0.01 mol % enabled conversions between 65 and 97% in short reaction times (15 min) and with excellent chemoselectivity toward the formation of epoxide derivatives 57 (with respect to diols side products) (Scheme 17).32

Scheme 17. Oxidation of Alkenes 56 to Epoxides 57 in water.

Scheme 17

Such a metallacarborane was also covalently linked on magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) coated with a silica layer to provide a heterogeneous catalytic system endowed with easy magnetic separation and recyclability, which proved to efficiently photooxidize alcohols using a loading of 0.1 and 0.01 mol %.33 More recently, the same authors developed a cooperative ruthenium cobaltabis(dicarbollide) photoredox catalytic system [RuII(trpy)(bpy)(H2O)][3,3′-Co(1,2-C2B9H11)2]2 (trpy = terpyridine and bpy = bipyridine) where the photoredox metallacarborane and the ruthenium oxidation catalyst were linked by noncovalent interactions persisting even after water dissolution (Scheme 18).34 The photooxidation of alcohols 54 to aldehydes 55 and carboxylic acids 58 was accomplished via a proton-coupled electron-transfer process under UV light irradiation and with a 0.005 mol % of catalyst loading (Scheme 18).

Scheme 18. Photooxidation of Alcohols to Aldehydes and Carboxylic Acids.

Scheme 18

A cobalt-based phthalocyanine photoredox catalyst [CpPc(SO3Na)4] enabling oxidative dehydrogenation of N-heterocycles in a biphasic system was reported by Baskar et al. Namely, tetrahydro-β-carbolines 59, indolines, and tetrahydro-(iso)quinolines were converted into biologically active indoles, (iso)-quinolines, and β-carbolines 60 (Scheme 19).35 The use of a biphasic reaction medium afforded an easy separation and an efficient reusability of the catalyst (up to 5 times with almost comparable reactivity). The optimum reaction conditions were also amenable to gram scale.

Scheme 19. Oxidative Dehydrogenation of N-Heterocycles in a Biphasic System.

Scheme 19

On the other hand, the selective oxidation of aromatic alcohols in water under visible-light organocatalytic conditions was pioneered by Wang et al. in 2013 by using mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (mpg-CN), a metal-free polymeric photocatalyst able to activate molecular oxygen for selective oxygenation or oxidative dehydrogenation of organic substrates.36 Such a catalytic system was endowed with high tunability of a wide range of parameters and both higher conversion and higher selectivity to the aldehyde when compared with other widely investigated visible-range inorganic photocatalysts.

4. Photomicellar Catalytic Systems

If the development of water-soluble photocatalysts would promote new chemical transformations of polar substrates such as amino acids, peptides, and proteins, most of the synthons used in drugs’ manufacturing require organic solvents for their dissolution, thus limiting the green chemistry features of these chemical approaches. A solution to this problem could arise from the application of micellar solutions as the reaction medium to photoredox catalytic conditions. Micellar catalysis, pioneered by Lipshutz, has been receiving increasing attention thanks to promising results reported in literature.37 The same Lipshutz in 2018 reported the design and the synthesis of a PQS-covalently (PQS = polyethyleneglycol ubiquinol succinate, reduced form of dietary supplement CoQ10) linked iridium photocatalyst PQS-[Ir] undergoing self-aggregation in water into nanomicelles.38 The efficiency of the amphoteric catalyst was demonstrated with different representative reactions involving difunctionalization of alkenes 61 and sulfonylation of enol acetates 64 (Scheme 20). Notably, the aqueous reaction mixture could be easily recycled in-flask up to 10 times without significant losses in the reaction yields.

Scheme 20. Difunctionalization of Alkenes 61 and Sulfonylation of Enol Acetates 64 Promoted by PQS-[Ir].

Scheme 20

Notwithstanding the obvious and exclusive advantages offered by the micellar photocatalytic system developed by Lipshutz, the need for the availability of photocatalysts endowed with a wide range of redox potentials to promote chemical transformations starting from a plethora of radical precursors, and on the other hand, the need for a preliminary design and synthesis of photoredox catalysts covalently linked to surfactants, together with their commercial unavailability, could represent a limit to a popular application. Probably, these are the reasons why most of the recent literature reports focus on the optimized use of well-known both metal-based and organic photoredox catalysts in common aqueous micellar solutions such as TPGS-750M, Triton-X, SDS, and CTAC, to cite a few. For instance, Cai et al. accomplished arylation reactions with diazonium ions generated in situ by using eosin B in a 2 wt % Triton-X solution in water without any cosolvents or additives at room temperature (Scheme 21).39tert-Butyl nitrite was used as the nitrosating agent, and the optimum conditions afforded arylation of a wide range of anilines 66, with electron-poor substrates giving higher yields with respect to electron-rich ones. Suitable heteroarenes 67 included furan, thiophene, and Boc-pyrrole. The developed photomicellar catalytic system also proved to efficiently promote α-arylation of enol acetates 69 and the synthesis of sulfides and selenides 72 (Scheme 21).

Scheme 21. Arylation of Heteroarenes and Enol Acetates and Synthesis of Sulfides and Selenides.

Scheme 21

Similar products can be obtained via direct arylations of aryl bromides 73 in water in a microfluidic reactor under irradiation with UV light as recently reported by Mattiello, Beverina, et al. (Scheme 22).40 The authors investigated in detail the catalytic efficiency of an association colloid formed in water by castor oil derivative Kolliphor EL (K-EL) and a specifically devised photoredox active surfactant (S-PTh). It was shown that the use of surfactants enabled a good selectivity with respect to the competing dehalogenation process.

Scheme 22. Direct Arylations of Aryl Bromides in Water.

Scheme 22

Aromatization of 1,4-dihydropyridines promoted by visible-light irradiation, K2S2O8 as oxidant, in an aqueous solution of Triton-X was proposed in 2013 by Das et al. (Scheme 23).41 Performing the reaction one-pot starting from an aldehyde 5, ethyl acetoacetate 78, and ammonium acetate 79 in the presence of visible-light irradiation was proposed as a greener method to synthesize pyridine derivatives 80 in very good yields (Scheme 23).

Scheme 23. One-Pot Synthesis of Pyridines.

Scheme 23

A Minisci C–H functionalization of heteroarenes 74 with nonactivated alkyl bromides 81 under photomicellar catalytic conditions was reported by Giedyk et al. (Scheme 24).42 The merging of bromide anion cocatalysis with photoredox catalysis in SDS micellar aqueous solution allowed to avoid stoichiometric radical promoters, oxidants, and acids as additives. It was shown how the spatial preaggregation of reacting species was key to promote the desired transformation since a very different outcome was observed depending on the use of neutral, anionic, or cationic surfactants. Interestingly, the same reaction performed in MeCN instead of SDS led to no product, further highlighting the critical importance of microstructuring of the components in the reaction medium.

Scheme 24. Photomicellar Catalytic Minisci C–H Functionalization of Heteroarenes.

Scheme 24

Interestingly, the same authors showed how the use of an anionic surfactant rather than a cationic one could be the key for chemoselectivity. Irradiation of o-chlorobenzamides 83 with blue LEDs, in the presence of methylene blue as the photocatalyst and an amine as a sacrificial electron donor (TMEDA or n-BuNH2), could lead to either intramolecular C–H arylation or N-dealkylation depending on the use of a CTAB or an SDS micellar solution as a reaction medium, respectively (Scheme 25).43

Scheme 25. Chemodivergent Intramolecular C–H Arylation and N-Dealkylation of o-Chlorobenzamides 83.

Scheme 25

Recently, we reported the synthesis of amide derivatives 88 starting from both aliphatic and aromatic isocyanides 87 and tertiary aromatic amines 86 using [Ir(ppy)2bpy]PF6 in a 2 wt % SDS water solution under irradiation with blue LEDs at room temperature (Scheme 26).44 In order to investigate the reaction environment at the atomic level (e.g., the localization of the photocatalyst with respect to the micelles), solution 1D- and 2D-NMR experiments were performed in the presence of paramagnetic probes. Such studies led to the identification of a reverse polarity principle, according to which a negatively charged surfactant such as SDS could provide the localization of a positively charged photocatalyst on the micelles’ surface, thus leading to an improved efficiency with respect to water alone.

Scheme 26. Photomicellar Catalytic Synthesis of Amides Starting from Isocyanides and Tertiary Aromatic Amines.

Scheme 26

SDS micelles were also shown to be the best performing surfactants in laser-induced Wurtz-type syntheses promoted by 2-aminoanthracene irradiation at 355 nm.45 These conditions readily produced hydrated electrons acting as “super-reductants”, rapidly converting chloro-organic substrates into carbon centered radicals, which underwent up to quantitative dimerization.

One more strategy to achieve visible light promoted reactions in water lies in the encapsulation of a photoredox catalyst into a nanosized molecular capsule, such as a V-shaped aromatic amphiphile.46 Alternatively, amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles have been harnessed as small reactors to perform light-driven chemical reactions. Palmans et al., by incorporating a phenothiazine catalyst into the polymeric scaffold, were able to perform metal-free reduction and C–C cross-couplings upon exposure to UV light.47 A further investigation of two popular organic photocatalysts, i.e., 10-phenylphenothiazine and one based on an acridinium dye, covalently linked to six different amphiphilic polymers forming nanoparticles in aqueous solution, was lately described by the same authors.48

Colloidal platinum nanoparticles dispersed by polyvinylpyrrolidone were instead used to set up a photoredox system of water-soluble zinc porphyrin and an electron mediator able to promote the selective reduction of pyruvate to lactate (a raw material for biodegradable polymers).49

In conclusion, the potentialities and the challenges of harnessing water exclusive properties in light-driven reactions have been herein highlighted. Such unique features span from applications as reductive equivalents (in combination with an electron donor) to the ability of enhancing the reductive power of ruthenium photocatalysts, to reductive proton transfer, water-promoted acceleration, LUMO-lowering effect, and the possibility of influencing chemoselectivity. A number of in/on-water reactions have been reported and continue to receive increasing attention, pointing out the need for a more precise classification of these protocols. Finally, while water-soluble photocatalysts have a pivotal role to promote peptides and proteins bioconjugation under visible light irradiation, the use of non-water-soluble mediators in micellar aqueous media stands for a promising approach to overcome the need for organic solvents and to develop milder and more sustainable processes. Besides being an added value per se, the progresses of photochemistry in water could be even more important if considering the feasibility of photobiocatalytic cascades.50 Given the polyhedric nature of water in light promoted chemical reactions, key and exciting future advancements in the field are expected.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” and Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy is acknowledged. The authors thank Gennaro Maddaloni for the realization of the Table of Contents graphic.

Biographies

graphic file with name jo2c00805_0001.jpg

Camilla Russo graduated in 2020 in Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology (summa cum laude) at the University of Naples “Federico II, Italy, where she is currently a Ph.D. student. Her research project focuses on the development of green synthetic methodologies for the obtainment of druglike bioactive scaffolds.

graphic file with name jo2c00805_0002.jpg

Francesca Brunelli graduated in 2020 in Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology (summa cum laude) at the University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, where she is currently a Ph.D. student. She is working on the discovery of novel isocyanide-mediated multicomponent reactions and in the search of novel isocyanides endowed with biological properties.

graphic file with name jo2c00805_0003.jpg

Gian Cesare Tron is full professor of medicinal chemistry at the Università del Piemonte Orientale, Department of Drug Science. His research interests concern the discovery of new multicomponent reactions and their application in the field of medicinal chemistry.

graphic file with name jo2c00805_0004.jpg

Mariateresa Giustiniano is an assistant professor (RTDB) at the University of Naples-Federico II, Department of Pharmacy. Her research interests focus on multicomponent reactions, visible-light photocatalysis, and medicinal chemistry.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. a Kobayashi S.Science of Synthesis: Water in Organic Synthesis; Thieme Chemistry, 2012. [Google Scholar]; b Lindstrom U. M.Organic Reactions in Water; Blackwell: Oxford, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rideout D. C.; Breslow R. Hydrophobic Acceleration of Diels-Alder Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7816–7817. 10.1021/ja00546a048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kitanosono T.; Masuda K.; Xu P.; Kobayashi S. Catalytic Organic Reactions in Water toward Sustainable Society. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 679–746. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Shaw M. H.; Twilton J.; MacMillan D. W. C. Photoredox Catalysis in Organic Chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6898–6926. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Romero N. A.; Nicewicz D. A. Organic Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10075–10166. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Stephenson C. R. J.; Yoon T. P.; MacMillan D. W. C.. Visible Light Photocatalysis in Organic Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Germany, 2018;. [Google Scholar]; d Cannalire R.; Pelliccia S.; Sancineto L.; Novellino E.; Tron G. C.; Giustiniano M. Visible Light Photocatalysis in the Late-Stage Functionalization of Pharmaceutically Relevant Compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 766–897. 10.1039/D0CS00493F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crisenza G. E. M.; Melchiorre P. Chemistry Glows Green with Photoredox Catalysis. Nature Commun. 2020, 11, 803–806. 10.1038/s41467-019-13887-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kitanosono T.; Kobayashi S. Reactions in Water Involving the “On-Water” Mechanism. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 9408–9429. 10.1002/chem.201905482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cortes-Clerget M.; Yu J.; Kincaid J. R. A.; Walde P.; Gallou F.; Lipshutz B. H. Water as the Reaction Medium in Organic Chemistry: from our Worst Enemy to our Best Friend. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 4237–4266. 10.1039/D0SC06000C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lang X.; Zhao J.; Chen X. Cooperative Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 3026–3038. 10.1039/C5CS00659G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ghosh T.; Slanina T.; König B. Visible Light Photocatalytic Reduction of Aldehydes by Rh(III)–H: a Detailed Mechanistic Study. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 2027–2034. 10.1039/C4SC03709J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Call A.; Casadevall C.; Acuña-Parés F.; Casitas A.; Lloret-Fillol J. Dual Cobalt–Copper Light-Driven Catalytic Reduction of Aldehydes and Aromatic Ketones in Aqueous Media. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4739–4749. 10.1039/C7SC01276D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campagna S.; Puntoriero F.; Nastasi F.; Bergamini G.; Balzani V. Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds: Ruthenium. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 280, 117–214. 10.1007/128_2007_133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Naumann R.; Goez M. How the Sustainable Solvent Water Unleashes the Photoredox Catalytic Potential of Ruthenium Polypyridyl Complexes for Pinacol Couplings. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4470–4474. 10.1039/C9GC02069A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. a Hou Y.; Wan P. Formal Intramolecular Photoredox Chemistry of Anthraquinones in Aqueous Solution: Photodeprotection for Alcohols, Aldehydes and Ketones. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008, 7, 588–596. 10.1039/b718970b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hou Y.; Huck L. A.; Wan P. Long-Range Intramolecular Photoredox Reaction via Coupled Charge and Proton Transfer of Triplet Excited Anthraquinones Mediated by Water. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2009, 8, 1408–1415. 10.1039/b909479b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hou H.; Zhu S.; Pan F.; Rueping M. Visible-Light Photoredox-Catalyzed Synthesis of Nitrones: Unexpected Rate Acceleration by Water in the Synthesis of Isoxazolidines. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2872–2875. 10.1021/ol500893g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. a Lennox A. J. J.; Lloyd-Jones G. C. Organotrifluoroborate Hydrolysis: Boronic Acid Release Mechanism and an Acid–Base Paradox in Cross-Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7431–7441. 10.1021/ja300236k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Molander G. A.; Sandrock D. L. Potassium Trifluoroborate Salts as Convenient, Stable Reagents for Difficult Alkyl Transfers. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Devel. 2009, 12, 811–823. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dai J.-J.; Zhang W.-M.; Shu Y.-J.; Sun Y.-Y.; Xu J.; Feng Y.-S.; Xu H.-J. Deboronative Cyanation of Potassium Alkyltrifluoroborates via Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 6793–6796. 10.1039/C6CC01530A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Speckmeier E.; Fuchs P. J. W.; Zeitler K. A Synergistic LUMO Lowering Strategy Using Lewis Acid Catalysis in Water to Enable Photoredox Catalytic, Functionalizing C–C Cross-Coupling of Styrenes. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 7096–7103. 10.1039/C8SC02106F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Aycock R. A.; Wang H.; Jui N. T. A Mild Catalytic System for Radical Conjugate Addition of Nitrogen Heterocycles. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 3121–3125. 10.1039/C7SC00243B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen F.; Xu X.-H.; Qing F.-L. Photoredox-Catalyzed Addition of Dibromofluoromethane to Alkenes: Direct Synthesis of 1-Bromo-1-fluoroalkanes. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2364–2369. 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c00639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xue D.; Jia Z.-H.; Zhao C.-J.; Zhang Y.-Y.; Wang C.; Xiao J. Direct Arylation of N-Heteroarenes with Aryldiazonium Salts by Photoredox Catalysis in Water. Chem.—Eur. J. 2014, 20, 2960–2965. 10.1002/chem.201304120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sahoo M. K.; Balaraman E. Room Temperature Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Cyclic Amines with the Liberation of H2 Using Water as a Solvent. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 2119–2128. 10.1039/C9GC00201D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Natarajan P.; Deachen C. P. Metal-Free, Visible-Light-Promoted Oxidative Radical Cyclization of N-Biarylglycine Esters: One-Pot Construction of Phenanthridine- 6-Carboxylates in Water. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4406–4411. 10.1039/C9GC01557D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu J.; He X.-K.; Cheng X.; Zhang A.-J.; Xu G.-Y.; Xuan J. Photoredox Catalyst Free, Visible Light-Promoted C3-H Acylation of Quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones in Water. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 2178–2182. 10.1002/adsc.202000116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan S.; Jiang M.; Hu J.; Xu R.; Zeng X.; Zhong G. Synthesis of 1,2-Amino Alcohols by Decarboxylative Coupling of Amino Acid Derived α-Amino Radicals to Carbonyl Compounds via Visible-Light Photocatalyst in Water. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 336–341. 10.1039/C9GC03470F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. de Souza G. F. P.; Bonacin J. A.; Salles A. G. Visible-Light-Driven Epoxyacylation and Hydroacylation of Olefins Using Methylene Blue/Persulfate System in Water. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 8331–8340. 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jeyapalan V.; Varadharajan R.; Veerakanellore G. B.; Ramamurthy V. Water: An Underappreciated Reaction Medium for Photodimerizations. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A: Chemistry 2021, 420, 113492. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jespersen D.; Keen B.; Day J. I.; Singh A.; Briles J.; Mullins D.; Weaver J. D. III Solubility of Iridium and Ruthenium Organometallic Photoredox Catalysts. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019, 23, 1087–1095. 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Lier R. C. W.; de Bruijn A. D.; Roelfes G. A Water-Soluble Iridium Photocatalyst for Chemical Modification of Dehydroalanines in Peptides and Proteins. Chem.—Eur. J. 2021, 27, 1430–1437. 10.1002/chem.202002599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nguyen T.-T. H.; O’Brien C. J.; Tran M. L. N.; Olson S. H.; Settineri N. S.; Prusiner S. B.; Paras N. A.; Conrad J. Water-Soluble Iridium Photoredox Catalyst for the Trifluoromethylation of Biomolecule Substrates in Phosphate Buffered Saline Solvent. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3823–3827. 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c00871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Qiao H.; Sun S.; Yang F.; Zhu Y.; Kang J.; Wu Y.; Wu Y. Merging Photoredox Catalysis with Iron(III) Catalysis: C5-H Bromination and Iodination of 8-Aminoquinoline Amides in Water. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1976–1980. 10.1002/adsc.201601053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Guerrero I.; Kelemen Z.; Viñas C.; Romero I.; Teixidor F. Metallacarboranes as Photoredox Catalysts in Water. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 5027–5036. 10.1002/chem.201905395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guerrero I.; Viñas C.; Romero I.; Teixidor F. A Stand-Alone Cobalt Bis(Dicarbollide) Photoredox Catalyst Epoxidates Alkenes in Water at Extremely Low Catalyst Load. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 10123–10131. 10.1039/D1GC03119H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Guerrero I.; Saha A.; Xavier J. A. M.; Viñas C.; Romero I.; Teixidor F. Noncovalently Linked Metallacarboranes on Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles as Highly Efficient, Robust, and Reusable Photocatalysts in Aqueous Medium. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 56372–56384. 10.1021/acsami.0c17847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guerrero I.; Viñas C.; Fontrodona X.; Romero I.; Teixidor F. Aqueous Persistent Noncovalent Ion-Pair Cooperative Coupling in a Ruthenium Cobaltabis(dicarbollide) System as a Highly Efficient Photoredox Oxidation Catalyst. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 8898–8907. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Srinath S.; Abinaya R.; Prasanth A.; Mariappan M.; Sridharc R.; Baskar B. Reusable, Homogeneous Water Soluble Photoredox Catalyzed Oxidative Dehydrogenation of N-Heterocycles in a Biphasic System: Application to the Synthesis of Biologically Active Natural Products. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2575–2587. 10.1039/D0GC00569J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Long B.; Ding Z.; Wang X. Carbon Nitride for the Selective Oxidation of Aromatic Alcohols in Water under Visible Light. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 2074–2078. 10.1002/cssc.201300360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. a Lipshutz B. H.; Ghorai S.; Cortes-Clerget M. The Hydrophobic Effect Applied to Organic Synthesis: Recent Synthetic Chemistry “in Water. Chem.—Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6672–6695. 10.1002/chem.201705499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b La Sorella G.; Strukul G.; Scarso A. Recent Advances in Catalysis in Micellar Media. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 644–683. 10.1039/C4GC01368A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Shen T.; Zhou S.; Ruan J.; Chen X.; Liu X.; Ge X.; Qian C. Recent Advances on Micellar Catalysis In Water. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 287, 102299. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bu M.-j.; Cai C.; Gallou F.; Lipshutz B. H. PQS-Enabled Visible-Light Iridium Photoredox Catalysis In Water At Room Temperature. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1233–1237. 10.1039/C7GC03866F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Bu M.-j.; Lu G.-p.; Jiang J.; Cai C. Merging Visible-Light Photoredox and Micellar Catalysis: Arylation Reactions with Anilines Nitrosated in Situ. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 3728–3732. 10.1039/C8CY01221K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pallini F.; Sangalli E.; Sassi M.; Roth P. M. C.; Mattiello S.; Beverina L. Selective Photoredox Direct Arylations of Aryl Bromides in Water in a Microfluidic Reactor. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 3016–3023. 10.1039/D1OB00050K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ghosh P. P.; Mukherjee P.; Das A. R. Triton-X-100 Catalyzed Synthesis of 1,4- Dihydropyridines and their Aromatization to Pyridines and a new One Pot Synthesis of Pyridines Using Visible Light in Aqueous Media. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 8220–8226. 10.1039/c3ra40706c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Santos M. S.; Cybularczyk-Cecotka M.; König B.; Giedyk M. Minisci C-H Alkylation of Heteroarenes Enabled by Dual Photoredox/Bromide Catalysis in Micellar Solutions. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 15323–15329. 10.1002/chem.202002320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cybularczyk-Cecotka M.; Predygier J.; Crespi S.; Szczepanik J.; Giedyk M. Photocatalysis in Aqueous Micellar Media Enables Divergent C–H Arylation and N-Dealkylation of Benzamides. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 3543–3549. 10.1021/acscatal.2c00468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cannalire R.; Santoro F.; Russo C.; Graziani G.; Tron G. C.; Carotenuto A.; Brancaccio D.; Giustiniano M. Photomicellar Catalyzed Synthesis of Amides from Isocyanides: Optimization, Scope, and NMR Studies of Photocatalyst/Surfactant Interactions. ACS Org. Inorg. Au 2022, 2, 66–74. 10.1021/acsorginorgau.1c00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kohlmann T.; Kerzig C.; Goez M. Laser-Induced Wurtz-Type Syntheses with a Metal-Free Photoredox Catalytic Source of Hydrated Electrons. Chem.—Eur. J. 2019, 25, 9991–9996. 10.1002/chem.201901618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Noto N.; Hyodo Y.; Yoshizawa M.; Koike T.; Akita M. Transition Metal-Free Supramolecular Photoredox Catalysis in Water: A Phenoxazine Photocatalyst Encapsulated in V-Shaped Aromatic Amphiphiles. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 14283–14289. 10.1021/acscatal.0c04221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eisenreich F.; Meijer E. W.; Palmans A. R. A. Amphiphilic Polymeric Nanoparticles for Photoredox Catalysis in Water. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 10355–10361. 10.1002/chem.202001767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Eisenreich F.; Kuster T. H. R.; van Krimpen D.; Palmans A. R. A. Photoredox-Catalyzed Reduction of Halogenated Arenes in Water by Amphiphilic Polymeric Nanoparticles. Molecules 2021, 26, 5882–5893. 10.3390/molecules26195882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kita Y.; Amao Y. pH-Controlled Selective Synthesis of Lactate from Pyruvate with a Photoredox System of Water- Soluble Zinc Porphyrin, an Electron Mediator and Platinum Nanoparticles Dispersed by Polyvinylpyrrolidone. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2021, 5, 6004–6013. 10.1039/D1SE01399H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. a Lee S. H.; Choi D. S.; Kuk S. K.; Park C. B. Photobiocatalysis: Activating Redox Enzymes by Direct or Indirect Transfer of Photoinduced Electrons. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7958–7985. 10.1002/anie.201710070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Schmermund L.; Jurkaš V.; Özgen F. F.; Barone G. D.; Büchsenschütz H. C.; Winkler C. K.; Schmidt S.; Kourist R.; Kroutil W. Photo-Biocatalysis: Biotransformations in the Presence of Light. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4115–4144. 10.1021/acscatal.9b00656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Peng Y.; Chen Z.; Xu J.; Wu Q. Recent Advances in Photobiocatalysis for Selective Organic Synthesis. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2022, 10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES